Little Sackville River Digger Log Installation 2009 - The Atlantic ...
Little Sackville River Digger Log Installation 2009 - The Atlantic ...
Little Sackville River Digger Log Installation 2009 - The Atlantic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 4. Actual and Projected <strong>Atlantic</strong> salmon Population Using Elson Norms<br />
Life Stage Elson Norm Actual Estimated Yield<br />
Catch<br />
Egg/unit 240 0 using fry catch 8.28, using parr catch<br />
22.85<br />
Fry/unit 29 1.04 using parr catch 2.76<br />
Parr/unit 38 3.84 using fry catch 1.36<br />
Creek chub<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were a total of 57 Creek chub caught during these three sweeps. <strong>The</strong> catch<br />
distribution did not sufficiently follow the Zippen model projections so no population estimate<br />
can be performed. This was probably due to the schooling behavior of the species. <strong>The</strong> only<br />
conclusion that can be arrived at is there is at least 57 Creek chub. <strong>The</strong>re are no previous<br />
comparable results to analyze this data against.<br />
White suckers<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were a total of 33 White suckers caught during these three sweeps. <strong>The</strong> catch<br />
distribution did not sufficiently follow the Zippen model projections so no population estimate<br />
can be performed. This was probably due to the schooling behavior of the species. <strong>The</strong> only<br />
conclusion that can be arrived at is there is at least 33 White suckers present. <strong>The</strong>re are no<br />
previous comparable results to analyze this data against.<br />
American eel<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were a total of 51 American eels caught during these three sweeps. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
numbered thirty‐four in sweep one, nine in sweep two and five in sweep three. This catch<br />
distribution allowed interpretation through the Zippen model (see Figure 5.) <strong>The</strong> projected<br />
total population was 53± 4.22 at a 95% confidence limit. This gave a per unit distribution of 5.5.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are no previous comparable results to analyze this data against.<br />
Figure 5. American eels caught During Respective Electrofishing Sweeps<br />
27 | D igger <strong>Log</strong> <strong>Installation</strong> <strong>2009</strong>