Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission
Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission
Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual - Texas Workforce Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
APPEALS POLICY AND PRECEDENT MANUAL<br />
VOLUNTARY LEAVING<br />
Tex 10-01-96<br />
VL HEALTH OR PHYSICAL CONDITION<br />
VL 235.25 - 235.40<br />
Appeal No. 256-CF-77<br />
(con’t)<br />
was able to do. He declined the promotion, preferring to remain as<br />
a mail h<strong>and</strong>ler, performing that part of such work of which he was<br />
capable. He was therefore terminated. HELD: Since the claimant<br />
refused a reasonable transfer, which constituted a promotion, to<br />
the only work which was then able to perform, the claimant thereby<br />
effectively voluntarily left his work without good cause connected<br />
with the work. Disqualification under Section 207.045.<br />
Appeal No. 2200-CA-76. The claimant was replaced by another<br />
person while she was off work, with notice, due to illness. The<br />
claimant filed her initial claim without having applied for reinstatement<br />
because she had been told by the employer that she had already<br />
been replaced. HELD: The claimant did not quit but was<br />
discharged <strong>and</strong> for reasons other than misconduct connected with<br />
the work. The case was distinguished from a case in which a claimant,<br />
without having been told that he has been replaced, files an<br />
initial claim after being medically released as able to work but without<br />
having applied for reinstatement with his former employer. No<br />
disqualification under Section 207.045 or Section 207.044.<br />
Also see Appeal No. 2726-CA-77 in this subsection <strong>and</strong> Appeal No.<br />
3595-CA-75 under VL 135.10.<br />
235.40 HEALTH OR PHYSICAL CONDITION: PREGNANCY.<br />
WHERE CLAIMANT LEFT WORK BECAUSE SHE WAS PREG-<br />
NANT, OR BECAUSE OF AN EMPLOYER'S RULE AGAINST EM-<br />
PLOYING PREGNANT WOMEN.<br />
Appeal No. 87-11216-10-070287. The claimant declined a job assignment<br />
from her employer, a temporary agency, because it required<br />
long periods of st<strong>and</strong>ing which her doctor had advised her<br />
against because she was pregnant. The claimant told the employer<br />
that she could not st<strong>and</strong> but did not tell the employer that this<br />
was her doctor's advice. The employer did not contact the