28.06.2014 Views

SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT

SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT

SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA<br />

Local Union 505<br />

County of Santa Cruz<br />

(831) 688-5025<br />

225 Searidge Road<br />

Aptos, CA 95003<br />

F(831) 688-5027<br />

December 3, 2012<br />

Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District<br />

110 Vernon Street<br />

<strong>SANTA</strong> <strong>CRUZ</strong>, CA 95060<br />

Attn: Members of the Board of Directors<br />

Re:<br />

Contract proposal for Judy K Souza Operations & Bus Park Facility<br />

1200 River Street<br />

Santa Cruz, CA 95060<br />

Bid Date: September 12, 2012<br />

Subject: Consideration of Bids from Lewis C Nelson & Sons, Inc. and C Overaa<br />

and Company, Inc.<br />

Dear Members of the Board;<br />

I am writing on behalf of the Carpenters Union Local 505 of Santa Cruz County.<br />

We have reviewed the bids on the above-named project and request that the Board<br />

reject the bid from Lewis C Nelson & Sons, Inc. (“LCN”) because it fails to meet the<br />

requirements of the California Public Contract Code “Subletting and Subcontracting Fair<br />

Practices Act” Section 4101, et seq. (“PCC4100”).<br />

The fundamental intent of the competitive bidding laws (PCC 4100, et. seq.), in<br />

requiring the listing of subcontractors, is to prevent bid shopping and bid peddling of<br />

subcontracted portions of public projects and it applies to those portions of work valued<br />

above the threshold amount (1/2 % of the total base bid amount). Further if a prime<br />

contractor fails to list a subcontractor for a portion of work valued over that threshold<br />

amount, the law requires that the prime contractor be qualified and actually do that<br />

portion of the work. If a prime contractor lists more than two subcontractors to do the<br />

same portion of work the prime contractor again must be qualified and actually do that<br />

portion of the work, instead of the listed subcontractor.<br />

From this, I believe that the case law supports the assertion that the subcontractor list<br />

together with any information contained in the bid submittal, i.e., only those documents<br />

presented at the time of the bid opening, 2 pm on September 12, 2012, and Bid Form<br />

Documents #6, #7, and #8 (#8 relative only to the subcontractor's workforce), submitted<br />

within 2 business days thereafter, must contain sufficient information so that the<br />

awarding body can determine, without ambiguity and without additional information from<br />

the bidder, the identity of each subcontractor listed on the Subcontractor List, Doc 9. If<br />

an examination of the entire bid submittal does not remove an ambiguity as to the<br />

2.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!