23.10.2014 Views

Positive Memory Bank - Berry Street

Positive Memory Bank - Berry Street

Positive Memory Bank - Berry Street

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Quantitative Data<br />

3.1 General<br />

Applications were invited from individuals<br />

and from groups. The characteristics of the<br />

groups which applied were hard to track,<br />

because in many cases the group of young<br />

people who applied did not end up being the<br />

same as the group who then participated in<br />

the activity. This may have been the result<br />

of multiple factors including natural<br />

attrition in the time lapse between<br />

application and opportunity, or applications<br />

being developed on a program basis and the<br />

group within the program changing over<br />

time.<br />

Among the applications submitted<br />

by<br />

individuals 39 were from female applicants<br />

and 25 from male applicants.<br />

Applicants were invited to self-identify their<br />

cultural identity if it was anything other<br />

than Anglo-Australian. Australian. Between the first and<br />

third application rounds applications from<br />

non-Anglo-Australians Australians increased from 20% to<br />

28%. Applicants identifying as Indigenous<br />

stayed static in the first and second round,<br />

but doubled in the third round.<br />

The following list is drawn from both the<br />

individual and group applications and covers<br />

all three rounds. The figures represent the<br />

total number of young people in each<br />

cultural group<br />

across all three Giving<br />

Rounds.<br />

• Aboriginal/Indigenous/Koori – 8<br />

• Sudanese/Dinka - 3<br />

• Macedonian - 3<br />

• New Zealanders – 2<br />

• Lebanese, Australian-Italian, Italian,<br />

Greek, Syrian and Ethiopian – 1 each<br />

Applications came from all the <strong>Berry</strong> <strong>Street</strong><br />

practice Groups. The table below shows the<br />

number of applications received from each<br />

group, across all three application rounds<br />

and includes those withdrawn before or<br />

after the Giving Group met.<br />

Application by Group<br />

24<br />

21<br />

15<br />

6<br />

7<br />

Hume<br />

North West Southern Gippsland Take Two<br />

(Therpeutic)<br />

The first application round received ten<br />

applications. The second saw an increase of<br />

60% (total 16 applications) and the third saw<br />

an overall increase of almost 300% from the<br />

second round and 470% from the first (47<br />

applications in total).<br />

This volume of increase in applications was<br />

completely un-expected. . It was observed<br />

that more applicants and support workers<br />

were contacting the PMB project manager<br />

for advice before submission, but this<br />

communication alone did not indicate the<br />

sharp increase in application numbers.<br />

The impact was also seen in the quantity of<br />

funding available and requested. In the first<br />

round just over $9,000 was requested. The<br />

second saw requests totalling $14,500 and<br />

the third round, $43,000.<br />

Page | 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!