16.06.2014 Views

Canadian Philatelist Philatéliste canadien - The Royal Philatelic ...

Canadian Philatelist Philatéliste canadien - The Royal Philatelic ...

Canadian Philatelist Philatéliste canadien - The Royal Philatelic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RPSC news • nouvelles SRPC • RPSC news • nouvelles SRPC • RPSC news • nouvelles SRPC • RPSC news • nouvelles SRPC<br />

in the MAILBOX<br />

dans la boîte aux LETTRES<br />

DEAR EDITOR,<br />

Here is an interesting error that I would like to share with readers. I found<br />

this item at a rural post office in late 2004. I have checked many dealer stocks and<br />

talked with many collectors and no one has seen one like it. <strong>The</strong> item is the $1.25,<br />

purple, international rate stamp listed in Unitrade Specialized Catalogue as No. 130v,<br />

booklet #253.<br />

Please note on the<br />

enclosed images that the<br />

centre booklet is “blue”<br />

rather than “purple” and<br />

that the booklet is mis-cut<br />

resulting in a C-tag error<br />

on the stamp at right.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mis-cut and C-<br />

tag are nice varieties but<br />

I think that the wrong<br />

colour, blue, instead of<br />

purple, make this a most<br />

interesting error.<br />

Please write me if you<br />

find examples of this blue<br />

variety.<br />

Best regards,<br />

Steve Trask,<br />

P.O. Box 1358,<br />

Battleford, SK S0M 0E0<br />

FAX (306) 937-7733<br />

DEAR EDITOR,<br />

In the last issue of TCP there was<br />

an announcement about removing<br />

the address label from the magazine’s<br />

cover. I must admit that I did not see<br />

the item on my first go through the<br />

magazine (<strong>The</strong> notice is on page 207.)<br />

That’s embarrassing because I was<br />

the one who had written the publisher<br />

about this item. <strong>The</strong> National<br />

Office has recently received several<br />

calls from members about the difficulty<br />

of removing the address label.<br />

Now that the wrapper is not used in<br />

the mailing procedure it has irked<br />

some members that if they try to<br />

remove the label, they destroy or at<br />

best tear the cover. We agreed that<br />

the label does detract from the cover<br />

if you keep the magazines for future<br />

reference and wish to have a “clean”<br />

cover. We asked the publisher, therefore,<br />

to look into the cost of providing<br />

a easy, peelable label. It is a significant<br />

increase to the costing so an<br />

alternate suggestion was provided…<br />

check out page 207 in the last issue.<br />

I tried using an iron to remove<br />

my address label. It worked fine. I<br />

agree with the caution though. One<br />

needs to proceed with care, but it does<br />

work. Thanks to Jim Szeplaki of Trajan<br />

Publishing for acting on this inquiry<br />

and providing a reasonable solution.<br />

It’s reassuring to us to know that there<br />

are members who want to save the<br />

magazine and it’s comforting to know<br />

that our publisher is anxious to help<br />

in providing answers to issues of concern<br />

to some members. We are all in<br />

this hobby together!<br />

Peter Butler<br />

National Office, RPSC<br />

I also tried using the “hot iron” suggestion<br />

to remove the label and it worked fine.<br />

- Editor<br />

266 • the CP / le PC • SO06

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!