22.10.2014 Views

Managing Underperformance Policy and Procedure

Managing Underperformance Policy and Procedure

Managing Underperformance Policy and Procedure

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.2 FORMAL<br />

General Principles<br />

• The <strong>Managing</strong> <strong>Underperformance</strong> framework consists of 3 formal stages.<br />

• In the vast majority of cases, an informal meeting is all that is needed, but when the levels of<br />

underperformance continue <strong>and</strong> where an action plan is not being met, a more formal<br />

meeting should be held to discuss the employees performance.<br />

• At this stage a decision will be made as to whether the <strong>Managing</strong> <strong>Underperformance</strong><br />

<strong>Procedure</strong> should be followed, or whether it is more appropriate to invoke the disciplinary<br />

procedure if the underperformance issue is deemed ‘wilful’. However, the aim of both<br />

procedures is to improve individual performance.<br />

• At each stage there should be a review of the action plan <strong>and</strong> any coaching or training<br />

provided <strong>and</strong> a discussion about why this has not resulted in a sufficient improvement. Prior<br />

to being asked to attend a meeting under the formal procedure, an employee will be provided<br />

with a letter setting out the nature of performance shortfall <strong>and</strong> providing relevant examples<br />

which demonstrate why the line manager is contemplating action under the formal procedure.<br />

Employees should be advised at each stage that should their performance not improve that it<br />

may lead to their dismissal from the organisation. The meeting may be adjourned if either<br />

party needs to gather any further information or give consider to matters discussed during the<br />

meeting.<br />

• The employee should be provided with 7 working days notice in writing of the meeting <strong>and</strong><br />

they will have the right to have a union representative or work colleague present at the<br />

meeting.<br />

• The outcomes from the formal stages should be confirmed in writing to the employee within 7<br />

working days of the meeting. Importantly this should set out the expected timescales for<br />

improvement, together with an indication of what the next step will be if not achieved along<br />

with the employee’s right of appeal.<br />

• If the managing under performance procedure is used any payments for additional<br />

performance such as CPD (for operational employees) will be suspended until the<br />

performance has improved. When the underperformance has been resolved the CPD may be<br />

re-instated following a new application but not backdated. Increments may be withheld for<br />

support employees until the performance has been resolved. When the underperformance is<br />

resolved the increment will be awarded but only from the date the underperformance was<br />

resolved. It will not be back-dated.<br />

• If conduct <strong>and</strong> performance problems begin to occur simultaneously, each issue will be dealt<br />

with under the respective policy by the line manager. The employee will have the right to<br />

representation.<br />

6.3 FIRST FORMAL REVIEW MEETING<br />

If the employee’s performance improves they should be advised <strong>and</strong> any further action suspended.<br />

However, should the informal stage not lead to the required improvement, the line Manager (the<br />

lowest level should be a Station manager or equivalent or more senior depending on the employee’s<br />

status in the organisation will advise the employee that they are required to a formal meeting under<br />

the procedure.<br />

The employee will be provided with 7 working days notice in writing. Employees have the right to<br />

have a union representative or work colleague accompany them at the meeting. If an employee’s<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!