22.10.2014 Views

Managing Underperformance Policy and Procedure

Managing Underperformance Policy and Procedure

Managing Underperformance Policy and Procedure

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BUCKINGHAMSHIRE & MILTON KEYNES FIRE AUTHORITY<br />

OC/26<br />

MANAGING UNDER PERFORMANCE POLICY &<br />

PROCEDURE<br />

1. <strong>Policy</strong> Statement<br />

2. Application<br />

3. Responsibilities<br />

4. Confidentiality<br />

5. Examples of Under Performance<br />

6. Framework for <strong>Managing</strong> Under Performance<br />

6.1 Informal<br />

6.2 Formal<br />

6.3 First Formal Review Meeting<br />

6.4 Second Formal Review Meeting<br />

6.5 Third Formal Review Meeting<br />

7. Timescales<br />

8. Role of Representatives<br />

9. Paid Time Off<br />

10. Appeals<br />

11. Other considerations<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


RECORD HISTORY:<br />

1.0 Second Issue: in final draft format – not agreed<br />

2.0 Redefine informal <strong>and</strong> formal stages<br />

3.0 Numerous minor changes <strong>and</strong> major changes to procedure. Previous policy disciplined<br />

employees incapable of carrying out the role. New policy has review meetings <strong>and</strong><br />

recognises that capability may not be wilful.<br />

CONSULTATION:<br />

The following groups were consulted with in line with the process agreed at the <strong>Policy</strong> Development<br />

Forum<br />

- <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum<br />

- Recognised Trade Unions: FBU, Unison, FOA<br />

- COFs/Human Resources<br />

- Employees via the Intranet <strong>and</strong> drop in surgeries<br />

- St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

COMMUNICATION:<br />

On approval of the policies <strong>and</strong> procedures will be accessible to all managers <strong>and</strong> employees via the<br />

intranet. Also available will be the following:<br />

- Relevant forms<br />

- Guidance for Managers<br />

- Relevant tables (i.e. redundancy, holiday, family friendly)<br />

It is expected that managers (from station manager up) will be required to attend a workshop on the<br />

re-launch of the policies in particular the disciplinary, health & sickness absence, managing<br />

underperformance, grievance <strong>and</strong> bullying <strong>and</strong> harassment.<br />

New Managers will attend the workshops as part of their induction.<br />

ORGANISATION<br />

Responsibilities:<br />

- Human Resources is responsible for reviewing the policies <strong>and</strong> procedures in line with<br />

changes to employment legislation, codes of practice.<br />

- Human Resources is responsible for carrying out People Impact Assessments on each<br />

policy.<br />

- Managers are responsible for ensuring that the policies <strong>and</strong> procedures are applied in a<br />

fair <strong>and</strong> consistent manner<br />

- Managers are responsible for communicating to employees the re-launch of the policies<br />

<strong>and</strong> procedures <strong>and</strong> supporting them to access them via the intranet<br />

- Employees are responsible for referring to policies <strong>and</strong> procedures on the intranet in the<br />

first instance<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


PLANNING<br />

All policies <strong>and</strong> procedures will be accessible via the intranet.<br />

Workshops will be available to all Managers <strong>and</strong> New Managers as part of the re-launch of the<br />

policies <strong>and</strong> procedures.<br />

This template, once approved, will replace the existing template which will be archived.<br />

MEASURING<br />

AUDITTING<br />

- The policy <strong>and</strong> procedures will be reviewed in line with changes to employment<br />

legislation/codes of practice.<br />

- Policies may be reviewed in line with case implementation <strong>and</strong> approx 6/12 months after<br />

their introduction to ensure they remain fit for purpose<br />

All approved policies will be stored as read only on the Intranet which only be updated by the Human<br />

Resources Department.<br />

REVIEWING<br />

All policies <strong>and</strong> procedures will be reviewed in line with any changes to employment legislation/codes<br />

of practice.<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


1. POLICY STATEMENT<br />

• The Authority recognises the need for a clear, fair <strong>and</strong> consistent policy <strong>and</strong> procedure<br />

for managing performance.<br />

• The organisation recognises the importance of individual performance <strong>and</strong> will endeavour to<br />

ensure that employees achieve <strong>and</strong> maintain a high st<strong>and</strong>ard of performance in their work by<br />

providing appropriate training <strong>and</strong> support to meet these st<strong>and</strong>ards. To this end the<br />

organisation will establish fair <strong>and</strong> achievable st<strong>and</strong>ards that are communicated clearly by line<br />

managers <strong>and</strong> performance is monitored.<br />

• It is further recognised that there are occasions when an individual’s performance may not<br />

meet the expected st<strong>and</strong>ards. In these circumstances the aim of the Authority is to support<br />

the employee to improve their performance within a timeframe to meet the needs of the<br />

Service <strong>and</strong> reasonable expectations on the employee. This will be achieved through the<br />

provision of appropriate resources; training, coaching <strong>and</strong> counselling to assist employees to<br />

develop in their role.<br />

• The <strong>Managing</strong> <strong>Underperformance</strong> procedure has been designed to ensure that concerns over<br />

performance are dealt with fairly <strong>and</strong> transparently <strong>and</strong> that steps are taken to establish the<br />

facts.<br />

• Where is it found that poor performance is within the employees control or wilful ie<br />

negligence, carelessness or unwillingness by the individual to co-operate in any training or<br />

development then the Disciplinary <strong>Procedure</strong> will be applied.<br />

• Where an employee is incapable of performing their duties due to long term ill health, then the<br />

‘Health & Sickness Absence’ policy applies.<br />

2. APPLICATION<br />

Scope<br />

• This policy applies to all employees directly employed by the Authority on permanent <strong>and</strong><br />

fixed term contracts of employment with the exception of the Chief Fire Officer for whom a<br />

separate procedure applies.<br />

• This policy <strong>and</strong> procedure will not apply to employees on probation period.<br />

• This policy does not apply to agency workers contracted to work through a temporary agency.<br />

3. RESPONSIBILITIES<br />

Employees are responsible for their performance.<br />

Line Managers are responsible for clearly communicating the st<strong>and</strong>ard required by the organisation to<br />

the employee. They are also responsible for providing, support <strong>and</strong> guidance to meet the required<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard expected.<br />

Line Managers will provide the necessary training, development <strong>and</strong> coaching <strong>and</strong> provide a<br />

reasonable period of time for the employee to acquire relevant skills. Line Managers will regularly<br />

review performance matters with all employees against their TAPS/Performance Objectives.<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


4. CONFIDENTIALITY<br />

The Authority recognises the need so far as reasonably practicable to keep matters confidential<br />

through the <strong>Managing</strong> <strong>Underperformance</strong> procedure. Only those individuals directly involved in the<br />

matter which includes Managers, representatives <strong>and</strong> Human Resources will be advised of the details<br />

on a ‘need to know’ basis.<br />

5. EXAMPLES OF UNDER PERFORMANCE<br />

For a variety of reasons, employees who are conscientious, hard working, willing to improve <strong>and</strong> who<br />

have undertaken appropriate training may nevertheless be unable to fulfil the requirements of their<br />

role. This situation can arise, for example, where an individual has been recruited into a job for which<br />

they were unsuitable or it can arise when the nature of the role, technology or the complexity of the<br />

job, evolve over a period time. This can result in a mis-match between the job <strong>and</strong> the individual’s<br />

capability to perform it. The employee will be advised of what is expected <strong>and</strong>, how their performance<br />

will be measured.<br />

If performance levels deteriorate the watch manager or equivalent, or more senior depending on the<br />

employee’s status in the organisation, may refer to role descriptions/job descriptions, st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

operating procedures, <strong>and</strong> national occupational st<strong>and</strong>ards. This is not an exhaustive list but any<br />

measures that are used will be set objectively <strong>and</strong> based on role maps <strong>and</strong> job descriptions.<br />

The manager will also have a discussion with the employee to underst<strong>and</strong> the reason for the poor<br />

performance, <strong>and</strong> offer help <strong>and</strong> support. If the employee’s performance continues to deteriorate the<br />

<strong>Managing</strong> under Performance policy will be invoked.<br />

In normal circumstances sanctions would be applied in sequence, however in serious cases the<br />

organisation reserves the right to start the procedure at any stage with the proviso that the sanction of<br />

dismissal/redeployment would not be applied unless there has been a second formal stage.<br />

6. FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGING UNDER PERFORMANCE<br />

6.1 INFORMAL<br />

Prior to invoking the formal procedure, managers should have discussed any performance issues with<br />

the employee <strong>and</strong> attempted to resolve them informally through the use of counselling, coaching<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or training as appropriate. Such informal discussions may be held with a view to (for example):<br />

o Clarify the required st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

o Indentifying areas of concern<br />

o Establishing the likely causes of poor performance <strong>and</strong> identifying any training needs<br />

o Setting targets for improvement <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

o Agreeing a timescale for review<br />

Where poor performance is highlighted it is important that the employee is given specific examples to<br />

demonstrate where performance has fallen below agreed st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> what needs to be done by<br />

the individual to improve the position is clearly explained.<br />

The discussion should highlight what training/coaching/counselling/other measures will be provided in<br />

order to achieve the required level of performance. The agreed actions, support, <strong>and</strong> timescales<br />

should be clearly documented in an action plan <strong>and</strong> provided to the employee.<br />

Managers should recognise that there may be some external factors affecting the employee’s<br />

performance although these may not always be apparent. It is important that the employee brings<br />

these to the manager’s attention. Employees should be assured that support <strong>and</strong> consideration will<br />

be given to those who inform their manager about personal domestic, <strong>and</strong>/or health difficulties that<br />

are affecting their performance at work.<br />

Details of the discussion should be held as a file note <strong>and</strong> a copy provide to the employee.<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


6.2 FORMAL<br />

General Principles<br />

• The <strong>Managing</strong> <strong>Underperformance</strong> framework consists of 3 formal stages.<br />

• In the vast majority of cases, an informal meeting is all that is needed, but when the levels of<br />

underperformance continue <strong>and</strong> where an action plan is not being met, a more formal<br />

meeting should be held to discuss the employees performance.<br />

• At this stage a decision will be made as to whether the <strong>Managing</strong> <strong>Underperformance</strong><br />

<strong>Procedure</strong> should be followed, or whether it is more appropriate to invoke the disciplinary<br />

procedure if the underperformance issue is deemed ‘wilful’. However, the aim of both<br />

procedures is to improve individual performance.<br />

• At each stage there should be a review of the action plan <strong>and</strong> any coaching or training<br />

provided <strong>and</strong> a discussion about why this has not resulted in a sufficient improvement. Prior<br />

to being asked to attend a meeting under the formal procedure, an employee will be provided<br />

with a letter setting out the nature of performance shortfall <strong>and</strong> providing relevant examples<br />

which demonstrate why the line manager is contemplating action under the formal procedure.<br />

Employees should be advised at each stage that should their performance not improve that it<br />

may lead to their dismissal from the organisation. The meeting may be adjourned if either<br />

party needs to gather any further information or give consider to matters discussed during the<br />

meeting.<br />

• The employee should be provided with 7 working days notice in writing of the meeting <strong>and</strong><br />

they will have the right to have a union representative or work colleague present at the<br />

meeting.<br />

• The outcomes from the formal stages should be confirmed in writing to the employee within 7<br />

working days of the meeting. Importantly this should set out the expected timescales for<br />

improvement, together with an indication of what the next step will be if not achieved along<br />

with the employee’s right of appeal.<br />

• If the managing under performance procedure is used any payments for additional<br />

performance such as CPD (for operational employees) will be suspended until the<br />

performance has improved. When the underperformance has been resolved the CPD may be<br />

re-instated following a new application but not backdated. Increments may be withheld for<br />

support employees until the performance has been resolved. When the underperformance is<br />

resolved the increment will be awarded but only from the date the underperformance was<br />

resolved. It will not be back-dated.<br />

• If conduct <strong>and</strong> performance problems begin to occur simultaneously, each issue will be dealt<br />

with under the respective policy by the line manager. The employee will have the right to<br />

representation.<br />

6.3 FIRST FORMAL REVIEW MEETING<br />

If the employee’s performance improves they should be advised <strong>and</strong> any further action suspended.<br />

However, should the informal stage not lead to the required improvement, the line Manager (the<br />

lowest level should be a Station manager or equivalent or more senior depending on the employee’s<br />

status in the organisation will advise the employee that they are required to a formal meeting under<br />

the procedure.<br />

The employee will be provided with 7 working days notice in writing. Employees have the right to<br />

have a union representative or work colleague accompany them at the meeting. If an employee’s<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


epresentative or work colleague cannot attend a proposed date the employee can suggest another date,<br />

so long as it is reasonable <strong>and</strong> is not more than 7 working days after the original date.<br />

The line manager will conduct the meeting in an open, helpful <strong>and</strong> supportive way. If the employee<br />

cannot satisfactorily explain why they are not performing, they will receive a letter confirming the<br />

meeting under the first formal stage <strong>and</strong> an action plan will be updated/created. A timescale for<br />

improvement along with review periods agreed.<br />

The employee should be advised that if they do not complete the action plan satisfactorily or their<br />

performance becomes worse within a 6 month period, a formal stage two under performance meeting<br />

will be arranged.<br />

The line manager is responsible for informing HR if entitlement to CPD or increments are to be<br />

withdrawn.<br />

The outcome of the meeting will be confirmed within 7 working days of the meeting <strong>and</strong> should<br />

include confirmation of the issue, any required remedial action <strong>and</strong> the timescale for improvement, It<br />

should also include confirmation that the employee has the right to appeal within 7 working days of<br />

receipt of the letter.<br />

A copy of the letter with the action plan will be provided to HR by the manager <strong>and</strong> this will be kept on<br />

the employees HR file for 6 months.<br />

6.4 SECOND FORMAL REVIEW MEETING<br />

If the employee’s performance improves they should be advised <strong>and</strong> any further action suspended.<br />

However, if the employee’s performance does not improve or continues to get worse the employee<br />

will be asked to attend a second formal stage meeting.<br />

The meeting will be conducted by the Group Manager or equivalent or more senior depending on the<br />

employee’s status in the organisation. The employee will receive 10 days notice of the meeting.<br />

The same process should be followed as in the first formal stage process.<br />

The employee should be advised that if they do not complete the action plan satisfactorily or their<br />

performance becomes worse within a 6 month period, a formal stage three under performance<br />

meeting will be arranged.<br />

The line manager is responsible for informing Human Resources if entitlement to CPD or increments<br />

are to be withdrawn.<br />

The outcome of the meeting will be confirmed within 7 working days of the meeting <strong>and</strong> should<br />

include confirmation of the issue, any required remedial action <strong>and</strong> the timescale for improvement,<br />

along with agreed review periods. It should also include confirmation that the employee has the right<br />

to appeal within 7 working days of receipt of the letter.<br />

A copy of the letter with the action plan will be provided to Human Resources by the manager <strong>and</strong> this<br />

will be kept on the employee’s Human Resource file for 12 months.<br />

6.5 THIRD/FINAL FORMAL REVIEW MEETING<br />

If the employee’s performance improves they should be advised <strong>and</strong> any further action suspended.<br />

However, if the employee does not successfully complete the action plan or their performance fails to<br />

improve or gets worse, the employee will be asked to attend a third <strong>and</strong> final under performance<br />

meeting.<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


The meeting will be conducted by an area manager or equivalent or more senior depending on the<br />

employee’s status in the organisation. The employee will receive 21 working days notice of the<br />

meeting.<br />

Employees have the right to have a union representative or work colleague accompany them at the<br />

meeting. If an employee’s representative or work colleague cannot attend a proposed date the<br />

employee can suggest another date, so long as it is reasonable <strong>and</strong> is not more than 7 working days<br />

after the original date.<br />

The manager will conduct the meeting in an open, helpful <strong>and</strong> supportive way. The employee should<br />

be advised of the serious nature of the meeting <strong>and</strong> that it may result in one of the following<br />

a) them being demoted with limited pay protection<br />

b) dismissed from the organisation, or<br />

c) have an extension to the under-performance action plan provided the Manager feels that you<br />

are in a position to improve to an acceptable level.<br />

If the employee is a senior member of staff, the elected members of the Fire Authority may be<br />

required to take part in initial underperformance hearings (in the case of the CFO) or in later stages<br />

(in the case of other senior officers) if all levels of Principal Officer have been used in the<br />

management of the individual’s underperformance. In such circumstances, the Head Of Human<br />

Resources, or more senior officer if necessary, will refer the matter to the Clerk to the Fire Authority.<br />

The Clerk, in consultation with the Chairman of the Executive Committee, will arrange for three<br />

members of the Committee to form a panel, to hear the case in accordance with the sections above<br />

as appropriate.<br />

Where dismissal is contemplated, every effort will be made to try <strong>and</strong> find a suitable role for the<br />

employee although this may include a reduction in grade with limited pay protection. This is not a<br />

guarantee of alternative employment, but a commitment by the organisation to avoid dismissal of staff<br />

where this is at all possible.<br />

The manager who either dismisses or re-deploys the employee will be responsible for informing HR of<br />

any changes.<br />

The outcome of the meeting will be confirmed within 7 working days of the meeting <strong>and</strong> should<br />

include confirmation that the employee has the right to appeal within 7 working days of receipt of the<br />

letter.<br />

7. TIMESCALES<br />

It is important any under-performance issue is resolved as quickly as possible. Whenever possible,<br />

this should be done at the Informal Stage <strong>and</strong> it is the expectation that the overwhelming majority of<br />

cases will be dealt with at this level.<br />

Under-performance stages will last for the following periods of time:<br />

Informal<br />

First Formal - 6 months<br />

Second Formal - 12 months<br />

Third Formal Stage redeployed staff may apply for promotion once they demonstrate 6 months<br />

competence in their new role<br />

In cases where a pattern of underperformance emerges such as performance levels being met <strong>and</strong><br />

then deteriorating again within 12 months of achieving performance this may be regarded as<br />

misconduct <strong>and</strong> the disciplinary procedure may be applied.<br />

Should an employee’s performance deteriorate within 12 months of the completion of an action plan<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


they will re-enter the managing underperformance procedure at the level of the last stage. This will<br />

apply at any stage of the procedure.<br />

Any period of absence from work for more than four consecutive weeks will not be included in the<br />

underperformance stages. In these situations, under performance stages will stop during the<br />

absence <strong>and</strong> start again when the employee returns to work with the end date of the stage increased<br />

to reflect the time that the employee has spent away. Managers should advise HR of this in writing.<br />

They must also inform the employee in writing.<br />

At the end of the under performance period, performance notes will be disregarded but copies of the<br />

relevant documentation will be retained on file in the HR Department.<br />

Whilst employees may apply for CPD during the formal stage of the procedure managers should take<br />

the stage into account when considering whether the evidence in the application has merit?.<br />

Managers/employees should retain notes of each action plan review. This procedure does not<br />

prevent both the employee <strong>and</strong> the manager sharing notes. It must be remembered by all parties<br />

that the underlying principle of this procedure is to improve performance.<br />

8. ROLE OF REPRESENTATIVES<br />

Employees may be accompanied by a union representative or a work colleague at an informal or<br />

formal stage of the underperformance meeting.<br />

The role of the representative is to confer with the employee during the meeting/hearing <strong>and</strong><br />

participate as fully as possible in the meeting/hearing, The employee can nominate that person to<br />

speak on their behalf although the employee will be required to answer questions put to them directly<br />

by the Manager chairing the meeting. Employees should arrange for their representative to attend.<br />

Managers have the right to proceed in the employee’s absence if the employee is unable to attend the<br />

re-arranged meeting at any stage. If the employee cannot attend the employee may request their<br />

representative to attend on their behalf.<br />

The Authority recommends that the employee belongs to a recognised Trade Union or an<br />

independent Trade union, as Trade Union Officials are trained in employment matters.<br />

9. PAID TIME OFF<br />

Employees who may be subject to this procedure they are entitled to time off with pay to prepare for<br />

the meeting.<br />

Trade Union Representatives employed by the organisation are entitled to paid time off to prepare for<br />

a meeting <strong>and</strong> to attend any meeting held under this procedure. The amount of time off required will<br />

vary upon the complexity of the case but it is assumed that it will be reasonable <strong>and</strong> not excessive.<br />

Managers should not unreasonably deny requests for additional time off, but the employee <strong>and</strong> their<br />

Trade Union Representative are asked to be reasonable with their requests<br />

The employee must advise the person who is chairing the meeting who will be attending as their<br />

representative at least one day beforeh<strong>and</strong><br />

The employee’s representative is there to support them. The employee may have reasonable time to<br />

talk with them in private <strong>and</strong> they can ask questions on their behalf at the Formal Stages of the<br />

procedure. Within reason they may also ask questions at the Informal Stage although the<br />

organisation must point out the difference between accompaniment <strong>and</strong> representation at the Informal<br />

Stage.<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


10. APPEALS<br />

Appeals should be dealt with speedily <strong>and</strong> should not be unduly protracted although this should not<br />

prejudice the thoroughness of any investigation.<br />

If an employee disagrees with a decision made at a formal stage of the <strong>Managing</strong> Under-Performance<br />

<strong>Policy</strong>, then they must write <strong>and</strong> ask for this review within 7 days of the outcome of the meeting. This<br />

must be made to the Area Manager, HR, setting out the grounds for their appeal The following<br />

Managers will hear the appeal case:<br />

Informal Stage<br />

First formal stage<br />

Second formal stage<br />

Third Formal stage<br />

No right of appeal<br />

Manager above that that carried out the 1 st formal meeting<br />

Manager above that that carried out the 2 nd formal meeting<br />

Director of the employee<br />

The above appeal managers may be more senior depending on the status of the employee.<br />

If an ‘appeal’ manager has had some previous involvement in the case then the Head of Human<br />

Resources in consultation with the relevant Director, allocate a different Manager to hear any appeal.<br />

This procedure would apply at any stage if it was felt that due to the complexity of the case or the<br />

involvement of the manager that this would be necessary to ensure a fair <strong>and</strong> equitable hearing.<br />

Should the original under performance sanction be applied by the CFO, then the appeal would be to a<br />

panel of elected Members of the Fire Authority. In such circumstances, the Head of Human<br />

Resources, or more senior officer if necessary, will refer the matter to the Clerk to the Fire Authority.<br />

The Clerk, in consultation with the Chairman of the Executive Committee, will arrange for three<br />

members of the Committee to form a panel, to hear the case in accordance with the sections above.<br />

Should the original under performance sanction be applied by elected members of the Executive<br />

Committee, the appeal would be to the full Fire Authority. In such circumstances the Clerk, in<br />

consultation with the Chairman of the Fire Authority, will arrange for three members of the Authority to<br />

form an appeal panel. The three members must not have had previous formal involvement in the<br />

case.<br />

Appeal at Formal Stage 1 &2<br />

The appeal hearing will be conducted by the next manager above that that conducted the formal<br />

under performance meeting.<br />

The employee should be provided with 7 working day’s notice of the appeal hearing from HR on<br />

behalf of the respective appeal manager. Details of the hearing, reason for appeal <strong>and</strong> representation<br />

rights will also be confirmed in writing.<br />

Employees have the right to a union representative or work colleague accompany them at an<br />

appeal hearing. If an employee’s representative or colleague cannot attend a proposed date the<br />

employee can suggest another date, so long as it is reasonable <strong>and</strong> is not more than 7 working days<br />

after the original date.<br />

Both parties will provide any evidence that they wish to refer to, to HR for circulation at least three<br />

days prior to the hearing.<br />

Both parties will outline their case <strong>and</strong> questions may be asked by both parties, <strong>and</strong> the appeal<br />

manager. At the end of the meeting, the manager will adjourn to consider his/her decision. The<br />

following options will be considered.<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Reject the appeal<br />

Amend the original decision by imposing a lower sanction<br />

Uphold the appeal <strong>and</strong> withdraw the original decision<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


The employee will receive the outcome of the appeal meeting within 7 working days of the appeal<br />

meeting...<br />

The decision of the appeal is final.<br />

Appeal against dismissal<br />

The appeal hearing will be conducted by the director of the employee.<br />

The employee should be provided with 7 working day’s notice of the hearing from HR on behalf of the<br />

director. Details of the hearing, reason for appeal <strong>and</strong> representation rights will also be confirmed in<br />

writing.<br />

Employees have the right to a union representative or work colleague accompany them at an<br />

appeal hearing. If an employee’s representative or colleague cannot attend a proposed date the<br />

employee can suggest another date, so long as it is reasonable <strong>and</strong> is not more than 7 working days<br />

after the original date.<br />

Both parties will provide any evidence that they wish to refer to, to HR for circulation at least three<br />

days prior to the hearing.<br />

Both parties will outline their case <strong>and</strong> questions may be asked by both parties, <strong>and</strong> the appeal<br />

manager. At the end of the meeting, the director will adjourn to consider his/her decision. The<br />

following options will be considered.<br />

• Dismiss the appeal<br />

• Amend the original decision by imposing a lower sanction, in which case the employee will be<br />

reinstated as though they had not left the service i.e. without a break in service<br />

• Uphold the appeal <strong>and</strong> withdraw the original decision, in which case the employee will be<br />

reinstated as though they had not left the service i.e. without a break in service.<br />

The employee will receive the outcome of the appeal meeting within 7 working days of the appeal<br />

meeting.<br />

The decision of the appeal is final.<br />

11. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Should the original sanction that is the subject of the appeal have been applied by the CFO, then the<br />

appeal would be to a panel of elected Members of the Fire Authority. In such circumstances, the Head<br />

of Human Resources or more senior officer if necessary, will refer the matter to the Clerk to the Fire<br />

Authority. The Clerk, in consultation with the Chairman of the Executive Committee, will arrange for<br />

three members of the Committee to form a panel, to hear the case in accordance with the sections<br />

above.<br />

In the event that the original underperformance sanction had been applied by elected members of the<br />

Executive Committee, the appeal would be to the full Fire Authority. In such circumstances the Clerk,<br />

in consultation with the Chairman of the Fire Authority, will arrange for three members of the Authority<br />

to form an appeal panel. The three members must not have had previous formal involvement in the<br />

case.<br />

In the course of a ‘managing under-performance’ process, an employee might raise a grievance that<br />

is related to the case. If this happens, the manager should consider suspending the managing underperformance<br />

procedure for a short period while the grievance is dealt with. Depending on the nature<br />

of the grievance, the manager may need to consider bringing in another manager to deal with the<br />

managing under-performance process.<br />

Managers are responsible for completing all administration <strong>and</strong> paperwork at Formal Stages 1, 2 <strong>and</strong><br />

3 of the <strong>Procedure</strong>. Copies of the relevant paperwork should be sent to HR. It is also important if the<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice


legal requirements of the Data Protection Act are to be met, <strong>and</strong> that references given are accurate<br />

<strong>and</strong> the principle of ‘not kept longer than necessary’ is adhered to.<br />

Department: Human Resources<br />

Author: Catherine Moroney - HR<br />

Approval: <strong>Policy</strong> Development Forum/St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee<br />

Issue number: 02<br />

Issue date: 14.09.08<br />

Review Date: In line with new legislation/codes of practice

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!