Winter Issue 2009 - cfmeu
Winter Issue 2009 - cfmeu
Winter Issue 2009 - cfmeu
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
U N I O N N E W S<br />
with Kevin Reynolds<br />
It’s time for entitlement/wages protection<br />
We are pushing for workers to have<br />
all their entitlements and wages<br />
guaranteed in the event employers<br />
go broke. We want an insurance type<br />
scheme to cover this as part of union<br />
collective agreements. We are out to<br />
stop employers dipping into their<br />
workers' entitlements, using them as<br />
a loan.<br />
For far too long worker’s have been<br />
shafted when their employer goes<br />
bust.<br />
It is gut-wrenching to see long time<br />
loyal employees who have devoted<br />
their life to a company then get<br />
absolutely zip, through no fault of<br />
their own.<br />
This form of social insurance would<br />
be right up there with the likes of<br />
Medicare and Superannuation as a<br />
major social achievement in<br />
providing workers with greater<br />
protection and security,<br />
especially in situations where<br />
we have an economic<br />
downturn.<br />
We also have a view that<br />
corporations laws should be<br />
amended to put employee<br />
entitlements, such as holiday<br />
pay and superannuation, ahead<br />
of unsecured creditors. Workers<br />
should come before banks in<br />
terms of getting paid.<br />
Countries such as Germany, Denmark<br />
and South Korea have similar systems in<br />
place where a substantial<br />
percentage of workers' wages<br />
are guaranteed to cushion the<br />
effects of job losses.<br />
It’s early days yet, but the CFMEU has been at the forefront of public<br />
policy changes and advancements to workplace conditions over the years<br />
and we see no reason why this type of system cannot be achieved. Stay<br />
tuned!<br />
If the boss goes broke<br />
workers should get paid!<br />
WA IRC tosses out electoral case.<br />
A retuning officer’s alleged provision of an electoral roll to candidates<br />
in a union branch election was NOT an irregularity as defined under<br />
the WA Industrial Relations Act, the Western Australian Industrial<br />
Relations Commission has ruled.<br />
Dismissing an application for an inquiry into the roll’s use in the<br />
postponed CFMEUWA C&G state branch election, acting<br />
Commission President Mark Ritter has found he had no jurisdiction<br />
to hear the matter. The alleged irregularity did not fall within the scope<br />
of S69 of the WA IR Act, Mr. Ritter found. Even if the matter was<br />
covered, the allegations would almost certainly have been found<br />
‘moot’ because a new election had been called, he found. The State<br />
Election of the CFMEUWA C&G has since been held with the ballot<br />
ending on June 19th.<br />
Construction Worker – <strong>Winter</strong> <strong>2009</strong> Page 41<br />
CFMEU