Exposure Draft - ACRA
Exposure Draft - ACRA
Exposure Draft - ACRA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS FOR PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
(c)<br />
The firm, or network firm, does not assume any managerial role or make any<br />
managerial decisions;<br />
The audit client accepts responsibility for the results of the work; and<br />
Personnel providing the services are not members of the assurance team.<br />
Valuation Services<br />
290.174 A valuation comprises the making of assumptions with regard to future developments,<br />
the application of certain methodologies and techniques, and the combination of both in<br />
order to compute a certain value, or range of values, for an asset, a liability or for a<br />
business as a whole.<br />
290.175 A self-review threat may be created when a firm or network firm performs a valuation<br />
for a financial statement audit client that is to be incorporated into the client‘s financial<br />
statements.<br />
290.176 If the valuation service involves the valuation of matters material to the financial<br />
statements and the valuation involves a significant degree of subjectivity, the selfreview<br />
threat created could not be reduced to an acceptable level by the application of<br />
any safeguard. Accordingly, such valuation services should not be provided or,<br />
alternatively, the only course of action would be to withdraw from the financial<br />
statement audit engagement.<br />
290.177 Performing valuation services for a financial statement audit client that are neither<br />
separately, nor in the aggregate, material to the financial statements, or that do not<br />
involve a significant degree of subjectivity, may create a self-review threat that could<br />
be reduced to an acceptable level by the application of safeguards. Such safeguards<br />
might include:<br />
(a) Involving an additional professional accountant who was not a member of the<br />
assurance team to review the work done or otherwise advise as necessary;<br />
(b) Confirming with the audit client their understanding of the underlying assumptions<br />
of the valuation and the methodology to be used and obtaining approval for their<br />
use;<br />
(c) Obtaining the audit client‘s acknowledgement of responsibility for the results of<br />
the work performed by the firm; and<br />
(d) Making arrangements so that personnel providing such services do not participate<br />
in the audit engagement.<br />
In determining whether the above safeguards would be effective, consideration should<br />
be given to the following matters:<br />
<br />
The extent of the audit client‘s knowledge, experience and ability to evaluate the<br />
issues concerned, and the extent of their involvement in determining and approving<br />
significant matters of judgment.<br />
67