BOY - Critic
BOY - Critic
BOY - Critic
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Opinion<br />
Two<br />
Left Feet<br />
The other day, I met a fellow who had been dismissed from his job<br />
under the 90-day employment act. In 2008, he had voted for National<br />
because it was “time for a change”. Perhaps this was the kind of thing<br />
that John Key had in mind when he recently declared that people<br />
need welfare because of their own “poor choices”. Then again, maybe<br />
it wasn’t. But either way, like our glorious and articulate leader I felt<br />
absolutely no sympathy towards this particular individual. In fact, I killed<br />
him. One less idiot.<br />
But back to Key’s statement. This was a pronouncement of such<br />
monumental and staggering ignorance that it managed to eclipse his<br />
erstwhile habit of saying “a whole bunch of time”. Granted, Key was<br />
referring specifically to the budgeting decisions of beneficiaries. But<br />
implicit in Key’s statement is the view that the benefit is adequate<br />
because it represents the level of bare subsistence.<br />
The philosophy of the right is that nobody is morally entitled to welfare.<br />
People are responsible for their own lives and should not expect<br />
society to help them out. The benefit is simply a practical concession<br />
to stop people from starving in the streets (which would be messy)<br />
or turning to crime (which would be expensive). Grudgingly given, it<br />
should not be any higher than it needs to be.<br />
But this is not why we have welfare. Welfare is a product of the moral<br />
principle that all people are entitled to a decent standard of living,<br />
irrespective of whether their market earning power allows them to<br />
purchase this for themselves. The self-responsibility mantra, and the<br />
“dole-bludger” stereotype crap spewed out by the right is just a pretext<br />
to ignore the reasons people might need welfare. Do some people<br />
abuse the system? Of course. Is this a reason for depriving those with a<br />
genuine need? Of course not. The question is not whether beneficiaries<br />
have a bona fide need (they do), but whether what we are currently<br />
paying out is enough.<br />
We all know what a media whore John Key is. When there’s some<br />
political cock-for-cash on the table, he jumps straight for the lube.<br />
And yet, like Jenny Shipley before him, he has ignored invitations to try<br />
living on the benefit of $194, even for a week. If he thought such a stunt<br />
was viable, he would almost certainly do it. But it’s not viable, because<br />
the benefit is peanuts. The image of Key suffering on two-minute noodles<br />
and instant coffee would be great for schadenfreude, but maybe<br />
not too great for the argument that the benefit is currently anything<br />
more than demeaning.<br />
- Sam McChesney<br />
Politics<br />
<strong>Critic</strong> 01 34<br />
The Eagle<br />
of Liberty<br />
The Eagle on Useless Government Departments<br />
Ah, bureaucracy. Useless government departments. Automated<br />
phone messages recorded by a patronising lady with a more annoying<br />
voice than the Pak ‘n’ Save guy. Inefficiency, waste and poor customer<br />
service. It’s enough to ruffle an Eagle’s feathers. Clearly government<br />
agencies are lumbering, unaccountable juggernauts. But any common<br />
magpie can spot a bushfire from above. The perceptive Eagle prefers to<br />
swoop lower to discover the cause of the fire. What causes government<br />
agencies to fail so miserably?<br />
Cause #1 – It’s not their money so they don’t care<br />
If a stranger gave you his credit card, would you show restraint? The<br />
Eagle, for one, would buy all sorts of liberty-related paraphernalia with<br />
no heed to cost. And sure enough, ACC blows its budget by $3billion.<br />
(To put that in perspective, the Christchurch Earthquake recovery will<br />
cost the government $5billion.) Tourists on NZ skiing trips are given<br />
free medical care, because, hey, travel insurance is for capitalist pigs!<br />
Criminals who injure themselves breaking windows are compensated<br />
– who says crime doesn’t pay? Bureaucrats don’t give a damn about<br />
wasting taxpayer dollars because it’s not their money.<br />
But ACC is not alone in its blundering ineptitude. Studylink gives<br />
“Student Hardship” payments to students on holiday in the Gold Coast.<br />
WINZ gives gang members money to fence their pool. The Eagle will<br />
put a stop to this idiocy once and for all.<br />
Eagle’s solution: Privatise government departments. The private<br />
sector doesn’t waste money because it’s their money – they have<br />
incentive to be efficient and have a culture of rewarding good workers<br />
and firing the blithering idiots.<br />
Cause #2 – Politicians don’t know how to run businesses<br />
Most MPs, especially socialist MPs, have never had a real job in their<br />
life. Bossy youngsters like Jacinda “My Little Pony” Ardern spend a<br />
few years in cushy government jobs or as union lackeys, then enter<br />
a 30-year career as a politician. A perfect example is the old Finance<br />
Minister, Michael Cullen, who had a PhD in History but not even a<br />
University of Waikato degree in common sense. He bought TranzRail<br />
for $690m, then found out it was only worth $369m. Oops. Nowadays,<br />
“Kiwirail” is a national joke. But the Eagle isn’t laughing.<br />
Eagle’s solution: Sell government departments to the private sector<br />
who actually have the skills and experience required, rather than a BA in<br />
Gender Studies. From Waikato.<br />
You are the wind beneath my wings,<br />
The Eagle