02.10.2014 Views

a history of curriculum services canada

a history of curriculum services canada

a history of curriculum services canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A new Draft Business Plan for 1998 to1999 was submitted to the Board Meeting in May and<br />

approved in principle at the Annual Meeting in June. This plan outlined six ways that OCC<br />

planned to generate revenue in future: 1) Through the Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Commercial and Non-<br />

Commercial Learning Materials; 2) Through the Management <strong>of</strong> Learning Materials Evaluation<br />

for MET (a plan still not confirmed); 3) Through Charitable Fundraising; 4) Through Teacher<br />

Training Programs; 5) Through Consulting Fees from commercial developers and publishers;<br />

and 6) Through License Sales <strong>of</strong> OCC developed tools such as the Evaluator.<br />

Other goals outlined in the plan were as follows:1) to secure the MET Management <strong>of</strong> Learning<br />

Materials Evaluation contract; 2) to continue with an effective public relations campaign; 3) to<br />

stay abreast <strong>of</strong> new and efficient technologies; 4) to make online Teacher-Training a priority; 5)<br />

to improve internal electronic communications systems by finding methods and carriers who<br />

have high client satisfaction records; 6) to reach out to parents, the community and other<br />

stakeholders in education; and 7) to continue to perform in a more business-motivated<br />

environment.<br />

The contract with MET for textbook reviews was completed in the early summer, with a letter on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the Canadian Publisher’s Council arriving in late July congratulating the OCC team for<br />

the thorough and pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>services</strong> rendered. And most encouraging <strong>of</strong> all, the letter<br />

indicated an intention <strong>of</strong> developing a mutually supportive relationship in future.<br />

A more practical outcome <strong>of</strong> the contract experience was the realization <strong>of</strong> the need for a<br />

glossary <strong>of</strong> terms for evaluators, to ensure consistency <strong>of</strong> written reviews, and with logos to be<br />

used on approved learning materials. Thus preparation began on a measurement tool for<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware evaluation. The idea that there was potential for OCC to evaluate s<strong>of</strong>tware for the<br />

provincial licensing process also arose, with developments in that direction commencing.<br />

Finally, the issue <strong>of</strong> redesigning American material to meet Canadian standards was raised as<br />

another possible marketing strategy.<br />

Concerns about the future relationship with OTF took priority in the summer. OCC gave a<br />

presentation to the OTF Executive meeting in August hoping to show OTF that the ultimate<br />

intent <strong>of</strong> OCC was to work with and for the benefit <strong>of</strong> all teachers. OCC proposed the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> a committee in which OCC and OTF <strong>of</strong>ficials could come together to address<br />

the concerns <strong>of</strong> both organizations and provide a list <strong>of</strong> recommendations for a satisfactory<br />

solution by November 1998.<br />

There was also movement in the summer to expand the size and range <strong>of</strong> membership <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Board. This initiative was in part a result <strong>of</strong> the ISO 9002 review. Suggestions were made that<br />

future board members should have skills from a variety <strong>of</strong> backgrounds, including corporate law,<br />

accounting, marketing, and/or public relations, textbook publishing, senior education<br />

management, and the volunteer community. Moreover, there was concern that if OTF did<br />

withdraw its membership, two practising teachers at large should be included on the Board.<br />

1998<br />

©2008 Curriculum Services Canada 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!