Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board
Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board
Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Value and Gray. Pursuant to the Order Appointing HCF Receiver, a receiver has already<br />
been appointed for Defendant Hill Country Funding. Pursuant to additional orders of the<br />
court, an Special Receiver for Retirement Value has been appointed to investigate<br />
potential claims against Wells Fargo, and if warranted, to prosecute such claims.<br />
140. Unless all receivership relief is maintained, the funds and other property held by RV<br />
Defendants and HCF Defendants will be dissipated and lost, to the immediate and<br />
irreparable harm of the persons who purchased the securities from same and to the harm<br />
of the general public. There is no adequate remedy at law.<br />
141. After final hearing, it is necessary to appoint permanent receivers for the affairs of<br />
Retirement Value and HCF. No adequate remedy is available at law.<br />
142. In addition, pursuant to Section 17.47(d) of the DTPA, the court may make any orders<br />
necessary to restore money or property that may have been acquired by means of any<br />
unlawful act or practice, which would include the appointment of a receiver under<br />
Section 64.001(a)(6) of the <strong>Texas</strong> Civil Practice & Remedies Code. As set forth in detail<br />
above, the continuing appointments of receivers for Retirement Value and Hill Country<br />
Funding are necessary to restore money or property which RV Defendants and HCF<br />
Defendants and their agents acquired by their unlawful acts or practices.<br />
143. All receivership relief sought in this case is available to the <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Texas</strong> as Plaintiff<br />
without bond under Section 25-1 of the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> Act and Section 6.001 of the<br />
<strong>Texas</strong> Civil Practice and Remedies Code.<br />
144. Eduardo S. Espinosa of K&L Gates, LLP, is an attorney practicing in Dallas, <strong>Texas</strong>,<br />
and has already been appointed to serve as Receiver for Defendant Retirement Value<br />
in this case.<br />
145. Donald R. Taylor of Taylor Dunham, LLP, is an attorney practicing in Austin, <strong>Texas</strong>,<br />
and has already been appointed to serve as Receiver for Defendant HCF.<br />
146. Janet Mortenson an attorney practicing in Houston, <strong>Texas</strong>, has already been appointed<br />
to serve as Special Receiver for the purposes of evaluating potential claims against<br />
Wells Fargo Bank NA, filing claims as she deems appropriate, and overseeing the<br />
prosecution of said claims through trial, settlement or other resolution<br />
147. Pursuant to Section 25-1 of the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> Act and Section 17.47 of the DTPA, the<br />
<strong>State</strong> of <strong>Texas</strong> seeks to maintain the appointment of each Receiver identified above. In<br />
addition to the foregoing, the Receivers’ appointments are also authorized by Section<br />
64.001(a)(5) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.<br />
<strong>State</strong> of <strong>Texas</strong> v. Retirement Value, LLC, et al.<br />
Plaintiff’s <strong>Fourth</strong> <strong>Amended</strong> Verified <strong>Petition</strong> Page 45 of 57