Petition for Review - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

More documents

Recommendations

Info

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES Cases • Page Alexander v. Hagedorn, 148 Tex. 565, 226 S.W.2d 996 (1950) 6 IJL.re Estate of Womack, 280 S.W.3d 317 (Tex. App. - Amarillo 2008) 5 McCain v. NME HospitalsT Inc.T 856 S,W.2d 751 (Tex. App. - Dallas 1993) 4 Rogers v. StateT 291 S.W.3d 148 (Tex. App. - Texarkana 2009) 5 Statutes Tex. Civ. Prac. &Rem. Code, Section 16.051 4 5 Tex. Fam. Code, Section 16.211 Tex. Gov't Code, Section 22.001 Rules Tex. R. App. Proc, Rule 33.1 4 5 Tex. R. App. Proc, Rule 53 ' Tex. R. Civ. Proc, Rule 296 Tex. R. Civ. Proc, Rule 297 Tex. R. Civ. Proc, Rule 326b(f) Tex. R. Civ. Proc, Rule 329b(f) •«' 5 Misc 3-5 2 1 3-5 3-5 3-5 Tex. Const., Art.W § 3 o 111
No. 11-0015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE INTEREST OF S.P., J.P., and A.P., Children. On Appeal From The Texas Sixth Court of Appeals at Texarakana Appeal case No. 06-10-00077-CV JU JLJLJLJ^A.!..!^^.!..!.J.-l..,!,-!-j„ff ,nf,^.tn,j,J&nJUJ.A A A A AAA A A A AAA A A A A A A A-A A A A A A PETITION FOR REVIEW TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TYEXAS Now comes, CHANDA PIPES, Petitioner herein and Appellant below, and files this Petition for Review, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 53 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and would respectfully show unto this honorable Supreme Court of Teixas the following: STATEMENT OF THE CASE In the 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas, in Cause No. C20,871-2004, in less than six (6) minutes a termination proceeding was held by the below trial court Judge Campbell Cox and before all parties in such termination case, Judge Cox made findings terminating petitioner's parental rights and so ordered that the Respondent be appointed Permanent Managing Conservator of Petitioner's children S.P., J.P., and A.P.. After the conclusion of terminating hearing, Petitioner's trial counsel advised her that she could not appeal the trial court's order of termination, and gave her back some of the retaining fee money she paid to retain him. On June 5, 2010, Petitioner's husband while incarcerated in prison disvered in the law library that trial counsel Scott Tatum gave him and peti tioner wrongful legal advise that they could not appeal from the trial court's
Page 1 and 2: FILED 3QV. -•wssr 14 NO- 11-0015
Page 3: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Identities o
Page 7 and 8: Constitution, as this is an appeal
Page 9 and 10: have the opportunity to correct any
Page 11 and 12: of the Court of Appeals and the Ord
Page 13 and 14: A P P E N D I X "A*
Page 15 and 16: A P PE N DI X "B*
Page 17 and 18: 1 Inn » 11 NACOGDOCHES COUNTY " CA
Page 19 and 20: APPENDIX "C°
Page 21 and 22: MEMORANDUM OPINION Chanda Pipes has
Page 23: J. < , '. Lif" pleading and proving

Petition for Review - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?