DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner - Supreme Court ...
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner - Supreme Court ...
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner - Supreme Court ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE<br />
The Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. (“PLAC”) is a non-profit association<br />
with 132 corporate members representing a broad cross-section of American and<br />
international product manufacturers.<br />
These companies seek to contribute to the<br />
improvement and reform of law in the United States and elsewhere, with emphasis on the<br />
law governing the liability of manufacturers of products. PLAC’s perspective is derived<br />
from the experiences of a corporate membership that spans a diverse group of industries<br />
in various facets of the manufacturing sector. Since 1983, PLAC has filed hundreds of<br />
briefs as amicus cuviae in both state and federal courts, including this <strong>Court</strong>, to present<br />
the broad perspective of product manufacturers seeking fairness and balance in the<br />
application and development of the law as it affects product liability. A list of PLAC’s<br />
corporate members is attached at Tab A,’<br />
PLAC and its members maintain a significant interest in this appeal because the<br />
<strong>Court</strong> of Appeals misunderstood the fatal flaws associated with “no injury” lawsuits, such<br />
as this one, which should bar them from proceeding, at minimum, past the class<br />
certification stage. The <strong>Court</strong> of Appeals’ approach dramatically expands the litigation<br />
costs for sellers and manufacturers by interpreting Texas standing and class certification<br />
law to extend the potential liability of manufacturers and sellers to consumers never<br />
injured by the product at issue. Not only is the <strong>Court</strong> of Appeals ruling on injury wrong<br />
as a matter of law, it also has been rejected nearly uniformly by the courts of other states.<br />
’ Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure ll(c), PLAC affirms that it received no outside funding for the<br />
preparation of this brief.