21.10.2014 Views

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 THE BRAUER-SEVERI VARIETY OF A CENTRAL SIMPLE ALGEBRA [Chap. I<br />

denotes the morphism induced by S(σ): SpecL → SpecL.<br />

Proof. In each case we have to prove that the functor given is fully faithful <strong>and</strong><br />

essentially surjective. Full faithfulness is proven in Propositions 3.7, 3.8, <strong>and</strong><br />

3.9, respectively. Propositions 3.3, 3.5, <strong>and</strong> 3.6 show essential surjectivity. □<br />

3.3. Proposition (Galois descent-algebraic version). —–<br />

Let L/K be a finite Galois extension of fields <strong>and</strong> G := Gal(L/K ).<br />

Let W be a vector space (an algebra, a central simple algebra, a commutative<br />

algebra, a commutative algebra with unit, ... ) over L together with an operation<br />

T : G × W → W of G from the left. Assume that T respects all extra structures<br />

<strong>and</strong> that for each σ ∈ G the action of σ is a σ-linear map T σ : W → W .<br />

Then, there is a vector space V (an algebra, a central simple algebra, a commutative<br />

algebra, a commutative algebra with unit, ... ) over K such that there is an<br />

isomorphism<br />

V ⊗ K L −→ b<br />

∼=<br />

W .<br />

Here, V ⊗ K L is equipped with the G-operation induced by the canonical operation<br />

on L. b respects all extra structures <strong>and</strong> the operation of G.<br />

Proof. Define V := W G . This is clearly a K-vector space (a K-algebra, a<br />

commutative K-algebra, a commutative K-algebra with unit). If W is a central<br />

simple algebra over L then V is a central simple algebra over K. The latter can<br />

not be seen directly but follows immediately from the formula W G ⊗ K L = W<br />

which we prove below. For that, let {l 1 , . . . , l n } be a K-basis of L.<br />

The assertion follows from the claim below.<br />

□<br />

3.4. Claim. –––– There exist an index set J <strong>and</strong> a subset {x j | j ∈ J } ⊂ W G such<br />

that {l i x j | i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, j ∈ J } is a K-basis of W .<br />

Proof. By Zorn’s Lemma, there exists a maximal subset {x j | j ∈ J } ⊂ W G<br />

such that {l i x j | i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, j ∈ J } ⊂ W is a system of K-linearly<br />

independent vectors. Assume, that system is not a basis of W . Then,<br />

〈l i x j | i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, j ∈ J 〉 K<br />

is a proper G-invariant L-sub-vector space of W <strong>and</strong> one can choose an element<br />

x ∈ W \ 〈l i x j | i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, j ∈ J 〉 K . For every l ∈ L, the sum<br />

∑ T σ (lx) = ∑ σ(l) · T σ (x)<br />

σ∈G σ∈G

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!