06.10.2014 Views

PDF | 8 MB - Australian Building Codes Board

PDF | 8 MB - Australian Building Codes Board

PDF | 8 MB - Australian Building Codes Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTERNATIONAL Regulatory Development<br />

Factory Production<br />

Control System<br />

formability. Metallurgical behaviour and<br />

performance of steel materials are also<br />

highly dependent on the manufacturing<br />

process like de-oxidation method,<br />

and quenching and tempering. For<br />

instance, rimming steel associated with<br />

internal voids shall not be allowed for<br />

structural use whereas application of<br />

quenched and tempered steel with low<br />

ductility and formability shall only be<br />

restricted to steel plates and hot rolled<br />

sections. Lastly, deviations from nominal<br />

dimensions and mass shall be well<br />

within the manufacturing tolerances<br />

to assure member resistance and<br />

structural safety, and constructability.<br />

Manufacturing tolerances are therefore<br />

important to prevent manufacturers<br />

from under-sizing and taking advantage<br />

of the liberal requirements.<br />

Due to differences in technical<br />

requirements ranging from<br />

manufacturing process to structural<br />

performance, BC1 has to adopt a more<br />

realistic and reasonable approach to<br />

make these requirements materialspecific.<br />

Different sets of requirements<br />

are imposed on each of the nine<br />

different categories of steel materials,<br />

namely steel plates, hot rolled sections,<br />

hollow sections, steel for cold forming,<br />

non-preloaded bolting assemblies,<br />

preloaded bolting assemblies, welding<br />

Integrated Resort at Marina Bay - roof top skypark with 60m cantilever<br />

consumables, profiled steel sheets<br />

and stud shear connectors, which are<br />

commonly used in the construction<br />

industry.<br />

RELIABILITY OF STEEL MATERIALS<br />

Another critical aspect is the reliability<br />

of steel materials which is the ability<br />

to meet the quality assurance<br />

requirements; for steel manufacturers<br />

to provide adequate assurance to<br />

ensure the compliance of the actual<br />

performance of their products with the<br />

nominal specifications stipulated.<br />

The utmost importance of material<br />

reliability is understandable as the<br />

so-called ‘adequate’ materials are<br />

theoretically sound on paper only<br />

and their ability to perform up to their<br />

nominal specifications in reality needs<br />

some form of guarantee or assurance,<br />

if not justification. In view of this, BC1<br />

requires manufacturers, as a minimum,<br />

to establish an approved factory<br />

production control (FPC) system and to<br />

provide assurance to their products in<br />

the form of authenticated manufacturer<br />

or mill test certificates (MTC). The core<br />

objective this requirement is driven by a<br />

desire to use only ‘quality products from<br />

quality mills’ in Singapore’s building and<br />

construction industry.<br />

In fact, it is indisputable that only<br />

‘quality mills’ are able to produce<br />

‘quality products’. A thorough factory<br />

production control system is a<br />

necessary evidence to substantiate the<br />

status of ‘quality mills’. According to<br />

BC1, manufacturers of steel materials<br />

must maintain an FPC system which<br />

consists of quality procedures, written<br />

instructions, regular inspection<br />

and test plans to control feedstock<br />

materials, equipment, personnel and<br />

production process which can affect<br />

product quality in anyway. Therefore,<br />

proper documentation of feedstock<br />

materials, inspection, calibration and<br />

maintenance history of equipment,<br />

personnel background and qualification,<br />

organisational charts defining<br />

responsibility of individual personnel<br />

and their inter-relationship, results of<br />

product testing, as well as procedures<br />

on product marking and nonconforming<br />

products, are required to<br />

facilitate audit and attestation by thirdparty<br />

accredited certification agencies.<br />

To attain the ‘quality mills’ status under<br />

the BC1 framework, manufacturers<br />

need to have their FPC system ‘audited’<br />

and attested by an independent thirdparty<br />

accredited certification agency<br />

acceptable to or recognized by BCA<br />

– for instance, Bureau Veritas, TUV<br />

Rheinland, Det Norske Veritas, Lloyd’s<br />

Register, Germanischer Lloyd, etc. A FPC<br />

certificate from one of these agencies,<br />

on the basis of initial inspection as<br />

well as continuous surveillance and<br />

assessment through annual inspection,<br />

shall form the acceptable indicator for<br />

an attested FPC system.<br />

It shall also be noted that compliance<br />

with ISO9001 is merely complimentary<br />

but insufficient to justify the reliability of<br />

a manufacturer’s reliability in producing<br />

structural steel materials. Meanwhile,<br />

FPC certificates to manufacture EN<br />

steel materials under the European<br />

Union Construction Product Directives/<br />

Regulations or API Monograms, both<br />

are already widely recognised in the<br />

European markets and the oil and gas<br />

industry respectively, are considered<br />

‘acceptable in lieu’, under the provision<br />

of BC1.<br />

16 • <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Building</strong> Regulation Bulletin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!