24.07.2014 Views

Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board

Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board

Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition - Texas State Securities Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elated to any form of bond or reinsurance to be procured from Provident<br />

Capital Indemnity, Ltd., and<br />

iii.<br />

Promised to comply with all provisions of the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> Act and to<br />

cooperate with any future inquiries by the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> <strong>Board</strong>.<br />

D. The underlying facts and circumstances described in SEC v. Secure Investment<br />

Services, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:07-cv-O1724-LEW-CMK, the aforementioned<br />

Notice of Hearing filed by the <strong>Texas</strong> Department of Insurance, and the facts and<br />

circumstances relating to the sale and subsequent rescission of investments<br />

through Defendant Hill Country Funding.<br />

112. In connection with the offer for sale and sale of the RSLIP Program, RV Defendants<br />

engaged in fraud by intentionally failing to disclose one or more of the following<br />

material facts relating to the safety, security or other risks associated with the<br />

RSLIP Program:<br />

A. Information regarding the nature of the life insurance policies and the manner in<br />

which the life insurance policies are selected, including but not limited to, any<br />

controls or due diligence that are used to screen out said life insurance policies for<br />

“jet-issued policies,” “wet-ink policies,” “second-to-die policies,” contestable<br />

policies, or other types of life insurance policies that could impact the RSLIP<br />

Program.<br />

B. Information related to the legal effect and consequence of Defendant Retirement<br />

Value being named as the owner of the life insurance policies offered in the<br />

RSLIP program, such as:<br />

i. The existence and nature of any legal obligations, contracts, or controls<br />

that prevent Defendant Retirement Value from selling, transferring or<br />

assigning its ownership of the life insurance policies to a third party,<br />

ii.<br />

iii.<br />

The existence and nature of any legal obligations, contracts, or controls<br />

that prevent Defendant Retirement Value from changing the beneficiary of<br />

the life insurance policies to a party other than Kiesling Porter, and<br />

The effect of the sale, transfer, or assignment of the ownership of the life<br />

insurance policies and the effect of the change of beneficiary of the life<br />

insurance policies.<br />

C. Information relating to the legal effect and consequence of the terms of the<br />

Escrow Agreement entered into by and between Kiesling Porter and Defendant<br />

Retirement Value, such as:<br />

i. Kiesling Porter is not obligated to perform any independent, objective or<br />

fiduciary duties and does not independently verify the purchase price,<br />

<strong>State</strong> of <strong>Texas</strong> v. Retirement Value, LLC, et al.<br />

Plaintiff’s <strong>Fourth</strong> <strong>Amended</strong> Verified <strong>Petition</strong> Page 34 of 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!