23.10.2014 Views

Answers to Self-Assessment Questions - ACCP

Answers to Self-Assessment Questions - ACCP

Answers to Self-Assessment Questions - ACCP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. Consensus recommendations from the U.S. Summit on<br />

immune-enhancing enteral therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral<br />

Nutr 2001;25:S61–S63.<br />

2. Kudsk KA. Immunonutrition in surgery and critical care.<br />

Annu Rev Nutr 2006;26:463–79.<br />

42. Answer: B<br />

In patients like J.B. with ARDS and acute lung injury<br />

(ALI), immune-enhancing EN formulations supplemented<br />

with the omega-3 PUFAs (eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA]<br />

and g-linolenic acid [GLA]) and antioxidants have been<br />

associated with decreased mortality and improved<br />

oxygenation. The immune-enhancing EN formulation<br />

with omega-3 PUFAs 8.6 g/L and antioxidants (Answer<br />

B) contains these nutrients and is therefore the best choice.<br />

The standard EN formulation with enteral glutamine<br />

supplementation (Answer C) is not the best option because<br />

it does not contain omega-3 PUFAs or antioxidants. Neither<br />

Answer A (immune-enhancing EN formulation with<br />

arginine, nucleotides, and omega-3 PUFAs) nor Answer<br />

D (immune-enhancing EN formulation with arginine and<br />

omega-3 PUFAs) is best for J.B. at this time because each<br />

contains arginine, which has been associated with potential<br />

harm in patients with sepsis.<br />

1. Pontes-Arruda A, Aragao AM, Albuquerque JD. Effects of<br />

enteral feeding with eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic<br />

acid, and antioxidants in mechanically ventilated patients with<br />

severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2325–<br />

33.<br />

2. Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NE, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet<br />

P, Kazandjiev G, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition:<br />

intensive care. Clin Nutr 2006;25:210–23.<br />

43. Answer: C<br />

Once J.B. is started on an immune-enhancing EN<br />

formulation, the duration of therapy will have <strong>to</strong> be decided.<br />

Clinical studies indicate that the greatest benefit from these<br />

formulations in patients with ARDS is obtained when therapy<br />

is continued until the patient has been extubated (Answer<br />

C); thus, Answer C is the best answer. Patients are unlikely<br />

<strong>to</strong> benefit from any immunonutrition therapy administered<br />

for only 2 days (Answer A) or 4 days (Answer B), and there<br />

is no clinical evidence that patients with ARDS derive any<br />

further improvement in outcome if immune-enhancing<br />

diets are used after they have recovered sufficiently <strong>to</strong> be<br />

extubated. Because hospital discharge will generally occur<br />

days <strong>to</strong> weeks after extubation, discontinuing the product on<br />

discharge (Answer D) is not appropriate for the duration of<br />

J.B.’s immunonutrition therapy.<br />

1. Pontes-Arruda A, Aragao AM, Albuquerque JD. Effects of<br />

enteral feeding with eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic<br />

acid, and antioxidants in mechanically ventilated patients with<br />

severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2325–<br />

33.<br />

2. Consensus recommendations from the U.S. Summit on<br />

immune-enhancing enteral therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral<br />

Nutr 2001;25:S61–S63.<br />

44. Answer: C<br />

If a patient with ARDS receiving an immune-enhancing<br />

EN formulation was evaluated for immunologic and<br />

inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry markers, the result likely would reflect the<br />

increased use of omega-3 PUFAs, which is associated<br />

with a decrease in inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry media<strong>to</strong>rs and markers.<br />

Thus, the concentrations of prostaglandin E 2<br />

(Answer D)<br />

and interleukin 6 (IL-6) (Answer B) would be expected<br />

<strong>to</strong> decrease, not increase, making Answer B and Answer<br />

D incorrect. Tumor necrosis fac<strong>to</strong>r alpha concentrations<br />

(Answer C) decrease with the addition of PUFAs <strong>to</strong> the<br />

diet; thus, Answer C is correct. Although these immuneenhancing<br />

EN formulations may alter T lymphocyte<br />

function, <strong>to</strong>tal lymphocyte count would not be expected <strong>to</strong><br />

decrease (Answer A); thus Answer A is incorrect.<br />

1. Suchner U, Kuhn KS, Furst P. The scientific basis of<br />

immunonutrition. Proc Nutr Soc 2000;59:553–63.<br />

2. Pacht ER, DeMichele SJ, Nelson JL, Hart J, Wennberg AK,<br />

Gadek JE. Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, gammalinolenic<br />

acid, and antioxidants reduces alveolar inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

media<strong>to</strong>rs and protein influx in patients with acute respira<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2003;31:491–500.<br />

45. Answer: D<br />

The use of immune-enhancing EN formulations<br />

containing arginine, omega-3 PUFAs, and nucleotides has<br />

been shown <strong>to</strong> improve outcomes in patients after trauma.<br />

The potential benefit is greatest in patients with an injury<br />

severity score (ISS) greater than 20 or an abdominal<br />

trauma index (ATI) greater than 25. The 47-year-old<br />

woman injured in a fall with an ISS of 22 (Answer D) is<br />

the patient most likely <strong>to</strong> derive additional benefit from<br />

the use of immunonutrition. The 32-year-old man with an<br />

ISS of 12 (Answer A), the 29-year-old woman injured in an<br />

industrial accident with a ATI of 22 (Answer C), and the<br />

55-year-old woman injured in an au<strong>to</strong>mobile accident with<br />

an ATI score of 11 (Answer B) do not have markers of injury<br />

severity in the range where a benefit of immunonutrition<br />

has been shown; thus Answer A, Answer B, and Answer C<br />

are incorrect. However, use of these products would not be<br />

expected <strong>to</strong> increase complications.<br />

1. Kudsk KA, Minard G, Croce MA, Brown RO, Lowrey TS,<br />

Pritchard FE, et al. A randomized trial of isonitrogenous<br />

enteral diets after severe trauma. An immune-enhancing diet<br />

reduces septic complications. Ann Surg 1996;224:531–40;<br />

discussion 540–3.<br />

2. Consensus recommendations from the U.S. Summit on<br />

immune-enhancing enteral therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral<br />

Nutr 2001;25:S61–S63.<br />

46. Answer: B<br />

Improved outcomes have been demonstrated when<br />

patients with burn injuries like R.R. are given a standard<br />

EN formulation and enteral glutamine supplementation, so<br />

Answer B (begin feeding with a standard EN formulation<br />

with enteral glutamine supplementation) is the correct<br />

answer. Withholding enteral feeding for the first 48 hours<br />

after a thermal injury (Answer D) decreases the likelihood<br />

that EN will be <strong>to</strong>lerated once started; thus, Answer D is<br />

incorrect. Feeding should begin as soon as the patient is<br />

hemodynamically stable after thermal injury. Immuneenhancing<br />

EN formulations supplemented with arginine<br />

12.5, omega-3 PUFAs, and nucleotides (Answer A) or<br />

arginine (Answer C) are not associated with harm in patients<br />

with burns, but they are not recommended for routine use<br />

Pharmacotherapy <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Assessment</strong> Program, 6th Edition 45 Gastroenterology and Nutrition <strong>Answers</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!