Issues 1 – 120 December 1986 – April 2007 - Citizens Advice

Issues 1 – 120 December 1986 – April 2007
ADVISER INDEX
ABSTRACTS INDEX
TABLE OF CASES
This index includes cases appearing in issues 1 – 120. The index reference eg,
Angus v Bryden, 29 indicates that the abstract appears in Adviser number 29.
139 Finborough Rd Management Ltd v Mansoor, 22
A
A G Securities v Vaughan & others, 8 (CA); 11 (HL)
A v B, 99
A v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, CA, 96
A v Fenland DC, 64
A v Tameside & Glossop Health Authority, 60
AA (R on the application of) v Lambeth LBC, CA, 94
Abbey Life Assurance v Tansell, CA, 80
Abbey National BS v Cann & others, 19
Abbey National BS v Gibson, CA, 67
Abbey National plc v Boscawen & others, 50
Abbey National plc v Moss & others, 42
Abbey National v Padfield, 96
Abbey National v Powell, CA, 84
Aberdeen Steak House plc v Ibrahim, 9
Adair v Bolton MBC, 104
Adams & another v Watkins, 21
Adams & others v 1. Healthcare Ltd 2. Taltov Ltd & others, 22
Adams v Lancashire CC, 55; CA, 64
Adams v Rhymney Valley DC, CA, 83
Adamson v B & L Cleaning Services Ltd, 50
Adamson v CAO, 5
Adamson v Halifax, CA, 115
Adan v Hounslow LBC and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, CA, 103
Adan v Newham LBC, CA, 92
Addison t/a Brayton News v Ashby, 98
Addison v Babcock Fata Ltd, 1
Advanced Technology v Cray Valley Products, 37
AEG (UK) Ltd v Lewis, 36
AEM (Avon) Ltd v Bristol CC, 91
Affleck v Newcastle Mind, 75
Afzal & others v Ford Motor Co Ltd, 45
Agyeman v Boadi, 56
Ahmed v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, CA, 111
AIB Group (UK) plc v Martin & Gould, HL, 91
AIB v Alsop, CA, 68

Air Foyle Ltd v Crosby-Clarke, CA, 93
Akinbolu v Hackney LBC, 57
Ako v Rothschild Asset Management Ltd, CA, 92
Akram v Adam, CA, 98, 108
Alabaster v Woolwich plc and SoS for Social Security, 83; CA, 93, ECJ, 105
Alawiye v Mahmood & National Westminster Bank, 117
Al-Ameri v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC, CA, 100; HL, 105
Alamo Group (Europe) Ltd v Tucker, 98
Alamo Housing Co-operative v Meredith, CA, 101
Albany Home Loans v Massey, 61
Albion Hotel (Freshwater) Ltd v Maia e Silva, 91
Alboni v Ind Coope Retail, CA, 67
Alcan Extrusions v Yates, 57
Alcock v Wraith & others, 29
Alexander & others v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No. 2), 27
Alexander v Rolls Royce Motor Cars Ltd, 50
Alexandrou v Oxford, 18
Alghile v Westminster CC, CA, 87
Ali and Nessa v Newham LBC, CA, 87
Ali v Christian Salvesen Food Services, 54
Ali v Khan, CA, 96
Ali v Southwark MBC, 9
Ali-Tobaishi v Aung, 43
Allan & others v Stirling DC, 44
Allen v Redbridge LBC, 42
Alliance & Leicester BS v Leicestershire CC, 38
Alliance and Leicester v Slayford, CA, 83
Allied Dunbar v Weisinger, 9
Allonby v Accrington and Rossendale College, CA, 87
ALM Medical Services Ltd v Bladon, CA, 95
Alsop v Star Vehicle Contracts Ltd, 18
Ambrose v Nottingham CC, 107
Ammadio v Dalton, 28
Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC, 88
Amrit Holdings v Shahbakhti, 111
Anderton v Clwyd County Council, CA, 93
Andreou v Lord Chancellor’s Department, CA, 95
Andrews v Schooling, 28
Anglia TV v Cayton, 13
Anglian Water v Wilson, 15
Angus v Bryden, 29
Aniagwu v (1) Hackney LBC (2) Owens, 74
Annandale Engineering v Samson, 43
Anthony v Anthony, 2
Antoniades v Villiers & another, CA, 8; HL, 11
Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC; R (N) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R
(M) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, CA, 105
Anya v University of Oxford, CA, 87
Aon Training v Dore, CA, 114
Aparau v Iceland Frozen Foods, 55

Aparu v Iceland Frozen Foods (No.2), CA, 79
Apelogun-Gabriels v Lambeth LBC, CA, 91
Appleton v Aspin & others, 7
Application by Badek, ECJ, 81
Arbeiterwohlfahrt Der Stadt Berlin v Botel (ECJ), 34
Archangel v Lambeth LBC, CA, 86
Archibald v Fife Council, CS, 103; HL, 106
Argyll Training v (1) Sinclair and (2) Argyll and the Islands Enterprise, 82
Ariston v Charly Records, 19
Ariyo v Sovereign Leasing, CA, 64
Arogol Co v Rajah, CA, 88
Arogundale v Brent LBC, CA, 88
Arthur v Anker, 54
Asda Stores Ltd v Thompson, 92
Ashbroom Facilities v Bodley, 11
Ashburn Anstalt v W J Arnold & Co & another, 7
Ashley Guarantee plc v Zacaria, 41
Ashley v Sutton LBC, 49
Ashmore v British Coal Corporation, 21
Ashraf v SoS for SS, CA, 78
Aslan v Murphy (Nos 1 & 2), 14
Associated British Ports v Palmer & others, CA, 38; HL, 50
Associated Newspapers Ltd v Wilson, 35; CA, 38; HL, 50
Astle v Cheshire CC, 108
Astley v Celtec Ltd, 90; CA, 95
Atlanta Trust Ltd v Domville, 40
Attorney General v Wheen, 83
Austin-Fell v Austin-Fell, 15
AUT v University of Newcastle, 4
Avon CC v Buscott & others, 8
Ayse Suzen v Zehnacker Gebandereinigung GmbH (ECJ), 61
Azmi v Newham LBC, 84
B
B v B (occupation order), CA, 74
B v B, 45
B v BAA, 114
B v Secretary of State for Social Security, 49
B v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, CA, 112
Babbage v N Norfolk DC, 23
Babcock Fata Ltd v Addison, 3
Badger Hill Properties Ltd v Cottrell, 26
Bairstow Eves v Smith & Hill, 106
Baker Refractories Ltd v Bishop, CA, 92
Baker v Cornwall County Council, 20
Baker v Maciver, 19
Balamoody v United Kingdon Central Council for Nursing Midwifery and Health
Visiting, CA, 92
Baldwin v British Coal Corporation, 49
Balfour Kilpatrick v Acheson, 101

Balgobin & Francis v Tower Hamlets, 6
Banco-Exterior v Mann, 48
Bank Mellat v Kazmi, 12
Bank of Baroda v Dhillon (CA), 67
Bank of Baroda v Rayarel & others, 49
Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Ali (No.3), CA, 93
Bank of Credit and Commerce International v Ali, CA, 82; HL, 86
Bank of Cyprus v Markou, 74
Bank of Ireland v Robertson, 102
Banks v Lavin, 17
Bankway Properties v Dunsford, CA, 87
Banque Bruxelles Lambert plc v Eagle Star & others, 43
Barber (R on the application of) v SoS for Work & Pensions, 96
Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group, ECJ, 20
Barber v NWS Bank, 54
Barber v RJB Mining (UK), 74
Barber v Staffordshire CC, 55
Barber v Thames Television plc, 26; CA, 33
Barca v Mears (Trustee in bankruptcy), 107
Barclays Bank v Kapur & others, 13
Barclays Bank v Boulter, 62; HL 77
Barclays Bank v Brooks, 32
Barclays Bank v Buhr, CA, 89
Barclays Bank v Caplan, 66
Barclays Bank v Coleman, CA, 78
Barclays Bank v Ellis, CA, 85
Barclays Bank v Hendricks, 53, 54
Barclays Bank v Kennedy & another, 12
Barclays Bank v Khaira & another, 29
Barclays Bank v O'Brien, CA 33; HL, 41
Barclays Bank v Rivett, CA, 69
Barclays Bank v Schwartz, 52
Barclays Bank v Thomson, 60
Bar-Gur v Squire & others, 41
Barke v Seetec Business Technology Centre, CA, 112
Barking & Dagenham LBC v Hyatt & Hyatt, 35
Barking and Dagenham LBC v Oguko, 79
Barlow v A J Whittle, 18
Barnet LBC v Smith, 23
Barnsley v Albon Engineering & Manufacturing, CA, 105
Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd, 9
Barrett v Morgan, CA, 73
Bartholomew v Hackney LBC, CA, 74
Barton v Investec Henderson Crossthwaite Securities Ltd, 99
Barwick & another v Kent CC, 32
Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw & others, 27
Batchelor v British Railways, 4
Bate v CAO CA, 48; HL, 56
Batooneh v Asombang, 105
Batsford Estates v Taylor, CA, 114

Baxter & others v Limb Group of Companies, 47
BBC Sports & Social Club v Morgan, 6
BBC v Kelly-Phillips, 65; CA, 69
BCCI v Ali, 74, 76
Beart v HM Prison Service, CA, 98
Beaton v Nationwide Anglia, 22
Beazer Investments v Soares, CA, 107
Beckman v Dynamo Whicheloe MacFarlane Ltd, ECJ, 95
BECTU v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ECJ, 87
Bedding & others v McCarthy, 47
Beedell v West Ferry Printers, 81
Beets-Proper v F Van Lanschot Bankiers NV (ECJ), 4
Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC, CA, 78
Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC, CA, 93; HL, 98
Behzadi v Shaftsbury Hotels, 22
Belfast CC v Donoghue & others, 39
Bell v DHSS, 14
Bellouti v Wandsworth LBC, CA, 112
Benham v Poole BC, 29
Benham v United Kingdom, EctHR, 49; ECJ, 57
Bennett v Copeland BC, CA, 108
Bennett v Southwark LBC, CA, 93
Bentley v SoS for Trade & Industry, 95
Benton v Sanderson Keyser, 8, 12 (CA)
Benveniste v University of Southampton, 14
Benyon v Scadden, 77
Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd & another, 42
Beresforde v Chesterfield BC, 15
Berg & Busschers v Besselsen, ECJ, 16
Berkley Leisure Group v Lee CA, 65
Berkshire Capital Funding v Street, CA, 78
Berkshire CC v Greenfield, 56
Bernadone v Pall Mall Group, CA, 82
Berrisford v Woodward Schools Ltd, 26
Berryman v Hounslow LBC, 60
Berwick Salmon Fisheries Ltd v Rutherford, 26
Bessa Plus v Lancaster, CA, 69
Betts v Brintel Helicopters & KLM ERA Helicopters (UK), 54; CA, 62
Bevan Ashford v Malin, 51
Bevan v Johnston, 19
Beveridge v KLM UK, 83
Bhatt v Chelsea & Westminster Health Care Trust, 66
Bhatti v Berkeley Court Investments Ltd & others, 26
Bhikha v Leicester CC, CA, 83
Bhudi & others v IMI Refiners Ltd, 44
Bibby v Chief Constable of Essex, CA, 81
Bibi v CAO, CA, 63
Biggs v Somerset CC, 52, 55 (CA)
Billsdon & others v Residential Apartments Ltd, 25 (CA), 30 (HL)
Birds Eye Walls Ltd v Roberts, ECJ, 43

Birmingham DC v McMahon & others, 5
Black v Carmichael, 33
Blackburn v Gridquest Ltd t/a Select Employment, 91; CA, 94
Blackpool & Fylde College v National Association of Teachers in Further & Higher
Education, 44
Blackstock v Blackstock, 29
Blake v Barking & Dagenham LBC, 61
Blockbuster Entertainment v James, CA, 118
Blockleys plc v Miller, 34
Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd, CA, 95
BNP Paribas v Mezzotero, 106
Bold Transmission Parts Ltd v Taree, 92
Boldack v East Lindsey DC, CA, 75
Bolton Roadways v Edwards & others, 7
Bond v Leicester CC, CA, 89
Bonner v Gilbert Ltd, 17
Boorman v Allmakes, 51
Boot v Boot, 56
Booth v USA, 72
Boots Co plc v Lees-Collier, 2
Boscawen & others v Bajwa & others, 50
Bossa v Nordstress, 69
Bostock v Bryant, 23
Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie, 3
Bosworth v Wolverhampton CCRO, 25
Botham v MOD, HL, 116
Botu v Brent LBC, CA, 81
Bowden v Tuffnells Parcels Express, 81
Bowerman v ABTA, 54
Bowes v J Richardson & Son, 105
Boyden v Watson, 112
Boyle v Verrall, 58
Boyo v London Borough of Lambeth, 48
Boys & Girls Welfare Society v McDonald, 55
Boyter v Thomson, 51
BP Chemicals Ltd v (1) Gillick (2) Roevin Management Services Ltd, 49
Brackley v Notting Hill Housing Trust and Brackley, CA, 87
Bradford & Bingley Building Society v Manchanda, CA, 97
Bradford & Bingley v Rashid, CA, 113; HL, 117
Bradford & Bingley v Ross, CA, 112
Bradford Council v Arora, 16
Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust v Al-Shahib, 96
Bradley & others v NALGO, 25
Bradley v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority, 48
Bradney v Birmingham CC, CA, 104
Braintree DC v Thompson, CA, 110
Bramhill v Edwards t/a Destination RV, CA, 104
Branchett v Beaney & others, 32
Brasserie Du Pecheur SA v Federal Republic of Germany, ECJ, 56
Bratko v Beloit Walmsley, 54

Bratton v Croydon LBC, CA, 95
Brennan v Lambeth LBC, CA, 68
Brent LBC v Charles, CA, 69
Brent LBC v Cronin, CA, 69
Brent LBC v Knightly, 61
Brent LBC v Marks, CA, 73
Brent LBC v Murphy, 51
Brent LBC v Sharma & Vyas, 40
Brentwood Bros (Manchester) Ltd v Shepherd, CA, 99
Brewer v Andrews, 62
Brewer v Best Travel, 43
Brigden v American Express Bank, 79
Briggs v Oates, 23
Brinnand v Ewens, 5
Briscoe v Lubrizol Ltd, CA, 94
Bristol & West BS v Ellis, 56, 57
Bristol & West Building Society v Turner & others, 28
Bristol & West plc v Bartlett, CA, 94
Bristol CC v Glastonbury, CA, 117
Bristol CC v Hassan, CA, 117
Bristol CC v Lovell, CA, 58; HL, 67
Bristol CC v Monah (CA), 65
Bristol Churches Housing Association v Ward, 54
Britannia Building Society v Earl & others, 22
Britannia Building Society v Pugh, 58
British & Commonwealth Group plc v Quadrex Holdings Inc, 12
British Aerospace v Green, 51
British Airways (Gatwick) v Moore and Botterill, 80
British Coal Corp v Cheesbrough, 19
British Coal Corporation v Keeble, 63
British Fuels v Meade & Baxendale, HL, 71
British Gas plc v McCarrick, 27
British Gas plc v Sharma, 23
British Newspaper Printing Ltd v Kelly & others, 14
British Nursing Association v Inland Revenue, 89; CA, 93
British Railways Board v Paul, 8
British Road Services v Loughran, 61
British Sugar v Kirker, 71
British Telecom plc v Roberts & Longstaffe, 60
British Telecom plc v Sheridan, 18
British Telecom plc v Tilehurst, 31
British Waterways Board v Norman, 42
Britool Ltd v Roberts & others, 41
Broaders v Kalkare Property Ltd, 23
Broadley v Guy Chapman, 40
Broadwick Financial Services v Spencer, CA, 91
Bromley & others v H & J Quick Ltd, 7; CA, 9
Bromley Park Gardens Estates Ltd v George, 27
Brook & Arden v Woodcock & Woodcock, 16
Brook Lane Finance Co Ltd v Bradley, 10

Brook v Haringey LBC, 35
Brooks & others v British Telecom plc, 24; CA, 31
Brown v Gavin Scott, 8
Brown v JBD Engineering Ltd, 42
Brown v Rentokill, 50; ECJ, 70
Brown v Stockton BC, CA, 5; HL, 10
Bruce & others v Wiggins Teape (Stationery) Ltd, 47
Bruce v Worthing BC, 44
Brumfitt v Ministry of Defence, 108
Bruno v BBC, 13
Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust, CA, 64; HL, 76
Bryant v Portsmouth CC, CA, 83
BSG Property Services v Tuck, 55
BTE Ltd v Merseyside & Cheshire Rent Assessment Committee & another, 33
Buchan & Ivey v Secretary of State, 61
Buchanan-Smith v Schlekker & Co, 59
Bucks CC v Moran, 13
Buggs (Josephine) v Buggs (David Maurice), 103
Bullock v Alice Ottley School, 27; CA, 36
Bunce v Postworth Ltd t/a Skyblue, CA, 112
Burgoyne v Griffiths & another, 26
Burke v Burke, 3
Burrett v Agnew & London Regional Transport, 43
Burrows & another v Sharp, 20
Burrows v Brent LBC, CA, 52; HL, 60
Burton & Rhule v DeVere Hotels, 59
Burton v Camden LBC, CA, 67; HL, 81
Burton v Higham t/a Ace Appointments, 98
Burton v New Forest DC, CA, 109
Busch v Klinicum Neustadt GmbH & Co, Betriebs-KG, ECJ, 101
Business Applic. Spec. v Nationwide Credit Corp v Marn Garage (third party), 13
Buss Leisure Ltd v Thomas, 44
Butuyuyu v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC, 65
Buxton v Equinox Design, 73
Byford v Butler (Trustee in Bankruptcy), 104
Byrne & others v Financial Times, 29
Byrne Brothers (Formwork) Ltd v Baird, 91
Byrne v BOC Ltd, 36
C
C & G Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for Health, 23
C (a minor) v Hackney LBC, 54
Cabaj v Westminster City Council, 47
Cadogan Estates v McMahon, HL, 86
Calder & Ciazakowsky v Rowntree Mackintosh Confectionary Ltd, 32
Calder v James Finlay Corp Ltd, 13
Caledonia Bureau Investment & Property v Caffrey, 67
Caledonian Mining Co Ltd v Bassett, 5
Callahan v Glasgow City Council, 89
Cambridge & District Co-operative Society Ltd v Rouse, 38

Camden & Islington Community Services NHS Trust v Kennedy, 57
Camden LBC v Akanni, CA, 69
Camden LBC v Alexandrou, CA, 69
Camden LBC v Gilsenan, CA, 70
Camden LBC v Goldenberg & another, 56
Camden LBC v Gumby, 77
Camden LBC v Hobson, 30
Camden LBC v Mallett, CA, 90
Camden LBC v Marshall, 58
Camden LBC v Oppong, 56
Camden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd & others, 32
Campbell and Smith Construction Group v Greenwood, 88
Campbell v (1) South Northamptonshire DC (2) Secretary of State for Work and
Pensions, CA, 111
Campbell v Dunoon & Cowal Housing Association, 41
Campbell v S Northamptonshire DC, CA, 105
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Bello, 33
Cannon v Barnsley MBC, 33
Cantor Fitzgerald (UK) Ltd v Wallace, 28
Cantor Fitzgerald International v Bird, 96
CAO & Secretary of State for Social Security v Ahmed & others, 45
CAO & Secretary of State for Social Security v Dommett (R(IS)6/93), 44
CAO & Secretary of State v Foster, CA, 25; HL, 37
CAO v Askew, CA, 68
CAO v Bath, CA, 77
CAO v Brunt (R(U)9/88), CA, 5; HL, 14
CAO v Clarke & Faul, 49
CAO v Coombe, 65
CAO v Creighton, NICA, 78
CAO v Eggleton & others, 50
CAO v Kenyon, 53
CAO v Maguire, CA, 74
CAO v Palfrey & others, 49
CAO v Patterson, CA, 63
CAO v Pearse (R(P)2/93), 33
CAO v Quinn , 59
CAO v Sheriff (CIS/545/92), 52
CAO v Stafford, CA, 77
CAO v Uprichard, NICA, 79
CAO v Webber, CA, 63
Caparo v Dickman, 18
Capello v Sos for Work and Pensions, CS, 107
Capital Foods Retail Ltd v Corrigan, 40
Capital v Hampshire CC, 56
Car Crash Line Ltd v Branton Edwards (a firm), 94
Cardiff CC v Stone, CA, 94
Cardiff Women's Aid v Hartup, 46
Cardigan Properties Ltd v Consolidated Property Investments Ltd, 25
Cardwell v Walker, 105
Carmichael v National Power, CA, 69; HL, 78

Carson (1) Reynolds (2) v SoS for Work & Pensions, CA, 100
Cartlidge v CAO (R(U)5/87), 4
Caruana v Manchester Airport, 57
Carver v Saudi Arabian Airlines, CA, 75
Castle Court Investment Co (Southampton) Ltd v Southern Rent Assessment Panel,
46
Castle Phillips v Wilkinson, 39
Catamaran Cruisers Ltd v Williams & others, 46
Catherall v Michelin Tyre plc, 97
Catherine Haigh Harlequin Hair v Seed, 20
Cato v Queen Charlotte's Special Health Authority, 5
Caulfield v Marshalls Clay Products; Clarke v Frank Staddon, CA, 105
Cedar Holdings v Aguinaldo, 34
Cedar Holdings v Thompson, 32
Celtec Ltd v Astley, 90; CA, 95
Central Sunderland Housing Company v Janet Wilson, CA, 96
Central YMCA Housing Association v Saunders, 24
Century (UK) v (1) G Clibbery (2) M Clibbery, 109
Cerberus Software v Rowley, 77; CA, 85
CGB Publishing v Killey, 42
Chamberlaine v Scally, 34
Chamberlin v Emokpae, 106, CA, 110
Charlton & Charlton v (1) Charlton Thermosystems (Romsey) Ltd (2) Ellis & others,
49
Chartered Trust v Pitcher, 10
Chatterton v CAO, 41
Chaudhry v Prabhakar, 14
Cheese v Thomas, 40
Cheesman (1) Onyx UK (2) v R Brewer Contracts, 84
Chelsea Yacht and Boat Co v Pope, CA, 84
Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Booker, 60
Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Grant, 44
Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Grattidge, 38
Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Johnson, 57
Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Krausz, 60
Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Norgan, 53
Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Obi, CA, 65
Cheniston Investments v Waddock, 12
Chessington World of Adventures v Reed, 65
Chesters Accommodation Agency v Abebrese, CA, 65
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs, 73
Chief Constable of the Thames Valley Police v Kellaway, 79
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Vento (No.2), 91
Chiltern House Ltd v Chambers & others, 19
Chimwe Gil v Baygreen Properties Ltd, CA, 96
Chisholm & others v Kirklees MBC & another, 39
Chrisdell Ltd v Tickner, 5
Christie v John E Haith, 101
Christmas v Hampshire CC, 52
Church Commissioners for England v El-Emerah, 57

Church v W Lancashire NHS Trust, 66
CIBC Mortgages v Hattle, 41
CIBC Mortgages v Pitt, CA, 38; HL, 41
Cinnamon Ltd v Morgan, CA, 94
Circle 33 Housing Trust v Ellis, 113; CA, 115
Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor, 3
City of Bradford Metropolitan Council v McMahon, 38
City of London Building Society v Flegg, 4
City of Westminster v Peart, 34
Clark & Tokeley t/a Spellbrook v Oakes, 65; CA, 72
Clark v Chief Land Registrar, 35, 41
Clark v Oxfordshire Health Authority (CA), 67
Clark v TDG t/a Novacold, 71; 74 (CA)
Clarke v CAA, 28
Clarke v CAO, ECJ, 5
Clarke v Coutts & Co, CA, 94
Clarke v Hampshire Electro-Plating Ltd, 30
Clarke v SoS for the Environment, Transport & the Regions and Tunbridge Wells
BC, 97
Clarke v Trimoco Group Ltd, 38
Claughton v Charalambous, 81
Clayton v Oldham Athletic, 49
Clayton v Vigers, 16
Clegg v Olle Andersson t/a Nordic Marine, CA, 98
Clements v Lambeth LBC, 86
Cleveland Ambulance NHS Trust v Blane, 63
Clifford v Devon County Council, 48
Clifford v Union of Democratic Mineworkers, 27
Close Asset Finance v Care Graphics Machinery, 81
Clutton v Clutton, 24
Clymo v Wandsworth LBC, 15
Coales v John Wood & Co, 2
Coban v Allen, 59
Cobb v Secretary of State for Employment & MSC, 18
Cobley v Forward Technology Industries, CA, 101
Cockburn v CAO, CA, 58; HL, 62
Codona v Mid-berkshire DC, CA, 109
Cohen v TSB Bank, 91
Cold Drawn Tubes Ltd v Middleton, 32
Colen v Cebrian (UK), CA, 103
College of Ripon and York St John v Hobbs, 91
Colley v Corkindale, 54
Collins v Howard de Walden Estates, CA, 103
Collins v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions, 116, CA
Coloroll Pension Trustees Ltd v Russell & others (ECJ), 47
Coltrane v Day, CA, 99
Commerzbank v Price-Jones, CA, 102
Commission of EC v Belgium, ECJ, 30
Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain &
Northern Ireland, 45

Commissioners of Customs & Excise v Carrier, 49
Commissioners of Customs & Excise v National Westminster Bank, 96
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Ainsworth, CA, 110
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Morgan, 95
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Post Office Ltd, 98
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v St Hermans Estate Co, 95
Commotion v Rutty, 115
Complaint against Barnet LBC, 82
Complaint against Birmingham City Council, 83
Complaint against Bristol CC, 40
Complaint against Chichester DC, 99
Complaint against Ealing LBC, 83
Complaint against Leicester CC, 49
Complaint against Lewisham LBC, 82
Complaint against London Borough of Hackney, 40
Complaint against Nottingham CC, 97
Complaint against Plymouth CC, 99
Complaint against Southwark LBC, 97
Complaint against Tunbridge Wells BC, 30
Conlin v United Dairies, 44
Connel Estate Agents v Begej, 38
Conoco UK v Neal, 12
Conroy v Kenny, CA, 73
Consignia plc v Sealy, CA, 95
Conville v Richmond upon Thames LBC, 113, CA, 120
Cook v Norlands Ltd, PC, 94
Cooke v Glenrose Fish Co, 107
Coote v Granada Hospitality, 76
Copping v Surrey CC, CA, 115
Copsey v WWB Devon Clays, 113
Cork v Rawlins, CA, 85
Cornwall County Council v Prater, CA, 116
Cornwell v UK and Leary v UK, EctHR, 80
Cosgrove v Caesar and Howie, 89
Costello v Costello, 44
Cotswold Developments Construction v Williams, 115
Cottingham & Geary v CAO & Secretary of State for Social Security (R(P)1/93), 36
Coulter v Chief of Dorset Police, 113
Council of the Isles of Scilly v (1) Brintel Helicopters Ltd (2) Ellis & others, 48
Courage Take Home Trades v Keys, 1
Courtaulds v Sibson, 9
Cousins v Metropolitan Guarantee Ltd, 17
Coventry City v Cole & others, 41
Cowan v Chief Constable for Avon and Somerset Constabulary, CA, 95
Cowley v Manson Timber Ltd, 49
Cox v London Borough of Camden, 57
Coxall v Goodyear Great Britain Ltd, CA, 95
CPL Distribution Ltd v Todd, CA, 96
Crago v Julian, 30
Cramp v Hastings BC; Phillips v Camden LBC, CA, 113

Crane v Kynoch, 44
Cranfield v Bridegrove, CA, 101
Crantrave v Lloyds Bank, CA, 80; 87
Crawford v (1) Secretary of State for Employment (2) Colmore Depot, 53
Crawley BC v B, CA, 81
Crawley BC v Sawyer, 7
Creasy v Breachwood Motors Ltd, 35
Credit Lyonnais Bank v Burch, 59
Credit Suisse v Waltham Forest LBC, 57
Crees v Royal London Mutual Insurance, 61; CA, 67
Croft v Consignia plc, 96
Croft v Royal Mail Group, CA, 101
Crofts v Veta, HL, 116
Crompton v Broomfield, 23
Crook & others v H Faiman Ltd, 18
Cross v British Airways, 111
Crossley v Crossley, CA, 115
Crossley v Westminster CC, CA, 117
Crosville Wales v Tracey (No.2), 56
Crosville Wales v Tracey (No.2), CA, 56; HL, 66
Crown Suppliers (PSA) v Dawkins, 27
Croydon LBC v Buston & Triance, 31
Crozier v Crozier, 43
Cruikshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd, 90
Curr v Marks & Spencer, CA, 97
Curran v N Ireland Co-ownership Housing Association Ltd, 4
Curtis v London RAC, 55; CA,67
Cutter v Eagle Star, 60; HL, 72
D
D O Ferguson v Sohl, 36
D’Souza v Lambeth LBC, HL, 100
Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd, 98, CA, 104
Dacorum BC v El-Kalyoubi, 94
Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney, 49
Daley, James, Wiseman and Reynolds v Mahmood and Rahman, 114
Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazley, 39
Damton v University of Surrey. 97
Dance & another v Welwyn Hatfield DC, 19
Darlington BC v Sterling, CA, 66
Darr & another v LRC Products Ltd, 39
Dattani v Chief Constable of West Mercia Police, 110
Davidson v Air Tours, 51
Davidson v City Electrical Factors, 67
Davidson v Davidson, 33
Davies & others v Hotpoint Ltd, 47
Davies v Manchester City Justices, 10
Davies v McCartneys, 16
Davies v MJ Wyatt (Decorators), 84
Davies v Yadegar, 23

Dawncar Investments Ltd v Plews, 39
De Grasse v Stockwell Tools Ltd, 30
De Keyser v Wilson, 87
Deadman v Southwark LBC, CA, 83
Dean v Ainley, 6
Dean v Upton, 20
Dear v Newham LBC, 4
Dekker v Stichting VJV Centrum Plus, ECJ) 24
Delaney v Staples, 18; CA, 24; HL, 31
Demetri v Westminster CC, CA, 78
Denard v Burton Retail, 65
Denard v Smith, 22
Denco Ltd v Joinson, 25
Denetower Ltd v Toop & others, 26
Dennehy v Sealink UK Ltd, 3
Dent v Dent, 58
Department for Work & Pensions v Webley, CA, 110
Department for Work and Pensions v Richards, CA, 111
Derby v Scottish Equitable, CA, 87
Derbyshire CC v Vincent, 20
Derry BAA Ltd v Castro-Blanca, 2
Derwent Coachworks v Kirby, 48
Desnousse v (1) Newham LBC (2) Paddington Churches (3) Veni Properties, CA,
120
Devine v Designer Flowers Wholesale Florists Sundries Ltd, 42
Devlin v Hall, 21
Dharni v Dhami, 13
Dhatt v Macdonalds Hamburgers Ltd, 24
Diab v Countrywide Rentals, 92
Dibbs v Campbell, 8
Dibro Ltd v Hore & others, 19
Dick & another v Glasgow University, 42
Dickinson v Enfield LBC, 58
Dickinson v Growth Hair Clinic, 42
Dickinson v Jones Alexander, 16
Dietman v Brent LBC, 5
Digital Equipment Co v Clements, 58, 60; CA, 67
Dignity Funeral v Bruce, CS, 109
Dillenkofer v Federal Republic of Germany, ECJ, 59
Dimond v Lovell, CA, 74; HL 80
Dines & others v (1) Initial Health Care Services (2) Pall Mall Services Group Ltd, 40;
CA, 45
Director General of Fair Trading v Diwan, CA, 71
Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank, 76; CA, 79; HL, 89
Discount Tobacco & Confectionary Ltd v Williamson, 39
Discount Tobacco v Armitage, 18
Dispatch Management Services (UK) Ltd v Douglas, 93
Dixon v Rees, 41
DJM International v Nicholas, 56
Dobson v General Accident, 15

Dodd v British Telecom plc, 8
Doe v Thomas Bates & Son, 22
Doncaster BC v Green & others, 30
Doncaster MBC v Lockwood, 3
Donnelly v Kelvin International Services, 36
Donoghue v Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association, CA, 87
Doodes v Gotham, 114
Dooley v Leyland Vehicles, 4
Doorbar v Alltime Securities, 54
Doshoki v Draeger Ltd, 92
Doughty v Rolls Royce, 31
Dowuona v John Lewis, 6
Dr Sophie Redmond Stichting v Bartol & others, ECJ, 34
Drage v Governors of Greenford Hight School, CA, 80
Drew Morgan v Hamid Zadeh, CA, 76
Drinkwater Sabey Ltd v (1) Burnett (2) Kent County Council, 50
Driskel v Peninsular Services, 79
Dryden v Greater Glasgow Health Board, 35
D'Souza v London Borough of Lambeth, 66
DSS v Butler, 53
Dubai Aluminium Co Ltd v Salaam, HL, 100
Dudley Bower Building Services Ltd v Lowe, 98
Dudley MBC v Bailey, 20
Dudley MBC v Debenhams plc, 47
Duffy v Newcastle United FC, 81
Duffy v Yeomans & Partners Ltd, 40, 48 (CA)
Duggan v CAO (R(SB)13/89), 18
Dugmore v Swansea NHS Trust, CA, 97
Duke of Westminster & others v Birrane, 49
Duke v Reliance Systems Ltd, 3
Dunbar Bank v Nadeem, 60; CA, 69
Duncan Web Offset (Maidstone) v Cooper, 54
Dundee Plant Co Ltd v Riddler, 13
Dundon v GPT, 52
Dunham v Ashford Windows, 112
Dunn v Bradford MBC, CA, 96
Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull Council, 99, CA, 104; HL, 105
Dunsire v Dunsire, 27
Durant v Financial Services Authority, CA, 102
D'Urso v Ercole Marelli Elettromeccanica General SpA (ECJ), 32
Duthie v Thompson Holidays, 10
E
E (a minor) v Dorset CC, 52
E Berkshire Health Authority v Matadeen, 34
E v C, 54
Eagland v British Telecommunications plc, 34
Ealing LBC v Surdonja, CA, 80; HL, 91
East Berkshire Health Authority v Matadeen, 33
Eastwood v Magnox Electric, CA, 93

easyCar (UK) v Office of Fair Trading, ECJ, 109
Eaton Ltd v King & others, 49
Eaton v NORWEB, 17
Ebony of Mayfair v Liburd, 20
Eclipse Blinds Ltd v Wright, 32
ECM (Vehicles Delivery Service) v Cox, 69; CA, 76
ED&F Man Liquid products v Patel, CA, 101
Edmonds v Edmonds, 24
Edmund Murray Ltd v BSP International, 33
Edmund Nuttall v Butterfield, 113
Edwards v Governors of Hanson School, 89
Edwards v Surrey Police, 76
EFTA Surveillance Authority v Kingdom of Norway, EFTACJ, 98
Ekinci v Hackney LBC, 85; CA, 88
Ekpe v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, 89
Ekwuru v Westminster CC, CA, 103
Eley v King & Chasemore, 14
Elitestone Ltd v Morris, HL, 63
Elizabeth Claire Care Management v Francis, 114
Elizabeth Robson v Kyle & Carrick DC, 43
Elkouil v Coney Island Ltd, 91
Elliot v Richard Stump Ltd, 5
Ellis v CAO, 62
Ellis v Greenwich LBC, 51
Ellis v Lambeth LBC, CA, 76
Elsner-Lakeberg v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, ECJ, 109
Elvidge v Coventry CC, 40
Ely v YKK Fasteners (UK) Ltd, 41
EMI Group Electronics v Coldicott, CA, 77
Emmott v Minister for Social Welfare & Attorney General (ECJ), 30
Encon Insulation v Nottingham CC, 86
Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority & Secretary of State for Health, 25; CA, 30;
ECJ, 42; CA, 80
Enfield LBC v Devonish & Sutton, 60
English Churches Housing Group v Avrom Shine, CA, 108
English v Emery Reimbold & Strick, CA, 101
English v UNISON, 81
Ephraim v Newham LBC, 37
Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett & another, 22
Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge & Brown, 31
Esfandiari v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions, 116, CA
Essa v Laing Ltd, 99; CA, 104
Estate Acquisition and Development v Wiltshire, CA, 118
Etherson v Strathclyde Region Council, 34
Euro Brokers Ltd v Rabey, 50
Evans & others v Secretary of State for Social Services, 41
Evans v Clayhope Properties Ltd, 3
Evans v Malley Orgnisation Ltd t/a First Business Support, CA, 97
Evans v South Ribble BC, 27
Evesham v North Hertfordshire Health Authority and Secretary of State for Health,

73; CA, 80
EWP Ltd v Moore, 28
Ex parte Bold, 57
Ex parte Scarth, CA, 76
Executors of Evans v Metropolitan Police Authority, 37
Express & Echo Publications v Tanton, CA, 75
Eyre & others v Hall & another, 4
Eyre v McCracken, CA, 91
Ezekiel v Orakpo, 47; CA, 59
F
F C Shepherd & Co Ltd v Jerrom, 1
Faircharm Investments v Citibank, CA, 67
Fairfield Ltd v Skinner, 37
Falco Finance v Gough, 73
Falconer v ASLEF & NUR, 2
Falkirk Council v Whyte, 65
Fall v Lothian Community Relations Council, 4
Family Housing Association v Jones, 16
Farley v Skinner, CA, 82
Farrell Matthews & Weir v Hanson, 109
Farrington (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, CA,
105
Faulkner v Yorkshire Electricity, 50
Fawaz v Aylward, 58
FDR v Holloway, 52
Fentiman v Fluid Engineering Products Ltd, 27
Ferguson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, CA, 101
Ferodo Ltd v Bradbury, 20
Field v Leeds CC, CA, 79
Fielding v Rigby, 40, 42
Fifield Investments v Mousari, 104
Filemart Ltd v Avery & another, 13
Financial Times Ltd v Byrne & others, 32
Finnegan v Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd, 21
First Interstate Bank of California v Cohen Arnold & Co, 54
First National Bank v Achampong, CA, 100
First National Bank v Colman, 36
First National Bank v Syed, 23, 26
First National Bank v Thompson, 52
First Sport v Barclays Bank, 38
Fisher v California Cake & Cookie, 62
Fitch v Official Receiver, 54
Fitzgerald v University of Kent, CA, 104
Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association, CA, 64
Flack & others v Kodak Ltd, 1
Fleming v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry, 66
Flemming v SoS for Work & Pensions, CA, 93
Fletcher v Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre Hospitals NHS Trust, 113
Fletcher v Midland Bank, HL, 68; ECJ, 80

Flett v Matheson, 111; CA, 116
Folsa Services (UK) v Birkett, 57
Forbes v Lambeth LBC, 101
Ford (R on the application of) v Board of Inland Revenue, 112
Ford v Burnley Borough Council, 50
Forebury Estates v Chiltern Thames and Eastern Rent Assessment Panel, 84
Forey v London Buses Ltd, 24
Forshaw v Archcraft, 112
Forster v Cartwright Black, 107
Forward Trust v Whymark, 13; CA, 15
Forward v W Sussex CC, 51
Foster v S Glamorgan Health Authority, 10
Foster Wheeler Ltd v Jackson, 22
Four Seasons Health Care v Maughan, 110
Frames Snooker Centre v Boyce, 35
Francis v Brown, CA, 65
Francis v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC, CA, 99
Francis v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, CA, 114
Francisco Hernandez Vidal SA v Gomez Perez, ECJ, 73
Frank Cowl v Plymouth CC, CA, 93
Franklin v CAO, 56
Frankovich v Italian Republic, ECJ, 31
Franks v Reuters Ltd, CA, 99
Fraser v HLMAD Ltd, CA, 118; 119
Freeman v Sovereign Chicken Ltd, 28
Frempomah v Haringey LBC, 119
Fry v First National Leasing, 85
Fu v London Borough of Camden, 86
Fuller v Lloyds Bank, 28
Fullers v Judy Properties Ltd, 30
Fytche v Wincanton Logistics, HL, 107
G
G E Capital Bank v Rushton and Jenking, CA, 114
G v F, 83
G v G, CA, 86
G v Harrow LBC, 106
G v J, 39
Gadhok v CAO, 2
Gale v Northern General Hospital NHS Trust, 45
Gallagher v Alpha Catering Services, CA, 109
Gallagher v Castle Vale Action Trust Ltd, CA, 93
Garcia v Garcia, 33
Gardner v Marsh & Parsons, 60
Gateway Hotels Ltd v Stewart & others, 11
Gavas v William Hill Ltd, 20
Gay v Sheeran and Enfield LBC, CA, 77
Gee v Shell UK Ltd, CA, 97
Gent & others v De La Mare, 7
Gentles v Santa Fe Offshore Construction Co, 23

Gerster v Freistaat Bayern, ECJ, 66
Ghaidon v Mendoza, HL, 108
Giambrone v Sunworld Holidays (No.2), CA, 106
Gibson v East Riding of Yorkshire Council, 73
Gill v Quinn, 108
Gillespie v Northern Health & Social Services Board, 55
Gillick v BP Chemicals Ltd, 40
Gillingham BC v Medway (Chatham) Dock Ltd & others, 30
Giraud UK v Smith, 83
Glendale Managed Services v Graham, CA, 101
Glenister v Rowe, CA, 74
Glennie v Independent Magazines, CA, 77
Global Financial Recoveries v Jones, 79
Gloucestershire Housing Association v Phelps, 102
Gloystarne v Martin, 86
GMB v Man Truck and Bus (UK), 83
GMB v Messrs Rankin & Harrison (Receivers of Lawtex plc), 36
Godsmark v Greenwich LBC, 108
Godwin v Rosendale BC, CA, 95
Gogay v Hertfordshire CC, CA, 84
Goker v NWS Bank plc, 20
Gomba Holdings (UK) Ltd v Minories Finance Ltd, 31
Good & another v Epping Forest DC, 42
Good Challenger Navegante v Metalexportimport, CA, 102
Goode Durrant Administration v Biddulph, 51
Goodger v Ealing LBC, CA, 95
Goodwill Inc. Ltd v Ferrier, 17
Goodwin v Cabletel UK, 66
Goodwin v The Patent Office, 72
Goodwin v United Kingdom, ECJ, 95
Gotham v Doodes, CA, 118
Gothard v Mirror Group Ltd, 10
Governing Body of Rugby School v Edwards, 108
Governing Body of the Northern Ireland Hotel & Catering College & North Eastern
Education & Library Board v NATFE, 49
Governors of the Peabody Donation Fund v Ham, 3
Grady v HM Prison Service, CA, 101
Gran Gelato Ltd v Richcliffe, 31
Grangewood Securities v Ellis, 83
Granleese v DHSS, 10
Gray v Taylor, CA, 69
Greaves v Kwik Save Stores, CA, 67
Green v Roberts, 36
Greenaway Harrison Ltd v Wiles, 46
Greenwich LBC v Dell, 54
Greenwich LBC v Discreet Selling Estates Ltd, 24
Greenwich LBC v Hughes & another, 42
Greenwich LBC v Powell & another, 8 (CA), 12 (HL)
Greenwich LBC v Regan, 55
Greenwood v Miller, 8

Greg May Ltd v Dring, 17
Gregory v Turner, CA, 98
Greyhound Bank plc v Coad, 43
Gridquest Ltd t/a Select Employment v Blackburn, 91; CA, 94
Griffin & others v South West Water Services Ltd, 48
Griffin v London Pension Fund Authority, 38
Griffin v Wakefield MBC, CA, 116
Griffin v Westminster CC, CA, 106
Griffiths v Renfree, 13
Griffiths v St Helens MBC, 109, 112; CA, 118
Grimaldi v Fond des Maladies Professionelles (ECJ), 22
Grimmer v KLM Cityhopper, 112
Grogan v Greenwich LBC, CA, 81
Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Cochran, 30
Group 4 Nightspeed v Gilbert, 63
Guest Health plc v Mirza, 20
Guest v Manchester CC, 23
Guinan v Enfield LBC, CA, 67
Guinness Ltd v Green, 15
Gurton v Parrott & another, 26
Gutzmore v J Wardley Holdings Ltd, 39
H
H v M, 30
Habib Bank v Tufail, CA, 119
Habinteg Housing Association v James, 49
Hackney LBC v Adams, 101
Hackney LBC v Ekinci, 85; CA, 88
Hackney LBC v Lambourne & another, 36
Hackney LBC v Mott & Fairman, 45
Hackney LBC v Mullen, 59
Hackney LBC v Papinder Sareen, CA, 99
Hackney LBC v Porter, 59
Hackney LBC v White, 51
Haddon v Van Den Bergh Foods, 77
Hadjiconstantinou v Charalambous & another, 42
Hadjiloucas v Crean, 6
Hagen v ICI Chemicals Ltd, 90
Haiseldon v P&O Properties, CA, 71
Halford v UK, ECJ, 64
Halifax BS v Barrett, 54
Halifax BS v Edell & others, 34
Halifax BS v Stansfield, 40
Halifax BS v Taffs, CA, 81
Halifax BS v Thomas & CPS, 52
Halifax Mortgage Services v Stepsky, 54
Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer, 44
Hall v Howard, 10
Hall v Rover Financial Services Ltd, CA, 96
Halonen v Westminster CC, 65

Hamblet v Walkers Snack Foods, 107
Hamilton v Futura Floors Ltd, 23
Hamilton v Hertfordshire CC, 103
Hamlin v Edwin Evans, 57
Hammell v Kensington & Chelsea LBC, 11
Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Hill, 44
Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Jastrzebski, 90
Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Monk, CA, 23; HL, 30
Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex parfte Creska (No.2), 84
Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Farnsworth, 83
Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Lemeh, CA, 83
Hammond v Secretary of State for Environment & another, 9
Hampson v Department of Education & Science, 12
Hampson v Des, 21
Handels-og on behalf of Larsson v Dank Handel & Service, ECJ, 65
Haniff v Robinson, 36
Hanoman v Southwark LBC, 110
Harber v N London Polytechnic, 20
Hardie v CD Northern, 79
Hardman v Mallon t/a Orchard Lodge Nursing Home, 95
Hardy v Polk (Leeds), 105
Hare v Schurek, 39
Harford v Swiftrim, 6
Haringey LBC v Awaritefe, CA, 75, 77
Haringey LBC v Jowett, 76
Haringey LBC v Powell, 60
Haringey LBC v Stewart, 27
Haringey LBC v Williams, 109
Harlow DC v Hall, 115
Harmony Kitchens v Latimer, 31
Harper v Virgin Net, CA, 104
Harris (Representative of Andrews) v Lewisham and Guys Mental Health NHS Trust,
CA, 80
Harris v Wyre Forest DC & another, CA, 8; HL, 14
Harrison v Lewis, 15
Harrison v Segger, 111
Harrods v Remick, CA, 65
Harrow LBC v Johnstone, HL, 63
Harrow LBC v Knight, 97
Harrow LBC v Qazi, CA, 92
Harrow LBC v Quazi, HL, 102
Harrow LBC v Tonge, 36
Hart Builders (Edinburgh) Ltd v Lyall, 32
Harvard Securities plc v Younghusband, 18
Harvest Press v McCaffrey, 78
Harvest Trucking Ltd v Davis, 25
Harvey Jones v Woolwich, CA, 83
Harvey v Port of Tilbury London, 77
Hassall & another v Secretary of State for Social Security, 48
Hay v George Hanson Building Contracts, 58

Hayward v Cammel Laird Ltd, 9
Health & Safety Executive v Beedie, 47
Health Development Agency v Parish, 105
Hearne v Secretary of State for Wales, CA, 80
Heath v Tang & others, 41
Heather v The Leonard Cheshire Foundation, 91; CA, 95
Hedgedale Ltd v Hards, 27
Heffernan v Grangewood Securities, CA, 89
Hegab v Shamash, CA, 74
Heggie v Uniroyal Englebert Tyres, 70
Heggie v Uniroyal Englebert Tyres, Court of Session, 78
Helena Housing Ltd v Curtis, 97; CA, 99
Helena Housing v Pinder, CA, 113
Hellings & another v Parker Breslin Estates, 46
Hendricks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, CA, 97
Hennie v Hennie, 41
Henry v Lambeth LBC, CA, 80
Henry v London Transport Services Ltd, CA, 93
Herbert v Lambeth LBC, 31
Hereford & Worcester CC v Clayton, 60
Hereford & Worcester CC v T & S Stores plc, 47
Heron v Citilink - Nottingham, 40
Hertfordshire Investments v Bubb, CA, 83
Hewcastle Catering Ltd v Ahmed & Elkamah, 29
Hewett v Alf Brown's Transport, 32
Hewett v Motorola, 105
Hewlett Packard Ltd v O’Murphy, 90
High Quality Lifestyles v Watts, 119
High Table v Horst, CA, 64
Higins v Hatch & Fielding, 52
Hijazi v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC, CA, 102
Hildebrand v Moon, 18
Hill and Stapleton v Revenue Commissioners and Department of Finance, ECJ, 70
Hill v Chappell, 96
Hilton International Hotels (UK) Ltd v Faraji, 45
Hilton v Plustile Ltd & Rose, 11
Hinchy v SoS for Work & Pensions, 97; HL, 109
Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd & others, CA, 45; HL, 56
HJ Heinz Co v Kenrick, 79
HM Prison Service v Beart, 109; CA, 112
HM Prison Service v Dolby, 101
HM Prison Service v Salmon, 87
Hobbs v Sutton LBC, 44
Hockenjos v Secretary of State for Social Security, CA, 86, 109
Hodge v Newport LBC, CA, 86
Hogg v Dover College, 13
Holder v Supperstone, CA, 78
Holdom v Kidd & others, 23
Holmes v Royal Caribbean International, 78
Home Insulation v Waldsley, 11

Home Office v Ayres, 30
Home4Rent v Killelea, 106
Hooper v British Railways Board, 12
Hooper v SoS for Work & Pensions, 94
Hopkins v Norcross plc, 32
Hopkins v Shepherd & Partners, 41
Hopkinson v Tupper, CA, 63
Horizon Holidays v Grassi, 6
Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald International, 102
Hounslow LBC v Hare & others, 31
Hounslow LBC v McBride, CA, 73
Hounslow LBC v Thames Water Utilities 104
Housing Services Agency v Cragg, 63
Houston v Lightwater Farms Ltd, 23
Howard & another v Midrome Ltd & others, 24
Howard v Charlton, CA, 97
Howker v SoS for Work & Pensions, CA, 96
Hoyland v Asda Stores, 111
HSBC (Midland Bank) v Madden, CA, 84
Hughes v Southwark MBC, 9
Hughes v Waltham Forest Health Authority, 23
Hughes v West Berkshire Health Authority and Secretary of State for Health, CA, 80
Hull CC v Beedie, 47
Humberclyde Finance v Thompson, CA, 68
Hunter v Babbage, 43
Hunter v Canary Wharf, CA 53; HL, 64
Hunter v London Docklands Development Corporation, 53
Huntingford v Hobbs, 3
Hurley v Martinez, 19
Hurstanger v Wilson & Burton, 117
Hussain v Elonex, CA, 75
Hussain v Lancaster CC, CA, 70
Hussain v Singh & others, 41
Hussey v Camden LBC, 49
Hussey v Eels, 17
Hussman Manufacturing v Weir, 69
Huwyler v Ruddy, 55
Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison, 23
Hyde Housing Association v Laborieux, 112
Hyde Park Funding v Ioannou, 74
Hynds v Midlothian DC, 1
I
Ibekwe v London General Services Transport, CA, 101
Ibex Trading Co Ltd v Walton & others, 47
Ibie v Trubshaw & others, 22
IBL Ltd v Coussens, 21
ICTS (UK) v Tchoula, 83
Igen (formerly Leeds Careers Guidance) v Wong, CA, 110
Igroup Loans v Bradshaw, 119

ILEA v Grant, 12
In petition of Richard Ward, 54
In the matter of Maxwell Fleet and Facilities Management (In administration), 82
Ingle v Scarborough BC, CA, 97
Inland Revenue v Fry, 90
Inland Revenue Wales & Midlands v Bebb Travel, 95
Inquest into the deaths of Catherine Harrison & Terri-Anne Jones, 47
Insitu Cleaning Co Ltd v Heads, 48
Institute of the Motor Industry v Harvey, 34
International Packaging Corporation (UK) Ltd v Balfour, 96
Iperion Investments v Broadwalk House Residents Ltd, 52
Ironmonger v Movefield Ltd t/a Deerings, 11
Irontrain Investments v Ansari, CA, 117
Irvine v Moran, 30
Irving v Post Office, 4
Isle of Wight CC v Humphreys, 31
Islington LBC v Harridge, 39
Islington LBC v Uckac, CA, 119
Ivin v Blake, 39
Izzo v Philip Ross & Co, 90
J
J & J Securities Ltd v Yeatman, 36
J A Mont (UK) Ltd v Mills, 36
J H Walker v Hussain, 54
J Lauritzen v Wijsmuller, 16
J A Pye (Oxford) v Graham, HL, 95
JA Pye (Oxford) v United Kingdom, ECJ, 115
Jackson & another v CAO (R(IS)10/91), ECJ, 35
Jackson v Foster Wheeler Ltd, 15
Jackson v Ghost & Ghost, 102
Jackson v Pekic & O'Brien, 19
Jacobs v Official Receiver, 69
Jaffrey v Department of Environment, Transport & Regions, 95
James Cook & Co Ltd v Tipper & others, 20
James Slater v Finning, 57
James v Barclays Bank plc, 13
James v Cumbernauld DC HBRB, 1
James v Eastleigh BC, CA, 15; HL, 21
Jamstalldhetsombudsmannen v Orebro Lans Landsting, ECJ, 81
Janstorp International (UK) Ltd v Allen, 22
Jarrett v Barclays Bank, 59
Jean Sorelle Ltd v Rybak, 24
Jenkins v Cedar Holdings Ltd, 6
Jenvey v Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 94
Jephson Homes Housing Association v Moisejevs, CA, 84
Jesuthasan v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC, CA, 69
Jiad v Byford, CA, 98
Jiggins v Brisley & others, 102
Jimenez Melgar v Ayuntamiento de Los Barrios, ECJ, 90

Jiminez v Southwark LBC, CA, 100
John Brown Engineering v Brown, 61
John Munroe (Acrylics) v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority, 59
Johnson v Bingley, 49
Johnson v CAO, ECJ, 48
Johnson v Davies, CA, 68
Johnson v HM Prison Service, 60
Johnson v London & Quadrant Housing Trust, CA, 78
Johnson v UNISYS, CA, 73; HL, 86
Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority, 25
Jones & another v Miah & another, 33
Jones & another v White & another, 42
Jones & Massey v Cook & Cook, 23
Jones & Sharples v CAO, 40
Jones v 3M Healthcare Ltd, HL, 100
Jones v Callagher & Callagher t/a Gallery Kitchens and Bathrooms, CA, 110
Jones v Department of Employment, 7
Jones v F Sirl & Son, 64
Jones v Gwent C C, 36
Jones v Jones, 60
Jones v Northampton BC, 20
Jones v Post Office, CA, 87
Jones v Secretary of State for Wales, 60
Jones v SoS for Work & Pensions, CA, 100
Jones v Tower Boot Co, 60
Jones v Walsall MBC, 97
Jones v Waveney DC, CA, 79
Jones v Wright, 24, 26 (CA)
Jowitt v Pioneer Technology (UK) Ltd, 96; CA, 99
Joyce v Liverpool City Council, 50
Judge v Crown Leisure, CA, 113
K
K v K, 31
Kalsi v Kalsi, 35
Kamer v Austria, ECJ, 102
Kanapathiar v Harrow LBC, 100
Kapadia v Lambeth LBC, 78
Katsikas v Konstantinidis, ECJ, 38
Kaur v CAO, 52
Kaur v Gill & others, 8
Kaur v Gill, 51
Kausar v Eagle Star, 57
Kawarindrasingh v White, 60
Kay v (1) Lambeth LBC (2) London & Quadrant Housing Trust, CA, 109; HL, 118
Kaye v Massbetter & Kanter, 32
Kazantis v CAO, CA, 75
Keating v Bromley CC, 52
Keepers & Governors of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon v James, 52
Kelly-Madden v Manor Surgery, 120

Kells v Pilkington plc, 95
Kelsey Housing Association v King, 52
Kelsey v ILG Travel, 14
Kemra (Management) v Lewis, 81
Kenny & others v South Manchester College, 39
Kenny v Hampshire Constabulary, 72
Kensington & Chelsea RBC and Westminster CC: Referee’s determination, 12
Kensington & Chelsea RLBC v O’Sullivan, CA, 101
Kensington & Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds, 58
Kensington Housing Trust v Oliver, CA, 67
Kent Management Services Ltd v Butterfield, 32
Kerr v Department for Social Development (NI), HL, 104
Kerr v Stephens, CA, 118
Kerr v The Sweater Shop (Scotland), 58
Kerry Foods v Creber, 78
Kerry Foods v Lynch, 113
Khan v Heywood & Middleton Primary Care Trust, 116
Khan v Islington LBC, CA, 75
Khan v Oxfordshire County Council, 98
Khan v Trident Safeguards, CA, 108
Khana v Southwark LBC, CA, 88
Khatun, Zeb & Iqbal v Newham LBC & OFT, 104; CA, 106
Khazanchi v Faircharm Investments, CA, 68
Khrasandijian v Bush, 39
Kidd v AXA Equity and Law Life Assurance, 80
Kigass Aero Components Ltd v Brown, 92
Killick v Roberts, 27
Kilvert v Flackett, 70
Kinch v Bullard, 74
King v Eaton (No.2), CS, 72
King v Eaton, 56
King v Great Britain-China Centre, 29
King v Jackson, CA, 67
King v South Northamptonshire DC, 30
King v University Court of the University of St Andrews, CS, 92
Kingston-upon-Thames RLBC v Prince, CA, 74
Kirklees MBC v Field, 67
Kirton v Tetrosyl, 96; CA, 99
Knight v Department of Social Security, 92
Knight v Vale Royal BC, CA, 103
Knowles v Liverpool City Council, 42
Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen, CA, 120
Knowsley Housing Trust v Revell, 97; CA, 99
Kopel v Safeway Stores, 102
Kording v Senator Fur Finanzen (ECJ), 66
Kournavous v Masterton & Sons Ltd, 19
Kova Establishment Co v Sasco Investments, 67
Kovacs v Queen Mary & Westfield College, CA, 93
Kowalska v Freie & Hansestadt Hamburg, ECJ, 22
Kpoharor v Woolwich BS, 54

Krasner v Dennison, CA, 80
Kuenyehia v International Hospitals Group, CA, 115
Kuttapan v Croydon LBC, 75
Kutz-Bauer v Freie Und Hansestadt Hamburg, ECJ, 99
Kwik Save Stores v Greaves, 62
Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd v Lineham, 32
L
Lagden v O’Connor, HL, 104
Laimond Properties v Al Shakarchi, CA, 67
Laing v Manchester CC, 118
Laird v AK Stoddard, 88
Lambert v Croydon College, 75
Lambeth BC v Thomas, 62
Lambeth LBC (1) Hyde Southbank (2) v O’Kane, CA, 113
Lambeth LBC v A, CA, 95
Lambeth LBC v Grant, CA, 112
Lambeth LBC v Howard, CA, 88
Lambeth LBC v Hughes, CA, 84
Lambeth LBC v Lindsay, CA, 95
Lambeth LBC v Rogers, CA, 79
Lambeth LBC v Vandra, CA, 117
Landeshaupstadt Kiel v Jaeger, ECJ, 102
Lane v Cadwallader, CA, 85
Lane v Liverpool CC, 69
Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford), 52
Langlands & McAinsh Ltd v Shearer, 8
Langley v Burlo, 117
Langston v Cranfield University, 68
Lansing Linde Ltd v Kerr, 25
Larusai (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, 101
Lassman v (1) Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (2) Pan Graphics Industries,
75
Laughton & Hawley v Bapp Ltd, 1
Law Land plc v Sinclair, 31
Law Society v Bahl, 101
Law Society v Persaud, 20
Law Society v Sephton & Co, HL, 117
Lawal v Northern Spirit Ltd, CA 95; HL, 100
Lawrence v Lesser, CA, 80
Lawrence v Regent Office Care, 73; ECJ, 95
Lawson v Serco, HL, 116
Lawton v BOC Transhield Ltd, 5
Lea v British Aerospace, 23
Ledernes Hovedorganisation on behalf of Ole Rygaard v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening
on behalf of Stro Molle Aknstik A/S (ECJ), 53
Lee v Chung & Shun Shing Construction Ltd, 20
Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications, 40
Lee v Leeds CC, 94
Leeds v Islington LBC, 69

Leicester CC v Aldwinckle, 31
Leicester CC v Lewis, CA, 83
Leighton v (1) Michael (2) Charalambous, 54
Leisure Leagues UK Ltd v Maconnachie, 94
Lennon v Hamilton DC, 24
Leonard v Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce, 85
Leonard v Strathclyde Buses, CS, 72
Letheby & Christopher Ltd v Bangurah, 7
Leverton v Clwyd C C, 13
Levett & others v Barclays Bank plc, 49
Levez v TH Jennings (Harlow Pools), 58; ECJ, 72
Levy v Legal Services Commission, 84
Levy v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions, 117, CA
Lewin v Barratt Homes, 82
Lewis & Brittan v E Mason & Sons, 43
Lewis Woolf Griptight v Corfield, 64
Lewis-Graham & another v Conacher, 29
Lewisham LBC v Adeyami, CA, 77
Liddell v Middleton, 52
Lightways (Contractors) v Associated Holdings, Court of Session, 80
Lilleshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan & another, 32
Links & Co Ltd v Rose, 28
Linton v EJ Parkinson & Son Ltd, 22
Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd, 26
Lismane v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC, CA, 72
List Design Group v Catley, 96
List Design Group v Douglas, 96
Litster v Forth Dry Dock Engineering Ltd, 13
Littlewoods Organisation plc v Traynor, 38
Liverpool City Council v Pleroma Distribution, 96
Liversidge v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police, CA, 94
Livingstone v Hepworth Refractories plc, 31
Lloyd v DPP, 26
Lloyd v Taylor Woodrow, 78
Lloyds Bank v Byrne & another, 26; CA, 29
Lloyds Bank v Egremont & another, 24
Lloyds Bank v Semmakie, 36
Lloyds Bank v Hawkins, CA, 72
Lloyds Bank v Rossett, 19
Lloyds Bank v Waterhouse, 18
Lloyds TSB Bank v Holdgate, CA, 95, 99
LMC Drains Ltd (1) Metro Rod Services Ltd (2) v Waugh, 28
Lock International plc v Beswick & others, 17
Lock v Cardiff Railway Co, 69
Lock v Connell Estate Agents, 46
Lodwick v Southwark LBC, CA, 106
Logan Salton v Durham CC, 14
Lohan v Hilton, 45
Lomas v Thomas Ness Ltd, 4
Lombard North Central v Stobart, 18

Lombard Tricity v Paton, 11
Lommers v Minister Van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer En Visserij, ECJ, 93
Lomotey v Enfield LBC, CA, 107
London & Global v Sahara Petroleum, CA, 72
London Ambulance Service v Charlton & others, 36
London Clubs Management Ltd v Hood, 89
London Fire & Civil Defence Authority v Betty, 46
London International College Ltd v Sen, 39
London North Securities v Meadows, 107; CA, 111
London North Securities v Williams, 112
London Probation Board v Kirkpatrick, 111
London Underground Ltd v Ferenc-Batchelor, Harding V London Underground Ltd,
98
London Underground v Edwards (No.2), 61
Long v Jones, 18
Lonsdale & Thompson v Black Arrow Group, 38
Lord and Haslewood-Orgam v Jessop, CA, 78
Love & another v Herrity, 24
Loveridge v Healey, CA, 109
Lowsley v Forbes, HL, 70
Lucas v Lucas, 32, 49
Luce v London Borough of Bexley, 23
Lunt v Merseyside TEC, 76
Lusty Architects v Finsbury Securities Ltd, 25
Lyncock v Cereal Packaging Ltd, 12
M
M (a minor) v Newham LBC, 52
Mabirizi v National Hospital for Nervous Diseases, 19
MacCartney v Oversley House Management, 117
MacDonald v Advocate General for Scotland, HL, 101
MacDonald v Ministry of Defence , 84; CS, 87
Macer v Abafast Ltd, 20
MacFarlane v Glasgow CC, 85
Machine Tool Research Association v Simpson, 9
Macklin v Dowsett, CA, 111
MacLeod v HBRB, 8
Macpherson v Lambeth LBC, 11
Macredie v Thrapston Garage, 92
Macruary v Washington Irvine Ltd, 45
Magna Housing Association v (1) Turner (2) Raison (3) Landscaping & Grounds
Magorrion & Cunningham v Eastern Health & Social Services Board (ECJ), 68
Mahlburg v Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, ECJ, 80
Maintenance; Lightways (Contractors) v (1) Hood (2) Associated Holdings, 73
Mairs (Inspector of Taxes) v Haughey, 42
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust, CA, 110; HL, 117
Malcolm v University of Oxford, 19; CA, 24
Malekshad v Howard De Walden Estates Ltd, HL, 98
Malik v BCCI, HL, 64
Mallinson v Secretary of State for Social Security (R(A)3/94), HL, 44

Mallone v BPB Industries, CA, 93
Malpas v St Ermin's Property Co Ltd, 35
Maltez v Lewis, 74
Manchester CC v Cochrane, CA, 74
Manchester CC v Joleen Finn, CA, 97
Manchester CC v Romano, CA, 108
Manchester CC v Samari, CA, 108
Mander v Evans, 87
Manel v Memon, CA, 81
Mangold v Helm, ECJ, 115
Manifold Industries v Sims & others, 26
Mann v Nijar, CA, 75
Mansfield DC v Carter, 49
Mansfield DC v Fitzpatrick, 49
Mansukhani v Sharkey, 33
Manx Electrical Authority v JP Morgan Chase Bank, 96
Marath v Macgillivray, 55
Marc Rich & others v Bishop Rock & others, 43
Marcic v Thames Water Utilities, CA, 97; HL, 111
Marely UK v Anderson, 54
Margereson v JW Roberts, 56
Mariola v Lloyds Register, 18
Market Force (UK) Ltd v Hunt, 96
Marks & Spencer v Williams-Ryan, CA, 113
Marlborough Park Services v Rowe, CA, 115, 120
Marlow v East Thames Housing Group Ltd, 95
Marschall v Land Nordhein-Westfalen, ECJ, 66
Marsh v Kerwin, 49
Marshall (Cambridge) Ltd v Hamblin, 45
Marshall Specialist Vehicles v Osborne, 101
Marshall v Rubypoint, 60; CA, 63
Marshall v Southampton & South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (ECJ), 40
Marshall v Southampton Area Health Authority (No.2), 22
Marshalls Clay Products v Caulfield, 101
Marston v Leeds CC, CA, 96
Masiak v City Restaurants, 78
Mason v Lawton, 29
Mason v Nwokorie, 41
Mathew v TM Sutton, 45
Mathewson v R B Wilson Dental Laboratory, 12
Mattis v Pollock t/a Flamingo’s Nightclub, CA, 100
Mattocks v Mann, 33
Mayeur v Association Promotion De L’Information Messine (APIM), ECJ, 84
Mayhew v Keepers & Governors of the Possessions, 29
McAndrew v Prestwick Circuits, 12
McCabe v Cornwall County Council, CA, 97
McCafferty v Rankin Park Club, 22
McCaffery v Lambeth LBC, 45
McCauley v Bristol C C, 27
McCleod v Hellyer Bros Ltd, 5

McClory & others v Post Office, 38
McConomy v Croft Inns Ltd, 37
McCrea v Cullen & Davison, 8
McCree v Tower Hamlets LBC, 29, 31
McDonald v Coys of Kensington, CA, 103
McDonald v Fernandez, CA, 103
McDougall v Easington DC, 13
McDowell v Hirschfield Lipson & Rumney & Smith, 35
McGinn v Grangewood Securities, CA, 92
McGregor v GMBATU, 2
McKechnie v UBM Building Supplies Ltd, 27
McKiernon v CAO (R(I) 2/94), 41
McLean v William Hill, 28
McLeod v Butterwick, 55; CA, 68
McMaster v Manchester Airport, 67
McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment, 52; CA, 63
McMenemy v Capita Business Services, 118
McMillan v Kyle & Carrick DC, 57
McMullen & Sons Ltd v Cerrone, 39
McNerny v Lambeth LBC, 12
McNicholas Construction (Holdings) v Endemol UK, 101
McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Ltd, CA, 95
McPherson v BNP Paribas, CA, 105
McPherson v Drumpark House, 62
Meade & Baxendale v British Fuels, 59; CA, 64
Meade-Hill & National Union of Civil & Public Servants v British Council, 52
Meadows v Kent & Medway Towns Fire Authority, 102
Mecca Leisure Group plc v Chatprachong, 42
Medhurst v NALGO, 23
Mediguard Services Ltd v Thame, 46
Medina Housing Association Ltd v Case, CA, 99
Meek v City of Birmingham DC, 5
Megarry v CAO, CA, 77
Mehmet v Wandsworth LBC, CA, 112
Mehta v J Pereira Fernandes SA, 117
Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland, 74
Melhuish v Redbridge CAB, 111
Melia v Magna Kansei, 111
Melville v Bruton, 56
Mendoza v Ghaidon, CA, 97
Mennell v Newell & Wright (Transport Containers), 56
Merckx & Neuhuys v Ford Motor Co Belgium SA, ECJ, 58
Merino Gomez v Continental Industrias del Caucho, ECJ, 104
Merrett v Babb, CA, 87
Methilhill Bowling Club v Hunter, 50
Meyers v Adjudication Officer (ECJ), 52
MFI Furniture v Hibbert, 52
MHC Consulting Services v Tansell, 77
Miah v SoS for Social Security, CA, 93
Michalak v Wandsworth LBC, CA, 93

Mid Staffordshire General Hospitals NHS Trust v Cambridge, 100
Middlesbrough BC v TGWU, 92
Midland Bank v Cooke, 52
Midland Bank v Madden, 80
Midland Bank v Massey, 44
Midland Bank v Pike, 11
Midland Bank v Serter, 50
Mikeover Ltd v Brady, 15
Miklaszewicz v Stolt Offshore Ltd, CS, 92
Miles v Wakefield MBC, 3
Miller Bros & FP Butler Ltd v Johnston, 93
Miller v Juby, 25
Miller v Secretary of State for Social Security, 44
Milligan v Securicor Cleaning, 51
Mills & Crown Prosecution Service v Marshall, 70
Mills v Grove Securities, 64
Milne-Berry v Tower Hamlets LBC, 62
Minah v Bank of Ireland, 53
Minchin v Sheffield City Council, CA, 82
Minetti v D V K Executive Hotels, 13
Mingford v Midland Bank, 62
Ministry of Defence v Cannock & others, 47
Ministry of Defence v Sullivan, 41
Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd, 22
Mistry v Isidore, 19
Mitre Managed Services Ltd v French, 95
Mobbs v Nuclear Electric, 59
Mock v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, 78
Mohammadi v Anston Investments, CA, 103
Mohammed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC, CA, 80; HL, 91
Mohammed v Kensington & Chelsea RBC, CA, 50
Monaghan v Close Thornton (Solicitors), 92
Mongan v Department for Social Development (NI), CA, 111
Monklands DC v W, 11
Monmouth BC v Marlog, 45
Montgomery v Johnson Underwood, CA, 86
Montoya v Hackney LBC, 114
Moon v Franklin, 21
Moonsar v Fiveways Express Transport, 108
Moore v Durham CC, 4
Moorgate Services v Kabir, 50
Moran v Secretary of State for Social Services, (R(A)1/88), 3
Morecombe v Secretary of State, 8
Moreland Properties v Dhokia, CA, 105
Morgan Guaranty Trust Co of New York v Lothian Regional Council, 49
Morgan v Electrolux Ltd, 25
Morgan v Staffordshire University, 91
Morgan v West Glamorgan County Council, 49
Morgans v Alpha Plus Security, 110
Morley (UK) Ltd v Anderson, 44

Morley v Heritage plc, 40
Morley v Secretary of State, 22
Morley v United Friendly Insurance plc, 39
Morrell v SoS for Work & Pensions, CA, 100
Morris Angel & Son Ltd v Hollande & others, 38
Morris v Breaveglen t/a Anzac Construction Co, 39
Morris v John Grose Group, 71
Morris v Liverpool CC, 10
Morris v Murray, 23
Morris v Walsh Western (UK), 65
Morrow v Safeway Stores, 90
Morse v Wiltshire CC, 69
Mortgage Agency Services Number Two v Chater, CA, 99
Mortgage Agency Services v Bal, 74
Mortgage Corporation v Braham, 47
Mortgage Corporation v Shaire, 80
Mortgage Corporation v Smith, 41
Mortgage Corporation v Ubah, 56
Mortgage Services Funding v Steele, CA, 64
Morton v CAO, 11
Mossop v Mossop, 8
Motorola v Davidson (1) and Melville Craig (2), 85
Mowan v Wandsworth LBC, CA, 86
Mowatt-Brown v University of Surrey, 92
Moyes v Hylton Castle Working Men's Club, 2
Moyna v SoS for Social Security, CA, 92; HL, 100
MPB Structures Ltd v Munro, 94; CS, 99
MSF v Refuge Assurance, 92
Muffett v Head, 2
Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley & another, 36
Mulhall v N Shropshire CCRO, 22
Mulox IBC Ltd v Geels (ECJ), 46
Mulvey v Secretary of State for Social Security, 48; HL, 61
Mulvine v University of Ulster, 42
Mumford & Smith v Bank of Scotland, 53
Mundy v Hook (CA), 64
Munir v Jang Publications Ltd, 14
Murco Petroleum v Forge, 3
Murphy v Brentwood DC, 17; CA, 18; HL, 21
Murray King t/a Oakland Services UK v Job, CA, 96
Murray v Foyle Meats, HL, 76
Murray v Hibernian Dance Club, 59
Murray v Newham Citizens Advice Bureau Ltd, 99
Mustafa v Ruddock (CA), 63
N
N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson, 31
N Tyneside MBC v Allsop, 31
N v Secretary of State for the Home Department, HL, 113
N Yorkshire CC v Capstick, 4

Nagarajan v Agnew & London Regional Transport, 43; HL, 76
Naiva v Covent Garden Group Ltd & another, 49
NALGO v Killorn & Simm, 22
Nash (1) Staunton (2) v Paragon Finance, CA, 89
Nash Dino Services Ltd v Prudential Assurance, 13
Nash v Marsh/Roe Group, 67
National & Provincial BS v Lloyd, 54
National Association of Colliery, Overmen, Deputies and Shot Firers (R on the
application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, 102
National Bank of Grece v Pinios, 17
National Coal Board v Ridgway, 2
National Counties BS v Antonelli, 54
National Federation of Self-employed & Small Businesses v Philpott, 63
National Grid Co v Virdes, 39
National Guardian Mortgage Corporation v Wilkes, 30
National Home Loans v Giffen, Couch & Archer, CA, 67
National Lifeboat Institution v Bushaway, 113
National Schizophrenia Fellowship v Ribble Estates SA & others, 41
National Trust v Knipe, CA) 64
National Westminster Bank v (1) Navjet Malhan (2) Anil Malhan (3) Puneeta Malhan
and Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs & Lord Chancellor, 107
National Westminster Bank v Abbey National plc, 42
National Westminster Bank v Amin, HL, 93
National Westminster Bank v Breeds, 85
National Westminster Bank v Kitch, CA, 63
National Westminster Bank v Powney & others, 19
National Westminster Bank v Stokfisz, 41
National Westminster Bank v Story, 74
National Westminster Bank v Timmis & Shaw, 46
Naughton v O'Callaghan, 18
Neal v Bingle, CA, 64
Neath v Hugh Steeper Ltd, (ECJ, 43
Nelson v Carillion Services Ltd, CA, 99
Nelson v Clearsprings (Management) Ltd, CA, 119
Nerva & others v R L & Co Ltd, 50
Nerva v United Kingdom, ECJ, 95
Nessa v CAO, CA, 67; HL, 77
New Centurion Trust v Welch, 19
New Century Cleaning Co v Church, CA, 78
New Charter Housing v Ashcroft, CA, 107
New Forest DC v Shutler, 116
New Victoria Hospital v Ryan, 36, 37
Newbury DC v Secretary of State for Environment & another, 25
Newcastle CC v Morrison, CA, 83
Newham LBC v Kibata, CA, 104
Newham LBC v Phillips, CA, 66
Newham LBC v Skingle, 97; CA, 99
Newins v British Airways plc, 38
Newlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimen, 60; HL, 72
Newman t/a Mantella Publishing v Modern Bookbinders, CA, 83

Newman v Polytechnic of Wales Student Union, 49
Niazi Services v Van der Loo, CA, 108
Nichols v Rushton, 33
Nicol v Ben Line Group Ltd, 14
Niru Battery Manufacturing Co v Credit Agricole Indosuez, CA, 101
Nitirigen Eirann v Inco Alloys, 29
Nolan v Devonport, 120
Nolan v Leeds C C, 23
Nolan v Stoke on Trent CC, 118
Noorani v Merseyside TEC, CA, 73
Norris v Checksield, 26
North British Housing Association v Matthews, CA, 109
North Devon Homes v Brazier, 101
North East Lincolnshire Council v Beck, 75
North Hertfordshire DC v Carthy, CA, 99
North Somerset DC v Richards, 97
North Western Health Board v McKenna, ECJ, 114
Northampton BC v Lovatt, CA, 66
Northern Joint Police Board v Power, 65
Nortons Letting Agents v Zaman, 86
Norweb plc v Dixon, 49
Norwich CC v Billings, CA, 68
Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus, CA, 120
Nottingham CC v Clifton Thames, CA, 96
Nottinghamshire C C v P, 28
Nunn v Dalrymple, 15
Nutt and another v Read and another, CA, 80
Nutting v Southern Housing Group, 112
O
O v Wandsworth LBC, CA, 83
O’Connor v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC, CA, 106
O’Connor v Old Etonians Housing Association, CA, 95
O’Hara v McDougall, CA, 116
O’Rourke v United Kingdom, ECtHR, 94
Oakley v Birmingham CC, 74; HL, 85
Oakley v Labour Party, 8
Obagi v Stanborough (Developments) Ltd & others, 44
O'Boyle v Leiper, 18
O'Brien & others v Barclays Bank plc, 47
O'Connor v Chief Adjudication Officer, CA, 73
Octavius Atkinson Ltd v Morris, 14
Odunsi v Brent LBC, 76
Office Angels Ltd v Rainer-Thomas & O'Connor, 26
Office of Fair Trading v Lloyds TSB Bank, 108; CA, 116
Official Receiver v Merchant, 120
O'Flynn v Adjudication Officer, ECJ, 58
Ogwr v Dykes, 12
O’Hanlon v HMRC, 119
Ojelay v Neosale Ltd, 4

O'Keefe v Southampton C C, 11
Okeneye v Newham LBC, CA, 103
O'Laoire v Jackel International Ltd, 18, 27
Omar v Worldwide News, 69
O'Neill v Governors of St Thomas More RCVA Upper School (1) Bedfordshire CC
(2), 57
O'Neill v Symm & Co, 68
Ord v Upton, CA, 79
Orejudos v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC, 105
O'Rourke v Camden LBC, 61
Orthet v Vince-Cain, 107
Ortiz v City of Westminster, 52
Osada v Shepping, CA, 84
Osborn & Co v Dior, CA, Marito Holdings SA v Deneche, CA, 100
Osmani v Camden LBC, CA, 112
Osmani v Harrow LBC, 97; CA, 100; HL, 105
O'Sullivan & McCann v Williams, 33
O'Sullivan v Barnett & another, 45
Otter v Norman, CA, 6; HL, 10
Owen v Chief Adjudication Officer, CA, 74
Owusu v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority, 53
Oxley v Hiscock, CA, 106
Oy Likenne AB v Liskojarvi and Juntunen, ECJ, 85
Ozbek v Ipswich BC, CA, 120
P
P Bork Int v Foreningen, 13
P v S Cornwall CC (ECJ), 57
P&O Trans European Ltd v Initial Transport Services Ltd, 97
Pacitti Jones v O’Brien, CS, 114
Padbury v York, 23
Page & Davis v CAO (R(SB)2/92), 28
Paggetti v Cobb, 96
Palfrey v Transco, 108
Palk v Mortgage Services Funding plc, 34
Palmer v McNamara, 26
Palmer v Sandwell MBC, 7
Pan Atlantic v Pine Top, 38
Panama v Hackney LBC, CA, 98
Panayi & another v Roberts, 38
Pape v Cumbria County Council, 29
Parker-Tweedale v Dunbar Bank plc, 22
Parkins v Sodexho Ltd, 91
Parkins v Westminster CC (CA), 66
Parry v Derbyshire Dales DC, 116
Parsons v Nasar, 26
Partridge v Adjudication Officer, ECJ, 69
Patefield v Belfast City Council, NICA, 83
Patel v General Medical Council, PC, 98
Patel v Nageson, 51

Patel v Patel, 6
Patel v Singh, CA, 105
Patel v Smeaton, CA, 86
Paterson v Agio, 6
Patterson v Greenwich LBC, 44
Paul v National Probation Service, 103
Pay v Lancashire Probation Service, 103
Peace v City of Edinburgh Council, Court of Session, 75
Peach Grey & Co v Sommers, 51
Peacock v Peacock, 26
Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield Secondary School, HL, 101
Pearson v Kent County Council, 28
Pearson v Staniland t/a West Bar Motor Co, 110
Pemberton v Southwark LBC, CA, 83
Pename Ltd v Paterson, 12
Pendragon v Jackson, 65
Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart, 37
Perkin v St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust, CA, 114
Perkins Engine Group Ltd v Overend, 18
Perry v AO, NICA, 79
Perry v Chief Adjudication Officer, CA, 72
Perry v Intec Colleges Ltd, 37
Persson v Matra Marconi Space UK, 60
Perth and Kinross Council v Donaldson, 103
Pesticcio v (1) Huet (2) Abbey National and (3) Niersmans, 102
Peter Stewart v Inverness DC, 33
Peter Yates v Bullock, 20
Peters v CAO (R(SB)3/89), 18
Peters v Sat Katar Co Ltd, CA, 100
Pfaffinger v City of Liverpool Community College, 58
Pfeiffer v Deutches Rotes Kreuz, ECJ, 109
Philip Hodges & Co Ltd v Kell, 47
Photostatic Copiers (Southern) Ltd v Okuda & Japan Office Equipment Ltd, 48
Pickstone & others v Freemans plc, CA, 5; HL, 10
Pidduck v Molloy, 36
Piggot Brothers Ltd v Jackson & others, 27
Pike v Sefton MBC, 85
Pinkney v Sandpiper Drilling Ltd, 16
Piscitelli v Zilli Fish, 115
Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd, 40
Pittalis v Grant, 13
Platts v TSB, CA, 68
Platts v Western Trust & Savings Ltd, 39
Plewa v CAO, 46
Polentarutti v Autokfract Ltd, 29
Polkey v Dayton Services Ltd, 7
Pollard v Ashurst, CA, 84
Pollards Hill Housing Association v Marsh, CA, 94
Pollway Nominees Ltd v Havering LBC, 15
Polonski v Lloyds Bank, 62

Popat v Popat, 25
Pope v Secretary of State for Environment & another, 30
Popely v Popely, CA, 104
Port of London Authority v Payne, 35; CA, 43
Porteous v West Dorset CC, CA, 106
Porter & Nanayakkara v Queen's Medical Centre (Nottingham University Hospital),
41
Porter v Barking & Dagenham LBC, 19
Post Office v Foley, CA, 84
Post Office v Footitt, 80
Post Office v Marney, 20
Potsos & Potsos v Theodotou, 28
Potter v Arafa, 52
Potter v Hunt Chemicals Ltd, 30
Pourdanay v Barclays Bank, 60
Powdrill & Atkinson v Watson, CA, 44; HL, 50
Power Lines Pipes & Cables Ltd v Penrice & others, 5
Power v Panasonic UK Ltd, 97
Pratley v Surrey County Council, CA, 102
Premier Portfolio v Morris, 40
Preston Borough Council v Riley & another, 50
Preston v Torfaen BC, 41, 43
Preston v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust, 68; ECJ, 80
Price v Hartwell, 57
Prime (Traffic Examiner) v Hosking, 49
Prince v Robinson, CA, 73
Proudreed v Microgen Holdings, 52
Provident Group & Whitecross Estate Agency v Hayward, 13
Pruden v Cunard Ellerman Ltd, 39
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body & others, 30
Puglia v C James & Sons, 55
Purbrick v Hackney LBC, 103
Purdew & Purdew v Seress Smith, 37
Purves v Joydisc Ltd, 99
Q
Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors, 98
Quarcoopome v Sock Shop Holdings, 51
Quinlan v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC, 12
Quinn v Schwarzkopf, 85; CS, 94
Quinton v East Hertfordshire DC, 97
Quirk v Burton Hospitals NHS Trust and Secretary of State for Health, 85
Qureshi v Newham LBC, 26
R
R (A & Kanidagli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 112
R (Beeson) v Dorset CC, 93
R (Behre) v Hillingdon LBC, 103
R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC, 98
R (Bibi) v Newham LBC, 105

R (Chester) v SoS for Social Security, 92
R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC & ODPM, 105
R (Gabaj) v Bristol CC and First Secretary of State, 118
R (Goldsmith) v Wandsworth LBC, CA, 111
R (Hislop) v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC, 104
R (James Sleith) v Camden LBC, CA, 102
R (Linda Mays) v Brent LBC, 102
R (Margaret Price) v Carmarthenshire CC, 101
R (McCauley and Stewart) v Highland Council, CS, 103
R (McGowan) v Brent Justices, 94
R (Murphy) v Westminster CC, 87
R (on the application of A) v (1) National Asylum Support Service (2) Waltham Forest
LBC, 103
R (on the application of Ahmed) v Waltham Forest LBC, 93
R (on the application of Ali) v (1) NASS (2) Waltham Forest LBC, CA, 106
R (on the application of B) v Southwark LBC, 102
R (on the application of BG) v Medway Council, 114
R (on the application of Bilverstone) v Oxford CC, 104
R (on the application of Brighton & Hove Justices) v Hamdan, 106
R (on the application of Calgin) v Enfield LBC, 113
R (on the application of Chelfat) v Tower Hamlets LBC, 118
R (on the application of Clark-Darby) v Highbury Magistrates Court, 98
R (on the application of Erdogan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, CA,
109
R (on the application of European Roma Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague
Airport, CA, 101; HL, 109
R (on the application of Gangera) v Hounslow LBC, 101
R (on the application of Gezer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 101
R (on the application of Heather) v Leonard Cheshire Foundation, 91; CA, 95
R (on the application of J) v Enfield LBC, 93
R (on the application of Kelly) v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC, 107
R (on the application of Khan) v Newham LBC, 94
R (on the application of Laporte) v Newham LBC, 106
R (on the application of Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee, CA, 103
R (on the application of M) v (1) Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs (2)
Leeds Magistrates Court, CA, 106
R (on the application of Maali) v Lambeth LBC, 104
R (on the application of Mathialagan) v Southwark LBC, CA, 108
R (on the application of McDonagh) v Salisbury DC, 91
R (on the application of Milburn) v Morpeth & Berwick County Court, CA, 104
R (on the application of Mohamed) v Harrow LBC, 116
R (on the application of Morris) v Westminster CC and First Secretary of State, 109
R (on the application of Morris) v Westminster CC, 103
R (on the application of Muscat) v Three Rivers DC, 99
R (on the application of O) v Haringey LBC and Secretary of State for the Home
Department, CA, 107
R (on the application of Q) v SoS for the Home Department, 98; CA, 100
R (on the application of Rowe) v Vale of White Horse DC, 101
R (on the application of Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBC, 118
R (on the application of T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, CA, 103

R (on the application of the British Broadcasting Corporation) v Central Arbitration
Committee, 101
R (on the application of Tull) v (1) Camberwell Green Magistrates Court (2) Lambeth
LBC, 113
R (on the application of Vatansever) v Southwark LBC, 96
R (Painter) v Carmarthanshire CC, 87
R (Raynor) v Ipswich BC, 109
R (Reynolds) v SoS for Work & Pensions, 92
R (Salih and Rahmani) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 103
R (Steele) v Birmingham CC and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, 110;
CA, 115
R (Taylor) v Secretary of State for Social Security, ECJ, 79
R (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBC, 97
R C Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinoni, 36
R J Dunnell Property Investments Ltd v Thorpe, 17
R v (1) Hammersmith & Fulham LBC (2) SoS for Work & Pensions ex parte Waite,
CA, 94
R v (1) Westminster CC (2) Southwark LBC ex parte Bantamagbari, 103
R v Adjudication Officer ex parte B, CA, 72
R v Adjudication Officer ex parte Velasquez, CA, 74
R v Admiralty Board of Defence Council ex parte Lustig-Pream & Beckett, 55
R v Alfreton Justices ex parte Gratton, 42
R v Army Board of Defence Council ex parte Anderson, 29
R v Avon CC ex parte Hazell, 41
R v Avon CC ex parte Rexworthy, 12
R v Barking and Dagenham LBC and Secretary of State for the Office of the Deputy
Prime Minister ex parte Albert Smith, 102
R v Barnet LBC ex parte G; R v Lambeth LBC ex parte W; R v Lambeth LBC ex
parte A, HL, 104
R v Barnet Magistrates' Court ex parte Cantor, 67
R v Beaconsfield Justices ex parte Stubbings, 3
R v Bevelectric Ltd, 35
R v Bexley LBC ex parte B, 33; 38 (HL)
R v Birmingham CC ex parte Mohammed, 71
R v Bow County Court ex parte Pelling, CA, 76
R v Bowden, 49
R v Bracknell Forest DC ex parte Johns and McLellan, 87
R v Brent CC ex parte Bariise, CA, 68
R v Brent LBC ex parte Awua, 43; CA, 44; HL, 51
R v Brent LBC ex parte Baruwa, 57; CA, 61
R v Brent LBC ex parte Connery, 17
R v Brent LBC ex parte D, 75
R v Brent LBC ex parte Grossett, 55
R v Brent LBC ex parte Macwan, 39; CA, 44
R v Brent LBC ex parte McDonagh, 13
R v Brent LBC ex parte McManus, 41
R v Brent LBC ex parte Miyanger, 66
R v Brent LBC ex parte O’Connor, 79
R v Brent LBC ex parte Omar, 26
R v Brent LBC ex parte Sadiq, 84

R v Brent LBC ex parte Sawyers, 43
R v Brighton & Hove Council ex parte Nacion, CA, 75
R v Brighton BC ex parte Harvey, 71
R v Bristol CC ex p Jacobs, 77
R v Bristol CC ex parte Bailey, 48
R v Bristol CC ex parte Bradic, 48; CA, 51
R v Bristol CC ex parte Johns, 39
R v Bristol CC ex parte Naqvi, 45
R v Bristol CC ex parte Penfold, CA, 68
R v Bristol CC ex parte Preece, 28
R v Broadland DC ex parte Price, 35
R v Bromsgrove DC ex parte Kennedy, 30
R v Brown, 39
R v Broxbournce BC ex parte Willmoth, 11, 14; CA, 16
R v Burke, 20
R v Camden LBC ex parte Adair, 57
R v Camden LBC ex parte Aranda, 59; CA, 69
R v Camden LBC ex parte Cosmo, 73
R v Camden LBC ex parte Gillan & others, 11
R v Camden LBC ex parte Hersi, CA, 85
R v Camden LBC ex parte Jibil, 65
R v Camden LBC ex parte Mohammed, 63
R v Camden LBC ex parte Naghshbandi, CA, 97
R v Camden LBC ex parte Nairne, CA, 73
R v Camden LBC ex parte Pereira, 68; CA, 70
R v Camden LBC ex parte Spencer, 57
R v Cardiff C C ex parte Barry, 23
R v Chesterfield BC ex parte Fullwood, 34; CA, 39
R v Chief Constable of Avon ex parte Clarke, 2
R v Chilterns DC ex parte Roberts & others, 29
R v Christchurch BC ex parte Lorraine Conway, 3
R v City of Bradford ex parte Parveen, 59
R v City of Westminster ex parte Ali & Bibi, 38
R v City of Westminster ex parte Khan, 27
R v Civil Service Appeal Board ex parte Bruce, 12
R v Civil Service Minister ex parte Petch, 7
R v Corby Magistrates ex parte Mott, 68
R v Coventry CC ex parte Waite, 54
R v Croydon LBC ex parte Graham, 45
R v Croydon LBC ex parte Jarvis, 42
R v Croydon LBC ex parte Marchant, 15
R v CSAB ex parte Cunningham, 20
R v Dacorum BC ex parte Brown, 15
R v Dacorum BC ex parte Walsh, 34
R v Dairy Produce Quota Tribunal ex parte Caswell, 15
R v Derbyshire Dales DC ex parte Cooper, 34
R v D-G of Water Services ex parte Oldham MBC, 67
R v Doncaster Justices ex parte (1) Jack (2) Christison, 75
R v Doncaster MBC ex parte Boulton, 36
R v DSS ex parte Scullion, 77

R v Ealing LBC ex parte Denny, 52
R v Ealing LBC ex parte Fox, 68
R v Ealing LBC ex parte Parkinson, 55
R v Ealing LBC ex parte Salmons, 27
R v Ealing LBC ex parte Sukhija, 48
R v Ealing LBC ex parte Surdonja, 73
R v East Devon BC HBRB ex parte Preston, 79
R v East Devon DC ex parte Robb, 70
R v East Devon DC HBRB ex parte Gibson, 32; CA, 39
R v East Herts DC ex parte Dallhold Resources, 16, 23
R v East Herts DC ex parte Smith, 22
R v East Northamptonshire DC ex parte Spruce, 10
R v East Yorkshire Borough of Beverley HBRB ex parte Hare, 50
R v Enfield LBC ex parte Campbell, 88
R v Enfield LBC ex parte J, 97
R v Enfield LBC ex parte Tasci, 97
R v Enfield LBC ex parte Yumsak, 93
R v Exeter CC ex parte Tranckle, 44
R v F & M Dobson Ltd, 49
R v Fareham BC ex parte Giles, 99
R v Faversham & Sittingbourne Justices ex parte Ursell, 31
R v Forest Heath DC ex parte West & Lucas, 30
R v Forest of Dean DC ex parte Trigg, 22
R v Gateshead MBC ex parte Lauder, 58
R v Gillingham BC ex parte Ashgar, 24
R v Gloucester CC ex parte Dutton, 33
R v Gloucestershire CC ex parte Barry, CA, 57; HL, 61
R v Gloucestershire CC ex parte Davies, 42
R v Gloucestershire CC ex parte Mahfood, 52
R v Gomez, 36
R v Great Grimsby BC ex parte Pennell, 35
R v Greater Manchester Police Authority ex parte Century Motors, 60
R v Greenwich LBC ex parte Patterson, 40
R v Gregory, 53
R v Hackney LBC ex parte Ajayi, 70
R v Hackney LBC ex parte Boulbour, CA, 83
R v Hackney LBC ex parte Decordova, 50
R v Hackney LBC ex parte Evenbray Ltd, 6
R v Hackney LBC ex parte Fell, 86
R v Hackney LBC ex parte K, CA, 66
R v Hackney LBC ex parte Tonnicodi, 73
R v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC ex parte Avdic, 57; CA, 69
R v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC ex parte Beddowes, 1
R v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC ex parte Fleck, 71
R v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC ex parte Hussain, 30
R v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC ex parte Llunga-Llunga, 56; CA, 57
R v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC ex parte Luisi, 25
R v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC ex parte O'Sullivan, 29
R v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC ex parte PP, 15
R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex parte Quigley, 83

R v Hammersmith LBC ex parte M, 59; CA, 61
R v Haringey LBC ex parte Ayub, 43
R v Haringey LBC ex parte Karaman, 66
R v Haringey LBC ex parte Muslu, 86
R v Haringey LBC ex parte Sampaio, 75
R v Harrow LBC ex parte Carter, 43
R v Harrow LBC ex parte Cobham, HL, 96
R v Harrow LBC ex parte Fahia, 59; CA, 69; HL, 70
R v Havant BC ex parte Marten, 58
R v Herefordshire DC ex parte Smith, 3
R v Hertfordshire DC ex parte Smith, 26
R v Highbury Corner Justices ex parte Uchendu, 43
R v Highbury Corner Magistrates Court ex parte Edwards, 48
R v Hillingdon BC ex parte Tinn, 10
R v Hillingdon LBC ex parte Bax, 43
R v Hillingdon LBC ex parte H, 10
R v Hillingdon LBC ex parte Rahim, CA, 84
R v Hillingdon LBC ex parte Thomas, 3
R v HM Treasury ex parte British Telecom, ECJ, 56
R v Hounslow LBC ex parte R, 61
R v Inner London Crown Court ex parte Bentham, 15
R v Inverness DC ex parte Stewart, 28
R v Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd ex parte Weyell & others, 40
R v Islington LBC ex parte Adigun, 12
R v Islington LBC ex parte Araya, 56; CA, 57
R v Islington LBC ex parte B, 69
R v Islington LBC ex parte Batantu, 86
R v Islington LBC ex parte Bibi, 58
R v Islington LBC ex parte Blissett, 70
R v Islington LBC ex parte Degnan, CA, 73
R v Islington LBC ex parte Hassan, 50
R v Islington LBC ex parte Hinds, 49
R v Islington LBC ex parte Okocha, 70
R v Islington LBC ex parte Thomas, 69
R v Jones, 38
R v Kearns, CA, 92
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Amarfio, 47; CA, 50
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Assister, 60
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Bayani, 16; CA, 20
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Ben-El-Mabrouk, 47; CA, 51
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Brandt, 54
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Byfield, 74
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Campbell, 51
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Doran, 24
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Ghebreslasie Ghebregiogis, 54
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Goodson, 7
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Kassam, 46; CA, 51
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Kihara, 56; CA, 57
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Korneva, 60
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Kujtim, CA, 77

R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Minton, 10
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Rouass, 74
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Silchenstedt, 65
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Westwoods, 52
R v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC ex parte Woolrich, 7
R v Kent CC ex parte Salisbury and Pierre, 79
R v Kettering BC and English Churches Housing Group ex parte Hossack, 96
R v Khan, CA, 91
R v Kingswood BC ex parte Smith-Morse, 48
R v Knowsley MBC ex parte O'Toole, 76
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte A, CA, 71
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Ashley, 64
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Campbell, 47
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Clayhope Properties Ltd, 5
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte El Yemlahi, 95
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Mani, 97
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Miah, 48
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Njomo, 56
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte P, 59; CA, 61
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Sarhangi, 74
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Tai Mui Ly, 1
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Trabi, 73
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Vagliviello, 20
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Walters, 41
R v Lambeth LBC ex parte Woodburne, 69
R v Leeds CC ex parte Adamiec & Adamiec, 32
R v Leeds CC ex parte Collier, 73
R v Leeds Justices ex parte Meikleham, 44
R v Legal Aid Board ex parte Bruce, 25; CA, 28
R v Leicester Justices ex parte Barrow, 24; CA, 27
R v Lewisham LBC ex parte Creppy, 32
R v Lewisham LBC ex parte Dolan, 35
R v Lincoln Justices ex parte Count, 52
R v Lincolnshire CC ex parte Atkinson, 53
R v Liverpool Crown Court ex parte Cooke, 56
R v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham ex parte Okuneye, 49
R v London Borough of Barnet ex parte Grumbridge, 34
R v London Borough of Barnet ex parte O'Connor, 24
R v London Borough of Brent ex parte Barnes, 38
R v London Borough of Brent ex parte Blatt, 34
R v London Borough of Croydon ex parte Easom, 39
R v London Borough of Lambeth ex parte Bodunrin, 37
R v London Borough of Southwark ex parte Cordwel, 41
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Abdul Subhan, 34
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Ali, 38
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Begum, 32; CA, 35; HL, 38
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Bibi, 38
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Byas, 38
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Hasib Ullah, 37
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Jalika Begum, 34

R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Mohib Ali, 38
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Nadia Saber, 35
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets ex parte Rahman, 35
R v London Leasehold Valuation Tribunal ex parte Daejan Properties, 85
R v London RAC ex parte Cadogan Estates, 63
R v London Rent Assessment Committee ex parte Lester, 99
R v London Rent Assessment Committee ex parte Morris, 88; CA, 98
R v Lord Chancellor ex parte Lightfoot, 70
R v Mabbott, 6
R v Maidstone BC ex parte Bunce, 45
R v Manchester CC ex parte Stennett, HL, 96
R v Marshall, 23
R v Medina BC ex parte Dee, 33
R v Merton BC ex parte Ruffle, 12
R v Merton LBC ex parte Sembi, 76
R v Mid Glamorgan Health Services ex parte Martin, 42
R v Middlesbrough Council ex parte Holmes, 50
R v Midlands Electricity Board ex parte Busby & Williamson, 7
R v Ministry of Defence ex parte Smith, 51; CA, 55
R v Modupe, 25
R v Mole Valley DC ex parte Burton, 10
R v Mungroo, CA, 64
R v N Cornwall DC ex parte Singer, 50
R v Nash, 23
R v Newark Justices ex parte Keenaghan, 61
R v Newcastle-upon-Tyne Justices ex parte Devine, 68
R v Newham LBC ex parte Aguiar, 97
R v Newham LBC ex parte Begum and Ali, 77
R v Newham LBC ex parte Begum, 56
R v Newham LBC ex parte Bones, 40
R v Newham LBC ex parte C, 77
R v Newham LBC ex parte Campbell, 41
R v Newham LBC ex parte Dada, CA, 50
R v Newham LBC ex parte Dale, 47
R v Newham LBC ex parte Gentle, 46
R v Newham LBC ex parte Gorenkin, 64
R v Newham LBC ex parte Kaur, 65
R v Newham LBC ex parte Laronde, 44
R v Newham LBC ex parte McIlroy, 27
R v Newham LBC ex parte Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture, 71
R v Newham LBC ex parte Miah, 55
R v Newham LBC ex parte Micah, 71
R v Newham LBC ex parte Morris, 95
R v Newham LBC ex parte Ojuri (No.1), 73
R v Newham LBC ex parte Ojuri (No.3), 74
R v Newham LBC ex parte Ojuri (No.5), 73
R v Newham LBC ex parte Patrick, 86
R v Newham LBC ex parte Plastin, 71
R v Newham LBC ex parte Ruksana Khan and Farzana Hussain, 82
R v Newham LBC ex parte Sacipima, 78; CA, 85

R v Newham LBC ex parte Tower Hamlets LBC, 19
R v Newham LBC ex parte Ugbo, 42
R v North and East Devon Health Authority ex parte Coughlan, CA, 76
R v Northampton BC ex parte Carpenter, 40
R v Northampton BC ex parte Clarkson, 33
R v Northavon DC ex parte Palmer, 40, 43; CA, 52
R v Northavon DC ex parte Smith, 39; HL, 45
R v Nottingham CC ex parte Caine, 57
R v Nottingham CC ex parte Costello, 13
R v Nottingham CC ex parte Edwards, 73
R v Nottingham CC ex parte SB and AB, 88
R v Oldham Justices ex parte Garrity, 4
R v Oldham MBC ex parte G, 33; HL, 38
R v Oxford CC ex parte Doyle, 68
R v Parking Adjudicator ex parte Wandsworth LBC, 60
R v Penwith DC ex parte Burt, 19
R v Penwith DC ex parte Menear, 30
R v Peterborough CC ex parte Carr, 18
R v Pharmaceutical Society of GB ex parte Sokoh, 2
R v Phillips, 14
R v Piper, 52
R v Poole BC ex parte Cooper, 47
R v Port Talbot BC ex parte McCarthy, 27
R v Powys CC ex parte Hambridge (Secretary for Health), CA, 72
R v Preston Justices & another ex parte McCosh, 49
R v Reading BC ex parte Glenton, 18
R v Redbridge Magistrates ex parte Guppy, 55
R v Redcar & Cleveland BC ex parte Armstrong, HL, 96
R v Rent Officer of Kensington and Chelsea ex parte Hartley, 87
R v Rent Service ex parte Cumpsty, 100
R v Rent Service ex parte Saadat, Dinsdale, Wilson & Shaw, CA, 91
R v Richmond LBC ex parte H, 86
R v Richmond LBC ex parte Stubbs, 12
R v Rochester upon Medway CC ex parte Williams, 44
R v Rugby BC ex parte Hunt, 34
R v Rushcliffe BC ex parte Summerson & Buckley, 43
R v Rushmoor BC ex parte Barrett, 2; CA, 8
R v Saint Edmundsbury BC ex parte Sandys, CA, 71
R v Sandwell BC ex parte Cashmore, 40
R v Sandwell MBC ex parte Lyn, 37
R v Secretary of State ex parte Clarke & others, 8
R v Secretary of State ex parte Ward, 15
R v Secretary of State for Defence ex parte EOC, 30
R v Secretary of State for Defence ex parte Perkins (No.2), 71
R v Secretary of State for Defence ex parte Perkins, 62
R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte EOC, 29; CA, 35; HL, 43
R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith & Perez, 46; CA, 52;
ECJ, 73
R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith (No.2), HL, 79
R v Secretary of State for Environment ex parte Kensington & Chelsea RBC, 3

R v Secretary of State for Environment ex parte N Herts DC, 17
R v Secretary of State for Environment ex parte Newham LBC, 4
R v Secretary of State for Environment ex parte Shelter & Refugee Council, 59
R v Secretary of State for Environment ex parte Tower Hamlets LBC, 33; CA, 38
R v Secretary of State for Environment ex parte W Oxfordshire DC, 46
R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Hammersmith & Fulham LBC, CA, 73
R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Richardson, ECJ, 53
R v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Jammeh, 64
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Armstrong, 57
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte B, 57
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Chapman, 55
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte EOC, ECJ, 34
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Golding, 55; CA, 59
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte JCWI, 57
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Moule, 59
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Nessa, 48
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Sarwar & others, 50
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Sherwin, 56
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Sutherland, 60
R v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Taylor, 55
R v Secretary of State for Social Services ex parte CPAG, 8; CA, 10
R v Secretary of State for Social Services ex parte Stitt, 30
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and
Secretary of State for Wales ex parte Spath Holme, CA, 80; HL, 85
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions ex parte
Holding and Barnes, HL, 87
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions ex partre
O’Byrne, 83
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Anufrijeva, HL, 100
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte M, 96
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Vitale, 56
R v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry ex parte Unison, 57
R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame, ECJ, 56
R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ex parte Carson, HL, 111
R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ex parte Hooper, CA, 101; HL, 111
R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ex parte Reynolds, HL, 111
R v Secretary of the Central Office of the Employment Tribunals ex parte Public
Concern at Work, 83
R v Sefton HBRB ex parte Brennan, 65
R v Sefton MBC ex parte Cunningham, 28
R v Sefton MBC ex parte Healis, 45
R v Sheffield CC ex parte Leek, 48
R v Shrewsbury & Atcham BC ex parte Griffiths, 43
R v SIB ex parte Independent Financial Advisers, 51
R v Slough BC ex parte Khan, 53
R v Social Fund Inspector ex parte Ali, 38
R v Social Fund Inspector ex parte Fatima Ahmed Mohammed, 41
R v Social Fund Inspector ex parte Ledicott, 51
R v Social Fund Inspector ex parte Mohammed, 36
R v Social Fund Inspector ex parte Semplis, 39

R v Social Fund Officer ex parte Hewson, 51
R v Social Security Appeal Tribunal ex parte O'Hara, 47
R v Social Security Commissioners ex parte Esmail, 83
R v Solihull Metropolitan HBRB ex parte Simpson, 43
R v South Hams DC ex parte Ash, 75
R v South Hams DC ex parte Gibb, 42
R v South Holland DC ex parte Baxter, 74
R v South Tyneside Justices ex parte Martin, 53
R v Southampton Industrial Tribunal ex parte INS News Group Ltd & Express
Newspapers plc, 50
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Bannerman & others, 17
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Bediako, 62
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Bempoa, 94
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Campisi, CA, 73
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Davies, 48
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Hughes, 74
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Hussey, 97
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Melak, 66
R v Southwark LBC ex parte Solomon, 48
R v Stockport Justices ex parte Conlon, 61
R v Stockton MBC ex parte Smith, 7
R v Sunderland CC ex parte Redezeus, 53
R v Sutton LBC ex parte Harrison, 64
R v Swale BC ex parte Marchant, 73
R v Swansea CC ex parte Littler, CA, 71
R v Swansea DC ex parte Evans, 24
R v Teignbridge DC ex parte Street, 17
R v Thanet DC ex parte Groves, 15
R v Thurrock BC ex parte Wellham, 26
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Abdul Wahid, 89; CA, 93
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Begum, 32, 35 (CA), 38 (HL)
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Bibi, 30
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Bradford, 63
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Camden LBC, 14
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Khalique, 44
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Khatun, 41; CA, 48
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Khatun, 53
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Kimvono, 90
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Kyere, 30
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Mbidi, 84
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Monaf, 5; CA, 9
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Ojo, 30
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Rouf, 15; CA, 28
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Spencer, 60
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Taylor, 57
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Thrasyvoulou, 21
R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Udding, Tahid and Curtis, 83
R v Tynedale DC ex parte Shield, 20
R v Walsall MBC ex parte Price, 57
R v Waltham Forest ex parte J, 96

R v Waltham Forest LBC ex parte Halil Direk & Okkes Arslan, 17
R v Waltham Forest LBC ex parte Holder, 56
R v Wandsworth CC ex parte Munn, 48
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Banbury, 5
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Beckwith, CA, 52; HL, 54
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Crooks & others, 49
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Dodia, 71
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Hawthorne, 45
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Lawrie, 69
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Onwudiwe, 45
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Oteng, 39
R v Wandsworth LBC ex parte Wingrove, 59
R v Warwickshire CC ex parte Johnson, 36
R v Warwickshire CC ex parte Waller, 42
R v Wealdon DC ex parte Stratford, 53
R v Wealdon DC ex parte Wales, 53
R v West Dorset DC & W Dorset HA ex parte Gerrard, 47
R v West Dorset DC ex parte Poupard, 8
R v West Glamorgan CC ex parte Morris & another, 26
R v West Sussex Rent Officer ex parte Haysport Properties, 86
R v Westminster CC ex parte A, 59; CA, 61
R v Westminster CC ex parte Ali, 64; CA, 73
R v Westminster CC ex parte Al-Korsan, 80
R v Westminster CC ex parte Alouat, 13
R v Westminster CC ex parte Benniche, 56
R v Westminster CC ex parte Bishop, 39
R v Westminster CC ex parte Bishop, 64
R v Westminster CC ex parte Castelli & Tristan-Garcia, 53; CA, 55
R v Westminster CC ex parte D'Souza, 56
R v Westminster CC ex parte Elioua, CA, 74
R v Westminster CC ex parte Ermakov, 50; CA, 54
R v Westminster CC ex parte Esmail, 13
R v Westminster CC ex parte Iqbal, 14
R v Westminster CC ex parte Jaafer, 71
R v Westminster CC ex parte Moozary-Oraky, 44
R v Westminster CC ex parte Mulonso, 49
R v Westminster CC ex parte N'Dormadingar, 66
R v Westminster CC ex parte Obeid, 58
R v Westminster CC ex parte Pavlov, 56; CA, 57
R v Westminster CC ex parte Reid, 48
R v Westminster CC ex parte Tansey, 13
R v Westminster CC ex parte Zafru, 62
R v Westminster CC ex parte Zaher, 99
R v Westminster LBC ex parte Geehan & Butler, 57
R v Wheeler, 23
R v Winchester CC ex parte Ashton, 31; CA, 35
R v Wirral MBC ex parte Bell, 51
R v Wolverhampton MBC ex parte Watters, 57; CA, 62
R v Wolverhampton Stipendiary Magistrate ex parte Mould, 35
R v Worthing BC ex parte Bruce, 33

R v Wychavon DC ex parte Saunders, 30
R v Wycombe BC ex parte Homes, 14
R v Wycombe DC ex parte Hazeltine, 39
R v Wycombe DC ex parte Mahsood, 10
R v Wycombe DC ex parte Queenie Homes & Dean Homes, 20
R v York Magistrates Court ex parte Grimes, 63
R(W) v Lambeth LBC, CA, 95
Radcliffe Infirmary NHS Trust v Dr B, 51
Radley (1984) Ltd v Fox, 23
Raeuchle v Laimond Properties, CA, 84
Rafsanjan Pistachio v Reiss, 17
Rahman v Sterling Credit, CA, 82
Rai v Birmingham City Council, 44
Rainey v Greater Glasgow Health Board, 2
Rakhit v Carty, 18
Ralton v Havering College of Further & Higher Education, 89
Ramsden v SoS for Work & Pensions, CA, 97
Ramsey v Walkers Snack Foods, 107
Rank Xerox (UK) v Stryczek, 53
Rank Xerox v Churchill & others, 10
Rao v Civil Aviation Authority, 44
Raspin v United News Shops, 72
Rastin v British Steel plc, 43
Ratcliffe v N Yorkshire CC, HL, 51, 52
Ratcliffe v Sandwell MBC, 94
Ravenseft Properties v Hall, CA, 92
RCO Support Services and Aintree Hospital Trust v UNISON, 82; CA, 93
Re a Bankrupt (No.145/95), 54
Re a Bankrupt (No.622/1995), 60
Re a Debtor (No.1/1987), 9
Re a Debtor (No.10/1988), 12
Re a Debtor (No.2389/1989), 27
Re a Debtor (No 32/1991) (No. 2), 44
Re a Debtor (No 88/1991), 33
Re a Debtor (No.490/1991, 32
Re a Debtor (No.10/1992), 49
Re a Debtor (No.68/1992), 39
Re a Debtor (No.106/1992), 32
Re a Debtor (No.340/1992), 40; CA, 50
Re a Debtor (No.32/1993), 43
Re a Debtor (No.87/1993) (No.2), 52
Re a Debtor (No.415/1993), 43
Re a Debtor (No.214/ 1995), 56
Re a debtor (90/1997), 71
Re a debtor (510/97), 69
Re a debtor (620/97), 69
Re a debtor (46/1998), 70
Re a debtor (No.647/1999), 81
Re B (a minor), 35
Re Bayoli, CA, 71

Re Bremner (a bankrupt), 81
Re Cavalier Insurance, 14
Re Citro (a bankrupt), 20
Re Clarke (Deceased), 28
Re Company No. 11212/1995, 50
Re Company's application, 17
Re Cove (a debtor), 23
Re Donella Cohen, 34
Re F (minors), 42
Re Flint (a bankrupt), 33
Re G (a minor), 35
Re Gilmartin (a bankrupt), 14
Re Gorman (a bankrupt), 20
Re Greenacre Publishing Ltd, 72
Re Haemophiliac Litigation, 22
Re Hartlebury Printers Ltd & others (In Liquidation), 36
Re Horne (a bankrupt), CA, 81
Re J (a minor), 36
Re Johnson, 118
Re Landau (a bankrupt), 61
Re Lord Chancellor's Department, C301/94, 56
Re M, 43
Re Marr (a bankrupt), 23
Re Nolton Business Centres,109
Re Priory Garage (Walthamstow) Ltd (Anwar v Giblett), 92
Re Rayatt, 71, 73
Re Robertson, 19
Re S, 15
Re Selectmove Ltd, 42
Re Smith (a bankrupt) ex parte Braintree DC, 17, 23 (HL)
Re Stapleford, 73
Re Susan Wilson, 34
Re Truck Equipment Ltd, 18
Re Vedmay Ltd, 42
Re Wilkinson (a debtor), 12
Re Williams (a bankrupt), 64
Redbank Schools v Abdullahzadeh, 54
Redfearn v Serco t/a West Yorkshire Transport Service, CA, 117
Reed (1) and Bull Information Systems (2) v Stedman, 74
Rees v Apollo Watch Repairs, 55
Rees v Davis, 5
Regalgrand v Dickerson & Wade, CA, 65
Regentford v Thanet DC, 103
Reid v Camphill Engravers, 19
Reilly v Merseyside Regional Health Authority, 44
Remilien v Secretary of State for Social Security, 57; CA, 57; HL, 66
Rentokil Ltd v Machin, 15
Restick v Crickmore, 42
Reston Ltd v Hudson & others, 23
Reuben v Brent LBC, 79

Reuters Ltd v Atkinson, 26
Revill v Newbury, 54
Rex Stewart etc Ltd v Parker, 11
Rexhaven v Nurse, 52
Rey v FNCB Ltd, 117
Reynolds v Sevenoaks DC, 22
Rhys-Harper v Relaxion Group, CA, 87; HL, 100
Ribee v Norrie, CA, 89
Rice v Bryson Meats Ltd, 18
Richardson v Pitt Stanley, 47
Richardson v West Lindsey DC, 15
Richmond v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC, CA, 117
Rickard v PB Glass Supplies Ltd, 15
Ridehalgh v Horsefield & another, 32
Ridgehill Housing Association v Chapman and Field, 103
Ridgeway Motors v ALTS, CA, 109
Ridgway & another v National Coal Board, 2
Ridout v TC Group, 71
Rigby v Ferodo Ltd, 3
Rihal v Ealing LBC, CA, 106
Rinner-Kuhn v FWW Spezialgebaudereinigung, ECJ, 17
Risch v McFee, 22
Riverside Housing Association v White, 109
Roach v CSB Moulds Ltd, 26
Roadchef Ltd v Hastings, 9
Roberts v Birds Eye Walls Ltd, 24
Roberts v Leonard, 50
Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link, CA, 99
Robertson v Magnet Ltd (Retail) Division, 42
Robinson v Gordons Pharmacy Ltd, 27
Robinson v Post Office, 84
Rockfon A/S v Specialarbejderforbundet I Danmark (ECJ), 56
Rock-It-Cargo v Green, 65
Rodriguez Cabellero v Fondo De Garantia Salarial (Fogosa), ECJ, 97
Rogan & another v Woodfield Building Services Ltd, 46
Rogers v Vosper Thorneycroft Ltd, 13
Rogers v Wicks & Wilson, 8
Rogerson v Wigan MBC, 109
Rolls Royce v Doughty, 7
Rolph v Zolan, 39
Ropaigealach v Allied Irish Bank, CA, 90
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank, CA, 73
Rosa v Charles, 33
Rose v AIB Group, 99
Ross v Raphael School Trust, 19
Rossiter v Pendragon, 86; CA, 93
Rothwell v Pelikan Hardcopy Scotland, 115
Rotstart De Hertaine v J Benoidt SA & IGC Housing Service SA, ECJ, 61
Rous v Mitchell, 23
Rovenska v GMC, CA, 63

Rover Finance v Siddons, 95
Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel, 96
Rowell v Hubbard Group Services Ltd, 50
Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group v Payne, 114
Royal Bank of Scotland v Ettridge (No.2), HL, 89
Royal Bank of Scotland v Miller, CA, 95
Royal Bank of Scotland v Newton, 47
Royal Liverpool Children’s NHS Trust v Dunsby, 116
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Trust v Howard, 96
Royal Ordnance plc v Pilkington, 11
Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson & others, 25
Rubenstein & Roskin v McGloughlin, 60
Rugamer v Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd, McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail
Maintenance Ltd, 89
Runnymede BC v Secretary of State for the Environment & another, 42
Rushmoor BC v Reynolds, 30
Rushton v Harcros Timber & Building Supplies Ltd, 36
Russell v Wilson, 14
Rutherford v Harvest Town Circle, 87
Rutherford v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (No.2), CA, 107; HL, 117
Rutherford v Towncircle Ltd t/a Harvest & SoS for Trade & Industry (No.2), 95
Rutten v Cross Medical, ECJ, 62
Ruxley Electronics v Forsythe, CA, 43; HL, 51
S
S v Poole BC, 96
S v West Oxfordshire DC, 61
Saavedra v Aceground Ltd t/a Terrazza Est, 50
Safeway Stores v Burrell, 62
Sahardid v Camden LBC, CA, 112
Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt, CA, 96
Sajid v Sussex Muslim Society, CA, 91
Saker v Secretary of State (R(I)2/88), 21
Saleem v Secretary of State for Social Security, CA, 88
Salford County Court v Garner, CA, 109
Salih v Enfield Health Authority, 25
Salinas v Bear Steams International Holdings, 111
Salvesen v Simons, 43
Sampson & another v Wilson & others, 46; CA, 51
Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker, CA, 68
Sanders v Templar, 38
Sandwell MBC v Bujok, 16, 20
Sandwell Metropolitan BC v Jones, CA, 92
Santamera v Express Cargo Forwarding, 98
Sarker v S Tees Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, 62
Savage v Saxena, 68
Savill v Goodall, 39
Sawa v Houssein, 57
Saxby v McKinley, 60
Scally & others v Southern Health & Social Services Board, 29

Schmidt v Spar und Leihkasse der Fruheren Amter Bordesholm, 44
Schofield v Church Army, 2
Schooler v Commissioners of Customs & Excise, 52
Schultz v Esso Petroleum, CA, 76
Scotch Premier Meat v Burns, 83
Scott & others v Coalite Fuels & Chemicals Ltd, 9
Scott v Scott, 31
Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright, CS, 96
Scottish Daily Records & Sunday Mail (1986) v Laird, 60
Scottish Equitable plc v Thompson & Pearson, CA, 98
Scottish Midland Co-op Ltd v Cullion, 26
Scotts Company (UK) Ltd v Budd, 97
Sealace Shipping v Oceanvoice Ltd, 22
Sebastian Coleman v Caute, 25
Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair, 3
Secretarial Nominee Co v Thomas, CA, 113
Secretary of State for Defence v MacDonald, 84; CS, 87
Secretary of State for Education and Employment v Bearman, 71
Secretary of State for Employment v Levy, 16
Secretary of State for Employment v Mann, 53
Secretary of State for Employment v Spence & others, 1
Secretary of State for Scotland v Taylor, 65
Secretary of State for Scotland v Wright & Hannah, 26
Secretary of State for Social Security v Fairey (aka Halliday), CA, 51; HL, 62
Secretary of State for Social Security v Graham, ECJ, 52
Secretary of State for Social Security v Harmon, CA, 69
Secretary of State for Social Security v Henderson, CA, 74
Secretary of State for Social Security v Julien (R(IS)13/92), 44
Secretary of State for Social Security v Mallinson, CA, 38
Secretary of State for Social Security v McKay, 57
Secretary of State for Social Security v McSherry, 44
Secretary of State for the Home Department v (1) Limbuela (2) Tesema (3) Adam
and Shelter (intervening party), CA, 107
Secretary of State for Trade & Industry v Bottrill, 67
Secretary of State for Trade & Industry v Cook, 61
Secretary of State for Trade & Industry v Forde, CA, 63
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bottrill, CA, 74
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Lassman, CA, 81
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Adams, CA, 101
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Batty, CA, 115
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Bhakta, CA, 115
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Bobezes, CA, 110
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Chiltern District Council & Warden Housing
Association, CA, 98
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Hourigan, CA, 97
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Miah, CA, 100
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Nelligan, CA, 98
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Perkins and Ryedale DC, CA, 109
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Selby, 116, CA
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Tribunal of Social Security Commissioners

and Gillies, CS, 102; HL, 115
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v W, CA, 112
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Walker-Fox, CA, 115
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Wilson, 117, CA
Secretary of State v Thomas, CA, 22; ECJ, 38
Secretary of State v Tunnicliffe (R(G)4/91), 24
Secretary of Trade and Industry v Walden, 79
Securicor Guarding v Fraser Security, 59
Securicor Ltd v Smith, 15
Securicor Omega Express v GMB, 103
Securum Finance v Ashton, 75
Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns, 7
Sekhon v Alissa, 13
Selfridges v Malik, 65
Selkent Bus Co v Moore, 60
Sellars Arenascene v Connolly, CA, 86
Sen v Headley, 25
Servite Houses v Perry, 107
Setiya v E Yorkshire Health Authority, 51
Shackell v UK (EctHR), 84
Shaftsbury Housing Association v Rickards,113
Shah v Mori, 103
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary, HL, 98
Sharky & another v Secretary of State for the Environment & another, 23
Sharp v Brent LBC, CA, 102
Sharp v Caledonia Group Services, 115
Sharrock v CAO, 26
Shawkat v Nottingham City Hospitals NHS Trust (No.2), CA, 88
Shearson (trustee in bankruptcy) v Boddy, 109
Sheffield CC v Barnes, 51
Sheffield CC v Blaskey & Sallis Properties Ltd, 1
Sheffield CC v Emma Smart, CA, 96
Sheffield CC v Green, 42
Sheffield CC v Jepson, 39
Sheffield CC v Wall, CA, 120
Shepherd's Bush Housing Association v HATS Co-operative, 30
Shergold v Fieldway Medical Centre, 115
Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft), CA, 75
Sherry v Sherry & another, 26
Shine v General Guarantee Corporation, 10
Shipman v Shipman, 26
Shire v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, CA, 102
Shogun Finance v Hudson, CA, 87
Shogun Finance v Hudson, HL, 102
Shomer v B & R Residential Lettings Ltd, 34
Shrewsbury & Atcham BC v Evans, CA, 69
Shtun v Zaljejska, 56
Sidhu v Aerospace Composite Technology, 77
Sillars v Charrington Fuels Ltd, 9, 13 (CA)
Simon v Brimham Associates, 6

Simpson v Law Society, 5
Simrad v Scott, 61
Sinclair Roche & Temperley v Heard, 107
Sinclair Roche & Temperley v Heard, 107
Sindicato de Asistencia Publica (Sinap) v Conselleria de Sanidad y Consumo de la
Generalidad Valenciana, ECJ, 84
Singh (Santosh Kumari) v Atombrook Ltd (t/a Sterling Travel), 16
Siraj-Eldin v Campbell Middleton Burness & Dickson, 14
Siu v Eastern Insurance Co Ltd, 42
Skilleter & othes v Charles, 32
Skipton Building Society v Stott, CA, 82
Slater v Lewisham LBC, CA, 119
Slaughter v Brewer & Sons Ltd, 23
Smith & others v Avdel Systems Ltd (ECJ), 47
Smith & others v Bexley LBC, 27
Smith and Grady v UK, ECJ, 77
Smith v A J Morrisroes & Sons, 109
Smith v Bank of Scotland, HL, 64
Smith v Bush, CA, 4 (CA); HL, 14
Smith v Gardner Merchant, 57
Smith v Gardner Merchant, CA, 70
Smith v Glasgow DC, 6
Smith v Grampian Regional Council, 24
Smith v Littlewoods Ltd, 4
Smith v Lloyds TSB, CA, 83
Smith v Phil's TV Service, 27
Smith v Safeway plc, 49; CA, 56
Smith v Simpson & Co, CA, 80
Smith v Smith & another, 9
Smith v Smith, 25
Smith v Stages, CA, 7; HL, 14
Smith v Waterman, Waterman and Bostock, 102
Snares v Adjudication Officer, ECJ, 66
Sneesby & another v Goldings, 49
Snowball v Gardner Merchant, 6
Snowden v Hackney LBC, CA, 86
Society of Licensed Victuallers v Chamberlain, 16
Sogbetun v Hackney LBC, 72
Solectron Scotland v Roper, 103
Solomon v Solomon, 98
Somerset County Council v Barber, CA, 92
Somjee v United Kingdom, ECJ, 96
Soros & Soros v Davison & Davison, 45
Soteriou v Ultrachem, 107
Sougrin v Haringey Health Authority, 33
South Ayrshire Council v Milligan, CS, 97
South Ayrshire Council v Morton, CS, 92
South Buckinghamshire DC v Porter, CA, 92
South Central Trains v Rodway, 107; CA, 112
South Glamorgan CC v Grifiths, 31

South Kirkham v E Mason, 40
South Lakeland DC v Secretary of State for Environment & another, 31
South Wales Electricity v Director General of Electricity Supply, 77
South West Launderettes Ltd v Laidler, 1
Southampton & SW Hants Health Authority v Marshall, 16
Southampton City Council v Randall, 115
Southern & District Finance plc v Barnes, 46; CA, 50
Southwark LBC v Afolabi, CA, 98
Southwark LBC v Ince, 14
Southwark LBC v Kofi-Adu, CA, 118
Southwark LBC v Logan, 53
Southwark LBC v Long, CA, 94
Southwark LBC v McIntosh, 96
Southwark LBC v O'Brien, 58
Southwark LBC v Sarfo, CA, 78
Southwark LBC v Storrie (CA), 66
Sovereign House S S Ltd v Savage, 14
Sovereign Leasing plc v Ali, 25
Spargos Mining v Atlantic Capital Corp, 54
Spath Holme Ltd v Chairman of the North Western RAC & Bigio, 89
Spath Holme Ltd v Greater Manchester & Lancashire RAC, 46, 52 (CA)
Spath Holme Ltd v UK, ECJ, 96
Specialarbejderforbundet: Danmark v Dansk Industri (ECJ), 51
Spencer v Cosmos Air Holidays, 17
Spring v Guardian Assurance plc & others, 32; CA, 36; HL, 46
Springette v Defoe, 32, 33
Springfield Investmnents Ltd v Bell, 21
Square D Ltd v Cook, 31
St Basil's Centre Ltd v McCrossan, 29
St Brice v Southwark LBC, CA, 88
St Ermines Property Ltd v Tingay, 99
St Helens MBC v Derbyshire, 107, CA, 113
St John of God (Care Services) Ltd v Brooks & others, 33
St Mary’s Mansions Ltd v Limegate Investments Co Ltd, CA, 98
Stafford v CAO, HL, 87
Staffordshire CC v Secretary of State, 8
Staffordshire Sentinel Newspapers v Potter, 107
Staghold v Takeda, 114
Stanley Cole (Wainfleet) Ltd v Sheridan, 97
Stanley v Ealing LBC, CA, 102
Stansbury v Datapulse, CA, 105
Starling v Lloyds TSB, CA, 82
Starmark Enterprises Ltd v CPL Distribution Ltd, CA, 90
Starmer v Bradbury, 44
State Bank of New South Wales t/a Colonial State Bank v Harrison, CA, 95
Staves v Leeds C C, 24
Steadman v Scholfield, 33
Steane v CAO, CA, 54; HL, 58
Stec v United Kingdom, ECJ, 118
Steel Linings Ltd v Bibby & Co, 39

Steel Stockholders (Birmingham) Ltd v Kirkwood, 42
Steele & another v McMahon & another, 23
Steele v Mooney, CA, 109
Stein v Blake, 52
Sterling Credit v Rahman, 97
Stevedoring and Haulage Services v Fuller, CA, 88
Stevens v Bexley Health Authority, 15
Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC, CA, 108
Stevens v Bower, CA, 108
Stevenson v Rogers, CA, 78
Steward v Rapley, 13
Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer Ltd, 31
Stewart v Cleveland Quest (Engineering) Ltd, 46
Stewart v Lambeth LBC, CA, 95
Stinton v Stinton & another, 34
Stirling v Dietsmann Management Systems Ltd, 28
Stirling v Leadenhall Residential, CA, 88
Stockley v Knowsley MBC, 3
Stoke on Trent CC v Frost & another, 30
Stoke on Trent CC v Walley, CA, 120
Stokes v Anderson, 28
Stonebridge Housing Action Trust v Gabbidon, 99
Stour Valley Builders v Stuart, 42
Stovin v Wise (Norfolk CC, third party), 43 (CA), 59 (HL)
Stovold v Barlows, 53
Street v Peacock, 58
Stribling v Wickham & others, 14
Stroud v Weir Associates Ltd, 3
Strouthos v London Underground, CA, 106
Strudwick v IBL, 11
Suflex Ltd v Thomas & others, 7
Sumeghova v McMahon, CA, 100
Summers v Summers, 5
Sunderland Polytechnic v Evans, 39
Surrey CC & another v Bredero Homes Ltd, 30
Surrey CC v Lamond, CA, 75
Surrey CC v Lewis, 1
Surrey Police v Marshall, 96
Sussex Investments Ltd & another v Jackson & another, 40
Sutherland v Hatton, CA, 92 Sutherland v Network Appliance, 85
Sutherland v Wall, 45
Swaddling v Adjudication Officer, ECJ, 73
Swain v Hillman, CA, 77
Swanbrae Ltd v Elliot, 3
Swansea CC v Glass, 31
Sweeney v J&S Henderson (Concessions), 74
Swindon BC v Aston, CA, 99
Swingcastle Ltd v Gibson, 19 (CA), 26 (HL)
Swiss Bank Corporation v Parry & others, 49
Swithland Motors v Peck, 31

Sykes v Harry, CA, 87
Symphony Group plc v Hodgson, 39
Syrett v Carr & Neave (a firm), 22
Szoma v SoS for Work & Pensions, CA, 100; HL, 113
T
T C Cleaning Contractors v Joy, 59
Taboada v Nelson Ltd, 33
Tagro v Cafane & Patel, 17, 25 (CA)
Tandridge DC v Bickers, CA, 74
Target Home Loans Ltd v Clothier & Clothier, 38
Targett v Torfaen BC, 30
Taylor Gordon & Co v Timmons, 103
Taylor v East Midlands Offender Employment, 84
Taylor v Secretary of State for Scotland, HL, 82
Taylorplan Services v Jackson, 57
Teinaz v Wandsworth LBC, CA, 95
Tele Danmark A/S v Handels-OG Kontorfunktionaerernes Forbund I Danmark (HK)
acting on behalf of Brandt-Nielson, ECJ, 90
Telephone Information Services Ltd v Wilkinson, 26
Televantos v McCulloch, 27
Temco Service Industries SA v Imzilyen, ECJ, 91
Ten Oever v Stichting (ECJ), 41
Terry v Tower Hamlets LBC, 116
TGWU v Webber, 23
Thames Water Utilities v Reynolds, 56
Thomas v Bunn, 23
Thomas v CAO (R(SB)17/87), 11
Thomas v Robinson, 96
Thomas v The National Training Partnership, 57
Thompson v Elmbridge BC, 6
Thompson v SCS Consulting Ltd, 90
Thompson v Thompson, 31
Thompson v Walon Car Delivery (1) & BRS Automotive (2), 63
Thomson Tour Operations v Birch, 73
Throssell v Leeds City Council, 41
Times Newspapers v Chohan, CA, 88
Tinsley v Milligan, 28 (CA), 40 (HL)
Tipper v Roofnec Ltd, 15
TNT Express (UK) Ltd v Downes & others, 40
Toff v McDowell & others, 41
Tolson v Governing Body of Mixenden, 102
Topp v London Bus, 29; CA, 38
Tower Boot Co v Jones, 53
Tower Hamlets LBC v Abadie, 23
Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi, 36
Tower Hamlets LBC v Ali, 32
Tower Hamlets LBC v Ayinde, CA, 47
Tower Hamlets LBC v Azad, CA, 65
Tower Hamlets LBC v Begum, CA, 93; HL, 98

Tower Hamlets LBC v Deugi, CA, 118
Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah, 30
Town & Country BS v Julien, 38
Toys R Us v Gloucestershire CC, 43
Trafford v Sharpe & Fisher (Building Supplies) Ltd, 45
Tramp Leasing Ltd v Turnbull, 27
Tran v Greenwich Vietnam Community, CA, 95
Transco (formerly BG) v O’Brien, CA, 93
Transport and General Workers Union v (1) James McKinnon (2) JR (Haulage), 88
Trevelyans Ltd v Norton, 23
Trotter v Forth Ports Authority, 29
Trustees of Henry Smith's Charity v Kyriakou, 20
Trustees of Thomas Pocklington v Hill & Sullivan, 15
Tsangalos v Amalgamated Chemicals, 59
TSB Bank plc v Botham, 49
TSB Bank plc v Camfield, 48
TSB Bank v Harris, 79
Tuohy v Bell (trustee in bankruptcy), CA, 93
Tyler v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, 29
U
UCB Corporate Services v Williams, CA, 93
Ujima Housing Association v Ansah (CA), 65
Ujima Housing Association v Smith, 88
Ulsterbus Ltd v Henderson, 15
Unicorn Consultancy Services v Westbrook, 79
United Arab Emirates v Abdelghafar, 50
United Bank Ltd v Akhtar, 17
United Bank of Kuwait plc v Sahib & others, 45
United Dominions Trust Ltd v Shellpoint Trustees, 36
United Kingdom v Council of the European Union (ECJ), 59
University of Huddersfield v Wolff, 105; 106
University of Oxford v (1) Humphreys and (2) Associated Examining Board, CA, 79
Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins, CA, 80; HL, 89
Uratemp Ventures v Carrell, CA, 80
Uttamchandami v Central Bank of India, 14
V
V G Fraulo & Co Ltd v Papa, 41
Vale of White Horse DC v Mirmalek-Sani & Mirmalek-Sani, 40
Van Aken v Camden LBC, CA, 104
Van Cant v Rijksdienst Voor Pensioenen, ECJ, 43
Van den Akkers & others v Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds, ECJ, 47
Van Haarlam & another v Kasner & another, 35
Various v Black, 52
Various v MM, HW & CE, 66
Various v S, 42
Various v Walker, 61
Vaughan v McKenzie, 26
Vaughan-Armatrading v Sarsah, 54

Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (No.2) 97
Verdin v Harrods, 116
Verein fur Konsumenteninformation v Osterreichische Kreditversicherungs AG, ECJ,
69
Verholen v SV Amsterdam, ECJ, 31
Verity v Lloyds Bank, 53
Vernon v Bosley, 60
Viasystems (Tyneside) v Thermal Transfer (Northern), CA, 114
Vicary v British Telecommunications, 77
Viggosdottir v Islandspostur hf, EFTACJ, 93
Vine v Waltham Forest LBC, CA, 80
Virgin Net v Harper, 102
Visa International Service Association v Paul, 103
Viscount Chelsea v McGirk, 57
Voice and Script International Ltd v Alghafar, CA, 100
Voith Turbo v Stowe, 110
W
W A Goold (Pearmak) v McConnell, 53
W G Clark (Properties) Ltd v Dupre, 30
Wadsworth v Nagle, 113
Wain v F Sherwood & Sons Transport, CA, 69
Waite v Lambeth LBC, 56
Waitt & another v Morris & another, 47
Wakefield v Secretary of State for Social Security, CA, 79
Walden Engineering Co Ltd v Warrener, 40
Walford v Miles, 33
Walker v Badcock, CA, 65
Walker v Lakhdari, 23
Walker v Northumberland County Council, 48
Wall v British Compressed Air Society, 102, CA, 103
Wallace Bogan & Co v Cove, CA, 64
Wallis v Wallis, 41
Walmsley v Ferguson Ltd, 14
Walter Braund Ltd v Murray, 22
Walters v Commissioner of Police, HL, 84
Waltham Forest Community Based Housing Association v Adkins, 88
Waltham Forest LBC v Omilaju, CA, 108
Waltham Forest LBC v Partridge, CA, 84
Waltham Forest LBC v Roberts, CA, 112
Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas, CA, 25; HL, 34
Walthamstow BS v Davies, 19
Walton v Airtours and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, CA, 97
Walton v Independent Living Organisation Ltd, CA, 100
Waltons & Morse v Dorrington, 64
Wandsworth LBC v Bowes, 26
Wandsworth LBC v Fadayomi, 6
Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu, CA, 74
Wandsworth LBC v Railtrack plc, CA, 89
Wandsworth LBC v Winder (No.2), 3

Wansbeck DC v Marley, 7
Ward v Warnke, 21
Warren v Wylie & Wylie, 45
Warsame v Hounslow LBC, CA, 76
Watchtower Investments v Payne, CA, 88
Waters v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, 53; CA, 65
Watson Rask & Christiansen v ISS Kantineservice A/S (ECJ), 37
Watson v Murray & Co, 26
Watson v National Smokeless Fuels, 4
Watson’s, Stennet’s, Cobham’s and Armstrong’s Application for Judicial Review v
Richmond BC, Manchester CC, Harrow LBC and Redcar BC, CA, 83
Watson-Smythe v Secretary of State for the Environment & another, 29
Watts v Morrow, 23; CA, 28
Way v Crouch, 112
Wayling v Jones & others, 40
Weathersfield t/a Van & Truck Rentals v Sargent, 64
Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) (No. 2), 53
Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd, 19, CA, 30; HL, 36; ECJ, 47
Webb v Secretary of State for the Environment & Ipswich BC, 23
Webb v Secretary of State for the Environment, 53
Weber v Universal Ogden Services Ltd, ECJ, 92
Webster v Brunel University (EOC intervening), CA, 110
Webster v Ellison Circlips, 52
Weir v National Westminster Bank, 35
Welcome Foundation v Darby, 59
Wellcome Trust v Hammad (CA), 65
Wells v Pickering, 96
Welsh v Greenwich LBC, CA, 85
West Bromwich Building Society v Crammer, 97
West Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinson, CA, 106; HL 111
West Kent Cold Storage v Hemmings, 16
West Kent HA v Davies, CA, 72, 74
West v Kneels Ltd, 1
West v Secretary of State for Scotland, 34
West Wiltshire DC v Snelgrove, 69
Western Web Offset Printers v Independent Media, 53
Westgate v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions, CA, 118
Westminster C C v Basson, 24
Westminster CC v Clarke, CA, 26; HL, 31
Westminster CC v Duke of Westminster & others, 24, 33 (CA)
Westminster CC v Garcia, CA, 83
Westminster CC v National Asylum Support Service, 87; CA, 94; HL, 97
Weston v Vegal Space Systems Ltd, 16
Whalley v SoS for Work & Pensions, CA, 98
Wheeler v Patel & Golding Group Ltd, 5
Wheeler v Trustees of St. Mary's, 16
Whelan t/a Cheers Off Licence v Richardson, 67
Whellans & Worthy v CAO, 12
Whent v T Cartledge, 61
Whiffen v Milham Ford Girls’ School, CA, 87

Whitbread & Co plc v Mills, 12
Whitbread v Thomas, 8
Whitbread W Penines Ltd v Reedy, 12
White & others v CAO, 40
White v Jones, 46
White v Lambeth LBC, 51
White v Riverside Housing Assocation, CA, 115
White v Worcester Royal Infirmary, 54
Whitehouse v Chas A Blatchford & Sons, CA, 76
Whitely v Marton Electrical Ltd, 98
Whitewater Leisure Management v Barnes, 82
Whitfield v General Medical Council, 96
Whittel v MSC, 7
Wilde v Wilde, 7
Wilding v British Telecommunications, CA, 95
Wileman v Minilec Engineering Ltd, 9
Williams v Horsham DC, CA, 104
Williams v Roffey Bros, 17
Williams v Tower Hamlets, CA, 86
Williams v Watsons Coaches Ltd, 19
Williamson v Travel Promotions t/a Voyages Jules Verne (CA), 67
Willowgreen Ltd v Smithers, 42, 45
Wilson & others v Boston Fisheries, 5
Wilson v Circular Distributors, 115
Wilson v Ethicon, 78
Wilson v First County Trust (No.2), CA, 86
Wilson v First County Trust, CA, 84
Wilson v Graham, 23
Wilson v Howard, CA, 112
Wilson v Pegasus (Holidays) London, 12
Wilson v Robertsons (London), 113; CA, 118
Wilson v SoS for Trade and Industry, HL, 99
Wilson v South Kesteven DC, CA, 83
Wilson v St Helens BC, 56; CA, 64; HL, 71
Wiluszynski v Tower Hamlets LBC, 15
Wimbledon & South Western Finance plc v Winning, 35
Winch v Mid Bedfordshire DC, 99
Wishart v National Association of CABx, 21
Witley and District Men’s Club v Mackay, 88
Witt v R MacMillan Construction, 13
Woking BC v Bystram, 43
Wood v Coverage Care, 56
Wood v Cunard Line Ltd, 15; CA, 21
Wood v SoS for Work & Pensions, 97
Wood v William Ball, 78
Woodchester Lease Management Services v Swain & Co, CA, 70
Woodcock v Friends School, 2
Woodruff v Hambro & others, 26
Woodrup v Southwark LBC, CA, 97
Woodward v Abbey National, 113; CA, 119

Woolwich Building Society v Brown, 55
Woolwich Building Society v Dickman, 56
Woolwich Building Society v Inland Revenue Commissioners, 28
Woolworths plc v Smith, 17
Worsley v Hollins, 25
Worthing BC v Secretary of State for Environment & another, 30
Wren v Eastbourne BC & UK Waste Control Ltd, 40
Wright v Lodge, 34
Wright v Mortimer, 56
Wright v Scottbridge Construction, 88
Wynnwith Engineering Co v Bennett, 91
Wyre Forest DC v Secretary of State for the Environment, 18
X (minors) v Bedfordshire CC, 52
X v Commission of the European Communities, ECJ, 51
X v Stevens, 99
X v Y, 101
X/Y/Z
XXX v YYY, CA, 105
Yates v Thakeham Tiles Ltd, 45
Yeboah v Crofton, CA, 94
Yenula Properties Ltd v Naidu, 90; CA, 95
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Meyrick, CA, 96
York City & District Travel Ltd v Smith, 19
York v Casey, CA, 68
Yorkshire Bank plc v Hussain, 9
Yorkshire Bank v Tinsley, CA, 105
Yorkshire Blood Transfusion Service v Plaskitt, 41
Young v DHSS, 24
Young v Post Office, CA, 94
Zabaxe Ltd v Nicklin, 23
Zafar v Glasgow CC (HL), 66
Zaiwalla & Co v Walia, 95
Zoan v Rouamba, CA, 79
Zonmor v Islington LBC, CA, 71