29.07.2014 Views

Chemical Process Control a First Course with Matlab

Chemical Process Control a First Course with Matlab

Chemical Process Control a First Course with Matlab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 - 26<br />

Let us try one simple example. Say if we keep the inlet temperature constant at our desired<br />

steady state, the statement in deviation variable (<strong>with</strong>out the apostrophe) is<br />

T i (t) = 0 , and T i (s) = 0<br />

Now we want to know what happens if the steam temperature increases by 10 °C. This change in<br />

deviation variable is<br />

T H = Mu(t) and T H (s) = M s<br />

, where M = 10 °C<br />

We can write<br />

T(s) =<br />

K p<br />

τ p s+1<br />

M<br />

s (2-50)<br />

After partial fraction expansion,<br />

1<br />

T(s) = MK p<br />

s –<br />

τ p<br />

τ p<br />

s+1<br />

Inverse transform via table look-up gives our time-domain solution for the deviation in T: 1<br />

T(t) = MK p 1 – e – t/τ p<br />

(2-51)<br />

Keep a mental imprint of the shape of this<br />

first order step response as shown in Fig. 2.10.<br />

As time progresses, the exponential term decays<br />

away, and the temperature approaches the new<br />

value MK p . Also illustrated in the figure is the<br />

much used property that at t = τp, the normalized<br />

response is 63.2%.<br />

After this exercise, let’s hope that we have a<br />

better appreciation of the different forms of a<br />

transfer function. With one, it is easier to identify<br />

the pole positions. With the other, it is easier to<br />

extract the steady state gain and time constants. It<br />

is very important for us to learn how to interpret<br />

qualitatively the dynamic response from the pole<br />

positions, and to make physical interpretation<br />

<strong>with</strong> the help of quantities like steady state gains,<br />

and time constants.<br />

1<br />

p<br />

T<br />

MK<br />

0.8<br />

0.632<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

τ p = 1.5<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

t<br />

Figure 2.10. Illustration of a first order response<br />

(2-51) normalized by MK p . The curve is plotted <strong>with</strong><br />

τ p = 1.5 [arbitrary time unit]. At t = τ p , the normalized<br />

response is 63.2%.<br />

2.9 Linearization of nonlinear equations<br />

Since Laplace transform can only be applied to a linear differential equation, we must "fix" a<br />

nonlinear equation. The goal of control is to keep a process running at a specified condition (the<br />

steady state). For the most part, if we do a good job, the system should only be slightly perturbed<br />

from the steady state such that the dynamics of returning to the steady state is a first order decay,<br />

i.e., a linear process. This is the cornerstone of classical control theory.<br />

What we do is a freshmen calculus exercise in first order Taylor series expansion about the<br />

1 Note that if we had chosen also T H = 0, T(t) = 0 for all t, i.e., nothing happens. Recall once<br />

again from Section 2.1 that this is a result of how we define a problem using deviation variables.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!