10.09.2014 Views

Exposure Draft - ACRA

Exposure Draft - ACRA

Exposure Draft - ACRA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS FOR PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

The firm, or network firm, does not assume any managerial role or make any<br />

managerial decisions;<br />

The audit client accepts responsibility for the results of the work; and<br />

Personnel providing the services are not members of the assurance team.<br />

Valuation Services<br />

290.174 A valuation comprises the making of assumptions with regard to future developments,<br />

the application of certain methodologies and techniques, and the combination of both in<br />

order to compute a certain value, or range of values, for an asset, a liability or for a<br />

business as a whole.<br />

290.175 A self-review threat may be created when a firm or network firm performs a valuation<br />

for a financial statement audit client that is to be incorporated into the client‘s financial<br />

statements.<br />

290.176 If the valuation service involves the valuation of matters material to the financial<br />

statements and the valuation involves a significant degree of subjectivity, the selfreview<br />

threat created could not be reduced to an acceptable level by the application of<br />

any safeguard. Accordingly, such valuation services should not be provided or,<br />

alternatively, the only course of action would be to withdraw from the financial<br />

statement audit engagement.<br />

290.177 Performing valuation services for a financial statement audit client that are neither<br />

separately, nor in the aggregate, material to the financial statements, or that do not<br />

involve a significant degree of subjectivity, may create a self-review threat that could<br />

be reduced to an acceptable level by the application of safeguards. Such safeguards<br />

might include:<br />

(a) Involving an additional professional accountant who was not a member of the<br />

assurance team to review the work done or otherwise advise as necessary;<br />

(b) Confirming with the audit client their understanding of the underlying assumptions<br />

of the valuation and the methodology to be used and obtaining approval for their<br />

use;<br />

(c) Obtaining the audit client‘s acknowledgement of responsibility for the results of<br />

the work performed by the firm; and<br />

(d) Making arrangements so that personnel providing such services do not participate<br />

in the audit engagement.<br />

In determining whether the above safeguards would be effective, consideration should<br />

be given to the following matters:<br />

<br />

The extent of the audit client‘s knowledge, experience and ability to evaluate the<br />

issues concerned, and the extent of their involvement in determining and approving<br />

significant matters of judgment.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!