21.10.2014 Views

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

xiv<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Unfortunately, it is necessary to make very restrictive assumptions on the number<br />

of variables in comparison with the degrees of the equations. These assumptions<br />

on the dimension of the ambient projective space are needed in order to<br />

ensure that the provable error term is smaller than the main term. On might,<br />

nevertheless, hope that there is a similar asymptotic under much less restrictive<br />

conditions. This is the origin of Manin’s conjecture.<br />

However, aswasobservedbyJ. Franke, Yu. I. Manin, <strong>and</strong>Y. Tschinkel[F/M/T],<br />

the main term as described above is not compatible with the formation of<br />

direct products. Already on a variety as simple as P 1 × P 1 , the growth of the<br />

number of theÉ-<strong>rational</strong> <strong>points</strong> is actually asymptotically equal to τB log B.<br />

This may be seen by a calculation which is completely elementary.<br />

Thus, in general, the asymptotic formula has to be modified by a log-factor.<br />

Franke, Manin, <strong>and</strong> Tschinkel suggest the factor log rkPic(X )−1 B <strong>and</strong> prove that<br />

this factor makes the asymptotic formula compatible with direct products.<br />

Furthermore, it turns out that the coefficient τ has to be modified<br />

when rkPic(X ) > 1. There appears an additional factor which is today<br />

called α(X ). This factor is defined by a beautiful yet somewhat mysterious<br />

elementary geometric construction.<br />

Another problem is that the Hasse principle does not hold universally. Consider<br />

the following elementary example which was given by C.-E. Lind in 1940.<br />

Lind [Lin] dealt with the Diophantine equation<br />

2u 2 = v 4 − 17w 4<br />

defining an algebraic curve of genus 2. It is obvious that this equation is nontrivially<br />

solvable in reals <strong>and</strong> it is easy to check that it is non-trivially solvable<br />

inÉp for every prime number p.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, there is no solution in <strong>rational</strong>s except for (0, 0, 0).<br />

Indeed, assume the contrary. Then, there is a solution in integers such<br />

that gcd(u, v, w) = 1. For such a solution, one clearly has ∤u. Since 2 is a<br />

square but not a fourth power modulo 17, we conclude that ( u<br />

17)<br />

= −1. On the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, for every odd prime divisor p of u, one has v 4 −17w 4 ≡ 0 (mod p).<br />

This shows ( ) (<br />

17<br />

p = 1. By the low of quadratic reciprocity, p<br />

17)<br />

= 1. Altogether,<br />

( u<br />

17)<br />

= 1 which is a contradiction.<br />

One might argue that this example is not too interesting since, on a curve of<br />

genus g ≥ 2, there can be only finitely manyÉ-<strong>rational</strong> <strong>points</strong>. Thus, it might<br />

happen that there are none of them without any particular reason.<br />

However, several other counterexamples to the Hasse principle had been invented.<br />

Some of them were Fano varieties. For example, Sir P. Swinnerton-<br />

Dyer[S-D62] <strong>and</strong> L.-J. Mordell [Mord] (cf. Chapter III, Section 5) constructed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!