13.07.2014 Views

Literature review to assess bird species connectivity to Special ...

Literature review to assess bird species connectivity to Special ...

Literature review to assess bird species connectivity to Special ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Proposals for operations or developments affecting <strong>Special</strong> Protection Areas (SPAs)<br />

have <strong>to</strong> be judged on a case-by-case basis using the procedures established through<br />

the Habitats Directive. These <strong>assess</strong> whether development proposals are likely <strong>to</strong><br />

have an impact on a designated site. The Conservation (Natural Habitats. &c.)<br />

Regulations 1994, as amended, set out measures <strong>to</strong> ensure that the Habitats and<br />

Birds Directives are implemented in accordance with planning law in the UK.<br />

SPAs (including potential SPAs) are protected by legal policies placed on competent<br />

authorities 1 <strong>to</strong> consider consents or permissions relating <strong>to</strong> plans or projects that<br />

could adversely affect the conservation interest of a European designated site. The<br />

competent authority must establish whether the proposed consent or permission is<br />

directly connected with, or necessary <strong>to</strong>, site management for nature conservation. It<br />

must also decide whether it is likely <strong>to</strong> have a significant effect on the site either<br />

individually or in combination with other plans or projects. The authority must take<br />

account of advice from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH).<br />

The purpose of this literature <strong>review</strong> is <strong>to</strong> help <strong>to</strong> identify when there is a connection<br />

between a proposal and the qualifying interests which may compromise the site.<br />

Stage 3 of the Habitats Regulations Appraisal process asks “Is the proposal likely <strong>to</strong><br />

have a significant effect on the site?” This step acts as a screening stage, removing<br />

from the Habitats Regulations Appraisal plans/projects which clearly have no<br />

connection <strong>to</strong> a site’s qualifying interests or those where it is very obvious that the<br />

conservation objectives for the site’s qualifying interests will not be undermined<br />

despite a connection. This <strong>review</strong> provides information on dispersal and foraging<br />

distances for a range of <strong>bird</strong> <strong>species</strong> (listed in Table 1) which, as qualifying interests<br />

of SPAs, are frequently encountered during the consideration of plans and projects.<br />

This information should help in the identification of potential connections.<br />

1 This term derives from the Habitats Regulations and relates <strong>to</strong> the duties which the<br />

Regulations impose on public bodies and individuals. Regulation 6(1) defines competent<br />

authorities as "any Minister, government department, public or statu<strong>to</strong>ry undertaker, public<br />

body of any description or person holding a public office". In the context of a plan or project,<br />

the competent authority is the authority with the power or duty <strong>to</strong> determine whether or not the<br />

proposal can proceed.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!