DRAFT 2 Brief on the merits - Supreme Court of Texas
DRAFT 2 Brief on the merits - Supreme Court of Texas
DRAFT 2 Brief on the merits - Supreme Court of Texas
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> master builder was resp<strong>on</strong>sible for both design and c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
By <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century, <strong>the</strong> rising complexity <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> eventually led to design<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>als becoming resp<strong>on</strong>sible for <strong>the</strong> design aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> process. Id.<br />
§ 1:2, at 14. General c<strong>on</strong>tractors, at that time, self-performed most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual<br />
c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> using <strong>the</strong>ir own forces. As <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinued to<br />
increase, it became cheaper and more effective for subc<strong>on</strong>tractors to perform most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
specialized work that was outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> general c<strong>on</strong>tractor’s expertise. The increasing<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subc<strong>on</strong>tracting industry in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> process has evolved over a<br />
l<strong>on</strong>g time, eventually to <strong>the</strong> current situati<strong>on</strong> where subc<strong>on</strong>tractors perform eighty to<br />
ninety percent, and many times <strong>on</strong>e hundred percent, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> work <strong>on</strong><br />
projects. See generally CURRIE, ET AL, supra n. 22, § 1.2, at 1; Owens-Corning Fiberglas<br />
Corp. v. United States, 419 F2d 439, 455 (Ct. Cl. 1969) (maximizing subc<strong>on</strong>tracting <strong>of</strong><br />
Government c<strong>on</strong>tracts is encouraged as a matter <strong>of</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al policy.)<br />
Subc<strong>on</strong>tractors, <strong>the</strong>n, put much at risk when <strong>the</strong>y agree to provide labor and<br />
material to a project. Subc<strong>on</strong>tractors provide most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> materials, skilled trade workers,<br />
and payroll, and bear <strong>the</strong> primary resp<strong>on</strong>sibility <strong>of</strong> meeting scheduled completi<strong>on</strong><br />
deadlines. KEISHA RUTLEDGE, SUBCONTRACTORS BUILDING RECOGNITION ON THE JOB,<br />
TAMPA BAY BUS. J. (Mar. 12, 2001). 2 Subc<strong>on</strong>tractors typically still have to pay <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
material suppliers, workers, overhead, and o<strong>the</strong>r direct project costs.<br />
Permitting an owner to file a lawsuit and <strong>the</strong>n indefinitely stay <strong>the</strong> proceedings,<br />
while taking no acti<strong>on</strong> to diligently pursue its claims, prejudices subc<strong>on</strong>tractors by<br />
2 Available at http://tampabay.bizjournals.com/tampabay/stories/2001/03/12/focus6.html.<br />
14