27.07.2014 Views

14 October 2011 - St Albans City & District Council

14 October 2011 - St Albans City & District Council

14 October 2011 - St Albans City & District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

~--------------;;::;::=-~<br />

Page 2<br />

Application No<br />

P1l4961/OOO<br />

11511<br />

WAY;<br />

ENGINEERING OPERATIONS TO REMODEL GROUND<br />

LEVELS;<br />

NEW LANDSCAPING INCLUDING WOODLAND AND SHRUB<br />

PLANTING, GRASSLAND AREAS AND WETLAND CREATION<br />

AND NEW BOARDWALK ADJACENT TO OLD SLADE LAKE.<br />

Location:<br />

SIFE, Land North of A4 Colnbrook By Pass, And West Of Lakeside<br />

Road, Colnbrook By Pass, Slough, Berkshire, SL3' OPE<br />

Dated this 8th September <strong>2011</strong><br />

THE REASON(S)<br />

FOR REFUSAL:<br />

1. .It has not been demonsttated that there is an over riding need for, or sufficient deliverable<br />

benefits from. therail freightfacility and warehousing in this location which would<br />

constitut; the very special circumstances which are necessary to overcome the<br />

presumption against inappropriate development in the Green Belt as set out in PPG2<br />

(Green Belts) and Core Policy 2 (Green Belt andOpen Spaces) of The Slough Local<br />

Development Framework, Core <strong>St</strong>rategy 2006-:2026, Development Plan Document,<br />

December 2008. It would cause significant harm to this fragmented and vulnerable part of<br />

the Green Belt.<br />

2. 'The proposed development would result in the further coalescence of Slough and Greater<br />

London and the further loss of the separate identity of Slough. It has not been<br />

demonstrated that it is essential for the rail freight facility and warehousing to be in this<br />

location within the <strong>St</strong>rategic Gap between Slough and Greater London and so it is<br />

contrary to Core Policy 2 (Green Belt and Open Spaces) and Core Policy 1 (Spatial<br />

<strong>St</strong>rategy) of The Slough Local Development Framework, Core <strong>St</strong>rategy 2006-2026,<br />

Development Plan Document, Decetnber 2008.<br />

3. The proposed development would result in the further urbanisation, loss of countryside'<br />

, recreation opportunities and severance of the Colne Valley Regional Park. it has not been<br />

demonstrated that it is essential for the rail freightfaciJity and warehousing to be in this<br />

location within the Colne Valley Regional Park and so it is contrary to Core Policy 2<br />

(Green Belt and Open Spaces) of The Slough Local Development Framework, Core<br />

<strong>St</strong>rategy 2006-2026 and Policy CGl (Coine Valley Park) of TIre Adopted Local Plan for<br />

Slough 2004.<br />

I<br />

4. It is not considered that there is a specific need fora <strong>St</strong>rategic Rail Freight Interchange in<br />

, this location. If there is a regional need for such a facility it is considered that this can be<br />

met at Radlett without causing so much harm to the Green Belt and other strategic policy<br />

and environmental concerns such as the <strong>St</strong>rategic Gap, Colne Valley Regional Park and<br />

air quality.<br />

. .<br />

5. The absence of any guarantee that there will be a high level of rail use of the<br />

warehousing, as required in the adopted Core <strong>St</strong>rategy, means that it cannot be<br />

demonstrated that there will be any environmental benefits associated with the proposed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!