29.09.2014 Views

Summer 2009 - British Columbia Transplant Society

Summer 2009 - British Columbia Transplant Society

Summer 2009 - British Columbia Transplant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

organ donation<br />

kidney donations and transplants in<br />

this country. Creating a centralized<br />

registry such as this gives us critical<br />

mass, greatly increases the chances<br />

of finding suitable matches, and more<br />

living donors will have their wishes<br />

fulfilled. Canadians in need will now<br />

be able to get compatible kidneys<br />

faster, and that will save lives.”<br />

The cross Canada domino transplant<br />

on June 24 th was the first resulting<br />

from the newly formed Living Donor<br />

Paired Exchange Registry in Canada.<br />

As more transplant programs across<br />

the country begin to participate in<br />

the Registry, the donor pool will grow,<br />

allowing for more large scale kidney<br />

exchanges and domino transplants.<br />

How are pairs entered into the<br />

Living Donor Paired Exchange<br />

Registry?<br />

If the blood tests indicate that the<br />

recipient and donor do not match,<br />

they are considered an incompatible<br />

pair. This means that the donor’s<br />

blood type is not compatible<br />

with the recipient’s blood type.<br />

If the ‘incompatible’ donor is still<br />

interested in donating a kidney, the<br />

pair can be tested to see if they are<br />

healthy enough to participate in<br />

an exchange. If they qualify, their<br />

medical information is entered into<br />

the LDPE Registry.<br />

Who can donate a kidney through<br />

the LDPE Registry?<br />

Any person in general good health<br />

can potentially donate a kidney and<br />

be entered into the LDPE registry. A<br />

person can enter in as a pair with an<br />

incompatible recipient, or a person<br />

can be entered into the Registry<br />

alone with the intention of donating<br />

a kidney to a stranger (altruistic<br />

donor). TT<br />

Donation After<br />

Cardiac Death<br />

By Michael Williams<br />

freelance writer<br />

Last November, St. Paul’s<br />

Hospital in Vancouver quietly became<br />

the first in BC to implement a procedure<br />

for organ retrieval that could<br />

considerably increase the number of<br />

life-prolonging transplants.<br />

The procedure, known as donation<br />

after cardio circulatory death,<br />

or DCD, involves the removal of life<br />

support from patients where death is<br />

imminent. With the blessing of family<br />

members, the assisted-breathing device<br />

and other life support is removed<br />

and, after the heart stops beating and<br />

two physicians from the ICU certify<br />

the patient has died, organ retrieval<br />

begins within minutes.<br />

Rigorous protocols had been<br />

put in place at St. Paul’s; experience<br />

from other hospitals worldwide, including<br />

ones in Ontario and Quebec,<br />

thoroughly analysed. The intensivecare<br />

unit (ICU) and the transplant<br />

team— keenly aware of each other’s<br />

very separate, but nonetheless interwoven,<br />

responsibilities —were set.<br />

The implementation date for<br />

the DCD protocols was Nov. 1 and the<br />

preliminary estimate was that three<br />

such procedures would be carried out<br />

in the first year. Within a month, that<br />

number had already been reached.<br />

The following looks at the<br />

re-emergence of DCD and the procedure’s<br />

inherent medical and ethical<br />

dilemmas.<br />

--------<br />

In their book, The Ethics of Organ<br />

<strong>Transplant</strong>s, Arthur Caplan and<br />

Daniel Coelho say in the opening<br />

chapter: “The boundaries of life and<br />

death are not as clear today as in<br />

the past.”<br />

That observation remains<br />

every bit as relevant more than a<br />

decade after the book’s publication.<br />

In 1968—the year of the first heart<br />

transplant in the US and Europe’s<br />

first lung transplant—a special committee<br />

at Harvard University wrote<br />

the definition of brain death—<br />

becoming widely accepted as the<br />

definition of end of life.<br />

Doctors looked for neurological<br />

activity in the brain—essentially<br />

the nervous system. If there<br />

was none, the person was deemed<br />

dead.<br />

If organs met the criteria for<br />

transplantation (assuming that was<br />

the declared wish of the decedent),<br />

they were retrieved.<br />

The concept of brain death<br />

became widely accepted as an<br />

ethical and legal criterion for organ<br />

donation, a practice known as<br />

donation after neurological determination<br />

of death, or DNDD.<br />

However, before the Harvard declaration,<br />

organs were retrieved after<br />

cardiac death, essentially following<br />

the same methods as DCD. The<br />

university’s declaration, later called<br />

the dead-donor rule —seemed, in<br />

hindsight, to have obscured the<br />

concepts surrounding death and<br />

donation.<br />

The debate between<br />

cardiac and brain death began. But<br />

even today the issues are debated<br />

mostly in medical and ethical journals.<br />

Page 3 <strong>Transplant</strong> Times <strong>2009</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!