12.07.2014 Views

Proximal interphalangeal Joint arthroplasty

Proximal interphalangeal Joint arthroplasty

Proximal interphalangeal Joint arthroplasty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Overview of PyroCarbon PIP Clinical Results<br />

CLINICAL report<br />

Pyrolytic Carbon <strong>Proximal</strong> Interphalangeal <strong>Joint</strong> Resurfacing Arthroplasty<br />

J Hand Surg. (am.) 2006;31A: 930-939<br />

Harrison G. Tuttle, MD, Peter J. Stern, MD<br />

PYC PIP<br />

Purpose<br />

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of a pyrolytic carbon resurfacing proximal <strong>interphalangeal</strong> joint<br />

(PIPJ) <strong>arthroplasty</strong> in patients with osteoarthritis.<br />

Demographics<br />

• 18 implants in 8 women<br />

• Average age of patient: 62 years old. Range: 52-71 years old<br />

• Indications: Advanced osteoarthritis with debilitating pain<br />

in the PIPJ that was resistant to non-surgical treatment<br />

Follow Up<br />

• Average follow up of 13.7 months<br />

“This implant has the<br />

potential to achieve all of the<br />

requirements of successful<br />

PIPJ <strong>arthroplasty</strong>.”<br />

Results<br />

• Range of motion had great variability after surgery<br />

o Pre op 10°/60° (Ext/flex)<br />

o Post opt 18°/71° (Ext/flex)<br />

• Grip strength increased from 10.2 kg preoperatively<br />

to 12.8 kg postoperatively<br />

• Average pain score was 1.8 (scale 0-10), 8 joints were pain-free<br />

• Average satisfaction score was 8.4 (scale 0-10)<br />

• Seventeen out of the 18 arthroplasties had coronal plane deformity<br />

after surgery; the authors now liberally use fluoroscopy when broaching<br />

the medullary canals to minimize the possibility of implant angulation.<br />

PIPJ implant dislocation follow-up<br />

radiograph at 6 months after surgery. There<br />

is a near-complete correction of the<br />

preoperative ulnar deviation.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The insertion of pyrolytic carbon implants for PIPJ <strong>arthroplasty</strong> is a technically demanding procedure, but it has the<br />

potential to achieve pain relief, stability, satisfactory ROM, and correction of the deformity; however, the results in<br />

this review were unpredictable and may not be superior to those achieved with other methods of <strong>arthroplasty</strong>.<br />

Tuttle HG, Stern PJ. Pyrolytic Carbon <strong>Proximal</strong> Interphalangeal <strong>Joint</strong> Resurfacing Arthroplasty. J Hand Surg 2006; 31A: 930-939<br />

8<br />

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!