Comparative Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for ...
Comparative Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for ...
Comparative Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Effectiveness</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Oral</strong> <strong>Anticoagulants</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong> Thromboprophylaxis<br />
Evidence-based Synthesis Program<br />
41. Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, et al. The results <strong>of</strong> direct and indirect treatment<br />
comparisons in meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol.<br />
1997;50(6):683-91.<br />
42. Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, Mckoy NA. Frameworks <strong>for</strong> Determining Research Gaps<br />
During Systematic Reviews. Methods Future Research Needs Report No. 2. (Prepared by<br />
the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. HHSA<br />
290-2007-10061-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC043-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency <strong>for</strong><br />
Healthcare Research and Quality. June 2011. Available at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.<br />
gov/reports/final.cfm. Accessed May 22, 2012.<br />
43. Myers E, McBroom AJ, Shen L, et al. Value-<strong>of</strong>-In<strong>for</strong>mation Analysis <strong>for</strong> Patient-Centered<br />
Outcomes Research Prioritization. Report prepared by the Duke Evidence-based Practice<br />
Center. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. March 2012.<br />
41
Change language