Issues 1 – 120 December 1986 – April 2007 - Citizens Advice
Issues 1 – 120 December 1986 – April 2007 - Citizens Advice
Issues 1 – 120 December 1986 – April 2007 - Citizens Advice
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Krasner v Dennison, CA, 80<br />
Kuenyehia v International Hospitals Group, CA, 115<br />
Kuttapan v Croydon LBC, 75<br />
Kutz-Bauer v Freie Und Hansestadt Hamburg, ECJ, 99<br />
Kwik Save Stores v Greaves, 62<br />
Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd v Lineham, 32<br />
L<br />
Lagden v O’Connor, HL, 104<br />
Laimond Properties v Al Shakarchi, CA, 67<br />
Laing v Manchester CC, 118<br />
Laird v AK Stoddard, 88<br />
Lambert v Croydon College, 75<br />
Lambeth BC v Thomas, 62<br />
Lambeth LBC (1) Hyde Southbank (2) v O’Kane, CA, 113<br />
Lambeth LBC v A, CA, 95<br />
Lambeth LBC v Grant, CA, 112<br />
Lambeth LBC v Howard, CA, 88<br />
Lambeth LBC v Hughes, CA, 84<br />
Lambeth LBC v Lindsay, CA, 95<br />
Lambeth LBC v Rogers, CA, 79<br />
Lambeth LBC v Vandra, CA, 117<br />
Landeshaupstadt Kiel v Jaeger, ECJ, 102<br />
Lane v Cadwallader, CA, 85<br />
Lane v Liverpool CC, 69<br />
Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford), 52<br />
Langlands & McAinsh Ltd v Shearer, 8<br />
Langley v Burlo, 117<br />
Langston v Cranfield University, 68<br />
Lansing Linde Ltd v Kerr, 25<br />
Larusai (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, 101<br />
Lassman v (1) Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (2) Pan Graphics Industries,<br />
75<br />
Laughton & Hawley v Bapp Ltd, 1<br />
Law Land plc v Sinclair, 31<br />
Law Society v Bahl, 101<br />
Law Society v Persaud, 20<br />
Law Society v Sephton & Co, HL, 117<br />
Lawal v Northern Spirit Ltd, CA 95; HL, 100<br />
Lawrence v Lesser, CA, 80<br />
Lawrence v Regent Office Care, 73; ECJ, 95<br />
Lawson v Serco, HL, 116<br />
Lawton v BOC Transhield Ltd, 5<br />
Lea v British Aerospace, 23<br />
Ledernes Hovedorganisation on behalf of Ole Rygaard v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening<br />
on behalf of Stro Molle Aknstik A/S (ECJ), 53<br />
Lee v Chung & Shun Shing Construction Ltd, 20<br />
Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications, 40<br />
Lee v Leeds CC, 94<br />
Leeds v Islington LBC, 69