Child-Friendly Hygiene and Sanitation Facilities in Schools

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHOOSE WELL CONSIDERED LOCATIONS a consensus between the different users. A good tool for site selection is the creation of maps together with the school community and, if relevant, the families living in the immediate surroundings. These maps can include practical considerations (prevailing wind direction, location of wells, existing pathways), as well as cultural and psychosocial (privacy, safety) considerations. Mapping will also help to develop different options for locations and make it easier to compare them. 33
CHILD-FRIENDLY HYGIENE AND SANITATION-FACILITIES IN SCHOOLS... References Boot, M. and Cairncross, S. (1993). Actions speak: the study of hygiene behaviour in water and sanitation projects. Delft, The Netherlands, IRC; and London, UK, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Brandberg, B. (1997). Latrine building: a handbook for implementation of the SanPlat system. London, UK, Intermediate Technology Publications. Dirección de Ingenieria Sanitaria, Secretaria de Salubridad y Asistencia. (1976). Manual de saneamiento, vivienda, agua y desechos. Mexico City, Mexico, Editoral LIMUSA. Esrey, S. et al. (1998). Ecological sanitation. Stockholm, Sweden, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. Ferron, S. et al. (2000). Hygiene promotion: a practical manual for relief and development. London, UK, Intermediate Technology Publications and Care. Hart, R. (1997). Children's participation: the theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London, UK, Earthscan (in association with UNICEF). Hawes, H. et al. (1997). Health promotion in our schools. London, UK, The Child-to-Child Trust (in association with UNICEF). Mara, D. (1996). Low cost urban sanitation. Chichester, UK, John Wiley. Morgan, P. (1999). Ecological sanitation in Zimbabwe: a compilation of manuals and experiences. Harare, Zimbabwe, Aquamor Pvt. Ltd. McKee, N. et al. (2000). Involving people evolving behaviour. Penang, Malaysia, Southbound Penang; and New York, USA, UNICEF. Mooijman, A. M. (2002). Assessment of 1994-2001 UNICEF School Sanitation and Hygiene Project in Khatlon, Tajikistan. Almaty, Kazakhstan, UNICEF-CARK. Pickford, J. (1995). Low-cost sanitation, a survey of practical experience. London, UK, ITDG Publishing. Simpson-Hebert, M. et al. (1996). The PHAST Initiative: participatory hygiene and sanitation transformation, a new approach to working with communities. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization. 34
Page 1 and 2: Child-Friendly Hygiene and Sanitati
Page 4 and 5: Child-Friendly Hygiene and Sanitati
Page 6 and 7: Tabel of Contens Acknowledgments Wh
Page 8 and 9: What you will find in this booklet
Page 10 and 11: Ten points towards child-friendly h
Page 12 and 13: ARE ‘INTERACTIVE’ SPACES THAT S
Page 14 and 15: ARE ‘INTERACTIVE’ SPACES THAT S
Page 16 and 17: ARE DESIGNED WITH INVOLVEMENT OF CH
Page 18 and 19: PROVIDE LOWEST-COST SOLUTIONS WITH
Page 20 and 21: HAVE APPROPRIATE DIMENSIONS AND FEA
Page 22 and 23: HAVE APPROPRIATE DIMENSIONS AND FEA
Page 24 and 25: ADDRESS THE SPECIAL GENDER-RELATED
Page 26 and 27: the soil, or stored underground in
Page 28 and 29: DO NOT HARM THE ENVIRONMENT 27
Page 30 and 31: ENCOURAGE HYGIENIC BEHAVIOUR Anal c
Page 32 and 33: 9. Offer enough capacity and minima
Page 36 and 37: REFERENCES UNICEF Guideline Series.
Page 38 and 39: ANNEX 1 Empowering all stakeholders
Page 40 and 41: ANNEX 1 Organising and designing th
Page 42 and 43: Annex 2: Sample set-up for the deve
Page 44 and 45: ANNEX 2 43
Page 46: Child-Friendly Hygiene and Sanitati

Child-Friendly Hygiene and Sanitation Facilities in Schools

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?