01.11.2012 Views

BOY - Critic

BOY - Critic

BOY - Critic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Opinion<br />

Two<br />

Left Feet<br />

The other day, I met a fellow who had been dismissed from his job<br />

under the 90-day employment act. In 2008, he had voted for National<br />

because it was “time for a change”. Perhaps this was the kind of thing<br />

that John Key had in mind when he recently declared that people<br />

need welfare because of their own “poor choices”. Then again, maybe<br />

it wasn’t. But either way, like our glorious and articulate leader I felt<br />

absolutely no sympathy towards this particular individual. In fact, I killed<br />

him. One less idiot.<br />

But back to Key’s statement. This was a pronouncement of such<br />

monumental and staggering ignorance that it managed to eclipse his<br />

erstwhile habit of saying “a whole bunch of time”. Granted, Key was<br />

referring specifically to the budgeting decisions of beneficiaries. But<br />

implicit in Key’s statement is the view that the benefit is adequate<br />

because it represents the level of bare subsistence.<br />

The philosophy of the right is that nobody is morally entitled to welfare.<br />

People are responsible for their own lives and should not expect<br />

society to help them out. The benefit is simply a practical concession<br />

to stop people from starving in the streets (which would be messy)<br />

or turning to crime (which would be expensive). Grudgingly given, it<br />

should not be any higher than it needs to be.<br />

But this is not why we have welfare. Welfare is a product of the moral<br />

principle that all people are entitled to a decent standard of living,<br />

irrespective of whether their market earning power allows them to<br />

purchase this for themselves. The self-responsibility mantra, and the<br />

“dole-bludger” stereotype crap spewed out by the right is just a pretext<br />

to ignore the reasons people might need welfare. Do some people<br />

abuse the system? Of course. Is this a reason for depriving those with a<br />

genuine need? Of course not. The question is not whether beneficiaries<br />

have a bona fide need (they do), but whether what we are currently<br />

paying out is enough.<br />

We all know what a media whore John Key is. When there’s some<br />

political cock-for-cash on the table, he jumps straight for the lube.<br />

And yet, like Jenny Shipley before him, he has ignored invitations to try<br />

living on the benefit of $194, even for a week. If he thought such a stunt<br />

was viable, he would almost certainly do it. But it’s not viable, because<br />

the benefit is peanuts. The image of Key suffering on two-minute noodles<br />

and instant coffee would be great for schadenfreude, but maybe<br />

not too great for the argument that the benefit is currently anything<br />

more than demeaning.<br />

- Sam McChesney<br />

Politics<br />

<strong>Critic</strong> 01 34<br />

The Eagle<br />

of Liberty<br />

The Eagle on Useless Government Departments<br />

Ah, bureaucracy. Useless government departments. Automated<br />

phone messages recorded by a patronising lady with a more annoying<br />

voice than the Pak ‘n’ Save guy. Inefficiency, waste and poor customer<br />

service. It’s enough to ruffle an Eagle’s feathers. Clearly government<br />

agencies are lumbering, unaccountable juggernauts. But any common<br />

magpie can spot a bushfire from above. The perceptive Eagle prefers to<br />

swoop lower to discover the cause of the fire. What causes government<br />

agencies to fail so miserably?<br />

Cause #1 – It’s not their money so they don’t care<br />

If a stranger gave you his credit card, would you show restraint? The<br />

Eagle, for one, would buy all sorts of liberty-related paraphernalia with<br />

no heed to cost. And sure enough, ACC blows its budget by $3billion.<br />

(To put that in perspective, the Christchurch Earthquake recovery will<br />

cost the government $5billion.) Tourists on NZ skiing trips are given<br />

free medical care, because, hey, travel insurance is for capitalist pigs!<br />

Criminals who injure themselves breaking windows are compensated<br />

– who says crime doesn’t pay? Bureaucrats don’t give a damn about<br />

wasting taxpayer dollars because it’s not their money.<br />

But ACC is not alone in its blundering ineptitude. Studylink gives<br />

“Student Hardship” payments to students on holiday in the Gold Coast.<br />

WINZ gives gang members money to fence their pool. The Eagle will<br />

put a stop to this idiocy once and for all.<br />

Eagle’s solution: Privatise government departments. The private<br />

sector doesn’t waste money because it’s their money – they have<br />

incentive to be efficient and have a culture of rewarding good workers<br />

and firing the blithering idiots.<br />

Cause #2 – Politicians don’t know how to run businesses<br />

Most MPs, especially socialist MPs, have never had a real job in their<br />

life. Bossy youngsters like Jacinda “My Little Pony” Ardern spend a<br />

few years in cushy government jobs or as union lackeys, then enter<br />

a 30-year career as a politician. A perfect example is the old Finance<br />

Minister, Michael Cullen, who had a PhD in History but not even a<br />

University of Waikato degree in common sense. He bought TranzRail<br />

for $690m, then found out it was only worth $369m. Oops. Nowadays,<br />

“Kiwirail” is a national joke. But the Eagle isn’t laughing.<br />

Eagle’s solution: Sell government departments to the private sector<br />

who actually have the skills and experience required, rather than a BA in<br />

Gender Studies. From Waikato.<br />

You are the wind beneath my wings,<br />

The Eagle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!