King Engineering Associates, Inc

Subject: 

RFQ 2012-10 

CONTINUING CONTRACTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 

Due: June 22, 2012 by 2:00 p.m. 

Respondent: 

King Engineering Associates, Inc. 

8390 NW 53 rd Street, Suite 200 

Doral, Florida 33166 

305-392-9979 

Primary Point of Contact: 

Agustin Maristany, PE 

Vice President 

amaristany@kingengineering.com

1. TITLE AND LOCATON (City and State) 

2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 

May 11, 2012 

ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS 

PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS 

A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 

City of North Miami Beach, Florida 

3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER 

RFQ # 2012-10 

B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 

4. NAME AND TITLE Agustin Maristany, PE, Vice President, Project Manager 

5. NAME OF FIRM 

6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 

305- 392-9979 

(Check) 


7. FAX NUMBER 

8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 

305-392-9912 

amaristany@kingengineering.com 

C. PROPOSED TEAM 

(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) 

PRIME 

J-V 

SUBCO 

N- 

9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 

a. 

√ 

King Engineering Associates, 

Inc. 

CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE 

8390 NW 53 rd Street 

Suite 200 

Doral, FL 33166 

Project Management, Water 

Resources/Drainage, Water/Sewer/Reuse 

Utilities, Roadway Drainage Design, 

Roadway, Traffic & Transportation 

Planning & Engineering, Civil Site Planning 

& Design, Land Use & Zoning, Ecological, 

MEP, Plans Review & Permitting, 

Landscape Design, Alternative Funding 

Assistance, Construction Engineering 

Inspection, Survey/GIS/Mapping, Cost 

Estimates/Permitting, Contract 

Administration 

b. 

√ 




4921 Memorial Highway 

Suite 300 

Tampa, FL 33634 

Technical Support 

c.. 

√ 




6500 Bowden Road 

Suite 290 

Jacksonville, FL 32216 


d. 

√ 




2930 University Parkway 

Sarasota, FL 34243 


e. √ 

Cummins Cederberg, Inc. 


22476 SW 94 Place 

Miami, FL 33190 

Marine Facilities Design 

f. 

√ 

Geosol, Inc. 


5795-A NW 151 st Street 

Miami Lakes, FL 33014 

Geotechnical 

g. 

√ 

Eastern Engineering Group 


3401 NW 82 nd Avenue, 

Suite 370 


Structural Engineering 

h. √ 

Hillers Electrical Engineering, 



23257 State Road 7 

Suite 100 

Boca Raton, FL 33428 

Electrical Engineering 

1

D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached) 

2

12. NAME 

Agustin E. Maristany, P.E. 

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) 

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT 

(Complete one Section E for each key person.) 

13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 

Project Management/Water 

Resources/Drainage 

a. TOTAL 

King Engineering Associates, Inc., Doral, FL 

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 

Masters of Science, Civil Engineering, 1979, University of Texas 

Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, 1978, University of Puerto Rico 

33 

14. YEARS EXPERIENCE 

b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 

4 

17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) 

Professional Engineer Florida No. 33351 

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Mr. Maristany has practiced civil engineering for over 25 years in south 

Florida, having completed numerous multi-disciplinary public works projects involving planning, modeling, design, construction documents, permitting, 

cost estimating, construction management and inspections, program management, construction management-at-risk, plan review, development of 

design standards, civil site planning, and land use projects in the fields of drainage, water/wastewater, utilities, and roadway/traffic. His technical 

expertise includes site grading, utility infrastructure, drainage, erosion control, BMPs, neighborhood improvements, roadway, MOT, water supply, 

construction inspection, shop drawing review, operation manuals, permitting, cost estimating, and public funding and financing. 

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS 

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 

(2) YEAR COMPLETED 

Lauderdale-By-The-Sea Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements Plan, 

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 

CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) 

Lauderdale-By-The-Sea, Florida 

2011 

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm 

a. 

Principal-in-charge for development of the Town’s Sanitary Sewer System Capital Improvement Plan. Activities included closet circuit TV 

(CCTV) video review of the sewer system, identification of defects, and repair recommendations; flow meter inspection and evaluation; pump 

station inspection and hydraulic analysis; infiltration and inflow (I/I) evaluation including development of wet and dry weather hydrographs, raindependant 

I/I estimation, and tidal infiltration estimation; 2035 demand projections; and development of the capital improvements plan. Since 

the Town currently pays a nearby utility to take its sewer flows, the projected substantial reduction in metered sewer flows will payback the cost 

of repairs within a short period of time. 



S. S. Lake Area Stormwater Modeling and BODR 



City of Hollywood, Broward County, FL 

2011 

Pending 


Project manager for the evaluation, design, and permitting of flood control improvements for a low-lying coastal area susceptible to flooding 

from high tides and rainfall. Developed ICPR model of the 256-acre drainage area, concluded that existing drainage system was severely 

b. 

undersized, and sized improvements to substantially reduce flooding. Improvements included new outfalls to tide, higher capacity collection 

system, an interceptor system, a 30,000 gpm pump station, and backflow prevention devices. Tasks included analysis of sea level rise, 

modeling, conceptual design of improvements, permittability, cost estimates, and technical memorandum. Also prepared Basis of Design 

Report for the 30,000 gpm pump station including siting study, pump type selection, pump station layout, electrical requirements, 

instrumentation and controls, bypass gravity discharge, construction cost estimate, schedule, and identification of permitting requirements 

(Broward County, FDEP, USACE), and reporting. Detail design of the system is currently underway. 



South Florida Water Management District S-124 Control Structure 



Design, Broward County, Florida. 

2009 


Task manager for the hydraulic and civil design for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure on the L-35A Canal for the South Florida 

c. Water Management District (SFWMD) with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. The hydraulic report identified design flows and stages, 

established the structure capacity (550-800 cfs), dimensions (triple 6’x 8’ box culverts), invert and crest elevations, and sized a temporary 

bypass structure to control flows and water levels during construction. The replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete box culvert 

with remotely operated slide gates, a design capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and back-up power supply. Civil design plans and 

specifications included site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction sequencing plan, vehicle barrier gate, floating trash 

barrier, security fence, warning signs, demolition and erosion/scour control plan, and canal stabilization treatments. 



City of Fort Lauderdale, Prospect Lake Recharge Facility, Fort 



Lauderdale, Florida. 

2000 


Project manager for planning, design, and limited construction support services for a $650,000 facility connecting SFWMD’s C-14 canal to 

Prospect Lake to recharge the city's main wellfield with freshwater that would otherwise be discharged to tide. The facility serves to intercept 

d. canal flows for storage in the lake and adjacent aquifer. Services included securing a $300,000 alternative water supply grant from the South 

Florida Water Management District. A unique aspect was the reclassification of the Lake from a Class I to a Class III water body, the first such 

reclassification in the state of Florida. Managed preparation of a grant application, request for reclassification, and Basis of Design Report 

summarizing the conceptual design and hydrologic/hydraulic modeling; surveying and geotechnical analysis; preparation of paving, grading, 

and drainage plans & specifications for 2,600 feet of 36" reinforced concrete pipe, an 8-foot-wide gated weir control structure, and a diversion 

structure with two vertical lift gates; structural analysis and design of the control and diversion structures; cost estimates; and permitting. 

Deliverables included electronic files in AutoCAD format. 



City of Fort Lauderdale, Five-Ash Water Treatment Plant, Fort 



Lauderdale, Florida. 

1998 

e. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm 

Project manager for retrofitting the drainage system in the facility to reduce frequent flooding and accommodate the addition of a 7-milliongallon 

storage tank and ASR well pad to the plant site in accordance with regulations. Work effort included modeling (adICPR), design, and 

permitting (SFWMD, DNRP, and FDOT).

f. 

g. 

h. 

i. 

j. 

k. 



District Engineer, Central Broward Water Control District, 



Hollywood, FL 

2007 

2007 


Under a consulting contract, served a District Engineer from 1995 through 2007 for a 43.5-square-mile District that includes unincorporated 

Broward County, Cooper City, the Seminole Indian Reservation, and the communities of Davie, Hollywood, Sunrise, Pembroke Pines, and 

Southwest Ranches. Provided services related to regulation, permitting, infrastructure improvements, and operation and maintenance. 

Reviewed plats, paving and drainage plans, and as-built drawings for all development and redevelopment for conformance with design 

standards, processing an average of 70 plans annually. Revised the design criteria manual and conducted site inspections. Attended Board 

and committee meetings. Managed special projects including development of capital improvements plan and the design, bidding, and 

construction oversight of various infrastructure improvements. Assisted with securing a $1M grant from the South Florida Water Management 

District for implementation of various BMP’s for water quality improvement. 



Broward County Office of Environmental Services, Central County 



Neighborhood Improvement Projects, Broward County, Florida. 

2001 


Task manager for the planning and design of a stormwater system to alleviate extensive flooding problems in several old neighborhoods, 

where common problems included lack of positive outfalls and poor surface infiltration due to the destruction (filling in) of street side swales. A 

stormwater (adICPR) model was applied to assess the severity of existing flooding problems and to size drainage facilities. Because positive 

outfalls to waters of the U.S. were required for flood control, best management practices (BMPs) were used for pollution control. Runoff and 

lake water quality models were used to assess BMP effectiveness, size controls, and estimate water quality impacts to receiving lakes. The 

designed system consisted of re-graded swales, exfiltration trenches, storage and treatment in neighborhood lakes, and overflow into the 

primary canal system. A major aspect of the design was the culverting of approximately 5,000 feet of the 35 th Avenue Ditch with dual 8-foot by 

8-foot reinforced concrete box culverts, and a large gated concrete control structure and emergency spillway prior to final discharge into the C- 

12 canal just upstream of the S-33 salinity control structure. 



JC Bermudez Park Recycled Storm Water Irrigation Project, Doral, 



FL 

2010 

2012 


Project manager for the modeling, design, permitting (ERP and CUP), construction observation, and development of O&M manual for the fasttrack 

implementation of a $2.9M recycled storm water irrigation system for the 80-acre park. Major project components included emergency 

lake intake structure, 2 MG above ground concrete storage tank, 3,000 gpm stormwater pump station, 130 micron disk filters with automatic 

backwash, gravity sand filter for backwash water, bleach disinfection system, 1,400 gpm irrigation pumps, 8,000 feet of 12” diameter looped 

main, irrigation system, and automated controls. A SFWMD conceptual ERP permit modification was approved within 5 weeks of application 

submittal. The project was partially funded by a $1M alternative water supply grant from the SFWMD. 



SR 694 Improvements, City of Pinellas Park, FL 



2001 

2005 


Project manager for the design of drainage and road improvements to alleviate severe flooding and congestion along a 0.75-mile stretch of SR 

694, a high-traffic hurricane evacuation route. Project deliverables included a basis of design report, modeling, construction drawings, technical 

specifications, cost estimate, maintenance of traffic plan, pavement restoration, and permits with SWFWMD, FDOT, and the County. Jointly 

funded by Pinellas Park, Pinellas County, and FDOT, the $4.3 million project involved the design of over 10,000 feet of reinforced concrete 

pipe ranging from 24 inches in diameter to a 12' x 8' box culvert. 



Needs Assessment Program, Miami-Dade Water and Sewer 



Department, Miami, FL 

2007 

2007 


Principal-in-charge for 40 water and sewer infrastructure projects totaling $60 million and involving the design and construction of 17,815 feet 

of pressurized sewer force main ranging from 4-inch to 12-inch diameter; 91,451 feet of 8-inch to 16-inch pressurized water main; 39,000 feet 

of 8-inch to 12-inch gravity sewer; and 6 pump stations. Services included master planning, modeling, preliminary design, design standard 

development, design management, utility conflict coordination, permitting assistance, cost estimating, scheduling, public information, bid 

packaging, and construction management. Target areas included Brownfields Program, Federal Designated Empowerment Zones, Infill 

Housing Initiatives, Office of Community and Economic Development Program as well as undersized water mains, low-pressure areas, and 

inadequate fire protection. Projects were identified in close coordination with stakeholders and County Commissioners. 



Miami-Dade County DERM, FEMA DORM Drainage Design, Miami, 



Florida. 

2003 


Project manager for the design of drainage improvements to alleviate flooding and water quality problems in flood prone neighborhoods 

throughout Miami-Dade County. Managed preparation of 57 design packages, covering about 2 square miles, and with a construction value of 

$4 million. Designs included catch basins, exfiltration trenches, pavement restoration, maintenance of traffic plans, hydraulic calculations, cost 

estimates, and utility conflict coordination.

12. NAME 

Thomas M. O’Connor, P.E. 





Principal-In-Charge 

King Engineering Associates, Inc., Tampa, FL 

a. TOTAL 

28 



22 


B.S., Civil Engineering 


Professional Engineer Florida, No. 39593 

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) 

Organizations: Water Pollution Control Federation, American Society of Civil Engineers 

a. 

b. 


Southwest Water Treatment Plant 

Pasco County, FL 



2004 




2005 

Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC Officer for the design and permitting for Pasco County's new Southwest WTP. This project included 7,000 

lf of raw water collector mains, 2.0 mgd chloramines disinfection treatment facility, 4.0 mg finished water storage tank, and 3.75 mgd high 

service pumping station. The tank was constructed underground in order to appease concerns in a mostly residential neighborhood. The 

project included site work, yard piping, security systems, and a 2,700 sf building housing the pumping station, chemical storage and feed 

systems, standby power generator, and electrical and I&C systems. 

Cost: $5.6 million 


Lehigh Acres Master Pump Station Upgrade 

Lee County, FL 


2009 




2010 

Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC Officer for the development of flow projections, hydraulic modeling, planning, design, permitting and 

construction for the upgrade and replacement of a 4 mgd triplex master wastewater pump station in Lee County. 

Cost: $600,000 

c. 


Palm River Restoration 

Hillsborough County, FL 


2008 




TBD 

Principal-in-Charge overseeing the Palm River Restoration Project, a SWFWMD - SWIM project cooperatively funded by the Florida 

Department of Transportation. The Palm River Restoration Project is a multi-faceted restoration project design covering a 28 square mile, 

highly urbanized watershed in the City of Tampa and Hillsborough County. Services include the preparation of a Feasibility Study, 

preliminary and final design plans and the permitting of multiple stormwater retrofit and wetland/shoreline habitat restoration projects within 

the Palm River/McKay Bay Basin. Project components includes 2D hydrodynamic modeling, data collection, land survey, pollutant 

loading/treatment efficiency, dredging, spoil disposal and bank stabilization assessments within the C-135/Palm River. Cost: $2 million 

d. 

e. 


U.S. 301 & Balm Riverview Rd Intersection Improvements, PD&E 

Study and Final Roadway Design Plans, 



2011 




2012 

Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC for the PD&E Study to evaluate alternative roadway alignments on Balm Riverview Road considering 

critical factors such as long-range planning, safety, cost, environmental impacts, property impacts, and other related factors. The report 

documented the need for the project and presented the procedure used to develop and evaluate four (4) alignment alternatives. Cost 

$1.5 million 


State Road 54 Water, Reuse and Force Main Project 



2005 




2008 

Project Manager and and QA/QC for the relocation of approximately 1.2 miles of 24-inch water, 12-inch reuse, and 8-inch force main 

along SR 54. This project was required to avoid conflicts with a FDOT road-widening project. Cost: $1.4 million

12. NAME 

Franklin Torrealba, P.E. 






Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities / 

Construction Management 

a. TOTAL 

24 





3 

MBA/1991/Business Administration 

2000/Professional Engineer Florida #56385 

B.S./1986/Civil Engineering 


Memberships 

American Society of Civil Engineers 

Water Environment Federation 




Lauderdale-By-The-Sea Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements Plan, 


Lauderdale-By-The-Sea, Florida 


2011 


Project Manager for development of the Town’s Sanitary Sewer System Capital Improvement Plan. The sanitary sewer collection 

a. 

system consists of two separate wastewater collection basins with approximately 10.5 miles of gravity pipes, 165 manholes and two 

pump stations with their respective force mains. Activities included closet circuit TV (CCTV) video review of the sewer system, 

identification of defects, and repair recommendations; flow meter inspection and evaluation; pump station inspection and hydraulic 

analysis; infiltration and inflow (I/I) evaluation including development of wet and dry weather hydrographs, rain-dependant I/I estimation, 

and tidal infiltration estimation; 2035 demand projections; and development of the capital improvements plan. Since the Town currently 

pays a nearby utility to take its sewer flows, the projected substantial reduction in metered sewer flows will pay back the cost of repairs 

within a short period of time. 



Preliminary Basis of Design Report and Pump Station Siting Study, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 


Hollywood, FL 

2010 

King prepared a Basis of Design Report and Pump Station Siting Study for the South S. Lake Drainage Basin, a low-lying urban coastal 

b. basin susceptible to flooding. Responsibilities included: evaluation of pump station types; pump station general arrangement layout 

drawings and site plan; meetings with Broward County, USACE, and FDEP to identify permitting requirements; pump station siting 

evaluation; opinion of probable cost for the drainage improvements and pump station; and project implementation schedule. Final 

report recommended pump station consisted of two 30,000 gpm axial submersible pumps with a gated gravity bypass to allow gravity 

flows and reduce fuel consumption during low to normal tides. The submersible pumps minimize noise and visual obstruction in this 

coastal residential community. Electrical, telemetry, and control panels can be camouflaged by landscaping. 



Miami‐Dade Water and Sewer Department, Cleaning and Televising PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 

CONSTRUCTION (if applicable 

c. 

of Small Diameter Sewers in Various Locations, Miami, Florida 

2011 

Construction management, field inspection, evaluation and recommendations for different locations anywhere within the limits of Miami- 

Dade County, Florida. The sanitary sewer collection system consists of approximately 205 miles of gravity pipes, 5,200 manholes, and 

54 pump stations. 



MDWASD Pump Station Engineering Reports (6) and Pump Station 



717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation 

2010 


d. Project Manager for the Basis of Design Report Assistance for six pump station engineering reports and the associated force main 

system that included field inspections, pump station evaluation, hydraulic analysis, cost analysis, alternatives analysis, and pump 

upgrade recommendations. The project involved the analysis of several alternatives in order to best serve the sewer system during 

2030 projected flows and pressures. Pump stations were inspected for wet well condition, dry pit condition, pump sizing, mechanical 

and electrical requirements, and overall siting. 



Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Pump Station 49 Siting 



Evaluation, Miami, Florida 

2010 

e. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm 

Project Manager for the siting analysis for the relocation of pump station 49, which presently has maintenance issues due to the depth 

of the wet well. Mr. Pisani was involved in utility coordination including the collection of all pertinent data and in the preparation of 

alternatives maps in ArcGIS. 



Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) - 48-Inch 



Water main Interconnect in the Central East Area (Downtown 

Miami) Preliminary Alternative Water main Route Analysis 

2010 

N/A 

f. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm 

Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of 

the proposed force main, determine its size (48-Inch) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of 

constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a 

preliminary project schedule for 7,300 feet of 48-Inch Water main in the Miami Downtown area.

g. 

h. 

i. 

j. 


Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) - CL-1 Pump 

Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain Connection Preliminary Alternative Pipe 

Route Analysis (60-Inch Forcemain), Miami Florida 


2010 



Services provide included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of 

the proposed force main, determine its size (60-Inch) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of 

constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a 

preliminary project schedule for 5,700 feet of 60-Inch Forcemain near the Miami Downtown area. 


Construction Management and Inspection Services for the 

“Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to 

the MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System within the City of Miami 

Springs, Florida” 


2010 



N/A 


The project involves construction management and inspection of a Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES) for a portion of the Miami- 

Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) wastewater collection system within the City of Miami Springs, Florida”. The sanitary 

sewer collection system consists of approximately 46 miles of gravity pipes, 912 manholes, and 17 separate wastewater collection 

basins within the City of Miami Springs, Florida. 


Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Wastewater Pump 

Station Improvement Program, Miami, Florida 


2000 



N/A 


Deputy Program Manager and assistant chief engineer of the program management team that managed a $1.0 billion wastewater 

system improvement program, with detailed management responsibility for the $240 million pump station improvement program. The 

program was created to achieve regulatory compliance by correcting a series of wastewater overflows to surface water. Provided 

program monitoring and reporting on a regular basis on the progress of more than 1,700 separate deliverables. The program included 

the upgrade of its pump stations and force mains, a reduction of the infiltration, exfiltration, and inflow in the collection system and an 

increase in the capacity of its wastewater treatment plants to minimize the occurrence of sanitary sewer overflows. 


Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Government Cut Tunnel 

Design-Build Criteria Package, Miami, Florida 


2010 



N/A 


Project Manager for the development of the design criteria package for the replacement of the 54-inch sanitary sewage force main from 

Miami Beach to Virginia Key and replacement of a 20-inch water main between Port Island and Fisher Island. Managed the data 

collection, engineering (geotechnical, survey, utility coordination, alternative analysis, tunnel design, and construction methodology), 

land acquisition, stake holder coordination, permitting, and public involvement programs associated with over 8000 linear feet of sub 

aqueous crossings, with five shaft locations impacting four islands.

12. NAME 

John R. Seals, P.E. 





Roadway & Transportation 


a. TOTAL 

26 



9 






a. 

b. 



Highland Avenue Reconstruction and Stormwater Retrofit Largo, 

FL 


2011 




N/A 

Project Manager for the preparation of a PD & E / conceptual design alternatives report and final design plans to reconstruct 

1.5 miles of an existing 2-lane rural facility. The project included converting the existing facility to an urban, pedestrianfriendly, 

roadway with streetscape and hardscape elements, including the design of a multi-use path and incorporating LID 

stormwater elements. Services include survey and right-of way mapping, SWFWMD grant funding application, public 

involvement, and County Joint Project Agreement. Additionally, the stormwater retrofit portion of the project included 

diverting 250 acres of untreated stormwater runoff into an expanded pond area to provide water quality treatment. Cost: $5.2 

million 


US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection Improvements PD&E 

Study and Final Roadway Design Plans 



2011 




TBD 

Project Manager/Engineer of Record for the preparation of a PD&E study and design plans for intersection improvements. 

The Study was done to evaluate alternative roadway geometry improvements considering safety, vehicle capacity, 

environmental and right-of-way impacts, and cost. The design plans included additional lane geometry, survey, right-of-way 

mapping, stormwater management facilities, wetland and flood plain design, traffic signalization, land acquisition assistance 

and environmental permitting. Cost: $1.5 million 

c. 


Skycrest Neighborhood Traffic Calming 

Clearwater, FL 


PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) 

2008 

2009 


Project Manager responsible for the design of neighborhood traffic calming, which included the preparation of design plans, 

presentation at commission and public information meetings, landscape and irrigation plans, contract specifications, traffic 

control plans and provided bidding services for the construction of four modern roundabouts, five mini circles, speed tables, 

continuous medians, drainage improvements, and various other traffic calming improvements. Cost: $2.1 million 

d. 

e. 

f. 


Hanley Road and Waters Avenue Intersection 



2009 




2011 

Project Manager for the design and permitting of major intersection improvements located within a dense commercial area. 

Responsibilities included preparing a traffic study, development of traffic control plans, roadway design plans, traffic 

signalization plans, environmental permitting, and conducting public information meetings. Cost: $1.1 million 


SR 56 Extension, from CR 581 to East Wiregrass Ranch 

Roadway and Drainage Improvements, Pasco County, FL 


2009 




2009 

Program and Quality Control Manager responsible for roadway and drainage design, traffic design, lighting design, and 

permitting of this 2.1-mile urban 4-lane divided (future 6-lane) arterial highway. $48 Mil 



SR 54/CR 54 Roadway Improvements, Pasco County, FL 



2005 


This project included the preparation of design plans to widen 2.1 miles of CR 54 (from Magnolia Boulevard to SR 581) from a 2-lane road to 

a 4-lane divided facility with accommodations for a future 6-lane divide urban typical section. Services included topographic survey, right-ofway 

survey and mapping, master drainage study and stormwater design, wetland mitigation design and environmental permitting, traffic 

design, and roadway lighting design. The initial project scope included the design of approximately 1.5 miles of Old Pasco Road widening 

and the extension of Dayflower Boulevard. However, these segments were removed from the final design. Estimated construction cost is 

$15.3 million.

g. 

h. 

i. 

j. 


Miscellaneous Engineering Services, Hillsborough County, FL 


2005 




Program Manager responsible for providing miscellaneous transportation engineering services to Hillsborough County for 

multiple years. These services have ranged from preliminary engineering studies and stormwater analysis to complete 

roadway construction plans. Services are provided through individual task orders directed through County Project Managers. 

Cost: $3.2 million. 



Columbus Drive Extension, Hillsborough County, FL 



2006 


Project Manager for the preparation of the Preliminary Engineering Study, the 30% design plans, and the Design-Build RFQ 

package to construct a new 4-lane divide urban roadway. The project included the identification of pond sites for flood plain 

and wetland impacts, USACOE permitting, and preparation of a Design-Build contract for advertisement and bidding. Cost: 

$9.3 million. 


Waters Avenue & Benjamin Road Intersection, Hillsborough 

County, FL 




2004 


Project Engineer responsible for the traffic operational analysis and design relative to the development of the PD&E study 

and the Intersection Improvement Plans. Cost: $530,000. 


State Road 56 from SR 581 to Meadow Pointe Boulevard Pasco 

County, FL 



2009 

Ongoing 


Project Manager for the design and environmental permitting of 3.5 miles of new four-lane/six-lane divided rural roadway as 

part of the Wiregrass Development in Pasco County. Responsibilities included roadway design, stormwater facilities design, 

wetland mitigation, traffic signalization plans, maintenance of traffic and environmental permitting. 

Cost: $26 million

12. NAME 

Michael E. Ross, P.E. 








Civil Site Engineering 


a. TOTAL 

25 





25 

a. 


McKinley Student Housing 




2007 




2009 

Principal-in-Charge providing engineering design, permitting and construction administration for a 287 unit, 947 bed multistory 

and cottage university housing apartment complex with a ±8,500 sf clubhouse and maintenance facility including 

roadway, utility infrastructure, stormwater system, construction documents and permitting. Cost: $6 million 


Pinellas County Housing Authority (PCHA) Proposal 

Redevelopment Project, Largo, FL 


2011 




2012 

b. 

King is providing civil engineering design, permitting, landscape design and survey services for the development of a 

PCHA’s Senior Living Facility. The redevelopment is to include demolition of existing building and parking area and 

replaced with multifamily style senior living facility with amenities, surface parking, and an additional 20,000 sf PCHA 

office. Cost: TBD 


USF Sports Venue Projects (Basketball, Baseball, Softball 

& Football), Tampa, FL 


2010 




N/A 

c. 

Principal-in-Charge responsible for providing civil engineering design and permitting services through the R.R. Simmons 

design-build team for the University of South Florida athletic facility improvement projects. The project includes multiple 

sport venues ranging from construction of a basketball practice facility adjacent to the Sun Dome to a new baseball & 

softball complex, as well as improvements to the football practice fields and general purpose student recreation fields. 

While the design for each venue is being prepared separately, the projects are being permitted concurrently to minimize 

impact to the respective sports and event schedules. Cost: $30 million 

d. 


Wesley Chapel Medical Center 



2009 




2011 

Principal in-Charge for the civil engineering services for a multi-phased healthcare property. Current scope provides for 

planning, site design, ecological and surveying services for 162,500 sf / 3-level hospital with future vertical expansion 

capability of three additional floors totaling 380,000 sf. King is also providing similar services for one of the two 100,000 sf 

medical office buildings to be built concurrent with the first phase of the hospital. Cost: $151 million 


FBI Field Office 

Tampa, FL 


2005 




2006 

e. 

Principal-in-Charge for this 4-story/ 138,500 sf office facility with a detached 382-space parking garage located in the 

Westshore Business District. Cost: $20 million

12. NAME 

William B. Moriarty, PE, BCEE 



BSCE, Marquette University, 1974 

MBA, University of Houston, 1985 




Alternative Funding 

a. TOTAL 

King Engineering Associates, Inc., Austin, TX 

38 



Professional Engineer Florida 64528 


5 


Mr. Moriarty has worked in the fields of environmental and civil engineering since 1974. He has successfully managed offices for consulting 

engineering firms as well as large program management assignments. 


a. 

b. 


JC Bermudez Park Recycled Stormwater Irrigation 




2011 

2010 


The City of Doral retained King Engineering to provide modeling, design, permitting (ERP and CUP), and construction 

support services for the fast-track implementation of a $2.9 M recycled stormwater irrigation system for the 80-acre park. 

– Principal-In-Charge 


Hamilton Jersey Outfall Drainage Improvements, Jacksonville, FL 




Est. 2012 

2009 


King Engineering performed all survey, ecological, water resources and civil engineering services for this 170 acre 

drainage project to relieve flooding within an existing subdivision – Principal-In-Charge 

c. 

d. 

e. 

f. 



717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation, Miami, FL 




2010 

2012 


King Engineering was awarded this continuing services contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable Distribution Work 

Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, 

identify the points of connection of the proposed force mains, pump stations preliminary engineering, determine its sizes 

and determine the best route for the proposed force mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable 

cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule. 

Principal-in-Charge 


MDWASD 48" Water Main Interconnect in the Central East Area 

Route Analysis, Miami, FL 




2010 

2014 


The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of Downtown Miami needs to be completed 

from the existing 48-Inch water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th Street and south to an existing 36-Inch water main 

along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. This project involved performing a preliminary alternative 

water main route analysis in order to interconnect the existing 48-Inch water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36- 

Inch on NW 6 Street. Principal-In-Charge 



Coastal Water System Interconnect, Northwest Florida 



Water Management District – 5 county area, north Florida. 

On-going 


King Engineering was retained by the Northwest Florida Water Management District to evaluate the feasibility of 

implementing water system interconnects with the objective of increasing water supply reliability in coastal communities 

in the event of water shortages, natural disasters, or system failures. The study area included selected coastal utilities in 

Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties. 



Design, Broward County, Florida 




2009 

2011 


Hydraulic and civil design for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure on the L-35A Canal for the South Florida 

Water Management District (SFWMD) with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. The hydraulic report identified 

design flows and stages, established the structure capacity (550-800 cfs), dimensions (triple 6’x 8’ box culverts), invert 

and crest elevations, and sized a temporary bypass structure to control flows and water levels during construction. The 

replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete box culvert with remotely operated slide gates, a design 

capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and back-up power supply. Civil design plans and specifications included 

site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction sequencing plan, vehicle barrier gate, floating trash barrier, 

security fence, warning signs, demolition and erosion/scour control plan, and canal stabilization treatments. Principal-In- 

Charge

12. NAME 

William B. Moriarty, PE, BCEE 



BSCE, Marquette University, 1974 

MBA, University of Houston, 1985 




Alternative Funding 

a. TOTAL 

King Engineering Associates, Inc., Austin, TX 

38 



Professional Engineer Florida 64528 


5 


Mr. Moriarty has worked in the fields of environmental and civil engineering since 1974. He has successfully managed offices for consulting 

engineering firms as well as large program management assignments. 


a. 

b. 






2011 

2010 


The City of Doral retained King Engineering to provide modeling, design, permitting (ERP and CUP), and construction 

support services for the fast-track implementation of a $2.9 M recycled stormwater irrigation system for the 80-acre park. 

– Principal-In-Charge 


Hamilton Jersey Outfall Drainage Improvements, Jacksonville, FL 




Est. 2012 

2009 


King Engineering performed all survey, ecological, water resources and civil engineering services for this 170 acre 

drainage project to relieve flooding within an existing subdivision – Principal-In-Charge 

c. 

d. 

e. 

f. 



717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation, Miami, FL 




2010 

2012 


King Engineering was awarded this continuing services contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable Distribution Work 

Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, 

identify the points of connection of the proposed force mains, pump stations preliminary engineering, determine its sizes 

and determine the best route for the proposed force mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable 

cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule. 

Principal-in-Charge 


MDWASD 48" Water Main Interconnect in the Central East Area 

Route Analysis, Miami, FL 




2010 

2014 


The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of Downtown Miami needs to be completed 

from the existing 48-Inch water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th Street and south to an existing 36-Inch water main 

along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. This project involved performing a preliminary alternative 

water main route analysis in order to interconnect the existing 48-Inch water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36- 

Inch on NW 6 Street. Principal-In-Charge 






Water Management District – 5 county area, north Florida. 

On-going 


King Engineering was retained by the Northwest Florida Water Management District to evaluate the feasibility of 

implementing water system interconnects with the objective of increasing water supply reliability in coastal communities 

in the event of water shortages, natural disasters, or system failures. The study area included selected coastal utilities in 

Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties. 



Design, Broward County, Florida 




2009 

2011 


Hydraulic and civil design for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure on the L-35A Canal for the South Florida 

Water Management District (SFWMD) with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. The hydraulic report identified 

design flows and stages, established the structure capacity (550-800 cfs), dimensions (triple 6’x 8’ box culverts), invert 

and crest elevations, and sized a temporary bypass structure to control flows and water levels during construction. The 

replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete box culvert with remotely operated slide gates, a design 

capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and back-up power supply. Civil design plans and specifications included 

site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction sequencing plan, vehicle barrier gate, floating trash barrier, 

security fence, warning signs, demolition and erosion/scour control plan, and canal stabilization treatments. Principal-In- 

Charge

12. NAME 

Christopher F. Kuzler, P.E. 



B.S., Mechanical Engineering 

Polytechnic Institute of New York, 1985 

M.S., Business Administration 

Adelphi University, New York, 1989 




Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities 

a. TOTAL 

22 





Professional Engineer Florida #45532 


His project experience includes wastewater master planning, design through construction of water and wastewater treatment facilities, pump 

station facility analysis and design, water and reclaimed water distribution systems, and design, analysis, estimating, permitting, and 

construction for all types of utility projects. 


a. 


Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) - 

48-Inch Water main Interconnect in the Central East 

Area (Downtown Miami) Preliminary Alternative Water 

main Route Analysis 


2010 


16 



Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the 

proposed force main, determine its size (48-Inch) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare 

an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 7,300 

feet of 48-Inch Water main in the Miami Downtown area. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 

f. 


Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) - 

CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain Connection 

Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis (60-Inch 

Forcemain), Miami Florida 


2010 




Services provide included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the 

proposed force main, determine its size (60-Inch) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare 

an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 5,700 

feet of 60-Inch Forcemain near the Miami Downtown area. 


Preliminary Basis of Design Report and Pump Station 

Siting Study, Hollywood, FL 


2010 




Project Engineer retained by the City of Hollywood to prepare a preliminary Basis of Design Report and Pump Station Siting Study for the South 

South Lake Drainage Basin, a low-lying urban coastal basin susceptible to flooding due to combination of high tides, low ground elevations, and 

intense rain storms. This project was part of King’s Continuing Engineering Contract with the City of Hollywood. 



Water Management District – 5 county area, north 

Florida. 


On-going 




King Engineering was retained by the Northwest Florida Water Management District to evaluate the feasibility of implementing water system 

interconnects with the objective of increasing water supply reliability in coastal communities in the event of water shortages, natural disasters, or 

system failures. The study area included selected coastal utilities in Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties. 


Dunedin WWTP Permitting 

Dunedin, FL 


2008 




Project Manager for the renewal of Dunedin’s Domestic Wastewater Permit with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 

Specific tasks included review and evaluation of existing Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs), circular flow charts, ground water monitoring 

reports, quarterly sludge analyses, ambient monitoring data, and other miscellaneous data; preparation and submittal of the required FDEP forms; 

preparation of a Capacity Analysis Report and Operation & Maintenance Performance Report; site visits and evaluation of six (6) sludge disposal 

sites; responding to FDEP’s questions and other services necessary to obtain the permit renewal. Also provided similar services as part of the 

City’s permit renewal in 2002. 


Utilities Miscellaneous Engineering 

Pinellas County, FL 


On-going 




Project Manager providing professional engineering s services for miscellaneous projects related to upgrade, rehabilitation, expansion or 

replacement of various water, solid waste, and wastewater facilities. Services provided: Preliminary and final design services, permitting, reports, 

studies, modeling, bid services including preparation, negotiations, and evaluations, construction management including observation and 

inspection, operation and maintenance, start-up, equipment testing, quality assurance/quality control and surveying services were also provided.

12. NAME 

Benjamin C. Turnage, P.E. 



Bachelor of Science, Physics, 2000 

Furman University 

Bachelor of Science, Biological Engineering, 2001 

University of Georgia 




Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities 



American Physical Society (APS) 

Water Environment Federation (WEF) 

a. 

b. 

c. 


SR 56 Extension, from CR 581 to East Wiregrass Ranch 


a. TOTAL 

8 






Ongoing 




7 


2009 

Preparation of design plans to construct 3.4 miles of a 6-lane and 4-lane (with accommodations for a future 6-lane) divided urban/rural, 

principal arterial through the Wiregrass Ranch property, located in Pasco County. 

Role: Utility Engineer 


Ulmerton Road Utility Adjustments 5 projects 

City of Largo, FL 


2007 




Est. 2014 

Provided permitting assistance; preliminary and final design plans and technical specifications; and limited construction services. In total, 

the five projects – two constructed to date – include approx. 10,000 LF of 4-inch-8-inch force main, 3,800 LF of 8-inch-12-inch reclaimed 

main, and 8,000 LF of 8-inch-12-inch gravity sewer. Role: Project Engineer 


Pinellas County Utilities - Various Projects 



2008 




2008 

Retained to complete municipal projects for Pinellas County. Project services include design, implementation and construction services for 

various South Cross Bayou and William A. Dunn Treatment Plant projects. 

Role: Project Engineer 


Lake Avenue Pump Station and Force Main 

Largo, FL 


2008 



2011 

d. 

e. 

f. 


Project Manager. Each collection system modeling alternatives included various pipeline construction methods, which were evaluated 

based on costs and impacts to traffic and residences. Pump station upgrades included mechanical and electrical elements required to 

replace the two existing 60-HP constant-speed pumps with 110-HP VFD-driven pumps. 


William E. Dunn WRF Miscellaneous Process Control 

Improvements 





2011 


Engineer of Record and Project Manager for the design and construction services for process control improvements at Pinellas County’s 

William E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility (WED WRF) in Palm Harbour, FL. The project includes the detailed design and construction 

services for a new fully integrated dry polymer make-up system to replace the existing outdated equipment at the plant’s sludge thickening 

facility. The project also includes the installation of two ChemScan continuous wastewater analyzers to monitor nitrogen and phosphorous 

throughout the process trains and six (6) sludge blanket level analyzers to monitor sludge level in the existing clarifiers. All components 

are designed to be implemented into the plant’s SCADA network, in a step towards automated process control. Cost: $1.07 million 


Redington Beach Pump Stations 76, 77, and 78 Upgrade 



2006 




2007 

Project Engineer for the design, cost analysis, permitting, and construction observation of three pump stations in the Town of Redington 

Beach. The existing pump stations were a part of an aging system that deteriorated over time, experiencing problems with odor and I&I. 

Pump Station 76 was a 6'-diameter wetwell to be refurbished in place, posing difficulties in design due to its location immediately adjacent 

to the Town Hall building. Pump Station 77 was an existing 6'-diameter station to be relocated due to its location in a heavily traveled 

intersection, and Pump Station 78 was upgraded from a duplex to a triplex.



12. NAME 

Thomas A. Traina, P.E. 




Mechanical/Instrumentation & Controls 

a. TOTAL 

33 



11 

16. EDUATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 



Florida Professional Engineer No. 42871 


a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 


Central Pasco Water and Wastewater Systems 

Improvements, Pasco County, FL 



2006 



2010 

3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm 

Engineer of Record for the hydraulic modeling, design, permitting, and construction management of water and wastewater 

transmission and distribution mains in central Pasco County. Project included 145,900 lf of 16-, 24- and 36-inch potable water 

mains and force mains, and a potable water booster pump station. The booster station included the design and permitting of 

a 5 MG ground storage tank, re-chlorination system, and 5 mgd high service pump station. As part of this project planning an 

interim model of the water system was developed in order to size a temporary booster pump station required to maintain 

system pressures in the northern part of the project service area. Cost: $27.9 million 


Stormwater Pump Station 

Hollywood, FL 


2011 



Est. 2013 


Engineer of Record for the design and permitting of a stormwater pump station for the City of Hollywood, Florida. Project 

included an initial sizing and siting study for a 30,000 GPM station needed to reduce flooding along the Intracoastal 

Waterway. The design includes a submersible duplex station with influent solids separation system; axial flow pumps, surface 

water discharge; power, control and telemetry systems; and, sitework and landscaping for this $3.1 million pump station. 

Engineering services include design, permitting, bidding, and construction management assistance. Cost: TBD 


Phase 2 Regional Interconnect, Peace River Manasota 

Regional Water Supply Authority 

Manatee /Sarasota / Charlotte Counties and 

City of North Port, FL 


2010 



Est. 2012 


Lead Engineer responsible for the preparation of a basis of design report and for the design and permitting of this 7-mile long, 

42-inch transmission main that included options for steel and ductile iron pipe, cathodic protection, three meter stations, 5 

interconnections with existing transmission mains, line valves, air valves and blow-offs. Engineering services included 

property acquisition, nine environmental and right of-use permits, contractor pre-qualification and cost estimating. Bidding 

services and construction management assistance are also being provided. Cost: $11 million. 


Stormwater Reuse Irrigation System 

Doral FL 


2010 



2011 


Engineer of Record for the study, design, permitting and construction of a stormwater reuse irrigation system serving the City 

of Doral’s 80-acre J.C. Bermudez Park. The system includes a 3,000 GPM stormwater pond intake and pumping system with 

provisions to connect to a future stormwater collection system; a pressure filtration and waste washwater sand filter system; 2 

MG ground storage tank; 1,500 gpm at 125 psi irrigation pumping station; 7,100 lf of 12-inch irrigation piping; and, a 10-acre 

irrigation system with smart controllers. The project is currently under construction at a cost of $2.9 million. 


Kenneth City Sewer System Rehabilitation 



2002 



2007 


Project Manager for this 2-phase project The first phase included the design, permitting, bidding, and construction 

management services for the rehabilitation of approximately 25,000 lf of residential sanitary sewer pipe. Rehabilitation was 

accomplished by the cured-in-place (Insituform) method. Cost: $1.6M Upon completion of the sewer line rehabilitation phase, 

performed infiltration and inflow study and then completed the design, permitting, bidding, and construction services related to 

the replacement of the pump station serving the sewage collection system along with a new 6-inch force main. Cost: $0.4 

million. Total Cost $2 million.


E. RESUMES (Complete OF KEY PERSONNEL one Section E PROPOSED for each key FOR person.) THIS CONTRACT 

(Complete one Section E for each key person.) (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 

12. NAME 


WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES 

a. TOTAL 

Loc P. Truong, P.E. 

Design / Permitting 

10 


B. S. Chemical Engineering 




MEMBERSHIP - American Water Works Association 


South Cross Bayou Water Reclamation Facility 

Chemscan System 




6 



Drinking Water Treatment Plant Operator Class C Florida, 

No. 0014398 



2011 



Est. 2012 

a. 


Senior Project Engineer providing final drawing and specification review and development of the upgrade and installation of 

Chemscan automatic sampling and analysis systems at various location within the facility’s process train and their 

integration into the Plant SCADA system. Cost: $1.1 million 

b. 


Reuse System Metering & Controls, Pasco County, FL 


2006 




2009 

Project Engineer for the design and implementation of improvements to the County’s existing SCADA system. 

Improvements provide for remote operation and control of master reuse system. This project included PLC’s for control of 

high service pump stations and communication between wastewater treatment facilities via a virtual private network (VPN). 



Northeast Advanced Pollution Control Facility 

Chemical Feed Lines Replacement 



2009 




2009 

c. 

Project Manager for the design and construction of three dual wall chemical feed pipes from the plant's chemical feed 

pumps in the chemical building to the chlorine contact chamber. The project included replacement of existing chemical feed 

piping for sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite with new dual wall high density polyethylene (HDPE) piping/valving. The 

project also included a below grade enclosure, sump, equipment, and alarm controls for detection of a leak in the chemical 

feed piping system. Cost: $43,000 

d. 


Shady Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion 



2007 




2010 

Project Engineer for the instrumentation and controls systems for a wastewater treatment plant expansion from 2 to 14 

mgd. This project included a headworks structure, mixing/anoxic/aeration basins, clarifiers, filters, chlorine contact chamber, 

reject pond, pump stations, septage and grease receiving station, electrical, instrumentation, and plantwide SCADA 

controls. Designed plantwide SCADA System with eight (8) Industrial Touchscreen PC’s located around the facility for realtime 

monitoring and control. Cost: $67 million 


South Cross Bayou Water Reclamation Facility Sludge 

Thickening Improvements Project, Pinellas County, FL 


2010 



2012 

e. 


Senior Project Engineer providing instrumentation and SCADA system design for improvement to the sludge holding, 

thickening, and receiving process and odor control systems at Pinellas County’s 330 mgd South Cross Bayou Water 

Reclamation Facility . Specific responsibilities included PID and specification development, equipment selection and overall 

controls and electrical panel coordination. Cost: $7.7 million

12. NAME 

Lara Bartholomew, P.E. 



Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering 1995 

Purdue University 




Cost Estimates / Permitting 

a. TOTAL 

13 





Professional Engineer – Florida #61035 

8 



South Florida Water Management Water District S-124 

Water Control Structure, Broward County, FL 



2009 



2011 

a. 

b. 

c 

d. 

e. 


Support Engineer for the hydraulic and civil design for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure for the 

South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. The 

replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete box culvert with remotely operated slide gates, a 

design capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and back-up power supply. Civil design plans and 

specifications included site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction sequencing plan, vehicle 

barrier gate, floating trash barrier, security fence, warning signs, demolition and erosion/scour control plan, 

and canal stabilization treatments. 


MDWASD Pump Station Engineering Reports (6) and 

Pump Station 717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation, 

Miami, FL 


2010 



N/A 


King Engineering was awarded this continuing services contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable 

Distribution Work Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing 

or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force mains, pump stations 

preliminary engineering, determine its sizes and determine the best route for the proposed force mains in 

terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of 

required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule. Role: Engineering, Modeling. 


MDWASD 48" Water Main Interconnect in the Central 

East Area Route Analysis, Miami, FL 




N/A 

2010 


The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of Downtown Miami needs to be 

completed from the existing 48-Inch water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th Street and south to an existing 

36-Inch water main along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. This project involved 

performing a preliminary alternative water main route analysis in order to interconnect the existing 48-Inch 

water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-Inch on NW 6 Street. Role: Engineering, Modeling 


MDWASD - CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain 

Connection Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route 

Analysis, Miami, FL 


2010 



2015 


This project involved performing a preliminary alternative pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to 

an existing 42-Inch force main which discharges at a manhole at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and the 

existing 48-Inch force main in the same vicinity. Role: Environmental Engineering, Modeling 


Peck Sink Preserve Water Control Structure 

Hernando County, FL 




2011 

2009 


This 111 acre County-owned site is dominated by karst features, including the Peck Sink complex, and 

receives mostly untreated storm water runoff from nearly 8,000 acres of urban and rural land uses in this 

closed drainage basin. Project objectives include storm water quality mitigation and volume management 

from both basin-wide and site-specific perspectives, development of a public park site for passive recreational 

uses, and restoration and management of native plant communities. King services include development of a 

master plan inclusive of park elements, stormwater infrastructure, design, permitting and construction bidding 

assistance. Role: Engineering Modeling

12. NAME 

Kyle D. Smith, P.E. 







Roadway Drainage Design 



a. TOTAL 

6 





5 

a. 

b. 

c. 


Hammock Park Natural Systems Restoration (Phase 2) 

Dunedin, FL 



2008 




2009 

Drainage Engineer responsible for data collection and analysis of 3 years of hydrological data to determine the 

effectiveness of the environmental improvement design for Hammock Park. The project involved the construction of a 

channel control structure (dam) and two overflow weir structures to divert flow from an existing man-made channel to 

rehydrate an adjacent wetland system as well as provide bank stabilization to surrounding residential areas that border the 

existing channel. Cost: $1.1 million 


Palatlakaha River Watershed Study 

Lake County Water Authority 


2011 




Est. 2012 

Engineer involved in the development of a watershed model and dam structure removal/replacement evaluations for the 

Palatlakaha River Restoration Project in Lake County. The overall contributing area of the Palatlakaha River watershed is 

over 200 square miles with the river exceeding flows of 1000 cfs during the flood flow “gates open” condition. For this 

project, the drainage study area was limited to the 50 square mile drainage basin from Cherry Lake to the outfall at Lake 

Harris. In order to quantify the upstream contributing area, flood frequency analyses were performed using USGS flow 

data at gage stations along the river to quantify the flood frequency inflows. This project involves evaluation of existing 

manually operated radial gate dam structures along the river, preparation of final design plans for the structure modification 

and permitting with the goal of removing the manual operations of the radial gates. Other activities included permit 

research, analysis of existing rainfall and flow data, analysis of existing drainage basin data and statistical analysis of 

historic flow data. Cost: $500,000 


Granger Drive Neighborhood Drainage Improvements 



2011 




N/A 

Engineer involved in the preliminary engineering phase of this drainage improvement project located in Clearwater, FL. 

Activities include permit research and analysis of existing data. Fee: $34,500 

d. 

e. 


MacDill AFB Restoration Phase 3 

SWFWMD SWIM 


2012 




TBD 

Engineer responsible for assisting in the design of a proposed diversion of stormwater from an existing tidal channel 

system through a cascading pond system to increase systems salinity and provide water quality treatment for MacDill Air 

Force Base. Activities include existing permit research, analysis of existing basin data, development of the hydrologic and 

hydraulic stormwater models, design of the main channel diversion structure as well as several other conveyance 

elements. Design phase is nearing completion. Cost: TBD 


River Tower Restoration and Stormwater Retrofit 

SWFWMD SWIM / FDOT 


2011 




2012 

Engineer responsible for the design of a stormwater retrofit project located adjacent to the Hillsborough River. Proposed 

design included a diversion of low flows from an existing 78-inch storm sewer trunk line along I275into a proposed 

stormwater treatment pond. Duties included permit research, basin pollutant loading and removal calculations, basin data 

collection and verification, sub-basin delineation, development of an existing and proposed drainage model of a 700 acre 

highly urbanized watershed, development of construction plans and preparation of quantity take-offs and construction cost 

estimate. Cost: $2.1 million

12. NAME 

Jennifer Harkleroad, PE 




Roadway & Drainage Design 

a. TOTAL 


King Engineering Associates, Inc., Jacksonville, FL 

10 



3 


Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering 

University of Maryland 


Professional Engineer – Florida #65963 



d. 

b. 

a. 


Hamilton Jersey Drainage Improvements, 

Jacksonville, Florida. 




2013 

2011 


Project Engineer for a 170 acre drainage project to relieve flooding within an existing subdivision. Prepared 

Engineering Report to evaluate design alternatives, including a large diameter gravity bypass main, local 

neighborhood improvements, and water quality improvements. Performed constructability review including 

utility relocation evaluation. Prepared cost estimates and recommended sequence of construction to address 

funding limitations. 


Miramar Tributary Improvements, 

Jacksonville, FL 




2006 

2005 


The scope of the project was to replace the culverts crossing Emerson Street and Hendricks Avenue. King 

reviewed the past design plans and the project limits to verify resource information determining the extent of 

current drainage system conditions. 


Inwood Terrace Drainage Improvements, 





2006 

2005 


Inwood Terrace is located in the Southside of Jacksonville. The project limits are from Dunsford Terrace in the 

north, the FEC Railroad to the east, Emerson Street to the south and St. Augustine Road to the west. With 

the project budget in mind, King Engineering performed roadside drainage improvements to Inwood Terrace, 

Felch Avenue, Kingswood Road, Geneve Street and Drew Street to provide maximum results in efforts to 

alleviate drainage problems in the area by capturing the water and preventing it from ponding in the roadways 

during average rainfall events. 

e. 

c 


Colonial Drive Pavement Rehabilitation, 

Clay County, Florida. 




2010 

2010 


As the site-civil engineer, responsible for field reviews of the existing asphalt roadway and collect existing data 

to perform a pavement evaluation to determine the cause(s) of the current roadway distress, determine 

corrective measures and prepare engineering design plans for bidding. The project included approximately 

1,000-linear feet along Colonial Drive from Pebble Beach Road to just west of Belfry Court and the design of 

an underdrain system to avoid existing utility conflicts. 


Chipola College Campus Improvements, 

Marianna, FL. 




2009 

2009 


Completed the design and permitting of the reconstruction and widening of River Forest Road to provide left 

and right turn lanes for the new Prough Drive access road to the campus. These improvements were 

coordinated with the hydraulic analysis and modeling for campus drainage improvements completed and 

permitted.

12. NAME 

Sandra L. Gorman, P.E., PTOE 




M.S., Civil Engineering 





Traffic & Transportation Planning & 

Engineering 


a. TOTAL 

13 



6 



Professional Traffic Operations Engineering, No. 1545 

a. 



US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection Improvements 



2011 




TBD 

Evaluated various geometric alternatives for the intersection as part of a Preliminary Design and Engineering (PD&E) 

Study for Hillsborough County. Recommended alternative geometry based on Level of Service (LOS), Delay, Queues, and 

constraining right-of-way. The analysis assisted the County in reaching a decision based on the above factors for the 

various proposed alternatives that were considered. Cost: $1.5 million 

b. 


Highland Ave. Roundabout Evaluation 



2010 




N/A 

Prepared analysis to evaluate the potential construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Highland Avenue and 

Rosary Ave in Pinellas County Florida. The analysis included the evaluation of am, pm and Sunday conditions using 

SIDRA software to compare operations under roundabout, signalized and unsignalized conditions. The location of a 

nearby church required that pedestrian and weekend activities also be considered in the analysis. Fee: $3,500 

c. 


Lenna Avenue at Wheeler Road 



2009 




N/A 

Prepared a detailed traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Lenna Avenue and Wheeler Road in Hillsborough 

County. Traffic data was collected and the study was performed to meet the criteria outlined in the Manual of Uniform 

Traffic Control Devices. The analysis included projecting volumes for year 2015 and 2019 and evaluating the intersection 

for a signal. Fee: $19,800 


SR 56 Mansfield Signal Warrant, Pasco County, FL 


2009 




Ongoing 

d. 

e. 

Prepared a detailed traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of SR 56 and Mansfield Boulevard in Pasco County. 

SR 56 is a new 6-lane state highway currently under construction in southeast Pasco County. The warrant analysis was 

performed to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted at the T-intersection upon opening of the new highway. 

Traffic volumes were projected using the FSUTMS model and other local data and the study was performed to meet the 

criteria outlined in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Fee: $15,000 


School Safety, Circulation and Access Program-S.S.C.A.P. 



2009 




Ongoing 

Performed traffic signal warrant analysis as part of preliminary engineering services and evaluation studies of nineteen (19) 

Hillsborough County schools to determine best solutions for improving right and left turning movements in the am and pm 

peak hours. King is also providing preliminary design, permitting research, schematic construction plans, signalized 

intersection planning analysis preparation and Design-Build RFQ administration. Cost: $5.6 million

12. NAME 

Rajesh Chindalur, PE 



Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, 1994 

Bangalore University 

Masters of Civil Engineering, 2003 

University of Texas at Arlington 




Traffic & Transportation 

Planning & Engineering 

a. TOTAL 

King Engineering Associates, Inc., Jacksonville, FL 


17 



8 


Professional Engineer – Texas 99303 


a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e 



MOT Traffic Analysis, State and Union Street PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 


Phase 2, Duval County, FL 

2005 


Performed traffic analysis to determine the closing of two lanes on State and Union Streets between Clay Street and Liberty 

Street to expedite completion of construction of the street-scaping improvements on both streets would cause traffic on Union 

Street to back up onto I-95 and recommend a detour plan that would alleviate traffic congestion on State and Union Streets. 

Used Synchro/SimTraffic 6 to prepare capacity analysis and prepare a simulation of the corridors to project the back ups due to 

lane closure and determined how much traffic must be diverted during the AM and PM peak hours to prevent the back ups onto 

I-95 and the Mathews Bridge Expressway. 


Downtown Jacksonville Pedestrian Mobility 

and Safety Enhancement Study, Duval 

County, FL 


2011 




Project Engineer for the pilot study showed that enhancing pedestrian mobility and safety could be achieved by not adversely 

reducing automobile mobility of Downtown Patrons. As such, the City of Jacksonville authorized an expanded study to identify 

strategies for enhancing pedestrian mobility and safety along Adams Street, Monroe Street, Pearl Street and Julia Street. The 

study also included the portions of Clay Street and Monroe Street to be closed due to the construction of the new County 

courthouse. The study included changing these existing one-way streets to two-way streets, recommendations to exclusive 

turn lanes, on-street parking, signalization and access to surface parking lots within the existing width of road. Several traffic 

calming strategies that could be implemented were identified to enhance pedestrian walkability. 



San Marco Riverwalk Traffic Impact Study, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) 

Duval County, FL 

2006 


Project Engineer to analyze the traffic impacts of the project. Estimated the impact of this project on the Downtown Roadway 

network and intersections. This proposed project was the first to face the parameters outlined in the Downtown TCEA 

ordinance. As such, King and the JEDC worked extensively to quantify the benefits of the various TCEA strategies to the 

impacted roadway network. 



JTA Interchange Study, Duval County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) 

2005 


Transportation Planner/Engineer responsible for assisting in the analysis and results of the Phase II and Phase III Better 

Jacksonville Plan (BJP) Interchange Component Evaluation study for the Jacksonville Transportation Authority. The study was 

to evaluate four corridors in southeast Duval County to determine the best combination of improvements at selected study 

intersections on the corridors to reduce congestion and delay in the PM peak design hour (K 30) for the horizon year 2025 

traffic. Used Synchro 6/SimTraffic in the analysis to estimate delay and network speed. 



Corridor Study – SR 200 (A1A), Nassau 


County, FL 

2006 


Project Engineer responsible for the traffic study of the SR 200 (A1A) corridor to assess existing traffic conditions, estimate 

future traffic conditions and make recommendations for interim and long-term transportation improvements. Evaluated the 

effect of six proposed roadway projects in eastern Nassau County on SR 200 (A1A) for the year 2015 and year 2025 traffic 

conditions. The evaluation included the determination of the best combinations of proposed roadway projects that provided the 

most relief to SR 200 (A1A) in terms of congestion, delay and safety. Developed a benefit cost index for each of the project 

combinations and prioritized the projects.



12. NAME 

O. Denise Greer, P.E., LEED AP 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 

Civil Site Planning & Design 






a. TOTAL 

24 





7 

a. 

b. 

c. 


Fleet Services Bldg 

Manatee County, FL 



2008 




2009 

Project Manager for site development, design and permitting for a 20,000 sq ft design-build 12 bay fleet service facility on 

a 4.84 AC site with support offices, break room, records library, mezzanine, virgin fluids distribution to each bay, 

containment of recovered fluids. Scope also provided exterior landscaping and irrigation, retention pond, parking areas 

storm water piping, and utilities. Cost $2.27 million 


Janie Poe Neighborhood Redevelopment 

City of Sarasota, FL 


2007 




2009 

Principal-in-Charge / Project Manager for ±13.4 redevelopment project for the Sarasota Housing Authority. Project 

consisted of inquiry, design, permitting and construction management. Design included paving, grading water and 

wastewater, retrofit, stormwater design, FEMA map amendment. Property Management Building was LEED certified. 



Rothenbach Park Pavilion 

Sarasota County, FL 




2009 

2007 


Principal-In-Charge / Project Manager for coordination of permitting, utility extensions, surveying and construction 

management including bidding and contract negotiation services for the pavilion and playground site. King worked with 

Sarasota County’s project manager to insure that the pavilion and playground complemented the other park amenities, 

which were designed by others under a separate contract with Sarasota County. The playground areas have the latest in 

safe playground equipment and a soft mulch surface so kids can run and jump with reduced risk of injury. The pavilion 

offers restrooms, kitchen facilities with a roll up door for serving counter, a grill with warming oven, a fireplace, a 

maintenance room and two exterior gathering areas. Cost: $250,000 


Sleeping Turtles Preserve North 



2010 




On Hold 

d. 

e. 

Principal-In-Charge / Project Manager for providing preliminary drainage design for park layout and refinement of design. 

Preliminary design of the 92 acre site which is part of the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Protection Program and the 

Myakka River Protection Zone included ADA trails, an observation deck, vehicle/horse trailer parking, kayak launch, fishing 

pier, observation tower, pavilions, playground, amphitheater, vegetative restoration areas. Due to the location and 

environmentally sensitive nature of the site, all improvements were to be sensitive to the local ecology. Final design of the 

project included improved roadway design, pervious parking lot, boulder climbing playground, ADA trails, custom pavilion, 

composting restrooms, potable well design, stormwater treatment system and a floodplain compensation area. 

Cost: $360,000 


Manatee County BDS – Pelletizer Plant 



2007 




2008 

Principal-in-Charge / Engineer of Record for land use permitting and drainage design of new biosolids pelletizing plant at 

Manatee County’s Southeast Water Reclamation Facility. Cost: $14 million

12. NAME 

Misty M. Servia, AICP 





Land Use and Zoning 

a. TOTAL 

King Engineering Associates, Inc., Sarasota, FL 

23 



5 

Page 48 



B. S., Geography 


Memberships 

Manatee Habitat for Humanity Board of Directors 

Florida Planning and Zoning State Board of Directors 

Governmental Affairs Committee for the Gulf Coast Builders Exchange 

Manatee County Planning Task Force 

Awards 

“Meritorious Service Award” for participation in developing the 1990 Manatee County 

Land Development Code for Manatee County 

APA “Award of Merit” for being part of a three-person team that developed the 

“Manatee County Youth Planning Commission” 


a. 


Parrish Lakes DRI, Plan Amendment, Rezone, & General 

Dev Plan, Manatee County, FL 


Ongoing 




N/A 

Part of the team that created an ADA, Plan Amendment, and Rezone for a 1,150 acre, master planned, mixed-use project, 

including a town-center. The DRI contains 3,300 residential units, 400,000 square feet of commercial, and 50,000 square 

feet of office space. This project was recently filed with the Tampa Regional Planning Council & Manatee County. 

b. 


Harborview DRI and Plan Amendments, 

Charlotte County, FL 


Ongoing 




N/A 

Part of a team that was selected by the Developer in the middle of the project to carry the effort forward to approval. The 

efforts are ongoing and include responding to Sufficiency Comments for the addition of a 139-acre parcel to the existing 

Harborview DRI and filing two new Comprehensive Plan Amendments to support the project. 

c. 

d. 

e. 


Little Cypress Plan Amendment & Rezone, 

Hardee County, FL 


2008 



N/A 


Filed and received approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment in Hardee County to change the Future Land Use from 

AGR to RCN to allow for a mixed-use project. Efforts included negotiations with the City of Zolfo Springs to provide a 

future source potable water to the project and greater area. Ms. Servia also received approval of a rezone for Phase I of 

the project. 



Habitat for Humanity, Manatee County, FL 


2007 

N/A 


Worked with Manatee County to receive approval of a Rezone and Preliminary Site Plan for a planned development 

project that included 18 single family attached affordable housing project. This effort also included negotiating an off-site 

roadway improvement and working to secure a CDBG grant. 



Parrish Centre, Parrish, FL 


2008 

N/A 


Won approval of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment that revised the Future Land Use from UF-3 to MU to 

accommodate a 750-acre employment center for the Parrish community. Efforts included a 2-day design charette with a 

nationally recognized architect, development of an Urban Sprawl Analysis and Population Needs Analysis to support the 

amendment, and negotiations with the State of Florida that lead to an approval of the amendment.


12. NAME 

Lawrence F. Kistler 




Drainage (Erosion and Sediment Control / 

Site Grading & Stormwater Runoff 

Modeling & Design) 



a. TOTAL 

37 


19 


Ulster County Community College- Advanced Computer Training Institute 

17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND 

DISCIPLINE) 


a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State 

Wiregrass Ranch, Pasco County, FL 



PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable) 

Ongoing 

Est. 2020 


Operation Manager for various development projects for the Wiregrass Ranch. Completed Wiregrass project to consist of 

include 14,000 residential units, 2.2 million square feet of office, 100 bed hospital (60% near completion), 120 room hotel, a 

community college and 3.2 million square feet of commercial with multi-faceted development team. Project includes five 

school sites, mixed-use town center, regional retail centers and employment centers, a National Tennis Center. Recently 

completed- The Shops at Wiregrass for which he served as Operation Manager, Land Development for a 735,000 sf Life Style 

Center on 75.3 acres in Pasco County. Scope included boundary, tree and topographic survey, preliminary phase services, 

construction drawings for paving, grading, drainage, water and sewer infrastructure improvements, permitting and construction 

administration services for the design of this regional mall. Also serving as District Engineer for the Wiregrass Community 

Development District. Cost: TBD 


Marine Science Research Center at USF, St. Pete Campus, St. 

Petersburg, FL 


2004 


CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable) 

2004 


Project Manager in charge of preparing the pans and specifications for the paving, grading, drainage, water and sewer systems 

for this 4.8 acre project. Worked with the architect to develop conceptual and final plans for this extremely tight marine science 

center site. Prepared plans for the relocation of utilities, which remained in service during construction, including water, sewer, 

gas, steam and telephone. Land surveying, traffic maintenance, environmental permitting and construction management 

services were also provided Cost: $24 million 


Criminal Court Facility, Pinellas County, FL 


1998-99 



2000 


Provided design, permitting, and surveying for the site engineering of this $60 million judicial complex at 49th Street. Managed 

the preparation of engineering, public utility, and environmental permitting/resource issues in the preparation of a Florida 

Quality Development Application for Development Approval. Also designed a water reuse distribution system and access to 

remote parking areas. King assisted in the coordination of two bridges over a canal between the two parking lots. During 

construction, King provided NPDES permitting and monitoring services, which consisted of evaluating stormwater runoff to 

ensure there was no degradation of water quality due to construction activity. 

Cost: $60 million 


Liberty Middle School/ Freedom High School aka Middle School 

JJ and High School JJJ, Hillsborough County, FL 


2003 



2003 


Project Manager for civil engineering and boundary survey for the park, environmental audit, and environmental permitting, 

which included an EPC, ACOE, and SWFWMD permits, and gopher tortoise study for a 148-acre campus for two new schools 

and a new city park (Tampa Community Park) for the Hillsborough County School Board. Liberty Middle School 

accommodates 1,537 students. Freedom High School sits on approximately 55 acres and serves 2,485 students and 229,000 

sf, The 40-acre Tampa community park was designed for the City of Tampa and included parking for 250, a 15,000 sf 

recreation building, a Park Maintenance Operations building and various shelter pavilions and restroom facilities. Cost: $40.25 

million 


Heritage Pines, Pasco County, FL 


2008 



2008 


Operations Manager, Land Development for this retirement community of 1,445 units on 650 acres in Pasco County. Services 

included preparation of Notice of Proposed Change to DRI and MPUD for Pasco County; preparation of engineering, master 

plans for master drainage, sanitary sewer, water distribution system and reuse system; and environmental permitting. This 

project also included plan production for Villages, as well as an 18-hole championship golf course. Cost: Est. $30 million

12. NAME 

Alberto Pisani, EI 



M.S. Environmental Engineering, Florida International 

University, 2011 

B.S. Civil Engineering, Florida International University, 

2008 




Engineering Analysis / Cost Estimate / 

Reports / Permitting / Construction 

Documents / Specifications 

a. TOTAL 


3 



1 


Engineer Intern Florida No. 1100012190 


Mr. Pisani has three years of experience in the fields of civil and environmental engineering. His technical experience includes SFWMD 

water use permitting for commercial developments; environmental permitting for rock quarries in South Florida; writing technical reports; 

water main and sanitary sewer design, permitting, and submittal of plans for review to City and County regulating agencies; and drainage 

calculations (exfiltration trench, drainage well, and detention/retention pond) to meet SFWMD flood criteria. Mr. Pisani is proficient in 

AutoCAD/Autodesk, ArcGIS, ICPR, HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS, and Access database. 

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 



MDWASD Miami Springs Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey 

(SSES), Miami Springs, FL 




2015 

2010 


This project involved performing a preliminary alternative pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to 

an existing 42-Inch force main which discharges at a manhole at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and 

the existing 48-Inch force main in the same vicinity. 



MDWASD 48" Water Main Interconnect in the Central East 

Area Route Analysis, Miami, FL 




2014 

2010 


The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of Downtown Miami needs to be 

completed from the existing 48-Inch water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th Street and south to an 

existing 36-Inch water main along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. This project involved 

performing a preliminary alternative water main route analysis in order to interconnect the existing 48-Inch 

water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-Inch on NW 6 Street. Engineering 


MDWASD Miami Springs Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey, 

Miami Springs, FL 




2010 

2010 


The project involves construction management and inspection of a Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey 

(SSES) for a portion of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) wastewater collection 

system within the City of Miami Springs, Florida. The sanitary sewer collection system consists of 

approximately 46 miles of gravity pipes, 912 manholes, and 17 separate wastewater collection basins 

within the City of Miami Springs, Florida. Engineering 


MDWASD Pump Station Engineering Reports (6) and Pump 

Station 717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation, Miami, FL 




2012 

2010 


King Engineering was awarded this continuing services contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable 

Distribution Work Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify 

existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force mains, pump 

stations preliminary engineering, determine its sizes and determine the best route for the proposed force 

mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine 

a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule. Engineering 


City of Florida City Roadway Improvement, Florida City, 

Florida 




2010 

2008 


The project involved the resurfacing of NW 3 rd Avenue in the City of Florida City from Lucy Street to Davis 

Parkway. Prepared paving, grading, and drainage plans to bring up to City and County code the roadway 

being resurfaced, including sidewalks and intersections.

12. NAME 

Peter J. Bottone 



B.A., Biology 




Ecological Services 

a. TOTAL 

28 



Certifications: 

Certified USACE Wetland Delineator 

Basic Prescribed Fire Training-Certificate No. 932325 

PADI Certified 

Memberships: 

Florida Native Plant Society 

Trout Unlimited 

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 



Robinson Preserve Habitat Restoration, Manatee County, FL 



5 





2008 

2005 


Project Manager and lead ecologist responsible for development of a conceptual restoration plan and construction design for the 487-acre 

Robinson Preserve. This regionally significant Manatee County project was co-funded by the SBNEP, FDEP, SWIM and USFWS and will 

be the largest of its kind under the SBNEP. The project will result in the creation of 104.5 acres of estuarine and palustrine wetlands, 55 

acres of upland and estuarine habitat enhancements and will incorporate various passive recreational features including a 2.5-mile kayak 

trail (blueway) system, fishing pier, numerous boardwalks, observation platforms and over 5 miles of hiking and multi-use pedestrian 

trails. Cost: $100,000 


Coral Creek Ecosystem Restoration, SWFWMD 




N/A 

Ongoing 


Project Manger responsible for development of a conceptual habitat restoration master plan and the construction design/ implementation 

of two habitat restoration projects on the 2,600-acre Coral Creek Property within the FDEP’s Charlotte Harbor Aquatic State Buffer 

Preserve for the SWFWMD SWIM program. Activities include habitat assessments, hydrological analysis, protected species evaluations, 

ecosystem restoration design, multi-agency coordination and permitting. Critical project elements include analysis of hydrological and 

salinity effects related to the potential removal of dam structure on the West Branch of Coral Creek and diversion of flows leaving the 

Rotonda West development to restore historic site hydrology. 

Cost: $300,000 


I-75 from Golden Gate Pkwy to Bonita Beach Road Final 

Design 




N/A 

2005 


Collier and Lee Counties, Florida. Project Manager responsible for overseeing wetland jurisdictional determinations, protected species, 

wetland impact and UMAM/WRAP assessments, agency coordination, mitigation, and permitting for 10 miles of interstate improvements 

associated with FDOT’S Mobility 2000 Improvements. Project entailed updating various FHWA/NEPA documentation including the 2002 

Endangered Species Biological Assessment and Pond Siting Report, and required additional coordination with the USFWS/FWC 

regarding potential impacts to several protected species such as the Florida panther, wood stork, eastern indigo snake, and the redcockaded 

woodpecker. Cost: $120,000 


Alligator Creek Restoration, Charlotte County, FL 




2001 

2000 


Project Ecologist responsible for development of a master conceptual restoration plan and construction design of two restoration projects 

on the FDEP-owned and managed 1,600-acre Alligator Creek Addition Parcel for the Charlotte Harbor SWIM Program and FDEPs 

Charlotte Harbor State Preserve Park. Activities include habitat assessments, wetland delineations, protected species evaluations, 

restoration design integrated with the existing trail system and FDEP management strategies, multi-agency coordination and permitting. 

The resulting Conceptual Restoration Plan was used by SWIM/FDEP as a basis for subsequent planning, budgeting and implementation 

of numerous habitat restoration projects in two additional Phases (2 &3). Cost: $140,000 


I-4 Widening, Polk County, FL 


2000 



2007 


Environmental Project Manager responsible for providing environmental permitting assistance for a 5.8-mile Multi-Modal I-4 Widening 

project through the Green Swamp. Activities included wetland jurisdictional determinations, threatened/endangered species 

assessments, wildlife corridor siting analysis, planning and crossing design, pond siting analysis, mitigation design, agency coordination 

and permit application preparation. Served on the Multi-Agency I-4 Corridor Advisory Committee representing FDOT in providing 

coordination with various stakeholders including FDEP, SWFMWD, SJRWMD, FWC and Polk County for long-range facility planning. 

Cost: $128,000



12. NAME 

Michael D. Palmer 



B.S., Biology 



a. TOTAL 

25 




23 



Memberships: Gopher-Tortoise Council 

Certifications: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Scientific Collecting Permit No. WV00464, FWC Gopher Tortoise Agent Permit 

No. GTA-09-00026 

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 



Odessa Northeast Segment Reclaimed Water Transmission Main, 

Odessa, FL 


2007 




On Hold 

Performed wetland delineations and prepared permit applications for approximately 20 miles of 20 and 24-inch 

reclaimed water transmission main, including roughly 48 wetlands and two river crossings. Cost: $3.5 million 


Phase 2 Regional Interconnect, Peace River Manasota Regional 

Water Supply Authority 


Ongoing 




2012 

Ecological Services Coordinator for the permitting of the project. Completed and filed FDEP ERP Individual 

permits for the 42-inch regional transmission main and also for the replacement of existing culverts. 

Completed gopher tortoise burrow field survey and filed a gopher tortoise temporary exclusion permit for the 

project. Cost: $17 million 


Bridge Replacement Wetland Mitigation Area Creation, Tampa 

Bay and Coastal Basin, Hillsborough County, FL 


2001 



2003 


Field Ecologist involved with the wetland delineation and permitting associated with the 15 mile pipeline 

corridor interconnecting the desalination facility at the Big Bend Power Plant and the water treatment facility 

north of State Highway 60. This project required approvals from Florida Department of Environmental 

Protection, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County 

and involved the subaqueous crossing of the Alafia River and Little Bullfrog Creek along with numerous 

wetland and surface water areas. Cost $112 million 


North-Central Pasco Reclaimed Water Main, Pasco County, FL 


2007 




2008 

Ecological Services Task Manager responsible for coordinating listed species assessments, gopher tortoise 

survey and permitting, wetland delineation and environmental resource permitting for this 22 mile proposed 

pipeline installation project. Conducted alternative routing and feasibility analysis. Cost: Est. $21 million 


Tampa Bay Desalination Facility Project, Hillsborough County, FL 


2001 



2003 


Provided professional consulting services to the Hillsborough County Public Works Department, which 

included coordination, conceptual design, and base data collection for the identification of potential bridge 

wetland mitigation areas within the specific SWFWMD ERP Drainage Basin known as the Tampa Bay and 

Coastal Basin. Also provided coordination of any associated acquisition of identified bridge wetland mitigation 

area, design of the bridge wetland mitigation area, assistance in the permitting of the bridges' wetland 

mitigation, and coordination of the mitigation area construction. This project resulted in the construction of two 

mitigation sites within the Tampa Bay and Coastal Basin. Cost: $112 million

12. NAME 

Joshua Logan, P.E. 




Construction Engineering Inspection 




B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Florida, 2000 

M.S., Engineering, University of Florida, 2002 


Memberships 


a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

a. TOTAL 

10 



Professional Engineering License FL#67467 



Master Pump Station B Refurbishments, Temple Terrace, FL 


2007 



4 


ongoing 


Project Engineer and Construction Field Representative providing construction oversight assistance for the 

demolition of an existing wet pit/dry pit wastewater pump station, the construction of a new submersible 

pump station and the installation of approximately 1,460 LF of 16-inch force main including a 755 LF 

directional drill under the Hillsborough River. Cost: $1 million. 


Largo Lift Station 23 & 40, Largo, FL 


2007 



2008 


Project Engineer and Construction Field Representative providing design input and resolution to all RFI's 

throughout the construction process. Services provided the complete refurbishment of two existing pump 

stations. Action items included the demolition and replacement of all valves, pumps, wire racks, wetwell 

liner, valve vaults, top slabs, hatches, float switches, antennas and control panels. Cost: $200,000. 


Lake Avenue Pump Station and Force Main, Largo, FL 


2008 



est 2011 - force main 

only 


Provide survey, hydraulic analysis, design, bidding, and construction observation services for the installation 

of approximately 9,200 lf of 10-inch and 24-inch force main through commercial and residential areas. Role: 

Project Engineer responsible for design and permitting of a pump station upgrade and ±9,200 LF of 10 and 

24-inch force main through a congested residential area. Role: Construction Engineering 


Ulmerton Road Utility Relocation, Largo, FL 


2008 




2008 

Project Engineer overseeing utility relocation on approximately 6,000 linear feet of 4-inch and 8-inch force 

main as well as 1500 feet of gravity sewer main with associated manhole relocation and construction. Duties 

included attendance at weekly progress coordination meetings, coordination with and between FDOT and 

the Utility owners, field oversight of the contractor. The project consisted of the widening and resurfacing of 

approximately 3.8 miles of 4 lane roadway (SR-688) in Largo, FL. The widening included two new lanes and 

resurfacing of all existing pavement within the project limits. Cost: $1.2 million. 


North Central Pasco Reclaimed Main & Force Main 



2010 



2011 

e. 


Route study, planning and design and permitting of approximately 7.5 miles of 36" potable water main, 36" 

reclaimed water main, and 8.5 miles of 12" and 16" force main serving the north-central area of Pasco 

County. Role: Construction Engineering

12. NAME 

Hamley Pacheco, EI 




Construction Management / Observation, 

Inspection / Shop Drawing Review 




a. TOTAL 

2 




2 

Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, 2009 

Engineer Intern # 1100013845 


Experience in Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES), construction management, inspections, design, and administration. Construction 

engineering inspections experience includes daily site inspections, shop drawing review, testing and certification of materials, and payment 

requests review. Proficient in AutoCAD, GIS, and Microsoft Office. 



MDWASD Miami Springs Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES) 

Miami Springs, FL 


2010 



2010 

a. 

b. 


The project involves construction management and inspection of a Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES) for a 

portion of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) wastewater collection system within the City of 

Miami Springs, Florida. The sanitary sewer collection system consists of approximately 46 miles of gravity pipes, 925 

manholes, and 17 separate wastewater collection basins within the City of Miami Springs, Florida. 

Construction Management / Inspection / Evaluation / Repair Recommendations /Smoke Testing. 



Doral, FL 


2010 



2011 


Major project components included emergency lake intake structure, propeller meter (2), 2 MG above ground storage 

tank, 3,000 gpm stormwater pump station, 130 micron disk filters with automatic backwash, bleach disinfection system, 

1,400 gpm irrigation pumps, 7,000 feet of 12-inch diameter main, irrigation system, and automated controls. The project 

was partially funded by a $1M AWS grant from the SFWMD. 

Construction Management / Inspection. 



717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation 


2010 



N/A 

c. 

d. 

e. 


BODR Assistance for six pump station engineering reports and the associated force main system that included field 

inspections, pump station evaluation, hydraulic analysis, cost analysis, alternatives analysis, and pump upgrade 

recommendations. The project involved the analysis of several alternatives in order to best serve the sewer system 

during 2030 projected flows and pressures. Pump stations were inspected for wet well condition, dry pit condition, pump 

sizing, mechanical and electrical requirements, and overall siting. 

Cost Estimate / Utility Coordination 


MDWASD 48-inch Water Main Interconnect in the Central East Area 

Route Analysis 


2010 



N/A 


The project involved a 48-inch water main route analysis required to interconnect the Hialeah/Preston service area in the 

north with the Alexander Orr service area in the south with a 48-inch water transmission main. The project spanned 1.5 

miles along the selected route in roads with heavy traffic and congested utilities. 

Cost Estimate / Utility Coordination. 


MDWASD - CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 60-inch Forcemain 

Connection Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis 


2010 



N/A 


This project involved performing a preliminary alternative pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to an existing 

42-Inch force main which discharges at a manhole at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and the existing 48-Inch force 

main in the same vicinity. 

Cost Estimate / Utility Coordination.

12. NAME 

Scott D. Sheridan, RLA 



B.S., Environmental Planning and Design 




Neighborhood Beautification, 

Presentation Materials 

a. TOTAL 


16 




Registered Landscape Architect, State of Florida, No. LA0001662 

8 


Memberships 

American Planning Association 

American Society of Landscape Architects 

International Society of Arborist 

a. 



Florida VANC Columbaria at the Florida National Cemetery Expansion - 5000 

Crypt Expansion, Sumter County, FL 


PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable) 

2003 

2004 

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x] Check if project performed with current firm 

Provided landscape architectural design services for the expansion of the existing Florida National Cemetery located in Bushnell, Florida. 

This design/build project consisted of approximately 5,000 double crypts, 1,000 columbaria units, and 2,700 in ground cremation plots. The 

scope of work for this $4,000,000 project required conceptual planning, civil engineering, geotechnical, landscape architecture, irrigation, 

structural, and surveying services from King. Cost: $4,000,000 


Koll - Intellicenter – Tampa, FL 


2007 



2008 

b. 

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE 

[x] Check if project performed with current firm 

This LEED project involved a class-A office development of 370,000+ SF on 30 m.o.l. in the master planned office park of Telecom Park in 

Temple Terrace, Florida. Telecom Park is a 340+ acre park on the east side of the Hillsborough River between the University of South Florida 

and I-75 on Fletcher Avenue. The office site consists of one 4-story and on 3-story office building with at-grade parking among native tree 

canopy. The master landscaping was planned to compliment the park’s atmosphere of a natural setting by maintaining as much tree canopy 

as possible within the development. The project received USGBC Silver Certification. Estimated Construction Cost: $20 million 



University of South Florida, Interdisciplinary Research Building, Tampa, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable) 

2003 

2005 


c. 

Provided project oversight for the landscape and hardscape designs for new $22 million research facilities on campus. King provided 

landscape and hardscape architecture for the newly constructed research and office facilities in University of South Florida's Research 

Corporate Park. Responsible for the landscape architecture design treatments needed to incorporate into the design styles of both buildings, 

as well as provide a pedestrian experience that compliments both of the entries into the building. The design also provided for the utilization 

of many existing grand oaks and the use of native Florida plants, which allowed for effective xeriscaping principles. Cost: $22 million 


Skycrest Traffic Calming, Clearwater, FL 


2005 



2008 

d. 


Neighborhood traffic calming project included the preparation of design plans, landscape and irrigation plans, contract specifications, and 

provide bidding services for the construction of 6 modern roundabouts, 5 mini circles, continuous medians, drainage improvements, and 

various other traffic calming improvements. Provide landscape design for Skycrest neighborhood traffic calming. Includes six roundabouts, 

stormwater design, traffic study, roadway design, specifications, and limited construction administration services. Cost: $1.6 million 


South Glen Avenue/Burlingame Avenue Reconstruction 

Temple Terrace, FL 


2005 



2006 

e. 


This project included the preparation of design plans to reconstruct 2.2 miles of 2-lane, local, urban roadways. Services included topography 

survey, jurisdictional wetland survey, traffic design, master drainage study and stormwater design, environmental permitting, Hillsbrorough 

County Health Department permitting, roadway design, maintenance of traffic, signing and marking plans, and potable water plans, the use of 

two CDS units for stormwater pollution control and close coordination with the Temple Terrace Country Club.

12. NAME 

Clark C. Lohmiller 





Landscape Design, GIS/Mapping 


a. TOTAL 

7 



7 


BS Landscape Architecture, 2006 

University of Florida 



a. 


Temple Terrace Downtown Redevelopment 




2008 




N/A 

Rezoning and detailed landscape and irrigation design services for a 30 acre mixed use redevelopment project as part of 

the first phase of the City’s CRA plan. In addition, 3D graphics and conceptual renderings were provided and were 

included in the presentation to City Council. Fee: $24,000 

b. 


Largo Towne Center 

Largo, FL 


2008 




N/A 

Largo Towne Center, a redevelopment of the old Crossroad Mall on US 19, was proposed to consist of approximately 

600,000 sf of retail (including restaurants), 286 apartments, a town center and two parking structures. Services provided 

by King were as follows: site designing and permitting, survey and landscape. Fee: $838,000 

c. 


Peck Sink Preserve 

Hernando County, FL 


2011 




Ongoing 

Responsible for review of all graphic and GIS data analysis for a stormwater improvement and public education park site 

located in central Hernando County. GIS services included: GIS data analysis; imagery and field data in the site inventory. 

Reviewed illustrations, master plan and interpretative educational park concept for this stormwater improvement project. 


d. 


South County Solid Waste Transfer Station Expansion 



2007 




2010 

Provided design and permitting for right of way buffering and screening. Landscaping utilized native vegetations of trees, 

shrubs and ground covers. Also incorporated a large berm for screening of noise and to provide enhancement of the 

roadway corridor. Design also included landscape irrigation system. Cost: $19.4 million 

e. 


Intellicenter – Tampa Phase 1 

Tampa, FL 


2007 




2008 

This LEED project involved a class-A office development of 370,000+ SF on 30 mol. in the master planned office park of 

Telecom Park in Temple Terrace, Florida. Telecom Park is a 340+ acre park on the east side of the Hillsborough River 

between the University of South Florida and I-75 on Fletcher Avenue. The office site consists of one 4-story and on 3-story 

office building with at-grade parking among native tree canopy. The master landscaping was planned to compliment the 

park’s atmosphere of a natural setting by maintaining as much tree canopy as possible within the development. 

Cost: $20 million

12. NAME 

Timothy W. Schram, Sr., PSM 



Sinclair Community College, Dayton Ohio 

Middle Georgia College, Cochran Georgia 




Surveyor 

a. TOTAL 

King Engineering Associates, Inc., Jacksonville Florida 

33 




6 

Florida – Professional Surveyor and Mapper LS6533 


He is active in his professions regional and national societies including the Florida Surveying and Mapping Society. He has specialized training 

in GPS and machine control technology. 


a. 


J.C. Bermudez Park, City of Doral, Boundary, Topographic & 

Specific Purpose Survey, Miami-Dade County, FL - 




2010 

2011 


Boundary, topographic, tree and utility location survey of an 80 acre City of Doral public park. The project required an updated survey of 

all improvement s within and adjacent to the park boundary. This included all site improvements, private and public utility locations and 

adjoining improvements within 25 feet of the project boundary. Adjoining improvements within the right of way of NW 87 th Avenue, NW 

33 rd Street and NW 29 th Street were included in the project scope. A combination of V.R.S. GPS, robotic total stations and electronic 

levels were utilized in gathering the project field data. All data was processed daily and checked for completeness to alleviate or 

minimize return trips to the site. 

b. 

c. 

d. 


U.S Coast Guard Housing Complex, Miami-Dade County Boundary 

and Record Survey, Miami-Dade County, FL - 




2010 

n/a 


Boundary, topographic, tree and utility location survey of a 40 acre former U.S. Coast Guard housing campus. The site required 

complete record survey of all improvements including 38 structures, site improvements, private utility locations and adjoining 

improvements within 50 feet of the project boundary. The project schedule required completion and delivery within 30 calendar days 

from NTP. All work was completed and delivered within 26 calendar days. A combination of V.R.S. GPS, robotic total stations and 

electronic levels were utilized in gathering the project field data. All data was processed daily and checked for completeness to alleviate 

or minimize return trips to the site. 


BODR Miami-Dade County WSA; PS-717 Sewer Forcemain System 

Evaluation, Miami-Dade County, FL - 




2010 

2011 


Provided GPS location services to geo reference six existing pump stations in the Pinecrest area of Miami-Dade County. Along with 

completing GPS location survey of improvements, measured as-builts of each lift station including wet wells, structures, mechanical, 

electrical and piping. This provided the Client with an existing conditions survey for inventory and base information for future design of 

upgrades and re-construction. 


BODR CL-1 Pump Station to C-2 Forcemain Connection Alternative 

Pipe Route Analysis, Miami-Dade County, FL - 




2010 

2011 


Provided GPS project control, existing utility mapping, drainage improvements and existing conditions survey along a 6,000 lineal foot 

corridor in urban Miami-Dade. Included GPS control network for alignment of existing utility and base mapping. GPS location of existing 

conditions, storm water structures and all existing visible utilities. The field mapped data was placed in a route analysis base map for 

providing preliminary design and alignment of the proposed new 60” forcemain. All data was geo referenced in Florida State Plane 

coordinates for insertion into aerial base maps to be included in the alternative route analysis report. 


Miami-Dade Cooperative Extension / Agricultural Center, Boundary, 

Limited Topographic & Specific Purpose Survey, Miami-Dade 

County, FL 




2010 


e. 

Boundary, limited topographic, tree and utility location survey of a portion of a 5 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Biscayne 

Drive (SW 288th Street) and Redland Road (SW 187th Avenue) in the Homestead area. The project required an updated survey of all 

improvements within and adjacent to the Agricultural Center property. This included all site improvements, private and public utility 

locations and adjoining improvements within 25 feet of the project boundary. Adjoining improvements within the right of way of SW 

187th Avenue and SW 288th Street were included in the project scope. A combination of V.R.S. GPS, robotic total stations and 

electronic levels were utilized in gathering the project field data. All data was processed daily and checked for completeness to alleviate 

return trips to the site. The project required that the final survey product be delivered within a four week time line. 

STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004) PAGE 1

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 

(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 

Complete one Section F for each project.) 

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 

Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan, Town of Lauderdale- 

By-The-Sea, FL 

a. PROJECT OWNER 

Lauderdale by-the-Sea 

Municipal Services 

4501 Ocean Drive 

Lauderdale by-the-Sea, FL 33308 

23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION 

b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME 

Mr. Don Prince 

Municipal Services Director 


2010 

22. YEAR COMPLETED 

20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY 

NUMBER 

1 


c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 

954-776-5119 

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) 

King was retained by the Town of Lauderdale-By-The-Sea (LBTS) to provide sanitary sewer system evaluation, 

analysis and engineering services for their “Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan”. The sanitary sewer 

collection system consists of two separate wastewater collection basins with approximately 10.5 miles of gravity 

pipes, 165 manholes and two pump stations (60 HP and 7.5 HP) with their respective force mains. 

The project involved conducting evaluations to quantify the needs of the existing gravity sewer system, flow 

meter, and lift stations, recommend improvements, prepare cost estimates, and develop a Sanitary Sewer Capital 

Improvements Plan (SSCIP). The work performed included: 

• Video review of 165 CCTV inspections – 632 defects were identified. 

• Assign repair recommendations based on approved repair protocol – 252 repairs were recommended. 

• Flow meter evaluation – (1) verified meter was installed as per manufacture’s specifications (2) reviewed 

calibration records. 

• Inspection and evaluation of two lift stations including hydraulic analysis, spacing requirements and 

electrical requirements – various minor repairs were recommended. 

• Infiltration and inflow (I/I) evaluation, including the development of dry and wet weather hydrographs for 

each lift station – analysis identified both stations as rain dependent I/I (RDII). 

• Prepared a comprehensive SSCIP report to assist the town of LBTS in planning ongoing maintenance, 

system repairs and upgrades, and quantifying the potential savings from the implementation of an 

Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) program. 

The SSCIP plan included the costs of repairs to the gravity sewer lines and two lift stations as well as the 

replacement costs of the lift stations and other key components of the sewer system. In addition, it included costs 

related to a proposed Gravity Sewer System Capacity Evaluation Hydraulic Model, proposed Lift Station 

Monitoring Program, proposed Suspect Lateral I/I Program, and I/I Reduction Maintenance Program. 

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT 

a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


b. King Engineering Associates, Inc. 

(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 

Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Planning, design 

(3) ROLE 

Planning, design






Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department Basis of Design Reports 


Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department 

3071 SW 38 th Avenue 




Dan Edwards, P.E. 

Chief – Planning Section 


On-Going 



NUMBER 

2 



786-552-8354 

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, 

size, and cost) 

King Engineering was awarded this continuing services 

contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable Distribution Work 

Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify 

Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of- 

Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force 

mains, pump stations preliminary engineering, determine its 

sizes and determine the best route for the proposed force 

mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of 

probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of 

required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project 

schedule. These projects to date include: 

1) Pump Station Engineering Reports (six) and Pump 

Station 717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation 

King Engineering Associates, Inc. (King) has been selected 

by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to 

provide engineering services in the preparation of Basis of 

Design Reports. This work assignment involves preparing 

pump station engineering reports for six pump station 

upgrades, analyzing the proposed Pump Station (PS) 717 

sewer forcemain system and providing alternative forcemain 

recommendations. These Pump Stations are as follows: 

717, 719, 728, 730, 738, and 739. 

As part of the analysis, the following criteria were considered: 

• Force main’s maintenance issues solved (4-Inch PS 717 force main and 10-Inch golf course force main) 

• No “piggy backs” 

• No property issues (New booster pump station only) 

• Smaller pump station, less total dynamic head 

• Flow diversion availability (72-Inch force main) 

• Cost effectiveness 

• No under utilization of PS 709 

2) 48-inch Water main Interconnect in the Central East Area (Downtown Miami) Preliminary Alternative 

Water Main Route Analysis: The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of 

Downtown Miami needs to be completed from the existing 48-Inch water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th 

Street and south to an existing 36-Inch water main along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. 

This project involved performing a preliminary alternative water main route analysis in order to interconnect the 

existing 48-Inch water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-Inch on NW 6 Street. The size of the 

interconnect water main was determined via modeling by MDWASD to be 48-Inch water main. The proposed 

interconnect will improve water service in MDWASD’s service area, including but not delimited to the AA Arena, 

Fisher Island, Overtown, Port of Miami and the Village of Key Biscayne. Currently, when several cruise ships are 

being filled with water concurrently, and the existing 24-Inch water main on the Rickenbacker Causeway is 

closed, Key Biscayne and Fisher Island do not receive adequate water supply. Therefore, the existing 30-Inch 

and 24-Inch on NW 6 Street from approximately NW 1st Court to Biscayne Blvd were paralleled with a new 36- 

Inch water main in order to improve the available water supply in the area. 

Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the

points of connection of the proposed force main, determine its size (48-Inch) and determine the best route for the 

proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to 

determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 7,300 feet of 48-Inch Water 

main in the Miami Downtown area. 

3) CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain Connection 

Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis: 

MDWASD has three wastewater treatment plants: South 

District Wastewater Treatment Plant (SDWWTP), North 

District Wastewater Treatment Plant (NDWWTP), and 

Central District Wastewater Treatment Plant (CDWWTP). 

The CDWWTP is one of two regional wastewater 

treatment plants that currently discharge wastewater 

through ocean outfalls. Pursuant to the requirements of 

Chapter 2008-232, Laws of Florida Domestic Wastewater 

Ocean Outfalls, the discharge of domestic wastewater 

through ocean outfalls in Florida will be prohibited after 

December 31, 2025. Currently, MDWASD is developing 

plans to divert flow from the CDWWTP to other 

wastewater treatment plants, including a proposed West 

District Water Reclamation Plant (WDWRP) and the 

SDWWTP. The proposed interconnection evaluated in 

this analysis would allow for wastewater flow from Pump 

Station 1 (PS 1) and Pump Station 2 (PS 2) to be diverted 

to the proposed WDWRP and the SDWWTP. 

This project involved performing a preliminary alternative 

pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to an 

existing 42-Inch force main which discharges at a manhole 

at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and the existing 

48-Inch force main in the same vicinity. The interconnect 

force main size was determined by MDWASD to be a 60- 

Inch force main as a result of modeling showing that a 60- 

Inch force main parallel to the existing 48-Inch force main on NW 2nd Street would provide sufficient pumping 

capacity. The project begins on NW 6th Avenue where the point of connection with the existing 84-Inch 

forcemain will be identified. The project then extends west and then north along a route to be determined to NW 

6th Street/NW 13th Avenue where the point of connection with the existing 42-Inch force main will be identified. 

Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the 



determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 5,700 feet of 60-Inch 

Forcemain near the Miami Downtown area. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



c. King Engineering Associates, Inc. 


Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 



(3) ROLE 

Environmental Engineering 

(3) ROLE 


(3) ROLE 

Surveying and Mapping






CSX – Terminal Pavement Management Plan Update 





2009 



NUMBER) 

3 


NA 


CSX Intermodal, Inc. 

Chris Durden 

301 W. Bay Street, Suite 2700 


904-633-1306 


King has been contracted by CSX Intermodal to conduct surveys of their intermodal terminals. For 

Phase 1 & 2 of this project King conducted surveys for 21 terminals in 13 different states, covering 

nearly 5 million square yards of pavement. Phase 3, which consists of surveys of 11 terminals in 10 

different states, covering over 1 million square yards of pavement, is set to proceed in the near future. 

CSX is a repeat client, having retained the firm of Infrastructure Technology, Inc. (acquired by King 

Engineering Associates, Inc. in 2002) to implement a pavement management program (PMP) for 12 

intermodal terminals, during the early to mid 1990’s. 

The platform for this analysis will be the proprietary software, Infrastructure Management System IV 

(IMS IV). This system is used to justify the use of capital funds for investment in rehabilitative and 

restorative pavement repairs on an annual basis at selected intermodal terminals to extend the life of 

the asphalt and concrete pavements. 

Project Cost: $881,357 


(1) FIRM NAME 


(3) ROLE 

a. 



Data Collection, 

Analysis, Reporting






Miscellaneous General Civil Engineering Services 



Hillsborough County Public Works Department 

601 E. Kennedy Boulevard 

22 nd Floor 




Tom Fass 

Section Manager, Dept. of 

Public Works 



2011 



NUMBER 

4 


Various Project 

Completion Dates 


813-307-1711 

King has been contracted by Hillsborough County to provide general/civil services for a two-year period 

since 1987. Under this miscellaneous civil engineering contract, King provides services on small and 

medium-sized projects from intersection surveys to wastewater treatment plant design services. The 

surveying, civil, environmental engineering, transportation and water resource groups all benefit from 

projects under these contracts. 

Engineering services include planning, program development, 

design, and construction management for general/civil projects in 

the areas of road and transportation, stormwater, solid waste, parks, 

sitework, environmental permitting, traffic analysis and landscaping. 

The projects executed under this contract include: 

• Intersection Program Master Plan Update 

• Waters Avenue & Hanley Road Intersection Improvements 

• US 301 & Balm Riverview Road 

• Benjamin & Waters Construction Administration 

• Columbus Drive Design 

• School Safety, Circulation and Access Program-S.S.C.A.P. 

• N. Mobley Road Improvements 

• Railroad Crossing Quiet Zone Study 

• Railroad Crossing Design 

• South County Solid Waste Transfer Station Leachate Collection 

System Improvements 

• South County Solid Waste Transfer Station FDEP Operating 

Permit Renewal 

• Falkenburg Yard Waste Processing Facility Improvements 

• South County Solid Yard Waste Processing Facility design, 

permitting and construction management services 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Planning, design, permitting 

and construction.






Skycrest Neighborhood Traffic Calming, Streetscape, Round-a-bouts, 






2008 



NUMBER 

5 


2008 


City of Clearwater 

Mr. Ken Sides, P.E. 

Sr. Professional Engineer 

727-562-4792 


King provided roadway and drainage design plans, technical specifications, and construction assistance for the 

construction of multiple roadway traffic calming features for the Skycrest neighborhood near downtown 

Clearwater. Services included: 

• Design for four (4) roundabouts along Cleveland Street, an east-west 3-lane minor collector, intersecting 2- 

lane residential streets. One of the roundabouts sits adjacent to an elementary school and serves as a school 

crossing. 

• Design of five (5) mini-roundabouts along several intersecting 2-lane residential streets 

• Coordinate design elements with all users and develop custom design templates for City vehicles to ensure 

that roundabout geometry serves the appropriate vehicles. 

• Landscape and Irrigation design plans 

• Utility relocation 

• Stormwater design and permitting. 

• Design of other traffic calming features including Diagonal Diverters, Speed Tables, landscaped median 

islands, hardscape elements, and roadway bulb-outs (tree wells) to reduce pavement widths at specific 

locations 

Cost $2.4 million 

Fee $354,895.00 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 


and construction.




US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection 

Improvements 



Hillsborough County – Florida 

601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 22 nd Floor 



2011 



William Alford 

Project Manager 

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and 

cost) 

King prepared a PD&E study to determine what roadway capacity 

improvements needed to be made and evaluated several 

alternative roadway alignments for the intersection. King is now 

preparing design plans for the construction of the proposed 

improvements. Professional services under the scope of the project 

include: 

• Topographic survey and right-of-way mapping 

• Traffic operation studies and modeling analysis 

• Roadway and stormwater design 

• Pond siting analysis and design 

• Permitting 

• Wetland/environmental impact assessment and 

mitigation design environmental permitting 

• Traffic signal design 

• Public involvement/meetings 

• Utility coordination and design 

• Right-of-way impact assessment 

• Subsurface utility exploration 

• Geotechnical investigation 

• Structural analysis 

Cost: $1.5 Million 


20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER 

8 


TBD 


813-307-1920 

PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS: 

• PD&E Study 

• Alternative Roadway Alignments 

• Stormwater Modeling 

• Traffic Modeling / Analysis 

• Traffic Signal Design 

• Pond Siting 

• Environmental Mitigation 

• Permitting Survey and Mapping 

• Public Involvements / Meeting 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(1) FIRM NAME 

F.R. Aleman. Inc. 


(2) FIRM LOCATION 

Tampa, FL 


Tampa, FL 

(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE - Prime 

Civil / Transportation Engineering 

and Planning 

Survey and Mapping 


(3) ROLE 

Subsurface Utility Engineering




Columbus Drive Extension Route Study 



Hillsborough County Public Works 




2009 



Sam Halabi, P.E. 



cost) 

The project included PD&E phase and a design phase services for 

the extension Columbus Drive from east of US 301 to Falkenburg 

Road, a distance approximately 1 mile. The PD&E services 

included the development and evaluation of a study for the typical 

sections for a 4-lane divided facility, alignment alternates 

considering geometry, environmental impacts, selection of 

stormwater ponds and mitigation areas, right-of-way, safety, and 

cost. Design phase services included providing 30% roadway and 

drainage design plans, wetland and flood plain mitigation design, 

submittal of the USACOE permit, the preparation of Design-Build 

RFQ and RFP contract documents for construction, and assistance 

with procurement of the Design-Build contract. 



9 


N/A 


813-307-1786 



• Preparation of Design/Build RFQ 

• 30% Roadway/Drainage Design Plans 

• Wetland and Flood Mitigation Design 

• Pond Siting Report 

• Environmental Permitting 

Est. Construction: $9.3 million 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 




Civil / Transportation Engineering

26. NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 

(From Section E, Block 12) 


G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 

27. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT (From 

Section E, Block 13) 

Project Manager / Water 

Resources/Drainage 

28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 

(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completing table. Place “X” under project key 

number for participation in same or similar role.) 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 

X X X X X 

Thomas O’Connor, PE Principal-In-Charge X X X X X 

Franklin Torrealba, PE 

Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities / 


X X X X X 

John Seals, PE Roadway & Transportation X X X 

Michael Ross, PE Civil Site Engineering X 

William Moriarty, PE, BCEE Alternative Funding X X X X 

Christopher Kuzler, PE Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities X X X X X X X 

Benjamin Turnage, PE Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities X X X 

Thomas Traina, PE 

Mechanical/Instrumentation & 

Controls 

X X X X 

Loc Truong, PE Instrumentation & Controls X X X X 

Lara Bartholomew, PE Cost Estimates/Permitting X X X X X X 

Larry Kistler 

Alberto Pisani, EI 

Civil/Site Planning & Design/Cost 

Estimates/Permitting 

Cost Estimates/Permitting/Plans 

Review 

Peter Bottone Ecological Services X 

Mike Palmer Ecological Services X 

Joshua Logan, PE Construction Engineering Inspection X 

X 

X X X X X 

Hamley Pacheco, EI Construction Engineering Inspection X X X X 

Scott Sheridan, RLA Planning/Landscape X X 

Clark Lohmiller, RLA Landscape Design, GIS/Mapping X X X 

Timothy Schram, PSM Survey/GIS/Mapping X X X X 

Oracio Riccobono, PE Geotechnical X 

29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY 

NO TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan, Town of 

Lauderdale-By-The-Sea, FL 

MDWASD Basis of Design Reports 

CSX – Terminal Pavement Management Plan Update, 

Various States, US 8 

Hillsborough County Miscellaneous General Civil 

Engineering Services 9 

Skycrest Neighborhood Traffic Calming, Streetscape, 

Round-a-bout 

6 JC Bermudez Park Recycled Storm Water Irrigation, Hollywood, FL 

7 

10 

Preliminary Basis of Design Report and Pump Station Siting Study, 

Hollywood, FL 

US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection Improvements 




Coastal Water Systems Interconnect Project – Phase 1, Basis of Design 

Report, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties, FL 

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. 

See the following section SF330 Additional Information 

3

31. SIGNATURE 

I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 

The foregoing is a statement of facts. 

32. DATE 

June 22, 2012 

33. NAME AND TITLE 

Agustin Maristany, PE, Vice President 

4

2a. FIRM (OR BRANCH OFFICE) NAME 


1. SOLICITATION NUMBER (If any) 

RFQ #2012-10 

PART II - GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS 

(If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 

3. YEAR ESTABLISHED 

1977 

2b. STREET 8390 NW 53 rd Street, Suite 200 5. OWNERSHIP 

2c. CITY Doral 2d. STATE 

FL 

6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 

Agustin Maristany, PE, Vice President 

6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 

305-392-9979 

a. Function 

Code 

6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS 

amaristany@kingengineering.com 

2e. ZIP CODE 

33166 

a. TYPE 

Corporation 

b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 

Federal Small Business 

4. DUNS NUMBER 

09-298-1521 

7. NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is a branch office). 


8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any) 8b. YR. ESTABLISHED 8c. DUNS NUMBER 

9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 

b. Discipline 

c. No. of Employees a. Profile 

(1) FIRM (2) RANCH Code 

1977 

09-298-1521 

10. PROFILE OF FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE 

REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS 

b. Experience c. Revenue 

Index 

Number 

(see below) 

02 Administrative 14 1 A05 Airports 4 

08 CADD Technician 10 1 C02 Cemeteries 2 

12 Civil Engineer 14 2 C10 Commercial Buildings 5 

15 Construction Inspector 1 1 C15 Construction Mgmt 6 

16 Construction Manager 2 1 D03 Desalination 2 

24 Environmental Scientist 4 1 E01 Ecological Investigations 5 

38 Land Surveyor 2 E02 Educational Facilities 3 

39 Landscape Architect 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies 2 

47 Planner: Urban/Regional 2 G01 Garages 2 

52 Sanitary Engineer 14 2 H06 Highrise Buildings 3 

58 Technician/Analyst 1 H07 Highways/Streets/ Parking Lots 5 

60 Transportation Engineer/ Planner 5 H10 Hotels/Motels 1 

62 Water Resources Engineer 3 1 H11 Housing 7 

Other Disciplines: I01 Industrial Buildings 3 

Surveying Crews and Technicians 9 I03 Industrial Waste Treatment 2 

GIS 1 I06 Irrigation; Drainage 2 

IT/Computer Techs 2 J01 Judicial/Courtroom Facilities 1 

Total 86 9 L01 Medical Research Facilities 2 

L02 Land Surveying 6 

L03 Landscape Architecture 2 

L04 Libraries/Museums 1 

M01 Mapping Systems 2 

O01 Industrial Parks 2 

P04 Pipelines 6 

P05 Regional Planning 4 

P07 Site Planning 5 

P09 Correctional Facilities 1 

R04 Recreation Facilities 1 

R11 Rivers; Canals; Waterways; Flood Control 4 

S04 Sewage Collection, Treatment, Disposal 5 

S07 Solid Wastes; Incineration; Landfill 6 

S10 Surveying; Platting; Mapping 5 

S13 Stormwater 4 

T03 Traffic & Transportation Engineering 6 

T04 Topographic Surveying & Mapping 5 

W02 Water Resources; Hydrology 2 

W03 Water Supply; Treatment & Distribution 5 

Z01 Zoning; Land Use Studies 1 

11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL 

SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 

YEARS 

(Insert revenue index number shown at right) 

a. Federal Work N/A 

b. Non-Federal Work 8 

c. Total Work 8 

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER 

1. Less than $100,000 6. $2 million to less than $5 million 

2. $100,000 to less than $250,000 7. $5 million to less than $10 million 


4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 9. $25 million to less than $50 million 

5. $1 million to less than $2 million 10. $50 million or greater 

12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 


a. SIGNATURE b. DATE 

6/22/2012 

c. NAME AND TITLE 

Agustin Maristany, PE, Vice President

SF 330 Additional Information 

Qualifications of Firm 

The following material provides further evidence of our team’s qualifications and experience to assist the City of North 

Miami Beach with completion of their municipal projects listed in the CIP. 

We have selected four local M/WBE firms to provide subconsultant services for this contract. 

Firm M/WBE Status Services Provided 

Cummins / Cederberg Federal SBA, Miami-Dade SBD Coastal and Marine Engineering 

Geosol, Inc. Broward CBE Geotechnical Engineering 

Eastern Engineering Group, Inc. DBE, WBE, MBE, SBE, CBE Structural Engineering 

Hillers Electrical Engineering, Inc. Broward CBE, SBE Electrical Engineering 

King has been very successful in establishing and maintaining long-term professional relationships with local governments 

and currently provides professional services to over 20 municipalities and agencies in Florida through continuing 

contracts. We take pride in being able to be responsive to our clients and working cooperatively with multiple clients. As a 

result, King has been successful with maintaining a number of continuing engineering services contracts with Florida 

municipalities. Examples include: 

• Hollywood • Miami-Dade County Public Works • North Miami • Miami-Dade County Water & Sewer Dept. 

• Southwest Ranches • Temple Terrace • Baker County • South Florida Water Management District 

• Doral • Dunedin • Citrus County • Hillsborough County 

• Lauderdale-by-the-Seas • Largo • Nassau County • Clearwater 

In addition to continuing engineering services contracts, King has individual contracts with other Florida governmental 

agencies including the South Florida Water Management District, Southwest Florida Water Management District, Peace 

River / Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority, Northwest Florida Water Management District, Florida Fish and Wildlife 

Conservation Commission, and the Florida Governmental Utility Authority. Because of our long-term experience working 

with Florida government entities, King understands the various issues uniquely associated with municipal projects and is 

able to acquire the necessary permits for those project activities which require regulatory approvals. 

Firm’s Number of Years Experience 

Established in 1977, King has applied its talents and resources to the implementation of innovative engineering projects. 

What began as a small engineering firm has grown into a full-service, employee-owned firm with expertise in engineering, 

planning, ecological services, surveying, and construction management. With 4 offices in Florida, King’s success is reflected 

in our work and our client’s loyalty. King is able to provide you with a cohesive multi-disciplinary team that understands 

every aspect of your project, and is committed to delivering to your satisfaction. King provides engineering, planning, 

ecological and surveying services for civil, transportation, water resources, and water/wastewater/reclaimed water 

related projects. 

Sustainable Business Practices 

King is dedicated to the practice of sound environmental stewardship and promotion of health, safety and well being of our 

employees. These values originate at the company’s top management and are emphasized through all levels of 

responsibility within the organization. As such, the Company agrees to: 

• Meet or exceed all applicable federal, state, local and company environmental, safety and health standards. 

• Provide a workplace free of recognized hazards and maintain healthy working conditions for all company employees. 

• Closely monitor all facilities for prevention of pollution. 

• Participate in recycling to the greatest practical extent to reduce impact on landfills and promote recovery of valuable 

resources. 

• Convey to our customers, industry associates, vendors and the general public our strong environmental, safety and 

health commitment. 


SF330 Additional Information 

1

City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services 


• Strive to continuously improve our commitment to the above-stated principles through exercise of our EMS, improved 

technology, production changes and due diligence. 

• Continue to educate personnel in LEED principles and encourage LEED accreditation. 

The procedures that have been implemented include: 

• Use of IT strategies to reduce paper usage and unnecessary bulk storage. 

• Donate and recycle ink and toner cartridges to regional charities. 

• Recycle office paper, cardboard, plastic and aluminum containers; containers are placed in each workstation and in 

strategic locations throughout the office building. 

• Use recycled paper products for printing, plotting , etc. 

King is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council has LEED accredited personnel on staff. We continue to encourage 

education and accreditation of staff members. 

King has developed a smart irrigation controller called the WaterOptimizer®. Water 

Optimizer, LLC is a subsidiary of King Engineering Associates, Inc. The controller is a real 

water management alternative that provides better, more precise use of a limited 

resource. It’s a new approach to resource management and conservation. 

Business Structure 

King, established in 1977, is a Florida-based corporation licensed to provide multidiscipline 

professional engineering services per State of Florida certification number #2610. King is also licensed by the 

State of Florida to provide surveying and landscape architecture services under license numbers LB2610 and LC26000183, 

respectively. 

King’s office located in Doral, Florida will serve as the responsible office for this contract. Agustin Maristany, PE, will serve 

as the Project Manager and Primary Point of Contact. 



8390 NW 53 rd Street, Suite 200, Doral, FL 33166 

Phone: 305-392-9979 Fax: 305-392-9912 

Email: amaristany@kingengineering.com 

Web: www.kingengineering.com 

Relative Size of Firm 

King is a Florida based company with over 85 employees with 4 offices in Florida and 2 offices in Texas. The table below 

provides detailed information of our leadership and personnel structure. 

Keith Appenzeller, PE 

Thomas O’Connor, PE 

Christopher Kuzler, PE 

Michael Ross, PE 

Scott Sheridan, RLA 


Denise Greer, PE 

William Moriarty, PE 

James Orchard, CPA 

Lara Bartholomew, PE 


Owners: 

Sandra Gorman, PE 

Principals / Officers / Board of Directors: 

CEO/Chairman: Keith Appenzeller, PE 

Professional Employees by 

Classification: 

William Holloway, PE President: Thomas O’Connor, PE 

Larry Kistler 

Sr. Vice President: Christopher Kuzler, PE Engineers: 47 

John Seals, PE 

Sr. Vice President: Michael Ross, PE 

Planners: 5 

Loc Truong, PE Sr. Vice President: Scott Sheridan, RLA Landscape Architects: 2 

Brian Skidmore Vice President: Agustin Maristany, PE Scientists: 4 

Franklin Torrealba, PE Vice President: Denise Greer, PE 

Surveyors: 9 

Thomas Traina, PE Vice President: William Moriarty, PE 

Tuyen Tran, PE Chief Financial Officer: James Orchard, CPA 

Total Number of 

Employees: 86 


2








Phone: 305-392-9979 Fax: 305-392-9912 

Email: amaristany@kingengineering.com 

Web: www.kingengineering.com 

King’s team will be led by Mr. Agustin Maristany, P.E., 

the proposed Project Manager for the City of North 

Miami Beach “Continuing Contract for Professional 

Services.” Mr. Maristany is committed to working in 

close partnership with the City and devoting his 

individual attention to ensure the successful 

completion of all assignments. He will be supported 

by a full-service, multi-disciplinary team of highly 

qualified personnel. 

A distinguishing qualification of Mr. Maristany is his extensive experience in successfully delivering civil 

engineering projects to south Florida clients very similar in scope to the projects envisioned for this contract. 

Over the last 30 years he has successfully completed a wide range of civil engineering projects for south Florida 

clients including the City of Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, Lauderdale by the Sea, Broward County, Sunrise, 

Lauderdale Lakes, Central Broward Water Control District, Miami-Dade County, Miami, Doral, Florida 

Department of Transportation, the South Florida Water Management District, and Homestead Air Force Base. 

He is a seasoned project manager with experience in all aspects of civil engineering projects, brings extensive 

experience and credibility with local regulatory agencies, and has helped to obtain grant funding for many local 

clients. 

Mr. Maristany has supported municipalities in the creation of stormwater utilities, the evaluation of funding 

alternatives and financing options, establishing rate structures, developing/revising ordinances, and prioritizing 

capital improvement plans. He has also developed design criteria and standards for permitting, and has 

reviewed hundreds of plats, paving and drainage plans, and as-built plans. 

Maristany’s Representative Project Experience 

Project Name Project Role Description Client 

Five-Ash Water 

Treatment Plant 

Drainage Retrofit 

Prospect Lake 

Recharge Facility 

Central County 

Neighborhood 

Improvements 

SR 694 Roadway 

Improvements 

Sanitary System 

Capital Improvement 

Plan 

Project 

Manager 

Project 

Manager 

Task 

Manager 

Project 

Manager 

Principal-incharge 

Drainage retrofit design and permitting to reduce frequent 

flooding and accommodate addition of 7 MG tank and ASR well 

pad. 

Modeling, design, and construction support for 2,600 feet of 36" 

RCP, an 8-foot-wide gated weir control structure, and a 

diversion structure with two vertical lift gates connecting C-14 

canal to Prospect Lake to recharge the City's main wellfield. 

Obtained $300K AWS grant from SFWMD. 

Stormwater modeling and design to reduce flooding in several 

older neighborhoods. Major improvements included 5,000 feet 

of dual 8’ x 8’ box culverts for the 35 th Avenue ditch and a large 

gated control structure discharging to the C-12 canal. 

Design and permitting of $4.3M in roadway and drainage 

improvements to reduce congestion and flooding along 0.75 

mile stretch of this heavy-traffic hurricane evacuation route. 

Joint project between FDOT, County, and City. 

Sewer, pump, and flow meter inspections, defect identifications, 

I/E/I quantification, repair and rehabilitation recommendations, 

cost estimates, and CIP schedule. 

Ft. Lauderdale 

Ft. Lauderdale 

Broward 

County 

Pinellas Park 

Lauderdale by 

the Sea 


3 

King Engineering Associates, Inc.



Maristany’s Representative Project Experience 

Project Name Project Role Description Client 

Hillsboro Blvd 

Drainage 

Improvements 

Development of 

Stormwater Utility 

JC Bermudez Park 

Recycled Storm Water 

Irrigation Project 

S Lake Area Drainage 

Improvements 

Neighborhood 

Drainage 

Improvements 

S-124 Control 

Structure Design 

District Engineer 

Needs Assessment 

Program 

Municipal NPDES 

Permit 

Northern Broward 

County Integrated 

Surface and 

Groundwater Model 

Project 

Manager 

Project 

Manager 

Project 

Manager 

Project 

Manager 

Project 

Manager 

Task 

Manager 

Project 

Manager 

Modeling, design, and permitting of drainage improvements for 

section of Hillsboro Blvd. Dual purpose drainage system also 

recharged Coquina Lakes impacted by wellfield withdrawals with 

water from C-3 canal. 

Needs assessment, rate structure, revenue projections, billing 

database, and stormwater utility ordinance 

Modeling, design, permitting, construction inspection, and O&M 

manual for 2MG tank, 3,000 gpm stormwater pump station, pretreatment 

system, and 1,400 gpm irrigation pump station for 80- 

acre park. Helped obtain $1M grant from SFWMD. 

Modeling, BODR, design, and permitting of drainage 

improvements for low lying coastal area flooded by rain and 

high tides. Design includes 5,000 feet of RCP (24” to 48”D), new 

outfalls to tide, backflow valves, and 30,000 gpm pump station. 

Fast-track preparation of 57 design packages, covering about 2 

square miles, and with a construction value of $4 million. 

Designs included catch basins, exfiltration trenches, pavement 

restoration, maintenance of traffic plans, hydraulic calculations, 

cost estimates, and utility conflict coordination. 

Hydraulic and civil design of 550 cfs gated control structure: 3- 8’ 

x 6’ gated RCP box culverts on L-35A Canal. 

Plan review, regulation, permitting, revision of drainage design 

criteria and standards, CIP development and implementation, 

design, permitting, and inspections for 43 square-mile urban 

area serving over 150,000 residents. 

Planning, modeling, preliminary design, design standards, design 

management and QA/QC, utility conflict coordination, 

permitting, cost estimating, scheduling, public information, bid 

packaging, and construction management for 40 water and 

sewer projects totaling $60 million. Project included 17,815 feet 

of 4” to 12” sewer force main, 91,451 feet of 8” to 16” water 

main, 39,000 feet of 8” to 12” gravity sewer, and 6 pump 

stations. 

Sewer system inventory, GIS mapping, dry- and wet-weather 

sampling, nonpoint source impacts, water quality management 

plan, analysis of program costs and fiscal resources, legal 

authority, public information, and negotiations with the EPA. 

Developed linked surface water (XPSWWM) and groundwater 

model (MODFLOW) for continuous simulation of northern 

Broward, a 77 square miles area that includes 8 municipalities 

and 9 drainage districts. The water management system 

consists of numerous lakes, canals, 33 water control structures, 

2 recharge pumps, and 8 urban water supply wellfields. 

Principal-in- 

Charge 

Project 

Manager 

Project 

Manager 

Broward 

County 

Lauderdale 

Lakes 

City of Doral 

Hollywood 

Miami-Dade 

County 

SFWMD 

CBWCD 

Miami-Dade 

WASD 

City of Miami 

Broward 

County 


4 




Certified Business Entity Participation 

King is not a disadvantaged business enterprise. We have historically supported disadvantaged businesses both in our 

public sector and private sector contracts. King has selected four subconsultant firms to assist us with this contract. 

Cummins / Cederberg – COASTAL AND MARINE ENGINEERING 

Geosol, Inc. – GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 

Eastern Engineering Group – STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 



5



KING’S COMMITMENT TO DIVERSITY WITHIN ITS COMMUNITY AND BEYOND 

It is King’s policy to ensure that we: 

• Recruit, hire and promote for all job classifications without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, 

physical handicap or ancestry 

• Base decisions on employment so as to further the principles of affirmative action 

• Ensure that all personnel actions such as compensation, benefits, transfers, layoffs, return from layoff, company 

sponsored training, education, tuition assistance, social and recreation programs are administered without regard 

to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical handicap or ancestry 

• Give qualified disadvantage business enterprises (consultants, suppliers and other businesses) priority 

consideration when services in their areas of expertise are required. 

King’s Equal Employment Opportunity/AA Policy 

King will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, sex, national origin, 

sexual orientation, age, handicap, marital status, familial status or religion. 

King will take Affirmative Action to ensure that all employment practices are free of such discrimination. Such employment 

practices include, but are not limited to, the following: hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment 

advertising, selection layoff, disciplinary action, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for 

training, including apprenticeship. 

King prohibits the harassment of any employee or job applicant on the basis of their protected class status. 

King will commit the necessary time and resources, both financial and human, to achieve the goals of Equal Employment 

Opportunity and Affirmative Action. 

King will evaluate the performance of its management and supervisory personnel on the basis of their involvement in 

achieving these Affirmative Action objectives as well as other established criteria. Any employee of this company or 

subcontractor to this company who does not comply with the Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Procedures set 

forth in this Statement and plan will be subject to disciplinary action. Any Opportunity/Affirmative Action laws, directives, 

regulations of the Federal, State and local governing bodies or agencies thereof, specifically including Chapter 26.5, Part II, 

City of Tampa Code and Chapter 130, Part IV, City of Jacksonville Code will be subject to appropriate legal sanctions. 

King has appointed Jim Orchard as EEO Coordinator to manage our Equal Employment Opportunity Program. His 

responsibilities include monitoring all Equal Employment Opportunity activities and reporting the effectiveness of this 

Affirmative Action Program, as required by Federal, State and Local agencies. If any employee or applicant for employment 

believes he or she has been discriminated against, please contact the EEO Coordinator. 



6

SF 330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline 

Water Resources Services (Function Code 62) 

King’s in-house Water Resource Group consists of H&H modelers, civil engineers, water resource engineers, 

hydrologists, and environmental scientists. Efficient water resource management systems are critical to the 

success of any project. We are proud of our strong stormwater modeling expertise in watersheds, some in 

excess of 120 square miles. We employ the latest computer modeling programs to ensure accurate flow rate 

analysis for multi-interval storm events and long-term continuous simulation. 

Our water resource engineers work daily with the design and permitting of these systems and are familiar with 

the codes and regulations of federal, state and local government agencies. King has extensive experience in not 

only traditional treatment (e.g. wet or dry retention) methods, but also with structural / physical / chemical / 

biological devices such as CDS units, alum injection, stormceptors, and created wetlands, as well as Low Impact 

Development (LID) treatment design techniques and options (e.g. bioswales, filter marshes, stormwater re-use) 

Our staff has performed planning, modeling, design, and construction management of canal systems, lakes, 

wetlands, stormwater pipe networks, control structures, pump stations, dams & reservoirs, levees, bank 

stabilization, erosion control, water quality control BMPs, seepage control, and recycled stormwater irrigation 

systems. Our relevant project expertise includes: 

• Drainage Master Planning 

• Flood Control 

• Erosion/Scour Modeling & Design 

• Watershed Planning & Studies 

• Dam/Control Structures 

• Water Quality Modeling 

• Water Quality Controls/BMPs Design 

• Stormwater Pump Station Design 

• Irrigation Systems 

• Levee Design 

• Seepage Control 

• Bank Stabilization 

• Wetland/Upland Restoration 

• Permitting – USACOE, FDEP, State WMDs, 

MD-DERM, and Local Agencies 

King has significant local experience and a clear understanding of Florida’s unique physical characteristics as well 

as its regulatory environment. King’s engineers are solution oriented professionals, addressing each problem 

with an alternatives evaluation and cost-benefit approach. Through this process, environmental impacts, 

reliability, cost-effectiveness, permitability and constructability are carefully considered during the formulation 

of each design. 

Our team has provided water resources services to numerous local clients in south Florida, including the 

following: 

• City of Miami 

• Miami-Dade DERM 

• South Florida Water Management District 

• City of Doral 

• City of North Miami 

• Broward County 


• City of Fort Lauderdale 

• Lauderdale Lakes 

• Central Broward Water Control District 

• City of Sunrise 

• Town of Southwest Ranches 

SF330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline 

1



Integrated Design 

King has extensive experience developing innovative designs that meet or exceed project objectives. For 

example, for the City of Hollywood, King evaluated drainage conditions for a highly developed low lying 

residential coastal area adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway. The area has a history of frequent flooding due 

to both high tides and intense rainfall. King designed a system that significantly improves flood levels of service, 

nearly achieving a 10-year level service during normal tides, with a combination of higher capacity gravity 

outfalls, pump station, and backflow prevention devices. 

The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support water 

resources services project types. 

King Engineering In-house 

Subconsultant Specialty 

Task Manager 


Civil Engineer 

Kyle Smith, PE 

Contract Manager 





King Team Available Services 

SF330 Function 

Code 

Description 

02 Administrative 

07 Biologist 

08 CADD Technician 

12 Civil Engineer 

15 Construction Inspector 

16 Construction Manager 

19 Ecologist 

21 Electrical Engineer 

22 Electronics Engineer 

23 Environmental Engineer 

24 Environmental Scientist 

27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer 

28 Geodetic Surveyor 

29 Geographic Information System Specialist 

32 Hydraulic Engineer 

33 Hydrographic Surveyor 

34 Hydrologist 

38 Land Surveyor 

39 Landscape Architect 

42 Mechanical Engineer 

47 Planner: Urban/Regional 

48 Project Manager 

52 Sanitary Engineer 

53 Scheduler 

55 Soils Engineer 

56 Specifications Writer 

57 Structural Engineer 

58 Technician/Analysis 

60 Transportation Engineer 

61 Value Engineer 

62 Water Resources Engineer 

NPDES 


2






S. S. Lake Area Stormwater Modeling and BODR 

City of Hollywood, Broward County, FL 


Hollywood Public Utilities 

1621 N. 14 th Avenue 

Hollywood, FL 33022 



Jeff Jiang, PE 



2011 



NUMBER 

1 



954-921-3490 


King Engineering was retained by the City of Hollywood for the evaluation, design, and permitting of flood control 

improvements for the South Lake Drainage Basin, a low-lying coastal area susceptible to flooding from high tides 

and rainfall. Developed ICPR model of the 256-acre drainage area, concluded that existing drainage system was 

severely undersized, and sized improvements to substantially reduce flooding. Improvements included new 

outfalls to tide, higher capacity collection system, an interceptor system, a 30,000 gpm pump station, and 

backflow prevention devices. Tasks included analysis of sea level rise, modeling, conceptual design of 

improvements, permittability, cost estimates, and technical memorandum. Also prepared Basis of Design Report 

for the 30,000 gpm pump station including siting study, pump type selection, pump station layout, electrical 

requirements, instrumentation and controls, bypass gravity discharge, construction cost estimate, schedule, and 

identification of permitting requirements (Broward County, FDEP, USACE), and reporting. Recommended pump 

station consisted of two 30,000 gpm axial submersible pumps with a gated gravity bypass to allow gravity flows 

and reduce fuel consumption during low to normal tides. The submersible pumps minimize noise and visual 

obstruction in this coastal residential community. Electrical, telemetry, and control panels can be camouflaged by 

landscaping. The estimated construction cost for entire project is $10.0M; $4,3M for Phase I. Phase I detail 

design of the system is currently underway. 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Planning, modeling, design, 

permitting, cost estimates 

(3) ROLE 

Design, cost estimates






SFWMD S-124 Control Structure Replacement Hydraulic and Civil 

Design, Broward County, FL 





2009 



NUMBER 

2 



Ross Engineering, Inc. 

Robert J. Ross, P.E. 

954-318-0624 


King Engineering was retained as subconsultant to Ross Engineering to lead the fast-track hydraulic and civil 

design and provide QA/QC of deliverables for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure on the L-35A 

Canal for the South Florida Water Management District, with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. 

The hydraulic report identified design flows and stages, established the structure capacity (550-800 cfs), 

dimensions (triple 6’x 8’ box culverts), invert and crest elevations, and sized a temporary bypass structure to 

control flows and water levels during construction. The replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete 

box culvert with remotely operated slide gates, a design capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and backup 

power supply. 

Civil design plans and specifications included site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction 

sequencing plan, vehicle barrier gate, floating trash barrier, security fence, warning signs, demolition and 

erosion/scour control plan, and canal stabilization treatments. Coordinated closely with other disciplines 

including geotechnical and structural. 


a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 


(3) ROLE 

Planning, Modeling, Design, 

Permitting Bidding 

Assistance, Construction 

Phase Services, O&M 

Manual 

(3) ROLE 

Design, Bidding Assistance, 

Construction Phase 

Services






JC Bermudez Park Recycled Storm Water Irrigation, Doral, FL 


City of Doral, FL 

8300 NW 53 rd Street 

Suite 202 




Barbara Hernandez 

Parks and Recreation 

Director 



2010 



NUMBER 

3 


2012 


305-593-6600 

The City of Doral retained King Engineering to provide modeling, design, permitting (ERP and CUP), 

construction support services, and O&M manual for the fast-track implementation of a $2.9M recycled 

storm water irrigation system for the 80-acre park. Major project components included emergency lake 

intake structure, 2 MG above ground concrete storage tank, 3,000 gpm stormwater pump station, 130 

micron disk filters with automatic backwash, gravity sand filter for backwash water, bleach disinfection 

system, 1,400 gpm irrigation pumps, 7,000 feet of 12” diameter looped main, irrigation system, and 

automated controls. Developed 20-year water balance model to calculate crop ET, rainfall-runoff, 

irrigation demand, and stormwater irrigation to determine optimal size of pump station and storage tank. 

Construction documents were completed within 4 months of notice to proceed. SFWMD’s conceptual 

ERP and CUP permit modifications were approved within 5 weeks of application submittal. The project 

was partially funded by a $1M alternative water supply grant from the SFWMD. 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 





Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 



(3) ROLE 

Planning, Modeling, Design, 

Permitting Bidding 

Assistance, Construction 

Phase Services, O&M 

Manual 

(3) ROLE 

Design, Bidding Assistance, 


Services 

(3) ROLE 

Surveying






Palatlakaha River Watershed Study, Lake County, FL 





Ongoing 



NUMBER 

4 


N/A 


Lake County Water Authority 

Ron Hart, P.E. 

352-343-3777 


King was retained for the development of a watershed model and evaluation of dam structure removal/replacement options for 

the Palatlakaha River Restoration Project in Lake County. The contributing area is over 200 square miles and the river flows 

exceed 1000 cfs during the flood flow gates open condition. This project involves evaluation of existing manually operated 

radial gate dam structures along the river, modification, or removal and replacement of the dam structures, preparation of final 

design plans for the structures and permitting with the goal of removing the manual operations of the radial gates. The model 

was developed in ICPR (v 3.10, SP 8) and incorporated an analysis of existing rainfall data, stage and flow data. Sensitivity 

analysis of the upstream watershed was required to determine reasonable flow rates out of upstream lakes and dam 

structures, with limited operational data. The model contains 280 square miles of the watershed in Lake County. LiDAR data 

was obtained and supplemented with conventional survey of the river (cross sections every 1,000 feet) along with key pipe, 

roadway overtopping, and weir elevations of the connecting sub-basins. As a result of a pre-application meeting with 

SJRWMD, several alternatives have been developed in order to balance the project objectives with permitting requirements in 

a cost effective manner. 

Additional elements include surveying, project design, permitting, and implementation assistance. Once the model was 

developed, King prepared construction plans for the proposed modifications. The design includes new, sheet pile weirs 

upstream of the current dams. This allows for the removal of the radial gates without adversely impacting the surrounding 

ecology or residents along the river. Permit applications have been submitted and are under review. The project is currently 

on schedule in accordance with the contract’s scope of services and fee schedule. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Doral, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Water Resources, Civil 



c. 


Tampa, FL 


(3) ROLE 


Engineering, Ecological






Baker County Stormwater Master Plan, Baker County, FL 





2008 



NUMBER 

5 



Baker County 

Ed Preston 

904-259-3354 


King Engineering was retained by Baker County to develop a 

Comprehensive Stormwater Master Plan for the 589-square-mile 

county. The objective of the master plan is to develop baseline 

information about the watershed, prepare a hydrologic and hydraulic model 

of the major streams, develop floodplain maps of the county, identify 

problem areas, develop recommendations for engineering solutions and 

permitting requirements, prepare cost estimates, and develop a capital 

improvement plan. Recommendations are intended to improve flood 

control, water quality, protect the floodplain, and reinforce local permitting 

requirements to improve the ability to make sound decisions regarding 

future development within the County. Partially funded by the St. John 

Water Management District, the Master Plan will be completed in three 

phases. 

Phase I 

Conducted field surveys to supplement existing inventoried data and to 

collect new data to complete a GIS geo database of major roadway cross-drains, structures, channels, 

channel crossings, retention and detention ponds and other major drainage features necessary to 

develop a master drainage model for the St. Mary’s River drainage Basins within Baker County. Data collection 

primarily used survey grade GPS equipment where vertical or horizontal accuracy was critical and mapping 

grade GPS equipment was utilized where vertical and horizontal positional accuracy was not critical. The 

surveyed inventory included channel cross-sections, floodplain cross-sections and structure Cross-Sections 

located along the main channel of the primary tributaries to the St. Mary River. This inventoried data was 

uploaded to the GIS database for creation of a master base map and model. Structures were surveyed to 

establish the necessary geometry including culvert invert elevations, top of road profiles, bridge geometry (pier 

width, number of piers, and top and bottom deck elevations), and other information required for modeling 

purposes. The total Phase 1 project required over 10 miles of section work to be completed in a twenty working 

day time period. 

Phase II 

Involved the compilation and review of previous studies, surveying of 39 stream cross-sections, review of 

historic rainfall, flow, and water level stations and data, establishment of procedures for stormwater model 

calibration and verification, assessment of the influence of groundwater on stormwater simulations, and 

extensive documentation (pictures and surveyed high water mark elevations) of the flooding impacts of Tropical 

Storm Fay. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Doral, FL 

(3) ROLE 






(3) ROLE 

Surveying 

c. 

(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE






Highland Avenue Stormwater Retrofit, Phase 1, Largo, FL 





2012 



NUMBER 

6 


2012 


City of Largo 

Leland Dicus, P.E. 

727-587-6713 


King provided a PD&E study and design services for the reconstruction 

of Highland Avenue from East Bay Drive to Belleair Road. As the project 

proceeded, King identified the potential for grant funding from the 

Southwest Florida Water Management District for the enhancement of 

stormwater runoff from the contributing basins and assisted the City in 

obtaining a cooperative SWFWMD grant. 

Currently, King is providing stormwater design for both phases of the 

project including modeling, permitting, plans preparation, and 

construction observation services for the stormwater enhancement and 

retrofit project. Phase 1 of the project includes expanding an existing 

pond to treat stormwater runoff from a mainly untreated residential/ 

commercial intensive land uses. Phase 2 includes design of a low flow 

diversion pipe system to implement several LID design concepts to 

improve water quality within the contributing watershed, including the 

use of bioswale treatment systems within the Highland Avenue right of 

way. Given that multiple sources of funding are used on this project, 

plans needed to be prepared as one cohesive set of construction 

documents that allowed easy separation of the project components 

based on the funding source. 

The drainage master planning effort for this project included ICPR 

modeling of approximately 620 acres of urban watershed. Several alternatives were evaluated to provide the 

City with the recommended alternatives that included the work completed within Phase 1 and future work to 

be completed in Phase 2. The phase 1 pond expansion accepts approximately 100 acres of previously 

untreated runoff, without increasing upstream peak elevations. Phase 2 includes the construction of a 

diversion weir to route the first 1.5 inches of runoff from approximately 145 acres into this pond. Additionally, 

bioswales will be designed to enhance the system when the Highland Avenue pedestrian improvements are 

implemented. 

Other services provided by King included survey and right of way mapping, report preparation, conducting public 

meetings, utility impact assessment / coordination. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Doral, FL 

(3) ROLE 



b. 

c. 



Tampa, FL 


(3) ROLE 


Engineering, Ecological 

Services






Hammock Park Natural System Restoration, Phase 2, 

Dunedin, FL 





2008 



NUMBER 

7 


2009 


City of Dunedin 

Thomas Burke, P.E. 

727-298-3175 


King provided oversight of development and implementation of a 3-year monitoring study for the City of 

Dunedin’s Hammock Park Natural Systems Restoration Project cooperatively funded by SWFWMD. The 

project required the design of a hydrologic and ecological monitoring protocol that included the installation 

of a monitoring array consisting of piezometers, staff gages and rain gauges, along with establishment of 

vegetative monitoring transects using WAP methodologies. The monitoring protocol was designed to detect 

positive hydrological and vegetative shifts towards the restoration of historic wetland functions of the on site 

wetlands in the post-project condition. Following the completion of the 3-year study, a Final Assessment 

Report was prepared detailing the overall effectiveness of the project design along with recommendations 

for system improvement and/or the potential for using treated stormwater to augment surficial flows. 



a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Ecological Services, 

Operation & Maintenance 

b. 

c. 








Battelle Memorial Institute, Louisiana Coastal Peer Review 





2010 



NUMBER 

8 



Battele Memorial Institute 

Karen Foster 

561-656-6304 


King provided independent external peer review 

services of the USACE Integrated Feasibility Study 

and Environmental Impact Statement for the LCA- 

Small Diversion at Convent/Blind River. The study 

area is 165 square miles. 

Panel member responsible for the review of several 

hydrologic and hydraulic models used to assess 

current conditions and the effectiveness of new 

infrastructure proposed to reintroduce freshwater, 

sediments, and nutrients to the Maurepas Swamp, 

approximating the natural historic flooding cycle, to 

rehydrate wetlands, restore sediment deposition, and 

reduce salinity to compensate for the negative effects 

of reduced seasonal floodplain inundation from the 

Mississippi River, sea level rise, and land subsidence. 

The general components of the plans evaluated involved the following: gated culvert gravity diversion of 

Mississippi River flows (approximately 3,000 cfs), a conveyance canal to convey diversion to the upper 

reaches of the Blind River canal system, canal berm cuts to restore wetland inundation, various water control 

structures strategically located to raise water levels to divert water through berm cuts into the wetlands, and 

several culverts to deliver freshwater under US Hwy 61. 

Several models were applied to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed project including HEC-HMS to generate a 

continuous hydrologic record of flows (rainfall-runoff process); HEC-RAS to simulate dynamic flow and storage 

(unsteady one dimensional hydraulic calculations); Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code, a two dimensional 

hydrodynamic and water quality model used to analyze the effects of freshwater diversions on the wetlands; and 

a Water Balance model used for long-term simulations in the area. 

Panel review comments were provided in the areas of model calibration and verification, boundary conditions 

uncertainty, sensitivity analyses, hydrologic water balance, spacing and location of proposed berm gaps, 

location and invert elevation of culverts, need for backflow preventers, sediment deposition rates, wetland 

phosphorus uptake, operations plan, flooding impacts to adjacent properties, screening criteria, future needs 

for adaptive management, and monitoring procedures. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Doral, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Independent Peer Review, 



b. 

c. 








Nutrimix Feed Company, Industrial NPDES Permit Renewal 





2010 



NUMBER 

9 


N/A 


Nutrimix Feed Company 

Calle A, Zona Portuaria, Industrial Sabana, 

Guaynabo, PR 00953 

Waldemar Gonzalez 

President 


787-622-7707 

Project manager for the renewal of the Individual Industrial NPDES permit (PR 0024619) with EPA Region 2. 

Responsibilities included letter to EPA responding to a compliance evaluation inspection report of the facility; 

evaluation and recommendation for renewal as either individual or general permit; recommendations regarding 

sampling, structural water quality improvements, and recording procedures; compilation and review of data and 

documents; filling out the forms and preparation of permit documents; facility walk through to review operations; 

update of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan; correspondence and communications with the EPA; and 

clarification responses to questions raised by the EPA after permit submittal. Total fee 10,454.00 


a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Permitting, SWPPP, 

Correspondence 

(3) ROLE 


Technical Support






Peck Sink Stormwater Park, Hernando County, FL 





2011 



NUMBER 

10 


Ongoing 


Hernando County – Florida 

20 North Main Street Room 262 

Brooksville, FL 34601 

Dawn Velsor 

Lead Environmental 

Planner 


352-540-6529 

King provided multi-disciplinary services for this 111+ acre proposed County park and stormwater retrofit project, 

located southwest of the City of Brooksville in unincorporated Hernando County. This unique property is 

dominated by karst features, including the Peck Sink complex, and receives mostly untreated storm water runoff 

from nearly 8,000 acres of urban and rural land uses within a closed drainage basin. 

Project objectives include stormwater quality mitigation and 

volume management from both basin-wide and site-specific 

perspectives, as well as restoration and management of native 

plant communities. Services provided included data collection 

and evaluation, topographic survey, wetland delineation, 

vegetation and wildlife assessments, nuisance & exotic 

species mapping, habitat enhancement plans, design of park 

features and amenities, hydrologic modeling, engineering and 

drainage design, utilities design, engineering and permitting 

and construction bidding assistance. The conceptual master 

plan incorporates low impact development (LID) site design 

and storm water treatment concepts, storm water treatment 

ponds, filter marshes and 

floodplain attenuation areas. 

The first phase of this 

project, which includes 


entrance driveways and stormwater infrastructure, is currently under 

construction. When completed, the overall project will provide a passive use 

public park that will combine the proposed storm water treatment aspects with 

the park components, and will provide a unique opportunity to educate the 

public about various LID features and benefits, stormwater treatment, habitat 

enhancement and restoration, as well as the dynamics and sensitivity of the 

karst and sinkhole features relative to the aquifer protection. King also teamed 

with Andreyev Engineering and Ambient Technologies for the project. 

Andreyev provided geotechnical exploration, ground and surface water 

monitoring services, and Ambient conducted a Ground Penetrating Radar 

(GPR) survey within 15 acres of proposed deep pond construction areas in 

order to characterize near-surface geological conditions relative to suspected 

karst activity or anomalies. 

Cost $1.3 million 


• 111+ acre Passive Use Park 

• Design of Park Features 

• Conceptual Master Plan - LID 

• Stormwater Quality Mitigation / Volume 

Management 

• Native Plant Restoration 

• Data Collection and Evaluation 

• Wetland Delineation 

• Hydraulic Modeling 

• Control Structure Design 

• Surveying Services 

a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 



Services, Surveying & 

Mapping 

b. 

c. 

Andreyev Engineering, Inc. 


Tampa, FL 


(3) ROLE 

Geotechnical / 

Hydrogeological 

Engineering


Sanitary Engineering Services (Function Code 52) 

Water supply, wastewater treatment, effluent disposal and reuse have become and will continue to be critical 

issues for municipalities and private utilities. As environmental regulations develop, disposing of waste products 

and reusing resources are becoming a bigger challenge. As populations grow and economic opportunity 

expands, new sources of water need to be developed. At the same time additional means of wastewater and 

biosolids treatment, reuse and disposal grow, too. King’s water and wastewater engineers work diligently with 

clients to plan, design, permit and construct systems that address these needs in a comprehensive and holistic 

manner. 

Our expertise and experience includes: 

Planning Services 

• Utilities Master Planning 


• Preliminary Engineering Evaluations 

• Assistance with Developing Capital 

Improvement Plans 

• Cost Estimating 

• Funding and Grant Application Assistance 

• Repair and Replace (R&R) Evaluations 

Water Systems 

• Traditional Source Development 

• Alternative Source Development 

• Wellfields and Intake Systems 

• Raw Water Pumping and Transmission 

• Conventional and Membrane Treatment 

Facilities 

• Chemical Adjustment and Disinfection 

Systems 

• Ground and Elevated Storage Tanks 

• Pumping Facilities 

• Transmission and Distribution Systems 

• Metering and Control Facilities 

• Irrigation Systems Design and Control 

Wastewater Systems 

• High Performance Septic Systems 

• Septic System Abandonment Programs 

• Infiltration/Inflow Analyses 

• Sewer Rehabilitation Programs 


• Gravity sewers 

• Pump Stations 

• Force Mains 

• Odor Control Systems 

• Municipal / Industrial Treatment Facilities 

• High Level Disinfection 

• Effluent Storage, Pumping and Disposal 

Systems 

• Reuse Systems 

• Water Balance and Supply/Demand 

Evaluations 

• Supplemental Supply Systems 

• Gray Water Systems 

• Ground and Elevated Storage Tanks 

• Pumping Facilities 

• Transmission and Distribution Systems 

• Metering and Control Facilities 

• Irrigation Systems Design and Control 

• Reservoirs 

• Rapid Infiltration Basins 

Regulatory Services 

• Construction and Operation Permitting 

• Compliance Monitoring 

• Compliance Reporting 

• Virus Inactivation Credit Determinations 

• Initial Distribution System Evaluations 

• Capacity Analysis Reports 

• Operation and Maintenance Performance 

Reports 

Our utility projects range from small diameter distribution and service lines in residential neighborhoods to large 

diameter transmission mains conveying resources for miles. Our treatment facility experience includes small 

package plants and large state-of-the-art treatment facilities with capacities greater than 10 MGD. 


1



Our capabilities go beyond designing, permitting and constructing water and wastewater systems. Our 

professional staff includes licensed water and wastewater treatment plant operators. These operators provide 

essential, practical advice during the design of our projects and assist with the startup and operation of these 

facilities as well as the training of our clients’ staff. 

The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support water, 

wastewater and reclaimed water services project types. 



Sanitary Engineer 

Christopher Kuzler, PE 

Task Manager 

Franklin Torrealba, PE 





Benjamin Turnage, PE 


Thomas Traina, PE 



Code 

Description 


07 Biologist 





19 Ecologist 

















53 Scheduler 








NPDES 


Loc Truong, PE 


2






Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the 

MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System within the City of Miami Springs, 

Florida. 


Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department 





Rod Lovett 

Chief-Sewer Collection 

Division 


On-going 



NUMBER 

1 



786-268-5025 


King Engineering Associates, Inc. (King) has been selected by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department 

(MDWASD) to provide Construction Management and Inspection services for the “Preliminary Evaluation Prior to 

Design and/or Other Upgrades to the MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System within the City of Miami Springs, Florida”. 

The project involves construction management and inspection of a Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES) for 

a portion of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) wastewater collection system within the 

City of Miami Springs, Florida. The sanitary sewer collection system consists of approximately 46 miles of gravity 

pipes, 912 manholes, and 17 separate wastewater collection basins within the City of Miami Springs, Florida. 

King is monitoring and inspecting the Contractor's cleaning and evaluation of MDWASD's sanitary sewer 

collection system, including gravity system, manholes and pump stations, for compliance with project 

specifications. Cleaning is accomplished by high velocity hydro-cleaning equipment. Smoke testing is also 

performed for the entire system. Additionally, King is documenting and reporting any discrepancies found on the 

MDWASD provided Sewer Atlas Maps on the Department's Atlas Correction Form so that MDWASD GIS Master 

Atlas sheets are up date. 

Engineering activity includes reviewing the video inspection recordings of the sewer lines that are cleaned and 

video inspected by the Contractor within each pump station basin and making repair recommendations according 

to MDWASD’s approved repair protocols. The protocols describe repair technologies that will be used to 

rehabilitate the defective segments identified through the SSES project. 

Estimated Construction Cost: $270,000 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 


and construction. 

(3) ROLE






Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department Basis of Design Reports 







Dan Edwards, P.E. 

Chief – Planning Section 


On-Going 



NUMBER 

2 



786-552-8354 

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, 

size, and cost) 

King Engineering was awarded this continuing services 

contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable Distribution Work 

Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify 

Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of- 

Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force 

mains, pump stations preliminary engineering, determine its 

sizes and determine the best route for the proposed force 

mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of 

probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of 

required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project 

schedule. These projects to date include: 

1) Pump Station Engineering Reports (six) and Pump 

Station 717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation 

King Engineering Associates, Inc. (King) has been selected 

by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to 

provide engineering services in the preparation of Basis of 

Design Reports. This work assignment involves preparing 

pump station engineering reports for six pump station 

upgrades, analyzing the proposed Pump Station (PS) 717 

sewer forcemain system and providing alternative forcemain 

recommendations. These Pump Stations are as follows: 

717, 719, 728, 730, 738, and 739. 

As part of the analysis, the following criteria were considered: 

• Force main’s maintenance issues solved (4-Inch PS 717 force main and 10-Inch golf course force main) 

• No “piggy backs” 

• No property issues (New booster pump station only) 

• Smaller pump station, less total dynamic head 

• Flow diversion availability (72-Inch force main) 

• Cost effectiveness 

• No under utilization of PS 709 

2) 48-inch Water main Interconnect in the Central East Area (Downtown Miami) Preliminary Alternative 

Water Main Route Analysis: The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of 

Downtown Miami needs to be completed from the existing 48-Inch water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th 

Street and south to an existing 36-Inch water main along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. 

This project involved performing a preliminary alternative water main route analysis in order to interconnect the 

existing 48-Inch water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-Inch on NW 6 Street. The size of the 

interconnect water main was determined via modeling by MDWASD to be 48-Inch water main. The proposed 

interconnect will improve water service in MDWASD’s service area, including but not delimited to the AA Arena, 

Fisher Island, Overtown, Port of Miami and the Village of Key Biscayne. Currently, when several cruise ships are 

being filled with water concurrently, and the existing 24-Inch water main on the Rickenbacker Causeway is 

closed, Key Biscayne and Fisher Island do not receive adequate water supply. Therefore, the existing 30-Inch 

and 24-Inch on NW 6 Street from approximately NW 1st Court to Biscayne Blvd were paralleled with a new 36- 

Inch water main in order to improve the available water supply in the area. 

Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the



determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 7,300 feet of 48-Inch Water 

main in the Miami Downtown area. 

3) CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain Connection 

Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis: 

MDWASD has three wastewater treatment plants: South 

District Wastewater Treatment Plant (SDWWTP), North 

District Wastewater Treatment Plant (NDWWTP), and 

Central District Wastewater Treatment Plant (CDWWTP). 

The CDWWTP is one of two regional wastewater 

treatment plants that currently discharge wastewater 

through ocean outfalls. Pursuant to the requirements of 

Chapter 2008-232, Laws of Florida Domestic Wastewater 

Ocean Outfalls, the discharge of domestic wastewater 

through ocean outfalls in Florida will be prohibited after 

December 31, 2025. Currently, MDWASD is developing 

plans to divert flow from the CDWWTP to other 

wastewater treatment plants, including a proposed West 

District Water Reclamation Plant (WDWRP) and the 

SDWWTP. The proposed interconnection evaluated in 

this analysis would allow for wastewater flow from Pump 

Station 1 (PS 1) and Pump Station 2 (PS 2) to be diverted 

to the proposed WDWRP and the SDWWTP. 

This project involved performing a preliminary alternative 

pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to an 

existing 42-Inch force main which discharges at a manhole 

at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and the existing 

48-Inch force main in the same vicinity. The interconnect 

force main size was determined by MDWASD to be a 60- 

Inch force main as a result of modeling showing that a 60- 

Inch force main parallel to the existing 48-Inch force main on NW 2nd Street would provide sufficient pumping 

capacity. The project begins on NW 6th Avenue where the point of connection with the existing 84-Inch 

forcemain will be identified. The project then extends west and then north along a route to be determined to NW 

6th Street/NW 13th Avenue where the point of connection with the existing 42-Inch force main will be identified. 

Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the 



determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 5,700 feet of 60-Inch 

Forcemain near the Miami Downtown area. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 





Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 



(3) ROLE 


(3) ROLE 


(3) ROLE 







MDWASD – Wastewater Transmission System Hydraulic Computer 

Model Task # 1 – Wastewater Gravity Sewer Modeling – Phase 1 







Peter Jelonek, PE 


On-Going 



NUMBER 

3 


NA 


786-552-8226 


King Engineering Associates, Inc. (King) has been selected by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department 

(MDWASD) to provide engineering, planning, evaluation, analysis, and wastewater modeling services. The 

“Overall Task Order” covers Special Services at the request of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department 

(MDWASD). 

MDWASD is the fifth largest utility in the nation and provides water and sewer service for most of Miami-Dade 

County, serving a current population of over 2,000,000 residents. 

MDWASD has a gravity sewer model which includes 1018 basins. The gravity sewer collection system (pipes 

only) was developed using interpolated invert elevations. While the gravity pipe network is incorporated into the 

overall countywide wastewater model, it is not currently operational. The current operational model is focused on 

the pressured system of pipes and pumps using SCADA data real-time pump on/off set points. 

As part of the continued development of the wastewater model, MDWASD wishes to incorporate the gravity 

system into the model. However, MDWASD wants to use a simplified but accurate methodology to expedite 

model development, reduce model run times, and minimize the associated level of effort. The proposed 

methodology incorporates two simplifying assumptions: 

• Use extrapolated invert elevations for the gravity sewer system pipes. The current extrapolation methodology 

starts with the known pipe invert elevation at the wet well and extrapolates inverts upstream as a function of 

pipe length and diameter. Alternatively, inverts can be extracted from as-built information which is a time 

consuming effort that will still result in some information gaps. 

• Use the gravity system stage-storage curve to route gravity basin inflows (design hydrographs) into the pump 

station wet well. The alternative is to simulate the gravity system in detail which requires an extensive effort 

to develop the system and will substantially increase model run times.

Under this task order, King provided the following services: 

• Developed the detailed gravity model with as-built invert and rim elevations for Basins 183 and 237. 

• Inflow hydrographs were already apportioned to each manhole in the interpolated model provided by 

MDWASD, the same ratio was used when distributing the current billing records for basins 183 and 237. The 

unit hydrograph was updated based on the Dry Weather Flow hydrograph provided by MDWASD for the two 

basins. 

• Obtained and confirmed pump curves, wet well inverts, pump on and off levels, pressure curves, and SCADA 

for PS 183 and 237. 

• Stage storage curves for the interpolated and as-built model were compared for both basins in order to 

highlight major differences in data accuracy. 

• Stage storage models for Basins 183 and 237 were created using both the interpolated model and the as-built 

model storage curves. 

• Diurnal pressure patterns for both basins were obtained from MDWASD, applied to the interpolated model 

run, and increased until an overflow (or near overflow) condition was observed. This increased pressure 

pattern was used as a basis for all other model runs. 

• All model scenarios (Interpolated, As-Built, Interpolated Stage Storage, and As-Built Stage Storage) were run 

to obtain a history of wet well water levels, inflow, and outflow hydrographs. 

• Prepared the following comparison graphs/tables: 

o Interpolated stage storage versus as-built stage storage (and error histograms) for basins 183 and 237. 

o 

Inflow and outflow hydrographs at the wet well for basins 183 and 237 (comparing the four model 

scenarios outlined above). 

o Wet well water levels for basins 183 and 237 (comparing all four scenarios). 

Fee: $21,800 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



c. 


Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 


(3) ROLE 

Environmental Engineering, 

Computer Modeling 

(3) ROLE 

Environmental Engineering, 

Computer Modeling






Coastal Water Systems Interconnect Project – Phase 1, Basis of 

Design Report 


Northwest Florida Water Management District 

81 Water Management Drive 

Havana, FL 32333-4712 



Mr. Nick Wooten 

Bureau Chief, Water 

Resources 


On-going 



NUMBER 

4 



850-539-5999 


The Northwest Florida Water Management District 

(NWFWMD) retained King Engineering Associates, Inc. 

(King) to provide planning, engineering, modeling, design, 

permitting, and construction management services for the 

implementation of regional water system interconnects with 

the objective of increasing water supply reliability in 

communities along the coastal panhandle in the event of 

water shortages resulting from environmental emergencies, 

natural disasters, or system failures. The study area 

included 18 different coastal utilities in Santa Rosa, 

Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties. 

King had previously completed a preliminary feasibility study 

of coastal water systems interconnects in January 2009. 

That study identified potential interconnects that achieved a 

high level of reliability for current and future demand in a 

cost-effective manner by relying on existing interconnects to 

the maximum extent possible and implementing 

interconnects in phases to match future demand growth. A 

more detailed engineering study was recommended based on the successful results of the feasibility study. 

Subsequent to the preliminary study, the NWFWMD retained King to proceed with Phase 1 of the Coastal Water Systems Interconnect 

Project. The objective of Phase 1 is to develop a Basis of Design Report (BODR). The BODR is intended to define major project elements 

and outline a clear course of action prior to initiating detail design activities. Major tasks under the BODR included: 

• Analysis of current (2007) and future (2030) water demand for the 18 utilities 

• Evaluation of current and future sources of raw water, including current permitted capacities 

• Determination of utility emergency production capacities based on well installed pump capacity, high service pumps, and water treatment 

plant capacities 

• Establishment of minimum interconnect flow reliability targets 

• Hydraulic modeling (H2ONET) 

• Construction of hydraulic model (H2ONET) including all 18 utilities, pumps, ground and elevated storage tanks, major 

transmission and distribution mains, valves, and interconnects. Used TAZ population data for geographical distribution of 

demand. 

• Model calibration to 2007 conditions (flows and pressures) 

• Creation of a 2030 base model including additional improvements (pumps, pipes, source waters) 

• Model evaluation of regional interconnect alternatives including failure scenarios and required additional infrastructure to 

maximize interconnect capacity 

• Analysis of finished water quality and desktop blending calculations to evaluate potential water quality problems and recommend 

chemical adjustment when blending waters from different sources and treated by different methods. Also estimated residence times of 

water in interconnect pipes and recommended solutions. Effort included finished water quality sampling event. 

• Evaluation of alignment alternatives considering cost, existing ROW/easements, utility conflicts, and MOT requirements, etc. 

• Prepared 200 scale maps showing preferred horizontal alignments 

• Preliminary design drawings 

• Permitting requirements and schedule 

• Prepared opinion of probable cost 

• Preliminary Operations Plans/Protocols 

• Detailed implementation schedule 

• Basis of Design Report summarizing Phase 1 work 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Water Use Analysis, Water 

Modeling, Water Quality 

Analysis, Preliminary 

Design Drawings, Cost 

Estimates 

(3) ROLE 

Preliminary Engineering, 

Water Modeling, GIS, 

Schedule






Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan, Town of Lauderdale- 

By-The-Sea, FL 


Lauderdale by-the-Sea 

Municipal Services 

4501 Ocean Drive 

Lauderdale by-the-Sea, FL 33308 



Mr. Don Prince 

Municipal Services Director 


2010 



NUMBER 

5 



954-776-5119 


King was retained by the Town of Lauderdale-By-The-Sea (LBTS) to provide sanitary sewer system evaluation, 

analysis and engineering services for their “Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan”. The sanitary sewer 

collection system consists of two separate wastewater collection basins with approximately 10.5 miles of gravity 

pipes, 165 manholes and two pump stations (60 HP and 7.5 HP) with their respective force mains. 

The project involved conducting evaluations to quantify the needs of the existing gravity sewer system, flow 

meter, and lift stations, recommend improvements, prepare cost estimates, and develop a Sanitary Sewer Capital 

Improvements Plan (SSCIP). The work performed included: 

• Video review of 165 CCTV inspections – 632 defects were identified. 

• Assign repair recommendations based on approved repair protocol – 252 repairs were recommended. 

• Flow meter evaluation – (1) verified meter was installed as per manufacture’s specifications (2) reviewed 

calibration records. 

• Inspection and evaluation of two lift stations including hydraulic analysis, spacing requirements and 

electrical requirements – various minor repairs were recommended. 

• Infiltration and inflow (I/I) evaluation, including the development of dry and wet weather hydrographs for 

each lift station – analysis identified both stations as rain dependent I/I (RDII). 

• Prepared a comprehensive SSCIP report to assist the town of LBTS in planning ongoing maintenance, 

system repairs and upgrades, and quantifying the potential savings from the implementation of an 

Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) program. 

The SSCIP plan included the costs of repairs to the gravity sewer lines and two lift stations as well as the 

replacement costs of the lift stations and other key components of the sewer system. In addition, it included costs 

related to a proposed Gravity Sewer System Capacity Evaluation Hydraulic Model, proposed Lift Station 

Monitoring Program, proposed Suspect Lateral I/I Program, and I/I Reduction Maintenance Program. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Doral, FL 


Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Planning, design 

(3) ROLE 

Planning, design






Pasco County General Professional and Consulting 

Services Agreement- Pasco County, FL 


Pasco County Utilities 



Contract1987-current 


Bob Sigmond - Director 

Utilities Fiscal Services Dept. 


cost) 

For the past 24 years, King has been providing professional 

engineering consulting services on an as-needed basis for projects 

related to the design, permitting and construction, operation, 

maintenance, rehabilitation, and expansion of facilities for water, 

wastewater and reclaimed water systems. Projects include water 

treatment plants, wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, 

gravity sewers, reservoirs, pipelines and reuse stations. The 

following project describes our recent wastewater treatment 

facility project and scope of services. Additional wastewater 

treatment and pumping systems projects are listed on the 

following page. 

Shady Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion-14 mgd 

In 2007, King was retained to provide design, permitting and 

construction services for the expansion of the Shady Hills 

Subregional WWTP from 2 mgd to 14 mgd. This project included the 

complete replacement of the existing headworks; four anoxic basins; 

three new aeration basins with DO control, each equipped with 

internal recycle pump stations for nitrate removal; four new 80-foot 

clarifiers; five deep bed mono-media filters; conversion of the 

existing high service pump station to a filter washwater pump station; 

conversion of the existing chlorine contact chamber and effluent 

transfer pump station to a filter washwater mud well; two new 

chlorine contact chambers with sodium hypochlorite storage and 

feed system; 32 mgd effluent transfer pump station; one 5 MG 

ground storage tank; 24 mgd high service reclaimed water pump 

station; 80,000 gpd septage/grease receiving station with screens, 

storage and vacuum filters; two 1-MG sludge storage tanks with 

scale house; 21 MG lined reject water storage pond; and, a new 

Administration Building. The project included expansion of the 

potable and plant service water systems; new standby generator and 

power distribution system, distributed control system, and security 

system. The plant expansion was designed to allow the future 

expansion to 21 mgd. Construction was completed 2010. 


SERVICES: 



NUMBER 

6 


varies 


727-847-8041 

• Master Planning – Water, 

Wastewater, Reclaimed Water 

• Project Feasibility 


• Preliminary and Final Design 

• Studies / Evaluations 

• System Analysis / Reports and 

Recommendations 

• System Performance Analysis 

• Regulatory Evaluations 


• Preparation of Specifications, 

Bid Documents, and 

Construction Drawings 

• Bid Services including 

Preparation, Negotiations, and 

Evaluations 

• Construction Administration and 

Field Observations 

• Operation and Maintenance 

Activities for system 

Management 

• Start-up and Equipment Testing 

• Environmental Assessments 

• Quality Assurance / Quality 

Control 

• Contract Closeout 


• Maintenance of Traffic 

• Environmental/Ecological 

Assessments






Pasco County General Professional and Consulting 

Services Agreement -Pasco County, FL 


Pasco County Utilities 



Bob Sigmond - Director 

Utilities Fiscal Services Dept. 


ADDITIONAL MAJOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROJECTS 

INCLUDE: 

Wastewater Treatment Facilities Projects 

• Wastewater Treatment Plants (8) Capacity Analysis / Operation and 

Maintenance Reports annually for 5 years 

• Lacoochee Wastewater Treatment Plant-52,000 gpd tubular tank 

• Lacoochee WWTP Flow Equalization System and Rerating 

• Odessa Subregional WWTP Upgrade (0.15 to 0.30 mgd) 

• Odessa Subregional WWTP Plant Expansion (from 0.3 to 1.0 mgd) 

• Land O’Lakes Subregional Wastewater Treatment Plant 

Phase 1B (8.0 mgd to 1.0 mgd) 

• Land O’Lakes Subregional Wastewater Treatment Plant (3.5 mgd) 

• Shady Hills Subregional WWTP Upgrade Phase 2 (from 0.4 to 3.5 mgd) 

• Reuse Metering and Controls 

• Process Equipment Evaluation and Rehabilitation Project for Hudson 

and Embassy Hills Wastewater Treatment Facilities 

• Embassy Hills WWTP Sludge Handling and Filtration Improvements 

Wastewater Treatment Plants Capacity Analysis Reports 

Pump Stations / Force Main Projects 

• Trinity/Odessa Master Wastewater Pump Station and Transmission 

Main 

• Central Pasco Master Pump Stations and Pipelines Project 

Sunlake Master Pump Station/ Collier Parkway Booster Pump Station 

• Little Road Water Treatment Plant Odor Control 

• Central Pasco Water and Wastewater Systems Improvements 

Reclaimed Water Storage Treatment and Distribution Projects 

• Timber Pines Reclaimed Water Irrigation System and Master Plan 

• Wet Weather Assessment 

• Boyette Road Reservoir 

• North-Central Pasco Reclaimed Main & Force 

• West Pasco Reuse System Northeast Segment 

Master Planning 

• Pasco County Wastewater Master Plan 

• Pasco County Reuse Master Plan 


Contract 1987-current 




NUMBER 

6 


varies 


727-847-8041 

a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



(City and State) 

Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Prime 

Environmental Engineering–Water / Wastewater 

Permitting 



Surveying






Ulmerton Road Utility Adjustments, Pinellas County, FL 


City of Largo 



Leland Dicus, P.E. 

City Engineer 


ongoing 



NUMBER 

5 


ongoing 


(727) 587-6713 


The City of Largo operates its own wastewater and reclaimed water utilities 

serving approximately 75,000 residents. Many of the City’s major utilities run 

along Ulmerton Road (State Road 688), which bisects the entire length of the 

City from east to west for almost 9 miles. Ulmerton Road is a major 

commercial traffic artery and is being widened in phases by the Florida 

Department of Transportation (FDOT). King was retained by the City of Largo 

to provide design, permitting, utility coordination and construction services for 

utility relocations associated with the different phases of the Ulmerton Road 

widening project. To date, the work has been completed under three separate 

contracts and has included approximately 16,400 LF of wastewater and 

reclaimed water utilities. 

Ulmerton Road Utility Relocations 

As part of the route analysis and preliminary design process, King evaluated and proposed an improved wastewater 

system configuration that provided the same level of service to the customer while resolving construction conflicts and 

reducing total length of pipe by over 20 percent. King’s innovative approach and attention to detail resulted in a cost 

savings to the City of approximately $200,000. Much of the alignment was heavily congested with traffic, businesses 

and utilities. Therefore, the project required an extensive amount of communication with the FDOT, business owners, 

the public and other utility providers located with the right-of-way. 

Throughout the project, King worked with the FDOT Utility Coordinator to complete the plans and to coordinate 

construction schedules, specifications, and estimates using new FDOT Utility Work Schedule forms and electronic 

submittal procedures, including FDOT PEDDS and MicroStation drafting software. 

Design is currently underway for the final two phases of the project, scheduled to be completed by 2012. As part of 

these final design services, King performed a study and developed recommendations for integrating expansions of the 

City’s sewer system into the utility relocation projects and providing sewer service to areas of the city currently served 

by individual septic systems. 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(1) FIRM NAME 


Tampa, FL 

T 


(3) ROLE 

Engineering Design and 


Services 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE 

f. 

(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE




Keller Septic System Phase Out Program, Keller, TX 


City of Keller, TX 


On-going 



Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E. 

Director of Public Works 




8 



817-743-4080 

The project involves the installation of sanitary sewer lines in three locations within the City of Keller to allow the 

decommissioning of septic tanks. The project is a multiphase project, consisting of three phases: 

Phase 1 - Katy Road Sanitary Sewer 

Improvements: this project involves construction of 

9,400 linear feet of new 8-inch gravity sewer line, 

2,500 linear feet of 3-inch force main, and one lift 

station. 

Phase 2 - Big Bear East Collectors: this project will 

extend the residential sewer collector system to pick 

up the wastewater from the Country Place Estates, 

Treehouse Lane, and Blackwood / Florence areas and 

transport it to the proposed Big Bear East Branch 

Interceptor system (2009) and then to the Trinity River 

Authority’s Central Regional Wastewater Treatment 

Plant in Grand Prairie. 

Phase 3 - Marshall Branch East Collectors: this 

Proposed Wastewater Line Profile 

project involves construction of a residential sewer 

collector system to pick up the wastewater from the Belaire Hills Estates and Summer Ridge areas and transport it to 

the proposed East-West Marshall Branch Interceptor system and then to the Trinity River Authority’s Denton Creek 

Wastewater Treatment Plant in Roanoke. King prepared all the application material and assisted the City in 

obtaining low-interest rate funding for the project through the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) in 2010. 

The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) is a State Agency created by the Texas Legislature in 1957 to 

provide loans to local governments for water supply projects and wastewater projects such as the one we are here to 

talk about tonight. TWDB financial assistance programs are funded through state-backed bonds and federal grant 

funds. 

The TWDB includes the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) in its portfolio of financial assistance 

programs. With King assistance, the City of Keller in 2010 made application for these funds and competed 

successfully against hundreds of other cities to obtain these most sought after funds. Funded in part by federal grant 

money, the CWSRF provides loans at interest rates lower than the market can offer to any eligible applicant. With 

either option, the borrower will receive a net long-term interest rate that is effectively 1.6 percent below the rate the 

borrower would receive on the open market at the time of closing. This 1.6 percent interest rate reduction equates to 

a savings of approximately $140,000 per $1 million borrowed during the life of a loan. Based on an expected 

borrowing of approximately $6 Million, these subsidized loans from the Texas Water Development Board will save 

the citizens of Keller over $800,000. 

a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Austin, TX 


Funding Assistance, Planning, Utilities Engineering, Permitting 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE - Subconsultant 

Funding Assistance, Planning, Utilities Engineering, Permitting






NUMBER) 

9 


Water, Wastewater & Reclaimed Water Master Plan, Baker 

County, FL 


Baker County, Florida 



Ed Preston 

Planning & Zoning 

Director 


Baker County is entering a period of potential growth and 

County officials decided to have this Master Plan prepared. 

The County is considering forming a regional utility, and is 

using the Master Plan to organize utility elements and 

secure quality facilities in the event of the County taking over 

the regional system. The Master Plan identified a new MBR 

wastewater treatment facility and new regional well field as 

significant elements of the system. This study set the 

ground work for Baker County to become a regional utility 

and provider of these services. This document established 

design criteria for regional water, wastewater and reclaimed 

water facilities. 


2006 


CONSTRUCTION (if 

applicable) 


904-259-3354 


a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(1) FIRM NAME 





Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Environmental 

Engineer 

(3) ROLE 


Environmental 

Engineer 

d. 


e. 


f. 







Miscellaneous Engineering 

Dunedin, FL 


City of Dunedin 

542 Main Street 

Dunedin, FL 34698 



Mr. Douglas Hutchens 


2009 



NUMBER 

10 





727-298-3005 


King has been providing engineering services on a continuing basis for the design, permitting and construction of miscellaneous public works 

projects. To date, projects have included stormwater and environmental improvements for Hammock Park, channel water quality control, 

wetland system improvements, utility coordination on downtown redevelopment projects, residential reclaimed water systems, reclaimed 

water transmission mains, SWFWMD grant coordination, water main replacement projects, new and rehabilitated potable water wells, sanitary 

sewer systems, city-wide telecommunications conduits, maintenance of traffic plans, and reverse osmosis water treatment plant, and 

advanced wastewater treatment plant modifications and upgrades. 

The following list depicts many of the tasks that have been performed under various scopes for the City of Dunedin projects listed. 

• Preliminary and final design services 


• Reports 

• Studies 

• Modeling 

• Bid services including preparation negotiations, and evaluations 

• Construction management including observation and inspection 

• Operation and maintenance 

• Start-up, equipment testing 

• Quality assurance/quality control 

• Survey 

• Landscape services 

• Residential Reclaimed Water Distribution Systems 

• Reclaimed Water Transmission System Hydraulic Model 


• Lift Station #10 Refurbishment 

• Main Street Water Main Replacement 

• LS-15 Influent Sewer 

• LS-15 Force Main Replacement 

• Rosewood Channel Stabilization 

• Management, Operations and Maintenance (MOM) Program Assessment 

• Weathersfield Booster Pump Station Reclaimed Water Pump Replacement 

• Lift Station 20 Evaluation 

• Spanish Trails Sanitary Sewage Study 

• Keene Road Utility Relocation 

• Belcher Road Reclaimed Water Storage and Booster Pump Station 

• Spanish Trails Sanitary Sewer and Reclaimed Water System 

• Community Center 

• Dunedin Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Transfer Pump Upgrade 

• Disinfection Evaluation for Removal / Inactivation of Viruses 

• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Pretreatment Chlorine Feed System 

• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Green Sand Filter Rehabilitation 

• Water Plant Green Sand Filters No. 6 and 7 

• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Chemical Bulk Storage System 

• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Modifications 

• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Stainless Steel Piping Modifications 

• Coastal Raw and Reclaimed Water Main 

• Reclaimed Water South Loop Transmission Main 

• Dunedin Risk Management Plans $ Process Safety Management Plans 

• Capacity Analysis Report for 6.0 MGD Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 


and construction.


Ecological Services (Function Codes 07 and 19) 

King’s Ecological staff has completed over 40 ecosystem/ecological restoration projects ranging from 10 acre 

habitat restoration projects to complex ecosystem restoration projects within large watersheds requiring 

extensive modeling of surface and groundwater conditions, erosion control measures, identification of wildlife 

and plant species, and permitting through state and local regulatory agencies. 

Each of these projects required King to coordinate with both cooperative funding partners and various 

interested parties and permitting agencies in order to successfully address the conditions and challenges unique 

to each project. As a result, our staff is intimately familiar with various regulatory requirements and the 

inevitable changes and updates to such regulations. 

King approaches each project with the understanding that the final plan must be ecologically and financially 

sound, with long-term management and sustainability as the prime objectives. Our experience includes the 

planning and design of created forested and herbaceous wetland systems, restoration and enhancement of 

degraded uplands and wetlands and the preservation of land with high ecological values. 

All of King's Ecological team members are authorized by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 

(FWC) to conduct work pursuant to a valid Scientific Collection Permit. Additionally, King’s ecological staff 

members, Mike Palmer and Ben Ballard, are authorized to capture, handle and relocate gopher tortoises 

pursuant to two valid Gopher Tortoise Authorized Agent Permits as issued by the FWC (#GTA-09-00026 and 

#GTA-09-00269). 

King's Ecological Services staff consists of 4 Environmental Scientists with professional expertise in a variety of 

applicable environmental disciplines including: 

• Habitat Restoration & Enhancement Design 

• Wetland Functional Analysis 

• Stormwater Treatment Retrofitting 

• Marine and Freshwater Ecology 

• Terrestrial Ecology 


• Natural Systems Hydrology 

• Water Quality Analysis 

• Listed Species Management 

• Habitat Evaluation and Monitoring 

King’s Ecological Staff have performed the above listed disciplines for many successful and thriving cooperatively 

funded Surface Water Improvement and Management Program (SWIM) habitat restoration and stormwater 

retrofit projects in the central Florida area, as well as similar projects throughout the state. 

King ecologists are experienced in the collection of both qualitative and quantitative field data, as well as the 

interpretation of such data relative to decision making or adaptive management recommendations. We have 

significant experience in the utilization of various data collection methodologies, including Florida Department 

of Environmental Protection Standard Operating Procedures for Field Activities, Florida Fish and Wildlife 

Conservation Commission (FWC) Methodology and Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedures (WRAP), Rapid 

Assessment Method (RAM) and Florida’s Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM). 

Aerial photographs are routinely used in habitat assessments, habitat mitigation design, assessments of coastal 

zone changes, and delineation of wetland boundaries. King’s environmental scientists are highly skilled and 

experienced in the ground truthing of ecosystems derived from aerial photographs, soils maps and other base 


1



data collections in the field. They are also very adept in the interpretation of data and in the interpretation and 

use of aerials, including black and white, full-color and infrared. 

King’s scientists are also able to statistically analyze vegetative and flow data for the development and use of 

regression models and other analyses performed by accepted procedures and to recognize patterns of 

community transition within the data. 

The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support 

ecological services project types. 



Task Manager 

Brian Skidmore 

Bioligist 

Peter Bottone 



Biologist 

Benjamin Ballard 


Biologist 

Mike Palmer 



Code 

Description 


07 Biologist 





19 Ecologist 

















53 Scheduler 








NPDES 


2






Terra Ceia Ecosystem Restoration Project 






1999 


NUMBER) 

1 


2010 


Southwest Florida Water Management District 

Dr. Brandt Henningsen 

(813) 985-7481 


King was contracted by the District to provide design, permitting and construction administration for this largescale 

ecosystem restoration project within the Terra Ceia Aquatic and Buffer Preserve. The 1,600 acre property 

is jointly owned by the District and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The site was 

formerly known as the Terra Ceia Isles parcel and at one time was proposed for a large-scale Development of 

Regional Impact. The project provides approximately 200 acres of estuarine habitat restoration and 400 acres of 

upland habitat restoration and may represent the largest single restoration project undertaken by the District to 

date. Permit approvals were obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the FDEP for the project. 

Elements of the project design included the regrading of disturbed wetlands to facilitate nuisance species 

removal and replanting with desirable salt marsh grass species, the regrading of agricultural ditches and 

associated spoil mounds to facilitate the construction of braided tidal creeks and channels, the regrading of 

selected fallow, nuisance species dominated agricultural fields to allow either tidal exchange and planting with 

selected salt marsh grass species, or freshwater wetland creation with the planting of freshwater marsh species, 

and the clearing of large upland parcels to facilitate nuisance/exotic species removal and replanting with 

desirable upland species. 

Within the Terra Ceia property, the existing cultural and historical resources were initially identified and mapped 

pursuant to the completion of a Level 1 cultural resource survey. The nature and location of each identified 

cultural resource was taken into account in the development of the conceptual design for the overall project. At 

the time that construction plans were prepared, any cultural resource areas that fell adjacent to proposed work 

areas were located using mapping grade GPS equipment and incorporated into the construction plans to ensure 

that the construction of habitat restoration areas would not imply impacts to existing cultural resources. 

The project received a “Second Place Future of the Region 

Award” from the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. King 

also received accolades from review agencies, the project 

Cooperator and Construction Contractor for the quality and 

accuracy of the ecosystem restoration plan set. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

King Engineering 


Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Civil Engineering / Ecological 

Services 

b. 







Camp Branch Creek – Putnam County, FL 


Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation 

Commission 



Ed Hayes, Project Manager 


2010 



NUMBER) 

2 


2011 

c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE 

NUMBER 

352-357-2398 


King provided design and permitting services associated with the proposed restoration of Camp Branch 

Creek, a tributary of the St. John’s River located in Putnam County. A section of the original creek was 

diverted in the late 1960’s by excavation of a “rim ditch” in association with agricultural activities, which 

has resulted in hydrologic impacts (tree fall, soils subsidence and upland species invasion) within the 

historic creek bed and wetland floodplain. The objective of the project was to restore flows to the 

original creek bed and improve the health and function of the associated wetland system. King’s 

design focused on the partial back-filling/plugging of the man-made rim ditch system with diversion of 

flows back into the historic creek bed, along with removal of flow obstructions within the historic flow 

path, in order to mimic the pre-disturbance flow conditions for Camp Branch Creek. Services provided 

by King under this contract included base data collection and evaluation, environmental assessments, 

stormwater and flood modeling, wetland enhancement plan, design, regulatory permitting, bidding 

assistance and construction observation. 

King prepared a topographic survey of the project area, delineated the wetlands along the rim ditch and 

historic creek segments, and performed extensive hydraulic modeling of the existing and proposed 

conditions. King also prepared a Technical Design Memorandum to evaluate design alternatives and 

prepared final construction plans and specifications for the selected alternative design. King Ecologists 

are also providing post-construction monitoring of the wetland enhancement and restoration areas. 

Construction 

Cost: $263,906 

Before 


After 

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(1) FIRM NAME 





Tampa, FL 



(3) ROLE 

Civil, Drainage 

Engineering, Surveying 

(3) ROLE 

Ecological, Water 

Resources Support 

e. 

f. 








St. Petersburg Junior College WESR Project 





1999 


NUMBER) 


3 


2001 


St. Petersburg College 

Lisa Cook 

(850) 245-9487 


King was contracted by St. Petersburg College (SPC) to provide design, 

permitting, bid package preparation, and construction management services for 

the Wetland Enhancement and Stormwater Retrofit (WESR) project located at 

the 102 acre Seminole campus. The WESR was a cooperatively funded project 

between SPC, SWFWMD, and Pinellas County. The project involved a 

combination of wetland restoration / enhancement of 10 acres of highly 

disturbed wetlands in concert with a stormwater retrofit. A series of wetland 

and upland ponds "cascade" stormwater through the campus site to provide 

treatment. The project provided treatment for the runoff from 74 acres of 

developed watershed that otherwise would be discharged to Lake Seminole in 

an untreated state. In order to address the unique challenge of a 10-foot plus 

drop in topography across the site, King 

developed an innovative design utilizing a 

cascading system of ponds and wetland 

marshes. Nuisance wetland vegetation, 

primarily Brazilian pepper (Schinus 

terebinthifolius), Chinese tallow (Sapium 

sebiferum), primrose willow (Ludwigia spp.), 

potato vine (Dioscorea sp.), and cattail (Typha 

spp.) were removed via a combination of 

mechanized means and herbicide application. 

All wetland restoration areas were replanted 

with desirable wetland vegetation and were deemed “successful” by the 

permitting agencies. The completed and fully functional project is currently being 

utilized by the College as an outdoor classroom to educate students about 

stormwater treatment concepts, wetland habitat function and wildlife identification. 

This project received an award for professional ecosystem restoration 

design from the Florida Native Plant Society (FNPS). 

Cost: $ 2 million. 


a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 




(3) ROLE 

Design, permitting, construction 

management services 

e. 







Coral Creek Ecosystem Restoration 



ongoing 


NUMBER) 

4 


TBD 






Ms. Stephanie Powers 

(813) 985-7481 


King is currently under contract to the District to provide 

professional engineering and ecological services for the 

Coral Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project, a joint 

Department/District SWIM habitat restoration project located 

on the 2,600-acre Coral Creek Preserve managed by the 

FDEP as part of the Charlotte Harbor Preserve State Park 

system. 

King initially conducted a comprehensive Feasibility Study 

and developed a Master Conceptual Ecosystem Restoration 

Plan for the entire property. The Feasibility Study included 

a detailed historical account and trend analysis 

documenting changes to the site from pre-1950’s to current 

conditions, site reconnaissance work, listed species and 

cultural resource assessments, exotic/nuisance plant 

inventories, water quality analysis, hydraulic and salinity modeling of the 12,000 acre urbanized West and East 

Branch basins of Coral Creek. 

Development of the Conceptual Plan targeted hydrological restoration of over 585 acres of degraded 

wetland/slough systems and proposed enhancements to the 200-acre West Branch Impoundment. The plan 

integrated proposed park improvements while maintaining the permitted stormwater management system function 

and flood protection for the adjacent Rotonda West Development and avoiding impacts to over 174 individual inholding 

parcels. 

In addition, the study included an evaluation of potential salt-water intrusion effects associated with the Coral 

Creek Dam removal as well as pollutant loading and stormwater retrofit opportunities to address TMDL concerns 

for nutrients within the East Branch of Coral Creek, a FDEP 303(d) listed impaired waterbody. 

Following District and FDEP cooperator input on the Conceptual Plan, King coordinated the final design, 

permitting and is assisting with bid preparation and construction management of restoration / stormwater retrofit 

projects 1A and 1B selected for implementation in 2012 and beyond. These projects include design of a geoweb 

weir to impound additional water within an existing degraded wetland system and discharge into the East Branch, 

returning the system to historic conditions. 

Additionally, two freshwater marshes were designed using two sheetpile with concrete cap diversion structures, 

returning flows back into East Branch, in accordance with the historic flow pattern established during the modeling 

phase of the project. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Engineering / Ecological 

Services 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

Archaeological Consultants, Inc 


Sarasota, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Archaeological Services 

c. 


STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004)






Lake Thonotosassa Shoreline Restoration 



1996 


NUMBER) 

5 


2001 






Lizanne Garcia 

(813) 985-7481 


King was contracted by the District to design, permit and manage the construction of a freshwater 

marsh creation and restoration project along Lake Thonotosassa, an 819 acre lake located in eastern 

Hillsborough County, Florida. FDOT mitigation funds were used for the construction and planting of this 

project. 

The project involved restoration of approximately 100 acres of disturbed and dewatered freshwater 

marsh habitat along the lake's eastern shoreline that was used as improved pasture. 

The project involved the removal of a shoreline dike 

system and significant regrading of the areas to be 

restored. The rehydrated areas were replanted with 

desirable freshwater vegetation. A structure was designed 

and constructed to divert flow from Baker Creek, the major 

tributary to the lake, through the restored freshwater marsh 

prior to discharge into the lake. 

The primary objective of the project was to provide 

removal of both nutrients and suspended solids from Baker 

Creek prior to entering the lake, as well as return the 

former value to fish and wildlife habitat along the eastern 

shoreline of the lake. This successful project required 

permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Florida 

Department of Environmental Protection and Hillsborough 

County. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 


Services 

b. 


c. 


d. 








Alligator Creek Ecosystem Restoration 



ongoing 


NUMBER) 

6 


n/a 


Southwest Florida Water Management District, Surface Water 

Improvement and Management Section 



Stephanie Powers 


985-7481 


Project objective is enhancement, restoration, and creation of 

coastal ecosystem habitats, and water quality improvements 

for the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine system, a SWIM Priority 

water body. This is a cooperative project with the Florida 

Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) who owns 

and manages the approximately 1,600 acre tract known as 

“Alligator Creek” as part of the Charlotte Harbor Preserve 

State Park (CHPSP), located south of Punta Gorda, between 

Burnt Store Road and the East Wall of Charlotte Harbor in 

Charlotte County, Florida. 

King is was tasked with the design, environmental permitting, 

bid preparation and construction management of Project No.’s 

4, 5, 6, 7, and 15 as identified in the Alligator Creek 

Conceptual Habitat Restoration Plan (Plan) collectively known 

as Alligator Creek Habitat Restoration Project-Phase 3. 

The project design focuses on the restoration of historic hydroperiods, hydropatterns, salinity gradients and sheet 

flow for a habitat mosaic containing over 100 acres of palustrine, oligohaline and estuarine wetland communities 

within the project area. The project will also enhance water quality entering the headwaters of Whidden Branch 

Creek system and Charlotte Harbor. To accomplish this restoration objective, King conducted a detailed H&H 

modeling analysis of the existing array of drainage ditches bisecting the project site that convey over 750 acres of 

offsite drainage, to ensure the proposed improvements would not result in a negative offsite impact. In addition, 

the project targets the removal of 110 acres of exotic/invasive vegetation, primarily dense stands of Brazilian 

pepper, and provide where appropriate, selective stormwater enhancements. The project design will 

accommodate park management objectives as well as existing listed species and archaeological resources. 

It is anticipated that the Project will provide the Charlotte Harbor estuarine ecosystem with hydrological restoration 

of important tidal creek and lagoonal habitats, transitional habitats, freshwater marshes, ponds and uplands. 

Restoration of these communities will help offset habitat impacts and losses suffered throughout Charlotte Harbor 

and will prove valuable for the public and for thousands of coastal species that use the Charlotte Harbor 

ecosystem. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 


Services 

b. 

c. 









Palm River Restoration, Hillsborough County, FL 



ongoing 


NUMBER) 

7 


n/a 


Southwest Florida Water Management District, FL 



Matt Preston 


813-985-7491 


The Palm River Restoration Project is a multi-faceted, multi-phase 

restoration project design within a 28 square mile, highly urbanized 

watershed in the City of Tampa and Hillsborough County. As an 

initial stage of project implementation, King prepared a Feasibility 

Study documenting existing data and information which involved 

solicitation of input from the District, FDOT and other stakeholders in 

order to identify and select specific property locations/components 

for implementation. The primary project objectives are to provide 

preliminary/final design plans and permitting of multiple stormwater 

retrofit and wetland/shoreline habitat restoration projects within the 

Palm River/McKay Basin. 

Project components included 2D hydrodynamic modeling, flood and 

scour analysis, data collection, surveying, pollutant loading/ 

treatment efficiency, dredging, spoil disposal and bank stabilization 

assessments within the C-135/Palm River, a U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers regulated floodway. Initial design phases have focused 

on freshwater and tidal wetland habitat restoration and 

enhancement, along with stormwater quality treatment from local 

sub-basins within the project area. 

This contract required multi-disciplinary services from King including 

civil engineering, survey and construction management over a 

projected three to five year period. 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 


b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

Archaeological Consultants, Inc 


Sarasota, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Archaeological Services 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 





8 


Lake SueMar Environmental Enhancement 

Dunedin, FL 


2009 



2010 


City of Dunedin – Florida 

737 Louden Avenue 2nd Floor 

Dunedin, FL 34697 



Thomas Burke, P.E. 

City Engineer 


727-298-3175 


The Lake SueMar stormwater and wetland enhancement project 

is served to complement the habitat and drainage improvements 

of the recently completed Hammock Park Restoration Project that 

was also designed and permitted by King. Lake SueMar was 

originally a ± 3.6-acre artificial lake that was historically 

excavated to provide fill and stormwater retention for the abutting 

residential development in the 1960s. 

King’s project design involved a diversion control structure on 

Channel A near Lake SueMar and two overflow weirs along the 

banks of the lake adjacent to Channels A and C for division of 

runoff into the lake. Additional design included regrading of the 

lake to include two sediment sumps near the channel inflows, the 

excavation of a deeper pool area within the lake for treatment purposes, and the construction of vegetative 

islands and littoral shelves for further habitat enhancement and water quality benefits to Lake SueMar as well as 

Cedar Creek and St. Joseph’s Sound. This SWFWMD cooperatively funded project required modeling of 

Channels A & C and Lake SueMar, using Cedar Creek as its outfall. Construction plans were developed and an 

Individual ERP from SWFWMD and a US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide permit were obtained. 

Construction observation services were provided for the duration of construction. 

King ecologists have been coordinating post-construction monitoring of the project, utilizing the "adaptive 

management" approach in order to evaluate stormwater improvement and habitat benefits of the project. 

Cost $880,000 


• Hydrology and Basin Studies 


• Design 

• Control Structure 

• Overflow Weirs 

• Regrading Design 

• Habitat Enhancement 

• Construction Observation 

• Post Construction Monitoring 

a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(1) FIRM NAME 

Engineering Technologies, Inc 



Tampa, FL 


Lake Mary, FL 


Civil Engineering 



Structural Engineering 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE






Coopers Point SWIM Project, Clearwater, FL 




SWIM Section 


Dr. Brandt Henningsen, PhD 


1997 



NUMBER) 

9 


1999 


Phone: 813-985-7481 


This District SWIM project involved the creation/restoration of 

over four (4) acres of intertidal habitat, including 

approximately three (3) acres of Brazilian pepper-dominated 

areas graded to intertidal elevations, with most of this area 

being planted with salt marsh species. 

Additional restoration involved the regrading of spoil mounds 

left over from former mosquito ditching to create new 

hydrologic connections and deep pool habitat areas. 

Services provided by King included wetland delineation, 

topographical and tree location survey services, design and 

permitting. King was required to actively coordinate with the 

City of Clearwater and Pinellas County in association with 

this project. The completed restoration site is utilized as a 

passive recreation area and as an outdoor “classroom” for 

the neighboring Clearwater Christian College. 


a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 

f. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 






(3) ROLE 


services, permitting, and 

construction management






Picnic Island Park Habitat Enhancement / Restoration 


1992 


NUMBER) 

10 



1992 





Southwest Florida Water Management District - 

SWIM Section 

Dr. Brandt Henningsen, 

PhD 

(813) 985-7481 


Picnic Island Park, located in the Port of Tampa encompasses 

7.8 acres of sandy beach access. King was contracted by the 

District to prepare detailed construction plans, permit 

applications, bid document preparation and construction 

management services for the habitat restoration within 

designated areas of the Picnic Island Park. 

As part of this project, King was required to coordinate services 

with the City of Tampa Parks Department. Restoration included 

the eradication of exotic vegetation from upland and wetland 

areas and the establishment of desirable marine intertidal 

habitat through excavation and subsequent replanting with 

saltmarsh plant species. 

Spoil materials generated by the excavation activities were retained within the park in a series of constructed 

observation berms. Salt marsh species have completely filled in the intertidal planting shelves and the restoration 

area has become a functioning ecosystem. Approximately 18 acres of intertidal habitats were created/restored in 

association with this project. 

Permits for this project were obtained from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, US Army Corps of 

Engineers, Tampa Port Authority, and Hillsborough County. 


a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 




(3) ROLE 

Civil Engineering and Ecological 

Services 

e. 


f. 



Civil Engineering (Function Code 12) 

King’s civil engineering services are comprehensive and include professional services ranging from site 

analysis/design and construction cost estimating and permitting to bid evaluation and program/construction 

management. Additionally, King’s design teams utilize the full range of our in-house support services to assist in 

evaluation and preparation of the project deliverables. These disciplines include site planning, transportation 

planning and design, landscape architecture, survey services and ecological sciences. King also has a LEED 

professional to contribute to any project concept. This integrated approach provides excellent potential to 

expedite the project’s schedule by minimizing outsourcing to multiple subconsultants. Historically, these 

services have been provided to both private sector and public sector projects. King Engineering has been the 

civil engineering subconsultant as well as the prime consultant for many project types including local 

government/municipal projects. Project types include municipal services buildings, parks, hospitals, schools, 

garages, community buildings such as public libraries and recreational centers, and public utilities facilities such 

as solid wastewater and water/wastewater treatment facilities, etc. The following is just a sample of our 

government work experience followed by a brief project description. 

The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support Civil 

Engineering project types. 





Task Manager 

Mike Ross, PE 

Civil Engineer Sr. Designer 

Denise Greer, PE Larry Kistler 


King Team Available Services for Civil Engineering Projects 

SF330 Function Code 

Description 


07 Biologist 





19 Ecologist 

















53 Scheduler 








NPDES 


1






M2GEN H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and 

Research Institute, Tampa, FL 



2007 





1 


2008 


H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center 

Dean Head 

VP Facilities Management & Construction 


cost) 

King Engineering was retained by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and 

Research Institute to provide site development for a 100,000 sf 

building as part of the Moffitt Cancer Center’s 30 acre expansion 

site to accommodate biotech research, including the M2GEN 

facility. Scope of services also included survey services as well as 

master infrastructure design and permitting phase services. Cost: 

$15 million 


813-745-3553 

• 100,000 sf biotech research building 

• Site Development 

• Design / Infrastructure Design 


• Surveying 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 




Civil Engineering






Manatee County Fleet Maintenance Building 




2008 





2 


2009 


Manatee County 

Salvatore Bordonaro, Jr. Project 

Manager 

941-708-7450 


cost) 

King was selected as part of a design-build team to provide design, 

permitting, survey and construction management services for a 

20,000 sf / 12 bay fleet service facility on a 4.84 AC site with 

support offices, break room, records library, mezzanine, virgin fluids 

distribution to each bay, containment of recovered fluids. 

Equipment to service within the facility ranges in size from small 

pups and mowers to heavy equipment and trucks weighing up to 

80,000 pounds. 

King prepared a revised preliminary site plan for a revised rezone, 

final site plan and construction plans including drainage, grading, 

utility, truck maneuvering and parking design. 

King determined that the existing rezoning requirement did not 

meet the needs of the Manatee County Fleet Maintenance 

Department and processed the rezone requirements 

simultaneously of the design documents in order to avoid delays. 

King also prepared construction plans including stormwater, 

drainage, grading, water and wastewater (including lift station 

design), truck maneuvering, parking design, landscaping and 

irrigation. Construction management and certifications were provided. 



• Design – Build Project 

• 20,000 sf / 12 bay fleet maintenance 

• Preliminary and Final Site Plan 

• Design 

• Water / Sewer Design 

• Stormwater Design 

• Parking Lot Design 

• Rezoning 


• Preparation of Specifications, and 

Construction Drawings 

• Construction Administration 

• Quality Assurance / Quality Control 

• Certification 

a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Sarasota, FL 


(3) ROLE – Design-Build 


c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

. 

(2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE






Imagine Charter School, Pasco County, FL 






2011 


NUMBER 

3 


2011 


Ryan Companies, Inc. 

Douglas Dieck 

(813) 204-5017 


King provided civil engineering services, as well as miscellaneous ROW and boundary surveys on this ±900 

student charter school located in Pasco County, Florida. The project included a ±7,000 sf. facility with an oncampus 

soccer field, individual school bus and student drop-off / pick-up lanes and an onsite stormwater pond. 



(1) FIRM NAME 


(3) ROLE – 

a. 

b. 


Tampa, FL 


Subconsultant 

Civil Engineering, 

Survey and Mapping, 

Environmental Services 

c. 







Downtown Jacksonville Wayfinding Signage Program, 



2009 


NUMBER) 


4 


2013 Estimate 


Jacksonville Economic Development Commission 

(JEDC) 



Eric Lindstrom, JEDC 


904-630-7114 


During preliminary design, King prepared a report outlining items such as; goals and objectives, research and 

analysis, example wayfinding programs, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, districts and destinations, and 

proposed family of signs. The primary goal of the project is to direct visitors to key destinations, and make them feel 

more comfortable traveling downtown. Throughout the project, King participated in several public presentations to 

such groups as the project stakeholders and the Downtown Development Review Board (DDRB). 

Working with the JEDC, King developed five downtown districts, color coded them, and incorporated them into 

signage for the purposes of orienting visitors as to what 

area of the city they are in. The signage program which 

includes +/- 150 signs, consists of gateway signs, 

vehicular directional signs, pedestrian directional signs, 

information kiosks, and parking signs. This new signage 

program will direct visitors to key destinations throughout 

the downtown. Scope of services included: thematic 

design, conceptual design, and construction 

documentation. Design fees were $189,000. Preliminary 

estimates have construction costs ranging between $1 

million - $2 million. 


a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(3) ROLE 



Planning & Design 



d. 


e. 







Belmont Heights Estates, Phase 1 and Phase 2 

Tampa, FL 



2000 





5 


2003 


Torti Gallas and Partners, Inc. 

Thomas M. Gallas, CPA, LEED AP 

Chief Executive Officer 

301-588-4800 


cost) 

King provided civil engineering services for this Hope VI funded 

redevelopment project consisting of a 370 t mix of single family and 

multifamily units. The project included extensive coordination with 

the City of Tampa to upgrade existing infrastructure and save 

numerous Grand trees located on-site. Permitting included FDOT, 

Hillsborough County EPC, Hillsborough County Health Department, 

FDEP, SWFWMD, City of Tampa Commercial Review, and City of 

Tampa Residential Review. 


• Hope VI Funded Redevelopment 

• ±370 single/mulit-family units 

• Coordination with the City of Tampa 

• Permitting Services and 

• City of Tampa Commercial Review 

• City of Tampa Residential Review 


a. 

b. 

c. 


(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 









USF Sports Venue, Tampa, FL 





2010 



NUMBER 

6 


2011 


University of South Florida 

Deryl Wagner, P.E. 

(813) 967-0518 


King provided civil engineering, design/build services, survey, and construction management for Basketball, 

Baseball, Softball & Football sports complex. The project includes multiple sport venues ranging from construction 

of a basketball practice facility adjacent to the Sun Dome to a new baseball & softball complex, as well as 

improvements to the football practice fields and general purpose student recreation fields. While the design for 

each venue was prepared separately, the projects were permitted concurrently to minimize impact to the 

respective sports and event schedules. 

Cost: ±$30 million 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 


Civil Engineering, Survey 

and Mapping Services 

b. 


c. 







Wesley Chapel Medical Center, Pasco County, FL 



2009 





7 


2011 


Florida Hospital / Adventist Health 

Care Systems 

John Negley 

Asst. to the CEO 

813-615-7203 


cost) 

King has been retained to provide civil engineering services for a 

multi-phased healthcare property. Scope of work provides for 

master planning, civil site design, ecological, environmental 

engineering, surveying and construction administration services for 

a 162,500 sf / 3 level hospital with future vertical expansion 

capability of three additional floors totaling 580,000 sf, one multistory 

medical office complex, a central energy plant, and a future 

multi-story office complex and multi-level parking deck. Civil design 

includes the planning, design, preparation of construction 

documents and permitting of a master stormwater, sanitary sewer 

and lift station, looped fire and potable water main systems, site 

grading, wetland mitigation and roadways. 


• 3-level / 162,500 sf - future expansion of 

580,000 sf 

• Central Energy Plant 

• Master Planning 

• Site Design 

• Water / Sewer 

• Ecological Services 




a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 



(3) ROLE - Subconsultants 

Civil Engineering

(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE - Subconsultant 






South County Solid Waste Transfer Station 

Expansion, Hillsborough County, FL 



2007 





8 


2010 


Hillsborough County 

Chris Snow 

Contract Administration 

813-272-5977 

King provided planning, design, permitting and construction management 

for the expansion of the South County Transfer Station (SCTS). 

The site previously operated at a capacity of approximately 300 tons per 

day and uses compactor technology. The new transfer station building 

was designed with a capacity of 1,000 tons per day using top load 

technology. In addition, the facility included: 

• A new scale house and scales 

• A new Community Collection Center 

• Expansion of an existing Yard and Wood Waste Processing 

Facility 

• Ancillary systems such as a hot load dumping pad, trailer staging 

areas, a fuel storage and dispensing system and a standby 

generator 

• Modifications to the existing Household Hazardous Waste 

Collection Center 

• New roadways, utilities and infrastructure 

The existing transfer station building, scale facility and community 

collection center was demolished. In consideration of surrounding 

communities, the architectural qualities of the exterior of all new buildings 

were extensively reviewed. In addition, the site was heavily landscaped, 

including a landscaped berm along the front of the property. 

In addition to detailed design, this project involved the following services: 

• Evaluation of current tonnages and projections of tonnages 

through the year 2025 

• Evaluation of traffic patterns, vehicle counts and required queuing 

• Alternative site plan evaluations 

• Visual renderings of the proposed facility 

• Public meetings and presentations 

• Ecological services, including listed species surveys, wetland 

delineation, and an invasive plant removal plan 

• General site design including roadways and utilities 

• Detailed building designs 

PROJECT WAS AWARDED THE ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND 

CONTRACTORS 2010 EXCELLENCE IN CONSTRUCTION 

AWARD FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR PROJECTS and 

SWANA’S 2011 TRANSFER STATION EXCELLENCE AWARD. 


• Studies/Evaluations 

• Planning 


Preliminary / Alternative and 

Final Designs 

• Construction Cost Estimating 


• Landscape Architecture 

• Stormwater /Drainage 


• Ecological Services / Assessments 


• Development of Maintenance of 

Traffic 

• Traffic Studies 

• Roadway Improvements 

• Public Meetings / Presentations 

• Preparation of Specifications, Bid 

Documents and Construction 

Drawings 

• Bid Services including Preparation, 

Negotiations, and Evaluations 

• Construction Management, 

including 

Full-time site observation 

Shop drawing review and 

tracking 

Liaison with FDOT 

RFI coordination / response 

Pay applications 

Start-up observations 

Permit condition tracking 

review 

Final punchlist inspections and 

walkthroughs 

As-builts 


(1) FIRM NAME 


(2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE - Prime 

a. 

b. 


Tampa, FL 


Civil, Transportation Engineering and 

Planning and Surveying 

(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE - Subconsultant






Henderson Hammocks Charter School, Hillsborough County, 

FL 






2011 


NUMBER 

9 


Est. 2012 



Douglas Dieck 

(813) 204-5017 


Provided civil engineering survey services for a 50,000 s.f. K- 8 charter school located in Hillsborough County 

Florida. The project included at-grade parking, individual school bus and student drop-off / pickup traffic planning, 

onsite stormwater attenuation, onsite wetland and floodplain mitigation. 

Cost: 

Est. $8.9 million 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 






c. 







Rasmussen College, Pasco County, FL 






2011 


NUMBER 

10 


2011 



Douglas Dieck 

(813) 204-5017 


Provided civil engineering services and topographic surveys on this 27,000 s.f. college located in Pasco County, 

Florida. The project included a 3.2 ac project site as part of a master planned commercial subdivision. 



a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 






c. 



Planning & Landscape Architecture (Function Codes 39 and 47) 

Our land planning professionals are industry leaders. Their knowledge and expertise in the latest growth 

management practices and regulations ensure that projects avoid costly and unnecessary mistakes. Developing 

new and innovative solutions for our clients let us help clients navigate the changing land use and entitlement 

process. Our planners combine creative thinking with practical, real world experience to produce project 

solutions and timely approvals. 

King’s land planning proposals generate cost effective projects that are permittable, workable and beautiful. 

Developing creative concepts and turning them into a well-designed plan is what makes King Engineering a 

leader in land planning. Whether it’s a greenbelt, a Brownfield, a redevelopment, single use, or mixed use, our 

land planning staff can help you. 

King’s Land Planning services include: 

• Entitlement and Regulatory Assistance 

• Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 

Applications and Amendments 

• Comprehensive Plan Amendments 

• Zoning Amendments 

• Developers Agreements 

• Concurrency Evaluations 

• Land Use Evaluations 

• Site Planning 

• Due Diligence/Feasibility Studies 

• Conceptual Master Planning 

• Park and Recreation Master Planning 

• Detailed Land and Site Planning 

• Design Guidelines and Presentation 

Graphics 

• GIS, Site Analysis 

• Graphic Design and Renderings 

The landscape architecture team at King includes registered landscape architects, LEED accredited professionals, 

and certified arborists. King can provide clients with the expertise needed for all of their landscape architectural 

and design needs. 

Our landscape architects believe that public facilities play an essential role in building and maintaining our sense 

of community and enhancing our quality of life. We have extensive experience in the designing and 

management of public sector projects, including participation during the public outreach process and working 

with agencies to gain the necessary approvals. We blend creativity, environmental sensitivity and 

constructability together, to create a pleasing and practical design for every project. 

• LEED and Low Impact Design 

• Landscape and Hardscape Design 

• Parks and Recreation Design 

• Wayfinding 

• Community Master Plans 

• Streetscapes 

• Signage Monuments 

• Recreational Amenities 

• Smart Irrigation Design 

• Illustrative Graphics 




1









Task Manager 

Scott Sheridan, RLA 

Landscape Architect Irrigation Design 

Clark Lohmiller, RLA Loc Truong, PE 



Code 

Description 


07 Biologist 





19 Ecologist 

















53 Scheduler 








NPDES 



2




1 


Rothenbach Park Pavilion 



2009 



2011 


Sarasota County – Florida 

1660 Ringling Blvd 5th Floor 




Brie Ondercin 

Public Use Coordinator 

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, 

and cost) 

Under a continuing services contract of park design for Sarasota 

County, King provided construction plans, specifications and 

construction administration for Rothenbach Park pavilion and 

playground. Rothenbach Park pavilion was the key stone for 

Sarasota County’s newest sustainable park. While not seeking 

certification, the green designed 3000 sf pavilion features soy 

based spray insulation, low flow fixtures, waterless urinals, and 

efficient mechanical systems. Other features include glulam 

beams, tongue and groove wood decking, cultured stone water 

table, a cooking grill with warming oven, and a fireplace. The 

building is designed with two different sized exterior gathering 

areas divided by the restrooms and services spaces. A small 

serving kitchen provides the ability to host events at the pavilion. 

The 450-acre park site, formerly a county landfill, now features 

advanced sustainable building techniques and recycled materials. 

Cost: $250,000 


• Design 

• Parking Lot Design 


• Park Landscape Design 

• Trailhead Design 


(941) 861-7286 

a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 




c. 





2 


Skycrest Neighborhood Traffic Calming 

Improvements 



2008 



2009 


City of Clearwater – Florida 

100 S. Myrtle Ave. # 220 

Clearwater, FL 33756 



Ken Sides, P.E. 



cost) 

King provided design of neighborhood traffic calming, which 

included the preparation of traffic study, design plans, presentations 

at commission and public information meetings, landscape and 

irrigation plans, contract specifications, traffic control plans and 

provided bidding services for the construction. The Project 

included four (4) roundabouts, five (5) mini-circles, diagonal 

diverters, speed tables, landscaped median islands, hardscape 

elements, and roadway bulb-outs. 

Landscape and irrigation design services were performed with 

sensitivity to the existing community and City design standards. 

King also provided evaluation of existing tree resources through 

King certified arborists to assist in the design and planning process. 



727-562-4792 


• Traffic Calming 

• Streetscape Design 

• Speed Tables 


• Bidding Assistance 

• Public Information Meetings 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 





Landscape Architecture




3 


Temple Terrace Downtown Redevelopment 



2008 



N/A 


Ram Development 

4801 PGA Blvd 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 



Bob Skinner 

Sr. Vice President of 

Development 


and cost) 

Rezoning and detailed landscape and irrigation design services 

for a 30 acre mixed use redevelopment project as part of the first 

phase of the City’s CRA plan. In addition, 3D graphics and 

conceptual renderings were provided and were included in the 

presentation to City Council. 

Fee: $20,000 


• Landscape Design 

• Irrigation Design 

• Conceptual Renderings 


561-282-4605 

a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 



Land Planning 

Landscape Architecture 

c. 





4 


Highwoods Bay Center 

Tampa, FL 


2007 



2008 


Highwoods Properties 

3111 W. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 




Dan Woodward 




813-876-7000 

For this Class A waterfront office redevelopment project King 

provided land planning, landscape architecture and civil 

engineering services. This project was designated a NAIOP “Best 

of the Best” project for 2007. King’s landscape architects 

provided landscape, hardscape and irrigation design as well as 

procurement of specimen palm trees for this unique bay-front 

project where salt tolerance was a principal concern. 



• Land Planning 

• Hardscape Design 

• Irrigation Design 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 





c. 





5 


Largo Towne Center 

Largo, FL 


2008 



N/A 


Weingarten Realty Investors 

601-C North Bumby Avenue 

Orlando, FL 32803 



James Childs 

President 


and cost) 

Largo Towne Center, a redevelopment of the old Crossroad Mall 

on US 19, was proposed to consist of approximately 600,000 sf 

of retail (including restaurants), 286 apartments, a town center 

and two parking structures. Services provided by King included 

site designing, permitting, survey and landscaping. Some of the 

agencies for which permitting services was provided include: City 

of Largo, Southwest Florida Water Management District 

(SWFWMD), Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE), Pinellas County, 

Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and Florida 

Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 

Fee: $838,000 



• Public Plaza Design 



• Survey 


407-894-3601 

a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 





Survey / Mapping




6 


Sleeping Turtles Preserve North 



2009 



2011 


Sarasota County – Florida 

1660 Ringling Blvd 5th Floor 




Brie Ondercin 

Public Use Coordinator 


and cost) 

This site is a 92 acre area that is part of the Environmentally 

Sensitive Lands Protection Program and the Myakka River 

Protection Zone. For this project King provided site layout and 

designs associated with the additions of a pavilion, playground, 

ADA compliant walking trail, composting restrooms, and parking 

facilities. Special attention was given to incorporating low-impact 

design elements such as tree friendly parking, trail layouts, as 

well as utilizing as much permeable pavement type systems for 

the necessary improvements. 


941-861-7286 

Due to the location and environmentally sensitive nature of the 

site, all improvements were designed to be compatible with site 

ecology and listed species habitat ecology. Other services included were master planning, conceptual graphics, site 

planning, site civil engineering design, permitting, environmental services, roadway design, pervious pavement 

design, drainage design, potable well design, composting restroom permitting, bid coordination services, and 

construction administration. 

Cost: $360,000 


• Park Landscape Design 

• Trailhead Design 

• Environmental Services 

• Roadway Design 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 







7 


Janie Poe Redevelopment Phase 1 – LEED Silver 

Sarasota, FL 


2007 



2009 


Sarasota Housing Authority 

Sarasota Housing Authority 

1300 Blvd. of The Arts 




Bill Russell 

Executive Director 


cost) 

Janie Poe is a revitalization project in the Newtown Neighborhood 

of Sarasota County. It was a public-private joint venture with the 

Sarasota Housing Authority and a variety of local stock holders, 

which benefited from federal housing subsidies, including Low 

Income Housing Tax Credits, as well as significant funding from the 

City of Sarasota, Sarasota County and the state of Florida. 

The 86-unit, garden-style community featuring both apartment flats 

and townhomes is the first of the Sarasota Housing Authority’s 

multi-phase, multi-million dollar redevelopment of the former Janie 

Poe public housing development. King provided permitting, 

construction plans (including demolish plans for the existing 

housing buildings and clubhouse area), stormwater design, FEMA 

Map Amendment, paving and grading design, utility extension to 

new buildings, bidding services, surveying, construction 

observation and certification services. Cost: $11.5 million 



941-361-6210 

• 86 unit – Garden Style Apartments 



• FEMA Map Amendment 

• Paving / Grading Design 

• Utility Extension 

• Construction Plans 

• Bidding Assistance 

• Surveying 

• Construction Observation 


Janie Poe PMRS Building 

has been awarded 

LEED-NC Silver Certification. 

a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 




Surveying




8 


Pinellas County Housing Authority (PCHA) 

Redevelopment Project, Largo, FL 


Norstar Primerica Multi-Family 

Development Group 

3629 Macada Lane 



2011 



Paula McDonald Rhodes 

Executive Vice President 


cost) 

As the civil engineering subconsultant, King is providing civil 

engineering design, permitting, landscape design and survey 

services for the development of a PCHA’s Senior Living Facility. 

The redevelopment is to include demolition of existing building and 

parking area and replaced with multifamily style senior living facility 

with amenities, surface parking, and an additional 20,000 sf PCHA 

office. Cost: TBD 




2012 


813-933-0629 

• Senior Living Facility 

• 20,000 sf PCHA Office 

• Design 

• Preliminary and Final Site Plan 

• Design 

• Water / Sewer Design 


• Surface Parking Lot Design 


• Landscape design 

• Survey 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 




Civil Engineering / Landscape Architecture




9 


Intellicenter – Tampa Ph. I – LEED Silver 



2007 



2008 


Koll Development Company 

6100 Fairview Road Suite 335 

Charlotte, NC 28210 



Sean McDonnell 



cost) 

This LEED project involved a class-A office development of 

370,000+ sf on 30 acres in the master planned office park of 

Telecom Park in Temple Terrace, Florida. Telecom Park is a 340+ 

acre park on the east side of the Hillsborough River between the 

University of South Florida and I-75 on Fletcher Avenue. 

The office site consists of one 4-story and one 3-story office 

building with at-grade parking among native tree canopy. King also 

provided landscape architecture services for this project. The 

master landscaping was planned to compliment the park’s 

atmosphere of a natural setting by maintaining as much tree 

canopy as possible within the development. 




• 370,000 sf / 30 acre Site 

• At-Grade Parking 

• USGBC Silver Certification 

• Planning 




704-554-6111 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 





Landscape Architecture




10 


Highland Avenue Roadway and Stormwater 

Improvements 

Largo, FL 


City of Largo, Florida 

201 Highland Ave. 

Largo, FL 33779 


2011 



Leland E. Dicus, P.E. 

City Engineer 


cost) 

King provided landscaping services for the reconstruction of 1.5 

miles of an existing 2-lane rural facility. The project included 

converting the existing roadway to an urban, pedestrian-friendly, 

roadway with streetscape and hardscape elements, including the 

design of a multi-use path. Services included a tree analysis / 

grade for tree removal. Also provided landscape and irrigation 

design for right of way and tree mitigation for the removed trees. 




N/A 


727-587-6713 


• Landscaping Design 

• Roadway and Trail Designs 


• PD & E Study 

• Alternative Design Options 

• Grant Funding Assistance- Stormwater 

a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 






c.


Transportation Engineer (Function Code 60) 

As the demand to improve highway safety and decrease travel delays continues to rise, King Engineering has the 

experience and expertise to assist public agencies in finding cost efficient solutions. We recognize the very 

diverse needs of our multiple municipal clients and work alongside local, state, and federal regulatory agencies 

to find economical and environmentally balanced solutions. In addition to finding engineering solutions to 

transportation needs, our efforts include assisting agencies with alternative funding sources and public grants. 

From travel demand forecasting and traffic modeling to final design and contract administration, our clients can 

count on us to assist with all phases of their Work Programs. With a full range of professional services offered 

by King, we are able to form a seamless team of planners, surveyors, scientists, and engineers for project 

delivery. 

Whether a project is simple or complex, our professionals have the capabilities to provide a full range of 

transportation services from traffic capacity and safety studies such as signal warrant analysis to complex major 

highway design. In today’s environment, it is important to incorporate context sensitive solutions to find 

balance among all of the road users from bus transit and vehicles to pedestrians and bicyclists. Our project 

experience includes residential traffic calming/roundabout design and streetscape improvements. 

Not all transportation projects are straightforward. Many require the completion of other seemingly unrelated 

tasks such as environmental/wetland impact assessments and public involvement. King's multi-disciplinary staff 

and our ability to develop cost effective solutions to challenging projects has earned the loyalty of repeat clients 

over the years. 

King's Transportation Engineering Services include: 

• Roadway Alternative alignment 

Studies/PD&E 

• Major and Minor Highway Design 

• Construction Engineering 

Inspection/Administration 

• Intersection Improvements 

• Traffic Signal and System Design 


• Traffic Control Plans 

• Highway Lighting Analysis and Design 

• Stormwater Design/Modeling 

• Pedestrian Sidewalk/Multi-use Trail Design 

• Roadway Resurfacing 

• Traffic Operation Studies/Design 

• Traffic Calming Design 







Code 

Description 


07 Biologist 





19 Ecologist 


1



















53 Scheduler 








NPDES 



Task Manager 

John Seals, PE 

Roadway Engineer 

Kyle Smith, PE 



Traffic Engineer 

Sandra Gorman, PE, 

PTOE 

Transportation 

Planner Rajesh 

Chindalur 


2 





School Safety, Circulation and Access Program 

(SSCAP) 







2009 




Senior Professional Engineer 




1 


Ongoing 


813-307-1786 

Assess existing traffic conditions at over 30 Hillsborough County 

school sites, research and gather data on each site including 

utilities, permits and right-of-way data; develop concept plans for 

improving traffic safety, circulation, and access for each site; 

coordinate with the School Board on site improvements; prepare 

preliminary design plans for constructing roadway improvements, 

develop cost estimates for each site alternative, rate and rank the 

proposed improvements for the top 20 school sites, prepare 

Design-Build RFQ and RFP documents for contract awarding, and 

assist with the administration the construction as the Design 

Criteria Engineer. 


• 30 Hillsborough County School Sites 

• Traffic Conditions Research 

• Site Design / Alternatives 

• Cost Estimates 

• Design Build RFQ/RFP Documents 


• Design Criteria Engineer 


a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 





And Planning






CSX – Terminal Pavement Management Plan Update 





2009 



NUMBER) 

2 


NA 


CSX Intermodal, Inc. 

Chris Durden 

301 W. Bay Street, Suite 2700 


904-633-1306 


King has been contracted by CSX Intermodal to conduct surveys of their intermodal terminals. For 

Phase 1 & 2 of this project King conducted surveys for 21 terminals in 13 different states, covering 

nearly 5 million square yards of pavement. Phase 3, which consists of surveys of 11 terminals in 10 

different states, covering over 1 million square yards of pavement, is set to proceed in the near future. 

CSX is a repeat client, having retained the firm of Infrastructure Technology, Inc. (acquired by King 

Engineering Associates, Inc. in 2002) to implement a pavement management program (PMP) for 12 

intermodal terminals, during the early to mid 1990’s. 

The platform for this analysis will be the proprietary software, Infrastructure Management System IV 

(IMS IV). This system is used to justify the use of capital funds for investment in rehabilitative and 

restorative pavement repairs on an annual basis at selected intermodal terminals to extend the life of 

the asphalt and concrete pavements. 

Project Cost: $881,357 


(1) FIRM NAME 


(3) ROLE 

a. 



Data Collection, 

Analysis, Reporting






Miscellaneous General Civil Engineering Services 



Hillsborough County Public Works Department 

601 E. Kennedy Boulevard 

22 nd Floor 




Tom Fass 

Section Manager, Dept. of 

Public Works 



2011 



NUMBER 

3 





813-307-1711 

King has been contracted by Hillsborough County to provide general/civil services for a two-year period 

since 1987. Under this miscellaneous civil engineering contract, King provides services on small and 

medium-sized projects from intersection surveys to wastewater treatment plant design services. The 

surveying, civil, environmental engineering, transportation and water resource groups all benefit from 

projects under these contracts. 

Engineering services include planning, program development, 

design, and construction management for general/civil projects in 

the areas of road and transportation, stormwater, solid waste, parks, 

sitework, environmental permitting, traffic analysis and landscaping. 


• Intersection Program Master Plan Update 

• Waters Avenue & Hanley Road Intersection Improvements 

• US 301 & Balm Riverview Road 

• Benjamin & Waters Construction Administration 

• Columbus Drive Design 

• School Safety, Circulation and Access Program-S.S.C.A.P. 

• N. Mobley Road Improvements 

• Railroad Crossing Quiet Zone Study 

• Railroad Crossing Design 

• South County Solid Waste Transfer Station Leachate Collection 

System Improvements 

• South County Solid Waste Transfer Station FDEP Operating 

Permit Renewal 

• Falkenburg Yard Waste Processing Facility Improvements 

• South County Solid Yard Waste Processing Facility design, 

permitting and construction management services 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 


and construction.




4 


N. Mobley Road (Walker/Hammond School) 

Roadway Improvements 







2010 






cost) 

King provided design plans for the widening of 0.360 miles of 

roadway widening along N. Mobley Rd. for an addition of left-turn 

and right-turn lanes into both existing Walker Middle School and 

proposed Hammond Elementary School in Hillsborough County. 

Cost: $387,000 



2011 


813-307-1786 


• Roadway and Stormwater Design 

• Traffic Design 


• Limited Construction Observation 

• Surveying and Mapping 

a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 



Surveying and Mapping 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 



Tampa, FL 

(3) ROLE 

Subsurface Utility Engineering 

c. 





Zephyrhills Bypass West – CR 54/Eiland Boulevard 

Zephyrhills, FL 


Pasco County Government- Florida 

4454 Grand Blvd. 

New Port Richey, FL 34652 


Ongoing 



Wayne A. Tocknell, P.E. 

Engineer 


cost) 

The reconstruction of a 2-lane arterial to a 4-lane rural/urban 

facility. The project length is approximately 2 miles and also 

included design, traffic report, onsite retention, drainage design, 

signing and marking plans, traffic control planning, utility relocation 

plans, permitting and signal plans at three intersections. The 

project scope also included a public meeting. The construction 

estimate is $2.1 million. 



5 


TBD 


727-834-3604 


• Reconstruction of 2-lane to 4-lane 

• Roadway and Drainage Design 

• Traffic Control Planning 

• Traffic Studies 

• Signing and Marking 

• Utility Relocations 


• Signal Design – 3 Intersections 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(1) FIRM NAME 

Driggers Engineering Services, Inc 



Tampa, FL 






Planning 

(3) ROLE 

Geotechnical Engineering




6 


State Road 56 Roadway Extension From SR 581 To 

Meadow Pointe Boulevard 



Pasco County Government – Florida 




2009 



Bob Shepherd P.E. 

Engineering Services 


cost) 

This project includes the preparation of design plans to construct 

3.4 miles of a 6-lane and 4-lane (with accommodations for a future 

6-lane) divided, high speed (70 mph), rural principal arterial through 

the Wiregrass Ranch property, located in Pasco County. 

Cost: Est. $26 million. 



Ongoing 


727-834-3604 


• 3.4 miles / 6- and 4-lane 

• Master Drainage Study 


• Traffic Planning 



• Potable Water and Force Main Plans 

• Topographic Survey 

• Right-Of-Way Survey and Mapping 

• Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation 

• Wetland Mitigation Design 

• Wildlife Surveys 


• FDOT Permitting 

• Pasco County Permitting 

• Signing and Marking Plans 

• Maintenance of Traffic Plans 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 





and Planning 






US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection 

Improvements 







2011 



William Alford 



cost) 

King prepared a PD&E study to determine what roadway capacity 

improvements needed to be made and evaluated several 

alternative roadway alignments for the intersection. King is now 

preparing design plans for the construction of the proposed 

improvements. Professional services under the scope of the project 

include: 

• Topographic survey and right-of-way mapping 

• Traffic operation studies and modeling analysis 

• Roadway and stormwater design 

• Pond siting analysis and design 


• Wetland/environmental impact assessment and 

mitigation design environmental permitting 

• Traffic signal design 

• Public involvement/meetings 

• Utility coordination and design 

• Right-of-way impact assessment 

• Subsurface utility exploration 

• Geotechnical investigation 

• Structural analysis 

Cost: $1.5 Million 



7 


TBD 


813-307-1920 



• Alternative Roadway Alignments 

• Stormwater Modeling 

• Traffic Modeling / Analysis 

• Traffic Signal Design 

• Pond Siting 

• Environmental Mitigation 

• Permitting Survey and Mapping 

• Public Involvements / Meeting 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 


Tampa, FL 




and Planning 

Survey and Mapping 


(3) ROLE 

Subsurface Utility Engineering




8 


Durant and Mulrennan / Durant and Valrico 

Intersections Signalization 







2011 



Mariela Gomez, P.E. 

TTF GEC Project Manager 


cost) 

King Engineering is providing final design engineering for the 

signalization and sidewalk improvements for two Hillsborough 

County Roadway intersections: Durant Road and Valrico Road and 

Durant Road and Mulrennan Road. Services will include design 

and plans production of signalization and signing and pavement 

markings plans. Responsibilities also included utility coordination 

and cost estimating. 

Cost: 

Durant / Mulrennan - $100,914 

Durant / Valrico - $177,821 



N/A 


813-307-1724 


• ATMS Coordination 

• Design 

• Specifications / Plans 

• Signing and Marking 

• Cost Estimating 

• Surveying / Mapping 

• ADA Sidewalk Additions 

• Drainage Improvements / Upgrade 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 





Survey and Mapping




9 





Hillsborough County Public Works 




2009 






cost) 

The project included PD&E phase and a design phase services for 

the extension Columbus Drive from east of US 301 to Falkenburg 

Road, a distance approximately 1 mile. The PD&E services 

included the development and evaluation of a study for the typical 

sections for a 4-lane divided facility, alignment alternates 

considering geometry, environmental impacts, selection of 

stormwater ponds and mitigation areas, right-of-way, safety, and 

cost. Design phase services included providing 30% roadway and 

drainage design plans, wetland and flood plain mitigation design, 

submittal of the USACOE permit, the preparation of Design-Build 

RFQ and RFP contract documents for construction, and assistance 

with procurement of the Design-Build contract. 



N/A 


813-307-1786 



• Preparation of Design/Build RFQ 

• 30% Roadway/Drainage Design Plans 

• Wetland and Flood Mitigation Design 

• Pond Siting Report 


Est. Construction: $9.3 million 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 




Civil / Transportation Engineering




State Road 56 Roadway Extension From SR 581 To 

Meadow Pointe Boulevard 



Pasco County Government – Florida 




2009 



Bob Shepherd P.E. 

Engineering Services 


cost) 

This project includes the preparation of design plans to construct 

3.4 miles of a 6-lane and 4-lane (with accommodations for a future 

6-lane) divided, high speed (70 mph), rural principal arterial through 

the Wiregrass Ranch property, located in Pasco County. 

Cost: Est. $26 million. 



10 


Ongoing 


727-834-3604 


• 3.4 miles / 6- and 4-lane 

• Master Drainage Study 


• Traffic Planning 



• Potable Water and Force Main Plans 

• Topographic Survey 

• Right-Of-Way Survey and Mapping 

• Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation 

• Wetland Mitigation Design 

• Wildlife Surveys 


• FDOT Permitting 

• Pasco County Permitting 

• Signing and Marking Plans 

• Maintenance of Traffic Plans 

a. 

b. 

c. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Tampa, FL 





and Planning 



ARCHITECT – ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS 


RFQ # 2012-10 

PART II – GENERAL CONDITIONS 



Cummins Cederberg, Inc. 

2b. STREET 

22476 SW 94 PL 

2c. CITY 

Cutler Bay 


Jannek Cederberg, President 


(305) 776-5028 

2d. STATE 

FL 


2010 

a. TYPE 

5. OWNERSHIP 

2e. ZIP CODE Corporation 

33190 b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 

Small Business 


info@CumminsCederberg.com 

8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any) 8b. YR. 

ESTABLISHED 


962526153 

7. NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is a branch office) 

8c. DUNS NUMBER 

a. Function 

Code 

9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 

b. Discipline 

c. No. of Employees a. Profile 

(1) FIRM (2) BRANCH Code 

10. PROFILE OF FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND 

ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS 

b. Experience 

c. Revenue Index 

Number 

(see below) 

C12 Coastal Engineers 2 C07 17 2 

Total 2 

11. ANNUAL AVERAGE 

PROFESSIONAL 


SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM 

FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than $100,000 6. $2 million to less than $5 million 

(insert revenue index number shown at 

right) 


a. Federal Work 0 3. $250,000 to less than $500,000 8. $10 million to less than $25 million 

b. Non-Federal 

Work 

2 4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 9. $25 million to less than $50 million 

c. Total Work 2 5. $1 million to less than $2 million 10. $50 million or greater 




June 4, 2012 


Jannek Cederberg, President 


Appendix A. Approach to Scope of Work 

General Project Approach 

KING’s approach to project execution is based on the philosophy that our ultimate goal is to deliver a high quality work 

product that exceeds the CITY’s schedule objectives while minimizing overall cost. For every assignment, we prepare a 

project management plan tailored to the complexity of the work. The plan includes a detailed budget, QA/QC procedures, 

and a project schedule identifying tasks, milestones, and critical path activities. During project execution, we monitor 

progress on a weekly basis to ensure internal adherence to deadlines, budget, and QA/QC activities. Externally, we 

coordinate closely with the CITY, permitting agencies, stakeholders, and contractors to ensure that there are no surprises 

and that our work products are completed satisfactorily the first time around. 

A cornerstone of this “high quality/value conscious” approach 

is to establish and maintain effective communication not only 

within the project team, but also with other stakeholders that 

are interested in the project. To this end, KING typically 

develops a detailed communication plan that is implemented 

as part of the overall delivery plan and in close coordination 

with the CITY. Timely and consistent communication will keep 

the project on track and allow all parties to quickly and easily 

deal with inevitable changes that may develop. 

A draft of the project management plan is developed 

immediately after receipt of an approved work order and 

distributed to all team members, including the CITY, for 

review and comment to ensure the CITY’s concurrence with 

the plan and schedule. After the CITY approves the project management plan, work will proceed in accordance with the 

approved plan. Any deviation from the approved schedule, assigned staff or budget would require approval by the CITY. 

Key Components of a Project Management Plan 

KING is a highly skilled group of professionals whose expertise, ability, and experience will ensure successful completion of 

public design projects. Our team continues to successfully serve numerous municipal clients as described elsewhere in this 

proposal. This experience gives us an in-depth understanding of the issues that must be addressed regarding public projects 

in the CITY. 

Proven Management Techniques Ensure Successful Projects 

Sound project management includes bringing together the correct resources and 

providing clearly articulated procedures and guidance documents to efficiently 

accomplish the work. KING has built its approach to project delivery based on 

methods used on highly successful projects. Critical elements of the project 

delivery system are: 

1. Plan the project to ensure that the client’s vision is achieved. 

2. Chart the team by developing the mission, vision, goals and 

procedures. 

3. Plan the work by developing a detailed Project Management / Work Plan. 

4. Gain endorsement by the CITY, the project team, and KING Team management. 


Projeca Project Management 

Software 

5. Perform the work and manage change. This is an iterative step that returns to Steps 3, 4, and 5 continually 

until the project is complete and fully endorsed by all participants. 

6. Close the project, including the final narrative report and cost accounting. 

Approach to Scope of Work 

1



Single Point of Contact 

North Miami Beach’s key point of contact with KING for this 

contract is the proposed Project Manager, Mr. Agustin 

Maristany, PE. As the Principal and Project Manager at KING, 

Mr. Maristany will be the lead advocate of the CITY’s interests 

within the firm. He is responsible for ensuring that the interests 

of the CITY are given priority within the firm and that the full 

resources of KING are engaged to meet the needs of the CITY. His goal is to establish a successful long-term record of 

performance with the CITY. To support him, Mr. Maristany handpicked the proposed team based on their expertise, local 

knowledge, commitment, and past experience completing similar projects. 

Project Management Plan 

KING’s philosophy for managing the CITY’s projects throughout our relationship will be to manage for success. The 

foundation of this philosophy is that success can only be achieved when the client and the consultant act in partnership. 

As the CITY’s engineering consultant, KING’s role will be to facilitate such a partnership so that the CITY’s expectations are 

consistently achieved through a process that produces projects that meet the following criteria: 

• Completed on time 

• Completed within or under budget 

• Completed with the required level of quality 

Local Project Manager: 





amaristany@KINGengineering.com 

305-763-9829 

To achieve these criteria, Mr. Maristany, our proposed Project Manager, will develop a project management plan to serve 

as the project reference guide for use by the CITY, KING and all sub consultants. Key elements of the plan are as follows: 

• Goals / Critical Success Factors 

• Scope of Work (Work Breakdown Structure) 

• Schedule 

• Team Organization and Responsibilities 

• Quality Control Process 

• Communication Plan 

• Contingency / Risk Management Plan 

Goals/Critical Success Factors 

KING conducts a kickoff meeting with the client at the beginning of the project. At the kickoff meeting, the Project Team 

identifies those factors most critical to the success of the project. Often time, critical success factors are related to 

anticipated difficulties. For each critical success factor, a performance measure is identified to provide a means of 

determining whether project progress is still focused on the goals. For example, obtaining a key permit may be identified as 

a critical success factor. In this case, application submittal and Request for Additional Information re-submittal dates may 

be defined as the performance measures. These critical success factors 

are established as goals and re-visited at each stage of the project to 

assure the project’s success. 

Activity Breakdown Structure and Project Schedule 

Mr. Maristany will identify and breakdown the project into individual 

tasks comprising an Activity Breakdown Structure (ABS). The ABS will be 

activity-based and describe the scope of services required to complete the 

project. A graphical Project Schedule, readily understandable to all team 

members, will be developed from the ABS and will be used to maintain a 

sense of urgency among the Project Team. Either a bar chart or critical 

path method type schedule, as acceptable to the CITY, will be used. The 

schedule will show task interrelationships on a calendar basis and will 

include review and revision time. 


Project Team Roles and Responsibilities 


2



KING recognizes the upmost importance that schedule management has over every aspect of a project. Careful 

consideration of the schedule and schedule influencers is essential at the onset of each assignment. Extensive planning by 

the team, including identifying all factors that can affect the schedule, will ensure that we meet the CITY’s established 

critical dates. 

Team Organization 

Providing outstanding support to the CITY throughout the life of the continuing contract for professional services is a high 

priority for KING. We are mindful of the importance of providing responsive service and committing the required personnel 

to meet the resource demands of each project. KING is committed to providing the necessary resources to ensure that all 

assignments are completed to the satisfaction of the CITY. We welcome the opportunity to work with the CITY to 

demonstrate our responsiveness, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness. 

Availability of Key Staff and Resources 

KING’s management team updates its workload projections on a monthly basis to ensure the availability of staffing 

resources to meet its contractual commitments. Beyond the current state of its workload, KING manages its workload on a 

regular basis to maintain the proper balance between workload and resources. On a monthly basis, all project managers 

update six month workload projections by project and by staff assignment for each member of KING’s staff to ensure that 

adequate staffing is maintained at all times. Project managers anticipate future contracts and work orders and include in 

their projections to ensure continued access and availability of selected staff to work on their projects. For the CITY, Mr. 

Maristany will work closely with CITY staff to anticipate staffing commitments associated with future work orders and to 

ensure that the required staff is committed to the CITY projects. 

Project Team Organization 


The organization of a project team starts with the 

CITY’s project management team defining the needs 

and goals of a particular assignment. Effectively, 

KING serves as an extension of the CITY staff and our 

methodology and approach strives for seamless 

integration of the CITY and KING’s team of in-house 

staff and sub consultants. For each assignment, 

KING organizes a compact, core group of team 

members with the proper technical credentials to 

address all the technical requirements of the job. 

Project teams are established based upon a balance 

of the level of expertise needed against the cost of 

service. This core group or “project team” consisting 

of KING and sub consultant staff, is involved from 

initial scoping through project completion to ensure 

commitment, consistency, and efficiency. Our sub 

consultants are fully integrated members of the team 

and will take technical direction from the assigned 

Task Manager. Sub consultant commitments, 

especially local minority and small businesses, are 

met on each assignment where their expertise/role is 

required. 

Mr. Maristany will use the organizational chart, and 

the activity breakdown structure to create a table of 

Project Team Member Roles and Responsibilities. 

The table will serve as a ready reference to team 

members and the CITY. 


3



As indicated in the organization chart, the team has access to a wide range of experts capable of addressing all the 

anticipated technical requirements of a project. In the event that a unique specialty is required for a job, our team will 

seek to find that specialist within our team first. In the event that the specialist cannot be found on our team, we will seek 

to add a sub consultant to fill that void with the approval of the CITY and in accordance with the procedures set forth by the 

CITY. 

Effective coordination with all team members is accomplished by establishing clearly defined lines of communication and 

accountability (outlined in the Project Management Plan), enabling seamless coordination between all team members – 

the CITY, KING, sub consultants, and stakeholders (as applicable). This coordination is particularly crucial to ensure efficient 

coordination amongst the various disciplines involved. 

Quality Control Process 

The primary goals of our Quality Control Program are to consistently achieve the high standards of technical excellence 

expected by the CITY, reduce overall engineering construction costs, and best meet the CITY’s needs relative to its public 

utility projects. These goals can be attained through implementation of a consistent quality control program for each aspect 

of the project. Quality control includes not just review of work products, but early involvement during the scoping phase of 

the project to establish methods and procedures for executing the work consistent with proven techniques that meet the 

needs of the project in the most efficient manner. The quality assurance/quality control plan for a project includes the 

following items: 

• Project Delivery Guidelines - Project delivery guidelines are established for project assignments to define the 

common vision of all team members and the CITY for completion of each element of the project. A project 

definition workshop will be held with the CITY to establish a clear understanding of the specific needs for each 

project element, and the appropriate delivery method to meet the project requirements. 

• Project Instructions - Our project manager and task leaders will develop a detailed set of project instructions 

for execution of the project. The instruction set will define key project information and milestones for all 

project team members. 

• Specific Quality Control Activities 

- Quality control review 

procedures for technical elements 

of the project are defined, and a 

separate staff of qualified 

professionals will be assigned as 

quality control reviewers for each 

discipline. 

Our QA/QC program is based on a "total quality 

management" approach, and includes the 

following key features: 

1. The client's perception of quality is the 

one that counts. 

2. Our project team and project 

management approach builds quality in 

throughout a project, rather than fixing 

it at the end. 

3. All members of our management staff 

are committed to delivering quality. 

4. Those doing the work make constant 

improvements to the system. 

5. All our work should continually add 

value to the client's operation. 



4



Quality Control Plan 

Mr. Maristany will establish a Quality Control Plan that will identify all QC elements, the 

team member responsible for the element, and target dates. Once a QC element is 

completed, the actual completion date will be entered into the Quality Control Plan. 

Typical elements of a Quality Control Plan are listed in the adjacent text box. 

Quality Control Philosophy 

“The client's perception of 

quality is the one that counts.” 

Communication Plan 

A Communication Plan will be prepared as part of the project management plan that will identify how the various 

communication elements will be used to distribute information to the team, as shown below: 

Possible Communication Elements 

♦ Client Meeting Meetings 

♦ Internal Team Meetings 

♦ Meeting Minutes 

♦ Progress Reports 

♦ Project Schedule & Budget 

♦ QC Reviews 

Possible Media 

♦ Email 

♦ Voice mail 

♦ Fax 

♦ Letter 

♦ Face-to-face 

As shown, the Communication Plan includes progress reports that will be 

submitted to the CITY’s Contract/Project Manager as required and on a monthly 

basis as a minimum. The progress reports will track all critical events in concert 

with the project schedule and will discuss developments of the project during the 

preceding month. The progress report will also serve as an exception report to 

appraise the CITY of any unexpected developments in the project and the 

manner in which these developments have been resolved by the project staff. 

These progress reports will be supplemented by project review meetings with 

CITY’s Contract/Project Manager. 

Similar to the Communication Plan, a Document Distribution Matrix will be 

prepared by the KING project manager to identify the team member(s) that will be 

a recipient of various documents developed during the project, to assure that the 

appropriate information is communicated to the proper party. Documents for 

distribution include progress reports, draft reports, designs, correspondence, 

permit applications, etc. 

Change Management Plan 

Communication Plan 

Often times, unanticipated circumstances arise during project execution in spite of our collective best efforts to anticipate 

change. It is therefore, prudent to have a plan in place to handle potential unexpected changes. If not managed and 

executed properly, such changes can have detrimental impacts on the overall success of the project. To prepare for 

potential changes, Mr. Maristany will prepare a Change Management Plan to provide guidance to all team members on 

identifying, handling, communicating, and resolving these events. The Change Management Plan will identify, in writing, 

the proposed change; provide a summary of the impact to the budget, schedule or other element of the project; include a 

place where team members can endorse the change; and provide a place for the CITY’s authorization or acknowledgement 

of the change. In this way, change can be smoothly incorporated into the overall project. 

Contingency/Risk Management Plan 

Factors beyond KING’s and CITY’s control (for example, changes in materials prices, availability or delivery time) can often 

influence the success of a project. The team members will assist Mr. Maristany with developing a Risk Management Plan 

at the kick-off meeting. The Plan will include a list of potential problems specific to the project and prevention measures 



5



that may be used to mitigate the problems. Monthly, Mr. Maristany will update the Risk Management Plan to reflect the 

status of each area of potential concern. 

Earned Value Analysis 

Managing costs must occur throughout 

the life of our services on every project 

for the CITY. KING realizes that every 

dollar of public funds is an investment 

made for the public's benefit. 

Managing those dollars, whether as 

engineering services fees or 

construction costs, must result in a 

maximum realized benefit to the CITY. 

The consulting engineering team, 

therefore, undertakes a stewardship of 

those funds in concert with the CITY. 

At KING, each project manager is 

provided with access to an in-house, 

computer-based management 

information system to track project 

costs and manpower requirements on 

a weekly basis, and to compare the 

quantity of work to be completed with 

the remaining amount of budgeted 

hours and funding. 

Cummulative Revenue 

$ 300,000 

$ 250,000 

$ 200,000 

$ 150,000 

$ 100,000 

$ 50,000 

$ 0 

Mar-07 

INTEGRATED SCHEDULE AND BUDGET MANAGEMENT 

Project Number : 2034-027-001 - Project Name: Hammock Park Natural Systems Restoration 

As of 10/1/2008 

- Over Budget : $4,128 

- Ahead Schedule : 19 days 

- 78.6% Complete 

Jun-07 

Sep-07 

Dec-07 

Mar-08 

Jun-08 

Aug-08 

Nov-08 

Feb-09 

May-09 

Date 

Budget Earned Value Invoiced Revenue 

Revenue Spent Work Order Expiration Contract Expiration 

Aug-09 

Mr. Maristany will also use Earned Value Analysis to monitor the project’s budget. As part of the project management plan, 

a budget will be assigned to each task in the ABS. Using the scheduled relationship between tasks, the projected 

cumulative budgeted cost of the work will be plotted against time to show how the project budget is scheduled to be 

expended. Then, on a monthly basis, the project manager will calculate the sum of the earned values (estimated percent 

complete times task budget) and compare the total earned value against the expended budget and the projected 

cumulative cost to evaluate engineering budget status and the overall project schedule. See attached sample chart. 

Presentations 

At the CITY’s request, KING will present reports and recommendations to the CITY Commission, CITY Administration, and 

other interest groups as specified by the CITY. Our Project Principal and Project Manager have many years of experience 

presenting reports and recommendations to multiple stake holders. 

Approach to Scope of Work: Traffic 

As requested, the KING team is prepared to assist the CITY in a variety of 

Roadway Engineering services from PD&E/Roadway Alignment Studies to 

final design, permitting, and contract administration, these include the 

following: 

Transportation Planning and Operations 

The approach to a traffic operations study to identify and correct traffic 

capacity and safety issues would vary from that used in an access 

management analysis that would identify safe and efficient access to 

maximize capacity along a corridor. The first step is to have a qualified 



6



Professional Engineer conduct field visits to the site to assess the operational characteristics of the roadway or intersection. 

Items that the field visits may uncover, such as trees, bushes, utility poles that limit motorists’ line of sight, may be crucial 

to the successful outcome of the study. Each location and project will have its own distinct set of safety and operational 

issues, and as such, each site will be observed on its own merit and approached accordingly. 

Subsequent to the field visit, a detailed methodology statement is prepared that clearly outlines the problems identified 

and the exact methods proposed to evaluate the alternatives. The methodology statement will be presented to the CITY 

and will outline the proposed methodology to be employed, included data collection techniques, reference material to be 

used, standards to be applied, and a list of the software that will be used for each analysis. 

The analysis will be prepared based upon the agreed upon methodology submitted, and a final report summarizing the 

results of the study will be prepared for use by the CITY. 

Transportation Corridor Studies 

Corridor studies are typically commissioned in order to determine the 

future transportation needs along a specified stretch of road that is 

important to the surrounding community. Typically, a corridor study 

begins with data collection and analysis for the existing traffic conditions 

along the roadway. Future volumes are then projected for the horizon 

year and the transportation system is analyzed under two scenarios: no 

build – which assumes no improvements to the corridor and build – 

which identifies any improvements necessary to maintain adequate 

operations through the future condition. 

KING believes that there are other aspects which must be included 

within a detailed corridor study. Access to adjacent properties must be evaluated since the number and configuration of 

access has a direct impact on traffic operations. Access should be evaluated not just against the adopted access 

management standards, but also from an overall corridor friendly approach. The access evaluation should include 

consideration of such options as frontage and reverse frontage roads, cross access and shared parking for compatible uses. 

Pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities must also be considered. It is a growing reality that improvements to vehicular 

traffic flow may not be enough to sustain our transportation systems. Therefore, the corridor study should include a 

detailed inventory and evaluation of the adequacy or feasibility of pedestrian, bicycle and transit amenities. Another key 

aspect that should be evaluated within a corridor study is the impact of the adjacent land use on the transportation 

patterns along the corridor. The existing and future land use maps and zoning information should be carefully reviewed to 

maximize interaction between land uses while minimizing the need for vehicular travel on the roadway. 

As you are aware, Public input is also a key component to a successful corridor study. Once draft recommendations and 

alternatives have been created, workshops with key stakeholders in the community should be held to gather input and 

comment. 

A detailed report describing the methods and results of the analysis as well as reflecting the input received in the public 

forums will be prepared for the CITY. The report should liberally use graphics where practical to easily portray the results 

and recommendations of the analysis. 

Traffic Data Collection 

Various methods will be employed to collect the data necessary to support the transportation planning and engineering 

tasks outlined in the scope of this project. Tools such as automatic traffic counters, capable of collecting traffic volumes, 

vehicle classification and speed will be used to obtain approach volumes, middle-block counts, and multi-day data 

collection. Digital video recorders may be used to record traffic movements at intersections. The use of the DVR’s can 

assure that all movements are being observed and recorded turning movements are then counted in-house. The use of 

DVR to collect intersection data allows for a video back up of the data to be retained if needed for verification later in the 

analysis. The DVR data also allows for the classification of vehicles during the count, as well as counting pedestrians, 



7



bicyclists and more specific data, such as “right turns on red”. Field personnel may also be used to collect intersection data 

in real time, allowing for a comprehensive observation of a variety of traffic characteristics. 

Roadway Design 

Maintenance of Traffic 

KING is qualified with FDOT to provide Highway Design services. Services 

to be provided by KING for Roadway Design include preparation of 

roadway construction plans, permit applications for environmental 

permits, utilities and stormwater systems, traffic control plans, signing 

and pavement marking design, roadway lighting, and traffic calming 

devices. All designs will meet FDOT’s Minimum Uniform Standards 

(“Greenbook”) and CITY’s road standards. Pavement design will be 

provided based on the FDOT Flexible Pavement Design Manual. KING will 

prepare and submit final design drawings and technical specifications for 

grading, drainage, paving and utility plans. Necessary copies of plans will 

be provided to all utilities to coordinate their distribution system design. 

Minimal disruption of traffic, safety of the traveling public and workers, and access to adjacent properties are elements that 

will be considered during the early development of the design and construction phasing. Early coordination and 

cooperation with utility companies is important to avoid re-design, construction outages and accidents. 

Whether a widening is done to the right side, the left side or along the center will depend on a careful investigation of the 

existing alignment, existing and proposed right-of-way, and location of existing utilities. A construction phasing analysis at 

the early stage of design will promote economy in construction and design efficiency. Avoidance of adverse disruption to 

the traveling public and achieving savings in construction costs is the primordial goal of our design. 

Access management is considered a critical issue both in roadway design and in maintenance of traffic. When an existing 

roadway is widened, the existing access may need to be modified to meet safety criteria. Modifying existing access may be 

costly due to right-of-way acquisition and consequential damages. These factors will be considered during the design to 

ensure that access is safely maintained including during construction. 

Traffic Signal Design 

The KING team will prepare signal design plans that will include all design services, such as survey, geotechnical 

engineering, structural design, and signalization plan. During the construction of the traffic signal, the team will provide 

inspection services covering the installing of the signal equipment and geotechnical testing services for installing the drill 

shafts and mast arm foundations. 

KING will be provided a survey base map of the intersection to be signalized. The survey will be provided in AutoCAD file 

format or other as requested and will be placed on the CITY’s standard plan sheet. This sheet will be the base plan for the 

signal design. 

At the CITY’s request, KING will prepare a 60% submittal, 90% submittal and final submittal. The 60% submittal will 

include a key sheet, topographic survey, signalization plan sheet, mast arm details, foundation details and soil boring data 

sheets. The 60% submittal plans will be sent to all the companies that have underground and overhead utilities in the 

intersections. As such, the mast arm and foundation design will be conducted after the 60% submittal plans have been 

reviewed the CITY, FDOT and the utility companies. 

The 90% submittal will provide all required sheets including the addition of the tabulation of quantities, the signing and 

pavement marking plan, mast arm and foundation design, maintenance of traffic and technical special provisions. 



8



The final submittal will include all sheets and will be signed and sealed by a professional engineer. The plans will show the 

overhead signing, ground signing, paving, drainage and marking modification associated with the new signal installation. 

The CITY’s specifications will be incorporated into the General Notes. 

Signing and Pavement Marking 

Signing and pavement marking plans will be designed based on the latest FDOT Design Standards and FHWA Manual on 

Uniform Traffic Control Devices. However, the CITY of North Miami Beach guidelines will be used for specific markings. 

Roadside signs will conform to Elder User Guidelines. The Transoft “GUIDSIGN” program will be used to design overhead 

street name signs to be installed on the mast arm poles. 

Construction Engineering Inspection 

The construction phase of a project marks the beginning of the 

most significant expenditure of a project’s funds. It is the time 

when an excellent engineering consultant shows its value. The 

design effort has set the stage for successful construction, now 

construction services must execute the assignment. Knowing how 

to work with contractors is critical. Contractors have a culture - an 

orientation. An engineering consultant must know how to 

understand a contractor’s perspective and use it to the advantage 

of the CITY. An engineering consultant must always be watching 

out for the Client’s best interest. In addition, KING has experience 

implementing a “Claims Management Approach” which quickly, 

efficiently and expeditiously handles claims in order to minimize 

any exposure to the CITY. 

The successful construction of a project, of course, begins during the design phase. The plans must undergo a 

constructability and bidability review. These reviews will not only avoid the “how do we build this” questions from the 

Contractor, but will also minimize supplemental agreement claims from the Contractor. 

The team approach is to have the design engineers for projects continue as the same basic team through the construction 

phase, thus, fully utilizing their knowledge and understanding of the project. 

Several important considerations occur during the construction phase of a project. Operations of adjacent roadways and 

maintenance of traffic must be impacted to the least amount possible, safety and security must not be compromised, and 

the construction effort itself must be kept moving. Delays must be avoided, changes must be avoided; the project should 

be kept moving and closed out in a timely fashion. 

Construction services can be generally separated into construction administration (CA) and resident project representative 

services (RPR). CA in general, is the designer checking and monitoring the construction to assure what is being built is what 

was designed. CA consists of attendance at a preconstruction conference, periodic visits to the construction site to monitor 

progress and quality of work, taking appropriate action on shop drawings and other submittals, preparation of change 

orders, reviewing laboratory and testing results, providing design clarifications, evaluating contractor substitution 

proposals, reviewing contractor applications for payment, performing substantial completion inspections, obtaining written 

warranties and preparing of closeout documents, including record drawings. 

If the CITY requests RPR services, then closer monitoring of the Contractor and construction effort would result. Services 

would consist of arranging progress meetings and job conferences, reviewing Contractor progress schedules, serving as 

liaison with the Contractor, administratively handling and reviewing paperwork between the contractor/CA team such as 

change orders and contractor pay requests, performing daily inspections, keeping daily work log, verifying that certificates 

and manuals furnished by the contractor are applicable to the items actually installed, conducting final inspection, 

preparing and completing a punch list, and providing the CITY and user start up assistance. 



9



Constructing a public works improvement is a multi-organization effort. It is a process that finds the CITY, the Contractor, 

the Design Engineer, the permitting agencies, and other government agencies in a partnership to implement the project 

safely and efficiently. In order to be successful, the relationship among the involved parties must be based on the following 

principals: 

• Commitment to an acceptable end product 

• Open communication 

• Trust 

• Teamwork 

• Understanding of mutual goals 

An additional vital component of the project “team” is the public. The citizens and taxpayers of the community expect and 

deserve a high quality project. They must have their questions and concerns answered in a factual and professional 

manner. KING’s extensive experience in public involvement efforts on many types of projects will be a great value on this 

project if required during the construction administration services. 

The successful construction of a project, of course, begins during the design phase. The plans must undergo a 

constructability and bidability review. These reviews will not only avoid the “how do we build this” questions from the 

Contractor, but will also minimize supplemental agreement claims from the Contractor. 

The day-to-day administration of the construction project will involve several essential phases: 

• Final review of contract package 

• Preconstruction conference 

• Shop drawing review 

• Documentation 

• Recommendations for contract alteration 

• Project acceptance 

All of these elements are vitally important. A further explanation of the documentation phase will help communicate 

KING’s understanding of the construction administration process. We live by a simple cardinal rule related to 

documentation: Document as if every decision you make may be challenged in court. The organization of this 

documentation is also very important. Many decisions are made during a construction project. The following list indicates 

the nature of KING’s administration documentation: 

• Project diary 

• Progress estimates 

• Control of materials reports 

• Utility work reports 

• Subletting requests 

• Time modifications 

• Supplemental agreements 

• Contract claims 

• Acceptance reports 

• Final estimates 

• Correspondence 



10



Approach to Scope of Work: Drainage Design 

KING welcomes the opportunity to work in partnership with the CITY of North Miami Beach to improve the 

stormwater/drainage levels of service either on a citywide basis, sub-basin scale, or in association with smaller localized 

projects that involve drainage improvements. 

KING relies on its multi-disciplinary in-house capabilities to deliver innovative and cost-effective solutions to increasingly 

complex stormwater challenges. As population growth places additional demands on our limited water resources, more 

creative solutions are required to manage water on an integrated basis and achieve a better balance between competing 

objectives such as water supply, flood control, aquifer recharge, water quality and aquatic control, navigation, and the 

natural environment. KING works closely with its clients to clearly define the nature of the challenges and find solutions 

that are uniquely tailored to their needs. 

We offer an integrated team of engineers, hydrologists, ecologists, surveyors, landscape architects, and GIS experts that can 

address the full range of stormwater services. KING provides the following stormwater services: 

Master Planning 

Capital Improvement Plans 

Hydrologic, Hydraulic, and Water Quality Modeling 

Flood & Erosion Control 

Stormwater Reuse and Aquifer Recharge 

Seepage modeling and control 

Enhancement of Water Quality through Best Management Practices 

Lake / Wetland Restoration 

Design of Water Resources Infrastructure 

o Drainage Systems 

o Hydraulic Control Structures 

o Stormwater Pump Stations 

o Lakes, Reservoirs, Canals, Retention Ponds 

Stakeholder/Interagency Coordination and Public Information 

Regulatory Issues / Permitting 

o Review of Plats; Paving, Grading, and Drainage Plans; As-Builts 

o Policy and design criteria development 

o Permitting procedures and fees 

o Drainage design and criteria manuals 

Construction Management and Inspections 

KING Engineering Associates, Inc. 


11



Most importantly, our staff has compiled an extensive record of stormwater experience in south Florida. Following is a 

representative list of projects: 

King Team South Florida Stormwater Experience 

Client Location Project Description 

Central Broward 

Water Control 

District 

Hollywood, FL 

District engineer from 1995 through 2007 for a 43.5-square-mile area that 

includes unincorporated Broward County, Cooper City, the Seminole Indian 

Reservation, and the communities of Davie, Hollywood, Sunrise, and Pembroke 

Pines. Provided services related to regulation, permitting, infrastructure 

improvements, and the operation and maintenance of more than 100 miles of 

secondary canals serving 150,000 residents. Reviewed plats, paving and 

drainage plans, and as-built drawings for all development and redevelopment 

for conformance with design standards, processing an average of 70 plans 

annually. Revised the design criteria manual and conducted site inspections. 

Attended Board and committee meetings. Managed special projects including 

flood assessments, stormwater modeling, and implementation of best 

management practices to improve water quality and erosion control, and the 

design of infrastructure improvements. 


Water Control 

District 

Hollywood, FL 

Design of ten secondary canal culvert crossings with a combined construction 

value of $700,000. Culverts ranged from circular 48-inch RCP to dual 72-inch 

RCP. Services included, planning, design, permitting, utility relocation, bidding 

assistance, and support during construction. 


Water Control 

District 

Hollywood, FL 

Water quality study of the C-11 West Basin, a highly urbanized area covering 

22.9 square miles. The XP-SWMM model was used to evaluate the retention 

capacity of the existing secondary canal network and to evaluate infrastructure 

improvements to improve the quality of discharges into the C-11 West canal. 

The recommended alternative consisted of enlarging and deepening several 

canal outfalls to enhance phosphorus removal via wet detention. The study 

and recommendations were used as the basis to obtain a $1 million grant from 

the South Florida Water Management District to construct the improvements. 


Water Control 

District 


Water Control 

District 

Hollywood, FL 

Hollywood, FL 


Development of a stormwater master plan for the C-11 East Basin, a 24– 

square-mile highly urbanized watershed. Major tasks included a facilities 

inventory and GIS mapping, development and calibration of a stormwater 

model (XP-SWMM), evaluation and recommendation of alternatives for flood 

control and water quality enhancement, preparation of capital and operation 

& maintenance costs, and recommended priorities for a $19M capital 

improvement plan. Alternatives evaluated included pump stations, canal 

dredging, and culvert improvements. The XP-SWMM model consisted of 38.8 

miles of canals, 185 culverts and bridges, two major control structures (S-13 

and S13A), and 3 pump stations. 

Design, permitting, bidding assistance, and construction support services for 

the construction of 2,800 feet of secondary canal improvements (deepening 

and widening) within the C-11 West Basin. The project is funded jointly by the 

CBWCD and the South Florida Water Management District. The project 

increases the capacity of selected secondary canals by deepening and widening 


12





the downstream canal sections to improve stormwater quality prior to 

discharge into the C-11 West Canal. 


Water Control 

District 

Hollywood, FL 

Development of a stormwater master plan for the C-11 West Basin, a 72 – 

square-mile highly urbanized watershed. Major tasks included a facilities 

inventory and mapping, development and calibration of a stormwater model 

(XP-SWMM), evaluation and recommendation of alternatives for flood control 

and water quality enhancement, preparation of capital and operation & 

maintenance costs, and recommended priorities for a $3M capital 

improvement plan. Alternatives evaluated included pump stations, canal 

dredging, and culvert improvements. The XP-SWMM model consisted of over 

2000 nodes including 250 sub-basins, 58 miles of canals, 364 culverts, 5 pump 

stations, and 20 control structures. 

South Florida Water 

Management 

District 


Management 

District 

Broward County 


Basis of Design Report (BODR) for a 1,650-acre above ground impoundment 

with a construction value of $134 million. The impoundment is an element of 

the Broward County Water Preserve Area. Key components of the 

impoundment include 6.5 miles of 15.5-foot levees, levee windbreaks, 295- 

acre mitigation wetland, 700 cfs inflow pump station, 500 cfs gated outlet 

structure, 500 cfs gated culvert on the C-9 canal, emergency overflow spillway, 

seepage control canals, and a 150 cfs seepage pump station. Services included 

topographical site baseline surveys and GIS database development, 

geotechnical and hydrogeological field investigations, dam break analysis, SPF 

routing, wind setup, wave run-up, erosion control, SEEP2D and MODFLOW 

seepage modeling, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical & instrumentation, 

and preparation of detailed cost estimates for the recommended 

configuration. 

Design and preparation of full contract documents for an $1.8 million, 500 cfs 

gated culvert structure on the C-9 Canal, including twin 6-ft by 10 ft RCP box 

culverts, SCADA controls, and manatee barrier. Services included hydraulic 

analysis, geotechnical investigation, surveying, civil, structural, mechanical, 

electrical & instrumentation design, erosion control, preparation of detailed 

cost estimates, construction schedule, and permitting support. 


Management 

District 



Development of two complex hydrologic and hydraulic models to support the 

design of the Broward County Water Preserve Area (BCWPA). The models 

assisted in the evaluation of alternative project configurations, dimensions, 

and capacities; the development of operation protocols for various project 

components; and the phasing of project components. Project components 

include reservoirs, pump stations, canals, control structures, and seepage 

management areas. A comprehensive Water Balance Model was developed to 

provide initial screening of alternatives to efficiently reduce the number of 

potential alternatives for more detailed analysis. An XP-SWMM model of the 

entire BCWPA was also created to perform more detailed analysis including 

hydraulic routing yielding instantaneous flows, water levels, and velocities for 

each selected alternative. Modeled components included two major 


13





impoundments (C-9 and C-11) with an approximate storage capacity of 6,000 

acre-ft each, routing through the C-11 and C-9 canals from the coast to the 

water conservation areas (48 miles of canals), 16 major control structures, and 

6 pump stations ranging in size from 100 cfs to 2,880 cfs. Recommendations 

resulted in significant cost savings ($206M vs. $224M) through reduced 

capacities (control structures, pumps, and new canals) while achieving higher 

flow diversion capacities (83% vs. 35%) through modified project 

configurations and operations protocols as compared to the originally 

proposed project. 


Management 

District 


Evaluation of potential flood impact of decommissioning pump station G-123 

(400 cfs) on the North New River (NNR) Basin and the evaluation of mitigation 

measures. The G-123 pump station discharges from the NNR Basin into the 

Water Conservation Area 3A (WCA-3A) for water supply purposes, but it is also 

used for flood control during major storms. An XP-SWMM model of the 30- 

square mile basin was developed and calibrated against Hurricane Irene and 

the “No-Name Storm”. The model covered an area of 30 mi2 extending 13.6 

miles along the NNR canal from G-123 to the G-54 saltwater control structure, 

and 3.7 miles along the C-42 canal. The model included 12 bridges, 2 culverts, 3 

control structures, the G-123 pump station, and 20 inflow points including 12 

pump stations. Since elimination of the pump would negatively impact flood 

levels in adjacent municipalities, alternatives and conceptual cost estimates 

were prepared to mitigate impacts, including canal deepening, removal of 

aquatic vegetation, and modified operational rules for G-123 allowing 

operation during extreme events. 


Office of 

Environmental 

Services 

City of Fort 

Lauderdale 

City of Fort 

Lauderdale 





Stormwater planning and design of a stormwater system to alleviate extensive 

flooding problems in several old neighborhoods, where common problems 

included lack of positive outfalls and poor surface infiltration due to the 

destruction (filling in) of street side swales. A stormwater (adICPR) model was 

applied to assess the severity of existing flooding problems and to size 

drainage facilities. Because positive outfalls to waters of the U.S. were required 

for flood control, best management practices (BMPs) were used for pollution 

control. Runoff and lake water quality models were used to assess BMP 

effectiveness, size controls, and estimate water quality impacts to receiving 

lakes. The designed system consisted of re-graded swales, exfiltration 

trenches, storage and treatment in neighborhood lakes, and overflow into the 

primary canal system. 

Retrofitting the drainage system in the facility to reduce frequent flooding and 

accommodate the addition of a 7-million-gallon storage tank and ASR well pad 

to the plant site in accordance with regulations. Work effort included modeling 

(adICPR), design, and permitting (SFWMD, DNRP, and FDOT). 

Planning, design, and limited construction support services for a $650,000 

facility connecting SFWMD’s C-14 canal to Prospect Lake to recharge the city's 

main wellfield with freshwater that would otherwise be discharged to tide. The 


14





facility serves to intercept canal flows for storage in the lake and adjacent 

aquifer. Services included securing a $300,000 alternative water supply grant 

from the South Florida Water Management District. A unique aspect was the 

reclassification of the Lake from a Class I to a Class III water body, the first such 

reclassification in the state of Florida. 

City of Lauderdale 

Lakes 


Development and implementation of a stormwater utility including needs 

assessment, rate structure, revenue projections, billing database, and 

stormwater utility ordinance. 

City of Miami 

Miami, FL 

Preparation of the municipal NPDES stormwater permit application, which 

included sewer system inventory, GIS mapping, dry- and wet-weather 

sampling, assessment of nonpoint source impacts, development of a water 

quality management plan to reduce pollutants to waters of the U.S., analysis of 

program costs and fiscal resources, public information, and assistance in 

negotiations with the EPA. 

Miami-Dade County 

DERM 

Miami, FL 

Development of a stormwater master plan for the C-6 Basin (Miami River). The 

study area, located in northeastern Miami-Dade County, has an area of 69 

square miles and contains approximately 175 sub-basins. Major tasks includes 

data review and statistical analysis of rainfall and flow records, compilation of 

drainage data from the cities, development of a digital terrain model for the 

basin area, delineation of sub-basins; building and calibration of a 

hydrologic/hydraulic and water quality XP-SWMM model for the basin; 

evaluation and ranking of flooding and water quality problems areas; 

identification and evaluation of flood and water quality control measures using 

XP-SWMM; cost estimates and recommendation of control measures. 


DERM 

Miami, FL 

Development of a stormwater master plan for the C-1 Basin. The study area, 

located in southeastern Miami-Dade County, has an area of 56.9 square miles 

and contains 145 sub-basins. Major tasks included evaluation and ranking of 

flooding and water quality problems areas; identification of control measures 

for flood and water quality control; hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality 

modeling of control measures using XP-SWMM; cost estimates and 

recommendation of control measures. 


DERM 


DERM 

Miami, FL 

Miami, FL 


Design of drainage improvements to alleviate flooding and water quality 

problems in flood prone neighborhoods throughout Miami-Dade County. 

Managed preparation of 57 design packages, covering about 2 square miles, 

and with a construction value of $4 million. Designs included catch basins, 

exfiltration trenches, pavement restoration, and maintenance of traffic plans, 

hydraulic calculations, cost estimates, and utility conflict coordination. 

Design of $6 million in canal dredging and embankment restoration 

improvements for 6.6 miles of the North Canal. Tasks included preparation of 

plan, profiles, specifications, quantity takeoffs using Geopak, and coordination 

with surveyors and geotechnical engineers. All deadlines were met on this fast- 


15





track project. 

City of Boca Raton 

Palm Beach 

County 

Evaluation of funding alternatives to finance stormwater capital improvement 

and operation and maintenance programs. A stormwater utility was selected 

as the preferred alternative. Developed the rate structure, revenue 

projections, and ordinance for implementation of the utility. 

City of Boca Raton 

Palm Beach 

County 

As part of a general stormwater services contract, provided assistance with 

preparation of a NPDES stormwater permit. 

Land Use 

The CITY of North Miami Beach is a mature, built-out community with a relatively stable population. Its attractive setting, 

warm climate, and vibrant business environment make it an attractive destination for permanent residents, businesses, and 

vacationers. 

Flood Prone Areas 

Because of its low lying elevations, proximity to the coast and the fact that primary canals within the CITY are tidal, flooding 

within the CITY may be caused by a combination of large storm events, high tides, and storm surge activity caused by 

hurricanes. 

The attached FEMA 

flood zone map 

shows the areas 

impacted by flooding. 

The inundation 

coincides closely with 

the topography, 

impacting the lower 

lying coastal areas and 

the relic floodplain 

areas adjacent to the 

C-9 primary drainage 

canal controlled by 

the S-29 saltwater 

control structure. 

Large areas of the 

CITY enjoy being 

outside the 100 year 

floodplain. 



16



Flood Insurance 

The CITY participates in the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Rating System and enjoys a 15% discount on 

flood insurance premiums to homes located in a Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) designated by the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA). 

The CITY has implemented measures to reduce and ultimately, eliminate the community’s exposure to floods. Fullcompliance 

with floodplain management requirements results in CRS premium discounts in flood insurance rates. 

Sea Level Rise 

Longer term, the CITY may be impacted by sea level rise based on the current observed trends, although the impact will 

occur very slowly over a very long period of time. Long term historic tidal data available at NOAA station 8723170 in Miami 

Beach (see following figure) shows a representative sea level rise for the area of 0.09 inches per year. 

Therefore, the CITY may consider the potential impact of this trend and incorporate into the design of future 

improvements. This may be accomplished by adjusting design boundary conditions to reflect the projected rise over the 

expected life of the improvements. 

Monthly Tides - Miami Beach 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

0 

-1 

-2 

-3 

-4 

1931 

1933 

1935 

1937 

1939 

1941 

1943 

1945 

Feet MSL 

1947 

1949 

1951 

1953 

1955 

1957 

1959 

1961 

1963 

1965 

1967 

1969 

1971 

1973 

1975 

1977 

1979 

1981 

Year 

Highest MSL Lowest 

Linear (Highest) Linear (MSL) Linear (Lowest) 

Regulatory Framework 

Stormwater quantity, quality, and flood protection within the CITY are regulated by various agencies including the South 

Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Broward County Environmental 

Protection Department (EPD), and the CITY’s Public Works Department. 

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has been targeting a revision of stormwater regulations and 

design criteria that will result in more stringent requirements for water quality control. The new governor has placed all 

such efforts on hold for the time being. 

KING Engineering has been tracking these changes very closely and is well positioned to provide timely information on the 

potential impacts of these regulations. Our staff serves on three committees including the Florida Engineering Society, 



17



Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers, and the Florida Home Builders Association. Each of these committees have a 

representative on a technical advisory committee (TAC) created by FDEP to provide feedback on the proposed changes. 

Drainage Solutions 

KING has worked effectively with many clients on the southeast coast of Florida to identify 

cost-effective solutions that provide substantial flood control relief when encountering 

conditions similar to the CITY. 

Typical solutions have ranged from increasing the capacity of outfall discharges to tide, 

supplementing capacity with stormwater pump stations, and using backflow prevention 

devices to avoid saltwater inundation during high tides. These improvements have resulted in 

significant reduction in peak flood levels and the duration of inundation for all storm events, 

including the larger 25-year and 100-year storms. 

Scope of Work: Underground Utility Design 

Preliminary Engineering 

Once the pipeline alignment is chosen, the project will enter the preliminary design phase. It is the intent of this phase to 

produce documents that are approximately 30% complete. During this Phase, KING will collect site specific design data in 

sufficient detail to establish the basis for the final design documents. Associated efforts include: 

• Re-evaluate pipeline sizing based on updated flows, if necessary. 

• Obtain ground and aerial survey data along the pipeline route, and identify locations of property and Right-of-Way 

lines. 

• Obtain geotechnical data, especially at all potential horizontal directional drill (HDD) and jack & bore entry and exit pits. 

• Perform “pedestrian” ecological surveys, such as an environmental resources evaluation, to identify specific locations 

that may be effected by construction. 

• Prepare base plan and profile drawings showing all existing utilities and the preliminary alignment of the proposed 

pipeline. 

• Develop a preliminary construction cost estimate. 

At the completion of this phase, KING will advise the CITY of any additional geotechnical work that appears to be necessary 

along with areas where SUE information is required. 

A minimum of ten copies of the preliminary plans will be submitted to the CITY for review. In addition, two sets of plans 

will be provided to each of the known utilities within the project area. These utilities will be requested to accurately depict 

and/or confirm the locations of their existing facilities. Two review meetings with the CITY will be attended (a 

constructability and a value engineering review), during which comments will be assembled for inclusion in the documents. 

Intermediate Design 

Upon receipt of the CITY’s comments on the preliminary design, KING will begin 

preparing the intermediate (60% + 90%) design submittal. This phase will consist of 

more detailed development of construction drawings and specifications including 

temporary construction easement recommendations (if any), plan and profile 

sheets, standard details, and process flow and instrumentation diagrams if 

required. At a minimum, the design documents will include the following items. 

• Cover sheet with location & vicinity map; 

• General Notes; 

• Coordinate Control; 

• Pipeline key map; 



18



• Pipeline plan and profile sheets; 

• Special crossings; 

• Miscellaneous details; 

• Mechanical, electrical, and structural plan sheets showing existing and proposed information, limits of construction, 

and construction sequencing; 

• Preliminary maintenance of traffic plans; 

• Wetland impact sheets, if any; 

• Erosion and sediment control measures; and, 

• Technical specifications. 

Other tasks to be conducted during this phase include: 

• Finalizing design of HDPE/PVC DR ratings; 

• Obtaining subsurface utility engineering (SUE) data, if necessary; 

• Preparing sketch and legal descriptions for easements and/or property acquisition, if necessary; 

• Attending pre-application meetings with permitting agencies; and, 

• Updating the opinion of probable construction cost. 

The project design documents will carefully specify the qualifications and experience of the contractor. In addition, the 

documents will explicitly address the contractor’s operations while working in the residential areas. Specifically, working 

hours, maximum noise levels, maintaining continuous access for residents, emergency services, trash collection and postal 

deliveries, maintenance of traffic and pedestrian safety will be thoroughly addressed. Regardless of the construction 

method, the contractor should be required to conduct pre-construction video-taping in order to document existing 

conditions before construction initiated. He should also be required to provide post-construction as-builts based on the 

reamed hole location so as to accurately depict the actual elevation of the pipeline. 

As outlined previously in this proposal, KING has significant successful experience with 

pipeline projects. In 2006, the longest (800’), largest (36”) ductile iron pipe installation 

to-date by HDD was successfully installed on a project designed by KING. As a result of 

this similar experience, we have a tried and true method for approaching such 

projects. 

At this point in the design, information from the various utilities regarding the location 

Water System Improvements 

of their facilities should be available and will be incorporated onto the drawings. If 

required, KING will conduct a utility coordination meeting with these utilities to verify 

the location of their facilities and resolve conflicts. Resolution of known conflicts will be documented to the CITY. 

A detailed cost estimate based on current unit prices will be developed. The estimate will include summaries of bid items 

and quantities on the unit price system of bidding, wherever practical. If necessary and practical, the design will be 

modified based on budgetary constraints. 

Land acquisition documents will also be developed, including sketch and legal descriptions and easement agreements if 

included in our scope of services. During this phase, it will also be important to begin development of railroad utility license 

agreements as needed. 

The KING team will conduct an internal quality control project review prior to the CITY's review. A minimum of ten sets of 

documents will be submitted to the CITY for review and comment. Again, two review meetings with the CITY will be 

attended, a constructability and a value engineering review, during which comments will be assembled for inclusion in the 

documents. 



19



Final Design 

Based on the outcome of the intermediate design review meetings, and other comments received from the CITY, KING will 

begin preparing the final design submittal. This phase will take the plans essentially to completion. The CITY’s comments 

will be incorporated into the drawings and technical specifications. The front end documents will also be prepared, 

including the bid form. During this phase permit application packages will be completed and submitted to the regulatory 

agencies. 

Two review meetings with the CITY will be attended, a constructability and a value engineering review, during which 

comments will be assembled for inclusion in the bid documents. The CITY will also be provided with ten (10) additional 

copies of the drawings to be forwarded to the utility companies and Real Estate Services Division of the CITY’s Real Estate 

and Development Department. 

All comments from permitting agencies will be addressed in order to secure the project permits and, if necessary, KING will 

assist with and attend a public information meeting for the project. 


After meeting with the CITY to discuss any final comments, the construction documents will be completed and submitted to 

the CITY for advertising and bidding. 

KING will prepare the application and submit the project plans to the 

FDOT or any other required permitting agency, for review, if required. 

After the project has been advertised for bids, KING will attend a pre-bid 

meeting if requested by the CITY. KING will provide assistance during the 

bidding phase by responding to requests for information and issuing 

addenda, as necessary. Upon receipt and opening of bids, KING will 

evaluate the bids, contact references, and make a recommendation of 

award to the CITY. 

Following contract approval, KING will provide construction phase 

services. These services will include office and field services depending 

on the CITY’s desired level of effort. 

• Assist in the preparation of formal Construction Contract Documents; 

• Provide engineering surveys to refresh and re-establish benchmarks and reference points on approved Coordinate 

System 

• Attend a preconstruction conference; 

• Review contractor submittals, including shop drawings, product data, samples, and other submittals required by the 

contract documents; 

• Furnish non-resident field observation services; 

• Prepare, reproduce and distribute supplemental drawings, specifications and interpretations in response to requests 

for clarification; 

• Observe and evaluate testing results and make recommendations to the CITY; 

• Prepare record drawings based on data provided by the contractor, including a bond copy and electronic copies in 

.DWG and .DXF formats; 

• Consult with the CITY regarding warranty and guarantee issues; 

Scope of Work: Grant Assistance 

KING brings a commitment to clients to enhance value in every project that we undertake. One of the ways we do that is to 

attract governmental funding when available, from local, State and Federal Sources 



20



Fiscal Year 2011 Appropriations are the normal appropriations bills which are passed every year. They fund all of the federal 

government’s discretional spending. The following is a listing of the Federal Appropriations Bills: 

• Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 

• Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies 

• Defense 

• Energy and Water 

• Financial Services and General Government 

• Homeland Security 

• Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies 

• Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies 

• Legislative Branch 

• Military Construction, Veterans Administration, and Related Agencies 

• State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 

• Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies 

• The following provides a general outline of our team’s appropriations activities: 

o Conduct Initial Screening 

o Packaging 

o Presentation 

o Promote and Advocate Project 

o Grant Release 

o Appropriations Timeline 

Conduct Initial Screening 

The first step of the process would be to work with the CITY to do an analysis of the potential requests. This analysis will 

determine the project’s cost, groups and constituencies to benefit from the funding, potential allies, potential funding 

sources, and requirements for each funding source. The team will work to asses every type of funding, such as a direct 

appropriation, a cooperative agreement with a federal agency, or a competitive grant. At the completion of the initial 

screening, a determination will be made as to which funding source or sources will be pursued. 

The team would seek to work with the appropriate CITY personnel and have discussions with Congressional appropriators 

and officials from relevant federal agencies. These discussions would be used to secure input regarding their thoughts 

about potential funding sources and strategies to move forward. 

Packaging 

This step consists of compiling all relevant information into a detailed proposal which will anticipate and answer any 

questions that a member of congress, an appropriator or administration official may have. The package will be specifically 

tailored to address the needs of the particular funding source selected. 

Presentation 

The team will work with the appropriate CITY officials and begin to hold meetings with the Congressional Delegation and 

appropriators, congressional leadership, and relevant administration personnel to present the requests for funding. 

Promote and Advocate Project 

The team would work to monitor the entire funding process and work to ensure that the request remains a priority for the 

House and Senate Appropriators, Congressional Leadership, and relevant staff within the administration. In this step of the 

process, the team provides day-to-day oversight of the request and watches out for potential opportunities, such as 



21



increasing funding and problems. The importance of this step is that instances occur where mistakes are made in 

appropriations bills, and the team has on occasion had to work with appropriators to fix errors, such as the naming of a 

request in manager’s amendments or technical correction packages. 

Grant Release 

Once a project is successful in securing federal funding, the team will work with the CITY to release the funding. All federal 

funding, including direct appropriations, have rules associated with the release of the funding. 

Further KING can assist with other innovative funding strategies, including: 

• Impact fees or other capital contribution charges levied on new growth 

• Revenue bond debt financing 

• Special assessments primarily for potable or reclaimed water transmission/distribution facilities, or wastewater 

conveyance facilities benefitting customers in a geographically defined area 

• Special assessment bonds, debt service of which is paid through receipts of special assessments 

As the need arises, KING will work with a firm based in Washington DC which brings together some of the most 

accomplished policy experts, public opinion influencers and issue advocates. 

KING has secured funding for the following projects: 

Client Name 

Pasco County, Florida 

Project Name 

East Pasco Reuse System For Price Altman 

Groves 

Estimated 

Funding Source 

Funds 

Provided 

$350,000 Southwest Florida Water 

Management District 

Status 

Approved 


Timber Pines Reclaimed Water Irrigation 

System and Master Plan 



Approved 

CITY of Dunedin, 

Florida 

Curlew Road Elevated Storage Tank 

Refurbishment and Reclaimed Water Booster 

Pump Station 



Approved 

Pasco County 

Utilities, Florida 

Land O'Lakes Subregional Wastewater 

Treatment Plant Phase 1 



Approved 

Pinellas County, 

Florida 

Florida Utilities North County Reclaimed 

Water Distribution System Project Phases 3a 

and 3b 

$2 Million Southwest Florida Water 


Approved 

CITY of Largo, Florida 


Florida 


Florida 

Florida Dept of 

Corrections - Sumter 


Florida Oakbrook Estates Reclaimed Water 

Distribution System 

Residential Reclaimed Water Distribution 

Systems 

Florida Spanish Trails Sanitary Sewer and 

Reclaimed Water Distribution Project 

Institution/Florida National Cemetery 

Reclaimed Water System 



Over $1 

Million 

Southwest Florida Water 




Partially 

Funded 



Approved 

Approved 

Approved 

Approved 


22



Correctional 


Florida 

Florida Treasure Island Reclaimed Water 

Distribution System 

Partially 

Funded 



Approved 

CITY of Largo, Florida Florida Reclaimed Water System Part X $300,000 Southwest Florida Water 


Approved 

CITY of Largo, Florida 

Florida Reclaimed Water System Part X Phase 

2 and Part Xi 



Approved 


Florida 

Florida Coastal Raw and Reclaimed Water 

Main 



Approved 


Florida 

Florida Reclaimed Water South Loop 

Transmission Main 



Approved 


Utilities West Pasco Reuse System Northeast 

Segment 



Approved 

Pasco County Florida 

Utilities 

Deer Park/Embassy Hills Reclaimed Water 

Interconnect 



Approved 


North-Central Pasco Reclaimed Main & Force 

Main 

Partially 

Funded 



Approved 


Land O'Lakes Master Reuse System Storage 

Reservoir Program Phase I 

Partially 

Funded 



Approved 


Master Reuse System Storage Reservoir 

Program Phase II, Boyette Road Reservoir 

Partially 

Funded 



Approved 


Odessa Interim Subregional WWTP 

Reclaimed Water Storage and High Service 

Pump Station 

Partially 

Funded 



Approved 

Pasco County, Florida Florida West-Central Reuse Interconnect Partially 

Funded 



Approved 


Florida Utilities Land O'Lakes Subregional 

Wastewater Treatment Plant 



Approved 


Florida Utilities Wildcat Groves Reclaimed 

Water Storage and Pumping System 



Approved 

Baker County, Florida Florida Stormwater Master Planning $300, 000 St. Johns River Water 


CITY of Largo, Florida Florida Stormwater Quality Retrofit $750,000 Southwest Florida Water 


St. Pete College 



Wetland Enhancement and Stormwater 

Quality Retrofit 



Approved 

Approved 

Approved 


23



Florida 

City of Hollywood, 

Florida 


Water Control 

District, Florida 

Florida Stormwater Reuse and Conservation $250,000 South Florida Water 


Canal Water Quality Retrofit $1,000,000 South Florida Water 


Approved 

Approved 

Available Facilities, Technology Capabilities and Other Resources 

KING utilizes up-to-date technology and tools that allow our engineers, ecologists, surveyors, technicians, field crews, and 

other professional staff work effectively and efficiently. 

General 

• 15-Ford F-150 Field Trucks 

• Leica High Definition Scanner 3000 

• Rhino 4-wheel ATVs 

• 1 - 14-ft jon-boat 

• Fisher M-Scope, FP 10 ferrous pipe detector 

• Ashtech Mobile Mapper 100 GIS hand held asset 

management data collector 

• JAMAR TDC -8 - Machine counter 

• JAMAR DB 400 – Machine counter – traffic counts only 

• 7 - JAMAR Trax Mite Machine Tube Counter 

• infrared remote video monitoring system (gopher 

tortoise camera) 

• Ground truthing equipment 

• Piezometer 

• Pressure gauges 

• Pressure recorder 

• Laptops 

• Shortwave radios 

• PDA’s 

• Cameras 

• Measuring Wheel 

• Safety Equipment – i.e. hard hat, safety glasses, steeltoed 

boots, and fluorescent vests 

SERVER / SYSTEMS 

• Microsoft SQL Server 2000 / SQL 2005 

• 100 Workstations (Pentium 4 2.4 to Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz) 

• 42 LAN / WAN servers 

• 6 office WAN 

• Network includes: 

• 4 – TB hard drive storage 

• 1 –3.3 TB LT03 tape library 

• – 1.2 TB LT02 tape library 

• 20 – DVD-RW Drives 

• – Citrix Metaframe XP Remote Access Server 

• 30 – CD – RW Drives 


• – Lotus Notes Application Server 

• Printers: 

• 1 – HP Design Jet 5000 42” color plotter 

• – HP Design Jet 1055 CM 1200 dpi color plotter 

• – HP Design Jet 1050C 1200 dpi color plotter 

• – OCE TDS 600 

• 15+ – HP laser printer 

• 10+ – color inkjet 

• Scanners: – high speed document scanners / extensive 

computer image enhancement of aerial photography 

and digital photo capabilities 

SOFTWARE 

• AutoDesk Land Development Desktop 2009/2011, 

Microstation Version J, Version V8I 

• AutoDesk 3D Studio Viz visualization software 

• ARC/INFO - Geographic Information System (GIS) 

• ARC VIEW 3.2A 

• ARCGIS 9.2 / 9.3 / 10.0 

• AUTOCAD LT 2008/2009 

• FSUTMS 6.1 Cube Voyager 

• Synchro 7.0 

• HCS+ 

• Corsim 6.0 

• LOS Plan 

• CIVIL 3D 2009 / 2011 

• CYBERNET - Hydraulic Modeling Program 

• HAESTAD – PondPak 3.2/3.3 

• H2ONet - Hydraulic Modeling Software with the 

capability of performing time based water quality 

analyses. 

• HEC-1 - Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering 

Center Hydrologic Model 

• HEC-2 - Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering 

Center Backwater Curve Model 

• HYDRAFLOW 

• Advanced ICPR - Advanced version of ICPR includes 


24



explicit hydrodynamic modeling element/PERCPARK 

• MODRET - Mounding analysis for retention ponds 

• MODFLO - USGS three-dimensional model for general 

groundwater flow analysis 

• Autoturn 7.0 

• SWFWMD Link Watershed Waterbody Model (LWWM) 

• SWMM - EPA Storm Water Management Model 

• EXTRAN - Explicit Hydrodynamic Channel Modeling 

computer program 

• LANDAP - Land application model for spray field sizing of 

effluent irrigation 

• PRIMAVERA - Project Management and Scheduling 

Program / P6 

• SewerCAD - Hydraulic Modeling Software with the 

capability of performing time based sewer flow analyses. 

• STORM CAD 6.5 

• TERRA MODEL 

• WATER CAD V8I - Hydraulic Modeling Software with the 

capability of performing time based water quality 

analyses 

• Bentley Hammer V8I 

• FDOT 2010 

• Guidsign 5.0 

• Microsoft Access 2003/2007 

• AUTOCAD LT 2008/2009 

• COMMUNITY ANALYSIS SYSTEM- for analysis of 

biological collections. Modules allow for a variety of 

inferential statistical interpretations of raw data. 

• DIGIAIR - Digital Aerial Photography (2009) of the Tampa 

Bay Metropolitan Area 

• Seamless, radiometrically (color) balanced, orthorectified, 

spatially correct image for use as a basemap 

for viewing sites and site related GIS information. 

• LABINS - Land and Boundary Information System 

• FDOT DRAINAGE CONNECTION 

• LEGAL HOLIDAY 

• LEGAL AID 

• LOTUS NOTES 

• METROSCAN 

• MICROSOFT OFFICE 2000/2003/2007 

• MICROSTATION – Versions J and V8I 

• MINE HYDROLOGY 

• SITEWORK 98 

• SITE VISION OFFICE (Machine Control) 

• STATGRAPHICS - Scientific Statistical Package 

• SURETRAK - Project Management and Critical Path 

Scheduling Program 

• MICROSOFT PROJECT 2003/2007 

• SURVEY LINK 

• TIMELINE - Project Management and Critical Path 

Scheduling Program 

• Adobe Photo Shop CS2 


• Adobe Illustrator CS3 

• CaiCe Software 

• Cyclone Scanning Software 

• Starplus Software 

• Google Sketch up 

• Land FX 

• M-Color 9.6 

• Geo Express 8.0 

SURVEY & MAPPING EQUIPMENT 

• Data Collectors 

• 16 TDS Ranger 

• 1 Husky FS/GS 

• Husky MP2500 

• Total Stations 

• 1 Topcon GPT 1003 

• Topcon GTS 225 

• Topcon GTS 4 Total Stations 

• Topcon GTS 303 Total Stations 

• 2 Topcon GTS 212 Total Stations 

• Geodimeter 600 (robotic) Total Stations 

• 1 Topcon GTS 500 Total Station 

• 1 Topcon GTS2B Theodolite with EDM 

• Trimble 5603 Robotic Total Stations DR 200+ 

• 1 Trimble 5606 Total Station 

• 3 Focus 10 Total Stations 

GPS 

• Trimble TSC1 Survey Controllers 

• 2 Trimble TSC2 Survey Controllers 

• Trimble 4800 Dual Frequency Receivers 

• 3 Trimble 4700 Dual Frequency Receivers 



• 2 Trimble Trimmark IIE 35watt Base Radios 

• Sokkia Radian Dual Frequency Receivers 

• Sokkia Radian IS Dual Frequency Receivers 

• 5 Sokkia Stratus Single Frequency Receivers 

• 1 Sokkia Axis III Receiver 

Levels 

• 4 Zeiss NI2 Levels 

• 3 Zeiss NI3 Levels 

• 1 Pentax ALM5C Level 

• 1 Leitz - NA828 Level 

• 1 Topcon - PAL5C Level 

• 1 Wild - Topcon NA20 Level 

• 1 Topcon - ATG3 Level 

• 2 Wild - Topcon ADT2 Levels 

• 1 Trimble DiNi 22 Electronic Digital Level 

• 3 Sokkia Electronic Levels 


25



Conclusion 

KING has developed the foregoing approach based on the scope of engineering services contained in Request for 

Qualifications, field observation and our experience working with other municipalities on similar projects. We have 

successfully used this approach over the years and look forward to continuing this success working with the CITY of North 

Miami Beach. We have brought together a strong team, a defined process, and experienced leadership to assist the CITY 

with its water and wastewater projects. 



26

RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services 

7.1 EXHIBIT A- LIST OF PROJECTS 

SECTION 7.0 EXHIBITS 

Public Services Department 

RFQ for Continuing Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Surveying & Mapping Services List 

Department 

Project Name 

1 Community Development Planning Studies and review 

2 Community Development Traffic studies and review 

3 Community Development Concurrency review 

4 Community Development/CIP Bike Path Extension to Greynolds Park (MPO) 

5 Community Development/CIP City Facilities 40-Year Recertification 

6 Community Development/CIP City Facilities Renovation -(City-wide ) 

7 Community Development/CIP City Hall Complex Repair / Replacement 

8 Community Development/CIP City Hall Restrooms Renovation - City Hall 4th Floor 

9 Community Development/CIP City Hall Restrooms Renovation -City Hall First Floor 

10 Community Development/CIP Eastern Shores Drainage Repair / Replacement 

11 Community Development/CIP 

Emergency Generator Installation - Fleet Management 

Facility 

12 Community Development/CIP Government Center Pavement Marking 

13 Community Development/CIP HVAC System assessment - all City Facilities 

14 Community Development/CIP McDonald Center Restrooms Renovation 



NE 159 Street Extension to Biscayne Blvd / Railroad 

crossing /closing design and traffic study 

NE 161 Street Roadway & Drainage Improvement - 

Between NE 13 Ave & NE 15 Ave 

Page 48 of 69




NE 162 Street Roadway Improvement - Between NE 12 

Ave & NE 16 Ave 

NE 165 Street Roadway Improvement - Between NE 15 

Ave & NE 16 Ave 

19 Community Development/CIP NE 173 St- Dixie Hwy Intersection re-design 










NE 167 Street & Miami Drive Roadway Improvement - 

Between NE 18 Avenue & NE 19 Avenue 

NE 167 Street Bridge - NE 167 St over the Snake Creek 

Canal 

South Glades Drive Roadway Improvement - Between NE 

17 Ave & NE 22 Avenue 

NE 171 Street Medians Landscape - Between NE 15 Ave & 

West Dixie Hwy 

NE 19 Avenue Roadway Improvement - From NE 163 St to 

NE 171 St 

NE 4 Place & NE 4 Court Roadway Improvement - 

Between NE 167 St & NE 168 St 

West Dixie Hwy - Pedestrian and Bike access to Snyder 

Tennis Center 

West Dixie Industrial District Roadway & Drainage 

Improvement - NE 151 St to NE 154 ST between West 

Dixie Hwy & Railroad track 

Oakgrove Traffic Calming - Miami Drive / NE 14 Avenue / 

NE 15 Avenue / NE 160 & NE 161 Street Intersections 

29 Community Development/CIP Police Facilities Repair / Replacement/PD 


Roof system assessment and replacement - all City 

Facilities 

31 Community Development/CIP Security Access Card System - all City Facilities 

32 Community Development/CIP Telephone System Replacement -City Hall & PD 

33 Community Development/CIP Windows Treatment - Police Building (3rd floor south side) 

34 Community Development/CIP Security Gate Replacement -Fleet Management Facility 

35 

36 

Community Development/CIP 

/PD 

Community 

Development/CIP/PD 

Fire Alarm and Suppression system assessment for City 

facilities 

City Hall Restrooms Renovation - City Hall Second & Third 

Floor 

Page 49 of 69


TRANSMISSION MAINS 

37 Engineering Condition assessment of mains over 40 years old 

38 Engineering 



Sunshine State Pkwy East to Sunshine State Pkwy West 

on N.W. 175 st. 

Biscayne Blvd. between N.E. 187 st. and N.E. 193 st. 

eastside of Bisc. 

Biscayne Blvd between 183 st. and 100' north of OLETA 

RIVER crossing, E side of Bisc. 

41 Engineering Biscayne Blvd from 172 st. to 1,300 ft. north 





Eastside of Bisc. Blvd. between 163 st. and Snake Creek 

Canal 

Westside of Bisc. Blvd. between N.E. 159 st. and N.E. 156 

st. 

N.E. 6 ave. between N.E. 181 st. & 180 dr. to Sunshine 

State Parkway West (170 st. 

N.W. 179 st. from Myrtle Grove west to 29ct. South to 

Treatment Plant 16" on Eastside 

46 Engineering 160 st. N. Mia. Ave. to 159 st. N.W. 7 ave. 

47 Engineering 181 st. N.E. 19th ave. to 180 st. N.E. 6 ave. 





Lot 6 (ISLAND SHORES CONDO) west to eastside of 

Oleta River 

160 st. N.E. 21 ave. N to 162 st. E to eastside of Bisc. Blvd. 

N to 163 st. 

181 ST. N.E. 19th ave. N to Mia. Gardens Dr. E to Bisc. 

Blvd. on Mia. Gardens Dr. 

Crossing Intracoastal Waterway to the Strand & Golden 

Beach Drive 

52 Engineering HAULOVER PARK/BEACH 

53 Engineering HAULOVER BRIDGE 


SOUTHSIDE of HAULOVER BRIDGE to BAL HARBOR 

INTERCONNECT 

55 Engineering N.E. 199 st. from N.E. 18 ave. east to Biscayne Blvd. 

Page 50 of 69




199 st. N.E. 18 ave. west to N.W. 7 ave. south to Norwood 

Water Plant 

183 st. between Bisc. Blvd. and N.E. 27th ave. inside 

shopping plaza CENTURY 21 

AERIAL PIPE CROSSINGS 

58 Engineering West Dixie Hwy & NE 176 St remove & replace 

59 Engineering Biscayne Canal & NW 27 Ave remove & replace 

60 Engineering Biscayne Canal & NW 32 Ave remove and replace 


NE 199 St & 25 Ave (Oleta River)- Rust removal, paint & 

ARV 

62 Engineering NW 168 St & 17 Ave - paint , ARV & signs 

63 Engineering NW 167 St & 16 Ct- paint , ARV & signs 

64 Engineering Williams Island Blvd & Two Island Blvd- paint ARV & signs 

65 Engineering Biscayne Canal & NW 7 Ave- remove and replace 

66 Engineering C9 Canal & NE 182 St- provide ultraconic testing 

67 Engineering C9 Canal & NE 176St- provide ultrasonic testing 

68 Engineering C9 Canal & NE 199 St- provide ARV, paint and signs 


Biscayne Canal & North Miami Ave- provide paint, ARV & 

signs 

70 Engineering Biscayne Canal & NW 17 Ave- provide paint and signs 


Poinciana Drive & West of Collins ave- ultraconic testing & 

paint 

72 Engineering Atlantic Isle- provide ARV, rust removal, paint & signs 

73 Engineering The Srand & Golden Beach Dr- paint & sign 

74 Engineering Verona Ave Bridge - paint & sign 

Page 51 of 69


75 Engineering Navona Ave Bridge - remove & replace PVC) 

76 Engineering Biscayne Blvd & 176 St- paint & signs 

77 Engineering Biscayne Blvd & Snake Creek canal- paint & signs 

78 Engineering Oleta River & SR 826 - paint and Signs 

79 Engineering Bakers Haulover inlet - liner &/or replace sections 

80 Engineering SUBAQUEOUS PIPE CROSSINGS 


INTRACOASTAL WW at STRAND CONDITION 

ASSESSMENT 

82 Engineering LEAK DETECTION PROGRAM 

83 Engineering/CIP NE 165 ST ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT 

84 Engineering/CIP COMMERCIAL ALLEYS RESURFACING CRA ONLY 

85 Engineering/CIP NMB BLVD-162 ST ( from 12CT-13 AVE) 

86 Engineering/CIP NMB BLVD ( from Miami Dr-16 Ave) 

87 Engineering/CIP NMB BLVD - 164 ST ( from 16-17 ave) 

88 Engineering/CIP NMB BLVD-164 ST (from 17-18 ave) 

89 Engineering/CIP South Glades Dr. -164 St (from 18-19 ave) 

90 Engineering/CIP North Glades Dr.-167 St (from 18-19 Ave) 

91 Engineering/CIP North Glades Dr.-167 St (from 19-20 Ave) 

92 Engineering/CIP NMB BLVD- 164 ST (from 20-21 Ave) 

93 Engineering/CIP West Dixie Hwy- 170 ST (from 170-171 ST) 

94 Engineering/CIP West Dixie Hwy- 23 Ave (from 170-171 ST) 

Page 52 of 69


95 Engineering/CIP West Dixie Hwy - 23 Ave (from 171-172 ST) 

96 Engineering/CIP West Dixie Hwy - 23 Ave (from 172-173 ST) 

97 Engineering/CIP NE 167-168 ST ( from 21-22 Ave) 

98 Engineering/CIP NE 161 ST ROADWAY & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 

99 Engineering/CIP ANNUAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM 

100 Engineering/CIP NE 167 ST & MIAMI DR. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT 

101 Engineering/CIP OAKGROVE TRAFFIC CALMING 160 & 161 ST INTERS. 


103 Engineering/CIP WEST DIXIE IND DISTRICT RDWY & DRAINAGE IMPR 

104 Engineering/CIP NE 162 ST ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT 

105 Engineering/CIP NE 171 ST MEDIAN LANDSCAPING 

106 Engineering/CIP GOVERNEMNT CENTER ALLEYWAYS RESURFACING 

107 Engineering/CIP NE 170 ST ON STREET PARKING 

108 Engineering/CIP NE 10 AVE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 

109 Engineering/CIP NE 4 PL & 4 CT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT 


111 Engineering/CIP NE 167 ST BRIDGE OVER SNAKE CREEK CANAL 

112 Engineering/CIP NE 159 ST & BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION 

113 Engineering/CIP SOUTH GLADES DR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT 


Page 53 of 69


115 Engineering/CIP NE 19 AVE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT 

DEAD END ELIMINATION PROJECTS 

Location 

116 Engineering/Distributions N. Bay Rd between NE 188 St and NE 189 St. 

117 Engineering/Distributions 

In Easment between NE 188 St and NE 189 St. on N. Bay 

Rd. 

118 Engineering/Distributions NE 21 Ave. North of NE 188 Terr 

119 Engineering/Distributions NE 19 Ave. Alleyway between NE 171 St and NE 172 St. 

120 Engineering/Distributions NE 20 Ave and NE 172 St 

121 Engineering/Distributions NE 20 Ave and NE 173 St 

122 Engineering/Distributions NE 168 St. Between 18 and 19 Ave 

123 Engineering/Distributions NE 174 Street Between NE 19th Ave and NE 20th Ave 


North Miami Beach Blvd. Between NE 19th Ave and NE 

20th Ave 

125 Engineering/Distributions NE 20 PL and NE 139 St 

126 Engineering/Distributions NE 11 AVE from NE 169 St to NE 169 Terr 

127 Engineering/Distributions NE 15 Ave from Ne 161 St to NE 162 St 

128 Engineering/Distributions NE 10 Ct. Alleyway between NE 156 St. and NE 157 St. 

129 Engineering/Distributions NE 10 Ave and NE 160 Terr 

130 Engineering/Distributions NE 10 Ave and NE 161 Terr 

131 Engineering/Distributions NE 162 St and NE 10 Ave 

132 Engineering/Distributions NE 160 Terr and NE 12 Ave 

Page 54 of 69


133 Engineering/Distributions NE 14 Ct and NE 152 Terr 

134 Engineering/Distributions NE 157 St between NE 14 Ct to NE 15 Ave 



137 Engineering/Distributions NE 11 Ave from NE 149 St to NE 150 St 

138 Engineering/Distributions NE 12 Ave from NE 148 St to NE 147 St 

139 Engineering/Distributions NE 191 St along Snake Creek Canal 

140 Engineering/Distributions NE 168 Terr and 3 ct 


142 Engineering/Distributions NE 2 Ave. Alleyway between NE 174 St and NE 175 St 

143 Engineering/Distributions NE 4 Ct and NE 174 Street 

144 Engineering/Distributions NE 3 Ave and NE 164 ST 



147 Engineering/Distributions NE 164 Street between NE 6 Ave and NE 7 Ave 



150 Engineering/Distributions NE 159 St between NE 2 Ave and NE 3 ave 

151 Engineering/Distributions NE 160 Terr between NE 4 Ave and NE 5 Ave 

152 Engineering/Distributions NE 5 Ave between NE 159 St and 160 St 

Page 55 of 69




155 Engineering/Distributions NE 7 Ave. Alleyway between NE 153 St and NE 154 St 


157 Engineering/Distributions NE 151 Street and N. Spur Drive 

158 Engineering/Distributions NE 2 Ave south of NE 148 Street 


Between NW 2 Ave and NE 3 Ave. Alon Snake Creek 

Canal 

160 Engineering/Distributions NW 183 terr and North Miami Ave 

161 Engineering/Distributions NE 185 Terr and NE 1 Ct 

162 Engineering/Distributions NE 1 Ct and NE 187 St 

163 Engineering/Distributions NW 164 St West of N. Miami Ave 

164 Engineering/Distributions NW 164 St East of N. Miami Ave 

165 Engineering/Distributions NW 165 St and N. Miami Ave 

166 Engineering/Distributions NW 17 Ave and NW 173 St 

167 Engineering/Distributions NW 17 Ave 175 St 

168 Engineering/Distributions NW 15 AVE between NW 163 St and NW 159 St 

169 Engineering/Distributions NW 15 AVE between NW 155 Terr and NW 159 St 

170 Engineering/Distributions NW 16 Drive and NW 12 Ave 

171 Engineering/Distributions NW 15 Drive and NW 13 Ave 

172 Engineering/Distributions NW 168 Terr between NW 29 Ave and NW 30 Ave 

Page 56 of 69


173 Engineering/Distributions NW 30 Ave between NW 171 st to NW 170 St 

174 Engineering/Distributions NW 171 St from NW 29 Ave to NW 28 Ave 


NW 27 Ave and NW 163 St (Approx 350 FT South of 

intersect) 

176 Engineering/Distributions NW 27 Ave and Biscayne Canal 

ALLEYWAYS IMPROVEMENTS 

177 Engineering/Distributions Alleyways 2" water main replacements phase 9 

178 Engineering/Distributions Commercial alleyways 

FIREFLOW IMPROVEMENTS 

179 Engineering/Distributions Ne 172 St fireflow improvement ( 9-10 Ave) 

180 Engineering/Distributions NW 1 Ave fireflow improvements ( 128-135 St) 

181 Engineering/Distributions Myrtle Grove Fireflow Improvements NW 171 St 

182 Engineering/Distributions Ne 157 Terr Fireflow Improvements (18-19 Pl) 

183 Engineering/Distributions Nw 15 Dr Fireflow Improvements (143-147 St) 

184 Engineering/Distributions North Glades Dr. (NE 170- 173 St) 

185 Engineering/Distributions NW 183 St & NW 2 Ave 

186 Engineering/Distributions NW 159 St between NW 2 Ave and N. Miami Ave 

187 Engineering/Distributions NW 167 St from NW 19 ave to NW 20 Ave 

188 Engineering/Distributions NW 161 St between NW 2 Ave and N. Miami Ave 

189 Engineering/Distributions NW 15 AVE between NW 163 St and NW 159 St 

190 Engineering/Distributions Nw 27 Ave ( 151-154 St) 

Page 57 of 69


191 Engineering/Distributions NW 155 Dr /13 Ave railroad xing in exist casing 

192 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 6 - Sunray East 

193 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 7 - Sunray West 

194 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 8 - Norwood 

195 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 9 - North Biscayne Gardens 

196 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 10 - Honey Hill 

197 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 11- Norland 

198 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 12- South Biscayne Gardens 

199 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 13- St- Thomas Univ 

200 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 14- Bell Gardens 

201 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 15- Fulford Highlands 

202 Engineering/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 16- Oak Grove 

SYSTEM BETTERMENT PROJECTS (


209 Engineering/Distributions SR 826 LANDSCAPING 

210 Engineering/Distributions SR 7 LANDSCAPING 

211 Engineering/Distributions SR 826 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 

212 Engineering/Distributions SR 826 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 

213 Engineering/Distributions TURNPIKE RESURFACING 

214 Engineering/Distributions SR 7 RESURFACING 


SR 860 ( MIAMI GARDENS DR) INTERSECTION 

IMPROVEMENT 

216 Engineering/Distributions SR 856 WILLIAM LEHMAN CAUSEWAY RES. 

217 Engineering/Distributions SR 915 (NE 6 AVE) RESURFACING 

218 Engineering/Distributions I-95 LANDSCAPING 

219 IT Dept. 

City Hall IT Server Room - Design for new space with Fire 

Suppression and dedicated A/C 

220 Leisure Services Pat Mishcon Field - Turf Field 

221 Leisure Services Allen Park Tot Lot Playground Equipment Replacement 

222 Leisure Services Highland Village Recreation Center Expansion 

223 Leisure Services 

Highland Village Tot Lot Playground Equipment 

Replacement 

224 Leisure Services Littman Park Tot Lot Playground Equipment Replacement 

225 Leisure Services Littman Theater - Remodeling Dressing Rooms 

226 Leisure Services Parks & Recreation Facilities Repair / Replacement 

227 Leisure Services Sky Lake Tot Lot 

228 Leisure Services Taylor Park - Phase I 

Page 59 of 69


229 Leisure Services Taylor Park Expansion - Phase III 

230 Leisure Services Uleta Phase II (Ballfields Renovations) 

231 Leisure Services Uleta Phase III (Pool, Tot Lot and Bathhouse) 

232 Leisure Services Victory Pool Bathrooms Renovation 

233 Leisure Services Victory Pool Water Feature 

234 Leisure Services Washington Expansion- Phase IV 

235 Leisure Services Washington Park Expansion- Phase I 

236 Leisure Services Washington Park Expansion- Phase III 

237 Leisure Services YES -Government Center Tot Lot 

238 Leisure Services 

Connectivity study for Bike Paths/ Trails throughout the 

City 

239 Meters METER Replacement Program 

240 Wastewater Annual report 

241 Wastewater SSES report 

242 Wastewater Norwood Water Wellfield protection report. 

243 Wastewater Inflow and Infiltration 

244 Wastewater Major Sewer Rehabiltation 

245 Wastewater GRINDER PUMPS REPLACEMENTS 

246 Wastewater COLLECTION SYSTEM REHABILITATION ( I & I ) 

247 Wastewater PUMP STATION REHABILITATIONS (under designing) 

248 Wastewater FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENTS (under designing) 

Page 60 of 69


249 Wastewater FLOW METER AT KIMCO 

250 Wastewater 

FORCE MAIN INSTALLATION NORWOOD TO HONEY 

HILL 

251 Wastewater INSTALLATION OF TRANSDUCERS AT ALL STATIONS 



INSTALLATION OF ISOLATION VALVES IN BISCAYNE 

BLVD ( COSTCO & KOA) 

PURCHASE OF STANDBY GENERATOR FOR WW 

ADMIN BLDG 

254 Wastewater Televised Inspections of Gravity Sanitary Sewers 

255 Wastewater WW VSCO Requirement 

WATER PLANT 

256 WATER PLANT General engineering services for water treatment plant 

257 WATER PLANT Water Supply Planning Update 

258 WATER PLANT Electrical engineering services for water treatment plant 

259 WATER PLANT SCADA and Instrumentation services 

260 WATER PLANT Deep Injection Well permitting, mechanical integrity testing 

261 WATER PLANT Membrane water treatment system expansion 

262 WATER PLANT 

Bidding, construction services for Myrtle Grove storage 

tank improvement and pump station 

263 WATER PLANT WTP expansion punchlist item 

264 WATER PLANT 1500 KW generator permenant installation, MCC 5 repl 

265 WATER PLANT Membrane replacement set aside 

266 WATER PLANT Wells 1F, 2F, and 4F acid treatment 

267 WATER PLANT SCADA Improvement 

Page 61 of 69


268 WATER PLANT Filter Media replacement/improvements 

269 WATER PLANT Annual Well Rehab 

270 WATER PLANT High Service Pump Replacement 

271 WATER PLANT Transfer Pump Reoplacement 

272 WATER PLANT Critical spareparts 

273 WATER PLANT Remote monitoring system 

274 WATER PLANT Certified scale for chemical truck measuring 

275 WATER PLANT Membrane Control System Server replacement 

276 WATER PLANT Thermal Image camera 

277 WATER PLANT Ultrasonic Meter for pacing lime slake feed control 

278 WATER PLANT RO and Nano Degasifier system cleaning system 

279 WATER PLANT Saveall tank bridges with pumps and level sensors 

280 WATER PLANT Filter valve acuator replacement 

281 WATER PLANT Water Storage Tank inspection and rehab 

282 WATER PLANT New High Service Pump 5314 

283 WATER PLANT Rebuild HSP 5311 and HPP 3331 

284 WATER PLANT Lime Slake #2 replacement 

285 WATER PLANT Maintenance shop and warehouse 

286 WATER PLANT add RO pressure vessel and membrane (1.5 MG) 

287 WATER PLANT Deep Injection Well Mechincal Integrity Test 

Page 62 of 69


288 WATER PLANT SCADA client computer replacement 

289 WATER PLANT AC replacement for MCC2 room 

290 WATER PLANT MCC 3 replacement 

291 WATER PLANT Norwood Site improvements 

292 WATER PLANT Misc Electrical Improvements 

293 WATER PLANT Small equipments (Turbidity, pH, SDI, etc) 

294 WATER PLANT HYDROGUARD INSTALLATIONS 

295 WATER PLANT SAMPLING POINT DEVICES 

296 WATER PLANT SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS 

297 WATER PLANT AMR Phase I-SRF WATER PROJECTS 

298 WATER PLANT VOC Phase - Phase II-SRF WATER PROJECTS 

299 CRA Way finding Signage 

300 CRA Environmental Analysis 

301 CRA Planning/Project Development 

302 CRA Site Planning Design& processing 

Page 63 of 69

Construction Management & 

Inspection Services 

Water and Sewer Department 

3071 SW 38th Avenue 

Miami, Florida 33133 

Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or 

Other Upgrades to the MDWASD 

Sanitary Sewer System within the 

City of Miami Springs, Florida 

ER No. S048414, RPQ #P0038 

December 2010 


8390 NW 53rd Street 

Suite 200 


Phone: (305) 392-9979 

King 

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 

Project No. EDP-2011-D-R 

Agreement No. EDP-WS-138 

W W W . K I N G E N G I N E E R I N G . C O M

MIAMI‐DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT 

Project No. EDP 2011‐D‐R 

Construction Management and Inspection Services for the 

“Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to 

the MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System within the City of Miami 

Springs, Florida” 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT 

December 24, 2010 

Miami‐Dade Water and Sewer Department 


Miami, Florida 33133 

Prepared By: 

8390 NW 53RD STREET 

SUITE 200 

DORAL, FL 33166 

Phone: (305) 392‐9979


MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The work completed as part of this project reflects the joint team effort of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer 

Department (MDWASD) staff, Reynolds Inliner LLC (Reynolds), and the members of the King Engineering 

Associates, Inc. (King) SSES team. 

The cooperation and professionalism demonstrated by MDWASD staff was key to the successful completion of 

this project. We gratefully acknowledge the special contributions of the following MDWASD staff: 

Mr. Rod Lovett - Chief, Wastewater Collection & Transmission Line Division 

Mr. Joe Mazzarese - Water Distribution Supervisor, TV & Grout South Unit (Retired) 

Mr. Larry Decker - Assistant Superintendent, Inspection Section 

Mr. Ini Roberts - Engineer 2, Evaluation / Review Section 

Mr. James Saren - Assistant Superintendent, M & R Section 

Mr. Juan Bedoya - Water Distribution Supervisor, TV & Grout North Unit 

Ms. Maria Morejon - Administrative Secretary 

Mr. Al Galambos - Chief, Pump Station Maintenance Division 

Mr. Rey Urquiola - Assistant Superintendent, Pump Station Division 

Mr. Charles Sutton - Assistant Superintendent, Pump Station Division 

Mr. Jorge Montier - Operations and Maintenance Supervisor, Pump Station Division 

Mr. Ralph Garcia - Plant Mechanic, Pump Station Division 

Finally, the following Reynolds personnel are gratefully acknowledged for their contribution to the project. 

These include: 

Rick Cooper, Branch Manager 

William Rivera, Project Manager 

Radhames Mejia, Operations Manager 

i



TABLE OF CONTENTS 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................... i 

INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 5 

i. Background ................................................................................................................................................ 5 

ii. Purpose ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 

iii. Scope ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 

INSPECTION METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS ................................................................................................ 8 

i. Manhole Cleaning and Inspection ............................................................................................................. 8 

ii. Pump Station Cleaning and Inspection ..................................................................................................... 9 

iii. Sewer Gravity Main Cleaning and CCTV Inspection ................................................................................. 9 

iv. Smoke Testing ......................................................................................................................................... 10 

RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 15 

i. Manhole Repair Recommendation .......................................................................................................... 15 

ii. Sewer Gravity Main Repair Recommendation ........................................................................................ 15 

PLANNING LEVEL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST .......................................................... 17 

Appendix “A” ........................................................................................................................................................ 18 

Atlas Correction Forms (One sample page included only / Total Pages 11) .................................................. 18 

Appendix “B” ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 

Manholes with Defects (One sample page included only / Total Pages 2) .................................................... 20 

Appendix “C” ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 

PS Inspection Forms (One sample page included only / Total Pages 17) ..................................................... 22 

Appendix “D” ....................................................................................................................................................... 24 

MDWASD Television Observation Codes ...................................................................................................... 24 

Appendix “E” ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 

Defects Identified Via CCTV Classified by Basin (One sample page included only / Total Pages 4) ............ 26 

Appendix “F” ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 

Detailed Listing of Work Performed (One sample page included only / Total Pages 10) .............................. 28 

Appendix “G” ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 

CD-ROM Containing Office Databases (Not included) ................................................................................... 29 

Appendix “H” ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 

Additional Quantities and Amount per Bid Item .............................................................................................. 30 

Appendix “I” ......................................................................................................................................................... 32 

MDWASD Repair Criteria and Technology Guidelines (Not included) ........................................................... 32 

Appendix “J” ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 

Manhole Repair Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (One sample page included only / 

Total Pages 4) ................................................................................................................................................. 33 

Appendix “K” ........................................................................................................................................................ 35 

1



Mainline Repair Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (One sample page included only / 

Total Pages 18) ............................................................................................................................................... 35 

Appendix “L” ........................................................................................................................................................ 37 

Special Line Segments (Not included) ............................................................................................................ 37 

Appendix “M” ....................................................................................................................................................... 38 

Repair Recommendations for MHs, Laterals, and Mainlines classified by Basin (One sample page included 

only / Total Pages 4) ....................................................................................................................................... 38 

Appendix “N” ....................................................................................................................................................... 40 

Summary of Bid Costs .................................................................................................................................... 40 

2



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

As part of the ongoing infiltration and inflow (I/I) Program, MDWASD performs inspections of at least 10% of its 

sewer collection system each year in order to comply with Miami-Dade County Code Section 24-42.2(1)(a). 

MDWASD has decreased treatment plant average daily flows over the last 14 years with an effective I/I 

program. The City of Miami Springs’ water and sewer system was recently acquired by MDWASD. The City’s 

sewer collection system was mostly installed in the early 1970’s and currently contributes I/I to MDWASD’s 

collection system. King was retained in support of the City‘s SSES program to perform construction 

management and inspection services and provide repair recommendations for all identified defects. 

The City’s’ sewer collection system is comprised of approximately 46 miles of gravity mains, 17 pump stations, 

and 925 manholes. Originally, basins 1233, 1235, 1240, 1242, 1245, 1246, 1247, and 1249 did not comply 

with the Miami-Dade County Code Section 24-42.2(1)(d) maximum I/I requirement of 5,000 GPD/dia-inch/mile. 

These basins were prioritized under the Volume Sewer Customer Ordinance (VSCO). In addition, the City’s 

sewer collection system lies within the limits of the Wellfield Protection area (Cone of Influence), so special 

attention must be paid to reducing or eliminating leakage from the sewer system. This project serves the dual 

purpose of cleaning the entire system and identifying the sources of I/I as well as eliminating potential sources 

of contamination to the drinking water wells in the vicinity. 

The project included manhole cleaning and inspection, pump station wet well cleaning and inspection, sewer 

gravity main cleaning and CCTV inspection, and smoke testing. This project is the first of a two step process 

to reduce I/I. In accordance with MDWASD’s guidelines, the project helps to identify specific repairs through 

the manhole, pump station, and CCTV inspections. The smoke testing identifies potential sources of I/I that 

need further investigation to determine exactly which repairs may be needed. In addition, the smoke testing 

helps to identify potential sources of I/I located outside of the publicly owned facilities. The second portion of 

the project includes the repair of the identified defects. 

The SSES found the following defects within the sewer collection system: 

• 145 defects during manhole inspections. 

• 13,106 defects during CCTV inspections. 

• 482 defects during smoke testing. 

• No visible defect during pump station inspections. 

Cleaning, inspection, and smoke testing procedures were conducted in accordance with the contract 

specifications while minimizing inconvenience to residents. All defects identified were logged into a database 

provided by MDWASD and repair recommendations were determined using MDWASD’s Repair Criteria and 

Technology Guidelines. Ultimately, eight priority basins were again identified under the VSCO. It was found 

that basins 1240 and 1242 no longer classify as VSCO. Basins 1236 and 1243, however, are now beyond the 

permittable threshold of I/I. As currently done, MDWASD will repair all defects identified in the sewer collection 

system in order to eliminate the estimated 4.28 MGPD of I/I. Table 1 below provides the estimated I/I for each 

basin as estimated by MDWASD based on the results of this investigation and sorted by GPD/diameterinch/mile. 

3



MDWASD 

Basin # 

No. of 

Lines 

Wet Net 

Flow 2010 

(gpm) 

TABLE 1 

TOTAL I/I PER BASIN 

Dry Net 

Flow 2010 

(gpm) 

Average Flow 

(gpm) 

Length (ft) 

Diameter- 

Inch/Mile 

GPD/Diameter- 

Inch/Mile 

1249* 5 76 7 41.5 565 1.38 43,219.53* 

1246* 10 77 98 87.5 1,372 3.22 39,167.85* 

1233* 131 2,378 690 1,534 35,880 97.56 22,641.12* 

1247* 10 68 11 39.5 1,206 2.83 20,115.26* 

1243* 20 138 9 73.5 5,715 13.40 7,898.54* 

1245* 10 25 14 19.5 1,839 4.31 6,512.21* 

1235* 16 52 23 37.5 3,212 8.25 6,547.02* 

1236* 203 768 246 507 50,952 123.45 5,913.78* 

1237 58 138 92 115 16,506 41.11 4,028.43 

1242 38 83 50 66.5 11,740 29.47 3,249.14 

1234 270 375 356 365.5 68,344 181.13 2,905.78 

1240 43 55 31 43 11,227 26.46 2,340.51 

1241 34 25 23 24 9,234 21.65 1,596.24 

1244 37 20 18 19 10,482 24.58 1,113.23 

1238 11 0 5 2.5 3,097 7.26 495.76 

1239 25 0 0 0 6,853 16.07 0 

1248 13 0 0 0 2,089 6.13 0 

*Basins not meeting the 5,000 GDP/diameter-inch/mile required by Miami-Dade County Code Section 24-42.2(1)(d) 

4



INTRODUCTION 

i. Background 

MDWASD acquired the City of Miami Springs water and sewer collection system in September 2008. 

The system is comprised of approximately: 

• 46 miles of sewer gravity mains, consisting of 8-inch to 24-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe 

(VCP), polyvinylchloride (PVC), cast iron (CI), ductile iron (DI), polyethylene (PE), and 

composite (i.e. lined pipes) 

• 17 pump stations 

• 925 sewer manholes 

A map of the City and its corresponding sewer gravity basins is shown below in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. City of Miami Springs and Sewer Gravity Basins 

A sanitary sewer evaluation survey (SSES) is typically performed on a collection system to identify the 

sources of infiltration and inflow and compare the cost of the repairs to the cost of treatment. 

Infiltration is groundwater that enters the sewer collection system through holes, breaks, joint failures, 

connection failures and other openings. Infiltration responds directly to groundwater levels, and is thus 

at its highest during the rainy season with its peak typically in October, and especially following 

significant rain events when the ground becomes saturated. 

Inflow is direct runoff that enters the collection system through illegal or improper connections (such as 

roof drains and catch basins) or through faulty, poorly sealed, or missing manhole covers and/or 

laterals clean out caps. Inflow contributes a significant amount of pollutants, especially during rain 

events following dry spells. Grease, oils, pesticides, and other pollutants are flushed from the surfaces 

where they have been accumulating into the sewer collection system. Thus, inflow increases peak 

5



flows to the treatment plant as well as pollutant load. Figure 2 depicts a schematic of different sources 

of I/I. 

Figure 2. I/I Sources 

Source: http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/wastewater/II/What.aspx 

ii. 

Purpose 

To help meet the criteria outlined in Miami-Dade County Code Section 24.42.2, MDWASD 

implemented a sewer collection system I/I program for the City of Miami Springs to reduce total system 

flows to the treatment facilities. The I/I program included manhole cleaning and inspection, pump 

station cleaning and inspection, gravity main cleaning and video TV, and smoke testing to identify all 

defects contributing to I/I in the system and to recommend repairs for these defects. Future projects 

will repair the defects identified by this investigation. 

A successful I/I program reduces peak flows to treatment facilities, allowing for better management of 

sewage flows into the system, and reducing treatment costs. It is an essential component of proper 

sewer management practices and ultimately reduces pollution due to treatment plant overflow in the 

event of large rain events that typically overload the treatment facility with I/I flows. 

iii. Scope 

King was retained by MDWASD to provide Construction Management and field services for the 

“Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the MDWASD Sanitary Sewer 

system within the City of Miami Springs, Florida” Project. The contractor for the project was Reynolds. 

The project has been divided into three (3) subtasks. Each of the subtasks details the specific Scope 

of Services and is broken as follows: 

6



• Project Management/Administration 

Monthly status reports were provided to MDWASD throughout the project in order to monitor 

progress versus the project schedule. 

• Field Services 

1. Monitored and documented the pipe cleaning and closed circuit TV (CCTV) inspection 

of the MDWASD sewer collection system by the Contractor for compliance with the 

project Specifications. 

2. Monitored and documented the inspection of the manholes contained within the 

MDWASD sewer collection system by the Contractor for compliance with the project 

Specifications. 

3. Monitored and documented the smoke testing of the MDWASD sewer collection 

system by the Contractor for compliance with the contract specifications. 

4. Documented and reported any discrepancies found on the MDWASD provided Sewer 

Atlas Maps on the Department's Atlas Correction Forms. 

• Construction Management/Office Support Services 

King was responsible for reviewing the video inspection recordings and providing repair 

recommendations according to MDWASD’s Repair Criteria and Technology Guidelines. Work 

order issuances were coordinated with the contractor. 

7



INSPECTION METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS 

MDWASD provided copies of their seven standard inspection and recommendation databases for use during 

the project. These are: 

• TV Field and Office 

• MH Field and Office 

• ST Field and Office 

• Repair Recommendation 

Upon completion of the inspection of each pipeline segment and manhole, Reynolds entered inspection data 

into the appropriate database for CCTV inspections, manhole inspections, and smoke testing using their 

specified coding of defects included in the respective databases. Pump station inspection data was provided 

on the manhole inspection forms. The field data was then reviewed by King for data compilation and repair 

recommendation. The following sections outline the specific process followed for each type of inspection. 

i. Manhole Cleaning and Inspection 

Before cleaning the gravity sewer lines, manholes were pressure cleaned and inspected using 

MDWASD’s manhole inspection form. In addition, photos were taken to document the manhole 

conditions. All inspections were visual from the top of the manhole without entry. A spotlight was 

used to assist with the inspection when needed. In addition to the 912 manholes that were originally 

identified to be cleaned and inspected, 11 new manholes were identified in the field, cleaned, and 

inspected bringing the total to 923 manholes. The location and other pertinent data for each of the 11 

additional manholes were documented using the MDWASD’s atlas correction form. Appendix A 

contains a copy of each of these forms. 

Inspection of the manhole components was performed to assess the condition of the cover, frame, 

frame seal, chimney, cone, wall, bench, channel, and cover insert. As required by the contract 

specifications, Reynolds prepared written field reports that were subsequently reviewed and verified 

prior to entering the inspection findings into the manhole inspection database. 

The results of the inspections show that 120 manholes had defects (see Appendix B). As shown in 

Table 2, the majority of the defects occurred in basins 1233, 1234, and 1236, and consisted primarily 

of frame seals and missing cover inserts. 

8



Basin No. 

Defective 

Manholes 

Cover 

Condition 

Frame 

Condition 

TABLE 2 

MANHOLE DEFECTS SUMMARY 

Frame 

Seal 

Condition 

Chimney 

Condition 

Cone 

Condition 

Wall 

Condition 

Bench 

Condition 

Channel 

Condition 

Insert 

Condition 

1233 31 0 3 1 4 4 7 4 1 21 

1234 17 0 2 13 0 0 0 1 0 2 

1235 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 

1236 31 0 3 22 7 1 1 0 0 0 

1237 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 

1238 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 

1240 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 

1242 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 

1244 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 

1245 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 

1246 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 3 

1247 7 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 7 

1248 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 

1249 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 

Subtotal 120 0 11 40 11 6 14 5 2 56 

Total Defects 145 

ii. 

Pump Station Cleaning and Inspection 

Pump station wet well cleaning and inspection was performed in compliance with MDWASD’s contract 

specifications. MDWASD personnel assisted with every inspection by coordinating access to pump 

stations and operating the electrical panel to lower the water level for better visibility during the 

cleaning and inspection. In addition, Reynolds used air plugs to momentarily shut down the incoming 

flow, and placed a Vac-Con catch basin nozzle on the bottom of the wet well for suction purposes 

while pressure cleaning. The pump station wet well and each pipeline connection were visually 

observed with the use of a spotlight, as needed. Wet wells were observed for infiltration and general 

overall condition. The findings were documented on MDWASD’s inspection form. A copy of each 

inspection form is included in Appendix C. In general, wet wells appeared to be in good condition with 

no visible defects. 

iii. Sewer Gravity Main Cleaning and CCTV Inspection 

All gravity sewer main lines were cleaned using a jet-type pressure cleaner before closed-circuit 

televising (CCTV). To aid in the CCTV inspection, the jet-type pressure cleaner was kept inside the 

pipe to remove any additional debris or obstruction and minimize standing water in order to improve 

the visibility of the camera. In accordance with contract specifications, all reasonable efforts were 

made to fully view the entire pipe segment from the upstream manhole to the downstream manhole. 

Occasionally, obstruction or equipment limitations required a reverse set up at the next manhole to 

fully view the entire pipe segment. In addition, removal of obstructions, and/or location and exposure 

of manholes were necessary in some cases in order to have access to the sewer system. Reynolds 

performed the CCTV inspection and data recording in accordance with Section 6.00 of the contract 

specifications. The inspections of the gravity sewer mains generated a video and a TV log per line 

segment. Each video was reviewed in its entirety to confirm data was collected and identified 

thoroughly and consistently using the MDWASD’s Television Observation Codes (Appendix D). The 

list of defects found is summarized in Table 3 and is presented in greater detail, including a breakdown 

of defects by basin, in Appendix E. 

9



TABLE 3 

DEFECTS IDENTIFIED VIA CCTV 

Defect Code Definition Count 

13 Light Roots 5548 

19 Joint / Infiltration 2521 

53 Conn. Infiltration 1427 

20 Cracked Joint 1321 

37 Deposits 625 

25 Circular Crack 457 

33 Sag in Pipe 441 

14 Medium Roots 230 

15 Heavy Roots 139 

22 Mineral Deposits 106 

26 Longitudinal Crack 50 

47 Connection w/defect 38 

21 Separated Joint 30 

16 Moderate Offset 28 

27 Open Crack 25 

30 Hole in Pipe 24 

38 Grease 20 

28 Broken Pipe 18 

46 Break-in-Connection 18 

17 Severe Offset 10 

23 Gasket Exposed 10 

39 Liner Defect Began Observation 7 

40 Liner Defect End Observation 5 

36 Corrosion 4 

48 Sectional Liner w/defect 2 

18 Misaligned Joint 1 

60 Liner Connection Defect 1 

Total 13,106 

Review of the CCTV inspections indicates that the majority of the visible pipeline defects include light 

root intrusion, joint problems with active infiltration, lateral infiltration at connection to the mainline, and 

cracked joints. 

iv. Smoke Testing 

Smoke testing was done in compliance with MDWASD’s contract specifications. A HURCO 

SMK1811-LS smoke blower was used in conjunction with HURCO Liquid-Smoke to force smoke 

through the isolated segment being tested. As a result of the smoke testing, Reynolds identified 

potential inflow sources such as illegal storm sewer cross-connections, roof leaders, yard and area 

drains, abandoned building sewers, pipe structural damage, leaking joints, and faulty service 

connections for further investigation and/or repair. 

Prior to the commencement of any smoke testing, the Contractor notified residents a minimum of 72 

hours in advance with door hangers containing contact and project related information. Every effort 

was made to minimize inconvenience to the public, and resident concerns were addressed in a 

courteous, professional, and timely manner. A summary of the calls received from residents and the 

action taken in response is outlined in Table 4. 

10



TABLE 4 

RESIDENT CALL LOG 

Date Name Address Resident Concern/Action Taken 

10/19/2010 Gladys Sainz 

751 Falcon Aging mother needs her there during test. Resident was notified 1 

Avenue hour prior to testing, per request. (10/20/2010) 

10/19/2010 Jim Saren 

10/19/2010 Raul Cuan 

10/20/2010 William Groves 

10/20/2010 Paula Camacho 

11/17/2010 Hayde Segarra 

11/18/2010 Barbara Batista 

11/22/2010 Antonio Martinez 

11/24/2010 Joell McGee 

11/29/2010 Carol Martinez 

11/30/2010 Carlos Perera 

11/30/2010 Alvaro Gutierrez 

12/02/2010 Pat Armstrong 

12/02/2010 Caridad Mora 

12/02/2010 Alex Szeelkan 

12/03/2010 Tomasa Del Val 

12/09/2010 Antonia Gando 

800 block of 

Falcon 

Avenue 

564 Mokena 

Drive 

1201 Plover 

Avenue 

1175 

Meadowlark 

Avenue 

361 

Rosedale 

Drive 

369 Corydon 

Drive 

130 Curtiss 

Parkway 

500 Curtiss 

Parkway 

101 Navarre 

Drive 

7401 SW 

131 st Avenue 

830 Wren 

Avenue 

6221 NW 

36 th Street 

29 Royal 

Ponciana 

6221 NW 

36 th Street 

1090 Quail 

Avenue 

517 Mokena 

Drive 

His neighbor is in home hospice, he wants to be notified when his 

area will be tested. Resident was notified 1 hour prior to testing, per 

request. (10/20/2010) 

Resident had smoke in his shower and was concerned about smoke 

from his roof vent. He claimed that he received the door hanger 3 

days after smoke test was done. Contractor confirmed that the 

hanger was placed 3 days before smoke test in that area. 

Resident saw smoke from his roof vent, wanted to know if 

everything was ok. 

Resident wanted to be home during smoke test to see if her 

plumbing had leaks. Her area was tested on 10/19; she was told 

that the contractor will not re-test the area. 

Resident has a smoke alarm in her house and wants to know when 

her area will be tested. She was notified on 11/18 that her area will 

be tested that day around 2 to 3:30 pm. 

11/19/2010 - Need to confirm that there is a defect. Defect is 

marked on the ground but no DERM notice was left. Defect was 

confirmed to be public, no action needed from the resident. 

Resident had smoke coming out of her kitchen roof. She was 

notified that smoke from the roof is normal and that no defects were 

identified on her property. 

Resident saw smoke coming from his backyard, wanted to know if 

he had to do anything. Area will be tested 11/23, will follow up to let 

him know if the defect is private or public. Followed up with resident 

on 11/24, defect was a public CO cap, no action is required from the 

resident. 

Resident had smoke inside her home, was not home when the 

testing occurred so she could not see where it came from. Wanted 

testing to be repeated when she was home to identify her leak. Was 

notified that the purpose of the testing is to identify leaks and breaks 

outside the home, the area will not be re-tested. 

Resident had smoke inside her home and was concerned. No 

defects were found on or adjacent to her property. 

Resident received a DERM notice, will replace the broken cap. 

Resident received a DERM notice for a broken riser. He will repair 

the defect. 

See Alex Szeelkan. 

Resident is in the process of closing a claim with a public adjuster 

for her internal plumbing. She just had open heart surgery and 

needs more than 30 days to fix the defect. Also, noted that the CO 

that was painted was supposed to be out of service because an 

existing tree damaged the lateral and a new lateral connection was 

made. 

Defects were not marked in the field. Wanted to know which CO 

risers they were. Defects were repaired 12/03/2010. 

Resident fixed the defect the day after she received a DERM notice. 

Resident will repair private defect, wants to know when MDWASD 

will repair the public defect adjacent to her property. 

As the smoke testing progressed, a Smoke Testing Defect Report was created following MDWASD’s 

Standard Protocol. Defects were classified as either Public or Private Defect. Public Defects will be 

11



repaired by MDWASD, while Private Defects are forwarded to the Miami-Dade Department of 

Environmental Resources Management (DERM) for enforcement of repair by property owners. Table 

5 summarizes all of the defects identified through smoke testing. 

TABLE 5 

SMOKE TESTING DEFECT REPORT 

Basin Number Defect Code Definition Count 

1233 4 Cleanout Cap 56 

1233 5 Broken Riser 5 

1233 9 Private Lateral 1 

Total 62 

1234 1 Catch Basin 1 



1234 10 Other* 3 

Total 115 


Total 8 

1236 1 Catch Basin 2 



1236 8 Public Lateral 1 

1236 9 Private Lateral 1 

Total 95 



Total 36 


Total 7 



Total 10 



Total 30 



Total 12 

1242 3 Roof Drain 1 



Total 38 


Total 16 


1244 8 Public Lateral 1 

1244 10 Other* 2 

Total 26 


Total 5 



1246 7 Manhole 1 

Total 10 


Total 2 

12






Total 5 


Total 5 

Grand Total 482 

* For details see MDWASD Smoke Testing database. 

In addition, property owners where private defects were identified and located were notified with a door 

hanger of the defect requiring repair. The private defect’s location was spray painted on the ground to 

provide the property owner proper identification of the defect. Table 6 summarizes the DERM notices 

distributed during smoke testing. 

TABLE 6 

TOTAL DERM NOTICES 

Basin Number Defect Code Definition DERM Case No. 

1233 5 Broken Riser 

4908 

4983 

4907 

4908 

10 Other* 5000 

4903 

4902 

4901 

1234 

4906 

5 Broken Riser 

4905 

4904 

5003 

4900 

1 Catch Basin 4997 

9 Private Lateral 4972 

4985 

4992 

4973 

1236 

4988 


4989 

4975 

4974 

4987 

4978 

4977 

4976 

4998 

4981 

1237 5 Broken Riser 

4993 

4996 

4979 

4994 

4980 

4982 

1242 

5 Broken Riser 4990 

3 Roof Drain 4970 

1244 10 Other* 4999 


13



Basin Number Defect Code Definition DERM Case No. 

5002 

4984 

4971 

1246 

5001 


1248 4915 

Total 43 

* For details see MDWASD Smoke Testing database. 

A summary and breakdown of the work performed is shown in Table 7 with a detailed listing of work performed 

as shown in Appendix F. All data archived in the office databases, videos, photos, inspector daily reports, 

DERM notice forms, and additional information were compiled in an external hard drive provided to MDWASD 

on December 28, 2010. In addition, all office databases are included in a CD-ROM in Appendix G. 

MDWASD 

Basin # 

TABLE 7 

SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED 

Cleaning, Video & Smoke Testing 

Total 

8-Inch 10-Inch 12-Inch 15-Inch 18-Inch 24-Inch LF/Basin 

MH 

Cleaning 

& 

Inspection 

PS 

Cleaning 

& 

Inspection 

2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.1 2.7 

1233* 23,425 2,839 3,667 4,210 1,116 623 35,880 128 

1234 47,591 7,784 5,342 2,992 3,632 1,003 68,344 266 

1235* 1,472 1,730 10 3,212 16 

1236 43,910 4,449 1,999 594 50,952 202 

1237 14,691 1,815 16,506 58 

1238 3,097 3,097 11 

1239 6,853 6,853 25 

1240* 10,879 348 11,227 43 

1241 9,234 9,234 33 

1242* 9,450 537 1,024 729 11,740 38 

1243 5,715 5,715 19 

1244 10,482 10,482 37 

1245* 1,839 1,839 10 

1246* 1,347 25 1,372 10 

1247* 1,206 1,206 9 

1248 464 1,625 2,089 13 

1249* 412 153 565 5 

Total 

Completed 

per Item 

* Miami Springs 2010 VSCO Basins 

192,067 17,865 13,667 10,340 4,748 1,626 240,313 923 17 

Since the pipe footage and number of manholes in the existing sewer gravity collection system could not be 

accurately estimated during the bid phase, adjustments were required to reflect a small increase in bid 

quantities. However, the revised total project cost stayed below the required original budget amount. Appendix 

H summarizes the additional quantities and amounts per bid item. 

14



RECOMMENDATIONS 

After all descriptive data was recorded and archived using MDWASD’s standard protocol and data format, King 

reviewed it and provided follow-up recommendations using MDWASD’s Repair Criteria and Technology 

Guidelines and cost data. Refer to Appendix I for Repair Criteria and Technology followed. 

i. Manhole Repair Recommendation 

If manholes showed signs of inflows from surface runoff or groundwater infiltration into the sewer, 

erosion, or hydrogen sulfide induced corrosion, then repairs were recommended such that the 

manhole would be watertight and more resistant to deterioration. Refer to Appendix J for the 

approximate total cost of manhole repairs. 

ii. 

Sewer Gravity Main Repair Recommendation 

All recommended repairs followed MDWASD’s Repair Criteria and Technology Guidelines as outlined 

in the flow chart shown in Exhibit A. In cases where the MDWASD Repair Criteria and Technology 

Guidelines led to a recommendation for point repairs (robotic, sectional liner, grouting, and/or 

excavated point repair), a comparison was made between the cost of point repairs and full length 

repair (CIPP or line replacement). If cost of point repairs represented 80% or more of the cost of full 

length repair, then full length repair was recommended. Refer to Appendix K to see these cost 

comparisons. Repair technologies were manually noted on the TV logs and incorporated in the 

electronic submittal made to MDWASD on December 28, 2010. 

In total, King evaluated the conditions of 923 manholes, 17 pumps stations and 934 line segments. The 

analysis resulted in total of 3,036 repair recommendations. No repairs were recommended for 122 line 

segments since no defects were identified, and two incomplete CCTV inspections were forwarded to the 

Department for further investigation. A portion of these two critical lines could not be inspected due to 

obstructions. Refer to Appendix L for details on these two line segments. 

The repair recommendations for manholes, laterals and gravity sewer mains were entered into the repair 

database and are summarized in Table 9. Refer to Appendix M for a list of repair recommendations by basin. 

TABLE 9 

TOTAL REPAIR RECOMMENDATION 

Repair 

Code 

Definition 

Count 

595 Inv Suspect Lateral 1408 

507 Point Repair Lateral (Public Property) 307 

531 De-root Main Line 283 

538 Sectional 228 

529 Clean, Test, Seal Main Line 227 

547 Cure-in-Place Liner (hold for another repair) 210 

537 Cured-in-Place Liner 100 

1 Insert Manhole Dish 56 

12 Seal Casting to Cone 44 

513 Grout Annular Space at Manhole/Pipe Connection 37 

511 Grout Lateral Annular Space 31 

557 Point Repair with Cured-in-Place Liner 23 

541 Heavy Clean Mainline with Degreaser 15 

526 Point Repair Main Line 8 

26 Repair Leaks in Manhole Wall 7 

534 De-scale Entire Line 7 

594 Investigate Suspect Drop-Connection 7 

9 Realign and Seal Manhole Frame 6 

13 Plug and Waterproof Coat Manhole Chimney 6 

392 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Entire Manhole 5 

15



Repair 

Code 

Definition 

Count 

24 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Manhole Walls 3 

47 Repair Manhole / Pipe Connection 3 

525 Replace Main Line 3 

4 Replace Manhole Cover 2 

18 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Manhole cone 2 

584 Robotics Repair Protruding Lateral 2 

17 Repair Leaks in Manhole Chimney 1 

22 Repair Leaks in Manhole Cone 1 

31 Repair Leaks in Manhole Bench 1 

33 Repair Leaks in Manhole Channel 1 

523 Plug Lateral at Point of Connection with Main Line 1 

533 De-scale (Spot) 1 

Total 3,036 

16



PLANNING LEVEL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST 

MDWASD’s internal processes and procedures were closely followed; therefore, MDWASD’s repair cost 

estimating guidelines were used. These were as follows: 

• One included the cost of both trenchless and dig-and-replace methods from recent bids, including 

CIPP, sectional liners, clean, test, and seal (grouting), excavated point repair, and line replacement. 

These costs are influenced by the diameter of the pipe, the length of pipe requiring rehabilitation, and 

the nature of the defects, such as cracks, roots, joint offsets, and others. Appendix N provides a 

summary of these bid repairs cost. 

• The other cost estimating guide came from the table “Repair Code Listing” contained in MDWASD’s 

repair database. 

The Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost was estimated as follows: 

• Gravity Sewer Mains - The cost data from recent bids was used to estimate rehabilitation costs 

shown in Appendix K, including repair recommendations. 

• Sewer Laterals - The cost of lateral repairs was estimated as the additive costs of additional 

investigations of suspect laterals exceeding an estimated flow of 0.4 gpm, recommended point repairs, 

and grout repairs as shown in Table 10 below. Cost data used was the one provided in the “Repair 

Code Listing” included in MDWASD’s repair database. 

• Sewer Manholes - The cost data in the “Repair Code Listing” in MDWASD’s repair database was 

used to estimate rehabilitation costs as shown in Appendix J. 

The total estimated costs to rehabilitate the City of Miami Springs gravity sewer system are summarized in 

Table 10. Table 10 does not include the additional cost of repairs that may arise from the recommended 

pending investigations of 520 suspect laterals. Additionally, the smoke testing discovered damaged and 

broken components (such as CO caps and risers), and illegal connections within private property. The cost of 

these repairs is the responsibility of the property owners, and it is not included in the total estimated cost 

below. 

TABLE 10 

PLANNING LEVEL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST 

Rehabilitation Cost Justification 

Gravity Sewer Main $2,798,222.00 See Appendix K for details. 

Sewer Lateral $1,223,200.00 

Sewer Manholes $44,700.00 See Appendix J for details. 

Total $4,066,122.00 

520 laterals ("Investigate Suspect Lateral") @ $150 each + 307 point 

repairs ("Point Repair Lateral") @ $3700 each + 31 grout repair ("Grout 

Lateral Annular Space") @ $300 each. 

17



Appendix “A” 

Atlas Correction Forms (One sample page included only / Total Pages 11) 

18



Appendix “B” 

Manholes with Defects (One sample page included only / Total Pages 2) 

20



Basin 

No. 

Manhole 

No. 

Atlas 

Page 

Cover 

Condition 

Frame 

Condition 

Frame 

Seal 

Condition 

Chimney 

Condition 

Cone 

Condition 

Wall 

Condition 

Bench 

Condition 

Channel 

Condition 

Insert 

Condition 

1233 82A F9 OK OK OK Corroded Corroded Corroded Corrosion OK OK 

1233 21 G9 OK Offset OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 

1233 11 G8 OK Broken OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 

1233 1A G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing 

1233 22 G9 OK OK OK OK OK Leaks OK OK OK 

1233 23 G8 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing 




1233 33A G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Damaged 


1233 400A F8 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing 

1233 88 E9 OK OK OK Corroded Corroded Corroded OK OK OK 

1233 86 E9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing 

1233 83 F9 OK OK OK OK Corroded Corroded Corrosion Corrosion OK 

1233 80 F9 OK OK OK Corroded OK OK Corrosion OK OK 

1233 400C F8 OK OK Cracked OK OK OK OK OK Missing 

1233 41 H9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing 



1233 4B G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing 

1233 50 G9 OK OK OK OK Corroded Corroded OK OK OK 

1233 84 E9 OK OK OK Corroded OK Leaks Corrosion OK Missing 


1233 77B F9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing 

1233 400B F8 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing 



1233 62C G8 OK Offset OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 

1233 66 F9 OK OK OK OK OK Corroded OK OK OK 


1234 568 D5 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK 




1234 470A E8 OK Offset Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK 



1234 443 F8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK 


1234 548A D6 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK 



1234 553 D6 OK Offset OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 

1234 562 E5 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK 

1234 304 F7 OK OK OK OK OK OK Leaks OK OK 



1235 91 E9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Damaged 


1236 918 C8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK 



1236 920A C8 OK Cracked Leaks Leaks OK OK OK OK OK 


1236 916 D8 OK Offset Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK 

1236 915 D8 OK OK OK Cracked OK OK OK OK OK 



1236 901 C7 OK OK OK Cracked OK OK OK OK OK 

1236 1063B C6 OK Offset OK OK OK OK OK OK OK 

1236 1001 C7 OK OK OK OK OK Cracked OK OK OK 

21



Appendix “C” 

PS Inspection Forms (One sample page included only / Total Pages 17) 

22



Appendix “D” 

MDWASD Television Observation Codes 

Total Pages 1 

24



Defect Code 

Definition 

1 Upstream Manhole 

2 Downstream Manhole 

3 Reverse Set-up 

5 Crown 

6 Invert 

7 Right 

8 Left 

9 Camera Submerged 

10 Camera Blocked 

12 Buried Manhole 

13 Light Roots 

14 Medium Roots 

15 Heavy Roots 

16 Moderate Offset 

17 Severe Offset 

18 Misaligned Joint 

19 Joint/Infiltration 

20 Cracked Joint 

21 Separated Joint 

22 Mineral Deposits 

23 Gasket Exposed 

25 Circular Crack 

26 Longitudinal Crack 

27 Open Crack 

28 Broken Pipe 

29 Collapsed Pipe 

30 Hole in Pipe 

31 Joint Air-Test Failed 

32 Flattened Flex Pipe 

33 Sag in Pipe 

34 Drop Connection 

35 Erosion 

36 Corrosion 

37 Deposits 

38 Grease 

39 Liner Defect Began Observation 

40 Liner Defect End Observation 

46 Break in Connection 

47 Connection w/Defect 

48 Sectional Liner w/Defect 

49 Domestic Flow 

50 Intruding > 1" Inch 

52 Joint Close to Lateral 

53 Connection w/Infiltration 

59 Stub-out at MH Leaking 

60 Liner Connection Defect 

61 Service Connection at MH 

64 Lamp Hole 

65 Conduit through Sewer 

455 Service Connection Crown 

457 Service Connection Right 

458 Service Connection Left 

515 Capped Service Crown 

517 Capped Service Right 

518 Capped Service Left 

25



Appendix “E” 

Defects Identified Via CCTV Classified by Basin (One sample page included only / Total 

Pages 4) 

26




1233 

1234 

1235 


19 Joint/Infiltration 364 









46 Break in Connection 4 

38 Grease 4 


21 Separated Joint 2 

48 Sectional Liner w/Defect 2 

40 Liner Defect End Observation 1 


47 Connection w/Defect 1 

Total 1,408 










22 Mineral Deposits 9 



26 Longitudinal Crack 4 


17 Severe Offset 4 

46 Break in Connection 3 

16 Moderate Offset 3 

47 Connection w/Defect 2 

39 Liner Defect Began Observation 1 

Total 4,089 






37 Deposits 4 


Total 211 

Grand Total 13,106 

27



Appendix “F” 

Detailed Listing of Work Performed (One sample page included only / Total Pages 10) 

28

CLEANING & VIDEO CLEANING 

MH 

PS 

SMOKE TESTING 

ID DATE INITIALS BASIN # 

LINE 

LINE 

8-Inch 10-Inch 12-Inch 15-Inch 18-Inch 24-Inch ID DATE BASIN# MH# PS 

ID DATE BASIN# MH# INSPECTION ID DATE BASIN# INSPECTION ID DATE BASIN# 

SEGMENT 

SEGMENT 

8-Inch 10-Inch 12-Inch 15-Inch 18-Inch 24-Inch 

2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 

848 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 242-201 339 882 M 08.25.10 1245 1B 864 ST 11.24.10 1234 453 - 452 403 

849 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 248-201 252 883 M 08.25.10 1245 1A 865 ST 11.24.10 1234 454 - 453 367 

850 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 232-228 361 884 M 08.25.10 1245 1 866 ST 11.24.10 1234 459 - 453 351 

851 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 228-227A 176 885 M 08.25.10 1245 2 867 ST 11.24.10 1234 460 - 459 330 

852 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 227A-227 247 886 M 08.25.10 1245 3 868 ST 11.24.10 1234 461 - 460 141 

853 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 227-214A 161 887 M 08.25.10 1245 4 869 ST 11.24.10 1234 458 - 454 283 

854 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 214A-214 251 888 M 08.25.10 1245 5 870 ST 11.24.10 1234 454A - 454 283 

855 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 231-227 201 889 M 08.25.10 1246 5 871 ST 11.24.10 1234 455 - 454A 279 

856 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 562-558 280 890 M 08.25.10 1246 4 872 ST 11.24.10 1234 456 - 455 286 

857 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 558-213 253 891 M 08.25.10 1246 3 873 ST 11.24.10 1234 457 - 456 306 

858 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 221A-221 57 892 M 08.25.10 1246 2 874 ST 11.24.10 1234 462 - 453 258 

859 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 221-206 395 893 M 08.25.10 1246 1 875 ST 11.24.10 1234 463 - 462 256 

860 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 273-309 291 894 M 08.25.10 1246 1A 876 ST 11.29.10 1234 280 - 277 222 

861 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 309-309A 129 895 M 08.25.10 1246 1B 877 ST 11.29.10 1234 277 - 276 393 

862 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 309A-208 143 896 M 08.25.10 1246 1C 878 ST 11.29.10 1234 278 - 277 403 

863 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 222-208 334 897 M 08.25.10 1248 1 879 ST 11.29.10 1234 279 - 278 352 

864 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 520-519 209 898 M 08.25.10 1248 2 880 ST 11.29.10 1234 276 - 275 231 

865 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 519-518 191 899 M 08.25.10 1248 3 881 ST 11.29.10 1234 275 - 274 155 

866 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 521-518 149 900 M 08.25.10 1248 4 882 ST 11.29.10 1234 260 - 274 55 

867 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 518-517 342 901 M 08.25.10 1248 5 883 ST 11.29.10 1234 260A - 260 92 

868 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 517-517A 287 902 M 08.25.10 1248 6 884 ST 11.29.10 1234 430 - 305 200 

869 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 522-517 208 903 M 08.25.10 1248 7 885 ST 11.29.10 1234 274 - 259 203 

870 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 517A-252 23 904 M 08.25.10 1248 8 886 ST 11.29.10 1234 259 - 258 249 

871 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 516-252 195 905 M 08.25.10 1248 10 887 ST 11.29.10 1234 281 - 258 254 

872 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 252A-252 253 906 M 08.25.10 1248 11 888 ST 11.29.10 1234 282 - 281 300 

873 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 252-251 265 907 M 08.25.10 1247 1 889 ST 11.29.10 1234 283 - 282 60 

874 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 251-205 170 908 M 08.25.10 1247 2 890 ST 11.29.10 1234 258 - 257 353 

875 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 534-533 146 910 M 08.25.10 1247 5 891 ST 11.29.10 1234 301 - 300 207 

876 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 533-532 379 911 M 08.25.10 1247 6 892 ST 11.29.10 1234 300 - 305 155 

877 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 541-530 120 912 M 08.25.10 1247 7 893 ST 11.29.10 1234 299 - 300 233 

878 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 528-211 225 913 M 08.25.10 1248 9 894 ST 11.29.10 1234 432 - 430 163 

879 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 515-514 230 914 M 10.05.10 1233 12 895 ST 11.29.10 1234 261 - 257 285 

880 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 445A-445 230 915 M 10.05.10 1233 13 896 ST 11.29.10 1234 262 - 261 298 

881 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 474-451 192 916 M 10.05.10 1233 14 897 ST 11.29.10 1234 263 - 262 188 

882 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 458-454 283 917 M 10.05.10 1233 16 898 ST 11.29.10 1234 264 - 263 122 

883 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 4-4A 80 918 M 10.05.10 1233 400B 899 ST 11.29.10 1234 265 - 264 79 

884 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 4A-4B 139 919 M 10.05.10 1233 400C 900 ST 11.29.10 1234 266 - 265 98 

885 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 4B-3 77 920 M 10.05.10 1240 650 901 ST 11.29.10 1234 431 - 430 406 

886 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 3-2 319 921 M 10.05.10 1248 12 902 ST 11.29.10 1234 305 - 304 207 

887 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 2-1 102 922 M 10.05.10 1248 13 903 ST 11.30.10 1234 245 - 238 371 

888 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 6-5 182 923 M 10.05.10 1247 8 904 ST 11.30.10 1234 246 - 245 42 

889 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 5-1 49 924 M 10.05.10 1247 3 905 ST 11.30.10 1234 238 - 237 153 

890 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 8-7 89 925 M 10.05.10 1247 4 906 ST 11.30.10 1234 237 - 236 64 

891 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 7-5 157 926 M 10.05.10 1247 4A 907 ST 11.30.10 1234 236 - 235 162 

892 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 1-1247 12 927 M 10.22.10 1249 44 908 ST 11.30.10 1234 271 - 235 120 

893 CV 10.19.10 HP 1246 1C-1B 162 928 M 10.22.10 1249 42D 909 ST 11.30.10 1234 272 - 271 201 

894 CV 10.19.10 HP 1246 1B-1A 150 929 M 10.22.10 1249 42C 910 ST 11.30.10 1234 272A - 272 82 

895 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 224-223 240 930 M 10.22.10 1249 42B 911 ST 11.30.10 1234 235 - 234 144 

896 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 223-213 244 931 M 10.22.10 1249 42A 912 ST 11.30.10 1234 234 - 233 96 

897 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 231A-231 65 932 M 11.15.10 1245 1D 913 ST 11.30.10 1234 308 - 307 267 

898 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 226-227 161 933 M 11.15.10 1245 1E 914 ST 11.30.10 1234 307 - 288 327 

899 CV 10.20.10 HP 1240 600-1240 36 934 M 11.15.10 1246 3A 915 ST 11.30.10 1234 288A - 288 59 

900 CV 10.20.10 HP 1237 800-1237 31 935 M 11.15.10 1246 4A 916 ST 11.30.10 1234 288 - 288B 43 

901 CV 10.20.10 HP 1235 100A-100 32 936 M 11.16.10 1235 91 917 ST 11.30.10 1234 288B - 287 143 

902 CV 10.20.10 HP 1235 100-1235 25 937 M 11.19.10 1233 15 918 ST 11.30.10 1234 441 - 441A 283 

903 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 253-200 147 938 M 11.30.10 1234 224 919 ST 11.30.10 1234 442 - 441 344 

904 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 200-1234 21 939 M 11.30.10 1234 231A 920 ST 11.30.10 1234 441A - 287 54 

905 CV 10.20.10 HP 1233 45-50 322 940 M 11.30.11 1234 226 921 ST 11.30.10 1234 287 - 286 363 

906 CV 10.20.10 HP 1233 50-50A 153 941 M 11.30.12 1234 209B 922 ST 11.30.10 1234 437 - 286 355 

907 CV 10.20.10 HP 1233 50A-1 104 942 M 11.30.13 1234 209C 923 ST 11.30.10 1234 438 - 437 348 

908 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 5-4A 98 943 M 12.01.10 1234 209 924 ST 11.30.10 1234 286 - 285 351 

909 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 4A-4 227 944 M 12.01.10 1234 208 925 ST 11.30.10 1234 435 - 285 238 

910 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 4-3A 227 945 M 12.01.10 1234 273 926 ST 11.30.10 1234 436 - 435 250 

911 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 3A-3 242 946 M 12.01.10 1234 309 927 ST 11.30.10 1234 285 - 284 379 

912 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 3-1 198 947 M 12.01.10 1234 309A 928 ST 11.30.10 1234 293 - 285 325 

913 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 2-1 15 948 M 12.01.10 1241 627 929 ST 11.30.10 1234 433 - 284 233 

914 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 1A-1 28 949 M 12.01.10 1241 622 930 ST 11.30.10 1234 434 - 433 257 

915 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 1-1246 25 950 M 12.01.10 1234 262 931 ST 11.30.10 1234 284 - 306A 378 

916 CV 10.20.10 HP 1245 5-4 260 951 M 08.23.10 1233 11 932 ST 11.30.10 1234 306A - 306 122 

917 CV 10.20.10 HP 1245 4-3 43 274 933 ST 11.30.10 1234 306 - 304 163 

918 CV 10.20.10 HP 1245 3-2 212 934 ST 11.30.10 1234 304 - 303 276 

919 CV 10.20.10 HP 1245 2-1245 20 935 ST 11.30.10 1234 303 - 257 278 

920 CV 10.21.10 HP 1233 1-1A 29 936 ST 11.30.10 1234 257 - 256 363 

921 CV 10.21.10 HP 1233 1A-1233 15 937 ST 11.30.10 1234 439 - 438 242 

922 CV 10.21.10 HP 1233 41-37 257 938 ST 11.30.10 1234 440 - 438 233 

923 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1E-1D 359 939 ST 11.30.10 1234 443 - 442 339 

924 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1D-1C 300 940 ST 11.30.10 1234 246A - 246 56 

925 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1C-1B 108 942 ST 10.16.10 1233 77B - 77A 24 

926 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1B-1A 23 

927 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1A-1 258 

928 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1-1245 25 

929 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 42A-1249 160 

930 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 44-42D 40 

931 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 42D-42C 80 

932 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 42C-42B 132 

933 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 42B-1249 153 

934 CV 12.01.10 HP 1233 77B-77A 24 

192067 17865 13667 10340 4748 1626 17 923 17 192067 17865 13667 10340 4748 1626 

Total 240313 Total 240313



Appendix “G” 

CD-ROM Containing Office Databases (Not included) 

29



Appendix “H” 

Additional Quantities and Amount per Bid Item 

Total Pages 1 

30

ITEM No. DESCRIPTION 

PRICE UNIT QUANTITY QUANTITY DIFFERENCE TOTAL TOTAL DIFFERENCE 

MOT 

CLEANING 

& 

TELEVISING 

MH & PS 

1.1 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT) 

$ 500.00 AG $ 500.00 $ 492.54 $ 7.46 

1.2 PROVIDING OFF DUTY POLICEMEN 

$ 35.00 MH $ 700.00 $ - $ 700.00 

2.1 CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION 8" DIAMETER 

$ 0.75 LF 198,000 192,067 5,933 $ 148,500.00 $ 144,050.25 $ 4,449.75 


$ 0.80 LF 15,900 17,865 -1,965 $ 12,720.00 $ 14,292.00 $ (1,572.00) 


$ 0.80 LF 13,500 13,667 -167 $ 10,800.00 $ 10,933.60 $ (133.60) 


$ 0.90 LF 10,700 10,340 360 $ 9,630.00 $ 9,306.00 $ 324.00 


$ 1.25 LF 4,200 4,748 -548 $ 5,250.00 $ 5,935.00 $ (685.00) 


$ 2.00 LF 1,600 1,626 -26 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,252.00 $ (52.00) 

2.7 CLEANING PUMP STATION WET WELLS 

$ 450.00 EA 17 17 0 $ 7,650.00 $ 7,650.00 $ - 

3.1 MANHOLES INSPECTION 

$ 0.01 EA 912 923 -11 $ 9.12 $ 9.23 $ (0.11) 

3.2 PUMP STATION WET WELLS INSPECTION 

$ 0.01 EA 17 17 0 $ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ - 

4.1 SMOKE TESTING 8" DIAMETER 

$ 0.15 LF 198,000 192,067 5,933 $ 29,700.00 $ 28,810.05 $ 889.95 


$ 0.17 LF 15,900 17,865 -1,965 $ 2,703.00 $ 3,037.05 $ (334.05) 

SMOKE 

SMOKE TESTING 12" DIAMETER 

TESTING SMOKE TESTING 15" DIAMETER 

4.3 $ 0.17 LF 13,500 13,667 -167 $ 2,295.00 $ 2,323.39 $ (28.39) 

4.4 $ 0.17 LF 10,700 10,340 360 $ 1,819.00 $ 1,757.80 $ 61.20 


$ 0.17 LF 4,200 4,748 -548 $ 714.00 $ 807.16 $ 

(93.16) 


$ 0.17 LF 1,600 1,626 -26 $ 272.00 $ 276.42 $ (4.42) 

(BID) 

(ACTUAL) 

(BID) 

(ACTUAL) 

SUBTOTAL 5 TOTAL OF ITEMS 1 TO 4 

$ 236,462.29 $ 232,932.66 $ 3,529.63 

CONTINGENCY 

ALLOWANCE 

6 

UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS, MINOR CONSTRUCTION CHANGES, AND QUANTITY ADJUSTMENTS, IF ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER 

$23,646.23 $ - $ 23,646.23 

DEDICATED 

ALLOWANCE 

7 

PERMITS, FEES, IMPACT OF FEES, AND INSPECTIONS, IF ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER 

$7,093.87 

$ 

- 

$ 7,093.87 

TOTAL BID 

SUM OF ITEMS 5,6, & 7 

$ 

267,202.39 

$ 232,932.66 $ 34,269.73



Appendix “I” 

MDWASD Repair Criteria and Technology Guidelines (Not included) 

32



Appendix “J” 

Manhole Repair Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (One sample page 

included only / Total Pages 4) 

33



Basin No. Manhole No. Atlas Page Repair Code Definition Average Cost 

1233 

1249 

1A G9 1 

$200.00 

4A G9 1 $200.00 

4B G9 1 $200.00 

6 G9 1 $200.00 

15 G7 1 $200.00 

23 G8 1 $200.00 

28 G9 1 $200.00 

29 G9 1 $200.00 

32 G9 1 $200.00 

33A G9 1 $200.00 

41 H9 1 Insert Manhole Dish 

$200.00 

48 G9 1 $200.00 

50A G9 1 $200.00 

61 G9 1 $200.00 

61A G9 1 $200.00 

77B F9 1 $200.00 

84 E9 1 $200.00 

86 E9 1 $200.00 

400A F8 1 $200.00 

400B F8 1 $200.00 

400C F8 1 $200.00 

80 F9 392 

$1,000.00 

82A F9 392 $1,000.00 

83 F9 392 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Entire Manhole $1,000.00 

84 F9 392 $1,000.00 

88 E9 392 $1,000.00 

50 G9 18 Plug and Waterproof-Coat Manhole Cone $300.00 

50 G9 24 

$1,000.00 

Plug and Waterproof-Coat Manhole Walls 

66 F9 24 $1,000.00 

21 G9 9 

$300.00 

Realign and Seal Manhole Frame 

62C G8 9 $300.00 

22 G9 26 Repair Leaks in Manhole Wall $300.00 

11 G8 12 

$300.00 

Seal Casting to Cone 

400C F8 12 $300.00 

Total $13,000.00 

42B H9 1 

$200.00 

42C H9 1 Insert Manhole Dish 

$200.00 

44 H9 1 $200.00 

Total $600.00 

Grand Total $44,700.00 

34



Appendix “K” 

Mainline Repair Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (One sample page 

included only / Total Pages 18) 

35



ID 

Previous 

ID 

TV Date 

Review 

Date 

Basin 

No. 

Line 

Segment 

Length 

Cost of 

Point 

Repairs 

CIP 

Repair Call* 

923 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1E-1D 359 $300.00 $300.00 

924 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1D-1C 300 $300.00 $300.00 

925 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1C-1B 108 $300.00 $300.00 

926 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1B-1A 23 No repair 

927 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1A-1 258 No repair 

928 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1-1245 25 No repair 

893 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.18.10 1246 1C-1B 162 $850.00 $3,240.00 $850.00 

894 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.18.10 1246 1B-1A 150 $300.00 $300.00 

908 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 5-4A 98 

909 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 4A-4 227 

910 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 4-3A 227 No repair 


912 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 3-1 198 $850.00 $3,960.00 $850.00 

913 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 2-1 15 No repair 

914 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 1A-1 28 $300.00 $300.00 

915 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 1-1246 25 $850.00 $862.50 $862.50 

883 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.10.10 1247 4-4A 80 $1,650.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 

884 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.10.10 1247 4A-4B 139 No repair 

885 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.10.10 1247 4B-3 77 No repair 

886 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 3-2 319 No repair 

887 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 2-1 102 No repair 

888 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 6-5 182 $3,640.00 $3,640.00 

889 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 5-1 49 No repair 

890 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 8-7 89 No repair 

891 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 7-5 157 No repair 

892 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.18.10 1247 1-1247 12 No repair 

803 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 11-10 100 No repair 

804 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 10-9 205 No repair 

805 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 9-8 95 No repair 

806 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 8-7 61 No repair 

807 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 7-6 131 No repair 

808 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 6-5 283 No repair 

809 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 5-4 309 No repair 

810 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 4-3 158 No repair 

811 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 3-2 138 No repair 

812 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 2-1 120 No repair 

813 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 13-12 367 No repair 

814 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 12-1 97 No repair 

815 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 1-1248 25 No repair 


930 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 44-42D 40 No repair 

931 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 42D-42C 80 No repair 

932 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 42C-42B 132 No repair 

933 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 42B-1249 153 No repair 

TOTAL 934 240313 $2,798,222.50 

No mainline repairs required. Only laterals repairs needed. 

* Cost of recommendations considers cost of "Sectional Liners" (538) and "Grouting" (529) versus "Cure in Place Liners" (537), in addition 

to applicable "De-root Main Line" (531), "Heavy Clean Mainline with Degreaser" (541), "Point Repair Main Line" (526), and "Grout Annular 

Space at Manhole/Pipe Connection" (513). 

No cost for applicable lateral repairs such as “Investigate Suspect Lateral" (595), "Grout Lateral Annular Space" (511), "Point Repair 

Lateral" (507), etc has been included. 

36



Appendix “L” 

Special Line Segments (Not included) 

37



Appendix “M” 

Repair Recommendations for MHs, Laterals, and Mainlines classified by Basin (One 

sample page included only / Total Pages 4) 

38



Basin No. Repair Code Definition Count 

1233 

1234 










541 Heavy Clean Mainline with Degreaser 7 


392 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Entire Manhole 5 


24 Plug and Waterproof-Coat Manhole Walls 2 



18 Plug and Waterproof-Coat Manhole cone 1 


26 Repair leaks in manhole wall 1 

Total 442 











526 Point Repair Main Line 6 




523 Plug Lateral at Point of Connection with Main Line 1 

31 Repair Leaks in Manhole Bench 1 

584 Robotics Repair Protruding Lateral 1 


Total 818 

Grand Total 3,038 

39



Appendix “N” 

Summary of Bid Costs 

Total Pages 1 

40



Line Replacement 

(525) 

Size (in) $/LF 0-9 ft depth $/LF 9-18 ft depth 

8 $ 34.50 $ 65.00 

10 $ 58.00 $ 84.00 

12 $ 58.00 $ 84.00 

15 $ 58.00 $ 84.00 

18 $ 58.00 $ 84.00 

24 $ 58.00 $ 84.00 

Sectional Liner 

(538) 

Cured in Place 

Liners (CIP) 

(537) 

Grouting 

(529) 

Point Repair 

(526) 

(557 CIP) 

Size (in) $/Each 8 ft Length $/LF Additional length 

8 $ 850.00 $ 1.00 

10 $ 800.00 $ 1.00 

12 $ 900.00 N/A 

15 $ 1,250.00 N/A 

18 $ 2,000.00 N/A 

24 $ 3,000.00 N/A 

Size (in) 

$/LF 

8 $ 20.00 

10 $ 23.00 

12 $ 24.00 

15 $ 30.00 

18 $ 40.00 

24 $ 60.00 

Size (in) 

$/LF 

8 $ 10.00 

10 $ 10.00 

12 $ 12.20 

15 $ 12.20 

18 $ 15.30 

24 $ 15.30 

$/Each (All Sizes) 

$ 3,000.00 

41





2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER 





7. FAX NUMBER 


(Check) 



PRIME 

J-V 

PARTNER 

SUBCON- 

TRACTOR 


a. 


b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 



AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 




12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 

a. TOTAL 








(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED 


CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 


a. 






b. 

Check if project performed with current firm 





c. 






d. 





e. 







a. TOTAL 












a. 






b. 






c. 






d. 





e. 







a. TOTAL 












a. 






b. 






c. 






d. 





e. 




F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 







NUMBER 



23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION 





a. 



(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 

b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 









NUMBER 








a. 




b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 

(3) ROLE 


26. NAMES OF KEY 

PERSONNEL 

(From Section E, 

Block 12) 



27. ROLE IN THIS 

(Fill in "Example Projects Key" section below before completing 

CONTRACT 

table. Place "X" under project key number for 


participation in same or similar role.) 

Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 


NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 











7. FAX NUMBER 


(Check) 



PRIME 

J-V 

PARTNER 

SUBCON- 

TRACTOR 


a. 


b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 





12. NAME 

Paul Hillers, P.E. 


Hillers Electrical Engineering, Inc, Boca Raton, Florida 

16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 

BSEE/1979/ Electrical Engineering 

MSEE/1981/Electrical Engineering 


(Complete one Section E for each person) 


14. YEARS EXPEREINCE 

a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 



17. CURRENT PROFIESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) 

31 

Florida Professional Engineer-41022 

Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), Instrument Society of America (ISA) 

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 


City of West Palm Beach Water Treatment Plant Existing Electrical 

System Evaluation, Study and Maintenance Testing, West Palm Beach, 

FL 


(2) YEAR COMPLETED: 


X Check if project performed with current firm 

Project Manager – Hillers Electrical Engineering provided electrical analysis, study and design services to assist the City with 

managing the aging plant electrical power distribution system. Performed power monitoring of the existing system and analyzed 

anomalies in power quality. Performed Short Circuit, Device Coordination and Arc Flash Study of the existing power distribution 

system. Analyzed the power distribution system for vulnerabilities and recommended solutions to reinforce the system. As-built 

the existing plant electrical power distribution system and updated the plant one line diagrams. 


East Central Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant Solids Handling 

Improvements Preliminary Engineering Report 


2009 


2009 

2011 


18 


Project Manager – Performed electrical and control systems analysis for the conceptual design of new biosolids handling, 

treatment and removal processes including new screening facilities, sludge pumping facilities, sludge storages facilities, 

anaerobic digestion facilities, sludge drying facilities and sludge cake removal. Provided conceptual design input to a possible 

cogeneration facility using methane gas generated in the anaerobic digestion process. Analyzed the existing plant normal and 

emergency electrical power distribution facilities, and control system infrastructure, to determine impacts and options to integrate 

and support the proposed process systems. Prepared options for integration into the plant of the electrical power generated by 

the proposed cogeneration facility. Created final study document sections for Electrical and Instrumentation and Control Systems 

and provided input into the budgetary cost estimate. 


Broward County North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant – Module E 



2006 

2010 




Project Manager - Electrical design and construction inspection services for construction of a 20 MGD capacity expansion and 

major process upgrade to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Process improvements included addition of a three 125 foot 

diameter primary clarifiers; four aeration basins; three 500 horsepower blowers; and suction sludge removal system. Project also 

included implementation of new PLC based SCADA system that included the integration of existing plant process components. 


Palm Beach County Lake Region WTP Membrane Facilities – Belle Glade, 

FL 



2006 

2008 



X 

Project Manager- Designed plant SCADA system with redundant hot backup PLC processors, Remote Input Output panels, 

redundant fiber optic communication data highway for the monitoring and control of on site plant systems for the operation of the 

RO Plant. 


City of Orlando – Iron Bridge Regional Water Reclamation Facility 

Bardenpho Improvements to 40 MGD 



2006 

2008 



Electrical design and construction inspection services for construction of 40 MGD capacity expansion, major process upgrade of 

the existing wastewater treatment system. Project included implementation of new electrical service and modification of existing 

four trains of fermentation basins, grit units, clarifiers, return activated sludge/waste activated sludge pump station, internal 

recycle pump stations, etc. 

X 



2008 

X 

Check if project performed with current firm

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3 


12. NAME 

Mark E. Luther, P.E. 


Hillers Electrical Engineering, Inc, Boca Raton, Florida 

16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 

BSEE/1987/ Electrical Engineering 


(Complete one Section E for each person) 


14. YEARS EXPEREINCE 

a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 

Lead Electrical Engineer 


17. CURRENT PROFIESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) 

25 

Florida Professional Engineer-48801 

Proficiency with SKM Power Tools for Windows DAPPER, CAPTOR, TMS and ARC FLASH; AutoCAD, LitePRO. 

a. 


City of West Palm Beach Water Treatment Plant Existing Electrical 

System Evaluation, Study and Maintenance Testing, West Palm 

Beach, FL 



2009 


15 


2011 


Lead Electrical Engineer – Hillers Electrical Engineering provided electrical analysis, study and design services to 

assist the City with managing the aging plant electrical power distribution system. Performed power monitoring of the 

existing system and analyzed anomalies in power quality. Performed Short Circuit, Device Coordination and Arc Flash 

Study of the existing power distribution system. Analyzed the power distribution system for vulnerabilities and 

recommended solutions to reinforce the system. As-built the existing plant electrical power distribution system and 

updated the plant one line diagrams. 


Orange County Utilities 8 Master Pump Station 

Replacement/Rehabilitation 


2003 



2008 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 



Lead Electrical Engineer - Performed electrical, instrumentation and control system engineering and design for 

replacement of eight master pump stations. Project was completed in three phases with two pump stations in the 

first phase, four in the second phase and two in the third phase. The projects consisted of main gear, ATS with 

generator and panel board. The projects consisted of a main control panel with Siemens PLC and spread spectrum 

radio communication, back-up control panel with floats, and field instrumentation such as ultrasonic level 

transducer and magnetic flowmeter. The electrical and instrumentation equipment are housed in an electrical 

enclosure with 150 mph wind loading. The generators are housed in a walk-in enclosure with 150mph wind loading. 


East Central Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant Solids 

Handling Improvements Preliminary Engineering Report 



2009 



2010 


Lead Electrical Engineer – Performed electrical and control systems analysis for the conceptual design of new 

biosolids handling, treatment and removal processes including new screening facilities, sludge pumping facilities, 

sludge storages facilities, anaerobic digestion facilities, sludge drying facilities and sludge cake removal. Provided 

conceptual design input to a possible cogeneration facility using methane gas generated in the anaerobic digestion 

process. Analyzed the existing plant normal and emergency electrical power distribution facilities, and control 

system infrastructure, to determine impacts and options to integrate and support the proposed process systems. 

Prepared options for integration into the plant of the electrical power generated by the proposed cogeneration 

facility. Created final study document sections for Electrical and Instrumentation and Control Systems and provided 

input into the budgetary cost estimate. 


ENCON Plant Expansion-Loxahatchee River District, Jupiter, FL 



2005 



2007 

X 

Lead Electrical Engineer- Provided electrical design and construction inspection services for construction of a 2.0 

MGD capacity expansion and major process upgrade to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Process 

improvements included addition of a fourth primary clarifier; two influent flow equalization tanks; replacement of the 

existing cryogenic oxygenation system with aeration basins and blowers; upgrades to RAS and WAS pumping 

facilities; new chlorine facilities; new chlorine contact chambers for reuse system disinfection; new synthetic media 

filters for reuse water filtering; and a new sludge storage and holding facility. 


Town of Jupiter Nanofiltration Plant, Jupiter, Florida 



2007 




2010 

X 


Lead Electrical Engineer – Performed electrical, instrumentation and control system engineering and design for a 14.7 

MGD (expandable to 17 MGD) nanofiltration plant including, normal and emergency power systems, plant control 

system architecture, process instrumentation design, variable frequency drive application, fire alarm system, plant 

surveillance and communication systems, interface with existing plant control system.

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3 




(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, If not specified. 



Lake Region WTP Membrane Facilities, Belle Glade, FL 


2006 



NUMBER 

CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) 

2008 


Palm Beach County Water Utilities 

Department 




Brian Shields 

561-493-6081 


Provided instrumentation and control design for the Lake Region Water Treatment Plant, plant off site well field and related systems at 

the existing Belle Glade, Pahokee and South Bay water treatment facilities. The instrumentation and controls design is based on an 

overall plant production of 10 MGD with 9.5 MGD of reverse osmosis membrane treatment and .5 MGD of pretreated raw water 

blending. The primary treatment process for the plant is low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO) membrane treatment skids. PBCWUD 

elected to use brackish water from the Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA) as a supply source to a facility which led to the use of LPRO 

membrane treatment for the Lake Region Plant. The off site well field is designed to provide 12.375 MGD of raw water to the plant for 

treatment. Each of the eight Upper Floridan Aquifer wells are monitored and controlled by a PLC based Remote Telemetry Unit (RTU) 

that uses radio signals to transmit data to and from the plant for control and monitoring of the wells. The plant high service pump (HSP) 

station will provide pressure for transmission to the various utilities. A 30-inch diameter finished water main will leave the plant. A 16- 

inch diameter main will branch from the 30-inch diameter main and will deliver up to 1.5 MGD of finished water flow to Pahokee. The 

30-inch diameter main will continue towards Belle Glade and South Bay with a 24-inch diameter main branching off to Belle Glade and 

a 16-inch diameter main branching off to South Bay. The 16-inch diameter transmission main will carry up to 1.5 MGD of finished water 

South Bay. Up to 7.0 MGD of finished water from the LRWTP will be delivered to Belle Glade via a 24-inch diameter transmission main. 

Hillers Electrical Engineering is part of the team providing construction inspection services for this project that is scheduled for 

completion in 2008. 

Project Highlights: 

 

 

 

 

Design plant SCADA system with redundant hot backup PLC processors, Remote Input Output panels, redundant fiber optic 

communication data highway for the monitoring and control of on site plant systems for the operation of the RO Plant. 

Design a Remote Telemetry System with a plant radio base station and off site RTU units for each of the raw water wells and 

units located at Belle Glade, Pahokee and South Bay water treatment facilities. 

Design control and monitoring strategies for automated plant start up to include pretreatment systems, acid addition, and 

cartridge filtration; membrane treatment including feedwater pumping, reverse osmosis treatment, and associated membrane 

cleaning facilities; post-treatment including degasification, off gas odor control, blended water clearwell storage, disinfection, 

chemical addition for water stabilization, and transfer pumping; finished water storage and high service pumping. 

Design plant wide security access control system, CCTV system and fire alarm system. 

Cost: $20M 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 




Boca Raton, Florida 

(3) ROLE 

I & C, Security & Access System, Power, Design and 

Construction Services 

b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

. 







RO Expansion WTP 3, Delray Beach, FL 


2005 



NUMBER 


2008 



Department 




Brian Shields 

561-493-6081 


Provided instrumentation and control design, construction inspection services and facility start up services for the expansion of the 

existing plant that produced 9.4 MGD nanofiltration with 7 MGD lime softening water plant to a 25.5 MGD nanofiltration water treatment 

with 4.5 MGD filtered raw water blending for total plant output of 30 MGD. A phase-out of the existing lime facilities was desired with the 

full treatment capacity to be delivered by nanofiltration. PBCWUD desired to significantly alter the configuration of the existing plant and 

add an entirely new membrane process building while maintaining full use off the existing treatment capacity. This approach allowed all 

membrane treatment to be consolidated and the existing buildings to be re-used for associated pretreatment and pumping functions. 

The design team carefully crafted a construction sequence that allowed orderly start-up of new capacity without existing facility 

operation interruption. Instrumentation and control design included intermediate phase and final phase SCADA system designs to 

maintain plant operations during the construction process. 


Design plant SCADA system with redundant hot backup PLC processors, Remote Input Output panels and a redundant fiber 

optic communication data highway for the monitoring and control of plant systems for the operation of the RO Plant. 

Design intermediate plant PLC configuration and programming requirements to maintain existing nanofiltration plant 

operations during the phased construction sequence and to start up and test the new nanofiltration systems. 

Design plant PLC configuration and programming requirements for plant operations in the 30 MGD plant configuration. 

Design control and monitoring strategies for automated plant start up to include pretreatment systems including sand 

separation, acid addition, and cartridge filtration; membrane treatment including feedwater pumping, nanofiltration treatment, 

and associated membrane cleaning facilities; post-treatment including degasification, off gas odor control, blended water 

clearwell storage, disinfection, chemical addition for water stabilization, and transfer pumping; finished water storage and 

pumping improvements including two 5-million-gallon ground storage tanks and new high service pumping. 

Design plant wide security access control system. 

Cost: $36.5M 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 






(3) ROLE 

I & C, Security & Access System, Power, Design and 

Construction Services 

c. 


d. 


e. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

. 







Southern Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion, Delray 

Beach, FL 


2005 




NUMBER 


2007 



Department 


David Dalton 


561-381-5303 


Provided electrical design and construction inspection services for construction of a 16.0 MGD capacity expansion of the reuse water 

system to the existing water reclamation facility. Process improvements included addition of reuse water high service pump station, new 

effluent filters and extending facility SCADA system to include the PLC based controls of the new filters. 


Modifications to the facility medium voltage 4160 volt main service gear to add two breakers to feed the new reuse water 

Switchgear. 

Design of reuse water double ended unit substation 480 volt Switchgear for installation in the existing main electrical building. 

Implementation of variable frequency drives and solid state reduced voltage starters. 

Design electrical system to feed the new facility filters. 

Modifications to the existing effluent pump station unit substation 480 volt Switchgear to add feeder breakers for the new filter 

systems 

Reuse Water Pump station and Filter structures lighting; grounding and lightning protection systems. 

Cost: $ 400,000 


a. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

Hillers Electrical Engineering, Inc 



(3) ROLE 

I & C, Power, Design and Construction Services 

b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

. 







Southern Regional Water Reclamation Facility, Delray Beach, FL 



Department 


2008 



David Dalton 




NUMBER 


2009 


561-381-5303 

The existing medium voltage emergency power distribution system had a single means of connection to the existing utility power 

distribution system equipment that, if were to fail, would prevent emergency power from energizing the facility on a loss of utility power. 

HEE designed a second route of power from the existing emergency generator medium voltage paralleling switchgear to the existing 

medium voltage power distribution switchgear including bus re-work in the generator paralleling switchgear, expansion of the existing 

utility power distribution switchgear, and re-design of the breaker operating control logic to achieve two independent generator/utility 

breaker pairs, and an interlocked manual tie breaker, to greatly improve the reliability of the existing system. 

Cost: $1.2M 


(1) FIRM NAME 


(3) ROLE 

a. 

Hillers Electrical Engineering, Inc 


Electrical design and construction services 

b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

. 







City of Ft. Lauderdale: Five Ash Water Treatment Plant Upgrades 


City of Ft. Lauderdale 


2006 



Paul Bolander 




NUMBER 


2008 


954-522-2604 

Hillers Electrical Engineering provided electrical design and construction inspection services for the reliability upgrade of the existing 70 

MGD capacity plant at Five Ash Water Treatment Plant. Process improvements included modification of existing high service pump 

system, washwater recovery pump system, sludge mixer system, sludge pump system, filter backwash pump system, lime system, 

polymer system, and replacement of all pneumatic valves associated with filters to electric valves. Project also included design and 

implementation of uninterrupted power supply system for all process instruments and controls. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Modification to existing plant electrical infrastructure including design and replacement of motor control centers, power panels, 

etc. 

Modification of the existing medium voltage starters for north high service pumps 

Design and replacement of existing motor starters for washwater recovery pumps 

Design and replacement of existing motor starters for sludge tank mixers and sludge pumps 

Addition of the uninterrupted power supply with distribution panels throughout the plants for instrumentation and control 

system 

Complete replacement of the existing filters pneumatic valves with electric valve actuators operating on the Profibus protocol 

Complete replacement of polymer system including control panels and metering pumps 


a. 

b. 

(1) FIRM NAME 


(3) ROLE 

Hillers Electrical 


Electrical design and construction services 

Engineering, Inc 


c. 


d. 


e. 

(1) FIRM NAME 

. 



PERSONNEL 





Paul Hillers, PE Project Manager X X X X X 

Mark Luther, PE Project Engineer X X X X X 


(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completing 

table. Place “X” under project key number for participation in same 

or similar role.) 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 



1 Lake Region WTP Membrane Facilities 6 

2 RO Expansion WTP 3 7 

3 SRWRF Expansion 8 

4 SRWRF Improvements 9 

5 Five Ash WTP Upgrades 10 




Hillers Electrical Engineering, Inc. has been in business since 1994 and is located in Boca Raton, Florida. Hillers 

Electrical Engineering, Inc. (HEE) brings over 200 years of unsurpassed experience, expertise, and personalized 

service in electrical engineering design, control application programming, and construction management. Our 

electrical design services include power, control, instrumentation, telemetry, start-up assistance, construction 

management services and PLC/computer programming for County and State municipal agencies as well as private 

industry. 

Our office is fully equipped with state-of-the-art computer systems and engineering software to help ensure a 

quality and cost-effective product. Software programs include AutoCAD SKM fault current/coordination/arc flash 

program, generator sizing programs, and 3 dimensional lighting calculations program. 

HEE design staff brings vast electrical, instrumentation and telemetry design and project management experience 

in a variety of areas such as raw water wells, ASR and DIW wells, water treatment facilities, water distribution 

systems, wastewater collection systems, wastewater treatment facilities including reuse, storm water and treatment 

pumping stations, airport terminals, airport runway-taxiway-apron lighting and navigational systems, sportsfield 

lighting, roadway and parking lot lighting, fire stations, etc.. 

HEE provides a variety of electrical, instrumentation and telemetry design and construction management tasks 

including: 

Low, Medium, and High Voltage Power Distribution Systems 

Motor Control Centers (MCCs) 

Distribution Panels 

Voltage Drop Calculations 

Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Application 

Luminaire Calculations 

Short-Circuit Calculations, Protective Device Coordination & Arc Flash 

Standby Generator Systems 

Fire Alarm and Security Systems 

Instrumentation & Control Systems 

Telemetry Systems 

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems 

Shop Drawing Review 

Energy Audits 

Cost Estimates, Testing, and Start-Ups 

The nature of Consulting is such that responsiveness is the key to maintaining a long-term relationship. HEE takes 

great pride in ensuring that we are immediately accessible and responsive to our client’s needs. This is 

demonstrated in the excellent relationship we have established over the last 18 years with many municipalities and 

environmental consulting firms. 



31. SIGNATURE 


Paul Hillers, President 

32. DATE 

6-11-12 


ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS 

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER (If Any) 

2012-10 


Hillers Electrical Engineering, Inc. 

2b. STREET 

23257 State Road 7, Suite 100 

2c. CITY 

Boca Raton 



PART II – GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS 


2d. STATE 

Florida 


1994 

a. TYPE 

Corporation 

5. OWNERSHIP 

2e. ZIP CODE 


Yes 

7. NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is branch office) 


876227059 


561-451-9165 


phillers@hillersee.com 


NA NA NA 

a. Function 

Code 


b. Discipline 

c. No. of Employees 

(1) FIRM (2) BRANCH 

a. Profile 

Code 


ANNUAL REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS 

b. Experience 


Number 

(see below) 

21 Electrical & Instrumentation Design Engineers 9 A05 Airport NAVAIDS, ILS, Lighting, Aircraft Fueling 5 

16 Electrical Construction Manager 2 A06 Airport Terminals and Hangars;Freight Handling 5 

08 CADD Technician 1 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 3 

02 Administrative 1 W03 

Water Supply; Treatment and Distribution(Electrical 

and instrumentation design 

5 

Other Employees 

Total 13 




FOR LAST 3 YEARS 


(Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,00 to less than $250,000 7. $5 million to less than $10 million 


b. Non-Federal Work 6 4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 9. $25 million to less than $50 million 




b. DATE 

a. SIGNATURE 



6/4/2012 


ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS 

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER (If Any) 

2012-10 


Hillers Electrical Engineering, Inc. 

2b. STREET 

23257 State Road 7, Suite 100 

2c. CITY 

Boca Raton 





2d. STATE 

Florida 


1994 

a. TYPE 

Corporation 

5. OWNERSHIP 

2e. ZIP CODE 


Yes 

7. NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is branch office) 


876227059 


561-451-9165 


phillers@hillersee.com 


NA NA NA 

a. Function 

Code 


b. Discipline 

c. No. of Employees 

(1) FIRM (2) BRANCH 

a. Profile 

Code 


ANNUAL REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS 

b. Experience 


Number 

(see below) 

21 Electrical & Instrumentation Design Engineers 9 A05 Airport NAVAIDS, ILS, Lighting, Aircraft Fueling 5 

16 Electrical Construction Manager 2 A06 Airport Terminals and Hangars;Freight Handling 5 

08 CADD Technician 1 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 3 

02 Administrative 1 W03 

Water Supply; Treatment and Distribution(Electrical 

and instrumentation design 

5 


Total 13 






(Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,00 to less than $250,000 7. $5 million to less than $10 million 


b. Non-Federal Work 6 4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 9. $25 million to less than $50 million 




b. DATE 

a. SIGNATURE 



6/4/2012 



ARCHITECT – ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS 

PART I – CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS 




B. ARCHITECT – ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 


6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 

(Check) 



PRIME 

J-V 

PARTNER 

SUBCON- 

TRACTOR 


a. 

GEOSOL, Inc. 

Oracio Riccobono, P.E, 

President 


5795-A NW 151 st Street, 


(305) 828-4367 

Geosolusa@bellsouth.net 

Soils, Foundations & 

Materials Testing 

b. 


c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 




MANDATORY USE DATE OF FORM 6/2004 




12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE 

Oracio Riccobono, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer A. TOTAL B. WITH CURRENT FIRM 

26 12 


GEOSOL, Inc.; 5795-A NW 151 st Street, Miami Lakes, FL 33014 

16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) 

Civil Engineer (BSCE) and Master Degree (MSCE in Geotechnical Registration No. 49324 (Florida, Civil Engineering) 

Enginering) 



Florida Engineering Society 


a. 

b. 

c. 


Areawide and Districtwide Geotechnical Consultant, FDOT Districts 4 and 6, over from Monroe 

to Osceola Counties 


2003 – Ongoing N/A 




Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for negotiating each task work orders (TWO), planning the geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of 

geotechnical engineering reports with foundation design and construction recommendations for new and existing roadway projects during Preliminary and Final Design 

phases. Project has budget cap of $1.5 millions. To date, we have successfully executed 95 TWO and have spent $1.3 millions. 


MIC-MIA Elevated People’s Mover, Miami-Dade County, FL, FDOT District 6. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 

2004 - 2006 Has not started 



Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical engineering 

report with foundation design and construction recommendations for the new viaduct bridge that will provide connection between the Miami Intermodal 

Center (MIC) and the Miami International Airport (MIA). Geotechnical fees were $200,000 


Bridge Replacement for New Railroad Tracks Over the New River, Broward County, FL, TRI- 

COUNTY COMMUTER RAIL 


2001 - 2003 2004 - 2006 




Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning the preliminary geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of the preliminary geotechnical 

engineering reports during preparation of Design-Build Documents for the new viaduct bridge. Also, involved during construction reviewing and approving contractor’s 

submittals and performing verification type testing. Geotechnical fees during design were $500,000 


d. 

e. 

SR 826 and NW 36 th Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County, FL, FDOT District 6. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 

2001- 2003 2004 - 2006 



Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical engineering report with 

foundation design and construction recommendations for the new bridges and retaining walls. Geotechnical fees were $250,000 


SR 826 and Okeechobee Road, Miami-Dade County, FL, FDOT District 6. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 

2001- 2003 2004 - 2006 



Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical engineering report with 

foundation design and construction recommendations for the new bridges and retaining walls. Geotechnical fees were $150,000 






20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER 

1 

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED 

Areawide and Districtwide Geotechnical Consultant, FDOT Districts 4 and 6, over from Monroe to 

Osceola Counties 



2003 – 2012 N/A 


a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 

FDOT Districts 4 and 6 Materials Office Mr. Juan Castellanos, P.E. (954) 475-4111 


Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for negotiating each task work orders (TWO), planning the geotechnical exploration and 

laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical engineering reports with foundation design and construction recommendations 

for new and existing roadway projects during Preliminary and Final Design phases. Project has budget cap of $1.5 millions. To date, 

we have successfully executed 95 TWO and have spent $1.3 millions. 


a. 

b. 

(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE 

GEOSOL, INC. 

GEOSOL, Inc.; 5795-A NW 151 st Street, 



Sr. Geotechnical Engineer 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 








2 


NE 2 nd Avenue Improvements, From NE 20 Th to NE 87 th Streets, City of Miami, FL 

PROFESSIONAL 

SERVICES 

April to July 2005 

CONSTRUCTION (If 

applicable) 

Has not started 


a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE 

NUMBER 

The City of Miami c/o: DMJM Harris, Inc. Mr. Alex Meitin, P.E (305) 444-8241 


Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical 

engineering report with foundation design and construction recommendations. Scope included collection of 20 asphalt pavement cores, 

performance of 104 test borings and 40 percolation tests. Geotechnical fees were $46,630. 


a. 

b. 


GEOSOL, INC. 


Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical, 


and Materials Testing Services 

(1) Firm Name 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 








3 


SR-5/Byscayne Blvd. Improvements, From NE 14 th to NE 38 th Streets, City of 

Miami, FL 


Dec. 04 to March 05 2008 




FDOT District 6 Mr. Jason Chang, P.E. (305) 470-5331 


Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning the final design level geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation 

of the geotechnical engineering reports for the proposed reconstruction. The geotechnical services for this project consisted in the performance of a 

roadway soils survey including asphalt pavement coring along the existing City of Miami side streets in order to provide recommendations for the 

proposed construction, 14 signalized intersections and 6 sign structures. The geotechnical services were performed using the requested scope of 

services and the field exploration criteria established in the FDOT's Soils and Foundations Handbook (2004). Scope included 88 test borings for soil 

survey, 59 pavement cores, 28 borings for signalized intersections, 6 borings for sign structures and LBR testing . Geotechnical fees during design 

were $97,260.65 


a. 

b. 


GEOSOL, INC. 





(1) Firm Name 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 








4 


SR 836 Extension, From NW 107 th to NW 137 th Avenues, Miami-Dade County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 


Jan.2004 to Dec. 2005 2007 


Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority c/o Gannett Fleming, Inc. 

(786) 845-9540 

(MDX) 

Mr. Carlos Cejas, P.E. 


Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer for this project. Design-Build project construction cost was $140,000,000. He was 

responsible for design and implementation of the project’s field exploration and laboratory testing programs. He is responsible for the geotechnical 

engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of 9 bridges. He is also responsible for geotechnical engineering evaluations and 

foundation recommendations for MSE retaining walls, sheet pile walls and signalization structures. He prepared geotechnical engineering reports 

containing recommendations for foundation design and construction for the new bridges, MSE walls, sheet pile walls and roadways. Geotechnical 

fees were $500,000 


a. 

b. 


GEOSOL, INC. 





(1) Firm Name 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 








5 


SR 826 and NW 36 th Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 


2001- 2003 2006 


FDOT District 6 Mr. Ali Toghiani, P.E. (305) 470-5343 


Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer during the Final Design phase of this project. Responsible for design 

and implementation of the project’s field exploration and laboratory testing programs. Performed geotechnical engineering 

analyses and design for foundation elements for the replacement of the 2 mainline bridges and a bridge widening on NW 

36 th Street over the Ives Dairy Canal. Driven piles will support the bridges. Also, performed geotechnical engineering 

evaluations and provided recommendations for MSE retaining walls, critical sheet pile walls and sign structures. 

Additionally, the project involved the evaluation of ground improvement methods and recommendations in the area of the 

on Ramp “A”. Also performed review and interpretation of aerial photographs to determine the horizontal limits of 

trash/debris deposits that were placed in the late 1960's after the area was mined of its natural limestone formation. He 

interpreted the results of the test borings and laboratory testing programs, evaluated and performed analyses of various 

soil stabilization methods. Prepared geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for foundation design 

and construction for the bridges, MSE walls, sheet pile walls and sign structures. The geotechnical reports were reviewed 

and approved by the FDOT District geotechnical engineer. Geotechnical fees were $200,000 


a. 

b. 


GEOSOL, INC. 





(1) Firm Name 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 








6 


SR 826 and SW 8 th Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 


2002- 2003 2007 


FDOT District 6 Mr. Ali Toghiani, P.E. (305) 470-5343 



and implementation of the project’s field exploration and laboratory testing programs. Performed geotechnical 

engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of 5 bridge widening/replacements to be founded on driven 

piles. The project also includes sheet pile walls, noise barrier walls (along the four ramps) and sign structures. Prepared 

the geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for foundation design and construction for bridges, 

sheet piles, noise walls and signs. Geotechnical fees were $200,000 


a. 

b. 


GEOSOL, INC. 





(1) Firm Name 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 








7 


SW 88 th Street/Kendall Drive On-Ramp to NB SR 874; Miami-Dade County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 


2004-2005 2006-2007 


Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority 

(MDX) 

c/o Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson 

Salman P.A. 

Attn.: Mr. Walfrido Pevida, P.E. 

(305) 445-2900 



and implementation of the project’s field exploration and laboratory testing programs. Performed geotechnical 

engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of a major new bridge to be founded on drilled shafts. The 

project also included sheet pile walls, noise barrier walls sign structures and signalized intersections. He prepared the 

geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for foundation design and construction for bridges, sheet 

piles, noise walls, signs mast arms and roadways. Geotechnical fees were $400,000 


a. 

b. 


GEOSOL, INC. 





(1) Firm Name 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 








8 


NW 74 th Street Interchange at the Homestead Extension of Florida’s Turnpike 

(HEFT), Miami-Dade County, FL 



April 05 – Jan. 06 2008-2011 



FDOT Turnpike Enterprise 

c/o Gannett Fleming, Inc. 

(786) 845-9540 

Mr. Alina Fernandez, P.E. 


Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer for this project. Responsible for design and implementation of the project’s field exploration and 

laboratory testing programs as well as for the geotechnical engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of 5 bridges. Also, performed 

geotechnical engineering evaluations and foundation recommendations for MSE retaining walls, sheet pile walls and signalization structures. 

Prepared preliminary and final geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for foundation design and construction for the new 

bridges, MSE walls, sheet pile walls and roadways. Geotechnical fees were $380,000 


a. 

b. 


GEOSOL, INC. 





(1) Firm Name 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 








9 


SR 836 Toll Plaza and Roadway Widening, From NW 87 th to 107 th Avenues, Miami- 

Dade County, FL 




April to Nov., 2005 2006-2007 


Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority 

(MDX) 

C/o HNTB Corporation 

(Mr. Jose de Almagro, P.E.) 

(305) 551-8100 


Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer for this project. Responsible for design and implementation of the project’s field exploration and 

laboratory testing programs as well as for the geotechnical engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of toll plaza buildings, 

canopies, sign structures and roadways. Prepared preliminary and final geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for 

foundation design and construction for the structures and roadways. Geotechnical fees were $135,000 


a. 

b. 


GEOSOL, INC. 





(1) Firm Name 

c. 


d. 


e. 


f. 





PERSONNEL 

(From Section E, Block 

12) 

Oracio Riccobono, P.E 

27. ROLE IN THIS 

CONTRACT 


Block 13) 

Sr. Geotech Engineer 


(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completing table. Place “X” 

under project key number for participation in same or similar role.) 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 

X X X X X X X X X 



1 

Areawide and Districtwide Geotechnical Consultant, FDOT 

SR 826 and NW 8 

6 

Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County, 

Districts 4 and 6, from Monroe to Osceola Counties 

FL 

2 

NE 2 nd Avenue Improvements, From NE 20 Th to NE 87 th SW 88 

7 

Street/Kendall Drive On-Ramp to NB SR 874; Miami- 

Streets, City of Miami, FL 

Dade County, FL 

3 

SR-5/Byscayne Blvd. Improvements, From NE 14 th to NE 38 th NW 74 

8 

Street Interchange at the Homestead Extension of 

Streets, Miami-Dade County, FL 

Florida’s Turnpike (HEFT), Miami-Dade County, FL 

4 

SR 836 Extension, From NW 107 th to NW 137 th Avenues, SR 836 Toll Plaza and Roadway Widening, From NW 87 

9 

to 

Miami-Dade County, FL 

107 th Avenues, Miami-Dade County, FL 

5 

SR 826 and NW 36 th Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County, 

FL 

10 

2 7 

3 8 

4 9 

5 10 






31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE 



ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS 


RFQ 2012-10 



2a. FIRM (or branch office) NAME 3. YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. DUNS NUMBER 

GEOSOL, INC. 2000 

2b. STREET 

5. OWNERSHIP 

5795-A NW 151 ST Street a. TYPE 

2c. CITY 2d. STATE 2e. ZIP CODE Corporation 

Miami Lakes FL 33014 b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 

6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE FDOT Certified DBE 

Oracio Riccobono, P.E. 

6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS N/A 

(305) 828-4367 Geosolusa@bellsouth.net 

7. NAME OF FIRM (if block 2a is a branch office) 

8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (if any) 8b. YR. ESTABLISHED 8c. DUNS NUMBER 

N/A 

N/A 

a. Function 

Code 


b. Discipline 

c. No. of employees a. 

(1) 

FIRM 

(2) 

BRANCH 

Profile 

Code 


ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS 

b. Experience 

Administrative 1 27 Geotechnical Services in 2011 6 

Civil Engineers 3 27 Geotechnical Services in 2010 6 

Soils Engineers 2 27 Geotechnical Services in 2009 6 

Engineering Technicians 5 27 Geotechnical Services in 2008 6 

Draftmen 1 27 Geotechnical Services in 2007 5 

Geotechnical Services in 2006 5 






c. Revenue 

Index Number 

(see below) 


Total 12 




(insert revenue index number shown at right) 

a. Federal Work 

B. Non-Federal Work $1,500,000 

c. Total Work $1,500,000 


1. Less than $100,000 

2. $100,000 to less that $250,000 

3. $250,000 to less than $500,000 

4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 

5. $1 million to less than $2 million 







10. $50 million or greater 


5/30/12 


Oracio Riccobono, P.E. 


MANDATORY USE DATE OF FORM 5/1/2004

King Engineering Associates, Inc

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?