10.10.2014 Views

EDHEC-Risk Institute Partner News

EDHEC-Risk Institute Partner News

EDHEC-Risk Institute Partner News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Private equity:<br />

• Financial Times (17/01/2011)<br />

Big buy-out firms poor performers<br />

“(...) The world’s largest private equity groups deliver<br />

the worst returns for investors, according to analysis<br />

of 7,500 investments over the past 40 years. The<br />

research, conducted by the <strong>EDHEC</strong>-<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>,<br />

an arm of France’s <strong>EDHEC</strong> Business School, found<br />

firms that hold a large number of investments<br />

simultaneously “underperform substantially”. The<br />

study, Giants at the Gate, also found returns from<br />

private equity investment in emerging markets are<br />

significantly below those in developed markets,<br />

potentially undermining the industry’s ongoing push<br />

into the fast-growing Asian markets. The report’s key<br />

finding was that “the scale of private equity firms is<br />

a significant and consistent driver of returns. Small<br />

investments outperform large.” <strong>EDHEC</strong> ranked the<br />

data in terms of the number of investments held<br />

simultaneously, a proxy for the size of a private<br />

equity firm. (...) <strong>EDHEC</strong> concluded, as private equity<br />

firms become bigger, communication becomes<br />

difficult and senior managers have less time for each<br />

portfolio company. “It is possible that the quality of<br />

the communication and the attention provided to [a<br />

given] investment may be lower, ultimately leading to<br />

poorer performance,” it said. (...)“<br />

Copyright Financial Times Fund Management<br />

Regulation:<br />

(investor protection) objectives were talked about for<br />

(Ucits), but regulators haven’t put their words into<br />

action,” he says. “(Current) regulations have huge<br />

holes in their safety nets.” In the study, available in<br />

our research archive, <strong>EDHEC</strong> says making risks clearer<br />

to investors would force managers into becoming<br />

more accountable. Mr Sender says the current<br />

reporting requirements under the Ucits regime are<br />

not sufficient to keep investors well informed. (...)”<br />

Copyright Ignites Europe<br />

• Financial Times (30/01/2011)<br />

Insurers gear up for new charges<br />

“(...) New regulations governing the European insurance<br />

industry could lead to a wave of selling of corporate<br />

bonds and equities, commentators believe. (...) The<br />

Solvency II directive, which sets new requirements on<br />

capital adequacy and risk management for insurers,<br />

aims to change investment behaviour by imposing<br />

varying capital charges on assets. Equities will need<br />

to be backed by reserves of 30-40 per cent, while<br />

European sovereign debt is deemed risk free. (...)<br />

Samuel Sender of the <strong>EDHEC</strong>-<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> added:<br />

“Corporate bonds will not be used really to hedge<br />

liabilities. If you are holding corporate bonds you are<br />

taking an extra risk.” (...) Mr Sender added: “Insurance<br />

companies invest in low risk hedge funds to diversify.<br />

If you have a higher capital charge, regulation almost<br />

prevents you from doing that. You will have a shift<br />

away from less risky investments.” (...)”<br />

Copyright Financial Times Fund Management<br />

• Ignites Europe (19/01/2011)<br />

Ucits framework riddled with danger: study<br />

“(...) The Ucits regime is riddled with dangerous holes<br />

that pose a safety risk to investors, says the author<br />

of a new study on the European fund industry. Ucits<br />

funds have become increasingly sophisticated over<br />

the past few years, and that fact has slipped the<br />

attention of EU policymakers, warns Samuel Sender,<br />

applied research manager at <strong>EDHEC</strong>-<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>. The<br />

emergence of counterparty, liquidity and sub-custody<br />

risks have not been followed up with adequate rules<br />

to protect investors, Mr Sender believes. “A lot of<br />

• Financial Times (28/03/2011)<br />

Action needed to shield investors from Ucits risk<br />

Article by Samuel Sender, applied research manager at<br />

<strong>EDHEC</strong>-<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Institute</strong><br />

“(...) Non-financial risks have been increasing since<br />

Ucits investment funds were first set up, but European<br />

authorities and investment professionals failed to<br />

study the impact of these risks when they facilitated<br />

the evolution of the funds. In recent research<br />

conducted by <strong>EDHEC</strong>-<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> as part of the “<strong>Risk</strong><br />

and Regulation in the European Fund Management<br />

Industry” research chair in partnership with Caceis,<br />

<strong>EDHEC</strong>-<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>Partner</strong> <strong>News</strong> - Issue nº 5 - April 2011 - 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!