01.09.2014 Views

Boyer diss 2009 1046..

Boyer diss 2009 1046..

Boyer diss 2009 1046..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(1976: Pl. 9b) noted that the ectotympanic bone of the basicranium has a “suspended<br />

ring” for attachment of the tympanic membrane that looks euprimate-like, which he<br />

illustrated with stereophotographs of the P .tricuspidens Pellouin skull. He identified a<br />

vidian foramen in the Pellouin skull, but did not illustrate this morphology. He confirmed<br />

Russell’s previous suggestion that there is a laterally-positioned posterior carotid foramen<br />

and canal, noting their presence in the Pellouin skull. He provided the first and only<br />

photographic documentation of the course of the internal carotid plexus in P. tricuspidens<br />

with a close-up, annotated stereophotograph of the right petrosal (Gingerich, 1976: Pl.<br />

9c). He provided additional evidence that a stapedial artery was absent by observing (but<br />

not clearly illustrating) that there exists a bony ridge on the promontorium ventral to the<br />

fenestra ovalis that would have blocked the course of the artery. He also provided an<br />

illustration of the P. anceps specimen, showing premaxillary/frontal contact (Gingerich,<br />

1976: fig. 32), and overview stereophotographs of MNHN CR 125 (Gingerich, 1976: Pl.<br />

8a-c), the Pellouin skull (Gingerich, 1976: Pl. 9a-c), and the frontal fragment from Berru<br />

(Gingerich, 1976: fig. 34). He used the reconstruction from Szalay (1971) as a basis for<br />

reconstruction of jaw musculature. Furthermore he used a lateral view of the brain<br />

“outline” based on Szalay’s reconstruction along with a dorsal “outline” to estimate brain<br />

volume (Gingerich, 1976: fig. 35a). Figure 33 of Gingerich (1976) is a redrawing of part<br />

of figure 19 of Russell (1964) and represents the orbitotemporal region of Plesiadapis. It<br />

is labeled with equivalent but different terms. The sutural patterns depicted are similar to<br />

those in Russell’s figure, but differ with respect to the relationship of the palatine/frontal<br />

suture to the postpalatine canal. Russell (1964) depicted the suture as entering the canal,<br />

while Gingerich showed the canal to be completely within the palatine. Finally, in plate<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!