Canadian Philatelist Philatéliste canadien - The Royal Philatelic ...
Canadian Philatelist Philatéliste canadien - The Royal Philatelic ...
Canadian Philatelist Philatéliste canadien - The Royal Philatelic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
RPSC news • nouvelles SRPC • RPSC news • nouvelles SRPC • RPSC news • nouvelles SRPC • RPSC news • nouvelles SRPC<br />
in the MAILBOX<br />
dans la boîte aux LETTRES<br />
DEAR EDITOR,<br />
Here is an interesting error that I would like to share with readers. I found<br />
this item at a rural post office in late 2004. I have checked many dealer stocks and<br />
talked with many collectors and no one has seen one like it. <strong>The</strong> item is the $1.25,<br />
purple, international rate stamp listed in Unitrade Specialized Catalogue as No. 130v,<br />
booklet #253.<br />
Please note on the<br />
enclosed images that the<br />
centre booklet is “blue”<br />
rather than “purple” and<br />
that the booklet is mis-cut<br />
resulting in a C-tag error<br />
on the stamp at right.<br />
<strong>The</strong> mis-cut and C-<br />
tag are nice varieties but<br />
I think that the wrong<br />
colour, blue, instead of<br />
purple, make this a most<br />
interesting error.<br />
Please write me if you<br />
find examples of this blue<br />
variety.<br />
Best regards,<br />
Steve Trask,<br />
P.O. Box 1358,<br />
Battleford, SK S0M 0E0<br />
FAX (306) 937-7733<br />
DEAR EDITOR,<br />
In the last issue of TCP there was<br />
an announcement about removing<br />
the address label from the magazine’s<br />
cover. I must admit that I did not see<br />
the item on my first go through the<br />
magazine (<strong>The</strong> notice is on page 207.)<br />
That’s embarrassing because I was<br />
the one who had written the publisher<br />
about this item. <strong>The</strong> National<br />
Office has recently received several<br />
calls from members about the difficulty<br />
of removing the address label.<br />
Now that the wrapper is not used in<br />
the mailing procedure it has irked<br />
some members that if they try to<br />
remove the label, they destroy or at<br />
best tear the cover. We agreed that<br />
the label does detract from the cover<br />
if you keep the magazines for future<br />
reference and wish to have a “clean”<br />
cover. We asked the publisher, therefore,<br />
to look into the cost of providing<br />
a easy, peelable label. It is a significant<br />
increase to the costing so an<br />
alternate suggestion was provided…<br />
check out page 207 in the last issue.<br />
I tried using an iron to remove<br />
my address label. It worked fine. I<br />
agree with the caution though. One<br />
needs to proceed with care, but it does<br />
work. Thanks to Jim Szeplaki of Trajan<br />
Publishing for acting on this inquiry<br />
and providing a reasonable solution.<br />
It’s reassuring to us to know that there<br />
are members who want to save the<br />
magazine and it’s comforting to know<br />
that our publisher is anxious to help<br />
in providing answers to issues of concern<br />
to some members. We are all in<br />
this hobby together!<br />
Peter Butler<br />
National Office, RPSC<br />
I also tried using the “hot iron” suggestion<br />
to remove the label and it worked fine.<br />
- Editor<br />
266 • the CP / le PC • SO06