Sri Lanka - Institut de statistique de l'Unesco
Sri Lanka - Institut de statistique de l'Unesco
Sri Lanka - Institut de statistique de l'Unesco
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Out-of-School Children in <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>: Country Study<br />
Birth certificates<br />
Although over 97 percent of children in <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> have a birth certificate, the lack of one was<br />
sometimes given as a reason for children in Dimensions 2 and 3 being out of school. Circulars<br />
have been repeatedly sent to schools to address this issue, instructing principals to admit children<br />
without birth certificates on the basis of an affidavit from the certification of the village officers<br />
(Grama Niladhari).<br />
Politicization<br />
There is a trend for politicization of appointments, promotions and transfers of educational<br />
personnel and officials and allocation of financial and physical resources that exacerbates<br />
disparities in the provision of education and welfare services. Politicization within the education<br />
sector is a problem that has been acknowledged by policy-makers. For example, the Mahinda<br />
Chintana: Development Framework 2010 intends to expand the distribution of primary and<br />
secondary schools according to divisional requirements, and has <strong>de</strong>fined objective criteria, based<br />
on a school mapping exercise, to ensure that the selection process is adhered to and politicization<br />
is eliminated.<br />
Devolution<br />
In 1987, un<strong>de</strong>r the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, authority was <strong>de</strong>volved to the<br />
provincial level on the basis of three lists of responsibilities: national/central, provincial and<br />
concurrent. The policy of <strong>de</strong>volution, however, has gaps, creating overlap and confusion at the<br />
local level, and re-examination of the gui<strong>de</strong>lines is nee<strong>de</strong>d to ensure their efficient<br />
implementation.<br />
Coordination of programmes<br />
Absence of effective coordination is seen in three areas of programme operation: within the<br />
education sector, between sectors and with donors. It was noted earlier that mechanisms have<br />
been created for coordination at the local level, e.g., the Compulsory Attendance Committees to<br />
implement the compulsory education regulations, and the District Child Development Committees<br />
functioning un<strong>de</strong>r the Ministry of Child Development and Women’s Affairs. While these<br />
committees are expected to have representation from state agencies involved in NFE, social<br />
services, probation and child care, labour, child rights promotion, the Samurdhi programme and<br />
the Grama Niladhari (state officials in the lowest administrative unit), meetings were reported to<br />
be irregular and collaboration to be limited. In extenuation, local officials said that they could not<br />
afford the transport costs incurred by participation in meetings.<br />
Planning and implementation of programmes<br />
A breakthrough in the traditional centralization of planning and plan implementation towards a<br />
participatory approach was partially achieved with the introduction of the ESDFP. The objective<br />
has been to transform the planning process through a bottom-up approach, with Annual School<br />
Development Plans being prepared at the school level in cooperation with local stakehol<strong>de</strong>rs and<br />
the community as an initial step. While this innovation has been set in motion and the preparation<br />
of Annual School Development Plans has been incorporated in the planning process, there have<br />
inevitably been ‘teething problems’ as a result of the lack of capacity in schools and local<br />
education offices to cope with the new procedures.<br />
67