Issues 1 – 120 December 1986 – April 2007 - Citizens Advice
Issues 1 – 120 December 1986 – April 2007 - Citizens Advice
Issues 1 – 120 December 1986 – April 2007 - Citizens Advice
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
R v Newham LBC ex parte Tower Hamlets LBC, 19<br />
R v Newham LBC ex parte Ugbo, 42<br />
R v North and East Devon Health Authority ex parte Coughlan, CA, 76<br />
R v Northampton BC ex parte Carpenter, 40<br />
R v Northampton BC ex parte Clarkson, 33<br />
R v Northavon DC ex parte Palmer, 40, 43; CA, 52<br />
R v Northavon DC ex parte Smith, 39; HL, 45<br />
R v Nottingham CC ex parte Caine, 57<br />
R v Nottingham CC ex parte Costello, 13<br />
R v Nottingham CC ex parte Edwards, 73<br />
R v Nottingham CC ex parte SB and AB, 88<br />
R v Oldham Justices ex parte Garrity, 4<br />
R v Oldham MBC ex parte G, 33; HL, 38<br />
R v Oxford CC ex parte Doyle, 68<br />
R v Parking Adjudicator ex parte Wandsworth LBC, 60<br />
R v Penwith DC ex parte Burt, 19<br />
R v Penwith DC ex parte Menear, 30<br />
R v Peterborough CC ex parte Carr, 18<br />
R v Pharmaceutical Society of GB ex parte Sokoh, 2<br />
R v Phillips, 14<br />
R v Piper, 52<br />
R v Poole BC ex parte Cooper, 47<br />
R v Port Talbot BC ex parte McCarthy, 27<br />
R v Powys CC ex parte Hambridge (Secretary for Health), CA, 72<br />
R v Preston Justices & another ex parte McCosh, 49<br />
R v Reading BC ex parte Glenton, 18<br />
R v Redbridge Magistrates ex parte Guppy, 55<br />
R v Redcar & Cleveland BC ex parte Armstrong, HL, 96<br />
R v Rent Officer of Kensington and Chelsea ex parte Hartley, 87<br />
R v Rent Service ex parte Cumpsty, 100<br />
R v Rent Service ex parte Saadat, Dinsdale, Wilson & Shaw, CA, 91<br />
R v Richmond LBC ex parte H, 86<br />
R v Richmond LBC ex parte Stubbs, 12<br />
R v Rochester upon Medway CC ex parte Williams, 44<br />
R v Rugby BC ex parte Hunt, 34<br />
R v Rushcliffe BC ex parte Summerson & Buckley, 43<br />
R v Rushmoor BC ex parte Barrett, 2; CA, 8<br />
R v Saint Edmundsbury BC ex parte Sandys, CA, 71<br />
R v Sandwell BC ex parte Cashmore, 40<br />
R v Sandwell MBC ex parte Lyn, 37<br />
R v Secretary of State ex parte Clarke & others, 8<br />
R v Secretary of State ex parte Ward, 15<br />
R v Secretary of State for Defence ex parte EOC, 30<br />
R v Secretary of State for Defence ex parte Perkins (No.2), 71<br />
R v Secretary of State for Defence ex parte Perkins, 62<br />
R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte EOC, 29; CA, 35; HL, 43<br />
R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith & Perez, 46; CA, 52;<br />
ECJ, 73<br />
R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith (No.2), HL, 79<br />
R v Secretary of State for Environment ex parte Kensington & Chelsea RBC, 3