14.06.2014 Views

Simultaneous Estimation of Cefixime and Ofloxacin in Bulk and ...

Simultaneous Estimation of Cefixime and Ofloxacin in Bulk and ...

Simultaneous Estimation of Cefixime and Ofloxacin in Bulk and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2011; Vol. 1: Issue 2, Pg 36-38<br />

A 2 ay 1 -A 1 ay 2<br />

C Y = --------------------- ---------------------- (2)<br />

ax 2 ay 1 -ax 1 ay 2<br />

Where, A1 <strong>and</strong> A2 are absorbance <strong>of</strong> the sample at 290.4nm<br />

<strong>and</strong> 297.4 nm respectively, ax 2, ax 1 = denote absorptivities<br />

<strong>of</strong> X at 290.4 nm <strong>and</strong> 297.4nm respectively, ay 1 ,ay 2 =<br />

denote absorptivities <strong>of</strong> Y at 290.4 nm <strong>and</strong> 297.4nm<br />

respectively, CX = concentration <strong>of</strong> cefexime; CY =<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Method B. Absorbance Ratio Method:<br />

It depends on the property that, for a substance which obey<br />

Beers law at all wavelengths is constant value <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

<strong>of</strong> concentration or path length.<br />

From the follow<strong>in</strong>g set <strong>of</strong> equations the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

each component <strong>in</strong> sample can be alculated.<br />

For <strong>Cefixime</strong>:<br />

Qm – Qy<br />

A1<br />

Cx = -------------- X ----- ---------------------- (3)<br />

Q x – Qy a<br />

For <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>:<br />

Qm – Qx A1<br />

CY= ------------- X ------ ---------------------- (4)<br />

Qy – Qx a<br />

Where, Cx = Concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong>, CY =<br />

Concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>, A1 = Absobance <strong>of</strong> sample at<br />

iso-absorptive wavelength 282.0 nm, a = Mean absorptivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO at iso-absorptive 282.0 nm,<br />

Absorbance <strong>of</strong> sample solution at290.4nm<br />

Qm = ____________________________________<br />

Absorbance <strong>of</strong> sample solution at 282.0 nm<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong> at290.4 nm<br />

Qx = ____________________________________<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong> at 282.0 nm<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> at 297.4 nm<br />

Qy = ____________________________________<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> at 282.0 nm<br />

Spectral characteristics <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO:<br />

Solutions <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO (10 g/ml, each), were<br />

prepared separately by appropriate dilution <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

stock solution. Both the solutions were scanned <strong>in</strong> the<br />

spectrum mode from 400 nm to 200 nm. Overlay absorption<br />

spectra were recorded (Fig. 1).<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> calibration curves<br />

Appropriate dilutions <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard stock solution were<br />

done separately to get 5,10,15,20, <strong>and</strong> 25 g/ml <strong>of</strong> CEFI<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2, 4, 6, 8, <strong>and</strong> 10g/ml <strong>of</strong> OFLO. The absorption<br />

[AJPAna.]<br />

spectra <strong>of</strong> all solutions were recorded between 200-400 nm.<br />

The absorbances were measured at 290.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong><br />

CEFI) 297.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> OFLO) <strong>and</strong> 282.0 nm (isoabsorptive<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t).Beer’s lamberts range for CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO were selected <strong>and</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g calibration curves <strong>of</strong> both<br />

the drugs were plotted separately.<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Absorptivity Value <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO:<br />

Appropriate dilutions <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard stock solution were<br />

done to get 10 g/ml <strong>of</strong> each CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO, respectively.<br />

The absorbances were measured for CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO at<br />

290.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> CEFI), 297.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> OFLO) <strong>and</strong><br />

282.0 nm (iso-absorptive po<strong>in</strong>t). The absorptivity values <strong>of</strong><br />

the drugs were determ<strong>in</strong>ed at the selected wavelengths.<br />

Assay <strong>of</strong> tablet formulation:<br />

Twenty tablets were weighed <strong>and</strong> average weight was<br />

calculated. The tablets were crushed to obta<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e powder.<br />

Tablet powder equivalent to 100 mg <strong>of</strong> CEFI was<br />

transferred to 100.0 ml volumetric flask, ethanol added,<br />

ultrasonicated for 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>and</strong> volume was made-up to<br />

the mark with ethanol. The solution was then filtered<br />

through a Whatman filter paper (No. 41). The filtrate was<br />

further diluted with ethanol to obta<strong>in</strong> 10 g/ml <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

10 g/ml <strong>of</strong> OFLO. The concentration <strong>of</strong> both CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by measur<strong>in</strong>g the absorbance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sample at 290.4 nm, 297.4 nm Calculated us<strong>in</strong>g (method A,<br />

simultaneous equation method) <strong>and</strong> (method B, absorbance<br />

ratio method). Concentration <strong>of</strong> sample solution was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g above equations1, 2,3 <strong>and</strong> 4.The<br />

results are reported <strong>in</strong> the Table 1.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:<br />

The present method could be provided a convenient <strong>and</strong><br />

accurate method for simultaneous analysis <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO. In simultaneous equation method, wavelengths<br />

selected for analysis were 290.4nm (max <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong>) <strong>and</strong><br />

297.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>). In both the methods<br />

l<strong>in</strong>earity for detector response was observed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

concentration range <strong>of</strong> 5-25 g/ml for CEFI <strong>and</strong> 2-10 g/ml<br />

for OFLO. Absorptivity coefficient were calculated for both<br />

the drugs at selected wavelengths <strong>and</strong> substituted <strong>in</strong><br />

equations for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g concentration <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO<br />

<strong>in</strong> tablet sample solution. Percent label claim for CEF <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO <strong>in</strong> tablet analysis, by both the method was found <strong>in</strong><br />

the range <strong>of</strong> 98.54 % to 100.5%. St<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>and</strong><br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> variance for six determ<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> tablet<br />

sample, by both the methods, was found to be less than ±<br />

2.0 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the precision <strong>of</strong> both the methods. Accuracy<br />

<strong>of</strong> proposed methods was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by recovery studies.<br />

The percent recovery for CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO, the methods was<br />

found <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 98.19 % – 100.45 %. The developed<br />

method could be employed for rout<strong>in</strong>e analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed dose tablet formulation.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!