14 October 2011 - St Albans City & District Council
14 October 2011 - St Albans City & District Council
14 October 2011 - St Albans City & District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
~--------------;;::;::=-~<br />
Page 2<br />
Application No<br />
P1l4961/OOO<br />
11511<br />
WAY;<br />
ENGINEERING OPERATIONS TO REMODEL GROUND<br />
LEVELS;<br />
NEW LANDSCAPING INCLUDING WOODLAND AND SHRUB<br />
PLANTING, GRASSLAND AREAS AND WETLAND CREATION<br />
AND NEW BOARDWALK ADJACENT TO OLD SLADE LAKE.<br />
Location:<br />
SIFE, Land North of A4 Colnbrook By Pass, And West Of Lakeside<br />
Road, Colnbrook By Pass, Slough, Berkshire, SL3' OPE<br />
Dated this 8th September <strong>2011</strong><br />
THE REASON(S)<br />
FOR REFUSAL:<br />
1. .It has not been demonsttated that there is an over riding need for, or sufficient deliverable<br />
benefits from. therail freightfacility and warehousing in this location which would<br />
constitut; the very special circumstances which are necessary to overcome the<br />
presumption against inappropriate development in the Green Belt as set out in PPG2<br />
(Green Belts) and Core Policy 2 (Green Belt andOpen Spaces) of The Slough Local<br />
Development Framework, Core <strong>St</strong>rategy 2006-:2026, Development Plan Document,<br />
December 2008. It would cause significant harm to this fragmented and vulnerable part of<br />
the Green Belt.<br />
2. 'The proposed development would result in the further coalescence of Slough and Greater<br />
London and the further loss of the separate identity of Slough. It has not been<br />
demonstrated that it is essential for the rail freight facility and warehousing to be in this<br />
location within the <strong>St</strong>rategic Gap between Slough and Greater London and so it is<br />
contrary to Core Policy 2 (Green Belt and Open Spaces) and Core Policy 1 (Spatial<br />
<strong>St</strong>rategy) of The Slough Local Development Framework, Core <strong>St</strong>rategy 2006-2026,<br />
Development Plan Document, Decetnber 2008.<br />
3. The proposed development would result in the further urbanisation, loss of countryside'<br />
, recreation opportunities and severance of the Colne Valley Regional Park. it has not been<br />
demonstrated that it is essential for the rail freightfaciJity and warehousing to be in this<br />
location within the Colne Valley Regional Park and so it is contrary to Core Policy 2<br />
(Green Belt and Open Spaces) of The Slough Local Development Framework, Core<br />
<strong>St</strong>rategy 2006-2026 and Policy CGl (Coine Valley Park) of TIre Adopted Local Plan for<br />
Slough 2004.<br />
I<br />
4. It is not considered that there is a specific need fora <strong>St</strong>rategic Rail Freight Interchange in<br />
, this location. If there is a regional need for such a facility it is considered that this can be<br />
met at Radlett without causing so much harm to the Green Belt and other strategic policy<br />
and environmental concerns such as the <strong>St</strong>rategic Gap, Colne Valley Regional Park and<br />
air quality.<br />
. .<br />
5. The absence of any guarantee that there will be a high level of rail use of the<br />
warehousing, as required in the adopted Core <strong>St</strong>rategy, means that it cannot be<br />
demonstrated that there will be any environmental benefits associated with the proposed