01.09.2014 Views

DEVELOPMENT OF REVISED SAPRC AROMATICS MECHANISMS

DEVELOPMENT OF REVISED SAPRC AROMATICS MECHANISMS

DEVELOPMENT OF REVISED SAPRC AROMATICS MECHANISMS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An indication of the biases in the <strong>SAPRC</strong>-07 aromatics mechanism in simulating the new CSIRO<br />

and UCR EPA chamber data is given in Figure 1, which gives plots of the model error in simulating<br />

amounts of NO oxidation and ozone formation 1 in benzene, toluene, m-xylene and o-cresol - NO x<br />

experiments against initial NO x and initial aromatic / NO x ratios. Different symbols are used for the new<br />

CSIRO and UCR EPA experiments. Figure 1 shows that the mechanism tends to underpredict ozone<br />

formed and NO oxidized in essentially all the new experiments with benzene, toluene and (especially) o-<br />

cresol and indicates a general underprediction bias for m-xylene. There also appears to be a dependence<br />

of the underprediction bias on initial NO x levels in the case of benzene and toluene, and on aromatic/NO x<br />

ratios in the case of toluene and m-xylene.<br />

Not shown on Figure 1 are the results of model simulations of new UCR-EPA chamber<br />

experiments for a number of other aromatic compounds, including other xylene isomers, the<br />

trimethylbenzenes, and compounds for which no chamber data were available when <strong>SAPRC</strong>-07 was<br />

developed, including the ethyltoluene and propylbenzene isomers and other phenolic compounds. It was<br />

found that <strong>SAPRC</strong>-07 had a tendency to underpredict ozone formation rates for many of these other<br />

compounds as well.<br />

Therefore, the new data from the CSIRO and UCR EPA chambers indicate that the <strong>SAPRC</strong>-07<br />

aromatics mechanisms do not give the best fits to the currently available chamber dataset, and need to be<br />

revised to take the new data into account. In addition, the data for benzene and toluene suggest a<br />

dependence of model bias on total NO x levels that cannot be accounted for by any adjustments to the<br />

mechanism using its current formulation. Recent laboratory data (e.g., Nishino et al, 2010; Bethel et al<br />

2000) indicates that there is a dependence of aromatic fragmentation product yields on total NO x levels,<br />

which is not represented in the current mechanism. This is attributed to a competition between the OHaromatic<br />

adduct reacting with O 2 and NO 2 (Koch et al, 2007), with the reaction with O 2 forming the<br />

expected fragmentation products and the reaction with NO 2 at high NO x levels presumably forming other<br />

products. However, according to the laboratory data (Koch et al, 2007), the competing reaction with NO 2<br />

only becomes significant at NO 2 levels greater than ~1 parts per million (ppm), which is much higher than<br />

the NO x levels used in almost all of the experiments in the current evaluation dataset. Therefore, even if<br />

the mechanism were modified to take this aromatic-OH adduct + NO 2 reaction into account it would not<br />

give significantly different simulations of the chamber data unless other changes were made.<br />

To address these problems, in this work we developed a revised version of the <strong>SAPRC</strong>-07<br />

mechanism with the aromatics mechanisms that is updated and readjusted to give better fits to the<br />

chamber data. This modified aromatics version of <strong>SAPRC</strong>-07 is referred to as “<strong>SAPRC</strong>-11” in the<br />

subsequent discussion, though most of the non-aromatic portions of <strong>SAPRC</strong>-11 are the same as <strong>SAPRC</strong>-<br />

07 because a full update of the mechanism is beyond the scope of this project. This <strong>SAPRC</strong>-11 aromatics<br />

mechanism is used as the starting point for a PM-<strong>SAPRC</strong>11 mechanism developed to predict secondary<br />

organic aerosol (SOA) formation from aromatics, as discussed by Carter et al (2012).<br />

1 See the discussion of ∆([O 3 ]-[NO]) model error in the mechanism evaluation section for the definitions<br />

of this and other measures used to evaluate mechanism performance.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!