15.06.2014 Views

"Rightsizing Europe" - The European car crisis and ... - Roland Berger

"Rightsizing Europe" - The European car crisis and ... - Roland Berger

"Rightsizing Europe" - The European car crisis and ... - Roland Berger

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"<strong>Rightsizing</strong> Europe"<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>car</strong> <strong>crisis</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

implications for automotive suppliers<br />

March 2013<br />

1


Contents<br />

A B C<br />

Market outlook Supplier implications Need for action<br />

Development of global <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>European</strong> <strong>car</strong> markets in the<br />

next few years<br />

"<strong>Rightsizing</strong>" <strong>European</strong><br />

structures is becoming a top<br />

priority<br />

Key levers for suppliers to<br />

sustainably improve<br />

profitability<br />

2


A. Market outlook: Development of global <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>European</strong> <strong>car</strong> markets in the next few years<br />

Rol<strong>and</strong>_<strong>Berger</strong>_Automotive_Supplier_Europe_20130328.pptx<br />

3


Global <strong>car</strong> sales: Strong recovery since the 2008 <strong>crisis</strong>. Continued<br />

growth expected after 2013<br />

Global sales of passenger vehicles 1) [million vehicles]<br />

FORECAST<br />

H1 (Jan-Jun) H2 (Jul-Dec)<br />

69.5<br />

34.4<br />

35.2<br />

-5.0%<br />

-11.7%<br />

+1.6%<br />

66.0<br />

30.3<br />

35.7<br />

-3.3%<br />

+10.3%<br />

-14.9%<br />

63.8<br />

33.5<br />

30.4<br />

+13.5%<br />

+9.0%<br />

+18.5%<br />

72.5<br />

36.5<br />

36.0<br />

+4.4%<br />

+3.4%<br />

+5.3%<br />

75.6<br />

37.7<br />

37.9<br />

+5.2%<br />

+4.1%<br />

+6.2%<br />

79.5<br />

39.2<br />

40.3<br />

+3.0%<br />

+3.1%<br />

+3.0%<br />

81.9<br />

40.5<br />

41.5<br />

+6.0%<br />

+5.7%<br />

+6.3%<br />

86.9<br />

42.8<br />

44.1<br />

+5.9%<br />

+5.8%<br />

+5.9%<br />

92.0<br />

45.3<br />

46.7<br />

+4.6%<br />

+4.5%<br />

+4.7%<br />

96.2<br />

47.3<br />

48.9<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

1) Incl. light commercial vehicles<br />

Source: IHS; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

4


Regional growth rates: Western Europe will see another weak year<br />

in 2013<br />

Global sales of passenger vehicles 1,2)<br />

NAFTA Western Europe China<br />

9%<br />

12%<br />

5%<br />

3%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

4%<br />

6%<br />

3%<br />

4%<br />

7%<br />

9%<br />

11%<br />

9%<br />

7%<br />

-9%<br />

-3%<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

South America WORLD Japan/Korea<br />

19%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

6%<br />

6%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

5%<br />

3%<br />

6%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

-12%<br />

-8%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

-2%<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

1) Incl. light commercial vehicles 2) Year-on-year growth rate = Forecast<br />

Source: IHS; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

5


Western Europe: Market volumes stagnating at "<strong>crisis</strong> level" – 2008<br />

production levels will not be reached in the next few years<br />

Medium-term outlook for passenger vehicles 1) in Western Europe [million vehicles]<br />

Sales<br />

Production<br />

16.9<br />

15.4<br />

16.0<br />

14.4<br />

15.0<br />

14.5<br />

14.4<br />

13.2<br />

12.8<br />

13.4<br />

14.2<br />

14.5<br />

11.8<br />

13.2<br />

13.6<br />

12.4<br />

12.1<br />

12.4<br />

12.7<br />

12.9<br />

'07<br />

'08<br />

'09<br />

'10<br />

'11<br />

'12<br />

'13<br />

'14<br />

'15<br />

'16<br />

'07<br />

'08<br />

'09<br />

'10<br />

'11<br />

'12<br />

'13<br />

'14<br />

'15<br />

'16<br />

1) Including light commercial vehicles<br />

Source: IHS; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

6


Western Europe: Global importance of W. Europe as a production<br />

hub is declining due to falling local sales <strong>and</strong> OEM globalization<br />

Development of WE passenger vehicle production structure… [million vehicles; %]<br />

… as a proportion<br />

of global<br />

production [%]<br />

➨ Declining global<br />

importance of<br />

Western Europe<br />

23<br />

21<br />

12<br />

2007<br />

25<br />

19<br />

15<br />

2013<br />

27<br />

18<br />

13<br />

2016<br />

China<br />

North America<br />

Western<br />

Europe<br />

… by OEM<br />

origin [%]<br />

➨ Share of German<br />

OEMs rising<br />

significantly<br />

35<br />

27<br />

19<br />

11<br />

2007<br />

48<br />

24<br />

13<br />

8<br />

7<br />

2013<br />

47<br />

23<br />

15<br />

9<br />

2016<br />

German<br />

French<br />

US<br />

Other <strong>European</strong><br />

Asian<br />

… by size<br />

segment<br />

➨ Only minor<br />

changes in size<br />

structure<br />

16.0<br />

1%<br />

14%<br />

23%<br />

35%<br />

26%<br />

1%<br />

2007<br />

12.9<br />

0%<br />

14%<br />

23%<br />

40%<br />

3% 20%<br />

2016<br />

HVAN<br />

E/F<br />

D<br />

C<br />

B<br />

A<br />

… by price<br />

segment<br />

➨ Decline in<br />

production of<br />

entry-level <strong>car</strong>s<br />

16.0<br />

27%<br />

23%<br />

50%<br />

2007<br />

12.9<br />

39%<br />

23%<br />

38%<br />

2016<br />

Premium<br />

Mid<br />

Entry<br />

1) Including light commercial vehicles<br />

Source: IHS; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

7


OEM profitability: <strong>The</strong> difficult market has already impacted OEM<br />

margins. German br<strong>and</strong>s show strong performance<br />

EBIT margin of OEMs 1) [%]<br />

4.5<br />

5.3<br />

5.0<br />

5.2<br />

4.0<br />

4.4<br />

4.8<br />

5.2<br />

5.8<br />

~5.5<br />

0.1<br />

-0.6<br />

’01<br />

’02<br />

’03<br />

’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 '12E<br />

1) n = 14 (BMW, Daimler, Fiat, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Mazda, Nissan, PSA, Renault, Suzuki, Toyota, Volkswagen)<br />

Source: Thomson; FactSet; OEMs' annual/half-yearly reports; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> analysis<br />

8


B. Supplier implications: "<strong>Rightsizing</strong>" <strong>European</strong> structures is<br />

becoming a top priority<br />

Rol<strong>and</strong>_<strong>Berger</strong>_Automotive_Supplier_Europe_20130328.pptx<br />

9


Supplier profitability: After the all-time high in 2010, the profitability<br />

of the global auto supplier industry is now declining again<br />

Key performance indicators of automotive suppliers<br />

Revenue growth [2000=100] EBIT margin [%]<br />

141<br />

154<br />

148<br />

~180<br />

~175<br />

167<br />

150<br />

6.1<br />

6.6<br />

6.1 6.1<br />

5.8<br />

5.2 5.0<br />

6.9<br />

6.6<br />

~6.0<br />

~5.5-6.0<br />

117<br />

129<br />

125<br />

3.3<br />

100<br />

106<br />

2.3<br />

1.8<br />

'02<br />

'03<br />

'04<br />

'05<br />

'06<br />

'07<br />

'08<br />

'09<br />

'10<br />

'11<br />

'12 1)<br />

13 1)<br />

'00<br />

'01<br />

'02<br />

'03<br />

'04<br />

'05<br />

'06<br />

'07<br />

'08<br />

'09<br />

'10<br />

'11 '12 1)<br />

13 1)<br />

1) Estimate – Calculation of final 2012 data currently in progress<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>/Lazard Global Automotive Supplier Database<br />

10


Regional differences: <strong>The</strong> main drivers of this decline are suppliers<br />

headquartered in Europe<br />

EBIT margins in the automotive supply industry by HQ location 1) [%]<br />

Europe<br />

NAFTA Japan China Korea<br />

10.3<br />

~9-10<br />

~9-10<br />

7.0 7.1<br />

~5-6<br />

5.6<br />

6.3 ~6<br />

6.5<br />

~6<br />

5.1<br />

9.8<br />

6.5<br />

9.3<br />

'07 '11'12 2) '07 '11'12 2) '07 '11'12 2)<br />

'07<br />

'11'12 2)<br />

'07<br />

'11'12 2)<br />

Trend 2012 vs. 2011<br />

1) n = approx. 600 suppliers, 2012 estimated 2) Estimate – Calculation of final 2012 data currently in progress<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong>/Lazard Global Automotive Supplier Database<br />

11


Looking forward: Local market development <strong>and</strong> OEMs' globalization<br />

initiatives are two of the top issues for <strong>European</strong> supplier CEOs<br />

Supplier CEO radar screen for 2013 <strong>and</strong> beyond (as of March 2013)<br />

3 COMPETITION 4 LEGISLATION<br />

1<br />

CAR<br />

BUYERS<br />

Demotorization<br />

2 OEMS<br />

Stagnation of triad<br />

markets<br />

Rising star<br />

OEMs<br />

Volatility in<br />

dem<strong>and</strong><br />

Terms &<br />

conditions<br />

Additional<br />

price pressure<br />

Market<br />

volumes 2013<br />

Europe<br />

Selective<br />

consolidation<br />

Global<br />

localization<br />

Emerging<br />

market<br />

suppliers<br />

Emerging<br />

market<br />

investors<br />

Zero casualties<br />

Further pressure to<br />

reduce <strong>car</strong>bon<br />

emissions<br />

Connected<br />

vehicle<br />

Factor cost<br />

inflation<br />

2013<br />

Rising energy<br />

costs<br />

Insolvencies in<br />

supplier base<br />

Oil price<br />

increase<br />

Availability<br />

of skilled<br />

workforce<br />

Volatility of equity<br />

Credit capital markets<br />

shortage<br />

Basle 3<br />

5 FACTOR<br />

MARKETS<br />

Investor view of<br />

automotive industry<br />

6<br />

CAPITAL<br />

MARKETS<br />

Topics with particular impact on Western Europe<br />

Excluding product segment-specific technology <strong>and</strong> operational issues<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

12


Consequence: Given the disappointing market situation, many auto<br />

suppliers are currently "rightsizing" their operations in Europe<br />

SUPPLIER'S REACTION<br />

Market<br />

situation<br />

Production R&D SG&A<br />

> Weak <strong>European</strong><br />

<strong>car</strong> sales<br />

(medium term)<br />

> Global<br />

localization of<br />

<strong>European</strong> OEMs<br />

➨ Reduced <strong>car</strong><br />

production<br />

levels in W.<br />

Europe<br />

> Adjustment of<br />

direct labor<br />

capacity<br />

> Adjustment of<br />

indirect labor<br />

capacity in line<br />

with direct labor<br />

> Relocation of<br />

R&D capacity<br />

to growth<br />

markets (closer<br />

to local OEM<br />

R&D/production)<br />

> Adjustment of<br />

<strong>European</strong> R&D<br />

capacity<br />

> Adjustment of<br />

SG&A headcount<br />

more or<br />

less in line with<br />

reduced<br />

production<br />

capacity (to<br />

keep a constant<br />

SG&A cost<br />

ratio)<br />

> Lower supplier<br />

headcount in<br />

Western<br />

Europe, while<br />

total (global)<br />

headcount<br />

continues to<br />

grow<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

13


Headcount impact: As a result, approximately 10% of the total<br />

750,000 Western <strong>European</strong> automotive supplier jobs could be at risk<br />

Estimated impact on automotive supplier employment in Western Europe<br />

Western Europe<br />

automotive supplier<br />

employment 2012<br />

~750,000<br />

High-level job split<br />

100%<br />

~10% SG&A<br />

~10% R&D<br />

~80% Operations<br />

Medium-term<br />

"misalignment"<br />

SG&A <strong>and</strong> R&D<br />

~5-7%<br />

> Adjustment to reduced<br />

"volume grid"<br />

> Adjustment due to relocation of<br />

activities<br />

OPERATIONS<br />

~10-13%<br />

> Adjustment to reduce current<br />

avg. supplier overcapacity (5-<br />

10%) <strong>and</strong> to reflect efficiency<br />

gains in the next 3-4 years in a<br />

more or less constant market<br />

MEDIUM-TERM<br />

IMPACT (3-4 yrs.)<br />

Employees at risk<br />

~85,000<br />

~75,000<br />

~65,000<br />

> Highest<br />

"relative"<br />

impact:<br />

FR, IT, ES<br />

> Highest<br />

"absolute"<br />

impact (due<br />

to large<br />

number of<br />

locations):<br />

GER<br />

Source: Eurostat; VDA; ACEA; Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> simulation<br />

14


C. Need for action: Key levers for suppliers to sustainably<br />

improve profitability<br />

Rol<strong>and</strong>_<strong>Berger</strong>_Automotive_Supplier_Europe_20130328.pptx<br />

15


Need for action: Nine key levers suppliers can apply to combat<br />

declining or stagnating margins in Europe<br />

"Rightsize<br />

Europe"<br />

R&D Purchasing Production Overhead/<br />

crossfunctional<br />

>Improve<br />

R&D<br />

efficiency<br />

> Adjust plant<br />

footprint<br />

> Optimize<br />

overheads<br />

Lower<br />

breakeven<br />

point in<br />

Europe<br />

"Operational<br />

excellence "<br />

>Improve<br />

project<br />

management<br />

organization<br />

> Achieve<br />

purchasing<br />

excellence<br />

> Anchor cost<br />

engineering<br />

> Cut stocks<br />

> Achieve<br />

logistics<br />

excellence<br />

> Achieve<br />

working<br />

capital<br />

excellence<br />

Increased<br />

operational<br />

efficiency<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

16


Nine key levers suppliers can apply to combat declining or<br />

stagnating margins in Europe (1/3)<br />

IMPROVE R&D<br />

EFFICIENCY<br />

ADJUST PLANT<br />

FOOTPRINT<br />

SMART OVERHEAD<br />

COST REDUCTION<br />

LEVER<br />

OBJECTIVE<br />

10-15% reduction in R&D<br />

resources (with constant<br />

output)<br />

Increase flexibility, efficiency <strong>and</strong><br />

long-term utilization of <strong>European</strong><br />

plant setup<br />

15-20% improvement in<br />

overhead efficiency<br />

ROLAND<br />

BERGER<br />

APPROACH<br />

> Identify actual costs <strong>and</strong><br />

resources in R&D<br />

> Set a target figure for costs <strong>and</strong><br />

resources based on benchmarks<br />

> Carry out strengths/weaknesses<br />

analysis, comparing with best<br />

practice<br />

> Use the RB lever tree <strong>and</strong> derive<br />

necessary actions (e.g.<br />

organizational setup, R&D<br />

footprint, resource allocation,<br />

controlling/KPIs)<br />

> Gain a clear picture of the current<br />

footprint in terms of setup <strong>and</strong><br />

technical/personnel scalability<br />

> Identify improvement measures<br />

within plants <strong>and</strong> the production<br />

network<br />

> Assess the financial feasibility of<br />

measures – focus on "true<br />

effects/synergies"<br />

> Derive implementation plan <strong>and</strong><br />

closely manage layoffs while achieving<br />

per capita cost improvements<br />

> Ensure transparency regarding<br />

the company's current overhead<br />

costs <strong>and</strong> headcount<br />

> Derive an efficiency target for<br />

each functional area/company<br />

on the basis of benchmarks (we<br />

have a benchmark database<br />

covering approx. 200 suppliers)<br />

> Develop appropriate bottom-up<br />

actions in workshops<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

17


Nine key levers suppliers can apply to combat declining or<br />

stagnating margins in Europe (2/3)<br />

IMPROVE PROJECT<br />

MGMT. ORGANIZATION<br />

PURCHASING<br />

EXCELLENCE<br />

ANCHOR COST<br />

ENGINEERING<br />

LEVER<br />

OBJECTIVE<br />

Clear improvement in<br />

efficiency <strong>and</strong> effectiveness<br />

of project management<br />

Best practice achieved in<br />

purchasing organization <strong>and</strong><br />

processes<br />

Reduction of procurement costs<br />

through better integration of<br />

development <strong>and</strong> purchasing<br />

ROLAND<br />

BERGER<br />

APPROACH<br />

> Describe existing project<br />

management organization<br />

(especially interface between<br />

development <strong>and</strong> sales)<br />

> Carry out strengths/weaknesses<br />

analysis, comparing with best<br />

practice<br />

> Draw up a conceptual objective in<br />

cross-functional workshops,<br />

especially for competencies <strong>and</strong><br />

responsibilities at interfaces<br />

> Prepare an action plan<br />

> Identify <strong>and</strong> evaluate the actual<br />

situation in purchasing using 10<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ardized criteria (e.g.<br />

organizational setup, processes,<br />

tools, committees, employee<br />

quality, controlling/KPIs)<br />

> Carry out detailed comparison<br />

with best-practice examples<br />

from the supplier industry<br />

> Derive a conceptual objective<br />

for purchasing <strong>and</strong> produce an<br />

action plan<br />

> Draw up a company-specific<br />

conceptual objective for cost<br />

engineering<br />

> Develop detailed components of<br />

cost engineering (organizational<br />

setup, processes, methods <strong>and</strong><br />

tools, KPIs, staffing, etc.)<br />

> In parallel, apply in 2-3 specific<br />

pilot projects<br />

> Draw up an implementation<br />

roadmap (incl. communication)<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

18


Nine key levers suppliers can apply to combat declining or<br />

stagnating margins in Europe (3/3)<br />

REDUCE<br />

INVENTORY<br />

ACHIEVE LOGISTICS<br />

EXCELLENCE<br />

ACHIEVE WORKING<br />

CAPITAL EXCELLENCE<br />

LEVER<br />

OBJECTIVE<br />

Reduction of inventory by approx.<br />

20% along the entire value chain<br />

Reduction of logistics<br />

costs <strong>and</strong> improvement<br />

of performance<br />

Lasting reduction of 15-20%<br />

in net working capital (NWC)<br />

ROLAND<br />

BERGER<br />

APPROACH<br />

> Identify potential reduction on the<br />

basis of a structural analysis, benchmarking<br />

<strong>and</strong> discussion of best<br />

practice levers (e.g. base stock/nonmovers,<br />

buffer stock, stock planning)<br />

> Hold 2-3 cross-functional workshops<br />

per location (incl. aftermarket)<br />

> Implement identified levers/actions<br />

immediately<br />

> Anchor long term through structural<br />

actions (incentives, processes, best<br />

practice transfer, etc.)<br />

> Identify current logistics<br />

performance using st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

questionnaires <strong>and</strong> data analysis<br />

> Audit critical locations using<br />

best practice checklists <strong>and</strong><br />

define improvement actions<br />

> Derive a st<strong>and</strong>ard logistics<br />

concept for global rollout<br />

> Create transparency regarding the<br />

structure <strong>and</strong> drivers of NWC<br />

> Draw up short-term actions for all<br />

areas of NWC (receivables,<br />

liabilities, stocks) based on the RB<br />

lever toolbox<br />

> Methods: Benchmarking, inventory<br />

structure analysis, optimization of<br />

payment terms, receivables mgmt.<br />

> Ensure sustainability through<br />

systematic NWC management<br />

Source: Rol<strong>and</strong> <strong>Berger</strong><br />

19


Rol<strong>and</strong>_<strong>Berger</strong>_Automotive_Supplier_Europe_20130328.pptx

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!