22.10.2014 Views

Download the complete report - Unicef

Download the complete report - Unicef

Download the complete report - Unicef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

levels; activities not sufficiently influenced by causal thinking and strategic planning;<br />

competing, sometimes chaotic priorities; bureaucratic and political impatience; and<br />

most failures relating to professional leadership at middle levels where supervision<br />

was poorly informed, focused, organised and supported. Based on <strong>the</strong>se findings, a<br />

programme strategy was developed through INHP.<br />

Title of project: Integrated Nutrition and Health Project (INHP)<br />

Duration:1996-2010<br />

Implementing Agencies: USAID, BMGF<br />

Coverage: 8 states, 100-250 million population, mainly ICDS (outreach preventive<br />

services); Bihar, 30-100 million population, both Health and ICDS (outreach and facility)<br />

Objectives<br />

To provide catalytic technical support at operational levelscovering MMR, NMR,<br />

malnutrition, TFR, FIC<br />

Programme Implementation<br />

The two arms of <strong>the</strong> programme were:<br />

i. Outreach services streng<strong>the</strong>ning (RMNCHN) through behaviour change and<br />

service coverage.<br />

ii. Streng<strong>the</strong>ning access and QoC in facilities for maternal, newborn and FP.<br />

The programme demonstrated simple, doable solutions which included incremental<br />

hands-on learning, improved supervisory interactions, tools, generation and use of<br />

relevant data, quality improvement; better interpersonal communication by ASHA, AWW<br />

using existing supervisory interactions between ANM-ASHA at VHSND; LS-AWW at<br />

sector meetings and field visits; MoIC/BHM-ANM in weekly (Tuesday) meetings; Block<br />

officials-FLWs at monthly meetings. All activities were marked by ad hoc priorities with<br />

short-term activity focus; were limited to FP-immunization-SNP; marked by lack of<br />

strategic vision or plan, poor coordination, low self-esteem and low respect for each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r. There was no focus on behaviour change, making it difficult for <strong>the</strong> programme<br />

to show results.<br />

Results<br />

• y Seven monthly rounds <strong>complete</strong>d since April involving 2500 sub-centres across<br />

137 blocks in 8 districts.<br />

• y 60-70% participation of ASHA and AWW in sub-centre meetings.<br />

• y 20% ANM ‘taking over’; 50% actively participating; ANM present in over 90% SC<br />

meetings.<br />

• y High level of acceptance at all levels in both programmes; state interested in<br />

using same approach for content beyond RMNCHN.<br />

• y Expecting early results on home visits, behaviour change by Jan 2013.<br />

30<br />

Consultation on Supportive Supervision to Streng<strong>the</strong>n<br />

Capacity of Frontline Workers and Service Providers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!