21.10.2014 Views

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

brauer groups, tamagawa measures, and rational points

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

xvi<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

weak approximation. If Colliot-Thélène’s conjecture were true then one could<br />

say that all cubic surfaces which are counterexamples to the Hasse principle or<br />

to weak approximation are of this form.<br />

The Brauer group of an algebraic variety X over an algebraically nonclosed<br />

field k admits, according to the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence,<br />

a canonical filtration in three steps. The first step is given by the image<br />

of Br(Speck) in Br(X ). Second, Br(X )/ Br(Speck), has a subgroup canonically<br />

isomorphic to H 1( Gal(k/k), Pic(X k<br />

) ) . The remaining subquotient is a subgroup<br />

of Br(X k<br />

) Gal(k/k) . It turns out that only the group H 1( Gal(k/k), Pic(X k<br />

) )<br />

is relevant for the Brauer-Manin obstruction.<br />

In the cases where the circle method is applicable, the Noether-Lefschetz Theorem<br />

shows that Pic(X ) =with trivial Galois operation. Consequently,<br />

H 1( Gal(k/k), Pic(X ) ) = 0 which is clearly sufficient for the absence<br />

of the Brauer-Manin obstruction. This coincides perfectly well with the observation<br />

that the circle method always proves equidistribution.<br />

By consequence, in a conjectural generalization of the results proven by the<br />

circle method, one can work with X (É) Br instead of X (É) without making<br />

any change in the proven cases. However, in the cases where weak<br />

approximation fails, this does not give the correct answer as was observed<br />

by D. R. Heath-Brown [H-B92a], in 1992. On a cubic surface such that<br />

H 1( Gal(k/k), Pic(X ) ) =/3<strong>and</strong> a non-trivial Brauer class excludes two<br />

thirds of the adelic <strong>points</strong>, there are nevertheless as many <strong>rational</strong> <strong>points</strong> as<br />

naively expected. Even more, E. Peyre <strong>and</strong> Y. Tschinkel [Pe/T] showed experimentally<br />

that if H 1( Gal(k/k), Pic(X ) ) =/3<strong>and</strong> the Brauer class does not<br />

exclude any adelic point then there are three times more <strong>rational</strong> <strong>points</strong> than expected.<br />

Correspondingly, in E. Peyre’s [Pe95a] definition of the conjectural<br />

constant τ, there appears an additional factor β(X ) := #H 1( Gal(k/k), Pic(X k<br />

) ) .<br />

This book is concerned with Diophantine equations from the theoretical <strong>and</strong><br />

experimental <strong>points</strong> of view. It is divided into three parts. Part A deals with the<br />

concepts of a Brauer group <strong>and</strong> their applications. In the first chapter, we begin<br />

with the simplest particular case <strong>and</strong> recall the Brauer group of a field. As an<br />

abstract group, we have Br(k) = H 2( Gal(k/k), k ∗) . Taking this as a definition,<br />

it is not hard to show that Br(X ) classifies two a priori rather different sorts<br />

of objects. Namely, on one h<strong>and</strong>, central simple algebras over k <strong>and</strong>, on the<br />

other, Brauer-Severi varieties over k.<br />

WerecallindetailthemachineryofGaloisdescent. Asanapplication, weexplain<br />

why both central simple algebras of dimension n 2 splitting over an extension<br />

field L as well as Brauer-Severi varieties of dimension n splitting over L are<br />

classified by H 1( Gal(L/K ), PGL n (L) ) . In Section I.7, there is given a functor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!