24.07.2014 Views

Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board

Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board

Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D. The RV Defendants received certificates that certified the life expectancies from<br />

the James Defendants and not directly from Midwest Medical, and that Midwest<br />

Medical issued a disclaimer for certificates not received directly from Midwest<br />

Medical.<br />

E. Information relating to the consequences of the insured living past his or her life<br />

expectancy estimate and the utilization of a “premium call” to pay pro-rata<br />

obligations necessary to keep life insurance policies in force and effect, including<br />

without limitation, the consequences of other investors refusing or being unable to<br />

satisfy their obligations under a “premium call.”<br />

F. True and accurate information regarding the life expectancy estimates including,<br />

but not limited to, what a life expectancy estimate means.<br />

109. In connection with the offer for sale and sale of the RSLIP Program, RV Defendants<br />

engaged in fraud by misrepresenting one or more of the following relevant facts<br />

relating to the true accuracy, reliability or historical performance of Midwest<br />

Medical in the analysis of medical records of insureds and/or the estimation of the life<br />

expectancy of insureds:<br />

A. RV Defendants directly or indirectly, misrepresented, for example, that in excess<br />

of 90% of insureds die within their estimated life expectancy and that 98.5% of<br />

insureds die within their estimated life expectancy plus a term of twelve (12)<br />

months. However, Midwest Medical has been accused in other regulatory actions<br />

of providing life expectancies that are too short.<br />

B. RV Defendants directly or indirectly, misrepresented that setting aside premiums<br />

for the insured’s life expectancy plus 24 months “insur[ed] that Retirement<br />

Value’s projections missing target [life expectancy was] less than 2%.”<br />

110. In connection with the offer for sale and sale of the RSLIP Program, RV Defendants<br />

engaged in fraud by misrepresenting relevant facts relating to life expectancy<br />

estimates, by making representations indicating that the life expectancy report provides<br />

the anticipated date the insured will die. For example, 90% of insureds die within their<br />

estimated life expectancy and that 98.5% of insureds die within their estimated life<br />

expectancy plus a term of twelve (12) months.<br />

111. In connection with the offer for sale and sale of the RSLIP Program, RV Defendants<br />

engaged in fraud by intentionally failing to disclose one or more of the following<br />

material facts relating to the business repute, qualifications, and experience of<br />

Defendant Gray:<br />

A. True and accurate information about Defendant Gray's sale of bonded life<br />

settlements through SIS, as well as true and accurate information related to SEC<br />

v. Secure Investment Services, Inc. et aI., Case No. 2:07-cv-O1724-LEW-CMK,<br />

<strong>State</strong> of <strong>Texas</strong> v. Retirement Value, LLC, et al.<br />

Plaintiff’s <strong>Fourth</strong> <strong>Amended</strong> Verified <strong>Petition</strong> Page 32 of 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!