Braun, V. and Clarke, V. - UWE Research Repository - University of ...
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. - UWE Research Repository - University of ...
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. - UWE Research Repository - University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
data will become apparent – the reading <strong>and</strong> re-reading <strong>of</strong> data is time consuming. It is, therefore,<br />
tempting to skip over this phase, or be selective. We would strongly advise against this, as this<br />
phase provides the bedrock for the rest <strong>of</strong> the analysis.<br />
During this phase, it is a good idea to start taking notes or marking ideas for coding that you will<br />
then go back to in subsequent phases. Once you have done this, you are ready to begin the more<br />
formal coding process. In essence, coding continues to be developed <strong>and</strong> defined throughout the<br />
entire analysis.<br />
Transcription <strong>of</strong> verbal data<br />
If you are working with verbal data such as interviews, television programmes or political speeches,<br />
the data will need to be transcribed into written form in order to conduct a thematic analysis. The<br />
process <strong>of</strong> transcription, while it may seen time-consuming, frustrating, <strong>and</strong> at times boring, can be<br />
an excellent way to start familiarising yourself with the data (Riessman, 1993). Further, some<br />
researchers even argue it should be seen as “a key phase <strong>of</strong> data analysis within interpretative<br />
qualitative methodology” (Bird, 2005: 227), <strong>and</strong> recognised as an interpretative act, where<br />
meanings are created, rather than simply a mechanical one <strong>of</strong> putting spoken sounds on paper<br />
(Lapadat & Lindsay, 1999).<br />
Various conventions exist for transforming spoken texts into written texts (see Edwards & Lampert,<br />
1993; Lapadat & Lindsay, 1999). Some systems <strong>of</strong> transcription have been developed for specific<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> analysis – such as the „Jefferson‟ system for CA (see Atkinson & Heritage, 1984; Hutchby &<br />
Wo<strong>of</strong>fitt, 1998). However, thematic analysis, even constructionist thematic analysis, does not<br />
require the same level <strong>of</strong> detail in the transcript as conversation, discourse or even narrative<br />
analysis. As there is no one way to conduct thematic analysis, there is no one set <strong>of</strong> guidelines to<br />
follow when producing a transcript. However, at a minimum it requires a rigorous <strong>and</strong> thorough<br />
„orthographic‟ transcript – a „verbatim‟ account <strong>of</strong> all verbal (<strong>and</strong> sometimes nonverbal [e.g.,<br />
coughs]) utterances. 8 What is important is that the transcript retains the information you need,<br />
from the verbal account, <strong>and</strong> in a way which is „true‟ to its original nature (e.g., punctuation added<br />
can alter the meaning <strong>of</strong> data - for example 'I hate it, you know. I do' versus 'I hate it. You know I<br />
do', Pol<strong>and</strong>, 2002: 632), <strong>and</strong> that the transcription convention is practically suited to the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
analysis (Edwards, 1993).<br />
17