23.10.2014 Views

Answers to Self-Assessment Questions - ACCP

Answers to Self-Assessment Questions - ACCP

Answers to Self-Assessment Questions - ACCP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically<br />

ill patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:410–6.<br />

2. S<strong>to</strong>ry DA, Ronco C, Bellomo R. Trace element and vitamin<br />

concentrations and losses in critically ill patients treated<br />

with continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Crit Care Med<br />

1999;27:220–3.<br />

18. Answer: D<br />

W.G.’s serum glucose concentration has been consistently<br />

elevated. The best approach for managing his hyperglycemia<br />

would be <strong>to</strong> start regular insulin by continuous intravenous<br />

infusion (Answer D); thus Answer D is correct. Using a<br />

sliding scale regimen of insulin aspart (Answer B) would<br />

be a reactive approach <strong>to</strong> hyperglycemia as opposed <strong>to</strong><br />

a proactive approach with the insulin infusion. Sliding<br />

scale insulin regimens are no longer widely used in ICUs.<br />

Although adding regular insulin <strong>to</strong> the PN formulation<br />

(Answer C) is more convenient for the nursing staff, it is<br />

not ideal for a patient like W.G. who is receiving CRRT.<br />

If insulin is in the PN formulation and CRRT is s<strong>to</strong>pped<br />

for any reason (e.g., because of filter clotting), the glucose<br />

delivery from the dialysis and replacement solutions will<br />

abruptly s<strong>to</strong>p, creating the potential for hypoglycemia unless<br />

the PN formulation is also s<strong>to</strong>pped. Similarly, administering<br />

insulin glargine subcutaneously every night (Answer A)<br />

would place the patient at risk of hypoglycemia in the event<br />

that any glucose source is discontinued.<br />

1. Wooley JA, Btaiche IF, Good KL. Metabolic and nutritional<br />

aspects of acute renal failure in critically ill patients requiring<br />

continuous renal replacement therapy. Nutr Clin Pract<br />

2005;20:176–91.<br />

2. Scheinkestel CD, Adams F, Mahony L, Bailey M, Davies<br />

AR, Nyulasi I, et al. Impact of increasing parenteral protein<br />

loads on amino acid levels and balance in critically ill anuric<br />

patients on continuous renal replacement therapy. Nutrition<br />

2003;19:733–40.<br />

19. Answer: B<br />

Various formulas are available for calculating nitrogen<br />

balance. Standard formulas have been revised <strong>to</strong> be used<br />

in patients receiving CRRT. W.G.’s nitrogen balance is<br />

negative 6.5 (-6.5) g of nitrogen (Answer B). This value can<br />

be calculated using the following equation:<br />

Nitrogen balance (g/day) = nitrogen intake (g/day) −<br />

nitrogen loss (g/day). In patients receiving CRRT, nitrogen<br />

loss (g/day) = effluent urea nitrogen loss (g/day) + amino<br />

acid losses across CRRT membrane (g/day) + urine urea<br />

nitrogen [UUN] (g/day) + insensible losses (2–4 g/day).<br />

W.G. is receiving 175 g of protein per day through his<br />

enteral formulation and additional protein supplementation.<br />

This intake provides 28 g of nitrogen per day (175 g of<br />

protein/6.25 g of protein per gram of nitrogen). The effluent<br />

urea nitrogen loss (grams per day) = <strong>to</strong>tal volume of<br />

replacement fluid (liters) + dialysate fluid (liters) + volume<br />

(liters) of parenteral volume removed from the patient over<br />

24 hours × the average urea nitrogen from the effluent<br />

sample (51 mg/dL). Convert 51 mg/dL <strong>to</strong> grams per liter<br />

by multiplying by 0.01 = 0.51 g of nitrogen per liter. Total<br />

replacement fluid plus dialysate fluid plus parenteral volume<br />

removed = 36,000 mL + 12,000 mL + 8,000 mL = 56,000<br />

mL = 56 L. Therefore, 56 L × 0.51 g of N per liter = 28.5<br />

g of nitrogen is lost as dialysate urea nitrogen. Dialysate<br />

plus replacement fluids are infusing at 2 L/hour; therefore,<br />

amino acid losses across the CRRT membrane = 2 g of N<br />

per day. Because W.G. is anuric, the UUN is omitted from<br />

the calculation. Adding 4 g of nitrogen for insensible losses<br />

gives a <strong>to</strong>tal of 34.5 g of nitrogen out. Nitrogen balance = 28<br />

g of nitrogen in – 34.5 g of nitrogen out = − 6.5 g of nitrogen.<br />

Answer A [negative 9 (−9) g of N], Answer C [negative 1.5<br />

(−1.5) g of N], and Answer D [positive 1 (+1) g of N] are<br />

incorrect based on the above calculations.<br />

1. Liu KD, Stralovich-Romani A, Cher<strong>to</strong>w GM. Nutrition support<br />

for adult patients with acute renal failure. In: Merritt R, ed. The<br />

A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual, 2nd ed. Silver<br />

Spring, MD: American Society for Parenteral and Enteral<br />

Nutrition, 2005:281–6.<br />

2. Manning EM, Shenkin A. Nutritional assessment in the<br />

critically ill. Crit Care Clin 1995;11:603–34.<br />

20. Answer: D<br />

W.G. has been converted from intermittent hemodialysis<br />

<strong>to</strong> CRRT. A high-nitrogen feeding formulation (Answer<br />

D) should be initiated because it will meet the high protein<br />

needs of this patient receiving CRRT. Also, additional<br />

protein supplementation will be needed. A low-electrolyte,<br />

renal disease–specific enteral formulation (Answer A) is not<br />

needed at this time because the low-electrolyte composition<br />

of these products is not needed during CRRT. Immuneenhancing<br />

feeding formulations (Answer B) may have a<br />

role, but currently neither clinical nor literature support is<br />

available <strong>to</strong> justify the use of these expensive formulations<br />

in patients receiving CRRT. Calorie-dense feeding<br />

formulations (Answer C) often lead <strong>to</strong> gastroparesis, which<br />

is common in patients such as W.G. who have diabetes<br />

mellitus and are receiving CRRT; thus Answer C is not the<br />

best answer.<br />

1. Wooley JA, Btaiche IF, Good KL. Metabolic and nutritional<br />

aspects of acute renal failure in critically ill patients requiring<br />

continuous renal replacement therapy. Nutr Clin Pract<br />

2005;20:176–91.<br />

2. Kapadia FN, Bhojani K, Shah B. Special issues in the<br />

patient with renal failure. Crit Care Clin 2003;19:233–5<br />

Home Parenteral Nutrition<br />

21. Answer: D<br />

A 70-year-old man was hospitalized with pancreatitis<br />

associated with biliary tract disease. Fifteen days after<br />

admission, after undergoing cholecystec<strong>to</strong>my, he is unable<br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>lerate oral nutrition. Two pancreatic pseudocysts were<br />

identified by ultrasound examination. The best nutrition<br />

support regimen for home nutrition support for this patient<br />

is Answer D (enteral feeding with the tip of the feeding<br />

tube located past the ligament of Treitz). There are several<br />

studies demonstrating that a nasojejunal feeding tube<br />

with the tip past the ligament of Treitz provides effective<br />

nutrition without pancreatic stimulation, which is the cause<br />

of the pain when oral feedings are attempted. Although<br />

difficult, this type of feeding can be done at home and, if<br />

it is <strong>to</strong>lerated, saves the high cost and complication rate of<br />

home PN. Answer A (PN though a central venous access<br />

device [CVAD]) is incorrect because PN is not indicated<br />

Pharmacotherapy <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Assessment</strong> Program, 6th Edition 39 Gastroenterology and Nutrition <strong>Answers</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!