Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission
Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission
Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Tex 07-03-97<br />
APPEALS POLICY AND PRECEDENT MANUAL<br />
VOLUNTARY LEAVING<br />
VL DISCHARGE OR LEAVING<br />
VL 135.05 (5)<br />
Appeal No. 2198-CA-77. The fact that, after resigning with notice, a claimant<br />
continued working until a replacement could be trained <strong>and</strong> in order to assist the<br />
employer with tax forms, did not change the nature of the claimant's separation<br />
from a voluntary quit to a discharge. Such activities by a claimant after she gave<br />
notice of her intention to resign should reasonably be considered a part of the<br />
process of the claimant's voluntary separation from employment. (For a more<br />
complete digest, see VL 515.30.)<br />
Appeal No. 1252-CA-77. The claimant, an employee of a temporary help service,<br />
failed to report for reassignment after the completion of the last assignment he<br />
was sent out on by the temporary help service. HELD: Because the claimant<br />
was separated when he failed to report for reassignment after completion of a<br />
temporary job, his separation was voluntary <strong>and</strong> without good cause connected<br />
with the work. Disqualification under Section 207.045.<br />
In Appeal No. 263-CA-68, the claimant, also an employee of a temporary<br />
help service, completed a job assignment on a Friday <strong>and</strong> reported to the<br />
employer on the following Monday for reassignment, at which time he<br />
was advised that no other work was available. The claimant was not<br />
offered any further work until after he filed his initial claim. The employer<br />
required its employees to report back as soon as possible upon completion<br />
of a job assignment <strong>and</strong> there was no evidence that there would<br />
have been any work available had the claimant reported back on the intervening<br />
Saturday. HELD: Since the claimant reported to the<br />
employer subsequent to completing his last job assignment <strong>and</strong> since he<br />
was not offered work until after he had filed his initial claim, his separation<br />
was due to lack of work. No disqualification under Section 207.045<br />
or Section 207.044.<br />
Also see Appeal No. 300-CA-71 under VL 495.00 <strong>and</strong> cases under MC<br />
450.55.<br />
(The above temporary help service cases are cross-referenced under<br />
MC 135.05.)