11.07.2014 Views

Volume 8, Number 3 - Space and Missile Defense Command - U.S. ...

Volume 8, Number 3 - Space and Missile Defense Command - U.S. ...

Volume 8, Number 3 - Space and Missile Defense Command - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UCP Cyber<br />

(NetOps) Crosswalk<br />

National Strategy<br />

National Military Strategy for Cyber<br />

Effects are achieved through the integrated execution of five “fundamental” ways.<br />

The fundamental ways are Information Operations, Network Operations, Kinetic<br />

Actions,Law Enforcement <strong>and</strong> Counterintelligence, <strong>and</strong> Themes <strong>and</strong> Messages.<br />

STRATCOM<br />

JTF-GNO<br />

UCP 08 (Cyber Language)<br />

USSTRATCOM is responsible for planning <strong>and</strong> coordinating<br />

cyberspace operations to include: executing cyberspace<br />

operations, directing GIG operations, <strong>and</strong> defense <strong>and</strong><br />

advocating for cyberspace capabilities.<br />

NetOps CONOPS<br />

NetOps consists of GIG Enterprise Management,<br />

GIG Network <strong>Defense</strong> <strong>and</strong> GIG Content<br />

Management, SA <strong>and</strong> C2.<br />

Joint-FFT<br />

Network Operations<br />

Community<br />

Terms Defined<br />

UCP<br />

Unified Comm<strong>and</strong> Plan<br />

GIG<br />

Global Information Grid<br />

NetOps<br />

Network Operations<br />

CONOPS<br />

Concept of Operations<br />

GNO<br />

Global Network Operations<br />

J-FFT<br />

Joint Friendly<br />

Force Tracking<br />

MMC<br />

Mission<br />

Management Center<br />

GCCS<br />

Global Comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Control System<br />

FOS<br />

Forward Operating Site<br />

PLI<br />

Precise Location <strong>and</strong><br />

Identification<br />

Joint-FFT<br />

USASMDC/ARSTRAT,<br />

Core Functions<br />

J-FFT Devices &<br />

Service Providers<br />

Mission<br />

Management Center<br />

Discrete Users<br />

<strong>and</strong> GCCS FOS<br />

PLI Generation<br />

<strong>and</strong> Transmission<br />

Processing<br />

<strong>and</strong> Dissemination<br />

Dissemination<br />

<strong>and</strong> Display<br />

Display<br />

Users at the tactical, operational, or strategic levels use comm<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> control display systems such as Global Comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Control<br />

System-Joint, Comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Control Personal Computer, or other<br />

tactical systems, e.g. Force XXI Battle Comm<strong>and</strong> Brigade <strong>and</strong><br />

Below terminals <strong>and</strong> Falcon View to present the data. These<br />

details are coordinated in the planning phase.<br />

While the core of the Mission Management Center’s mission<br />

involves the Precise Location <strong>and</strong> Identification portion of<br />

the FFT transmission, many FFT systems also include a 3-digit<br />

brevity code for status. For these systems, getting that data to<br />

the right user is equally important. Of critical significance is the<br />

Mission Management Center’s responsibilities related to those<br />

NTM systems <strong>and</strong> certain Iridium FFT systems that can transmit<br />

a “911” or emergency message. For this critical message,<br />

the Mission Management Center has an enduring responsibility<br />

to the Warfighter to maintain a state of constant vigilance <strong>and</strong><br />

to execute prescribed emergency notification procedures precoordinated<br />

with the tactical user.<br />

It’s also important to underst<strong>and</strong> that FFT data is part of,<br />

<strong>and</strong> exchanged with, a larger body of operational information.<br />

It is a critical Department of <strong>Defense</strong> objective that FFT systems<br />

must be integrated with Combat Identification systems,<br />

as mutually-supporting capabilities, whose common goal is the<br />

unambiguous characterization of forces within the operational<br />

environment. While FFT <strong>and</strong> Combat Identification is not the<br />

same thing, their support to military operations is inextricably<br />

linked; each employs user association data devices or displays<br />

to exchange entity disposition, characterization, <strong>and</strong> identity<br />

information. The attendant capabilities, systems, <strong>and</strong> processes<br />

must be developed to provide interoperable <strong>and</strong> integrated<br />

entity data that are exchanged within the overall SA enterprise.<br />

30<br />

Army <strong>Space</strong> Journal<br />

2009 Fall Edition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!