07.07.2014 Views

Household Metabolism in the Five Cities.

Household Metabolism in the Five Cities.

Household Metabolism in the Five Cities.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Household</strong> <strong>Metabolism</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Five</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>.<br />

Swedish National Report-Stockholm.<br />

Annika Carlsson-Kanyama and Rebecka Karlsson<br />

Environmental Strategies Research Group/FOI<br />

Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Henri Moll and Rixt Kok<br />

IVEM<br />

University of Gron<strong>in</strong>gen<br />

The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

With contributions from Anders Wadeskog<br />

Statistics Sweden<br />

Fms-Report 177, September 2002


Fms report 177 September 2002<br />

<strong>Household</strong> <strong>Metabolism</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Five</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>.<br />

Swedish National Report-Stockholm.<br />

Annika Carlsson-Kanyama and Rebecka Karlsson<br />

Environmental Strategies Research Group/FOI<br />

Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Henri Moll and Rixt Kok<br />

IVEM<br />

University of Gron<strong>in</strong>gen<br />

The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

With contributions from Anders Wadeskog<br />

Statistics Sweden<br />

Deliverable No. 8<br />

ToolSust is a part of<br />

Key Action 4 "City of<br />

Tomorrow and Cultural<br />

Heritage" from<br />

<strong>the</strong> programme "Energy,<br />

Environment<br />

and Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development"<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Fifth Framework Programme<br />

of <strong>the</strong> EU.<br />

S T O C K H O L M S U N I V E R S I T E T / S Y S T E M E K O L O G I O C H F O I<br />

fms 08-402 38 00 Besöksadress:<br />

Box 2142 08-402 38 01 (fax) Lilla Nygatan 1<br />

103 14 Stockholm Gamla Stan


ISSN 1404-6520<br />

Fms homepage: www.fms.ecology.su.se<br />

S T O C K H O L M S U N I V E R S I T E T / S Y S T E M E K O L O G I O C H F O I<br />

fms 08-402 38 00 Besöksadress:<br />

Box 2142 08-402 38 01 (fax) Lilla Nygatan 1<br />

103 14 Stockholm Gamla Stan


1 Preface<br />

This is a national city report of Sweden where we present <strong>the</strong> Swedish results of <strong>the</strong><br />

second research step of <strong>the</strong> ToolSust project, The <strong>in</strong>volvement of stakeholders to<br />

develop and implement tools for susta<strong>in</strong>able households <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> city of tomorrow.<br />

ToolSust was developed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fifth framework program of <strong>the</strong> EU, as a part of<br />

Energy, Environment and Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development, Key action 4: City of Tomorrow<br />

and Cultural Heritage, 4.1.2 Improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> quality of Urban life.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> aim of <strong>the</strong> second research step is to estimate <strong>the</strong> total primary energy<br />

requirements of various household types <strong>in</strong> some European cities. This research step<br />

builds upon <strong>the</strong> notion that at <strong>the</strong> city level, <strong>in</strong>dividual consumers and household<br />

activities play an important role as far as susta<strong>in</strong>able development strategies are<br />

concerned. The total (direct and <strong>in</strong>direct) energy demand of households presents a<br />

useful proxy for environmental pressure related to household consumption <strong>in</strong> our city.<br />

The direct energy demand refers to <strong>the</strong> use of energy carriers that are literally<br />

consumed by households (district heat<strong>in</strong>g or oil for warm<strong>in</strong>g flats and water,<br />

electricity and motor fuels). The <strong>in</strong>direct energy demand refers to <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

embodied <strong>in</strong> consumer items. Account<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct energy demand implies<br />

calculation of <strong>the</strong> energy requirements for <strong>the</strong> production and distribution activities <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> production-consumption cha<strong>in</strong> of consumer items.<br />

The calculation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct energy requirements is based upon a method developed<br />

at <strong>the</strong> Center for Energy and Environmental Studies (IVEM) of <strong>the</strong> University of<br />

Gron<strong>in</strong>gen, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands. The energy data are calculated us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Energy Analys<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Program EAP, available at IVEM. Especially for this project <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al Dutch<br />

database was adjusted for <strong>the</strong> Swedish situation. Swedish data were used as much<br />

possible to build up a Swedish database. The <strong>in</strong>direct energy requirements of a<br />

household are calculated by l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> energy data with household expenditure data.<br />

Although data availability did not allow us to fully represent <strong>the</strong> Swedish context <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> databases, this research yields a unique tool for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> knowledge of <strong>the</strong><br />

energy consumption by households <strong>in</strong> Södermalm/Stockholm and <strong>in</strong> Sweden as a<br />

whole.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> energy values presented <strong>in</strong> this study can only be <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicative<br />

estimates of <strong>the</strong> energy budgets of different household types <strong>in</strong> Stockholm we<br />

consider <strong>the</strong>se results to be very useful for <strong>the</strong> design of different sets of change<br />

options for more susta<strong>in</strong>able consumption patterns <strong>in</strong> this city.<br />

We would like to thank all participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ToolSust project for <strong>the</strong>ir contributions<br />

as well as our colleagues Mattias Höjer and Per Bolund for valuable discussions and<br />

help. The project was f<strong>in</strong>anced by <strong>the</strong> European Commission, <strong>the</strong> Swedish Environmental<br />

Protection Agency and <strong>the</strong> Swedish Research Council for Environment,<br />

Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3


2 Summary<br />

The study present results from a European project, ToolSust, <strong>in</strong> which direct and<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct energy use of household consumption is quantified. The focus is on<br />

households <strong>in</strong> Stockholm and how <strong>the</strong>ir spend<strong>in</strong>g contributes to energy use. A Dutch<br />

energy analyses programme, EAP, was modified to portray Swedish conditions, and<br />

analyses of more than 300 consumer goods were performed. These data were matched<br />

with <strong>in</strong>formation about family expenditure patterns from 1996. Six households were<br />

analysed, Swedish average, Stockholm City average and four households from<br />

Stockholm City.<br />

The results show that it is possible to portray households’ total energy use, even <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>direct one, with <strong>the</strong> help of <strong>the</strong> EAP programme and Swedish statistics. Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct energy use may account for more than half of households total energy use and<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore it needs to be considered <strong>in</strong> policy mak<strong>in</strong>g. The total primary energy use for<br />

<strong>the</strong> average households varied from 240 to 260 GJ dur<strong>in</strong>g 1996. Heat<strong>in</strong>g, food and<br />

transportation were large contributors. The energy efficiency of total household<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>gs varied from 8.8 MJ per Euro 13 MJ per Euro. Information about <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

efficiency on spend<strong>in</strong>gs is valuable but cannot be presented and used without<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g basic needs and quality of life. The total energy use per person varied<br />

from 50 to 350 GJ per year, a difference of factor seven. The analyses of energy<br />

efficiency of spend<strong>in</strong>gs, MJ per SEK, <strong>in</strong>dicate important opportunities for less energy<br />

demand<strong>in</strong>g spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns, but those with low <strong>in</strong>comes have fewer opportunties<br />

than those with high <strong>in</strong>comes. The energy profiles for different households show that<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual ones may differ a lot from <strong>the</strong> average picture. There is a need for<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual household advice about how to f<strong>in</strong>d more energy efficient spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

patterns. Large cuts <strong>in</strong> household energy use means substantial changes <strong>in</strong> both<br />

energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of goods and services and expenditure profiles. Expenditure levels<br />

should also be questioned.<br />

4


Contents<br />

1 Preface............................................................................................................... 3<br />

2 Summary ........................................................................................................... 4<br />

3 Introduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> household metabolism concept .................................................. 6<br />

3.1 Introduction................................................................................................ 6<br />

A brief reader’s guide to <strong>the</strong> report..................................................................... 6<br />

3.2 <strong>Household</strong> consumption and environmental impacts .................................. 7<br />

3.3 A brief <strong>in</strong>troduction to <strong>the</strong> household metabolism concept.......................... 7<br />

3.4 The metabolism concept applied to households .......................................... 8<br />

3.5 <strong>Household</strong> metabolism and susta<strong>in</strong>able cities ............................................. 9<br />

3.6 <strong>Household</strong> metabolism: focus on energy .................................................. 10<br />

4. Method ............................................................................................................ 10<br />

4.1 A brief <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong> Energy Analysis ................................................... 10<br />

4.2 The orig<strong>in</strong>al EAP model as a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t............................................... 12<br />

The EAP database............................................................................................ 12<br />

4.3 Non-Eap analyses..................................................................................... 16<br />

5 Data for <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP, version 1.0 and <strong>the</strong> analyses................................... 16<br />

5.1 Introduction.............................................................................................. 16<br />

5.2 Databases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP, version 1.0 .............................................. 16<br />

ERE values and conversion rates...................................................................... 16<br />

Input-output sectors ......................................................................................... 17<br />

Basic goods...................................................................................................... 18<br />

Packag<strong>in</strong>g materials ......................................................................................... 18<br />

Manufacturers.................................................................................................. 18<br />

Transport ......................................................................................................... 18<br />

Trade and Services........................................................................................... 19<br />

Direct Consumption......................................................................................... 19<br />

Waste Process<strong>in</strong>g ............................................................................................. 19<br />

5.3 Data for <strong>the</strong> EAP analyses ........................................................................ 19<br />

The Swedish Family Expenditure Survey 1996 ................................................ 19<br />

Consumer prices and consumer taxes............................................................... 20<br />

Transportation distances and modes ................................................................. 21<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r assumptions............................................................................................ 22<br />

5.4 Data for analyses made partly outside EAP .............................................. 22<br />

5.5 Demographic data and <strong>the</strong> types of households selected for <strong>the</strong> analyses .. 23<br />

6 Direct energy use of households....................................................................... 25<br />

7 Indirect energy use of households. ................................................................... 28<br />

7.1 <strong>Household</strong> expenditures ........................................................................... 28<br />

7.2 How many items do <strong>the</strong> households buy? ................................................. 30<br />

5.3 Indirect energy profiles .................................................................................. 30<br />

8 Total energy use <strong>in</strong> households ........................................................................ 33<br />

9 Discussion and conclusion ............................................................................... 37<br />

9.1 Discussion................................................................................................ 37<br />

Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties.................................................................................................... 37<br />

Total energy use versus spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity....................................................... 38<br />

9.2 Conclusions.............................................................................................. 41<br />

References............................................................................................................... 43<br />

Appendix 1-8…………………………………………………………………………46<br />

5


3 Introduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> household metabolism concept<br />

3.1 Introduction<br />

Nearly anyone is familiar with <strong>the</strong> household concept as a ‘housekeep<strong>in</strong>g’ unit <strong>in</strong><br />

which <strong>in</strong>dividuals are and <strong>in</strong>teract with each o<strong>the</strong>r. Yet this familiarity is not widely<br />

reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific and political attention given to households as an important<br />

socio-economic sector with its associated environmental impacts. By spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>in</strong>come, modern households consume a complex and ever chang<strong>in</strong>g mix of goods and<br />

services. The environmental load<strong>in</strong>g associated with <strong>the</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g of household<br />

<strong>in</strong>come differs per consumer item. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> environmental effects of<br />

consumer activities are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> way households spend <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>come. In this<br />

report, <strong>the</strong> environmental consequences of household consumption are calculated <strong>in</strong><br />

energy terms. A dist<strong>in</strong>ction is made between direct energy and <strong>in</strong>direct energy use.<br />

Insight on <strong>the</strong> total energy use of households offers <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong> how to direct <strong>the</strong><br />

present day consumption patterns <strong>in</strong>to more environmentally sound directions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

future, <strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong> short term and <strong>the</strong> longer term.<br />

A brief reader’s guide to <strong>the</strong> report<br />

In <strong>the</strong> second phase of <strong>the</strong> ToolSust project (WP2) <strong>the</strong> concept of household<br />

metabolism is applied to enhance <strong>the</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> environmental impact of<br />

household consumption <strong>in</strong> Stockholm. The primary results are presented <strong>in</strong> this report<br />

(Deliverable 8).<br />

In chapter 1 we briefly present <strong>the</strong> concept of household metabolism as a metaphor to<br />

study <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegral pattern of natural resource flows <strong>in</strong>to and out of households <strong>in</strong><br />

Stockholm. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>the</strong> full range of natural resources, we<br />

focus on <strong>the</strong> use of energy by households. By do<strong>in</strong>g so we make a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between<br />

direct and <strong>in</strong>direct energy use. These concepts are <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> chapter 1.<br />

In chapter 2 we present <strong>the</strong> method to calculate <strong>the</strong> total energy budgets of households<br />

<strong>in</strong> Stockholm. The application of <strong>the</strong> method depends heavily on <strong>the</strong> availability of<br />

statistical data of <strong>the</strong> energy use and <strong>the</strong> production <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic sectors and of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on household budget spend<strong>in</strong>g. In chapter 2 we also discuss <strong>in</strong> general <strong>the</strong><br />

databases required to calculate <strong>the</strong> direct and <strong>in</strong>direct energy requirements of<br />

households. Chapter 3 presents <strong>the</strong> available data for Sweden and Stockholm. The<br />

direct energy requirements of households, both at <strong>the</strong> more aggregate national level<br />

and <strong>the</strong> city level are presented <strong>in</strong> chapter 4. In chapter 5 we present and discuss <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>direct energy requirements of households and different consumption categories. In<br />

chapter 6 <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> chapters 5 and 6 are comb<strong>in</strong>ed to calculate <strong>the</strong> total energy<br />

budgets of households <strong>in</strong> Stockholm. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> chapter 7 we discuss how <strong>the</strong> results<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study can contribute to compos<strong>in</strong>g short term and longer-term<br />

outlooks on possible transition routes <strong>in</strong> terms of chang<strong>in</strong>g direct and <strong>in</strong>direct<br />

household energy requirements.<br />

6


3.2 <strong>Household</strong> consumption and environmental impacts<br />

Many European economies are characterised by <strong>the</strong> simultaneously occurr<strong>in</strong>g trends<br />

of sharply <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g household numbers and slow-grow<strong>in</strong>g populations. These<br />

processes have important implications for <strong>the</strong> direct and <strong>in</strong>direct use of resources by<br />

households. The total demand for natural resources is not only determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong><br />

number of households and <strong>the</strong>ir average size but also by <strong>the</strong> consumption per<br />

household and <strong>the</strong> material and energy efficiency of consumption and production<br />

processes. The latter, <strong>in</strong> turn, is not only a function of biophysical, technological,<br />

spatial and economic aspects, but also of consumer behavioural aspects, social<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative policy measures.<br />

Our ma<strong>in</strong> focus, <strong>the</strong>refore, is on consumers and household consumption <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> city. It<br />

is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly recognized that when aim<strong>in</strong>g at redirect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> present consumption<br />

and production patterns <strong>in</strong> a more susta<strong>in</strong>able direction, cities play an important role.<br />

Urbanization rates show a steady <strong>in</strong>crease all over Europe, whereas at <strong>the</strong> same time<br />

pollution, noise, poor environmental quality and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand for energy<br />

endanger susta<strong>in</strong>able development of <strong>the</strong> cities and <strong>the</strong> quality of life of those liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

today’s cities. City planners, toge<strong>the</strong>r with a wide variety of stakeholders, launch a lot<br />

of new <strong>in</strong>itiatives to deal with <strong>the</strong> environmental problems that go along with<br />

urbanization.<br />

<strong>Cities</strong> can be regarded as resource consum<strong>in</strong>g systems. Only <strong>in</strong> recent decades it has<br />

become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly recognised that parallel to <strong>the</strong> wide range of activities tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

place on <strong>the</strong> production side of <strong>the</strong> economy, a society also consists of a large and<br />

rapidly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of households characterized by different lifestyles. Most of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se households live <strong>in</strong> urban areas. This has led to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight that households and<br />

lifestyles are <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g concepts for assess<strong>in</strong>g and explor<strong>in</strong>g routes to <strong>the</strong> required<br />

reduction of <strong>the</strong> long-term environmental impacts of <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed effects of<br />

consumption and production. The household metabolism metaphor is <strong>in</strong>troduced to<br />

study <strong>the</strong> natural resource consumption of households and <strong>the</strong> associated<br />

environmental aspects.<br />

3.3 A brief <strong>in</strong>troduction to <strong>the</strong> household metabolism concept<br />

In ecological science, metabolism refers to <strong>the</strong> material cycles and energy flows that<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> viability and cont<strong>in</strong>uation of organism-environment <strong>in</strong>teractions. In<br />

natural systems, waste produced by one organism is food for ano<strong>the</strong>r. The application<br />

of metabolism as a metaphor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ToolSust project stresses <strong>the</strong> fact that human<br />

societies use large amounts of materials and energy <strong>in</strong> ways analogous to s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

organisms and communities of organisms. Just like natural systems, <strong>the</strong> physical basis<br />

of mank<strong>in</strong>d’s economy is also dependent on <strong>the</strong> extraction and <strong>the</strong> conversion of raw<br />

resources <strong>in</strong>to useful products by means of energy. And just as <strong>in</strong> natural systems,<br />

<strong>the</strong>se processes affect <strong>the</strong> quality of our natural surround<strong>in</strong>gs. It is not just dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

production and consumption phase of <strong>the</strong> life cycle of products that environmental<br />

effects occur. After consum<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> products or <strong>the</strong> services related to <strong>the</strong>se products,<br />

waste residues are returned to <strong>the</strong> natural environment. The result<strong>in</strong>g material flows <strong>in</strong><br />

human societies should preferably occur <strong>in</strong> “closed” cycles, just as <strong>in</strong> communities of<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r organisms <strong>in</strong> nature. Mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> metabolism concept operational at <strong>the</strong> city<br />

7


level implies <strong>the</strong> design of metabolic models that describe <strong>the</strong> flows of materials and<br />

energy related to <strong>the</strong> services delivered. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, such models can be used to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> associated environmental impact and to predict some of <strong>the</strong><br />

consequences of social and technological development (Moll, 1993).<br />

3.4 The metabolism concept applied to households<br />

Nowadays, similarities are be<strong>in</strong>g recognised between <strong>the</strong> production side of <strong>the</strong><br />

economy, which consists of a broad range of activities, and society which consists of<br />

a large (and rapidly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g) number of households characterised by different lifestyles.<br />

It is acknowledged that households and lifestyle are <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g concepts for<br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g and explor<strong>in</strong>g routes to <strong>the</strong> required reduction of <strong>the</strong> (long-term)<br />

environmental impacts of <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed effects of production and consumption<br />

activities that take place with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy (Duch<strong>in</strong>, 1995; IIASA, 1990).<br />

Consumer activities, centred on households, can be l<strong>in</strong>ked to patterns of <strong>in</strong>puts and<br />

outputs of <strong>the</strong> economy and, thus, to <strong>the</strong> associated environmental effects of economic<br />

activities. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> major part of consumer activities takes place with<strong>in</strong> households,<br />

households ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong>dividual consumers determ<strong>in</strong>e a large part of resource<br />

consumption. The term “household metabolism” refers both to <strong>the</strong> demand for<br />

resources, i.e., <strong>the</strong> direct flows of resources through households, and to <strong>the</strong> supply of<br />

resources, i.e., <strong>the</strong> materials and energy <strong>in</strong>directly required to realise <strong>the</strong>se flows (e.g.<br />

<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, production of materials, construction of houses, and manufactur<strong>in</strong>g goods).<br />

Natural system<br />

Natural resources<br />

Man-made system<br />

Production of goods<br />

and services<br />

Energy supply<br />

City level<br />

Waste<br />

management<br />

Waste residues<br />

Figure 1.1: <strong>Household</strong> metabolism at <strong>the</strong> city level<br />

8


This is shown <strong>in</strong> figure 1.1. By adopt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> household metabolism metaphor, a<br />

picture is obta<strong>in</strong>ed that relates <strong>the</strong> use of natural resources to <strong>the</strong> very basis of<br />

economic activity: consumption <strong>in</strong> households. Measur<strong>in</strong>g household consumption<br />

patterns as a way of understand<strong>in</strong>g how to direct <strong>the</strong>m towards environmentally<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able goals requires <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> mechanics of household metabolism.<br />

3.5 <strong>Household</strong> metabolism and susta<strong>in</strong>able cities<br />

When aim<strong>in</strong>g at redirect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> present consumption and production patterns <strong>in</strong> a<br />

more susta<strong>in</strong>able direction cities play an important role. For many people <strong>the</strong> city is<br />

<strong>the</strong> place were <strong>the</strong>y live, work and build up a social network. <strong>Cities</strong> often are <strong>the</strong><br />

economic, social-cultural and political heart of society. Modern cities face many<br />

challenges when it comes to balanc<strong>in</strong>g environmental (urban) quality and<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability with modern city life.<br />

When look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> options for cities to become more susta<strong>in</strong>able, focuss<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong><br />

role of consumers seems a good start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t. Although cities show a great diversity,<br />

and every city is characterized by its own specific features, <strong>the</strong>y share one common<br />

characterstic: <strong>the</strong> presence of citizens. S<strong>in</strong>ce all citizens are consumers, consumption<br />

turns out to be an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g concept for assess<strong>in</strong>g and explor<strong>in</strong>g routes to <strong>the</strong><br />

required reduction of <strong>the</strong> long-term environmental impacts <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability strategies.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r reason for focuss<strong>in</strong>g on household consumption is <strong>the</strong> recognition that<br />

consumers play a key role <strong>in</strong> our modern market economy. Consumers’ preferences<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e, to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent, producers’ actions. The products demanded by <strong>the</strong><br />

consumer are produced and offered at a price that <strong>the</strong> consumer is will<strong>in</strong>g to pay.<br />

Clearly, it is not just <strong>the</strong> consumers who rule <strong>the</strong> market. Consumers, producers and<br />

retailers mutually affect each o<strong>the</strong>r. Insight <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>se processes at <strong>the</strong> city level seems<br />

a good start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t when search<strong>in</strong>g for susta<strong>in</strong>ability strategies. From <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

paragraph it can be concluded that strategies aimed at reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> environmental<br />

impact of consumption activities should ultimately embrace <strong>the</strong> entire lifecycle of<br />

consumer goods and services. We draw <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e at those aspects of environmental<br />

pressure that take place dur<strong>in</strong>g and as a result of <strong>the</strong> consumption itself at <strong>the</strong> city level.<br />

The different phases and activities regard<strong>in</strong>g production and consumption are<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> figure 1.2. Four different activities at <strong>the</strong> city level are dist<strong>in</strong>guished:<br />

distribution, purchase, use and discard<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

extraction<br />

of raw<br />

materials<br />

Production distribution purchase use Discard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

waste<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

recycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 1.2: Production and consumption activities <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> city level<br />

9


3.6 <strong>Household</strong> metabolism: focus on energy<br />

In order to illustrate <strong>the</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g rates of household metabolism <strong>in</strong> Stockholm, this<br />

study focuses on patterns of household energy use ra<strong>the</strong>r than tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>the</strong><br />

full range of natural resources used <strong>in</strong> production and consumption processes.<br />

<strong>Household</strong> energy consumption is usually taken to comprise that fraction of <strong>the</strong><br />

national energy consumption that is literally consumed <strong>in</strong> (electricity, natural gas, etc)<br />

or via (car fuels) households (i.e. direct energy consumption). Typical OECD values<br />

range from 15 to 20 % of total energy consumption. However, households also use<br />

energy <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>direct way. They purchase goods and services delivered by <strong>the</strong><br />

production sectors. The energy directly used for produc<strong>in</strong>g consumer items and<br />

services can be considered as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct energy consumption of households. We<br />

proceed from this perspective and assume that <strong>the</strong> economy is based on <strong>the</strong> production<br />

of goods and services on behalf of household consumption, and that <strong>the</strong> total energy<br />

consumption can be assigned to households (tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account import and export).<br />

In various studies, it was demonstrated that 60-70% of <strong>the</strong> total energy consumption is<br />

directly or <strong>in</strong>directly consumed by households (Wilt<strong>in</strong>g, 1996). Government spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

related to taxes consumes <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g energy. The total energy consumption has<br />

been calculated as a function of household expenditures. This generates <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to<br />

<strong>the</strong> relationships between household spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns and <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong>se,<br />

counted as energy consumption. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> approach reflects <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terdependency between <strong>in</strong>dustrial metabolism and household metabolism as<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> figure 1.1. Metabolic changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> production processes of consumer<br />

items might have significant impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct household energy use, but on <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r hand chang<strong>in</strong>g consumption patterns has its effect on <strong>the</strong> structure of production<br />

side of <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

The method we used to calculate <strong>the</strong> total household energy requirements is presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> chapter 2.<br />

4. Method<br />

4.1 A brief <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong> Energy Analysis<br />

The energy requirements of households are determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g methods of energy<br />

analysis. Energy analysis considers <strong>the</strong> use of energy throughout <strong>the</strong> entire production<br />

and consumption cha<strong>in</strong> (life cycle) of products. Energy requirements are expressed <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of primary energy, i.e., energy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>in</strong> which it appears <strong>in</strong> nature. Thus, if<br />

a process uses electricity, <strong>the</strong> energy used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> production and distribution of <strong>the</strong><br />

electricity is also taken <strong>in</strong>to account, e.g., <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> extraction, transport and combustion<br />

of coal. Energy analyses can be carried out from both technical (process analysis) and<br />

economic (<strong>in</strong>put-output analysis) po<strong>in</strong>ts of view.<br />

Process analysis starts from a description <strong>in</strong> physical terms of <strong>the</strong> life cycle of a<br />

product. The energy used <strong>in</strong> different processes is determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> detail. For example,<br />

<strong>the</strong> energy used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bakery, on <strong>the</strong> farm, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fertilizer plant contributes to <strong>the</strong><br />

energy requirements of a loaf of bread. So process analysis is an accurate but<br />

laborious method.<br />

10


Input-output analysis, which has its orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> economics, is based on <strong>in</strong>put-output<br />

tables. An <strong>in</strong>put-output table of an economy conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> transactions between<br />

economic sectors <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial units. Input-output tables conta<strong>in</strong> only <strong>the</strong> direct<br />

transactions between economic sectors, but <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct deliveries between sectors can<br />

be determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g a ma<strong>the</strong>matical formula. In <strong>the</strong> example of <strong>the</strong> loaf of bread, <strong>the</strong><br />

deliveries of <strong>the</strong> fertilizer plant and agriculture are <strong>in</strong>direct deliveries to <strong>the</strong> bakery.<br />

The energy requirements of <strong>the</strong> bakery are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

data on <strong>the</strong> (direct and <strong>in</strong>direct) deliveries to <strong>the</strong> bakery with data on energy use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

economic sector. Input-output analysis is a rapid method of calculation, but is less<br />

detailed due to <strong>the</strong> use of aggregated data <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>put-output tables. The bakery, for<br />

example, belongs to <strong>the</strong> flour-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, which also produces biscuits.<br />

A comb<strong>in</strong>ation of elements of process analysis and <strong>in</strong>put-output analysis results <strong>in</strong> a<br />

so-called hybrid analysis, which builds on <strong>the</strong> advantages of both methods. The<br />

essence of <strong>the</strong> methodology used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ToolSust project is <strong>the</strong> projection of <strong>the</strong> total<br />

energy consumption (<strong>in</strong> production, distribution and consumption) on behalf of<br />

household consumption on desegregated household budget spend<strong>in</strong>g categories. This<br />

generates <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> relationship of household spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns and <strong>the</strong> effects<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se (counted as energy consumption). The energy requirement of a specific<br />

household budget category thus conta<strong>in</strong>s a so-called direct part (energy consumed<br />

directly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> household for this purpose) and an <strong>in</strong>direct part (account<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong><br />

energy consumption <strong>in</strong> production and service sectors). The relationship of<br />

consumption of goods and services versus energy requirements can only be<br />

established <strong>in</strong>directly. <strong>Household</strong> consumption must first be split <strong>in</strong>to patterns of<br />

household consumption activities (e.g. vacation, private transport). Next, such<br />

activities need to be translated <strong>in</strong>to energy terms, after which <strong>the</strong> direct and <strong>in</strong>direct<br />

energy requirements of <strong>the</strong>se activities can be established.<br />

The methodology for <strong>the</strong> assessment of energy requirements and <strong>in</strong>tensities is<br />

outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> figure 2.1. It requires reliable statistical data concern<strong>in</strong>g energy production<br />

and consumption, economic <strong>in</strong>put-output matrices, household budget surveys and<br />

goods and services price <strong>in</strong>formation (that are only rarely available <strong>in</strong> a highresolution,<br />

and compatible form).<br />

11


Economic<br />

I-O data<br />

Energy Statistics<br />

Budget Surveys<br />

I-O Energy<br />

Analysis<br />

Process Analysis<br />

Energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of<br />

Production sectors<br />

Energy Contents<br />

of materials<br />

EAP: LCA of goods and services<br />

prices Energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of goods and services Budget spend<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Energy requirement and <strong>in</strong>tensity of<br />

<strong>Household</strong> Budget Spend<strong>in</strong>g Categories<br />

Figure 2.1: Flowchart of <strong>the</strong> methodology for calculat<strong>in</strong>g energy parameters of<br />

budget spend<strong>in</strong>g categories.<br />

Figure 2.1 illustrates that a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of economic <strong>in</strong>put-output data and energy<br />

statistics delivers data concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of (about 60 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong><br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands) production sectors by means of <strong>in</strong>put-output energy analysis techniques<br />

(Van Engelenburg et al., 1991; Wilt<strong>in</strong>g, 1996; Wilt<strong>in</strong>g et al., 1994). Energy analysis is<br />

used to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of a range of basic materials (over 100)<br />

frequently used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> delivery and consumption of goods and services. Both data sets<br />

are used <strong>in</strong> a simplified Life Cycle Analysis of goods and services pert<strong>in</strong>ent to <strong>the</strong><br />

categories of <strong>the</strong> budget spend<strong>in</strong>g surveys. The LCA results are calculated and stored<br />

by a software program EAP (Wilt<strong>in</strong>g et al., 1995). The EAP results lead to evaluation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> energy requirements of goods and services.<br />

4.2 The orig<strong>in</strong>al EAP model as a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

To calculate <strong>the</strong> energy requirements of <strong>the</strong> consumer goods and services, <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

EAP model was used as a default. It is beyond <strong>the</strong> scope of this study to give a full<br />

description of <strong>the</strong> EAP model. For a detailed description <strong>the</strong> reader is referred to<br />

Wilt<strong>in</strong>g (1996). In this section we only report on <strong>the</strong> adjustments of <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al EAP<br />

model <strong>in</strong> order to make <strong>the</strong> method mean<strong>in</strong>gful for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r European countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Toolsust project.<br />

The EAP database<br />

The EAP model consists of a common database of basic data on <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

requirements of materials, economic sectors, forms of transport, trade and services,<br />

and waste process<strong>in</strong>g. In order to make <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al database mean<strong>in</strong>gful for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

12


countries <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Toolsust project, a number of adjustments were needed.<br />

Chapter 3 gives description of <strong>the</strong> data used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP version.<br />

For each country, <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of <strong>the</strong> production sectors dist<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Input-output table were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g country specific energy data and economic<br />

data. It turned out that data is available <strong>in</strong> different degrees of detail <strong>in</strong> different<br />

countries. The level of detail at which <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities were calculated was<br />

merely determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> availability of energy data. To calculate <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensities per country <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g economic data were used:<br />

• An <strong>in</strong>put-output table with <strong>in</strong>termediate deliveries, <strong>in</strong> basic prices.<br />

• An <strong>in</strong>put-output table with competitive and non-competitive imports.<br />

Competitive imports are imported commodities that are also produced<br />

domestically whereas non-competitive imports are not produced domestically.<br />

• Per sector: total domestic production value.<br />

• Per sector: net value added.<br />

• Per sector: energy prices payed by <strong>the</strong> producers. In some cases due to lack of<br />

data <strong>the</strong> energy price per group of sectors was used.<br />

• Per sector: consumption of fixed capital (depreciation of capital goods).<br />

In addition to economic data, <strong>in</strong>formation on energy consumption per sector, divided<br />

per fuel type, is required to calculate <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put-output sectors.<br />

The energy <strong>in</strong>tensities were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g primary energy terms. The energy<br />

required to produce primary energy and process it <strong>in</strong>to useful fuels or electricity is<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> so-called ERE (Energy Requirement for Energy) value. Except for<br />

electricity, it was assumed that <strong>the</strong> ERE values for fuels were <strong>the</strong> same <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> various<br />

countries. This assumption was not valid for electricity production s<strong>in</strong>ce electricity is<br />

produced <strong>in</strong> different ways <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> different countries us<strong>in</strong>g a various comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

fossil energy, nuclear fuels, and renewable sources.<br />

EAP analyses<br />

Once <strong>the</strong> national database was available, EAP was used to calculate <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensities of consumer items. The selection of relevant consumer goods was merely<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> available household budget surveys. Per country, two important sets of<br />

data were needed:<br />

• Consumer prices<br />

• Expenditure surveys<br />

• The format of <strong>the</strong> various datasets differs per country. The Swedish datasets<br />

will be presented <strong>in</strong> more detail <strong>in</strong> chapter 3.<br />

Taxes (such as motor vehicle taxes) were not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> calculation of <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensities of consumer goods and services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget survey. Spend<strong>in</strong>g on taxes is<br />

viewed as collective spend<strong>in</strong>g and can <strong>the</strong>refore not be ascribed to an <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

household. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore it is very difficult to identify where <strong>the</strong> tax money is spent.<br />

Medical costs (except for medic<strong>in</strong>es directly paid for by households) were also not<br />

13


<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EAP analyses, as medical care is usually paid through <strong>in</strong>surances and<br />

cannot be ascribed to an <strong>in</strong>dividual household.<br />

Per EAP analysis, different types of <strong>in</strong>formation are needed:<br />

• Price <strong>in</strong>formation (i.e. consumer price of <strong>the</strong> product, <strong>in</strong>cl. VAT).<br />

• Composition of <strong>the</strong> product (i.e. type and amount of <strong>the</strong> basic goods and type<br />

and amount of packag<strong>in</strong>g materials).<br />

• The orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong> product (i.e. name of <strong>the</strong> manufacturer, names of <strong>the</strong><br />

wholesale and retail trade and transport distances).<br />

• How <strong>the</strong> consumer product is treated after be<strong>in</strong>g used (i.e. waste process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g recycl<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

Example of a calculation us<strong>in</strong>g EAP<br />

To give a better idea of <strong>the</strong> possibilities and outcome of a general EAP analysis we<br />

present one here. The case of refrigerators and freezers has been elaborated fur<strong>the</strong>r to<br />

give an impression of <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong> EAP model. The example comes from <strong>the</strong><br />

Swedish EAP.<br />

14


Refrigerator<br />

Expenditure<br />

: vk 2352, refrigerators and freezers<br />

Manufacturer sector : manufacturer of domestic appliances<br />

Price <strong>in</strong>cl. Taxes (SEK) : 5671<br />

Unit<br />

: piece,<br />

Number : 1.0<br />

Transport weight (kg) : 69.30<br />

Basic goods kg MJ/kg MJ<br />

Alum<strong>in</strong>ium 2.40 184.93 443.83<br />

Copper (cathodic) 1.80 97.59 175.66<br />

Polystyrene (granules) 9.70 96.05 931.68<br />

PUR 7.30 93.90 685.47<br />

Steel 42.30 43.70 1848.51<br />

Pa<strong>in</strong>t 0.70 51.90 36.33<br />

Packag<strong>in</strong>g Kg MJ/kg MJ<br />

Cardboard (corrugated) 2.60 17.86 46.44<br />

LDPE 0.70 83.41 58.39<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Inputs SEK MJ/SEK MJ<br />

Residual goods 1162.74 0.93 1078.89<br />

Capital goods 120.22 1.00 120.22<br />

Production SEK MJ/SEK MJ<br />

Production 2795.70 0.26 724.09<br />

Transport Km MJ/tonkm MJ<br />

Cargo vessels, large 133.00 0.22 2.03<br />

Heavy lorry with trailer, 40 tons 1745.00 0.72 87.07<br />

Light lorry distribution service 100.00 2.41 16.70<br />

Trade/Services SEK MJ/SEK MJ<br />

Retail trade white goods, audio/visual 1200.36 0.80 960.29<br />

etc.<br />

Wholesale trade electrical domestic 729.77 0.60 437.86<br />

appl. etc.<br />

<strong>Household</strong> (direct) - - -<br />

Waste treatment Kg MJ/kg MJ<br />

Average plastics (<strong>in</strong>cl. transport) 17.70 -14.25 - 252.22<br />

Average residual waste (<strong>in</strong>cl. 28.20 0.09 2.54<br />

transport)<br />

Recycled alum<strong>in</strong>ium 0.89 -158.01 - 140.63<br />

Recycled copper 0.90 -85.59 -77.03<br />

Recycled steel 16.10 -22.96 -369.66<br />

RESULTS<br />

Energy use MJ MJ/SEK MJ/piece<br />

Indirect 6816.45 1.20 6816.45<br />

Direct - - -<br />

Total 6816.45 1.20 6816.45<br />

15


4.3 Non-Eap analyses<br />

Most energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of consumer items were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g EAP. In some cases,<br />

however, energy <strong>in</strong>tensities were calculated <strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r way. For unspecified products<br />

(products for which <strong>the</strong> basic goods could not be identified) and expenditures that<br />

constitute only a very small fraction of <strong>the</strong> total budget spend<strong>in</strong>g, average energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensities were used.<br />

For some items <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget survey EAP could not be used (i.e. holidays, domestic<br />

services, taxi transport etc.) The energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of <strong>the</strong>se items cannot be<br />

standardised. Energy <strong>in</strong>tensities were taken from literature or calculated <strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

way.<br />

5 Data for <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP, version 1.0 and <strong>the</strong> analyses<br />

5.1 Introduction<br />

In chapter 2 <strong>the</strong> EAP model was <strong>in</strong>troduced, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> required data to perform<br />

<strong>the</strong> analyses. In this chapter, <strong>the</strong> data that we used for <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP, version 1.0<br />

and for <strong>the</strong> analyses are presented <strong>in</strong> detail. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> course of search<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong><br />

suitable data, it became apparent that some data was readily available while some<br />

were hard or impossible to f<strong>in</strong>d. Therefore, we had to make some compromises and to<br />

some extent Dutch data has been used also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first Swedish version of EAP.<br />

5.2 Databases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP, version 1.0<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP databases, version 1.0, we used data from 1995, to <strong>the</strong> extent<br />

possible.<br />

ERE values and conversion rates<br />

ERE values (Energy Requirements for Energy) are used for calculat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

energy use from data about <strong>the</strong> direct energy use <strong>in</strong> processes. The Dutch ERE values<br />

for oil, petrol and diesel were used when <strong>the</strong>se fuels were consumed directly by<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries and consumers, as we did not expect any <strong>in</strong>ter-country differences. These<br />

values are 1.11 for oil products, 1.12 for petrol and 1.067 for diesel. The figures<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> energy needed for drill<strong>in</strong>g, extract<strong>in</strong>g and transport<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fuels to where<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are used.<br />

In order to calculate <strong>the</strong> energy content of <strong>the</strong> fuels used for power and heat<br />

generation, <strong>in</strong>formation about conversion rates are needed <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong> ERE<br />

values mentioned above. We calculated a general conversion factor of 2.41 for<br />

electricity generated <strong>in</strong> Sweden (IEA Statistics, 1998). This figure was multiplied<br />

with <strong>the</strong> electricity use <strong>in</strong> order to estimate <strong>the</strong> primary energy use. Electricity <strong>in</strong><br />

Sweden is generated ma<strong>in</strong>ly by nuclear and hydropower, with <strong>the</strong> use of oil and coal<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g heavy demand. When <strong>the</strong> electricity production is apportioned to fuel type, <strong>the</strong><br />

result is as seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.1; almost half of <strong>the</strong> electricity generated comes from<br />

nuclear plants and half from hydropower plants. However, when <strong>the</strong> primary energy<br />

16


use for electricity production is calculated (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ERE value and conversion<br />

losses), <strong>the</strong> result is different, as can be seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.2. More than 70 % of <strong>the</strong><br />

primary energy for electricity production <strong>in</strong> Sweden comes from fuels used <strong>in</strong> nuclear<br />

plants. The ERE value + conversion factor for uranium is 3.4 while <strong>the</strong> same factor<br />

for hydropower is 1. This means that almost all energy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g water can be<br />

converted to electricity while <strong>the</strong> efficiency of convert<strong>in</strong>g uranium to electricity is<br />

much lower (IEA Statistics, 1998).<br />

46%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

3%<br />

coal<br />

petroleum products<br />

nuclear<br />

hydro<br />

waste<br />

47%<br />

Figure 3.1: Electricity generation (output) accord<strong>in</strong>g to fuel type <strong>in</strong> Sweden, 1995<br />

(IEA Statistics, 1998).<br />

75%<br />

21%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

1%<br />

2%<br />

coal<br />

petroleum products<br />

nuclear<br />

hydro<br />

waste<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r renewable<br />

gas<br />

Figure 3.2: Fuels (primary energy) used for electricity generation <strong>in</strong> Sweden,<br />

1995 (IEA Statistics, 1998).<br />

Input-output sectors<br />

Swedish official statistics permit a division of 65 <strong>in</strong>put-output (IO) sectors, listed <strong>in</strong><br />

Appendix 1. Compared to <strong>the</strong> Dutch EAP, version 3.2 with 66 sectors (Kok et al,<br />

2001), <strong>the</strong> Swedish IO sectors are less detailed when it comes to agriculture and food<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g. However, <strong>the</strong> sectors related to chemical and pharmaceutical <strong>in</strong>dustry are<br />

more detailed than <strong>the</strong> Dutch ones. This reflects <strong>the</strong> different economic profiles of <strong>the</strong><br />

two countries. The IO-matrix is used to calculate <strong>the</strong> cumulative energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of<br />

<strong>the</strong> sectors. These cumulative energy <strong>in</strong>tensities are used to calculate <strong>the</strong> energy use<br />

for residual goods.<br />

17


Basic goods<br />

The table Basic Goods <strong>in</strong> EAP has <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> energy content and producer<br />

prices of materials used for fur<strong>the</strong>r process<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>in</strong>dustry. All types of basic goods<br />

also have <strong>the</strong> appropriate number of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put-output sector.<br />

Information about <strong>the</strong> energy content of basic goods (MJ per kg) and producer prices<br />

(SEK per kg) was collected from Swedish sources as far as possible. Life cycle<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory (LCI) data was used for estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> energy content of 75 products from<br />

<strong>the</strong> agriculture and fisheries sectors, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation was ma<strong>in</strong>ly derived from<br />

Carlsson-Kanyama and Faist (2000). The Dutch EAP, version 3.2, conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about energy content of 45 items from <strong>the</strong> same sectors (Kok et al, 2001).<br />

For all o<strong>the</strong>r basic goods we used <strong>the</strong> Dutch default data on energy content as we<br />

thought <strong>the</strong>m appropriate. In total, <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP data-base conta<strong>in</strong>s LCI data<br />

about energy content of 131 items. An additional 10 basic goods have been added to<br />

<strong>the</strong> list after analyses with <strong>the</strong> help of <strong>the</strong> EAP programme itself. Examples of such<br />

goods are butter, cream and oil.<br />

Producer prices were collected from official statistics, ma<strong>in</strong>ly (SCB 1997a,<br />

Jordbruksverket 1996 and 2001, and Sveriges fiskares producentorganisation, 2001).<br />

Producer prices collected by a research team at <strong>the</strong> Spatial Modell<strong>in</strong>g Centre <strong>in</strong><br />

Kiruna were used for a few items. The energy content and prices of <strong>the</strong> basic goods <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP programme are shown <strong>in</strong> Appendix 2.<br />

Packag<strong>in</strong>g materials<br />

The Packag<strong>in</strong>g Materials table <strong>in</strong> EAP has <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> energy content and<br />

<strong>the</strong> producer prices of packag<strong>in</strong>g materials. All types of basic goods also have <strong>the</strong><br />

appropriate number of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put-output sector.<br />

Producer prices for packag<strong>in</strong>g materials (SEK per kg) were collected from SCB<br />

(1997a) apart from polypropene and PET granules where <strong>in</strong>dustry provided <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>formation. We used <strong>the</strong> Dutch default data on energy content of packag<strong>in</strong>g materials<br />

(MJ per kg). Appendix 3 has <strong>in</strong>formation about producer prices and energy content of<br />

packag<strong>in</strong>g materials, <strong>in</strong> total 18 different k<strong>in</strong>ds.<br />

Manufacturers<br />

The Manufacturers table <strong>in</strong> EAP has <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> price that <strong>the</strong><br />

manufacturers <strong>in</strong> different sectors pay for <strong>the</strong>ir energy (SEK per GJ). 65<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sectors were identified from <strong>the</strong> Swedish national accounts. The table<br />

also has <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> direct energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of <strong>the</strong> sectors (MJ per SEK), <strong>the</strong><br />

NACE code for each sector, <strong>the</strong> percentage of net added value (NAV), and <strong>the</strong><br />

depreciation. The entire set of <strong>in</strong>formation for this table comes from <strong>the</strong> Swedish<br />

national accounts (SCB, 2002a). Appendix 4 has all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation from <strong>the</strong><br />

Manufacturers file with <strong>the</strong> appropriate number of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put-output sector. Compared<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Dutch version 3.2 of <strong>the</strong> EAP, <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP has far fewer categories of<br />

manufacturer. In <strong>the</strong> Swedish version, manufacturers are equal to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put output<br />

sectors.<br />

Transport<br />

The Transport table <strong>in</strong> EAP has <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> energy demand for<br />

transportation with different vehicles (MJ per tonne km). 21 modes of transport were<br />

18


identified, rang<strong>in</strong>g from aeroplanes, ships, tra<strong>in</strong>s, lorries and delivery vehicles. All<br />

data for this file came from <strong>the</strong> Swedish based Network for Transport and <strong>the</strong><br />

Environment, NTM (2002). Appendix 5 conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> energy use for different vehicles.<br />

Trade and Services<br />

The Trade and Services table <strong>in</strong> EAP has <strong>in</strong>formation about marg<strong>in</strong>s and cumulative<br />

energy <strong>in</strong>tensities for <strong>the</strong> Trade and Services sectors. Despite substantial efforts and<br />

collaboration with Statistics Sweden we could not identify <strong>the</strong> necessary Swedish data<br />

for this table, so <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP, version 1.0, has Dutch default values only.<br />

Reasons for <strong>the</strong> failure to identify Swedish data are related to differences <strong>in</strong> statistical<br />

procedures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> two countries and also, we believe, a certa<strong>in</strong> extent of confusion<br />

related to language and professional cultures.<br />

Direct Consumption<br />

The Direct Consumption table has not been used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish <strong>in</strong> EAP, version 1.0,<br />

so it is empty. It can, however, easily be complemented with data that makes it<br />

possible to add <strong>the</strong> consumption of e.g. electricity and oil dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> user phase of<br />

products. An example is <strong>the</strong> refrigerator where <strong>the</strong> user phase is represented by <strong>the</strong><br />

electricity required to run it <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> household.<br />

Waste Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The Waste Process<strong>in</strong>g table has <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> energy use or energy recovery<br />

for process<strong>in</strong>g and recycl<strong>in</strong>g of waste (MJ per kg). We found that <strong>the</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

percentages <strong>in</strong> Sweden were similar to those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, so it was not<br />

necessary to change those values for several materials. However, for landfill, and<br />

collect<strong>in</strong>g and transport of waste <strong>the</strong> figures were altered, based on data from IVL<br />

(2001). The value for average residual waste was calculated tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account that<br />

almost all (90%) waste was <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erated with heat exploitation <strong>in</strong> Stockholm <strong>in</strong> 1995<br />

(Renhålln<strong>in</strong>gsförvaltn<strong>in</strong>gen, 2001).<br />

5.3 Data for <strong>the</strong> EAP analyses<br />

Several pieces of <strong>in</strong>formation are needed for analys<strong>in</strong>g products and services <strong>in</strong> EAP:<br />

consumer prices, taxes, transportation distances and <strong>the</strong> amount and types of materials<br />

needed <strong>in</strong> order to manufacture products. The first question is, however, to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

which items to analyse. The aim of <strong>the</strong> ToolSust project is to portray <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

consequences of households’ spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns, so we consulted <strong>the</strong> Swedish family<br />

expenditure survey ,1996, <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e which products to analyse.<br />

The Swedish Family Expenditure Survey 1996<br />

The Swedish Family Expenditure Survey (SCB, 1998) is one of <strong>the</strong> series of studies<br />

on household consumption that have been carried out s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> early 1900. Previous<br />

surveys were carried out <strong>in</strong> 1958, 1969, 1978, 1988, 1992 and 1995. The Family<br />

Expenditure Survey is based on an expenditure diary kept for four weeks by <strong>the</strong><br />

selected households. Food purchases are only recorded dur<strong>in</strong>g two weeks.<br />

Expenditures on petrol, travel outside Sweden, capital goods and second homes are<br />

recorded outside <strong>the</strong> diary and should be representative for a whole year. The 1995<br />

survey was not detailed enough for our purpose, so we used <strong>the</strong> 1996 survey. The total<br />

number of households selected for <strong>the</strong> 1996 survey was 2026 persons, aged 18 to 74<br />

19


years old, and 54 % of <strong>the</strong>m participated (SCB, 1998). We obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> computer file<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g data for all <strong>the</strong>se households from Statistics Sweden and found 85<br />

households who lived <strong>in</strong> Stockholm city.<br />

The categories of <strong>the</strong> Swedish Family Expenditure Survey are presented <strong>in</strong> Appendix<br />

6. All EAP analyses emanate from those categories. In total, <strong>the</strong>re are 298 expenditure<br />

categories: 76 concern<strong>in</strong>g food and dr<strong>in</strong>ks, 15 concern<strong>in</strong>g non-durable goods and 28<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear. Some of <strong>the</strong> expenditure categories are aggregated.<br />

An example is Meal and flour. It is difficult to make an analysis of that category <strong>in</strong><br />

EAP, because it <strong>in</strong>cludes items as different as wheat flour, flour mixes for cakes, rice<br />

and pasta, all with different consumer prices, <strong>in</strong>gredients and transportation distances.<br />

For those aggregated categories, we made several separate analyses <strong>in</strong> EAP.<br />

Information about how much is consumed of each item <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> category was ga<strong>the</strong>red<br />

from trade associations or from <strong>in</strong>formation about import and export (SCB 2002b,<br />

1997a) and domestic production. These data <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> Swedish consumption, which<br />

supposedly does not differ much from <strong>the</strong> consumption <strong>in</strong> Stockholm. For some<br />

categories no data could be found, and <strong>in</strong> those cases an educated guess had to be<br />

made (see Appendix 6).<br />

Some of <strong>the</strong> budget expenditure survey categories are also quite detailed, and for a<br />

number of <strong>the</strong>se categories <strong>the</strong> same analysis could be used. For example this was <strong>the</strong><br />

case for milk, where <strong>the</strong> Family expenditure survey has three different k<strong>in</strong>ds of milk;<br />

but also for garden tools, which were assumed to be equal to tools; or different k<strong>in</strong>ds<br />

of <strong>in</strong>surances, which all were assumed to have <strong>the</strong> same energy <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />

For some expenditure categories, it has been hard to f<strong>in</strong>d out how much and what<br />

types of basic goods that are commonly used for produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> items to be analysed.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g on this category is low, as for example is <strong>the</strong> case with o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

paper, <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity has been assumed to be <strong>the</strong> same as a similar category, <strong>in</strong><br />

this case books, although <strong>the</strong> items are not exactly <strong>the</strong> same. For different k<strong>in</strong>ds of<br />

furniture it was hard to tell <strong>the</strong> average weight and composition. It was, however,<br />

possible to f<strong>in</strong>d out from import statistics (SCB, 2002b) <strong>the</strong> price per kg of furniture<br />

and <strong>the</strong> division between furniture made of wood, metal and syn<strong>the</strong>tic materials. Thus<br />

furniture could more easily be calculated as one category.<br />

Several assumptions have been made with reference to <strong>the</strong> budget survey expenditure<br />

categories, ei<strong>the</strong>r by splitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m up when we analysed <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity, or by<br />

aggregat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m. We discovered that a ra<strong>the</strong>r large part of <strong>the</strong> total energy of an item<br />

analysed <strong>in</strong> EAP often comes from manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and trade and service. With this <strong>in</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>d, we assumed that changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> composition of basic goods would not make<br />

any major difference to <strong>the</strong> total outcome when we dealt with goods produced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

same manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector and sold <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same stores.<br />

Consumer prices and consumer taxes<br />

Consumer prices for 1995 were ga<strong>the</strong>red from <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g sources (see fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Appendix 6):<br />

From Statistics Sweden, we obta<strong>in</strong>ed a file on average consumer prices dur<strong>in</strong>g 1995<br />

for 87 of <strong>the</strong> items <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget survey (SCB, 2001a). The consumer prices of<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r 17 items have been found <strong>in</strong> SCB (1997b).<br />

20


From <strong>the</strong> Swedish Dairy Association we obta<strong>in</strong>ed average prices for some dairy<br />

products (Swedish Dairy Association, 2002).<br />

The rest of <strong>the</strong> consumer prices were calculated <strong>in</strong> three different ways: some of <strong>the</strong><br />

prices are <strong>the</strong> Dutch consumer prices from EAP version 3.2 but recalculated <strong>in</strong>to SEK<br />

by use of <strong>the</strong> exchange rate <strong>in</strong> 1995. Some consumer prices have been calculated from<br />

<strong>the</strong> producer prices (SCB, 1997, 2002b) plus taxes and trade marg<strong>in</strong>s (SCB, 2002a).<br />

Some prices come from stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm 2002, recalculated with price <strong>in</strong>dex for<br />

<strong>the</strong> different groups of items to represent <strong>the</strong> prices of 1995. Appendix 6 conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong><br />

consumer prices and a note of how <strong>the</strong> prices were estimated.<br />

Consumer prices are important for <strong>the</strong> result of an EAP-analysis. Average prices are<br />

also hard to f<strong>in</strong>d for a lot of items. Clo<strong>the</strong>s, for example, can differ very much <strong>in</strong> price<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g on whe<strong>the</strong>r you shop <strong>in</strong> expensive boutiques or <strong>in</strong> cheap stores. To make a<br />

proper assumption of <strong>the</strong> average price you must <strong>the</strong>n know how much of <strong>the</strong> clo<strong>the</strong>s<br />

are bought <strong>in</strong> which stores. Because of those difficulties, Statistics Sweden does not<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude average prices for clo<strong>the</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir price statistics. Instead, we had to make our<br />

own assumptions. The follow<strong>in</strong>g example shows that <strong>the</strong> result from EAP can differ<br />

because of <strong>the</strong> price:<br />

We assumed that <strong>the</strong> price of a sweater <strong>in</strong> Sweden is 539 SEK 1 . This gives an energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity of 0.87 MJ per SEK <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EAP analysis. If you buy a more exclusive<br />

sweater, say 1000 SEK per piece, you get an energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of 0.90 MJ per SEK and<br />

if you pay 50 SEK for a t-shirt at <strong>the</strong> supermarket you get <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity 1.07<br />

MJ per SEK. The average household <strong>in</strong> Stockholm spent 2581 SEK or on sweaters<br />

every year. If <strong>the</strong> sweater you buy costs 539 SEK this means 2323 MJ per year, if it<br />

costs 1000 SEK it means 2245 MJ and if it costs 50 SEK it means 2762 MJ per year.<br />

The difference between <strong>the</strong> highest and <strong>the</strong> lowest value is 19%.<br />

The consumer taxes used for EAP analyses were ga<strong>the</strong>red by SCB (2002a) and can be<br />

found <strong>in</strong> Appendix 7.<br />

Transportation distances and modes<br />

Transportation distances have been calculated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g way:<br />

For all of <strong>the</strong> 298 categories <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish budget survey, import, export and<br />

Swedish production statistics for 1995 were assembled. Import and export statistics<br />

were available <strong>in</strong> SCB (2002b). Data about Swedish production could be found <strong>in</strong><br />

SCB (1997a), except for some fruits and vegetables where data was found <strong>in</strong><br />

Jordbruksverket (1996). These data are <strong>in</strong> most cases very detailed, so <strong>the</strong>y have been<br />

aggregated to match <strong>the</strong> budget survey categories. The data are for Sweden, not<br />

specifically for Stockholm.<br />

The countries from which imports to Sweden come were split <strong>in</strong>to three different<br />

groups: Middle Europe, Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Europe and Rest of <strong>the</strong> world. The export was<br />

primarily assumed to come from Swedish production. Sometimes <strong>the</strong> export,<br />

however, was greater than <strong>the</strong> Swedish production, and <strong>the</strong> rest was <strong>the</strong>n assumed to<br />

come from Middle Europe. This assumption is not necessarily true, it is even likely<br />

that some of <strong>the</strong> Swedish production is consumed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country, but it was not<br />

possible to f<strong>in</strong>d out where exported goods came from <strong>in</strong> such a situation.<br />

1 1 Euro = 9.67 SEK<br />

21


From this <strong>in</strong>formation, we estimated a weighted average transportation distance for<br />

each item relevant for analyses accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> expenditure survey. In this process<br />

we assumed that:<br />

• Goods from Swedish production have been transported 400 km by lorry.<br />

• Goods from Middle Europe 2000 km by lorry.<br />

• Goods from Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Europe 3500 km by lorry.<br />

• Goods from <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> world are transported 1000 km by lorry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

country of orig<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong>n12 000 km by ship to a European harbor, and <strong>the</strong>n 1500<br />

km by lorry to <strong>the</strong> Swedish wholesaler.<br />

We also assumed that all goods had to be transported 100 km by a small lorry from<br />

wholesaler to retailer. All <strong>the</strong> transport distance can be found <strong>in</strong> Appendix 8.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> transport distance and mode constitute a fairly small part of <strong>the</strong> total energy<br />

of most items analysed <strong>in</strong> EAP, whatever assumptions we made about transportation<br />

seem to have little <strong>in</strong>fluence.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r assumptions<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g weight of products, composition of <strong>the</strong> basic materials needed to make<br />

products, pack<strong>in</strong>g materials and waste process<strong>in</strong>g, Dutch default data have been used<br />

to a large extent. However, for some categories <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish Family Expenditure<br />

Survey <strong>the</strong>re were no suitable Dutch default data. For <strong>the</strong>se items we estimated <strong>the</strong><br />

weight and composition of materials ourselves based on descriptions on packages and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r product <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

5.4 Data for analyses made partly outside EAP<br />

Some analyses of <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities for households’ expenditure categories were<br />

not made <strong>in</strong> EAP but were carried out partly outside <strong>the</strong> program. Travell<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

public transport or taxi, purchas<strong>in</strong>g cars, go<strong>in</strong>g on holiday, buy<strong>in</strong>g petrol, electricity<br />

and water, pay<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> rent related to heat<strong>in</strong>g, and spend<strong>in</strong>g money on<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g are such examples. Several of <strong>the</strong>se categories are related to <strong>the</strong> direct energy<br />

use of <strong>the</strong> households.<br />

We estimated <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity for expenditures on tra<strong>in</strong>s and local public transport<br />

by divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> energy use (MJ per person km) for different vehicles with <strong>the</strong> cost<br />

(SEK per person km). Dutch data was used for energy <strong>in</strong>tensities (1.07 MJ per person<br />

km for tra<strong>in</strong>, 1.87 for local buses and 1.29 for tram/subway). The cost was established<br />

by contact<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> travell<strong>in</strong>g companies relevant to <strong>the</strong> Stockholm area. For<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about prices for tra<strong>in</strong> transport, SJ (2000) gave us a price of 0.82 SEK per<br />

person km and for local public transport 1.25 SEK was considered reasonable by SL<br />

(2000).<br />

For expenditures on cars, a standard EAP analysis was made for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

energy use of <strong>the</strong> product (MJ per car). Then, <strong>the</strong> energy use for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure that<br />

<strong>the</strong> car uses (roads, bridges) was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g a default value (0.55 MJ per<br />

km, Dutch calculation). This latter value was multiplied with <strong>the</strong> numbers of<br />

22


kilometers per year that <strong>the</strong> car will travel (16,300) and <strong>the</strong> lifespan of a car (11<br />

years). Also here we used Dutch default data. The energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of <strong>the</strong> car (MJ per<br />

SEK) was <strong>the</strong>n determ<strong>in</strong>ed by divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> energy for production and <strong>in</strong>frastructure by<br />

<strong>the</strong> price of <strong>the</strong> car, 247,445 SEK (producer price from SCB, 2002b) plus trade<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>s and tax from SCB (2002b).<br />

For expenditures on taxi travel, we used <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation about energy use for car<br />

production and divided that figure with <strong>the</strong> depreciation of <strong>the</strong> taxi (4 years, Dutch<br />

data) and <strong>the</strong> numbers of person km driven per year and car 82,710 (Taxi Stockholm,<br />

2001). The result was an estimate of <strong>the</strong> MJ per person km that could be related to<br />

taxi production. The energy use for runn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> taxi was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

assumed energy need per km (5.74 MJ, Dutch default data) with <strong>the</strong> occupancy rate<br />

(on average 1.7 passenger per taxi, Taxi Stockholm, 2001). We assumed that <strong>the</strong><br />

energy use for <strong>in</strong>frastructure per km was <strong>the</strong> same as for cars (0.55 MJ), but divided<br />

that figure with <strong>the</strong> occupancy rate for taxis, 1.7. To get <strong>the</strong> total energy <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>in</strong><br />

MJ per SEK for spend<strong>in</strong>g on taxi travel, <strong>the</strong> figures for production, <strong>in</strong>frastructure and<br />

runn<strong>in</strong>g were summed and divided with <strong>the</strong> price per km for taxi travel, 15.53 SEK<br />

(Taxi Stockholm 2002).<br />

The energy <strong>in</strong>tensity (MJ per SEK) of expenditures on electricity was calculated by<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> consumer price for electricity <strong>in</strong> 1995, 1.06 SEK per kWh, and <strong>the</strong><br />

stationary cost for electricity, 680 SEK dur<strong>in</strong>g 1995 (Birka Energi 2002). The energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity of <strong>the</strong> electricity sector was calculated <strong>in</strong> EAP and became 2.92 MJ per SEK.<br />

Consumer prices for petrol and diesel, 7.55 SEK and 6.80 SEK per litre respectively<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1995 (SCB 2001a) were used for calculat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities for expenditures<br />

on motor fuel. For heat<strong>in</strong>g oil, <strong>the</strong> consumer price was 4705 SEK per m3 <strong>in</strong> 1995<br />

(SPI, 2002).<br />

Expenditures on rent <strong>in</strong>clude heat<strong>in</strong>g and water. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Boverket (2002), 12 %<br />

of <strong>the</strong> rent is spent on heat<strong>in</strong>g and 4 % on water. We assumed that district heat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was used <strong>in</strong> all houses where rent was paid. In Sweden this is <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant way of<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g multi-dwell<strong>in</strong>g build<strong>in</strong>gs. In 1995, 68 % of <strong>the</strong> multi-dwell<strong>in</strong>g build<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />

heated <strong>in</strong> this way, and <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>the</strong> share was 75 % (SCB, 2001b). The energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity for heat<strong>in</strong>g when it was part of rent expenditures (MJ per SEK) was<br />

calculated by us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> consumer price for district heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1995 which was 0.48<br />

SEK per kWh, (Birka energi 2002b). We used a factor of 1.18 to calculate primary<br />

energy use of district heat<strong>in</strong>g from direct energy use (Birka Energi, 2002c). For water,<br />

<strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity was calculated by divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> energy content (5.74 MJ per m3,<br />

Dutch value) with <strong>the</strong> consumer price, 11.95 SEK (Stockholm Vatten 2002).<br />

Expenditures on heat<strong>in</strong>g are relevant for households that live <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle-family houses<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y pay such bills <strong>the</strong>mselves. The energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of heat<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

calculated by assum<strong>in</strong>g that such houses were heated 65% by oil and 35% electricity.<br />

In summary, a lot of <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities related to households direct energy use was<br />

calculated outside EAP.<br />

5.5 Demographic data and <strong>the</strong> types of households selected for <strong>the</strong> analyses<br />

The Swedish part of <strong>the</strong> ToolSust project focuses on a densely populated area of <strong>in</strong>ner<br />

Stockholm, called Södermalm. The area and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>habitants, values and behaviour as<br />

23


well as stakeholders’ op<strong>in</strong>ions about possibilities and constra<strong>in</strong>ts for susta<strong>in</strong>able consumption<br />

were described at length <strong>in</strong> Carlsson-Kanyama et al (2001a, 2001b). The<br />

description was based on a questionnaire to 600 <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area, as well as<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviews and statistics. Here, we summarize some of <strong>the</strong> demographic data about <strong>the</strong><br />

Stockholm and Södermalm area.<br />

The Södermalm area is mostly located on one island and has an area of 744 ha. That is<br />

4 % of <strong>the</strong> land area of Stockholm City. The population, almost 100,000 persons<br />

(1999) represent 13 % of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> city of Stockholm. The central parts of<br />

Södermalm, with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parishes Maria and Katar<strong>in</strong>a, are <strong>the</strong> most densely populated<br />

parts of Stockholm with 25,000 and 19,000 persons respectively per km 2 . All<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area live <strong>in</strong> apartments <strong>in</strong> multi-stores build<strong>in</strong>gs. There<br />

are almost no s<strong>in</strong>gle-family houses at all. The number of rooms, exclud<strong>in</strong>g kitchen,<br />

available per person is 1.81 for <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area and 1.95 for <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>in</strong>ner city.<br />

The density of shopp<strong>in</strong>g and service facilities <strong>in</strong> Södermalm is high, and <strong>the</strong> network<br />

for public transportation excellent. Most apartments have fewer than three rooms, not<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> kitchen.<br />

The whole <strong>in</strong>ner city of Stockholm has become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly gentrified dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> past<br />

decade. Compared with <strong>the</strong> outer city, <strong>the</strong> share of immigrants is lower, education and<br />

<strong>in</strong>come levels are higher, and apartments for rental are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly replaced by<br />

condomiums. In <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area, 31 % owned <strong>the</strong>ir apartment <strong>in</strong> 2001, while 68<br />

% rented it. Compared to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner city as a whole, <strong>the</strong> share of rented apartments is<br />

higher <strong>in</strong> Södermalm.<br />

Some specific demographic facts about <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area are that <strong>the</strong> age structure<br />

of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area is similar to <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>in</strong>ner city, which is<br />

characterised by a smaller number of children and a higher number of adults <strong>in</strong><br />

work<strong>in</strong>g ages than <strong>the</strong> outer city. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner city, <strong>the</strong> share of children aged 0-16<br />

years is 12 % and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> outer city it is 20 %. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner city, 45 % of <strong>the</strong> population<br />

is between 20 and 44 years, and 10 % between 65 and 79 years.<br />

90 % of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area had education above <strong>the</strong> compulsory<br />

level (2001) and 10 % education at compulsory level only; thus a ra<strong>the</strong>r highly<br />

educated population. Of those hav<strong>in</strong>g more than a compulsory education, <strong>the</strong> average<br />

number of years of additional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was 5. Most of <strong>the</strong> population <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Södermalm area (69 %) work full time, while <strong>the</strong> share of retired and unemployed etc.<br />

is 13 %. <strong>Household</strong>s with one or two members dom<strong>in</strong>ate, as this type of household<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s 75 % of <strong>the</strong> population. <strong>Household</strong>s with three or four members represented<br />

21 % of <strong>the</strong> total and 79 % of <strong>the</strong> households have no persons under 14 years of age.<br />

Income distribution with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area is ra<strong>the</strong>r similar to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner city. The<br />

average <strong>in</strong>come per household was between 320,000 to 429,000 SEK <strong>in</strong> 2001. More<br />

than half of <strong>the</strong> households (57 %) do not have access to cars.<br />

In short, <strong>the</strong> typical <strong>in</strong>habitant is a middle-aged person liv<strong>in</strong>g alone, or with a partner<br />

and with no children. This person works full time with an average <strong>in</strong>come, has no car<br />

and lives <strong>in</strong> a rented flat.<br />

We selected six households for <strong>the</strong> analyses of energy use result<strong>in</strong>g from expenditure<br />

patterns. Two were average households based on <strong>the</strong> Family expenditure survey from<br />

24


1996 (SCB, 1998). Expenditures for <strong>the</strong> average Swedish and <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm<br />

City household were calculated by SCB (2002c). The average Swedish household had<br />

2.2 persons, an apartment area of 108 m 2 and 1.03 cars. The average <strong>in</strong> Stockholm<br />

City was 1.8 <strong>in</strong>habitants, an apartment area of 84 m 2 and 0.47 cars. We could not<br />

def<strong>in</strong>e an average household for <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area because <strong>the</strong> sample was too<br />

small: only 11 households. Instead, we selected four <strong>in</strong>dividual households: three<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Södermalm area and one <strong>in</strong> Stockholm City. We called <strong>the</strong>se four<br />

households: Urban Rich, Young and Poor, S<strong>in</strong>gle with Car and Squeezed with<br />

Children. Two adult persons live <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Urban Rich household and <strong>the</strong>y have no car,<br />

an apartment of more than 200 m 2 and spend about 650,000 SEK a year. In <strong>the</strong> Young<br />

and Poor household, <strong>the</strong>re is a s<strong>in</strong>gle person without a car liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an apartment of<br />

75 m 2 and he/she spends about 60,000 SEK yearly. A s<strong>in</strong>gle person is also liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle with Car household, and <strong>the</strong> apartment is ra<strong>the</strong>r large, 90 m 2 , as are <strong>the</strong><br />

expenditures, 250,000 SEK each year. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> household Squeezed with<br />

Children <strong>the</strong>re are two adults and two children <strong>in</strong> a ra<strong>the</strong>r small apartment, of 60 m 2.<br />

The expenditures are 240,000 SEK a year. It is important to remember that<br />

expenditures were only recorded dur<strong>in</strong>g a period of four weeks. The yearly<br />

expenditure patterns of <strong>in</strong>dividual households may <strong>the</strong>refore be misrepresented if<br />

expenditures dur<strong>in</strong>g those four weeks were far from <strong>the</strong> average.<br />

6 Direct energy use of households<br />

In this chapter we present <strong>the</strong> direct energy use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> six different households we<br />

analysed. The calculations are based on <strong>the</strong> household expenditures (SEK) and <strong>the</strong><br />

energy <strong>in</strong>tensities (MJ per SEK) shown <strong>in</strong> Appendix 6. Direct energy use is for<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g, fuel and electricity.<br />

Expenditures on direct energy use are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.1. The figure shows that such<br />

expenditure ranges from 480 to 2600 Euro 2 every year. The ma<strong>in</strong> part of <strong>the</strong><br />

expenditures is for heat<strong>in</strong>g. Expenditures on motor fuel represent 40 % of <strong>the</strong> total for<br />

<strong>the</strong> average Swedish household, that also spend about 45 % more on direct energy use<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City household. Expenditures on household<br />

electricity ranges from 160 to 750 Euro per year and for heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> range is from 320<br />

to 1 870 Euro. Most of <strong>the</strong> analysed households pay for heat<strong>in</strong>g as a part of <strong>the</strong> rent,<br />

and never directly perceive <strong>the</strong> heat<strong>in</strong>g costs.<br />

2 1 Euro = 9.67 SEK<br />

25


3<br />

1000 Euro<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

motor fuel<br />

household electricity<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

City<br />

Average<br />

Swedish<br />

Urban Rich<br />

Young and<br />

Poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

Car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

children<br />

Figure 4.1: Expenditures related to direct energy use dur<strong>in</strong>g 1996 for six Swedish<br />

households.<br />

Figure 4.2 shows how <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City household used its direct energy.<br />

65 % was used for heat<strong>in</strong>g, 19 % for motor fuel and 16 % for household electricity.<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

household electricity<br />

motor fuel<br />

16%<br />

65%<br />

19%<br />

Figure 4.2: Percentages of direct energy use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City<br />

household, 1996 (primary energy).<br />

Table 4.3 shows <strong>the</strong> shares of direct energy use for all <strong>the</strong> households. As can be seen,<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g is dom<strong>in</strong>ant, and ranges from 50-81 %. For households without a car; Urban<br />

Rich, Young and Poor and Squeezed with Children, <strong>the</strong> percentage is even higher as<br />

<strong>the</strong> direct energy use on motor fuel is nil. The average Stockholm City household<br />

differs from <strong>the</strong> average Swedish household <strong>in</strong> terms of energy used for motor fuel.<br />

This share is only 0.19 for <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City household, but 0.30 for <strong>the</strong><br />

average Swedish household.<br />

26


Table 4.3: Shares of direct energy use by household type and usage, 1996<br />

(primary energy).<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

City<br />

Average<br />

Swedish<br />

Urban<br />

Rich<br />

Young<br />

and<br />

poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

with<br />

Car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

children<br />

Heat<strong>in</strong>g 0.65 0.56 0.77 0.73 0.50 0.81<br />

<strong>Household</strong> electricity 0.16 0.14 0.23 0.27 0.21 0.19<br />

Motor fuel 0.19 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00<br />

Figure 4.4 shows <strong>the</strong> absolute numbers for <strong>the</strong> direct energy use of households. They<br />

vary from 34 to 208 GJ 3 per year. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant post, heat<strong>in</strong>g, accounts for between<br />

27 to 160 GJ a year. Average energy requirements for heat<strong>in</strong>g 1 m 2 of apartment<br />

house <strong>in</strong> Södermalm built between 1926 to 1975, and heated with district heat<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

may be 540 MJ (Carlsson-Kanyama et al, 2001a) a year. The same <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />

showed a m<strong>in</strong>imum value of 324 MJ per m 2 and a maximum value of 1044 MJ per m 2 .<br />

If we translate <strong>the</strong> calculated values of energy use for heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.4 <strong>in</strong>to square<br />

metres, while consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ERE value for district heat<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> average energy<br />

<strong>in</strong>put per unit of area, we conclude that <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm household pays for<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g 97 m 2 . This is higher that <strong>the</strong> 84 m 2 apartment area reported but tenants also<br />

pay for common and shared areas <strong>in</strong> apartment houses. We conclude that <strong>the</strong> figures<br />

on direct energy use for heat<strong>in</strong>g seem plausible.<br />

GJ<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

household electricity<br />

motor fuel<br />

50<br />

0<br />

<strong>Household</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong><br />

Stockholm<br />

Swedish<br />

households<br />

Urban rich<br />

Young and<br />

poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with children<br />

Figure 4.4: Direct energy use per year for six types of households, 1996 (primary<br />

GJ)<br />

Figure 4.4 also shows that energy use for household electricity varies from 10 to 47<br />

GJ a year. Calculated <strong>in</strong>to available electricity this means that <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm<br />

City household used 1500 kWh per year, a plausible figure. The Urban Rich<br />

3 1 GJ = 1000 MJ<br />

27


household used 4700 kWh <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir apartment of more than 200 m 2 and <strong>the</strong> average<br />

Swedish household used 1800 kWh of household electricity per year. All <strong>in</strong> all,<br />

estimations rema<strong>in</strong> reasonable but probably a bit too low.<br />

Primary energy use for motor fuel amounts to 38 GJ yearly, at most, and that was for<br />

<strong>the</strong> average Swedish household. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> primary energy content of 1 litre of fuel is<br />

36.7 MJ, this means that <strong>the</strong> average Swedish household bought 1040 litre of fuels <strong>in</strong><br />

1995 and that <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm household bought 504 litres, half as much. For<br />

this fuel, <strong>the</strong> average Swedish household can travel for 12,000 km if <strong>the</strong> car uses 0.09<br />

litres per km. Carlsson-Kanyama and L<strong>in</strong>den (1999) found that <strong>in</strong> 1996 men on <strong>the</strong><br />

average travelled 12,000 km by car while women travelled 8500 km. On this po<strong>in</strong>t as<br />

well, assumptions and results seems reasonable.<br />

7 Indirect energy use of households.<br />

In this chapter we present <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct energy use of <strong>the</strong> six different households. The<br />

calculations were based on household expenditures (SEK) and <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities<br />

(MJ per SEK) shown <strong>in</strong> Appendix 6 4 . Indirect energy is spent on produc<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

transport<strong>in</strong>g and stor<strong>in</strong>g products and services that <strong>the</strong> household buy or rent. Thus,<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct energy is <strong>in</strong>visible to <strong>the</strong> households but has been made visible with <strong>the</strong> EAP<br />

calculations.<br />

7.1 <strong>Household</strong> expenditures<br />

Many of <strong>the</strong> household expenditures are related to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use, a pattern<br />

common <strong>in</strong> any household participat<strong>in</strong>g heavily <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market economy. Figure 5.1<br />

shows <strong>the</strong> patterns of expenditures from <strong>the</strong> six Swedish households. Expenditures<br />

related to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use ranges from 5600 to 64,000 Euro a year. The average<br />

Stockholm City household has expenditures of 19,500 Euro and <strong>the</strong> average Swedish<br />

one 18,300 Euros. The s<strong>in</strong>gle largest expenditure category is food, with expenditures<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1700 to 19,000 Euro each year when all six households are considered.<br />

The average Stockholm City household spent 4500 Euro on food and <strong>the</strong> average<br />

Swedish one 4200 Euros.<br />

4 1 Euro = 9.67 SEK<br />

28


o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

1000 Euro<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

transport<br />

recreation<br />

education<br />

hygiene<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

household effects<br />

house<br />

food<br />

0<br />

Average Stockholm City<br />

Average Sweden<br />

Urban rich<br />

Young and poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with car<br />

Squeezed with children<br />

Figure 5.1: Expenditures related to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use dur<strong>in</strong>g 1996 <strong>in</strong> six<br />

Swedish households.<br />

The relative importance of <strong>the</strong> expenditures is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.2. Food amounts to<br />

between 25-30 % of <strong>the</strong> expenditures. O<strong>the</strong>r important expenditure categories are<br />

hous<strong>in</strong>g (exclud<strong>in</strong>g expenditures on heat<strong>in</strong>g), cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear, and recreation.<br />

<strong>Household</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Stockholm City spend more on cloth<strong>in</strong>g, footwear and recreation than<br />

<strong>the</strong> average Swedish.<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

transport<br />

recreation<br />

education<br />

hygiene<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

household effects<br />

house<br />

food<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

City<br />

Average<br />

Sweden<br />

Urban rich Young and<br />

poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

children<br />

Figure 5.2: Relative expenditures related to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use <strong>in</strong> six Swedish<br />

households, 1996.<br />

29


7.2 How many items do <strong>the</strong> households buy?<br />

From <strong>the</strong> expenditure survey and consumer prices it is possible to estimate <strong>the</strong><br />

numbers and kg of items consumed by <strong>the</strong> households. Such a cross-check is valuable<br />

for validat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> calculations of household energy use.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g this method, we estimated that each person <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City<br />

household bought 700 kg of food while <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g figure for <strong>the</strong> average<br />

Swedish one was 625 kg. These are plausible figures as national statistics suggest a<br />

food consumption of around 700 kg per person and year (Carlsson-Kanyama and<br />

L<strong>in</strong>den, 2001). But when we compare <strong>the</strong> results for food from <strong>the</strong> four o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

households with <strong>the</strong> national estimates <strong>the</strong> figures become more difficult to expla<strong>in</strong>.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>habitants of <strong>the</strong> Urban and Rich household bought 1,400 kg food each dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1996. Ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y had a big party dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> time when <strong>the</strong>y recorded <strong>the</strong>ir purchases,<br />

or <strong>the</strong>y bought food for storage, or else <strong>the</strong>y bought very expensive food. The figures<br />

are more realistic for <strong>the</strong> households called Young and Poor and Squeezed with<br />

Children, especially if one considers that children sometimes eat outside <strong>the</strong> home and<br />

that <strong>the</strong> cost for this is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> child-care expenditure.<br />

The same test for toilet paper showed that <strong>the</strong> Stockholm City and Swedish household<br />

bought 64 and 80 rolls each and <strong>the</strong>y also bought 13 litres of soap and shampoo. Table<br />

5.3 shows some selected results from <strong>the</strong> account of amounts purchased for <strong>the</strong><br />

Stockholm City and Swedish household. We are confident that <strong>the</strong> EAP analyses are<br />

based on plausible assumptions on consumer prices and expenditure patterns, but it is<br />

also important to have <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>the</strong> account is based on one years expenditure<br />

pattern only and that consumer prices are likely to vary a lot.<br />

Table 5.3: Amounts of products per year bought by Swedish households, 1996.<br />

Average Stockholm City Average Swedish<br />

Food, kg 1,300 1,400<br />

Toilet rolls, number 64 80<br />

Schampoo, litre 13 13<br />

Dresses, number 1 0.7<br />

Trousers, number 4 2.3<br />

Underwear, number 10 8<br />

Sport shoes, number 1 1.4<br />

Towels, number 4 1.2<br />

Iron, number 1 0.3<br />

5.3 Indirect energy profiles<br />

Figure 5.4 shows how <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City household used its <strong>in</strong>direct energy.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>direct energy use was largest for food, with 33 % of <strong>the</strong> total, while <strong>the</strong> share<br />

for <strong>the</strong> house was 8 %, and 17 % was used for recreation.<br />

30


11% 1% food<br />

17%<br />

33%<br />

house<br />

household effects<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

hygiene<br />

education<br />

5%<br />

6%<br />

11%<br />

8%<br />

8%<br />

recreation<br />

transport<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

Figure 5.4: Percentages of <strong>in</strong>direct energy use for <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City<br />

household, 1996 (primary energy).<br />

Table 5.5 shows <strong>the</strong> percentages of <strong>in</strong>direct energy use for <strong>the</strong> six households <strong>in</strong> our<br />

study. As can be seen, food accounts for between 32 and 52 % of <strong>the</strong> total but a third<br />

is most normal. Recreation is ano<strong>the</strong>r large contributor, with between 16-17 % of <strong>the</strong><br />

total for <strong>the</strong> two average households and 26 % for <strong>the</strong> Urban rich household.<br />

<strong>Household</strong> Squeezed with children use 15 % of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct energy for hygiene as<br />

opposed to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r households where hygiene contributed to less than 10%.<br />

Table 5.5: Share of <strong>in</strong>direct energy use by household type and usage, 1996<br />

(primary energy)<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

City<br />

Average<br />

Swedish<br />

Urban<br />

Rich<br />

Young and<br />

Poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

Car<br />

Food 0.32 0.32 0.36 0.52 0.36 0.38<br />

House 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.13 0.06 0.10<br />

<strong>Household</strong><br />

effects 0.08 0.09 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.11<br />

Cloth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and<br />

footwear 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.32 0.14<br />

Hygiene 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.08 0.04 0.15<br />

Education 0.05 0.04 0.09 0.02 0.05 0.04<br />

Recreation 0.17 0.16 0.26 0.07 0.05 0.08<br />

Transport 0.11 0.16 0.08 0.13 0.05 0.01<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

consumptio<br />

n 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

Children<br />

31


The absolute figures for <strong>in</strong>direct energy use of <strong>the</strong> average household <strong>in</strong> Stockholm<br />

City are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 5.6. The total use per year is 141 GJ 5 . This figure can be<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong> direct energy use that was just below 100 GJ for this household type.<br />

As with expenditures, <strong>the</strong> most important category for <strong>in</strong>direct energy is food with 46<br />

GJ followed by recreation with 25 GJ per year. The energy <strong>in</strong>tensity for both food and<br />

recreation is 10 MJ per Euro and this <strong>in</strong>tensity is higher than for household effects,<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear, and transport.<br />

Table 5.6: Indirect energy use for <strong>the</strong> average household <strong>in</strong> Stockholm<br />

City, 1996.<br />

Category Spend<strong>in</strong>g Total energy Energy <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />

(1000 €) (GJ) (MJ / €)<br />

Food 4.45 45.59 10.2<br />

House 4.84 11.53 2.4<br />

<strong>Household</strong> effects 1.21 10.64 8.8<br />

Cloth<strong>in</strong>g and 1.75 14.89 8.5<br />

footwear<br />

Hygiene 1.09 8.86 8.1<br />

Education 0.91 7.42 8.2<br />

Recreation 2.44 24.72 10.1<br />

Transport 1.71 15.76 9.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r consumption 1.08 1.95 1.8<br />

Total <strong>in</strong>direct 19.47 141.37<br />

The absolute figures for <strong>in</strong>direct energy use of <strong>the</strong> six households <strong>in</strong> our study are<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.7. The total <strong>in</strong>direct energy use varies from 42 to 480 GJ per year, a<br />

difference of factor 10. The lowest value is for <strong>the</strong> household called Young and Poor<br />

and <strong>the</strong> highest is for <strong>the</strong> one called Urban and Rich, a pattern consistent with <strong>the</strong> one<br />

for direct energy use. Food accounts for as much as 176 GJ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Urban and Rich<br />

household and, as discussed earlier, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y had a big party, stocked food or else<br />

<strong>the</strong> food was more expensive than we assumed, and <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>puts are too high for<br />

this household. The average Stockholm City and Swedish households are quite similar<br />

with respect to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use for food (43-46 GJ), house (11-12 GJ), household<br />

effects (11-12 GJ) and hygiene (9 GJ), but differ <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>direct energy for<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear, and recreation where <strong>the</strong> Stockholm City households use more;<br />

15 GJ as opposed to 11 GJ for cloth<strong>in</strong>g and 25 GJ as opposed to 21 GJ for recreation.<br />

The Swedish household uses more energy for transportation, 22 GJ compared with <strong>the</strong><br />

Stockholm household that used 16 GJ a year. The different patterns reflect differences<br />

<strong>in</strong> lifestyles between <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner city and <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> country; <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner city<br />

opportunities for shopp<strong>in</strong>g and recreation are plentiful and close-by, enabl<strong>in</strong>g people<br />

to spend money on such activities.<br />

5 1 GJ = 1000 MJ<br />

32


GJ<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

transport<br />

recreation<br />

education<br />

hygiene<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

household effects<br />

house<br />

food<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

City<br />

Average<br />

Sweden<br />

Urban rich Young and<br />

poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

children<br />

Figure 5.7: Indirect energy use per year for six types of household, 1996<br />

(primary GJ).<br />

8 Total energy use <strong>in</strong> households<br />

In this chapter we present <strong>the</strong> total energy use, both direct and <strong>in</strong>direct of <strong>the</strong> six<br />

different households. The figures are <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>in</strong> chapter four and five.<br />

Total expenditures for <strong>the</strong> six households are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 6.1 and <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

expenditures <strong>in</strong> Table 6.2.<br />

33


Table 6.1: Total expenditures dur<strong>in</strong>g 1996 <strong>in</strong> six Swedish households.<br />

Average<br />

Stockhol<br />

m City<br />

Average<br />

Sweden<br />

Urban<br />

rich<br />

Young<br />

and poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

with car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

children<br />

1000 Euro 6<br />

Food 4.45 4.15 18.92 1.66 7.60 4.85<br />

House 4.84 4.66 13.43 2.29 4.06 5.48<br />

<strong>Household</strong> 1.21 1.33 2.16 0.24 1.14 1.48<br />

effects<br />

Cloth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and<br />

footwear<br />

1.75 1.20 4.49 0.00 6.93 2.20<br />

Hygiene 1.09 1.08 2.15 0.29 1.02 4.91<br />

Education 0.91 0.63 4.89 0.07 0.78 0.43<br />

Recreation 2.44 2.26 12.88 0.48 1.02 1.21<br />

Transport 1.71 2.11 4.66 0.48 1.28 0.25<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

consumpti<br />

on<br />

1.08 0.87 0.63 0.14 0.33 0.80<br />

Heat<strong>in</strong>g 0.74 0.90 1.87 0.32 0.51 0.59<br />

Electricity 0.25 0.29 0.75 0.16 0.31 0.19<br />

Motor fuel 0.39 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00<br />

Total 20.85 20.29 66.82 6.13 25.50 22.38<br />

households, <strong>the</strong> house for 23 % and recreation for 12 %. These are <strong>the</strong> only <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g categories wwhich exceed 10 % of <strong>the</strong> total. For <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual households,<br />

<strong>the</strong> shares differ; recreation is 19% for <strong>the</strong> Urban Rich household but only 5 % for <strong>the</strong><br />

household Squeezed with Children. The house is 37 % for <strong>the</strong> Young and Poor<br />

household but only 16 % for <strong>the</strong> household called S<strong>in</strong>gle with Car. Clearly, <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

patterns differ from <strong>the</strong> average and from each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

The relation between expenditures for direct and <strong>in</strong>direct energy use is similar <strong>in</strong> all<br />

households; more than 90 % of <strong>the</strong> expenditures are related to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use.<br />

6 1 Euro = 9.67 SEK<br />

34


Table 6.2: Total relative expenditures <strong>in</strong> six Swedish households, 1996.<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

City<br />

Average<br />

Sweden<br />

Urban rich Young and<br />

poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

children<br />

Food 0.21 0.20 0.28 0.27 0.30 0.22<br />

House 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.37 0.16 0.24<br />

<strong>Household</strong> 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.07<br />

effects<br />

Cloth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and<br />

footwear<br />

0.08 0.06 0.07 0.00 0.27 0.10<br />

Hygiene 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.22<br />

Education 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.02<br />

Recreation 0.12 0.11 0.19 0.08 0.04 0.05<br />

Transport 0.08 0.10 0.07 0.08 0.05 0.01<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

consumptio<br />

n<br />

0.05 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04<br />

Heat<strong>in</strong>g 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.03<br />

Electricity 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01<br />

Motor fuel 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00<br />

The energy profile for <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City household is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 6.3.<br />

The relation between direct and <strong>in</strong>direct energy use is 40 versus 60; thus <strong>in</strong>direct<br />

energy use is more important than <strong>the</strong> direct one. The largest contributor to total<br />

energy use is heat<strong>in</strong>g, with 27 %, followed by food with 19%. However, mobility,<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r known energy-demand<strong>in</strong>g activity is divided up <strong>in</strong> two categories <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Figure (transport and motor fuel), account<strong>in</strong>g for 4 and 8 %, respectively, of <strong>the</strong> total.<br />

Mobility is also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> recreation to some extent and <strong>the</strong> conclusion is that <strong>the</strong><br />

house, travell<strong>in</strong>g and eat<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>the</strong> most energy demand<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

household.<br />

35


6%<br />

8%<br />

19%<br />

food<br />

house<br />

household effects<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footw ear<br />

5%<br />

hygiene<br />

education<br />

27%<br />

1%<br />

7%<br />

10%<br />

4%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

recreation<br />

transport<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

electricity<br />

motor fuel<br />

Figure 6.3: Percentages of total energy use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City<br />

household, 1996 (primary energy).<br />

Figure 6.4 shows <strong>the</strong> total energy use for <strong>the</strong> six households. It varies from 80 to 691<br />

GJ per year. The average Stockholm City household uses a total of 237 GJ and <strong>the</strong><br />

average Swedish one a total of 263 GJ. The share of direct versus <strong>in</strong>direct energy<br />

varies to some extent; <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> average Swedish household it was 48:52, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Urban<br />

Rich 30:70, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle with Car 32:68. Thus, <strong>in</strong>direct energy use is always<br />

important, and may be dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> urban households without a car and with high<br />

<strong>in</strong>comes.<br />

In general, heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> house, and food, are <strong>the</strong> most energy demand<strong>in</strong>g categories <strong>in</strong><br />

all households. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual households, categories such as recreation, and<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear may contribute substantially as well. The profiles show that<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual household profiles may differ from <strong>the</strong> average picture, enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> need<br />

for <strong>in</strong>dividual consumer advice on energy efficiency measures.<br />

36


800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

GJ<br />

motor fuel<br />

electricity<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

transport<br />

recreation<br />

education<br />

hygiene<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

household effects<br />

house<br />

food<br />

0<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

City<br />

Average<br />

Sweden<br />

Urban rich Young and<br />

poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

children<br />

Figure 6.4: Total energy use per year of six different households, 1996 (primary<br />

energy).<br />

9 Discussion and conclusion<br />

9.1 Discussion<br />

Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties<br />

There are three levels at which uncerta<strong>in</strong>ities can be discussed; <strong>the</strong> general EAP level<br />

(1), <strong>the</strong> level of analysis of consumption items (2) and at <strong>the</strong> level of budget surveys<br />

(3). We highlight some of <strong>the</strong> most important observations from our study with<br />

respect to <strong>the</strong>se three levels.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> general EAP level, it is important to <strong>in</strong>vestigate to what extent <strong>the</strong> Dutch data<br />

that we used for <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of <strong>the</strong> trade and service sectors are relevant for<br />

Sweden. The contribution to <strong>the</strong> total from <strong>the</strong>se sectors is significant <strong>in</strong> many<br />

analyses. Validat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se energy <strong>in</strong>tensities, or f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g suitable Swedish <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

is a priority for fur<strong>the</strong>r research. Likewise, fur<strong>the</strong>r use of EAP should <strong>in</strong>clude an<br />

update of <strong>the</strong> statistics and figures from 1995/1996 that was used <strong>in</strong> this study. It is<br />

also important to discuss <strong>the</strong> significance of conversion losses dur<strong>in</strong>g power<br />

production for <strong>the</strong> outcome of results. When primary energy is used to portraye<br />

household consumption, as done here, it is not only <strong>the</strong> consumption pattern that is<br />

described but also <strong>the</strong> power production pattern of <strong>the</strong> specific country <strong>the</strong> household<br />

is liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>. The consequence is that household energy use could change, perhaps<br />

substantially, should <strong>the</strong> household move to a different country while spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

money <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way as before. Ano<strong>the</strong>r uncertanity when it comes to compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

results about Swedish households with those from o<strong>the</strong>r countries is that many<br />

services commonly payed for directly by households are payed by taxes <strong>in</strong> Sweden.<br />

Examples are school lunches and schoolfees. The energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of taxes was not<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> our study.<br />

37


At <strong>the</strong> level of analys<strong>in</strong>g consumption items we particularly feel that <strong>the</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ities<br />

about consumer prices should be fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>vestigated as reliable statistics were partly<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g and we had to estbalish several prices based on ra<strong>the</strong>r ad-hoc methods. Also,<br />

<strong>the</strong> default data about <strong>the</strong> composition of products should be validated if possible.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> level of budget surveys it is important to remember that <strong>the</strong> expenditure<br />

profiles for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual households are based on record<strong>in</strong>gs from one month only.<br />

Thus, <strong>the</strong> energy profiles for <strong>the</strong>se households are even more uncerta<strong>in</strong> than for <strong>the</strong><br />

two average ones. This was particularly strik<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> household called Urban and<br />

Rich where energy use for food purchases was clearly overstimated.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong>se uncerta<strong>in</strong>ities, it seems that our results resemble those that can be<br />

derived from <strong>the</strong> national accounts concern<strong>in</strong>g direct energy. SCB (2002 d) reports<br />

that <strong>the</strong> direct energy use per person and year dur<strong>in</strong>g 1993 to 1997 was 50 GJ.<br />

Transposed to <strong>the</strong> average Swedish household, of 2.2 persons, it means a direct<br />

energy use of 110 GJ per year, which comes close to our estimate of 129 GJ per year.<br />

We have not been able to validate <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct energy use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way but <strong>the</strong><br />

partition<strong>in</strong>g between direct and <strong>in</strong>direct energy that we found is similar to what was<br />

found by o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

In summary, <strong>the</strong> absolute numbers about total household energy consumption<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> this report are more uncerta<strong>in</strong> than relative comparisions between<br />

households. The results can <strong>the</strong>refore ma<strong>in</strong>ly be used for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g effects of change<br />

<strong>in</strong> variables such as spended amounts or spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns.<br />

Total energy use versus spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />

EAP analyses can be used to discuss <strong>the</strong> potential for decoupl<strong>in</strong>g energy use from<br />

<strong>in</strong>come growth and for identify<strong>in</strong>g energy efficient ways to spend money (e.g.<br />

Alfredsson, 2002). Clearly, such a discussion is much needed, with a cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> household <strong>in</strong>comes while meet<strong>in</strong>g needs for energy efficiency. However,<br />

absolute numbers of energy use must also figure <strong>in</strong> such discussions as <strong>the</strong>y o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />

risk becom<strong>in</strong>g partial and <strong>in</strong>complete.<br />

The comparision of households <strong>in</strong> our study showed that <strong>the</strong> average household <strong>in</strong><br />

Stockholm City spent more money (2029 Euro 7 ) than <strong>the</strong> average Swedish (2085<br />

Euro) but used less energy. The Stockholm City household used a total 237 GJ 8 per<br />

year and <strong>the</strong> Swedish one 263 GJ. This means that <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Stockholm City household is lower, at 11.36 MJ per Euro, than <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Swedish one, at 12.94 MJ per Euro. If <strong>the</strong> comparision stops <strong>the</strong>re, it may appear<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Stockholm City household is <strong>the</strong> most environmentally friendly because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

spend <strong>the</strong>ir money <strong>in</strong> a more energy efficient way. The same can be said for <strong>the</strong> Urban<br />

and Rich household with an energy <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir spend<strong>in</strong>gs of 10.34 MJ per Euro<br />

when compared to <strong>the</strong> Young and Poor household with a spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity of 12.98<br />

MJ per Euro. Figure 7.1 shows <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of <strong>the</strong> households spend<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> MJ<br />

per Euro. The lowest <strong>in</strong>tensity was found for <strong>the</strong> household Squeezed with Children,<br />

at 8.79 MJ per Euro.<br />

7 1 Euro = 9.67 SEK<br />

8 1 GJ = 1000 MJ<br />

38


MJ per Euro<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

City<br />

Average<br />

Sweden<br />

Urban rich Young and<br />

poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with<br />

children<br />

Figure 7.1: Energy <strong>in</strong>tensity of budget spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> six households, 1996. In<br />

MJ primary energy per Euro.<br />

However, when we consider <strong>the</strong> total energy use of <strong>the</strong> households as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

number of persons liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, a different picture of which is <strong>the</strong> most energy<br />

demand<strong>in</strong>g emerges. The Stockholm City household had only 1.8 person while <strong>the</strong><br />

Swedish household had 2.2 persons and as Figure 7.2 shows, <strong>the</strong> energy use per<br />

person <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Stockholm City household is higher than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> average Swedish one.<br />

So, despite a more energy efficient way of spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir money, <strong>the</strong> Stockholm City<br />

household use more energy per person because <strong>the</strong>y have more money to spend. The<br />

same can be said about <strong>the</strong> comparision between <strong>the</strong> Urban Rich household (two<br />

persons) and <strong>the</strong> one called Young and Poor (one person). Although Urban Rich has a<br />

more energy efficient spend<strong>in</strong>g pattern it does not outweigh <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y have<br />

much more money to spend per person than <strong>the</strong> Young and Poor household. The<br />

lowest energy per person is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Squeezed with Children household (four persons).<br />

Here, shar<strong>in</strong>g a household with several o<strong>the</strong>r people contributes to less energy use.<br />

The lesson that can be learnt from <strong>the</strong>se comparisions is to put total energy use first<br />

and to use household size, household <strong>in</strong>comes, <strong>in</strong>tensities of spend<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>tensities of<br />

basic and luxury needs as explanatory factors for differences between households total<br />

energy use.<br />

39


primary GJ<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

total energy per<br />

household<br />

total energy per<br />

person<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Average<br />

Stockholm<br />

city<br />

Average<br />

Sweden<br />

Urban rich<br />

Young and<br />

poor<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle with<br />

car<br />

Squeezed<br />

with children<br />

Figure 7.1: Total yearly energy use per household and per person <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

households, 1996.<br />

How <strong>the</strong>n can households f<strong>in</strong>d more energy efficient ways of spend<strong>in</strong>g money? It<br />

seems that <strong>the</strong> options identified <strong>in</strong> EAP are open, mostly but not only, to households<br />

that have already fullfilled <strong>the</strong>ir basic needs. Every household needs a warm and light<br />

house, food on <strong>the</strong> table and some transportation services. There is little choice but to<br />

spend some money on energy <strong>in</strong>tensive categories such as heat<strong>in</strong>g with 8.85 MJ per<br />

SEK or electricity with 6.63 MJ per SEK. Food is ano<strong>the</strong>r category with relatively<br />

large energy <strong>in</strong>puts per expenditure unit, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.5 to 3 MJ per SEK. Food<br />

expenditures cannot be altered without nutrition considerations so any suggestions for<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g expenditures <strong>in</strong> that area will have to consider that aspect.<br />

We looked more closely at <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of <strong>the</strong> different spend<strong>in</strong>g categories<br />

related to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use to f<strong>in</strong>d suggestions for less energy demand<strong>in</strong>g spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

patterns for <strong>the</strong> not-poor households. It is obvious that <strong>the</strong>re are numerous options <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> field of food and that has been discussed extensively <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature (Carlsson-<br />

Kanyama, 1998, Kramer et al, 1999). O<strong>the</strong>r options identified <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP is<br />

repar<strong>in</strong>g shoes, 0.59 MJ per SEK, versus buy<strong>in</strong>g new shoes, 0.96 MJ per SEK.<br />

Similarly, repair and hire of domestic appliances, 0.69 MJ per SEK, is a more energy<br />

efficient expenditure option than to buy a new dishwasher at 1.03 MJ per SEK.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector of recreation and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment, it is more energy efficient to buy<br />

lotteries, 0.52 MJ per SEK than to buy flowers, 1.28 MJ per SEK.<br />

We did f<strong>in</strong>d some examples of energy efficient expenditure patterns when we looked<br />

at <strong>the</strong> six households. When we compared <strong>the</strong> Urban and Rich household with <strong>the</strong><br />

Young and Poor, we saw that <strong>the</strong> latter used almost all <strong>the</strong> money spent with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

category called Hygiene on soap and schampoo. These items have a ra<strong>the</strong>r high<br />

energy <strong>in</strong>tensity 1.57 MJ per SEK. The Urban and Rich household spent as much<br />

money on soap and schampoo but also bought a lot of vitam<strong>in</strong>s with lower energy<br />

itensity, 1.17 MJ per SEK. So once <strong>the</strong> need for be<strong>in</strong>g clean was fullfilled <strong>the</strong><br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g money was spent <strong>in</strong> an energy efficient manner. Also, <strong>the</strong> Urban and Rich<br />

household used a lot of it’s money for Transport on phone calls, an item with lower<br />

energy <strong>in</strong>tensity, 0.58 MJ per SEK, than travell<strong>in</strong>g by collective transportation such as<br />

40


us at 0.98 MJ per SEK. So it is better to stay home and make a phone call than to<br />

take <strong>the</strong> bus to a friends place! Also, <strong>the</strong> food expenditure pattern of <strong>the</strong> Young and<br />

Poor household was not very energy efficient, as a lot of <strong>the</strong> money was spent on<br />

energy expensive items such as soft dr<strong>in</strong>ks and greenhouse vegetables. The Urban and<br />

Rich household had more w<strong>in</strong>e and spirits, items with lower energy <strong>in</strong>tensities, partly<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y are expensive. However, we want to emphasize aga<strong>in</strong> that figures about<br />

<strong>the</strong> energy efficiency of spend<strong>in</strong>gs cannot be discussed <strong>in</strong> isolation from issues related<br />

to basic needs and quality of life.<br />

In order to demonstrate some possible effects of changed spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns while<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come, we also calculated a possible reduction level <strong>in</strong> total energy use<br />

by chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns related to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use for <strong>the</strong> average<br />

Stockholm city household. We did not change expenditures related to direct energy<br />

because <strong>the</strong> effects of such changes have already been explored elesewhere. Benefits<br />

from <strong>in</strong>sulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> house, sav<strong>in</strong>g electricity and chang<strong>in</strong>g to a more fuel efficient cars<br />

are well known. Likewise, we did not change much <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall expenditure pattern<br />

related to <strong>in</strong>direct energy but <strong>in</strong>stead identified some changes which should not<br />

require major lifestyle alterations. Changes that we <strong>in</strong>cluded were a reduction of<br />

expenditure on meat (but not a vegetarian diet), less vegetables grown <strong>in</strong> greenhouses<br />

and less soft dr<strong>in</strong>ks. Instead, <strong>the</strong> expenditures on vegetables of <strong>the</strong> season was<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased as was expenditures on dr<strong>in</strong>ks o<strong>the</strong>r than soft dr<strong>in</strong>ks. The expenditures on<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear were reduced to <strong>the</strong> same level as <strong>the</strong> average Swedish<br />

household, and <strong>the</strong> saved money was spent on home help, e.g. clean<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> house.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, we assumed no personal own<strong>in</strong>g of any vehicles, but <strong>in</strong>stead put this money<br />

on taxis or rent<strong>in</strong>g vehicles. The <strong>in</strong>ternational travell<strong>in</strong>g was reduced, and replaced<br />

with domestic travell<strong>in</strong>g. These changes led to a reduction of total energy use by 10%.<br />

Thus, <strong>the</strong>re are options for change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> short term by chang<strong>in</strong>g expenditures related<br />

to <strong>in</strong>direct energy use only. The potential is, however, far from <strong>the</strong> goal to reduce<br />

resource use by a factor ten or even a factor four (e.g. Von Weizäcker et al., 1997).<br />

To achive such large changes, it is clear that <strong>the</strong>re have to be major alterations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of goods and services, major shifts <strong>in</strong> expenditure patterns and<br />

possibly also reduced household expenditures. This will <strong>in</strong>volve actors at <strong>the</strong> micro<br />

level (households), at <strong>the</strong> meso level (city authorites) as well as actors at <strong>the</strong> national<br />

level. The EAP approach could be used to model <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>in</strong>terventions by <strong>the</strong>se<br />

different actors and also to analyse a multitude of energy <strong>in</strong>tensities for goods and<br />

services not covered <strong>in</strong> this study, but that may evnetually reach <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

9.2 Conclusions<br />

It is possible to portray households total energy use, even <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct, with <strong>the</strong> help of<br />

<strong>the</strong> EAP programme and Swedish statistics.<br />

Indirect energy use may account for more than half <strong>the</strong> households’ total energy use.<br />

Therefore it needs to be considered <strong>in</strong> policy mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Information about <strong>the</strong> energy efficiency on spend<strong>in</strong>gs is valuable but cannot be<br />

presented and used without consider<strong>in</strong>g basic needs and quality of life.<br />

41


The energy profiles for different households show that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual ones may differ<br />

a lot from <strong>the</strong> average. There is a need for <strong>in</strong>dividual consumer advice about more<br />

energy efficient spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns.<br />

The prelim<strong>in</strong>ary figures on <strong>the</strong> energy efficiency of spend<strong>in</strong>g presented here <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

opportunities for less energy demand<strong>in</strong>g spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns. The potential <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> short<br />

term may be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> order of 10% if <strong>in</strong>come is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed, only <strong>in</strong>direct energy is<br />

considered and no “drastic” changes are considered.<br />

Large reductions <strong>in</strong> household energy use, such as a factor four or more, seem to<br />

require substantial changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>tensities of goods and services, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with major shifts <strong>in</strong> expenditure patterns, and possibly also reduced household<br />

expenditures.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r use of <strong>the</strong> Swedish EAP programme should <strong>in</strong>clude updat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> databases<br />

and consumer prices as well explor<strong>in</strong>g important uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties.<br />

Results about energy <strong>in</strong>tensities should be presented toge<strong>the</strong>r with total energy use.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong>y don’t make sense <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> debate about how to achieve susta<strong>in</strong>ability,<br />

where safeguard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> function<strong>in</strong>g of ecological support systems is <strong>the</strong> ultimate<br />

goal. <strong>Household</strong> energy use should be put <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> number of persons per<br />

household. O<strong>the</strong>rwise, household dilution may obscur <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> energy use.<br />

42


References<br />

Alfredsson A. 2002. Green Consumption, Energy Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions.<br />

PhD <strong>the</strong>sis, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Spatial Modell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Centre, Umeå, Sweden.<br />

Bil Sweden, 2001: Bilismen i Sverige 2001. BIL Sweden Adm AB, Stockholm.<br />

Birka Energi, 2002 a: Anette Rådman, personal communication<br />

Birka Energi, 2002 b: Anders L<strong>in</strong>dberg, personal communication<br />

Birka Energi, 2002 c: Per-Olof Moberg, personal communication<br />

Boverket, 2002: homepage www.boverket.se<br />

Carlsson-Kanayma A., 1998: Climate change and dietary choices: How can emissions<br />

of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? Food Policy 23 (3-4), 277-<br />

293.<br />

Carlsson-Kanyama A. and Faist M., 2000: Energy Use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Food Sector: A Data<br />

Survey. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, AFR Report 291, Stockholm.<br />

Carlsson-Kanyama A. and L<strong>in</strong>den A-L, 1999: Travel Patterns and Environmental<br />

Effects Now and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Future: implications of differences <strong>in</strong> energy consumption<br />

among socio-economic groups. Ecological Economics, 30 (3), 405-417.<br />

Carlsson-Kanyama A. and L<strong>in</strong>dén A-L., 2001: Trends <strong>in</strong> food production and<br />

consumption - Swedish experiences from environmental and cultural impacts. The<br />

International Journal of Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development 4 (4), 392-406.<br />

Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Eriksson, B., Henriksson, G., 2001a: Stake holders and<br />

Consumption <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Five</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>. Swedish National Report -- Stockholm. Fms-report<br />

173.<br />

Carlsson-Kanyama A., Eriksson, B. and Henriksson, G., 2001b: M<strong>in</strong>dre<br />

miljöpåverkan från hushållens konsumtion på Södermalm? - nuläge, h<strong>in</strong>der och<br />

möjligheter (In Swedish). Popular Science Summary of a Study Carried out with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

EU Project ToolSust. Work<strong>in</strong>g paper.<br />

Duch<strong>in</strong> F., 1995: Global Scenarios about Lifestyle and Technology. Paper presented<br />

at <strong>the</strong> Conference "The Susta<strong>in</strong>able Future of <strong>the</strong> Global System", United<br />

Nations University, October 1995. 1995. Tokyo.<br />

IEA Statistics, 1998: Energy Balances of OECD countries 1995-1996, Paris<br />

IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1990: The Price of<br />

Pollution. Brown, L.R. et al. (Eds) State of <strong>the</strong> World 1993, Earthscan Publications<br />

Ltd, London.<br />

43


IVL, 2001: Jessica Granath, personal communication<br />

Jordbruksverket, 1996: Trädgårdsundersökn<strong>in</strong>gen 1995. Jönköp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Jordbruksverket, 2001: Pris<strong>in</strong>dex, priser, produktion och utrikeshandel <strong>in</strong>om<br />

livsmedelsområdet. Månadsstatistik 2001:9. Sveriges Officiella statistik. Price<br />

<strong>in</strong>dices, prices, production and foreign trade <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> food sector. Monthly statistics<br />

2001:9. Official statistics of Sweden. Jönköp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Kok, R., Benders, R.M.J. and Moll, H.C., 2001: Energie-<strong>in</strong>tensiteiten van de<br />

Nederlandse consumptieve bestend<strong>in</strong>gen anno 1996, IVEM-researchreport no. 105,<br />

University of Gron<strong>in</strong>gen.<br />

Kramer K.J., Moll H.C., Nonhebel S. and Wilt<strong>in</strong>g H.C., 1999. Greenhouse gas<br />

emissions related to Dutch food consumption. Energy Policy 27, 203-216.<br />

Moll H.C., 1993: Energy counts and materials matter <strong>in</strong> models for susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

development. Dynamic lifecycle modell<strong>in</strong>g as a tool for design and evaluation<br />

of long-term environmental strategies. PhD. Thesis. Gron<strong>in</strong>gen, <strong>the</strong><br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Gron<strong>in</strong>gen University.<br />

NTM, 2002: Network for Transport and <strong>the</strong> Environment, homepage<br />

www.ntm.a.se/english/<br />

Renhålln<strong>in</strong>gsförvaltn<strong>in</strong>gen, 2001: Anita Tärnström, personal communication.<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden1997 a: Industri. Del 2 Varudata 1995. Produktion av varor<br />

och tjänster fördelade enligt HS-nomenklaturen. Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g 1995. Part 2, Örebro.<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden 1997 b: När mat kommer på tal. Tabeller om livsmedel 1997.<br />

SCB-Tryck, Örebro.<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden 1998: The Swedish Family Expenditure Survey<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden 2001 a: Datafile on consumer prices <strong>in</strong> 1995 sent by email <strong>in</strong><br />

2001<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden. 2001 b: Energistatistik för småhus, flerbostadshus och<br />

lokaler. Sammanställn<strong>in</strong>g avseende år 1999 och 2000. EN 16 SM 0104, Stockholm.<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden 2002 a: Datafiles on manufacturers, taxes and trade marg<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

calculated by Anders Wadeskog<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden 2002 b: databases on homepage, www.scb.se<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden 2002 c: Datafile on expenditures for <strong>the</strong> average Swedish and<br />

<strong>the</strong> average Stockholm City household, calculated by Anita Olsson-Malmberg<br />

SCB, Statistics Sweden 2002 d: Regionala miljöräkenskaper 1993-1997 för<br />

Stockholms län. SCB-Tryck, Örebro 2002.06.<br />

44


SJ (Statens Järnvägar), 2000: Årsberättelse. Year report, can be downloaded at <strong>the</strong><br />

homepage www.om.sj.se<br />

SL (Storstockholms Lokaltrafik), 2000: Årsberättelse. Year report, can be<br />

downloaded at <strong>the</strong> homepage www.sl.se/om<br />

SJV, 1991: Jordbruksekonomiska meddelanden 1991:7-8. Can be downloaded at<br />

www.sjv.se<br />

SPI, 2002: Swedish Petroleum Institute, homepage www.spi.se<br />

Stockholm Vatten, 2002: Marita Hult, personal communication.<br />

Swedish Dairy Association, 2002: homepage www.svenskmjolk.se<br />

Sveriges fiskares producentorganisation, 2001: Datafile on producer prices of fish <strong>in</strong><br />

1995 sent by email <strong>in</strong> 2001.<br />

Taxi Stockholm, 2001: Årsredovisn<strong>in</strong>g och koncernredovisn<strong>in</strong>g 2001-01-01 – 2001-<br />

12-31. Taxi Trafikfören<strong>in</strong>g upa Org nr 700202-3045. Year report.<br />

Taxi Stockholm, 2002: Arve Fjeld, personal communication<br />

Van Engelenburg,B, T van Rossum, K Blok, W Biesiot, H C Wilt<strong>in</strong>g, 1991: Energy<br />

use and household consumption. 1991. The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands. (<strong>in</strong> Dutch),<br />

IVEM/STS, Utrecht University.<br />

Von Weizäcker E., Lov<strong>in</strong>s A., and Lov<strong>in</strong>s H. 1997. Factor Four: doubl<strong>in</strong>g wealth,<br />

halv<strong>in</strong>g resource use. Island Press.<br />

Wilt<strong>in</strong>g,HC, W Biesiot, H C Moll,1994: Economic activities from an energetic<br />

perspective - changes <strong>in</strong> The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1969-1988. IVEM<br />

research report 72. 1994. Gron<strong>in</strong>gen, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, July 1994 (<strong>in</strong> Dutch),<br />

University of Gron<strong>in</strong>gen.<br />

Wilt<strong>in</strong>g,HC, W Biesiot, H C Moll, 1995: Energy Analysis Program, a manual for<br />

version 2.0. IVEM research report 76. 1995. Gron<strong>in</strong>gen, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands,<br />

February 1995 (<strong>in</strong> Dutch), University of Gron<strong>in</strong>gen.<br />

Wilt<strong>in</strong>g H.C., 1996: An Energy Perspective on Economic Activities. Gron<strong>in</strong>gen,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, University of Gron<strong>in</strong>gen.<br />

List of deliverables from <strong>the</strong> ToolSust project, see fur<strong>the</strong>r www.ToolSust.org<br />

45


Appendix 1: Input output sectors<br />

sector number<br />

agriculture 1<br />

air transport 49<br />

bank<strong>in</strong>g 52<br />

beverage <strong>in</strong>dustry 13<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities (o<strong>the</strong>r) 58<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and lea<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustry 16<br />

construction 43<br />

data consultants, research 57<br />

education 59<br />

electricity and gas supply 41<br />

fishery 3<br />

forestry 2<br />

graphical <strong>in</strong>dustry 21<br />

hotels and restaurants 46<br />

human health and veter<strong>in</strong>ary activities 60<br />

<strong>in</strong>surance 53<br />

land transport 47<br />

manufacture of animal feed 12<br />

manufacture of computers 34<br />

manufacture of dairy products 10<br />

manufacture of detergents 26<br />

manufacture of domestic appliances 33<br />

manufacture of electrical and electronical mach<strong>in</strong>ery n.e.c. 35<br />

manufacture of fats and oils 9<br />

manufacture of furniture 39<br />

manufacture of glass, bricks and cement 29<br />

manufacture of iron and steel 30<br />

manufacture of motor vehicles, tra<strong>in</strong>s, trams and aircraft 36<br />

manufacture of o<strong>the</strong>r basic chemicals 23<br />

manufacture of o<strong>the</strong>r food products 11<br />

manufacture of o<strong>the</strong>r mach<strong>in</strong>ery and equipment 32<br />

manufacture of o<strong>the</strong>r transport equipment 38<br />

manufacture of pa<strong>in</strong>ts 24<br />

manufacture of pharmaceutical products 25<br />

manufacture of ships and boats 37<br />

manufacture of wood and wood products 17<br />

metal <strong>in</strong>dustry 31<br />

metal ore m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 4<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r chemical <strong>in</strong>dustry 27<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial activities 54<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r manufactur<strong>in</strong>g 40<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and quarry<strong>in</strong>g 5<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r service activities 64<br />

paper and cardboard <strong>in</strong>dustry 18<br />

paperware <strong>in</strong>dustry 19<br />

petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry 22<br />

post and telecommunication 51<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, publish<strong>in</strong>g and related <strong>in</strong>dustry 20<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g of fish 7<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g of fruit and vegetables 8<br />

public sectors and ngo's 65<br />

real estate activities 55<br />

recreational, cultural and sport<strong>in</strong>g activities 63<br />

rent<strong>in</strong>g of movables 56<br />

rubber and syn<strong>the</strong>tic material-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry 28<br />

sewage and refuse disposal services 62<br />

slaughter<strong>in</strong>g and meat-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry 6<br />

social work activities 61<br />

support<strong>in</strong>g transport activities 50<br />

textiles <strong>in</strong>dustry 15<br />

tobacco-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry 14<br />

trade/repair of motor vehicles 44<br />

water supply 42<br />

water transport 48<br />

wholesale and retail trade 45


Appendix 2: Basic goods Energy use and prices<br />

SEK/kg MJ/kg SEK/kg MJ/kg<br />

apples , Swedish farm 5.32 1.08 cotton 30.60 49.90<br />

apples, farm <strong>in</strong> Europe 5.32 2.44 lea<strong>the</strong>r 16.16 40.80<br />

barley 1.11 2.79 softwood (sawn) 2.17 3.10<br />

beef, bullocks 23.49 40.65 cardboard (solid) 6.01 27.54<br />

beef, culled cow 18.12 27.52 plywood 6.90 16.00<br />

bananas 6.00 6.36 chipboard 8.08 11.80<br />

broiler 6.78 17.72 hardwood (sawn) 2.06 6.20<br />

cabbage, white 1.94 1.13 plywood 3.50 16.00<br />

carrots 2.08 0.60 paper pulp 5.27 32.84<br />

cherries 32.51 2.56 cardboard (corrugated) 10.78 17.86<br />

cocoa beans 11.16 3.42 cardboard (fold<strong>in</strong>g) 6.01 27.54<br />

coffee beans 28.50 10.22 paper (graphic) 8.43 28.52<br />

cons. potatoes (organic) 3.00 1.09 paper (newspaper) 4.78 21.31<br />

consumer potatoes 2.50 1.09 paper (sanitary) 10.59 13.30<br />

cucumber, open ground 2.41 0.83 petrol (gasol<strong>in</strong>e) 1.47 49.28<br />

eggs 7.76 15.24 bitumen 0.28 42.00<br />

factory potatoes 0.56 1.09 ammonia 13.89 74.56<br />

grapes 10.44 3.94 chlor<strong>in</strong>e (Cl2) 0.64 18.40<br />

glasshouse grow<strong>in</strong>g vegetables 38.34 26.19 pa<strong>in</strong>t 20.45 51.90<br />

lamb 27.66 21.72 surface active material 11.67 51.40<br />

leek 5.08 1.92 glycerol 7.66 0.79<br />

lettuce, open ground 5.35 1.50 lipid 8.52 32.60<br />

lettuce, greenhouse 18.88 111.24 sweeteners 28.22 160.00<br />

l<strong>in</strong>gonberries, picked <strong>in</strong> Norrland 11.00 0.80 nylon (PA 66) 23.08 130.70<br />

milk, whole, organic 3.58 3.51 ABS (granules) 19.44 86.71<br />

milk , whole 3.08 3.85 HDPE (granules) 10.51 75.74<br />

mushrooms 23.00 7.63 LDPE (granules) 10.51 83.41<br />

oat 1.07 3.64 PET (granules) 14.52 73.02<br />

olives 6.96 2.71 PUR 19.04 93.90<br />

oranges 7.64 3.79 PVC (granules) 16.75 61.79<br />

peas, green 1.35 1.40 SBR rubber (gra<strong>in</strong>s) 4.83 85.47<br />

pork 12.25 22.72 polyacrylic fibre 49.84 135.70<br />

rape seed 1.70 5.84 nylon fiber 23.08 185.58<br />

raspberries, open ground 28.00 3.94 polycarbonate (granules) 33.81 105.00<br />

rice (paddy) 7.12 9.03 polyester 67.01 97.80<br />

rye 1.10 2.90 polypropene (granules) 5.94 82.00<br />

soya beans 2.06 7.07 polystyrene (granules) 9.92 96.05<br />

sugar beets 0.42 0.53 Portland cement cl<strong>in</strong>ker 0.18 3.90<br />

sunflower seeds 3.90 11.94 bricks 1.62 3.10<br />

strawberries, open ground 15.75 3.74 cement (Portland) 0.27 4.50<br />

tea 8.44 7.30 chalk sandstone 0.37 0.77<br />

tobacco 29.40 45.50 glass (flat) 3.21 10.57<br />

tomatoes, open ground 2.66 4.08 glass wool 11.60 20.00<br />

tomatoes, greenhouse 11.06 56.24 sta<strong>in</strong>less steel 40.69 43.70<br />

wheat 1.18 2.94 steel 5.95 43.70<br />

wool 2.00 20.00 alum<strong>in</strong>ium 13.82 184.93<br />

fish (cod) 11.00 31.00 chrome 99.01 174.88<br />

fish (herr<strong>in</strong>g) 4.88 4.20 copper (cathodic) 20.62 97.59<br />

chalk 0.83 0.10 gold (per gram) 87.40 5.60<br />

natural stone (broken) 1.43 0.37 lead 4.91 28.90<br />

sand 0.19 0.10 manganese 1.08 216.34<br />

gravel 0.05 0.10 nickel (electrolytic) 64.80 360.50<br />

gravel (broken) 0.05 0.19 silver 1174.00 80.00<br />

lime 0.09 0.02 t<strong>in</strong> 47.90 211.05<br />

soya mash 4.54 6.10 titanium 12.48 641.00<br />

sunflower mash 2.00 5.64 z<strong>in</strong>c 8.27 52.10<br />

whey 0.10 0.50 zirconium 1509.95 1200.00<br />

beet pulp (dried) 0.90 12.50 water 0.01 0.00<br />

cocoa butter 28.34 15.34 clams 4.33 1.40<br />

cocoa mass 18.16 13.50 fish (cultured salmon) 32.79 36.00<br />

cocoa powder 22.16 12.00 nuts and peanuts 97.71 15.70<br />

molasses (as by-product) 1.07 1.24 onions 2.99 1.92<br />

sugar 7.21 9.21 shrimps 35.00 64.00<br />

pastry 11.33 13.00


Appendix 3: Packag<strong>in</strong>g materials Energy use and prices<br />

SEK/kg<br />

MJ/kg<br />

alum<strong>in</strong>ium 13.82 168.01<br />

cardboard (beverages) 6.01 36.37<br />

cardboard (corrugated ) 10.78 17.86<br />

cardboard (dry food) 6.01 12.55<br />

cardboard (o<strong>the</strong>rs) 6.01 43.89<br />

glass (once used) 3.21 10.57<br />

glass (re-used, deposit) 0.14 2.64<br />

HDPE (granules) 10.51 75.74<br />

LDPE 10.51 83.41<br />

paper 8.43 40.85<br />

PET bottle grade (re-used, deposit) 7.26 23.86<br />

PET (granules) 14.52 73.02<br />

polycarbonate (granules) 33.81 105.00<br />

polypropene (granules) 5.94 82.00<br />

polystyrene (granules) 9.92 96.05<br />

PVC (soft, granules) 16.75 61.79<br />

softwood (sawn) 2.17 3.10<br />

t<strong>in</strong> 28.27 35.77


Appendix 4: Manufacturers<br />

Sector NACE-code SEK/GJ MJ/SEK NAV Depreciation<br />

agriculture 01 69.24 1.030 29.4 13.1<br />

air transport 62 24.24 1.720 30.0 8.6<br />

bank<strong>in</strong>g 65 128.13 0.019 65.8 3.7<br />

beverage <strong>in</strong>dustry 15.9 27.65 0.333 26.4 4.3<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities (o<strong>the</strong>r) 74 98.69 0.102 43.2 6.0<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and lea<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustry 18-19 23.64 0.383 27.4 4.3<br />

construction 45 118.01 0.195 45.4 4.6<br />

data consultants, research 72-73 122.77 0.082 41.1 6.0<br />

education 80 73.49 0.430 43.6 5.1<br />

electricity and gas supply 40 22.09 3.320 47.1 18.8<br />

fishery 05 38.93 2.502 35.8 13.1<br />

forestry 02 96.77 0.311 73.9 13.1<br />

graphical <strong>in</strong>dustry 22.2-22.3 43.79 0.155 37.7 4.3<br />

hotels and restaurants 55 63.92 0.208 35.3 5.8<br />

human health and veter<strong>in</strong>ary activities 851-2 103.01 0.246 52.5 5.1<br />

<strong>in</strong>surance 66 64.25 0.311 58.6 3.7<br />

land transport 60 97.02 0.866 39.0 9.0<br />

manufacture of animal feed 15.7 17.50 0.373 7.0 4.3<br />

manufacture of computers 30 64.41 0.093 36.7 4.3<br />

manufacture of dairy products 15.5 14.24 0.443 12.2 4.3<br />

manufacture of detergents 24.5 49.24 0.306 24.7 4.3<br />

manufacture of domestic appliances 297 42.55 0.259 31.3 4.3<br />

manufacture of electrical and electronical mach<strong>in</strong>ery n.e.c. 31-33 62.16 0.095 27.3 4.3<br />

manufacture of fats and oils 15.4 28.37 0.543 15.8 4.3<br />

manufacture of furniture 361 44.66 0.209 28.6 4.3<br />

manufacture of glass, bricks and cement 26 19.17 1.800 37.0 4.3<br />

manufacture of iron and steel 27 8.95 1.783 24.1 4.3<br />

manufacture of motor vehicles, tra<strong>in</strong>s, trams and aircraft 34,352-353 39.69 0.177 23.5 4.3<br />

manufacture of o<strong>the</strong>r basic chemicals 24.1-24.2 165.45 1.333 28.4 4.3<br />

manufacture of o<strong>the</strong>r food products 15.6,15.8 19.13 0.465 29.9 4.3<br />

manufacture of o<strong>the</strong>r mach<strong>in</strong>ery and equipment 291-296 55.48 0.198 31.8 4.3<br />

manufacture of o<strong>the</strong>r transport equipment 354-355 55.12 0.372 30.4 4.3<br />

manufacture of pa<strong>in</strong>ts 24.3 204.77 0.170 25.8 4.3<br />

manufacture of pharmaceutical products 24.4 107.68 0.161 48.7 4.3<br />

manufacture of ships and boats 351 38.10 0.186 36.2 4.3<br />

manufacture of wood and wood products 20 38.59 0.484 24.0 4.3<br />

metal <strong>in</strong>dustry 28 39.88 0.340 37.7 4.3<br />

metal ore m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 10-13 14.68 3.149 35.7 11.4<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r chemical <strong>in</strong>dustry 24.6-24.7 58.52 0.819 27.7 4.3<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial activities 67 168.09 0.019 43.1 3.7<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r manufactur<strong>in</strong>g 362-366,37,39 52.77 0.518 25.5 4.3<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and quarry<strong>in</strong>g 14 52.55 0.990 32.6 11.4<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r service activities 93 76.40 0.215 50.9 5.1<br />

paper and cardboard <strong>in</strong>dustry 211 3.77 3.634 35.1 4.3<br />

paper ware <strong>in</strong>dustry 21.2 28.29 0.370 30.6 4.3<br />

petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry 23 17.13 2.397 9.8 4.3<br />

post and telecommunication 64 85.97 0.137 48.1 11.0<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, publish<strong>in</strong>g and related <strong>in</strong>dustry 22.1 78.15 0.087 34.3 4.3<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g of fish 15.2 30.33 0.381 20.1 4.3<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g of fruit and vegetables 15.3 16.04 0.484 22.7 4.3<br />

public sectors and ngo's 75 67.63 0.239 57.2 5.1<br />

real estate activities 70 69.15 0.202 48.0 20.5<br />

recreational, cultural and sport<strong>in</strong>g activities 92 70.26 0.363 45.4 5.1<br />

rent<strong>in</strong>g of movables 71 89.02 0.289 46.8 6.0<br />

rubber and syn<strong>the</strong>tic material-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry 25 53.76 0.424 31.2 4.3<br />

sewage and refuse disposal services 90 74.09 0.786 44.0 5.1<br />

slaughter<strong>in</strong>g and meat-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry 15.1 28.26 0.236 14.5 4.3<br />

social work activities 853 89.65 0.468 66.2 5.1<br />

support<strong>in</strong>g transport activities 63 86.92 0.180 40.5 5.8<br />

textiles <strong>in</strong>dustry 17 30.06 0.462 33.4 4.3<br />

tobacco-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry 16 7.28 0.145 50.4 4.3<br />

trade/repair of motor vehicles 502 117.42 0.588 44.7 6.6<br />

water supply 41 62.77 1.001 27.1 31.5<br />

water transport 61 19.00 3.495 22.1 5.0<br />

wholesale and retail trade 50-52 övr 93.64 0.249 59.0 6.6


Appendix 5: Energy use for different vehicles<br />

MJ/tonkm Comment<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747-400 1200 km<br />

7.88 MTOW 394 ton<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747, <strong>in</strong>tercont<strong>in</strong>ental flights 7.59 payload 75 %<br />

Cargo vessels, large<br />

0.22 >8 dwt. Medium value.<br />

Cargo vessels, large, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport<br />

0.26 >8 dwt. Medium value.<br />

Cargo vessels, medium size<br />

0.30 2-8 dwt. Medium value<br />

Cargo vessels, medium size, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport<br />

0.34 2-8 dwt. Medium value<br />

Diesel tra<strong>in</strong> 0.24<br />

Diesel tra<strong>in</strong>, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport 0.28<br />

Ferries<br />

0.43 of <strong>the</strong> type trafick<strong>in</strong>g Sweden-F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Heavy lorry with trailer, 40 tons<br />

0.72 Total weight, 40 tons, payload 26 ton, Euro 1. Medium values.<br />

Heavy lorry with trailer, 60 tons<br />

0.65 Total weight, 60 tons, payload 40 ton, Euro 1. Medium values.<br />

Heavy lorry with trailer, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport, 40 tons<br />

0.83 Total weight, 40 tons, payload 26 ton, Euro 1. Medium values.<br />

Heavy lorry with trailer, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport, 60 tons<br />

0.75 Total weight, 60 tons, payload 40 ton, Euro 1. Medium values.<br />

Light Lorry Distribution Service<br />

2.41 Total weight, 14 tons, payload 8.4 ton, Euro 1. Medium values.<br />

Light Lorry Distribution Service, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport<br />

2.77 Total weight, 14 tons, payload 8.4 ton, Euro 1. Medium values.<br />

Medium lorry, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport, regional transport<br />

2.15 Total weight, 24 tons, payload 14 ton, Euro 1. Medium values.<br />

Medium lorry, regional transport<br />

1.87 Total weight, 24 tons, payload 14 ton, Euro 1. Medium values.<br />

Parcel delivery vehicle (diesel)<br />

9.72 total weight, 3.5 tons, payload 1.4 ton, diesel<br />

Parcel delivery vehicle (petrol)<br />

13.68 total weight, 3.5 tons, payload 1.4 ton, petrol<br />

Parcel delivery vehicle, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport (diesel)<br />

11.18 total weight, 3.5 tons, payload 1.4 ton, diesel<br />

Parcel delivery vehicle, cool<strong>in</strong>g transport (petrol)<br />

15.73 total weight, 3.5 tons, payload 1.4 ton, petrol


Appendix 6: Energy and consumer prices<br />

Code of Energy Energy Consumer Aggregated<br />

expenditure Description <strong>in</strong>tensity MJ/unit Unit price Unit Source of consumer price Category<br />

category<br />

MJ/sek<br />

Food<br />

rad1 flour and meal 1.19 1.19 kg food<br />

rad1a wheat flour 1.25 12.05 kg 9.61 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad1b flour mixes 1.10 27.49 kg 25 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad1c rice 1.09 27.24 kg 25 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad1d pasta 1.19 23.80 kg 20 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad1e breakfast cereals 1.22 54.80 kg 45 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad2 crisp bread 1.05 49.28 kg 47 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad3 white bread 1.10 24.12 kg 22 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

rad4 o<strong>the</strong>r soft bread 1.06 34.88 kg 33 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

rad5 unspecified bread 1.07 1.07 sek food<br />

rad6 cake and biscuits 0.39 23.92 kg 62 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

rad7 beef and veal, fresh 1.18 88.85 kg 75.03 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad8 pork, fresh 1.17 57.95 kg 49.65 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad9 m<strong>in</strong>ced meat, fresh 1.13 61.01 kg 53.93 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad10 o<strong>the</strong>r meat 0.55 0.55 sek food<br />

rad10a game 0.46 31.32 kg 68 kg Dutch prices recalculated food<br />

rad10b lamb 0.79 62.84 kg 80 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad11 poultry 1.44 32.84 kg 22.85 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad12 sausage 1.14 56.23 kg 49.48 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad13 meat products for sandwiches 1.06 1.06 sek food<br />

ham for sandwiches 1.06 161.44 kg 152.55 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

sausage for sandwiches 1.06 161.08 kg 152.55 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad14 meat courses and o<strong>the</strong>r meat products 1.04 79.26 kg 76 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad15 cod, fresh and frozen 1.68 1.68 sek food<br />

cod, fresh 1.65 74.34 kg 45 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

cod, frozen 1.71 76.91 kg 45 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad16 salmon (cultured), fresh and prepared 1.01 69.44 kg 69 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad17 herr<strong>in</strong>g, fresh and pickled 1.60 1.60 sek food<br />

herr<strong>in</strong>g, fresh 1.65 46.23 kg 28 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

herr<strong>in</strong>g, pickled 1.54 118.06 kg 80 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad18 o<strong>the</strong>r fish, fresh and prepared 1.55 1.55 sek food<br />

rad19 shellfish 1.24 200.74 kg 162 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad20 caviar, spawn and o<strong>the</strong>r fish products 1.40 57.20 kg 123 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad21 milk 3% fat 1.49 9.12 litre food<br />

rad22 milk 1.5% fat 1.49 1.49 sek 6.15 litre The Swedish Dairy Association food<br />

rad23 milk 0.5% fat 1.49 1.49 sek food<br />

rad24 powdered milk 1.49 1.49 sek food<br />

rad25 soured milk and yoghurt 1.29 1.29 sek food<br />

soured milk 1.29 9.40 litre 7.28 litre The Swedish Dairy Association food<br />

fruit yoghurt 1.28 19.13 litre 15 litre Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad26 cream >=29% fat 1.05 35.57 litre 33.77 litre The Swedish Dairy Association food<br />

rad27 cream 10-28% fat 1.05 1.05 sek food<br />

rad28 cheese >17% fat 1.37 88.12 kg 64.24 kg The Swedish Dairy Association food<br />

rad29 cheese


Appendix 6 cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Code of Energy Energy Consumer Aggregated<br />

expenditure Description <strong>in</strong>tensity MJ/unit Unit price Unit Source of consumer price Category<br />

category<br />

MJ/sek<br />

rad44 berries 0.27 0.27 sek food<br />

strawberries 0.29 24.48 kg 84 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

l<strong>in</strong>gonberries 0.25 21.15 kg 84 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad45 canned fruit and soups 1.97 69.03 litre 35 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad46 fruit-syrup 1.34 4.01 litre 3 litre Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad47 fruit juice 0.70 9.14 litre 13 litre Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad48 cucumber, fresh and pickled 2.02 2.02 sek food<br />

cucumber, fresh 2.51 52.81 kg 21 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

cucumber, pickled 1.19 21.36 can 18 can Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad49 salad, different k<strong>in</strong>ds, fresh 4.18 75.32 kg 18 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

rad50 cabbage, fresh 0.43 5.65 kg 13 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

rad51 tomatoes, fresh and canned 2.53 2.53 sek food<br />

tomatoes, fresh 2.86 60.05 kg 21 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

canned tomatoes 1.28 6.38 piece 5 can Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad52 onions and leek 0.62 6.05 kg 10 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

rad53 o<strong>the</strong>r vegetables, fresh and prepared 1.44 1.44 sek food<br />

rad54 mushrooms, fresh and canned 0.50 0.50 sek food<br />

mushrooms, fresh 0.39 20.46 kg 52 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

canned mushrooms 0.57 5.43 piece 10 can Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad55 vegetable dishes, soups and salads 1.10 39.78 36 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad56 root vegetables 0.40 3.22 kg 8 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

rad57 potatoes fresh and canned 0.66 4.65 kg 7 kg Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

rad58 potato-products (french fries etc) 0.98 30.44 kg 31 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad59 sugar 0.94 16.03 kg 10.82 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad60 jams and marmelades 1.78 71.07 kg 40 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad61 honey and syrup 1.21 69.86 kg 57.5 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad62 ice-cream 1.24 39.53 litre 32 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad63 confectionary 1.01 101.45 kg 100 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad64 Sauces and dress<strong>in</strong>gs 1.14 63.77 litre 56 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad65 salt and spices 0.96 196.86 kg 204 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad66 broth and additives 1.34 85.72 litre 64 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad67 snacks 1.04 103.52 kg 100 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad68 soft dr<strong>in</strong>ks 2.18 25.21 litre 11.58 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad69 m<strong>in</strong>eral and soda water 1.20 13.88 litre 11.58 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad70 coffee 0.64 46.50 kg 72.92 kg SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad71 tea 0.90 262.38 kg 290 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad72 cocoa 0.58 43.69 kg 75 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm food<br />

rad78 unspecified food 1.00 1.00 sek food<br />

rad100 own produced food 0.00 0.00 sek food<br />

rad101 outdoor consumption 0.85 0.85 sek food<br />

sum15 alcoholic beverages 0.94 0.94 sek food<br />

sum15a beer 1.13 21.60 litre 19.06 litre SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

sum15b w<strong>in</strong>e 0.90 165.41 litre 183.31 litre Average prices Statistics Sweden food<br />

sum15c spirits and liqueurs 0.63 165.46 litre 262.86 litre SCB 1997: När mat kommer på tal food<br />

rad 102<br />

tobacco<br />

vk2052 tobacco 0.38 0.38 sek recreation<br />

vk2052a cigarettes 0.25 301.25 kg 29.2 pack of 20 Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm recreation<br />

vk2052b moist snuff 0.48 205.58 kg 560 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm recreation<br />

rad 103<br />

non-durable goods<br />

vk2021 electrical supplies 0.84 0.84 sek household effects<br />

vk2021a cords, plugs and switches 0.74 0.74 sek household effects<br />

vk2021b light bulbs 0.96 6.22 piece 6.5 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2021c batteries, NiCd 0.84 17.23 piece 10.25 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm electricity<br />

vk2021d batteries, z<strong>in</strong>c/manganese 0.81 16.67 piece 10.25 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm electricity<br />

vk2022 detergents (not personal) 0.96 45.84 bottle 48 litre Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm hygiene<br />

vk2023 clean<strong>in</strong>g tools 1.01 1.01 sek household effects<br />

vk2024 kitchen roll 0.91 8.22 piece 9 roll Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2025 toilet paper 0.97 21.57 kg 31 packet of 8 rolls Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm<br />

vk2026 rubbish bags 2.03 97.64 roll 48 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

hygiene


Appendix 6 cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Code of Energy Energy Consumer Aggregated<br />

expenditure Description <strong>in</strong>tensity MJ/unit Unit price Unit Source of consumer price Category<br />

category<br />

MJ/sek<br />

vk2027 nails, screws etc 1.25 48.89 kg 39 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2028 pa<strong>in</strong>t 1.07 133.26 kg 125 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2029 soap and shampoo 1.57 95.76 kg 61 litre Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm hygiene<br />

vk2030 cosmetics 1.09 0.72 sek hygiene<br />

vk2030a perfume 1.21 120.09 kg 327 kr litre Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm hygiene<br />

vk2030b sk<strong>in</strong> cream 0.97 316.44 kg 1 295 kr litre Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm hygiene<br />

vk2031 sanitairy protection 0.98 199.91 kg 204 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm hygiene<br />

vk2032 diapers 1.60 86.27 kg 54 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm hygiene<br />

vk2033 o<strong>the</strong>r toilet requisites 0.98 10.81 tube 11 tooth paste tube Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm hygiene<br />

vk2034 medical articles 0.76 0.76 sek hygiene<br />

vk2035 o<strong>the</strong>r disposables 1.27 1.27 sek household effects<br />

vk2035a candles 1.24 1.24 sek household effects<br />

vk2035b charcoal 1.18 69.43 bag 59 bag of 5 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2035c paper plates 1.19 0.76 piece 31.8 packet of 50 Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2035d disposables 1.80 0.54 piece 30 packet of 100 Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

sum 16<br />

rad 104<br />

household services<br />

child care<br />

vk2692 municipal babysitt<strong>in</strong>g out of doors 0.74 0.74 sek hygiene<br />

vk2693 privat babysitt<strong>in</strong>g out of doors 0.74 0.74 sek hygiene<br />

rad 105<br />

union dues, o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>surance<br />

AKASSA union dues 0.69 0.69 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

H12E1 casualty <strong>in</strong>surance 0.64 0.64 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

H12F1 health and accident <strong>in</strong>surance 0.64 0.64 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

rad 106<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r services<br />

vk2391 laundry, dry-clean<strong>in</strong>g 0.67 0.67 sek hygiene<br />

vk2392 social home help 0.00 0.00 sek hygiene<br />

vk2393 clean<strong>in</strong>g 0.00 0.00 sek hygiene<br />

vk2721 hairdresser 0.69 0.69 sek hygiene<br />

vk2755 bank<strong>in</strong>g service 0.29 0.29 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

vk2772 subscription public organisations 0.69 0.69 sek recreation<br />

vk2774 o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>terest 0.29 0.29 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

vk2775 adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenses 0.80 0.80 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

vk2776 cash donations and benefit 0.00 0.00 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

vk2777 o<strong>the</strong>r service activities 0.67 0.67 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

sum 17<br />

rad 107<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

cloth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

vk2100 unspecified clo<strong>the</strong>s 0.90 0.90 sek cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2101 women's coats 0.91 1007.60 piece 1108 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2102 men's coats 0.86 850.37 pieces 987 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2103 fur and lea<strong>the</strong>r wear 0.92 1372.27 piece 1499 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2104 women's suits 0.90 1467.13 piece 1629 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2105 dresses 0.87 403.48 piece 465 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2106 jackets 0.91 1126.07 piece 1242 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2107 men's suits 0.86 1401.25 piece 1629 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2108 skirts 0.90 377.73 piece 418 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2109 jeans 0.92 426.33 piece 465 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2110 trousers 0.91 350.88 piece 387 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2111 coats 0.89 0.89 sek cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2112 cardigans and jersey/sweater 0.87 469.46 piece 539 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2113 babies' clo<strong>the</strong>s 0.92 124.62 piece 136 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2114 sports and beachwear 0.92 512.78 piece 559 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2115 ra<strong>in</strong>wear and overalls 0.90 671.16 piece 743 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2116 night and dress<strong>in</strong>g gowns 0.87 324.57 piece 372 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2117 blouses 0.87 263.16 piece 302 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2118 shirts 0.87 263.41 piece 302 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2119 bra 0.92 314.38 piece 340 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2120 o<strong>the</strong>r underwear 0.87 40.79 peice 47 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2121 socks 0.87 0.87 sek cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2122 hats 0.96 282.24 piece 295 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear


Appendix 6 cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Code of Energy Energy Consumer Aggregated<br />

expenditure Description <strong>in</strong>tensity MJ/unit Unit price Unit Source of consumer price Category<br />

category<br />

MJ/sek<br />

vk2123 gloves 0.94 93.19 pair 99 pair Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2124 cloth<strong>in</strong>g accessories 0.92 139.67 piece 151 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2125 material for clo<strong>the</strong>s 0.94 73.06 piece 78 metre Average prices Statistics Sweden cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2126 knitt<strong>in</strong>g wool 1.05 10.10 ball 9.6 ball Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2127 requisites, haberdashery 0.90 15.78 piece 17.5 piece Dutch prices recalculated cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2128 charge for mak<strong>in</strong>g clo<strong>the</strong>s 0.60 0.60 sek cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

rad 108<br />

footwear<br />

vk2141 ski boots 0.99 693.08 piece 698 pair Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2142 lea<strong>the</strong>r boots 0.96 490.58 pair 509 pair Average prices Statistics Sweden cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2143 sport shoes 0.98 321.03 pair 327 pair Average prices Statistics Sweden cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2144 ord<strong>in</strong>ary shoes 0.91 438.18 pair 479 pair Average prices Statistics Sweden cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2145 sandals and flip flops 0.94 289.94 pair 309 pair Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2146 Well<strong>in</strong>gtons 1.29 303.97 pair 236 pair Average prices Statistics Sweden cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2147 shoe-repairs 0.59 52.22 time 89 heel<strong>in</strong>g Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

sum 18<br />

rad 109<br />

furniture and household articles<br />

furniture and textiles<br />

230 furniture 0.52 0.52 sek household effects<br />

230a furniture (wood) 0.43 39.29 kg 91 kg Dutch prices recalculated household effects<br />

230b furniture (metal) 0.93 179.83 kg 193 kg Dutch prices recalculated household effects<br />

230c furniture (syn<strong>the</strong>tic material) 1.73 483.76 piece 279 piece Dutch prices recalculated household effects<br />

vk2301 table household effects<br />

vk2302 cupboard household effects<br />

vk2304 set of shelves household effects<br />

vk2306 chair household effects<br />

vk2307 sofa household effects<br />

vk2309 armchair household effects<br />

vk2311 bed household effects<br />

vk2313 light fitt<strong>in</strong>gs 0.85 0.85 sek household effects<br />

vk2314 outdoor furniture household effects<br />

vk2316 carpets 0.51 0.51 sek household effects<br />

vk2316a l<strong>in</strong>oleum carpets 0.49 108.19 m2 219 m2 Production price+tax+marg<strong>in</strong> household effects<br />

vk2316b v<strong>in</strong>yl carpets 0.75 95.76 m2 128 m2 Production price+tax+marg<strong>in</strong> household effects<br />

vk2316c woolen carpets 0.39 388.76 m2 1002 m2 Production price+tax+marg<strong>in</strong> household effects<br />

vk2317 pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs 1.22 1.22 sek household effects<br />

vk2318 bl<strong>in</strong>d, syn<strong>the</strong>tic material 1.10 329.57 piece 300 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2319 furnish<strong>in</strong>gs 1.00 1.00 sek household effects<br />

vk2320 repair and hire of furniture 0.69 0.69 sek household effects<br />

vk2320a repair/ma<strong>in</strong>ten.furniture 0.67 0.67 sek household effects<br />

vk2320b hire of furniture 0.70 0.70 sek household effects<br />

vk2321 o<strong>the</strong>r furnish<strong>in</strong>g accessories 0.88 0.88 sek household effects<br />

vk2331 sheets 0.94 155.56 piece 166 set Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2332 quilts and pillows 0.86 204.43 piece 239 täcke Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2333 mattresses 1.31 2191.58 piece 1678 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2334 table-cloths and curta<strong>in</strong>s 0.92 336.99 piece 366 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2335 towel 0.93 24.10 piece 26 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

rad 110<br />

household equipment<br />

vk2352 microwave oven 0.91 2168.34 piece 2372 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2353 toaster 0.87 243.18 piece 279 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2354 refrigerators and freezers 1.20 6816.45 piece 5671 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2355 dishwasher 1.03 5071.11 piece 4923 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2356 vacuum cleaner 0.96 1216.64 piece 1268 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2357 wash<strong>in</strong>g and dry<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>es 1.12 1.12 sek household effects<br />

vk2357a wash<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e 1.17 6330.28 piece 5408 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2357b dry<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e 0.96 5136.33 piece 5355 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2359 electric iron 0.86 310.88 piece 363 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2360 electrical sew<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e 0.89 3102.86 piece 3499 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2361 garden tools, electrical 0.80 3044.89 kg 3794 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2362 repair and hire of domestic appliances 0.69 0.69 sek household effects<br />

vk2362a repair of domestic appliances 0.67 0.67 sek household effects<br />

vk2362b hire of domestic appliances 0.71 0.71 sek household effects


Appendix 6 cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Code of Energy Energy Consumer Aggregated<br />

expenditure Description <strong>in</strong>tensity MJ/unit Unit price Unit Source of consumer price Category<br />

category<br />

MJ/sek<br />

vk2363 food-processor 0.89 738.90 piece 1419 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2364 compost mill etc 0.85 0.85 sek household effects<br />

vk2371 pottery and glassware 1.32 1.32 sek household effects<br />

vk2372 knives, forks and spoons 0.96 0.96 sek household effects<br />

vk2373 cook<strong>in</strong>g utensils 0.99 0.99 sek household effects<br />

vk2374 receptacles 0.98 0.98 sek household effects<br />

vk2375 bathroom and sauna eqiupment 0.77 4740.54 piece 6163 piece Dutch prices recalculated household effects<br />

vk2376 tools 0.75 0.75 sek household effects<br />

vk2377 garden tools 0.75 0.75 sek household effects<br />

vk2378 o<strong>the</strong>r cook<strong>in</strong>g apparatus 0.99 237.44 piece 239 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2704 bags 0.85 657.97 piece 773 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2705 prams, buggies, baby-carriages 0.86 2720.56 piece 3181 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2706 electric razor 0.62 362.63 kg 585 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden hygiene<br />

rad 111<br />

health and medical care<br />

vk2401 medic<strong>in</strong>es etc. 0.82 0.82 sek hygiene<br />

vk2402 vitam<strong>in</strong>s 1.17 1.17 sek hygiene<br />

vk2403 dental care 0.00 sek<br />

vk2404 medical attendance / hospital treatment 0.00 sek<br />

vk2406 glasses 0.82 1008.30 piece 1226 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden hygiene<br />

sum 19<br />

rad 112<br />

transport<br />

purchases of cars<br />

vk2501 new car 1.38 1.38 sek transport<br />

vk2501a car 0.98 243545.60 piece 247445 piece Production price+tax+marg<strong>in</strong><br />

vk2502 used car 1.38 1.38 sek transport<br />

rad 113<br />

operation of cars<br />

vk2503 fuel 4.89 4.89 sek petrol<br />

vk2503a<br />

vk2503b<br />

petrol<br />

diesel<br />

vk2504 ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of cars 1.02 1.02 sek transport<br />

vk2505 car tyre 1.12 1.12 sek transport<br />

vk2506 accessories of cars 1.12 262.56 kg 235 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm transport<br />

vk2508 taxes and vehicle test<strong>in</strong>g 0.00 0.00 sek<br />

vk2509 hire of car 1.22 1.22 sek transport<br />

vk2511 rent of garage 0.80 0.80 sek transport<br />

H12B1 car <strong>in</strong>surance 0.64 0.64 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

rad 114<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles<br />

vk2521 caravans 0.94 443.36 kg 282979 piece Production price+tax+marg<strong>in</strong> recreation<br />

vk2522 motor cycle, scooter, snowmobile 0.94 82432.22 piece 87819 piece Production price+tax+marg<strong>in</strong> transport<br />

vk2523 bicycle 0.97 2256.66 piece 2338 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden transport<br />

vk2524 fuel, o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles 4.89 4.89 sek petrol<br />

vk2525 repairs, o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles 1.02 1.02 sek transport<br />

vk2527 parts, o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles 1.13 476.70 kg 423 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm transport<br />

vk2529 o<strong>the</strong>r vehicle accessories 1.02 1.02 sek transport<br />

vk2531 moped 0.92 11725.40 piece 12789 piece Production price+tax+marg<strong>in</strong> transport<br />

H12D1 <strong>in</strong>surance o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles 0.64 0.64 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

rad 115<br />

local journeys<br />

vk2541 local journeys 1.20 1.20 sek transport<br />

sum 20<br />

rad 116<br />

recreation and cultural services<br />

secondary dwell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

vk2261 mortgage secondary dwell<strong>in</strong>g 0.21 0.21 sek house<br />

vk2263 delivered reparations sec.dw. 0.67 0.67 sek house<br />

vk2264 reparation materials sec.dw. 1.00 1.00 sek household effects<br />

vk2267 rent/tenancy, association fees sec.dw. 0.23 0.23 sek house<br />

vk2268 electricity and heat<strong>in</strong>g sec.dw. 6.63 6.63 sek electricity<br />

vk2269 water/sewage and refuse removal sec.dw. 0.82 0.82 sek house<br />

vk2272 site-lease rent, tenancy sec.dw. 0.21 0.21 sek house<br />

H12A1 <strong>in</strong>surance secondary dwell<strong>in</strong>g 0.64 0.64 sek household effects<br />

rad 117<br />

radio and tv<br />

vk2601 television sets 0.66 4563.37 piece 6939 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden recreation<br />

vk2602 VCR 0.67 2169.16 piece 3257 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden recreation


Appendix 6 cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Code of Energy Energy Consumer Aggregated<br />

expenditure Description <strong>in</strong>tensity MJ/unit Unit price Unit Source of consumer price Category<br />

category<br />

MJ/sek<br />

vk2603 sound-equipment comb<strong>in</strong>ed 0.66 2796.11 piece 4246 comb<strong>in</strong>ation Average prices Statistics Sweden recreation<br />

vk2605 repair and hire of audio/video equipment 0.69 0.69 sek recreation<br />

vk2605a hire audio/video equipment 0.71 0.71 sek recreation<br />

vk2605b repair audio/video equipment 0.67 0.67 sek recreation<br />

vk2607 satellite dish 0.66 0.66 sek recreation<br />

rad 118 play, sport, hobby<br />

vk2622 musical <strong>in</strong>strument 0.92 5512.99 piece 5967 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm recreation<br />

vk2634 sports goods 0.95 1103.94 kg 1165 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm recreation<br />

vk2635 fish<strong>in</strong>g equipment 0.95 0.95 sek recreation<br />

vk2636 camp<strong>in</strong>g equipment 0.94 1071.45 kg 1134 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm recreation<br />

vk2639 gramophone record 0.89 0.89 sek recreation<br />

vk2640 music cassettes 0.89 0.89 sek recreation<br />

vk2641 video cassettes 0.89 0.89 sek recreation<br />

vk2642 toys 0.97 404.50 kg 176 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden recreation<br />

vk2643 o<strong>the</strong>r hobby articles 0.61 575.57 kg 932 kg Dutch prices recalculated recreation<br />

vk2646 cd's 0.89 1201.80 kg 149 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden recreation<br />

vk2662 hire of video cassettes 0.71 0.71 sek recreation<br />

rad 119 watches, optics, photo<br />

vk2604 video camera 0.58 4516.73 piece 7775 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden recreation<br />

vk2621 photo-cameras 0.60 537.75 piece 894 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden recreation<br />

vk2632 film develop/pr<strong>in</strong>t 1.19 74.08 piece 62 time Dutch prices recalculated recreation<br />

vk2633 photo materials 0.95 1442.82 kg 1511 kg Dutch prices recalculated recreation<br />

vk2701 jewellery 0.63 485.27 piece 765 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

vk2703 watches 0.63 0.63 sek cloth<strong>in</strong>g and footwear<br />

rad 120 travels, hotel services<br />

vk2542 taxi 0.29 0.29 sek transport<br />

vk2543 domestic conducted tour 0.98 0.98 sek recreation<br />

vk2544 domestic journey by tra<strong>in</strong> 1.30 1.30 sek transport<br />

vk2545 domestic flights 0.98 0.98 sek transport<br />

vk2546 domestic journey by ferry or bus 0.98 0.98 sek transport<br />

vk2672 domestic school tour 0.98 0.98 sek recreation<br />

vk2741 hotel accomodation 0.92 0.92 sek recreation<br />

vk2801 <strong>in</strong>ternational travell<strong>in</strong>g 1.70 1.70 sek recreation<br />

rad 121 o<strong>the</strong>r recreation<br />

vk2003 food for pets 1.22 57.19 kg 47 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm recreation<br />

vk2408 sunglasses 0.88 242.48 piece 274 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm recreation<br />

vk2565 <strong>in</strong>ternet subscription charges 0.58 0.58 sek transport<br />

vk2623 sail<strong>in</strong>g and motor-boats 1.06 186.95 kg 62008 piece Dutch prices recalculated recreation<br />

vk2624 boat eng<strong>in</strong>e 0.81 0.81 sek recreation<br />

vk2625 o<strong>the</strong>r boat expenditure 0.76 0.76 sek recreation<br />

vk2627 fuel 4.98 4.98 sek Average prices Statistics Sweden petrol<br />

vk2628 computer equipment 0.56 12985.79 piece 23038 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm education<br />

vk2630 electrical tools 0.85 659.40 piece 773 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2631 o<strong>the</strong>r larger recreation articles 0.56 0.56 sek education<br />

vk2637 purchase of pets 0.65 0.65 sek recreation<br />

vk2638 vet 0.60 0.60 sek recreation<br />

vk2644 flowers 1.28 1.28 sek household effects<br />

vk2644a <strong>in</strong>door plants 1.28 39.73 piece 31 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2644b cut flowers 0.47 5.67 piece 12 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden household effects<br />

vk2644c outdoor plants 2.38 16.68 piece 7 piece Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

vk2645 repair and hire of recreation articles 0.69 0.69 sek recreation<br />

vk2707 o<strong>the</strong>r recreation articles 1.09 1.09 sek recreation<br />

H12C1 boat <strong>in</strong>surance 0.64 0.64 sek o<strong>the</strong>r consumption<br />

rad 122 enterta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

vk2661 pools and lottery 0.52 0.52 sek recreation<br />

vk2663 entrance fee movie 0.85 0.85 sek recreation<br />

vk2664 entrance fee <strong>the</strong>atre 0.85 0.85 sek recreation<br />

vk2665 entrance fee opera and concert 0.85 0.85 sek recreation<br />

vk2666 entrance fee stage performance and dance 0.85 0.85 sek recreation<br />

vk2667 entrance fee museum and exhibition 0.85 0.85 sek recreation


Appendix 6 cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Code of Energy Energy Consumer Aggregated<br />

expenditure Description <strong>in</strong>tensity MJ/unit Unit price Unit Source of consumer price Category<br />

category<br />

MJ/sek<br />

vk2668 entrance fee sport<strong>in</strong>g event 0.85 0.85 sek recreation<br />

vk2669 subscribtion sports organization 0.69 0.69 sek education<br />

rad 123<br />

books, communication<br />

vk2547 cargo services 1.28 1.28 sek transport<br />

vk2561 postage 0.58 0.58 sek transport<br />

vk2562 telephone 0.58 0.58 sek transport<br />

vk2563 licence fee tv 0.85 0.85 sek recreation<br />

vk2564 cell phone 0.58 0.58 sek recreation<br />

vk2566 cell phone accessories 0.58 0.58 sek recreation<br />

vk2681 books 0.71 139.72 kg 196 kg Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm education<br />

vk2682 newspapers 1.16 45.37 kg 7.06 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden education<br />

vk2683 magaz<strong>in</strong>es 0.72 131.90 kg 21.82 piece Average prices Statistics Sweden education<br />

vk2684 o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>in</strong>ted paper 0.71 0.71 sek education<br />

vk2685 o<strong>the</strong>r stationary 0.81 475.67 kg 584 kg Dutch prices recalculated education<br />

vk2691 school, course-fees etc. 0.98 0.98 sek education<br />

sum 21<br />

rad 203<br />

dwell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rent, <strong>in</strong>surance<br />

f39b householders comprehensive <strong>in</strong>surance (small house) 0.64 0.64 sek household effects<br />

f40a jo<strong>in</strong>t ownership fees 0.80 0.80 sek house<br />

f40 water/sewage and refuse collection 0.82 0.82 sek house/hygiene<br />

f40b refuse collection 1.15 1.15 sek house<br />

f40c water and sewarage charges 0.48 0.48 sek hygiene<br />

f43a householders comprehensive <strong>in</strong>surance (not small house) 0.64 0.64 sek household effects<br />

sfskatt tax on real estate 0.00 0.00 sek house<br />

hyra2 rent and fees 0.23 0.23 sek house<br />

hyra2a heat<strong>in</strong>g (district heat<strong>in</strong>g) house<br />

hyra2b water and sewarage charges hygiene<br />

skkutomt site-lease rent 0.21 0.21 sek house<br />

rad 204<br />

repairs<br />

rad204 repairs 0.83 0.83 sek<br />

rad204a repairs and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance 0.67 0.67 sek house<br />

rad204b wallpaper 1.00 149.00 kg 149 roll Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

rad204c wooden sheets 0.99 12.89 kg 7565 m3 Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

rad204d beams and boards 0.99 11.72 kg 6851 m3 Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

rad204e plywood 1.01 34.72 kg 24007 m3 Stores <strong>in</strong> Stockholm household effects<br />

rad 205<br />

household energy<br />

rad205a fixed charge electricity 2.92 2.92 sek electricity<br />

hhel household electricity 6.63 6.63 sek electricity<br />

uppv heat<strong>in</strong>g (district heat<strong>in</strong>g) heat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rad 206<br />

district heat<strong>in</strong>g 8.85 8.85 sek<br />

oil 8.46 8.46 sek<br />

electricity 6.63 6.63 sek<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests (gross)<br />

rad206 mortgage 0.21 0.21 sek house<br />

sum 22<br />

benefits (taxable)<br />

skpfbil car benefit 0 sek<br />

skpfbila car and o<strong>the</strong>r benefit 0 sek<br />

skpfan rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g benefit 0 sek


Appendix 7: Taxes<br />

Bread and gra<strong>in</strong>s 17% Patient's fee medical care 0% Hire of sport equipment 7%<br />

Meat 17% Patient's fee dental care 0% Boat fees 5%<br />

Fish 17% Physio<strong>the</strong>rapy 2% Municipal school of music 0%<br />

Dairy products 17% Chiropractor 0% Educational associations 0%<br />

Fats 17% Patient's fee hospital treatment 0% TV 0%<br />

Fruit 17% New cars 26% Cable TV 20%<br />

Vegetables 17% Used cars 20% Photographic services 20%<br />

Sugar, jam, confectionary 17% Motor cycle etc 20% Hire of equipment 18%<br />

Salt, spices, sauces 17% Bike 20% Movies 0%<br />

Coffee, tea, chocolate 17% Spare parts 20% Library, museum 0%<br />

Soft dr<strong>in</strong>ks, juice 17% Fuel 72% Theatre, concert 0%<br />

Spirits and liqours 84% Oil, lubricants 20% Play 38%<br />

W<strong>in</strong>e 60% Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and repair 20% Books 20%<br />

Beer class III 60% Driv<strong>in</strong>g schools 0% Newspapers 0%<br />

Beer class I and II 30% Vehicle test 20% Magaz<strong>in</strong>es 20%<br />

Tobacco 65% Garage 0% O<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>in</strong>ted paper 20%<br />

Materials for clo<strong>the</strong>s 20% Park<strong>in</strong>g 20% Stationary 20%<br />

Clo<strong>the</strong>s 20% Car hire service 1% Charter trip 0%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r cloth<strong>in</strong>g articles 20% Tra<strong>in</strong> 10% Recreation fee, public 0%<br />

Repair, hire and laundry 20% Taxi, car travell<strong>in</strong>g 11% Recreation fee, o<strong>the</strong>r 0%<br />

Shoes 20% Coach 11% University studies 0%<br />

Repair and hire of shoes 20% Air transport 5% Restaurants and cafés 20%<br />

Rent <strong>in</strong> apartment block 0% Sea transport 2% Hotel services 11%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r rent 0% Public transport 11% Hair and beauty care 16%<br />

Small house 0% O<strong>the</strong>r transport 20% Electrical articles 20%<br />

Secondary dwell<strong>in</strong>g 0% Postal services 20% O<strong>the</strong>r articles 20%<br />

Goods for ma<strong>in</strong>tanance 20% Telephone, fax 25% Jewellery and watches 20%<br />

Services for ma<strong>in</strong>tenance 20% Cell phone 20% Repair of jewellery and watches 20%<br />

Electricity 34% Telephone 20% O<strong>the</strong>r personal items 20%<br />

Gas 38% Cell phone 20% Child care 0%<br />

Liquid fuels 62% Radio, TV etc 20% Eldercare 0%<br />

Solid fuels 4% Photo equipment etc 20% O<strong>the</strong>r care 0%<br />

District heat<strong>in</strong>g 20% Computers etc 20% Individual care 0%<br />

Furniture etc. 19% Film, cd, cassettes 20% Life <strong>in</strong>surance 0%<br />

Carpets 20% Repair of TV, IT, photo 20% <strong>Household</strong>er's comprehensive <strong>in</strong>surance 0%<br />

Repair of furniture 20% Caravan 20% Health <strong>in</strong>surance 0%<br />

<strong>Household</strong> textiles 20% Boat 20% Vehicle <strong>in</strong>surance 0%<br />

Large household equipment 20% Boat accessories and motors 20% O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>surance 0%<br />

Small household equipment 20% Horses 21% F<strong>in</strong>ancial services 8%<br />

Repair of larger apparatus 19% Large recreation articles 19% Funeral 20%<br />

Kitchen tools, glass ware, pottery 20% Musical <strong>in</strong>struments 20% Passport, hunt<strong>in</strong>g fees etc 0%<br />

Larger power tools 20% Repair and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance recreation articles 20% Consultant fees 16%<br />

Smaller tools 20% Play, sport, hobby 19%<br />

Detergents, not personal 20% Sport, camp<strong>in</strong>g articles etc 20%<br />

<strong>Household</strong> services 17% Flowers and plants 20%<br />

Medic<strong>in</strong>es on prescription 0% Pets 20%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r medic<strong>in</strong>e 20% Medic<strong>in</strong>es, vitam<strong>in</strong>s 20%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r health care products 19% Vet 20%<br />

Glasses etc. 20% Entrance fee play and sport 0%


Appendix 8: Transport distance and mode<br />

Item ship lorry light lorry Item ship lorry light lorry<br />

Food<br />

Food<br />

meal and flour 154 504 100 cocoa 0 1776 100<br />

flour mixes 28 542 100 beer 388 998 100<br />

rice 3357 2489 100 w<strong>in</strong>e 1250 1742 100<br />

pasta 613 1811 100 spirits and liqours 272 866 100<br />

breakfast cereals 174 1449 100 Tobacco<br />

crisp bread 0 544 100 cigarettes 2 2000 100<br />

white and wholemeal bread 0 442 100 moist snuff 11 454 100<br />

cake and bisquits 57 591 100 Non-durable goods<br />

beef and veal 233 720 100 detergents 37 1960 100<br />

pork 5 594 100 kitchen roll 0 777 100<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r meat 1848 856 100 toilet paper 3 664 100<br />

poultry 0 434 100 rubbish bags 545 924 100<br />

sausage 0 463 100 nails and screws 2071 2188 100<br />

meat products for sandwiches 0 628 100 pa<strong>in</strong>t 40 1299 100<br />

salmon 457 1945 100 hair care articles 406 1887 100<br />

herr<strong>in</strong>g 49 704 100 perfumes 209 2085 100<br />

cod 35 2002 100 cosmetics 832 2048 100<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r fish 2203 2108 100 sanitary protection 13 1672 100<br />

shellfish 2156 1997 100 diapers 3 1883 100<br />

caviar, spawn etc 294 2012 100 o<strong>the</strong>r toilet requisites 1678 2242 100<br />

milk and cream 0 402 100 medical articles 1830 2153 100<br />

soured milk and yoghurt 2 484 100 light bulbs 1447 2135 100<br />

cheese 1 661 100 Zn-Mn batteries 924 2289 100<br />

eggs 0 964 100 Ni-Cd batteries 10626 2444 100<br />

butter 0 430 100 candles 216 1367 100<br />

margar<strong>in</strong>e 9 471 100 disposable mugs 1319 1613 100<br />

oil and o<strong>the</strong>r fats 20 948 100 paper plates 913 2296 100<br />

apples and pears 4189 2101 100 matches 260 1158 100<br />

bananas 9777 2407 100 alum<strong>in</strong>ium foil 3 1589 100<br />

citrus fruits 258 2937 100 coffee filters 34 1856 100<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r fresh fruit 2222 2751 100 Clo<strong>the</strong>s<br />

dried fruit and nuts 6435 2552 100 men's coats 6677 2504 100<br />

berries 539 2280 100 men's suits 241 2529 100<br />

canned fruit 2641 2217 100 men's jackets 1433 2510 100<br />

fruit syrup 219 958 100 men's trousers 3464 2691 100<br />

cucumber, fresh 2 1408 100 men's shirts 7615 2612 100<br />

cucumber, pickled 60 550 100 men's underwear 8332 2449 100<br />

salad, different k<strong>in</strong>ds 1 1948 100 men's pyamas 7894 2660 100<br />

cabbage, different k<strong>in</strong>ds 15 1812 100 women's coats 3840 2275 100<br />

tomatoes, fresh 17 1461 100 women's suits 760 1853 100<br />

tomatoes, canned 66 3420 100 women's jackets 1273 2379 100<br />

leek and onion 873 1761 100 women's dresses 5139 2439 100<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r vegetables, fresh and prepared 1192 1816 100 women's skirts 3509 2424 100<br />

mushroom, fresh 17 1994 100 women's trousers 4813 2501 100<br />

mushroom, canned 4772 2133 100 women's shirts 5185 2389 100<br />

root vegetables 0 738 100 bra 6908 2451 100<br />

potatoes, fresh or canned 207 1310 100 women's o<strong>the</strong>r underwear 4572 2834 100<br />

potato products (french fries etc) 442 776 100 women's nightgowns 6939 2568 100<br />

sugar 70 842 100 cardigans and sweaters 5599 2576 100<br />

jam and marmalade 15 627 100 sports and beachwear 4429 2437 100<br />

syrup and honey 242 1652 100 socks and stock<strong>in</strong>gs 2362 2601 100<br />

ice cream 0 512 100 babies' clo<strong>the</strong>s 6251 2527 100<br />

confectionary 48 2046 100 gloves 10610 2462 100<br />

sauces and dress<strong>in</strong>gs 557 923 100 accessories 5243 2954 100<br />

salt and spices 4871 2488 100 hats and caps 6607 2148 100<br />

bak<strong>in</strong>g powder, broth 7 503 100 textile fabrics 2104 2222 100<br />

soft dr<strong>in</strong>ks 28 461 100 yarns 13 2355 100<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral and soda water 2 444 100 sew<strong>in</strong>g materials 3446 2726 100<br />

coffee 3527 1178 100 fur and lea<strong>the</strong>r wear 10972 2586 100<br />

tea 1369 2061 100


Appendix 8 cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Item ship lorry light lorry Item ship lorry light lorry<br />

Shoes<br />

Transport<br />

Well<strong>in</strong>gtons 5217 2344 100 cars 1096 1635 100<br />

ski boots 208 2560 100 tyres 2181 2291 100<br />

sports shoes 8223 2815 100 car accessories 524 1973 100<br />

sandals and flip flops 5139 3000 100 caravans 2 776 100<br />

lea<strong>the</strong>r boots 7271 2845 100 motor cycles 9615 2546 100<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary shoes 4503 2597 100 mopeds 2598 2526 100<br />

soles 3891 2207 100 bicycles 2656 1240 100<br />

Reparat<strong>in</strong>g materials accessories o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles 5095 2475 100<br />

beams and boards 497 725 100 Radio and TV<br />

wooden sheets 14 974 100 television sets 216 2179 100<br />

plywood 685 1681 100 VCR 1442 2090 100<br />

Furniture and textiles sound equipment 5855 2247 100<br />

tables 869 1905 100 Play, sport, hobby<br />

cupboards 4 430 100 musical <strong>in</strong>struments 11055 2579 100<br />

sets of shelves 12 495 100 sports equipment 7462 2419 100<br />

chairs 3588 3201 100 fish<strong>in</strong>g equipment 11439 2547 100<br />

sofas 426 1335 100 camp<strong>in</strong>g equipment 7914 2334 100<br />

armchairs 445 1307 100 gramophone records 3218 1914 100<br />

beds 344 1043 100 cd records 2857 2130 100<br />

chairs, syn<strong>the</strong>tic material 1620 3059 100 cassettes 3279 2153 100<br />

furniture 361 1053 100 toys 6594 2349 100<br />

bl<strong>in</strong>ds 463 839 100 hobby articles 967 1121 100<br />

matrasses 68 781 100 Watches, optics, photo<br />

bed-l<strong>in</strong>en 6415 2870 100 cameras 3685 1795 100<br />

table-cloths 4809 2287 100 photographic materials 1892 2099 100<br />

curta<strong>in</strong>s 2863 1435 100 jewellery 4543 2767 100<br />

quilts and pillows 8813 2479 100 watches 9646 2407 100<br />

towels 7035 2673 100 O<strong>the</strong>r recreation<br />

l<strong>in</strong>oleum carpets 0 2206 100 boats 1328 1255 100<br />

v<strong>in</strong>yl carpets 543 1736 100 boat eng<strong>in</strong>es 8955 2380 100<br />

woolen carpets 7497 2414 100 computer 2731 2122 100<br />

<strong>Household</strong> equipment power tools 3233 2301 100<br />

microwave oven 4050 1639 100 typewriter 5581 2141 100<br />

toaster 9586 2400 100 food for pets 1210 1561 100<br />

fridges/freezers/chillers 133 1745 100 outdoor plants 87 1014 100<br />

dishwashers 0 1662 100 <strong>in</strong>door plants 21 1189 100<br />

vacuum cleaners 3015 1993 100 cut flowers 555 1937 100<br />

wash<strong>in</strong>g- and dry<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>es 50 2735 100 sunglasses 5229 2290 100<br />

sew<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>es 4730 1607 100 books 379 740 100<br />

power garden tools 9668 2694 100 newspapers 0 401 100<br />

electric iron 6873 2291 100 magaz<strong>in</strong>es 105 547 100<br />

food processors 2046 1776 100 stationary 466 1001 100<br />

compost mill 9010 2375 100<br />

glass and pottery 2464 2353 100<br />

knives, forks and spoons 3043 1304 100<br />

cook<strong>in</strong>g tools 5152 2300 100<br />

receptacles 2276 2195 100<br />

geysers 2 869 100<br />

tools 2589 1846 100<br />

garden tools 3725 966 100<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r household items 5416 2310 100<br />

bags 6709 2199 100<br />

baby carriages 482 609 100<br />

electric razor 1094 2046 100<br />

glasses 5725 2633 100


ISSN 1404-652

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!