King Engineering Associates, Inc
King Engineering Associates, Inc
King Engineering Associates, Inc
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Subject:<br />
RFQ 2012-10<br />
CONTINUING CONTRACTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Due: June 22, 2012 by 2:00 p.m.<br />
Respondent:<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
8390 NW 53 rd Street, Suite 200<br />
Doral, Florida 33166<br />
305-392-9979<br />
Primary Point of Contact:<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Vice President<br />
amaristany@kingengineering.com
1. TITLE AND LOCATON (City and State)<br />
2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE<br />
May 11, 2012<br />
ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS<br />
PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS<br />
A. CONTRACT INFORMATION<br />
City of North Miami Beach, Florida<br />
3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER<br />
RFQ # 2012-10<br />
B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT<br />
4. NAME AND TITLE Agustin Maristany, PE, Vice President, Project Manager<br />
5. NAME OF FIRM<br />
6. TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
305- 392-9979<br />
(Check)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
7. FAX NUMBER<br />
8. E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
305-392-9912<br />
amaristany@kingengineering.com<br />
C. PROPOSED TEAM<br />
(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)<br />
PRIME<br />
J-V<br />
SUBCO<br />
N-<br />
9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
a.<br />
√<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>,<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
8390 NW 53 rd Street<br />
Suite 200<br />
Doral, FL 33166<br />
Project Management, Water<br />
Resources/Drainage, Water/Sewer/Reuse<br />
Utilities, Roadway Drainage Design,<br />
Roadway, Traffic & Transportation<br />
Planning & <strong>Engineering</strong>, Civil Site Planning<br />
& Design, Land Use & Zoning, Ecological,<br />
MEP, Plans Review & Permitting,<br />
Landscape Design, Alternative Funding<br />
Assistance, Construction <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Inspection, Survey/GIS/Mapping, Cost<br />
Estimates/Permitting, Contract<br />
Administration<br />
b.<br />
√<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>,<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
4921 Memorial Highway<br />
Suite 300<br />
Tampa, FL 33634<br />
Technical Support<br />
c..<br />
√<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>,<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
6500 Bowden Road<br />
Suite 290<br />
Jacksonville, FL 32216<br />
Technical Support<br />
d.<br />
√<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>,<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
2930 University Parkway<br />
Sarasota, FL 34243<br />
Technical Support<br />
e. √<br />
Cummins Cederberg, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
22476 SW 94 Place<br />
Miami, FL 33190<br />
Marine Facilities Design<br />
f.<br />
√<br />
Geosol, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
Geotechnical<br />
g.<br />
√<br />
Eastern <strong>Engineering</strong> Group<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
3401 NW 82 nd Avenue,<br />
Suite 370<br />
Doral, FL 33122<br />
Structural <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
h. √<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
23257 State Road 7<br />
Suite 100<br />
Boca Raton, FL 33428<br />
Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
1
D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)<br />
2
12. NAME<br />
Agustin E. Maristany, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Project Management/Water<br />
Resources/Drainage<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Doral, FL<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
Masters of Science, Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, 1979, University of Texas<br />
Bachelor of Science, Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, 1978, University of Puerto Rico<br />
33<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
4<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida No. 33351<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Mr. Maristany has practiced civil engineering for over 25 years in south<br />
Florida, having completed numerous multi-disciplinary public works projects involving planning, modeling, design, construction documents, permitting,<br />
cost estimating, construction management and inspections, program management, construction management-at-risk, plan review, development of<br />
design standards, civil site planning, and land use projects in the fields of drainage, water/wastewater, utilities, and roadway/traffic. His technical<br />
expertise includes site grading, utility infrastructure, drainage, erosion control, BMPs, neighborhood improvements, roadway, MOT, water supply,<br />
construction inspection, shop drawing review, operation manuals, permitting, cost estimating, and public funding and financing.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Lauderdale-By-The-Sea Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements Plan,<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Lauderdale-By-The-Sea, Florida<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
a.<br />
Principal-in-charge for development of the Town’s Sanitary Sewer System Capital Improvement Plan. Activities included closet circuit TV<br />
(CCTV) video review of the sewer system, identification of defects, and repair recommendations; flow meter inspection and evaluation; pump<br />
station inspection and hydraulic analysis; infiltration and inflow (I/I) evaluation including development of wet and dry weather hydrographs, raindependant<br />
I/I estimation, and tidal infiltration estimation; 2035 demand projections; and development of the capital improvements plan. Since<br />
the Town currently pays a nearby utility to take its sewer flows, the projected substantial reduction in metered sewer flows will payback the cost<br />
of repairs within a short period of time.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
S. S. Lake Area Stormwater Modeling and BODR<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
City of Hollywood, Broward County, FL<br />
2011<br />
Pending<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project manager for the evaluation, design, and permitting of flood control improvements for a low-lying coastal area susceptible to flooding<br />
from high tides and rainfall. Developed ICPR model of the 256-acre drainage area, concluded that existing drainage system was severely<br />
b.<br />
undersized, and sized improvements to substantially reduce flooding. Improvements included new outfalls to tide, higher capacity collection<br />
system, an interceptor system, a 30,000 gpm pump station, and backflow prevention devices. Tasks included analysis of sea level rise,<br />
modeling, conceptual design of improvements, permittability, cost estimates, and technical memorandum. Also prepared Basis of Design<br />
Report for the 30,000 gpm pump station including siting study, pump type selection, pump station layout, electrical requirements,<br />
instrumentation and controls, bypass gravity discharge, construction cost estimate, schedule, and identification of permitting requirements<br />
(Broward County, FDEP, USACE), and reporting. Detail design of the system is currently underway.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
South Florida Water Management District S-124 Control Structure<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Design, Broward County, Florida.<br />
2009<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Task manager for the hydraulic and civil design for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure on the L-35A Canal for the South Florida<br />
c. Water Management District (SFWMD) with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. The hydraulic report identified design flows and stages,<br />
established the structure capacity (550-800 cfs), dimensions (triple 6’x 8’ box culverts), invert and crest elevations, and sized a temporary<br />
bypass structure to control flows and water levels during construction. The replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete box culvert<br />
with remotely operated slide gates, a design capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and back-up power supply. Civil design plans and<br />
specifications included site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction sequencing plan, vehicle barrier gate, floating trash<br />
barrier, security fence, warning signs, demolition and erosion/scour control plan, and canal stabilization treatments.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
City of Fort Lauderdale, Prospect Lake Recharge Facility, Fort<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Lauderdale, Florida.<br />
2000<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project manager for planning, design, and limited construction support services for a $650,000 facility connecting SFWMD’s C-14 canal to<br />
Prospect Lake to recharge the city's main wellfield with freshwater that would otherwise be discharged to tide. The facility serves to intercept<br />
d. canal flows for storage in the lake and adjacent aquifer. Services included securing a $300,000 alternative water supply grant from the South<br />
Florida Water Management District. A unique aspect was the reclassification of the Lake from a Class I to a Class III water body, the first such<br />
reclassification in the state of Florida. Managed preparation of a grant application, request for reclassification, and Basis of Design Report<br />
summarizing the conceptual design and hydrologic/hydraulic modeling; surveying and geotechnical analysis; preparation of paving, grading,<br />
and drainage plans & specifications for 2,600 feet of 36" reinforced concrete pipe, an 8-foot-wide gated weir control structure, and a diversion<br />
structure with two vertical lift gates; structural analysis and design of the control and diversion structures; cost estimates; and permitting.<br />
Deliverables included electronic files in AutoCAD format.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
City of Fort Lauderdale, Five-Ash Water Treatment Plant, Fort<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Lauderdale, Florida.<br />
1998<br />
e. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project manager for retrofitting the drainage system in the facility to reduce frequent flooding and accommodate the addition of a 7-milliongallon<br />
storage tank and ASR well pad to the plant site in accordance with regulations. Work effort included modeling (adICPR), design, and<br />
permitting (SFWMD, DNRP, and FDOT).
f.<br />
g.<br />
h.<br />
i.<br />
j.<br />
k.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
District Engineer, Central Broward Water Control District,<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
2007<br />
2007<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Under a consulting contract, served a District Engineer from 1995 through 2007 for a 43.5-square-mile District that includes unincorporated<br />
Broward County, Cooper City, the Seminole Indian Reservation, and the communities of Davie, Hollywood, Sunrise, Pembroke Pines, and<br />
Southwest Ranches. Provided services related to regulation, permitting, infrastructure improvements, and operation and maintenance.<br />
Reviewed plats, paving and drainage plans, and as-built drawings for all development and redevelopment for conformance with design<br />
standards, processing an average of 70 plans annually. Revised the design criteria manual and conducted site inspections. Attended Board<br />
and committee meetings. Managed special projects including development of capital improvements plan and the design, bidding, and<br />
construction oversight of various infrastructure improvements. Assisted with securing a $1M grant from the South Florida Water Management<br />
District for implementation of various BMP’s for water quality improvement.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Broward County Office of Environmental Services, Central County<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Neighborhood Improvement Projects, Broward County, Florida.<br />
2001<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Task manager for the planning and design of a stormwater system to alleviate extensive flooding problems in several old neighborhoods,<br />
where common problems included lack of positive outfalls and poor surface infiltration due to the destruction (filling in) of street side swales. A<br />
stormwater (adICPR) model was applied to assess the severity of existing flooding problems and to size drainage facilities. Because positive<br />
outfalls to waters of the U.S. were required for flood control, best management practices (BMPs) were used for pollution control. Runoff and<br />
lake water quality models were used to assess BMP effectiveness, size controls, and estimate water quality impacts to receiving lakes. The<br />
designed system consisted of re-graded swales, exfiltration trenches, storage and treatment in neighborhood lakes, and overflow into the<br />
primary canal system. A major aspect of the design was the culverting of approximately 5,000 feet of the 35 th Avenue Ditch with dual 8-foot by<br />
8-foot reinforced concrete box culverts, and a large gated concrete control structure and emergency spillway prior to final discharge into the C-<br />
12 canal just upstream of the S-33 salinity control structure.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
JC Bermudez Park Recycled Storm Water Irrigation Project, Doral,<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
FL<br />
2010<br />
2012<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project manager for the modeling, design, permitting (ERP and CUP), construction observation, and development of O&M manual for the fasttrack<br />
implementation of a $2.9M recycled storm water irrigation system for the 80-acre park. Major project components included emergency<br />
lake intake structure, 2 MG above ground concrete storage tank, 3,000 gpm stormwater pump station, 130 micron disk filters with automatic<br />
backwash, gravity sand filter for backwash water, bleach disinfection system, 1,400 gpm irrigation pumps, 8,000 feet of 12” diameter looped<br />
main, irrigation system, and automated controls. A SFWMD conceptual ERP permit modification was approved within 5 weeks of application<br />
submittal. The project was partially funded by a $1M alternative water supply grant from the SFWMD.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SR 694 Improvements, City of Pinellas Park, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2001<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project manager for the design of drainage and road improvements to alleviate severe flooding and congestion along a 0.75-mile stretch of SR<br />
694, a high-traffic hurricane evacuation route. Project deliverables included a basis of design report, modeling, construction drawings, technical<br />
specifications, cost estimate, maintenance of traffic plan, pavement restoration, and permits with SWFWMD, FDOT, and the County. Jointly<br />
funded by Pinellas Park, Pinellas County, and FDOT, the $4.3 million project involved the design of over 10,000 feet of reinforced concrete<br />
pipe ranging from 24 inches in diameter to a 12' x 8' box culvert.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Needs Assessment Program, Miami-Dade Water and Sewer<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Department, Miami, FL<br />
2007<br />
2007<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Principal-in-charge for 40 water and sewer infrastructure projects totaling $60 million and involving the design and construction of 17,815 feet<br />
of pressurized sewer force main ranging from 4-inch to 12-inch diameter; 91,451 feet of 8-inch to 16-inch pressurized water main; 39,000 feet<br />
of 8-inch to 12-inch gravity sewer; and 6 pump stations. Services included master planning, modeling, preliminary design, design standard<br />
development, design management, utility conflict coordination, permitting assistance, cost estimating, scheduling, public information, bid<br />
packaging, and construction management. Target areas included Brownfields Program, Federal Designated Empowerment Zones, Infill<br />
Housing Initiatives, Office of Community and Economic Development Program as well as undersized water mains, low-pressure areas, and<br />
inadequate fire protection. Projects were identified in close coordination with stakeholders and County Commissioners.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Miami-Dade County DERM, FEMA DORM Drainage Design, Miami,<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Florida.<br />
2003<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project manager for the design of drainage improvements to alleviate flooding and water quality problems in flood prone neighborhoods<br />
throughout Miami-Dade County. Managed preparation of 57 design packages, covering about 2 square miles, and with a construction value of<br />
$4 million. Designs included catch basins, exfiltration trenches, pavement restoration, maintenance of traffic plans, hydraulic calculations, cost<br />
estimates, and utility conflict coordination.
12. NAME<br />
Thomas M. O’Connor, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Principal-In-Charge<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
28<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
22<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida, No. 39593<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Organizations: Water Pollution Control Federation, American Society of Civil Engineers<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Southwest Water Treatment Plant<br />
Pasco County, FL<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2004<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2005<br />
Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC Officer for the design and permitting for Pasco County's new Southwest WTP. This project included 7,000<br />
lf of raw water collector mains, 2.0 mgd chloramines disinfection treatment facility, 4.0 mg finished water storage tank, and 3.75 mgd high<br />
service pumping station. The tank was constructed underground in order to appease concerns in a mostly residential neighborhood. The<br />
project included site work, yard piping, security systems, and a 2,700 sf building housing the pumping station, chemical storage and feed<br />
systems, standby power generator, and electrical and I&C systems.<br />
Cost: $5.6 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Lehigh Acres Master Pump Station Upgrade<br />
Lee County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC Officer for the development of flow projections, hydraulic modeling, planning, design, permitting and<br />
construction for the upgrade and replacement of a 4 mgd triplex master wastewater pump station in Lee County.<br />
Cost: $600,000<br />
c.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Palm River Restoration<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
TBD<br />
Principal-in-Charge overseeing the Palm River Restoration Project, a SWFWMD - SWIM project cooperatively funded by the Florida<br />
Department of Transportation. The Palm River Restoration Project is a multi-faceted restoration project design covering a 28 square mile,<br />
highly urbanized watershed in the City of Tampa and Hillsborough County. Services include the preparation of a Feasibility Study,<br />
preliminary and final design plans and the permitting of multiple stormwater retrofit and wetland/shoreline habitat restoration projects within<br />
the Palm River/McKay Bay Basin. Project components includes 2D hydrodynamic modeling, data collection, land survey, pollutant<br />
loading/treatment efficiency, dredging, spoil disposal and bank stabilization assessments within the C-135/Palm River. Cost: $2 million<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
U.S. 301 & Balm Riverview Rd Intersection Improvements, PD&E<br />
Study and Final Roadway Design Plans,<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC for the PD&E Study to evaluate alternative roadway alignments on Balm Riverview Road considering<br />
critical factors such as long-range planning, safety, cost, environmental impacts, property impacts, and other related factors. The report<br />
documented the need for the project and presented the procedure used to develop and evaluate four (4) alignment alternatives. Cost<br />
$1.5 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
State Road 54 Water, Reuse and Force Main Project<br />
Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2005<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
Project Manager and and QA/QC for the relocation of approximately 1.2 miles of 24-inch water, 12-inch reuse, and 8-inch force main<br />
along SR 54. This project was required to avoid conflicts with a FDOT road-widening project. Cost: $1.4 million
12. NAME<br />
Franklin Torrealba, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities /<br />
Construction Management<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
24<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Doral, FL<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
3<br />
MBA/1991/Business Administration<br />
2000/Professional Engineer Florida #56385<br />
B.S./1986/Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Memberships<br />
American Society of Civil Engineers<br />
Water Environment Federation<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Lauderdale-By-The-Sea Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements Plan,<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Lauderdale-By-The-Sea, Florida<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager for development of the Town’s Sanitary Sewer System Capital Improvement Plan. The sanitary sewer collection<br />
a.<br />
system consists of two separate wastewater collection basins with approximately 10.5 miles of gravity pipes, 165 manholes and two<br />
pump stations with their respective force mains. Activities included closet circuit TV (CCTV) video review of the sewer system,<br />
identification of defects, and repair recommendations; flow meter inspection and evaluation; pump station inspection and hydraulic<br />
analysis; infiltration and inflow (I/I) evaluation including development of wet and dry weather hydrographs, rain-dependant I/I estimation,<br />
and tidal infiltration estimation; 2035 demand projections; and development of the capital improvements plan. Since the Town currently<br />
pays a nearby utility to take its sewer flows, the projected substantial reduction in metered sewer flows will pay back the cost of repairs<br />
within a short period of time.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Preliminary Basis of Design Report and Pump Station Siting Study, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
2010<br />
<strong>King</strong> prepared a Basis of Design Report and Pump Station Siting Study for the South S. Lake Drainage Basin, a low-lying urban coastal<br />
b. basin susceptible to flooding. Responsibilities included: evaluation of pump station types; pump station general arrangement layout<br />
drawings and site plan; meetings with Broward County, USACE, and FDEP to identify permitting requirements; pump station siting<br />
evaluation; opinion of probable cost for the drainage improvements and pump station; and project implementation schedule. Final<br />
report recommended pump station consisted of two 30,000 gpm axial submersible pumps with a gated gravity bypass to allow gravity<br />
flows and reduce fuel consumption during low to normal tides. The submersible pumps minimize noise and visual obstruction in this<br />
coastal residential community. Electrical, telemetry, and control panels can be camouflaged by landscaping.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Miami‐Dade Water and Sewer Department, Cleaning and Televising PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable<br />
c.<br />
of Small Diameter Sewers in Various Locations, Miami, Florida<br />
2011<br />
Construction management, field inspection, evaluation and recommendations for different locations anywhere within the limits of Miami-<br />
Dade County, Florida. The sanitary sewer collection system consists of approximately 205 miles of gravity pipes, 5,200 manholes, and<br />
54 pump stations.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
MDWASD Pump Station <strong>Engineering</strong> Reports (6) and Pump Station<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
d. Project Manager for the Basis of Design Report Assistance for six pump station engineering reports and the associated force main<br />
system that included field inspections, pump station evaluation, hydraulic analysis, cost analysis, alternatives analysis, and pump<br />
upgrade recommendations. The project involved the analysis of several alternatives in order to best serve the sewer system during<br />
2030 projected flows and pressures. Pump stations were inspected for wet well condition, dry pit condition, pump sizing, mechanical<br />
and electrical requirements, and overall siting.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Pump Station 49 Siting<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Evaluation, Miami, Florida<br />
2010<br />
e. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager for the siting analysis for the relocation of pump station 49, which presently has maintenance issues due to the depth<br />
of the wet well. Mr. Pisani was involved in utility coordination including the collection of all pertinent data and in the preparation of<br />
alternatives maps in ArcGIS.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) - 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Water main Interconnect in the Central East Area (Downtown<br />
Miami) Preliminary Alternative Water main Route Analysis<br />
2010<br />
N/A<br />
f. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of<br />
the proposed force main, determine its size (48-<strong>Inc</strong>h) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of<br />
constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a<br />
preliminary project schedule for 7,300 feet of 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h Water main in the Miami Downtown area.
g.<br />
h.<br />
i.<br />
j.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) - CL-1 Pump<br />
Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain Connection Preliminary Alternative Pipe<br />
Route Analysis (60-<strong>Inc</strong>h Forcemain), Miami Florida<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Services provide included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of<br />
the proposed force main, determine its size (60-<strong>Inc</strong>h) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of<br />
constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a<br />
preliminary project schedule for 5,700 feet of 60-<strong>Inc</strong>h Forcemain near the Miami Downtown area.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Construction Management and Inspection Services for the<br />
“Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to<br />
the MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System within the City of Miami<br />
Springs, Florida”<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The project involves construction management and inspection of a Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES) for a portion of the Miami-<br />
Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) wastewater collection system within the City of Miami Springs, Florida”. The sanitary<br />
sewer collection system consists of approximately 46 miles of gravity pipes, 912 manholes, and 17 separate wastewater collection<br />
basins within the City of Miami Springs, Florida.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Wastewater Pump<br />
Station Improvement Program, Miami, Florida<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2000<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Deputy Program Manager and assistant chief engineer of the program management team that managed a $1.0 billion wastewater<br />
system improvement program, with detailed management responsibility for the $240 million pump station improvement program. The<br />
program was created to achieve regulatory compliance by correcting a series of wastewater overflows to surface water. Provided<br />
program monitoring and reporting on a regular basis on the progress of more than 1,700 separate deliverables. The program included<br />
the upgrade of its pump stations and force mains, a reduction of the infiltration, exfiltration, and inflow in the collection system and an<br />
increase in the capacity of its wastewater treatment plants to minimize the occurrence of sanitary sewer overflows.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Government Cut Tunnel<br />
Design-Build Criteria Package, Miami, Florida<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager for the development of the design criteria package for the replacement of the 54-inch sanitary sewage force main from<br />
Miami Beach to Virginia Key and replacement of a 20-inch water main between Port Island and Fisher Island. Managed the data<br />
collection, engineering (geotechnical, survey, utility coordination, alternative analysis, tunnel design, and construction methodology),<br />
land acquisition, stake holder coordination, permitting, and public involvement programs associated with over 8000 linear feet of sub<br />
aqueous crossings, with five shaft locations impacting four islands.
12. NAME<br />
John R. Seals, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Roadway & Transportation<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
26<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
9<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida, No. 51505<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Highland Avenue Reconstruction and Stormwater Retrofit Largo,<br />
FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Project Manager for the preparation of a PD & E / conceptual design alternatives report and final design plans to reconstruct<br />
1.5 miles of an existing 2-lane rural facility. The project included converting the existing facility to an urban, pedestrianfriendly,<br />
roadway with streetscape and hardscape elements, including the design of a multi-use path and incorporating LID<br />
stormwater elements. Services include survey and right-of way mapping, SWFWMD grant funding application, public<br />
involvement, and County Joint Project Agreement. Additionally, the stormwater retrofit portion of the project included<br />
diverting 250 acres of untreated stormwater runoff into an expanded pond area to provide water quality treatment. Cost: $5.2<br />
million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection Improvements PD&E<br />
Study and Final Roadway Design Plans<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
TBD<br />
Project Manager/Engineer of Record for the preparation of a PD&E study and design plans for intersection improvements.<br />
The Study was done to evaluate alternative roadway geometry improvements considering safety, vehicle capacity,<br />
environmental and right-of-way impacts, and cost. The design plans included additional lane geometry, survey, right-of-way<br />
mapping, stormwater management facilities, wetland and flood plain design, traffic signalization, land acquisition assistance<br />
and environmental permitting. Cost: $1.5 million<br />
c.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Skycrest Neighborhood Traffic Calming<br />
Clearwater, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
2009<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager responsible for the design of neighborhood traffic calming, which included the preparation of design plans,<br />
presentation at commission and public information meetings, landscape and irrigation plans, contract specifications, traffic<br />
control plans and provided bidding services for the construction of four modern roundabouts, five mini circles, speed tables,<br />
continuous medians, drainage improvements, and various other traffic calming improvements. Cost: $2.1 million<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
f.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Hanley Road and Waters Avenue Intersection<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
Project Manager for the design and permitting of major intersection improvements located within a dense commercial area.<br />
Responsibilities included preparing a traffic study, development of traffic control plans, roadway design plans, traffic<br />
signalization plans, environmental permitting, and conducting public information meetings. Cost: $1.1 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
SR 56 Extension, from CR 581 to East Wiregrass Ranch<br />
Roadway and Drainage Improvements, Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
Program and Quality Control Manager responsible for roadway and drainage design, traffic design, lighting design, and<br />
permitting of this 2.1-mile urban 4-lane divided (future 6-lane) arterial highway. $48 Mil<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SR 54/CR 54 Roadway Improvements, Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
This project included the preparation of design plans to widen 2.1 miles of CR 54 (from Magnolia Boulevard to SR 581) from a 2-lane road to<br />
a 4-lane divided facility with accommodations for a future 6-lane divide urban typical section. Services included topographic survey, right-ofway<br />
survey and mapping, master drainage study and stormwater design, wetland mitigation design and environmental permitting, traffic<br />
design, and roadway lighting design. The initial project scope included the design of approximately 1.5 miles of Old Pasco Road widening<br />
and the extension of Dayflower Boulevard. However, these segments were removed from the final design. Estimated construction cost is<br />
$15.3 million.
g.<br />
h.<br />
i.<br />
j.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miscellaneous <strong>Engineering</strong> Services, Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2005<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Program Manager responsible for providing miscellaneous transportation engineering services to Hillsborough County for<br />
multiple years. These services have ranged from preliminary engineering studies and stormwater analysis to complete<br />
roadway construction plans. Services are provided through individual task orders directed through County Project Managers.<br />
Cost: $3.2 million.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Columbus Drive Extension, Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2006<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager for the preparation of the Preliminary <strong>Engineering</strong> Study, the 30% design plans, and the Design-Build RFQ<br />
package to construct a new 4-lane divide urban roadway. The project included the identification of pond sites for flood plain<br />
and wetland impacts, USACOE permitting, and preparation of a Design-Build contract for advertisement and bidding. Cost:<br />
$9.3 million.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Waters Avenue & Benjamin Road Intersection, Hillsborough<br />
County, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2004<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Engineer responsible for the traffic operational analysis and design relative to the development of the PD&E study<br />
and the Intersection Improvement Plans. Cost: $530,000.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
State Road 56 from SR 581 to Meadow Pointe Boulevard Pasco<br />
County, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
Ongoing<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager for the design and environmental permitting of 3.5 miles of new four-lane/six-lane divided rural roadway as<br />
part of the Wiregrass Development in Pasco County. Responsibilities included roadway design, stormwater facilities design,<br />
wetland mitigation, traffic signalization plans, maintenance of traffic and environmental permitting.<br />
Cost: $26 million
12. NAME<br />
Michael E. Ross, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Civil Site <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
25<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida, No. 47112<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
25<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
McKinley Student Housing<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
Principal-in-Charge providing engineering design, permitting and construction administration for a 287 unit, 947 bed multistory<br />
and cottage university housing apartment complex with a ±8,500 sf clubhouse and maintenance facility including<br />
roadway, utility infrastructure, stormwater system, construction documents and permitting. Cost: $6 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Pinellas County Housing Authority (PCHA) Proposal<br />
Redevelopment Project, Largo, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
b.<br />
<strong>King</strong> is providing civil engineering design, permitting, landscape design and survey services for the development of a<br />
PCHA’s Senior Living Facility. The redevelopment is to include demolition of existing building and parking area and<br />
replaced with multifamily style senior living facility with amenities, surface parking, and an additional 20,000 sf PCHA<br />
office. Cost: TBD<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
USF Sports Venue Projects (Basketball, Baseball, Softball<br />
& Football), Tampa, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
c.<br />
Principal-in-Charge responsible for providing civil engineering design and permitting services through the R.R. Simmons<br />
design-build team for the University of South Florida athletic facility improvement projects. The project includes multiple<br />
sport venues ranging from construction of a basketball practice facility adjacent to the Sun Dome to a new baseball &<br />
softball complex, as well as improvements to the football practice fields and general purpose student recreation fields.<br />
While the design for each venue is being prepared separately, the projects are being permitted concurrently to minimize<br />
impact to the respective sports and event schedules. Cost: $30 million<br />
d.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Wesley Chapel Medical Center<br />
Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
Principal in-Charge for the civil engineering services for a multi-phased healthcare property. Current scope provides for<br />
planning, site design, ecological and surveying services for 162,500 sf / 3-level hospital with future vertical expansion<br />
capability of three additional floors totaling 380,000 sf. <strong>King</strong> is also providing similar services for one of the two 100,000 sf<br />
medical office buildings to be built concurrent with the first phase of the hospital. Cost: $151 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
FBI Field Office<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2005<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2006<br />
e.<br />
Principal-in-Charge for this 4-story/ 138,500 sf office facility with a detached 382-space parking garage located in the<br />
Westshore Business District. Cost: $20 million
12. NAME<br />
William B. Moriarty, PE, BCEE<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
BSCE, Marquette University, 1974<br />
MBA, University of Houston, 1985<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Alternative Funding<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Austin, TX<br />
38<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida 64528<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
5<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Mr. Moriarty has worked in the fields of environmental and civil engineering since 1974. He has successfully managed offices for consulting<br />
engineering firms as well as large program management assignments.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
JC Bermudez Park Recycled Stormwater Irrigation<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The City of Doral retained <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> to provide modeling, design, permitting (ERP and CUP), and construction<br />
support services for the fast-track implementation of a $2.9 M recycled stormwater irrigation system for the 80-acre park.<br />
– Principal-In-Charge<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Hamilton Jersey Outfall Drainage Improvements, Jacksonville, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Est. 2012<br />
2009<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> performed all survey, ecological, water resources and civil engineering services for this 170 acre<br />
drainage project to relieve flooding within an existing subdivision – Principal-In-Charge<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
f.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD Pump Station <strong>Engineering</strong> Reports (6) and Pump Station<br />
717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation, Miami, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2012<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was awarded this continuing services contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable Distribution Work<br />
Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way,<br />
identify the points of connection of the proposed force mains, pump stations preliminary engineering, determine its sizes<br />
and determine the best route for the proposed force mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable<br />
cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule.<br />
Principal-in-Charge<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD 48" Water Main Interconnect in the Central East Area<br />
Route Analysis, Miami, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2014<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of Downtown Miami needs to be completed<br />
from the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th Street and south to an existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main<br />
along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. This project involved performing a preliminary alternative<br />
water main route analysis in order to interconnect the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h on NW 6 Street. Principal-In-Charge<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Coastal Water System Interconnect, Northwest Florida<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Water Management District – 5 county area, north Florida.<br />
On-going<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was retained by the Northwest Florida Water Management District to evaluate the feasibility of<br />
implementing water system interconnects with the objective of increasing water supply reliability in coastal communities<br />
in the event of water shortages, natural disasters, or system failures. The study area included selected coastal utilities in<br />
Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
South Florida Water Management District S-124 Control Structure<br />
Design, Broward County, Florida<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Hydraulic and civil design for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure on the L-35A Canal for the South Florida<br />
Water Management District (SFWMD) with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. The hydraulic report identified<br />
design flows and stages, established the structure capacity (550-800 cfs), dimensions (triple 6’x 8’ box culverts), invert<br />
and crest elevations, and sized a temporary bypass structure to control flows and water levels during construction. The<br />
replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete box culvert with remotely operated slide gates, a design<br />
capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and back-up power supply. Civil design plans and specifications included<br />
site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction sequencing plan, vehicle barrier gate, floating trash barrier,<br />
security fence, warning signs, demolition and erosion/scour control plan, and canal stabilization treatments. Principal-In-<br />
Charge
12. NAME<br />
William B. Moriarty, PE, BCEE<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
BSCE, Marquette University, 1974<br />
MBA, University of Houston, 1985<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Alternative Funding<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Austin, TX<br />
38<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida 64528<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
5<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Mr. Moriarty has worked in the fields of environmental and civil engineering since 1974. He has successfully managed offices for consulting<br />
engineering firms as well as large program management assignments.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
JC Bermudez Park Recycled Stormwater Irrigation<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The City of Doral retained <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> to provide modeling, design, permitting (ERP and CUP), and construction<br />
support services for the fast-track implementation of a $2.9 M recycled stormwater irrigation system for the 80-acre park.<br />
– Principal-In-Charge<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Hamilton Jersey Outfall Drainage Improvements, Jacksonville, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Est. 2012<br />
2009<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> performed all survey, ecological, water resources and civil engineering services for this 170 acre<br />
drainage project to relieve flooding within an existing subdivision – Principal-In-Charge<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
f.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD Pump Station <strong>Engineering</strong> Reports (6) and Pump Station<br />
717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation, Miami, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2012<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was awarded this continuing services contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable Distribution Work<br />
Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way,<br />
identify the points of connection of the proposed force mains, pump stations preliminary engineering, determine its sizes<br />
and determine the best route for the proposed force mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable<br />
cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule.<br />
Principal-in-Charge<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD 48" Water Main Interconnect in the Central East Area<br />
Route Analysis, Miami, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2014<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of Downtown Miami needs to be completed<br />
from the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th Street and south to an existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main<br />
along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. This project involved performing a preliminary alternative<br />
water main route analysis in order to interconnect the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h on NW 6 Street. Principal-In-Charge<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Coastal Water System Interconnect, Northwest Florida<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Water Management District – 5 county area, north Florida.<br />
On-going<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was retained by the Northwest Florida Water Management District to evaluate the feasibility of<br />
implementing water system interconnects with the objective of increasing water supply reliability in coastal communities<br />
in the event of water shortages, natural disasters, or system failures. The study area included selected coastal utilities in<br />
Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
South Florida Water Management District S-124 Control Structure<br />
Design, Broward County, Florida<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Hydraulic and civil design for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure on the L-35A Canal for the South Florida<br />
Water Management District (SFWMD) with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. The hydraulic report identified<br />
design flows and stages, established the structure capacity (550-800 cfs), dimensions (triple 6’x 8’ box culverts), invert<br />
and crest elevations, and sized a temporary bypass structure to control flows and water levels during construction. The<br />
replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete box culvert with remotely operated slide gates, a design<br />
capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and back-up power supply. Civil design plans and specifications included<br />
site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction sequencing plan, vehicle barrier gate, floating trash barrier,<br />
security fence, warning signs, demolition and erosion/scour control plan, and canal stabilization treatments. Principal-In-<br />
Charge
12. NAME<br />
Christopher F. Kuzler, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Polytechnic Institute of New York, 1985<br />
M.S., Business Administration<br />
Adelphi University, New York, 1989<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
22<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida #45532<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
His project experience includes wastewater master planning, design through construction of water and wastewater treatment facilities, pump<br />
station facility analysis and design, water and reclaimed water distribution systems, and design, analysis, estimating, permitting, and<br />
construction for all types of utility projects.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) -<br />
48-<strong>Inc</strong>h Water main Interconnect in the Central East<br />
Area (Downtown Miami) Preliminary Alternative Water<br />
main Route Analysis<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
16<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the<br />
proposed force main, determine its size (48-<strong>Inc</strong>h) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare<br />
an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 7,300<br />
feet of 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h Water main in the Miami Downtown area.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
f.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) -<br />
CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain Connection<br />
Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis (60-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
Forcemain), Miami Florida<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Services provide included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the<br />
proposed force main, determine its size (60-<strong>Inc</strong>h) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare<br />
an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 5,700<br />
feet of 60-<strong>Inc</strong>h Forcemain near the Miami Downtown area.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Preliminary Basis of Design Report and Pump Station<br />
Siting Study, Hollywood, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Engineer retained by the City of Hollywood to prepare a preliminary Basis of Design Report and Pump Station Siting Study for the South<br />
South Lake Drainage Basin, a low-lying urban coastal basin susceptible to flooding due to combination of high tides, low ground elevations, and<br />
intense rain storms. This project was part of <strong>King</strong>’s Continuing <strong>Engineering</strong> Contract with the City of Hollywood.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Coastal Water System Interconnect, Northwest Florida<br />
Water Management District – 5 county area, north<br />
Florida.<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
On-going<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was retained by the Northwest Florida Water Management District to evaluate the feasibility of implementing water system<br />
interconnects with the objective of increasing water supply reliability in coastal communities in the event of water shortages, natural disasters, or<br />
system failures. The study area included selected coastal utilities in Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Dunedin WWTP Permitting<br />
Dunedin, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager for the renewal of Dunedin’s Domestic Wastewater Permit with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP).<br />
Specific tasks included review and evaluation of existing Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs), circular flow charts, ground water monitoring<br />
reports, quarterly sludge analyses, ambient monitoring data, and other miscellaneous data; preparation and submittal of the required FDEP forms;<br />
preparation of a Capacity Analysis Report and Operation & Maintenance Performance Report; site visits and evaluation of six (6) sludge disposal<br />
sites; responding to FDEP’s questions and other services necessary to obtain the permit renewal. Also provided similar services as part of the<br />
City’s permit renewal in 2002.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Utilities Miscellaneous <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Pinellas County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
On-going<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager providing professional engineering s services for miscellaneous projects related to upgrade, rehabilitation, expansion or<br />
replacement of various water, solid waste, and wastewater facilities. Services provided: Preliminary and final design services, permitting, reports,<br />
studies, modeling, bid services including preparation, negotiations, and evaluations, construction management including observation and<br />
inspection, operation and maintenance, start-up, equipment testing, quality assurance/quality control and surveying services were also provided.
12. NAME<br />
Benjamin C. Turnage, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
Bachelor of Science, Physics, 2000<br />
Furman University<br />
Bachelor of Science, Biological <strong>Engineering</strong>, 2001<br />
University of Georgia<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
American Physical Society (APS)<br />
Water Environment Federation (WEF)<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
SR 56 Extension, from CR 581 to East Wiregrass Ranch<br />
Pasco County, FL<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
8<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida, No. 64055<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Ongoing<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
7<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
Preparation of design plans to construct 3.4 miles of a 6-lane and 4-lane (with accommodations for a future 6-lane) divided urban/rural,<br />
principal arterial through the Wiregrass Ranch property, located in Pasco County.<br />
Role: Utility Engineer<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Ulmerton Road Utility Adjustments 5 projects<br />
City of Largo, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Est. 2014<br />
Provided permitting assistance; preliminary and final design plans and technical specifications; and limited construction services. In total,<br />
the five projects – two constructed to date – include approx. 10,000 LF of 4-inch-8-inch force main, 3,800 LF of 8-inch-12-inch reclaimed<br />
main, and 8,000 LF of 8-inch-12-inch gravity sewer. Role: Project Engineer<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Pinellas County Utilities - Various Projects<br />
Pinellas County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
Retained to complete municipal projects for Pinellas County. Project services include design, implementation and construction services for<br />
various South Cross Bayou and William A. Dunn Treatment Plant projects.<br />
Role: Project Engineer<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Lake Avenue Pump Station and Force Main<br />
Largo, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
f.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager. Each collection system modeling alternatives included various pipeline construction methods, which were evaluated<br />
based on costs and impacts to traffic and residences. Pump station upgrades included mechanical and electrical elements required to<br />
replace the two existing 60-HP constant-speed pumps with 110-HP VFD-driven pumps.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
William E. Dunn WRF Miscellaneous Process Control<br />
Improvements<br />
Pinellas County, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Engineer of Record and Project Manager for the design and construction services for process control improvements at Pinellas County’s<br />
William E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility (WED WRF) in Palm Harbour, FL. The project includes the detailed design and construction<br />
services for a new fully integrated dry polymer make-up system to replace the existing outdated equipment at the plant’s sludge thickening<br />
facility. The project also includes the installation of two ChemScan continuous wastewater analyzers to monitor nitrogen and phosphorous<br />
throughout the process trains and six (6) sludge blanket level analyzers to monitor sludge level in the existing clarifiers. All components<br />
are designed to be implemented into the plant’s SCADA network, in a step towards automated process control. Cost: $1.07 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Redington Beach Pump Stations 76, 77, and 78 Upgrade<br />
Pinellas County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2007<br />
Project Engineer for the design, cost analysis, permitting, and construction observation of three pump stations in the Town of Redington<br />
Beach. The existing pump stations were a part of an aging system that deteriorated over time, experiencing problems with odor and I&I.<br />
Pump Station 76 was a 6'-diameter wetwell to be refurbished in place, posing difficulties in design due to its location immediately adjacent<br />
to the Town Hall building. Pump Station 77 was an existing 6'-diameter station to be relocated due to its location in a heavily traveled<br />
intersection, and Pump Station 78 was upgraded from a duplex to a triplex.
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
12. NAME<br />
Thomas A. Traina, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Mechanical/Instrumentation & Controls<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
33<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
11<br />
16. EDUATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Florida Professional Engineer No. 42871<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Central Pasco Water and Wastewater Systems<br />
Improvements, Pasco County, FL<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Engineer of Record for the hydraulic modeling, design, permitting, and construction management of water and wastewater<br />
transmission and distribution mains in central Pasco County. Project included 145,900 lf of 16-, 24- and 36-inch potable water<br />
mains and force mains, and a potable water booster pump station. The booster station included the design and permitting of<br />
a 5 MG ground storage tank, re-chlorination system, and 5 mgd high service pump station. As part of this project planning an<br />
interim model of the water system was developed in order to size a temporary booster pump station required to maintain<br />
system pressures in the northern part of the project service area. Cost: $27.9 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Stormwater Pump Station<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Est. 2013<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Engineer of Record for the design and permitting of a stormwater pump station for the City of Hollywood, Florida. Project<br />
included an initial sizing and siting study for a 30,000 GPM station needed to reduce flooding along the Intracoastal<br />
Waterway. The design includes a submersible duplex station with influent solids separation system; axial flow pumps, surface<br />
water discharge; power, control and telemetry systems; and, sitework and landscaping for this $3.1 million pump station.<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> services include design, permitting, bidding, and construction management assistance. Cost: TBD<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Phase 2 Regional Interconnect, Peace River Manasota<br />
Regional Water Supply Authority<br />
Manatee /Sarasota / Charlotte Counties and<br />
City of North Port, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Est. 2012<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Lead Engineer responsible for the preparation of a basis of design report and for the design and permitting of this 7-mile long,<br />
42-inch transmission main that included options for steel and ductile iron pipe, cathodic protection, three meter stations, 5<br />
interconnections with existing transmission mains, line valves, air valves and blow-offs. <strong>Engineering</strong> services included<br />
property acquisition, nine environmental and right of-use permits, contractor pre-qualification and cost estimating. Bidding<br />
services and construction management assistance are also being provided. Cost: $11 million.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Stormwater Reuse Irrigation System<br />
Doral FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Engineer of Record for the study, design, permitting and construction of a stormwater reuse irrigation system serving the City<br />
of Doral’s 80-acre J.C. Bermudez Park. The system includes a 3,000 GPM stormwater pond intake and pumping system with<br />
provisions to connect to a future stormwater collection system; a pressure filtration and waste washwater sand filter system; 2<br />
MG ground storage tank; 1,500 gpm at 125 psi irrigation pumping station; 7,100 lf of 12-inch irrigation piping; and, a 10-acre<br />
irrigation system with smart controllers. The project is currently under construction at a cost of $2.9 million.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Kenneth City Sewer System Rehabilitation<br />
Pinellas County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2002<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2007<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager for this 2-phase project The first phase included the design, permitting, bidding, and construction<br />
management services for the rehabilitation of approximately 25,000 lf of residential sanitary sewer pipe. Rehabilitation was<br />
accomplished by the cured-in-place (Insituform) method. Cost: $1.6M Upon completion of the sewer line rehabilitation phase,<br />
performed infiltration and inflow study and then completed the design, permitting, bidding, and construction services related to<br />
the replacement of the pump station serving the sewage collection system along with a new 6-inch force main. Cost: $0.4<br />
million. Total Cost $2 million.
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
E. RESUMES (Complete OF KEY PERSONNEL one Section E PROPOSED for each key FOR person.) THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.) (Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
12. NAME<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
Loc P. Truong, P.E.<br />
Design / Permitting<br />
10<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B. S. Chemical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
MEMBERSHIP - American Water Works Association<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
South Cross Bayou Water Reclamation Facility<br />
Chemscan System<br />
Pinellas County, FL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
6<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida, No. 65709<br />
Drinking Water Treatment Plant Operator Class C Florida,<br />
No. 0014398<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Est. 2012<br />
a.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Senior Project Engineer providing final drawing and specification review and development of the upgrade and installation of<br />
Chemscan automatic sampling and analysis systems at various location within the facility’s process train and their<br />
integration into the Plant SCADA system. Cost: $1.1 million<br />
b.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Reuse System Metering & Controls, Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
Project Engineer for the design and implementation of improvements to the County’s existing SCADA system.<br />
Improvements provide for remote operation and control of master reuse system. This project included PLC’s for control of<br />
high service pump stations and communication between wastewater treatment facilities via a virtual private network (VPN).<br />
Cost: $3.1 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Northeast Advanced Pollution Control Facility<br />
Chemical Feed Lines Replacement<br />
Clearwater, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
c.<br />
Project Manager for the design and construction of three dual wall chemical feed pipes from the plant's chemical feed<br />
pumps in the chemical building to the chlorine contact chamber. The project included replacement of existing chemical feed<br />
piping for sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite with new dual wall high density polyethylene (HDPE) piping/valving. The<br />
project also included a below grade enclosure, sump, equipment, and alarm controls for detection of a leak in the chemical<br />
feed piping system. Cost: $43,000<br />
d.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Shady Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion<br />
Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
Project Engineer for the instrumentation and controls systems for a wastewater treatment plant expansion from 2 to 14<br />
mgd. This project included a headworks structure, mixing/anoxic/aeration basins, clarifiers, filters, chlorine contact chamber,<br />
reject pond, pump stations, septage and grease receiving station, electrical, instrumentation, and plantwide SCADA<br />
controls. Designed plantwide SCADA System with eight (8) Industrial Touchscreen PC’s located around the facility for realtime<br />
monitoring and control. Cost: $67 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
South Cross Bayou Water Reclamation Facility Sludge<br />
Thickening Improvements Project, Pinellas County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Senior Project Engineer providing instrumentation and SCADA system design for improvement to the sludge holding,<br />
thickening, and receiving process and odor control systems at Pinellas County’s 330 mgd South Cross Bayou Water<br />
Reclamation Facility . Specific responsibilities included PID and specification development, equipment selection and overall<br />
controls and electrical panel coordination. Cost: $7.7 million
12. NAME<br />
Lara Bartholomew, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
Bachelor of Science, Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> 1995<br />
Purdue University<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Cost Estimates / Permitting<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
13<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer – Florida #61035<br />
8<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
South Florida Water Management Water District S-124<br />
Water Control Structure, Broward County, FL<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Support Engineer for the hydraulic and civil design for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure for the<br />
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M. The<br />
replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete box culvert with remotely operated slide gates, a<br />
design capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and back-up power supply. Civil design plans and<br />
specifications included site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction sequencing plan, vehicle<br />
barrier gate, floating trash barrier, security fence, warning signs, demolition and erosion/scour control plan,<br />
and canal stabilization treatments.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD Pump Station <strong>Engineering</strong> Reports (6) and<br />
Pump Station 717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation,<br />
Miami, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was awarded this continuing services contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable<br />
Distribution Work Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing<br />
or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force mains, pump stations<br />
preliminary engineering, determine its sizes and determine the best route for the proposed force mains in<br />
terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of<br />
required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule. Role: <strong>Engineering</strong>, Modeling.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD 48" Water Main Interconnect in the Central<br />
East Area Route Analysis, Miami, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of Downtown Miami needs to be<br />
completed from the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th Street and south to an existing<br />
36-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. This project involved<br />
performing a preliminary alternative water main route analysis in order to interconnect the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h on NW 6 Street. Role: <strong>Engineering</strong>, Modeling<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD - CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain<br />
Connection Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route<br />
Analysis, Miami, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2015<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
This project involved performing a preliminary alternative pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to<br />
an existing 42-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main which discharges at a manhole at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and the<br />
existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main in the same vicinity. Role: Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, Modeling<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Peck Sink Preserve Water Control Structure<br />
Hernando County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
2009<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
This 111 acre County-owned site is dominated by karst features, including the Peck Sink complex, and<br />
receives mostly untreated storm water runoff from nearly 8,000 acres of urban and rural land uses in this<br />
closed drainage basin. Project objectives include storm water quality mitigation and volume management<br />
from both basin-wide and site-specific perspectives, development of a public park site for passive recreational<br />
uses, and restoration and management of native plant communities. <strong>King</strong> services include development of a<br />
master plan inclusive of park elements, stormwater infrastructure, design, permitting and construction bidding<br />
assistance. Role: <strong>Engineering</strong> Modeling
12. NAME<br />
Kyle D. Smith, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Roadway Drainage Design<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
6<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida, No. 71509<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
5<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Hammock Park Natural Systems Restoration (Phase 2)<br />
Dunedin, FL<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
Drainage Engineer responsible for data collection and analysis of 3 years of hydrological data to determine the<br />
effectiveness of the environmental improvement design for Hammock Park. The project involved the construction of a<br />
channel control structure (dam) and two overflow weir structures to divert flow from an existing man-made channel to<br />
rehydrate an adjacent wetland system as well as provide bank stabilization to surrounding residential areas that border the<br />
existing channel. Cost: $1.1 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Palatlakaha River Watershed Study<br />
Lake County Water Authority<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Est. 2012<br />
Engineer involved in the development of a watershed model and dam structure removal/replacement evaluations for the<br />
Palatlakaha River Restoration Project in Lake County. The overall contributing area of the Palatlakaha River watershed is<br />
over 200 square miles with the river exceeding flows of 1000 cfs during the flood flow “gates open” condition. For this<br />
project, the drainage study area was limited to the 50 square mile drainage basin from Cherry Lake to the outfall at Lake<br />
Harris. In order to quantify the upstream contributing area, flood frequency analyses were performed using USGS flow<br />
data at gage stations along the river to quantify the flood frequency inflows. This project involves evaluation of existing<br />
manually operated radial gate dam structures along the river, preparation of final design plans for the structure modification<br />
and permitting with the goal of removing the manual operations of the radial gates. Other activities included permit<br />
research, analysis of existing rainfall and flow data, analysis of existing drainage basin data and statistical analysis of<br />
historic flow data. Cost: $500,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Granger Drive Neighborhood Drainage Improvements<br />
Pinellas County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Engineer involved in the preliminary engineering phase of this drainage improvement project located in Clearwater, FL.<br />
Activities include permit research and analysis of existing data. Fee: $34,500<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MacDill AFB Restoration Phase 3<br />
SWFWMD SWIM<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2012<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
TBD<br />
Engineer responsible for assisting in the design of a proposed diversion of stormwater from an existing tidal channel<br />
system through a cascading pond system to increase systems salinity and provide water quality treatment for MacDill Air<br />
Force Base. Activities include existing permit research, analysis of existing basin data, development of the hydrologic and<br />
hydraulic stormwater models, design of the main channel diversion structure as well as several other conveyance<br />
elements. Design phase is nearing completion. Cost: TBD<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
River Tower Restoration and Stormwater Retrofit<br />
SWFWMD SWIM / FDOT<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
Engineer responsible for the design of a stormwater retrofit project located adjacent to the Hillsborough River. Proposed<br />
design included a diversion of low flows from an existing 78-inch storm sewer trunk line along I275into a proposed<br />
stormwater treatment pond. Duties included permit research, basin pollutant loading and removal calculations, basin data<br />
collection and verification, sub-basin delineation, development of an existing and proposed drainage model of a 700 acre<br />
highly urbanized watershed, development of construction plans and preparation of quantity take-offs and construction cost<br />
estimate. Cost: $2.1 million
12. NAME<br />
Jennifer Harkleroad, PE<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Roadway & Drainage Design<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Jacksonville, FL<br />
10<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
3<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
Bachelor of Science, Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
University of Maryland<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer – Florida #65963<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
d.<br />
b.<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Hamilton Jersey Drainage Improvements,<br />
Jacksonville, Florida.<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2013<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Engineer for a 170 acre drainage project to relieve flooding within an existing subdivision. Prepared<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> Report to evaluate design alternatives, including a large diameter gravity bypass main, local<br />
neighborhood improvements, and water quality improvements. Performed constructability review including<br />
utility relocation evaluation. Prepared cost estimates and recommended sequence of construction to address<br />
funding limitations.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miramar Tributary Improvements,<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2006<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The scope of the project was to replace the culverts crossing Emerson Street and Hendricks Avenue. <strong>King</strong><br />
reviewed the past design plans and the project limits to verify resource information determining the extent of<br />
current drainage system conditions.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Inwood Terrace Drainage Improvements,<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2006<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Inwood Terrace is located in the Southside of Jacksonville. The project limits are from Dunsford Terrace in the<br />
north, the FEC Railroad to the east, Emerson Street to the south and St. Augustine Road to the west. With<br />
the project budget in mind, <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> performed roadside drainage improvements to Inwood Terrace,<br />
Felch Avenue, <strong>King</strong>swood Road, Geneve Street and Drew Street to provide maximum results in efforts to<br />
alleviate drainage problems in the area by capturing the water and preventing it from ponding in the roadways<br />
during average rainfall events.<br />
e.<br />
c<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Colonial Drive Pavement Rehabilitation,<br />
Clay County, Florida.<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
As the site-civil engineer, responsible for field reviews of the existing asphalt roadway and collect existing data<br />
to perform a pavement evaluation to determine the cause(s) of the current roadway distress, determine<br />
corrective measures and prepare engineering design plans for bidding. The project included approximately<br />
1,000-linear feet along Colonial Drive from Pebble Beach Road to just west of Belfry Court and the design of<br />
an underdrain system to avoid existing utility conflicts.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Chipola College Campus Improvements,<br />
Marianna, FL.<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
2009<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Completed the design and permitting of the reconstruction and widening of River Forest Road to provide left<br />
and right turn lanes for the new Prough Drive access road to the campus. These improvements were<br />
coordinated with the hydraulic analysis and modeling for campus drainage improvements completed and<br />
permitted.
12. NAME<br />
Sandra L. Gorman, P.E., PTOE<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
M.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
B.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Traffic & Transportation Planning &<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong><br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
13<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
6<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida, No. 59530<br />
Professional Traffic Operations <strong>Engineering</strong>, No. 1545<br />
a.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection Improvements<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
TBD<br />
Evaluated various geometric alternatives for the intersection as part of a Preliminary Design and <strong>Engineering</strong> (PD&E)<br />
Study for Hillsborough County. Recommended alternative geometry based on Level of Service (LOS), Delay, Queues, and<br />
constraining right-of-way. The analysis assisted the County in reaching a decision based on the above factors for the<br />
various proposed alternatives that were considered. Cost: $1.5 million<br />
b.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Highland Ave. Roundabout Evaluation<br />
Pinellas County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Prepared analysis to evaluate the potential construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Highland Avenue and<br />
Rosary Ave in Pinellas County Florida. The analysis included the evaluation of am, pm and Sunday conditions using<br />
SIDRA software to compare operations under roundabout, signalized and unsignalized conditions. The location of a<br />
nearby church required that pedestrian and weekend activities also be considered in the analysis. Fee: $3,500<br />
c.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Lenna Avenue at Wheeler Road<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Prepared a detailed traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Lenna Avenue and Wheeler Road in Hillsborough<br />
County. Traffic data was collected and the study was performed to meet the criteria outlined in the Manual of Uniform<br />
Traffic Control Devices. The analysis included projecting volumes for year 2015 and 2019 and evaluating the intersection<br />
for a signal. Fee: $19,800<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
SR 56 Mansfield Signal Warrant, Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Ongoing<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
Prepared a detailed traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of SR 56 and Mansfield Boulevard in Pasco County.<br />
SR 56 is a new 6-lane state highway currently under construction in southeast Pasco County. The warrant analysis was<br />
performed to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted at the T-intersection upon opening of the new highway.<br />
Traffic volumes were projected using the FSUTMS model and other local data and the study was performed to meet the<br />
criteria outlined in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Fee: $15,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
School Safety, Circulation and Access Program-S.S.C.A.P.<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Ongoing<br />
Performed traffic signal warrant analysis as part of preliminary engineering services and evaluation studies of nineteen (19)<br />
Hillsborough County schools to determine best solutions for improving right and left turning movements in the am and pm<br />
peak hours. <strong>King</strong> is also providing preliminary design, permitting research, schematic construction plans, signalized<br />
intersection planning analysis preparation and Design-Build RFQ administration. Cost: $5.6 million
12. NAME<br />
Rajesh Chindalur, PE<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
Bachelor of Science, Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, 1994<br />
Bangalore University<br />
Masters of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, 2003<br />
University of Texas at Arlington<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Traffic & Transportation<br />
Planning & <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
a. TOTAL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Jacksonville, FL<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
17<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
8<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer – Texas 99303<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
MOT Traffic Analysis, State and Union Street PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Phase 2, Duval County, FL<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Performed traffic analysis to determine the closing of two lanes on State and Union Streets between Clay Street and Liberty<br />
Street to expedite completion of construction of the street-scaping improvements on both streets would cause traffic on Union<br />
Street to back up onto I-95 and recommend a detour plan that would alleviate traffic congestion on State and Union Streets.<br />
Used Synchro/SimTraffic 6 to prepare capacity analysis and prepare a simulation of the corridors to project the back ups due to<br />
lane closure and determined how much traffic must be diverted during the AM and PM peak hours to prevent the back ups onto<br />
I-95 and the Mathews Bridge Expressway.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Downtown Jacksonville Pedestrian Mobility<br />
and Safety Enhancement Study, Duval<br />
County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Engineer for the pilot study showed that enhancing pedestrian mobility and safety could be achieved by not adversely<br />
reducing automobile mobility of Downtown Patrons. As such, the City of Jacksonville authorized an expanded study to identify<br />
strategies for enhancing pedestrian mobility and safety along Adams Street, Monroe Street, Pearl Street and Julia Street. The<br />
study also included the portions of Clay Street and Monroe Street to be closed due to the construction of the new County<br />
courthouse. The study included changing these existing one-way streets to two-way streets, recommendations to exclusive<br />
turn lanes, on-street parking, signalization and access to surface parking lots within the existing width of road. Several traffic<br />
calming strategies that could be implemented were identified to enhance pedestrian walkability.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
San Marco Riverwalk Traffic Impact Study, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Duval County, FL<br />
2006<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Engineer to analyze the traffic impacts of the project. Estimated the impact of this project on the Downtown Roadway<br />
network and intersections. This proposed project was the first to face the parameters outlined in the Downtown TCEA<br />
ordinance. As such, <strong>King</strong> and the JEDC worked extensively to quantify the benefits of the various TCEA strategies to the<br />
impacted roadway network.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
JTA Interchange Study, Duval County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Transportation Planner/Engineer responsible for assisting in the analysis and results of the Phase II and Phase III Better<br />
Jacksonville Plan (BJP) Interchange Component Evaluation study for the Jacksonville Transportation Authority. The study was<br />
to evaluate four corridors in southeast Duval County to determine the best combination of improvements at selected study<br />
intersections on the corridors to reduce congestion and delay in the PM peak design hour (K 30) for the horizon year 2025<br />
traffic. Used Synchro 6/SimTraffic in the analysis to estimate delay and network speed.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Corridor Study – SR 200 (A1A), Nassau<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
County, FL<br />
2006<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Engineer responsible for the traffic study of the SR 200 (A1A) corridor to assess existing traffic conditions, estimate<br />
future traffic conditions and make recommendations for interim and long-term transportation improvements. Evaluated the<br />
effect of six proposed roadway projects in eastern Nassau County on SR 200 (A1A) for the year 2015 and year 2025 traffic<br />
conditions. The evaluation included the determination of the best combinations of proposed roadway projects that provided the<br />
most relief to SR 200 (A1A) in terms of congestion, delay and safety. Developed a benefit cost index for each of the project<br />
combinations and prioritized the projects.
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
12. NAME<br />
O. Denise Greer, P.E., LEED AP 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Civil Site Planning & Design<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
24<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional Engineer Florida, No. 47679<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
7<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Fleet Services Bldg<br />
Manatee County, FL<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
Project Manager for site development, design and permitting for a 20,000 sq ft design-build 12 bay fleet service facility on<br />
a 4.84 AC site with support offices, break room, records library, mezzanine, virgin fluids distribution to each bay,<br />
containment of recovered fluids. Scope also provided exterior landscaping and irrigation, retention pond, parking areas<br />
storm water piping, and utilities. Cost $2.27 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Janie Poe Neighborhood Redevelopment<br />
City of Sarasota, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
Principal-in-Charge / Project Manager for ±13.4 redevelopment project for the Sarasota Housing Authority. Project<br />
consisted of inquiry, design, permitting and construction management. Design included paving, grading water and<br />
wastewater, retrofit, stormwater design, FEMA map amendment. Property Management Building was LEED certified.<br />
Cost: $11.5 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Rothenbach Park Pavilion<br />
Sarasota County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
2007<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Principal-In-Charge / Project Manager for coordination of permitting, utility extensions, surveying and construction<br />
management including bidding and contract negotiation services for the pavilion and playground site. <strong>King</strong> worked with<br />
Sarasota County’s project manager to insure that the pavilion and playground complemented the other park amenities,<br />
which were designed by others under a separate contract with Sarasota County. The playground areas have the latest in<br />
safe playground equipment and a soft mulch surface so kids can run and jump with reduced risk of injury. The pavilion<br />
offers restrooms, kitchen facilities with a roll up door for serving counter, a grill with warming oven, a fireplace, a<br />
maintenance room and two exterior gathering areas. Cost: $250,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Sleeping Turtles Preserve North<br />
Sarasota County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
On Hold<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
Principal-In-Charge / Project Manager for providing preliminary drainage design for park layout and refinement of design.<br />
Preliminary design of the 92 acre site which is part of the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Protection Program and the<br />
Myakka River Protection Zone included ADA trails, an observation deck, vehicle/horse trailer parking, kayak launch, fishing<br />
pier, observation tower, pavilions, playground, amphitheater, vegetative restoration areas. Due to the location and<br />
environmentally sensitive nature of the site, all improvements were to be sensitive to the local ecology. Final design of the<br />
project included improved roadway design, pervious parking lot, boulder climbing playground, ADA trails, custom pavilion,<br />
composting restrooms, potable well design, stormwater treatment system and a floodplain compensation area.<br />
Cost: $360,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Manatee County BDS – Pelletizer Plant<br />
Manatee County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
Principal-in-Charge / Engineer of Record for land use permitting and drainage design of new biosolids pelletizing plant at<br />
Manatee County’s Southeast Water Reclamation Facility. Cost: $14 million
12. NAME<br />
Misty M. Servia, AICP<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Land Use and Zoning<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Sarasota, FL<br />
23<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
5<br />
Page 48<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
B. S., Geography<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Memberships<br />
Manatee Habitat for Humanity Board of Directors<br />
Florida Planning and Zoning State Board of Directors<br />
Governmental Affairs Committee for the Gulf Coast Builders Exchange<br />
Manatee County Planning Task Force<br />
Awards<br />
“Meritorious Service Award” for participation in developing the 1990 Manatee County<br />
Land Development Code for Manatee County<br />
APA “Award of Merit” for being part of a three-person team that developed the<br />
“Manatee County Youth Planning Commission”<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Parrish Lakes DRI, Plan Amendment, Rezone, & General<br />
Dev Plan, Manatee County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Ongoing<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Part of the team that created an ADA, Plan Amendment, and Rezone for a 1,150 acre, master planned, mixed-use project,<br />
including a town-center. The DRI contains 3,300 residential units, 400,000 square feet of commercial, and 50,000 square<br />
feet of office space. This project was recently filed with the Tampa Regional Planning Council & Manatee County.<br />
b.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Harborview DRI and Plan Amendments,<br />
Charlotte County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Ongoing<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Part of a team that was selected by the Developer in the middle of the project to carry the effort forward to approval. The<br />
efforts are ongoing and include responding to Sufficiency Comments for the addition of a 139-acre parcel to the existing<br />
Harborview DRI and filing two new Comprehensive Plan Amendments to support the project.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Little Cypress Plan Amendment & Rezone,<br />
Hardee County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Filed and received approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment in Hardee County to change the Future Land Use from<br />
AGR to RCN to allow for a mixed-use project. Efforts included negotiations with the City of Zolfo Springs to provide a<br />
future source potable water to the project and greater area. Ms. Servia also received approval of a rezone for Phase I of<br />
the project.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Habitat for Humanity, Manatee County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2007<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Worked with Manatee County to receive approval of a Rezone and Preliminary Site Plan for a planned development<br />
project that included 18 single family attached affordable housing project. This effort also included negotiating an off-site<br />
roadway improvement and working to secure a CDBG grant.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Parrish Centre, Parrish, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Won approval of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment that revised the Future Land Use from UF-3 to MU to<br />
accommodate a 750-acre employment center for the Parrish community. Efforts included a 2-day design charette with a<br />
nationally recognized architect, development of an Urban Sprawl Analysis and Population Needs Analysis to support the<br />
amendment, and negotiations with the State of Florida that lead to an approval of the amendment.
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
12. NAME<br />
Lawrence F. Kistler<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Drainage (Erosion and Sediment Control /<br />
Site Grading & Stormwater Runoff<br />
Modeling & Design)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
37<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
19<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
Ulster County Community College- Advanced Computer Training Institute<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND<br />
DISCIPLINE)<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State<br />
Wiregrass Ranch, Pasco County, FL<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
Ongoing<br />
Est. 2020<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Operation Manager for various development projects for the Wiregrass Ranch. Completed Wiregrass project to consist of<br />
include 14,000 residential units, 2.2 million square feet of office, 100 bed hospital (60% near completion), 120 room hotel, a<br />
community college and 3.2 million square feet of commercial with multi-faceted development team. Project includes five<br />
school sites, mixed-use town center, regional retail centers and employment centers, a National Tennis Center. Recently<br />
completed- The Shops at Wiregrass for which he served as Operation Manager, Land Development for a 735,000 sf Life Style<br />
Center on 75.3 acres in Pasco County. Scope included boundary, tree and topographic survey, preliminary phase services,<br />
construction drawings for paving, grading, drainage, water and sewer infrastructure improvements, permitting and construction<br />
administration services for the design of this regional mall. Also serving as District Engineer for the Wiregrass Community<br />
Development District. Cost: TBD<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State<br />
Marine Science Research Center at USF, St. Pete Campus, St.<br />
Petersburg, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2004<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2004<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager in charge of preparing the pans and specifications for the paving, grading, drainage, water and sewer systems<br />
for this 4.8 acre project. Worked with the architect to develop conceptual and final plans for this extremely tight marine science<br />
center site. Prepared plans for the relocation of utilities, which remained in service during construction, including water, sewer,<br />
gas, steam and telephone. Land surveying, traffic maintenance, environmental permitting and construction management<br />
services were also provided Cost: $24 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Criminal Court Facility, Pinellas County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
1998-99<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2000<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Provided design, permitting, and surveying for the site engineering of this $60 million judicial complex at 49th Street. Managed<br />
the preparation of engineering, public utility, and environmental permitting/resource issues in the preparation of a Florida<br />
Quality Development Application for Development Approval. Also designed a water reuse distribution system and access to<br />
remote parking areas. <strong>King</strong> assisted in the coordination of two bridges over a canal between the two parking lots. During<br />
construction, <strong>King</strong> provided NPDES permitting and monitoring services, which consisted of evaluating stormwater runoff to<br />
ensure there was no degradation of water quality due to construction activity.<br />
Cost: $60 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Liberty Middle School/ Freedom High School aka Middle School<br />
JJ and High School JJJ, Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2003<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2003<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager for civil engineering and boundary survey for the park, environmental audit, and environmental permitting,<br />
which included an EPC, ACOE, and SWFWMD permits, and gopher tortoise study for a 148-acre campus for two new schools<br />
and a new city park (Tampa Community Park) for the Hillsborough County School Board. Liberty Middle School<br />
accommodates 1,537 students. Freedom High School sits on approximately 55 acres and serves 2,485 students and 229,000<br />
sf, The 40-acre Tampa community park was designed for the City of Tampa and included parking for 250, a 15,000 sf<br />
recreation building, a Park Maintenance Operations building and various shelter pavilions and restroom facilities. Cost: $40.25<br />
million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Heritage Pines, Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2008<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Operations Manager, Land Development for this retirement community of 1,445 units on 650 acres in Pasco County. Services<br />
included preparation of Notice of Proposed Change to DRI and MPUD for Pasco County; preparation of engineering, master<br />
plans for master drainage, sanitary sewer, water distribution system and reuse system; and environmental permitting. This<br />
project also included plan production for Villages, as well as an 18-hole championship golf course. Cost: Est. $30 million
12. NAME<br />
Alberto Pisani, EI<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
M.S. Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, Florida International<br />
University, 2011<br />
B.S. Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Florida International University,<br />
2008<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> Analysis / Cost Estimate /<br />
Reports / Permitting / Construction<br />
Documents / Specifications<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Doral, FL<br />
3<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
1<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Engineer Intern Florida No. 1100012190<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Mr. Pisani has three years of experience in the fields of civil and environmental engineering. His technical experience includes SFWMD<br />
water use permitting for commercial developments; environmental permitting for rock quarries in South Florida; writing technical reports;<br />
water main and sanitary sewer design, permitting, and submittal of plans for review to City and County regulating agencies; and drainage<br />
calculations (exfiltration trench, drainage well, and detention/retention pond) to meet SFWMD flood criteria. Mr. Pisani is proficient in<br />
AutoCAD/Autodesk, ArcGIS, ICPR, HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS, and Access database.<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD Miami Springs Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey<br />
(SSES), Miami Springs, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2015<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
This project involved performing a preliminary alternative pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to<br />
an existing 42-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main which discharges at a manhole at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and<br />
the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main in the same vicinity.<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD 48" Water Main Interconnect in the Central East<br />
Area Route Analysis, Miami, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2014<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of Downtown Miami needs to be<br />
completed from the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th Street and south to an<br />
existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court. This project involved<br />
performing a preliminary alternative water main route analysis in order to interconnect the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h on NW 6 Street. <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD Miami Springs Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey,<br />
Miami Springs, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The project involves construction management and inspection of a Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey<br />
(SSES) for a portion of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) wastewater collection<br />
system within the City of Miami Springs, Florida. The sanitary sewer collection system consists of<br />
approximately 46 miles of gravity pipes, 912 manholes, and 17 separate wastewater collection basins<br />
within the City of Miami Springs, Florida. <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD Pump Station <strong>Engineering</strong> Reports (6) and Pump<br />
Station 717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation, Miami, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was awarded this continuing services contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable<br />
Distribution Work Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify<br />
existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force mains, pump<br />
stations preliminary engineering, determine its sizes and determine the best route for the proposed force<br />
mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine<br />
a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule. <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
City of Florida City Roadway Improvement, Florida City,<br />
Florida<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2008<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The project involved the resurfacing of NW 3 rd Avenue in the City of Florida City from Lucy Street to Davis<br />
Parkway. Prepared paving, grading, and drainage plans to bring up to City and County code the roadway<br />
being resurfaced, including sidewalks and intersections.
12. NAME<br />
Peter J. Bottone<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.A., Biology<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Ecological Services<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
28<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Certifications:<br />
Certified USACE Wetland Delineator<br />
Basic Prescribed Fire Training-Certificate No. 932325<br />
PADI Certified<br />
Memberships:<br />
Florida Native Plant Society<br />
Trout Unlimited<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Robinson Preserve Habitat Restoration, Manatee County, FL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
5<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager and lead ecologist responsible for development of a conceptual restoration plan and construction design for the 487-acre<br />
Robinson Preserve. This regionally significant Manatee County project was co-funded by the SBNEP, FDEP, SWIM and USFWS and will<br />
be the largest of its kind under the SBNEP. The project will result in the creation of 104.5 acres of estuarine and palustrine wetlands, 55<br />
acres of upland and estuarine habitat enhancements and will incorporate various passive recreational features including a 2.5-mile kayak<br />
trail (blueway) system, fishing pier, numerous boardwalks, observation platforms and over 5 miles of hiking and multi-use pedestrian<br />
trails. Cost: $100,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Coral Creek Ecosystem Restoration, SWFWMD<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Ongoing<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manger responsible for development of a conceptual habitat restoration master plan and the construction design/ implementation<br />
of two habitat restoration projects on the 2,600-acre Coral Creek Property within the FDEP’s Charlotte Harbor Aquatic State Buffer<br />
Preserve for the SWFWMD SWIM program. Activities include habitat assessments, hydrological analysis, protected species evaluations,<br />
ecosystem restoration design, multi-agency coordination and permitting. Critical project elements include analysis of hydrological and<br />
salinity effects related to the potential removal of dam structure on the West Branch of Coral Creek and diversion of flows leaving the<br />
Rotonda West development to restore historic site hydrology.<br />
Cost: $300,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
I-75 from Golden Gate Pkwy to Bonita Beach Road Final<br />
Design<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Collier and Lee Counties, Florida. Project Manager responsible for overseeing wetland jurisdictional determinations, protected species,<br />
wetland impact and UMAM/WRAP assessments, agency coordination, mitigation, and permitting for 10 miles of interstate improvements<br />
associated with FDOT’S Mobility 2000 Improvements. Project entailed updating various FHWA/NEPA documentation including the 2002<br />
Endangered Species Biological Assessment and Pond Siting Report, and required additional coordination with the USFWS/FWC<br />
regarding potential impacts to several protected species such as the Florida panther, wood stork, eastern indigo snake, and the redcockaded<br />
woodpecker. Cost: $120,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Alligator Creek Restoration, Charlotte County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2001<br />
2000<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Ecologist responsible for development of a master conceptual restoration plan and construction design of two restoration projects<br />
on the FDEP-owned and managed 1,600-acre Alligator Creek Addition Parcel for the Charlotte Harbor SWIM Program and FDEPs<br />
Charlotte Harbor State Preserve Park. Activities include habitat assessments, wetland delineations, protected species evaluations,<br />
restoration design integrated with the existing trail system and FDEP management strategies, multi-agency coordination and permitting.<br />
The resulting Conceptual Restoration Plan was used by SWIM/FDEP as a basis for subsequent planning, budgeting and implementation<br />
of numerous habitat restoration projects in two additional Phases (2 &3). Cost: $140,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
I-4 Widening, Polk County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2000<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2007<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Environmental Project Manager responsible for providing environmental permitting assistance for a 5.8-mile Multi-Modal I-4 Widening<br />
project through the Green Swamp. Activities included wetland jurisdictional determinations, threatened/endangered species<br />
assessments, wildlife corridor siting analysis, planning and crossing design, pond siting analysis, mitigation design, agency coordination<br />
and permit application preparation. Served on the Multi-Agency I-4 Corridor Advisory Committee representing FDOT in providing<br />
coordination with various stakeholders including FDEP, SWFMWD, SJRWMD, FWC and Polk County for long-range facility planning.<br />
Cost: $128,000
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
12. NAME<br />
Michael D. Palmer<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Biology<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Ecological Services<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
25<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
23<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Memberships: Gopher-Tortoise Council<br />
Certifications: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Scientific Collecting Permit No. WV00464, FWC Gopher Tortoise Agent Permit<br />
No. GTA-09-00026<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Odessa Northeast Segment Reclaimed Water Transmission Main,<br />
Odessa, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
On Hold<br />
Performed wetland delineations and prepared permit applications for approximately 20 miles of 20 and 24-inch<br />
reclaimed water transmission main, including roughly 48 wetlands and two river crossings. Cost: $3.5 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Phase 2 Regional Interconnect, Peace River Manasota Regional<br />
Water Supply Authority<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Ongoing<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
Ecological Services Coordinator for the permitting of the project. Completed and filed FDEP ERP Individual<br />
permits for the 42-inch regional transmission main and also for the replacement of existing culverts.<br />
Completed gopher tortoise burrow field survey and filed a gopher tortoise temporary exclusion permit for the<br />
project. Cost: $17 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Bridge Replacement Wetland Mitigation Area Creation, Tampa<br />
Bay and Coastal Basin, Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2001<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2003<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Field Ecologist involved with the wetland delineation and permitting associated with the 15 mile pipeline<br />
corridor interconnecting the desalination facility at the Big Bend Power Plant and the water treatment facility<br />
north of State Highway 60. This project required approvals from Florida Department of Environmental<br />
Protection, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County<br />
and involved the subaqueous crossing of the Alafia River and Little Bullfrog Creek along with numerous<br />
wetland and surface water areas. Cost $112 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
North-Central Pasco Reclaimed Water Main, Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
Ecological Services Task Manager responsible for coordinating listed species assessments, gopher tortoise<br />
survey and permitting, wetland delineation and environmental resource permitting for this 22 mile proposed<br />
pipeline installation project. Conducted alternative routing and feasibility analysis. Cost: Est. $21 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa Bay Desalination Facility Project, Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2001<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2003<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Provided professional consulting services to the Hillsborough County Public Works Department, which<br />
included coordination, conceptual design, and base data collection for the identification of potential bridge<br />
wetland mitigation areas within the specific SWFWMD ERP Drainage Basin known as the Tampa Bay and<br />
Coastal Basin. Also provided coordination of any associated acquisition of identified bridge wetland mitigation<br />
area, design of the bridge wetland mitigation area, assistance in the permitting of the bridges' wetland<br />
mitigation, and coordination of the mitigation area construction. This project resulted in the construction of two<br />
mitigation sites within the Tampa Bay and Coastal Basin. Cost: $112 million
12. NAME<br />
Joshua Logan, P.E.<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Construction <strong>Engineering</strong> Inspection<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, University of Florida, 2000<br />
M.S., <strong>Engineering</strong>, University of Florida, 2002<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Memberships<br />
American Society of Civil Engineers<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
10<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Professional <strong>Engineering</strong> License FL#67467<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Master Pump Station B Refurbishments, Temple Terrace, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
4<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
ongoing<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Engineer and Construction Field Representative providing construction oversight assistance for the<br />
demolition of an existing wet pit/dry pit wastewater pump station, the construction of a new submersible<br />
pump station and the installation of approximately 1,460 LF of 16-inch force main including a 755 LF<br />
directional drill under the Hillsborough River. Cost: $1 million.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Largo Lift Station 23 & 40, Largo, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Engineer and Construction Field Representative providing design input and resolution to all RFI's<br />
throughout the construction process. Services provided the complete refurbishment of two existing pump<br />
stations. Action items included the demolition and replacement of all valves, pumps, wire racks, wetwell<br />
liner, valve vaults, top slabs, hatches, float switches, antennas and control panels. Cost: $200,000.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Lake Avenue Pump Station and Force Main, Largo, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
est 2011 - force main<br />
only<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Provide survey, hydraulic analysis, design, bidding, and construction observation services for the installation<br />
of approximately 9,200 lf of 10-inch and 24-inch force main through commercial and residential areas. Role:<br />
Project Engineer responsible for design and permitting of a pump station upgrade and ±9,200 LF of 10 and<br />
24-inch force main through a congested residential area. Role: Construction <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Ulmerton Road Utility Relocation, Largo, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
Project Engineer overseeing utility relocation on approximately 6,000 linear feet of 4-inch and 8-inch force<br />
main as well as 1500 feet of gravity sewer main with associated manhole relocation and construction. Duties<br />
included attendance at weekly progress coordination meetings, coordination with and between FDOT and<br />
the Utility owners, field oversight of the contractor. The project consisted of the widening and resurfacing of<br />
approximately 3.8 miles of 4 lane roadway (SR-688) in Largo, FL. The widening included two new lanes and<br />
resurfacing of all existing pavement within the project limits. Cost: $1.2 million.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
North Central Pasco Reclaimed Main & Force Main<br />
Pasco County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Route study, planning and design and permitting of approximately 7.5 miles of 36" potable water main, 36"<br />
reclaimed water main, and 8.5 miles of 12" and 16" force main serving the north-central area of Pasco<br />
County. Role: Construction <strong>Engineering</strong>
12. NAME<br />
Hamley Pacheco, EI<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Construction Management / Observation,<br />
Inspection / Shop Drawing Review<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Doral, FL<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
2<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
2<br />
Bachelor of Science, Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, 2009<br />
Engineer Intern # 1100013845<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Experience in Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES), construction management, inspections, design, and administration. Construction<br />
engineering inspections experience includes daily site inspections, shop drawing review, testing and certification of materials, and payment<br />
requests review. Proficient in AutoCAD, GIS, and Microsoft Office.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD Miami Springs Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES)<br />
Miami Springs, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The project involves construction management and inspection of a Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES) for a<br />
portion of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) wastewater collection system within the City of<br />
Miami Springs, Florida. The sanitary sewer collection system consists of approximately 46 miles of gravity pipes, 925<br />
manholes, and 17 separate wastewater collection basins within the City of Miami Springs, Florida.<br />
Construction Management / Inspection / Evaluation / Repair Recommendations /Smoke Testing.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
JC Bermudez Park Recycled Stormwater Irrigation<br />
Doral, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Major project components included emergency lake intake structure, propeller meter (2), 2 MG above ground storage<br />
tank, 3,000 gpm stormwater pump station, 130 micron disk filters with automatic backwash, bleach disinfection system,<br />
1,400 gpm irrigation pumps, 7,000 feet of 12-inch diameter main, irrigation system, and automated controls. The project<br />
was partially funded by a $1M AWS grant from the SFWMD.<br />
Construction Management / Inspection.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD Pump Station <strong>Engineering</strong> Reports (6) and Pump Station<br />
717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
BODR Assistance for six pump station engineering reports and the associated force main system that included field<br />
inspections, pump station evaluation, hydraulic analysis, cost analysis, alternatives analysis, and pump upgrade<br />
recommendations. The project involved the analysis of several alternatives in order to best serve the sewer system<br />
during 2030 projected flows and pressures. Pump stations were inspected for wet well condition, dry pit condition, pump<br />
sizing, mechanical and electrical requirements, and overall siting.<br />
Cost Estimate / Utility Coordination<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD 48-inch Water Main Interconnect in the Central East Area<br />
Route Analysis<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
The project involved a 48-inch water main route analysis required to interconnect the Hialeah/Preston service area in the<br />
north with the Alexander Orr service area in the south with a 48-inch water transmission main. The project spanned 1.5<br />
miles along the selected route in roads with heavy traffic and congested utilities.<br />
Cost Estimate / Utility Coordination.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD - CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 60-inch Forcemain<br />
Connection Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
This project involved performing a preliminary alternative pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to an existing<br />
42-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main which discharges at a manhole at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h force<br />
main in the same vicinity.<br />
Cost Estimate / Utility Coordination.
12. NAME<br />
Scott D. Sheridan, RLA<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
B.S., Environmental Planning and Design<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Neighborhood Beautification,<br />
Presentation Materials<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
16<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
Registered Landscape Architect, State of Florida, No. LA0001662<br />
8<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
Memberships<br />
American Planning Association<br />
American Society of Landscape Architects<br />
International Society of Arborist<br />
a.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State<br />
Florida VANC Columbaria at the Florida National Cemetery Expansion - 5000<br />
Crypt Expansion, Sumter County, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x] Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Provided landscape architectural design services for the expansion of the existing Florida National Cemetery located in Bushnell, Florida.<br />
This design/build project consisted of approximately 5,000 double crypts, 1,000 columbaria units, and 2,700 in ground cremation plots. The<br />
scope of work for this $4,000,000 project required conceptual planning, civil engineering, geotechnical, landscape architecture, irrigation,<br />
structural, and surveying services from <strong>King</strong>. Cost: $4,000,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State<br />
Koll - Intellicenter – Tampa, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2008<br />
b.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
[x] Check if project performed with current firm<br />
This LEED project involved a class-A office development of 370,000+ SF on 30 m.o.l. in the master planned office park of Telecom Park in<br />
Temple Terrace, Florida. Telecom Park is a 340+ acre park on the east side of the Hillsborough River between the University of South Florida<br />
and I-75 on Fletcher Avenue. The office site consists of one 4-story and on 3-story office building with at-grade parking among native tree<br />
canopy. The master landscaping was planned to compliment the park’s atmosphere of a natural setting by maintaining as much tree canopy<br />
as possible within the development. The project received USGBC Silver Certification. Estimated Construction Cost: $20 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
University of South Florida, Interdisciplinary Research Building, Tampa, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2003<br />
2005<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x] Check if project performed with current firm<br />
c.<br />
Provided project oversight for the landscape and hardscape designs for new $22 million research facilities on campus. <strong>King</strong> provided<br />
landscape and hardscape architecture for the newly constructed research and office facilities in University of South Florida's Research<br />
Corporate Park. Responsible for the landscape architecture design treatments needed to incorporate into the design styles of both buildings,<br />
as well as provide a pedestrian experience that compliments both of the entries into the building. The design also provided for the utilization<br />
of many existing grand oaks and the use of native Florida plants, which allowed for effective xeriscaping principles. Cost: $22 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Skycrest Traffic Calming, Clearwater, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2005<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2008<br />
d.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x] Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Neighborhood traffic calming project included the preparation of design plans, landscape and irrigation plans, contract specifications, and<br />
provide bidding services for the construction of 6 modern roundabouts, 5 mini circles, continuous medians, drainage improvements, and<br />
various other traffic calming improvements. Provide landscape design for Skycrest neighborhood traffic calming. <strong>Inc</strong>ludes six roundabouts,<br />
stormwater design, traffic study, roadway design, specifications, and limited construction administration services. Cost: $1.6 million<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
South Glen Avenue/Burlingame Avenue Reconstruction<br />
Temple Terrace, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2005<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable)<br />
2006<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x] Check if project performed with current firm<br />
This project included the preparation of design plans to reconstruct 2.2 miles of 2-lane, local, urban roadways. Services included topography<br />
survey, jurisdictional wetland survey, traffic design, master drainage study and stormwater design, environmental permitting, Hillsbrorough<br />
County Health Department permitting, roadway design, maintenance of traffic, signing and marking plans, and potable water plans, the use of<br />
two CDS units for stormwater pollution control and close coordination with the Temple Terrace Country Club.
12. NAME<br />
Clark C. Lohmiller<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Landscape Design, GIS/Mapping<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Tampa, FL<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
7<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
7<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
BS Landscape Architecture, 2006<br />
University of Florida<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Temple Terrace Downtown Redevelopment<br />
Temple Terrace, FL<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Rezoning and detailed landscape and irrigation design services for a 30 acre mixed use redevelopment project as part of<br />
the first phase of the City’s CRA plan. In addition, 3D graphics and conceptual renderings were provided and were<br />
included in the presentation to City Council. Fee: $24,000<br />
b.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Largo Towne Center<br />
Largo, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
Largo Towne Center, a redevelopment of the old Crossroad Mall on US 19, was proposed to consist of approximately<br />
600,000 sf of retail (including restaurants), 286 apartments, a town center and two parking structures. Services provided<br />
by <strong>King</strong> were as follows: site designing and permitting, survey and landscape. Fee: $838,000<br />
c.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Peck Sink Preserve<br />
Hernando County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Ongoing<br />
Responsible for review of all graphic and GIS data analysis for a stormwater improvement and public education park site<br />
located in central Hernando County. GIS services included: GIS data analysis; imagery and field data in the site inventory.<br />
Reviewed illustrations, master plan and interpretative educational park concept for this stormwater improvement project.<br />
Cost: $1.3 million<br />
d.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
South County Solid Waste Transfer Station Expansion<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
Provided design and permitting for right of way buffering and screening. Landscaping utilized native vegetations of trees,<br />
shrubs and ground covers. Also incorporated a large berm for screening of noise and to provide enhancement of the<br />
roadway corridor. Design also included landscape irrigation system. Cost: $19.4 million<br />
e.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Intellicenter – Tampa Phase 1<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
This LEED project involved a class-A office development of 370,000+ SF on 30 mol. in the master planned office park of<br />
Telecom Park in Temple Terrace, Florida. Telecom Park is a 340+ acre park on the east side of the Hillsborough River<br />
between the University of South Florida and I-75 on Fletcher Avenue. The office site consists of one 4-story and on 3-story<br />
office building with at-grade parking among native tree canopy. The master landscaping was planned to compliment the<br />
park’s atmosphere of a natural setting by maintaining as much tree canopy as possible within the development.<br />
Cost: $20 million
12. NAME<br />
Timothy W. Schram, Sr., PSM<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
Sinclair Community College, Dayton Ohio<br />
Middle Georgia College, Cochran Georgia<br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
Surveyor<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>., Jacksonville Florida<br />
33<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
6<br />
Florida – Professional Surveyor and Mapper LS6533<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
He is active in his professions regional and national societies including the Florida Surveying and Mapping Society. He has specialized training<br />
in GPS and machine control technology.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
J.C. Bermudez Park, City of Doral, Boundary, Topographic &<br />
Specific Purpose Survey, Miami-Dade County, FL -<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Boundary, topographic, tree and utility location survey of an 80 acre City of Doral public park. The project required an updated survey of<br />
all improvement s within and adjacent to the park boundary. This included all site improvements, private and public utility locations and<br />
adjoining improvements within 25 feet of the project boundary. Adjoining improvements within the right of way of NW 87 th Avenue, NW<br />
33 rd Street and NW 29 th Street were included in the project scope. A combination of V.R.S. GPS, robotic total stations and electronic<br />
levels were utilized in gathering the project field data. All data was processed daily and checked for completeness to alleviate or<br />
minimize return trips to the site.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
U.S Coast Guard Housing Complex, Miami-Dade County Boundary<br />
and Record Survey, Miami-Dade County, FL -<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
n/a<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Boundary, topographic, tree and utility location survey of a 40 acre former U.S. Coast Guard housing campus. The site required<br />
complete record survey of all improvements including 38 structures, site improvements, private utility locations and adjoining<br />
improvements within 50 feet of the project boundary. The project schedule required completion and delivery within 30 calendar days<br />
from NTP. All work was completed and delivered within 26 calendar days. A combination of V.R.S. GPS, robotic total stations and<br />
electronic levels were utilized in gathering the project field data. All data was processed daily and checked for completeness to alleviate<br />
or minimize return trips to the site.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
BODR Miami-Dade County WSA; PS-717 Sewer Forcemain System<br />
Evaluation, Miami-Dade County, FL -<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Provided GPS location services to geo reference six existing pump stations in the Pinecrest area of Miami-Dade County. Along with<br />
completing GPS location survey of improvements, measured as-builts of each lift station including wet wells, structures, mechanical,<br />
electrical and piping. This provided the Client with an existing conditions survey for inventory and base information for future design of<br />
upgrades and re-construction.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
BODR CL-1 Pump Station to C-2 Forcemain Connection Alternative<br />
Pipe Route Analysis, Miami-Dade County, FL -<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
2011<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Provided GPS project control, existing utility mapping, drainage improvements and existing conditions survey along a 6,000 lineal foot<br />
corridor in urban Miami-Dade. <strong>Inc</strong>luded GPS control network for alignment of existing utility and base mapping. GPS location of existing<br />
conditions, storm water structures and all existing visible utilities. The field mapped data was placed in a route analysis base map for<br />
providing preliminary design and alignment of the proposed new 60” forcemain. All data was geo referenced in Florida State Plane<br />
coordinates for insertion into aerial base maps to be included in the alternative route analysis report.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miami-Dade Cooperative Extension / Agricultural Center, Boundary,<br />
Limited Topographic & Specific Purpose Survey, Miami-Dade<br />
County, FL<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
e.<br />
Boundary, limited topographic, tree and utility location survey of a portion of a 5 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Biscayne<br />
Drive (SW 288th Street) and Redland Road (SW 187th Avenue) in the Homestead area. The project required an updated survey of all<br />
improvements within and adjacent to the Agricultural Center property. This included all site improvements, private and public utility<br />
locations and adjoining improvements within 25 feet of the project boundary. Adjoining improvements within the right of way of SW<br />
187th Avenue and SW 288th Street were included in the project scope. A combination of V.R.S. GPS, robotic total stations and<br />
electronic levels were utilized in gathering the project field data. All data was processed daily and checked for completeness to alleviate<br />
return trips to the site. The project required that the final survey product be delivered within a four week time line.<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004) PAGE 1
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan, Town of Lauderdale-<br />
By-The-Sea, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Lauderdale by-the-Sea<br />
Municipal Services<br />
4501 Ocean Drive<br />
Lauderdale by-the-Sea, FL 33308<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Mr. Don Prince<br />
Municipal Services Director<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
1<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
954-776-5119<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> was retained by the Town of Lauderdale-By-The-Sea (LBTS) to provide sanitary sewer system evaluation,<br />
analysis and engineering services for their “Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan”. The sanitary sewer<br />
collection system consists of two separate wastewater collection basins with approximately 10.5 miles of gravity<br />
pipes, 165 manholes and two pump stations (60 HP and 7.5 HP) with their respective force mains.<br />
The project involved conducting evaluations to quantify the needs of the existing gravity sewer system, flow<br />
meter, and lift stations, recommend improvements, prepare cost estimates, and develop a Sanitary Sewer Capital<br />
Improvements Plan (SSCIP). The work performed included:<br />
• Video review of 165 CCTV inspections – 632 defects were identified.<br />
• Assign repair recommendations based on approved repair protocol – 252 repairs were recommended.<br />
• Flow meter evaluation – (1) verified meter was installed as per manufacture’s specifications (2) reviewed<br />
calibration records.<br />
• Inspection and evaluation of two lift stations including hydraulic analysis, spacing requirements and<br />
electrical requirements – various minor repairs were recommended.<br />
• Infiltration and inflow (I/I) evaluation, including the development of dry and wet weather hydrographs for<br />
each lift station – analysis identified both stations as rain dependent I/I (RDII).<br />
• Prepared a comprehensive SSCIP report to assist the town of LBTS in planning ongoing maintenance,<br />
system repairs and upgrades, and quantifying the potential savings from the implementation of an<br />
Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) program.<br />
The SSCIP plan included the costs of repairs to the gravity sewer lines and two lift stations as well as the<br />
replacement costs of the lift stations and other key components of the sewer system. In addition, it included costs<br />
related to a proposed Gravity Sewer System Capacity Evaluation Hydraulic Model, proposed Lift Station<br />
Monitoring Program, proposed Suspect Lateral I/I Program, and I/I Reduction Maintenance Program.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
b. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department Basis of Design Reports<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department<br />
3071 SW 38 th Avenue<br />
Miami, FL 33146<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Dan Edwards, P.E.<br />
Chief – Planning Section<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
On-Going<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
2<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
786-552-8354<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope,<br />
size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was awarded this continuing services<br />
contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable Distribution Work<br />
Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify<br />
Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-<br />
Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force<br />
mains, pump stations preliminary engineering, determine its<br />
sizes and determine the best route for the proposed force<br />
mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of<br />
probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of<br />
required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project<br />
schedule. These projects to date include:<br />
1) Pump Station <strong>Engineering</strong> Reports (six) and Pump<br />
Station 717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>King</strong>) has been selected<br />
by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to<br />
provide engineering services in the preparation of Basis of<br />
Design Reports. This work assignment involves preparing<br />
pump station engineering reports for six pump station<br />
upgrades, analyzing the proposed Pump Station (PS) 717<br />
sewer forcemain system and providing alternative forcemain<br />
recommendations. These Pump Stations are as follows:<br />
717, 719, 728, 730, 738, and 739.<br />
As part of the analysis, the following criteria were considered:<br />
• Force main’s maintenance issues solved (4-<strong>Inc</strong>h PS 717 force main and 10-<strong>Inc</strong>h golf course force main)<br />
• No “piggy backs”<br />
• No property issues (New booster pump station only)<br />
• Smaller pump station, less total dynamic head<br />
• Flow diversion availability (72-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main)<br />
• Cost effectiveness<br />
• No under utilization of PS 709<br />
2) 48-inch Water main Interconnect in the Central East Area (Downtown Miami) Preliminary Alternative<br />
Water Main Route Analysis: The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of<br />
Downtown Miami needs to be completed from the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th<br />
Street and south to an existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court.<br />
This project involved performing a preliminary alternative water main route analysis in order to interconnect the<br />
existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h on NW 6 Street. The size of the<br />
interconnect water main was determined via modeling by MDWASD to be 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main. The proposed<br />
interconnect will improve water service in MDWASD’s service area, including but not delimited to the AA Arena,<br />
Fisher Island, Overtown, Port of Miami and the Village of Key Biscayne. Currently, when several cruise ships are<br />
being filled with water concurrently, and the existing 24-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main on the Rickenbacker Causeway is<br />
closed, Key Biscayne and Fisher Island do not receive adequate water supply. Therefore, the existing 30-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
and 24-<strong>Inc</strong>h on NW 6 Street from approximately NW 1st Court to Biscayne Blvd were paralleled with a new 36-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h water main in order to improve the available water supply in the area.<br />
Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the
points of connection of the proposed force main, determine its size (48-<strong>Inc</strong>h) and determine the best route for the<br />
proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to<br />
determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 7,300 feet of 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h Water<br />
main in the Miami Downtown area.<br />
3) CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain Connection<br />
Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis:<br />
MDWASD has three wastewater treatment plants: South<br />
District Wastewater Treatment Plant (SDWWTP), North<br />
District Wastewater Treatment Plant (NDWWTP), and<br />
Central District Wastewater Treatment Plant (CDWWTP).<br />
The CDWWTP is one of two regional wastewater<br />
treatment plants that currently discharge wastewater<br />
through ocean outfalls. Pursuant to the requirements of<br />
Chapter 2008-232, Laws of Florida Domestic Wastewater<br />
Ocean Outfalls, the discharge of domestic wastewater<br />
through ocean outfalls in Florida will be prohibited after<br />
December 31, 2025. Currently, MDWASD is developing<br />
plans to divert flow from the CDWWTP to other<br />
wastewater treatment plants, including a proposed West<br />
District Water Reclamation Plant (WDWRP) and the<br />
SDWWTP. The proposed interconnection evaluated in<br />
this analysis would allow for wastewater flow from Pump<br />
Station 1 (PS 1) and Pump Station 2 (PS 2) to be diverted<br />
to the proposed WDWRP and the SDWWTP.<br />
This project involved performing a preliminary alternative<br />
pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to an<br />
existing 42-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main which discharges at a manhole<br />
at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and the existing<br />
48-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main in the same vicinity. The interconnect<br />
force main size was determined by MDWASD to be a 60-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h force main as a result of modeling showing that a 60-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h force main parallel to the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main on NW 2nd Street would provide sufficient pumping<br />
capacity. The project begins on NW 6th Avenue where the point of connection with the existing 84-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
forcemain will be identified. The project then extends west and then north along a route to be determined to NW<br />
6th Street/NW 13th Avenue where the point of connection with the existing 42-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main will be identified.<br />
Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the<br />
points of connection of the proposed force main, determine its size (60-<strong>Inc</strong>h) and determine the best route for the<br />
proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to<br />
determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 5,700 feet of 60-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
Forcemain near the Miami Downtown area.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
b. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
c. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Surveying and Mapping
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
CSX – Terminal Pavement Management Plan Update<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
3<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
NA<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
CSX Intermodal, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Chris Durden<br />
301 W. Bay Street, Suite 2700<br />
Jacksonville, FL 32202<br />
904-633-1306<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> has been contracted by CSX Intermodal to conduct surveys of their intermodal terminals. For<br />
Phase 1 & 2 of this project <strong>King</strong> conducted surveys for 21 terminals in 13 different states, covering<br />
nearly 5 million square yards of pavement. Phase 3, which consists of surveys of 11 terminals in 10<br />
different states, covering over 1 million square yards of pavement, is set to proceed in the near future.<br />
CSX is a repeat client, having retained the firm of Infrastructure Technology, <strong>Inc</strong>. (acquired by <strong>King</strong><br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. in 2002) to implement a pavement management program (PMP) for 12<br />
intermodal terminals, during the early to mid 1990’s.<br />
The platform for this analysis will be the proprietary software, Infrastructure Management System IV<br />
(IMS IV). This system is used to justify the use of capital funds for investment in rehabilitative and<br />
restorative pavement repairs on an annual basis at selected intermodal terminals to extend the life of<br />
the asphalt and concrete pavements.<br />
Project Cost: $881,357<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
a.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
Data Collection,<br />
Analysis, Reporting
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miscellaneous General Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Services<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County Public Works Department<br />
601 E. Kennedy Boulevard<br />
22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33602<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Tom Fass<br />
Section Manager, Dept. of<br />
Public Works<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
4<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Various Project<br />
Completion Dates<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1711<br />
<strong>King</strong> has been contracted by Hillsborough County to provide general/civil services for a two-year period<br />
since 1987. Under this miscellaneous civil engineering contract, <strong>King</strong> provides services on small and<br />
medium-sized projects from intersection surveys to wastewater treatment plant design services. The<br />
surveying, civil, environmental engineering, transportation and water resource groups all benefit from<br />
projects under these contracts.<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> services include planning, program development,<br />
design, and construction management for general/civil projects in<br />
the areas of road and transportation, stormwater, solid waste, parks,<br />
sitework, environmental permitting, traffic analysis and landscaping.<br />
The projects executed under this contract include:<br />
• Intersection Program Master Plan Update<br />
• Waters Avenue & Hanley Road Intersection Improvements<br />
• US 301 & Balm Riverview Road<br />
• Benjamin & Waters Construction Administration<br />
• Columbus Drive Design<br />
• School Safety, Circulation and Access Program-S.S.C.A.P.<br />
• N. Mobley Road Improvements<br />
• Railroad Crossing Quiet Zone Study<br />
• Railroad Crossing Design<br />
• South County Solid Waste Transfer Station Leachate Collection<br />
System Improvements<br />
• South County Solid Waste Transfer Station FDEP Operating<br />
Permit Renewal<br />
• Falkenburg Yard Waste Processing Facility Improvements<br />
• South County Solid Yard Waste Processing Facility design,<br />
permitting and construction management services<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design, permitting<br />
and construction.
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Skycrest Neighborhood Traffic Calming, Streetscape, Round-a-bouts,<br />
Clearwater, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
5<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
City of Clearwater<br />
Mr. Ken Sides, P.E.<br />
Sr. Professional Engineer<br />
727-562-4792<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided roadway and drainage design plans, technical specifications, and construction assistance for the<br />
construction of multiple roadway traffic calming features for the Skycrest neighborhood near downtown<br />
Clearwater. Services included:<br />
• Design for four (4) roundabouts along Cleveland Street, an east-west 3-lane minor collector, intersecting 2-<br />
lane residential streets. One of the roundabouts sits adjacent to an elementary school and serves as a school<br />
crossing.<br />
• Design of five (5) mini-roundabouts along several intersecting 2-lane residential streets<br />
• Coordinate design elements with all users and develop custom design templates for City vehicles to ensure<br />
that roundabout geometry serves the appropriate vehicles.<br />
• Landscape and Irrigation design plans<br />
• Utility relocation<br />
• Stormwater design and permitting.<br />
• Design of other traffic calming features including Diagonal Diverters, Speed Tables, landscaped median<br />
islands, hardscape elements, and roadway bulb-outs (tree wells) to reduce pavement widths at specific<br />
locations<br />
Cost $2.4 million<br />
Fee $354,895.00<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design, permitting<br />
and construction.
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection<br />
Improvements<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County – Florida<br />
601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33602<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
William Alford<br />
Project Manager<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> prepared a PD&E study to determine what roadway capacity<br />
improvements needed to be made and evaluated several<br />
alternative roadway alignments for the intersection. <strong>King</strong> is now<br />
preparing design plans for the construction of the proposed<br />
improvements. Professional services under the scope of the project<br />
include:<br />
• Topographic survey and right-of-way mapping<br />
• Traffic operation studies and modeling analysis<br />
• Roadway and stormwater design<br />
• Pond siting analysis and design<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Wetland/environmental impact assessment and<br />
mitigation design environmental permitting<br />
• Traffic signal design<br />
• Public involvement/meetings<br />
• Utility coordination and design<br />
• Right-of-way impact assessment<br />
• Subsurface utility exploration<br />
• Geotechnical investigation<br />
• Structural analysis<br />
Cost: $1.5 Million<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
8<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
TBD<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1920<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• PD&E Study<br />
• Alternative Roadway Alignments<br />
• Stormwater Modeling<br />
• Traffic Modeling / Analysis<br />
• Traffic Signal Design<br />
• Pond Siting<br />
• Environmental Mitigation<br />
• Permitting Survey and Mapping<br />
• Public Involvements / Meeting<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
F.R. Aleman. <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
and Planning<br />
Survey and Mapping<br />
Ecological Services<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Subsurface Utility <strong>Engineering</strong>
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Columbus Drive Extension Route Study<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County Public Works<br />
601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33602<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Sam Halabi, P.E.<br />
Sr. Professional Engineer<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
The project included PD&E phase and a design phase services for<br />
the extension Columbus Drive from east of US 301 to Falkenburg<br />
Road, a distance approximately 1 mile. The PD&E services<br />
included the development and evaluation of a study for the typical<br />
sections for a 4-lane divided facility, alignment alternates<br />
considering geometry, environmental impacts, selection of<br />
stormwater ponds and mitigation areas, right-of-way, safety, and<br />
cost. Design phase services included providing 30% roadway and<br />
drainage design plans, wetland and flood plain mitigation design,<br />
submittal of the USACOE permit, the preparation of Design-Build<br />
RFQ and RFP contract documents for construction, and assistance<br />
with procurement of the Design-Build contract.<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
9<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1786<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• PD&E Study<br />
• Preparation of Design/Build RFQ<br />
• 30% Roadway/Drainage Design Plans<br />
• Wetland and Flood Mitigation Design<br />
• Pond Siting Report<br />
• Environmental Permitting<br />
Est. Construction: $9.3 million<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong>
26. NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL<br />
(From Section E, Block 12)<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS<br />
27. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT (From<br />
Section E, Block 13)<br />
Project Manager / Water<br />
Resources/Drainage<br />
28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F<br />
(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completing table. Place “X” under project key<br />
number for participation in same or similar role.)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
X X X X X<br />
Thomas O’Connor, PE Principal-In-Charge X X X X X<br />
Franklin Torrealba, PE<br />
Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities /<br />
Construction Management<br />
X X X X X<br />
John Seals, PE Roadway & Transportation X X X<br />
Michael Ross, PE Civil Site <strong>Engineering</strong> X<br />
William Moriarty, PE, BCEE Alternative Funding X X X X<br />
Christopher Kuzler, PE Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities X X X X X X X<br />
Benjamin Turnage, PE Water, Sewer, Reuse Utilities X X X<br />
Thomas Traina, PE<br />
Mechanical/Instrumentation &<br />
Controls<br />
X X X X<br />
Loc Truong, PE Instrumentation & Controls X X X X<br />
Lara Bartholomew, PE Cost Estimates/Permitting X X X X X X<br />
Larry Kistler<br />
Alberto Pisani, EI<br />
Civil/Site Planning & Design/Cost<br />
Estimates/Permitting<br />
Cost Estimates/Permitting/Plans<br />
Review<br />
Peter Bottone Ecological Services X<br />
Mike Palmer Ecological Services X<br />
Joshua Logan, PE Construction <strong>Engineering</strong> Inspection X<br />
X<br />
X X X X X<br />
Hamley Pacheco, EI Construction <strong>Engineering</strong> Inspection X X X X<br />
Scott Sheridan, RLA Planning/Landscape X X<br />
Clark Lohmiller, RLA Landscape Design, GIS/Mapping X X X<br />
Timothy Schram, PSM Survey/GIS/Mapping X X X X<br />
Oracio Riccobono, PE Geotechnical X<br />
29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY<br />
NO TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F)<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan, Town of<br />
Lauderdale-By-The-Sea, FL<br />
MDWASD Basis of Design Reports<br />
CSX – Terminal Pavement Management Plan Update,<br />
Various States, US 8<br />
Hillsborough County Miscellaneous General Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> Services 9<br />
Skycrest Neighborhood Traffic Calming, Streetscape,<br />
Round-a-bout<br />
6 JC Bermudez Park Recycled Storm Water Irrigation, Hollywood, FL<br />
7<br />
10<br />
Preliminary Basis of Design Report and Pump Station Siting Study,<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection Improvements<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
Columbus Drive Extension Route Study<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
Coastal Water Systems Interconnect Project – Phase 1, Basis of Design<br />
Report, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties, FL<br />
H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<br />
30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.<br />
See the following section SF330 Additional Information<br />
3
31. SIGNATURE<br />
I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The foregoing is a statement of facts.<br />
32. DATE<br />
June 22, 2012<br />
33. NAME AND TITLE<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE, Vice President<br />
4
2a. FIRM (OR BRANCH OFFICE) NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER (If any)<br />
RFQ #2012-10<br />
PART II - GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS<br />
(If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.)<br />
3. YEAR ESTABLISHED<br />
1977<br />
2b. STREET 8390 NW 53 rd Street, Suite 200 5. OWNERSHIP<br />
2c. CITY Doral 2d. STATE<br />
FL<br />
6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE, Vice President<br />
6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
305-392-9979<br />
a. Function<br />
Code<br />
6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
amaristany@kingengineering.com<br />
2e. ZIP CODE<br />
33166<br />
a. TYPE<br />
Corporation<br />
b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS<br />
Federal Small Business<br />
4. DUNS NUMBER<br />
09-298-1521<br />
7. NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is a branch office).<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any) 8b. YR. ESTABLISHED 8c. DUNS NUMBER<br />
9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE<br />
b. Discipline<br />
c. No. of Employees a. Profile<br />
(1) FIRM (2) RANCH Code<br />
1977<br />
09-298-1521<br />
10. PROFILE OF FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE<br />
REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS<br />
b. Experience c. Revenue<br />
Index<br />
Number<br />
(see below)<br />
02 Administrative 14 1 A05 Airports 4<br />
08 CADD Technician 10 1 C02 Cemeteries 2<br />
12 Civil Engineer 14 2 C10 Commercial Buildings 5<br />
15 Construction Inspector 1 1 C15 Construction Mgmt 6<br />
16 Construction Manager 2 1 D03 Desalination 2<br />
24 Environmental Scientist 4 1 E01 Ecological Investigations 5<br />
38 Land Surveyor 2 E02 Educational Facilities 3<br />
39 Landscape Architect 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies 2<br />
47 Planner: Urban/Regional 2 G01 Garages 2<br />
52 Sanitary Engineer 14 2 H06 Highrise Buildings 3<br />
58 Technician/Analyst 1 H07 Highways/Streets/ Parking Lots 5<br />
60 Transportation Engineer/ Planner 5 H10 Hotels/Motels 1<br />
62 Water Resources Engineer 3 1 H11 Housing 7<br />
Other Disciplines: I01 Industrial Buildings 3<br />
Surveying Crews and Technicians 9 I03 Industrial Waste Treatment 2<br />
GIS 1 I06 Irrigation; Drainage 2<br />
IT/Computer Techs 2 J01 Judicial/Courtroom Facilities 1<br />
Total 86 9 L01 Medical Research Facilities 2<br />
L02 Land Surveying 6<br />
L03 Landscape Architecture 2<br />
L04 Libraries/Museums 1<br />
M01 Mapping Systems 2<br />
O01 Industrial Parks 2<br />
P04 Pipelines 6<br />
P05 Regional Planning 4<br />
P07 Site Planning 5<br />
P09 Correctional Facilities 1<br />
R04 Recreation Facilities 1<br />
R11 Rivers; Canals; Waterways; Flood Control 4<br />
S04 Sewage Collection, Treatment, Disposal 5<br />
S07 Solid Wastes; <strong>Inc</strong>ineration; Landfill 6<br />
S10 Surveying; Platting; Mapping 5<br />
S13 Stormwater 4<br />
T03 Traffic & Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong> 6<br />
T04 Topographic Surveying & Mapping 5<br />
W02 Water Resources; Hydrology 2<br />
W03 Water Supply; Treatment & Distribution 5<br />
Z01 Zoning; Land Use Studies 1<br />
11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL<br />
SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3<br />
YEARS<br />
(Insert revenue index number shown at right)<br />
a. Federal Work N/A<br />
b. Non-Federal Work 8<br />
c. Total Work 8<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER<br />
1. Less than $100,000 6. $2 million to less than $5 million<br />
2. $100,000 to less than $250,000 7. $5 million to less than $10 million<br />
3. $250,000 to less than $500,000 8. $10 million to less than $25 million<br />
4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 9. $25 million to less than $50 million<br />
5. $1 million to less than $2 million 10. $50 million or greater<br />
12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The foregoing is a statement of facts.<br />
a. SIGNATURE b. DATE<br />
6/22/2012<br />
c. NAME AND TITLE<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE, Vice President
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
Qualifications of Firm<br />
The following material provides further evidence of our team’s qualifications and experience to assist the City of North<br />
Miami Beach with completion of their municipal projects listed in the CIP.<br />
We have selected four local M/WBE firms to provide subconsultant services for this contract.<br />
Firm M/WBE Status Services Provided<br />
Cummins / Cederberg Federal SBA, Miami-Dade SBD Coastal and Marine <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Geosol, <strong>Inc</strong>. Broward CBE Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Eastern <strong>Engineering</strong> Group, <strong>Inc</strong>. DBE, WBE, MBE, SBE, CBE Structural <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. Broward CBE, SBE Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
<strong>King</strong> has been very successful in establishing and maintaining long-term professional relationships with local governments<br />
and currently provides professional services to over 20 municipalities and agencies in Florida through continuing<br />
contracts. We take pride in being able to be responsive to our clients and working cooperatively with multiple clients. As a<br />
result, <strong>King</strong> has been successful with maintaining a number of continuing engineering services contracts with Florida<br />
municipalities. Examples include:<br />
• Hollywood • Miami-Dade County Public Works • North Miami • Miami-Dade County Water & Sewer Dept.<br />
• Southwest Ranches • Temple Terrace • Baker County • South Florida Water Management District<br />
• Doral • Dunedin • Citrus County • Hillsborough County<br />
• Lauderdale-by-the-Seas • Largo • Nassau County • Clearwater<br />
In addition to continuing engineering services contracts, <strong>King</strong> has individual contracts with other Florida governmental<br />
agencies including the South Florida Water Management District, Southwest Florida Water Management District, Peace<br />
River / Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority, Northwest Florida Water Management District, Florida Fish and Wildlife<br />
Conservation Commission, and the Florida Governmental Utility Authority. Because of our long-term experience working<br />
with Florida government entities, <strong>King</strong> understands the various issues uniquely associated with municipal projects and is<br />
able to acquire the necessary permits for those project activities which require regulatory approvals.<br />
Firm’s Number of Years Experience<br />
Established in 1977, <strong>King</strong> has applied its talents and resources to the implementation of innovative engineering projects.<br />
What began as a small engineering firm has grown into a full-service, employee-owned firm with expertise in engineering,<br />
planning, ecological services, surveying, and construction management. With 4 offices in Florida, <strong>King</strong>’s success is reflected<br />
in our work and our client’s loyalty. <strong>King</strong> is able to provide you with a cohesive multi-disciplinary team that understands<br />
every aspect of your project, and is committed to delivering to your satisfaction. <strong>King</strong> provides engineering, planning,<br />
ecological and surveying services for civil, transportation, water resources, and water/wastewater/reclaimed water<br />
related projects.<br />
Sustainable Business Practices<br />
<strong>King</strong> is dedicated to the practice of sound environmental stewardship and promotion of health, safety and well being of our<br />
employees. These values originate at the company’s top management and are emphasized through all levels of<br />
responsibility within the organization. As such, the Company agrees to:<br />
• Meet or exceed all applicable federal, state, local and company environmental, safety and health standards.<br />
• Provide a workplace free of recognized hazards and maintain healthy working conditions for all company employees.<br />
• Closely monitor all facilities for prevention of pollution.<br />
• Participate in recycling to the greatest practical extent to reduce impact on landfills and promote recovery of valuable<br />
resources.<br />
• Convey to our customers, industry associates, vendors and the general public our strong environmental, safety and<br />
health commitment.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
1
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
• Strive to continuously improve our commitment to the above-stated principles through exercise of our EMS, improved<br />
technology, production changes and due diligence.<br />
• Continue to educate personnel in LEED principles and encourage LEED accreditation.<br />
The procedures that have been implemented include:<br />
• Use of IT strategies to reduce paper usage and unnecessary bulk storage.<br />
• Donate and recycle ink and toner cartridges to regional charities.<br />
• Recycle office paper, cardboard, plastic and aluminum containers; containers are placed in each workstation and in<br />
strategic locations throughout the office building.<br />
• Use recycled paper products for printing, plotting , etc.<br />
<strong>King</strong> is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council has LEED accredited personnel on staff. We continue to encourage<br />
education and accreditation of staff members.<br />
<strong>King</strong> has developed a smart irrigation controller called the WaterOptimizer®. Water<br />
Optimizer, LLC is a subsidiary of <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. The controller is a real<br />
water management alternative that provides better, more precise use of a limited<br />
resource. It’s a new approach to resource management and conservation.<br />
Business Structure<br />
<strong>King</strong>, established in 1977, is a Florida-based corporation licensed to provide multidiscipline<br />
professional engineering services per State of Florida certification number #2610. <strong>King</strong> is also licensed by the<br />
State of Florida to provide surveying and landscape architecture services under license numbers LB2610 and LC26000183,<br />
respectively.<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s office located in Doral, Florida will serve as the responsible office for this contract. Agustin Maristany, PE, will serve<br />
as the Project Manager and Primary Point of Contact.<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Vice President<br />
8390 NW 53 rd Street, Suite 200, Doral, FL 33166<br />
Phone: 305-392-9979 Fax: 305-392-9912<br />
Email: amaristany@kingengineering.com<br />
Web: www.kingengineering.com<br />
Relative Size of Firm<br />
<strong>King</strong> is a Florida based company with over 85 employees with 4 offices in Florida and 2 offices in Texas. The table below<br />
provides detailed information of our leadership and personnel structure.<br />
Keith Appenzeller, PE<br />
Thomas O’Connor, PE<br />
Christopher Kuzler, PE<br />
Michael Ross, PE<br />
Scott Sheridan, RLA<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Denise Greer, PE<br />
William Moriarty, PE<br />
James Orchard, CPA<br />
Lara Bartholomew, PE<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Owners:<br />
Sandra Gorman, PE<br />
Principals / Officers / Board of Directors:<br />
CEO/Chairman: Keith Appenzeller, PE<br />
Professional Employees by<br />
Classification:<br />
William Holloway, PE President: Thomas O’Connor, PE<br />
Larry Kistler<br />
Sr. Vice President: Christopher Kuzler, PE Engineers: 47<br />
John Seals, PE<br />
Sr. Vice President: Michael Ross, PE<br />
Planners: 5<br />
Loc Truong, PE Sr. Vice President: Scott Sheridan, RLA Landscape Architects: 2<br />
Brian Skidmore Vice President: Agustin Maristany, PE Scientists: 4<br />
Franklin Torrealba, PE Vice President: Denise Greer, PE<br />
Surveyors: 9<br />
Thomas Traina, PE Vice President: William Moriarty, PE<br />
Tuyen Tran, PE Chief Financial Officer: James Orchard, CPA<br />
Total Number of<br />
Employees: 86<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
2
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
Project Manager<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Vice President<br />
8390 NW 53 rd Street, Suite 200<br />
Doral, FL 33166<br />
Phone: 305-392-9979 Fax: 305-392-9912<br />
Email: amaristany@kingengineering.com<br />
Web: www.kingengineering.com<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s team will be led by Mr. Agustin Maristany, P.E.,<br />
the proposed Project Manager for the City of North<br />
Miami Beach “Continuing Contract for Professional<br />
Services.” Mr. Maristany is committed to working in<br />
close partnership with the City and devoting his<br />
individual attention to ensure the successful<br />
completion of all assignments. He will be supported<br />
by a full-service, multi-disciplinary team of highly<br />
qualified personnel.<br />
A distinguishing qualification of Mr. Maristany is his extensive experience in successfully delivering civil<br />
engineering projects to south Florida clients very similar in scope to the projects envisioned for this contract.<br />
Over the last 30 years he has successfully completed a wide range of civil engineering projects for south Florida<br />
clients including the City of Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, Lauderdale by the Sea, Broward County, Sunrise,<br />
Lauderdale Lakes, Central Broward Water Control District, Miami-Dade County, Miami, Doral, Florida<br />
Department of Transportation, the South Florida Water Management District, and Homestead Air Force Base.<br />
He is a seasoned project manager with experience in all aspects of civil engineering projects, brings extensive<br />
experience and credibility with local regulatory agencies, and has helped to obtain grant funding for many local<br />
clients.<br />
Mr. Maristany has supported municipalities in the creation of stormwater utilities, the evaluation of funding<br />
alternatives and financing options, establishing rate structures, developing/revising ordinances, and prioritizing<br />
capital improvement plans. He has also developed design criteria and standards for permitting, and has<br />
reviewed hundreds of plats, paving and drainage plans, and as-built plans.<br />
Maristany’s Representative Project Experience<br />
Project Name Project Role Description Client<br />
Five-Ash Water<br />
Treatment Plant<br />
Drainage Retrofit<br />
Prospect Lake<br />
Recharge Facility<br />
Central County<br />
Neighborhood<br />
Improvements<br />
SR 694 Roadway<br />
Improvements<br />
Sanitary System<br />
Capital Improvement<br />
Plan<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Task<br />
Manager<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Principal-incharge<br />
Drainage retrofit design and permitting to reduce frequent<br />
flooding and accommodate addition of 7 MG tank and ASR well<br />
pad.<br />
Modeling, design, and construction support for 2,600 feet of 36"<br />
RCP, an 8-foot-wide gated weir control structure, and a<br />
diversion structure with two vertical lift gates connecting C-14<br />
canal to Prospect Lake to recharge the City's main wellfield.<br />
Obtained $300K AWS grant from SFWMD.<br />
Stormwater modeling and design to reduce flooding in several<br />
older neighborhoods. Major improvements included 5,000 feet<br />
of dual 8’ x 8’ box culverts for the 35 th Avenue ditch and a large<br />
gated control structure discharging to the C-12 canal.<br />
Design and permitting of $4.3M in roadway and drainage<br />
improvements to reduce congestion and flooding along 0.75<br />
mile stretch of this heavy-traffic hurricane evacuation route.<br />
Joint project between FDOT, County, and City.<br />
Sewer, pump, and flow meter inspections, defect identifications,<br />
I/E/I quantification, repair and rehabilitation recommendations,<br />
cost estimates, and CIP schedule.<br />
Ft. Lauderdale<br />
Ft. Lauderdale<br />
Broward<br />
County<br />
Pinellas Park<br />
Lauderdale by<br />
the Sea<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
3<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
Maristany’s Representative Project Experience<br />
Project Name Project Role Description Client<br />
Hillsboro Blvd<br />
Drainage<br />
Improvements<br />
Development of<br />
Stormwater Utility<br />
JC Bermudez Park<br />
Recycled Storm Water<br />
Irrigation Project<br />
S Lake Area Drainage<br />
Improvements<br />
Neighborhood<br />
Drainage<br />
Improvements<br />
S-124 Control<br />
Structure Design<br />
District Engineer<br />
Needs Assessment<br />
Program<br />
Municipal NPDES<br />
Permit<br />
Northern Broward<br />
County Integrated<br />
Surface and<br />
Groundwater Model<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Task<br />
Manager<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Modeling, design, and permitting of drainage improvements for<br />
section of Hillsboro Blvd. Dual purpose drainage system also<br />
recharged Coquina Lakes impacted by wellfield withdrawals with<br />
water from C-3 canal.<br />
Needs assessment, rate structure, revenue projections, billing<br />
database, and stormwater utility ordinance<br />
Modeling, design, permitting, construction inspection, and O&M<br />
manual for 2MG tank, 3,000 gpm stormwater pump station, pretreatment<br />
system, and 1,400 gpm irrigation pump station for 80-<br />
acre park. Helped obtain $1M grant from SFWMD.<br />
Modeling, BODR, design, and permitting of drainage<br />
improvements for low lying coastal area flooded by rain and<br />
high tides. Design includes 5,000 feet of RCP (24” to 48”D), new<br />
outfalls to tide, backflow valves, and 30,000 gpm pump station.<br />
Fast-track preparation of 57 design packages, covering about 2<br />
square miles, and with a construction value of $4 million.<br />
Designs included catch basins, exfiltration trenches, pavement<br />
restoration, maintenance of traffic plans, hydraulic calculations,<br />
cost estimates, and utility conflict coordination.<br />
Hydraulic and civil design of 550 cfs gated control structure: 3- 8’<br />
x 6’ gated RCP box culverts on L-35A Canal.<br />
Plan review, regulation, permitting, revision of drainage design<br />
criteria and standards, CIP development and implementation,<br />
design, permitting, and inspections for 43 square-mile urban<br />
area serving over 150,000 residents.<br />
Planning, modeling, preliminary design, design standards, design<br />
management and QA/QC, utility conflict coordination,<br />
permitting, cost estimating, scheduling, public information, bid<br />
packaging, and construction management for 40 water and<br />
sewer projects totaling $60 million. Project included 17,815 feet<br />
of 4” to 12” sewer force main, 91,451 feet of 8” to 16” water<br />
main, 39,000 feet of 8” to 12” gravity sewer, and 6 pump<br />
stations.<br />
Sewer system inventory, GIS mapping, dry- and wet-weather<br />
sampling, nonpoint source impacts, water quality management<br />
plan, analysis of program costs and fiscal resources, legal<br />
authority, public information, and negotiations with the EPA.<br />
Developed linked surface water (XPSWWM) and groundwater<br />
model (MODFLOW) for continuous simulation of northern<br />
Broward, a 77 square miles area that includes 8 municipalities<br />
and 9 drainage districts. The water management system<br />
consists of numerous lakes, canals, 33 water control structures,<br />
2 recharge pumps, and 8 urban water supply wellfields.<br />
Principal-in-<br />
Charge<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Project<br />
Manager<br />
Broward<br />
County<br />
Lauderdale<br />
Lakes<br />
City of Doral<br />
Hollywood<br />
Miami-Dade<br />
County<br />
SFWMD<br />
CBWCD<br />
Miami-Dade<br />
WASD<br />
City of Miami<br />
Broward<br />
County<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
4<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
Certified Business Entity Participation<br />
<strong>King</strong> is not a disadvantaged business enterprise. We have historically supported disadvantaged businesses both in our<br />
public sector and private sector contracts. <strong>King</strong> has selected four subconsultant firms to assist us with this contract.<br />
Cummins / Cederberg – COASTAL AND MARINE ENGINEERING<br />
Geosol, <strong>Inc</strong>. – GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING<br />
Eastern <strong>Engineering</strong> Group – STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
5
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
KING’S COMMITMENT TO DIVERSITY WITHIN ITS COMMUNITY AND BEYOND<br />
It is <strong>King</strong>’s policy to ensure that we:<br />
• Recruit, hire and promote for all job classifications without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age,<br />
physical handicap or ancestry<br />
• Base decisions on employment so as to further the principles of affirmative action<br />
• Ensure that all personnel actions such as compensation, benefits, transfers, layoffs, return from layoff, company<br />
sponsored training, education, tuition assistance, social and recreation programs are administered without regard<br />
to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical handicap or ancestry<br />
• Give qualified disadvantage business enterprises (consultants, suppliers and other businesses) priority<br />
consideration when services in their areas of expertise are required.<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s Equal Employment Opportunity/AA Policy<br />
<strong>King</strong> will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, sex, national origin,<br />
sexual orientation, age, handicap, marital status, familial status or religion.<br />
<strong>King</strong> will take Affirmative Action to ensure that all employment practices are free of such discrimination. Such employment<br />
practices include, but are not limited to, the following: hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment<br />
advertising, selection layoff, disciplinary action, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for<br />
training, including apprenticeship.<br />
<strong>King</strong> prohibits the harassment of any employee or job applicant on the basis of their protected class status.<br />
<strong>King</strong> will commit the necessary time and resources, both financial and human, to achieve the goals of Equal Employment<br />
Opportunity and Affirmative Action.<br />
<strong>King</strong> will evaluate the performance of its management and supervisory personnel on the basis of their involvement in<br />
achieving these Affirmative Action objectives as well as other established criteria. Any employee of this company or<br />
subcontractor to this company who does not comply with the Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Procedures set<br />
forth in this Statement and plan will be subject to disciplinary action. Any Opportunity/Affirmative Action laws, directives,<br />
regulations of the Federal, State and local governing bodies or agencies thereof, specifically including Chapter 26.5, Part II,<br />
City of Tampa Code and Chapter 130, Part IV, City of Jacksonville Code will be subject to appropriate legal sanctions.<br />
<strong>King</strong> has appointed Jim Orchard as EEO Coordinator to manage our Equal Employment Opportunity Program. His<br />
responsibilities include monitoring all Equal Employment Opportunity activities and reporting the effectiveness of this<br />
Affirmative Action Program, as required by Federal, State and Local agencies. If any employee or applicant for employment<br />
believes he or she has been discriminated against, please contact the EEO Coordinator.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
6
SF 330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
Water Resources Services (Function Code 62)<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s in-house Water Resource Group consists of H&H modelers, civil engineers, water resource engineers,<br />
hydrologists, and environmental scientists. Efficient water resource management systems are critical to the<br />
success of any project. We are proud of our strong stormwater modeling expertise in watersheds, some in<br />
excess of 120 square miles. We employ the latest computer modeling programs to ensure accurate flow rate<br />
analysis for multi-interval storm events and long-term continuous simulation.<br />
Our water resource engineers work daily with the design and permitting of these systems and are familiar with<br />
the codes and regulations of federal, state and local government agencies. <strong>King</strong> has extensive experience in not<br />
only traditional treatment (e.g. wet or dry retention) methods, but also with structural / physical / chemical /<br />
biological devices such as CDS units, alum injection, stormceptors, and created wetlands, as well as Low Impact<br />
Development (LID) treatment design techniques and options (e.g. bioswales, filter marshes, stormwater re-use)<br />
Our staff has performed planning, modeling, design, and construction management of canal systems, lakes,<br />
wetlands, stormwater pipe networks, control structures, pump stations, dams & reservoirs, levees, bank<br />
stabilization, erosion control, water quality control BMPs, seepage control, and recycled stormwater irrigation<br />
systems. Our relevant project expertise includes:<br />
• Drainage Master Planning<br />
• Flood Control<br />
• Erosion/Scour Modeling & Design<br />
• Watershed Planning & Studies<br />
• Dam/Control Structures<br />
• Water Quality Modeling<br />
• Water Quality Controls/BMPs Design<br />
• Stormwater Pump Station Design<br />
• Irrigation Systems<br />
• Levee Design<br />
• Seepage Control<br />
• Bank Stabilization<br />
• Wetland/Upland Restoration<br />
• Permitting – USACOE, FDEP, State WMDs,<br />
MD-DERM, and Local Agencies<br />
<strong>King</strong> has significant local experience and a clear understanding of Florida’s unique physical characteristics as well<br />
as its regulatory environment. <strong>King</strong>’s engineers are solution oriented professionals, addressing each problem<br />
with an alternatives evaluation and cost-benefit approach. Through this process, environmental impacts,<br />
reliability, cost-effectiveness, permitability and constructability are carefully considered during the formulation<br />
of each design.<br />
Our team has provided water resources services to numerous local clients in south Florida, including the<br />
following:<br />
• City of Miami<br />
• Miami-Dade DERM<br />
• South Florida Water Management District<br />
• City of Doral<br />
• City of North Miami<br />
• Broward County<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
• City of Fort Lauderdale<br />
• Lauderdale Lakes<br />
• Central Broward Water Control District<br />
• City of Sunrise<br />
• Town of Southwest Ranches<br />
SF330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
1
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
Integrated Design<br />
<strong>King</strong> has extensive experience developing innovative designs that meet or exceed project objectives. For<br />
example, for the City of Hollywood, <strong>King</strong> evaluated drainage conditions for a highly developed low lying<br />
residential coastal area adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway. The area has a history of frequent flooding due<br />
to both high tides and intense rainfall. <strong>King</strong> designed a system that significantly improves flood levels of service,<br />
nearly achieving a 10-year level service during normal tides, with a combination of higher capacity gravity<br />
outfalls, pump station, and backflow prevention devices.<br />
The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support water<br />
resources services project types.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> In-house<br />
Subconsultant Specialty<br />
Task Manager<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Civil Engineer<br />
Kyle Smith, PE<br />
Contract Manager<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Civil Engineer<br />
Jennifer Harkleroad, PE<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team Available Services<br />
SF330 Function<br />
Code<br />
Description<br />
02 Administrative<br />
07 Biologist<br />
08 CADD Technician<br />
12 Civil Engineer<br />
15 Construction Inspector<br />
16 Construction Manager<br />
19 Ecologist<br />
21 Electrical Engineer<br />
22 Electronics Engineer<br />
23 Environmental Engineer<br />
24 Environmental Scientist<br />
27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer<br />
28 Geodetic Surveyor<br />
29 Geographic Information System Specialist<br />
32 Hydraulic Engineer<br />
33 Hydrographic Surveyor<br />
34 Hydrologist<br />
38 Land Surveyor<br />
39 Landscape Architect<br />
42 Mechanical Engineer<br />
47 Planner: Urban/Regional<br />
48 Project Manager<br />
52 Sanitary Engineer<br />
53 Scheduler<br />
55 Soils Engineer<br />
56 Specifications Writer<br />
57 Structural Engineer<br />
58 Technician/Analysis<br />
60 Transportation Engineer<br />
61 Value Engineer<br />
62 Water Resources Engineer<br />
NPDES<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
2
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
S. S. Lake Area Stormwater Modeling and BODR<br />
City of Hollywood, Broward County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hollywood Public Utilities<br />
1621 N. 14 th Avenue<br />
Hollywood, FL 33022<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Jeff Jiang, PE<br />
Project Manager<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
1<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
954-921-3490<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was retained by the City of Hollywood for the evaluation, design, and permitting of flood control<br />
improvements for the South Lake Drainage Basin, a low-lying coastal area susceptible to flooding from high tides<br />
and rainfall. Developed ICPR model of the 256-acre drainage area, concluded that existing drainage system was<br />
severely undersized, and sized improvements to substantially reduce flooding. Improvements included new<br />
outfalls to tide, higher capacity collection system, an interceptor system, a 30,000 gpm pump station, and<br />
backflow prevention devices. Tasks included analysis of sea level rise, modeling, conceptual design of<br />
improvements, permittability, cost estimates, and technical memorandum. Also prepared Basis of Design Report<br />
for the 30,000 gpm pump station including siting study, pump type selection, pump station layout, electrical<br />
requirements, instrumentation and controls, bypass gravity discharge, construction cost estimate, schedule, and<br />
identification of permitting requirements (Broward County, FDEP, USACE), and reporting. Recommended pump<br />
station consisted of two 30,000 gpm axial submersible pumps with a gated gravity bypass to allow gravity flows<br />
and reduce fuel consumption during low to normal tides. The submersible pumps minimize noise and visual<br />
obstruction in this coastal residential community. Electrical, telemetry, and control panels can be camouflaged by<br />
landscaping. The estimated construction cost for entire project is $10.0M; $4,3M for Phase I. Phase I detail<br />
design of the system is currently underway.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, modeling, design,<br />
permitting, cost estimates<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Design, cost estimates
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
SFWMD S-124 Control Structure Replacement Hydraulic and Civil<br />
Design, Broward County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
2<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Ross <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Robert J. Ross, P.E.<br />
954-318-0624<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was retained as subconsultant to Ross <strong>Engineering</strong> to lead the fast-track hydraulic and civil<br />
design and provide QA/QC of deliverables for the replacement of the S-124 Control Structure on the L-35A<br />
Canal for the South Florida Water Management District, with an estimated construction cost of $3.9M.<br />
The hydraulic report identified design flows and stages, established the structure capacity (550-800 cfs),<br />
dimensions (triple 6’x 8’ box culverts), invert and crest elevations, and sized a temporary bypass structure to<br />
control flows and water levels during construction. The replacement structure consists of a triple 8’ x 6’ concrete<br />
box culvert with remotely operated slide gates, a design capacity of 550 cfs, hardened control room, and backup<br />
power supply.<br />
Civil design plans and specifications included site plan, grading, drainage, levee access ramp, construction<br />
sequencing plan, vehicle barrier gate, floating trash barrier, security fence, warning signs, demolition and<br />
erosion/scour control plan, and canal stabilization treatments. Coordinated closely with other disciplines<br />
including geotechnical and structural.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, Modeling, Design,<br />
Permitting Bidding<br />
Assistance, Construction<br />
Phase Services, O&M<br />
Manual<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Design, Bidding Assistance,<br />
Construction Phase<br />
Services
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
JC Bermudez Park Recycled Storm Water Irrigation, Doral, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
City of Doral, FL<br />
8300 NW 53 rd Street<br />
Suite 202<br />
Doral, FL 33166<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Barbara Hernandez<br />
Parks and Recreation<br />
Director<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
3<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
305-593-6600<br />
The City of Doral retained <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> to provide modeling, design, permitting (ERP and CUP),<br />
construction support services, and O&M manual for the fast-track implementation of a $2.9M recycled<br />
storm water irrigation system for the 80-acre park. Major project components included emergency lake<br />
intake structure, 2 MG above ground concrete storage tank, 3,000 gpm stormwater pump station, 130<br />
micron disk filters with automatic backwash, gravity sand filter for backwash water, bleach disinfection<br />
system, 1,400 gpm irrigation pumps, 7,000 feet of 12” diameter looped main, irrigation system, and<br />
automated controls. Developed 20-year water balance model to calculate crop ET, rainfall-runoff,<br />
irrigation demand, and stormwater irrigation to determine optimal size of pump station and storage tank.<br />
Construction documents were completed within 4 months of notice to proceed. SFWMD’s conceptual<br />
ERP and CUP permit modifications were approved within 5 weeks of application submittal. The project<br />
was partially funded by a $1M alternative water supply grant from the SFWMD.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
c. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, Modeling, Design,<br />
Permitting Bidding<br />
Assistance, Construction<br />
Phase Services, O&M<br />
Manual<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Design, Bidding Assistance,<br />
Construction Phase<br />
Services<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Surveying
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Palatlakaha River Watershed Study, Lake County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Ongoing<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
4<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Lake County Water Authority<br />
Ron Hart, P.E.<br />
352-343-3777<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> was retained for the development of a watershed model and evaluation of dam structure removal/replacement options for<br />
the Palatlakaha River Restoration Project in Lake County. The contributing area is over 200 square miles and the river flows<br />
exceed 1000 cfs during the flood flow gates open condition. This project involves evaluation of existing manually operated<br />
radial gate dam structures along the river, modification, or removal and replacement of the dam structures, preparation of final<br />
design plans for the structures and permitting with the goal of removing the manual operations of the radial gates. The model<br />
was developed in ICPR (v 3.10, SP 8) and incorporated an analysis of existing rainfall data, stage and flow data. Sensitivity<br />
analysis of the upstream watershed was required to determine reasonable flow rates out of upstream lakes and dam<br />
structures, with limited operational data. The model contains 280 square miles of the watershed in Lake County. LiDAR data<br />
was obtained and supplemented with conventional survey of the river (cross sections every 1,000 feet) along with key pipe,<br />
roadway overtopping, and weir elevations of the connecting sub-basins. As a result of a pre-application meeting with<br />
SJRWMD, several alternatives have been developed in order to balance the project objectives with permitting requirements in<br />
a cost effective manner.<br />
Additional elements include surveying, project design, permitting, and implementation assistance. Once the model was<br />
developed, <strong>King</strong> prepared construction plans for the proposed modifications. The design includes new, sheet pile weirs<br />
upstream of the current dams. This allows for the removal of the radial gates without adversely impacting the surrounding<br />
ecology or residents along the river. Permit applications have been submitted and are under review. The project is currently<br />
on schedule in accordance with the contract’s scope of services and fee schedule.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Water Resources, Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong><br />
b. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
c.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Water Resources, Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong>, Ecological
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Baker County Stormwater Master Plan, Baker County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
5<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Baker County<br />
Ed Preston<br />
904-259-3354<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was retained by Baker County to develop a<br />
Comprehensive Stormwater Master Plan for the 589-square-mile<br />
county. The objective of the master plan is to develop baseline<br />
information about the watershed, prepare a hydrologic and hydraulic model<br />
of the major streams, develop floodplain maps of the county, identify<br />
problem areas, develop recommendations for engineering solutions and<br />
permitting requirements, prepare cost estimates, and develop a capital<br />
improvement plan. Recommendations are intended to improve flood<br />
control, water quality, protect the floodplain, and reinforce local permitting<br />
requirements to improve the ability to make sound decisions regarding<br />
future development within the County. Partially funded by the St. John<br />
Water Management District, the Master Plan will be completed in three<br />
phases.<br />
Phase I<br />
Conducted field surveys to supplement existing inventoried data and to<br />
collect new data to complete a GIS geo database of major roadway cross-drains, structures, channels,<br />
channel crossings, retention and detention ponds and other major drainage features necessary to<br />
develop a master drainage model for the St. Mary’s River drainage Basins within Baker County. Data collection<br />
primarily used survey grade GPS equipment where vertical or horizontal accuracy was critical and mapping<br />
grade GPS equipment was utilized where vertical and horizontal positional accuracy was not critical. The<br />
surveyed inventory included channel cross-sections, floodplain cross-sections and structure Cross-Sections<br />
located along the main channel of the primary tributaries to the St. Mary River. This inventoried data was<br />
uploaded to the GIS database for creation of a master base map and model. Structures were surveyed to<br />
establish the necessary geometry including culvert invert elevations, top of road profiles, bridge geometry (pier<br />
width, number of piers, and top and bottom deck elevations), and other information required for modeling<br />
purposes. The total Phase 1 project required over 10 miles of section work to be completed in a twenty working<br />
day time period.<br />
Phase II<br />
Involved the compilation and review of previous studies, surveying of 39 stream cross-sections, review of<br />
historic rainfall, flow, and water level stations and data, establishment of procedures for stormwater model<br />
calibration and verification, assessment of the influence of groundwater on stormwater simulations, and<br />
extensive documentation (pictures and surveyed high water mark elevations) of the flooding impacts of Tropical<br />
Storm Fay.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Water Resources, Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong><br />
b. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Surveying<br />
c.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Highland Avenue Stormwater Retrofit, Phase 1, Largo, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2012<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
6<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
City of Largo<br />
Leland Dicus, P.E.<br />
727-587-6713<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided a PD&E study and design services for the reconstruction<br />
of Highland Avenue from East Bay Drive to Belleair Road. As the project<br />
proceeded, <strong>King</strong> identified the potential for grant funding from the<br />
Southwest Florida Water Management District for the enhancement of<br />
stormwater runoff from the contributing basins and assisted the City in<br />
obtaining a cooperative SWFWMD grant.<br />
Currently, <strong>King</strong> is providing stormwater design for both phases of the<br />
project including modeling, permitting, plans preparation, and<br />
construction observation services for the stormwater enhancement and<br />
retrofit project. Phase 1 of the project includes expanding an existing<br />
pond to treat stormwater runoff from a mainly untreated residential/<br />
commercial intensive land uses. Phase 2 includes design of a low flow<br />
diversion pipe system to implement several LID design concepts to<br />
improve water quality within the contributing watershed, including the<br />
use of bioswale treatment systems within the Highland Avenue right of<br />
way. Given that multiple sources of funding are used on this project,<br />
plans needed to be prepared as one cohesive set of construction<br />
documents that allowed easy separation of the project components<br />
based on the funding source.<br />
The drainage master planning effort for this project included ICPR<br />
modeling of approximately 620 acres of urban watershed. Several alternatives were evaluated to provide the<br />
City with the recommended alternatives that included the work completed within Phase 1 and future work to<br />
be completed in Phase 2. The phase 1 pond expansion accepts approximately 100 acres of previously<br />
untreated runoff, without increasing upstream peak elevations. Phase 2 includes the construction of a<br />
diversion weir to route the first 1.5 inches of runoff from approximately 145 acres into this pond. Additionally,<br />
bioswales will be designed to enhance the system when the Highland Avenue pedestrian improvements are<br />
implemented.<br />
Other services provided by <strong>King</strong> included survey and right of way mapping, report preparation, conducting public<br />
meetings, utility impact assessment / coordination.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Water Resources, Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong><br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Water Resources, Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong>, Ecological<br />
Services
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Hammock Park Natural System Restoration, Phase 2,<br />
Dunedin, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
7<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
City of Dunedin<br />
Thomas Burke, P.E.<br />
727-298-3175<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided oversight of development and implementation of a 3-year monitoring study for the City of<br />
Dunedin’s Hammock Park Natural Systems Restoration Project cooperatively funded by SWFWMD. The<br />
project required the design of a hydrologic and ecological monitoring protocol that included the installation<br />
of a monitoring array consisting of piezometers, staff gages and rain gauges, along with establishment of<br />
vegetative monitoring transects using WAP methodologies. The monitoring protocol was designed to detect<br />
positive hydrological and vegetative shifts towards the restoration of historic wetland functions of the on site<br />
wetlands in the post-project condition. Following the completion of the 3-year study, a Final Assessment<br />
Report was prepared detailing the overall effectiveness of the project design along with recommendations<br />
for system improvement and/or the potential for using treated stormwater to augment surficial flows.<br />
Cost: $1.1 million<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Ecological Services,<br />
Operation & Maintenance<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Battelle Memorial Institute, Louisiana Coastal Peer Review<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
8<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Battele Memorial Institute<br />
Karen Foster<br />
561-656-6304<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided independent external peer review<br />
services of the USACE Integrated Feasibility Study<br />
and Environmental Impact Statement for the LCA-<br />
Small Diversion at Convent/Blind River. The study<br />
area is 165 square miles.<br />
Panel member responsible for the review of several<br />
hydrologic and hydraulic models used to assess<br />
current conditions and the effectiveness of new<br />
infrastructure proposed to reintroduce freshwater,<br />
sediments, and nutrients to the Maurepas Swamp,<br />
approximating the natural historic flooding cycle, to<br />
rehydrate wetlands, restore sediment deposition, and<br />
reduce salinity to compensate for the negative effects<br />
of reduced seasonal floodplain inundation from the<br />
Mississippi River, sea level rise, and land subsidence.<br />
The general components of the plans evaluated involved the following: gated culvert gravity diversion of<br />
Mississippi River flows (approximately 3,000 cfs), a conveyance canal to convey diversion to the upper<br />
reaches of the Blind River canal system, canal berm cuts to restore wetland inundation, various water control<br />
structures strategically located to raise water levels to divert water through berm cuts into the wetlands, and<br />
several culverts to deliver freshwater under US Hwy 61.<br />
Several models were applied to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed project including HEC-HMS to generate a<br />
continuous hydrologic record of flows (rainfall-runoff process); HEC-RAS to simulate dynamic flow and storage<br />
(unsteady one dimensional hydraulic calculations); Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code, a two dimensional<br />
hydrodynamic and water quality model used to analyze the effects of freshwater diversions on the wetlands; and<br />
a Water Balance model used for long-term simulations in the area.<br />
Panel review comments were provided in the areas of model calibration and verification, boundary conditions<br />
uncertainty, sensitivity analyses, hydrologic water balance, spacing and location of proposed berm gaps,<br />
location and invert elevation of culverts, need for backflow preventers, sediment deposition rates, wetland<br />
phosphorus uptake, operations plan, flooding impacts to adjacent properties, screening criteria, future needs<br />
for adaptive management, and monitoring procedures.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Independent Peer Review,<br />
Water Resources, Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong><br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Nutrimix Feed Company, Industrial NPDES Permit Renewal<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
9<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Nutrimix Feed Company<br />
Calle A, Zona Portuaria, Industrial Sabana,<br />
Guaynabo, PR 00953<br />
Waldemar Gonzalez<br />
President<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
787-622-7707<br />
Project manager for the renewal of the Individual Industrial NPDES permit (PR 0024619) with EPA Region 2.<br />
Responsibilities included letter to EPA responding to a compliance evaluation inspection report of the facility;<br />
evaluation and recommendation for renewal as either individual or general permit; recommendations regarding<br />
sampling, structural water quality improvements, and recording procedures; compilation and review of data and<br />
documents; filling out the forms and preparation of permit documents; facility walk through to review operations;<br />
update of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan; correspondence and communications with the EPA; and<br />
clarification responses to questions raised by the EPA after permit submittal. Total fee 10,454.00<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Permitting, SWPPP,<br />
Correspondence<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
Technical Support
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Peck Sink Stormwater Park, Hernando County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
10<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Ongoing<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Hernando County – Florida<br />
20 North Main Street Room 262<br />
Brooksville, FL 34601<br />
Dawn Velsor<br />
Lead Environmental<br />
Planner<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
352-540-6529<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided multi-disciplinary services for this 111+ acre proposed County park and stormwater retrofit project,<br />
located southwest of the City of Brooksville in unincorporated Hernando County. This unique property is<br />
dominated by karst features, including the Peck Sink complex, and receives mostly untreated storm water runoff<br />
from nearly 8,000 acres of urban and rural land uses within a closed drainage basin.<br />
Project objectives include stormwater quality mitigation and<br />
volume management from both basin-wide and site-specific<br />
perspectives, as well as restoration and management of native<br />
plant communities. Services provided included data collection<br />
and evaluation, topographic survey, wetland delineation,<br />
vegetation and wildlife assessments, nuisance & exotic<br />
species mapping, habitat enhancement plans, design of park<br />
features and amenities, hydrologic modeling, engineering and<br />
drainage design, utilities design, engineering and permitting<br />
and construction bidding assistance. The conceptual master<br />
plan incorporates low impact development (LID) site design<br />
and storm water treatment concepts, storm water treatment<br />
ponds, filter marshes and<br />
floodplain attenuation areas.<br />
The first phase of this<br />
project, which includes<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
entrance driveways and stormwater infrastructure, is currently under<br />
construction. When completed, the overall project will provide a passive use<br />
public park that will combine the proposed storm water treatment aspects with<br />
the park components, and will provide a unique opportunity to educate the<br />
public about various LID features and benefits, stormwater treatment, habitat<br />
enhancement and restoration, as well as the dynamics and sensitivity of the<br />
karst and sinkhole features relative to the aquifer protection. <strong>King</strong> also teamed<br />
with Andreyev <strong>Engineering</strong> and Ambient Technologies for the project.<br />
Andreyev provided geotechnical exploration, ground and surface water<br />
monitoring services, and Ambient conducted a Ground Penetrating Radar<br />
(GPR) survey within 15 acres of proposed deep pond construction areas in<br />
order to characterize near-surface geological conditions relative to suspected<br />
karst activity or anomalies.<br />
Cost $1.3 million<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
• 111+ acre Passive Use Park<br />
• Design of Park Features<br />
• Conceptual Master Plan - LID<br />
• Stormwater Quality Mitigation / Volume<br />
Management<br />
• Native Plant Restoration<br />
• Data Collection and Evaluation<br />
• Wetland Delineation<br />
• Hydraulic Modeling<br />
• Control Structure Design<br />
• Surveying Services<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Water Resources, Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong>, Ecological<br />
Services, Surveying &<br />
Mapping<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
Andreyev <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Geotechnical /<br />
Hydrogeological<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong>
SF 330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
Sanitary <strong>Engineering</strong> Services (Function Code 52)<br />
Water supply, wastewater treatment, effluent disposal and reuse have become and will continue to be critical<br />
issues for municipalities and private utilities. As environmental regulations develop, disposing of waste products<br />
and reusing resources are becoming a bigger challenge. As populations grow and economic opportunity<br />
expands, new sources of water need to be developed. At the same time additional means of wastewater and<br />
biosolids treatment, reuse and disposal grow, too. <strong>King</strong>’s water and wastewater engineers work diligently with<br />
clients to plan, design, permit and construct systems that address these needs in a comprehensive and holistic<br />
manner.<br />
Our expertise and experience includes:<br />
Planning Services<br />
• Utilities Master Planning<br />
• Hydraulic Modeling<br />
• Preliminary <strong>Engineering</strong> Evaluations<br />
• Assistance with Developing Capital<br />
Improvement Plans<br />
• Cost Estimating<br />
• Funding and Grant Application Assistance<br />
• Repair and Replace (R&R) Evaluations<br />
Water Systems<br />
• Traditional Source Development<br />
• Alternative Source Development<br />
• Wellfields and Intake Systems<br />
• Raw Water Pumping and Transmission<br />
• Conventional and Membrane Treatment<br />
Facilities<br />
• Chemical Adjustment and Disinfection<br />
Systems<br />
• Ground and Elevated Storage Tanks<br />
• Pumping Facilities<br />
• Transmission and Distribution Systems<br />
• Metering and Control Facilities<br />
• Irrigation Systems Design and Control<br />
Wastewater Systems<br />
• High Performance Septic Systems<br />
• Septic System Abandonment Programs<br />
• Infiltration/Inflow Analyses<br />
• Sewer Rehabilitation Programs<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
• Gravity sewers<br />
• Pump Stations<br />
• Force Mains<br />
• Odor Control Systems<br />
• Municipal / Industrial Treatment Facilities<br />
• High Level Disinfection<br />
• Effluent Storage, Pumping and Disposal<br />
Systems<br />
• Reuse Systems<br />
• Water Balance and Supply/Demand<br />
Evaluations<br />
• Supplemental Supply Systems<br />
• Gray Water Systems<br />
• Ground and Elevated Storage Tanks<br />
• Pumping Facilities<br />
• Transmission and Distribution Systems<br />
• Metering and Control Facilities<br />
• Irrigation Systems Design and Control<br />
• Reservoirs<br />
• Rapid Infiltration Basins<br />
Regulatory Services<br />
• Construction and Operation Permitting<br />
• Compliance Monitoring<br />
• Compliance Reporting<br />
• Virus Inactivation Credit Determinations<br />
• Initial Distribution System Evaluations<br />
• Capacity Analysis Reports<br />
• Operation and Maintenance Performance<br />
Reports<br />
Our utility projects range from small diameter distribution and service lines in residential neighborhoods to large<br />
diameter transmission mains conveying resources for miles. Our treatment facility experience includes small<br />
package plants and large state-of-the-art treatment facilities with capacities greater than 10 MGD.<br />
SF330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
1
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
Our capabilities go beyond designing, permitting and constructing water and wastewater systems. Our<br />
professional staff includes licensed water and wastewater treatment plant operators. These operators provide<br />
essential, practical advice during the design of our projects and assist with the startup and operation of these<br />
facilities as well as the training of our clients’ staff.<br />
The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support water,<br />
wastewater and reclaimed water services project types.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> In-house<br />
Subconsultant Specialty<br />
Sanitary Engineer<br />
Christopher Kuzler, PE<br />
Task Manager<br />
Franklin Torrealba, PE<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Contract Manager<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Sanitary Engineer<br />
Benjamin Turnage, PE<br />
Sanitary Engineer<br />
Thomas Traina, PE<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team Available Services<br />
SF330 Function<br />
Code<br />
Description<br />
02 Administrative<br />
07 Biologist<br />
08 CADD Technician<br />
12 Civil Engineer<br />
15 Construction Inspector<br />
16 Construction Manager<br />
19 Ecologist<br />
21 Electrical Engineer<br />
22 Electronics Engineer<br />
23 Environmental Engineer<br />
24 Environmental Scientist<br />
27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer<br />
28 Geodetic Surveyor<br />
29 Geographic Information System Specialist<br />
32 Hydraulic Engineer<br />
33 Hydrographic Surveyor<br />
34 Hydrologist<br />
38 Land Surveyor<br />
39 Landscape Architect<br />
42 Mechanical Engineer<br />
47 Planner: Urban/Regional<br />
48 Project Manager<br />
52 Sanitary Engineer<br />
53 Scheduler<br />
55 Soils Engineer<br />
56 Specifications Writer<br />
57 Structural Engineer<br />
58 Technician/Analysis<br />
60 Transportation Engineer<br />
61 Value Engineer<br />
62 Water Resources Engineer<br />
NPDES<br />
Sanitary Engineer<br />
Loc Truong, PE<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
2
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System within the City of Miami Springs,<br />
Florida.<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department<br />
3071 SW 38 th Avenue<br />
Miami, FL 33146<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Rod Lovett<br />
Chief-Sewer Collection<br />
Division<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
On-going<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
1<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
786-268-5025<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>King</strong>) has been selected by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department<br />
(MDWASD) to provide Construction Management and Inspection services for the “Preliminary Evaluation Prior to<br />
Design and/or Other Upgrades to the MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System within the City of Miami Springs, Florida”.<br />
The project involves construction management and inspection of a Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES) for<br />
a portion of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) wastewater collection system within the<br />
City of Miami Springs, Florida. The sanitary sewer collection system consists of approximately 46 miles of gravity<br />
pipes, 912 manholes, and 17 separate wastewater collection basins within the City of Miami Springs, Florida.<br />
<strong>King</strong> is monitoring and inspecting the Contractor's cleaning and evaluation of MDWASD's sanitary sewer<br />
collection system, including gravity system, manholes and pump stations, for compliance with project<br />
specifications. Cleaning is accomplished by high velocity hydro-cleaning equipment. Smoke testing is also<br />
performed for the entire system. Additionally, <strong>King</strong> is documenting and reporting any discrepancies found on the<br />
MDWASD provided Sewer Atlas Maps on the Department's Atlas Correction Form so that MDWASD GIS Master<br />
Atlas sheets are up date.<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> activity includes reviewing the video inspection recordings of the sewer lines that are cleaned and<br />
video inspected by the Contractor within each pump station basin and making repair recommendations according<br />
to MDWASD’s approved repair protocols. The protocols describe repair technologies that will be used to<br />
rehabilitate the defective segments identified through the SSES project.<br />
Estimated Construction Cost: $270,000<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
b. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design, permitting<br />
and construction.<br />
(3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department Basis of Design Reports<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department<br />
3071 SW 38 th Avenue<br />
Miami, FL 33146<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Dan Edwards, P.E.<br />
Chief – Planning Section<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
On-Going<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
2<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
786-552-8354<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope,<br />
size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was awarded this continuing services<br />
contract through the Miami-Dade Equitable Distribution Work<br />
Program. The purpose of these projects is to identify<br />
Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-<br />
Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force<br />
mains, pump stations preliminary engineering, determine its<br />
sizes and determine the best route for the proposed force<br />
mains in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of<br />
probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of<br />
required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project<br />
schedule. These projects to date include:<br />
1) Pump Station <strong>Engineering</strong> Reports (six) and Pump<br />
Station 717 Sewer Forcemain System Evaluation<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>King</strong>) has been selected<br />
by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to<br />
provide engineering services in the preparation of Basis of<br />
Design Reports. This work assignment involves preparing<br />
pump station engineering reports for six pump station<br />
upgrades, analyzing the proposed Pump Station (PS) 717<br />
sewer forcemain system and providing alternative forcemain<br />
recommendations. These Pump Stations are as follows:<br />
717, 719, 728, 730, 738, and 739.<br />
As part of the analysis, the following criteria were considered:<br />
• Force main’s maintenance issues solved (4-<strong>Inc</strong>h PS 717 force main and 10-<strong>Inc</strong>h golf course force main)<br />
• No “piggy backs”<br />
• No property issues (New booster pump station only)<br />
• Smaller pump station, less total dynamic head<br />
• Flow diversion availability (72-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main)<br />
• Cost effectiveness<br />
• No under utilization of PS 709<br />
2) 48-inch Water main Interconnect in the Central East Area (Downtown Miami) Preliminary Alternative<br />
Water Main Route Analysis: The MDWASD water transmission system in the Central East Area north of<br />
Downtown Miami needs to be completed from the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 1st Place and NW 17th<br />
Street and south to an existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main along NW 6th Street from NW 7 Avenue to NW 1st Court.<br />
This project involved performing a preliminary alternative water main route analysis in order to interconnect the<br />
existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main at NW 17 Street and the existing 36-<strong>Inc</strong>h on NW 6 Street. The size of the<br />
interconnect water main was determined via modeling by MDWASD to be 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main. The proposed<br />
interconnect will improve water service in MDWASD’s service area, including but not delimited to the AA Arena,<br />
Fisher Island, Overtown, Port of Miami and the Village of Key Biscayne. Currently, when several cruise ships are<br />
being filled with water concurrently, and the existing 24-<strong>Inc</strong>h water main on the Rickenbacker Causeway is<br />
closed, Key Biscayne and Fisher Island do not receive adequate water supply. Therefore, the existing 30-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
and 24-<strong>Inc</strong>h on NW 6 Street from approximately NW 1st Court to Biscayne Blvd were paralleled with a new 36-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h water main in order to improve the available water supply in the area.<br />
Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the
points of connection of the proposed force main, determine its size (48-<strong>Inc</strong>h) and determine the best route for the<br />
proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to<br />
determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 7,300 feet of 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h Water<br />
main in the Miami Downtown area.<br />
3) CL-1 Pump Station 1 to C-2 Forcemain Connection<br />
Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis:<br />
MDWASD has three wastewater treatment plants: South<br />
District Wastewater Treatment Plant (SDWWTP), North<br />
District Wastewater Treatment Plant (NDWWTP), and<br />
Central District Wastewater Treatment Plant (CDWWTP).<br />
The CDWWTP is one of two regional wastewater<br />
treatment plants that currently discharge wastewater<br />
through ocean outfalls. Pursuant to the requirements of<br />
Chapter 2008-232, Laws of Florida Domestic Wastewater<br />
Ocean Outfalls, the discharge of domestic wastewater<br />
through ocean outfalls in Florida will be prohibited after<br />
December 31, 2025. Currently, MDWASD is developing<br />
plans to divert flow from the CDWWTP to other<br />
wastewater treatment plants, including a proposed West<br />
District Water Reclamation Plant (WDWRP) and the<br />
SDWWTP. The proposed interconnection evaluated in<br />
this analysis would allow for wastewater flow from Pump<br />
Station 1 (PS 1) and Pump Station 2 (PS 2) to be diverted<br />
to the proposed WDWRP and the SDWWTP.<br />
This project involved performing a preliminary alternative<br />
pipe route analysis so that PS 1 can pump west to an<br />
existing 42-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main which discharges at a manhole<br />
at NW 13th Avenue and NW 7th Street and the existing<br />
48-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main in the same vicinity. The interconnect<br />
force main size was determined by MDWASD to be a 60-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h force main as a result of modeling showing that a 60-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h force main parallel to the existing 48-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main on NW 2nd Street would provide sufficient pumping<br />
capacity. The project begins on NW 6th Avenue where the point of connection with the existing 84-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
forcemain will be identified. The project then extends west and then north along a route to be determined to NW<br />
6th Street/NW 13th Avenue where the point of connection with the existing 42-<strong>Inc</strong>h force main will be identified.<br />
Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the<br />
points of connection of the proposed force main, determine its size (60-<strong>Inc</strong>h) and determine the best route for the<br />
proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to<br />
determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 5,700 feet of 60-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
Forcemain near the Miami Downtown area.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
b. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
c. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Surveying and Mapping
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
MDWASD – Wastewater Transmission System Hydraulic Computer<br />
Model Task # 1 – Wastewater Gravity Sewer Modeling – Phase 1<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department<br />
3071 SW 38 th Avenue<br />
Miami, FL 33146<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Peter Jelonek, PE<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
On-Going<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
3<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
NA<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
786-552-8226<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>King</strong>) has been selected by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department<br />
(MDWASD) to provide engineering, planning, evaluation, analysis, and wastewater modeling services. The<br />
“Overall Task Order” covers Special Services at the request of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department<br />
(MDWASD).<br />
MDWASD is the fifth largest utility in the nation and provides water and sewer service for most of Miami-Dade<br />
County, serving a current population of over 2,000,000 residents.<br />
MDWASD has a gravity sewer model which includes 1018 basins. The gravity sewer collection system (pipes<br />
only) was developed using interpolated invert elevations. While the gravity pipe network is incorporated into the<br />
overall countywide wastewater model, it is not currently operational. The current operational model is focused on<br />
the pressured system of pipes and pumps using SCADA data real-time pump on/off set points.<br />
As part of the continued development of the wastewater model, MDWASD wishes to incorporate the gravity<br />
system into the model. However, MDWASD wants to use a simplified but accurate methodology to expedite<br />
model development, reduce model run times, and minimize the associated level of effort. The proposed<br />
methodology incorporates two simplifying assumptions:<br />
• Use extrapolated invert elevations for the gravity sewer system pipes. The current extrapolation methodology<br />
starts with the known pipe invert elevation at the wet well and extrapolates inverts upstream as a function of<br />
pipe length and diameter. Alternatively, inverts can be extracted from as-built information which is a time<br />
consuming effort that will still result in some information gaps.<br />
• Use the gravity system stage-storage curve to route gravity basin inflows (design hydrographs) into the pump<br />
station wet well. The alternative is to simulate the gravity system in detail which requires an extensive effort<br />
to develop the system and will substantially increase model run times.
Under this task order, <strong>King</strong> provided the following services:<br />
• Developed the detailed gravity model with as-built invert and rim elevations for Basins 183 and 237.<br />
• Inflow hydrographs were already apportioned to each manhole in the interpolated model provided by<br />
MDWASD, the same ratio was used when distributing the current billing records for basins 183 and 237. The<br />
unit hydrograph was updated based on the Dry Weather Flow hydrograph provided by MDWASD for the two<br />
basins.<br />
• Obtained and confirmed pump curves, wet well inverts, pump on and off levels, pressure curves, and SCADA<br />
for PS 183 and 237.<br />
• Stage storage curves for the interpolated and as-built model were compared for both basins in order to<br />
highlight major differences in data accuracy.<br />
• Stage storage models for Basins 183 and 237 were created using both the interpolated model and the as-built<br />
model storage curves.<br />
• Diurnal pressure patterns for both basins were obtained from MDWASD, applied to the interpolated model<br />
run, and increased until an overflow (or near overflow) condition was observed. This increased pressure<br />
pattern was used as a basis for all other model runs.<br />
• All model scenarios (Interpolated, As-Built, Interpolated Stage Storage, and As-Built Stage Storage) were run<br />
to obtain a history of wet well water levels, inflow, and outflow hydrographs.<br />
• Prepared the following comparison graphs/tables:<br />
o Interpolated stage storage versus as-built stage storage (and error histograms) for basins 183 and 237.<br />
o<br />
Inflow and outflow hydrographs at the wet well for basins 183 and 237 (comparing the four model<br />
scenarios outlined above).<br />
o Wet well water levels for basins 183 and 237 (comparing all four scenarios).<br />
Fee: $21,800<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
b. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
c.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
Computer Modeling<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
Computer Modeling
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Coastal Water Systems Interconnect Project – Phase 1, Basis of<br />
Design Report<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Northwest Florida Water Management District<br />
81 Water Management Drive<br />
Havana, FL 32333-4712<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Mr. Nick Wooten<br />
Bureau Chief, Water<br />
Resources<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
On-going<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
4<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
850-539-5999<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
The Northwest Florida Water Management District<br />
(NWFWMD) retained <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(<strong>King</strong>) to provide planning, engineering, modeling, design,<br />
permitting, and construction management services for the<br />
implementation of regional water system interconnects with<br />
the objective of increasing water supply reliability in<br />
communities along the coastal panhandle in the event of<br />
water shortages resulting from environmental emergencies,<br />
natural disasters, or system failures. The study area<br />
included 18 different coastal utilities in Santa Rosa,<br />
Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, and Gulf counties.<br />
<strong>King</strong> had previously completed a preliminary feasibility study<br />
of coastal water systems interconnects in January 2009.<br />
That study identified potential interconnects that achieved a<br />
high level of reliability for current and future demand in a<br />
cost-effective manner by relying on existing interconnects to<br />
the maximum extent possible and implementing<br />
interconnects in phases to match future demand growth. A<br />
more detailed engineering study was recommended based on the successful results of the feasibility study.<br />
Subsequent to the preliminary study, the NWFWMD retained <strong>King</strong> to proceed with Phase 1 of the Coastal Water Systems Interconnect<br />
Project. The objective of Phase 1 is to develop a Basis of Design Report (BODR). The BODR is intended to define major project elements<br />
and outline a clear course of action prior to initiating detail design activities. Major tasks under the BODR included:<br />
• Analysis of current (2007) and future (2030) water demand for the 18 utilities<br />
• Evaluation of current and future sources of raw water, including current permitted capacities<br />
• Determination of utility emergency production capacities based on well installed pump capacity, high service pumps, and water treatment<br />
plant capacities<br />
• Establishment of minimum interconnect flow reliability targets<br />
• Hydraulic modeling (H2ONET)<br />
• Construction of hydraulic model (H2ONET) including all 18 utilities, pumps, ground and elevated storage tanks, major<br />
transmission and distribution mains, valves, and interconnects. Used TAZ population data for geographical distribution of<br />
demand.<br />
• Model calibration to 2007 conditions (flows and pressures)<br />
• Creation of a 2030 base model including additional improvements (pumps, pipes, source waters)<br />
• Model evaluation of regional interconnect alternatives including failure scenarios and required additional infrastructure to<br />
maximize interconnect capacity<br />
• Analysis of finished water quality and desktop blending calculations to evaluate potential water quality problems and recommend<br />
chemical adjustment when blending waters from different sources and treated by different methods. Also estimated residence times of<br />
water in interconnect pipes and recommended solutions. Effort included finished water quality sampling event.<br />
• Evaluation of alignment alternatives considering cost, existing ROW/easements, utility conflicts, and MOT requirements, etc.<br />
• Prepared 200 scale maps showing preferred horizontal alignments<br />
• Preliminary design drawings<br />
• Permitting requirements and schedule<br />
• Prepared opinion of probable cost<br />
• Preliminary Operations Plans/Protocols<br />
• Detailed implementation schedule<br />
• Basis of Design Report summarizing Phase 1 work<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Water Use Analysis, Water<br />
Modeling, Water Quality<br />
Analysis, Preliminary<br />
Design Drawings, Cost<br />
Estimates<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Preliminary <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
Water Modeling, GIS,<br />
Schedule
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan, Town of Lauderdale-<br />
By-The-Sea, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Lauderdale by-the-Sea<br />
Municipal Services<br />
4501 Ocean Drive<br />
Lauderdale by-the-Sea, FL 33308<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Mr. Don Prince<br />
Municipal Services Director<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
5<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
954-776-5119<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> was retained by the Town of Lauderdale-By-The-Sea (LBTS) to provide sanitary sewer system evaluation,<br />
analysis and engineering services for their “Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan”. The sanitary sewer<br />
collection system consists of two separate wastewater collection basins with approximately 10.5 miles of gravity<br />
pipes, 165 manholes and two pump stations (60 HP and 7.5 HP) with their respective force mains.<br />
The project involved conducting evaluations to quantify the needs of the existing gravity sewer system, flow<br />
meter, and lift stations, recommend improvements, prepare cost estimates, and develop a Sanitary Sewer Capital<br />
Improvements Plan (SSCIP). The work performed included:<br />
• Video review of 165 CCTV inspections – 632 defects were identified.<br />
• Assign repair recommendations based on approved repair protocol – 252 repairs were recommended.<br />
• Flow meter evaluation – (1) verified meter was installed as per manufacture’s specifications (2) reviewed<br />
calibration records.<br />
• Inspection and evaluation of two lift stations including hydraulic analysis, spacing requirements and<br />
electrical requirements – various minor repairs were recommended.<br />
• Infiltration and inflow (I/I) evaluation, including the development of dry and wet weather hydrographs for<br />
each lift station – analysis identified both stations as rain dependent I/I (RDII).<br />
• Prepared a comprehensive SSCIP report to assist the town of LBTS in planning ongoing maintenance,<br />
system repairs and upgrades, and quantifying the potential savings from the implementation of an<br />
Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) program.<br />
The SSCIP plan included the costs of repairs to the gravity sewer lines and two lift stations as well as the<br />
replacement costs of the lift stations and other key components of the sewer system. In addition, it included costs<br />
related to a proposed Gravity Sewer System Capacity Evaluation Hydraulic Model, proposed Lift Station<br />
Monitoring Program, proposed Suspect Lateral I/I Program, and I/I Reduction Maintenance Program.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
b. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Doral, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Pasco County General Professional and Consulting<br />
Services Agreement- Pasco County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Pasco County Utilities<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Contract1987-current<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Bob Sigmond - Director<br />
Utilities Fiscal Services Dept.<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
For the past 24 years, <strong>King</strong> has been providing professional<br />
engineering consulting services on an as-needed basis for projects<br />
related to the design, permitting and construction, operation,<br />
maintenance, rehabilitation, and expansion of facilities for water,<br />
wastewater and reclaimed water systems. Projects include water<br />
treatment plants, wastewater treatment plants, pump stations,<br />
gravity sewers, reservoirs, pipelines and reuse stations. The<br />
following project describes our recent wastewater treatment<br />
facility project and scope of services. Additional wastewater<br />
treatment and pumping systems projects are listed on the<br />
following page.<br />
Shady Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion-14 mgd<br />
In 2007, <strong>King</strong> was retained to provide design, permitting and<br />
construction services for the expansion of the Shady Hills<br />
Subregional WWTP from 2 mgd to 14 mgd. This project included the<br />
complete replacement of the existing headworks; four anoxic basins;<br />
three new aeration basins with DO control, each equipped with<br />
internal recycle pump stations for nitrate removal; four new 80-foot<br />
clarifiers; five deep bed mono-media filters; conversion of the<br />
existing high service pump station to a filter washwater pump station;<br />
conversion of the existing chlorine contact chamber and effluent<br />
transfer pump station to a filter washwater mud well; two new<br />
chlorine contact chambers with sodium hypochlorite storage and<br />
feed system; 32 mgd effluent transfer pump station; one 5 MG<br />
ground storage tank; 24 mgd high service reclaimed water pump<br />
station; 80,000 gpd septage/grease receiving station with screens,<br />
storage and vacuum filters; two 1-MG sludge storage tanks with<br />
scale house; 21 MG lined reject water storage pond; and, a new<br />
Administration Building. The project included expansion of the<br />
potable and plant service water systems; new standby generator and<br />
power distribution system, distributed control system, and security<br />
system. The plant expansion was designed to allow the future<br />
expansion to 21 mgd. Construction was completed 2010.<br />
Cost: $67 million<br />
SERVICES:<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
6<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
varies<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-847-8041<br />
• Master Planning – Water,<br />
Wastewater, Reclaimed Water<br />
• Project Feasibility<br />
• Hydraulic Modeling<br />
• Preliminary and Final Design<br />
• Studies / Evaluations<br />
• System Analysis / Reports and<br />
Recommendations<br />
• System Performance Analysis<br />
• Regulatory Evaluations<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Preparation of Specifications,<br />
Bid Documents, and<br />
Construction Drawings<br />
• Bid Services including<br />
Preparation, Negotiations, and<br />
Evaluations<br />
• Construction Administration and<br />
Field Observations<br />
• Operation and Maintenance<br />
Activities for system<br />
Management<br />
• Start-up and Equipment Testing<br />
• Environmental Assessments<br />
• Quality Assurance / Quality<br />
Control<br />
• Contract Closeout<br />
• Surveying Services<br />
• Maintenance of Traffic<br />
• Environmental/Ecological<br />
Assessments
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Pasco County General Professional and Consulting<br />
Services Agreement -Pasco County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Pasco County Utilities<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Bob Sigmond - Director<br />
Utilities Fiscal Services Dept.<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
ADDITIONAL MAJOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROJECTS<br />
INCLUDE:<br />
Wastewater Treatment Facilities Projects<br />
• Wastewater Treatment Plants (8) Capacity Analysis / Operation and<br />
Maintenance Reports annually for 5 years<br />
• Lacoochee Wastewater Treatment Plant-52,000 gpd tubular tank<br />
• Lacoochee WWTP Flow Equalization System and Rerating<br />
• Odessa Subregional WWTP Upgrade (0.15 to 0.30 mgd)<br />
• Odessa Subregional WWTP Plant Expansion (from 0.3 to 1.0 mgd)<br />
• Land O’Lakes Subregional Wastewater Treatment Plant<br />
Phase 1B (8.0 mgd to 1.0 mgd)<br />
• Land O’Lakes Subregional Wastewater Treatment Plant (3.5 mgd)<br />
• Shady Hills Subregional WWTP Upgrade Phase 2 (from 0.4 to 3.5 mgd)<br />
• Reuse Metering and Controls<br />
• Process Equipment Evaluation and Rehabilitation Project for Hudson<br />
and Embassy Hills Wastewater Treatment Facilities<br />
• Embassy Hills WWTP Sludge Handling and Filtration Improvements<br />
Wastewater Treatment Plants Capacity Analysis Reports<br />
Pump Stations / Force Main Projects<br />
• Trinity/Odessa Master Wastewater Pump Station and Transmission<br />
Main<br />
• Central Pasco Master Pump Stations and Pipelines Project<br />
Sunlake Master Pump Station/ Collier Parkway Booster Pump Station<br />
• Little Road Water Treatment Plant Odor Control<br />
• Central Pasco Water and Wastewater Systems Improvements<br />
Reclaimed Water Storage Treatment and Distribution Projects<br />
• Timber Pines Reclaimed Water Irrigation System and Master Plan<br />
• Wet Weather Assessment<br />
• Boyette Road Reservoir<br />
• North-Central Pasco Reclaimed Main & Force<br />
• West Pasco Reuse System Northeast Segment<br />
Master Planning<br />
• Pasco County Wastewater Master Plan<br />
• Pasco County Reuse Master Plan<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Contract 1987-current<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
6<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
varies<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-847-8041<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
(City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Prime<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>–Water / Wastewater<br />
Permitting<br />
Ecological Services<br />
Construction Management<br />
Surveying
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Ulmerton Road Utility Adjustments, Pinellas County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
City of Largo<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Leland Dicus, P.E.<br />
City Engineer<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
ongoing<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
5<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
ongoing<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
(727) 587-6713<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
The City of Largo operates its own wastewater and reclaimed water utilities<br />
serving approximately 75,000 residents. Many of the City’s major utilities run<br />
along Ulmerton Road (State Road 688), which bisects the entire length of the<br />
City from east to west for almost 9 miles. Ulmerton Road is a major<br />
commercial traffic artery and is being widened in phases by the Florida<br />
Department of Transportation (FDOT). <strong>King</strong> was retained by the City of Largo<br />
to provide design, permitting, utility coordination and construction services for<br />
utility relocations associated with the different phases of the Ulmerton Road<br />
widening project. To date, the work has been completed under three separate<br />
contracts and has included approximately 16,400 LF of wastewater and<br />
reclaimed water utilities.<br />
Ulmerton Road Utility Relocations<br />
As part of the route analysis and preliminary design process, <strong>King</strong> evaluated and proposed an improved wastewater<br />
system configuration that provided the same level of service to the customer while resolving construction conflicts and<br />
reducing total length of pipe by over 20 percent. <strong>King</strong>’s innovative approach and attention to detail resulted in a cost<br />
savings to the City of approximately $200,000. Much of the alignment was heavily congested with traffic, businesses<br />
and utilities. Therefore, the project required an extensive amount of communication with the FDOT, business owners,<br />
the public and other utility providers located with the right-of-way.<br />
Throughout the project, <strong>King</strong> worked with the FDOT Utility Coordinator to complete the plans and to coordinate<br />
construction schedules, specifications, and estimates using new FDOT Utility Work Schedule forms and electronic<br />
submittal procedures, including FDOT PEDDS and MicroStation drafting software.<br />
Design is currently underway for the final two phases of the project, scheduled to be completed by 2012. As part of<br />
these final design services, <strong>King</strong> performed a study and developed recommendations for integrating expansions of the<br />
City’s sewer system into the utility relocation projects and providing sewer service to areas of the city currently served<br />
by individual septic systems.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
T<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> Design and<br />
Construction Phase<br />
Services<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Keller Septic System Phase Out Program, Keller, TX<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
City of Keller, TX<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
On-going<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E.<br />
Director of Public Works<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
8<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
817-743-4080<br />
The project involves the installation of sanitary sewer lines in three locations within the City of Keller to allow the<br />
decommissioning of septic tanks. The project is a multiphase project, consisting of three phases:<br />
Phase 1 - Katy Road Sanitary Sewer<br />
Improvements: this project involves construction of<br />
9,400 linear feet of new 8-inch gravity sewer line,<br />
2,500 linear feet of 3-inch force main, and one lift<br />
station.<br />
Phase 2 - Big Bear East Collectors: this project will<br />
extend the residential sewer collector system to pick<br />
up the wastewater from the Country Place Estates,<br />
Treehouse Lane, and Blackwood / Florence areas and<br />
transport it to the proposed Big Bear East Branch<br />
Interceptor system (2009) and then to the Trinity River<br />
Authority’s Central Regional Wastewater Treatment<br />
Plant in Grand Prairie.<br />
Phase 3 - Marshall Branch East Collectors: this<br />
Proposed Wastewater Line Profile<br />
project involves construction of a residential sewer<br />
collector system to pick up the wastewater from the Belaire Hills Estates and Summer Ridge areas and transport it to<br />
the proposed East-West Marshall Branch Interceptor system and then to the Trinity River Authority’s Denton Creek<br />
Wastewater Treatment Plant in Roanoke. <strong>King</strong> prepared all the application material and assisted the City in<br />
obtaining low-interest rate funding for the project through the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) in 2010.<br />
The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) is a State Agency created by the Texas Legislature in 1957 to<br />
provide loans to local governments for water supply projects and wastewater projects such as the one we are here to<br />
talk about tonight. TWDB financial assistance programs are funded through state-backed bonds and federal grant<br />
funds.<br />
The TWDB includes the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) in its portfolio of financial assistance<br />
programs. With <strong>King</strong> assistance, the City of Keller in 2010 made application for these funds and competed<br />
successfully against hundreds of other cities to obtain these most sought after funds. Funded in part by federal grant<br />
money, the CWSRF provides loans at interest rates lower than the market can offer to any eligible applicant. With<br />
either option, the borrower will receive a net long-term interest rate that is effectively 1.6 percent below the rate the<br />
borrower would receive on the open market at the time of closing. This 1.6 percent interest rate reduction equates to<br />
a savings of approximately $140,000 per $1 million borrowed during the life of a loan. Based on an expected<br />
borrowing of approximately $6 Million, these subsidized loans from the Texas Water Development Board will save<br />
the citizens of Keller over $800,000.<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Austin, TX<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Funding Assistance, Planning, Utilities <strong>Engineering</strong>, Permitting<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Funding Assistance, Planning, Utilities <strong>Engineering</strong>, Permitting
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
9<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Water, Wastewater & Reclaimed Water Master Plan, Baker<br />
County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Baker County, Florida<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Ed Preston<br />
Planning & Zoning<br />
Director<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Baker County is entering a period of potential growth and<br />
County officials decided to have this Master Plan prepared.<br />
The County is considering forming a regional utility, and is<br />
using the Master Plan to organize utility elements and<br />
secure quality facilities in the event of the County taking over<br />
the regional system. The Master Plan identified a new MBR<br />
wastewater treatment facility and new regional well field as<br />
significant elements of the system. This study set the<br />
ground work for Baker County to become a regional utility<br />
and provider of these services. This document established<br />
design criteria for regional water, wastewater and reclaimed<br />
water facilities.<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if<br />
applicable)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
904-259-3354<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Environmental<br />
Engineer<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
Environmental<br />
Engineer<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miscellaneous <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Dunedin, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
City of Dunedin<br />
542 Main Street<br />
Dunedin, FL 34698<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Mr. Douglas Hutchens<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
10<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Various Project<br />
Completion Dates<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-298-3005<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> has been providing engineering services on a continuing basis for the design, permitting and construction of miscellaneous public works<br />
projects. To date, projects have included stormwater and environmental improvements for Hammock Park, channel water quality control,<br />
wetland system improvements, utility coordination on downtown redevelopment projects, residential reclaimed water systems, reclaimed<br />
water transmission mains, SWFWMD grant coordination, water main replacement projects, new and rehabilitated potable water wells, sanitary<br />
sewer systems, city-wide telecommunications conduits, maintenance of traffic plans, and reverse osmosis water treatment plant, and<br />
advanced wastewater treatment plant modifications and upgrades.<br />
The following list depicts many of the tasks that have been performed under various scopes for the City of Dunedin projects listed.<br />
• Preliminary and final design services<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Reports<br />
• Studies<br />
• Modeling<br />
• Bid services including preparation negotiations, and evaluations<br />
• Construction management including observation and inspection<br />
• Operation and maintenance<br />
• Start-up, equipment testing<br />
• Quality assurance/quality control<br />
• Survey<br />
• Landscape services<br />
• Residential Reclaimed Water Distribution Systems<br />
• Reclaimed Water Transmission System Hydraulic Model<br />
The projects executed under this contract include:<br />
• Lift Station #10 Refurbishment<br />
• Main Street Water Main Replacement<br />
• LS-15 Influent Sewer<br />
• LS-15 Force Main Replacement<br />
• Rosewood Channel Stabilization<br />
• Management, Operations and Maintenance (MOM) Program Assessment<br />
• Weathersfield Booster Pump Station Reclaimed Water Pump Replacement<br />
• Lift Station 20 Evaluation<br />
• Spanish Trails Sanitary Sewage Study<br />
• Keene Road Utility Relocation<br />
• Belcher Road Reclaimed Water Storage and Booster Pump Station<br />
• Spanish Trails Sanitary Sewer and Reclaimed Water System<br />
• Community Center<br />
• Dunedin Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Transfer Pump Upgrade<br />
• Disinfection Evaluation for Removal / Inactivation of Viruses<br />
• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Pretreatment Chlorine Feed System<br />
• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Green Sand Filter Rehabilitation<br />
• Water Plant Green Sand Filters No. 6 and 7<br />
• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Chemical Bulk Storage System<br />
• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Modifications<br />
• Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Stainless Steel Piping Modifications<br />
• Coastal Raw and Reclaimed Water Main<br />
• Reclaimed Water South Loop Transmission Main<br />
• Dunedin Risk Management Plans $ Process Safety Management Plans<br />
• Capacity Analysis Report for 6.0 MGD Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design, permitting<br />
and construction.
SF 330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
Ecological Services (Function Codes 07 and 19)<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s Ecological staff has completed over 40 ecosystem/ecological restoration projects ranging from 10 acre<br />
habitat restoration projects to complex ecosystem restoration projects within large watersheds requiring<br />
extensive modeling of surface and groundwater conditions, erosion control measures, identification of wildlife<br />
and plant species, and permitting through state and local regulatory agencies.<br />
Each of these projects required <strong>King</strong> to coordinate with both cooperative funding partners and various<br />
interested parties and permitting agencies in order to successfully address the conditions and challenges unique<br />
to each project. As a result, our staff is intimately familiar with various regulatory requirements and the<br />
inevitable changes and updates to such regulations.<br />
<strong>King</strong> approaches each project with the understanding that the final plan must be ecologically and financially<br />
sound, with long-term management and sustainability as the prime objectives. Our experience includes the<br />
planning and design of created forested and herbaceous wetland systems, restoration and enhancement of<br />
degraded uplands and wetlands and the preservation of land with high ecological values.<br />
All of <strong>King</strong>'s Ecological team members are authorized by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission<br />
(FWC) to conduct work pursuant to a valid Scientific Collection Permit. Additionally, <strong>King</strong>’s ecological staff<br />
members, Mike Palmer and Ben Ballard, are authorized to capture, handle and relocate gopher tortoises<br />
pursuant to two valid Gopher Tortoise Authorized Agent Permits as issued by the FWC (#GTA-09-00026 and<br />
#GTA-09-00269).<br />
<strong>King</strong>'s Ecological Services staff consists of 4 Environmental Scientists with professional expertise in a variety of<br />
applicable environmental disciplines including:<br />
• Habitat Restoration & Enhancement Design<br />
• Wetland Functional Analysis<br />
• Stormwater Treatment Retrofitting<br />
• Marine and Freshwater Ecology<br />
• Terrestrial Ecology<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
• Natural Systems Hydrology<br />
• Water Quality Analysis<br />
• Listed Species Management<br />
• Habitat Evaluation and Monitoring<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s Ecological Staff have performed the above listed disciplines for many successful and thriving cooperatively<br />
funded Surface Water Improvement and Management Program (SWIM) habitat restoration and stormwater<br />
retrofit projects in the central Florida area, as well as similar projects throughout the state.<br />
<strong>King</strong> ecologists are experienced in the collection of both qualitative and quantitative field data, as well as the<br />
interpretation of such data relative to decision making or adaptive management recommendations. We have<br />
significant experience in the utilization of various data collection methodologies, including Florida Department<br />
of Environmental Protection Standard Operating Procedures for Field Activities, Florida Fish and Wildlife<br />
Conservation Commission (FWC) Methodology and Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedures (WRAP), Rapid<br />
Assessment Method (RAM) and Florida’s Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM).<br />
Aerial photographs are routinely used in habitat assessments, habitat mitigation design, assessments of coastal<br />
zone changes, and delineation of wetland boundaries. <strong>King</strong>’s environmental scientists are highly skilled and<br />
experienced in the ground truthing of ecosystems derived from aerial photographs, soils maps and other base<br />
SF330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
1
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
data collections in the field. They are also very adept in the interpretation of data and in the interpretation and<br />
use of aerials, including black and white, full-color and infrared.<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s scientists are also able to statistically analyze vegetative and flow data for the development and use of<br />
regression models and other analyses performed by accepted procedures and to recognize patterns of<br />
community transition within the data.<br />
The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support<br />
ecological services project types.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> In-house<br />
Subconsultant Specialty<br />
Task Manager<br />
Brian Skidmore<br />
Bioligist<br />
Peter Bottone<br />
Contract Manager<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Biologist<br />
Benjamin Ballard<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Biologist<br />
Mike Palmer<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team Available Services<br />
SF330 Function<br />
Code<br />
Description<br />
02 Administrative<br />
07 Biologist<br />
08 CADD Technician<br />
12 Civil Engineer<br />
15 Construction Inspector<br />
16 Construction Manager<br />
19 Ecologist<br />
21 Electrical Engineer<br />
22 Electronics Engineer<br />
23 Environmental Engineer<br />
24 Environmental Scientist<br />
27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer<br />
28 Geodetic Surveyor<br />
29 Geographic Information System Specialist<br />
32 Hydraulic Engineer<br />
33 Hydrographic Surveyor<br />
34 Hydrologist<br />
38 Land Surveyor<br />
39 Landscape Architect<br />
42 Mechanical Engineer<br />
47 Planner: Urban/Regional<br />
48 Project Manager<br />
52 Sanitary Engineer<br />
53 Scheduler<br />
55 Soils Engineer<br />
56 Specifications Writer<br />
57 Structural Engineer<br />
58 Technician/Analysis<br />
60 Transportation Engineer<br />
61 Value Engineer<br />
62 Water Resources Engineer<br />
NPDES<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
2
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
Terra Ceia Ecosystem Restoration Project<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
1999<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
1<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Southwest Florida Water Management District<br />
Dr. Brandt Henningsen<br />
(813) 985-7481<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> was contracted by the District to provide design, permitting and construction administration for this largescale<br />
ecosystem restoration project within the Terra Ceia Aquatic and Buffer Preserve. The 1,600 acre property<br />
is jointly owned by the District and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The site was<br />
formerly known as the Terra Ceia Isles parcel and at one time was proposed for a large-scale Development of<br />
Regional Impact. The project provides approximately 200 acres of estuarine habitat restoration and 400 acres of<br />
upland habitat restoration and may represent the largest single restoration project undertaken by the District to<br />
date. Permit approvals were obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the FDEP for the project.<br />
Elements of the project design included the regrading of disturbed wetlands to facilitate nuisance species<br />
removal and replanting with desirable salt marsh grass species, the regrading of agricultural ditches and<br />
associated spoil mounds to facilitate the construction of braided tidal creeks and channels, the regrading of<br />
selected fallow, nuisance species dominated agricultural fields to allow either tidal exchange and planting with<br />
selected salt marsh grass species, or freshwater wetland creation with the planting of freshwater marsh species,<br />
and the clearing of large upland parcels to facilitate nuisance/exotic species removal and replanting with<br />
desirable upland species.<br />
Within the Terra Ceia property, the existing cultural and historical resources were initially identified and mapped<br />
pursuant to the completion of a Level 1 cultural resource survey. The nature and location of each identified<br />
cultural resource was taken into account in the development of the conceptual design for the overall project. At<br />
the time that construction plans were prepared, any cultural resource areas that fell adjacent to proposed work<br />
areas were located using mapping grade GPS equipment and incorporated into the construction plans to ensure<br />
that the construction of habitat restoration areas would not imply impacts to existing cultural resources.<br />
The project received a “Second Place Future of the Region<br />
Award” from the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. <strong>King</strong><br />
also received accolades from review agencies, the project<br />
Cooperator and Construction Contractor for the quality and<br />
accuracy of the ecosystem restoration plan set.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> / Ecological<br />
Services<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Camp Branch Creek – Putnam County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation<br />
Commission<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Ed Hayes, Project Manager<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
2<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE<br />
NUMBER<br />
352-357-2398<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided design and permitting services associated with the proposed restoration of Camp Branch<br />
Creek, a tributary of the St. John’s River located in Putnam County. A section of the original creek was<br />
diverted in the late 1960’s by excavation of a “rim ditch” in association with agricultural activities, which<br />
has resulted in hydrologic impacts (tree fall, soils subsidence and upland species invasion) within the<br />
historic creek bed and wetland floodplain. The objective of the project was to restore flows to the<br />
original creek bed and improve the health and function of the associated wetland system. <strong>King</strong>’s<br />
design focused on the partial back-filling/plugging of the man-made rim ditch system with diversion of<br />
flows back into the historic creek bed, along with removal of flow obstructions within the historic flow<br />
path, in order to mimic the pre-disturbance flow conditions for Camp Branch Creek. Services provided<br />
by <strong>King</strong> under this contract included base data collection and evaluation, environmental assessments,<br />
stormwater and flood modeling, wetland enhancement plan, design, regulatory permitting, bidding<br />
assistance and construction observation.<br />
<strong>King</strong> prepared a topographic survey of the project area, delineated the wetlands along the rim ditch and<br />
historic creek segments, and performed extensive hydraulic modeling of the existing and proposed<br />
conditions. <strong>King</strong> also prepared a Technical Design Memorandum to evaluate design alternatives and<br />
prepared final construction plans and specifications for the selected alternative design. <strong>King</strong> Ecologists<br />
are also providing post-construction monitoring of the wetland enhancement and restoration areas.<br />
Construction<br />
Cost: $263,906<br />
Before<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
After<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Civil, Drainage<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong>, Surveying<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Ecological, Water<br />
Resources Support<br />
e.<br />
f.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
St. Petersburg Junior College WESR Project<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
1999<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
3<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2001<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
St. Petersburg College<br />
Lisa Cook<br />
(850) 245-9487<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> was contracted by St. Petersburg College (SPC) to provide design,<br />
permitting, bid package preparation, and construction management services for<br />
the Wetland Enhancement and Stormwater Retrofit (WESR) project located at<br />
the 102 acre Seminole campus. The WESR was a cooperatively funded project<br />
between SPC, SWFWMD, and Pinellas County. The project involved a<br />
combination of wetland restoration / enhancement of 10 acres of highly<br />
disturbed wetlands in concert with a stormwater retrofit. A series of wetland<br />
and upland ponds "cascade" stormwater through the campus site to provide<br />
treatment. The project provided treatment for the runoff from 74 acres of<br />
developed watershed that otherwise would be discharged to Lake Seminole in<br />
an untreated state. In order to address the unique challenge of a 10-foot plus<br />
drop in topography across the site, <strong>King</strong><br />
developed an innovative design utilizing a<br />
cascading system of ponds and wetland<br />
marshes. Nuisance wetland vegetation,<br />
primarily Brazilian pepper (Schinus<br />
terebinthifolius), Chinese tallow (Sapium<br />
sebiferum), primrose willow (Ludwigia spp.),<br />
potato vine (Dioscorea sp.), and cattail (Typha<br />
spp.) were removed via a combination of<br />
mechanized means and herbicide application.<br />
All wetland restoration areas were replanted<br />
with desirable wetland vegetation and were deemed “successful” by the<br />
permitting agencies. The completed and fully functional project is currently being<br />
utilized by the College as an outdoor classroom to educate students about<br />
stormwater treatment concepts, wetland habitat function and wildlife identification.<br />
This project received an award for professional ecosystem restoration<br />
design from the Florida Native Plant Society (FNPS).<br />
Cost: $ 2 million.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Design, permitting, construction<br />
management services<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Coral Creek Ecosystem Restoration<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
ongoing<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
4<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
TBD<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Southwest Florida Water Management District<br />
Ms. Stephanie Powers<br />
(813) 985-7481<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> is currently under contract to the District to provide<br />
professional engineering and ecological services for the<br />
Coral Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project, a joint<br />
Department/District SWIM habitat restoration project located<br />
on the 2,600-acre Coral Creek Preserve managed by the<br />
FDEP as part of the Charlotte Harbor Preserve State Park<br />
system.<br />
<strong>King</strong> initially conducted a comprehensive Feasibility Study<br />
and developed a Master Conceptual Ecosystem Restoration<br />
Plan for the entire property. The Feasibility Study included<br />
a detailed historical account and trend analysis<br />
documenting changes to the site from pre-1950’s to current<br />
conditions, site reconnaissance work, listed species and<br />
cultural resource assessments, exotic/nuisance plant<br />
inventories, water quality analysis, hydraulic and salinity modeling of the 12,000 acre urbanized West and East<br />
Branch basins of Coral Creek.<br />
Development of the Conceptual Plan targeted hydrological restoration of over 585 acres of degraded<br />
wetland/slough systems and proposed enhancements to the 200-acre West Branch Impoundment. The plan<br />
integrated proposed park improvements while maintaining the permitted stormwater management system function<br />
and flood protection for the adjacent Rotonda West Development and avoiding impacts to over 174 individual inholding<br />
parcels.<br />
In addition, the study included an evaluation of potential salt-water intrusion effects associated with the Coral<br />
Creek Dam removal as well as pollutant loading and stormwater retrofit opportunities to address TMDL concerns<br />
for nutrients within the East Branch of Coral Creek, a FDEP 303(d) listed impaired waterbody.<br />
Following District and FDEP cooperator input on the Conceptual Plan, <strong>King</strong> coordinated the final design,<br />
permitting and is assisting with bid preparation and construction management of restoration / stormwater retrofit<br />
projects 1A and 1B selected for implementation in 2012 and beyond. These projects include design of a geoweb<br />
weir to impound additional water within an existing degraded wetland system and discharge into the East Branch,<br />
returning the system to historic conditions.<br />
Additionally, two freshwater marshes were designed using two sheetpile with concrete cap diversion structures,<br />
returning flows back into East Branch, in accordance with the historic flow pattern established during the modeling<br />
phase of the project.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> / Ecological<br />
Services<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
Archaeological Consultants, <strong>Inc</strong><br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Sarasota, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Archaeological Services<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004)
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Lake Thonotosassa Shoreline Restoration<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
1996<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
5<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2001<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Southwest Florida Water Management District<br />
Lizanne Garcia<br />
(813) 985-7481<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> was contracted by the District to design, permit and manage the construction of a freshwater<br />
marsh creation and restoration project along Lake Thonotosassa, an 819 acre lake located in eastern<br />
Hillsborough County, Florida. FDOT mitigation funds were used for the construction and planting of this<br />
project.<br />
The project involved restoration of approximately 100 acres of disturbed and dewatered freshwater<br />
marsh habitat along the lake's eastern shoreline that was used as improved pasture.<br />
The project involved the removal of a shoreline dike<br />
system and significant regrading of the areas to be<br />
restored. The rehydrated areas were replanted with<br />
desirable freshwater vegetation. A structure was designed<br />
and constructed to divert flow from Baker Creek, the major<br />
tributary to the lake, through the restored freshwater marsh<br />
prior to discharge into the lake.<br />
The primary objective of the project was to provide<br />
removal of both nutrients and suspended solids from Baker<br />
Creek prior to entering the lake, as well as return the<br />
former value to fish and wildlife habitat along the eastern<br />
shoreline of the lake. This successful project required<br />
permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Florida<br />
Department of Environmental Protection and Hillsborough<br />
County.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> / Ecological<br />
Services<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004)
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Alligator Creek Ecosystem Restoration<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
ongoing<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
6<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
n/a<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Southwest Florida Water Management District, Surface Water<br />
Improvement and Management Section<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Stephanie Powers<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
985-7481<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Project objective is enhancement, restoration, and creation of<br />
coastal ecosystem habitats, and water quality improvements<br />
for the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine system, a SWIM Priority<br />
water body. This is a cooperative project with the Florida<br />
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) who owns<br />
and manages the approximately 1,600 acre tract known as<br />
“Alligator Creek” as part of the Charlotte Harbor Preserve<br />
State Park (CHPSP), located south of Punta Gorda, between<br />
Burnt Store Road and the East Wall of Charlotte Harbor in<br />
Charlotte County, Florida.<br />
<strong>King</strong> is was tasked with the design, environmental permitting,<br />
bid preparation and construction management of Project No.’s<br />
4, 5, 6, 7, and 15 as identified in the Alligator Creek<br />
Conceptual Habitat Restoration Plan (Plan) collectively known<br />
as Alligator Creek Habitat Restoration Project-Phase 3.<br />
The project design focuses on the restoration of historic hydroperiods, hydropatterns, salinity gradients and sheet<br />
flow for a habitat mosaic containing over 100 acres of palustrine, oligohaline and estuarine wetland communities<br />
within the project area. The project will also enhance water quality entering the headwaters of Whidden Branch<br />
Creek system and Charlotte Harbor. To accomplish this restoration objective, <strong>King</strong> conducted a detailed H&H<br />
modeling analysis of the existing array of drainage ditches bisecting the project site that convey over 750 acres of<br />
offsite drainage, to ensure the proposed improvements would not result in a negative offsite impact. In addition,<br />
the project targets the removal of 110 acres of exotic/invasive vegetation, primarily dense stands of Brazilian<br />
pepper, and provide where appropriate, selective stormwater enhancements. The project design will<br />
accommodate park management objectives as well as existing listed species and archaeological resources.<br />
It is anticipated that the Project will provide the Charlotte Harbor estuarine ecosystem with hydrological restoration<br />
of important tidal creek and lagoonal habitats, transitional habitats, freshwater marshes, ponds and uplands.<br />
Restoration of these communities will help offset habitat impacts and losses suffered throughout Charlotte Harbor<br />
and will prove valuable for the public and for thousands of coastal species that use the Charlotte Harbor<br />
ecosystem.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> / Ecological<br />
Services<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004)
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Palm River Restoration, Hillsborough County, FL<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
ongoing<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
7<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
n/a<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Southwest Florida Water Management District, FL<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Matt Preston<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-985-7491<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
The Palm River Restoration Project is a multi-faceted, multi-phase<br />
restoration project design within a 28 square mile, highly urbanized<br />
watershed in the City of Tampa and Hillsborough County. As an<br />
initial stage of project implementation, <strong>King</strong> prepared a Feasibility<br />
Study documenting existing data and information which involved<br />
solicitation of input from the District, FDOT and other stakeholders in<br />
order to identify and select specific property locations/components<br />
for implementation. The primary project objectives are to provide<br />
preliminary/final design plans and permitting of multiple stormwater<br />
retrofit and wetland/shoreline habitat restoration projects within the<br />
Palm River/McKay Basin.<br />
Project components included 2D hydrodynamic modeling, flood and<br />
scour analysis, data collection, surveying, pollutant loading/<br />
treatment efficiency, dredging, spoil disposal and bank stabilization<br />
assessments within the C-135/Palm River, a U.S. Army Corps of<br />
Engineers regulated floodway. Initial design phases have focused<br />
on freshwater and tidal wetland habitat restoration and<br />
enhancement, along with stormwater quality treatment from local<br />
sub-basins within the project area.<br />
This contract required multi-disciplinary services from <strong>King</strong> including<br />
civil engineering, survey and construction management over a<br />
projected three to five year period.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
Archaeological Consultants, <strong>Inc</strong><br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Sarasota, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Archaeological Services<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
8<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Lake SueMar Environmental Enhancement<br />
Dunedin, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
City of Dunedin – Florida<br />
737 Louden Avenue 2nd Floor<br />
Dunedin, FL 34697<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Thomas Burke, P.E.<br />
City Engineer<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-298-3175<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
The Lake SueMar stormwater and wetland enhancement project<br />
is served to complement the habitat and drainage improvements<br />
of the recently completed Hammock Park Restoration Project that<br />
was also designed and permitted by <strong>King</strong>. Lake SueMar was<br />
originally a ± 3.6-acre artificial lake that was historically<br />
excavated to provide fill and stormwater retention for the abutting<br />
residential development in the 1960s.<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s project design involved a diversion control structure on<br />
Channel A near Lake SueMar and two overflow weirs along the<br />
banks of the lake adjacent to Channels A and C for division of<br />
runoff into the lake. Additional design included regrading of the<br />
lake to include two sediment sumps near the channel inflows, the<br />
excavation of a deeper pool area within the lake for treatment purposes, and the construction of vegetative<br />
islands and littoral shelves for further habitat enhancement and water quality benefits to Lake SueMar as well as<br />
Cedar Creek and St. Joseph’s Sound. This SWFWMD cooperatively funded project required modeling of<br />
Channels A & C and Lake SueMar, using Cedar Creek as its outfall. Construction plans were developed and an<br />
Individual ERP from SWFWMD and a US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide permit were obtained.<br />
Construction observation services were provided for the duration of construction.<br />
<strong>King</strong> ecologists have been coordinating post-construction monitoring of the project, utilizing the "adaptive<br />
management" approach in order to evaluate stormwater improvement and habitat benefits of the project.<br />
Cost $880,000<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Hydrology and Basin Studies<br />
• Hydraulic Modeling<br />
• Design<br />
• Control Structure<br />
• Overflow Weirs<br />
• Regrading Design<br />
• Habitat Enhancement<br />
• Construction Observation<br />
• Post Construction Monitoring<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> Technologies, <strong>Inc</strong><br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Lake Mary, FL<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Ecological Services<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Structural <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Coopers Point SWIM Project, Clearwater, FL<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Southwest Florida Water Management District<br />
SWIM Section<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Dr. Brandt Henningsen, PhD<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
1997<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
9<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
1999<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Phone: 813-985-7481<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
This District SWIM project involved the creation/restoration of<br />
over four (4) acres of intertidal habitat, including<br />
approximately three (3) acres of Brazilian pepper-dominated<br />
areas graded to intertidal elevations, with most of this area<br />
being planted with salt marsh species.<br />
Additional restoration involved the regrading of spoil mounds<br />
left over from former mosquito ditching to create new<br />
hydrologic connections and deep pool habitat areas.<br />
Services provided by <strong>King</strong> included wetland delineation,<br />
topographical and tree location survey services, design and<br />
permitting. <strong>King</strong> was required to actively coordinate with the<br />
City of Clearwater and Pinellas County in association with<br />
this project. The completed restoration site is utilized as a<br />
passive recreation area and as an outdoor “classroom” for<br />
the neighboring Clearwater Christian College.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
f.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong>, Ecological<br />
services, permitting, and<br />
construction management
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Picnic Island Park Habitat Enhancement / Restoration<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
1992<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
10<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
1992<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Southwest Florida Water Management District -<br />
SWIM Section<br />
Dr. Brandt Henningsen,<br />
PhD<br />
(813) 985-7481<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Picnic Island Park, located in the Port of Tampa encompasses<br />
7.8 acres of sandy beach access. <strong>King</strong> was contracted by the<br />
District to prepare detailed construction plans, permit<br />
applications, bid document preparation and construction<br />
management services for the habitat restoration within<br />
designated areas of the Picnic Island Park.<br />
As part of this project, <strong>King</strong> was required to coordinate services<br />
with the City of Tampa Parks Department. Restoration included<br />
the eradication of exotic vegetation from upland and wetland<br />
areas and the establishment of desirable marine intertidal<br />
habitat through excavation and subsequent replanting with<br />
saltmarsh plant species.<br />
Spoil materials generated by the excavation activities were retained within the park in a series of constructed<br />
observation berms. Salt marsh species have completely filled in the intertidal planting shelves and the restoration<br />
area has become a functioning ecosystem. Approximately 18 acres of intertidal habitats were created/restored in<br />
association with this project.<br />
Permits for this project were obtained from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, US Army Corps of<br />
Engineers, Tampa Port Authority, and Hillsborough County.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> and Ecological<br />
Services<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
SF 330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> (Function Code 12)<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s civil engineering services are comprehensive and include professional services ranging from site<br />
analysis/design and construction cost estimating and permitting to bid evaluation and program/construction<br />
management. Additionally, <strong>King</strong>’s design teams utilize the full range of our in-house support services to assist in<br />
evaluation and preparation of the project deliverables. These disciplines include site planning, transportation<br />
planning and design, landscape architecture, survey services and ecological sciences. <strong>King</strong> also has a LEED<br />
professional to contribute to any project concept. This integrated approach provides excellent potential to<br />
expedite the project’s schedule by minimizing outsourcing to multiple subconsultants. Historically, these<br />
services have been provided to both private sector and public sector projects. <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> has been the<br />
civil engineering subconsultant as well as the prime consultant for many project types including local<br />
government/municipal projects. Project types include municipal services buildings, parks, hospitals, schools,<br />
garages, community buildings such as public libraries and recreational centers, and public utilities facilities such<br />
as solid wastewater and water/wastewater treatment facilities, etc. The following is just a sample of our<br />
government work experience followed by a brief project description.<br />
The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support Civil<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> project types.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> In-house<br />
Subconsultant Specialty<br />
Contract Manager<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Task Manager<br />
Mike Ross, PE<br />
Civil Engineer Sr. Designer<br />
Denise Greer, PE Larry Kistler<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team Available Services for Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Projects<br />
SF330 Function Code<br />
Description<br />
02 Administrative<br />
07 Biologist<br />
08 CADD Technician<br />
12 Civil Engineer<br />
15 Construction Inspector<br />
16 Construction Manager<br />
19 Ecologist<br />
21 Electrical Engineer<br />
22 Electronics Engineer<br />
23 Environmental Engineer<br />
24 Environmental Scientist<br />
27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer<br />
28 Geodetic Surveyor<br />
29 Geographic Information System Specialist<br />
32 Hydraulic Engineer<br />
33 Hydrographic Surveyor<br />
34 Hydrologist<br />
38 Land Surveyor<br />
39 Landscape Architect<br />
42 Mechanical Engineer<br />
47 Planner: Urban/Regional<br />
48 Project Manager<br />
52 Sanitary Engineer<br />
53 Scheduler<br />
55 Soils Engineer<br />
56 Specifications Writer<br />
57 Structural Engineer<br />
58 Technician/Analysis<br />
60 Transportation Engineer<br />
61 Value Engineer<br />
62 Water Resources Engineer<br />
NPDES<br />
SF330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
1
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
M2GEN H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and<br />
Research Institute, Tampa, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
1<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center<br />
Dean Head<br />
VP Facilities Management & Construction<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> was retained by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and<br />
Research Institute to provide site development for a 100,000 sf<br />
building as part of the Moffitt Cancer Center’s 30 acre expansion<br />
site to accommodate biotech research, including the M2GEN<br />
facility. Scope of services also included survey services as well as<br />
master infrastructure design and permitting phase services. Cost:<br />
$15 million<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
813-745-3553<br />
• 100,000 sf biotech research building<br />
• Site Development<br />
• Design / Infrastructure Design<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Surveying<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Manatee County Fleet Maintenance Building<br />
Manatee County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
2<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Manatee County<br />
Salvatore Bordonaro, Jr. Project<br />
Manager<br />
941-708-7450<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> was selected as part of a design-build team to provide design,<br />
permitting, survey and construction management services for a<br />
20,000 sf / 12 bay fleet service facility on a 4.84 AC site with<br />
support offices, break room, records library, mezzanine, virgin fluids<br />
distribution to each bay, containment of recovered fluids.<br />
Equipment to service within the facility ranges in size from small<br />
pups and mowers to heavy equipment and trucks weighing up to<br />
80,000 pounds.<br />
<strong>King</strong> prepared a revised preliminary site plan for a revised rezone,<br />
final site plan and construction plans including drainage, grading,<br />
utility, truck maneuvering and parking design.<br />
<strong>King</strong> determined that the existing rezoning requirement did not<br />
meet the needs of the Manatee County Fleet Maintenance<br />
Department and processed the rezone requirements<br />
simultaneously of the design documents in order to avoid delays.<br />
<strong>King</strong> also prepared construction plans including stormwater,<br />
drainage, grading, water and wastewater (including lift station<br />
design), truck maneuvering, parking design, landscaping and<br />
irrigation. Construction management and certifications were provided.<br />
Cost: $2.27 million<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Design – Build Project<br />
• 20,000 sf / 12 bay fleet maintenance<br />
• Preliminary and Final Site Plan<br />
• Design<br />
• Water / Sewer Design<br />
• Stormwater Design<br />
• Parking Lot Design<br />
• Rezoning<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Preparation of Specifications, and<br />
Construction Drawings<br />
• Construction Administration<br />
• Quality Assurance / Quality Control<br />
• Certification<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Sarasota, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE – Design-Build<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Imagine Charter School, Pasco County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
3<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Ryan Companies, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Douglas Dieck<br />
(813) 204-5017<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided civil engineering services, as well as miscellaneous ROW and boundary surveys on this ±900<br />
student charter school located in Pasco County, Florida. The project included a ±7,000 sf. facility with an oncampus<br />
soccer field, individual school bus and student drop-off / pick-up lanes and an onsite stormwater pond.<br />
Cost: $4.6 million<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(3) ROLE –<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
Survey and Mapping,<br />
Environmental Services<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Downtown Jacksonville Wayfinding Signage Program,<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
4<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2013 Estimate<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Jacksonville Economic Development Commission<br />
(JEDC)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Eric Lindstrom, JEDC<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
904-630-7114<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
During preliminary design, <strong>King</strong> prepared a report outlining items such as; goals and objectives, research and<br />
analysis, example wayfinding programs, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, districts and destinations, and<br />
proposed family of signs. The primary goal of the project is to direct visitors to key destinations, and make them feel<br />
more comfortable traveling downtown. Throughout the project, <strong>King</strong> participated in several public presentations to<br />
such groups as the project stakeholders and the Downtown Development Review Board (DDRB).<br />
Working with the JEDC, <strong>King</strong> developed five downtown districts, color coded them, and incorporated them into<br />
signage for the purposes of orienting visitors as to what<br />
area of the city they are in. The signage program which<br />
includes +/- 150 signs, consists of gateway signs,<br />
vehicular directional signs, pedestrian directional signs,<br />
information kiosks, and parking signs. This new signage<br />
program will direct visitors to key destinations throughout<br />
the downtown. Scope of services included: thematic<br />
design, conceptual design, and construction<br />
documentation. Design fees were $189,000. Preliminary<br />
estimates have construction costs ranging between $1<br />
million - $2 million.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
Planning & Design<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Belmont Heights Estates, Phase 1 and Phase 2<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2000<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
5<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2003<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Torti Gallas and Partners, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Thomas M. Gallas, CPA, LEED AP<br />
Chief Executive Officer<br />
301-588-4800<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided civil engineering services for this Hope VI funded<br />
redevelopment project consisting of a 370 t mix of single family and<br />
multifamily units. The project included extensive coordination with<br />
the City of Tampa to upgrade existing infrastructure and save<br />
numerous Grand trees located on-site. Permitting included FDOT,<br />
Hillsborough County EPC, Hillsborough County Health Department,<br />
FDEP, SWFWMD, City of Tampa Commercial Review, and City of<br />
Tampa Residential Review.<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Hope VI Funded Redevelopment<br />
• ±370 single/mulit-family units<br />
• Coordination with the City of Tampa<br />
• Permitting Services and<br />
• City of Tampa Commercial Review<br />
• City of Tampa Residential Review<br />
Cost: $25 million<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
USF Sports Venue, Tampa, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
6<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
University of South Florida<br />
Deryl Wagner, P.E.<br />
(813) 967-0518<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided civil engineering, design/build services, survey, and construction management for Basketball,<br />
Baseball, Softball & Football sports complex. The project includes multiple sport venues ranging from construction<br />
of a basketball practice facility adjacent to the Sun Dome to a new baseball & softball complex, as well as<br />
improvements to the football practice fields and general purpose student recreation fields. While the design for<br />
each venue was prepared separately, the projects were permitted concurrently to minimize impact to the<br />
respective sports and event schedules.<br />
Cost: ±$30 million<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Survey<br />
and Mapping Services<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Wesley Chapel Medical Center, Pasco County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
7<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Florida Hospital / Adventist Health<br />
Care Systems<br />
John Negley<br />
Asst. to the CEO<br />
813-615-7203<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> has been retained to provide civil engineering services for a<br />
multi-phased healthcare property. Scope of work provides for<br />
master planning, civil site design, ecological, environmental<br />
engineering, surveying and construction administration services for<br />
a 162,500 sf / 3 level hospital with future vertical expansion<br />
capability of three additional floors totaling 580,000 sf, one multistory<br />
medical office complex, a central energy plant, and a future<br />
multi-story office complex and multi-level parking deck. Civil design<br />
includes the planning, design, preparation of construction<br />
documents and permitting of a master stormwater, sanitary sewer<br />
and lift station, looped fire and potable water main systems, site<br />
grading, wetland mitigation and roadways.<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• 3-level / 162,500 sf - future expansion of<br />
580,000 sf<br />
• Central Energy Plant<br />
• Master Planning<br />
• Site Design<br />
• Water / Sewer<br />
• Ecological Services<br />
• Construction Administration<br />
• Permitting<br />
Cost: $151 million<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultants<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
South County Solid Waste Transfer Station<br />
Expansion, Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
8<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Hillsborough County<br />
Chris Snow<br />
Contract Administration<br />
813-272-5977<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided planning, design, permitting and construction management<br />
for the expansion of the South County Transfer Station (SCTS).<br />
The site previously operated at a capacity of approximately 300 tons per<br />
day and uses compactor technology. The new transfer station building<br />
was designed with a capacity of 1,000 tons per day using top load<br />
technology. In addition, the facility included:<br />
• A new scale house and scales<br />
• A new Community Collection Center<br />
• Expansion of an existing Yard and Wood Waste Processing<br />
Facility<br />
• Ancillary systems such as a hot load dumping pad, trailer staging<br />
areas, a fuel storage and dispensing system and a standby<br />
generator<br />
• Modifications to the existing Household Hazardous Waste<br />
Collection Center<br />
• New roadways, utilities and infrastructure<br />
The existing transfer station building, scale facility and community<br />
collection center was demolished. In consideration of surrounding<br />
communities, the architectural qualities of the exterior of all new buildings<br />
were extensively reviewed. In addition, the site was heavily landscaped,<br />
including a landscaped berm along the front of the property.<br />
In addition to detailed design, this project involved the following services:<br />
• Evaluation of current tonnages and projections of tonnages<br />
through the year 2025<br />
• Evaluation of traffic patterns, vehicle counts and required queuing<br />
• Alternative site plan evaluations<br />
• Visual renderings of the proposed facility<br />
• Public meetings and presentations<br />
• Ecological services, including listed species surveys, wetland<br />
delineation, and an invasive plant removal plan<br />
• General site design including roadways and utilities<br />
• Detailed building designs<br />
PROJECT WAS AWARDED THE ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND<br />
CONTRACTORS 2010 EXCELLENCE IN CONSTRUCTION<br />
AWARD FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR PROJECTS and<br />
SWANA’S 2011 TRANSFER STATION EXCELLENCE AWARD.<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Studies/Evaluations<br />
• Planning<br />
• Site Design<br />
Preliminary / Alternative and<br />
Final Designs<br />
• Construction Cost Estimating<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Landscape Architecture<br />
• Stormwater /Drainage<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong><br />
• Ecological Services / Assessments<br />
• Surveying Services<br />
• Development of Maintenance of<br />
Traffic<br />
• Traffic Studies<br />
• Roadway Improvements<br />
• Public Meetings / Presentations<br />
• Preparation of Specifications, Bid<br />
Documents and Construction<br />
Drawings<br />
• Bid Services including Preparation,<br />
Negotiations, and Evaluations<br />
• Construction Management,<br />
including<br />
Full-time site observation<br />
Shop drawing review and<br />
tracking<br />
Liaison with FDOT<br />
RFI coordination / response<br />
Pay applications<br />
Start-up observations<br />
Permit condition tracking<br />
review<br />
Final punchlist inspections and<br />
walkthroughs<br />
As-builts<br />
• Certification<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE - Prime<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Civil, Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong> and<br />
Planning and Surveying<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE - Subconsultant
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Henderson Hammocks Charter School, Hillsborough County,<br />
FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
9<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Est. 2012<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Ryan Companies, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Douglas Dieck<br />
(813) 204-5017<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Provided civil engineering survey services for a 50,000 s.f. K- 8 charter school located in Hillsborough County<br />
Florida. The project included at-grade parking, individual school bus and student drop-off / pickup traffic planning,<br />
onsite stormwater attenuation, onsite wetland and floodplain mitigation.<br />
Cost:<br />
Est. $8.9 million<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
Survey and Mapping,<br />
Environmental Services<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Rasmussen College, Pasco County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
10<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Ryan Companies, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Douglas Dieck<br />
(813) 204-5017<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Provided civil engineering services and topographic surveys on this 27,000 s.f. college located in Pasco County,<br />
Florida. The project included a 3.2 ac project site as part of a master planned commercial subdivision.<br />
Cost: $3.9 million<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
Survey and Mapping,<br />
Environmental Services<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
SF 330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
Planning & Landscape Architecture (Function Codes 39 and 47)<br />
Our land planning professionals are industry leaders. Their knowledge and expertise in the latest growth<br />
management practices and regulations ensure that projects avoid costly and unnecessary mistakes. Developing<br />
new and innovative solutions for our clients let us help clients navigate the changing land use and entitlement<br />
process. Our planners combine creative thinking with practical, real world experience to produce project<br />
solutions and timely approvals.<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s land planning proposals generate cost effective projects that are permittable, workable and beautiful.<br />
Developing creative concepts and turning them into a well-designed plan is what makes <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> a<br />
leader in land planning. Whether it’s a greenbelt, a Brownfield, a redevelopment, single use, or mixed use, our<br />
land planning staff can help you.<br />
<strong>King</strong>’s Land Planning services include:<br />
• Entitlement and Regulatory Assistance<br />
• Development of Regional Impact (DRI)<br />
Applications and Amendments<br />
• Comprehensive Plan Amendments<br />
• Zoning Amendments<br />
• Developers Agreements<br />
• Concurrency Evaluations<br />
• Land Use Evaluations<br />
• Site Planning<br />
• Due Diligence/Feasibility Studies<br />
• Conceptual Master Planning<br />
• Park and Recreation Master Planning<br />
• Detailed Land and Site Planning<br />
• Design Guidelines and Presentation<br />
Graphics<br />
• GIS, Site Analysis<br />
• Graphic Design and Renderings<br />
The landscape architecture team at <strong>King</strong> includes registered landscape architects, LEED accredited professionals,<br />
and certified arborists. <strong>King</strong> can provide clients with the expertise needed for all of their landscape architectural<br />
and design needs.<br />
Our landscape architects believe that public facilities play an essential role in building and maintaining our sense<br />
of community and enhancing our quality of life. We have extensive experience in the designing and<br />
management of public sector projects, including participation during the public outreach process and working<br />
with agencies to gain the necessary approvals. We blend creativity, environmental sensitivity and<br />
constructability together, to create a pleasing and practical design for every project.<br />
• LEED and Low Impact Design<br />
• Landscape and Hardscape Design<br />
• Parks and Recreation Design<br />
• Wayfinding<br />
• Community Master Plans<br />
• Streetscapes<br />
• Signage Monuments<br />
• Recreational Amenities<br />
• Smart Irrigation Design<br />
• Illustrative Graphics<br />
• Construction Administration<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
SF330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
1
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support water,<br />
wastewater and reclaimed water services project types.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> In-house<br />
Subconsultant Specialty<br />
Contract Manager<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Task Manager<br />
Scott Sheridan, RLA<br />
Landscape Architect Irrigation Design<br />
Clark Lohmiller, RLA Loc Truong, PE<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team Available Services<br />
SF330 Function<br />
Code<br />
Description<br />
02 Administrative<br />
07 Biologist<br />
08 CADD Technician<br />
12 Civil Engineer<br />
15 Construction Inspector<br />
16 Construction Manager<br />
19 Ecologist<br />
21 Electrical Engineer<br />
22 Electronics Engineer<br />
23 Environmental Engineer<br />
24 Environmental Scientist<br />
27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer<br />
28 Geodetic Surveyor<br />
29 Geographic Information System Specialist<br />
32 Hydraulic Engineer<br />
33 Hydrographic Surveyor<br />
34 Hydrologist<br />
38 Land Surveyor<br />
39 Landscape Architect<br />
42 Mechanical Engineer<br />
47 Planner: Urban/Regional<br />
48 Project Manager<br />
52 Sanitary Engineer<br />
53 Scheduler<br />
55 Soils Engineer<br />
56 Specifications Writer<br />
57 Structural Engineer<br />
58 Technician/Analysis<br />
60 Transportation Engineer<br />
61 Value Engineer<br />
62 Water Resources Engineer<br />
NPDES<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
2
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
1<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Rothenbach Park Pavilion<br />
Sarasota County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Sarasota County – Florida<br />
1660 Ringling Blvd 5th Floor<br />
Sarasota, FL 34236<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Brie Ondercin<br />
Public Use Coordinator<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size,<br />
and cost)<br />
Under a continuing services contract of park design for Sarasota<br />
County, <strong>King</strong> provided construction plans, specifications and<br />
construction administration for Rothenbach Park pavilion and<br />
playground. Rothenbach Park pavilion was the key stone for<br />
Sarasota County’s newest sustainable park. While not seeking<br />
certification, the green designed 3000 sf pavilion features soy<br />
based spray insulation, low flow fixtures, waterless urinals, and<br />
efficient mechanical systems. Other features include glulam<br />
beams, tongue and groove wood decking, cultured stone water<br />
table, a cooking grill with warming oven, and a fireplace. The<br />
building is designed with two different sized exterior gathering<br />
areas divided by the restrooms and services spaces. A small<br />
serving kitchen provides the ability to host events at the pavilion.<br />
The 450-acre park site, formerly a county landfill, now features<br />
advanced sustainable building techniques and recycled materials.<br />
Cost: $250,000<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Design<br />
• Parking Lot Design<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Park Landscape Design<br />
• Trailhead Design<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
(941) 861-7286<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
2<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Skycrest Neighborhood Traffic Calming<br />
Improvements<br />
Clearwater, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
City of Clearwater – Florida<br />
100 S. Myrtle Ave. # 220<br />
Clearwater, FL 33756<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Ken Sides, P.E.<br />
Sr. Professional Engineer<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided design of neighborhood traffic calming, which<br />
included the preparation of traffic study, design plans, presentations<br />
at commission and public information meetings, landscape and<br />
irrigation plans, contract specifications, traffic control plans and<br />
provided bidding services for the construction. The Project<br />
included four (4) roundabouts, five (5) mini-circles, diagonal<br />
diverters, speed tables, landscaped median islands, hardscape<br />
elements, and roadway bulb-outs.<br />
Landscape and irrigation design services were performed with<br />
sensitivity to the existing community and City design standards.<br />
<strong>King</strong> also provided evaluation of existing tree resources through<br />
<strong>King</strong> certified arborists to assist in the design and planning process.<br />
Cost: $2.1 million<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-562-4792<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Traffic Calming<br />
• Streetscape Design<br />
• Speed Tables<br />
• Landscape Architecture<br />
• Bidding Assistance<br />
• Public Information Meetings<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Landscape Architecture
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
3<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Temple Terrace Downtown Redevelopment<br />
Temple Terrace, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Ram Development<br />
4801 PGA Blvd<br />
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Bob Skinner<br />
Sr. Vice President of<br />
Development<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size,<br />
and cost)<br />
Rezoning and detailed landscape and irrigation design services<br />
for a 30 acre mixed use redevelopment project as part of the first<br />
phase of the City’s CRA plan. In addition, 3D graphics and<br />
conceptual renderings were provided and were included in the<br />
presentation to City Council.<br />
Fee: $20,000<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Landscape Design<br />
• Irrigation Design<br />
• Conceptual Renderings<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
561-282-4605<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Land Planning<br />
Landscape Architecture<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
4<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Highwoods Bay Center<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Highwoods Properties<br />
3111 W. Dr. Martin Luther <strong>King</strong> Jr. Blvd.<br />
Tampa, FL 33607<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Dan Woodward<br />
Vice President<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-876-7000<br />
For this Class A waterfront office redevelopment project <strong>King</strong><br />
provided land planning, landscape architecture and civil<br />
engineering services. This project was designated a NAIOP “Best<br />
of the Best” project for 2007. <strong>King</strong>’s landscape architects<br />
provided landscape, hardscape and irrigation design as well as<br />
procurement of specimen palm trees for this unique bay-front<br />
project where salt tolerance was a principal concern.<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Landscape Architecture<br />
• Land Planning<br />
• Hardscape Design<br />
• Irrigation Design<br />
Cost: $22 million<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Landscape Architecture<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
5<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Largo Towne Center<br />
Largo, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Weingarten Realty Investors<br />
601-C North Bumby Avenue<br />
Orlando, FL 32803<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
James Childs<br />
President<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size,<br />
and cost)<br />
Largo Towne Center, a redevelopment of the old Crossroad Mall<br />
on US 19, was proposed to consist of approximately 600,000 sf<br />
of retail (including restaurants), 286 apartments, a town center<br />
and two parking structures. Services provided by <strong>King</strong> included<br />
site designing, permitting, survey and landscaping. Some of the<br />
agencies for which permitting services was provided include: City<br />
of Largo, Southwest Florida Water Management District<br />
(SWFWMD), Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE), Pinellas County,<br />
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and Florida<br />
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP).<br />
Fee: $838,000<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Landscape Architecture<br />
• Public Plaza Design<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Site Design<br />
• Survey<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
407-894-3601<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Landscape Architecture<br />
Survey / Mapping
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
6<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Sleeping Turtles Preserve North<br />
Sarasota County, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Sarasota County – Florida<br />
1660 Ringling Blvd 5th Floor<br />
Sarasota, FL 34236<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Brie Ondercin<br />
Public Use Coordinator<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size,<br />
and cost)<br />
This site is a 92 acre area that is part of the Environmentally<br />
Sensitive Lands Protection Program and the Myakka River<br />
Protection Zone. For this project <strong>King</strong> provided site layout and<br />
designs associated with the additions of a pavilion, playground,<br />
ADA compliant walking trail, composting restrooms, and parking<br />
facilities. Special attention was given to incorporating low-impact<br />
design elements such as tree friendly parking, trail layouts, as<br />
well as utilizing as much permeable pavement type systems for<br />
the necessary improvements.<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
941-861-7286<br />
Due to the location and environmentally sensitive nature of the<br />
site, all improvements were designed to be compatible with site<br />
ecology and listed species habitat ecology. Other services included were master planning, conceptual graphics, site<br />
planning, site civil engineering design, permitting, environmental services, roadway design, pervious pavement<br />
design, drainage design, potable well design, composting restroom permitting, bid coordination services, and<br />
construction administration.<br />
Cost: $360,000<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Park Landscape Design<br />
• Trailhead Design<br />
• Environmental Services<br />
• Roadway Design<br />
• Permitting<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
7<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Janie Poe Redevelopment Phase 1 – LEED Silver<br />
Sarasota, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2009<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Sarasota Housing Authority<br />
Sarasota Housing Authority<br />
1300 Blvd. of The Arts<br />
Sarasota, FL 34236<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Bill Russell<br />
Executive Director<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
Janie Poe is a revitalization project in the Newtown Neighborhood<br />
of Sarasota County. It was a public-private joint venture with the<br />
Sarasota Housing Authority and a variety of local stock holders,<br />
which benefited from federal housing subsidies, including Low<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>ome Housing Tax Credits, as well as significant funding from the<br />
City of Sarasota, Sarasota County and the state of Florida.<br />
The 86-unit, garden-style community featuring both apartment flats<br />
and townhomes is the first of the Sarasota Housing Authority’s<br />
multi-phase, multi-million dollar redevelopment of the former Janie<br />
Poe public housing development. <strong>King</strong> provided permitting,<br />
construction plans (including demolish plans for the existing<br />
housing buildings and clubhouse area), stormwater design, FEMA<br />
Map Amendment, paving and grading design, utility extension to<br />
new buildings, bidding services, surveying, construction<br />
observation and certification services. Cost: $11.5 million<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
941-361-6210<br />
• 86 unit – Garden Style Apartments<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Stormwater Design<br />
• FEMA Map Amendment<br />
• Paving / Grading Design<br />
• Utility Extension<br />
• Construction Plans<br />
• Bidding Assistance<br />
• Surveying<br />
• Construction Observation<br />
• Certification<br />
Janie Poe PMRS Building<br />
has been awarded<br />
LEED-NC Silver Certification.<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Surveying
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
8<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Pinellas County Housing Authority (PCHA)<br />
Redevelopment Project, Largo, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Norstar Primerica Multi-Family<br />
Development Group<br />
3629 Macada Lane<br />
Tampa, FL 33618<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Paula McDonald Rhodes<br />
Executive Vice President<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
As the civil engineering subconsultant, <strong>King</strong> is providing civil<br />
engineering design, permitting, landscape design and survey<br />
services for the development of a PCHA’s Senior Living Facility.<br />
The redevelopment is to include demolition of existing building and<br />
parking area and replaced with multifamily style senior living facility<br />
with amenities, surface parking, and an additional 20,000 sf PCHA<br />
office. Cost: TBD<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2012<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-933-0629<br />
• Senior Living Facility<br />
• 20,000 sf PCHA Office<br />
• Design<br />
• Preliminary and Final Site Plan<br />
• Design<br />
• Water / Sewer Design<br />
• Stormwater Design<br />
• Surface Parking Lot Design<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Landscape design<br />
• Survey<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> / Landscape Architecture
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
9<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Intellicenter – Tampa Ph. I – LEED Silver<br />
Temple Terrace, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Koll Development Company<br />
6100 Fairview Road Suite 335<br />
Charlotte, NC 28210<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Sean McDonnell<br />
Vice President<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
This LEED project involved a class-A office development of<br />
370,000+ sf on 30 acres in the master planned office park of<br />
Telecom Park in Temple Terrace, Florida. Telecom Park is a 340+<br />
acre park on the east side of the Hillsborough River between the<br />
University of South Florida and I-75 on Fletcher Avenue.<br />
The office site consists of one 4-story and one 3-story office<br />
building with at-grade parking among native tree canopy. <strong>King</strong> also<br />
provided landscape architecture services for this project. The<br />
master landscaping was planned to compliment the park’s<br />
atmosphere of a natural setting by maintaining as much tree<br />
canopy as possible within the development.<br />
Cost: $20 million<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Landscape Architecture<br />
• 370,000 sf / 30 acre Site<br />
• At-Grade Parking<br />
• USGBC Silver Certification<br />
• Planning<br />
• Site Design<br />
• Permitting<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
704-554-6111<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Subconsultant<br />
Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Landscape Architecture
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
10<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Highland Avenue Roadway and Stormwater<br />
Improvements<br />
Largo, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
City of Largo, Florida<br />
201 Highland Ave.<br />
Largo, FL 33779<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Leland E. Dicus, P.E.<br />
City Engineer<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided landscaping services for the reconstruction of 1.5<br />
miles of an existing 2-lane rural facility. The project included<br />
converting the existing roadway to an urban, pedestrian-friendly,<br />
roadway with streetscape and hardscape elements, including the<br />
design of a multi-use path. Services included a tree analysis /<br />
grade for tree removal. Also provided landscape and irrigation<br />
design for right of way and tree mitigation for the removed trees.<br />
Cost: $5.2 million<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-587-6713<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Landscaping Design<br />
• Roadway and Trail Designs<br />
• Environmental Permitting<br />
• PD & E Study<br />
• Alternative Design Options<br />
• Grant Funding Assistance- Stormwater<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Landscape Architecture<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
c.
SF 330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
Transportation Engineer (Function Code 60)<br />
As the demand to improve highway safety and decrease travel delays continues to rise, <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> has the<br />
experience and expertise to assist public agencies in finding cost efficient solutions. We recognize the very<br />
diverse needs of our multiple municipal clients and work alongside local, state, and federal regulatory agencies<br />
to find economical and environmentally balanced solutions. In addition to finding engineering solutions to<br />
transportation needs, our efforts include assisting agencies with alternative funding sources and public grants.<br />
From travel demand forecasting and traffic modeling to final design and contract administration, our clients can<br />
count on us to assist with all phases of their Work Programs. With a full range of professional services offered<br />
by <strong>King</strong>, we are able to form a seamless team of planners, surveyors, scientists, and engineers for project<br />
delivery.<br />
Whether a project is simple or complex, our professionals have the capabilities to provide a full range of<br />
transportation services from traffic capacity and safety studies such as signal warrant analysis to complex major<br />
highway design. In today’s environment, it is important to incorporate context sensitive solutions to find<br />
balance among all of the road users from bus transit and vehicles to pedestrians and bicyclists. Our project<br />
experience includes residential traffic calming/roundabout design and streetscape improvements.<br />
Not all transportation projects are straightforward. Many require the completion of other seemingly unrelated<br />
tasks such as environmental/wetland impact assessments and public involvement. <strong>King</strong>'s multi-disciplinary staff<br />
and our ability to develop cost effective solutions to challenging projects has earned the loyalty of repeat clients<br />
over the years.<br />
<strong>King</strong>'s Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong> Services include:<br />
• Roadway Alternative alignment<br />
Studies/PD&E<br />
• Major and Minor Highway Design<br />
• Construction <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Inspection/Administration<br />
• Intersection Improvements<br />
• Traffic Signal and System Design<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
• Traffic Control Plans<br />
• Highway Lighting Analysis and Design<br />
• Stormwater Design/Modeling<br />
• Pedestrian Sidewalk/Multi-use Trail Design<br />
• Roadway Resurfacing<br />
• Traffic Operation Studies/Design<br />
• Traffic Calming Design<br />
The following table lists the function codes for the services provided by our team personnel to support water,<br />
wastewater and reclaimed water services project types.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> In-house<br />
Subconsultant Specialty<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team Available Services<br />
SF330 Function<br />
Code<br />
Description<br />
02 Administrative<br />
07 Biologist<br />
08 CADD Technician<br />
12 Civil Engineer<br />
15 Construction Inspector<br />
16 Construction Manager<br />
19 Ecologist<br />
SF330 Projects by Primary Technical Discipline<br />
1
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
SF 330 Additional Information<br />
21 Electrical Engineer<br />
22 Electronics Engineer<br />
23 Environmental Engineer<br />
24 Environmental Scientist<br />
27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer<br />
28 Geodetic Surveyor<br />
29 Geographic Information System Specialist<br />
32 Hydraulic Engineer<br />
33 Hydrographic Surveyor<br />
34 Hydrologist<br />
38 Land Surveyor<br />
39 Landscape Architect<br />
42 Mechanical Engineer<br />
47 Planner: Urban/Regional<br />
48 Project Manager<br />
52 Sanitary Engineer<br />
53 Scheduler<br />
55 Soils Engineer<br />
56 Specifications Writer<br />
57 Structural Engineer<br />
58 Technician/Analysis<br />
60 Transportation Engineer<br />
61 Value Engineer<br />
62 Water Resources Engineer<br />
NPDES<br />
Contract Manager<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Task Manager<br />
John Seals, PE<br />
Roadway Engineer<br />
Kyle Smith, PE<br />
Civil Engineer<br />
Jennifer Harkleroad, PE<br />
Traffic Engineer<br />
Sandra Gorman, PE,<br />
PTOE<br />
Transportation<br />
Planner Rajesh<br />
Chindalur<br />
SF330 Additional Information<br />
2<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
School Safety, Circulation and Access Program<br />
(SSCAP)<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County – Florida<br />
601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33602<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Sam Halabi, P.E.<br />
Senior Professional Engineer<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
1<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Ongoing<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1786<br />
Assess existing traffic conditions at over 30 Hillsborough County<br />
school sites, research and gather data on each site including<br />
utilities, permits and right-of-way data; develop concept plans for<br />
improving traffic safety, circulation, and access for each site;<br />
coordinate with the School Board on site improvements; prepare<br />
preliminary design plans for constructing roadway improvements,<br />
develop cost estimates for each site alternative, rate and rank the<br />
proposed improvements for the top 20 school sites, prepare<br />
Design-Build RFQ and RFP documents for contract awarding, and<br />
assist with the administration the construction as the Design<br />
Criteria Engineer.<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• 30 Hillsborough County School Sites<br />
• Traffic Conditions Research<br />
• Site Design / Alternatives<br />
• Cost Estimates<br />
• Design Build RFQ/RFP Documents<br />
• Construction Administration<br />
• Design Criteria Engineer<br />
Cost: $5.6 million<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
And Planning
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
CSX – Terminal Pavement Management Plan Update<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER)<br />
2<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
NA<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
CSX Intermodal, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Chris Durden<br />
301 W. Bay Street, Suite 2700<br />
Jacksonville, FL 32202<br />
904-633-1306<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> has been contracted by CSX Intermodal to conduct surveys of their intermodal terminals. For<br />
Phase 1 & 2 of this project <strong>King</strong> conducted surveys for 21 terminals in 13 different states, covering<br />
nearly 5 million square yards of pavement. Phase 3, which consists of surveys of 11 terminals in 10<br />
different states, covering over 1 million square yards of pavement, is set to proceed in the near future.<br />
CSX is a repeat client, having retained the firm of Infrastructure Technology, <strong>Inc</strong>. (acquired by <strong>King</strong><br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. in 2002) to implement a pavement management program (PMP) for 12<br />
intermodal terminals, during the early to mid 1990’s.<br />
The platform for this analysis will be the proprietary software, Infrastructure Management System IV<br />
(IMS IV). This system is used to justify the use of capital funds for investment in rehabilitative and<br />
restorative pavement repairs on an annual basis at selected intermodal terminals to extend the life of<br />
the asphalt and concrete pavements.<br />
Project Cost: $881,357<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
a.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Jacksonville, FL<br />
Data Collection,<br />
Analysis, Reporting
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Miscellaneous General Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Services<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County Public Works Department<br />
601 E. Kennedy Boulevard<br />
22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33602<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Tom Fass<br />
Section Manager, Dept. of<br />
Public Works<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
3<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Various Project<br />
Completion Dates<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1711<br />
<strong>King</strong> has been contracted by Hillsborough County to provide general/civil services for a two-year period<br />
since 1987. Under this miscellaneous civil engineering contract, <strong>King</strong> provides services on small and<br />
medium-sized projects from intersection surveys to wastewater treatment plant design services. The<br />
surveying, civil, environmental engineering, transportation and water resource groups all benefit from<br />
projects under these contracts.<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> services include planning, program development,<br />
design, and construction management for general/civil projects in<br />
the areas of road and transportation, stormwater, solid waste, parks,<br />
sitework, environmental permitting, traffic analysis and landscaping.<br />
The projects executed under this contract include:<br />
• Intersection Program Master Plan Update<br />
• Waters Avenue & Hanley Road Intersection Improvements<br />
• US 301 & Balm Riverview Road<br />
• Benjamin & Waters Construction Administration<br />
• Columbus Drive Design<br />
• School Safety, Circulation and Access Program-S.S.C.A.P.<br />
• N. Mobley Road Improvements<br />
• Railroad Crossing Quiet Zone Study<br />
• Railroad Crossing Design<br />
• South County Solid Waste Transfer Station Leachate Collection<br />
System Improvements<br />
• South County Solid Waste Transfer Station FDEP Operating<br />
Permit Renewal<br />
• Falkenburg Yard Waste Processing Facility Improvements<br />
• South County Solid Yard Waste Processing Facility design,<br />
permitting and construction management services<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Planning, design, permitting<br />
and construction.
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
4<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
N. Mobley Road (Walker/Hammond School)<br />
Roadway Improvements<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County – Florida<br />
601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33602<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2010<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Sam Halabi, P.E.<br />
Sr. Professional Engineer<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> provided design plans for the widening of 0.360 miles of<br />
roadway widening along N. Mobley Rd. for an addition of left-turn<br />
and right-turn lanes into both existing Walker Middle School and<br />
proposed Hammond Elementary School in Hillsborough County.<br />
Cost: $387,000<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1786<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Roadway and Stormwater Design<br />
• Traffic Design<br />
• Environmental Permitting<br />
• Limited Construction Observation<br />
• Surveying and Mapping<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Surveying and Mapping<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
F.R. Aleman. <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Subsurface Utility <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Zephyrhills Bypass West – CR 54/Eiland Boulevard<br />
Zephyrhills, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Pasco County Government- Florida<br />
4454 Grand Blvd.<br />
New Port Richey, FL 34652<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Ongoing<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Wayne A. Tocknell, P.E.<br />
Engineer<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
The reconstruction of a 2-lane arterial to a 4-lane rural/urban<br />
facility. The project length is approximately 2 miles and also<br />
included design, traffic report, onsite retention, drainage design,<br />
signing and marking plans, traffic control planning, utility relocation<br />
plans, permitting and signal plans at three intersections. The<br />
project scope also included a public meeting. The construction<br />
estimate is $2.1 million.<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
5<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
TBD<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-834-3604<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• Reconstruction of 2-lane to 4-lane<br />
• Roadway and Drainage Design<br />
• Traffic Control Planning<br />
• Traffic Studies<br />
• Signing and Marking<br />
• Utility Relocations<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Signal Design – 3 Intersections<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
Driggers <strong>Engineering</strong> Services, <strong>Inc</strong><br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Clearwater, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Planning<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong>
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
6<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
State Road 56 Roadway Extension From SR 581 To<br />
Meadow Pointe Boulevard<br />
Pasco County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Pasco County Government – Florida<br />
4454 Grand Blvd.<br />
New Port Richey, FL 34652<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Bob Shepherd P.E.<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> Services<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
This project includes the preparation of design plans to construct<br />
3.4 miles of a 6-lane and 4-lane (with accommodations for a future<br />
6-lane) divided, high speed (70 mph), rural principal arterial through<br />
the Wiregrass Ranch property, located in Pasco County.<br />
Cost: Est. $26 million.<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Ongoing<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-834-3604<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• 3.4 miles / 6- and 4-lane<br />
• Master Drainage Study<br />
• Stormwater Design<br />
• Traffic Planning<br />
• Traffic Design<br />
• Roadway Design<br />
• Potable Water and Force Main Plans<br />
• Topographic Survey<br />
• Right-Of-Way Survey and Mapping<br />
• Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation<br />
• Wetland Mitigation Design<br />
• Wildlife Surveys<br />
• Environmental Permitting<br />
• FDOT Permitting<br />
• Pasco County Permitting<br />
• Signing and Marking Plans<br />
• Maintenance of Traffic Plans<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
and Planning<br />
Ecological Services<br />
Surveying and Mapping
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
US 301 & Balm Riverview Road Intersection<br />
Improvements<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County – Florida<br />
601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33602<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
William Alford<br />
Project Manager<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> prepared a PD&E study to determine what roadway capacity<br />
improvements needed to be made and evaluated several<br />
alternative roadway alignments for the intersection. <strong>King</strong> is now<br />
preparing design plans for the construction of the proposed<br />
improvements. Professional services under the scope of the project<br />
include:<br />
• Topographic survey and right-of-way mapping<br />
• Traffic operation studies and modeling analysis<br />
• Roadway and stormwater design<br />
• Pond siting analysis and design<br />
• Permitting<br />
• Wetland/environmental impact assessment and<br />
mitigation design environmental permitting<br />
• Traffic signal design<br />
• Public involvement/meetings<br />
• Utility coordination and design<br />
• Right-of-way impact assessment<br />
• Subsurface utility exploration<br />
• Geotechnical investigation<br />
• Structural analysis<br />
Cost: $1.5 Million<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
7<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
TBD<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1920<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• PD&E Study<br />
• Alternative Roadway Alignments<br />
• Stormwater Modeling<br />
• Traffic Modeling / Analysis<br />
• Traffic Signal Design<br />
• Pond Siting<br />
• Environmental Mitigation<br />
• Permitting Survey and Mapping<br />
• Public Involvements / Meeting<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
F.R. Aleman. <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
and Planning<br />
Survey and Mapping<br />
Ecological Services<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Subsurface Utility <strong>Engineering</strong>
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
8<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Durant and Mulrennan / Durant and Valrico<br />
Intersections Signalization<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County – Florida<br />
601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33601<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2011<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Mariela Gomez, P.E.<br />
TTF GEC Project Manager<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> is providing final design engineering for the<br />
signalization and sidewalk improvements for two Hillsborough<br />
County Roadway intersections: Durant Road and Valrico Road and<br />
Durant Road and Mulrennan Road. Services will include design<br />
and plans production of signalization and signing and pavement<br />
markings plans. Responsibilities also included utility coordination<br />
and cost estimating.<br />
Cost:<br />
Durant / Mulrennan - $100,914<br />
Durant / Valrico - $177,821<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1724<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• ATMS Coordination<br />
• Design<br />
• Specifications / Plans<br />
• Signing and Marking<br />
• Cost Estimating<br />
• Surveying / Mapping<br />
• ADA Sidewalk Additions<br />
• Drainage Improvements / Upgrade<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Survey and Mapping
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
9<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Columbus Drive Extension Route Study<br />
Hillsborough County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Hillsborough County Public Works<br />
601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 22 nd Floor<br />
Tampa, FL 33602<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Sam Halabi, P.E.<br />
Sr. Professional Engineer<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
The project included PD&E phase and a design phase services for<br />
the extension Columbus Drive from east of US 301 to Falkenburg<br />
Road, a distance approximately 1 mile. The PD&E services<br />
included the development and evaluation of a study for the typical<br />
sections for a 4-lane divided facility, alignment alternates<br />
considering geometry, environmental impacts, selection of<br />
stormwater ponds and mitigation areas, right-of-way, safety, and<br />
cost. Design phase services included providing 30% roadway and<br />
drainage design plans, wetland and flood plain mitigation design,<br />
submittal of the USACOE permit, the preparation of Design-Build<br />
RFQ and RFP contract documents for construction, and assistance<br />
with procurement of the Design-Build contract.<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
N/A<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
813-307-1786<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• PD&E Study<br />
• Preparation of Design/Build RFQ<br />
• 30% Roadway/Drainage Design Plans<br />
• Wetland and Flood Mitigation Design<br />
• Pond Siting Report<br />
• Environmental Permitting<br />
Est. Construction: $9.3 million<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong>
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
State Road 56 Roadway Extension From SR 581 To<br />
Meadow Pointe Boulevard<br />
Pasco County, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Pasco County Government – Florida<br />
4454 Grand Blvd.<br />
New Port Richey, FL 34652<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Bob Shepherd P.E.<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> Services<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and<br />
cost)<br />
This project includes the preparation of design plans to construct<br />
3.4 miles of a 6-lane and 4-lane (with accommodations for a future<br />
6-lane) divided, high speed (70 mph), rural principal arterial through<br />
the Wiregrass Ranch property, located in Pasco County.<br />
Cost: Est. $26 million.<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
10<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Ongoing<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
727-834-3604<br />
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:<br />
• 3.4 miles / 6- and 4-lane<br />
• Master Drainage Study<br />
• Stormwater Design<br />
• Traffic Planning<br />
• Traffic Design<br />
• Roadway Design<br />
• Potable Water and Force Main Plans<br />
• Topographic Survey<br />
• Right-Of-Way Survey and Mapping<br />
• Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation<br />
• Wetland Mitigation Design<br />
• Wildlife Surveys<br />
• Environmental Permitting<br />
• FDOT Permitting<br />
• Pasco County Permitting<br />
• Signing and Marking Plans<br />
• Maintenance of Traffic Plans<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION<br />
Tampa, FL<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE - Prime<br />
Civil / Transportation <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
and Planning<br />
Ecological Services<br />
Surveying and Mapping
ARCHITECT – ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS<br />
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER (If any)<br />
RFQ # 2012-10<br />
PART II – GENERAL CONDITIONS<br />
(If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.)<br />
2a. FIRM (OR BRANCH OFFICE) NAME<br />
Cummins Cederberg, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
2b. STREET<br />
22476 SW 94 PL<br />
2c. CITY<br />
Cutler Bay<br />
6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE<br />
Jannek Cederberg, President<br />
6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
(305) 776-5028<br />
2d. STATE<br />
FL<br />
3. YEAR ESTABLISHED<br />
2010<br />
a. TYPE<br />
5. OWNERSHIP<br />
2e. ZIP CODE Corporation<br />
33190 b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS<br />
Small Business<br />
6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
info@CumminsCederberg.com<br />
8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any) 8b. YR.<br />
ESTABLISHED<br />
4. DUNS NUMBER<br />
962526153<br />
7. NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is a branch office)<br />
8c. DUNS NUMBER<br />
a. Function<br />
Code<br />
9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE<br />
b. Discipline<br />
c. No. of Employees a. Profile<br />
(1) FIRM (2) BRANCH Code<br />
10. PROFILE OF FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND<br />
ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS<br />
b. Experience<br />
c. Revenue Index<br />
Number<br />
(see below)<br />
C12 Coastal Engineers 2 C07 17 2<br />
Total 2<br />
11. ANNUAL AVERAGE<br />
PROFESSIONAL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER<br />
SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM<br />
FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than $100,000 6. $2 million to less than $5 million<br />
(insert revenue index number shown at<br />
right)<br />
2. $100,00 to less than $250,000 7. $5 million to less than $10 million<br />
a. Federal Work 0 3. $250,000 to less than $500,000 8. $10 million to less than $25 million<br />
b. Non-Federal<br />
Work<br />
2 4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 9. $25 million to less than $50 million<br />
c. Total Work 2 5. $1 million to less than $2 million 10. $50 million or greater<br />
12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The foregoing is a statement of facts.<br />
a. SIGNATURE b. DATE<br />
June 4, 2012<br />
c. NAME AND TITLE<br />
Jannek Cederberg, President<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004) PAGE 1
Appendix A. Approach to Scope of Work<br />
General Project Approach<br />
KING’s approach to project execution is based on the philosophy that our ultimate goal is to deliver a high quality work<br />
product that exceeds the CITY’s schedule objectives while minimizing overall cost. For every assignment, we prepare a<br />
project management plan tailored to the complexity of the work. The plan includes a detailed budget, QA/QC procedures,<br />
and a project schedule identifying tasks, milestones, and critical path activities. During project execution, we monitor<br />
progress on a weekly basis to ensure internal adherence to deadlines, budget, and QA/QC activities. Externally, we<br />
coordinate closely with the CITY, permitting agencies, stakeholders, and contractors to ensure that there are no surprises<br />
and that our work products are completed satisfactorily the first time around.<br />
A cornerstone of this “high quality/value conscious” approach<br />
is to establish and maintain effective communication not only<br />
within the project team, but also with other stakeholders that<br />
are interested in the project. To this end, KING typically<br />
develops a detailed communication plan that is implemented<br />
as part of the overall delivery plan and in close coordination<br />
with the CITY. Timely and consistent communication will keep<br />
the project on track and allow all parties to quickly and easily<br />
deal with inevitable changes that may develop.<br />
A draft of the project management plan is developed<br />
immediately after receipt of an approved work order and<br />
distributed to all team members, including the CITY, for<br />
review and comment to ensure the CITY’s concurrence with<br />
the plan and schedule. After the CITY approves the project management plan, work will proceed in accordance with the<br />
approved plan. Any deviation from the approved schedule, assigned staff or budget would require approval by the CITY.<br />
Key Components of a Project Management Plan<br />
KING is a highly skilled group of professionals whose expertise, ability, and experience will ensure successful completion of<br />
public design projects. Our team continues to successfully serve numerous municipal clients as described elsewhere in this<br />
proposal. This experience gives us an in-depth understanding of the issues that must be addressed regarding public projects<br />
in the CITY.<br />
Proven Management Techniques Ensure Successful Projects<br />
Sound project management includes bringing together the correct resources and<br />
providing clearly articulated procedures and guidance documents to efficiently<br />
accomplish the work. KING has built its approach to project delivery based on<br />
methods used on highly successful projects. Critical elements of the project<br />
delivery system are:<br />
1. Plan the project to ensure that the client’s vision is achieved.<br />
2. Chart the team by developing the mission, vision, goals and<br />
procedures.<br />
3. Plan the work by developing a detailed Project Management / Work Plan.<br />
4. Gain endorsement by the CITY, the project team, and KING Team management.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Projeca Project Management<br />
Software<br />
5. Perform the work and manage change. This is an iterative step that returns to Steps 3, 4, and 5 continually<br />
until the project is complete and fully endorsed by all participants.<br />
6. Close the project, including the final narrative report and cost accounting.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
1
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Single Point of Contact<br />
North Miami Beach’s key point of contact with KING for this<br />
contract is the proposed Project Manager, Mr. Agustin<br />
Maristany, PE. As the Principal and Project Manager at KING,<br />
Mr. Maristany will be the lead advocate of the CITY’s interests<br />
within the firm. He is responsible for ensuring that the interests<br />
of the CITY are given priority within the firm and that the full<br />
resources of KING are engaged to meet the needs of the CITY. His goal is to establish a successful long-term record of<br />
performance with the CITY. To support him, Mr. Maristany handpicked the proposed team based on their expertise, local<br />
knowledge, commitment, and past experience completing similar projects.<br />
Project Management Plan<br />
KING’s philosophy for managing the CITY’s projects throughout our relationship will be to manage for success. The<br />
foundation of this philosophy is that success can only be achieved when the client and the consultant act in partnership.<br />
As the CITY’s engineering consultant, KING’s role will be to facilitate such a partnership so that the CITY’s expectations are<br />
consistently achieved through a process that produces projects that meet the following criteria:<br />
• Completed on time<br />
• Completed within or under budget<br />
• Completed with the required level of quality<br />
Local Project Manager:<br />
Agustin Maristany, PE<br />
Vice President<br />
8390 NW 53 rd Street, Suite 200<br />
Doral, Florida 33166<br />
amaristany@KINGengineering.com<br />
305-763-9829<br />
To achieve these criteria, Mr. Maristany, our proposed Project Manager, will develop a project management plan to serve<br />
as the project reference guide for use by the CITY, KING and all sub consultants. Key elements of the plan are as follows:<br />
• Goals / Critical Success Factors<br />
• Scope of Work (Work Breakdown Structure)<br />
• Schedule<br />
• Team Organization and Responsibilities<br />
• Quality Control Process<br />
• Communication Plan<br />
• Contingency / Risk Management Plan<br />
Goals/Critical Success Factors<br />
KING conducts a kickoff meeting with the client at the beginning of the project. At the kickoff meeting, the Project Team<br />
identifies those factors most critical to the success of the project. Often time, critical success factors are related to<br />
anticipated difficulties. For each critical success factor, a performance measure is identified to provide a means of<br />
determining whether project progress is still focused on the goals. For example, obtaining a key permit may be identified as<br />
a critical success factor. In this case, application submittal and Request for Additional Information re-submittal dates may<br />
be defined as the performance measures. These critical success factors<br />
are established as goals and re-visited at each stage of the project to<br />
assure the project’s success.<br />
Activity Breakdown Structure and Project Schedule<br />
Mr. Maristany will identify and breakdown the project into individual<br />
tasks comprising an Activity Breakdown Structure (ABS). The ABS will be<br />
activity-based and describe the scope of services required to complete the<br />
project. A graphical Project Schedule, readily understandable to all team<br />
members, will be developed from the ABS and will be used to maintain a<br />
sense of urgency among the Project Team. Either a bar chart or critical<br />
path method type schedule, as acceptable to the CITY, will be used. The<br />
schedule will show task interrelationships on a calendar basis and will<br />
include review and revision time.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Project Team Roles and Responsibilities<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
2
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
KING recognizes the upmost importance that schedule management has over every aspect of a project. Careful<br />
consideration of the schedule and schedule influencers is essential at the onset of each assignment. Extensive planning by<br />
the team, including identifying all factors that can affect the schedule, will ensure that we meet the CITY’s established<br />
critical dates.<br />
Team Organization<br />
Providing outstanding support to the CITY throughout the life of the continuing contract for professional services is a high<br />
priority for KING. We are mindful of the importance of providing responsive service and committing the required personnel<br />
to meet the resource demands of each project. KING is committed to providing the necessary resources to ensure that all<br />
assignments are completed to the satisfaction of the CITY. We welcome the opportunity to work with the CITY to<br />
demonstrate our responsiveness, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness.<br />
Availability of Key Staff and Resources<br />
KING’s management team updates its workload projections on a monthly basis to ensure the availability of staffing<br />
resources to meet its contractual commitments. Beyond the current state of its workload, KING manages its workload on a<br />
regular basis to maintain the proper balance between workload and resources. On a monthly basis, all project managers<br />
update six month workload projections by project and by staff assignment for each member of KING’s staff to ensure that<br />
adequate staffing is maintained at all times. Project managers anticipate future contracts and work orders and include in<br />
their projections to ensure continued access and availability of selected staff to work on their projects. For the CITY, Mr.<br />
Maristany will work closely with CITY staff to anticipate staffing commitments associated with future work orders and to<br />
ensure that the required staff is committed to the CITY projects.<br />
Project Team Organization<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
The organization of a project team starts with the<br />
CITY’s project management team defining the needs<br />
and goals of a particular assignment. Effectively,<br />
KING serves as an extension of the CITY staff and our<br />
methodology and approach strives for seamless<br />
integration of the CITY and KING’s team of in-house<br />
staff and sub consultants. For each assignment,<br />
KING organizes a compact, core group of team<br />
members with the proper technical credentials to<br />
address all the technical requirements of the job.<br />
Project teams are established based upon a balance<br />
of the level of expertise needed against the cost of<br />
service. This core group or “project team” consisting<br />
of KING and sub consultant staff, is involved from<br />
initial scoping through project completion to ensure<br />
commitment, consistency, and efficiency. Our sub<br />
consultants are fully integrated members of the team<br />
and will take technical direction from the assigned<br />
Task Manager. Sub consultant commitments,<br />
especially local minority and small businesses, are<br />
met on each assignment where their expertise/role is<br />
required.<br />
Mr. Maristany will use the organizational chart, and<br />
the activity breakdown structure to create a table of<br />
Project Team Member Roles and Responsibilities.<br />
The table will serve as a ready reference to team<br />
members and the CITY.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
3
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
As indicated in the organization chart, the team has access to a wide range of experts capable of addressing all the<br />
anticipated technical requirements of a project. In the event that a unique specialty is required for a job, our team will<br />
seek to find that specialist within our team first. In the event that the specialist cannot be found on our team, we will seek<br />
to add a sub consultant to fill that void with the approval of the CITY and in accordance with the procedures set forth by the<br />
CITY.<br />
Effective coordination with all team members is accomplished by establishing clearly defined lines of communication and<br />
accountability (outlined in the Project Management Plan), enabling seamless coordination between all team members –<br />
the CITY, KING, sub consultants, and stakeholders (as applicable). This coordination is particularly crucial to ensure efficient<br />
coordination amongst the various disciplines involved.<br />
Quality Control Process<br />
The primary goals of our Quality Control Program are to consistently achieve the high standards of technical excellence<br />
expected by the CITY, reduce overall engineering construction costs, and best meet the CITY’s needs relative to its public<br />
utility projects. These goals can be attained through implementation of a consistent quality control program for each aspect<br />
of the project. Quality control includes not just review of work products, but early involvement during the scoping phase of<br />
the project to establish methods and procedures for executing the work consistent with proven techniques that meet the<br />
needs of the project in the most efficient manner. The quality assurance/quality control plan for a project includes the<br />
following items:<br />
• Project Delivery Guidelines - Project delivery guidelines are established for project assignments to define the<br />
common vision of all team members and the CITY for completion of each element of the project. A project<br />
definition workshop will be held with the CITY to establish a clear understanding of the specific needs for each<br />
project element, and the appropriate delivery method to meet the project requirements.<br />
• Project Instructions - Our project manager and task leaders will develop a detailed set of project instructions<br />
for execution of the project. The instruction set will define key project information and milestones for all<br />
project team members.<br />
• Specific Quality Control Activities<br />
- Quality control review<br />
procedures for technical elements<br />
of the project are defined, and a<br />
separate staff of qualified<br />
professionals will be assigned as<br />
quality control reviewers for each<br />
discipline.<br />
Our QA/QC program is based on a "total quality<br />
management" approach, and includes the<br />
following key features:<br />
1. The client's perception of quality is the<br />
one that counts.<br />
2. Our project team and project<br />
management approach builds quality in<br />
throughout a project, rather than fixing<br />
it at the end.<br />
3. All members of our management staff<br />
are committed to delivering quality.<br />
4. Those doing the work make constant<br />
improvements to the system.<br />
5. All our work should continually add<br />
value to the client's operation.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
4
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Quality Control Plan<br />
Mr. Maristany will establish a Quality Control Plan that will identify all QC elements, the<br />
team member responsible for the element, and target dates. Once a QC element is<br />
completed, the actual completion date will be entered into the Quality Control Plan.<br />
Typical elements of a Quality Control Plan are listed in the adjacent text box.<br />
Quality Control Philosophy<br />
“The client's perception of<br />
quality is the one that counts.”<br />
Communication Plan<br />
A Communication Plan will be prepared as part of the project management plan that will identify how the various<br />
communication elements will be used to distribute information to the team, as shown below:<br />
Possible Communication Elements<br />
♦ Client Meeting Meetings<br />
♦ Internal Team Meetings<br />
♦ Meeting Minutes<br />
♦ Progress Reports<br />
♦ Project Schedule & Budget<br />
♦ QC Reviews<br />
Possible Media<br />
♦ Email<br />
♦ Voice mail<br />
♦ Fax<br />
♦ Letter<br />
♦ Face-to-face<br />
As shown, the Communication Plan includes progress reports that will be<br />
submitted to the CITY’s Contract/Project Manager as required and on a monthly<br />
basis as a minimum. The progress reports will track all critical events in concert<br />
with the project schedule and will discuss developments of the project during the<br />
preceding month. The progress report will also serve as an exception report to<br />
appraise the CITY of any unexpected developments in the project and the<br />
manner in which these developments have been resolved by the project staff.<br />
These progress reports will be supplemented by project review meetings with<br />
CITY’s Contract/Project Manager.<br />
Similar to the Communication Plan, a Document Distribution Matrix will be<br />
prepared by the KING project manager to identify the team member(s) that will be<br />
a recipient of various documents developed during the project, to assure that the<br />
appropriate information is communicated to the proper party. Documents for<br />
distribution include progress reports, draft reports, designs, correspondence,<br />
permit applications, etc.<br />
Change Management Plan<br />
Communication Plan<br />
Often times, unanticipated circumstances arise during project execution in spite of our collective best efforts to anticipate<br />
change. It is therefore, prudent to have a plan in place to handle potential unexpected changes. If not managed and<br />
executed properly, such changes can have detrimental impacts on the overall success of the project. To prepare for<br />
potential changes, Mr. Maristany will prepare a Change Management Plan to provide guidance to all team members on<br />
identifying, handling, communicating, and resolving these events. The Change Management Plan will identify, in writing,<br />
the proposed change; provide a summary of the impact to the budget, schedule or other element of the project; include a<br />
place where team members can endorse the change; and provide a place for the CITY’s authorization or acknowledgement<br />
of the change. In this way, change can be smoothly incorporated into the overall project.<br />
Contingency/Risk Management Plan<br />
Factors beyond KING’s and CITY’s control (for example, changes in materials prices, availability or delivery time) can often<br />
influence the success of a project. The team members will assist Mr. Maristany with developing a Risk Management Plan<br />
at the kick-off meeting. The Plan will include a list of potential problems specific to the project and prevention measures<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
5
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
that may be used to mitigate the problems. Monthly, Mr. Maristany will update the Risk Management Plan to reflect the<br />
status of each area of potential concern.<br />
Earned Value Analysis<br />
Managing costs must occur throughout<br />
the life of our services on every project<br />
for the CITY. KING realizes that every<br />
dollar of public funds is an investment<br />
made for the public's benefit.<br />
Managing those dollars, whether as<br />
engineering services fees or<br />
construction costs, must result in a<br />
maximum realized benefit to the CITY.<br />
The consulting engineering team,<br />
therefore, undertakes a stewardship of<br />
those funds in concert with the CITY.<br />
At KING, each project manager is<br />
provided with access to an in-house,<br />
computer-based management<br />
information system to track project<br />
costs and manpower requirements on<br />
a weekly basis, and to compare the<br />
quantity of work to be completed with<br />
the remaining amount of budgeted<br />
hours and funding.<br />
Cummulative Revenue<br />
$ 300,000<br />
$ 250,000<br />
$ 200,000<br />
$ 150,000<br />
$ 100,000<br />
$ 50,000<br />
$ 0<br />
Mar-07<br />
INTEGRATED SCHEDULE AND BUDGET MANAGEMENT<br />
Project Number : 2034-027-001 - Project Name: Hammock Park Natural Systems Restoration<br />
As of 10/1/2008<br />
- Over Budget : $4,128<br />
- Ahead Schedule : 19 days<br />
- 78.6% Complete<br />
Jun-07<br />
Sep-07<br />
Dec-07<br />
Mar-08<br />
Jun-08<br />
Aug-08<br />
Nov-08<br />
Feb-09<br />
May-09<br />
Date<br />
Budget Earned Value Invoiced Revenue<br />
Revenue Spent Work Order Expiration Contract Expiration<br />
Aug-09<br />
Mr. Maristany will also use Earned Value Analysis to monitor the project’s budget. As part of the project management plan,<br />
a budget will be assigned to each task in the ABS. Using the scheduled relationship between tasks, the projected<br />
cumulative budgeted cost of the work will be plotted against time to show how the project budget is scheduled to be<br />
expended. Then, on a monthly basis, the project manager will calculate the sum of the earned values (estimated percent<br />
complete times task budget) and compare the total earned value against the expended budget and the projected<br />
cumulative cost to evaluate engineering budget status and the overall project schedule. See attached sample chart.<br />
Presentations<br />
At the CITY’s request, KING will present reports and recommendations to the CITY Commission, CITY Administration, and<br />
other interest groups as specified by the CITY. Our Project Principal and Project Manager have many years of experience<br />
presenting reports and recommendations to multiple stake holders.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work: Traffic<br />
As requested, the KING team is prepared to assist the CITY in a variety of<br />
Roadway <strong>Engineering</strong> services from PD&E/Roadway Alignment Studies to<br />
final design, permitting, and contract administration, these include the<br />
following:<br />
Transportation Planning and Operations<br />
The approach to a traffic operations study to identify and correct traffic<br />
capacity and safety issues would vary from that used in an access<br />
management analysis that would identify safe and efficient access to<br />
maximize capacity along a corridor. The first step is to have a qualified<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
6
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Professional Engineer conduct field visits to the site to assess the operational characteristics of the roadway or intersection.<br />
Items that the field visits may uncover, such as trees, bushes, utility poles that limit motorists’ line of sight, may be crucial<br />
to the successful outcome of the study. Each location and project will have its own distinct set of safety and operational<br />
issues, and as such, each site will be observed on its own merit and approached accordingly.<br />
Subsequent to the field visit, a detailed methodology statement is prepared that clearly outlines the problems identified<br />
and the exact methods proposed to evaluate the alternatives. The methodology statement will be presented to the CITY<br />
and will outline the proposed methodology to be employed, included data collection techniques, reference material to be<br />
used, standards to be applied, and a list of the software that will be used for each analysis.<br />
The analysis will be prepared based upon the agreed upon methodology submitted, and a final report summarizing the<br />
results of the study will be prepared for use by the CITY.<br />
Transportation Corridor Studies<br />
Corridor studies are typically commissioned in order to determine the<br />
future transportation needs along a specified stretch of road that is<br />
important to the surrounding community. Typically, a corridor study<br />
begins with data collection and analysis for the existing traffic conditions<br />
along the roadway. Future volumes are then projected for the horizon<br />
year and the transportation system is analyzed under two scenarios: no<br />
build – which assumes no improvements to the corridor and build –<br />
which identifies any improvements necessary to maintain adequate<br />
operations through the future condition.<br />
KING believes that there are other aspects which must be included<br />
within a detailed corridor study. Access to adjacent properties must be evaluated since the number and configuration of<br />
access has a direct impact on traffic operations. Access should be evaluated not just against the adopted access<br />
management standards, but also from an overall corridor friendly approach. The access evaluation should include<br />
consideration of such options as frontage and reverse frontage roads, cross access and shared parking for compatible uses.<br />
Pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities must also be considered. It is a growing reality that improvements to vehicular<br />
traffic flow may not be enough to sustain our transportation systems. Therefore, the corridor study should include a<br />
detailed inventory and evaluation of the adequacy or feasibility of pedestrian, bicycle and transit amenities. Another key<br />
aspect that should be evaluated within a corridor study is the impact of the adjacent land use on the transportation<br />
patterns along the corridor. The existing and future land use maps and zoning information should be carefully reviewed to<br />
maximize interaction between land uses while minimizing the need for vehicular travel on the roadway.<br />
As you are aware, Public input is also a key component to a successful corridor study. Once draft recommendations and<br />
alternatives have been created, workshops with key stakeholders in the community should be held to gather input and<br />
comment.<br />
A detailed report describing the methods and results of the analysis as well as reflecting the input received in the public<br />
forums will be prepared for the CITY. The report should liberally use graphics where practical to easily portray the results<br />
and recommendations of the analysis.<br />
Traffic Data Collection<br />
Various methods will be employed to collect the data necessary to support the transportation planning and engineering<br />
tasks outlined in the scope of this project. Tools such as automatic traffic counters, capable of collecting traffic volumes,<br />
vehicle classification and speed will be used to obtain approach volumes, middle-block counts, and multi-day data<br />
collection. Digital video recorders may be used to record traffic movements at intersections. The use of the DVR’s can<br />
assure that all movements are being observed and recorded turning movements are then counted in-house. The use of<br />
DVR to collect intersection data allows for a video back up of the data to be retained if needed for verification later in the<br />
analysis. The DVR data also allows for the classification of vehicles during the count, as well as counting pedestrians,<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
7
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
bicyclists and more specific data, such as “right turns on red”. Field personnel may also be used to collect intersection data<br />
in real time, allowing for a comprehensive observation of a variety of traffic characteristics.<br />
Roadway Design<br />
Maintenance of Traffic<br />
KING is qualified with FDOT to provide Highway Design services. Services<br />
to be provided by KING for Roadway Design include preparation of<br />
roadway construction plans, permit applications for environmental<br />
permits, utilities and stormwater systems, traffic control plans, signing<br />
and pavement marking design, roadway lighting, and traffic calming<br />
devices. All designs will meet FDOT’s Minimum Uniform Standards<br />
(“Greenbook”) and CITY’s road standards. Pavement design will be<br />
provided based on the FDOT Flexible Pavement Design Manual. KING will<br />
prepare and submit final design drawings and technical specifications for<br />
grading, drainage, paving and utility plans. Necessary copies of plans will<br />
be provided to all utilities to coordinate their distribution system design.<br />
Minimal disruption of traffic, safety of the traveling public and workers, and access to adjacent properties are elements that<br />
will be considered during the early development of the design and construction phasing. Early coordination and<br />
cooperation with utility companies is important to avoid re-design, construction outages and accidents.<br />
Whether a widening is done to the right side, the left side or along the center will depend on a careful investigation of the<br />
existing alignment, existing and proposed right-of-way, and location of existing utilities. A construction phasing analysis at<br />
the early stage of design will promote economy in construction and design efficiency. Avoidance of adverse disruption to<br />
the traveling public and achieving savings in construction costs is the primordial goal of our design.<br />
Access management is considered a critical issue both in roadway design and in maintenance of traffic. When an existing<br />
roadway is widened, the existing access may need to be modified to meet safety criteria. Modifying existing access may be<br />
costly due to right-of-way acquisition and consequential damages. These factors will be considered during the design to<br />
ensure that access is safely maintained including during construction.<br />
Traffic Signal Design<br />
The KING team will prepare signal design plans that will include all design services, such as survey, geotechnical<br />
engineering, structural design, and signalization plan. During the construction of the traffic signal, the team will provide<br />
inspection services covering the installing of the signal equipment and geotechnical testing services for installing the drill<br />
shafts and mast arm foundations.<br />
KING will be provided a survey base map of the intersection to be signalized. The survey will be provided in AutoCAD file<br />
format or other as requested and will be placed on the CITY’s standard plan sheet. This sheet will be the base plan for the<br />
signal design.<br />
At the CITY’s request, KING will prepare a 60% submittal, 90% submittal and final submittal. The 60% submittal will<br />
include a key sheet, topographic survey, signalization plan sheet, mast arm details, foundation details and soil boring data<br />
sheets. The 60% submittal plans will be sent to all the companies that have underground and overhead utilities in the<br />
intersections. As such, the mast arm and foundation design will be conducted after the 60% submittal plans have been<br />
reviewed the CITY, FDOT and the utility companies.<br />
The 90% submittal will provide all required sheets including the addition of the tabulation of quantities, the signing and<br />
pavement marking plan, mast arm and foundation design, maintenance of traffic and technical special provisions.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
8
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
The final submittal will include all sheets and will be signed and sealed by a professional engineer. The plans will show the<br />
overhead signing, ground signing, paving, drainage and marking modification associated with the new signal installation.<br />
The CITY’s specifications will be incorporated into the General Notes.<br />
Signing and Pavement Marking<br />
Signing and pavement marking plans will be designed based on the latest FDOT Design Standards and FHWA Manual on<br />
Uniform Traffic Control Devices. However, the CITY of North Miami Beach guidelines will be used for specific markings.<br />
Roadside signs will conform to Elder User Guidelines. The Transoft “GUIDSIGN” program will be used to design overhead<br />
street name signs to be installed on the mast arm poles.<br />
Construction <strong>Engineering</strong> Inspection<br />
The construction phase of a project marks the beginning of the<br />
most significant expenditure of a project’s funds. It is the time<br />
when an excellent engineering consultant shows its value. The<br />
design effort has set the stage for successful construction, now<br />
construction services must execute the assignment. Knowing how<br />
to work with contractors is critical. Contractors have a culture - an<br />
orientation. An engineering consultant must know how to<br />
understand a contractor’s perspective and use it to the advantage<br />
of the CITY. An engineering consultant must always be watching<br />
out for the Client’s best interest. In addition, KING has experience<br />
implementing a “Claims Management Approach” which quickly,<br />
efficiently and expeditiously handles claims in order to minimize<br />
any exposure to the CITY.<br />
The successful construction of a project, of course, begins during the design phase. The plans must undergo a<br />
constructability and bidability review. These reviews will not only avoid the “how do we build this” questions from the<br />
Contractor, but will also minimize supplemental agreement claims from the Contractor.<br />
The team approach is to have the design engineers for projects continue as the same basic team through the construction<br />
phase, thus, fully utilizing their knowledge and understanding of the project.<br />
Several important considerations occur during the construction phase of a project. Operations of adjacent roadways and<br />
maintenance of traffic must be impacted to the least amount possible, safety and security must not be compromised, and<br />
the construction effort itself must be kept moving. Delays must be avoided, changes must be avoided; the project should<br />
be kept moving and closed out in a timely fashion.<br />
Construction services can be generally separated into construction administration (CA) and resident project representative<br />
services (RPR). CA in general, is the designer checking and monitoring the construction to assure what is being built is what<br />
was designed. CA consists of attendance at a preconstruction conference, periodic visits to the construction site to monitor<br />
progress and quality of work, taking appropriate action on shop drawings and other submittals, preparation of change<br />
orders, reviewing laboratory and testing results, providing design clarifications, evaluating contractor substitution<br />
proposals, reviewing contractor applications for payment, performing substantial completion inspections, obtaining written<br />
warranties and preparing of closeout documents, including record drawings.<br />
If the CITY requests RPR services, then closer monitoring of the Contractor and construction effort would result. Services<br />
would consist of arranging progress meetings and job conferences, reviewing Contractor progress schedules, serving as<br />
liaison with the Contractor, administratively handling and reviewing paperwork between the contractor/CA team such as<br />
change orders and contractor pay requests, performing daily inspections, keeping daily work log, verifying that certificates<br />
and manuals furnished by the contractor are applicable to the items actually installed, conducting final inspection,<br />
preparing and completing a punch list, and providing the CITY and user start up assistance.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
9
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Constructing a public works improvement is a multi-organization effort. It is a process that finds the CITY, the Contractor,<br />
the Design Engineer, the permitting agencies, and other government agencies in a partnership to implement the project<br />
safely and efficiently. In order to be successful, the relationship among the involved parties must be based on the following<br />
principals:<br />
• Commitment to an acceptable end product<br />
• Open communication<br />
• Trust<br />
• Teamwork<br />
• Understanding of mutual goals<br />
An additional vital component of the project “team” is the public. The citizens and taxpayers of the community expect and<br />
deserve a high quality project. They must have their questions and concerns answered in a factual and professional<br />
manner. KING’s extensive experience in public involvement efforts on many types of projects will be a great value on this<br />
project if required during the construction administration services.<br />
The successful construction of a project, of course, begins during the design phase. The plans must undergo a<br />
constructability and bidability review. These reviews will not only avoid the “how do we build this” questions from the<br />
Contractor, but will also minimize supplemental agreement claims from the Contractor.<br />
The day-to-day administration of the construction project will involve several essential phases:<br />
• Final review of contract package<br />
• Preconstruction conference<br />
• Shop drawing review<br />
• Documentation<br />
• Recommendations for contract alteration<br />
• Project acceptance<br />
All of these elements are vitally important. A further explanation of the documentation phase will help communicate<br />
KING’s understanding of the construction administration process. We live by a simple cardinal rule related to<br />
documentation: Document as if every decision you make may be challenged in court. The organization of this<br />
documentation is also very important. Many decisions are made during a construction project. The following list indicates<br />
the nature of KING’s administration documentation:<br />
• Project diary<br />
• Progress estimates<br />
• Control of materials reports<br />
• Utility work reports<br />
• Subletting requests<br />
• Time modifications<br />
• Supplemental agreements<br />
• Contract claims<br />
• Acceptance reports<br />
• Final estimates<br />
• Correspondence<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
10
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Approach to Scope of Work: Drainage Design<br />
KING welcomes the opportunity to work in partnership with the CITY of North Miami Beach to improve the<br />
stormwater/drainage levels of service either on a citywide basis, sub-basin scale, or in association with smaller localized<br />
projects that involve drainage improvements.<br />
KING relies on its multi-disciplinary in-house capabilities to deliver innovative and cost-effective solutions to increasingly<br />
complex stormwater challenges. As population growth places additional demands on our limited water resources, more<br />
creative solutions are required to manage water on an integrated basis and achieve a better balance between competing<br />
objectives such as water supply, flood control, aquifer recharge, water quality and aquatic control, navigation, and the<br />
natural environment. KING works closely with its clients to clearly define the nature of the challenges and find solutions<br />
that are uniquely tailored to their needs.<br />
We offer an integrated team of engineers, hydrologists, ecologists, surveyors, landscape architects, and GIS experts that can<br />
address the full range of stormwater services. KING provides the following stormwater services:<br />
Master Planning<br />
Capital Improvement Plans<br />
Hydrologic, Hydraulic, and Water Quality Modeling<br />
Flood & Erosion Control<br />
Stormwater Reuse and Aquifer Recharge<br />
Seepage modeling and control<br />
Enhancement of Water Quality through Best Management Practices<br />
Lake / Wetland Restoration<br />
Design of Water Resources Infrastructure<br />
o Drainage Systems<br />
o Hydraulic Control Structures<br />
o Stormwater Pump Stations<br />
o Lakes, Reservoirs, Canals, Retention Ponds<br />
Stakeholder/Interagency Coordination and Public Information<br />
Regulatory Issues / Permitting<br />
o Review of Plats; Paving, Grading, and Drainage Plans; As-Builts<br />
o Policy and design criteria development<br />
o Permitting procedures and fees<br />
o Drainage design and criteria manuals<br />
Construction Management and Inspections<br />
KING <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
11
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Most importantly, our staff has compiled an extensive record of stormwater experience in south Florida. Following is a<br />
representative list of projects:<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team South Florida Stormwater Experience<br />
Client Location Project Description<br />
Central Broward<br />
Water Control<br />
District<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
District engineer from 1995 through 2007 for a 43.5-square-mile area that<br />
includes unincorporated Broward County, Cooper City, the Seminole Indian<br />
Reservation, and the communities of Davie, Hollywood, Sunrise, and Pembroke<br />
Pines. Provided services related to regulation, permitting, infrastructure<br />
improvements, and the operation and maintenance of more than 100 miles of<br />
secondary canals serving 150,000 residents. Reviewed plats, paving and<br />
drainage plans, and as-built drawings for all development and redevelopment<br />
for conformance with design standards, processing an average of 70 plans<br />
annually. Revised the design criteria manual and conducted site inspections.<br />
Attended Board and committee meetings. Managed special projects including<br />
flood assessments, stormwater modeling, and implementation of best<br />
management practices to improve water quality and erosion control, and the<br />
design of infrastructure improvements.<br />
Central Broward<br />
Water Control<br />
District<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
Design of ten secondary canal culvert crossings with a combined construction<br />
value of $700,000. Culverts ranged from circular 48-inch RCP to dual 72-inch<br />
RCP. Services included, planning, design, permitting, utility relocation, bidding<br />
assistance, and support during construction.<br />
Central Broward<br />
Water Control<br />
District<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
Water quality study of the C-11 West Basin, a highly urbanized area covering<br />
22.9 square miles. The XP-SWMM model was used to evaluate the retention<br />
capacity of the existing secondary canal network and to evaluate infrastructure<br />
improvements to improve the quality of discharges into the C-11 West canal.<br />
The recommended alternative consisted of enlarging and deepening several<br />
canal outfalls to enhance phosphorus removal via wet detention. The study<br />
and recommendations were used as the basis to obtain a $1 million grant from<br />
the South Florida Water Management District to construct the improvements.<br />
Central Broward<br />
Water Control<br />
District<br />
Central Broward<br />
Water Control<br />
District<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Development of a stormwater master plan for the C-11 East Basin, a 24–<br />
square-mile highly urbanized watershed. Major tasks included a facilities<br />
inventory and GIS mapping, development and calibration of a stormwater<br />
model (XP-SWMM), evaluation and recommendation of alternatives for flood<br />
control and water quality enhancement, preparation of capital and operation<br />
& maintenance costs, and recommended priorities for a $19M capital<br />
improvement plan. Alternatives evaluated included pump stations, canal<br />
dredging, and culvert improvements. The XP-SWMM model consisted of 38.8<br />
miles of canals, 185 culverts and bridges, two major control structures (S-13<br />
and S13A), and 3 pump stations.<br />
Design, permitting, bidding assistance, and construction support services for<br />
the construction of 2,800 feet of secondary canal improvements (deepening<br />
and widening) within the C-11 West Basin. The project is funded jointly by the<br />
CBWCD and the South Florida Water Management District. The project<br />
increases the capacity of selected secondary canals by deepening and widening<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
12
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team South Florida Stormwater Experience<br />
Client Location Project Description<br />
the downstream canal sections to improve stormwater quality prior to<br />
discharge into the C-11 West Canal.<br />
Central Broward<br />
Water Control<br />
District<br />
Hollywood, FL<br />
Development of a stormwater master plan for the C-11 West Basin, a 72 –<br />
square-mile highly urbanized watershed. Major tasks included a facilities<br />
inventory and mapping, development and calibration of a stormwater model<br />
(XP-SWMM), evaluation and recommendation of alternatives for flood control<br />
and water quality enhancement, preparation of capital and operation &<br />
maintenance costs, and recommended priorities for a $3M capital<br />
improvement plan. Alternatives evaluated included pump stations, canal<br />
dredging, and culvert improvements. The XP-SWMM model consisted of over<br />
2000 nodes including 250 sub-basins, 58 miles of canals, 364 culverts, 5 pump<br />
stations, and 20 control structures.<br />
South Florida Water<br />
Management<br />
District<br />
South Florida Water<br />
Management<br />
District<br />
Broward County<br />
Broward County<br />
Basis of Design Report (BODR) for a 1,650-acre above ground impoundment<br />
with a construction value of $134 million. The impoundment is an element of<br />
the Broward County Water Preserve Area. Key components of the<br />
impoundment include 6.5 miles of 15.5-foot levees, levee windbreaks, 295-<br />
acre mitigation wetland, 700 cfs inflow pump station, 500 cfs gated outlet<br />
structure, 500 cfs gated culvert on the C-9 canal, emergency overflow spillway,<br />
seepage control canals, and a 150 cfs seepage pump station. Services included<br />
topographical site baseline surveys and GIS database development,<br />
geotechnical and hydrogeological field investigations, dam break analysis, SPF<br />
routing, wind setup, wave run-up, erosion control, SEEP2D and MODFLOW<br />
seepage modeling, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical & instrumentation,<br />
and preparation of detailed cost estimates for the recommended<br />
configuration.<br />
Design and preparation of full contract documents for an $1.8 million, 500 cfs<br />
gated culvert structure on the C-9 Canal, including twin 6-ft by 10 ft RCP box<br />
culverts, SCADA controls, and manatee barrier. Services included hydraulic<br />
analysis, geotechnical investigation, surveying, civil, structural, mechanical,<br />
electrical & instrumentation design, erosion control, preparation of detailed<br />
cost estimates, construction schedule, and permitting support.<br />
South Florida Water<br />
Management<br />
District<br />
Broward County<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Development of two complex hydrologic and hydraulic models to support the<br />
design of the Broward County Water Preserve Area (BCWPA). The models<br />
assisted in the evaluation of alternative project configurations, dimensions,<br />
and capacities; the development of operation protocols for various project<br />
components; and the phasing of project components. Project components<br />
include reservoirs, pump stations, canals, control structures, and seepage<br />
management areas. A comprehensive Water Balance Model was developed to<br />
provide initial screening of alternatives to efficiently reduce the number of<br />
potential alternatives for more detailed analysis. An XP-SWMM model of the<br />
entire BCWPA was also created to perform more detailed analysis including<br />
hydraulic routing yielding instantaneous flows, water levels, and velocities for<br />
each selected alternative. Modeled components included two major<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
13
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team South Florida Stormwater Experience<br />
Client Location Project Description<br />
impoundments (C-9 and C-11) with an approximate storage capacity of 6,000<br />
acre-ft each, routing through the C-11 and C-9 canals from the coast to the<br />
water conservation areas (48 miles of canals), 16 major control structures, and<br />
6 pump stations ranging in size from 100 cfs to 2,880 cfs. Recommendations<br />
resulted in significant cost savings ($206M vs. $224M) through reduced<br />
capacities (control structures, pumps, and new canals) while achieving higher<br />
flow diversion capacities (83% vs. 35%) through modified project<br />
configurations and operations protocols as compared to the originally<br />
proposed project.<br />
South Florida Water<br />
Management<br />
District<br />
Broward County<br />
Evaluation of potential flood impact of decommissioning pump station G-123<br />
(400 cfs) on the North New River (NNR) Basin and the evaluation of mitigation<br />
measures. The G-123 pump station discharges from the NNR Basin into the<br />
Water Conservation Area 3A (WCA-3A) for water supply purposes, but it is also<br />
used for flood control during major storms. An XP-SWMM model of the 30-<br />
square mile basin was developed and calibrated against Hurricane Irene and<br />
the “No-Name Storm”. The model covered an area of 30 mi2 extending 13.6<br />
miles along the NNR canal from G-123 to the G-54 saltwater control structure,<br />
and 3.7 miles along the C-42 canal. The model included 12 bridges, 2 culverts, 3<br />
control structures, the G-123 pump station, and 20 inflow points including 12<br />
pump stations. Since elimination of the pump would negatively impact flood<br />
levels in adjacent municipalities, alternatives and conceptual cost estimates<br />
were prepared to mitigate impacts, including canal deepening, removal of<br />
aquatic vegetation, and modified operational rules for G-123 allowing<br />
operation during extreme events.<br />
Broward County<br />
Office of<br />
Environmental<br />
Services<br />
City of Fort<br />
Lauderdale<br />
City of Fort<br />
Lauderdale<br />
Broward County<br />
Broward County<br />
Broward County<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Stormwater planning and design of a stormwater system to alleviate extensive<br />
flooding problems in several old neighborhoods, where common problems<br />
included lack of positive outfalls and poor surface infiltration due to the<br />
destruction (filling in) of street side swales. A stormwater (adICPR) model was<br />
applied to assess the severity of existing flooding problems and to size<br />
drainage facilities. Because positive outfalls to waters of the U.S. were required<br />
for flood control, best management practices (BMPs) were used for pollution<br />
control. Runoff and lake water quality models were used to assess BMP<br />
effectiveness, size controls, and estimate water quality impacts to receiving<br />
lakes. The designed system consisted of re-graded swales, exfiltration<br />
trenches, storage and treatment in neighborhood lakes, and overflow into the<br />
primary canal system.<br />
Retrofitting the drainage system in the facility to reduce frequent flooding and<br />
accommodate the addition of a 7-million-gallon storage tank and ASR well pad<br />
to the plant site in accordance with regulations. Work effort included modeling<br />
(adICPR), design, and permitting (SFWMD, DNRP, and FDOT).<br />
Planning, design, and limited construction support services for a $650,000<br />
facility connecting SFWMD’s C-14 canal to Prospect Lake to recharge the city's<br />
main wellfield with freshwater that would otherwise be discharged to tide. The<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
14
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team South Florida Stormwater Experience<br />
Client Location Project Description<br />
facility serves to intercept canal flows for storage in the lake and adjacent<br />
aquifer. Services included securing a $300,000 alternative water supply grant<br />
from the South Florida Water Management District. A unique aspect was the<br />
reclassification of the Lake from a Class I to a Class III water body, the first such<br />
reclassification in the state of Florida.<br />
City of Lauderdale<br />
Lakes<br />
Broward County<br />
Development and implementation of a stormwater utility including needs<br />
assessment, rate structure, revenue projections, billing database, and<br />
stormwater utility ordinance.<br />
City of Miami<br />
Miami, FL<br />
Preparation of the municipal NPDES stormwater permit application, which<br />
included sewer system inventory, GIS mapping, dry- and wet-weather<br />
sampling, assessment of nonpoint source impacts, development of a water<br />
quality management plan to reduce pollutants to waters of the U.S., analysis of<br />
program costs and fiscal resources, public information, and assistance in<br />
negotiations with the EPA.<br />
Miami-Dade County<br />
DERM<br />
Miami, FL<br />
Development of a stormwater master plan for the C-6 Basin (Miami River). The<br />
study area, located in northeastern Miami-Dade County, has an area of 69<br />
square miles and contains approximately 175 sub-basins. Major tasks includes<br />
data review and statistical analysis of rainfall and flow records, compilation of<br />
drainage data from the cities, development of a digital terrain model for the<br />
basin area, delineation of sub-basins; building and calibration of a<br />
hydrologic/hydraulic and water quality XP-SWMM model for the basin;<br />
evaluation and ranking of flooding and water quality problems areas;<br />
identification and evaluation of flood and water quality control measures using<br />
XP-SWMM; cost estimates and recommendation of control measures.<br />
Miami-Dade County<br />
DERM<br />
Miami, FL<br />
Development of a stormwater master plan for the C-1 Basin. The study area,<br />
located in southeastern Miami-Dade County, has an area of 56.9 square miles<br />
and contains 145 sub-basins. Major tasks included evaluation and ranking of<br />
flooding and water quality problems areas; identification of control measures<br />
for flood and water quality control; hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality<br />
modeling of control measures using XP-SWMM; cost estimates and<br />
recommendation of control measures.<br />
Miami-Dade County<br />
DERM<br />
Miami-Dade County<br />
DERM<br />
Miami, FL<br />
Miami, FL<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Design of drainage improvements to alleviate flooding and water quality<br />
problems in flood prone neighborhoods throughout Miami-Dade County.<br />
Managed preparation of 57 design packages, covering about 2 square miles,<br />
and with a construction value of $4 million. Designs included catch basins,<br />
exfiltration trenches, pavement restoration, and maintenance of traffic plans,<br />
hydraulic calculations, cost estimates, and utility conflict coordination.<br />
Design of $6 million in canal dredging and embankment restoration<br />
improvements for 6.6 miles of the North Canal. Tasks included preparation of<br />
plan, profiles, specifications, quantity takeoffs using Geopak, and coordination<br />
with surveyors and geotechnical engineers. All deadlines were met on this fast-<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
15
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
<strong>King</strong> Team South Florida Stormwater Experience<br />
Client Location Project Description<br />
track project.<br />
City of Boca Raton<br />
Palm Beach<br />
County<br />
Evaluation of funding alternatives to finance stormwater capital improvement<br />
and operation and maintenance programs. A stormwater utility was selected<br />
as the preferred alternative. Developed the rate structure, revenue<br />
projections, and ordinance for implementation of the utility.<br />
City of Boca Raton<br />
Palm Beach<br />
County<br />
As part of a general stormwater services contract, provided assistance with<br />
preparation of a NPDES stormwater permit.<br />
Land Use<br />
The CITY of North Miami Beach is a mature, built-out community with a relatively stable population. Its attractive setting,<br />
warm climate, and vibrant business environment make it an attractive destination for permanent residents, businesses, and<br />
vacationers.<br />
Flood Prone Areas<br />
Because of its low lying elevations, proximity to the coast and the fact that primary canals within the CITY are tidal, flooding<br />
within the CITY may be caused by a combination of large storm events, high tides, and storm surge activity caused by<br />
hurricanes.<br />
The attached FEMA<br />
flood zone map<br />
shows the areas<br />
impacted by flooding.<br />
The inundation<br />
coincides closely with<br />
the topography,<br />
impacting the lower<br />
lying coastal areas and<br />
the relic floodplain<br />
areas adjacent to the<br />
C-9 primary drainage<br />
canal controlled by<br />
the S-29 saltwater<br />
control structure.<br />
Large areas of the<br />
CITY enjoy being<br />
outside the 100 year<br />
floodplain.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
16
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Flood Insurance<br />
The CITY participates in the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Rating System and enjoys a 15% discount on<br />
flood insurance premiums to homes located in a Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) designated by the Federal Emergency<br />
Management Agency (FEMA).<br />
The CITY has implemented measures to reduce and ultimately, eliminate the community’s exposure to floods. Fullcompliance<br />
with floodplain management requirements results in CRS premium discounts in flood insurance rates.<br />
Sea Level Rise<br />
Longer term, the CITY may be impacted by sea level rise based on the current observed trends, although the impact will<br />
occur very slowly over a very long period of time. Long term historic tidal data available at NOAA station 8723170 in Miami<br />
Beach (see following figure) shows a representative sea level rise for the area of 0.09 inches per year.<br />
Therefore, the CITY may consider the potential impact of this trend and incorporate into the design of future<br />
improvements. This may be accomplished by adjusting design boundary conditions to reflect the projected rise over the<br />
expected life of the improvements.<br />
Monthly Tides - Miami Beach<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-1<br />
-2<br />
-3<br />
-4<br />
1931<br />
1933<br />
1935<br />
1937<br />
1939<br />
1941<br />
1943<br />
1945<br />
Feet MSL<br />
1947<br />
1949<br />
1951<br />
1953<br />
1955<br />
1957<br />
1959<br />
1961<br />
1963<br />
1965<br />
1967<br />
1969<br />
1971<br />
1973<br />
1975<br />
1977<br />
1979<br />
1981<br />
Year<br />
Highest MSL Lowest<br />
Linear (Highest) Linear (MSL) Linear (Lowest)<br />
Regulatory Framework<br />
Stormwater quantity, quality, and flood protection within the CITY are regulated by various agencies including the South<br />
Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Broward County Environmental<br />
Protection Department (EPD), and the CITY’s Public Works Department.<br />
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has been targeting a revision of stormwater regulations and<br />
design criteria that will result in more stringent requirements for water quality control. The new governor has placed all<br />
such efforts on hold for the time being.<br />
KING <strong>Engineering</strong> has been tracking these changes very closely and is well positioned to provide timely information on the<br />
potential impacts of these regulations. Our staff serves on three committees including the Florida <strong>Engineering</strong> Society,<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
17
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers, and the Florida Home Builders Association. Each of these committees have a<br />
representative on a technical advisory committee (TAC) created by FDEP to provide feedback on the proposed changes.<br />
Drainage Solutions<br />
KING has worked effectively with many clients on the southeast coast of Florida to identify<br />
cost-effective solutions that provide substantial flood control relief when encountering<br />
conditions similar to the CITY.<br />
Typical solutions have ranged from increasing the capacity of outfall discharges to tide,<br />
supplementing capacity with stormwater pump stations, and using backflow prevention<br />
devices to avoid saltwater inundation during high tides. These improvements have resulted in<br />
significant reduction in peak flood levels and the duration of inundation for all storm events,<br />
including the larger 25-year and 100-year storms.<br />
Scope of Work: Underground Utility Design<br />
Preliminary <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Once the pipeline alignment is chosen, the project will enter the preliminary design phase. It is the intent of this phase to<br />
produce documents that are approximately 30% complete. During this Phase, KING will collect site specific design data in<br />
sufficient detail to establish the basis for the final design documents. Associated efforts include:<br />
• Re-evaluate pipeline sizing based on updated flows, if necessary.<br />
• Obtain ground and aerial survey data along the pipeline route, and identify locations of property and Right-of-Way<br />
lines.<br />
• Obtain geotechnical data, especially at all potential horizontal directional drill (HDD) and jack & bore entry and exit pits.<br />
• Perform “pedestrian” ecological surveys, such as an environmental resources evaluation, to identify specific locations<br />
that may be effected by construction.<br />
• Prepare base plan and profile drawings showing all existing utilities and the preliminary alignment of the proposed<br />
pipeline.<br />
• Develop a preliminary construction cost estimate.<br />
At the completion of this phase, KING will advise the CITY of any additional geotechnical work that appears to be necessary<br />
along with areas where SUE information is required.<br />
A minimum of ten copies of the preliminary plans will be submitted to the CITY for review. In addition, two sets of plans<br />
will be provided to each of the known utilities within the project area. These utilities will be requested to accurately depict<br />
and/or confirm the locations of their existing facilities. Two review meetings with the CITY will be attended (a<br />
constructability and a value engineering review), during which comments will be assembled for inclusion in the documents.<br />
Intermediate Design<br />
Upon receipt of the CITY’s comments on the preliminary design, KING will begin<br />
preparing the intermediate (60% + 90%) design submittal. This phase will consist of<br />
more detailed development of construction drawings and specifications including<br />
temporary construction easement recommendations (if any), plan and profile<br />
sheets, standard details, and process flow and instrumentation diagrams if<br />
required. At a minimum, the design documents will include the following items.<br />
• Cover sheet with location & vicinity map;<br />
• General Notes;<br />
• Coordinate Control;<br />
• Pipeline key map;<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
18
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
• Pipeline plan and profile sheets;<br />
• Special crossings;<br />
• Miscellaneous details;<br />
• Mechanical, electrical, and structural plan sheets showing existing and proposed information, limits of construction,<br />
and construction sequencing;<br />
• Preliminary maintenance of traffic plans;<br />
• Wetland impact sheets, if any;<br />
• Erosion and sediment control measures; and,<br />
• Technical specifications.<br />
Other tasks to be conducted during this phase include:<br />
• Finalizing design of HDPE/PVC DR ratings;<br />
• Obtaining subsurface utility engineering (SUE) data, if necessary;<br />
• Preparing sketch and legal descriptions for easements and/or property acquisition, if necessary;<br />
• Attending pre-application meetings with permitting agencies; and,<br />
• Updating the opinion of probable construction cost.<br />
The project design documents will carefully specify the qualifications and experience of the contractor. In addition, the<br />
documents will explicitly address the contractor’s operations while working in the residential areas. Specifically, working<br />
hours, maximum noise levels, maintaining continuous access for residents, emergency services, trash collection and postal<br />
deliveries, maintenance of traffic and pedestrian safety will be thoroughly addressed. Regardless of the construction<br />
method, the contractor should be required to conduct pre-construction video-taping in order to document existing<br />
conditions before construction initiated. He should also be required to provide post-construction as-builts based on the<br />
reamed hole location so as to accurately depict the actual elevation of the pipeline.<br />
As outlined previously in this proposal, KING has significant successful experience with<br />
pipeline projects. In 2006, the longest (800’), largest (36”) ductile iron pipe installation<br />
to-date by HDD was successfully installed on a project designed by KING. As a result of<br />
this similar experience, we have a tried and true method for approaching such<br />
projects.<br />
At this point in the design, information from the various utilities regarding the location<br />
Water System Improvements<br />
of their facilities should be available and will be incorporated onto the drawings. If<br />
required, KING will conduct a utility coordination meeting with these utilities to verify<br />
the location of their facilities and resolve conflicts. Resolution of known conflicts will be documented to the CITY.<br />
A detailed cost estimate based on current unit prices will be developed. The estimate will include summaries of bid items<br />
and quantities on the unit price system of bidding, wherever practical. If necessary and practical, the design will be<br />
modified based on budgetary constraints.<br />
Land acquisition documents will also be developed, including sketch and legal descriptions and easement agreements if<br />
included in our scope of services. During this phase, it will also be important to begin development of railroad utility license<br />
agreements as needed.<br />
The KING team will conduct an internal quality control project review prior to the CITY's review. A minimum of ten sets of<br />
documents will be submitted to the CITY for review and comment. Again, two review meetings with the CITY will be<br />
attended, a constructability and a value engineering review, during which comments will be assembled for inclusion in the<br />
documents.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
19
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Final Design<br />
Based on the outcome of the intermediate design review meetings, and other comments received from the CITY, KING will<br />
begin preparing the final design submittal. This phase will take the plans essentially to completion. The CITY’s comments<br />
will be incorporated into the drawings and technical specifications. The front end documents will also be prepared,<br />
including the bid form. During this phase permit application packages will be completed and submitted to the regulatory<br />
agencies.<br />
Two review meetings with the CITY will be attended, a constructability and a value engineering review, during which<br />
comments will be assembled for inclusion in the bid documents. The CITY will also be provided with ten (10) additional<br />
copies of the drawings to be forwarded to the utility companies and Real Estate Services Division of the CITY’s Real Estate<br />
and Development Department.<br />
All comments from permitting agencies will be addressed in order to secure the project permits and, if necessary, KING will<br />
assist with and attend a public information meeting for the project.<br />
Construction Phase<br />
After meeting with the CITY to discuss any final comments, the construction documents will be completed and submitted to<br />
the CITY for advertising and bidding.<br />
KING will prepare the application and submit the project plans to the<br />
FDOT or any other required permitting agency, for review, if required.<br />
After the project has been advertised for bids, KING will attend a pre-bid<br />
meeting if requested by the CITY. KING will provide assistance during the<br />
bidding phase by responding to requests for information and issuing<br />
addenda, as necessary. Upon receipt and opening of bids, KING will<br />
evaluate the bids, contact references, and make a recommendation of<br />
award to the CITY.<br />
Following contract approval, KING will provide construction phase<br />
services. These services will include office and field services depending<br />
on the CITY’s desired level of effort.<br />
• Assist in the preparation of formal Construction Contract Documents;<br />
• Provide engineering surveys to refresh and re-establish benchmarks and reference points on approved Coordinate<br />
System<br />
• Attend a preconstruction conference;<br />
• Review contractor submittals, including shop drawings, product data, samples, and other submittals required by the<br />
contract documents;<br />
• Furnish non-resident field observation services;<br />
• Prepare, reproduce and distribute supplemental drawings, specifications and interpretations in response to requests<br />
for clarification;<br />
• Observe and evaluate testing results and make recommendations to the CITY;<br />
• Prepare record drawings based on data provided by the contractor, including a bond copy and electronic copies in<br />
.DWG and .DXF formats;<br />
• Consult with the CITY regarding warranty and guarantee issues;<br />
Scope of Work: Grant Assistance<br />
KING brings a commitment to clients to enhance value in every project that we undertake. One of the ways we do that is to<br />
attract governmental funding when available, from local, State and Federal Sources<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
20
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Fiscal Year 2011 Appropriations are the normal appropriations bills which are passed every year. They fund all of the federal<br />
government’s discretional spending. The following is a listing of the Federal Appropriations Bills:<br />
• Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies<br />
• Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies<br />
• Defense<br />
• Energy and Water<br />
• Financial Services and General Government<br />
• Homeland Security<br />
• Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies<br />
• Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies<br />
• Legislative Branch<br />
• Military Construction, Veterans Administration, and Related Agencies<br />
• State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs<br />
• Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies<br />
• The following provides a general outline of our team’s appropriations activities:<br />
o Conduct Initial Screening<br />
o Packaging<br />
o Presentation<br />
o Promote and Advocate Project<br />
o Grant Release<br />
o Appropriations Timeline<br />
Conduct Initial Screening<br />
The first step of the process would be to work with the CITY to do an analysis of the potential requests. This analysis will<br />
determine the project’s cost, groups and constituencies to benefit from the funding, potential allies, potential funding<br />
sources, and requirements for each funding source. The team will work to asses every type of funding, such as a direct<br />
appropriation, a cooperative agreement with a federal agency, or a competitive grant. At the completion of the initial<br />
screening, a determination will be made as to which funding source or sources will be pursued.<br />
The team would seek to work with the appropriate CITY personnel and have discussions with Congressional appropriators<br />
and officials from relevant federal agencies. These discussions would be used to secure input regarding their thoughts<br />
about potential funding sources and strategies to move forward.<br />
Packaging<br />
This step consists of compiling all relevant information into a detailed proposal which will anticipate and answer any<br />
questions that a member of congress, an appropriator or administration official may have. The package will be specifically<br />
tailored to address the needs of the particular funding source selected.<br />
Presentation<br />
The team will work with the appropriate CITY officials and begin to hold meetings with the Congressional Delegation and<br />
appropriators, congressional leadership, and relevant administration personnel to present the requests for funding.<br />
Promote and Advocate Project<br />
The team would work to monitor the entire funding process and work to ensure that the request remains a priority for the<br />
House and Senate Appropriators, Congressional Leadership, and relevant staff within the administration. In this step of the<br />
process, the team provides day-to-day oversight of the request and watches out for potential opportunities, such as<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
21
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
increasing funding and problems. The importance of this step is that instances occur where mistakes are made in<br />
appropriations bills, and the team has on occasion had to work with appropriators to fix errors, such as the naming of a<br />
request in manager’s amendments or technical correction packages.<br />
Grant Release<br />
Once a project is successful in securing federal funding, the team will work with the CITY to release the funding. All federal<br />
funding, including direct appropriations, have rules associated with the release of the funding.<br />
Further KING can assist with other innovative funding strategies, including:<br />
• Impact fees or other capital contribution charges levied on new growth<br />
• Revenue bond debt financing<br />
• Special assessments primarily for potable or reclaimed water transmission/distribution facilities, or wastewater<br />
conveyance facilities benefitting customers in a geographically defined area<br />
• Special assessment bonds, debt service of which is paid through receipts of special assessments<br />
As the need arises, KING will work with a firm based in Washington DC which brings together some of the most<br />
accomplished policy experts, public opinion influencers and issue advocates.<br />
KING has secured funding for the following projects:<br />
Client Name<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
Project Name<br />
East Pasco Reuse System For Price Altman<br />
Groves<br />
Estimated<br />
Funding Source<br />
Funds<br />
Provided<br />
$350,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Status<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
Timber Pines Reclaimed Water Irrigation<br />
System and Master Plan<br />
$250,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
CITY of Dunedin,<br />
Florida<br />
Curlew Road Elevated Storage Tank<br />
Refurbishment and Reclaimed Water Booster<br />
Pump Station<br />
$400,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County<br />
Utilities, Florida<br />
Land O'Lakes Subregional Wastewater<br />
Treatment Plant Phase 1<br />
$400,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pinellas County,<br />
Florida<br />
Florida Utilities North County Reclaimed<br />
Water Distribution System Project Phases 3a<br />
and 3b<br />
$2 Million Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
CITY of Largo, Florida<br />
CITY of Dunedin,<br />
Florida<br />
CITY of Dunedin,<br />
Florida<br />
Florida Dept of<br />
Corrections - Sumter<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Florida Oakbrook Estates Reclaimed Water<br />
Distribution System<br />
Residential Reclaimed Water Distribution<br />
Systems<br />
Florida Spanish Trails Sanitary Sewer and<br />
Reclaimed Water Distribution Project<br />
Institution/Florida National Cemetery<br />
Reclaimed Water System<br />
$400,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Over $1<br />
Million<br />
Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
$700,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Partially<br />
Funded<br />
Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Approved<br />
Approved<br />
Approved<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
22
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Correctional<br />
Pinellas County,<br />
Florida<br />
Florida Treasure Island Reclaimed Water<br />
Distribution System<br />
Partially<br />
Funded<br />
Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
CITY of Largo, Florida Florida Reclaimed Water System Part X $300,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
CITY of Largo, Florida<br />
Florida Reclaimed Water System Part X Phase<br />
2 and Part Xi<br />
$400,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
CITY of Dunedin,<br />
Florida<br />
Florida Coastal Raw and Reclaimed Water<br />
Main<br />
$200,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
CITY of Dunedin,<br />
Florida<br />
Florida Reclaimed Water South Loop<br />
Transmission Main<br />
$500,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
Utilities West Pasco Reuse System Northeast<br />
Segment<br />
$200,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County Florida<br />
Utilities<br />
Deer Park/Embassy Hills Reclaimed Water<br />
Interconnect<br />
$800,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
North-Central Pasco Reclaimed Main & Force<br />
Main<br />
Partially<br />
Funded<br />
Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
Land O'Lakes Master Reuse System Storage<br />
Reservoir Program Phase I<br />
Partially<br />
Funded<br />
Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
Master Reuse System Storage Reservoir<br />
Program Phase II, Boyette Road Reservoir<br />
Partially<br />
Funded<br />
Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
Odessa Interim Subregional WWTP<br />
Reclaimed Water Storage and High Service<br />
Pump Station<br />
Partially<br />
Funded<br />
Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida Florida West-Central Reuse Interconnect Partially<br />
Funded<br />
Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
Florida Utilities Land O'Lakes Subregional<br />
Wastewater Treatment Plant<br />
$400,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Pasco County, Florida<br />
Florida Utilities Wildcat Groves Reclaimed<br />
Water Storage and Pumping System<br />
$350,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Baker County, Florida Florida Stormwater Master Planning $300, 000 St. Johns River Water<br />
Management District<br />
CITY of Largo, Florida Florida Stormwater Quality Retrofit $750,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
St. Pete College<br />
Pinellas County,<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Wetland Enhancement and Stormwater<br />
Quality Retrofit<br />
$372,000 Southwest Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Approved<br />
Approved<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
23
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Florida<br />
City of Hollywood,<br />
Florida<br />
Central Broward<br />
Water Control<br />
District, Florida<br />
Florida Stormwater Reuse and Conservation $250,000 South Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Canal Water Quality Retrofit $1,000,000 South Florida Water<br />
Management District<br />
Approved<br />
Approved<br />
Available Facilities, Technology Capabilities and Other Resources<br />
KING utilizes up-to-date technology and tools that allow our engineers, ecologists, surveyors, technicians, field crews, and<br />
other professional staff work effectively and efficiently.<br />
General<br />
• 15-Ford F-150 Field Trucks<br />
• Leica High Definition Scanner 3000<br />
• Rhino 4-wheel ATVs<br />
• 1 - 14-ft jon-boat<br />
• Fisher M-Scope, FP 10 ferrous pipe detector<br />
• Ashtech Mobile Mapper 100 GIS hand held asset<br />
management data collector<br />
• JAMAR TDC -8 - Machine counter<br />
• JAMAR DB 400 – Machine counter – traffic counts only<br />
• 7 - JAMAR Trax Mite Machine Tube Counter<br />
• infrared remote video monitoring system (gopher<br />
tortoise camera)<br />
• Ground truthing equipment<br />
• Piezometer<br />
• Pressure gauges<br />
• Pressure recorder<br />
• Laptops<br />
• Shortwave radios<br />
• PDA’s<br />
• Cameras<br />
• Measuring Wheel<br />
• Safety Equipment – i.e. hard hat, safety glasses, steeltoed<br />
boots, and fluorescent vests<br />
SERVER / SYSTEMS<br />
• Microsoft SQL Server 2000 / SQL 2005<br />
• 100 Workstations (Pentium 4 2.4 to Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz)<br />
• 42 LAN / WAN servers<br />
• 6 office WAN<br />
• Network includes:<br />
• 4 – TB hard drive storage<br />
• 1 –3.3 TB LT03 tape library<br />
• – 1.2 TB LT02 tape library<br />
• 20 – DVD-RW Drives<br />
• – Citrix Metaframe XP Remote Access Server<br />
• 30 – CD – RW Drives<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
• – Lotus Notes Application Server<br />
• Printers:<br />
• 1 – HP Design Jet 5000 42” color plotter<br />
• – HP Design Jet 1055 CM 1200 dpi color plotter<br />
• – HP Design Jet 1050C 1200 dpi color plotter<br />
• – OCE TDS 600<br />
• 15+ – HP laser printer<br />
• 10+ – color inkjet<br />
• Scanners: – high speed document scanners / extensive<br />
computer image enhancement of aerial photography<br />
and digital photo capabilities<br />
SOFTWARE<br />
• AutoDesk Land Development Desktop 2009/2011,<br />
Microstation Version J, Version V8I<br />
• AutoDesk 3D Studio Viz visualization software<br />
• ARC/INFO - Geographic Information System (GIS)<br />
• ARC VIEW 3.2A<br />
• ARCGIS 9.2 / 9.3 / 10.0<br />
• AUTOCAD LT 2008/2009<br />
• FSUTMS 6.1 Cube Voyager<br />
• Synchro 7.0<br />
• HCS+<br />
• Corsim 6.0<br />
• LOS Plan<br />
• CIVIL 3D 2009 / 2011<br />
• CYBERNET - Hydraulic Modeling Program<br />
• HAESTAD – PondPak 3.2/3.3<br />
• H2ONet - Hydraulic Modeling Software with the<br />
capability of performing time based water quality<br />
analyses.<br />
• HEC-1 - Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Center Hydrologic Model<br />
• HEC-2 - Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Center Backwater Curve Model<br />
• HYDRAFLOW<br />
• Advanced ICPR - Advanced version of ICPR includes<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
24
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
explicit hydrodynamic modeling element/PERCPARK<br />
• MODRET - Mounding analysis for retention ponds<br />
• MODFLO - USGS three-dimensional model for general<br />
groundwater flow analysis<br />
• Autoturn 7.0<br />
• SWFWMD Link Watershed Waterbody Model (LWWM)<br />
• SWMM - EPA Storm Water Management Model<br />
• EXTRAN - Explicit Hydrodynamic Channel Modeling<br />
computer program<br />
• LANDAP - Land application model for spray field sizing of<br />
effluent irrigation<br />
• PRIMAVERA - Project Management and Scheduling<br />
Program / P6<br />
• SewerCAD - Hydraulic Modeling Software with the<br />
capability of performing time based sewer flow analyses.<br />
• STORM CAD 6.5<br />
• TERRA MODEL<br />
• WATER CAD V8I - Hydraulic Modeling Software with the<br />
capability of performing time based water quality<br />
analyses<br />
• Bentley Hammer V8I<br />
• FDOT 2010<br />
• Guidsign 5.0<br />
• Microsoft Access 2003/2007<br />
• AUTOCAD LT 2008/2009<br />
• COMMUNITY ANALYSIS SYSTEM- for analysis of<br />
biological collections. Modules allow for a variety of<br />
inferential statistical interpretations of raw data.<br />
• DIGIAIR - Digital Aerial Photography (2009) of the Tampa<br />
Bay Metropolitan Area<br />
• Seamless, radiometrically (color) balanced, orthorectified,<br />
spatially correct image for use as a basemap<br />
for viewing sites and site related GIS information.<br />
• LABINS - Land and Boundary Information System<br />
• FDOT DRAINAGE CONNECTION<br />
• LEGAL HOLIDAY<br />
• LEGAL AID<br />
• LOTUS NOTES<br />
• METROSCAN<br />
• MICROSOFT OFFICE 2000/2003/2007<br />
• MICROSTATION – Versions J and V8I<br />
• MINE HYDROLOGY<br />
• SITEWORK 98<br />
• SITE VISION OFFICE (Machine Control)<br />
• STATGRAPHICS - Scientific Statistical Package<br />
• SURETRAK - Project Management and Critical Path<br />
Scheduling Program<br />
• MICROSOFT PROJECT 2003/2007<br />
• SURVEY LINK<br />
• TIMELINE - Project Management and Critical Path<br />
Scheduling Program<br />
• Adobe Photo Shop CS2<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
• Adobe Illustrator CS3<br />
• CaiCe Software<br />
• Cyclone Scanning Software<br />
• Starplus Software<br />
• Google Sketch up<br />
• Land FX<br />
• M-Color 9.6<br />
• Geo Express 8.0<br />
SURVEY & MAPPING EQUIPMENT<br />
• Data Collectors<br />
• 16 TDS Ranger<br />
• 1 Husky FS/GS<br />
• Husky MP2500<br />
• Total Stations<br />
• 1 Topcon GPT 1003<br />
• Topcon GTS 225<br />
• Topcon GTS 4 Total Stations<br />
• Topcon GTS 303 Total Stations<br />
• 2 Topcon GTS 212 Total Stations<br />
• Geodimeter 600 (robotic) Total Stations<br />
• 1 Topcon GTS 500 Total Station<br />
• 1 Topcon GTS2B Theodolite with EDM<br />
• Trimble 5603 Robotic Total Stations DR 200+<br />
• 1 Trimble 5606 Total Station<br />
• 3 Focus 10 Total Stations<br />
GPS<br />
• Trimble TSC1 Survey Controllers<br />
• 2 Trimble TSC2 Survey Controllers<br />
• Trimble 4800 Dual Frequency Receivers<br />
• 3 Trimble 4700 Dual Frequency Receivers<br />
• 2 Trimble 5800 Dual Frequency Receivers<br />
• 2 Trimble 5700 Dual Frequency Receivers<br />
• 2 Trimble Trimmark IIE 35watt Base Radios<br />
• Sokkia Radian Dual Frequency Receivers<br />
• Sokkia Radian IS Dual Frequency Receivers<br />
• 5 Sokkia Stratus Single Frequency Receivers<br />
• 1 Sokkia Axis III Receiver<br />
Levels<br />
• 4 Zeiss NI2 Levels<br />
• 3 Zeiss NI3 Levels<br />
• 1 Pentax ALM5C Level<br />
• 1 Leitz - NA828 Level<br />
• 1 Topcon - PAL5C Level<br />
• 1 Wild - Topcon NA20 Level<br />
• 1 Topcon - ATG3 Level<br />
• 2 Wild - Topcon ADT2 Levels<br />
• 1 Trimble DiNi 22 Electronic Digital Level<br />
• 3 Sokkia Electronic Levels<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
25
City of North Miami Beach Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
Conclusion<br />
KING has developed the foregoing approach based on the scope of engineering services contained in Request for<br />
Qualifications, field observation and our experience working with other municipalities on similar projects. We have<br />
successfully used this approach over the years and look forward to continuing this success working with the CITY of North<br />
Miami Beach. We have brought together a strong team, a defined process, and experienced leadership to assist the CITY<br />
with its water and wastewater projects.<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Approach to Scope of Work<br />
26
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
7.1 EXHIBIT A- LIST OF PROJECTS<br />
SECTION 7.0 EXHIBITS<br />
Public Services Department<br />
RFQ for Continuing Architecture, <strong>Engineering</strong>, Planning, Surveying & Mapping Services List<br />
Department<br />
Project Name<br />
1 Community Development Planning Studies and review<br />
2 Community Development Traffic studies and review<br />
3 Community Development Concurrency review<br />
4 Community Development/CIP Bike Path Extension to Greynolds Park (MPO)<br />
5 Community Development/CIP City Facilities 40-Year Recertification<br />
6 Community Development/CIP City Facilities Renovation -(City-wide )<br />
7 Community Development/CIP City Hall Complex Repair / Replacement<br />
8 Community Development/CIP City Hall Restrooms Renovation - City Hall 4th Floor<br />
9 Community Development/CIP City Hall Restrooms Renovation -City Hall First Floor<br />
10 Community Development/CIP Eastern Shores Drainage Repair / Replacement<br />
11 Community Development/CIP<br />
Emergency Generator Installation - Fleet Management<br />
Facility<br />
12 Community Development/CIP Government Center Pavement Marking<br />
13 Community Development/CIP HVAC System assessment - all City Facilities<br />
14 Community Development/CIP McDonald Center Restrooms Renovation<br />
15 Community Development/CIP<br />
16 Community Development/CIP<br />
NE 159 Street Extension to Biscayne Blvd / Railroad<br />
crossing /closing design and traffic study<br />
NE 161 Street Roadway & Drainage Improvement -<br />
Between NE 13 Ave & NE 15 Ave<br />
Page 48 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
17 Community Development/CIP<br />
18 Community Development/CIP<br />
NE 162 Street Roadway Improvement - Between NE 12<br />
Ave & NE 16 Ave<br />
NE 165 Street Roadway Improvement - Between NE 15<br />
Ave & NE 16 Ave<br />
19 Community Development/CIP NE 173 St- Dixie Hwy Intersection re-design<br />
20 Community Development/CIP<br />
21 Community Development/CIP<br />
22 Community Development/CIP<br />
23 Community Development/CIP<br />
24 Community Development/CIP<br />
25 Community Development/CIP<br />
26 Community Development/CIP<br />
27 Community Development/CIP<br />
28 Community Development/CIP<br />
NE 167 Street & Miami Drive Roadway Improvement -<br />
Between NE 18 Avenue & NE 19 Avenue<br />
NE 167 Street Bridge - NE 167 St over the Snake Creek<br />
Canal<br />
South Glades Drive Roadway Improvement - Between NE<br />
17 Ave & NE 22 Avenue<br />
NE 171 Street Medians Landscape - Between NE 15 Ave &<br />
West Dixie Hwy<br />
NE 19 Avenue Roadway Improvement - From NE 163 St to<br />
NE 171 St<br />
NE 4 Place & NE 4 Court Roadway Improvement -<br />
Between NE 167 St & NE 168 St<br />
West Dixie Hwy - Pedestrian and Bike access to Snyder<br />
Tennis Center<br />
West Dixie Industrial District Roadway & Drainage<br />
Improvement - NE 151 St to NE 154 ST between West<br />
Dixie Hwy & Railroad track<br />
Oakgrove Traffic Calming - Miami Drive / NE 14 Avenue /<br />
NE 15 Avenue / NE 160 & NE 161 Street Intersections<br />
29 Community Development/CIP Police Facilities Repair / Replacement/PD<br />
30 Community Development/CIP<br />
Roof system assessment and replacement - all City<br />
Facilities<br />
31 Community Development/CIP Security Access Card System - all City Facilities<br />
32 Community Development/CIP Telephone System Replacement -City Hall & PD<br />
33 Community Development/CIP Windows Treatment - Police Building (3rd floor south side)<br />
34 Community Development/CIP Security Gate Replacement -Fleet Management Facility<br />
35<br />
36<br />
Community Development/CIP<br />
/PD<br />
Community<br />
Development/CIP/PD<br />
Fire Alarm and Suppression system assessment for City<br />
facilities<br />
City Hall Restrooms Renovation - City Hall Second & Third<br />
Floor<br />
Page 49 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
TRANSMISSION MAINS<br />
37 <strong>Engineering</strong> Condition assessment of mains over 40 years old<br />
38 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
39 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
40 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Sunshine State Pkwy East to Sunshine State Pkwy West<br />
on N.W. 175 st.<br />
Biscayne Blvd. between N.E. 187 st. and N.E. 193 st.<br />
eastside of Bisc.<br />
Biscayne Blvd between 183 st. and 100' north of OLETA<br />
RIVER crossing, E side of Bisc.<br />
41 <strong>Engineering</strong> Biscayne Blvd from 172 st. to 1,300 ft. north<br />
42 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
43 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
44 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
45 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Eastside of Bisc. Blvd. between 163 st. and Snake Creek<br />
Canal<br />
Westside of Bisc. Blvd. between N.E. 159 st. and N.E. 156<br />
st.<br />
N.E. 6 ave. between N.E. 181 st. & 180 dr. to Sunshine<br />
State Parkway West (170 st.<br />
N.W. 179 st. from Myrtle Grove west to 29ct. South to<br />
Treatment Plant 16" on Eastside<br />
46 <strong>Engineering</strong> 160 st. N. Mia. Ave. to 159 st. N.W. 7 ave.<br />
47 <strong>Engineering</strong> 181 st. N.E. 19th ave. to 180 st. N.E. 6 ave.<br />
48 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
49 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
50 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
51 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Lot 6 (ISLAND SHORES CONDO) west to eastside of<br />
Oleta River<br />
160 st. N.E. 21 ave. N to 162 st. E to eastside of Bisc. Blvd.<br />
N to 163 st.<br />
181 ST. N.E. 19th ave. N to Mia. Gardens Dr. E to Bisc.<br />
Blvd. on Mia. Gardens Dr.<br />
Crossing Intracoastal Waterway to the Strand & Golden<br />
Beach Drive<br />
52 <strong>Engineering</strong> HAULOVER PARK/BEACH<br />
53 <strong>Engineering</strong> HAULOVER BRIDGE<br />
54 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
SOUTHSIDE of HAULOVER BRIDGE to BAL HARBOR<br />
INTERCONNECT<br />
55 <strong>Engineering</strong> N.E. 199 st. from N.E. 18 ave. east to Biscayne Blvd.<br />
Page 50 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
56 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
57 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
199 st. N.E. 18 ave. west to N.W. 7 ave. south to Norwood<br />
Water Plant<br />
183 st. between Bisc. Blvd. and N.E. 27th ave. inside<br />
shopping plaza CENTURY 21<br />
AERIAL PIPE CROSSINGS<br />
58 <strong>Engineering</strong> West Dixie Hwy & NE 176 St remove & replace<br />
59 <strong>Engineering</strong> Biscayne Canal & NW 27 Ave remove & replace<br />
60 <strong>Engineering</strong> Biscayne Canal & NW 32 Ave remove and replace<br />
61 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
NE 199 St & 25 Ave (Oleta River)- Rust removal, paint &<br />
ARV<br />
62 <strong>Engineering</strong> NW 168 St & 17 Ave - paint , ARV & signs<br />
63 <strong>Engineering</strong> NW 167 St & 16 Ct- paint , ARV & signs<br />
64 <strong>Engineering</strong> Williams Island Blvd & Two Island Blvd- paint ARV & signs<br />
65 <strong>Engineering</strong> Biscayne Canal & NW 7 Ave- remove and replace<br />
66 <strong>Engineering</strong> C9 Canal & NE 182 St- provide ultraconic testing<br />
67 <strong>Engineering</strong> C9 Canal & NE 176St- provide ultrasonic testing<br />
68 <strong>Engineering</strong> C9 Canal & NE 199 St- provide ARV, paint and signs<br />
69 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Biscayne Canal & North Miami Ave- provide paint, ARV &<br />
signs<br />
70 <strong>Engineering</strong> Biscayne Canal & NW 17 Ave- provide paint and signs<br />
71 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Poinciana Drive & West of Collins ave- ultraconic testing &<br />
paint<br />
72 <strong>Engineering</strong> Atlantic Isle- provide ARV, rust removal, paint & signs<br />
73 <strong>Engineering</strong> The Srand & Golden Beach Dr- paint & sign<br />
74 <strong>Engineering</strong> Verona Ave Bridge - paint & sign<br />
Page 51 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
75 <strong>Engineering</strong> Navona Ave Bridge - remove & replace PVC)<br />
76 <strong>Engineering</strong> Biscayne Blvd & 176 St- paint & signs<br />
77 <strong>Engineering</strong> Biscayne Blvd & Snake Creek canal- paint & signs<br />
78 <strong>Engineering</strong> Oleta River & SR 826 - paint and Signs<br />
79 <strong>Engineering</strong> Bakers Haulover inlet - liner &/or replace sections<br />
80 <strong>Engineering</strong> SUBAQUEOUS PIPE CROSSINGS<br />
81 <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
INTRACOASTAL WW at STRAND CONDITION<br />
ASSESSMENT<br />
82 <strong>Engineering</strong> LEAK DETECTION PROGRAM<br />
83 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 165 ST ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT<br />
84 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP COMMERCIAL ALLEYS RESURFACING CRA ONLY<br />
85 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NMB BLVD-162 ST ( from 12CT-13 AVE)<br />
86 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NMB BLVD ( from Miami Dr-16 Ave)<br />
87 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NMB BLVD - 164 ST ( from 16-17 ave)<br />
88 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NMB BLVD-164 ST (from 17-18 ave)<br />
89 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP South Glades Dr. -164 St (from 18-19 ave)<br />
90 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP North Glades Dr.-167 St (from 18-19 Ave)<br />
91 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP North Glades Dr.-167 St (from 19-20 Ave)<br />
92 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NMB BLVD- 164 ST (from 20-21 Ave)<br />
93 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP West Dixie Hwy- 170 ST (from 170-171 ST)<br />
94 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP West Dixie Hwy- 23 Ave (from 170-171 ST)<br />
Page 52 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
95 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP West Dixie Hwy - 23 Ave (from 171-172 ST)<br />
96 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP West Dixie Hwy - 23 Ave (from 172-173 ST)<br />
97 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 167-168 ST ( from 21-22 Ave)<br />
98 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 161 ST ROADWAY & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS<br />
99 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP ANNUAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM<br />
100 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 167 ST & MIAMI DR. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT<br />
101 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP OAKGROVE TRAFFIC CALMING 160 & 161 ST INTERS.<br />
102 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP ANNUAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM<br />
103 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP WEST DIXIE IND DISTRICT RDWY & DRAINAGE IMPR<br />
104 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 162 ST ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT<br />
105 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 171 ST MEDIAN LANDSCAPING<br />
106 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP GOVERNEMNT CENTER ALLEYWAYS RESURFACING<br />
107 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 170 ST ON STREET PARKING<br />
108 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 10 AVE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS<br />
109 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 4 PL & 4 CT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT<br />
110 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP ANNUAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM<br />
111 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 167 ST BRIDGE OVER SNAKE CREEK CANAL<br />
112 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 159 ST & BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION<br />
113 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP SOUTH GLADES DR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT<br />
114 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP ANNUAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM<br />
Page 53 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
115 <strong>Engineering</strong>/CIP NE 19 AVE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT<br />
DEAD END ELIMINATION PROJECTS<br />
Location<br />
116 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions N. Bay Rd between NE 188 St and NE 189 St.<br />
117 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions<br />
In Easment between NE 188 St and NE 189 St. on N. Bay<br />
Rd.<br />
118 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 21 Ave. North of NE 188 Terr<br />
119 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 19 Ave. Alleyway between NE 171 St and NE 172 St.<br />
120 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 20 Ave and NE 172 St<br />
121 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 20 Ave and NE 173 St<br />
122 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 168 St. Between 18 and 19 Ave<br />
123 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 174 Street Between NE 19th Ave and NE 20th Ave<br />
124 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions<br />
North Miami Beach Blvd. Between NE 19th Ave and NE<br />
20th Ave<br />
125 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 20 PL and NE 139 St<br />
126 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 11 AVE from NE 169 St to NE 169 Terr<br />
127 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 15 Ave from Ne 161 St to NE 162 St<br />
128 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 10 Ct. Alleyway between NE 156 St. and NE 157 St.<br />
129 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 10 Ave and NE 160 Terr<br />
130 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 10 Ave and NE 161 Terr<br />
131 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 162 St and NE 10 Ave<br />
132 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 160 Terr and NE 12 Ave<br />
Page 54 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
133 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 14 Ct and NE 152 Terr<br />
134 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 157 St between NE 14 Ct to NE 15 Ave<br />
135 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 162 St and NE 16 Ave<br />
136 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 158 St and NE 15 Ave<br />
137 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 11 Ave from NE 149 St to NE 150 St<br />
138 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 12 Ave from NE 148 St to NE 147 St<br />
139 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 191 St along Snake Creek Canal<br />
140 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 168 Terr and 3 ct<br />
141 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 173 St and NE 2 Ave<br />
142 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 2 Ave. Alleyway between NE 174 St and NE 175 St<br />
143 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 4 Ct and NE 174 Street<br />
144 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 3 Ave and NE 164 ST<br />
145 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 158 St and NE 2 Ave<br />
146 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 162 St and NE 6 Ave<br />
147 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 164 Street between NE 6 Ave and NE 7 Ave<br />
148 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 163 Street between NE 7 Ave and NE 8 Ave<br />
149 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 160 Street between NE 7 Ave and NE 8 Ave<br />
150 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 159 St between NE 2 Ave and NE 3 ave<br />
151 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 160 Terr between NE 4 Ave and NE 5 Ave<br />
152 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 5 Ave between NE 159 St and 160 St<br />
Page 55 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
153 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 151 St and NE 7 Ave<br />
154 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 152 St and NE 7 Ave<br />
155 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 7 Ave. Alleyway between NE 153 St and NE 154 St<br />
156 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 164 St and NE 8 Ave<br />
157 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 151 Street and N. Spur Drive<br />
158 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 2 Ave south of NE 148 Street<br />
159 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions<br />
Between NW 2 Ave and NE 3 Ave. Alon Snake Creek<br />
Canal<br />
160 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 183 terr and North Miami Ave<br />
161 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 185 Terr and NE 1 Ct<br />
162 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NE 1 Ct and NE 187 St<br />
163 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 164 St West of N. Miami Ave<br />
164 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 164 St East of N. Miami Ave<br />
165 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 165 St and N. Miami Ave<br />
166 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 17 Ave and NW 173 St<br />
167 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 17 Ave 175 St<br />
168 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 15 AVE between NW 163 St and NW 159 St<br />
169 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 15 AVE between NW 155 Terr and NW 159 St<br />
170 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 16 Drive and NW 12 Ave<br />
171 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 15 Drive and NW 13 Ave<br />
172 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 168 Terr between NW 29 Ave and NW 30 Ave<br />
Page 56 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
173 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 30 Ave between NW 171 st to NW 170 St<br />
174 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 171 St from NW 29 Ave to NW 28 Ave<br />
175 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions<br />
NW 27 Ave and NW 163 St (Approx 350 FT South of<br />
intersect)<br />
176 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 27 Ave and Biscayne Canal<br />
ALLEYWAYS IMPROVEMENTS<br />
177 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Alleyways 2" water main replacements phase 9<br />
178 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Commercial alleyways<br />
FIREFLOW IMPROVEMENTS<br />
179 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Ne 172 St fireflow improvement ( 9-10 Ave)<br />
180 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 1 Ave fireflow improvements ( 128-135 St)<br />
181 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Myrtle Grove Fireflow Improvements NW 171 St<br />
182 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Ne 157 Terr Fireflow Improvements (18-19 Pl)<br />
183 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Nw 15 Dr Fireflow Improvements (143-147 St)<br />
184 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions North Glades Dr. (NE 170- 173 St)<br />
185 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 183 St & NW 2 Ave<br />
186 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 159 St between NW 2 Ave and N. Miami Ave<br />
187 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 167 St from NW 19 ave to NW 20 Ave<br />
188 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 161 St between NW 2 Ave and N. Miami Ave<br />
189 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 15 AVE between NW 163 St and NW 159 St<br />
190 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Nw 27 Ave ( 151-154 St)<br />
Page 57 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
191 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions NW 155 Dr /13 Ave railroad xing in exist casing<br />
192 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 6 - Sunray East<br />
193 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 7 - Sunray West<br />
194 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 8 - Norwood<br />
195 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 9 - North Biscayne Gardens<br />
196 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 10 - Honey Hill<br />
197 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 11- Norland<br />
198 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 12- South Biscayne Gardens<br />
199 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 13- St- Thomas Univ<br />
200 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 14- Bell Gardens<br />
201 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 15- Fulford Highlands<br />
202 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions Fire Hydrants Phase 16- Oak Grove<br />
SYSTEM BETTERMENT PROJECTS (
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
209 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions SR 826 LANDSCAPING<br />
210 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions SR 7 LANDSCAPING<br />
211 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions SR 826 TRAFFIC SIGNALS<br />
212 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions SR 826 TRAFFIC SIGNALS<br />
213 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions TURNPIKE RESURFACING<br />
214 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions SR 7 RESURFACING<br />
215 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions<br />
SR 860 ( MIAMI GARDENS DR) INTERSECTION<br />
IMPROVEMENT<br />
216 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions SR 856 WILLIAM LEHMAN CAUSEWAY RES.<br />
217 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions SR 915 (NE 6 AVE) RESURFACING<br />
218 <strong>Engineering</strong>/Distributions I-95 LANDSCAPING<br />
219 IT Dept.<br />
City Hall IT Server Room - Design for new space with Fire<br />
Suppression and dedicated A/C<br />
220 Leisure Services Pat Mishcon Field - Turf Field<br />
221 Leisure Services Allen Park Tot Lot Playground Equipment Replacement<br />
222 Leisure Services Highland Village Recreation Center Expansion<br />
223 Leisure Services<br />
Highland Village Tot Lot Playground Equipment<br />
Replacement<br />
224 Leisure Services Littman Park Tot Lot Playground Equipment Replacement<br />
225 Leisure Services Littman Theater - Remodeling Dressing Rooms<br />
226 Leisure Services Parks & Recreation Facilities Repair / Replacement<br />
227 Leisure Services Sky Lake Tot Lot<br />
228 Leisure Services Taylor Park - Phase I<br />
Page 59 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
229 Leisure Services Taylor Park Expansion - Phase III<br />
230 Leisure Services Uleta Phase II (Ballfields Renovations)<br />
231 Leisure Services Uleta Phase III (Pool, Tot Lot and Bathhouse)<br />
232 Leisure Services Victory Pool Bathrooms Renovation<br />
233 Leisure Services Victory Pool Water Feature<br />
234 Leisure Services Washington Expansion- Phase IV<br />
235 Leisure Services Washington Park Expansion- Phase I<br />
236 Leisure Services Washington Park Expansion- Phase III<br />
237 Leisure Services YES -Government Center Tot Lot<br />
238 Leisure Services<br />
Connectivity study for Bike Paths/ Trails throughout the<br />
City<br />
239 Meters METER Replacement Program<br />
240 Wastewater Annual report<br />
241 Wastewater SSES report<br />
242 Wastewater Norwood Water Wellfield protection report.<br />
243 Wastewater Inflow and Infiltration<br />
244 Wastewater Major Sewer Rehabiltation<br />
245 Wastewater GRINDER PUMPS REPLACEMENTS<br />
246 Wastewater COLLECTION SYSTEM REHABILITATION ( I & I )<br />
247 Wastewater PUMP STATION REHABILITATIONS (under designing)<br />
248 Wastewater FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENTS (under designing)<br />
Page 60 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
249 Wastewater FLOW METER AT KIMCO<br />
250 Wastewater<br />
FORCE MAIN INSTALLATION NORWOOD TO HONEY<br />
HILL<br />
251 Wastewater INSTALLATION OF TRANSDUCERS AT ALL STATIONS<br />
252 Wastewater<br />
253 Wastewater<br />
INSTALLATION OF ISOLATION VALVES IN BISCAYNE<br />
BLVD ( COSTCO & KOA)<br />
PURCHASE OF STANDBY GENERATOR FOR WW<br />
ADMIN BLDG<br />
254 Wastewater Televised Inspections of Gravity Sanitary Sewers<br />
255 Wastewater WW VSCO Requirement<br />
WATER PLANT<br />
256 WATER PLANT General engineering services for water treatment plant<br />
257 WATER PLANT Water Supply Planning Update<br />
258 WATER PLANT Electrical engineering services for water treatment plant<br />
259 WATER PLANT SCADA and Instrumentation services<br />
260 WATER PLANT Deep Injection Well permitting, mechanical integrity testing<br />
261 WATER PLANT Membrane water treatment system expansion<br />
262 WATER PLANT<br />
Bidding, construction services for Myrtle Grove storage<br />
tank improvement and pump station<br />
263 WATER PLANT WTP expansion punchlist item<br />
264 WATER PLANT 1500 KW generator permenant installation, MCC 5 repl<br />
265 WATER PLANT Membrane replacement set aside<br />
266 WATER PLANT Wells 1F, 2F, and 4F acid treatment<br />
267 WATER PLANT SCADA Improvement<br />
Page 61 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
268 WATER PLANT Filter Media replacement/improvements<br />
269 WATER PLANT Annual Well Rehab<br />
270 WATER PLANT High Service Pump Replacement<br />
271 WATER PLANT Transfer Pump Reoplacement<br />
272 WATER PLANT Critical spareparts<br />
273 WATER PLANT Remote monitoring system<br />
274 WATER PLANT Certified scale for chemical truck measuring<br />
275 WATER PLANT Membrane Control System Server replacement<br />
276 WATER PLANT Thermal Image camera<br />
277 WATER PLANT Ultrasonic Meter for pacing lime slake feed control<br />
278 WATER PLANT RO and Nano Degasifier system cleaning system<br />
279 WATER PLANT Saveall tank bridges with pumps and level sensors<br />
280 WATER PLANT Filter valve acuator replacement<br />
281 WATER PLANT Water Storage Tank inspection and rehab<br />
282 WATER PLANT New High Service Pump 5314<br />
283 WATER PLANT Rebuild HSP 5311 and HPP 3331<br />
284 WATER PLANT Lime Slake #2 replacement<br />
285 WATER PLANT Maintenance shop and warehouse<br />
286 WATER PLANT add RO pressure vessel and membrane (1.5 MG)<br />
287 WATER PLANT Deep Injection Well Mechincal Integrity Test<br />
Page 62 of 69
RFQ No. 2012-10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services<br />
288 WATER PLANT SCADA client computer replacement<br />
289 WATER PLANT AC replacement for MCC2 room<br />
290 WATER PLANT MCC 3 replacement<br />
291 WATER PLANT Norwood Site improvements<br />
292 WATER PLANT Misc Electrical Improvements<br />
293 WATER PLANT Small equipments (Turbidity, pH, SDI, etc)<br />
294 WATER PLANT HYDROGUARD INSTALLATIONS<br />
295 WATER PLANT SAMPLING POINT DEVICES<br />
296 WATER PLANT SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS<br />
297 WATER PLANT AMR Phase I-SRF WATER PROJECTS<br />
298 WATER PLANT VOC Phase - Phase II-SRF WATER PROJECTS<br />
299 CRA Way finding Signage<br />
300 CRA Environmental Analysis<br />
301 CRA Planning/Project Development<br />
302 CRA Site Planning Design& processing<br />
Page 63 of 69
Construction Management &<br />
Inspection Services<br />
Water and Sewer Department<br />
3071 SW 38th Avenue<br />
Miami, Florida 33133<br />
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or<br />
Other Upgrades to the MDWASD<br />
Sanitary Sewer System within the<br />
City of Miami Springs, Florida<br />
ER No. S048414, RPQ #P0038<br />
December 2010<br />
<strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
8390 NW 53rd Street<br />
Suite 200<br />
Doral, Florida 33166<br />
Phone: (305) 392-9979<br />
<strong>King</strong><br />
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.<br />
Project No. EDP-2011-D-R<br />
Agreement No. EDP-WS-138<br />
W W W . K I N G E N G I N E E R I N G . C O M
MIAMI‐DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT<br />
Project No. EDP 2011‐D‐R<br />
Construction Management and Inspection Services for the<br />
“Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to<br />
the MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System within the City of Miami<br />
Springs, Florida”<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT<br />
December 24, 2010<br />
Miami‐Dade Water and Sewer Department<br />
3071 SW 38 th Avenue<br />
Miami, Florida 33133<br />
Prepared By:<br />
8390 NW 53RD STREET<br />
SUITE 200<br />
DORAL, FL 33166<br />
Phone: (305) 392‐9979
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
The work completed as part of this project reflects the joint team effort of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer<br />
Department (MDWASD) staff, Reynolds Inliner LLC (Reynolds), and the members of the <strong>King</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
<strong>Associates</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>King</strong>) SSES team.<br />
The cooperation and professionalism demonstrated by MDWASD staff was key to the successful completion of<br />
this project. We gratefully acknowledge the special contributions of the following MDWASD staff:<br />
Mr. Rod Lovett - Chief, Wastewater Collection & Transmission Line Division<br />
Mr. Joe Mazzarese - Water Distribution Supervisor, TV & Grout South Unit (Retired)<br />
Mr. Larry Decker - Assistant Superintendent, Inspection Section<br />
Mr. Ini Roberts - Engineer 2, Evaluation / Review Section<br />
Mr. James Saren - Assistant Superintendent, M & R Section<br />
Mr. Juan Bedoya - Water Distribution Supervisor, TV & Grout North Unit<br />
Ms. Maria Morejon - Administrative Secretary<br />
Mr. Al Galambos - Chief, Pump Station Maintenance Division<br />
Mr. Rey Urquiola - Assistant Superintendent, Pump Station Division<br />
Mr. Charles Sutton - Assistant Superintendent, Pump Station Division<br />
Mr. Jorge Montier - Operations and Maintenance Supervisor, Pump Station Division<br />
Mr. Ralph Garcia - Plant Mechanic, Pump Station Division<br />
Finally, the following Reynolds personnel are gratefully acknowledged for their contribution to the project.<br />
These include:<br />
Rick Cooper, Branch Manager<br />
William Rivera, Project Manager<br />
Radhames Mejia, Operations Manager<br />
i
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................... i<br />
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 5<br />
i. Background ................................................................................................................................................ 5<br />
ii. Purpose ...................................................................................................................................................... 6<br />
iii. Scope ......................................................................................................................................................... 6<br />
INSPECTION METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS ................................................................................................ 8<br />
i. Manhole Cleaning and Inspection ............................................................................................................. 8<br />
ii. Pump Station Cleaning and Inspection ..................................................................................................... 9<br />
iii. Sewer Gravity Main Cleaning and CCTV Inspection ................................................................................. 9<br />
iv. Smoke Testing ......................................................................................................................................... 10<br />
RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 15<br />
i. Manhole Repair Recommendation .......................................................................................................... 15<br />
ii. Sewer Gravity Main Repair Recommendation ........................................................................................ 15<br />
PLANNING LEVEL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST .......................................................... 17<br />
Appendix “A” ........................................................................................................................................................ 18<br />
Atlas Correction Forms (One sample page included only / Total Pages 11) .................................................. 18<br />
Appendix “B” ........................................................................................................................................................ 20<br />
Manholes with Defects (One sample page included only / Total Pages 2) .................................................... 20<br />
Appendix “C” ....................................................................................................................................................... 22<br />
PS Inspection Forms (One sample page included only / Total Pages 17) ..................................................... 22<br />
Appendix “D” ....................................................................................................................................................... 24<br />
MDWASD Television Observation Codes ...................................................................................................... 24<br />
Appendix “E” ........................................................................................................................................................ 26<br />
Defects Identified Via CCTV Classified by Basin (One sample page included only / Total Pages 4) ............ 26<br />
Appendix “F” ........................................................................................................................................................ 28<br />
Detailed Listing of Work Performed (One sample page included only / Total Pages 10) .............................. 28<br />
Appendix “G” ....................................................................................................................................................... 29<br />
CD-ROM Containing Office Databases (Not included) ................................................................................... 29<br />
Appendix “H” ....................................................................................................................................................... 30<br />
Additional Quantities and Amount per Bid Item .............................................................................................. 30<br />
Appendix “I” ......................................................................................................................................................... 32<br />
MDWASD Repair Criteria and Technology Guidelines (Not included) ........................................................... 32<br />
Appendix “J” ........................................................................................................................................................ 33<br />
Manhole Repair Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (One sample page included only /<br />
Total Pages 4) ................................................................................................................................................. 33<br />
Appendix “K” ........................................................................................................................................................ 35<br />
1
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Mainline Repair Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (One sample page included only /<br />
Total Pages 18) ............................................................................................................................................... 35<br />
Appendix “L” ........................................................................................................................................................ 37<br />
Special Line Segments (Not included) ............................................................................................................ 37<br />
Appendix “M” ....................................................................................................................................................... 38<br />
Repair Recommendations for MHs, Laterals, and Mainlines classified by Basin (One sample page included<br />
only / Total Pages 4) ....................................................................................................................................... 38<br />
Appendix “N” ....................................................................................................................................................... 40<br />
Summary of Bid Costs .................................................................................................................................... 40<br />
2
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
As part of the ongoing infiltration and inflow (I/I) Program, MDWASD performs inspections of at least 10% of its<br />
sewer collection system each year in order to comply with Miami-Dade County Code Section 24-42.2(1)(a).<br />
MDWASD has decreased treatment plant average daily flows over the last 14 years with an effective I/I<br />
program. The City of Miami Springs’ water and sewer system was recently acquired by MDWASD. The City’s<br />
sewer collection system was mostly installed in the early 1970’s and currently contributes I/I to MDWASD’s<br />
collection system. <strong>King</strong> was retained in support of the City‘s SSES program to perform construction<br />
management and inspection services and provide repair recommendations for all identified defects.<br />
The City’s’ sewer collection system is comprised of approximately 46 miles of gravity mains, 17 pump stations,<br />
and 925 manholes. Originally, basins 1233, 1235, 1240, 1242, 1245, 1246, 1247, and 1249 did not comply<br />
with the Miami-Dade County Code Section 24-42.2(1)(d) maximum I/I requirement of 5,000 GPD/dia-inch/mile.<br />
These basins were prioritized under the Volume Sewer Customer Ordinance (VSCO). In addition, the City’s<br />
sewer collection system lies within the limits of the Wellfield Protection area (Cone of Influence), so special<br />
attention must be paid to reducing or eliminating leakage from the sewer system. This project serves the dual<br />
purpose of cleaning the entire system and identifying the sources of I/I as well as eliminating potential sources<br />
of contamination to the drinking water wells in the vicinity.<br />
The project included manhole cleaning and inspection, pump station wet well cleaning and inspection, sewer<br />
gravity main cleaning and CCTV inspection, and smoke testing. This project is the first of a two step process<br />
to reduce I/I. In accordance with MDWASD’s guidelines, the project helps to identify specific repairs through<br />
the manhole, pump station, and CCTV inspections. The smoke testing identifies potential sources of I/I that<br />
need further investigation to determine exactly which repairs may be needed. In addition, the smoke testing<br />
helps to identify potential sources of I/I located outside of the publicly owned facilities. The second portion of<br />
the project includes the repair of the identified defects.<br />
The SSES found the following defects within the sewer collection system:<br />
• 145 defects during manhole inspections.<br />
• 13,106 defects during CCTV inspections.<br />
• 482 defects during smoke testing.<br />
• No visible defect during pump station inspections.<br />
Cleaning, inspection, and smoke testing procedures were conducted in accordance with the contract<br />
specifications while minimizing inconvenience to residents. All defects identified were logged into a database<br />
provided by MDWASD and repair recommendations were determined using MDWASD’s Repair Criteria and<br />
Technology Guidelines. Ultimately, eight priority basins were again identified under the VSCO. It was found<br />
that basins 1240 and 1242 no longer classify as VSCO. Basins 1236 and 1243, however, are now beyond the<br />
permittable threshold of I/I. As currently done, MDWASD will repair all defects identified in the sewer collection<br />
system in order to eliminate the estimated 4.28 MGPD of I/I. Table 1 below provides the estimated I/I for each<br />
basin as estimated by MDWASD based on the results of this investigation and sorted by GPD/diameterinch/mile.<br />
3
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
MDWASD<br />
Basin #<br />
No. of<br />
Lines<br />
Wet Net<br />
Flow 2010<br />
(gpm)<br />
TABLE 1<br />
TOTAL I/I PER BASIN<br />
Dry Net<br />
Flow 2010<br />
(gpm)<br />
Average Flow<br />
(gpm)<br />
Length (ft)<br />
Diameter-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h/Mile<br />
GPD/Diameter-<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>h/Mile<br />
1249* 5 76 7 41.5 565 1.38 43,219.53*<br />
1246* 10 77 98 87.5 1,372 3.22 39,167.85*<br />
1233* 131 2,378 690 1,534 35,880 97.56 22,641.12*<br />
1247* 10 68 11 39.5 1,206 2.83 20,115.26*<br />
1243* 20 138 9 73.5 5,715 13.40 7,898.54*<br />
1245* 10 25 14 19.5 1,839 4.31 6,512.21*<br />
1235* 16 52 23 37.5 3,212 8.25 6,547.02*<br />
1236* 203 768 246 507 50,952 123.45 5,913.78*<br />
1237 58 138 92 115 16,506 41.11 4,028.43<br />
1242 38 83 50 66.5 11,740 29.47 3,249.14<br />
1234 270 375 356 365.5 68,344 181.13 2,905.78<br />
1240 43 55 31 43 11,227 26.46 2,340.51<br />
1241 34 25 23 24 9,234 21.65 1,596.24<br />
1244 37 20 18 19 10,482 24.58 1,113.23<br />
1238 11 0 5 2.5 3,097 7.26 495.76<br />
1239 25 0 0 0 6,853 16.07 0<br />
1248 13 0 0 0 2,089 6.13 0<br />
*Basins not meeting the 5,000 GDP/diameter-inch/mile required by Miami-Dade County Code Section 24-42.2(1)(d)<br />
4
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
i. Background<br />
MDWASD acquired the City of Miami Springs water and sewer collection system in September 2008.<br />
The system is comprised of approximately:<br />
• 46 miles of sewer gravity mains, consisting of 8-inch to 24-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe<br />
(VCP), polyvinylchloride (PVC), cast iron (CI), ductile iron (DI), polyethylene (PE), and<br />
composite (i.e. lined pipes)<br />
• 17 pump stations<br />
• 925 sewer manholes<br />
A map of the City and its corresponding sewer gravity basins is shown below in Figure 1.<br />
Figure 1. City of Miami Springs and Sewer Gravity Basins<br />
A sanitary sewer evaluation survey (SSES) is typically performed on a collection system to identify the<br />
sources of infiltration and inflow and compare the cost of the repairs to the cost of treatment.<br />
Infiltration is groundwater that enters the sewer collection system through holes, breaks, joint failures,<br />
connection failures and other openings. Infiltration responds directly to groundwater levels, and is thus<br />
at its highest during the rainy season with its peak typically in October, and especially following<br />
significant rain events when the ground becomes saturated.<br />
Inflow is direct runoff that enters the collection system through illegal or improper connections (such as<br />
roof drains and catch basins) or through faulty, poorly sealed, or missing manhole covers and/or<br />
laterals clean out caps. Inflow contributes a significant amount of pollutants, especially during rain<br />
events following dry spells. Grease, oils, pesticides, and other pollutants are flushed from the surfaces<br />
where they have been accumulating into the sewer collection system. Thus, inflow increases peak<br />
5
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
flows to the treatment plant as well as pollutant load. Figure 2 depicts a schematic of different sources<br />
of I/I.<br />
Figure 2. I/I Sources<br />
Source: http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/wastewater/II/What.aspx<br />
ii.<br />
Purpose<br />
To help meet the criteria outlined in Miami-Dade County Code Section 24.42.2, MDWASD<br />
implemented a sewer collection system I/I program for the City of Miami Springs to reduce total system<br />
flows to the treatment facilities. The I/I program included manhole cleaning and inspection, pump<br />
station cleaning and inspection, gravity main cleaning and video TV, and smoke testing to identify all<br />
defects contributing to I/I in the system and to recommend repairs for these defects. Future projects<br />
will repair the defects identified by this investigation.<br />
A successful I/I program reduces peak flows to treatment facilities, allowing for better management of<br />
sewage flows into the system, and reducing treatment costs. It is an essential component of proper<br />
sewer management practices and ultimately reduces pollution due to treatment plant overflow in the<br />
event of large rain events that typically overload the treatment facility with I/I flows.<br />
iii. Scope<br />
<strong>King</strong> was retained by MDWASD to provide Construction Management and field services for the<br />
“Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the MDWASD Sanitary Sewer<br />
system within the City of Miami Springs, Florida” Project. The contractor for the project was Reynolds.<br />
The project has been divided into three (3) subtasks. Each of the subtasks details the specific Scope<br />
of Services and is broken as follows:<br />
6
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
• Project Management/Administration<br />
Monthly status reports were provided to MDWASD throughout the project in order to monitor<br />
progress versus the project schedule.<br />
• Field Services<br />
1. Monitored and documented the pipe cleaning and closed circuit TV (CCTV) inspection<br />
of the MDWASD sewer collection system by the Contractor for compliance with the<br />
project Specifications.<br />
2. Monitored and documented the inspection of the manholes contained within the<br />
MDWASD sewer collection system by the Contractor for compliance with the project<br />
Specifications.<br />
3. Monitored and documented the smoke testing of the MDWASD sewer collection<br />
system by the Contractor for compliance with the contract specifications.<br />
4. Documented and reported any discrepancies found on the MDWASD provided Sewer<br />
Atlas Maps on the Department's Atlas Correction Forms.<br />
• Construction Management/Office Support Services<br />
<strong>King</strong> was responsible for reviewing the video inspection recordings and providing repair<br />
recommendations according to MDWASD’s Repair Criteria and Technology Guidelines. Work<br />
order issuances were coordinated with the contractor.<br />
7
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
INSPECTION METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS<br />
MDWASD provided copies of their seven standard inspection and recommendation databases for use during<br />
the project. These are:<br />
• TV Field and Office<br />
• MH Field and Office<br />
• ST Field and Office<br />
• Repair Recommendation<br />
Upon completion of the inspection of each pipeline segment and manhole, Reynolds entered inspection data<br />
into the appropriate database for CCTV inspections, manhole inspections, and smoke testing using their<br />
specified coding of defects included in the respective databases. Pump station inspection data was provided<br />
on the manhole inspection forms. The field data was then reviewed by <strong>King</strong> for data compilation and repair<br />
recommendation. The following sections outline the specific process followed for each type of inspection.<br />
i. Manhole Cleaning and Inspection<br />
Before cleaning the gravity sewer lines, manholes were pressure cleaned and inspected using<br />
MDWASD’s manhole inspection form. In addition, photos were taken to document the manhole<br />
conditions. All inspections were visual from the top of the manhole without entry. A spotlight was<br />
used to assist with the inspection when needed. In addition to the 912 manholes that were originally<br />
identified to be cleaned and inspected, 11 new manholes were identified in the field, cleaned, and<br />
inspected bringing the total to 923 manholes. The location and other pertinent data for each of the 11<br />
additional manholes were documented using the MDWASD’s atlas correction form. Appendix A<br />
contains a copy of each of these forms.<br />
Inspection of the manhole components was performed to assess the condition of the cover, frame,<br />
frame seal, chimney, cone, wall, bench, channel, and cover insert. As required by the contract<br />
specifications, Reynolds prepared written field reports that were subsequently reviewed and verified<br />
prior to entering the inspection findings into the manhole inspection database.<br />
The results of the inspections show that 120 manholes had defects (see Appendix B). As shown in<br />
Table 2, the majority of the defects occurred in basins 1233, 1234, and 1236, and consisted primarily<br />
of frame seals and missing cover inserts.<br />
8
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Basin No.<br />
Defective<br />
Manholes<br />
Cover<br />
Condition<br />
Frame<br />
Condition<br />
TABLE 2<br />
MANHOLE DEFECTS SUMMARY<br />
Frame<br />
Seal<br />
Condition<br />
Chimney<br />
Condition<br />
Cone<br />
Condition<br />
Wall<br />
Condition<br />
Bench<br />
Condition<br />
Channel<br />
Condition<br />
Insert<br />
Condition<br />
1233 31 0 3 1 4 4 7 4 1 21<br />
1234 17 0 2 13 0 0 0 1 0 2<br />
1235 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />
1236 31 0 3 22 7 1 1 0 0 0<br />
1237 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />
1238 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />
1240 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />
1242 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0<br />
1244 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />
1245 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5<br />
1246 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 3<br />
1247 7 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 7<br />
1248 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10<br />
1249 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3<br />
Subtotal 120 0 11 40 11 6 14 5 2 56<br />
Total Defects 145<br />
ii.<br />
Pump Station Cleaning and Inspection<br />
Pump station wet well cleaning and inspection was performed in compliance with MDWASD’s contract<br />
specifications. MDWASD personnel assisted with every inspection by coordinating access to pump<br />
stations and operating the electrical panel to lower the water level for better visibility during the<br />
cleaning and inspection. In addition, Reynolds used air plugs to momentarily shut down the incoming<br />
flow, and placed a Vac-Con catch basin nozzle on the bottom of the wet well for suction purposes<br />
while pressure cleaning. The pump station wet well and each pipeline connection were visually<br />
observed with the use of a spotlight, as needed. Wet wells were observed for infiltration and general<br />
overall condition. The findings were documented on MDWASD’s inspection form. A copy of each<br />
inspection form is included in Appendix C. In general, wet wells appeared to be in good condition with<br />
no visible defects.<br />
iii. Sewer Gravity Main Cleaning and CCTV Inspection<br />
All gravity sewer main lines were cleaned using a jet-type pressure cleaner before closed-circuit<br />
televising (CCTV). To aid in the CCTV inspection, the jet-type pressure cleaner was kept inside the<br />
pipe to remove any additional debris or obstruction and minimize standing water in order to improve<br />
the visibility of the camera. In accordance with contract specifications, all reasonable efforts were<br />
made to fully view the entire pipe segment from the upstream manhole to the downstream manhole.<br />
Occasionally, obstruction or equipment limitations required a reverse set up at the next manhole to<br />
fully view the entire pipe segment. In addition, removal of obstructions, and/or location and exposure<br />
of manholes were necessary in some cases in order to have access to the sewer system. Reynolds<br />
performed the CCTV inspection and data recording in accordance with Section 6.00 of the contract<br />
specifications. The inspections of the gravity sewer mains generated a video and a TV log per line<br />
segment. Each video was reviewed in its entirety to confirm data was collected and identified<br />
thoroughly and consistently using the MDWASD’s Television Observation Codes (Appendix D). The<br />
list of defects found is summarized in Table 3 and is presented in greater detail, including a breakdown<br />
of defects by basin, in Appendix E.<br />
9
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
TABLE 3<br />
DEFECTS IDENTIFIED VIA CCTV<br />
Defect Code Definition Count<br />
13 Light Roots 5548<br />
19 Joint / Infiltration 2521<br />
53 Conn. Infiltration 1427<br />
20 Cracked Joint 1321<br />
37 Deposits 625<br />
25 Circular Crack 457<br />
33 Sag in Pipe 441<br />
14 Medium Roots 230<br />
15 Heavy Roots 139<br />
22 Mineral Deposits 106<br />
26 Longitudinal Crack 50<br />
47 Connection w/defect 38<br />
21 Separated Joint 30<br />
16 Moderate Offset 28<br />
27 Open Crack 25<br />
30 Hole in Pipe 24<br />
38 Grease 20<br />
28 Broken Pipe 18<br />
46 Break-in-Connection 18<br />
17 Severe Offset 10<br />
23 Gasket Exposed 10<br />
39 Liner Defect Began Observation 7<br />
40 Liner Defect End Observation 5<br />
36 Corrosion 4<br />
48 Sectional Liner w/defect 2<br />
18 Misaligned Joint 1<br />
60 Liner Connection Defect 1<br />
Total 13,106<br />
Review of the CCTV inspections indicates that the majority of the visible pipeline defects include light<br />
root intrusion, joint problems with active infiltration, lateral infiltration at connection to the mainline, and<br />
cracked joints.<br />
iv. Smoke Testing<br />
Smoke testing was done in compliance with MDWASD’s contract specifications. A HURCO<br />
SMK1811-LS smoke blower was used in conjunction with HURCO Liquid-Smoke to force smoke<br />
through the isolated segment being tested. As a result of the smoke testing, Reynolds identified<br />
potential inflow sources such as illegal storm sewer cross-connections, roof leaders, yard and area<br />
drains, abandoned building sewers, pipe structural damage, leaking joints, and faulty service<br />
connections for further investigation and/or repair.<br />
Prior to the commencement of any smoke testing, the Contractor notified residents a minimum of 72<br />
hours in advance with door hangers containing contact and project related information. Every effort<br />
was made to minimize inconvenience to the public, and resident concerns were addressed in a<br />
courteous, professional, and timely manner. A summary of the calls received from residents and the<br />
action taken in response is outlined in Table 4.<br />
10
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
TABLE 4<br />
RESIDENT CALL LOG<br />
Date Name Address Resident Concern/Action Taken<br />
10/19/2010 Gladys Sainz<br />
751 Falcon Aging mother needs her there during test. Resident was notified 1<br />
Avenue hour prior to testing, per request. (10/20/2010)<br />
10/19/2010 Jim Saren<br />
10/19/2010 Raul Cuan<br />
10/20/2010 William Groves<br />
10/20/2010 Paula Camacho<br />
11/17/2010 Hayde Segarra<br />
11/18/2010 Barbara Batista<br />
11/22/2010 Antonio Martinez<br />
11/24/2010 Joell McGee<br />
11/29/2010 Carol Martinez<br />
11/30/2010 Carlos Perera<br />
11/30/2010 Alvaro Gutierrez<br />
12/02/2010 Pat Armstrong<br />
12/02/2010 Caridad Mora<br />
12/02/2010 Alex Szeelkan<br />
12/03/2010 Tomasa Del Val<br />
12/09/2010 Antonia Gando<br />
800 block of<br />
Falcon<br />
Avenue<br />
564 Mokena<br />
Drive<br />
1201 Plover<br />
Avenue<br />
1175<br />
Meadowlark<br />
Avenue<br />
361<br />
Rosedale<br />
Drive<br />
369 Corydon<br />
Drive<br />
130 Curtiss<br />
Parkway<br />
500 Curtiss<br />
Parkway<br />
101 Navarre<br />
Drive<br />
7401 SW<br />
131 st Avenue<br />
830 Wren<br />
Avenue<br />
6221 NW<br />
36 th Street<br />
29 Royal<br />
Ponciana<br />
6221 NW<br />
36 th Street<br />
1090 Quail<br />
Avenue<br />
517 Mokena<br />
Drive<br />
His neighbor is in home hospice, he wants to be notified when his<br />
area will be tested. Resident was notified 1 hour prior to testing, per<br />
request. (10/20/2010)<br />
Resident had smoke in his shower and was concerned about smoke<br />
from his roof vent. He claimed that he received the door hanger 3<br />
days after smoke test was done. Contractor confirmed that the<br />
hanger was placed 3 days before smoke test in that area.<br />
Resident saw smoke from his roof vent, wanted to know if<br />
everything was ok.<br />
Resident wanted to be home during smoke test to see if her<br />
plumbing had leaks. Her area was tested on 10/19; she was told<br />
that the contractor will not re-test the area.<br />
Resident has a smoke alarm in her house and wants to know when<br />
her area will be tested. She was notified on 11/18 that her area will<br />
be tested that day around 2 to 3:30 pm.<br />
11/19/2010 - Need to confirm that there is a defect. Defect is<br />
marked on the ground but no DERM notice was left. Defect was<br />
confirmed to be public, no action needed from the resident.<br />
Resident had smoke coming out of her kitchen roof. She was<br />
notified that smoke from the roof is normal and that no defects were<br />
identified on her property.<br />
Resident saw smoke coming from his backyard, wanted to know if<br />
he had to do anything. Area will be tested 11/23, will follow up to let<br />
him know if the defect is private or public. Followed up with resident<br />
on 11/24, defect was a public CO cap, no action is required from the<br />
resident.<br />
Resident had smoke inside her home, was not home when the<br />
testing occurred so she could not see where it came from. Wanted<br />
testing to be repeated when she was home to identify her leak. Was<br />
notified that the purpose of the testing is to identify leaks and breaks<br />
outside the home, the area will not be re-tested.<br />
Resident had smoke inside her home and was concerned. No<br />
defects were found on or adjacent to her property.<br />
Resident received a DERM notice, will replace the broken cap.<br />
Resident received a DERM notice for a broken riser. He will repair<br />
the defect.<br />
See Alex Szeelkan.<br />
Resident is in the process of closing a claim with a public adjuster<br />
for her internal plumbing. She just had open heart surgery and<br />
needs more than 30 days to fix the defect. Also, noted that the CO<br />
that was painted was supposed to be out of service because an<br />
existing tree damaged the lateral and a new lateral connection was<br />
made.<br />
Defects were not marked in the field. Wanted to know which CO<br />
risers they were. Defects were repaired 12/03/2010.<br />
Resident fixed the defect the day after she received a DERM notice.<br />
Resident will repair private defect, wants to know when MDWASD<br />
will repair the public defect adjacent to her property.<br />
As the smoke testing progressed, a Smoke Testing Defect Report was created following MDWASD’s<br />
Standard Protocol. Defects were classified as either Public or Private Defect. Public Defects will be<br />
11
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
repaired by MDWASD, while Private Defects are forwarded to the Miami-Dade Department of<br />
Environmental Resources Management (DERM) for enforcement of repair by property owners. Table<br />
5 summarizes all of the defects identified through smoke testing.<br />
TABLE 5<br />
SMOKE TESTING DEFECT REPORT<br />
Basin Number Defect Code Definition Count<br />
1233 4 Cleanout Cap 56<br />
1233 5 Broken Riser 5<br />
1233 9 Private Lateral 1<br />
Total 62<br />
1234 1 Catch Basin 1<br />
1234 4 Cleanout Cap 79<br />
1234 5 Broken Riser 32<br />
1234 10 Other* 3<br />
Total 115<br />
1235 4 Cleanout Cap 8<br />
Total 8<br />
1236 1 Catch Basin 2<br />
1236 4 Cleanout Cap 63<br />
1236 5 Broken Riser 28<br />
1236 8 Public Lateral 1<br />
1236 9 Private Lateral 1<br />
Total 95<br />
1237 4 Cleanout Cap 25<br />
1237 5 Broken Riser 11<br />
Total 36<br />
1238 4 Cleanout Cap 7<br />
Total 7<br />
1239 4 Cleanout Cap 8<br />
1239 5 Broken Riser 2<br />
Total 10<br />
1240 4 Cleanout Cap 28<br />
1240 5 Broken Riser 2<br />
Total 30<br />
1241 4 Cleanout Cap 11<br />
1241 5 Broken Riser 1<br />
Total 12<br />
1242 3 Roof Drain 1<br />
1242 4 Cleanout Cap 31<br />
1242 5 Broken Riser 6<br />
Total 38<br />
1243 4 Cleanout Cap 16<br />
Total 16<br />
1244 4 Cleanout Cap 23<br />
1244 8 Public Lateral 1<br />
1244 10 Other* 2<br />
Total 26<br />
1245 5 Broken Riser 5<br />
Total 5<br />
1246 4 Cleanout Cap 8<br />
1246 5 Broken Riser 1<br />
1246 7 Manhole 1<br />
Total 10<br />
1247 4 Cleanout Cap 2<br />
Total 2<br />
12
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Basin Number Defect Code Definition Count<br />
1248 4 Cleanout Cap 2<br />
1248 5 Broken Riser 3<br />
Total 5<br />
1249 4 Cleanout Cap 5<br />
Total 5<br />
Grand Total 482<br />
* For details see MDWASD Smoke Testing database.<br />
In addition, property owners where private defects were identified and located were notified with a door<br />
hanger of the defect requiring repair. The private defect’s location was spray painted on the ground to<br />
provide the property owner proper identification of the defect. Table 6 summarizes the DERM notices<br />
distributed during smoke testing.<br />
TABLE 6<br />
TOTAL DERM NOTICES<br />
Basin Number Defect Code Definition DERM Case No.<br />
1233 5 Broken Riser<br />
4908<br />
4983<br />
4907<br />
4908<br />
10 Other* 5000<br />
4903<br />
4902<br />
4901<br />
1234<br />
4906<br />
5 Broken Riser<br />
4905<br />
4904<br />
5003<br />
4900<br />
1 Catch Basin 4997<br />
9 Private Lateral 4972<br />
4985<br />
4992<br />
4973<br />
1236<br />
4988<br />
5 Broken Riser<br />
4989<br />
4975<br />
4974<br />
4987<br />
4978<br />
4977<br />
4976<br />
4998<br />
4981<br />
1237 5 Broken Riser<br />
4993<br />
4996<br />
4979<br />
4994<br />
4980<br />
4982<br />
1242<br />
5 Broken Riser 4990<br />
3 Roof Drain 4970<br />
1244 10 Other* 4999<br />
1245 5 Broken Riser 4916<br />
13
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Basin Number Defect Code Definition DERM Case No.<br />
5002<br />
4984<br />
4971<br />
1246<br />
5001<br />
5 Broken Riser<br />
1248 4915<br />
Total 43<br />
* For details see MDWASD Smoke Testing database.<br />
A summary and breakdown of the work performed is shown in Table 7 with a detailed listing of work performed<br />
as shown in Appendix F. All data archived in the office databases, videos, photos, inspector daily reports,<br />
DERM notice forms, and additional information were compiled in an external hard drive provided to MDWASD<br />
on December 28, 2010. In addition, all office databases are included in a CD-ROM in Appendix G.<br />
MDWASD<br />
Basin #<br />
TABLE 7<br />
SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED<br />
Cleaning, Video & Smoke Testing<br />
Total<br />
8-<strong>Inc</strong>h 10-<strong>Inc</strong>h 12-<strong>Inc</strong>h 15-<strong>Inc</strong>h 18-<strong>Inc</strong>h 24-<strong>Inc</strong>h LF/Basin<br />
MH<br />
Cleaning<br />
&<br />
Inspection<br />
PS<br />
Cleaning<br />
&<br />
Inspection<br />
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.1 2.7<br />
1233* 23,425 2,839 3,667 4,210 1,116 623 35,880 128 <br />
1234 47,591 7,784 5,342 2,992 3,632 1,003 68,344 266 <br />
1235* 1,472 1,730 10 3,212 16 <br />
1236 43,910 4,449 1,999 594 50,952 202 <br />
1237 14,691 1,815 16,506 58 <br />
1238 3,097 3,097 11 <br />
1239 6,853 6,853 25 <br />
1240* 10,879 348 11,227 43 <br />
1241 9,234 9,234 33 <br />
1242* 9,450 537 1,024 729 11,740 38 <br />
1243 5,715 5,715 19 <br />
1244 10,482 10,482 37 <br />
1245* 1,839 1,839 10 <br />
1246* 1,347 25 1,372 10 <br />
1247* 1,206 1,206 9 <br />
1248 464 1,625 2,089 13 <br />
1249* 412 153 565 5 <br />
Total<br />
Completed<br />
per Item<br />
* Miami Springs 2010 VSCO Basins<br />
192,067 17,865 13,667 10,340 4,748 1,626 240,313 923 17<br />
Since the pipe footage and number of manholes in the existing sewer gravity collection system could not be<br />
accurately estimated during the bid phase, adjustments were required to reflect a small increase in bid<br />
quantities. However, the revised total project cost stayed below the required original budget amount. Appendix<br />
H summarizes the additional quantities and amounts per bid item.<br />
14
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
After all descriptive data was recorded and archived using MDWASD’s standard protocol and data format, <strong>King</strong><br />
reviewed it and provided follow-up recommendations using MDWASD’s Repair Criteria and Technology<br />
Guidelines and cost data. Refer to Appendix I for Repair Criteria and Technology followed.<br />
i. Manhole Repair Recommendation<br />
If manholes showed signs of inflows from surface runoff or groundwater infiltration into the sewer,<br />
erosion, or hydrogen sulfide induced corrosion, then repairs were recommended such that the<br />
manhole would be watertight and more resistant to deterioration. Refer to Appendix J for the<br />
approximate total cost of manhole repairs.<br />
ii.<br />
Sewer Gravity Main Repair Recommendation<br />
All recommended repairs followed MDWASD’s Repair Criteria and Technology Guidelines as outlined<br />
in the flow chart shown in Exhibit A. In cases where the MDWASD Repair Criteria and Technology<br />
Guidelines led to a recommendation for point repairs (robotic, sectional liner, grouting, and/or<br />
excavated point repair), a comparison was made between the cost of point repairs and full length<br />
repair (CIPP or line replacement). If cost of point repairs represented 80% or more of the cost of full<br />
length repair, then full length repair was recommended. Refer to Appendix K to see these cost<br />
comparisons. Repair technologies were manually noted on the TV logs and incorporated in the<br />
electronic submittal made to MDWASD on December 28, 2010.<br />
In total, <strong>King</strong> evaluated the conditions of 923 manholes, 17 pumps stations and 934 line segments. The<br />
analysis resulted in total of 3,036 repair recommendations. No repairs were recommended for 122 line<br />
segments since no defects were identified, and two incomplete CCTV inspections were forwarded to the<br />
Department for further investigation. A portion of these two critical lines could not be inspected due to<br />
obstructions. Refer to Appendix L for details on these two line segments.<br />
The repair recommendations for manholes, laterals and gravity sewer mains were entered into the repair<br />
database and are summarized in Table 9. Refer to Appendix M for a list of repair recommendations by basin.<br />
TABLE 9<br />
TOTAL REPAIR RECOMMENDATION<br />
Repair<br />
Code<br />
Definition<br />
Count<br />
595 Inv Suspect Lateral 1408<br />
507 Point Repair Lateral (Public Property) 307<br />
531 De-root Main Line 283<br />
538 Sectional 228<br />
529 Clean, Test, Seal Main Line 227<br />
547 Cure-in-Place Liner (hold for another repair) 210<br />
537 Cured-in-Place Liner 100<br />
1 Insert Manhole Dish 56<br />
12 Seal Casting to Cone 44<br />
513 Grout Annular Space at Manhole/Pipe Connection 37<br />
511 Grout Lateral Annular Space 31<br />
557 Point Repair with Cured-in-Place Liner 23<br />
541 Heavy Clean Mainline with Degreaser 15<br />
526 Point Repair Main Line 8<br />
26 Repair Leaks in Manhole Wall 7<br />
534 De-scale Entire Line 7<br />
594 Investigate Suspect Drop-Connection 7<br />
9 Realign and Seal Manhole Frame 6<br />
13 Plug and Waterproof Coat Manhole Chimney 6<br />
392 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Entire Manhole 5<br />
15
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Repair<br />
Code<br />
Definition<br />
Count<br />
24 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Manhole Walls 3<br />
47 Repair Manhole / Pipe Connection 3<br />
525 Replace Main Line 3<br />
4 Replace Manhole Cover 2<br />
18 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Manhole cone 2<br />
584 Robotics Repair Protruding Lateral 2<br />
17 Repair Leaks in Manhole Chimney 1<br />
22 Repair Leaks in Manhole Cone 1<br />
31 Repair Leaks in Manhole Bench 1<br />
33 Repair Leaks in Manhole Channel 1<br />
523 Plug Lateral at Point of Connection with Main Line 1<br />
533 De-scale (Spot) 1<br />
Total 3,036<br />
16
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
PLANNING LEVEL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST<br />
MDWASD’s internal processes and procedures were closely followed; therefore, MDWASD’s repair cost<br />
estimating guidelines were used. These were as follows:<br />
• One included the cost of both trenchless and dig-and-replace methods from recent bids, including<br />
CIPP, sectional liners, clean, test, and seal (grouting), excavated point repair, and line replacement.<br />
These costs are influenced by the diameter of the pipe, the length of pipe requiring rehabilitation, and<br />
the nature of the defects, such as cracks, roots, joint offsets, and others. Appendix N provides a<br />
summary of these bid repairs cost.<br />
• The other cost estimating guide came from the table “Repair Code Listing” contained in MDWASD’s<br />
repair database.<br />
The Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost was estimated as follows:<br />
• Gravity Sewer Mains - The cost data from recent bids was used to estimate rehabilitation costs<br />
shown in Appendix K, including repair recommendations.<br />
• Sewer Laterals - The cost of lateral repairs was estimated as the additive costs of additional<br />
investigations of suspect laterals exceeding an estimated flow of 0.4 gpm, recommended point repairs,<br />
and grout repairs as shown in Table 10 below. Cost data used was the one provided in the “Repair<br />
Code Listing” included in MDWASD’s repair database.<br />
• Sewer Manholes - The cost data in the “Repair Code Listing” in MDWASD’s repair database was<br />
used to estimate rehabilitation costs as shown in Appendix J.<br />
The total estimated costs to rehabilitate the City of Miami Springs gravity sewer system are summarized in<br />
Table 10. Table 10 does not include the additional cost of repairs that may arise from the recommended<br />
pending investigations of 520 suspect laterals. Additionally, the smoke testing discovered damaged and<br />
broken components (such as CO caps and risers), and illegal connections within private property. The cost of<br />
these repairs is the responsibility of the property owners, and it is not included in the total estimated cost<br />
below.<br />
TABLE 10<br />
PLANNING LEVEL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST<br />
Rehabilitation Cost Justification<br />
Gravity Sewer Main $2,798,222.00 See Appendix K for details.<br />
Sewer Lateral $1,223,200.00<br />
Sewer Manholes $44,700.00 See Appendix J for details.<br />
Total $4,066,122.00<br />
520 laterals ("Investigate Suspect Lateral") @ $150 each + 307 point<br />
repairs ("Point Repair Lateral") @ $3700 each + 31 grout repair ("Grout<br />
Lateral Annular Space") @ $300 each.<br />
17
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “A”<br />
Atlas Correction Forms (One sample page included only / Total Pages 11)<br />
18
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “B”<br />
Manholes with Defects (One sample page included only / Total Pages 2)<br />
20
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Basin<br />
No.<br />
Manhole<br />
No.<br />
Atlas<br />
Page<br />
Cover<br />
Condition<br />
Frame<br />
Condition<br />
Frame<br />
Seal<br />
Condition<br />
Chimney<br />
Condition<br />
Cone<br />
Condition<br />
Wall<br />
Condition<br />
Bench<br />
Condition<br />
Channel<br />
Condition<br />
Insert<br />
Condition<br />
1233 82A F9 OK OK OK Corroded Corroded Corroded Corrosion OK OK<br />
1233 21 G9 OK Offset OK OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1233 11 G8 OK Broken OK OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1233 1A G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 22 G9 OK OK OK OK OK Leaks OK OK OK<br />
1233 23 G8 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 28 G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 29 G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 32 G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 33A G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Damaged<br />
1233 15 G7 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 400A F8 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 88 E9 OK OK OK Corroded Corroded Corroded OK OK OK<br />
1233 86 E9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 83 F9 OK OK OK OK Corroded Corroded Corrosion Corrosion OK<br />
1233 80 F9 OK OK OK Corroded OK OK Corrosion OK OK<br />
1233 400C F8 OK OK Cracked OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 41 H9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 48 G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 4A G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 4B G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 50 G9 OK OK OK OK Corroded Corroded OK OK OK<br />
1233 84 E9 OK OK OK Corroded OK Leaks Corrosion OK Missing<br />
1233 6 G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 77B F9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 400B F8 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 61 G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 61A G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1233 62C G8 OK Offset OK OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1233 66 F9 OK OK OK OK OK Corroded OK OK OK<br />
1233 50A G9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1234 568 D5 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 569 D5 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 564 D5 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 516 E6 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1234 470A E8 OK Offset Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 567 D5 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 244 E6 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Missing<br />
1234 443 F8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 461 F8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 548A D6 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 550 D6 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 551 D6 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 553 D6 OK Offset OK OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 562 E5 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 304 F7 OK OK OK OK OK OK Leaks OK OK<br />
1234 565 D5 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1234 460 F8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1235 91 E9 OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Damaged<br />
1236 1077 D7 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 918 C8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 921 C8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 922 C8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 920A C8 OK Cracked Leaks Leaks OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 919 C8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 916 D8 OK Offset Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 915 D8 OK OK OK Cracked OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 909 C8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 908 C8 OK OK Leaks OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 901 C7 OK OK OK Cracked OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 1063B C6 OK Offset OK OK OK OK OK OK OK<br />
1236 1001 C7 OK OK OK OK OK Cracked OK OK OK<br />
21
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “C”<br />
PS Inspection Forms (One sample page included only / Total Pages 17)<br />
22
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “D”<br />
MDWASD Television Observation Codes<br />
Total Pages 1<br />
24
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Defect Code<br />
Definition<br />
1 Upstream Manhole<br />
2 Downstream Manhole<br />
3 Reverse Set-up<br />
5 Crown<br />
6 Invert<br />
7 Right<br />
8 Left<br />
9 Camera Submerged<br />
10 Camera Blocked<br />
12 Buried Manhole<br />
13 Light Roots<br />
14 Medium Roots<br />
15 Heavy Roots<br />
16 Moderate Offset<br />
17 Severe Offset<br />
18 Misaligned Joint<br />
19 Joint/Infiltration<br />
20 Cracked Joint<br />
21 Separated Joint<br />
22 Mineral Deposits<br />
23 Gasket Exposed<br />
25 Circular Crack<br />
26 Longitudinal Crack<br />
27 Open Crack<br />
28 Broken Pipe<br />
29 Collapsed Pipe<br />
30 Hole in Pipe<br />
31 Joint Air-Test Failed<br />
32 Flattened Flex Pipe<br />
33 Sag in Pipe<br />
34 Drop Connection<br />
35 Erosion<br />
36 Corrosion<br />
37 Deposits<br />
38 Grease<br />
39 Liner Defect Began Observation<br />
40 Liner Defect End Observation<br />
46 Break in Connection<br />
47 Connection w/Defect<br />
48 Sectional Liner w/Defect<br />
49 Domestic Flow<br />
50 Intruding > 1" <strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
52 Joint Close to Lateral<br />
53 Connection w/Infiltration<br />
59 Stub-out at MH Leaking<br />
60 Liner Connection Defect<br />
61 Service Connection at MH<br />
64 Lamp Hole<br />
65 Conduit through Sewer<br />
455 Service Connection Crown<br />
457 Service Connection Right<br />
458 Service Connection Left<br />
515 Capped Service Crown<br />
517 Capped Service Right<br />
518 Capped Service Left<br />
25
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “E”<br />
Defects Identified Via CCTV Classified by Basin (One sample page included only / Total<br />
Pages 4)<br />
26
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Basin Number Defect Code Definition Count<br />
1233<br />
1234<br />
1235<br />
13 Light Roots 521<br />
19 Joint/Infiltration 364<br />
53 Conn. Infiltration 248<br />
37 Deposits 77<br />
20 Cracked Joint 60<br />
33 Sag in Pipe 41<br />
14 Medium Roots 32<br />
15 Heavy Roots 18<br />
25 Circular Crack 16<br />
30 Hole in Pipe 14<br />
46 Break in Connection 4<br />
38 Grease 4<br />
27 Open Crack 2<br />
21 Separated Joint 2<br />
48 Sectional Liner w/Defect 2<br />
40 Liner Defect End Observation 1<br />
28 Broken Pipe 1<br />
47 Connection w/Defect 1<br />
Total 1,408<br />
13 Light Roots 1799<br />
19 Joint/Infiltration 1038<br />
53 Conn. Infiltration 397<br />
20 Cracked Joint 386<br />
37 Deposits 144<br />
25 Circular Crack 103<br />
33 Sag in Pipe 77<br />
14 Medium Roots 60<br />
15 Heavy Roots 41<br />
22 Mineral Deposits 9<br />
27 Open Crack 7<br />
28 Broken Pipe 7<br />
26 Longitudinal Crack 4<br />
30 Hole in Pipe 4<br />
17 Severe Offset 4<br />
46 Break in Connection 3<br />
16 Moderate Offset 3<br />
47 Connection w/Defect 2<br />
39 Liner Defect Began Observation 1<br />
Total 4,089<br />
20 Cracked Joint 121<br />
19 Joint/Infiltration 52<br />
13 Light Roots 16<br />
53 Conn. Infiltration 6<br />
33 Sag in Pipe 4<br />
37 Deposits 4<br />
25 Circular Crack 3<br />
Total 211<br />
Grand Total 13,106<br />
27
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “F”<br />
Detailed Listing of Work Performed (One sample page included only / Total Pages 10)<br />
28
CLEANING & VIDEO CLEANING<br />
MH<br />
PS<br />
SMOKE TESTING<br />
ID DATE INITIALS BASIN #<br />
LINE<br />
LINE<br />
8-<strong>Inc</strong>h 10-<strong>Inc</strong>h 12-<strong>Inc</strong>h 15-<strong>Inc</strong>h 18-<strong>Inc</strong>h 24-<strong>Inc</strong>h ID DATE BASIN# MH# PS<br />
ID DATE BASIN# MH# INSPECTION ID DATE BASIN# INSPECTION ID DATE BASIN#<br />
SEGMENT<br />
SEGMENT<br />
8-<strong>Inc</strong>h 10-<strong>Inc</strong>h 12-<strong>Inc</strong>h 15-<strong>Inc</strong>h 18-<strong>Inc</strong>h 24-<strong>Inc</strong>h<br />
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6<br />
848 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 242-201 339 882 M 08.25.10 1245 1B 864 ST 11.24.10 1234 453 - 452 403<br />
849 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 248-201 252 883 M 08.25.10 1245 1A 865 ST 11.24.10 1234 454 - 453 367<br />
850 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 232-228 361 884 M 08.25.10 1245 1 866 ST 11.24.10 1234 459 - 453 351<br />
851 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 228-227A 176 885 M 08.25.10 1245 2 867 ST 11.24.10 1234 460 - 459 330<br />
852 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 227A-227 247 886 M 08.25.10 1245 3 868 ST 11.24.10 1234 461 - 460 141<br />
853 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 227-214A 161 887 M 08.25.10 1245 4 869 ST 11.24.10 1234 458 - 454 283<br />
854 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 214A-214 251 888 M 08.25.10 1245 5 870 ST 11.24.10 1234 454A - 454 283<br />
855 CV 10.16.10 HP 1234 231-227 201 889 M 08.25.10 1246 5 871 ST 11.24.10 1234 455 - 454A 279<br />
856 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 562-558 280 890 M 08.25.10 1246 4 872 ST 11.24.10 1234 456 - 455 286<br />
857 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 558-213 253 891 M 08.25.10 1246 3 873 ST 11.24.10 1234 457 - 456 306<br />
858 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 221A-221 57 892 M 08.25.10 1246 2 874 ST 11.24.10 1234 462 - 453 258<br />
859 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 221-206 395 893 M 08.25.10 1246 1 875 ST 11.24.10 1234 463 - 462 256<br />
860 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 273-309 291 894 M 08.25.10 1246 1A 876 ST 11.29.10 1234 280 - 277 222<br />
861 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 309-309A 129 895 M 08.25.10 1246 1B 877 ST 11.29.10 1234 277 - 276 393<br />
862 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 309A-208 143 896 M 08.25.10 1246 1C 878 ST 11.29.10 1234 278 - 277 403<br />
863 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 222-208 334 897 M 08.25.10 1248 1 879 ST 11.29.10 1234 279 - 278 352<br />
864 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 520-519 209 898 M 08.25.10 1248 2 880 ST 11.29.10 1234 276 - 275 231<br />
865 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 519-518 191 899 M 08.25.10 1248 3 881 ST 11.29.10 1234 275 - 274 155<br />
866 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 521-518 149 900 M 08.25.10 1248 4 882 ST 11.29.10 1234 260 - 274 55<br />
867 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 518-517 342 901 M 08.25.10 1248 5 883 ST 11.29.10 1234 260A - 260 92<br />
868 CV 10.18.10 HP 1234 517-517A 287 902 M 08.25.10 1248 6 884 ST 11.29.10 1234 430 - 305 200<br />
869 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 522-517 208 903 M 08.25.10 1248 7 885 ST 11.29.10 1234 274 - 259 203<br />
870 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 517A-252 23 904 M 08.25.10 1248 8 886 ST 11.29.10 1234 259 - 258 249<br />
871 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 516-252 195 905 M 08.25.10 1248 10 887 ST 11.29.10 1234 281 - 258 254<br />
872 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 252A-252 253 906 M 08.25.10 1248 11 888 ST 11.29.10 1234 282 - 281 300<br />
873 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 252-251 265 907 M 08.25.10 1247 1 889 ST 11.29.10 1234 283 - 282 60<br />
874 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 251-205 170 908 M 08.25.10 1247 2 890 ST 11.29.10 1234 258 - 257 353<br />
875 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 534-533 146 910 M 08.25.10 1247 5 891 ST 11.29.10 1234 301 - 300 207<br />
876 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 533-532 379 911 M 08.25.10 1247 6 892 ST 11.29.10 1234 300 - 305 155<br />
877 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 541-530 120 912 M 08.25.10 1247 7 893 ST 11.29.10 1234 299 - 300 233<br />
878 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 528-211 225 913 M 08.25.10 1248 9 894 ST 11.29.10 1234 432 - 430 163<br />
879 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 515-514 230 914 M 10.05.10 1233 12 895 ST 11.29.10 1234 261 - 257 285<br />
880 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 445A-445 230 915 M 10.05.10 1233 13 896 ST 11.29.10 1234 262 - 261 298<br />
881 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 474-451 192 916 M 10.05.10 1233 14 897 ST 11.29.10 1234 263 - 262 188<br />
882 CV 10.19.10 HP 1234 458-454 283 917 M 10.05.10 1233 16 898 ST 11.29.10 1234 264 - 263 122<br />
883 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 4-4A 80 918 M 10.05.10 1233 400B 899 ST 11.29.10 1234 265 - 264 79<br />
884 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 4A-4B 139 919 M 10.05.10 1233 400C 900 ST 11.29.10 1234 266 - 265 98<br />
885 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 4B-3 77 920 M 10.05.10 1240 650 901 ST 11.29.10 1234 431 - 430 406<br />
886 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 3-2 319 921 M 10.05.10 1248 12 902 ST 11.29.10 1234 305 - 304 207<br />
887 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 2-1 102 922 M 10.05.10 1248 13 903 ST 11.30.10 1234 245 - 238 371<br />
888 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 6-5 182 923 M 10.05.10 1247 8 904 ST 11.30.10 1234 246 - 245 42<br />
889 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 5-1 49 924 M 10.05.10 1247 3 905 ST 11.30.10 1234 238 - 237 153<br />
890 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 8-7 89 925 M 10.05.10 1247 4 906 ST 11.30.10 1234 237 - 236 64<br />
891 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 7-5 157 926 M 10.05.10 1247 4A 907 ST 11.30.10 1234 236 - 235 162<br />
892 CV 10.19.10 HP 1247 1-1247 12 927 M 10.22.10 1249 44 908 ST 11.30.10 1234 271 - 235 120<br />
893 CV 10.19.10 HP 1246 1C-1B 162 928 M 10.22.10 1249 42D 909 ST 11.30.10 1234 272 - 271 201<br />
894 CV 10.19.10 HP 1246 1B-1A 150 929 M 10.22.10 1249 42C 910 ST 11.30.10 1234 272A - 272 82<br />
895 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 224-223 240 930 M 10.22.10 1249 42B 911 ST 11.30.10 1234 235 - 234 144<br />
896 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 223-213 244 931 M 10.22.10 1249 42A 912 ST 11.30.10 1234 234 - 233 96<br />
897 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 231A-231 65 932 M 11.15.10 1245 1D 913 ST 11.30.10 1234 308 - 307 267<br />
898 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 226-227 161 933 M 11.15.10 1245 1E 914 ST 11.30.10 1234 307 - 288 327<br />
899 CV 10.20.10 HP 1240 600-1240 36 934 M 11.15.10 1246 3A 915 ST 11.30.10 1234 288A - 288 59<br />
900 CV 10.20.10 HP 1237 800-1237 31 935 M 11.15.10 1246 4A 916 ST 11.30.10 1234 288 - 288B 43<br />
901 CV 10.20.10 HP 1235 100A-100 32 936 M 11.16.10 1235 91 917 ST 11.30.10 1234 288B - 287 143<br />
902 CV 10.20.10 HP 1235 100-1235 25 937 M 11.19.10 1233 15 918 ST 11.30.10 1234 441 - 441A 283<br />
903 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 253-200 147 938 M 11.30.10 1234 224 919 ST 11.30.10 1234 442 - 441 344<br />
904 CV 10.20.10 HP 1234 200-1234 21 939 M 11.30.10 1234 231A 920 ST 11.30.10 1234 441A - 287 54<br />
905 CV 10.20.10 HP 1233 45-50 322 940 M 11.30.11 1234 226 921 ST 11.30.10 1234 287 - 286 363<br />
906 CV 10.20.10 HP 1233 50-50A 153 941 M 11.30.12 1234 209B 922 ST 11.30.10 1234 437 - 286 355<br />
907 CV 10.20.10 HP 1233 50A-1 104 942 M 11.30.13 1234 209C 923 ST 11.30.10 1234 438 - 437 348<br />
908 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 5-4A 98 943 M 12.01.10 1234 209 924 ST 11.30.10 1234 286 - 285 351<br />
909 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 4A-4 227 944 M 12.01.10 1234 208 925 ST 11.30.10 1234 435 - 285 238<br />
910 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 4-3A 227 945 M 12.01.10 1234 273 926 ST 11.30.10 1234 436 - 435 250<br />
911 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 3A-3 242 946 M 12.01.10 1234 309 927 ST 11.30.10 1234 285 - 284 379<br />
912 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 3-1 198 947 M 12.01.10 1234 309A 928 ST 11.30.10 1234 293 - 285 325<br />
913 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 2-1 15 948 M 12.01.10 1241 627 929 ST 11.30.10 1234 433 - 284 233<br />
914 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 1A-1 28 949 M 12.01.10 1241 622 930 ST 11.30.10 1234 434 - 433 257<br />
915 CV 10.20.10 HP 1246 1-1246 25 950 M 12.01.10 1234 262 931 ST 11.30.10 1234 284 - 306A 378<br />
916 CV 10.20.10 HP 1245 5-4 260 951 M 08.23.10 1233 11 932 ST 11.30.10 1234 306A - 306 122<br />
917 CV 10.20.10 HP 1245 4-3 43 274 933 ST 11.30.10 1234 306 - 304 163<br />
918 CV 10.20.10 HP 1245 3-2 212 934 ST 11.30.10 1234 304 - 303 276<br />
919 CV 10.20.10 HP 1245 2-1245 20 935 ST 11.30.10 1234 303 - 257 278<br />
920 CV 10.21.10 HP 1233 1-1A 29 936 ST 11.30.10 1234 257 - 256 363<br />
921 CV 10.21.10 HP 1233 1A-1233 15 937 ST 11.30.10 1234 439 - 438 242<br />
922 CV 10.21.10 HP 1233 41-37 257 938 ST 11.30.10 1234 440 - 438 233<br />
923 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1E-1D 359 939 ST 11.30.10 1234 443 - 442 339<br />
924 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1D-1C 300 940 ST 11.30.10 1234 246A - 246 56<br />
925 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1C-1B 108 942 ST 10.16.10 1233 77B - 77A 24<br />
926 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1B-1A 23<br />
927 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1A-1 258<br />
928 CV 10.21.10 HP 1245 1-1245 25<br />
929 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 42A-1249 160<br />
930 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 44-42D 40<br />
931 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 42D-42C 80<br />
932 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 42C-42B 132<br />
933 CV 10.22.10 HP 1249 42B-1249 153<br />
934 CV 12.01.10 HP 1233 77B-77A 24<br />
192067 17865 13667 10340 4748 1626 17 923 17 192067 17865 13667 10340 4748 1626<br />
Total 240313 Total 240313
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “G”<br />
CD-ROM Containing Office Databases (Not included)<br />
29
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “H”<br />
Additional Quantities and Amount per Bid Item<br />
Total Pages 1<br />
30
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION<br />
PRICE UNIT QUANTITY QUANTITY DIFFERENCE TOTAL TOTAL DIFFERENCE<br />
MOT<br />
CLEANING<br />
&<br />
TELEVISING<br />
MH & PS<br />
1.1 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT)<br />
$ 500.00 AG $ 500.00 $ 492.54 $ 7.46<br />
1.2 PROVIDING OFF DUTY POLICEMEN<br />
$ 35.00 MH $ 700.00 $ - $ 700.00<br />
2.1 CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION 8" DIAMETER<br />
$ 0.75 LF 198,000 192,067 5,933 $ 148,500.00 $ 144,050.25 $ 4,449.75<br />
2.2 CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION 10" DIAMETER<br />
$ 0.80 LF 15,900 17,865 -1,965 $ 12,720.00 $ 14,292.00 $ (1,572.00)<br />
2.3 CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION 12" DIAMETER<br />
$ 0.80 LF 13,500 13,667 -167 $ 10,800.00 $ 10,933.60 $ (133.60)<br />
2.4 CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION 15" DIAMETER<br />
$ 0.90 LF 10,700 10,340 360 $ 9,630.00 $ 9,306.00 $ 324.00<br />
2.5 CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION 18" DIAMETER<br />
$ 1.25 LF 4,200 4,748 -548 $ 5,250.00 $ 5,935.00 $ (685.00)<br />
2.6 CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION 24" DIAMETER<br />
$ 2.00 LF 1,600 1,626 -26 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,252.00 $ (52.00)<br />
2.7 CLEANING PUMP STATION WET WELLS<br />
$ 450.00 EA 17 17 0 $ 7,650.00 $ 7,650.00 $ -<br />
3.1 MANHOLES INSPECTION<br />
$ 0.01 EA 912 923 -11 $ 9.12 $ 9.23 $ (0.11)<br />
3.2 PUMP STATION WET WELLS INSPECTION<br />
$ 0.01 EA 17 17 0 $ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ -<br />
4.1 SMOKE TESTING 8" DIAMETER<br />
$ 0.15 LF 198,000 192,067 5,933 $ 29,700.00 $ 28,810.05 $ 889.95<br />
4.2 SMOKE TESTING 10" DIAMETER<br />
$ 0.17 LF 15,900 17,865 -1,965 $ 2,703.00 $ 3,037.05 $ (334.05)<br />
SMOKE<br />
SMOKE TESTING 12" DIAMETER<br />
TESTING SMOKE TESTING 15" DIAMETER<br />
4.3 $ 0.17 LF 13,500 13,667 -167 $ 2,295.00 $ 2,323.39 $ (28.39)<br />
4.4 $ 0.17 LF 10,700 10,340 360 $ 1,819.00 $ 1,757.80 $ 61.20<br />
4.5 SMOKE TESTING 18" DIAMETER<br />
$ 0.17 LF 4,200 4,748 -548 $ 714.00 $ 807.16 $<br />
(93.16)<br />
4.6 SMOKE TESTING 24" DIAMETER<br />
$ 0.17 LF 1,600 1,626 -26 $ 272.00 $ 276.42 $ (4.42)<br />
(BID)<br />
(ACTUAL)<br />
(BID)<br />
(ACTUAL)<br />
SUBTOTAL 5 TOTAL OF ITEMS 1 TO 4<br />
$ 236,462.29 $ 232,932.66 $ 3,529.63<br />
CONTINGENCY<br />
ALLOWANCE<br />
6<br />
UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS, MINOR CONSTRUCTION CHANGES, AND QUANTITY ADJUSTMENTS, IF ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER<br />
$23,646.23 $ - $ 23,646.23<br />
DEDICATED<br />
ALLOWANCE<br />
7<br />
PERMITS, FEES, IMPACT OF FEES, AND INSPECTIONS, IF ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER<br />
$7,093.87<br />
$<br />
-<br />
$ 7,093.87<br />
TOTAL BID<br />
SUM OF ITEMS 5,6, & 7<br />
$<br />
267,202.39<br />
$ 232,932.66 $ 34,269.73
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “I”<br />
MDWASD Repair Criteria and Technology Guidelines (Not included)<br />
32
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “J”<br />
Manhole Repair Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (One sample page<br />
included only / Total Pages 4)<br />
33
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Basin No. Manhole No. Atlas Page Repair Code Definition Average Cost<br />
1233<br />
1249<br />
1A G9 1<br />
$200.00<br />
4A G9 1 $200.00<br />
4B G9 1 $200.00<br />
6 G9 1 $200.00<br />
15 G7 1 $200.00<br />
23 G8 1 $200.00<br />
28 G9 1 $200.00<br />
29 G9 1 $200.00<br />
32 G9 1 $200.00<br />
33A G9 1 $200.00<br />
41 H9 1 Insert Manhole Dish<br />
$200.00<br />
48 G9 1 $200.00<br />
50A G9 1 $200.00<br />
61 G9 1 $200.00<br />
61A G9 1 $200.00<br />
77B F9 1 $200.00<br />
84 E9 1 $200.00<br />
86 E9 1 $200.00<br />
400A F8 1 $200.00<br />
400B F8 1 $200.00<br />
400C F8 1 $200.00<br />
80 F9 392<br />
$1,000.00<br />
82A F9 392 $1,000.00<br />
83 F9 392 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Entire Manhole $1,000.00<br />
84 F9 392 $1,000.00<br />
88 E9 392 $1,000.00<br />
50 G9 18 Plug and Waterproof-Coat Manhole Cone $300.00<br />
50 G9 24<br />
$1,000.00<br />
Plug and Waterproof-Coat Manhole Walls<br />
66 F9 24 $1,000.00<br />
21 G9 9<br />
$300.00<br />
Realign and Seal Manhole Frame<br />
62C G8 9 $300.00<br />
22 G9 26 Repair Leaks in Manhole Wall $300.00<br />
11 G8 12<br />
$300.00<br />
Seal Casting to Cone<br />
400C F8 12 $300.00<br />
Total $13,000.00<br />
42B H9 1<br />
$200.00<br />
42C H9 1 Insert Manhole Dish<br />
$200.00<br />
44 H9 1 $200.00<br />
Total $600.00<br />
Grand Total $44,700.00<br />
34
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “K”<br />
Mainline Repair Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (One sample page<br />
included only / Total Pages 18)<br />
35
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
ID<br />
Previous<br />
ID<br />
TV Date<br />
Review<br />
Date<br />
Basin<br />
No.<br />
Line<br />
Segment<br />
Length<br />
Cost of<br />
Point<br />
Repairs<br />
CIP<br />
Repair Call*<br />
923 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1E-1D 359 $300.00 $300.00<br />
924 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1D-1C 300 $300.00 $300.00<br />
925 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1C-1B 108 $300.00 $300.00<br />
926 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1B-1A 23 No repair<br />
927 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1A-1 258 No repair<br />
928 CV N/A 10.21.10 11.19.10 1245 1-1245 25 No repair<br />
893 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.18.10 1246 1C-1B 162 $850.00 $3,240.00 $850.00<br />
894 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.18.10 1246 1B-1A 150 $300.00 $300.00<br />
908 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 5-4A 98<br />
909 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 4A-4 227<br />
910 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 4-3A 227 No repair<br />
911 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 3A-3 242 No repair<br />
912 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 3-1 198 $850.00 $3,960.00 $850.00<br />
913 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 2-1 15 No repair<br />
914 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 1A-1 28 $300.00 $300.00<br />
915 CV N/A 10.20.10 11.19.10 1246 1-1246 25 $850.00 $862.50 $862.50<br />
883 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.10.10 1247 4-4A 80 $1,650.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00<br />
884 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.10.10 1247 4A-4B 139 No repair<br />
885 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.10.10 1247 4B-3 77 No repair<br />
886 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 3-2 319 No repair<br />
887 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 2-1 102 No repair<br />
888 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 6-5 182 $3,640.00 $3,640.00<br />
889 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 5-1 49 No repair<br />
890 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 8-7 89 No repair<br />
891 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.11.10 1247 7-5 157 No repair<br />
892 CV N/A 10.19.10 11.18.10 1247 1-1247 12 No repair<br />
803 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 11-10 100 No repair<br />
804 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 10-9 205 No repair<br />
805 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 9-8 95 No repair<br />
806 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 8-7 61 No repair<br />
807 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 7-6 131 No repair<br />
808 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 6-5 283 No repair<br />
809 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 5-4 309 No repair<br />
810 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 4-3 158 No repair<br />
811 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 3-2 138 No repair<br />
812 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 2-1 120 No repair<br />
813 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 13-12 367 No repair<br />
814 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 12-1 97 No repair<br />
815 CV N/A 10.13.10 11.05.10 1248 1-1248 25 No repair<br />
929 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 42A-1249 160 No repair<br />
930 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 44-42D 40 No repair<br />
931 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 42D-42C 80 No repair<br />
932 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 42C-42B 132 No repair<br />
933 CV N/A 10.22.10 11.19.10 1249 42B-1249 153 No repair<br />
TOTAL 934 240313 $2,798,222.50<br />
No mainline repairs required. Only laterals repairs needed.<br />
* Cost of recommendations considers cost of "Sectional Liners" (538) and "Grouting" (529) versus "Cure in Place Liners" (537), in addition<br />
to applicable "De-root Main Line" (531), "Heavy Clean Mainline with Degreaser" (541), "Point Repair Main Line" (526), and "Grout Annular<br />
Space at Manhole/Pipe Connection" (513).<br />
No cost for applicable lateral repairs such as “Investigate Suspect Lateral" (595), "Grout Lateral Annular Space" (511), "Point Repair<br />
Lateral" (507), etc has been included.<br />
36
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “L”<br />
Special Line Segments (Not included)<br />
37
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “M”<br />
Repair Recommendations for MHs, Laterals, and Mainlines classified by Basin (One<br />
sample page included only / Total Pages 4)<br />
38
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Basin No. Repair Code Definition Count<br />
1233<br />
1234<br />
595 Inv Suspect Lateral 235<br />
507 Point Repair Lateral (Public Property) 42<br />
529 Clean, Test, Seal Main Line 32<br />
538 Sectional 29<br />
1 Insert Manhole Dish 23<br />
531 De-root Main Line 16<br />
513 Grout Annular Space at Manhole/Pipe Connection 15<br />
511 Grout Lateral Annular Space 10<br />
547 Cure-in-Place Liner (hold for another repair) 9<br />
541 Heavy Clean Mainline with Degreaser 7<br />
537 Cured-in-Place Liner 7<br />
392 Plug and Waterproof - Coat Entire Manhole 5<br />
594 Investigate Suspect Drop-Connection 3<br />
24 Plug and Waterproof-Coat Manhole Walls 2<br />
12 Seal Casting to Cone 2<br />
9 Realign and Seal Manhole Frame 2<br />
18 Plug and Waterproof-Coat Manhole cone 1<br />
557 Point Repair with Cured-in-Place Liner 1<br />
26 Repair leaks in manhole wall 1<br />
Total 442<br />
595 Inv Suspect Lateral 373<br />
529 Clean, Test, Seal Main Line 98<br />
531 De-root Main Line 73<br />
507 Point Repair Lateral (Public Property) 72<br />
538 Sectional 67<br />
547 Cure-in-Place Liner (hold for another repair) 43<br />
537 Cured-in-Place Liner 33<br />
513 Grout Annular Space at Manhole/Pipe Connection 16<br />
12 Seal Casting to Cone 13<br />
511 Grout Lateral Annular Space 11<br />
526 Point Repair Main Line 6<br />
557 Point Repair with Cured-in-Place Liner 5<br />
1 Insert Manhole Dish 2<br />
9 Realign and Seal Manhole Frame 2<br />
523 Plug Lateral at Point of Connection with Main Line 1<br />
31 Repair Leaks in Manhole Bench 1<br />
584 Robotics Repair Protruding Lateral 1<br />
594 Investigate Suspect Drop-Connection 1<br />
Total 818<br />
Grand Total 3,038<br />
39
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Appendix “N”<br />
Summary of Bid Costs<br />
Total Pages 1<br />
40
Preliminary Evaluation Prior to Design and/or Other Upgrades to the<br />
MDWASD Sanitary Sewer System Within the City of Miami Springs<br />
Line Replacement<br />
(525)<br />
Size (in) $/LF 0-9 ft depth $/LF 9-18 ft depth<br />
8 $ 34.50 $ 65.00<br />
10 $ 58.00 $ 84.00<br />
12 $ 58.00 $ 84.00<br />
15 $ 58.00 $ 84.00<br />
18 $ 58.00 $ 84.00<br />
24 $ 58.00 $ 84.00<br />
Sectional Liner<br />
(538)<br />
Cured in Place<br />
Liners (CIP)<br />
(537)<br />
Grouting<br />
(529)<br />
Point Repair<br />
(526)<br />
(557 CIP)<br />
Size (in) $/Each 8 ft Length $/LF Additional length<br />
8 $ 850.00 $ 1.00<br />
10 $ 800.00 $ 1.00<br />
12 $ 900.00 N/A<br />
15 $ 1,250.00 N/A<br />
18 $ 2,000.00 N/A<br />
24 $ 3,000.00 N/A<br />
Size (in)<br />
$/LF<br />
8 $ 20.00<br />
10 $ 23.00<br />
12 $ 24.00<br />
15 $ 30.00<br />
18 $ 40.00<br />
24 $ 60.00<br />
Size (in)<br />
$/LF<br />
8 $ 10.00<br />
10 $ 10.00<br />
12 $ 12.20<br />
15 $ 12.20<br />
18 $ 15.30<br />
24 $ 15.30<br />
$/Each (All Sizes)<br />
$ 3,000.00<br />
41
ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS<br />
1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS<br />
A. CONTRACT INFORMATION<br />
2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER<br />
4. NAME AND TITLE<br />
B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT<br />
5. NAME OF FIRM<br />
6. TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
7. FAX NUMBER<br />
8. E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
(Check)<br />
C. PROPOSED TEAM<br />
(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)<br />
PRIME<br />
J-V<br />
PARTNER<br />
SUBCON-<br />
TRACTOR<br />
9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
a.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
b.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
c.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
d.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
e.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
f.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)<br />
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 1
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
b.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
c.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
d.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 2
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
b.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
c.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
d.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 2
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
a. TOTAL<br />
14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)<br />
17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE)<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm<br />
a.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
b.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
c.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
d.<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 2
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
a.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
f.<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
26. NAMES OF KEY<br />
PERSONNEL<br />
(From Section E,<br />
Block 12)<br />
G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS<br />
28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F<br />
27. ROLE IN THIS<br />
(Fill in "Example Projects Key" section below before completing<br />
CONTRACT<br />
table. Place "X" under project key number for<br />
(From Section E,<br />
participation in same or similar role.)<br />
Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY<br />
NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F)<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 4
ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS<br />
1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS<br />
A. CONTRACT INFORMATION<br />
2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER<br />
4. NAME AND TITLE<br />
B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT<br />
5. NAME OF FIRM<br />
6. TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
7. FAX NUMBER<br />
8. E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
(Check)<br />
C. PROPOSED TEAM<br />
(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)<br />
PRIME<br />
J-V<br />
PARTNER<br />
SUBCON-<br />
TRACTOR<br />
9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
a.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
b.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
c.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
d.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
e.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
f.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)<br />
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 1
12. NAME<br />
Paul Hillers, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>, Boca Raton, Florida<br />
16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization)<br />
BSEE/1979/ Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
MSEE/1981/Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each person)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
14. YEARS EXPEREINCE<br />
a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
Project Manager<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
17. CURRENT PROFIESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline)<br />
31<br />
Florida Professional Engineer-41022<br />
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), Instrument Society of America (ISA)<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
City of West Palm Beach Water Treatment Plant Existing Electrical<br />
System Evaluation, Study and Maintenance Testing, West Palm Beach,<br />
FL<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
X Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager – Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong> provided electrical analysis, study and design services to assist the City with<br />
managing the aging plant electrical power distribution system. Performed power monitoring of the existing system and analyzed<br />
anomalies in power quality. Performed Short Circuit, Device Coordination and Arc Flash Study of the existing power distribution<br />
system. Analyzed the power distribution system for vulnerabilities and recommended solutions to reinforce the system. As-built<br />
the existing plant electrical power distribution system and updated the plant one line diagrams.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
East Central Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant Solids Handling<br />
Improvements Preliminary <strong>Engineering</strong> Report<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
2009<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
2011<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
18<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Project Manager – Performed electrical and control systems analysis for the conceptual design of new biosolids handling,<br />
treatment and removal processes including new screening facilities, sludge pumping facilities, sludge storages facilities,<br />
anaerobic digestion facilities, sludge drying facilities and sludge cake removal. Provided conceptual design input to a possible<br />
cogeneration facility using methane gas generated in the anaerobic digestion process. Analyzed the existing plant normal and<br />
emergency electrical power distribution facilities, and control system infrastructure, to determine impacts and options to integrate<br />
and support the proposed process systems. Prepared options for integration into the plant of the electrical power generated by<br />
the proposed cogeneration facility. Created final study document sections for Electrical and Instrumentation and Control Systems<br />
and provided input into the budgetary cost estimate.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Broward County North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant – Module E<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
2010<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
X Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Manager - Electrical design and construction inspection services for construction of a 20 MGD capacity expansion and<br />
major process upgrade to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Process improvements included addition of a three 125 foot<br />
diameter primary clarifiers; four aeration basins; three 500 horsepower blowers; and suction sludge removal system. Project also<br />
included implementation of new PLC based SCADA system that included the integration of existing plant process components.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Palm Beach County Lake Region WTP Membrane Facilities – Belle Glade,<br />
FL<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
X<br />
Project Manager- Designed plant SCADA system with redundant hot backup PLC processors, Remote Input Output panels,<br />
redundant fiber optic communication data highway for the monitoring and control of on site plant systems for the operation of the<br />
RO Plant.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
City of Orlando – Iron Bridge Regional Water Reclamation Facility<br />
Bardenpho Improvements to 40 MGD<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
2008<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
Electrical design and construction inspection services for construction of 40 MGD capacity expansion, major process upgrade of<br />
the existing wastewater treatment system. Project included implementation of new electrical service and modification of existing<br />
four trains of fermentation basins, grit units, clarifiers, return activated sludge/waste activated sludge pump station, internal<br />
recycle pump stations, etc.<br />
X<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
2008<br />
X<br />
Check if project performed with current firm
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004) PAGE 2
12. NAME<br />
Mark E. Luther, P.E.<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>, Boca Raton, Florida<br />
16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization)<br />
BSEE/1987/ Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each person)<br />
13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
14. YEARS EXPEREINCE<br />
a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
Lead Electrical Engineer<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
17. CURRENT PROFIESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline)<br />
25<br />
Florida Professional Engineer-48801<br />
Proficiency with SKM Power Tools for Windows DAPPER, CAPTOR, TMS and ARC FLASH; AutoCAD, LitePRO.<br />
a.<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
City of West Palm Beach Water Treatment Plant Existing Electrical<br />
System Evaluation, Study and Maintenance Testing, West Palm<br />
Beach, FL<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
15<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2011<br />
X Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Lead Electrical Engineer – Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong> provided electrical analysis, study and design services to<br />
assist the City with managing the aging plant electrical power distribution system. Performed power monitoring of the<br />
existing system and analyzed anomalies in power quality. Performed Short Circuit, Device Coordination and Arc Flash<br />
Study of the existing power distribution system. Analyzed the power distribution system for vulnerabilities and<br />
recommended solutions to reinforce the system. As-built the existing plant electrical power distribution system and<br />
updated the plant one line diagrams.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Orange County Utilities 8 Master Pump Station<br />
Replacement/Rehabilitation<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2003<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2008<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
X Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Lead Electrical Engineer - Performed electrical, instrumentation and control system engineering and design for<br />
replacement of eight master pump stations. Project was completed in three phases with two pump stations in the<br />
first phase, four in the second phase and two in the third phase. The projects consisted of main gear, ATS with<br />
generator and panel board. The projects consisted of a main control panel with Siemens PLC and spread spectrum<br />
radio communication, back-up control panel with floats, and field instrumentation such as ultrasonic level<br />
transducer and magnetic flowmeter. The electrical and instrumentation equipment are housed in an electrical<br />
enclosure with 150 mph wind loading. The generators are housed in a walk-in enclosure with 150mph wind loading.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
East Central Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant Solids<br />
Handling Improvements Preliminary <strong>Engineering</strong> Report<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2009<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
X Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Lead Electrical Engineer – Performed electrical and control systems analysis for the conceptual design of new<br />
biosolids handling, treatment and removal processes including new screening facilities, sludge pumping facilities,<br />
sludge storages facilities, anaerobic digestion facilities, sludge drying facilities and sludge cake removal. Provided<br />
conceptual design input to a possible cogeneration facility using methane gas generated in the anaerobic digestion<br />
process. Analyzed the existing plant normal and emergency electrical power distribution facilities, and control<br />
system infrastructure, to determine impacts and options to integrate and support the proposed process systems.<br />
Prepared options for integration into the plant of the electrical power generated by the proposed cogeneration<br />
facility. Created final study document sections for Electrical and Instrumentation and Control Systems and provided<br />
input into the budgetary cost estimate.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
ENCON Plant Expansion-Loxahatchee River District, Jupiter, FL<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2005<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2007<br />
X<br />
Lead Electrical Engineer- Provided electrical design and construction inspection services for construction of a 2.0<br />
MGD capacity expansion and major process upgrade to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Process<br />
improvements included addition of a fourth primary clarifier; two influent flow equalization tanks; replacement of the<br />
existing cryogenic oxygenation system with aeration basins and blowers; upgrades to RAS and WAS pumping<br />
facilities; new chlorine facilities; new chlorine contact chambers for reuse system disinfection; new synthetic media<br />
filters for reuse water filtering; and a new sludge storage and holding facility.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Town of Jupiter Nanofiltration Plant, Jupiter, Florida<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2007<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
(2) YEAR COMPLETED:<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if applicable)<br />
2010<br />
X<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Lead Electrical Engineer – Performed electrical, instrumentation and control system engineering and design for a 14.7<br />
MGD (expandable to 17 MGD) nanofiltration plant including, normal and emergency power systems, plant control<br />
system architecture, process instrumentation design, variable frequency drive application, fire alarm system, plant<br />
surveillance and communication systems, interface with existing plant control system.
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (1/2004) PAGE 2
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, If not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Lake Region WTP Membrane Facilities, Belle Glade, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable)<br />
2008<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Palm Beach County Water Utilities<br />
Department<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Brian Shields<br />
561-493-6081<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Provided instrumentation and control design for the Lake Region Water Treatment Plant, plant off site well field and related systems at<br />
the existing Belle Glade, Pahokee and South Bay water treatment facilities. The instrumentation and controls design is based on an<br />
overall plant production of 10 MGD with 9.5 MGD of reverse osmosis membrane treatment and .5 MGD of pretreated raw water<br />
blending. The primary treatment process for the plant is low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO) membrane treatment skids. PBCWUD<br />
elected to use brackish water from the Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA) as a supply source to a facility which led to the use of LPRO<br />
membrane treatment for the Lake Region Plant. The off site well field is designed to provide 12.375 MGD of raw water to the plant for<br />
treatment. Each of the eight Upper Floridan Aquifer wells are monitored and controlled by a PLC based Remote Telemetry Unit (RTU)<br />
that uses radio signals to transmit data to and from the plant for control and monitoring of the wells. The plant high service pump (HSP)<br />
station will provide pressure for transmission to the various utilities. A 30-inch diameter finished water main will leave the plant. A 16-<br />
inch diameter main will branch from the 30-inch diameter main and will deliver up to 1.5 MGD of finished water flow to Pahokee. The<br />
30-inch diameter main will continue towards Belle Glade and South Bay with a 24-inch diameter main branching off to Belle Glade and<br />
a 16-inch diameter main branching off to South Bay. The 16-inch diameter transmission main will carry up to 1.5 MGD of finished water<br />
South Bay. Up to 7.0 MGD of finished water from the LRWTP will be delivered to Belle Glade via a 24-inch diameter transmission main.<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong> is part of the team providing construction inspection services for this project that is scheduled for<br />
completion in 2008.<br />
Project Highlights:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Design plant SCADA system with redundant hot backup PLC processors, Remote Input Output panels, redundant fiber optic<br />
communication data highway for the monitoring and control of on site plant systems for the operation of the RO Plant.<br />
Design a Remote Telemetry System with a plant radio base station and off site RTU units for each of the raw water wells and<br />
units located at Belle Glade, Pahokee and South Bay water treatment facilities.<br />
Design control and monitoring strategies for automated plant start up to include pretreatment systems, acid addition, and<br />
cartridge filtration; membrane treatment including feedwater pumping, reverse osmosis treatment, and associated membrane<br />
cleaning facilities; post-treatment including degasification, off gas odor control, blended water clearwell storage, disinfection,<br />
chemical addition for water stabilization, and transfer pumping; finished water storage and high service pumping.<br />
Design plant wide security access control system, CCTV system and fire alarm system.<br />
Cost: $20M<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Boca Raton, Florida<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
I & C, Security & Access System, Power, Design and<br />
Construction Services<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, If not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
RO Expansion WTP 3, Delray Beach, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2005<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable)<br />
2008<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Palm Beach County Water Utilities<br />
Department<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Brian Shields<br />
561-493-6081<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Provided instrumentation and control design, construction inspection services and facility start up services for the expansion of the<br />
existing plant that produced 9.4 MGD nanofiltration with 7 MGD lime softening water plant to a 25.5 MGD nanofiltration water treatment<br />
with 4.5 MGD filtered raw water blending for total plant output of 30 MGD. A phase-out of the existing lime facilities was desired with the<br />
full treatment capacity to be delivered by nanofiltration. PBCWUD desired to significantly alter the configuration of the existing plant and<br />
add an entirely new membrane process building while maintaining full use off the existing treatment capacity. This approach allowed all<br />
membrane treatment to be consolidated and the existing buildings to be re-used for associated pretreatment and pumping functions.<br />
The design team carefully crafted a construction sequence that allowed orderly start-up of new capacity without existing facility<br />
operation interruption. Instrumentation and control design included intermediate phase and final phase SCADA system designs to<br />
maintain plant operations during the construction process.<br />
Project Highlights:<br />
Design plant SCADA system with redundant hot backup PLC processors, Remote Input Output panels and a redundant fiber<br />
optic communication data highway for the monitoring and control of plant systems for the operation of the RO Plant.<br />
Design intermediate plant PLC configuration and programming requirements to maintain existing nanofiltration plant<br />
operations during the phased construction sequence and to start up and test the new nanofiltration systems.<br />
Design plant PLC configuration and programming requirements for plant operations in the 30 MGD plant configuration.<br />
Design control and monitoring strategies for automated plant start up to include pretreatment systems including sand<br />
separation, acid addition, and cartridge filtration; membrane treatment including feedwater pumping, nanofiltration treatment,<br />
and associated membrane cleaning facilities; post-treatment including degasification, off gas odor control, blended water<br />
clearwell storage, disinfection, chemical addition for water stabilization, and transfer pumping; finished water storage and<br />
pumping improvements including two 5-million-gallon ground storage tanks and new high service pumping.<br />
Design plant wide security access control system.<br />
Cost: $36.5M<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />
<strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Boca Raton, Florida<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
I & C, Security & Access System, Power, Design and<br />
Construction Services<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, If not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Southern Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion, Delray<br />
Beach, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2005<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable)<br />
2007<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Palm Beach County Water Utilities<br />
Department<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
David Dalton<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
561-381-5303<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Provided electrical design and construction inspection services for construction of a 16.0 MGD capacity expansion of the reuse water<br />
system to the existing water reclamation facility. Process improvements included addition of reuse water high service pump station, new<br />
effluent filters and extending facility SCADA system to include the PLC based controls of the new filters.<br />
Project Highlights:<br />
Modifications to the facility medium voltage 4160 volt main service gear to add two breakers to feed the new reuse water<br />
Switchgear.<br />
Design of reuse water double ended unit substation 480 volt Switchgear for installation in the existing main electrical building.<br />
Implementation of variable frequency drives and solid state reduced voltage starters.<br />
Design electrical system to feed the new facility filters.<br />
Modifications to the existing effluent pump station unit substation 480 volt Switchgear to add feeder breakers for the new filter<br />
systems<br />
Reuse Water Pump station and Filter structures lighting; grounding and lightning protection systems.<br />
Cost: $ 400,000<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong><br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Boca Raton, Florida<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
I & C, Power, Design and Construction Services<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, If not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
Southern Regional Water Reclamation Facility, Delray Beach, FL<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
Palm Beach County Water Utilities<br />
Department<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2008<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
David Dalton<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable)<br />
2009<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
561-381-5303<br />
The existing medium voltage emergency power distribution system had a single means of connection to the existing utility power<br />
distribution system equipment that, if were to fail, would prevent emergency power from energizing the facility on a loss of utility power.<br />
HEE designed a second route of power from the existing emergency generator medium voltage paralleling switchgear to the existing<br />
medium voltage power distribution switchgear including bus re-work in the generator paralleling switchgear, expansion of the existing<br />
utility power distribution switchgear, and re-design of the breaker operating control logic to achieve two independent generator/utility<br />
breaker pairs, and an interlocked manual tie breaker, to greatly improve the reliability of the existing system.<br />
Cost: $1.2M<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
a.<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong><br />
Boca Raton, Florida<br />
Electrical design and construction services<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, If not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
City of Ft. Lauderdale: Five Ash Water Treatment Plant Upgrades<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER<br />
City of Ft. Lauderdale<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2006<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME<br />
Paul Bolander<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY<br />
NUMBER<br />
CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable)<br />
2008<br />
c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
954-522-2604<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong> provided electrical design and construction inspection services for the reliability upgrade of the existing 70<br />
MGD capacity plant at Five Ash Water Treatment Plant. Process improvements included modification of existing high service pump<br />
system, washwater recovery pump system, sludge mixer system, sludge pump system, filter backwash pump system, lime system,<br />
polymer system, and replacement of all pneumatic valves associated with filters to electric valves. Project also included design and<br />
implementation of uninterrupted power supply system for all process instruments and controls.<br />
Project Highlights:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Modification to existing plant electrical infrastructure including design and replacement of motor control centers, power panels,<br />
etc.<br />
Modification of the existing medium voltage starters for north high service pumps<br />
Design and replacement of existing motor starters for washwater recovery pumps<br />
Design and replacement of existing motor starters for sludge tank mixers and sludge pumps<br />
Addition of the uninterrupted power supply with distribution panels throughout the plants for instrumentation and control<br />
system<br />
Complete replacement of the existing filters pneumatic valves with electric valve actuators operating on the Profibus protocol<br />
Complete replacement of polymer system including control panels and metering pumps<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)<br />
(3) ROLE<br />
Hillers Electrical<br />
Boca Raton, Florida<br />
Electrical design and construction services<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong><br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
c.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) FIRM NAME<br />
.<br />
(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE
26. NAMES OF KEY<br />
PERSONNEL<br />
(From Section E, Block 12)<br />
G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS<br />
27. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
(From Section E, Block 13)<br />
Paul Hillers, PE Project Manager X X X X X<br />
Mark Luther, PE Project Engineer X X X X X<br />
28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F<br />
(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completing<br />
table. Place “X” under project key number for participation in same<br />
or similar role.)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY<br />
NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F)<br />
1 Lake Region WTP Membrane Facilities 6<br />
2 RO Expansion WTP 3 7<br />
3 SRWRF Expansion 8<br />
4 SRWRF Improvements 9<br />
5 Five Ash WTP Upgrades 10<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 1
H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<br />
30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. has been in business since 1994 and is located in Boca Raton, Florida. Hillers<br />
Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. (HEE) brings over 200 years of unsurpassed experience, expertise, and personalized<br />
service in electrical engineering design, control application programming, and construction management. Our<br />
electrical design services include power, control, instrumentation, telemetry, start-up assistance, construction<br />
management services and PLC/computer programming for County and State municipal agencies as well as private<br />
industry.<br />
Our office is fully equipped with state-of-the-art computer systems and engineering software to help ensure a<br />
quality and cost-effective product. Software programs include AutoCAD SKM fault current/coordination/arc flash<br />
program, generator sizing programs, and 3 dimensional lighting calculations program.<br />
HEE design staff brings vast electrical, instrumentation and telemetry design and project management experience<br />
in a variety of areas such as raw water wells, ASR and DIW wells, water treatment facilities, water distribution<br />
systems, wastewater collection systems, wastewater treatment facilities including reuse, storm water and treatment<br />
pumping stations, airport terminals, airport runway-taxiway-apron lighting and navigational systems, sportsfield<br />
lighting, roadway and parking lot lighting, fire stations, etc..<br />
HEE provides a variety of electrical, instrumentation and telemetry design and construction management tasks<br />
including:<br />
Low, Medium, and High Voltage Power Distribution Systems<br />
Motor Control Centers (MCCs)<br />
Distribution Panels<br />
Voltage Drop Calculations<br />
Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Application<br />
Luminaire Calculations<br />
Short-Circuit Calculations, Protective Device Coordination & Arc Flash<br />
Standby Generator Systems<br />
Fire Alarm and Security Systems<br />
Instrumentation & Control Systems<br />
Telemetry Systems<br />
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems<br />
Shop Drawing Review<br />
Energy Audits<br />
Cost Estimates, Testing, and Start-Ups<br />
The nature of Consulting is such that responsiveness is the key to maintaining a long-term relationship. HEE takes<br />
great pride in ensuring that we are immediately accessible and responsive to our client’s needs. This is<br />
demonstrated in the excellent relationship we have established over the last 18 years with many municipalities and<br />
environmental consulting firms.<br />
I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The foregoing is a statement of facts.<br />
31. SIGNATURE<br />
33. NAME AND TITLE<br />
Paul Hillers, President<br />
32. DATE<br />
6-11-12<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 5
ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS<br />
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER (If Any)<br />
2012-10<br />
2a. FIRM (OR BRANCH OFFICE) NAME<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
2b. STREET<br />
23257 State Road 7, Suite 100<br />
2c. CITY<br />
Boca Raton<br />
6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE<br />
Paul Hillers, President<br />
PART II – GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS<br />
(If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.)<br />
2d. STATE<br />
Florida<br />
3. YEAR ESTABLISHED<br />
1994<br />
a. TYPE<br />
Corporation<br />
5. OWNERSHIP<br />
2e. ZIP CODE<br />
33428 b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS<br />
Yes<br />
7. NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is branch office)<br />
4. DUNS NUMBER<br />
876227059<br />
6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
561-451-9165<br />
6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
phillers@hillersee.com<br />
8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any) 8b. YR. ESTABLISHED 8c. DUNS NUMBER<br />
NA NA NA<br />
a. Function<br />
Code<br />
9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE<br />
b. Discipline<br />
c. No. of Employees<br />
(1) FIRM (2) BRANCH<br />
a. Profile<br />
Code<br />
10. PROFILE OF FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND<br />
ANNUAL REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS<br />
b. Experience<br />
c. Revenue Index<br />
Number<br />
(see below)<br />
21 Electrical & Instrumentation Design Engineers 9 A05 Airport NAVAIDS, ILS, Lighting, Aircraft Fueling 5<br />
16 Electrical Construction Manager 2 A06 Airport Terminals and Hangars;Freight Handling 5<br />
08 CADD Technician 1 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 3<br />
02 Administrative 1 W03<br />
Water Supply; Treatment and Distribution(Electrical<br />
and instrumentation design<br />
5<br />
Other Employees<br />
Total 13<br />
11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL<br />
SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER<br />
FOR LAST 3 YEARS<br />
1. Less than $100,000 6. $2 million to less than $5 million<br />
(Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,00 to less than $250,000 7. $5 million to less than $10 million<br />
a. Federal Work 1 3. $250,000 to less than $500,000 8. $10 million to less than $25 million<br />
b. Non-Federal Work 6 4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 9. $25 million to less than $50 million<br />
c. Total Work 7 5. $1 million to less than $2 million 10. $50 million or greater<br />
12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The foregoing is a statement of facts.<br />
b. DATE<br />
a. SIGNATURE<br />
c. NAME AND TITLE<br />
Paul Hillers, President<br />
6/4/2012<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)
ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS<br />
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER (If Any)<br />
2012-10<br />
2a. FIRM (OR BRANCH OFFICE) NAME<br />
Hillers Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
2b. STREET<br />
23257 State Road 7, Suite 100<br />
2c. CITY<br />
Boca Raton<br />
6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE<br />
Paul Hillers, President<br />
PART II – GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS<br />
(If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.)<br />
2d. STATE<br />
Florida<br />
3. YEAR ESTABLISHED<br />
1994<br />
a. TYPE<br />
Corporation<br />
5. OWNERSHIP<br />
2e. ZIP CODE<br />
33428 b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS<br />
Yes<br />
7. NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is branch office)<br />
4. DUNS NUMBER<br />
876227059<br />
6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
561-451-9165<br />
6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
phillers@hillersee.com<br />
8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any) 8b. YR. ESTABLISHED 8c. DUNS NUMBER<br />
NA NA NA<br />
a. Function<br />
Code<br />
9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE<br />
b. Discipline<br />
c. No. of Employees<br />
(1) FIRM (2) BRANCH<br />
a. Profile<br />
Code<br />
10. PROFILE OF FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND<br />
ANNUAL REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS<br />
b. Experience<br />
c. Revenue Index<br />
Number<br />
(see below)<br />
21 Electrical & Instrumentation Design Engineers 9 A05 Airport NAVAIDS, ILS, Lighting, Aircraft Fueling 5<br />
16 Electrical Construction Manager 2 A06 Airport Terminals and Hangars;Freight Handling 5<br />
08 CADD Technician 1 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 3<br />
02 Administrative 1 W03<br />
Water Supply; Treatment and Distribution(Electrical<br />
and instrumentation design<br />
5<br />
Other Employees<br />
Total 13<br />
11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL<br />
SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER<br />
FOR LAST 3 YEARS<br />
1. Less than $100,000 6. $2 million to less than $5 million<br />
(Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,00 to less than $250,000 7. $5 million to less than $10 million<br />
a. Federal Work 1 3. $250,000 to less than $500,000 8. $10 million to less than $25 million<br />
b. Non-Federal Work 6 4. $500,000 to less than $1 million 9. $25 million to less than $50 million<br />
c. Total Work 7 5. $1 million to less than $2 million 10. $50 million or greater<br />
12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The foregoing is a statement of facts.<br />
b. DATE<br />
a. SIGNATURE<br />
c. NAME AND TITLE<br />
Paul Hillers, President<br />
6/4/2012<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)
1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
ARCHITECT – ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS<br />
PART I – CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS<br />
A. CONTRACT INFORMATION<br />
2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER<br />
4. NAME AND TITLE<br />
B. ARCHITECT – ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT<br />
5. NAME OF FIRM<br />
6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS<br />
(Check)<br />
C. PROPOSED TEAM<br />
(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)<br />
PRIME<br />
J-V<br />
PARTNER<br />
SUBCON-<br />
TRACTOR<br />
9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT<br />
a.<br />
GEOSOL, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
Oracio Riccobono, P.E,<br />
President<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
(305) 828-4367<br />
Geosolusa@bellsouth.net<br />
Soils, Foundations &<br />
Materials Testing<br />
b.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
c.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
d.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
e.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
f.<br />
CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE<br />
D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)<br />
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION<br />
MANDATORY USE DATE OF FORM 6/2004<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 1
E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)<br />
12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE<br />
Oracio Riccobono, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer A. TOTAL B. WITH CURRENT FIRM<br />
26 12<br />
15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)<br />
GEOSOL, <strong>Inc</strong>.; 5795-A NW 151 st Street, Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline)<br />
Civil Engineer (BSCE) and Master Degree (MSCE in Geotechnical Registration No. 49324 (Florida, Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>)<br />
Enginering)<br />
18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)<br />
American Society of Civil Engineers<br />
Florida <strong>Engineering</strong> Society<br />
19. RELEVANT PROJECTS<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
c.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Areawide and Districtwide Geotechnical Consultant, FDOT Districts 4 and 6, over from Monroe<br />
to Osceola Counties<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2003 – Ongoing N/A<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for negotiating each task work orders (TWO), planning the geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of<br />
geotechnical engineering reports with foundation design and construction recommendations for new and existing roadway projects during Preliminary and Final Design<br />
phases. Project has budget cap of $1.5 millions. To date, we have successfully executed 95 TWO and have spent $1.3 millions.<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
MIC-MIA Elevated People’s Mover, Miami-Dade County, FL, FDOT District 6. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
2004 - 2006 Has not started<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical engineering<br />
report with foundation design and construction recommendations for the new viaduct bridge that will provide connection between the Miami Intermodal<br />
Center (MIC) and the Miami International Airport (MIA). Geotechnical fees were $200,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Bridge Replacement for New Railroad Tracks Over the New River, Broward County, FL, TRI-<br />
COUNTY COMMUTER RAIL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2001 - 2003 2004 - 2006<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning the preliminary geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of the preliminary geotechnical<br />
engineering reports during preparation of Design-Build Documents for the new viaduct bridge. Also, involved during construction reviewing and approving contractor’s<br />
submittals and performing verification type testing. Geotechnical fees during design were $500,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
SR 826 and NW 36 th Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County, FL, FDOT District 6. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
2001- 2003 2004 - 2006<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical engineering report with<br />
foundation design and construction recommendations for the new bridges and retaining walls. Geotechnical fees were $250,000<br />
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SR 826 and Okeechobee Road, Miami-Dade County, FL, FDOT District 6. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
2001- 2003 2004 - 2006<br />
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE<br />
Check if project performed with current firm<br />
Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical engineering report with<br />
foundation design and construction recommendations for the new bridges and retaining walls. Geotechnical fees were $150,000<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 2
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
1<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
Areawide and Districtwide Geotechnical Consultant, FDOT Districts 4 and 6, over from Monroe to<br />
Osceola Counties<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
2003 – 2012 N/A<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
FDOT Districts 4 and 6 Materials Office Mr. Juan Castellanos, P.E. (954) 475-4111<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for negotiating each task work orders (TWO), planning the geotechnical exploration and<br />
laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical engineering reports with foundation design and construction recommendations<br />
for new and existing roadway projects during Preliminary and Final Design phases. Project has budget cap of $1.5 millions. To date,<br />
we have successfully executed 95 TWO and have spent $1.3 millions.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
GEOSOL, <strong>Inc</strong>.; 5795-A NW 151 st Street,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
Sr. Geotechnical Engineer<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
2<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
NE 2 nd Avenue Improvements, From NE 20 Th to NE 87 th Streets, City of Miami, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL<br />
SERVICES<br />
April to July 2005<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If<br />
applicable)<br />
Has not started<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE<br />
NUMBER<br />
The City of Miami c/o: DMJM Harris, <strong>Inc</strong>. Mr. Alex Meitin, P.E (305) 444-8241<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation of geotechnical<br />
engineering report with foundation design and construction recommendations. Scope included collection of 20 asphalt pavement cores,<br />
performance of 104 test borings and 40 percolation tests. Geotechnical fees were $46,630.<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
and Materials Testing Services<br />
(1) Firm Name<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
3<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SR-5/Byscayne Blvd. Improvements, From NE 14 th to NE 38 th Streets, City of<br />
Miami, FL<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
Dec. 04 to March 05 2008<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
FDOT District 6 Mr. Jason Chang, P.E. (305) 470-5331<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Project Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning the final design level geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing programs, preparation<br />
of the geotechnical engineering reports for the proposed reconstruction. The geotechnical services for this project consisted in the performance of a<br />
roadway soils survey including asphalt pavement coring along the existing City of Miami side streets in order to provide recommendations for the<br />
proposed construction, 14 signalized intersections and 6 sign structures. The geotechnical services were performed using the requested scope of<br />
services and the field exploration criteria established in the FDOT's Soils and Foundations Handbook (2004). Scope included 88 test borings for soil<br />
survey, 59 pavement cores, 28 borings for signalized intersections, 6 borings for sign structures and LBR testing . Geotechnical fees during design<br />
were $97,260.65<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
and Materials Testing Services<br />
(1) Firm Name<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
4<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SR 836 Extension, From NW 107 th to NW 137 th Avenues, Miami-Dade County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
Jan.2004 to Dec. 2005 2007<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority c/o Gannett Fleming, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(786) 845-9540<br />
(MDX)<br />
Mr. Carlos Cejas, P.E.<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer for this project. Design-Build project construction cost was $140,000,000. He was<br />
responsible for design and implementation of the project’s field exploration and laboratory testing programs. He is responsible for the geotechnical<br />
engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of 9 bridges. He is also responsible for geotechnical engineering evaluations and<br />
foundation recommendations for MSE retaining walls, sheet pile walls and signalization structures. He prepared geotechnical engineering reports<br />
containing recommendations for foundation design and construction for the new bridges, MSE walls, sheet pile walls and roadways. Geotechnical<br />
fees were $500,000<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
and Materials Testing Services<br />
(1) Firm Name<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
5<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SR 826 and NW 36 th Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
2001- 2003 2006<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
FDOT District 6 Mr. Ali Toghiani, P.E. (305) 470-5343<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer during the Final Design phase of this project. Responsible for design<br />
and implementation of the project’s field exploration and laboratory testing programs. Performed geotechnical engineering<br />
analyses and design for foundation elements for the replacement of the 2 mainline bridges and a bridge widening on NW<br />
36 th Street over the Ives Dairy Canal. Driven piles will support the bridges. Also, performed geotechnical engineering<br />
evaluations and provided recommendations for MSE retaining walls, critical sheet pile walls and sign structures.<br />
Additionally, the project involved the evaluation of ground improvement methods and recommendations in the area of the<br />
on Ramp “A”. Also performed review and interpretation of aerial photographs to determine the horizontal limits of<br />
trash/debris deposits that were placed in the late 1960's after the area was mined of its natural limestone formation. He<br />
interpreted the results of the test borings and laboratory testing programs, evaluated and performed analyses of various<br />
soil stabilization methods. Prepared geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for foundation design<br />
and construction for the bridges, MSE walls, sheet pile walls and sign structures. The geotechnical reports were reviewed<br />
and approved by the FDOT District geotechnical engineer. Geotechnical fees were $200,000<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
and Materials Testing Services<br />
(1) Firm Name<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
6<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SR 826 and SW 8 th Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
2002- 2003 2007<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
FDOT District 6 Mr. Ali Toghiani, P.E. (305) 470-5343<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer during the Final Design phase of this project. Responsible for design<br />
and implementation of the project’s field exploration and laboratory testing programs. Performed geotechnical<br />
engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of 5 bridge widening/replacements to be founded on driven<br />
piles. The project also includes sheet pile walls, noise barrier walls (along the four ramps) and sign structures. Prepared<br />
the geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for foundation design and construction for bridges,<br />
sheet piles, noise walls and signs. Geotechnical fees were $200,000<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
and Materials Testing Services<br />
(1) Firm Name<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
7<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SW 88 th Street/Kendall Drive On-Ramp to NB SR 874; Miami-Dade County, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
2004-2005 2006-2007<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority<br />
(MDX)<br />
c/o Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson<br />
Salman P.A.<br />
Attn.: Mr. Walfrido Pevida, P.E.<br />
(305) 445-2900<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer during the Final Design phase of this project. Responsible for design<br />
and implementation of the project’s field exploration and laboratory testing programs. Performed geotechnical<br />
engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of a major new bridge to be founded on drilled shafts. The<br />
project also included sheet pile walls, noise barrier walls sign structures and signalized intersections. He prepared the<br />
geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for foundation design and construction for bridges, sheet<br />
piles, noise walls, signs mast arms and roadways. Geotechnical fees were $400,000<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
and Materials Testing Services<br />
(1) Firm Name<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
8<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
NW 74 th Street Interchange at the Homestead Extension of Florida’s Turnpike<br />
(HEFT), Miami-Dade County, FL<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
April 05 – Jan. 06 2008-2011<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
FDOT Turnpike Enterprise<br />
c/o Gannett Fleming, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
(786) 845-9540<br />
Mr. Alina Fernandez, P.E.<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer for this project. Responsible for design and implementation of the project’s field exploration and<br />
laboratory testing programs as well as for the geotechnical engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of 5 bridges. Also, performed<br />
geotechnical engineering evaluations and foundation recommendations for MSE retaining walls, sheet pile walls and signalization structures.<br />
Prepared preliminary and final geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for foundation design and construction for the new<br />
bridges, MSE walls, sheet pile walls and roadways. Geotechnical fees were $380,000<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
and Materials Testing Services<br />
(1) Firm Name<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S<br />
QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT<br />
(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified.<br />
Complete one Section F for each project.)<br />
20, EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER<br />
9<br />
21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED<br />
SR 836 Toll Plaza and Roadway Widening, From NW 87 th to 107 th Avenues, Miami-<br />
Dade County, FL<br />
23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES<br />
CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)<br />
April to Nov., 2005 2006-2007<br />
a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER<br />
Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority<br />
(MDX)<br />
C/o HNTB Corporation<br />
(Mr. Jose de Almagro, P.E.)<br />
(305) 551-8100<br />
24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (<strong>Inc</strong>lude scope, size, and cost)<br />
Geotechnical project manager and senior engineer for this project. Responsible for design and implementation of the project’s field exploration and<br />
laboratory testing programs as well as for the geotechnical engineering analyses and design for foundation elements of toll plaza buildings,<br />
canopies, sign structures and roadways. Prepared preliminary and final geotechnical engineering reports containing recommendations for<br />
foundation design and construction for the structures and roadways. Geotechnical fees were $135,000<br />
25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT<br />
a.<br />
b.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
GEOSOL, INC.<br />
5795-A NW 151 st Street<br />
Prime Consultant. Performed Geotechnical,<br />
Miami Lakes, FL 33014<br />
and Materials Testing Services<br />
(1) Firm Name<br />
c.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
d.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
e.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
f.<br />
(1) Firm Name (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3
G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS<br />
26. NAMES OF KEY<br />
PERSONNEL<br />
(From Section E, Block<br />
12)<br />
Oracio Riccobono, P.E<br />
27. ROLE IN THIS<br />
CONTRACT<br />
(From Section E,<br />
Block 13)<br />
Sr. Geotech Engineer<br />
28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F<br />
(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completing table. Place “X”<br />
under project key number for participation in same or similar role.)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
X X X X X X X X X<br />
29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY<br />
NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F)<br />
1<br />
Areawide and Districtwide Geotechnical Consultant, FDOT<br />
SR 826 and NW 8<br />
6<br />
Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County,<br />
Districts 4 and 6, from Monroe to Osceola Counties<br />
FL<br />
2<br />
NE 2 nd Avenue Improvements, From NE 20 Th to NE 87 th SW 88<br />
7<br />
Street/Kendall Drive On-Ramp to NB SR 874; Miami-<br />
Streets, City of Miami, FL<br />
Dade County, FL<br />
3<br />
SR-5/Byscayne Blvd. Improvements, From NE 14 th to NE 38 th NW 74<br />
8<br />
Street Interchange at the Homestead Extension of<br />
Streets, Miami-Dade County, FL<br />
Florida’s Turnpike (HEFT), Miami-Dade County, FL<br />
4<br />
SR 836 Extension, From NW 107 th to NW 137 th Avenues, SR 836 Toll Plaza and Roadway Widening, From NW 87<br />
9<br />
to<br />
Miami-Dade County, FL<br />
107 th Avenues, Miami-Dade County, FL<br />
5<br />
SR 826 and NW 36 th Street Interchange, Miami-Dade County,<br />
FL<br />
10<br />
2 7<br />
3 8<br />
4 9<br />
5 10<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 4
H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION<br />
30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.<br />
I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The foregoing is a statement of facts.<br />
31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE<br />
33. NAME AND TITLE<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 5
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS<br />
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER (If any)<br />
RFQ 2012-10<br />
PART II – GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS<br />
(If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.)<br />
2a. FIRM (or branch office) NAME 3. YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. DUNS NUMBER<br />
GEOSOL, INC. 2000<br />
2b. STREET<br />
5. OWNERSHIP<br />
5795-A NW 151 ST Street a. TYPE<br />
2c. CITY 2d. STATE 2e. ZIP CODE Corporation<br />
Miami Lakes FL 33014 b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS<br />
6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE FDOT Certified DBE<br />
Oracio Riccobono, P.E.<br />
6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS N/A<br />
(305) 828-4367 Geosolusa@bellsouth.net<br />
7. NAME OF FIRM (if block 2a is a branch office)<br />
8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (if any) 8b. YR. ESTABLISHED 8c. DUNS NUMBER<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
a. Function<br />
Code<br />
9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE<br />
b. Discipline<br />
c. No. of employees a.<br />
(1)<br />
FIRM<br />
(2)<br />
BRANCH<br />
Profile<br />
Code<br />
10. PROFILE OF FIRM’S EXPERIENCE AND<br />
ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS<br />
b. Experience<br />
Administrative 1 27 Geotechnical Services in 2011 6<br />
Civil Engineers 3 27 Geotechnical Services in 2010 6<br />
Soils Engineers 2 27 Geotechnical Services in 2009 6<br />
<strong>Engineering</strong> Technicians 5 27 Geotechnical Services in 2008 6<br />
Draftmen 1 27 Geotechnical Services in 2007 5<br />
Geotechnical Services in 2006 5<br />
Geotechnical Services in 2005 5<br />
Geotechnical Services in 2004 5<br />
Geotechnical Services in 2003 4<br />
Geotechnical Services in 2002 4<br />
Geotechnical Services in 2001 3<br />
c. Revenue<br />
Index Number<br />
(see below)<br />
Other Employees<br />
Total 12<br />
11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL<br />
SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM<br />
FOR LAST 3 YEARS<br />
(insert revenue index number shown at right)<br />
a. Federal Work<br />
B. Non-Federal Work $1,500,000<br />
c. Total Work $1,500,000<br />
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER<br />
1. Less than $100,000<br />
2. $100,000 to less that $250,000<br />
3. $250,000 to less than $500,000<br />
4. $500,000 to less than $1 million<br />
5. $1 million to less than $2 million<br />
12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE<br />
The foregoing is a statement of facts.<br />
6. $2 million to less than $5 million<br />
7. $5 million to less than $10 million<br />
8. $10 million to less than $25 million<br />
9. $25 million to less than $50 million<br />
10. $50 million or greater<br />
a. SIGNATURE b. DATE<br />
5/30/12<br />
c. NAME AND TITLE<br />
Oracio Riccobono, P.E.<br />
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION<br />
MANDATORY USE DATE OF FORM 5/1/2004<br />
STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 6