11.10.2014 Views

Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission

Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission

Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPEALS POLICY AND PRECEDENT MANUAL<br />

VOLUNTARY LEAVING<br />

Tex 10-01-96<br />

VL HEALTH OR PHYSICAL CONDITION<br />

VL 235.25 - 235.40<br />

Appeal No. 256-CF-77<br />

(con’t)<br />

was able to do. He declined the promotion, preferring to remain as<br />

a mail h<strong>and</strong>ler, performing that part of such work of which he was<br />

capable. He was therefore terminated. HELD: Since the claimant<br />

refused a reasonable transfer, which constituted a promotion, to<br />

the only work which was then able to perform, the claimant thereby<br />

effectively voluntarily left his work without good cause connected<br />

with the work. Disqualification under Section 207.045.<br />

Appeal No. 2200-CA-76. The claimant was replaced by another<br />

person while she was off work, with notice, due to illness. The<br />

claimant filed her initial claim without having applied for reinstatement<br />

because she had been told by the employer that she had already<br />

been replaced. HELD: The claimant did not quit but was<br />

discharged <strong>and</strong> for reasons other than misconduct connected with<br />

the work. The case was distinguished from a case in which a claimant,<br />

without having been told that he has been replaced, files an<br />

initial claim after being medically released as able to work but without<br />

having applied for reinstatement with his former employer. No<br />

disqualification under Section 207.045 or Section 207.044.<br />

Also see Appeal No. 2726-CA-77 in this subsection <strong>and</strong> Appeal No.<br />

3595-CA-75 under VL 135.10.<br />

235.40 HEALTH OR PHYSICAL CONDITION: PREGNANCY.<br />

WHERE CLAIMANT LEFT WORK BECAUSE SHE WAS PREG-<br />

NANT, OR BECAUSE OF AN EMPLOYER'S RULE AGAINST EM-<br />

PLOYING PREGNANT WOMEN.<br />

Appeal No. 87-11216-10-070287. The claimant declined a job assignment<br />

from her employer, a temporary agency, because it required<br />

long periods of st<strong>and</strong>ing which her doctor had advised her<br />

against because she was pregnant. The claimant told the employer<br />

that she could not st<strong>and</strong> but did not tell the employer that this<br />

was her doctor's advice. The employer did not contact the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!