07.08.2014 Views

U.S. Private Equity and VC Investments in Canada - Stikeman Elliott

U.S. Private Equity and VC Investments in Canada - Stikeman Elliott

U.S. Private Equity and VC Investments in Canada - Stikeman Elliott

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

circumstances (the CBCA be<strong>in</strong>g broader than the OBCA). For<br />

example, whether or not it otherwise carries vot<strong>in</strong>g rights, each share<br />

of a CBCA corporation has a statutory right to vote <strong>in</strong> respect of a<br />

number of events, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g (among others) a long-form<br />

amalgamation, “export” (cont<strong>in</strong>uance) to another jurisdiction <strong>and</strong><br />

the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the<br />

corporation’s property. In addition, both the CBCA <strong>and</strong> the OBCA<br />

also provide for class or series votes <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances.<br />

Election of Directors<br />

Holders of preferred shares or of a particular class or series of<br />

preferred shares often negotiate the right to elect a specified<br />

number of directors to the board of directors. Alternatively,<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestors sometimes simply provide for a separate class or series<br />

vote of preferred shareholders with respect to the election of<br />

directors. In <strong>Canada</strong>, this type of provision is usually found <strong>in</strong> a<br />

Unanimous Shareholder Agreement (see pages 17-19), rather than<br />

<strong>in</strong> the articles. However, “nom<strong>in</strong>ee” directors <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> are bound<br />

by the basic duty – applicable to all directors – of act<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the best<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests of the corporation as a whole. This is so even where that<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest diverges from the <strong>in</strong>terest of those who nom<strong>in</strong>ated the<br />

director. Directors’ obligations are discussed below at pages 19-21.<br />

It should also be noted that a number of Canadian corporate statutes<br />

have residency restrictions on directors – for example, the CBCA<br />

requires that at least 25% of the members of a board be resident<br />

Canadians <strong>and</strong> the OBCA that resident Canadians comprise a majority<br />

of the board (or, one of two <strong>in</strong> the case of an Ontario corporation with<br />

only two directors). Notable exceptions <strong>in</strong>clude the New Brunswick<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Corporations Act (NBBCA) – a CBCA-type statute – <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Nova Scotia Companies Act (NSCA), which is based on the English<br />

“memor<strong>and</strong>um <strong>and</strong> articles of association” model. OBCA <strong>and</strong> CBCA<br />

corporations are often “cont<strong>in</strong>ued” under the NBBCA or NSCA where<br />

Canadian director requirements become an issue. “Cont<strong>in</strong>uance” is<br />

generally a simple, quick <strong>and</strong> tax-neutral transaction.<br />

Other director residency restrictions exist with respect to certa<strong>in</strong><br />

regulated <strong>in</strong>dustries. For example, the federal Telecommunications<br />

Act requires that at least 80% of the directors of a common carrier<br />

must be resident Canadians.<br />

STIKEMAN ELLIOTT LLP: U.S. PRIVATE EQUITY AND <strong>VC</strong> INVESTMENTS IN CANADA<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!