Summer 2011, Volume 57, Number 3 - San Diego History Center
Summer 2011, Volume 57, Number 3 - San Diego History Center
Summer 2011, Volume 57, Number 3 - San Diego History Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Book Reviews<br />
Louv as well) to urge the readers to enhance their lives by connecting more with<br />
the therapeutic attributes of nature.<br />
The book is enhanced by two sets of photos, and the pictures in both sets<br />
are well chosen and photographically very instructive. The first set illustrates<br />
types of chaparral, chaparral fires, and post-fire effects. The second, near the end,<br />
depicts some key plants and animals of the chaparral community. The sixty plant<br />
photos would serve quite well as a beginning field guide for identifying the most<br />
common chaparral plants.<br />
The only topic that seemed to be somewhat skirted was an overview of the pros<br />
and cons of the “defend in place” option, where homeowners under very specific<br />
sets of conditions might be allowed to defend their homes instead of evacuating.<br />
This is a controversial topic which many fire professionals quickly dismiss for<br />
liability reasons, but a case can be made for its limited and narrowly defined use.<br />
The book has been well edited, and is virtually free of typographical errors. A<br />
few minor glitches were noticed: the illustrated invertebrate in the second edition<br />
is the ceanothus silk moth, but a different insect is named in the text (page 135).<br />
The common name of Adenostoma sparsifolium is red shank (not pluralized). Also,<br />
his description of the wrentit’s song (“a descending whistle”) seems incorrect;<br />
that’s more the call of another chaparral songbird, the canyon wren. A small<br />
suggestion: on page 25 he might change the starting year of the nineteenthcentury<br />
drought from 1862 to 1863. 1862 is well recorded as possibly the wettest<br />
year in California history. Another suggestion for the third edition (I hope there<br />
will be one) might be to expand the “Animals” section of chapter 1. It overlooks<br />
many key species, and also doesn’t note that almost all of the mammals (except<br />
ground squirrels and rabbits) are nocturnal.<br />
Finally, the epilogue by Anne Fege (pp. 173-174) presents a good introduction to<br />
the many benefits and values of nature, but a future edition could profit the reader<br />
by summarizing the importance of current research in the fields of ethnobotany<br />
and biomimicry. Next to tropical rain forests, chaparral might have the most to<br />
teach us in these emerging research areas, which will be increasingly important<br />
to our common human future.<br />
207