Runnymede Campus - Runnymede Borough Council

Runnymede 

Campus 

Englefield Green 

Environmental Statement 

Volume 3d: 

Technical Appendices 

December January 2011 2010 

Environ

Volume 3d Technical Appendices: Runnymede Campus 

Orchid Residential Ltd 

Volume 3d: Technical Appendices 

Appendix 12.2 

Appendix 12.3 

Appendix 12.4 

Appendix 12.5 

Appendix 12.6 

Appendix 14.1 

Appendix 16.1 

Appendix 16.2 

Appendix 16.3 

Bat Survey 

Reptile Survey 

Tree Removal and Replacement Plan 

Arboricultural Assessment 

Heads of Terms LEMF Plan 

Transport Assessment 

Glossary of Acoustic Terminology 

Construction Plant Assumptions 

Traffic Flows used in the Noise Assessment 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVRON 

UK11-16357


Orchid Runnymede Ltd 

APPENDIX 12.2 

Bat Survey 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVRON 

UK11-16357

Runnymede / Bat Assessment / Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd

Runnymede / Bat Assessment / Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd 


Bat Assessment 

Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd 

Author 

Victoria Forder MSc AIEEM 

ECL Job No 2010/817 

Status Date Review 

Draft 171210 MW 

Revision 110111 MW 



The Ecology Consultancy 6-8, Cole Street, London SE1 4YH 

T. 020 7378 1914 E. enquiries@ecologyconsultancy.co.uk W. www.ecologyconsultancy.co

CONTENTS 

Executive Summary 1 

1 Introduction 3 

2 Legislation 6 

3 Methodology 8 

4 Survey results 12 

5 Conclusions and recommendations 25 

References 37 

Appendix 1: Plans 38 

Appendix 2: Photographs 42 

Appendix 3: Tree & Habitat Assessment 52 

Appendix 4 Summary of Roosts 54 

Appendix 5: Bat Survey Data 56 

LIABILITY 

Ecology Consultancy Limited (ECL) has prepared this report for the sole use of Orchid Runnymede Ltd in accordance 

with the agreement under which our services were performed. No warranty, express or implied, is made as to the advice 

in this report or any other service provided by us. This report may not be relied upon by any other party without the prior 

written permission of ECL. The content of this report is, at least in part, based upon information provided by others and on 

the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested. 

Information obtained from any third party has not been independently verified by ECL, unless otherwise stated in the 

report. The Ecology Consultancy is the trading name of Ecology Consultancy Ltd. 

COPYRIGHT 

© This report is the copyright of ECL. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person is prohibited.

Executive Summary 

 

 

 

 

 

The Ecology Consultancy was commissioned by Orchid Runnymede Limited in 2010 to 

undertake bat surveys of the former Brunel University Runnymede Campus in Egham, 

Surrey. The Ecology Consultancy also undertook preliminary bat assessments of the Site in 

August 2003, July 2007 and 2008. 

Building and tree surveys were undertaken on the 23rd, 25th and 28th January, the 6th May 

2008, 6 th April, 23 rd April and 12 th July 2010 and the 6 th Jan 2011. Bat emergence surveys 

and dawn re-entry surveys were completed at the site between 6th June and 19th August 

2008 as well as between 13 th May and 10 th September 2010. 

This report details the methodology, results and conclusion of the 2008 and 2010 bat 

surveys although the 2003 and 2007 assessments are mentioned where appropriate. 

Recommendations for further surveys that will be required to inform a Natural England 

European Protected Species Licence, together with advice on bat mitigation measures that 

would be necessary to ensure that the favourable conservation status of the species is 

maintained post-redevelopment, are provided. 

The President’s Hall building was confirmed to provide a maternity roost for brown longeared 

bats Plecotus auritus (No: 10) as well as summer roosts for common pipistrelle and 

soprano pipistrelles (No: ≥5). Although it was previously identified as a possible serotine 

Eptisicus serotinus roost, this was not confirmed in 2008 or 2010 and is no longer thought 

likely. The Mews supported a maternity colony of soprano and common pipistrelle bats (No: 

≥80-100 bats). The Clock Tower, College, Chapel, Kimberley, Reed Hall, Williams Hall, 

Rowan Hall, Scrivens Hall, Bradley Hall, the Gatehouse, Principal’s House, Club House, 

Science Block, Gardener’s Cottage, Oak Lane Cottage and the Laboratory provided 

summer roosts for low numbers of common pipistrelle, brown long eared and soprano 

pipistrelle bats (No: ≤1-5 bats/ building). The Laboratory was previously thought to contain a 

Myotis sp. roost, although this was not confirmed in 2008 or 2010 and is therefore no 

longer considered likely. 

The 2008 and 2010 surveys revealed that at least three species roost at the Site; common 

and soprano pipstrelles and brown long eared. At least 8 species of bat use the site 

including common pipistrelle, soprano pipistrelle, noctule Nyctalus noctula, brown longeared, 

serotine, Leisler’s Nyctalus leisleri, Daubenton’s Myotis daubentonii and Natterer’s 

Myotis nattereri. The earlier possibility of Bechstein’s bat Myotis bechsteinii, whiskered 

The Ecology Consultancy 

Runnymede / Bat Survey / Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd 1

Myotis mystacinus or Brandt’s Myotis brandti being present has not been confirmed in 

2008 or 2010 surveys and so is not considered likely. 

 

 

 

 

Any works reasonably likely to result in an offence relating the bats or roosts within any of 

the buildings highlighted above can only be legally carried out under licence from Natural 

England. Further surveys of these buildings may be required to inform the application of an 

EPS licence (see Section 5) depending upon the timing of the works. 

Five trees requiring removal or management works have been identified as supporting 

features of moderate or high potential for roosting bats. These will need to be resurveyed 

by dusk/dawn survey and/or inspection by endoscope to fully assess the presence or likely 

absence of roosting bats prior to the commencement of works. If these surveys confirm the 

presence of a bat roost, works to these trees that affect the roosts can only be legally 

carried out under licence from Natural England. A further six trees were identified with a low 

potential for roosting bats. Precautionary measures should also be followed for all high-low 

potential trees by the tree surgeons to ensure compliance with the bat legislation (See 

Sections 5.21 and 5.23). 

In order to maintain favourable conservation status of the bat species present within the 

Site, an appropriate mitigation strategy will need to be agreed as part of the planning 

decision. Details regarding the scheduling and procedure of refurbishment and demolition 

works of buildings are described in Sections 5.28 and 5.31, together with options for the 

retention of existing roost habitat and the creation of replacement bat roost sites. 

Advice on lighting proposals that should also be considered within the new development 

and recommended planting proposals and landscape management to compensate for any 

loss of bat foraging and/or commuting habitat are discussed in Sections 5.32 to 5.36. 



1 Introduction 

BACKGROUND 

1.1 The Ecology Consultancy was commissioned by Orchid Runnymede Limited to undertake an 

ecological assessment of the former Brunel University site, Runnymede Campus located in 

Egham, Surrey. An initial Phase 1 habitat survey, desk-top study and protected species 

assessment (ECL, 2007) indicated that habitats suitable for bats were present and 

recommended bat surveys. The surveys comprised an external and internal building 

assessments, tree assessments, assessment of bat foraging and commuting habitat and 

evening bat emergence/dawn re-entry surveys. 

SCOPE OF THE REPORT 

1.2 This report details the methodology, results and conclusions of the second and third phases 

of bat surveys undertaken at the former Brunel University Campus Site by The Ecology 

Consultancy in 2008 and 2010. 

1.3 The surveys were based on the Bat Conservation Trust Bat Survey Best Practice Guidelines 

(BCT 2007) and were carried out by a Natural England licensed bat ecologist (Huma Pearce: 

Licence No. 20083423). Assessment of trees were carried out with consideration to their 

value for use by bats (Cowan, 2006). 

1.4 The surveys included: 

 

An internal and/or external inspection of all buildings on-site to identify the presence 

or likely absence of winter and summer bat roosts within the buildings (2008 and 

2010); 

 

An assessment of the potential for trees within the application site to support roosting 

bats (2008 and 2011); and 

 

A series of evening bat emergence and dawn re-entry surveys were carried at the Site 

between June and August 2008 as well as between May and September 2010, to 

determine the presence or likely absence of bat roosts within the buildings on site. 

1.5 These Phase 2 surveys provide up-to-date information about the use of the application site 

by bats to support the ES being prepared to support the Proposed Redevelopment. 


Runnymede / Bat Survey / Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd 

3

1.6 Recommendations for further surveys, mitigation measures (including the need to apply for a 

Natural England Licence) and enhancement measures are discussed. 

SITE CONTEXT AND STATUS 

1.7 The former Brunel University Runnymede Campus is situated on Coopers Hill Lane, 

Englefield Green, Egham, Surrey. It is located about 2km southeast of Windsor and about 

1km northwest of Egham at Ordnance Survey Grid Reference SU 994721. The total area of 

the Site is approximately 27 hectares (ha) and the local planning authority is Runnymede 

Borough Council; the regional planning authority is Surrey County Council. 

1.8 The Site is within the Green Belt and is in an Area of Landscape Importance. Part of the 

north-eastern side of the Site is ancient woodland (Coopers Hill Wood) and a small area of 

the south-western side is protected by a Tree Preservation Order. (No. 168), with a number of 

additional trees along the southern boundary located within the Englefield Green 

Conservation Area.. 

1.9 To the west of the Campus is a well-wooded suburban district of large houses and 

institutions, including retirement homes. To the east is the Commonwealth Air Forces 

Memorial. To the north, between Cooper’s Hill and the river, is woodland and grassland 

which forms the National Trust’s Runnymede Estate. Although much of the floodplain has 

been subjected to agricultural improvement in the past, part of the valley floor is ecologically 

rich grassland. 

1.10 Immediately to the north east of the Runnymede Campus is Langham Pond SSSI. The SSSI 

includes floodplain meadows, wetlands and, on the hill slopes, broad-leaved woodland. 

1.11 Cooper’s Hill rises to about 75 m above sea level. The upper part of the Runnymede Campus 

is on well drained Bagshot Sands, which cover Claygate Beds and London Clay. Springs at 

the boundary between the sands and clays occur on the slope within the Campus. 

1.12 The slopes which separate the Runnymede Campus from Langham Pond proper support in 

semi-natural broadleaved woodland. The woodlands adjacent to the Runnymede Campus 

are mature oak and ash with hazel coppice and frequent sycamore. Larch and other conifers 

have been planted on the lower slopes. These woodlands are contiguous with the woodlands 

within the Runnymede Campus. 



4

CONSULTATION 

1.13 Natural England, the Environment Agency, Surrey Wildlife Trust, Runnymede Borough 

Council and Surrey County Council were contacted with details about the ecological survey 

and planned proposals for redevelopment at the Site. A request for any ecological 

information on the Site and its environment, their comments on the scope of our work, and 

suggestions for other potential contacts, was also made. 

DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 

1.14 The proposals are to demolish the majority of the buildings on the Site which comprise 

student accommodation, other educational buildings and a small science park constructed 

generally in the 1960s and which are now redundant. The Site will then be redeveloped to 

provide new student accommodation, private and affordable housing. A number of buildings 

(the Presidents Building, College Building, Pillar Hall, the Chapel, the Mews and the Club 

House) will be retained and refurbished to provide an extra care facility and additional 

residential accommodation. 



5

2 Legislation 

2.1 All species of bat are fully protected under The Conservation of Habitats and Species 

Regulations 2010 through their inclusion on Schedule 2. Regulation 40(1) prohibits: 

 

 

 

Deliberate killing, injuring or taking (capture) of Schedule 2 species (e.g. 

bats); 

Deliberate disturbance of bat species as: 

a) to impair their ability: 

(i) to survive, breed, or reproduce, or to rear or nurture young; 

(ii) to hibernate or migrate 

b) to affect significantly the local distribution or abundance of the species; 

and 

Damage or destruction of a breeding site or resting place. 

2.2 Bats are also currently protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as 

amended) through their inclusion on Schedule 5. Under this Act, they are additionally 

protected from: 

 

 

Intentional or reckless disturbance whilst occupying a place of shelter or 

protection; and 

Intentional or reckless obstruction of access to any place of shelter or 

protection. 

2.3 A European Protected Species (EPS) Licence issued by the relevant countryside 

agency (e.g. Natural England) will be required for works reasonably likely to result in 

one of the offences listed above (Natural England 2010). The licence is to allow 

derogation from the relevant legislation but also to enable appropriate mitigation 

measures to be put in place and their efficacy to be monitored. 

2.4 Though there is no case law to clarify the disturbance offences described above, the 

legislation may also be interpreted such that, in certain circumstances, important 

foraging areas and/or commuting routes can be regarded as being afforded de facto 

protection, for example, where it can be proven that the continued usage of such 

areas is crucial to maintaining the integrity and long-term viability of a bat roost or to 

the maintenance of the local conservation status of a population of bats. 



DERROGATIONS / THREE TESTS 

2.5 The species protection provision of the Habitats Regulations, contain three 

‚derogation tests‛ which must be applied by the Local Planning Authority when 

deciding whether to grant planning permission for a development that could harm a 

European Protective Species. The three tests are that: 

 

 

 

The activity to be licensed must be for imperative reasons of overriding public 

interest or for public health and safety; 

There must be no satisfactory alternative; and 

Favourable conservation status of the species must be maintained. 

2.6 It is the responsibility of the applicant to submit sufficient information to address 

these tests when applying for planning permission. 

NB: For development activities, a Natural England EPS Licence application can only 

be obtained after planning permission has been granted. However, the granting of 

planning permission does not guarantee that a licence will be issued by Natural 

England. 



3 Methodology 

OVERVIEW 

3.1 The bat surveys included the compilation of existing desk study records and a detailed field 

survey. 

DESK STUDY 

3.2 Existing records relating to the Site and a surrounding 1-2km radius were compiled from the 

following sources: 

 

 

The Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT); and 

Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC). 

3.3 It is important to note that, even where data is held, a lack of records for a defined 

geographical area does not necessarily mean that there is a lack of ecological interest; the 

area may be simply under-recorded. 

BUILDING ASSESSMENT 

3.4 An external and internal inspection of all buildings within the Site was carried out between 

the 23 rd and 28 th January 2008 and in 6 th April, 23 rd April and 12 th July 2010 to determine the 

potential for the buildings on site to support a bat roost(s). 

3.5 Bat field signs – droppings, feeding remains such as moth wings, scratch marks around 

suitable crevices and urine and fur oil stains - were searched for on the exterior of the 

buildings (exterior walls, window sills etc) and within the interior of the roof space. Potential 

bat access points into the buildings were also identified. 

3.6 The survey was carried out using close focusing binoculars, a high power torch, endoscope 

and inspection mirrors (as required). 

3.7 The survey methodology was based on the Bat Conservation Trust Bat Survey Guidelines 

(2007). 

TREE ASSESSMENT 

3.8 Detailed ground-level inspections of all trees within the development area were undertaken in 

May 2008 and January 2011 to assess their potential to support bat roosts. 

3.9 Features of potential value to roosting bats such as natural holes, cracks/splits in major 

limbs, loose bark, the presence of dense epicormic growth and/or ivy, were identified. Bat 



field signs, notably droppings, scratch marks and urine and fur oil staining around suitable 

crevices were also search for. The survey was carried out using close focusing binoculars, a 

high power torch, endoscope and inspection mirrors (as required). 

3.10 The tree evaluation was based on the Bat Conservation Trust Bat Survey Guidelines (2007) 

and Andrew Cowan, ArborEcology, 2006. 

3.11 According to the extent of positive habitat features, each tree was assigned a bat roost 

potential value. Target notes were reported for all trees and these records were cross 

referenced to the Tree Removal and Replacement Plan (Drawing no. TD526-03D in Appendix 

1). 

ASSESSMENT OF BAT FORAGING AND COMMUTING HABITAT 

3.12 The value of the Site and surrounding area to foraging bats was assessed according to the 

occurrence of habitats that typically support high insect populations such as edge and 

mosaic habitats, sheltered habitat features, broadleaved woodland/trees, hedgerows, grazed 

pasture, parkland and aquatic habitats. 

3.13 Linear features such as hedgerows, treelines and rivers, that offer potential commuting 

routes/flight lines for bats, were also identified with the aid of aerial photographs to assess 

the connectivity of the Site to suitable bat habitats within a 1km radius. 

EVENING BAT EMERGENCE AND DAWN RE-ENTRY SURVEYS 

3.14 A series of evening bat emergence and dawn re-entry surveys were carried out at the Site 

between 9th June and 19th August 2008 and updated between 13th May and 10th 

September 2010. 

3.15 The following buildings were included within the 2008 assessment: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Mansion – the College Building, President’s Building and the Clock Tower; 

The Chapel; 

The Mews; 

The Club House; 

The Science Block; 

The Workshop and Laundry; 

Halls of residence – Haywood’s Hall, Marshall Hall, Reed Hall, Rowan Hall, Bradley 

Hall, Williams Hall, Kimberley, Scriven’s Hall; and 



Other university buildings – the Refectory, Sports Hall, the Laboratory. 

3.16 The following buildings were surveyed in 2010: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Mansion – the College Building, President’s Building and the Clock Tower; 

The Chapel; 

The Mews; 

The Club House; 

The Science Block; 

Halls of residence – Haywood’s Hall, Marshall Hall, Reed Hall, Rowan Hall, Bradley Hall, 

Williams Hall, Kimberley, Scriven’s Hall; 

Other university buildings – the Laboratory; 

Gardners Cottages; 

Gatehouse; 

Principals; and 

Oak Lane Cottages. 

3.17 The surveys followed the Bat Conservation Trust – Bat Surveys – Best Practice Guidelines 

(BCT 2007) and at least one licensed bat ecologist (Licence No: 20083423) was in 

attendance during the surveys. 

3.18 Between two and four surveyors were employed for the surveys to ensure adequate 

coverage of the buildings and for health and safety reasons. The evening emergence surveys 

commenced at least 15 minutes before sunset and lasted for at least 1 hour after sunset. The 

dawn re-entry surveys commenced at least 1.5 hours before sunrise and lasted until sunrise 

or until bat activity ceased. 

3.19 All surveyors were equipped with a BatBox Duet heterodyne and frequency division bat 

detectors and a hand held recorder (Edirol R-09). Recordings made were analysed using 

BatSound Software and interpreted according to Russ (2004). 

LIMITATIONS 

3.20 The following survey limitations are acknowledged: 



The building assessment in 2008 was undertaken outside of the bat activity period 

(May to September) and therefore any field signs such as droppings on the exterior of 

the building are likely to have been removed as a result of wind and rain. This was 

rectified with the 2010 building inspection carried out in May; and 

The tree assessment undertaken in 2008 was carried out in June, outside of the 

optimum survey period (November to April). Trees were in leaf and therefore some 

potential bat roosting features may have been obscured. This was rectified with the 

2011 tree survey carried out in January. 

3.21 It is noted, however, that the above limitations do not affect the conclusions reached in this 

Bat Assessment report or Chapter 12 of the ES, as sufficient baseline bat data has been 

collected to enable a robust assessment to be undertaken. 

3.22 It should be further noted that the future survey work identified and recommended in this 

report is to inform the EPS licence that will need to be applied for and that sufficient baseline 

data on bats has been collected to enable a robust assessment to be undertaken of the 

potential impacts of the proposed development on bats and to allow an assessment of 

whether the scheme will maintain bats in a favourable conservation status as required by the 

Habitats Regulations 2010. 



4 Survey results 

DESK STUDY 

4.1 The SWT data search (2007) revealed records of four bat species within the 2km 

search area; noctule, pipistrelle, serotine and brown long-eared bats. No additional 

desk based study was carried out in 2010 as it was unlikely that this would include 

additional data. 

BUILDING ASSESSMENT 

4.2 Internal and/or external inspection of all buildings within the Site were carried out in 

2008 and 2010 to identify the occurrence of bat roosts within the buildings and to 

assess the potential value of the buildings to summer and winter roosting bats. 

Photographs were taken during the assessment and are presented in Appendix 2 and 

cross-referenced within the descriptive text below. The visual inspections provide an 

assessment of the suitability of the buildings to support bat roosts. A low suitability 

does not mean than bats will be absent, rather that their presence, or the presence of 

an important roost is not as likely. 

THE PRESIDENTS HALL, COLLEGE BUILDINGS AND CLOCK TOWER 

4.3 The Presidents Hall comprises a complex of Gothic style buildings that date back to 

the 12th Century and included the College Building, the President’s Hall and the 

Clock Tower. 

4.4 The College Building (see Appendix 2, Photograph 1) is a four storey brick building 

with multiple pitched roof that was covered with slates. The roof was in a good state 

of repair and no potential bat access points into the building or under the roofing 

materials were identified from the external inspection. However, due to the size and 

height of the building not all areas of the roof were visible, and the potential for 

access points to be available for bats to enter into the roof voids or between the 

roofing materials could not be discounted. 

4.5 An internal inspection of the roof spaces of the College Building revealed that this 

had been divided up into several units by fire doors. One of the roof spaces showed 

signs of significant water damage and the chip-boarding that lined the interior of the 

roof was partially collapsed. It also supported windows at the northern and southern 

elevations and was well lit by natural light. Pigeons were nesting within this roof 

space on the date of survey, but no bats or bat evidence was found. Overall this 

section of the roof was assessed as being of negligible value to bats. 



4.6 Part of the roof space above the College Building housed a number of service units 

and only a shallow void, with a floor to apex height of less than one metre, was 

present here. The interior of the roof was well sealed with timber sarking which 

restricted opportunities for bats to enter into the roof spaces. No bats or evidence of 

bats was found but the possibility of bats roosting between the roofing materials 

(slates, bitumen felt and timber sarking) could not be discounted. This section of the 

building was assessed as offering low potential to support crevice roosting bat 

species and warranted further investigation during emergence and/or dawn re-entry 

surveys. 

4.7 The Clock Tower (see Appendix 2, Photograph 2) is a five storey tower with a pitched 

roof that was covered with slates. The Clock Tower joined the College building to the 

east. The roof was supported by four king-post style beam structures and the 

interior was lined with timber sarking throughout. Numerous dead flies were present 

within the void to suggest recent insecticide use. No bats or bat evidence was 

discovered and no obvious bat access points were identified. Bat roosting 

opportunities are therefore most likely to be associated with crevice features 

between the roofing materials (slates, bitumen felt and timber sarking). 

4.8 The President’s Hall is a three storey brick building with multiple pitched roofs that 

are covered with slates (see Appendix 2, Photograph 3). The building comprised 

sash style windows throughout and there was considerable damage to the brickwork 

around several of the windows which offered potential crawl spaces for bats to roost. 

4.9 The interior of the roof was lined with traditional bitumen felt and timber sarking. 

However, gaps were identified between the timber boards, in particular within the 

northern part of the roof, and these openings offered potential access for bats into 

the roof space. There were also opportunities for bats to access the space between 

the slates and bitumen felting. 

4.10 More than fifty long-eared bat droppings were discovered within the roof space 

above the main entrance in 2008, towards the western section of the building (see 

Appendix 2, Photograph 4). A pile of fresh (less than one year old) and old droppings 

were found beneath the ridge and central supporting beam, and a scatter of 

dropping was found throughout the roof space. Based on the number, colour and 

location of droppings it was concluded that the roof void provided a roost site for a 

low numbers of long-eared bats (less than 10) and that there is potential for the 

building to support a maternity colony. This was confirmed in 2010 surveys when a 

similar number of brown long eared droppings were recorded. 



4.11 The eastern section of President’s Hall was assessed as being unsuitable for roosting 

bats, primarily because no bats or bat evidence was found and the building was well 

used by pigeons, such that the interior of the roof was covered by a layer of bird 

droppings (see Appendix 2, Photograph 5). Other sections of the roof had skylights 

and were well lit by natural light. These were also assessed as being of negligible 

value as a day roost site for bats. 

THE CHAPEL 

4.12 The Chapel is a two storey brick building with a pitched slated roof with four skylights 

(see Appendix 2, Photograph 6). The slates appeared to be in good condition, and no 

significant potential bat access points were identified. Two pitched porch entrances 

were present at the north-west and south-east of the Chapel and offered some 

potential as a sheltered bat feeding or night roost site, but no bat evidence was 

found here to confirm use in 2008. However, in 2010 Pipistrelle sp. droppings were 

recorded externally confirming its use as a roost. 

4.13 An internal inspection of the building revealed that the building was open plan from 

floor to roof height and partially lit by natural light. The roof was close boarded with 

timbers, which were all well sealed and likely to restrict bats from entering into the 

main area of the building. No bats or evidence of bats were found within the building 

to confirm bat presence. Previous anecdotal evidence from 2007 suggested that a 

small number of brown long eared droppings had been found inside the Chapel. 

However, this was not confirmed in 2008 or in 2010 and is considered unlikely. 

4.14 The basement of the Chapel was accessed via a door to the east. The basement 

offered cold, stable and humid conditions that were assessed as being of potential 

value to hibernating bats. However, the structure was well sealed and no bat access 

points were identified. No bats or bat evidence was found to confirm use by bats. 

4.15 The porch to the Chapel was confirmed as containing a bat roost. However the rest 

of the building was assessed as having low potential to support summer and winter 

roosting bats. 

THE MEWS 

4.16 The Mews is a one and two storey brick building with a pitched roof that was covered 

by slates. At the centre of the building is a courtyard (see Appendix 2, Photograph 7). 



4.17 The building supported three roof voids. The roof structure comprised a simple beam 

and rafter structure and the interior of the roof was lined with traditional bitumen felt. 

There was glass-fibre insulation covering the floor. 

4.18 Cobwebs were present along the ridge, and particularly at the gable ends. Potential 

access points for bats were identified and there was evidence of use by mice and 

squirrels. No bats or bat evidence was found to confirm the presence of a bat roost 

within northern and western voids however, one bat dropping was found within the 

eastern void. 

4.19 Bat droppings were found on a window sill at the eastern elevation of the building 

and on the planted shrubbery below in June 2008. There was a gap between the 

fascia board and the exterior wall at this location which provided a suitable crawl 

space for bats. Further droppings were found in 2010 confirming the presence of a 

bat roost in this building. 

THE CLUB HOUSE 

4.20 The Club House is a two storey brick building with a half hipped tiled roof. There is 

no separate roof void associated with this building and the roof was well sealed by 

timber sarking. 

4.21 There was damage to the brickwork around the drainage pipes at the north-east 

corner and along the northern elevation of the building which offered potential access 

for bats to the wall plate. There was evidence of use by nesting/ roosting birds at 

several of these access points however at the north-east corner the wall plate was 

free from bird droppings (see Appendix 2, Photograph 8). 

4.22 This building was assessed as offering low to moderate potential to support roosting 

bats in 2008. However, in 2010 an external inspection found common pipistrelle 

droppings on the wall outside this building and a roost was therefore confirmed. 

THE SCIENCE BLOCK 

4.23 This is a single storey brick building with a multiple pitched and sloping roof that is 

covered by slates. The north-eastern section of the building supported hanging tiles 

and gaps between the tiles offered potential roosting features of value to crevice 

dwelling bats (see Appendix 2, Photograph 9). No bats were found under the tiles 

and no droppings were discovered to confirm the presence of a bat roost. However, 

given that the survey was undertaken outside of the bat activity season, any bat 

evidence was likely to have been lost. 



4.24 An internal inspection of the central section of the roof void found no bats or 

evidence of bats but potential access points into the roof space were identified at the 

eaves. The void was interconnected with two roof spaces to the east and west. 

These could not be fully investigated due to health and safety concerns. The roof in 

these sections comprised a queen post style structure and there was timber/chip 

board sarking throughout. Windows were present at either end of the voids, and they 

were partially lit by natural light. 

4.25 Although no bat evidence was found within the central roof void, the potential for 

bats to use the eastern and western voids could not be discounted from the 2008 

survey, particularly since potential access points into the roof space were identified. 

Additionally there is low potential for bats to be roosting beneath roofing materials. 

4.26 The building was assessed as having moderate potential to support a bat roost in 

2008. 2007 surveys identified this building as potentially supporting a Myotis sp. 

roost. However an external inspection in 2010 found droppings on a wall which could 

have been either Pipistrelle spp. or Myotis spp. And so while confirming the presence 

of roost, could not confirm the species present. Table 1, Paragraphs 4.51-2 and the 

data Appendix 5 provide further information on this building and conclusions from 

the emergence surveys. 

THE WORKSHOP AND LAUNDRY 

4.27 The Workshop is a single storey brick building with a pitched roof that is covered 

with slates. There is a single storey flat roof extension to the south (see Appendix 2, 

Photograph 10). 

4.28 Damage to the roof and the exterior brickwork offered potential crawl spaces that 

could be used as a roost site for single or low numbers of bats, but no bat evidence 

was discovered on the 2008 surveys to confirm use. 

4.29 Access to the interior of the building was not possible in 2008. 

4.30 A basement was located to the east part of the building. This housed the services to 

the building. No bats or bat evidence was found within the basement and no access 

points were identified. The basement was assessed as being unsuitable as a bat 

hibernation site. 



HALLS OF RESIDENCE 

4.31 Haywoods Hall is a two storey brick building with a flat roof (see Appendix 2, 

Photograph 11). The building was in a good state of repair and no features of value 

to roosting bats were identified from the external inspection in 2008 or 2010. 

4.32 Marshall, Reed, Rowan and Bradley Halls at the western section of the development 

area are three and four storey brick buildings with multiple pitched metal roofs (see 

Appendix 2, Photograph 12). They did not support a roof void and potential roosting 

features were limited to gaps between the fascias and the exterior wall which offered 

potential crawl spaces for single or low numbers of crevices dwelling bat species. 

These buildings were assessed as being of low value to roosting bats in 2008 and 

2010. 

4.33 Williams Hall is a three storey brick building with a flat and multiple pitched metal 

roof. There was no separate roof void and potential roosting features were limited to 

gaps between the fascias and exterior wall. The building was assessed as being of 

low value to single or low numbers of crevice dwelling bats in 2008 and 2010. 

4.34 Kimberley is a brick building with a multiple pitched roof that is covered by slates. 

Part of the roof supports skylights (see Appendix 2, Photograph 13). There is no 

separate roof void. Potential roosting features are limited to minor crevices within the 

brickwork and gaps between the fascias and exterior wall. The building was 

assessed as being of low value to single or low numbers of roosting bats in 2008. 

However an external inspection in 2010 found small numbers of pipistrelle sp 

droppings which confirmed its use as a roost. 

4.35 Scriven’s Hall is a four storey brick building with a flat bitumen felted roof. The fascia 

boarding and soffits all appeared to be well sealed and no potential roosting features 

were identified. Overall the building was assessed as being of negligible value to 

roosting bats in 2008 and 2010 (though see emergence survey results in 2010). 

OTHER UNVERSITY BUILDINGS 

4.36 The Refectory Building is a one and two storey building that comprised brick, metal 

and glass (see Appendix 2, Photograph 14). There was an inward sloping roof at the 

centre of the building and a number of single storey flat roofed extensions to the east 

and west. No separate roof void was present above the central part of the building 

and it was well lit by natural light. No suitable bat roosting features were identified on 

the exterior of the building and it was assessed as being of negligible value to 




4.37 The Gym is a two storey brick building with a flat bitumen felted roof. The building 

comprised an open structure between floor and roof height and any potential roof 

void is likely to be narrow (

of the main house. A gap was identified at the northern gable end which offered a 

potential access point for bats into the roof space. It was assessed as having low 

value to support a bat roost and warranted further investigation in 2008 and 2010. 

4.42 Oak Lane Cottage is a two storey brick building with a multiple pitched roof that is 

covered with clay tiles (see Appendix 2, Photograph 19). There were skylights along 

the southern section of the property which suggested that there was no separate roof 

void associated with at least part of the building. Several tiles were slightly raised 

and or lose. These have the potential to provide access for bats between the roofing 

materials. Further investigation by bat evening emergence and dawn re-entry survey 

was recommended in 2008. Internal inspection in 2010 found small numbers of 

brown long eared and pipistrelle sp. droppings confirming its use as a roost. 

TREE ASSESSMENT 

4.43 Trees, hedges and tree and shrub habitat to be removed as part of the 

redevelopment proposals are shown in Appendix 1. Owing ot the changes in tree 

removal plans between 2008 and 2010, only the 2010 results are discussed below as 

these are most relevant to the proposed development. 3. 

4.44 One tree (T132) that is proposed for removal was assessed in 2010 as having high 

potential to support roosting bats. Four trees (T123, T79, T74 and T174) were 

assessed as of moderate potential for bat roosts and five trees (T226, T169, T176, 

T145 and T147) were of low potential. One tree close to Oak Lane Cottages was also 

assessed as of low potential for bat roosts, although it was not possible to identify its 

number owing to the dense growth. 

4.45 To the south of Haywoods Hall was a monolith oak (T198) that was assessed as 

being of moderate potential value as a bat roost site in 2008. This dead tree was 

assessed during the emergence surveys in 2007, but use by bats was not confirmed. 

ASSESSMENT OF ON-SITE BAT FORAGING AND COMMUTING HABITAT 

4.46 Several groups of trees within the development area were identified as offering 

foraging potential to bats. These included the avenue of limes T199 to T203 together 

with T211, T212 and T213; the group of trees to the rear of the Principal’s House; the 

sheltered tree and scrub habitat to the rear of the Gatehouse/Lodge (H218 to G233 

together with T239 to T241; see Appendix 2, Photograph 20) and the rear of the 

Science Block (see Appendix 2, Photograph 21); scattered trees over grassland T171 

to G183 and T137 to T146; and the treeline of predominantly sweet chestnuts, horse 

chestnuts and limes adjacent to the woodland (T59 to H84). 



4.47 With the exception of the tree and scrub habitat to the rear of the Science Block and 

some of the scattered trees within the grassland, these habitats will be unaffected by 

the current development proposals. 

4.48 Numerous opportunities for bat roosting, foraging and commuting were also 

identified within the grounds of the campus but outside of the development area. 

Several veteran and mature trees within the grounds of the campus supported 

significant cavities that were of value to roosting bats. The expanse of grassland to 

the north-west of the site offered suitable foraging habitat for hawking bat species 

such as noctules and the woodland to the north-east of the site offered dense habitat 

for value to gleaning bat species such as Myotis sp. and long-eared bats. The 

hedgerows and treelines within the campus site offered suitable foraging habitat for 

edge feeding species such as pipistrelles and serotines. 

4.49 The Site is well connected by hedgerows and treelines to high quality bat foraging 

habitat associated with the National Trust Runnymede Estate to the north, Windsor 

Great Park to the west, Langham Ponds SSSI to the north-east and the Wraysbury 

and Hythe End SSSI SPA to the north-east. 

4.50 The Runnymede Campus offers high quality bat habitat and this was confirmed 

during the surveys when up to eight species of bat were recorded feeding within the 

grounds. 

EVENING BAT EMERGENCE AND DAWN RE-ENTY SURVEYS 

4.51 The results of the 2008 and 2010 emergence surveys are summarised in Table 1 

below. These confirm the presence of three species of bats roosting within the 

buildings and eight species foraging. Columns 4 and 5 of this table provide dates and 

times of activity associated with roosts at each building; mostly confirmed and 

possible entry/emergence, but also swarming close to sunrise or flights near 

buildings with a lack of echo location close to sunset or sunrise. Detailed survey data 

from 2008 and 2010 are presented in Appendix 5. 

4.52 The reuslts indiciate that the number of casual roosts within the main campus has 

increased slightly between 2008 and 2010, perhaps resulting from the lack of human 

presence. However much of the increase can be explained by the inclusion of the 

Gate House, Oak Lane Cottages, the Principal’s House and the Gardener’s Cottage 

within the 2010, but not the 2008 surveys. The locations of bat roosts identified are 

presented in the Bat Roost Location Map in Appendix 4. The Myotis sp. and serotine 

roosts provisionally identified in 2007 are also displayed on the Location Map, 



although these were not confirmed in 2008 or 2010 and it is considered unlikely that 

they are present. The surveys confirmed the presence of summer bat roosts within 

18 buildings on-site and maternity roosts in two buildings. 



Table 1: 2008 and 2010 Bat Survey Results 

Building (bat roost potential) Species Roost Type 2010 Evidence 2008 Evidence 

Presidents Hall building Brown long-eared bat Small maternity colony (

Kimberley (low) Common pipistrelle Summer roost (c. 3 animals) External inspection – 

droppings found 

13 th May S1 – 21.07 

13 th May S3 – 21.04, 21.05, 

21.07 

18 th June S1 – 04.27 

Clock Tower (Low) Brown long-eared bat Summer roost (≤3 animals) Internal Inspection – 


25 th May S4 – 04.24 

9 th Sep S1 – 20.53 

10 th Sep S1 – 05.49 

Soprano pipistrelle Summer roost (≤3 animals) Internal Inspection – 


25 th May S3 – 04.17, 04.26 

9 th Sep S2 – 19.50 

15 th July S3 – 21.30 

6 th Aug S1 – 04.59, 05.03 

College Building (Low) Brown long-eared bat Summer roost (≤3 animals) Internal and External 

Inspection – droppings found 

24 th Aug S3 – 05.19 

9 th Sep S1 – 20.53 

9 th Sep S3 – 20.01 

10 th Sep S1 – 06.09 

Gate House (Moderate) Pipistrellus sp. Summer roost (≤3 animals) Internal Inspection – old 


Brown long-eared bat 10 th Sep S1 – 04.44 

Principal’s House (Low) Pipistrellus sp. Summer roost (≤3 animals) Internal Inspection – old 


Brown long-eared bat 17 th June S1 – 22.08 

10 th Sep S1 – 04.44 

10 th Sep S3 – 05.15 

Scriven’s hall (negligible) Soprano pipistrelle Summer roost (c. 2 animals) 3 rd Sep S1 – 05.45 

The Clubhouse (Low/Mod) Common pipistrelle Summer roost (c. 1 animal) External inspection – 


14 th June S2 – 21.36 

Science Block (Mod) Pipistrellus sp. Summer roost (≤5 animals) External inspection – 

droppings found (species 

unsure, but likely to Pipistrellus 

10 th June S1 – 04.08, 04.27 



23

sp.) 

Gardeners Cottage (Low) Common pipistrelle Summer roost (c. 1 animal) 02 nd Sep S1 – 20.07 

Oak Lane Cottages (Mod) Brown long-eared bats Summer roost (c. 3 animals) Internal inspection – droppings 

found 

12 th July S2 – 22.07 

31 st Aug S1 – 21.02 

1 st Sep S1 – 04.19 

Common & Soprano pipistrelle Summer roost (c. 5 animals) Internal inspection – droppings 

found 

12 th July S2 – 21.14, 21.40 

12 th July S3 – 21.27 

12 th July S3 – 22.24 

31 st Aug S1 – 19.59, 20.09, 

20.16, 20.31, 

31 st Aug S2 – 19.58, 20.08, 

20.23, 

31 st Aug S3 – 20.07 

31 st Aug S4 – 20.10, 20.18 

1 st Sep S1 – 05.28, 05.29, 

05.34, 05.49. 

1 st Sep S3 – 05.39, 05.53 



24

5 Conclusions and recommendations 

CONCLUSIONS 

PRESIDENT’S BUILDING AND THE MEWS 

5.1 The surveys confirmed the presence of a maternity roost for brown long-eared bats 

and summer roosts for common and soprano pipistrelle within the President’s Hall 

building. 

5.2 The Mews was also confirmed to support a maternity colony of common and 

soprano pipistrelle bats containing up to 100 individuals. 

KIMBERLEY, THE LABORATORY, ROWAN HALL, REED HALL, WILLIAMS HALL, BRADLEY 

HALL, SCRIVENS HALL, GARDENER’S COTTAGE, OAK LANE COTTAGE AND THE 

CHAPEL 

5.3 These buildings were confirmed or reasonably likely to provide summer roost sites 

for low numbers of common pipistrelle, soprano pipistrelle and brown long eared 

bats bats in 2010. 


5.4 The building inspection confirmed the presence of a roost through droppings. 

However, the 2007 surveys identified these as Myotis sp. However both the 2008 and 

2010 surveys were unsure as to this identification. The emergence surveys did not 

confirm any species entering this building, but due to the respective levels of activity 

of Myotis spp. and pipstrelle spp. within the site it is likely that the roost supports 

pipistrelles. 

GATE HOUSE AND THE PRINCIAPAL’S 

5.5 These buildings were confirmed as roosts, but as only old droppings were found 

internally in 2010, the roof voids were not confirmed as in current use. However, 

activity associated with roosts was recorded at both buildings in 2010 suggesting 

summer use by low numbers of bats. 

OTHER BUILDINGS ON-SITE 

5.6 No evidence of roosting bats was discovered within Marshall Hall, Haywoods Hall, 

the Refectory, the Laundry or the Gym 

TREE REMOVAL AND MANAGEMENT WORKS 

5.7 11 trees (T132, T123, T79, T74, T174, T226, T169, T176, T145, T147 and a tree near 

Oak Lane Cottage) that had high to low potential to support roosting bats are 



25

proposed for removal for development or arboricultural reasons. The presence or 

absence of roosting bats within these structures could not be confirmed from this 

survey. 

BUILDING ROOSTS: POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT 

5.8 Proposals to refurbish the Presidents Building and the Mews could result in the 

destruction/obstruction of roost sites. If there is a significant delay between the 2010 

surveys and the proposed timings of works, further surveys may need to be 

completed prior to the commencement of any refurbishment works in order to obtain 

up to date information to inform an appropriate mitigation strategy and EPS licence 

application . The type and scheduling of these surveys are described in Section 

5.21. 

5.9 Proposals to refurbish the Chapel and demolish Kimberley, The Laboratory, Rowan 

Hall, Reed Hall, Williams Hall, & Bradley Hall, Scrivens Hall and The Principal’s 

House, Gate House, the Gardener’s Cottage and Oak Lane Cottage are reasonably 

likely to result in the destruction of roost sites and could cause disturbance and/or 

killing or injury to bats. These works can therefore only be legally carried out under 

license from Natural England. 

5.10 Planning permission will need to be obtained before a Natural England licence can be 

applied for. In order to comply with the Habitats Directive as implemented by the 

Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, planning permission will 

only be granted if the proposed activities meet the three derogation tests described 

in Sections 2.6 and 2.7. 

5.11 Following the granting of planning permission, a Natural England EPS Licence will 

need to be submitted to and approved by Natural England prior to the 

commencement of works that are reasonably likely to impact upon bats and/or their 

roost sites. A Natural England EPS licence application will need to be supported by a 

Reasoned Statement that clearly describes how the three derogation tests (see 

Section 2.6 and 2.7) have been met (produced by the applicant), in addition to a 

method statement (produced by an ecologist on behalf of the applicant) which 

describes the program of works, and mitigation and enhancement measures that 

seek to ensure that ‘the favourable conservation status of the species is maintained’. 

Recommendations for the mitigation and enhancement measures which, following 

approval by the applicant, are likely to form part of the method statement are 

described in Sections 5.28 to 5.31. 



26

TREE REMOVAL AND MANAGEMENT WORKS 

5.12 Hollows in trees are used by a wide variety of bat species and natural cavities can be 

used by bats as a gathering site in spring, a maternity roost in summer, a mating 

place in autumn and a hibernation site during the winter. Tree roost sites are a limited 

resource and generally habitat features of high value to roosting bats are formed over 

a long period of time and consequently they cannot be readily replaced. Where 

possible, steps should be taken to ensure that trees with high or moderate bat 

roosting potential are not destroyed. In particular, trees to be removed for 

arboricultural reasons should be retained by reducing the crown or retaining the tree 

as a monolith (to minimise the health and safety risks), and features of interest to 

roosting bats (such as rot holes) should not be destroyed. 

5.13 If retention of these trees is not possible, further surveys and precautionary measures 

will need to be carried for those of moderate or high potential and precautionary 

measures for those of low potential in order to avoid a breach in the bat legislation. 

LIGHTING PROPOSALS 

5.14 The current levels of lighting associated with the Site are low. Research has found 

that bats are sensitive to artificial lighting and that excessive lighting can delay bats 

from emerging, thus shortening the time available for foraging, as well as causing 

bats to move away from suitable foraging grounds or roost sites, to alternative dark 

areas (Jones 2000). It is therefore recommended that where possible, measures to 

minimise the level of lighting on-site should be considered within the design plans. 

5.15 Advice on the type and extent of lighting that should be installed at the Site to ensure 

that this is successfully achieved is provided in Sections 5.33 to 5.41. 

LANDSCAPING PROPOSALS 

5.16 Landscaping proposals for the new development should seek to enhance the value 

of the Site for wildlife. Recommendations for planting proposals that could be 

incorporated within the landscaping designs are described in Sections 5.37 to 5.41. 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

FURTHER SURVEYS - BUILDINGS 

5.20 The need for further surveys is dependent upon the timing of demolition and 

renovation works. These timings are understood to include demolition of all relevant 

buildings with renovation of the Mews in 2011. Rennovation of the President’s Hall 

complex is due to take place between 2012 and 2013. 



27

FURTHER SURVEYS - TREES 

5.21 If retention of trees with high or moderate bat roosting potential is not possible (T132, 

T123, T79, T74, T174), or where tree management works will result in the loss of a 

potential bat roost feature(s), the following procedures should be carried out in order 

to comply with the bat legislation and to avoid impacts to roosting bats: 

 

Surveys of trees identified as having high or moderate potential to support 

roosting bats should comprise a minimum of one dusk and one dawn visit 

between May and September to assess the presence or likely absence of a 

bat summer roost. Alternatively/additionally, trees should be climbed or 

accessed by cherry picker and all suitable bat roosting features inspected by 

endoscope. These surveys should be carried out by a suitably qualified 

ecologist; 

 

If these surveys reveal that a bat roost is present, any works to the tree that 

are likely to impact on a bat roost, or cause death, injury or a significant 

disturbance to roosting bats can only be legally carried out under licence 

from Natural England. A licence application would need to include a detailed 

method statement, reasoned statement and mitigation strategy for the 

proposed works, and further survey data may be required to obtain sufficient 

information to assess the impact of the proposed works on bats at a local, 

regional and national level; 

 

If no evidence of a bat roost is confirmed from the above surveys, as a 

precaution, given that bats are highly mobile animals that use a number of 

roost sites within and between years, any trees with high or moderate 

potential to support a bat roost should be re-inspected by a suitably qualified 

ecologist with an endoscope and/or dawn survey (as appropriate) 

immediately prior to the commencement of tree works. If bats are 

discovered, works should be postponed until a European Protected Species 

licence application has been submitted to and approved by Natural England. 

If no evidence of bats is discovered, works can proceed; 

 

The trunks or stems of any trees identified as having potential to support 

roosting bats should be sectioned and lowered to the ground, rather than 

clear felled, and left on site for at least 48 hours; 

 

If ivy is present, this should be cut at the base and the tree should be 

inspected following die back. Alternatively, the ivy should be removed with 



28

care in sections and any crevice features inspected for bats prior to felling or 

tree works; 

 

Tree works should be carried out under the instruction of a suitably qualified 

ecologist. They should ideally be undertaken outside of the bat breeding and 

hibernation seasons (i.e. between 14th September and 1st of November). 

The bird nesting season should also be avoided (February to August 

inclusive). Works should only be carried out under suitable weather 

conditions (i.e. when the weather is dry and the temperature is ≥10°C); and 

 

If bats are found during works, further works should be stopped immediately 

and should not continue until a licensed bat ecologist has been informed and 

provided advice on how best to proceed. 

5.23 The following precautionary measures should be undertaken prior to and during 

works to trees identified as having low potential to support a bat roost (T226, T169, 

T176, T145, T147 and a tree near to Oak Lane Cottage): 

 

Tree surgeons should be briefed by a suitably qualified bat ecologist on the 

bat legislation, where bats might roost within trees and what to do if bats are 

found, prior to the commencement of tree works; 

 

Trees with low bat roost potential should be climbed and any splits or 

cavities associated with stems >10cm diameter should be inspected by a 

tree surgeon prior to works, to assess the extent of the cavity spaces and the 

presence of bats; 

 

If works involve only the removal of minor stems

conditions (i.e. when the weather is dry and the nighttime temperature is 

≥consistently at or above 10°C); and 

 

If bats are found, works should be stopped immediately and further advice 

sought from a licensed bat ecologist. NB: Any works to a tree that are likely 

to impact on a bat roost or cause death, injury or a significant disturbance to 

roosting bats can only be legally carried out under licence from Natural 

England. 

APPLICATION FOR A NATURAL ENGLAND EPS LICENCE 

5.24 A licence from Wildlife Management and Licensing Service, Natural England, will be 

required in order to allow prohibited activities, such as disturbing bats or damaging 

their breeding sites or resting places, for the purpose of development. Based on the 

current survey data for the site, substantial refurbishment works to the President’s 

Hall building, the Mews, the Chapel and demolition works to the Kimberley, The 

Laboratory, Rowan Hall, Reed Hall, Williams Hall, Bradley Hall, Scrivens Hall and 

The Principal’s House, the Science Block, Gatehouse, the Gardener’s Cottage and 

Oak Lane Cottage can only be legally carried out once a licence application has 

been submitted to and approved by Natural England. 

5.25 The derogation tests described in Section 2 should have been addressed within the 

planning application to the Local Planning Authority (see Sections 5.9 and 5.10) but 

will also need to be reaffirmed in more detail by the applicant within the Reason 

Statement as part of the licence. 

5.26 The licence application will also need to include a Method Statement (produced by 

the commissioned ecologist on behalf of the applicant). This will contain a detailed 

mitigation strategy that describes the proposed course of action and timing of works 

for the demolition, restoration and/or construction phases as well as the remedial 

methods that will be adopted to minimise adverse impacts to bats during the redevelopment 

works and post-development. It must provide details of compensatory 

measures to ensure minimal or no net loss of bat habitats in the long-term. 

Enhancement measures that seek to improve the value of the site for bats in the longterm 

should also be included as well as provisions for future monitoring of the bat 

populations at the site. 



30

MITIGATION STRATEGY TO ENSURE FAVOURABLE CONSERVATION STATUS – RE- 

ROOFING WORKS AND RESTORATION OF ROOST SITES WITHIN BUILDINGS 

5.27 In order to ensure that ‘the development proposal will not be detrimental to the 

maintenance of the population of the species concerned at a favourable conservation 

status in their natural range’ it is recommended that restoration works to the roofs 

(including soffits and fascias), cavity walls, and windows of the President’s building, 

The Mews, and the Chapel should be carried out in a manner that minimizes 

disturbances to bats and ensures that the existing roost sites are maintained. These 

works can only be legally carried out under licence from Natural England. 

5.28 The following measures will be adopted where appropriate to minimise the likelihood 

of disturbance to hibernating and summer roosting bats during refurbishment works 

to these buildings: 

 

 

 

 

 

A licensed bat worker would meet with contractors before refurbishment works 

commence and brief workers on where bats might be found. They will be 

informed of the bat legislation and made aware that if bats are found, works 

must stop in that area until a licensed bat ecologist has been informed and has 

given advice on how best to proceed; 

Any works to the roof, or activities that are likely to obstruct access by bats into 

a roof space or cause disturbance to bats (such as timber treatment, the erection 

of scaffolding or the demolition or construction of new extensions to the 

buildings) will be carried out in accordance with best practice guidance; 

An Anabat Bat Detector will be left within any roof voids for up to one week prior 

to the commencement of works to assess the presence or likely absence of bats. 

A dawn survey and/or visual check by endoscope of all crevice features within 

the interior of the roof voids and associated with the exterior of the building 

where past evidence of bats has been discovered, will also be carried out by a 

licensed bat ecologist immediately prior to the commencement of works; 

If bats are found they will be excluded from the building before works are 

allowed to proceed; 

Bats will be excluded from the roof voids by sealing off of all access points to the 

roof space following the emergence of bats from the roost site and a visual 

check of the building, (including an investigation of any crevice features by 

endoscope), to ensure that bats have left the roost. Heavy duty polythene will be 

places around roost entrance, within soffits or openings to prevent bats reentering. 

Bats will be excluded from roosts located under roof tiles by removing 

these tiles or sealing the gap beneath them with heavy duty polythene; 



31

Any exclusion works would be carried out by a suitably qualified bat ecologist, 

prior the commencement of works and only under favourable weather conditions 

(when nighttime temperatures are above 10°C and weather conditions are dry). 

Refurbishment works would only proceed if no bats are discovered and would 

be carried out immediately following the successful exclusion of bats; 

Any re-roofing works will involve soft-strip dismantling of the structures (i.e. by 

hand). This will include the removal by hand of any roof tiles, roofing felt, timber 

sarking, timber beams and soffits that need to be removed/replaced. Best 

practice will be followed to avoid disturbance, killing or injury to bats and all 

roofing stripping works will be carried out under favourable weather conditions 

(≥10°C and dry) and supervised by a suitably qualified ecologist. If bats are 

found, further work to the building would cease and would not continue until a 

licensed bat ecologist has given advice on how best to proceed i.e. until the bats 

have dispersed on their own accord or have been successfully excluded from the 

buildings; 

Any new or old timbers will be treated with substances that are non-toxic to bats 

such as those that comprise a copper, zinc or boron compound in emulsion or 

aqueous solution as recommended by Natural England; 

Where roofs are to be relined, traditional bitumen and Hessian roofing felt will be 

used in preference to breathable membranes. The use of bitumen felting should 

ensure that the environmental conditions within the roof space are stable and 

that the roof space is weather proof; 

Bat access points into the roof voids will be restored by the inclusion of vertical 

bat access slots (20 x 100mm) set below the gable apex, at the ridge (20 x 

100mm gaps spaced at c.3 metre intervals), and approximately half of the way 

down the roof slopes under tiles/slates (20 x 100mm gaps spaced at c.5 metre 

intervals); 

Where soffits are included within the re-roofing works bat access into this void 

will be provided via 20 x 100mm slots at the soffit/eaves spaced at 3-5metre 

intervals; 

Ideally the fascias/soffits associated with the existing roost sites will be retained. 

However, where this is not possible, they will be suitably replaced with like for 

like materials and the cavity space between these and the exterior walls will be 

retained; 

In order to provide additional roosting opportunities within the roof spaces, no 

less than 5 wooden wedges will be installed within each of the roof voids at 

varying heights (1m upwards). These will comprise lengths of timber (about 200 



32

mm long) with a width of between 150 mm to 300 mm across. They will be hung 

flush to the roof wall at the top and have no less than a 20mm gap at the base. 

They will be attached to blocks/wedges so that the sides are sealed. At least 2 

artificial mortise joints will also be installed within each of the roof voids; 

Loft hatches to the retained roof spaces containing bats within the Presidnet’s 

Hall will be no more than 500 x 500mm in size to restrict future access and use 

of these voids for storage, thus ensuring an unobstructed flight space for bats 

within the lofts; and 

Following completion of the works, roof voids will be surveyed at least twice over 

a five year period, post-development by a suitably qualified bat ecologist. 

Ladders, high power torches, inspection mirrors and an endoscope will be used 

during the roof void inspection. Emergence and/or dawn re-entry surveys will be 

carried out between May and September. Details of bat evidence collected from 

these surveys will be sent to the Surrey Bat group and the Biological Records 

Centre. 

MITIGATION STRATEGY TO ENSURE FAVOURABLE CONSERVATION STATUS – 

DEMOLIION OF ROOST SITES WITHIN BUILDINGS 

5.29 Demolition of Kimberley Hall, The Laboratory, Rowan Hall, Reed Hall, Williams Hall, 

Bradley Hall, Scrivens Hall, the Principal’s House, the Gate House, the Gardener’s 

Cottage and Oak Lane Cottage buildings can only be legally carried out under licence 

from Natural England and must be carried out in a manner that minimizes 

disturbances and the likelihood of killing or injury of bats. In order to ensure that ‘the 

development proposal will not be detrimental to the maintenance of the population of 

the species concerned at a favourable conservation status in their natural range’ 

compensatory roosting habitat must be provided for prior to their demolition. 

5.30 The following measures will be adopted where appropriate to minimise the likelihood 

of disturbance to hibernating and summer roosting bats during demolition works to 

these buildings: 

 

A licensed bat worker would meet with contractors before refurbishment works 

commence and brief workers on where bats might be found. They will be 

informed of the bat legislation and made aware that if bats are found, works 

must stop in that area until a licensed bat ecologist has been informed and has 

given advice on how best to proceed; 



33

Any works to the roof, or activities that are likely to obstruct access by bats into 

a roof space or cause disturbance to bats (such as timber treatment, the erection 

of scaffolding or the demolition or construction of new extensions to the 

buildings) will be carried out in accordance with best practice guidance; 

A dawn survey and/or visual check by endoscope of all suitable crevice features 

where past evidence of bats has been discovered will be carried out by a 

licensed bat ecologist immediately prior to the commencement of works; 

If bats are found they will be excluded from the building before works are 

allowed to proceed; 

Bats will be excluded by sealing off of all access points to the roost sites 

following the emergence of bats. Heavy duty polythene will be places around 

roost entrance, within soffits or openings to prevent bats re-entering the roost 

sites. Bats will be excluded from roosts located under roof tiles or fascia by 

removing these or sealing the gap beneath them with heavy duty polythene; and 

Any exclusion works would be carried out by a suitably qualified bat ecologist, 

prior the commencement of works and only under favourable weather conditions 

(when temperatures are above 10°C and weather conditions are dry). 

Refurbishment works would only proceed if no bats are discovered and would 

be carried out immediately following the successful exclusion of bats. 

5.31 Compensatory roosting habitat will be provided prior to the commencement of 

demolition works. The following are suggestions for providing compensatory roosting 

habitat although this will be finalised with Natural England within the licence 

conditions: 

 

 

 

Bat boxes such as Schwegler summer bat boxes (e.g. 2FS, 2F, 2FF and 2FN) 

should be installed onto mature trees that are retained within the redevelopment 

plans in 2011; 

A suitable void space with access for bats should be installed in at least one of 

the buildings to be constructed in 2011-2012 to replace roof voids accessible to 

bats in the Science Block and Workshop; and 

In order to assess the value of the roosting habitat provided, any artificial roost 

sites should be surveyed at least twice over a five year period, postdevelopment 

by a suitably qualified bat ecologist. Details of bat evidence 

collected from these surveys should be sent to the Surrey Bat Group and 

Biological Records Centre. Ideally, an agreement should be formed with the 



34

Surrey Bat Group so as to ensure that these sites continue to be monitored after 

five years. 

LIGHTING PROPOSALS 

5.32 Research has found that bats are sensitive to artificial lighting and that excessive 

lighting can delay bats from emerging, thus shortening the time available for foraging, 

as well as causing bats to move away from suitable foraging grounds or roost sites to 

alternative dark areas (Jones 2000). 

5.33 The Site currently only supports low level lighting and ideally, any new lighting 

proposals for the site should not exceed current levels. 

5.34 Where this does not conflict with health and safety requirements, roost sites should 

be kept dark during the period of bat emergence (0 to 1.5 hours after sunset) and 

during peak bat activity (0 to 1.5 hours after sunset and1.5 hours before sunrise. 

5.35 Lighting that is required for security or safety reasons should use a lamp of no greater 

than 2000 lumes (150 Watts) and should comprise sensor activated low pressure 

sodium or mercury lamps (Jones 200; BCT 2008). Lighting should be directed to 

where it is needed with minimal light spillage. This can be achieved by limiting the 

height of the lighting columns and by using as steep a downward angle as possible 

and/or a shield or hood that directs the light below the horizontal plane (Jones 2000, 

BCT 2008). 

5.36 Artificial lighting should not directly illuminate any potential bat roosting features or 

habitats of value to foraging bats, in particular the roofs of buildings that provide bat 

roosting habitat and the woodland, woodland copse and/or newly created aquatic 

habitats within the Site since these were found to provide commuting and foraging 

habitat for bats. The tree lines around Oak Lane Cottages, the leading to the Mews 

and the Chestnut avenue leading to the Commonwealth Air Forces Memorial are 

particularly sensitive locations where lighting must be avoided. 

COMPENSATORY BAT FORAGING AND COMMUTING HABITAT 

5.37 The redevelopment proposals will involve the removal of some tree and scrub habitat. 

Any loss of habitat should be adequately compensated for and where possible the 

landscaping proposals should seek to enhance the value of the site for foraging and 

commuting bats. 



35

5.38 Any planting schemes should include native plant species that will attract insects and 

provide a potential food source for bats throughout the bat activity period (spring to 

autumn). Suitable tree and shrub species include silver birch Betula pendula, hazel 

Corylus avellana, oak Quercus spp, alder Alnus glutinosa, honeysuckle Lonicera 

periclymenum, dog rose Rosa canina, guelder-rose Viburnum opulus, hawthorn 

Crataegus monogyna and elder Sambucus nigra (JNCC 2001; BCT Updated). Ideally 

any new planting schemes should seek to create a gradation of vegetation types that 

includes native trees and shrubs, and tall grasses and herb species. This would 

provide a suitably diverse and sheltered habitat for insects and should maximize the 

value of these habitats for foraging bats. 

5.39 Any new aquatic habitats should seek to maximize their value to foraging bats. 

Ideally, these should be located close to the boundary treelines and hedgerows to 

ensure connectivity with other suitable bat foraging and commuting areas. The 

banks and bank margins of should be planted with species such as reed Phragmities 

sp., rushes Juncus sp. sedges Carex sp., reed canary grass Phalaris arundinacea, 

sweet-grasses Glyceria sp., marsh marigold Caltha palustris, purple loosestrife 

Lythrum salicaria and watermint Mentha aquatica. Submerged and floating plants 

(e.g. water crowsfoot Ranunculus sp and pond weeds Potamogeton sp) would also 

be beneficial, but some areas of open water should also be maintained. 

5.40 Grazing of the grassland with livestock would be beneficial providing a source of 

invertebrates for foraging. 

5.41 Living walls could also be considered within the design plans for the new buildings. 

These are simply external walls covered in climbing plants supported on a trellis 

attached several centimeters from the wall. Recommended plant species include ivy 

Hedera helix, Russian-vine Fallopia sp, Virginia creeper Parthenocissus sp, clematis 

Clematis sp., honeysuckle Lonicera sp., wisteria Wisteria sp, passion-flower 

Passiflora sp, morning-glory Ipomoea sp. and jasmine Jasminum sp., since many of 

these plants are night-scented and typically support a high insect diversity (JNCC 

2001, BCT Updated.). 



36

References 

Bat Conservation Trust (2007). Bat Surveys – Good Practice Guidelines. Bat Conservation 

Trust, London. 

BCT (2008). BCT Mitigation Conference Proceedings. 25-26 th April 2007. 

BCT (2008). Bats and lighting in the UK – Bats and the built environment series 

http://www.bats.org.uk/downloads/Helpline/lighting.pdf 

BCT (undated). Encouraging bats – a guide to bat friendly gardening and living. A leaflet 

produced by Bat Conservation Trust, London. 

Cowan, A. (2003) Trees and Bats: Guidance Notes No.1. Arboricultural Association 

Cowan, A. (2006) Assessment of trees with consideration to their value for use by bats, 

ArborEcology 

DLA Piper (2009). LPA’s and protected species. Recent court case clarifies Local Planning 

Authorities protected species legal duty. 

DLA Piper (2009). EPS licenses – changes March 2009. A summary of the key impacts 

from Natural England’s procedural amendments. 

Gedge, D & Little, J. (2008) The DIY guide to green and living roofs. 

Jones J. (2000). Impact of Lighting on Bats. Bat Conservation Trust, London. 

JNCC (2004). Bat Worker’s Manual. 3 rd 

McLeish. JNCC, Peterborough. 

Edition. Edited by A.J. Mitchell-Jones & A.P. 

JNCC (2001). Habitat management for bats – A guide for land managers, land owners and 

their advisors. JNCC, Peterborough. 

ODPM (2005). Planning Policy Statement 9. Biodiversity and Geological Conservation. 

ODPM (2005). Circular 06/2005: Government Circular: Biodiversity and geological 

conservation – statutory obligations and their impact within the planning system. ODPM, 

16 th August 2005. 

Russ, J (1999). The bats of Britain and Ireland. Echolocation Calls, Sound Analysis and 

Species identification. Alana Books, Alana Ecology Ltd 1999. 



37

Appendix 1: Plans 



38

Plan 1: Former Brunel University Campus showing principle habitats within the application site. 



Plan 2: December 2010 Landscape Strategy for the development proposal for the Runnymede Campus Site. 



Plan 3. Runnymede Campus Tree Removal Plan 



Appendix 2: Photographs 



42

Photograph 1 

The College Building. 

Photograph 2 

The Clock Tower 



43

Photograph 3 

The President’s Hall building 

Location of the long-eared bat roost 

within the roof void was directly 

above the main entrance. 

Photograph 4 

Old and fresh long-eared bat 

droppings found within the roof void 

of the President’s Hall building. 



44

Photograph 5 

President’s Hall building 

The eastern section of the building 

was occupied by pigeons and there 

was a high accumulation of bird 

droppings. This section of the 

building was assessed as being 

unsuitable for roosting bats 

Photograph 6 

The Chapel 

There was no separate roof void and 

the interior of the roof was well 

sealed. Porch entrances offered 

some value to bats as a roost site as 

well as a potential sheltered feeding 

site. 



45

Photograph 7 

The Mews 

Pipistrelle bats were seen to emerge 

from this building during the 2007 

bat evening emergence survey. 

Photograph 8 

The Club House 

Potential access for bats behind the 

wall plate was provided by damage 

around the drainage pipes 



46

Photograph 9 

The Science Block 

Hanging tiles at the north-west 

corner of the building offered 

potential roost sites for crevice 

dwelling bat species. 

Photograph 10 

The Workshop 



47

Photograph 11 

Haywards Hall 

This building was in a good state of 

repair and no potential roost sites for 

bats were identified. 

Photograph 12 

Reed hall 

This building had no separate roof 

void and roofing materials were 

considered unsuitable for roosting 

bats. 

Photograph 13 

Kimberley. 

This building had roof lights and no 

separate roof void. Overall it was 

assessed as having limited potential 

to support roosting bats. 



48

Photograph 14 

The Refectory 

This did not have a separate roof 

void and was well lit by natural light. 

This building was assessed as 

having limited potential to support 


Photograph 15 

Laboratory building 

Common pipistrelle bats recorded 

entering the building in 2008. 

Photograph 16 

The Principal’s House 



49

Photograph 17 

The Gate House/Lodge 

Photograph 18 

Gardener’s Cottage 



50

Photograph 19 

Oak Lane Cottages 

Photograph 20 

Potential bat foraging habitat to the 

rear of the Gate House/Lodge 

Photograph 21 

Tree and scrub habitat to the rear of 

the Science Block that offered 

potential foraging habitat for bats. 

This will be removed as part of the 

redevelopment proposals for the site 



51

Appendix 3: Tree & Habitat Assessment 



52

Table 3: Assessment of trees to be removed for development reasons 

Tree Tree/Shrub 

Roost Assessment 

Number 

potential 

T226 Horse chestnut Low Major decay on south facing limb from sheer break 

(3-5m above ground). 

T174 Lime Moderate Sheer fissure on north-east side of central limb. 

One hole leading to canal with wood rot (3.5m 

above ground). 

T169 Horse chestnut Low Amputation wound on south facing side (1.5m 

above ground). 

T176 Sweet chestnut Low Cracked limbs and cavities in 2 branches c.6m 

above the ground. 

T132 Holm oak High Multiple vertical trunk fissures and stress fractures 

throughout (1-9m above ground). 

T123 Sweet chestnut Moderate Multiple holes facing south and vertical shear folds 

on northern aspect. 

T145 Lawson cypress Low Sheer stress fractures on many limbs (1-5m above 

ground). 

T147 Lime Low Downward facing limb end hole. Woodpecker hole 

in upper trunk (5-10m above ground). 

Close to Holm oak Low Split in broken limb facing north. Long fissure in 

Oak Lane 

horizontal bough facing north-east. 

Cottage 

T79 Horse chestnut Moderate Two fractured primary remaining limbs with 

T74 Horse chestnut Moderate Weak base. Woodpecker hole facing south-east. 

Downward facing rot hole in north-east deadwood 

limb. 



53

Appendix 4: Summary of Roosts 2007 – 2010 



54



55

Appendix 5: Bat Survey Data 



56

2008 SURVEY DATA 

THE COLLEGE & WORKSHOP 

Survey 1: Evening Emergence Date: 30th June 2008 

Sunset: 21:26 Start Time: 21:13 End Time: 22:50 

Weather conditions: 18°C, clear, light breeze, dry 

Surveyor 1: South-west of College Building 

Time Species Comments 

22:02 Common pipistrelle Bat pass, not seen 

22:04 Common pipistrelle Faint record to the south 

22:07 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass, not seen 

22:14 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record of a bat not seen 

22:29 Common pipistrelle Bat commute 

22:41 Common pipistrelle Bat commuting in the open 

Surveyor 2: South-east of College Building 


21:18 Soprano pipistrelle 5 minutes after sunset 

Bat pass from the south- possibly emerged from one of the halls of 

residence 

21:41 Soprano pipistrelle Flew from the back of the building towards the woodland edge 

21:50 Soprano pipistrelle Bat heard not seen from behind the treeline 

21:51 Common pipistrelle Bat heard not seen 

21:56 Noctule 

Pipistrelle bat seen passing towards the woodland edge 

Soprano pipistrelle 


Noctule pass across the site 

Heard, not seen. 2 bat passes across the side of the building from south 

to north towards the woodland edge 

22:03 - 

22:04 

22:05 Common pipistrelle Bat flew from the rear of the building towards the woodland edge 

22:08 Soprano pipistrelle 

22:10 Common pipistrelle Pass from south to north across the eastern elevation of the building 

22:11 Soprano pipistrelle Bat heard not seen 

22:16 Soprano pipistrelle Flying north towards the woodland edge 

22:24 Common pipistrelle Flying from south to north 

22:33 Common pipistrelle Flying from south to north towards the woodland edge 

22:42 Common pipistrelle Bat pass, commute from south to north 

Surveyor 3: West of Workshop and north-east of College Building 



Bat pass from south to north 

21:30 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass not seen 

21:41 Common pipistrelle 2 bat passes 


21:53 - Common pipistrelle Feeding along the woodland edge to the north of the workshop 


21:56 Common pipistrelle Faint record 

21:57 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record along the treeline 

21:58 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding along the woodland edge 


22:08 Common pipistrelle 

22:10 Soprano pipistrelle Two bat passes 

22:12 - 

22:14 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding along the woodland 



57


22:21 Common pipistrelle Bat pass 



22:31 - Common pipistrelle Bat feeding along treeline 

22:34 



Surveyor 4: East of Workshop 




21:31 – Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding in the canopy 

21:33 

21:37 - Soprano pipistrelle Faint record of a bat feeding at canopy height at the woodland edge 

21:51 


21:53 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding at canopy height 


21:55 – Common pipistrelle Feeding at canopy height at woodland edge 

21:58 

22:01 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record of a bat 

22:03 Soprano pipistrelle Fain record 

22:06 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding at canopy 


22:10 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass 


22:12- Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding at canopy 

22:14 



22:26 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding at canopy height 




Survey 2: Dawn Re-entry Date: 30/07/08 

Sunrise: 05:25 Start Time: 03:30 End Time: 05:30 

Weather conditions: 13°C, dry, 40% cloud cover, calm 

Surveyor 1: South-west of College Building 


03:35 Common pipistrelle Bat pass not seen 


03:38 Soprano pipistrelle One soprano pipistrelle + 2 x common pipistrelle 

Common pipistrelle 



03:44 Common pipistrelle Social calls 

03:46 to Common pipistrelle Social calls 

03:47 


03:51 – 

03:57 

Common pipistrelle 5 bat passes 



58


03:54 – Common pipistrelle 7 bat passes 

03:57 


04:01 BLE? 

04:05 Soprano pipistrelle Faint pass 


04:08 BLE? 




2 x bats 

1 x bats 




04:16 Myotis sp 

04:17 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding, arrived from the north 

04:20 Soprano pipistrelle 2 passes 

04:23 Pipistrelle sp 






04:31 – Soprano pipistrelle 

04:33 








Sen over reception, flew north 

Bat pass westwards towards Presidents Building 

Surveyor 2: East of College Building; west of Workshop 



03:41 Serotine pass? 





04:00-04:05 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding along woodland edge to north of the Workshop 


04:10 Common pipistrelle 3 bats feeding along the treeline; social calls 


04:30- Common pipistrelle Circling above the workshop by canopy trees 


04:42 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record 

04:44 Common pipistrelle 2 x bat passes 

04:44- Soprano pipistrelle Faint records of bats feeding at canopy 

04:46 

04:47 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bat passes 

04:48 – Common pipistrelle Bats feeding at canopy 

04:49 

04:50 – Common pipistrelle 



59



04:52 – Common pipistrelle Feeding at tree canopy 

04:58 

05:04 Soprano pipistrelle Bat commute south. 

Surveyor 3: East of Workshop 


03:34 – Common pipistrelle 2+ bats feeding at tree canopy with social calls 

03:44 


03:39 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls 


Myotis sp 






03:52 

03:54 – Pipistrelle sp 

04:09 

04:07 Soprano pipistrelle Faint activity 



04:43 – Soprano pipistrelle Feeding at canopy 

04:48 





60

THE PRESIDENTS HALL BUILDING AND CLOCKTOWER 

Survey 1: Evening Emergence Date: 12 th June 2008 

Sunset: 21:20 Start Time: 20:46 End Time 22:35 

Weather conditions: 

Surveyor 1: South-west of building 


21:49 Soprano pipistrelle Flew south towards northern treeline, possibly emerged close to the 

entrance to the building 

21:49 Noctule Bat pass not seen 

21:54 ? Bat flew out towards the western treeline, not heard 


22:16 Common pipistrelle Flew from south to north-west 

22:21 Common pipistrelle Few north-west across site 

22:24 ? Bat seen flying from direction of the building to the west 

22:26 Soprano pipistrelle Few from south to north-west 


Surveyor 2: South-east, close to Presidents and the Clocktower 


21:49 Noctule 



22:31 Noctule 

Surveyor 3: Located to the north of the building 


21:50 Soprano pipistrelle Flew from west to east 

21:50 Noctule 

Survey 2: Dawn re-entry Date: 16 th July 2008 

Sunrise: 05:03 Start Time:03:11 End Time 05:05 

Weather conditions:13°C, dry, 30% cloud cover, calm 

Surveyor 1: North-east of building 



03::45 Possible Serotine 








04:24 – Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen flying east towards the treeline 

04:25 

04:28 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats flew to the north over the building 

04:33 Nyctalus sp 

04:40 – 

04:43 

Common pipistrelle Feeding 

Surveyor 2: North-west of the building 


03:11 – 

03:25 

Common pipistrelle Feeding in gardens 



61




03:26 Possible serotine 


03:30 BLE 

03:31 Common pipistrelle Intermittent calls 


03:50 Common pipistrelle Feeding to the north 


04:01 BLE 

04:02 BLE 







04:16 

04:21 Soprano pipistrelle North of building 



04:30 Noctule Bat pass north to south 


04:36 Common pipistrelle Flying towards woodland 

Surveyor 3: Located to the north of the building 



04:19 Common pipistrelle Feeding to the west 

04:25 – Common pipistrelle Circling south-west corner 

04:28 

04:36 – 

04:43 

Common pipistrelle Bat circling window at first floor with social calls and entered roost site 

Survey 3: Dawn Re-entry Date: 30/07/08 


Weather conditions:13°C, dry, 40% cloud cover, calm 

Surveyor 1: South-west of building 





03:54 BLE 














62





04:47 – 

04:49 

Common pipistrelle Circling window at first floor – 2 bats entered gap in window frame to the 

west 




63

THE CHAPEL 

Survey 1: Evening Emergence Survey Date: 6 th August 2008 


Weather conditions: 14°C, 100% cloud cover, light spotting of rain at start 

Surveyor 1: Southside of Chapel 


20:39 Pipistrelle sp Faint record of a bat pass, Not seen 

3 minutes before sunset 

20:42 Soprano pipistrelle Faint brief record, bat not seen 

At sunset 

20:50 Pipistrelle sp Bat flew across the southern elevation of the building from west to east. Not 

echolocating. Possibly emerged from the western corner of the chapel. 

20:53 Common pipistrelle Bat pass across the southern elevation of the Chapel. Possible emergence 

from the south-west corner of the chapel 

20:55 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen 

20:56 Common pipistrelle 2 faint passes with a feeding buzz 

20:57- Common pipistrelle 5 bat passes – bat feeding along the hedgerow to the west of the Chapel 

20:59 

20:59- Common pipistrelle 3 passes – bat feeding to the east of the Chapel 

21:01 

21:01 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the southern elevation from west to east. Headed north-east 

21:03 Common pipistrelle Feeding over grassland to the south of the Chapel close to the cedar 

21:03- 

21:05 

Common pipistrelle Bat feeding north to south within the garden to the south of the Chapel, close 

to the southern entrance 

21:05- Common pipistrelle Faint feeding passes 

21:06 

21:08- Common pipistrelle Feeding to the south of the Chapel close to the cedar 

21:09 

21:10 Common pipistrelle Flying south-west to north-east across the southern elevation of the Chapel 

21:11 Common pipistrelle Pass from the north-west 

21:12 Common pipistrelle Pass from south-west to north-east 

21:13 Common pipistrelle Feeding 

21:15– Common pipistrelle 3 passes 

21:16 

21:17 Soprano pipistrelle Brief record 

21:18 Soprano pipistrelle With feeding buzz and social calls at the south of the Chapel and along the 

hedgerow to the west 

21:19 Common pipistrelle Feeding buzz – along hedgerow 

21:22- 

21:26 



Feeding over lawn to the south of the chapel with feeding buzz and social 

calls. 2 bats seen flying together 

21:27- Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats 

21:28 

21:28 Common pipistrelle feeding 

21:29- Soprano pipistrelle Feeding buzz and social calls to south of the Chapel 

21:30 

21:31 Common pipistrelle Bat seen flying high close to the ridge of the Chapel 

21:31- Common pipistrelle Feeding to south of Chapel 


21:31- Common pipistrelle Faint record of feeding bats 

21:34 

21:35 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding buzz and social calls 

21:35- Common pipistrelle Feeding 



21:55 




64


Surveyor 2: North-side of chapel 



20:53 Common pipistrelle Bat seen exiting from chapel porch 

11 minutes after sunset 

20:55 Noctule Faint bat pass not seen 


20:57 Common pipistrelle Bat activity within Courtyard close to the oak 

21:00 Soprano pipistrelle Bat recorded close to porch – possible exit? 


21:03- Common pipistrelle Feeding between chapel and hedgerow up to the oak 

21:04 

21:07 Soprano pipistrelle Faint brief record 

21:08 Common pipistrelle Feeding activity plus bat pass over Willliam’s Hall and Chapel 

21:11 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats flying low from Williams Hall (possible roost?) 



21:16- Common pipistrelle Feeding along hedgerow 

21:24 

21:25 Common pipistrelle Flying towards Williams Hall at low level 


21:27 Common pipistrelle Feeding along hedgerow 

21:29 Common pipistrelle Feeding along hedgerow 

21:30 Nathusius pipistrelle 

? 

21:30 Common pipistrelle Close to Williams Hall 

21:32 ? Bat seen from apex of the roof towards oak 



21:37 

21:38 Soprano pipistrelle Circling close to the Chapel entrance and leaving again 




21:46 Myotis sp? 1 hour and 4 minutes after sunset 

21:47 Soprano pipistrelle commute 

21:48 Common pipistrelle commute 

21:51 Myotis so 


Survey 2: Dawn re-entry survey Date: 7 th August 2008 


Weather conditions: 13°C, 90% cloud cover, dry 

Surveyor 1:South side of Chapel 


03:45- Common pipistrelle Social calls 

03:47 






03:55 Common pipistrelle Bat pass faint record 



65




04:03- Pipistrelle sp Faint records 

04:04 



04:13 Nathusius 

pipistrelle? 




04:17 


04:18 Common pipistrelle Faint records 



04:24- 

04:25 



04:28 Myotis sp? Possible 

BLE 




04:36- Common pipistrelle 3 bat passes with social calls along the hedgerow to the west of the Chapel 

04:37 



04:40- Soprano pipistrelle Soprano pipistrelle pass. Common pipistrelle feeding 


04:44 Common pipistrelle 2 bat passes with social calls 


04:47- Common pipistrelle Feeding and social calls 


04:50 Noctule 


04:55- Common pipistrelle Feeding buzz 

04:57 

04:58 Soprano pipistrelle Bat appeared to enter south-west corner of the chapel 


05:01 Common pipistrelle Feeding buzz 




Surveyor 2: North-side of the chapel 


03:34 Common pipistrelle 2 x passes 


03:37 Common pipistrelle 4 passes 




03:42 Common pipistrelle 2 passes 

03:42 Serotine? Faint record of a bat pas 





66





03:57- Common pipistrelle 7 x passes with social calls 

03:59 


Myotis sp 



04:04- Common pipistrelle 3 bat passes 

04:07 


04:13- Common pipistrelle 3 bat passes 

04:14 

04:15 Common pipistrelle Near to Williams Hall 


04:20 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats seen flying towards Williams Hall 



04:23 Common pipistrelle 2 x bats 

04:24 BLE 

04:25 BLE 

04:28 BLE 






04:36 BLE 



04:41 Soprano pipistrelle Activity at hedgerow 



04:46- Soprano pipistrelle 3 x bat passes 

04:47 





04:56 Soprano pipistrelle Close to airduct at Kimberley 


05:01 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen entering corner of Williams building 2 x bats 


05:07 Common pipistrelle Circling up to apex of Williams Hall 

05:11 Leisler’s bat Flight across site to the south 

05:25 Pipistrelle sp Bat seen flying south towards halls of residence 



67

THE MEWS 



Weather conditions: 20.6°C, clear, calm, dry 

Surveyor 1: located to the east of the Mews 

66 common pipistrelle bats counted out of the roost. Five bats seen returning to the roost. 

Surveyor 2: Located at courtyard to the Mews 


21:45 Noctule 

21:47 Noctule 

21:51 Noctule 




22:11 ? Bat seen not heard. 




Survey 2: Dawn re-entry Date: 10 th June 2008 


Weather conditions: 15°C, dry, clear, calm 

Surveyor 1: Located to the east of the mews 

Time Species Comment 

03:44- 

04:37 

Common pipistrelle 65 bats counted into roost 



Weather conditions: 15°C, 30% cloud cover, light breeze, dry 

Surveyor 1: located to the south-east of the building 


03:45 – 

04:41 

Common pipistrelle 62 bats counted into the roost site 



68

THE CLUBHOUSE 

Survey 1: Evening emergence survey Date: 9 th June 2008 


Weather conditions: 20.6°C, clear, calm, dry 

Surveyor 1: Walked a transect around the building 




2 x bats feeding over playing fields to the north-east 


21:46- Noctule 

21:47 


21:56 Soprano pipistrelle Faint brief pass 

22:03 Common pipistrelle Circling then commute away 

22:04 Common pipistrelle Faint record of bat feeding by hedgerow close to The Mews 

22:08- 

22:17 



22:09 BLE Heard not seen 



2:21- 

22:32 


2 bats feeding close to the building with social calls 

2+ bats circling/feeding close to treeline/hedgeline 

Survey 2: Dawn re-entry survey Date: 10 th June 2008 



Surveyor 1: Walked a transect around the building 


02:54– 

03:08 

Common pipistrelle Several bats feeding between hedgerow and in the open. Commuting 

towards the Mews 

03:13- Common pipistrelle Several bats commuting towards the Mews 

03:17 





03:26 Common pipistrelle Bat pass close to the corner of the clubhouse 



03:33 Common pipistrelle Feeding along hedgerow and commuting towards the Mews 

03:35- Soprano pipistrelle Feeding close to bins 

03:37 

03:40 Common pipistrelle Bat commute 

03:43 Common pipistrelle At north-east corner 

03:46 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding 

03:46– Common pipistrelle Feeding between clubhouse and mews 

03:52 

03:55 Common pipistrelle North-east corner 

03:58 Common pipistrelle Several bats circling with social calls close to the Mews 

04:02 Common pipistrelle Bat circling between clubhouse and mews with social calls 

04:04 Common pipistrelle 8+ bats circling between the clubhouse and the mews 


04:06 Common pipistrelle 2 bat passes at north-east corner 



Circling between clubhouse and mews 



69


04:10 Common pipistrelle Commute towards the mews 

04:27- 

04:30 

Common pipistrelle Circling between clubhouse and mews. Activity steadily declines 



70




Weather conditions: 14°C, light intermittent drizzle, 100% cloud cover 

Surveyor 1: South-east section of building complex 


22:28 Myotis sp Heard, not seen 

1 hour and 2 minutes after sunset 



Surveyor 2:South west section of building complex 


21:43- 

21:45 


22:52 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x passes 


21:53 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding at boundary of site 

Faint records of bats feeding at canopy of woodland copse close to 

gatehouse and along the treeline at boundary of the site 


Feeding high above hedgerow, woodland edge and over grassland with social 

calls 

21:56- Common pipistrelle Feeding along edge of woodland copse and over grassland 

22:00 



22:02 Common pipistrelle 2 x bats 

22:03- 

22:07 




22:26 Common pipistrelle Commuting out in the open 

22:30 Noctule Bat heard commuting across site, not seen 

Surveyor 3: North-west section of building complex 


21:42- 

21:43 

Common pipistrelle Feeding to north of building at tree canopy and over grassland 


21:45- Common pipistrelle Feeding t north of building at tree canopy and over grassland 

21:52 

21:54- Common pipistrelle Feeding north of building at tree canopy and over grassland 

21:56 

21:58 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass not seen. 32 minutes after sunset 




22:03- Common pipistrelle With social calls 






Surveyor 4: North-east section of building complex 


21:44 Common pipistrelle Heard to north, not seen 





71

Survey 2: Evening Emergence Survey Date: 29 th July 2008 


Weather conditions: 16°C, dry, 15% cloud cover, calm 

Surveyor 1: South-east section of complex of buildings 


21:13 Noctule Commute across site 





22:14 Myotis sp/BLE Bat heard, not seen 


Feeding at woodland and over grassland 


Surveyor 2: South-west section of building complex 


21:19 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x faint bat record at woodland edge 


21:22 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat pass at woodland edge 

21:23- Soprano pipistrelle Fain bat records at woodland edge 

21:25 

21:25- Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding with social calls 

21:27 

21:30- Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding 

21:31 

21:35- Soprano pipistrelle Several bats feeding 

21:38 




21:54- Common pipistrelle Feeding at canopy 


21:57 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding at canopy 

21:59 Noctule 

Bat pass not seen 

Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bat passes 

22:00 Common pipistrelle Feeding at canopy 


21:01 Common pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding at canopy 




22:10 Pipistrellus sp Bat heard not seen 

Surveyor 3: North-west section of building complex 


21:11 Soprano pipistrelle Bat heard to the north. 11 minutes after sunset 

21:12- 

21:21 

Common pipistrelle Feeding at tree canopy and over grassland to north 


21:22 Common pipistrelle To north of building 


21:23 Serotine? Heard not seen 




To north, feeding at tree canopy and over grassland 



72



21:34- Common pipistrelle Feeding at tree canopy 

21:37 

21:38- Common pipistrelle Feeding at tree canopy 


21:41 Common pipistrelle Feeding at tree canopy 

21:42 Common pipistrelle Feeding at tree canopy 




21:48 


21:52- Common pipistrelle Social calls 

21:58 




22:02- 

22:13 



2:14 Myotis sp/ BLE Bat heard not seen 

I hour and 14 minutes after sunset 

Surveyor 4: North-east section of building complex 









22:14 Myotis sp?/BLE Bat heard not seen 

1 hour 14 minutes after sunset 



73

KIMBERLEY 

Survey 1: Evening emergence Date: 15 th July 2008 

Sunset: 21:15 Start Time: 21:00 End Time 22:50 

Weather conditions: 16°C, breezy, clear, dry 

Surveyor 1: located to the east of Kimberley 


21:13 Pipistrelle sp Faint record not seen 

21:29 Common pipistrelle Flew from west to the east over building 

21:32 ? Bat seen flying north, no echolocation 

21:44 Soprano pipistrelle Flew north to woodland 


21:53 – Soprano pipistrelle From chapel, north to woodland 

21:54 

21:57 Noctule 

21:59 Common pipistrelle Flew west 



22:02 ? Large bat species, possible serotine 



22:18 Common pipistrelle Flew from north-eat to south-west 

22:24 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls – flew from north-east to south-west 

22:28 Common pipistrelle Flying by treeline to close to the chapel 



22:32 BLE 

22:35 BLE 

22:38 ? Faint record of a large bat 

22:39 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding close to the chapel 

22:45 Common pipistrelle Feeding close to the chapel 

22:46 – 

22:49 



Feeding close to the chapel 

Surveyor 2: Located to the north of Kimberley 



21:40 Common pipistrelle From treeline south-east across building 


21:52 Soprano pipistrelle Flying from college across yard in an easterly direction 

21:56 Pipistrelle sp Brief record 


22:11 Common pipistrelle Feeding at the canopy of the woodland to the north of Kimberley 


22:!6 Common pipistrelle 


22:32 BLE 

22:34 BLE 

22:37 – ? Faint record of a large bat. Possible Leisler’s bat 

22:39 


Surveyor 3: Located to the south-east of Kimberley 


21:25 to Soprano pipistrelle Faint records from treeline to the south close to the chapel 

21:26 

21:28 Soprano pipistrelle Brief call 



74

21:28 to ? Bat seen flying from the direct of Williams Hall towards the chapel 

21:29 

21:30 Pipistrelle sp Possibly emerged from building 

21:31 – Common pipistrelle Feeding along treeline to north of chapel 

21:33 


21:37 Soprano pipistrelle Flew from chapel to woodland to the north 

21:38 Common pipistrelle Feeding at treeline 



21:49 Common pipistrelle Feeding at treeline to the north of the chapel 

21:51 – Common pipistrelle Feeding at treeline to the north of the chapel 

21:53 


21:58 Soprano pipistrelle Flying to the north of the building 




22:15 Soprano pipistrelle Along treeline to north of chapel 


22:18 – 

22:33 



22:34 BLE 


22:45 – 

22:46 



Survey 2: Dawn re-entry Date: 6 th August 2008 

Sunrise: 05:27 Start Time:03:44 End Time:05:30 

Weather conditions:14°C, 90% cloud cover, dry, calm 

Surveyor 1: Located to the south and east of Kimberley 


03:35 – Common pipistrelle Feeding along treeline to the north of the chapel, faint records 




03:54 


04:04 BLE/Myotis? 





04:34 BLE Foraging at treeline to the north of the chapel 

04:36 Common pipistrelle From north to south towards the chapel 


04:37 BLE 


04:38 – 

04:39 



04:44 – Common pipistrelle Intermittent records 


04:59 Common pipistrelle Circling the southern elevation of Kimberley 

First bat entered beneath soffit at 05:00 

05:01 Common pipistrelle Bat seen entering Williams building 



75

05:03 Common pipistrelle 2 nd bat seen entering under soffit at southern elevation of Kimberley 

05:09 – Common pipistrelle Bat seen entering the apex of the chapel 

05:10 

Surveyor 2: Located to the north and west of Kimberley 


03:45 – Common pipistrelle Feeding at treeline to north 

03:50 



03:51 – Common pipistrelle Feeding at treeline 

03:56 

04:04 BLE/Myotis sp Between Kimberley and college 

04:07 Common pipistrelle Feeding at treeline 



04:22 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding between Kimberley and the chapel 



04:32 BLE/Myotis sp? 


04:37 Pipistrelle sp Social calls 

04:45 – Common pipistrelle 2 bats seen circling Williams hall 

04:47 


04:48 – 

05:01 

Common pipistrelle 2 x bats seen circling close to Williams hall and entering at southern end 

between fascia and brickwork 

05:10- 

05:11 

Common pipistrelle Bat seen entering apex of chapel 



76

THE HALLS OF RESIDENCE 

Survey 1: Evening emergence Date: 18 th August 2008 



Surveyor 1 : Bradley and Marshall Hall 



20:42 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the west of the building 


20:49 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass towards the copse. 2 x bat passes 




20:58 – Soprano pipistrelle Flying at canopy height, feeding over the woodland copse 

21:04 


21:06 – Common pipistrelle Bat pass by mature tree to the south of the HOR 







Feeding over grassland 

Social calls 


21:22 

21:25 Noctule Bat pass and brief feed 

21:26 BLE? 


21:34 – 

21:36 


Feeding by woodland copse and over grassland 

Feeding 

Surveyor 2: Bradley Hall, Marshall Hall, Reed Hall 


20:34 Common pipistrelle Bat flying at side of reed hall 

20:35 Common pipistrelle Feeding at side of Reed Hall 

20:36 Common pipistrelle Feeding at canopy height of trees at the centre of the halls of residence 

20:39 Common pipistrelle Feeding at canopy of the trees at the centre of the halls of residence 

20:49 – Common pipistrelle Feeding at canopy of trees at the centre of the halls of residence 

20:50 

20:52 Common pipistrelle Feeding close to Marshall hall 

20:57- Common pipistrelle Feeding around the trees close to Reed Hall 

20:58 

21:02 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding along treeline to the north of the buildings 

21:04 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding at the northern end of Reed Hall 

21:05 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding along the western elevation of Reed Hall 

21:07 Pipistrelle sp Bat seen flying from south to north across the lawn towards the northern 

corner of Reed hall 

21:08 Soprano pipistrelle Flying close to the treeline to the north of the site 

21:11 – Common pipistrelle Heard at the centre of the lawn feeding at tree canopy 

21:!3 

21:17 – Soprano pipistrelle Feeding at the northern corner of Reed Hall with social calls 

21:20 

21:21 Common pipistrelle Recorded to the south of Marshall Hall 

21:26 Myotis? To the south of president’s 

21:33 – 

21:37 

Soprano pipistrelle At the side of Reed Hall – feeding 



77


Surveyor 3: Rowan Hall, Reed Hall, Scrivens Hall, Refectory 


20:33 Common pipistrelle Heard, not seen 

20:37 Common pipistrelle 3 passes flying around trees towards the chapel to the north-east of the 

HOR 

20:38 – Common pipistrelle Feeding between trees close to the refectory 

20:43 


20:51 Common pipistrelle Bat seen flying across the site northwards towards to chapel 

20:55 Soprano pipistrelle North-east corner of courtyard close to chapel 

21:02 Common pipistrelle Flying between trees at the centre of the courtyard and towards the 

chapel 


21:11 Myotis sp Heard not seen 

21:17 Possible BLE Heard at north-east corner of courtyard 


21:25 Noctule 

21:26 BLE North-east corner of the courtyard 

21:34 – 

21:36 

Common pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding 

Survey 2: Dawn re-entry Date: 19/08/08 

Sunrise: 05:55 Start Time:04:16 End Time: 06:00 

Weather conditions: 12°C, breezy, 100% cloud cover, dry 

Surveyor 1: Located to the west of Bradley Hall 




04:19 Noctule Faint record 



04:31 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding at woodland copse to north-west 

04:32 BLE? Recorded close to woodland copse 

04:39 - Common pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding with social calls 

04:40 

04:41 BLE Recorded close to woodland copse 

04:43 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding at woodland copse 

04:49 Common pipistrelle Bat passes 


04:51 Common pipistrelle Faint records of bats feeding at canopy height with social calls 

04:54 – Common pipistrelle Feeding buzz 

04:55 


04:57 


05:03 

05:04 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from east to west over Bradley Hall 

05:06 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass away from the HOR to south-west 



05:20 Noctule 


Bat pass along the western elevation of Bradley Hall towards the trees to 

the south 



78

Surveyor 2: Courtyard between Bradley and Reed Halls 


04:19 Noctule 

04:27 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass at southern end of Reed Hall 

04:38 Common pipistrelle Heard close to road entrance at Marshall Hall 

Myotis? 

04:50 – Soprano pipistrelle North of Reed Hall, seen heading south 


04:56 – Soprano pipistrelle Faint record 

04:57 

05:04 Soprano pipistrelle North of Reed Hall 

05:05 Common pipistrelle Feeding to the north of Reed Hall 

05:06 Soprano pipistrelle Heard close to Bradley Hall 

05:07 – 

05:11 

Common pipistrelle 3 bats seen entering into 4 th apex along from south to north 

Surveyor 3: Courtyard between Scrivens Hall and Reed Hall 


04:36 Noctule 


04:46 Common pipistrelle Bat seen flying towards the north-east of the courtyard with social calls 

04:47 Common pipistrelle One bat seen flying over the buildings away from the survey area 


04:47 to 

04:51 



Circling close to the north-west corner 

Brief record 


04:54 Soprano pipistrelle Flew south towards refectory 

04:56 Common pipistrelle Circling in the north-west corner of the courtyard 

04:59 – Common pipistrelle Possibly entered building – out of vie over first apex (east) at Rowan Hall 

05:00 


05:03 - 

05:16 

Common pipistrelle 2 bats circling north-west corner of courtyard – flew towards Williams 

Hall and back again between Reed hall and Scrivens Hall 

05:21 – 

05:23 

Common pipistrelle Circling close to apex of Reed Hall – 1st bat entered 2 nd Apex (North to 

south) 

05:28 Common pipistrelle Second bat entered at 3 rd Apex (north to south) 



79

THE LABORATORY 

Survey 1: Dawn re-entry survey Date: 10 th June 2008 

Sunrise: 04:46 Start Time:02:54 End Time:04:45 


Surveyor 1: walked a transect around the building 


03:37 – Common pipistrelle Intermittent feeding along the northern elevation 


03:55 – Common pipistrelle Feeding close to south-west elevation 

03:58 

04:00 – Common pipistrelle Feeding close to the south-east corner and along the southern elevation 

04:05 

04:06 – Common pipistrelle feeding to the north and west of the building 

04:08 

04:11 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass 

04:12- Common pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding 

04:13 

04:16 BLE 





04:23 Common pipistrelle Feeding close to the western elevation of the building 


04:30 – Common pipistrelle To the south-east of the lab 

04:34 

04:41 – Common pipistrelle North-west corner & western elevation 

04:42 


04:53 Common pipistrelle Flew along northern elevation heading west 

04:54 Noctule 

04:55 - Common pipistrelle Circling close to south-east corner of lab 

04:58 

05:03 - 

05:10 

Common pipistrelle 3 bats seen circling the south-east corner of lab entering under the 

brickwork at the stairwell 



Weather conditions: 15°C, 30% cloud cover, light breeze, dry 

Surveyor 1: located to the south-east of the building 




04:32 Common pipistrelle One bat seen entering roost site in stairwell 

04:43 Common pipistrelle Bat seen leaving roost site at stairwell 



80

2010 SURVEYS 

PRESIDENTS HALL 

Survey 1: 25th May 2010 – Dawn re-entry survey 

Sunrise time: 04:46 Start time: 03:09 End time: 04:50 

Weather conditions: 12.1°C, clear, dry, calm 

03:31 

03:32 

– 

03:36 

03:38 

– 

03:42 

03:48 

– 

03:50 






Surveyor 1: Caroline Nash – located to the north-east of College 


03:07- Common pipistrelle Bat feeding along treeline 


03:09- Common pipistrelle Feeding passes along treeline 

03:10 

03:10 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass with social calls 

03:16 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat calls followed by 2 bats seen feeding along treeline 

– 

03:17 

03:19 Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes with social calls 

– 

03:25 

03:19 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding along treeline 

– 

03:23 

03:26 Common pipistrelle Bat passes not seen 

– 

03:29 


03:29 Myotis sp/BLE Bat pass at corner of the building 

03:30- Soprano pipistrelle 2 + bat passes along the treeline 


03:51- Soprano pipistrelle 

03:53 


– 

03:57 

Bats recorded with social calls 

Bat passes with social calls 

Feeding activity along the treeline 

Bat feeding activity along the treeline 

2 + bats feeding to the rear of college 



04:01 Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes 


04:03 

– 

04:05 

Common pipistrelle Bat activity recorded to the rear of College 

04:07 

– 

04:17 



Bat passes along the treeline. Mostly soprano pipistrelle bats 

04:18 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen investigating possible roost site by pitch near to clocktower 

04:22 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats feeding between College and President’s with social calls 



81

– 

04:23 

04:25 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding by the treeline 

04:26 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen flying at the roof of President’s Building – possible roost 

investigation 

04:30 Soprano pipistrelle Bat over roof with social calls 

– 

04:31 

04:53 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen passing along woodand edge, left site in direction of chapel 

Surveyor 2: Sabrina Bremner - located at the front of College 


03:07 Common pipistrelle Faint at record heard, not seen 






03:23 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat record 



03:28 Soprano pipistrelle Bat commute 


03:31 BLE Bat not seen 




03:35 Common pipistrelle Faint pass 








Social calls 

Brief passes 




03:54 Common pipistrelle Brief pass 

03:58 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in carpark and to the east of the building 




04:05 Soprano pipistrelle Faint records 

04:07 Common pipistrelle Feeding passes 

04:12 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat passes 

04:19 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding pass 

Surveyor 3: Dan Simmons – located to the south of the President’s Building and view of the Clocktower 


03:10 Soprano pipistrelle Recorded at front of President’s with social calls 


03:15- Common pipistrelle Bat feeding with social calls 

03:17 


03:26 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding activity 

03:28 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding activity 



82





03:44 Common pipistrelle Bat pass across the front of President’s Hall 



03:51 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bat passes with social calls 

– 

03:52 

03:54 Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes by the trees in front of President’s Hall 

03:58 Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes along the treeline 


04:07 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding over the top of President’s Hall 


04:17 Bat Possible bat entry at north side of Clocktower. No echolocation. 

Species unknown. 

04:26 Bat No echolocation . Bat seen exiting clocktower. Species unknown. 

04:53 BLE Bat heard, not seen 

Surveyor 4: Huma Pearce – located to the rear of President’s Hall 


03:09 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding to the rear of President’s 


03:11 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding at the corner of President’s Hall 

03:12 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding passes 


03:14 Soprano pipistrelle bat pass not seen 

03:15 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in rear garden 

03:18 Soprano pipistrelle Bat commuting pass to rear of President’s Hall 

03:20 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass at rear of Presidents Hall 

03:21 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding in rear garden 

03:24 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across garden 

03:25 Common pipistrelle Bat pass at side of President’s Hall 

03:27 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record, not seen 

03:29 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls recorded to the rear of President’s Hall 

03:30 Soprano pipistrelle Bats recorded in the courtyard 

Myotis sp 


BLE/Myotis sp 


03:34 

– 

BLE 


Bat pass at rear of garden 

Social calls 

03:35 

03:36 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass at the rear of President’s Hall 

03:37 Myotis sp Bat recorded in the rear garden 

03:39 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass at the rear of garden 

Myotis sp/BLE 


03:41 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along the treeline to the rear of President’s Hall 

03:42 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the rear garden 

03:43 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass at rear of garden 

03:44 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding pass at rear garden 

03:45 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass at corner of President’s Hall 

03:46 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in the open, passed westwards 

Myotis sp 

03:47 Common pipistrelle Bat pass at the corner of the building 



83


03:48 Common pipistrelle Bat commute across the rear garden 

03:49 Myotis sp/BLE Bat pass at the corner of the building 


03:50 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the rear garden 



03:53 Common pipistrelle Bat pass along the western side of President’s Hall 

03:54 BLE Bat pass at the corner of the building 

03:55 Common pipistrelle Bat pass at the corner of the building 

03:56 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats with social calls at the corner of the buildings 

03:57 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding pass at the rear of building 

03:58 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding over the courtyard 

– 

04:02 

04:03 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass at corner of President’s Hall 

04:05 Common pipistrelle Bat pass at the corner of President’s Hall 

04:06 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass eastwards towards college 

04:08 Pipistrellus sp Faint brief record 


04:11 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record across patio 

04:12 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats pass to the rear of President’s Hall towards College 

04:13 BLE 

Bat flying by tree in the rear garden 


04:15 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass cross the corner of President’s Hall 

04:24 

– 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat flying between woodland and President’s Hall, circling close to the 

chimney – possible roost site? 

04:29 

04:32 Soprano pipistrelle Bat flying within patio area 

04:35 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen flying at chimney 

Survey 2: 24th August 2010 – Dawn re-entry survey 

Sunrise: 06:02 Start time: 04:12 End time: 06:05 

Weather conditions: 12.2°C, clear, dry, breezy 

Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce – located at the front of President’s Hall 



04:13 Soprano pipistrelle Faint call, bat not seen 


04:17 Common pipistrelle Bat commute pass 


04:22 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in the garden to the west of building 



04:33 Noctule Bat pass over site, not seen 

04:35 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in garden 


04:39 Pipistrellus sp Brief faint pass, not seen 

04:45 Soprano pipistrelle Brief bat pass, not seen 



04:50 BLE Feeding record close to the building, bat not seen 

04:51 BLE Bat pass not seen 

04:52 Common pipistrelle Faint bat pass, not seen 

04:53 Pipistrellus sp Faint records 



84


04:55 Noctule Brief record 


05:00 Pipistrellus sp Faint record 

05:01 Myotis sp Bat pass towards the garden (west) 

05:03 Common pipistrelle Bat passes, faint records 

05:05 Soprano pipistrelle Brief bat pass 




05:15 Noctule Bat pass 



05:24 Soprano pipistrelle Faint brief record 




Surveyor 2: Jackie Watson – located at the front of College. 



04:19 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass overhead 

04:30 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass over site 

Noctule 

04:32 BLE? 


04:42 Bat Faint bat record. Species unknown. 

04:44 Common pipistrelle Bat pass with social calls 

04:46 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat record, not seen 

04:49 Pipistrellus sp Faint record, not seen 



04:54 Common pipistrelle Faint bat pass 


04:46 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bat passes, not seen 

04:59 Myotis sp Bat pass not seen 

05:04 BLE 




05:11 Pipistrelle sp Bat passes, not seen 

05:13- 

05:14 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding activity 

05:19 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across garden from west to east 

05:22 

– 

05:24 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from rear of college and headed southwards and back again , 

followed by faint feeding records 

Surveyor 3: Toni Harrington – located to the north of College 


04:16 Noctule 

Bat pass not seen 


4:18 Common pipistrelle Bat pass not seen, probably along treeline 

04:19 Common pipistrelle Faint bat call, heard not seen 

04:21 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass, not seen – feeding along the treeline 




85


– 

04:23 

04:25 Common pipistrelle Bat passes along treeline 

– 

04:26 

04:28 

– 

04:29 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass with social calls 


04:35 Common pipistrelle Bat pass along woodland edge 


04:38 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding along treeline 

04:39 Soprano pipistrelle Faint records 





04:50 

– 

04:51 

BLE 

Bat pass with social calls 

Bat pass, not seen 



04:54 

– 

05:56 


04:56 BLE Bat flying towards the side of the building 

04:57 

– 

05:00 



Bat feeding passes along treeline with social calls 

05:03 

– 

05:50 



05:17 Noctule 

05:19 

– 

05:33 

BLE ? 

2-3 Bat feeding intermittently at treeline with social calls 

At 05:11, bat seen flying towards the building 

At 05:14 bat seen flying over roof of the building 

Bats flying between the building and treeline between 05:23 -05:47 

3 x bats seen circling close to the roof 

2 more bats arrived close to roof at 05:21 

Surveyor 4: Caroline Nash – located at rear of Presidents 


04:17 Common pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Feeding. 

04:18 Common pipistrelle Pass, not seen 




Pass, not seen 

Pass, not seen. Social calls heard. 

04:20 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Social calls heard. 


& 

04:24 



04:30 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. 


BLE 

04:32 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen 

04:33 BLE/Myotis sp Pass, not seen 

Pass, not seen. Social calls heard. 




86


& 

04:34 

04:35 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass, not seen 


04:42 BLE? Pass, not seen 

04:46 

& 

Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass, not seen 

04:47 

04:48 

& 

04:49 

Myotis sp 


Passes, not seen 

04:50 Soprano pipistrelle Social call. Pass, not seen. 

04:51 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass, not seen. 

04:52 Leisler’s Pass, not seen 


Myotis sp 

Pass, not seen. 


04:54 Myotis sp Feeding then headed towards Presidents 

04:55 BLE Feeding over hedge and trees 


Myotis sp 


Feeding 



2 bats. Pass. 

Pass 



2 bats. Pass. 

Pass 

04:59 BLE/Myotis sp Passes, not seen 


05:00 BLE Pass, not seen 

05:02 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats, pass, not seen. 





05:08 Soprano pipistrelle Pass and feeding. Not seen. 

05:10 

– 

05:15 



Passes, not seen. 

05:15 Noctule Pass, not seen 






05:24 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Possibly from the trees behind. 

05:25 Soprano pipistrelle Pass. Feeding and social calls heard. 


05:28 Common pipistrelle? Brief pass, not seen 

05:30 Soprano pipistrelle Faint pass, not seen 

05:31 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Feeding 


05:37 Soprano pipistrelle? Flying over flat roof area. Very brief call. 

05:38 Pipistrellus sp Seen near the roof, close to front of building, slightly away from the flat 

roof section. 



87

Survey 3: 9th September 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 

Sunset: 19:29 Start time: 19:19 End time: 21:30 

Weather conditions: 17°C, 25% cloud cover, dry, calm 

Surveyor 1: Caroline Nash – up on roof by College 


20:03 

– 

Pipistrellus sp Social calls hear, bat not seen 


20:04 

20:08 Common pipistrelle Faint record, bat not seen 

20:10 Pipistrellus sp Faint record, bat not seen 

– 

20:11 

20:14 Pipistrellus sp Faint social calls, bat not seen 

20:24 Pipistrellus sp Brief record, not seen 

20:27 Common pipistrelle Bat pass, heard not seen 



20:38 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record, bat not seen 

20:42- Pipistrellus sp Faint intermittent records, 1-2 bats, not seen 

20:47 


20:53 BLE 2 x bats recorded not seen – possible emergence from towards the 

front part of the roof 1 hour and 24 minutes after sunrise 


21:00 

– 

21:04 

Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent records with social callings and feeding buzz 

Surveyor 2: Toni Harrington - to the rear of college 


19:33 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen flying towards the woodland edge – not seen to emerge 


19:35 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from woodland edge in a southerly direction 

19:35 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats seen circling close to building 

19:36 Pipistrellus sp Seen circling close to clocktower 

19:37 Soprano pipistrelle Bat circled between college and laundry then headed towards 

woodland edge 

19:41 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding along woodland edge 



19:50 

- 

20:13 


Bat pass eastwards along building. Bats seen circling between the 

woodland and the building and over both College and Presidents Hall, 

close to stairwell and laundry. Numerous bats seen close to clocktower 

– possible emergence - Feeding. 

19:57 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding at woodland edge 

20:04 Pipistrellus sp 4 x bats seen circling over College and President’s building 

20:06 

– 

20:09 

Common pipistrelle Feeding along woodland edge and at the centre of the buildings 

20:13 

– 

20:17 

20:17 

– 

20:22 




Lots of social calling – feeding over building 

Bat feeding activity and social calls. One bat seen flying from the 

direction of the clocktower towards the woodland edge 

20:24 Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent records of bats feeding over the buildings and along 



88


– Common pipistrelle woodland edge. High levels of social calling. 

20:39 

20:37 BLE? 

20:39 

– 

Common pipistrelle Bat feeding activity. Flying along the side of building close to the steps 

and along the woodland edge. Some social calling 

21:01 

20: 42 Myotis sp 



– 

20:57 




21:09 Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent bat passes with social calls 

– 

21:15 

21:16 

– 

21:18 


Surveyor 3: Jackie Watson – rear of President’s Hall 


19:49 Soprano pipistrelle Faint call with sociall calls recorded, bat not seen 

19:54 Pipistrellus sp Intermittent faint social calls recorded 

– 

19:56 


20:01 Soprano pipistrelle Possible emergence from direction of college 

20:02 Soprano pipistrelle Faint calls, bat not seen 

20:04 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding pass 

20:05 

– 

20:21 


Intermittent bat feeding passes with social calls – possibly along treeline 

that borders rear garden and later, over lawn 

20:13 BLE Brief pass 

20:23 

– 

20:28 

Common pipistrelle Intermittent bat passes along the side of the building 

20:27 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding over rear garden 

20:29 

– 

20:30 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding to the rear of president’s hall and college 

20:33 Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes to the rear of the building along the treeline 

20:34 Common pipistrelle Brief feeding pass in rear garden 


20:36 Myotis sp/BLE 2 bats recorded, not seen. Pass in the rear garden. 


20:42 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding to the rear of college/corner of presidents 

20:47 

– 

20:48 



20:49 Common pipistrelle Brief bat pass 


20:51 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding pass 


Intermittent bat passes in the rear garden 



89


20:54 Common pipistrelle Bat commuting pass 


20:55 Common pipistrelle Brief bat pass 

20:56 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass with social calling 


– 

21:01 

21:02 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass, faint record, not seen 

21:04 BLE? Bat pass to the rear of president’s hall not seen 

21:05 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding activity with a lot of social calling 

– 

21:15 


– 

21:18 


Surveyor 4: Huma Pearce - located at the front of the building 


19:36 Soprano pipistrelle Possible emergence from the section of building opposite the 

clocktower. 7 minutes after sunset. Feeding activity between the 

clocktower and presidents with social calls 

19:38 Soprano pipistrelle Possible emergence from the section of building opposite the 

clocktower 

19:42 

– 

19:58 

19:56 

– 

19:58 



2 x bats feeding with some social calling – one at arrived from direction 

of college. Feeding close to the clocktower. 

3 rd bat arrived from direction of carpark to the west and feeding 

19:58 Pipistrellus sp One bat left in westerly direction 

19:59 

– 

20:03 



Bats feeding by clocktower – 3 x bats 

20:05 

– 

20:09 

20:10 

– 

20:25 

20:12 

– 

20:25 




2 x bats arrived close to the clocktower. Feeding along the building 

between college and the clocktower and over the roof towards the front 

of the building 

Bat feeding over roof 

Arrived from direction of college feeding over roof with social calls 

20:27 Common pipistrelle Bat arrived from the front of president’s hall and passed over roof 



20:34 BLE Bat recorded at the western corner of President’s Hall 



20:35 Myotis sp Bat pass at the side of president’s hall 

20:38 BLE? At the western elevation of President’s hall 

20:40 Soprano pipistrelle Brief record at front of President’s hall 

20:42 Pipistrellus sp Faint record close to college 

20:44 Soprano pipistrelle Corner of President’s hall 

Bat feeding passes at the front of president’s hall, possibly within the 

garden 

20:44 BLE At the side of president’s building 



90


– 

20:45 

20:45 Common pipistrelle Faint records of bat feeding in garden to the west of the building 

20:47 Common pipistrelle Bat activity close to the clocktower 

– 

20:48 

20:49 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in garden to the west of President’s hall 

20:53 BLE Bat recorded at the front of President’s hall 

20:54 Common pipistrelle Bat passes at front of President’s hall 

– 

20:55 

20:56 Soprano pipistrelle Bat recorded feeding close to the clocktower 

20:56 Common pipistrelle Bat activity at the front of President’s hall 

– 

20:59 

20:57 BLE Bat flying over towards the roof of President’s hall 

20:59 BLE Corner of President’s Hall 

21:04 BLE Recorded close to clocktower 

21:06 Pipistrellus sp Faint feeding records to the west of President’s hall 

21:06 BLE West side of president’s hall 

21:10 Pipistrellus sp Faint feeding records to the west of President’s Hall 

21:11 Common pipistrelle Bat pass at front of President’s Hall 

21:15 Common pipistrelle Bat pass at front of President’s Hall 

21:26 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass with social calls in front of college 

Survey 4: 10th September 2010 – Dawn re-entry survey 


Weather conditions: 14.1°C, overcast, rain overnight, dry during survey, breezy 

Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce – located at the front of President’s Hall 



04:46 BLE? Not seen 

04:49 BLE 


04:55 

– 

04:56 

Soprano pipistrelle Feeding to the side of college with social calls 

04:58 Common pipistrelle Feeding to the side of college 

05:03 

– 

05:04 


Bat pass with social call at the front of President’s Hall and by the 

clocktower 

05:06 BLE 

Bat pass at the western corner of President’s Hall 


05:22 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding to the side of College 

05:23 Soprano pipistrelle Bat commuting pass at side of college 

05:31 

– 

05:37 



Bat feeding with social calls by the clocktower 


–05:40 

05:43- Common pipistrelle Bat circling around clocktower 

05:44 

05:45 Common pipistrelle Bat pass across front of building towards college 

05:45 BLE? Bat circling by the main entrance to President’s hall, no echolocation 



91


04:48 Common pipistrelle Bat in front of President’s Hall – social calling 

05:49 

– 

05:50 

BLE? 

Flying at roof height between clockhouse and President’s Hall – more 

activity towards the clocktower 

06:02 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the front of president’s hall – to off site 

06:03 Bat circling by clocktower, no echolocation calls 

06:07 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bat pass with social calls 

06:08 Common pipistrelle Bat circling by the clocktower – seemed to pass towards college at 

06:09 

OAK LANE COTTAGES 

Survey 1: 12th July 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 


Weather conditions: 19.7°C, 70% cloud cover, dry, calm 

Surveyor 1: Caroline Nash – located at the northern corner of the property 


21:29 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass over the roof of the building towards the trees to the north – 

possible emergence but not confirmed – 16 minutes after sunset 

21:38 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat record – bat seen towards the west of the building 


21:40 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record. Bat pass along the treeline from west to north 

21:43 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding record – feeding at the treeline. One bat pass over the house 


21:51 Soprano pipistrelle Faint feeding records not seen 


21:54 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat pass, not seen 

21:58 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding activity, not seen but probably at the treeline to the north 



22:05 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding at tree canopy 

22:06 

– 

22:07 



22:08 

– 

22:11 



Bat feeding at treeline with social calls. Soprano pipistrelle – bat flew 

over roof in a southerly direction 

Intermittent bat feeding at canopy 

22:09 Myotis sp Bat pass 

22:12 Nyctalus sp Bat pass 

22:13 Common pipistrelle Feeding passes along treeline 

22:24 Soprano pipistelle Bat pass not seen 

22:15 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in the treeline, headed west 


22:17 Myotis sp/BLE 2 x bats – not seen 


22:24 Nyctalus sp Faint record 

22:27 Soprano pipistrelle Bat not seen 

22:32 Myotis sp Bat pass, not seen 

22:33 BLE? 





– 

Bat passes, not seen 

Bats not seen – pass along woodland edge 

Bat feeding passes 



92

22:38 


Surveyor 2: Sasha Dodsworth – located to the west of the building 


21:14 Soprano pipistrelle Bat emergence from near to chimney. 1 minute after sunset 

21:36 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from treeline in a south-westerly direction 

21:38 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass in a northly direction across the front of the house 

21:39 Big bat Faint record 

21:40 Soprano pipistrelle Bat emerged from near to chimney 

21:41 

– 

21:42 


2 x bats – one bat pass from the north to the west and both feeding 

over grassland close to the west side of the house 

21:45 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding to the west side of the house 

21:49 

– 

21:52 


22:00 

– 

22:02 


Bat feeding between the two treelines along the western side of the 

house 

Bat feeding along treeline at the front of the house – passed to 

southern treeline 

22:03 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding over grassland and towards the southern treeline 

22:03 Myotis sp/ BLE Bat seen flying along treeline at the front of the house 


– 

22:05 


22:07 

– 

22:09 


BLE? 



– 

22:13 


22:15 BLE/Myotis sp 

– 

22:17 

Bat feeding along treeline and over grassland to west of house 

Bat feeding to the west of the house 

Bat seen circling chimney – possible emergence 

Bat feeding activity 

Bat feeding along treeline 

22:17 Common pipistrelle Faint feeding records 

22:22 BLE?/Myotis sp Feeding along treeline 


22:24 

– 

22:25 

22:29 

– 

22:30 

BLE/Myotis sp 

Myotis sp/BLE 


22:34 Myotis sp/BLE 






93

Surveyor 3: Dan Simmons – located at southern corner of building 


21:27 Pipistrellus sp Bat seen flying low over roof towards the treeline – possible emergence 

21:35 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along the west of the building towards the treeline and 

westwards 


21:41 

– 

21:42 

21:44 

– 

21:45 



2 x bats feeding to the west of the house, passed to treeline and 

headed east 

Bat feeding between the two treelines and over the grassland 

21:48 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from south towards treeline, passed along woodland edge in 

an easterly direction 

21:49- Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding along woodland edge and over grassland 

21:52 

21:56 

– 

21:57 

Nyctalus sp Faint bat call 

21:56 

– 

21:58 




– 

22:01 


Bat feeding activity over grassland and along treeline 


Bat passes along the treeline 


22:03 BLE? Bat records along treeline 

22:03 

– 

22:05 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes from west to east along the treeline 

22:05 

– 

22:07 

22:06 

– 

22:09 



Bat feeding passes to the side of the house 

Intermittent bat feeding along treeline 

22:07 BLE/Myotis sp Bat not seen 

Bat passes along woodland edge 


Nyctalus sp 

BLE? 

Bat feeding passes 

Bat pass from east to west over the fields 

22:10 

– 

22:16 

22:14 

– 

22:17 



Myotis sp 

Faint intermittent records, bat not seen 

Bat passes along the treeline 


22:22 Noctule Bat pass over field 


22:24 

– 

22:29 

Myotis sp 

Bat feeding passes along the treeline – Natterer’s bat? 


22:34 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass close to the roost – possible re-entry 

2:34 Myotis sp Bat pass over roof 



94


Surveyor 4: Huma Pearce – located to the east of the building 


21:28 Pipistrellus sp Bat seen flying close to the dormer 

21:40 Noctule Bat feeding activity recorded, bat not seen 

21:42 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat pass 

21:44 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record of bat feeding, not seen 

21:45 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats passing over roof from the northern corner of the building, 

heading southwards 

21:46 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along the treeline towards the field to the east 

21:49 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from the grassland to the east, headed west towards the 

building 

21:53 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from western corner of the building, over the roof towards the 

grassland to the east 

21:57 

– 

21:58 


21:57 Serotine Brief record 


22:00 

– 

22:10 


Bat pass from the direction of grassland to the east and fed briefly to 

the side of the building 

Bat pass from grassland to the east and fed at side of building and 

adjacent vegetation 

22:04 Myotis sp Bat pass from the direction of building 

22:05 Common pipistrelle Feeding along the tree and shrub vegetation to the south-east of the 

house 

22:07 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding around vegetation adjacent to the house 


22:08 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across building towards the grassland to the east with social 

calls 



22:12 

– 

22:13 

22:15 

– 

22:17 


Myotis sp/BLE 

Feeding by vegetation and one bat seen pass from direction of building 

towards the grassland to the east 


22:22 Myotis sp Bass across building to the treeline and towards the grassland 


22:26 Myotis sp/BLE Bat pass 


22:31 Myotis sp 2 x bat passes not seen 


22:34 

– 

22:36 

22:37 BLE? 

BLE? 


Faint bat feeding records 



95

Survey 2: 31st August 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 

Sunset: 19:52 Start time: 19:40 End time:21:29 


Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce – located at the southern corner of the building 


19:59 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen emerge from the central part of the western roof void 

20:09 Pipistrellus sp Bat seen passing from the direction of the eastern section of roof 

towards the treeline no echolocation calls – possible emergence 

20:15 Pipistrellus sp No echolocation – bat pass from over the western side of building 

20:15 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from the western side of the building – faint feeding record 

20:16 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding along the southern elevation of the building – seen 

from the gable end of the eastern section of the building – emergence 

not confirmed 

20:17 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass south between the two woodland and headed east along 

woodland edge 

20:18 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding records along woodland edge 

20:19 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from woodland, north to opposite treeline 

20:19 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding over grassland to the west 

20:21 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from northern treeline to south along the western elevation of 

the building 

20:21 

– 

20:23 


Bat feeding passes from northern treeline to southern treeline, feeding 

to the east and back again 

20:25 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from the northern treeline to the southern treeline 

20:26 

– 

20:35 

Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent feeding records along the southern woodland edge and 

the east of the building 

20:27 Noctule Bat pass in an eastern direction over the site 

20:29 Serotine? 

20:31 Nyctalus sp/ 

Eptesicus sp 

20:31 Bat Bat pass from east side of building towards the northern treeline– 

possible emergence 

20:34 Noctule Bat pass from north-west to south-east 


20:40 



– Common pipistrelle 

20:45 

Bat feeding to the east of the house and along the southern woodland 

edge 

3 x bats seen briefly feeding by the porch entrance along the southern 

elevation of the building and along the woodland edge 

20:44 Myotis sp Bat pass along the western elevation of the building towards the 

southern treeline 

20:47 

– 

21:00 

Myotis sp 

Several bats feeding passes along the woodland edge. Bats appeared 

to arrive from the north along the western elevation of the building 

20:45 

– 

20:57 


Intermittent bat feeding activity along the woodland edge 



21:00 

– 

21:01 

BLE 

Bat passes along woodland 

21:02 Myotis sp Bat pass along woodland edge 

21:02 Myotis sp/BLE Bat seen investigating the eaves of the building at the western elevation 

21:04 Common pipistrelle Brief faint record 



96

21:05 

– 

21:16 

Myotis sp 

BLE 

Bat activity at treeline 










21:22 

– 

21:25 

BLE 


21:27 

– 

21:32 

Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent records 

21:28 Noctule 

Surveyor 2: Jackie Watson – located to the north-western corner of the building 


19:58 Soprano pipistrelle Possible emergence – bat not seen 

20:08 Pipistrellus sp? Bat seen emerge close to the chimneys 

20:14 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from the south and headed west along the treeline 

20:15 Noctule Bat pass, not seen 


20:19 Common pipistrelle Bat not seen 


20:20 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass over roof towards the treeline 


20:23 Soprano pipistrelle Bat emergence from near to the drainpipe 

20:23 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding record, bat not seen 


20:26 Bat? Bat seen passing from tree to the east, no echolocation recorded 


20:26 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass. Not seen 

20:27 

– 

20:28 


20:28 Serotine Bat pass 

20:28 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from northern treeline 

20:29 

– 

20:58 



20:41 

– 

20:42 

Myotis sp 

2 x bat passes 

Bat feeding passes from trees located to the east and north of the 

house 

Almost continuous feeding activity by 3-4 bat feeding at canopy, along 

the woodland edge and from east to west. Activity over roof between 

dormer and chimney 


20:47 Myotis sp Bats recorded along woodland edge 

20:48 BLE/Myotis sp Bat bass from chimney towards treeline 

20:51 

– 

20:56 

BLE 

Myotis sp 


Feeding activity along the treeline 



97

21:00 Soprano pipistrelle Faint commuting pass 


– 

21:01 

21:02 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat call 

– 

21:03 


2 bats flying between the roof and the treeline 

– 

21:04 


21:05 BLE 



21:08 Soprano pipistrelle Faint intermittent records 

– 

21:09 

21:08 BLE/Myotis sp Intermittent passes 

– 

21:09 


– 

21:11 

21:14 BLE 

21:14 Noctule 

21:15 Common pipistrelle Feeding records 


21:16 Serotine? Bat pass not seen 

21:18 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls recorded 

– 

21:19 


21:22 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls recorded 

– 

21:23 


21:25 BLE? 

21:25 

– 

21:29 


Surveyor 3: Caroline Nash 


20:07 Soprano pipistrelle First bat emerged. Came out from somewhere under eaves, near 

chimney. 

20:12 Soprano pipistrelle Flew from direction of road to house, then off over grassland. Feeding. 


Noctule 

Flew round HP. Social call heard. 

Pass overhead. Not seen. 

20:14 Soprano pipistrelle From SB towards surveyor then to HP 

20:15- Soprano pipistrelle Feeding overhead 

20:17 

20:18 Common pipistrelle Arrived from behind then over to HP and around side of house. 

20:19 Soprano pipistrelle Flying around feeding outside the house 

20:22 Soprano pipistrelle Heard, not seen 

20:23 Soprano pipistrelle Heading towards SB 

20:24 Noctule Heard but not seen. Feeding 

20:25 Soprano pipistrelle Pass towards SB 

20:26 Soprano pipistrelle Heard but not seen 



98

20:47 

& 

20:48 

Big bat 

Soprano pipistrelle Pass over grass towards wood 

20:27 Soprano pipistrelle Flew over roof towards grass 


Serotine 

Feeding over grass and then flew towards SB 

Flew from HP direction towards road 


Noctule 

2 bats. Pass, not seen. 

Heard but not seen 

20:32 Soprano pipistrelle Passes, not seen. 

20:33 Soprano pipistrelle Fed over grass and then flew towards SB 

20:34 Soprano pipistrelle Heard but not seen. Feeding. 

20:36 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding around house and along trees by driveway 

20:38- Soprano pipistrelle Constant activity, feeding around house 

20:40 



2 passes, not seen. 


20:45 

& 

20:46 

Myotis sp 


Passes, not seen. Feeding. 

20:50- 

20:56 

20:57- 

20:59 

21:01- 

21:10 

21:10- 

21:23 

Myotis sp 


Myotis sp 

Pipistrellus sp 

BLE? 

Myotis sp 



Myotis sp 

Myotis sp 




Several passes 

Several passes, not seen 


1-2 passes per minute 

Surveyor 4: Sabrina Bremner 


20:10 Bat Bat emerged from other side. No echolocation call. 

20:16 Bat Flew from behind surveyor towards Caroline. No echolocation call. 


Noctule 

Pass 

Observed above 

20:18 Bat Bat emerged from grill on second floor of house. No echolocation call. 

20:19 Soprano pipistrelle Bat foraging and then flew from opposite side towards surveyor. 

20:22 Soprano pipistrelle 2 brief passes 

20:26 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass from opposite side towards surveyor 

20:27 Soprano pipistrelle From Caroline’s direction past surveyor 

20:28 Soprano pipistrelle 2 brief pass, not seen 

20:30 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass from Caroline’s direction towards surveyor. 

Bat seen to fly from opposite side towards surveyor but not 

echolocating. 

20:31 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats, from Caroline’s direction towards surveyor and beyond, 


20:35 Bat Brief call, not seen 

20:37 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats passing briefly from Caroline’s direction towards surveyor and 

beyond. Followed by a retuning bat back towards Caroline. 

20:37 Soprano pipistrelle Bats foraging over the house and pass, not seen. 

20:39 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass from Caroline’s direction towards surveyor and beyond. 

20:40 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats passing from Caroline’s direction towards surveyor and beyond 

20:41 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from Caroline’s direction towards surveyor and beyond 

20:42 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats pass from Caroline’s direction towards surveyor and beyond. 



99

Followed by bats retuning. 

20:43 Soprano pipistrelle Bat foraging 


20:45 Common pipistrelle Passes, not seen. Social call heard. 


20;46 Soprano pipistrelle Brief passes, not seen 

20:48 Soprano pipistrelle 3 brief passes, not seen 

20:49 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Foraging and social calls heard. 

20:50 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from Caroline’s direction towards surveyor and beyond 

Myotis sp 


Myotis sp 

Foraging overhead, not seen. 

Seen foraging over house. 

20:53 BLE Pass 

20:54 Soprano pipistrelle Foraging, not seen. Social calls heard. 

Myotis sp 

20:56 Soprano pipistrelle Heard not seen 


Myotis sp 

Pass. Social calls heard. 

Heard not seen 

20:59 Bat Pass, not seen 

21:00 Soprano pipistrelle 3 passes, not seen 

21:01 Myotis sp Pass 


21:03 Bat Heard, not seen 


21:06 Soprano pipistrelle Brief call, not seen 


Myotis sp 

Brief pass, not seen. Social calls heard. 

Brief pass, not seen. 

21:09 Myotis sp Heard, not seen 




21:16 Myotis sp Foraging pass, not seen 


21:22 Bat Heard but not seen 

21:24 Bat Brief pass 

21:25 Myotis sp Foraging, not seen 

21:26 Bat Heard, not seen 


Brief passes 


21:29 BLE? Heard, not seen 

21:30 Myotis? Pass 

21:32 Soprano pipistrelle Pass 

Survey 3: 1st September 2010 – Dawn re-entry survey 



Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce – located in the south-western corner of the building 


04:11 Soprano pipistrelle Bat social calling 

04:16 BLE 


– 

04:17 

04:19 

– 

04:20 

BLE? 

Bat seen flying at the eaves of the south-eastern corner of the building. 



100

04:22 BLE? Bat not seen 


04:27 BLE? Bat seen flying close to the eaves of the building, at the southern 

elevation 



04:30 Myotis sp/BLE? Bat recorded along treeline 

-04:31 


04:34 Myotis sp Bat pass along the treeline 



04:37 Myotis sp Bat pass along treeline 

04:37 BLE Bat seen flying between the treeline and house to the west of the 

building 



04:42 BLE 

Bat not seen 

– 

04:43 


– 

04:43 


04:46 BLE Couple of bat passes 


04:52 Myotis sp Bat pass along treeline 

04:53 Soprano pipistrelle Faint brief calls 

04:54 Soprano pipistrelle Bat circling in front of the pitched roof at the western part of the 

building 

04:55 Myotis sp 2 x bat passes, not seen 


– 

05:00 

04:59 BLE 

05:02 Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent bat feeding passes plus social calling 

– 

05:24 

05:04 BLE 

05:06 BLE? 2 x bats recorded 

05:09 Myotis sp 2 x bat passes from the south-east corner to north-west 


05:11 BLE 

Intermittent records 

– 

05:14 

05:18 BLE? 

– 

05:19 

05:20 Soprano pipistrelle Bat headed east along treeline 

05:24 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen flying over the roof of the building from the treeline 

05:25 Soprano pipistrelle Bat flying over the grassland to the west of the building with social calls 

05:26- Soprano pipistrelle Bat social calling 

05:27 

05:27 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen passing towards the chimney 


05:28 Pipistrellus sp Bat seen close to ridge and circling no echolocation calls 

05:29 

– 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat social calling – bat seen flying at the ridge of the building 



101

05:30 

05:30 Myotis sp Bat passed over the ridge of the building towards the treeline to the 

north 

05:31 

– 

Pipistrellus sp 2 x bats seen circling at the ridge 

05:33 

05:34 

– 

05:45 


2 x bats seen passing between woodland and roof of building 

Bat circling at the gable ends of the building and the western section of 

the building. Mostly no echolocation – brief echolocation and social call. 

Flying up to the ridge of the hipped section of the building, to the side 

of the dormer window and also at the westernmost part of the building 

Circling close to chimney – bat possibly entered building close to the 

eaves? 

05:37 Noctule Bat passing over site 

05:49 Common pipistrelle Bat entered entered apex of thd dormer window 

Surveyor 2: Jackie Watson 


04:06 Soprano pipistrelle Pass and social calls. 


04:09 Bat Faint pass in distance. Not enough information on Batsound to identify 

species 

04:11 Bat Pass. Not enough information on Batsound to identify species 

04:15 Pipistrellus sp Faint. Heard but not seen. 

04:18 Pipistrellus sp Faint pass in distance. 

04:19 Pipistrellus sp Pass 

04:23 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding close by. 

04:24 Bat Faint pass. Not enough information on Batsound to identify species 



04:27 Noctule Heard in distance 

04:28 Soprano pipistrelle Faint call in distance. 

04:29 Pipistrellus sp Bat heard in distance 

04:30 Pipistrellus sp 

04:32 Bat Faint call. Not enough information on Batsound to identify species 

04:33 Bat Bat seen pass from trees by Sabrina to trees at rear of cottage. Not 

echolocating. 

04:34 Common pipistrelle Pass 

04:35 Pipistrellus sp Distance pass. Feeding. 

04:37 Bat Flew across in background. Not echolocating. 


04:40 Myotis sp Faint pass 



and myotis sp 

04:44 Soprano pipistrelle Pass and feeding 

04:45 Noctule Faint pass in background 



04:47 Bat Faint pass 



04:51 Pipistrellus sp Pass from trees by Sabrina to surveyors left. 



04:54 Pipistrellus sp Feeding nearby and social call. 



102

04:56 Noctule Faint pass 

04:58 Soprano pipistrelle Social call 



05:02 Pipistrellus sp Foraging 


05:05 Pipistrellus sp Foraging 



05:08 Pipistrellus sp Pass by trees over to right 

05:09- Soprano pipistrelles Intermittent bat passes. Feeding and social calls. 

05:19 

05:20 Soprano pipistrelle Fly from trees on right heading towards Huma. Social calls heard. 

05:22 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls heard. 

05:23 Common pipistrelle Feeding above surveyors head 

05:24- Soprano pipistrelle Feeding and social calls heard 

05:26 

05:34 Noctule 


05:38 Noctule In distance 




04:05 BLE? Faint record, not seen. 

04:12 BLE? 

Myotis sp 

Faint record, not seen. 



BLE? 


Faint record, not seen. 

04:16 BLE Pass, not seen 

04:17 BLE Not seen 

04:18 BLE? Pass, not seen. 

04:20 BLE/Myotis sp Pass, not seen. 



04:25 Serotine/Noctule Not seen 



04:30 Bat Faint record, not seen. 

04:31 Myotis sp? Pass, not seen 


04:34 Myotis sp/BLE? Pass, not seen. 

04:36 Myotis sp/BLE? Pass, not seen. 


04:39 

& 

04:40 

BLE? 


Not seen. 

04:43 Myotis sp Pass, not seen. 


04:46 BLE Pass, not seen. 





Myotis sp 


Myotis sp/BLE 


Social calls. 




103

04:55- Soprano pipistrelle Regular socials calls heard. 

05:03 







05:07 BLE? 










05:20 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats 


05:23 BLE 



05:24 Myotis sp Feeding, not seen. 

05:26 Pipistrellus sp Seen fly over roof. 


05:39 Bats 3+ bats swarming for several minutes. 

05:53 Pipistrellus sp In by chimney. 

Surveyor 4: Sabrina Bremner 



04:08 Myotis sp Brief pass. 

04:15 Common pipistrelle Brief pass, not seen. 



04:20 Myotis sp Brief pass, not seen. 

04:22 Myotis sp/BLE? Brief pass, not seen. 



04:27 Common pipistrelle Not seen. 

04:28 BLE? Faint pass, not seen. 

04:29 Common pipistrelles Not seen, 2 bats. 

04:30 Soprano pipistrelle Passes, unseen. 

Myotis sp? 






Myotis sp/BLE 

04:43 Bat Brief pass, not seen. 


04:49 Serotine/Noctule 2 bat passes, not seen. 





04:54 Myotis sp/BLE and 

common pipistrelle 


BLE 

Brief pass 

Brief pass 



104

04:56 Soprano pipistrelle Also social calls heard. 

Myotis sp 

04:56- 

05:03 


Myotis sp 

Foraging and not seen. Social calls. 

Pass 

05:04 Soprano pipistrelle Several bats and foraging passes. 

05:04- Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent foraging passes and social calls. 

05:07 

05:09- Soprano pipistrelles Several bats. Foraging passes and social calls. Not seen. 

05:12 


WILLIAM HALL, KIMBERLEY HALL AND THE CHAPEL 

Survey 1: 13th May 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 


Weather conditions: 9.4°C, 20% cloud cover, calm, dry 

Surveyor 1: Jackie Watson – in between all three buildings 



21:07 Common pipistrelle From Kimberley 




21:21 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from hedge adjacent to chapel 


21:24 Common pipistrelle Feeding record 







21:32 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding along hedgeline 

21:33 Common pipistrelle Feeding activity 

21:36 

– 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding records 

21:38 





21:49 Myotis sp Bat pass at rear of chapel 





Noctule 


Bat pass over site 

Surveyor 2: Huma Pearce – rear of chapel 


21:04 Common pipistrelle Bat not seen 20 minutes after sunset 


21:09 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding record along hedgerow 

21:11 Common pipistrelle Bat pass across chapel west to east 



105

21:13 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from south of chapel, bat flew in direction of tenis courts 

21:14 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from south, headed north-east 

21:18 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from south to north 

21:19 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding along the hedgerow 

21:21 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding along hedgerow 

21:21 Common pipistrelle Bat flying close to gableend, fed close to oak 


21:24 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding along hedgerow, passed across garden to south-west 


21:28 Common pipistrelle Bat pass to south-west of garden 

21:29 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats pass from south-west to north-east 

21:30 Common pipistrelle Brief feed bat headed north-east 

21:31 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding along hedge 

21:31 Nyctalus sp? 


2 x Possble leisler’s bat 

2 x bat pass in north-easterly direction 



21:33 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bat passes 

21:34 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bat passes 

21:36 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from south to north-east 


21:37 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding record 


21:44 Myotis sp Bat pass across garden 

21:46 BLE 



21:50 BLE/Myotis sp 


Surveyor 3: Caroline Nash - Located in between Kimberly, Williams and the chapel 


21:04 Pipistrellus sp Bat pass, possible emergence from roof of Kimberly 20 minutes after 

sunset 

21:05 Soprano pipistrelle Bat not seen (possible emergence) 

21:07 Soprano pipistrelle Bat emerged from Kimberley from raised bitumen felt 

21:08 Common pipistrelle Bat not seen but possible between Kimberly and Williams 


21:10 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding activity, but not seen 

21:13 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding activity - feeding along the hedgeline adjacent to the 

chapel 

21:15 Common pipistrelle Feeding activity – came from the direction of Williams – possible 

emergence? 30 minutes after sunset 

21:21 

– 

21:22 



Bat feeding passes, bat not seen. Possibly close to the chapel gardens 

21:24 Common pipistrelle Bat passing along the side of Williams and towards President’s 

21:25 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding activity - feeding by the gardens close to the chapel 


21:28 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding close to chapel and passing close to Williams 


21:30 

– 

21:32 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding passes, probably by chapel and adjacent gardens and 

hedgerows 




Bats feeding, not seen, probably within the gardens, plus one bat pass 

between the chapel and kimberley 



106

21:34 

21:36 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from woodland and across the side of the chapel 

21:37 

– 

21:38 




21:44 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass, across chapel garden 

21:46 Common pipistrelle Bat pass, across chapel garden 

21:49 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass, across the chapel garden 


21:52 Common pipistrelle Bat pass by chapel 

21:57 Common pipistrelle Bat pass across rear garden of chapel 



Noctule 

Bat pass across rear of chapel 

Survey 2: 15th June 2010 – Dawn re-entry survey 



Surveyor 1: Sasha Dodsworth – in between Kimberley, Williams and Chapel 




03:03 Common pipistrelle Bat passes, not seen 


03:07 Common pipistrelle Faint bat record, not seen 





03:18 Common pipistrelle Bat pass in courtyard 




03:25 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass in courtyard 






03:35 Common pipistrelle Feeding activity 

– 

03:36 


03:37- Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent feeding activity 

03:40 





– 

03:47 

03:49 Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent faint feeding passes 

– 

03:51 




107



– 

04:02 

Surveyor 2: Toni Harrington – rear of chapel 



02:55 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across garden 

02:58 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass to the rear of the garden 

03:01 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding along the hedgerow 

– 

03:03 

03:06 Myotis sp/BLE Bat pass to the rear of the garden 

03:07 Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes along the hedgerow 

– 

03:08 


03:11 BLE Bat passing along the hedgerow 

03:12 Common pipistelle Bat pass not seen 

03:16 

– 

03:22 



Intermittent bat passes along the hedgerow 




03:31 Common pipistrelle Bat pass in front of the chapel 


03:33 

– 

03:37 


Faint bat passes to the west of the chapel 



03:44 Common pipistrelle Bat pass along the hedgerow 

03:49 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass to rear of chapel 

03:50 Common pipistrelle Bat pass over the chapel 




04:04 Pipistrellus sp Bat pass over towards the front of the Chapel 

Survey 3: 23rd August 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 

Sunset: 20:08 Start time: 20:00 End time:21:37 

Weather conditions: 16.7°C, 5% cloud cover, dry, breezy 

Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce – located in between chapel, Kimberley, Williams 


20:16 Pipistrellus sp Bat seen flying to the west of the church. No echolocation, possible 

emergence from the chapel or one of the HOR. 8 minutes after sunset 

20:19 Pipistrellus sp Bat seen flying at the western gable end of the chapel – possible 

emergence. 11 minutes after sunset 


20:36 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from the direction of HOR headed westwards towards 

President’s Hall 


20:43 Pipistrellus sp Bat flying in front of the HOR 



108

– 

20:44 

20:45 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from college and passed towards President’s 

20:49 Pipistrellus sp Faint record of a bat seen flying in front of the halls of residence 


20:51 Common pipistrelle Seen flying over vegetation in front of chapel and HOR 

20:52 Pipistrellus sp Faint record of bat not seen 

20:53 Nyctalus/Eptesicus Serotine, bat pass not seen 



20:55 Soprano pipistrelle Bat flying over the top of Kimberly towards the laundry and woodland 

edge 



20:59 

– 

21:00 


2 x bat passes with social call, flew towards HOR. One bat flew north 

over towards woodland edge 

21:03 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass between Kimberley and Sports courts 

21:04 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass in front of chapel 

21:08 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat record close to kimberley 


21:09 Serotine Bat pass over chapel 

21:11 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass at east end of chapel 

21:12 Common pipistrelle Bat pass not seen by oak at east end of chapel 

21:14 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat records near to Williams hall 

21:14 Serotine Bat feeding pass 

21:15 

– 

21:16 

21:18 

– 

21:19 



Faint bat pass 

21:21 Common pipistrelle Bat pass along Williams hall 

21:21 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass by Williams Hall 

21:23 BLE/Myotis sp Bat pass not seen 


21:25 

– 

21:26 

21:28 

– 

21:30 





Faint feeding activity along woodland edge to the rear of kimberly 

Feeding records 



Bat feeding records along woodland edge 



20:32 Pipistrellus sp Heard, not seen 

20:34 Pipistrellus sp 2 bats, heard, not seen 


20:37 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats. Faint call, not seen, possibly from behind the hedge. Social 

calls heard. 

20:40 Common pipistrelle Bat flying from the hedgeline to the left of surveyor across front of 

Chapel, towards Kimberley. Social calls heard. 

20:41 Soprano pipistrelle Pass from trees and hedges behind surveyor towards east 



2 bats, flying east 



109

20:43 Common pipistrelle 2 bats, not seen. Faint records. 


20:47 Soprano pipistrelle Seen in front of chapel and then flew off in westerly direction 

20:48 Soprano pipistrelle Came from west, flying east past Chapel 


20:50 Pipistrellus sp Faint records, not seen 

20:51 Common pipistrelle Flew from west to east across the front of the Chapel 



20:53- Soprano pipistrelle Feeding, heard but not seen. Social calls heard. 

20:55 

20:56 Soprano pipistrelle Seen flying west to east 


21:01 Common pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Social calls 


21:03 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats, pass not seen 

21:04 Soprano pipistrelle Seen flying from west to east 




21:09 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats, not seen. Social calls heard. 






21:15 Soprano pipistrelle Seen feeding near roof of Chapel 

21:16 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats, pass, not seen. Feeding 










Brief record 

21:25 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bats, pass, not seen 

21:27 Myotis sp? 


Pass 


21:30 Myotis sp/BLE? Brief record 



Brief pass, not seen 




Noctule 


SCIENCE BLOCK 

Survey 1: 20 th May 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 

Sunset: 21.00 Start time: 20:39 End time:22.39 

Weather conditions: Dry, light breeze, 5% cloud cover, 17.5 o c 

Surveyor 1: Dan Simmons – located to the rear of the Science block 


21:20 Pipistrellus sp Heard but not seen 




110

21:34 Common pipistrelle Over from T1 to T3 

21:38 Pipistrellus sp Heard but not seen around south side of T1 seen 

21:40 Soprano pipistrelle Passing over from T3 to east side of T1 

21:47 Common pipistrelle Heard but not seen. In between T2 and T1 

21:49 Common pipistrelle Seen heading over from T3 to T1 

21:50 Bat? Heard but not seen 

21:53 Common pipistrelle Feeding. Heard but not seen 

Noctule? 

21:55 Soprano pipistrelle Passing south to north from T1 to T3 towards woods at the back 

21:56 Common pipistrelle Heard but not seen somewhere around T3 

21:56 Common pipistrelle Seen heading from T3 over to T1 

21:59 Common pipistrelle Seen heading east to west just north of T3 


22:03 Soprano pipistrelle Foraging north east side of T1 

22:04 Soprano pipistrelle Foraging over T2 

22:05 Soprano pipistrelle Foraging around T2 

22:07 Common pipistrelle Circling above trees on north west side of T2 

22:09 Common pipistrelle Feeding. Flying in circles above T2 and then flying to T1 

22:10 Pipistrellus sp Heard but not seen in between T2 and T3 

22:11 Common pipistrelle Heard but not seen (probably over T1) 

22:13 Pipistrellus sp In between T3 and T1 in the courtyard 

22:14 Pipistrellus sp In between T1 and T3. Heard but not seen 

22:16 Soprano pipistrelle Flying from south east to north west. 


22:17 Noctule? Heard but not seen. Northeast side of T2 

22:22 Common pipistrelle Foraging behind T3 

22:23 Pipistrellus sp Heard but not seen, by T3 

22:23 Soprano pipistrelle Heading over T2 and T3 

22:27 Pipistrellus sp Heard between T2 and T3 

Surveyor 2: Caroline Nash – located to the front of the Science block 


21:18 Bat? Faint records very far away. Species not known. 

21:20 Common pipistrelle Flew overhead towards trees in north-east direction 

21:23 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from north-east towards trees behind. Pip social calls. 

21:25 Pipistrellus? Bat flew over top of science block from north-east direction towards 

trees. 

21:27 Common pipistrelle Constant pip activity. Feeding buzzes heard. Also bat pass, came from 

treeline, flew across front of science and flew round to north-east 

21:30 Soprano pipistrelle Pip pass, didn’t see where it came from 

21:33 Common pipistrelle Foraging. Flew out from trees, fed by building. 

21:37 Common pipistrelle Flew from north-east in south-west direction 

21:38 Common pipistrelle Brief pass not seen and social calls 


21:41 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding buzz. Bat not seen. 

21:41 Common pipistrelle Pip passing from round corner to north-east is towards trees 

21:43 Common pipistrelle Flew round trees 

21:44 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding. 

Noctule 


21:47 Soprano pipistrelle Pass not seen 

21:49 Common pipistrelle Pip feeding behind and flew over towards trees 

21:50 Common pipistrelle Not seen 

21:52 Common pipistrelle Feeding around trees 

21:53 Noctule 

21:54 Common pipistrelle Lots of pip activity 

21:57 Pipistrellus sp Pass not seen 



111

22:00 Myotis sp? Not seen 



Possibly noctule 

Intermittent pip activity. Bats not seen. Thought to be coming from 

trees behind. 

22:11 Pipistrellus sp Intermittent pip activity. 


22:15 Noctule? Big bat 

22:17 Pipistrellus sp Intermittent pip activity. Thought to be in trees. Not seen. 

22:18 Myotis sp Brief pass 

22:21 Myotis sp Not seen. Passed overhead 

22:23 Myotis sp Brief pass 


Surveyor 3: Jackie Watson – located to the east of the Science block 


21:21 Common pipistrelle Passing from behind 

21:29 Soprano pipistrelle Foraging 



21:37 Bat Pass. 

21:43 Bat Pass. 


21:48 Nyctalus /Eptesicus 

sp 





Survey 2: 15 th June 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 




Time Species Notes 

02:58 Soprano pipistrelles Pass 

x2 

03:02 Pipistrellus sp Pass. . 


03:04 Pipistrellus sp Brief pass. 


03:07 Possible BLE? Could be common pipistrelle? 













03:29 

& 

03:30 

Bat? 

Faint record. 



112

03:31 Soprano pipistrelle Passed overhead 

03:32 Soprano pipistrelles Pass 

03:33 Common pipistrelle Bat seen. Flying along treeline towards security hut and gate 

03:33 Myotis sp Flying along treeline towards security hut and gate 


& 

03:45 


03:39 

– 

03:55 

03:58 

– 

04:02 



Soprano pips 



Bat seen flying along trees towards President building. Numerous 

passes, heard not seen. 

Bat flew from trees towards science block, around back of science 

block. Few passes, heard not seen. 

HALLS OF RESIDENCE 

Survey 1: 18 th June 2010 – Dawn re-entry bat survey 

Sunrise:04:43 Start time: 02:57 End time: 04:30 


Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce 


03:05 Common pipistrelle Commuting alongside science 

03:06 Soprano pipistrelle Commuting past refectory and workshop 

03:07 Common pipistrelle Activity close to the tennis courts 

03:09 BLE 

Courtyard of chapel 

Myotis sp? 

03:10 Pipistrellus sp Activity 

03:12 Soprano pipistrelle Heard close to science 

03:20 Soprano pipistrelle By Sasha 

03:23 Soprano pipistrelle Close to laboratory 


03:36 BLE Pass not seen at corner of halls of residence and refectory. 

03:40 Common pipistrelle Commute. Standing alongside science building. 

03:44 Soprano pipistrelle Commute. Across side of halls of residence heading towards the 

woodland. Bat feeding close to chapel. 

03:53 Common pipistrelle By chapel. 

03:54 Common pipistrelle Pass across side of chapel 

03:57 Soprano pipistrelle Pass not seen. Close to workshop. 

03:58 Soprano pipistrelle Bat circling. Feeding along the elevation of the laboratory 

03:58 Common pipistrelle Pass across the science building. 

04:01 Soprano pipistrelle Commute across front of woodstore/gym and headed north 

04:02 Common pipistrelle By refectory and halls of residence. Not seen. 

04:04 Soprano pipistrelle Pass not seen. By gym. 

04:04 Soprano pipistrelle Pass heading south across elevation of the gym 

04:05 Common pipistrelle Heading south across elevation of laboratory and down past science 

block 

04:06 Common pipistrelle Brief pass. By science block, flew up to ridge and then away. 

04:07 Noctule 

Pass. 


04:11 Soprano pipistrelle Pass not seen. 

04:16 Common pipistrelle Pass at corner of halls of residence and refectory 

04:24 Soprano pipistrelle Bat circling by the chapel. 

04:27 Soprano pipistrelle Entered roost at Kimberley 



113

Surveyor 2: Jackie Watson 




03:10 Pipistrelle Feeding 

03:15 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding overhead 




03:31 BLE? Surveyor not sure of species but very quiet bat. 


03:40 Pipistrellus sp Overhead. 

03:41- Soprano pipistrelle Flying around. Intermittent. Number 8 on map. 

03:43 


03:45 Pipistrellus sp Pass. 

03:47 Soprano pipistrelle Pass. Same place as number 9. 


03:48 Common pipistrelle Pass and feeding 

03:50 Pipistrellus sp Pass and feeding. 





03:58- Soprano pipistrelle Feeding. Intermittent. 

03:59 



04:10 Pipistrellus sp Faint pass. 

04:12 Common pipistrelle Flying around. Heard but not seen. 


04:19 Bat? Entered roost in Bradley. 

Surveyor 3: Dan Simmons - standing in courtyard of accommodation block 



03:06 Bat? Heard but not seen. 

03:07 Bat? Heard but not seen. 

03:18 Bat? Bat seen whilst standing at the top of A. 

03:22 Common pipistrelle Standing at A/B corner of courtyard. Not seen. 

03:40 Common pipistrelle Standing halfway up B. Not seen. 

03:48 Common pipistrelle Standing halfway up A. Not seen. 

03:50 Soprano pipistrelle Seen commuting from green over A. 

03:51 Bat? Heard but not seen. Top end of A. 

03:53 Soprano pipistrelle Commuting from B up the face of A, out towards trees. 

04:06 Common pipistrelle Foraging in trees on opposite site of green to A, over the top of the 

buildings. 

04:15 Soprano pipistrelles Two bats looked like they were going to go into A side but then 

disappeared. A further 2 bat passes, bats not echo-locating. 2 bats 

entered apex halfway down A and then flew off echo-locating. 

04:18 Common pipistrelle Heading from green towards A and then bearing south towards B and 

disappearing over roofs 

04:22 Common pipistrelle Circles around corner of A and B and disappearing around the back of 

B. 



114

Surveyor 4: Sasha Dodsworth 





03:06 Bat? 

03:07 Bat? 






03:16 Common pipistrelle Activity 















03:53 Pipistrellus sp Bat flying from direction of Huma towards church. 






04:07 Noctule Pass 


Survey 2: 3 rd September 2010 – Dawn re-entry bat survey 


Weather condtions: 

Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce 


04:27 Soprano pipistrelle Pass adjacent to chapel 

04:33 Soprano pipistrelle Recorded just in front of the science block 

04:36 Soprano pipistrelle In front of Marshall Hall 


04:40 Soprano pipistrelle Near to sports courts. Social calls also heard 

04:41 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls also heard. 

04:43 Soprano pipistrelle Just in front of gym. Activity and social calls also heard. 

04:44 Soprano pipistrelle Next to laboratory 

04:47 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass at corner of science 

04:48 Soprano pipistrelle In front of Hayward building. Not enough information on Batsound to 

identify species. 

04:49 Common pipistrelle Side of Hayward building. 

04:51 Soprano pipistrelle Next to refectory. Not enough information on Batsound to identify 



115

species. 


04:53 BLE? Corner of Jackie’s section. Not enough information on Batsound to 


04:57 Serotine? Brief record by science block. Not enough information on Batsound to 


04:59 Myotis sp Rear of Hayward’s Hall 

05:01- Common pipistrelle Social calls in front of Marshall Hall 

05:02 

05:03 Soprano pipistrelle In front of sports hall. Also social calls. 

05:07 Noctule? By refectory. Not enough information on Batsound to identify species. 

05:10 Common pipistrelle Pass. Next to Hayward’s Hall. 

05:11 Common pipistrelle Next to Hayward’s Hall. 

05:13 Myotis sp By Sports Hall. 


05:19 Common pipistrelle Corner of Jackie’s site 

05:22 Common pipistrelle Brief record in front of gym 


05:23 Soprano pipistrelle In front of shed 

05:24 Serotine? Passing from across science building towards science building. 

05:25 Common pipistrelle Along the front of science block 

05:26 Soprano pipistrelle Pass by refectory. 

05:28 Common pipistrelle Corner of science block. 


05:29 Pipistrellus sp Faint record by Hayward’s Hall. Not enough information on Batsound 

to identify species. 

05:30 Soprano pipistrelle Rear of Hayward’s Hall. Activity. 

05:31 Soprano pipistrelle In front of Marshall’s Hall 

05:32 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass by Sports hall. Also social calls 

05:33 Soprano pipistrelle Seen in Jackie’s area. 

05:34 Soprano pipistrelle Flying up and down by halls of residence 

05:34 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen passing towards direction of laboratory. Currently at back of 

Scriven’s Hall. 

05:35 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across side of building 

05:37 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass, not seen. By laboratory. 

05:39 Soprano pipistrelle Bat heard but not seen. Recorded in front of science building. 

05:40 Common pipistrelle Brief record. 

05:41 Soprano pipistrelle Pass by Hayward’s Hall. 

05:45 Soprano pipistrelle Pass and bat circling at roof height. Also social calls. Bat entered into 

Scriven’s Hall? Circling by window. 

Surveyor 2: Jackie Watson – located in courtyard by Reed Hall and Rowan Hall 



04:27 Common pipistrelle Pass and social call in distance 


04:29 Soprano pipistrelle Pass and social calls 


04:35 Noctule? 

04:36 Soprano pipistrelle Faint call 

04:37 Pipistrellus sp Faint call. 

04:38 Soprano pipistrelle Faint call. 

04:39 Soprano pipistrelle Pass overhead and feeding. 



04:45 Soprano pipistrelle Pass and social call 

04:50 Soprano pipistrelle Faint call 



116

04:50 Pipistrellus sp Faint call 

04:50 Soprano pipistrelle Pass overhead. 



04:55 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding just above the tree in the centre 


04:57 Soprano pipistrelle Faint pass and feeding buzz 


05:00 Soprano pipistrelle Faint pass 

05:02 Soprano pipistrelle Pass overhead 

05:03 Pipistrellus sp Pass. 

05:04 Noctule? Faint pass. 


05:09 Common pipistrelle Distant pass followed by closer pass 




05:15 Possible serotine? Faint pass. 



05:19 Noctule 


05:21 Common pipistrelle Pass and social calls 

05:22 Common pipistrelle Pass and social calls 





05:27 Common pipistrelle Pass and social call 

05:28 Common pipistrelle Pass, feeding and social calls 

05:29 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding in the square and social calls 


05:31 Soprano pipistrelle Pass and feeding 

05:36 Soprano pipistrelle Pass and feeding over tree 

05:37 Soprano pipistrelle Passing from direction of Catherine 

Surveyor 3: Catherine Jones – located by Reed Hall 



04:21 Serotine/Noctule Heard in distance, not seen. 

04:22 Common pipistrelle Not seen but thought to be foraging around trees in centre of quadrant. 


04:27 Soprano pipistrelle Heard in distance. 

04:30 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls heard 

Noctule 



Pass on path, east side of quadrant. 

Foraging 

04:51 Common pipistrelle Foraging around trees in middle of quadrant. 


04:59 Noctule 


Pass 

Foraging around trees in middle. 

05:05 Common pipistrelle Pass in middle of quadrant 

05:06 Myotis sp/BLE 

05:07 Noctule 






117



05:28 Common pipistrelle Heard but not seen. 



05:33 Noctule 

05:34 Soprano pipistrelle Flew from the building on east side of quadrant into middle of quadrant. 

05:37 Soprano pipistrelle Flying around trees in middle of quadrant 

Myotis sp 


05:39 Noctule 

05:43 Soprano pipistrelle Heard, not seen. 

MEWS, CLUBHOUSE AND LABORATORY 

Survey 1: 10 th May 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 


Weather conditions: 90% cloud cover, still, dry, 10 o c 

Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce – North side of Clubhouse on first floor level 




21:10 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along Leylandii hedge 

21:11 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along Leylandii hedge 

21:13 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along leylandii hedge 

21:14 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along leyandii hedge 

21:16 Common pipistrelle Bat pass along the eaves of the building towards the laboratory 

21:18 Soprano pipistrelle Faint records along leylandii 

– 

21:19 


21:29 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along the treeline 

21:32 Myotis sp Pass along the eaves of the building 


21:37 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along leylandii 

21:39 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding along leylandii 

21:40 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding along leylandii 

21:43 Soprano pipistrelle Bat commute 

21:44 Soprano pipistrelle Bat activity with social calls 

21:53 

– 

21:59 



22:02 Common pipistrelle Bat commute along hedgerow 




Bat passes along the hedgeline 


Surveyor 2: Jackie Watson – by Mews 


20:38 

– 

20:47 

Bat feeding activity along the hedgeline at the corner of the sports field 

Common pipistrelle First bat emerged at 20:38 

First 50 bats emerged 

20:47 Soprano pipistrelle 8 minutes after sunset – possible second roost site? 

20: 47 Common pipistrelle 72nd bats emerged 



118

- 

20:50 

20:50 

– 

21:43 

20:50 

– 

21:05 




110th bat emerged. 

Surveyor 3: Caroline Nash – by Laboratory/Workshop 


20:47 Pipistrellus sp Faint bat pass, no emergence 

20:50 Common pipistrelle Bat seen in stairwell – possible emergence 11 minutes after sunset 



21:13 Pipistrellus sp Bat pass, not seen 

21:26 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat record, not seen 

21:28 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass, not seen. Possibly commuting along the treeline at the 

gardens of the house opposite (south) 


21:36 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from lab to the Clubhouse 

Myotis sp 


21:40 Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes, not seen 


21:43 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass not seen – along leylandii? 

– 

21:46 

21:53 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding activity along the hedgeline at the corner of the sports field 

– 

21:59 

22:02 Common pipistrelle Bat commute along hedgerow 


22:04 Common pipistrelle Bat passes along the hedgeline 



Survey 2: 14 th June 2010 – Evening emergence bat survey 


Weather conditions: Gusty wind, has been raining, feels damp, 10% cloud cover, 14 o c 

Surveyor 1: Caroline Nash - laboratory 


21:37 Bat? Faint bat call. 

21:40 Pipistrellus sp Pass heard not seen. 

21:48 Noctule Pass heard not seen. 


21:50 Pipistrellus sp Heard not seen. 

21:52 Noctule Heard but not seen 

22:06 Common pipistrelle Quick pass came from direction of rugby field towards trees. 

22:14 Common pipistrelle Heard but not seen 

22:28 Soprano pipistrelle Passing along treeline 

22:37 Bat? Brief, faint pass. 

Surveyor 2: Sasha Dodsworth - clubhouse 




119


21:36 Pipistrellus sp Emerged from behind drainpipe 

21:47 Noctule Heard but not seen 

21:51 Noctule Pass, heard but not seen 

21:54 Noctule Brief pass 




Surveyor 3: Toni Harrington - Mews 


21:23 Common pipistrelles Bats 1 and 2 emerge 

21:24 Common pipistrelles Bats 3-12 emerged 

21:26 Soprano pipistrelles Bats 13-19 emerged 



21:29 Common pipistrelles Bat 52 came out left of black drainpipe. Four bats in total emerged 

from this location. 

21:29 Common pipistrelles Bats 53-58 emerged from original location 

21:30 Common pipistrelles Bat 59 emerged 


21:32 Common pipistrelles Bats 68-73 emerged (although many came out at once so could be 

more) 

21:33 Common pipistrelles Came out from the slightly to left of original location close to drainpipe 


21:37 Soprano pipistrelles Bats 82-87 emerged 



21:42 Common pipistrelles Pass from behind Mews. 


21:46 Common pipistrelle Bats 96-100 emerged 



21:48 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from round front of building 

21:48 Soprano pipistrelle Bat 101 emerged 

21:49 Common pipistrelle Bat pass round side of building 130 

21:50 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along front of building away from surveyor around the corner 


21:51 Noctules Two bats passed above surveyors head. 


21:52 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the front of the building 

21:53 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along the front of the building. Most of passes concentrated 

by metal steps at front of building. Bats coming from corner towards 

surveyor. 

21:54 Soprano pipistrelle Flew over surveyors head, in front of building and disappeared towards 

corner of steps. 

21:55 Common pipistrelle Feeding buzz. Bat heard but not seen. 

21:58 Bat? Faint bat pass. Heard but not seen. Not enough information on 

Batsound to identify species. 

22:08 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the front of the building towards steps and 

disappeared around the corner. 

22:13 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from front of building and flew behind surveyor 

22:17 Common pipistrelle Flew from behind surveyor towards building and then circled foraging 

22:21 Soprano pipistrelle Flew from behind surveyor towards building. Feeding. 

22:23 Common pipistrelle Flew from behind surveyor. Feeding. 

22:25 Common pipistrelle Flying up and down along building foraging. 

22:28 Soprano pipistrelle Bat 104 emerged from corner of building by steps. Social call. 



120

22:32 Common pipistrelle Bat seen flying by far left of building opposite steps. 

22:32- Common pipistrelle Numerous bats flying in front of the building feeding. 


Survey 3: 23 rd August 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 



Surveyor 1: John Newton - Mews 



20:25- Soprano pipistrelle First bat emerged at 20:25. 44 bats emerged in total. 


20:31- 

20:46 



59 bats emerged in total. Social calls heard. Numerous bats flying 

around outside Mews feeding. Emerged from under the soffit board. 

20:40 Common pipistrelle Bat flying around outside but hasn’t emerged. Social calls heard. 

20:47- 

21:00 



Numerous bats flying around outside Mews. Feeding buzzes and 

social calls heard. 

21:01- Soprano pipistrelle Intermittent activity. Bats foraging and/or commuting outside Mews. 


21:17- 

21:28 



Intermittent activity. Bats foraging and/or commuting outside Mews. 

Surveyor 2: Toni Harrington - Mews 


20:17 Soprano pipistrelle First bat emerged from right hand side of barge board near drainpipe. 

20:28 Soprano pipistrelle Bat 2 emerged from right hand side of barge board near drainpipe. 

20:29- 

20:31 

Soprano pipistrelle Bats foraging outside Mews. Social calls also heard. Lots of activity 

around end of building near tall chimney furthest from steps. Possibly 

another roost under barge board near first chimney. 

20:31 Soprano pipistrelle Bat 3 emerged from right hand side of barge board near drainpipe. 

20:31- 

20:42 



Bats foraging outside Mews. Social calls also heard. Lots of activity 

around end of building near tall chimney furthest from steps. 

20:42 Common pipistrelle Bat 4 emerged from right hand side of barge board near drainpipe. 

20:43- 

21:30 



Bats foraging outside Mews. Social calls also heard. Lots of activity 

around end of building near tall chimney furthest from steps. 

Survey 4: 2 nd September 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 


Weather: 14 o c at start, no cloud, light breeze, no rain, dry. 

Surveyor 1: Catherine Jones - Clubhouse 


20:16 Noctule 

Distant call, heard but not seen. 

& 

20:18 

20:20 Noctule Flying up high in straight line overhead, over field and Students Union. 

20:25 Common pipistrelle Flew round building and over raised platform, past surveyor towards 

field. 

20:42 Serotine? Flew around corner of student union towards playing field. 

20:44 Soprano pipistrelle Heard, not seen. 

20:47 Pipistrellus sp Heard, not seen. 

20:48 Pipistrellus sp Heard, not seen. 

20:50 Soprano pipistrelle Heard, not seen. Also bat seen passing but not heard. 

20:57 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. At west end of building. 

20:59 Soprano pipistrelle Heard but not seen. 



121

21:02 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bat passes, heard but not seen. 

21:04 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bat passes, heard but not seen. 

21:07 Soprano pipistrelle 2 consecutive bat passes, heard but not seen. 

21:08 Soprano pipistrelle Activity, heard but not seen. 


21:12 

21:16 Common pipistrelle Heard at west end of building but not seen. 


Pips heard occasionally passing the building but not seen each time. 

Suspected to be flying close to Leylandi tree line below me. 

Surveyor 2: Caroline Nash – Laboratory/workshop 


20:06 Common pipistrelle Emerged from top corner then flew towards Mews. 

20:09 Soprano pipistrelle Emerged from stairwell and flew towards hedgerow of house towards 

surveyors. 

20:13 Noctule Pass, not seen. 



20:17 Noctule 



20:26 Soprano pipistrelle Faint pass, not seen. 




One flew from garden behind surveyor and headed towards grassland 

by Clubhouse. 

Other flew from garden behind surveyor towards Workshops and went 

back again. 

20:31 Common pipistrelle Passes, not seen. 


20:32 Common pipistrelle Other flew from garden behind surveyor towards Workshops and went 

back again. Second pass not seen. 

20:33 Serotine? Pass, not seen. 



20:35 Soprano pipistrelle Came out of garden and fed over car park. 

20:38 Noctule Feeding. Not seen. 




20:49 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Feeding. 

20:50 Common pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Feeding. 

20:51 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Feeding. Think they are feeding on tree line by garden. 

20:53 Common pipistrelle Pass, not seen. 

20:54 Common pipistrelle Commuting bat, not seen. 


20:59 Soprano pipistrelle Foraging bat, not seen. 

21:00 BLE? 









Myotis sp 

Not seen. Coming from direction of garden behind. 

Pass 

GARDENERS COTTAGE 



122

Survey 1: 20 th July 2010 – Eveing bat emergence survey 


Weather conditions: 100% cloud cover, dry, calm 

Surveyor 1: Corey Cannon – located round the front of the house 


21:23 Common pipistrelle Faint call, not heard 

21:27 Soprano pipistrelle Heard, not seen. Social calls heard. 

21:30 Common pipistrelles 2 bats flying overhead to the left of the cottage 


21:38 Myotis sp Flying to left of cottage 

21:39 Soprano pipistrelle Flew past surveyor 

21:42 Soprano pipistrelle Bat flew right overhead away from house into trees opposite. 


21:47 Common pipistrelle Bat flew overhead into university grounds. Feeding. 

21:48 Common pipistrelle Flew from university grounds to the back of the cottage 

21:49 Soprano pipistrelle Bat flew from back of house into university grounds 

21:50 Soprano pipistrelle Flying around the front of the house 

21:51 Serotine Bat heard, not seen 

21:53 Soprano pipistrelle Heard not seen. 

21:54 Common pipistrelle Flying overhead, over the roof of the house 

21:57 Soprano pipistrelle Bat came from left of the house, flew over head and 

21:58 Bat? Bat heard, not seen. 

22:00- Soprano pipistrelles Bats flying overhead around house and trees. 

22:02 

22:05 Soprano pipistrelles Bats flying overhead to the left of the house. 


22:10 Soprano pipistrelle Flying overhead, came from back of the house. 

22:12 Soprano pipistrelle Flying around the trees 



22:20 Bat? Heard but not seen 

22:23 Bat? 

22:25 Common pipistrelle Flew over head and around trees opposite house. 

22:27 Common pipistrelle Flew overhead 

Surveyor 2: Caroline Nash – located in back garden 


21:45 Big bat? Faint call heard 

21:47- Common pipistrelle Feeding over back garden 

21:49 

21:51- Common pipistrelle Constantly feeding in back garden 

21:56 

21:56 BLE? Bat pass? 

22:01 Soprano pipistrelle Faint records, not seen 

& 

22:02 

22:03 Bat? Too faint to hear but can see bat feeding in trees in front garden 


22:07 Common pipistrelle Feeding round house and garden. 

22:09 Bat? Too faint to hear but can see bat feeding in trees in front garden 


22:12 Common pipistrelle Pass over site and flew away from cottage. 

22:12 Common pipistrelle Faint pass, not seen 

22:13 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record, not seen 





123




Survey 2 – 2nd September 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 



Surveyor 1: Huma Pearce – located at the front of the house (east) 

Tim e Species Comments 

20:07 Common pipistrelle Possible bat emergence from the roof of the building to the south side 

of the chimney? 


20:12 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding by the oak to the north-east of the house in adjacent 

garden. Bat passed over roof to the rear of the house 

20:12 

– 

20:13 


Bat feeding in the adjacent garden to the east of the house and access 

road 

20:15 Soprano pipistrelle Soprano pipistrelle bat pass from the adjacent buildings and garden to 

the east 

20:15 Common pipistrelle Bat pass over roof from the rear garden. Headed north-east and fed by 

oak 

20:16 Noctule Bat flying over site to the north of the house 


20:18 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding records, not seen 

20:19 Noctule Bat pass across the site from the south-west to north-east 

20:21 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in the adjacent garden to the east of the site 

20:23 Soprano pipistrelle Bat not seen, possibly feeding within the garden adjacent 

20:25 Pipistrellus sp Faint records of bat feeding, possibly within adjacent garden outside of 

site 

20:26 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen flying from rear of house in a north-easterly direction 

20:27 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along access track southwards and across the road at 

boundary of site 

20:28 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from road, northwards into the site 

20:29 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in the rear of the adjacent garden 

20:30 Noctule Bat pass from direction of the rear garden, over the roof in a northeasterly 

direction 

20:31 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding in adjacent garden site 

20:31 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from rear of house in a north-easterly direction 

20:32 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding in the adjacent rear garden feeding close to the oak and 

between this and leylandii 

20:33 

– 

20:36 


Bat flying north from the roadside up the access track towards the oak 

where it fed for a while 

20:35 Noctule Bat pass across the site in an easterly direction with feeding buzz 

recorded 

20:38 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding activity 


20:38 Common pipistrelle Bat pass southwards across the front of the house towards the road 

20:39 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from the direction of the oak, southwards towards the 

roadside 

20:40 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from roadside towards oak 

20:40 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bat passes from rear of house in a north-east direction 

20:41 Common pipistrelle Bat pass northwards from roadside and fed briefly between oak and 

horse chestnut 

20:42 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from road in a north-easterly direction 




124


20:46 Soprano pipistrelle Faint intermittent feeding records, bat not seen 

– 

20:50 

20:52 Common pipistrelle Faint brief record 

20:55 Common pipistrelle Brief record 

20:57 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding records 







21:03 Soprano pipistrelle Faint feeding records 



21:07 Nyctalus/Eptesicus Bat pass, not seen 


21:10 Common pipistrelle Brief faint records 











– 

21:35 


21:39 

– 

21:40 


Surveyor 2: Jackie Watson – rear of the house (west) 


20:08 Common pipistrelle Bat flew over the house to the rear garden and fed 

20:11 Common pipistrelle Feeding pass, bat not seen 

20:13 Noctule 

20:14 Noctule 


20:16 Noctule 

20:23 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass to the garages along the roadside and flew towards the front 

of the house 

20:26 Soprano pipistrelle Bat flew over house from the front to the rear 

20:26 Noctule Bat pass from west to east 

20:28 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding pass from east to west 

20:31 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding at the rear garden 


20:32 Noctule 

20:33 Common pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding in the rear garden 

– 

20:34 





125


20:42 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats passes in rear garden 



20:48 Soprano pipistrelle Bat passes 




20:58 Leisler’s bat Bat passes, not seen 







21:07 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding pass 

21:09 Nyctalus/Eptesicius 



Survey 3: 3rd September 2010 – Dawn re-entry bat survey 

Sunrise:06:16 Start time: 04:19 End time: 06:18 

Weather conditions: Clear skies, dry, still, 11.8 o c 

Surveyor 1: Caroline Nash – located at the front of the house (east) 



Noctule 

04:32 Myotis sp/BLE? Pass, not seen 


04:46 Common pipistrelle Social calls heard. Pass, not seen, 


04:52 Bat? Pass, not seen 

04:56 Serotine Pass, not seen 


05:01 Soprano pipistrelle Faint pass, not seen 


05:03 Pipistrellus sp Pass, not seen 


05:08 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding. Pass, not seen. 

05:13 Common pipistrelle Social calls heard. Pass, not seen 


05:19 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding. Pass, not seen. 


Noctule 


05:25 Soprano pipistrelle Social calls heard. Pass, not seen 

05:27 Pipistrellus sp Faint pass, not seen 


05:29 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding and social calls heard. Not seen. 

05:31 Soprano pipistrelle Pass, not seen. Possibly along trees opposite cottage. 


05:36 Soprano pipistrelle Flew towards Mews, past cottages in easterly direction. 

05:41 Pipistrellus sp Brief pass, not seen 


05:47 

& 

Common pipistrelle Pass, not seen 



126

05:49 


GATEHOUSE & PRINCIPALS 

Survey 1: 24th May 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 



Surveyor 1: Caroline Nash – located to the north of the Gatehouse 




21:32 Common pipistrelle Faint feeding activity at tree canopy 


21:42 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass along road 


21:47 Pipistrellus sp Faint record not seen 

21:49 Pipistrellus sp Brief record, not seen 

21:52 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding not seen 

21:56 Soprano pipistrelle Faint record of bat feeding at canopy 

21:59 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding activity 


22:03 Nyctalus sp. Brief record 

22:04 Leisler’s bat Bat pass at roadside 



21:14 Leisler’s bat Feeding at roadside 

– 

22:18 

21:16 Nathusius’ 

Brief bat record 

pipistrelle? 

22:22 Common pipistrelle Bat pass in garden 



22:28 

– 

22:29 

Nyctalus sp. Possible Leisler’s bat feeding at roadside 

Surveyor 2: Sabrina Bremner – located at the south-east of Gatehouse 


21:33 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding at canopy. 32 minutes after sunset 

– 

21:34 


21:43 Common pipistrelle Feeding pass 


21:52 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from lodge to Principal’s House 

21:54 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from roadside towards the rear garden 

21:56 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass towards the rear garden, arrived from off site 


Nyctalus sp 


22:03 Leisler’s bat Bat recorded at roadside 

22:04 Leisler’s bat 


22:14 Leisler’s bat 2 x bats seen feeding close to road 



127


22:15 



22:17 Leisler’s bat 2-3 bats feeding over road 

- 

22:19 



22:23 Common pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding in garden 

– 

22:24 


22:28 Leisler’s bat Faint record 

22:29 Leisler’s bat Feeding along roadside 

Surveyor 3: Dan Simmons – located at front of Principal’s house 


21:02 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across front of Principal’s House 

1 minute after sunset 


21:18 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the front of the building from roadside 


21:35 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding at canopy height 

21:45 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats pass from south-west to north-east 

21:46 Soprano pipistrelle 2 bat passes, not seen 

21:48 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding at tree canopy, headed towards the rear of Principal’s House 

21:50 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass to rear of house 






Bat pass over the house 


22:07 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass over site 


22:15 Leisler’s bat Faint record 

22:16 BLE 

Soprano pipstrelle 

22:18 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass over building 



Leisler’s bat 

Bat feeding at tree canopy in front of house 

Surveyor 4: Huma Pearce – located to the rear of the Principal’s house 


21:14 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from the west of the site towards the roadside 

21:16 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from off site towards the roadside 

21:17 Soprano pipistrelle 2 x bats circling in the garden, one bat headed to roadside the other 

headed westward – social calls recorded. 

21:19 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from roadside and back 

21:20 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from off site to the west towards the roadside 

21:21 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from off site to the west, bat flew towards the roadside 

Bat pass from roadside to garden 

21:23 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from roadside towards the garden 


21:44 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from roadside to garden 




128


21:50 Leisler’s bat Bat not seen 





22:01 Common pipistrelle Brief bat passes 


22:04 Common pipistrelle Brief bat passes 




22:12 BLE 




22:23 Leisler’s bat Feeding records, bat not seen 

22:24 Leisler’ bat Feeding records, bat not seen 

22:27 Leisler’s bat Feeding records, bat not seen 

22:28 

– 

22:30 

Leisler’s bat Feeding records, bat not seen 

Survey 2 – 17th June 2010 – Evening bat emergence survey 

Sunset: 21:22 Start 21:12 End time: 


Surveyor 1 – Huma Pearce 


21:49 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass with social calls, bat not seen 

21:52 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass from north-east, passed over the roof, brief feed then flew off 

to the north-west 

21:53 

– 

21:55 


21:55 Leisler’s bat Bat pass from roadside 

21:55 

– 

21:56 


Bat pass from roadside across the garden and fed in the rear garden 

for a time at the tree canopy 

2 x bats passed from roadside in north-easterly direction across the 

rear garden – bat appears to be circling the house 

21:57 Leisler’s bat Passing from the treeline towards the road and the treeline bordering 

the road 


22:01 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from north across towards the road 


22:03 Leisler’s bat Bat seen flying towards the road 

22:03 

– 

22:04 

22:05 

– 

22:33 



Bat pass to the north-west and circled around the house feeding 

Feeding around the house and within the rear garden at canopy 

22:08 Leisler’s bat Bat pass over towards the roadside 

22:08 BLE Bat circling the building 

22:09 Noctule Bat pass over the site from east to west 

22:17 Leisler’s bat Pass from roadside to the treeline in rear garden 

22:26 Leisler’s bat Pass from east to west over gatehouse 

22:32 Bat? Seen flying at roof height of building 




129


22:47 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding 

– 

22:48 

22:50 Nathusius pipistrelle Bat pass, not seen 

22:52 BLE Brief record, bat not seen 



22:55 

– 

23:00 


Surveyor 2: Dan Simmons – located to the west of the gatehouse 



21:45 Pipistrellus sp Bat not seen 


21:48 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding around tree at the side of the gatehouse 

21:52 Soprano pipistrelle Bat heard, not seen 

21:54 Leislers bat Bat pass over gatehouse towards the west (Principal’s House) 

21:58 Noctule Bat pass from north to south along the access road 


22:00 Leislers bat Bat pass from the rear of gatehouse north-westwards 

22:01 Noctule Bat pass in a northerly direction across the site 

22:01 Common pipistrelle Bat heard, not seen 

22:07 Noctule 


22:08 Noctule Bat pass westwards towards principals house 

22:12 Common pipistrelle Bat pass in a northerly direction across the site 

22:13 Leisler’s bat Feeding record. Passed southwards 

22:16- Leisler’s bat Feeding records 

22:17 




22:30 Common pipistrelle Faint call. Feeding at trees along the road 

22:36 Common pipistrelle Bat not seen 


22:39 Common pipistrelle Feeding in trees along side the gatehouse 

– 

22:44 


22:48 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding close to trees near to gatehouse 

Surveyor 3: Jackie Watson - located to the rear of the Principal’s house 


21:47 Common pipistrelle Bat pass over the rear garden 



21:59 Soprano pipistrelle Feeding in the trees in the rear garden 

– 

22:00 


22:09 Noctule 

22:21 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in trees at rear garden 

22:22 

– 

Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding in rear garden 



130

22:23 

22:25 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding in rear garden 


22:27 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding record 

22:30 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat feeding record 


22:33 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding at rear garden 

– 

22:34 


Surveyor 4: Sasha Dodsworth located to the front of Principal’s House 





21:47 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass, not seen – possibly passing along treeline at canopy height 

21:52 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from the east to west over the roof of the house 


21:55 Common pipistrelle Bat pass from the north and feeding over the grassland adjacent to the 

house 

21:57 

– 

21:59 



22:02 

– 

22:03 




22:07 Leisler’s bat 2 x bats feeding 



22:12 

– 

22:14 


2 x bats feeding over the grassland. Bats arrived from the direction of 

library to the north 




22:21 Nyctalus sp Faint record 



22:26 BLE? 


22:31 Common pipistrelle 2 x bats feeding over lawn 





22:44 

– 

22:45 





– 

22:55 


Feeding record 



131

– 

22:59 

Survey 3: 10th September 2010 – Dawn re-entry survey 


Weather conditions: 14.1°C, overcast, rain overnight, dry during survey, breezy 

Surveyor 1: Toni Harrington – located to the rear of the Gatehouse 


04:44 BLE Bat circling at the side of the gatehouse 


04:52 BLE/Myotis sp Bat not seen 

05:11 Myotis sp Bat not seen 

05:14 Common pipistrelle Bat pass, towards the roadside 

05:20 Soprano pipistrelle Brief pass, bat not seen 


05:22 Serotine? Faint record 


05:29 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat feeding passes, along trees that border the roadside 

05:34 Soprano pipistrelle Faint bat passes, bat not seen 

– 

05:42 

05:37 BLE Bat heard, not seen 

05:50 Soprano pipistrelle Bat flying across the rear elevation of the gatehouse towards the 

roadside 

05:52 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass across the rear elevation of the gatehouse towards the 

roadside 


06:18 Soprano pipistrelle Bat seen flying around the side of the gatehouse towards the front of 

the building 

Surveyor 2: Caroline Nash – located at the front of gatehouse and Principal’s house 



05:05 Soprano pipistrelle Brief bat pass in front of Principal’s House 


05:08 Myotis sp Bat heard at the corner of the gatehouse 

05:15 Common pipistrelle Faint bat pass, not seen 

05:17 Soprano pipistrelle Brief faint pass, bat not seen 

05:21 Soprano pipistrelle Brief faint pass, bat not seen 

05:23 Common pipistrelle Faint record at the front of Principal’s house 


05:28 Soprano pipistrelle Bat recorded close to science building 

05:37 Pipistrellus sp Faint bat record, not seen 

05:38 BLE Faint bat pass, by science building 

05:39 Common pipistrelle Bat pass with social calls passed across front of the science building 

05:40 Soprano pipistrelle Bat pass by science building, not seen 

05:41 Common pipistrelle Bat circling the roof of science block and flew towards the roadside 

05:43 Common pipistrelle Bat circling at the roof of science block 

05:48 Soprano pipistrelle Bat flying at the front of principal’s house 

05:55 Pipistrellus sp Faint bat record, not seen 

Surveyor 3: Jackie Watson – located in the rear garden of Principal’s House 




132




04:54 BLE? Bat not seen 

05:15 BLE Bat circling in the rear garden 

05:20 BLE? 

05:35 Soprano pipstrelle 3 x brief bat passes, not seen 

– 

05:36 






05:51 Soprano pipistelle Bat pass, not seen 


05:55 Soprano pipistrelle Bat feeding passes, bat not seen 

06:00 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding in the rear garden 

06:15 Common pipistrelle Bat feeding with social calls in the rear garden 



133



APPENDIX 12.3 


Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVRON 

UK11-16357

Runnymede / Reptile Survey / Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd

Runnymede / Reptile Survey / Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd 



Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd 

Author 

Victoria Forder MSc AIEEM 

ECL Job No 2010/817 

Status Date Approved by 

Initial 21/10/10 John Newton 

Revision 01/12/10 Matt Wilson 

Revision 26/01/11 Matt Wilson 

The Ecology Consultancy 6-8, Cole Street, London SE1 4YH 

T. 020 7378 1914 E. enquiries@ecologyconsultancy.co.uk W. www.ecologyconsultancy.co.uk

Contents 

Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 

1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2 

2 Legislation .............................................................................................................. 4 

3 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 5 

4 Results .................................................................................................................... 9 

5 Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................... 11 

6 References ............................................................................................................ 14 

Appendix 1: Site Plan .............................................................................................. 15 

Appendix 2: Photographs ........................................................................................ 17 

Appendix 3: Population size categories for common reptile species ...................... 20 

Appendix 4: Reptile survey results .......................................................................... 22 

LIABILITY 

Ecology Consultancy Limited (ECL) has prepared this report for the sole use of Orchid Runnymede Ltd in accordance 

with the agreement under which our services were performed. No warranty, express or implied, is made as to the advice 

in this report or any other service provided by us. This report may not be relied upon by any other party without the prior 

written permission of ECL. The content of this report is, at least in part, based upon information provided by others and on 

the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested. 

Information obtained from any third party has not been independently verified by ECL, unless otherwise stated in the 

report. The Ecology Consultancy is the trading name of Ecology Consultancy Ltd. 

COPYRIGHT 

© This report is the copyright of ECL. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person is prohibited.

Executive Summary 

 

The Ecology Consultancy was commissioned by Orchid Runnymede Limited, 

initially in June 2008 and for an update survey in September 2010, to undertake a 

reptile survey of the former Brunel University Runnymede Campus in Egham, 

Surrey. 

 

Surveys for the purpose of reptile presence or likely absence were undertaken in 

June/July 2008 and October 2010, in all areas of suitable reptile habitat that may be 

directly impacted by the proposed works. 

 

Grass snakes were recorded in two areas of the site only during the course of the 

seven survey visits in 2008 and 2010. The SWT data search (2007) revealed two 

records of grass snake within 2km of the development site. 

Recommendations to avoid causing an offence under wildlife legislation include; 

The retention of the compost heap in the east of the site if possible, and its 

replacement by suitable refugia if it cannot be retained; 

Ecological tool box talks for all contractors; 

Timing of construction during the reptile active season (April-September); 

Strimming of the grassland and scrub to a height of no less 6 inches under 

ecological supervision within those areas where reptiles may be present at least 

one week prior to construction; 

A destructive search of suitable features (rubble piles, log piles, leaf litter etc.) 

within this area; 

The translocation of any individuals found to suitable habitat outside of the 

construction zone; and 

The maintenance of vegetation within the construction zone at no more than 6 

inches height during the construction process. 


Runnymede / Reptile Survey / Report for Orchid Runnymede Ltd 1


BACKGROUND 

1.1 The Ecology Consultancy was commissioned by Orchid Runnymede Limited to 

undertake an ecological assessment of the former Brunel University site, Runnymede 

Campus located in Egham, Surrey. An initial Phase 1 habitat survey, desk-top study 

and protected species assessment (ECL, 2007) indicated that habitats suitable for 

reptiles were present and recommended a reptile survey. These habitats include log 

piles and scattered dead wood, hedge habitats, rough grassland and a compost 

area. 

SCOPE OF THE REPORT 

1.2 This report describes the objectives, methodologies and findings of the reptile 

survey. Any potentially significant ecological constraints that may affect the 

proposals, such as the need to undertake a reptile translocation prior to the 

commencement of works, are also discussed. 

SITE CONTEXT AND STATUS 

1.3 Brunel University’s Runnymede Campus is situated on Cooper’s Hill Lane, 

immediately to the north of the village of Englefield Green, Surrey. It is located about 

3km south-east of Windsor and about 1.5km north-west of Egham, National Grid 

Reference SU994721. 

1.4 The site is approximately 27.15ha in extent, of which approximately 40% supports 

woodland, 30% supports building and roads which are unsuitable for reptiles and 

30% of grassland areas. 

1.5 Many natural refugia for reptiles are distributed on site such as log piles, scattered 

dead wood, hedge habitats and rough grassland. A compost area in the eastern side 

of the site, is also suitable for reptiles. 

DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 

1.6 The proposals are to demolish the majority of the buildings on the site which 

comprise student accommodation and other educational buildings constructed 

generally in the 1960s and which are now redundant. The site will then be 

redeveloped to provide new student accommodation, private and affordable housing. 

A number of buildings (the Presidents Building, College Building, Pillar Hall, the 



chapel, the mews and the clubhouse) will be retained and refurbished to provide an 

extra care facility and additional residential accommodation. 



2 Legislation 

2.1 All reptiles native to the UK are listed under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife & Countryside 

Act 1981 (as amended). The four most commonly encountered species of reptile; the 

adder Vipera berus, grass snake Natrix natrix, common lizard Zootoca vivipara and 

slow-worm Anguis fragilis are protected under Section 9(1) and 9(5) of the Act which 

makes it an offence to: 

 

 

Intentionally kill, injure or take a reptile, 

Sell, offer for sale, possess or transport a reptile for the purpose of sale. 

2.2 An offence under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 with regard to reptiles can 

lead to fines of up to £5000, confiscation of machinery, and/or six months 

imprisonment for each offence. Harm to more than one animal may be taken as 

separate offences. Both individuals and companies may be liable for offences. 

2.3 There are no licensing provisions within the Act for development activities affecting 

these species. However, developers are expected to take adequate precautions to 

avoid breaches of the legislation, including undertaking adequate surveys and 

mitigation to avoid or minimise the risk of killing or injuring reptiles. 

2.4 All common reptiles were added to the UK Biodiversity Action Plans (UKBAP) as 

priority species in September 2007. A Widespread Reptile Species Action Plan (SAP) 

was produced by the Herpetological Conservation Trust (HCT) in 2008. The main 

aims of the Widespread Reptile SAP are; maintain and increase the range of the 

species (10km squares); maintain the range of the species (vice counties): and, 

maintain and increase the number of occupied sites. 



3 Methodology 

OVERVIEW 

3.1 The reptile surveys included the compilation of existing desk study records and a 

detailed field survey. 

DESK STUDY 

3.2 Existing records relating to the site and a surrounding 1-2km radius were compiled 

from the following sources: 

 

 

The Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT); 

Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC); and, 

3.3 It is important to note that, even where data is held, a lack of records for a defined 

geographical area does not necessarily mean that there is a lack of ecological 

interest; the area may be simply under-recorded. 

FIELD SURVEY 

3.4 Surveys for the purpose of reptile presence/likely absence and to enable relative 

population class size estimation, were undertaken in all areas of suitable reptile 

habitat that may be directly impacted by the proposed works. Initial surveys took 

place between June and July 2008, with update surveys undertaken in October 2010, 

and were completed under suitable weather conditions by experienced surveyors. 

These surveys were completed with consideration of the recommendations made in 

the JNCC Herpetofauna Workers Manual (Gent & Gibson, 2003) and Froglife (1999). 

3.5 The reptile survey involved the placement of artificial refugia (in this case heavy-grade 

bitumen roofing felt) together with direct observation to determine whether reptiles 

were present or likely absent. The refugia were cut to a size of 500mm x 1000mm. 

This material warms up in the sun and attracts reptiles to bask on or under it. 

Approximately 200 refugia were placed around the site in early June 2008, in habitat 

that was considered suitable for reptiles. For the update survey, approximately 70 

refugia were placed around the site on 24 th September 2010. 

3.6 Suitable habitat for reptiles includes areas of rough grassland, scrub or woodland 

edge habitat which can be used for basking whilst also providing a source of 

invertebrate prey and shelter. South facing aspects provide particularly favourable 

basking opportunities. 



3.7 The refugia were left in place for one week to allow any reptiles present time to 

habituate to them. Initially a total of seven survey visits were made to the site 

between 16 th June 2008 and 1 st July 2008. During the update survey, a total of seven 

survey visits were made to the site between 8th and 21st October 2010 to check the 

refugia for the presence of reptiles. The visits were carried out under suitable weather 

conditions. Prior to the checking of the artificial refugia, each area of suitable reptile 

habitat was walked to try and ‘spot’ basking common lizards. This species will often 

sit on top of grass tussocks, debris and felts and will quickly move from sight upon 

disturbance. Common lizards are generally territorial and will often reuse favourite 

basking sites (Beebe & Griffiths, 2000), therefore once these sites are known spotting 

can become a relatively successful method of lizard recording. 

3.8 The best weather conditions for reptile surveying are temperatures between 10 and 

18ºC with intermittent or hazy sunshine and little or no wind (Beebe & Griffiths, 2000). 

Sunny spells between rain showers provide windows of opportunity for reptiles to 

bask and therefore provide good opportunities for finding them. Very bright sunny 

days are often poor for surveying as the animals will reach their optimum temperature 

very quickly and therefore spend less time basking before moving off into vegetation, 

where they are less visible. 

3.9 The survey was carried out in reasonable accordance with best practice guidelines 

(Froglife, 1999). These guidelines suggest a scoring system for broadly categorising 

population sizes of common British reptile species. The scoring system is based on 

the maximum number of adults seen by observation or under artificial refugia (placed 

at a density of 10 per hectare), by one person in one day, see Appendix 3. It should 

be noted that without a very extensive and lengthy survey, it is difficult to determine 

an accurate population size in accordance with this methodology. 

LIMITATIONS 

3.10 The accuracy of reptile surveys is often weather dependant, with reptiles preferring 

sunny conditions with a relatively low air temperature and little wind. The months of 

April, May and September are important, but reptiles are often active throughout 

summer. Generally surveying is recommended in temperatures of between 10º and 

17º C (Gent & Gibson, 2003). However, each species responds to temperature 

differently; adders tend to bask in temperatures up to 16º C, lizards up to 

temperatures of 18º C and grass snakes up to 20º C (Gent & Gibson, 2003). 



3.11 All of the surveys were undertaken in temperatures between 10º and 17º C. Whilst 

October is not an optimal month to survey for reptiles, overall it is considered that the 

objectives of the surveys have been met. 

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY: DETERMINING BIODIVERSITY VALUE 

3.12 The Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (IEEM) (2006) state that 

there are various characteristics that can be used to identify important species. 

These include: 

 

 

 

 

 

The rarity of the species at various geographical scales; 

The threat status and vulnerability of the species at various geographical scales; 

The population size and/or geographical extent of the species; 

How characteristic or typical a species is; and, 

The location of the species in relation to its known geographical distribution and 

range at various geographical scales. 

3.13 The characteristics listed above help define a species’ conservation status which can 

then be used to help determine its biodiversity value. IEEM (2006) provides further 

information on how the relative value and importance of a species can be determined 

and states that the value of a species should be measured against published 

selection criteria where available. 

3.14 The analysis of the data collected for this site was therefore made in reasonable 

accordance with such published guidance, which included: 

 

 

HGBI; Evaluating local mitigation/translocation programmes: Maintaining best 

practice and lawful standards. HGBI Advisory notes for amphibian and reptile 

groups (HGBI, 1998); 

FrogLife; Reptile Survey; an introduction to planning, conducting and 

interpreting surveys for snake and lizard conservation (Froglife, 1999); and, 

JNCC; Herpetofauna workers manual (Gent & Gibson, 2003). 

3.15 IEEM (2006) states that is useful to distinguish between the biodiversity value of a 

receptor and its legal status, as the scale at which any legal protection is governed 

should not always determine the geographical scale of biodiversity value i.e. the 

presence of a nationally protected species such as the slow-worm within in a 

grassland field, does not automatically qualify that field as being of biodiversity value 

at the national scale. 



3.16 In reasonable accordance with IEEM (2006), each population should be assessed as 

valuable, or potentially valuable, based on the following geographic frame of 

reference: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International e.g. a population warranting designation as a SAC and/or of 

significant conservation status for Europe; 

National (i.e. UK) e.g. a population warranting designation as a Sites of Special 

Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and/or of significant conservation status for England; 

Regional e.g. a population valuable at a regional level and/or of significant 

conservation status for the south-east; 

County e.g. a population warranting designation as a County Wildlife Site and/or 

of significant conservation status for the Surrey; 

District e.g. a population of significant conservation status for the local district; 

Local e.g. a population of significant conservation status within a local context 

(i.e. within ~5 km of the proposed Runnymede site); 

Within the immediate survey area only i.e. a population of significance for the 

immediate survey site only. 



4 Results 

DESK STUDY 

4.1 The SWT data search (2007) revealed two records of grass snake within 2km of the 

development site. The TCERC data search revealed no field records of reptiles within 

2km of the proposed development site. 

FIELD SURVEY 

4.2 The full survey results for 2008 and 2010 are presented in Appendix 4. Grass snakes 

were recorded on site during the course of the seven survey visits, in both 2008 and 

2010. 

2008 SURVEY 

4.3 The full survey results are presented in Appendix 4. To make the results clearer, the 

site was divided into 10 sections (A to J). The locations of the site areas are 

presented in the site map, Appendix 1. 

4.4 Grass snakes were recorded on site during the course of the seven survey visits. An 

adult grass snake was observed incidentally on the 11th June 2008, during the laying 

of the artificial refugia. Grass snakes were seen on a number of occasions in area J. 

A juvenile was recorded on the 26th June 2008, suggesting that the grass snake 

population breeds successfully in or nearby area J. No other reptile species were 

recorded on site. 

4.5 Based on the survey results, a good population of grass snake was recorded on site 

as the peak adult count was six on the 1 st July 2008 (last survey). This evaluation of 

population size was calculated using the Froglife scoring system (Froglife, 1999). 

Under the Froglife scoring system, assuming a typical density of 10 traps per 

hectare, a population class assessment of the reptiles recorded at a site can be 

calculated as summarised in Appendix 3. 

4.6 However, because of the small size of area J and because grass snakes were 

recorded in each survey visit, more investigations should be required to assess the 

population size in this particular area. Indeed the Species Conservation Handbook 

(English Nature 1994) suggests that a higher proportion of potentially one fifth to one 

third of the population may be recorded in a survey. The true number of reptiles is 

likely to be higher than the totals described here (refer summary of the results in 

Table 2), since some will inevitably have escaped detection, especially in an area 



such as J where the vegetation cover is quite thick and many natural refugia are 

available for reptiles. 

2010 SURVEY 

4.7 A juvenile grass snake was observed under the same reptile felt in Section A (see 

Appendix 1) on the 8 th and 20 th October 2010. No further observations of grass 

snakes were found during the survey. No other reptile species were recorded on site. 

4.8 Based on the survey results, a small population of grass snake was recorded on site 

as the peak adult count was one on both the 8 th and 20 th October 2010. The 

evaluation of population size is calculated using the Froglife scoring system (Froglife, 

1999) as summarised in Appendix 3. 

4.9 However, Froglife (1999) states that to establish presence, generally a minimum of 

seven visits are required in suitable weather conditions, at the appropriate time of 

year. For detailed surveys to gain an accurate idea of relative population size, or to 

identify key areas, at least 20 visits per season in suitable weather, are 

recommended. Further surveys would therefore be required to more accurately 

assess the size of the population present. 

4.10 The true number of reptiles is likely to be higher than the totals described here, since 

some will inevitably have escaped detection, especially in areas where the vegetation 

cover is quite thick and many natural refugia are available for reptiles. It must also be 

noted that October is not an optimal time of year to survey for reptiles. The 

temperatures overnight have been close to freezing on several occasions and reptiles 

may have become torpid or gone into hibernation earlier than what is normally 

expected. 



5 Conclusions and Recommendations 

CONCLUSIONS 

5.1 The habitat surveyed offered potential for common reptiles, with areas of log piles, 

scattered dead wood, hedge habitat and rough grassland. 

5.2 During the survey period in July 2008, grass snakes were recorded on the site in Area 

J only. 

5.3 During the survey period in October 2010, two juvenile grass snakes were found to 

be present within Area A (potentially the same individual as found under the same 

artificial refugia). The maximum number of reptiles recorded during one survey visit 

was one grass snake and there were five occasions when no reptiles were observed 

under any of the artificial refugia. 

5.4 The grass snake has large home ranges, often over 10ha in extent and so it is likely 

that they use suitable habitat within the eastern part of the survey area at least; Areas 

A, H and J in Appendix 1. 

BIODIVERSITY VALUE OF REPTILE POPULATIONS 

5.5 None of the four species of common reptiles are considered nationally rare and only 

the adder is thought to be significantly declining in England, with the other reptile 

species currently thought to have relatively stable populations nationwide (English 

Nature, 2004). None of the four species are listed as threatened on the Joint Nature 

Conservation Committee (JNCC) conservation status lists. The conservation status of 

the four species within Surrey is believed to be stable. 

5.6 All common reptiles were added to the UK Biodiversity Action Plans (UKBAP) as 

priority species in September 2007. A Widespread Reptile Species Action Plan (SAP) 

was produced by the Herpetological Conservation Trust (HCT) in 2008. The main 

aims of the Widespread Reptile SAP are: maintain and increase the range of the 

species (10km squares); maintain the range of the species (vice counties) and, 

maintain and increase the number of occupied sites. 

5.7 Both adult and juvenile grass snakes were observed, suggesting that the site 

contains a breeding location likely to be the compost heap in area J. Further to this 

as the grass snakes were found late in the year, it is presumed that they also use the 



site for hibernation, with numerous potential hibernacula opportunities within the site 

itself. 

5.8 Based on the survey results from both the 2008 and 2010 surveys, the survey area is 

thought to support a ‘low’ population of grass snake in areas A and J which use the 

site during breeding and hibernation. Therefore, the survey area and the population 

of grass snake on site are assessed as being of likely biodiversity value at the local 

scale. The presence of grass snake on site may have legal and policy implications. 

POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT 

5.9 The grass snake is listed on Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as 

amended) in respect of Sections 9(1) and 9(5) which makes it an offence to 

intentionally kill, injure or sell the animals. Therefore the presence of reptiles within 

the Runnymede site represents a legal constraint to the proposed works and reptiles 

must be safeguarded during and after the development. 

5.10 The grass snake exhibits large home ranges that are often over 10ha in extent (Beebe 

& Griffiths 2000), and any individuals currently utilising the survey area are therefore 

unlikely to be solely dependent upon the habitats located within the extent of the 

Runnymede site survival. Nevertheless, the survey area supports optimal foraging 

habitat, refugia and hibernation opportunities. In the absence of mitigation the 

potential loss of log piles, scattered dead wood, hedge habitat and rough grassland 

could have an impact that may be of ecological significance at a local scale. 

Mitigation to relocate this species offsite is included in the recommendations below. 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Reptiles 

5.11 The compost heap within Section J should be retained if possible. If this needs to be 

removed, an ecologist should supervise its destruction by hand and a similar habitat 

should be provided in its place to provide a breeding site for grass snakes 

5.12 Every effort should be made to retain reptile habitat in the final design, with particular 

care taken in those areas which contain key habitat features (such as dead wood and 

log piles) which provide refugia and hibernation opportunities. Works and storage 

compounds should be located away from such areas. 

5.13 A watching brief and destructive search of suitable features shall be undertaken in 

the construction zone; Areas A, H & J in Appendix 1. The precise extent of such 

destructive searches would be confirmed with the onsite ecologist. A destructive 



search involves the removal of potential refugia by hand. All reptiles encountered 

should be safely relocated into receptor sites away from the construction zone. 

5.14 The following methods would be used in any destructive search: 

Ecological tool box talks for all contractors; 

Timing of construction works to avoid the reptile hibernation period which runs 

from October to April (dependant on weather conditions); 

Strimming of the grassland and scrub within the construction zone to a height of 

no less 6 inches under ecological supervision at least a week prior to 

construction; 

If excavation works are due to be undertaken in suitable features such as rubble, 

log piles and leaf litter, a full destructive search of these areas will be required. 

This entails: removing the debris by hand, removing the first few centimetres of 

topsoil carefully using an excavator with a toothed bucket to reveal any 

sheltering reptiles below the surface, a hand searched of removed soil by an 

ecologist. Deeper excavations can proceed following instruction from the 

ecologist. All spoil will continue to be searched; 

Vegetation within the construction zone should be maintained at less than 6 

inches during the construction process; 

Should a reptile species (or any other protected species) be encountered at any 

time during the works, when an ecologist is not onsite, it may be necessary to 

halt works until further ecological advice can be obtained. 

5.15 Following the completion of works on the Runnymede site, landscape and ecological 

mitigation proposals shall be implemented to promote the occurrence of reptiles. 

Measures will include the provision of hibernacula in the locality of the scheme within 

the receptor site. 



6 References 

Beebe, T. & Griffiths, R. (2000) Amphibians and Reptiles – A Natural History of the 

British Herpetofauna, HarperCollins, London. 

Cranfield, C (2007). Amphibian and Reptile Survey – Best Practice. In Developing 

Best Practice in Survey Reporting published by Institute of Ecology and 

Environmental Management (IEEM) (April 2007). 

English Nature (2004) Status of the adder Vipera berus and slow-worm Anguis fragilis 

in England. English Nature Research Reports 546. http://www.englishnature.org.uk/pubs/publication/PDF/546.pdf?bcsi_scan_B0E78F72A8747CE5=0&bcs 

i_scan_filename=546.pdf 

Froglife (1999) Reptile Survey; an introduction to planning, conducting and 

interpreting surveys for snake and lizard conservation. Froglife Advice Sheet 10. 

Froglife, Halesworth. 

Gent, T. & Gibson, S. (2003) Herpetofauna Workers Manual. Joint Nature 

Conservancy Council, Peterborough UK. 

Herpetofauna Groups of Britain and Ireland (1998) Evaluating local 

mitigation/translocation programmes: Maintaining best practice and lawful standards. 

HGBI Advisory notes for amphibian and reptile groups. 

Herpetological Conservation Trust (2009) Widespread Reptiles Species Action Plan 

NCC (1989) Guidelines for selection of biological SSSIs. Nature Conservancy 

Council, Peterborough UK. 



Appendix 1: Site Plan 



Plan 1: Reptile survey map indicating presence of reptiles during 2008 and 2010 surveys 



Appendix 2: Photographs 



Photograph 1 

Area of amenity grassland that 

covers half of the site 

Photograph 2 

Area of highly shaded amenity 

grassland. 

Photograph 3 

Juvenile grass snake found 

under artificial refugia in Area A 

during 2010 surveys. 



Photograph 4 

Compost heap in Area J where 

most grass snakes were 

recorded in 2008 surveys. 



Appendix 3: Population size categories for common 

reptile species 



Population scores according to Froglife (1999) 

Species 

Low population 

Score 1 

Good population 

Score 2 

Exceptional 

population 

Score 3 

Adder 10 

Grass snake 10 

Common lizard 20 

Slow-worm 20 

The figures in the table refer to the maximum number of adults seen by observation 

and/or under artificial refugia (placed at a density of up to 10 per hectare), by one 

person in one day. 



Appendix 4: Reptile survey results 



Table 1: Reptile survey results 2010 

Date 

Start 

time 

Stop 

time 

Temp 

(°C) 

Weather conditions No. Seen Age status 

Sex (if 

known) 

Species 

Location 

within site 

08/10/2010 10:00 11:15 17°C Cloud cover 90%, mild, overcast 1 Juv Unknown Grass snake By main house 

13/10/2010 12:30 13:30 13°C 

15/10/2010 10:30 11:30 14°C 

Cloud cover 100%, cold, 

overcast 

Cloud cover 80%, mild, overcast 

0 

0 

18/10/2010 13:00 14:00 12°C 

19/10/2010 13:00 14:10 10°C 

Cloud cover 20%, mild, little 

wind 

Cloud cover 40%, light wind 

0 

0 

20/10/2010 12:30 13:30 11°C 

Cloud cover 50%, cold, sunny 

1 Juv Unknown Grass snake By main house 

21/10/2010 12:00 13:30 10°C 

Cloud cover 50%, mild, sunny 

0 



Table 2: Reptile survey results 2008 

Date 

Start 

time 

Stop 

time 

Temp 

(°C) 

Weather conditions No. Seen Age status 

Sex (if 

known) 

Species 

Location 

within site 

16/06/2008 13:15 15:30 18 

18/06/2008 10:10 11:55 17.5 

18/06/2008 14:00 15:30 17.9 

19/06/2008 9:30 11:00 16.1 

23/06/2008 12:00 13:30 17.9 

26/06/2008 8:00 9:15 15 

01/07/2008 6:45 8:25 14 

Cloud cover 70%, no rain, light 

breeze 

Cloud cover 100%, no rain, mild 

to strong breeze 


breeze 


breeze 


breeze 

Cloud cover 30%, no rain, no 

breeze 


breeze 

1 Adult Not known Grass snake J 




5 (and 

slough) 

4 

7 (and 

slough) 

Adult Not known Grass snake J 

3 adults, 1 

juvenile 

6 adults, 1 

sub-adult 

Not known Grass snake J 

Not known Grass snake J 





APPENDIX 12.4 

Tree Removal and Replacement Plan 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVRON 

UK11-16357



APPENDIX 12.5 

Arboricultural Assessment 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVRON 

UK11-16357

ARBORICULTURAL REPORT 

AND 

IMPLICATIONS ASSESSMENT 

to BS 5837:2005 

at 

Runnymede Site 

Englefield Green 

Egham 

Surrey 

TW20 0JZ 

Client: 

ENVIRON UK Ltd 

Client Address: 

5 Stratford Place 

Mayfair 

W1C 1AX 

Client Telephone: 

020 74789800 

07931189163 (Mob) 

0207478 9801 (Fax) 

JCA Ref: 

9832A/AB

Arboricultural Report at: Runnymede Site, Englefield Green, Egham, Surrey TW20 0JZ. 

Ref: 9832A/AB Page 3 of 22 

Contents 

1. Introduction _________________________________________________________________________________ 4 

1.1 Purpose of the Report ________________________________________________________________________ 4 

1.2 Terms of Reference _________________________________________________________________________ 4 

1.3 Scope of the Report _________________________________________________________________________ 4 

1.4 Survey Details _____________________________________________________________________________ 4 

2. Site Description ______________________________________________________________________________ 5 

2.1 Land Use _________________________________________________________________________________ 5 

2.2 Topography _______________________________________________________________________________ 5 

2.3 Treescape _________________________________________________________________________________ 5 

2.4 Amenity Value _____________________________________________________________________________ 5 

2.5 Age Class Mix _____________________________________________________________________________ 5 

2.6 Species Diversity ___________________________________________________________________________ 6 

3. Status of the Trees ____________________________________________________________________________ 6 

4. Tree Descriptions and Recommendations _________________________________________________________ 6 

5. Discussion ___________________________________________________________________________________ 6 

6. Arboricultural Implications Assessment (AIA) ____________________________________________________ 8 

6.1 Proposed Development _______________________________________________________________________ 8 

6.2 Implications for Existing Trees ________________________________________________________________ 9 

6.3 Protection of Retained Trees __________________________________________________________________ 9 

6.4 Remedial Measures ________________________________________________________________________ 10 

7. Conclusions ________________________________________________________________________________ 11 

Appendix 1: Tree Descriptions and Recommendations ________________________________________________ 14 

Appendix 2: Explanation of Tree Descriptions _______________________________________________________ 15 

A2.1 Measurements __________________________________________________________________________ 15 

A2.2 Evaluations ____________________________________________________________________________ 15 

A2.3 Retention Categories _____________________________________________________________________ 16 

Appendix 3: General Guidelines ___________________________________________________________________ 17 

Appendix 4: Glossary of Terms & Abbreviations _____________________________________________________ 18 

Appendix 5: Author Qualifications _________________________________________________________________ 19 

Appendix 6: Tree Constraints Plan _________________________________________________________________ 20 

Appendix 7: Arboricultural Implications Plan _______________________________________________________ 21 

© JCA Limited 2011



1. Introduction 

1.1 Purpose of the Report 

1.1.1 A report is needed at Runnymede Campus, Englefield Green, Egham, TW20 0JZ to 

provide detailed, independent, arboricultural advice on the trees present, in the context 

of potential development. 

1.2 Terms of Reference 

1.2.1 I am instructed by ENVIRON to visit the site and prepare my findings in a report. 

1.2.2 For this purpose I have been supplied with a topographical survey, Drawing Nos. RG- 

07-817-01, RG-08-940-01B and 03A_Tree Removal & Replacement Plan. 

1.3 Scope of the Report 

1.3.1 This report is compiled in accordance with BS 5837:2005 Trees in relation to 

construction. 

1.3.2 Preliminary recommendations are given with a view to the long-term management of a 

sustainable tree cover. 

1.3.3 All trees within the site boundary with a stem diameter above 75mm are included. 

1.3.4 Where applicable trees outside the site boundary, but close enough to be affected by 

the proposed development, are included. 

1.3.5 The specific design of the proposed development has been considered within the 

Arboricultural Implication Assessment in Section 6 and detailed on the plan at 

Appendix 7. 

1.4 Survey Details 

1.4.1 Surveys of the site were undertaken in October 2007 and August 2008 with an updated 

survey undertaken in October 2010 to resurvey several trees in the centre of the 

development area and survey some trees along the Coopers Hill Lane boundary not 

surveyed previously. 

1.4.2 The survey was conducted by Andrew Bagshaw FDSc (Arboriculture). 

1.4.3 Inspection was made at ground level. Further investigation, such as climbed 

inspections or decay detection surveys, may be recommended where appropriate. 

© JCA Limited 2011



1.4.4 Measurements were obtained using clinometers, specialist tapes or electronic 

distometers. Where this was not possible measurements were estimated. 

2. Site Description 

2.1 Land Use 

2.1.1 Built areas within the site27.3ha are largely confined to a small area in the centre of the 

site and most recently comprised a university campus (up until 2007), a small science 

park (although the last few businesses are due to vacate in January 2011) plus several 

now vacant residential dwellings at Oak Lane Cottages. The remaining section of the 

Campus site includes woodland, gardens, parkland, sports pitches and areas of hard 

standing (roads, car parking areas and old tennis courts). 

2.2 Topography 

2.2.1 The main areas of the centre of the site where the survey took place are approximately 

level with only minor changes in ground level encountered. Oak Lane Cottages in the 

north west of the site is located on a slope, although the area surveyed around these 

properties are relatively flat. 

2.2.2 There are some significant level changes on the edges of the surveyed area where the 

ground slopes away into an extensive area of mature, mixed broadleaf woodland within 

the Coopers Hill Slopes, however these areas are not included in the survey. 

2.3 Treescape 

2.3.1 The trees on this site have a significant impact on the local treescape. 

2.3.2 Surrounding the site is a rural area containing occasional garden trees and many patches 

of woodland in the surrounding agricultural land. 

2.4 Amenity Value 

2.4.1 The trees on site collectively provide a high amenity to the surrounding area. 

2.5 Age Class Mix 

2.5.1 The trees surveyed ranged in age from young to mature. However, the trees were 

predominantly early-mature and mature. 

© JCA Limited 2011



2.6 Species Diversity 

2.6.1 Species surveyed include Oak, Ash, Beech, Lime, Cedar, Cypress, Pine, Maple, 

Sycamore, Fir, Redwood, Wellingtonia, Monkey Puzzle, Holly, Rhododendron, Sweet 

Chestnut and Horse Chestnut. The predominant species were Oak, Beech, Cedar, 

Cypress and Lime with other species being occasional, or even single, specimens. 

3. Status of the Trees 

3.1 A check was made on 4 th October 2007 with Runnymede Borough Council (RBC). 

3.2 RBC indicated that there are some Tree Preservation Orders in force on this site at the 

Coopers Hill Lane boundary and that parts of the site are within Englefield Green 

Conservation Area; again this is along the Coopers Hill Lane boundary in the south of 

the site. 

3.3 Before any work is organised, all the necessary steps to get the permission from RBC 

should be taken. 

No work should be done to any trees until this permission has been granted. 

3.4 Due to the large potential penalties for illegally carrying out work to protected trees, it 

is recommended that a further check is carried out prior to any works being undertaken. 

4. Tree Descriptions and Recommendations 

4.1 Full details of all individual trees surveyed are recorded in the tables at Appendix 1, a 

full explanation of the tables can be found at Appendix 2. Please refer also to the Tree 

Constraints Plan at Appendix 6 for tree locations. 

5. Discussion 

5.1.1 The tree survey revealed a total of 258 items of vegetation (212 individual trees, 38 

groups of trees and 8 hedges). Using the retention category and definition criteria given 

in Appendix 2 these were categorised as follows:: 

• 35 trees were identified as retention category ‘A’; 

• 87 trees, groups of trees and hedges were identified as retention category ‘B’; 

• 124 trees, groups of trees and hedges as retention category ‘C; and 

• 12 trees as retention category ‘R’. 

5.1.2 Twelve trees (T3, G35 (one tree), T38, T40, T74, T78, T123, T132, T204, T214, 

© JCA Limited 2011



T226 and T242) were identified as retention category ‘R’ (trees to be removed). These 

trees have no long term future on the site, are already in decline or considered to be 

potentially hazardous. 

5.1.3 G35 (one tree), T74, T78, T123, T132, T214, T226 and T242 are considered to be 

unsafe and should be removed as soon as it is reasonably practicable. Their removal is 

of high priority. 

5.1.4 T3, T38, T40 and T204 have been recommended for removal in order to benefit 

adjacent trees or to prevent them from becoming dangerous trees. Their removal is of a 

removal is of lower priority. 

5.1.5 Remedial tree works are recommended for reasons of public safety and/or to ensure the 

long term health of the trees. This work is detailed in Appendix 1. Attention is drawn 

to T14, T30, T31, T32, T56, T62, T186, T187 and G197 these trees require works for 

various reasons such as their proximity to buildings or the safety of visitors to the site. 

The works recommended for safety (such as removing deadwood or clearances over 

the highway) should be regarded as high priority. Works detailed to reduce problems 

such as crown reductions away from buildings can be considered a lower priority. 

5.1.6 T60, T81, T82, T117, T123, T206 and T240 were found to possess decayed wounds 

or cavities, as detailed at Appendix 1. Further detailed investigations should be 

undertaken before a decision is made regarding tree retention or removal. Decay 

detection analysis is recommended (using a Resistograph or Picus, information of 

which can be viewed on the JCA website – www.jcaac.com) to determine the extent of 

the decay and to establish the extent of tree works required. 

5.1.7 Many of the surveyed trees had stubs, broken branches or deadwood within their 

canopies. It is advised that those trees which are located close to, or which overhang 

any access routes or structures, both existing and proposed, be remedially pruned to 

remove the stubs, broken branches and deadwood from their crowns. It should be noted 

that Phytophthora was observed to one mature Oak tree located along Oak Lane to the 

West of the site and this tree now requires urgent remedial works. 

5.1.8 For those trees growing within the woodland areas, away from the roads, footpaths and 

buildings, the deadwood is tolerable and actually beneficial for wildlife. However, if 

these woodland areas are developed, and regularly used by people, then some remedial 

pruning work will be required to these trees also. 

5.1.9 Those trees which overhang public footpaths and public highways, as described in 

Appendix 1, shall require future maintenance in order to maintain clearance heights for 

vehicular and pedestrian traffic. These heights should be 5.6m above a road and 2.5m 

above a footpath. 

5.1.10 A full detailed inspection of T27, T42, T62, T66, T67, T76, T95, T99, T100, T101, 

© JCA Limited 2011



T102, G118, T128, T137, T141, T143, T164, T166, T170, T171, T177, T180, T182, 

T187, G194, T199, T201 – T204, G205, G208, G209 and H218 was inhibited by 

restricted access to the tree or the base of the tree or by the presence of Ivy. It is 

therefore advised that these trees be re-inspected for any possible defects when the Ivy 

has been removed or when access has been made available. 

5.1.11 T14, T22, T54, T57, T61, T72, T77, T79, T80, T145, T147, T164, T169, T174, 

T176, G227, T248 and T253 were noted to have defects, poor form or signs of disease 

such as Bleeding Horse Chestnut Canker which may lead to their early demise or 

render them unsafe in the future. I have made recommendations in Appendix 1 for 

these trees to be monitored in the future, to assess if their condition is still acceptable. I 

advise that these trees be re-surveyed and re-assessed on an annual basis. 

5.1.12 BLEEDING CANKER OF HORSE CHESTNUTS: This disease is rapidly spreading 

throughout the country. Until recently the disease was blamed upon two species of 

Phytophthora: P. cactorum and P. citricola. A third and more virulent causal agent has 

now been identified, this is Pseudomonas syringae. The symptoms begin with the 

appearance of watery exudates. These are usually to be found on the stem. On the 

occasions when they are to be found on branches instead of the stem, these infected 

branches should be removed, as this may arrest the spread of the disease. 

5.1.13 As the disease progresses patches of peeling bark can be observed and the timber 

becomes extremely brittle. At this stage the tree poses a serious threat to public safety 

and, as a minimal measure, any large limbs should be removed. A tree exhibiting any 

symptoms is likely to require removal within 5 years and highly unlikely to survive 10 

years. No control measures are currently known and there is no definitive guidance as 

to at which point the tree should be removed. On the one hand it would be preferable to 

retain tree as long as they are not dangerous, on the other hand it will be harbouring the 

disease and as such will help to spread it. A prudent approach would be to remove 

diseased trees if they are occasional specimens, in order to protect other specimens. 

However, it is often the case that upwards of 30% of the specimens within an area, are 

infected. In such circumstances it is highly likely that all specimens will become 

infected, regardless of the removal of infected specimens. It is important therefore that 

a wide ranging survey is conducted to ascertain the extent of the problem in the 

locality. On the basis of these findings better decisions can be made. 

6. Arboricultural Implications Assessment (AIA) 

6.1 Proposed Development 

6.1.1 The proposed development will consist of the redevelopment of the Runnymede site as 

an educational facility including student accommodation. Drawing, No. 03A_ Tree 

Removal &Replacement Plan has been supplied by the client; this plan can be found 

at Appendix 7 and is the basis for which this AIA has been prepared. 

© JCA Limited 2011



6.2 Implications for Existing Trees 

6.2.1 H6, T7, T8, T11, T12, T13, T17, T18, T19, T20, T21, T22, G35, G36, G37, H39, 

T42, H44, T46, G92, G118, G119, G122, G124, T125, T128, T134, T135, T136, 

T138, T147, T148, T149, T150, T151, T152, G153, T154, T155, T156, G157, H158, 

T159, T160, T161, T162, T166, T167, T168, T169, T170, T171, T172, T173, T174, 

T176, T177, T184, G197, H218, G219, 5 specimens from G229, G235, T236 and 

T257 shall require removal as they are situated within the footprint of the proposed 

development. 

6.2.2 G2, G9, G10, T15, T16, T23, G28, T43, T45, T47, T126, G127, T133, T185, T230, 

T231, T232, T234 and G237 shall require removal, as they are situated so close to the 

proposed development that protecting them during construction is not practical as they 

will not survive the construction phase. 

6.3 There are some Tree Preservation Orders in force on this site at the Coopers Hill Lane 

boundary. We are also informed that parts of the site are within a Conservation Area; 

again this is along the Coopers Hill Lane boundary. 

6.3.1 Most of the trees recommended for removal are retention category ‘C’ trees and can be 

removed without significantly affecting the overall visual amenity of the area. 

6.3.2 T7, H39, T42, T46, T147, T154, T160, T161, T166, T171, T173, G229, T230, T231 

and T232 are ‘B’ trees and T138 is an ‘A’ tree. These trees have been recommended 

for removal to facilitate the proposed development. Unfortunately in this instance the 

removal of these trees would be unavoidable. The planting of semi-mature trees should 

go towards mitigating their removal. 

6.3.3 The majority of trees recommended for retention are situated close to the site boundary. 

This offers a potential window for development within the centre of the site. 

6.3.4 There is little room for development within this site without the removal of some trees. 

However many of the trees are of poor quality (retention category ‘C’) and could be 

replaced as part of a post development landscaping scheme. 

6.3 Protection of Retained Trees 

6.3.1 The erection of protective fencing, in accordance with BS 5837: 2005, will be the very 

first job on site following the tree removal and pruning works. The fencing should 

ideally be positioned to protect the entire Root Protection Area (RPA) of the retained 

trees, in order to create a Construction Exclusion Zone (CEZ). 

6.3.2 Where it is not possible to protect the entire RPAs by fencing, specialist measures must 

be taken during the construction phase to avoid ground compaction and minimise root 

damage, where the RPAs remain unprotected. Such areas are highlighted in blue on the 

Development Proposals Plan at Appendix 7. 

© JCA Limited 2011



6.3.3 Routes for pedestrian and site traffic should ideally be located outside, and diverted 

away from, the RPAs of the retained trees. Where this is not possible, (T14, T24, T48, 

T49, T52, 53, T55, T56, T62, T76, T93, T94, T96, T97, T98, T99, T100, T101, 


T201, T202, T203, G210, T21, T213, T214, T215, T216, G233, T241 and T256) 

temporary protective surfaces must be laid over the exposed RPAs which will 

distribute the weight of site vehicles, machinery or pedestrians whilst allowing 

moisture to reach the tree rooting area beneath. 

6.3.4 Care must be taken to avoid causing damage to tree roots during when removing 

existing hard surface or demolishing existing buildings within, or adjacent to, the RPA 

of retained trees. JCA should be informed in advance of such activities so that 

monitoring arrangements can be made. 

6.3.5 It is proposed to construct access roads, and car parking areas within the RPA of T14, 

T24, T48, T49, T52, 53, T55, T56, T62, T76, T93, T94, T96, T97, T98, T99, T100, 


T200, T201, T202, T203, G210, T21, T213, T214, T215, T216, G233, T241 and 

T256. Special engineering methods will be required in order to protect the roots of 

trees during the development and to ensure that they are able to access oxygen, water 

and nutrients once the development is complete. The existing access into the site is 

being utilised. This will minimise damage to tree roots. 

6.3.6 New buildings are proposed adjacent to T24, T86, T90, T96, T97, T105, T139, T146, 

T175, T186 and G229. Where the new buildings encroach into the RPAs of retained 

trees, in order to minimise root damage, special engineering techniques, such as pile 

foundations, must be adopted in favour of the more traditional strip foundations. 

6.3.7 Where utilities need to be brought onto the site, these should ideally be routed away 

from the RPAs of the trees. Where this is not possible, methodologies on the 

installation of underground services without damage to tree roots should be considered. 

All service providers should be consulted prior to commencement of works with the 

aim of minimising the number of service runs on the site. 

6.3.8 The site compound, which typically includes the site office, mess facilities, toilets, 

storage of materials and parking, must be located away from the trees and outside the 

RPAs. Care should also be taken to prevent soil contamination with chemical spillages, 

including petrol, diesel and oils. 

6.3.9 The remaining trees will be unaffected by the development but shall require protection 

by fencing to BS 5837: 2005 during the development phase. 

6.4 Remedial Measures 

6.4.1 Part of the proposed development will encroach into the RPAs of T14, T24, T48, T49, 

T52, 53, T55, T56, T62, T76, T93, T94, T96, T97, T98, T99, T100, T101, T102, 

© JCA Limited 2011




T202, T203, G210, T21, T213, T214, T215, T216, G233, T241 and T256, resulting 

in possible root loss. It would therefore be prudent to apply mycorrhiza fungi to the 

soils around these trees after the construction phase is complete. Mycorrhiza is a 

fungus that forms a symbiotic relationship with the tree roots. A tree root associated 

with mycorrhiza takes up nutrients more effectively and this will therefore help the 

trees to produce new roots more effectively, so benefitting their recovery. 

6.4.2 The site offers scope for landscaping and tree planting. Should new planting be desired, 

or required, then the areas identified for the new planting should also be protected by 

fencing during the construction phase to prevent the compaction of the soil. 

6.4.3 In addition to any new planting, where there are existing young trees which require 

removal in order to facilitate the proposed development, consideration should be given 

to transplanting such trees to a more suitable location elsewhere on site. 

6.4.4 In order to protect the retained trees during the construction phase, protective fencing 

needs to be installed. Protective fencing specifications and on site positioning, along 

with details of any necessary specialist construction methods can be provided in an 

Arboricultural Method Statement (AMS). 

7. Conclusions 

7.1 The trees surveyed were generally found to be in good condition. 

7.2 There are a number of Tree Preservation Orders in force on this site and parts of the 

site are within a Conservation Area at the Coopers Hill Lane boundary. 

7.3 Some trees have been recommended for removal for arboricultural reasons. These are 

discussed in Section 5 and detailed at Appendix 1. 

7.4 Some pruning works have been recommended for reasons of public safety and to 

ensure the long term health of the trees. These are summarised in Section 5 and 

detailed at Appendix 1. 

7.5 The arboricultural implications of the development have been considered and discussed 

in Section 6. 

7.6 All development work carried out in close proximity to trees should be done so in a 

manner sympathetic to their needs. Otherwise the condition of the trees may deteriorate 

in the months and years following the development, leading to a loss of amenity and 

potentially hazardous trees. 

7.7 The protection of retained trees can be achieved by the creation of a Construction 

Exclusion Zone based on the Root Protection Area of a tree. The Root Protection Area 

of each tree or group is marked on the Tree Constraints Plan at Appendix 6. 

© JCA Limited 2011



7.8 The proposed development should be accompanied by an Arboricultural Method 

Statement (AMS) detailing the specific protection measures necessary for each tree. 

This should specify fencing standard and positions (the creation of the Construction 

Exclusion Zone), acceptable construction techniques and necessary tree works. 

7.9 Upon instruction JCA are able to provide a comprehensive Arboricultural Method 

Statement in order to ensure the continued health of trees throughout the proposed 

development. We are also able to provide trees planting schemes and organise tree 

works. 

© JCA Limited 2011



Appendices 

© JCA Limited 2011



Appendix 1: Tree Descriptions and Recommendations 

© JCA Limited 2011

Appendix 1 – Tree Descriptions and Recommendations 1 

Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 

Crown Height (m) 

Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 

Recommendations 

Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 

Life Expectancy 

(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

G1 

Semi Mature 2.5 

Oak To To 

0 

11 31 

4.5 4 

Quercus robur 

4 

Single stemmed and leaning. Well developed 

crown. No evidence of significant pruning. No 

major visible defects. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

G2 

T3 

Young / Semi 

Mature 

Oak & Birch 

Quercus robur 

and Betula 

pendula 

To 

7 

0 

15 

est. 

See plan 

Mature 2.5 

Apple 14 2 62 4.5 4 

Malus sp 

4 

Low shrubby under layer. No evidence of 

significant pruning. No major visible defects. 

Multi-stemmed at 2m. Well developed crown. 

Occasional pruning wounds. Major die back 

and major decay. 

No action 

required 

Remove 

GOOD 

GOOD 

FAIR 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T11 


Norway Maple 

‘Crimson King’ 

Acer platanoides 


7 2 19 

2 2.5 

2.5 

Single stemmed and vertical. Well developed 



No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T12 


18 

Norway Maple 6 2 at 2.5 2 


base 

2.5 

Twin-stemmed at 0.5m. Well developed crown. 

No evidence of significant pruning. No major 

visible defects. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T13 

Semi Mature 3 

Norway Maple 




8 2 22 

3 3.5 

3 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T14 

Mature 8 

Beech 15 2 76 7.5 7.5 

Fagus sylvatica 

7 


Some decay in forks. Multiple Pruning wounds. 

Topped at 2 metres and 8 metres. Very Poor 

unions. Major deadwood and dieback. 

Crown 

clean. 

Monitor 

yearly. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

10-20 C 

T15 

Semi Mature 3 

Purple Plum 6 2 17 2 3 

Prunus cerasifera 

3 

‘Pissardii’ 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T16 


19 

Weeping Birch 4 1 at 2 2.5 

Betula pendula 

base 

3.5 

‘Youngii’ 

Twin-stemmed at 1m. Well developed crown. 



No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T17 

Semi Mature 2 

25 

Weeping Birch 4 1 at 2.5 2.5 


base 

3 

‘Youngii’ 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T18 

Semi Mature 2 

14 

Weeping Birch 2 0.5 at 1 1 


base 

1.5 

‘Youngii’ 


crown. Multiple pruning wounds. No major 

visible defects. Die back. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T19 

Semi Mature 2 

22 

Weeping Birch 4 1 at 2 2.5 


base 

3 

‘Youngii’ 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T20 


Purple Plum 5 2 15 2.5 2 


3 



crown. Occasional pruning wounds due to 

crown lifting. No major visible defects. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T21 

Early Mature 4 

Ash 9 2 36 4.5 4 

Fraxinus excelsior 

4.5 


Minor deadwood. Occasional pruning wounds 

due to crown lifting. No major visible defects. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T22 

Semi Mature 3 

Rowan 6 2 20 3 2.5 

Sorbus aucuparia 

3 



major visible defects. Die back, basal decay. 

Monitor 

FAIR 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 

20-40 C 

T23 

Young 1.5 

Rowan 5 2 8 2 2 


2 


crown. No evidence of previous pruning. No 


No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

20-40 C 

T24 

Early Mature 5.5 

Indian Bean Tree 12 2.5 55 5 5 

Catalpa 

5 

bignonioides 

Twin-stemmed at 2.5m. Well developed crown. 


visible defects. Bark damage. Minor decay. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

G25 

Early Mature 

Mixed Cypress 

Chameacyparis 

sp. 

To 

15 

0 

To 

26 

est. 

See plan 



No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T26 


False Acacia 13 3 25 4 4 

Robinia 

4 

pseudoacacia 



major visible defects. Minor decay. Minor die 

back. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T27 

Mature 4.5 

Lime 17 5 80 4 4 

Tilia sp 

4 


crown. Occasional pruning wounds. No major 

visible defects. Ivy. 

Remove ivy 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

G28 

T29 

Young 

Mixed Sycamore 

and Ash 

Acer 

pseudoplatanus 

and Fraxinus 

excelsior 

8 0.5 

To 

18 

est. 

See plan 

Semi Mature 1 

Silver Birch 13 1 13 1 1.5 


2.5 

Self-seeded. No evidence of significant 

pruning. No major visible defects. 




No action 

required 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

40+ C 

T30 


Field Maple 9 0.5 27 @ 

base 

3.5 4 

Acer campestre 

3.5 

Multi-stemmed at 0.5m. No evidence of 


Crown lift to 

5 metres 

over 

highway 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T31 


Silver Birch 13 3 17 3 3.5 


5 




Crown lift 5 

metres Over 

highway 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T32 


Field Maple 22 @ 

9 2 3 3 

base 


3.5 


visible defects. Weak unions 1.5metres. 

Crown lift to 

5 metres 

over 

highway. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

G33 


Oak To To 

1.5 6 5 

14 35 

Quercus robur 

5.5 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

G34 


Silver Birch To To 

2.5 

14 18 

2.5 3 


0.5 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

G35 

G36 

Semi-Mature 4 

Field Maple To To 4 3 

2.5 

8 17 


4 

Young 

Mixed 

To 

4 

0 

To 

7.5 

est. 

See plan 

Two trees – one single stemmed and leaning 

with a well developed crown, the other is twinstemmed 

at 1m with a well developed crown. 

Occasional pruning wounds due to crown 

lifting. The single-stemmed tree has basal decay 

and needs to be felled. 

A small nursery plot. Pot plants and planted 

out. 

Remove the 

singlestemmed 

tree 

No action 

required 

FAIR 

POOR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

L 

O 

W 

20-40 R 

40+ C 

Young 

G37 Shrubs 3 0 

To 

10 

est. 

See plan 


visible defects. Low growing shrubs. 

No action 

required 

FAIR 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T38 

Semi-Mature 4 

Silver Birch To 

9 0 3 5 

16 


3 

Re-growth from a rotten stump. A full detailed 

inspection not possible. 

Remove 

POOR 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

G41 

Young 

Mixed 

To 

4 

0 

To 

7.5 

See plan 

Nursery area. Various small trees and shrubs. 

No action 

required 

FAIR 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T42 

Mature 4.5 

Cherry 8 2 40 4.5 4 

Prunus sp 

5 

Multi-stemmed at 1.5m. Well developed crown. 

Occasional pruning wounds due to crown 

lifting. No major visible defects. Full detailed 

inspection not possible due to ivy. 

Remove ivy 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ B 

T43 


Snake Bark Maple 8 1.5 16 3 3 

Acer capillipes 

3.5 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

H44 

Early Mature 

Cypress 

Chameacyparis sp 

7 0 

To 

18 

est. 

See plan 

Occasional pruning wounds - Trimming. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T45 

Semi Mature 4 

34 

False Acacia 11 2 at 3 4 

Robinia 

base 

4 

pseudoacacia 


Minor decay at base. No evidence of significant 

pruning. No major visible defects. Poor main 

fork. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T46 

Mature 3.5 

Pine 14 2 42 4 4 

Pinus sp 

5 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T47 

T48 

Young 0.5 

Corkscrew 

Willow 

Salix babylonica 

var. pekinesis 

‘Tortuasa’ 

3 1 6 

0.5 0.5 

Mature 14.5 

Oak 15 1.5 114 11 14 

Quercus robur 

1 

13 







No action 

required 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ C 

40 + A 

T49 

Mature 13 

Cedar 25 2 119 12 11 

Cedrus sp 

12 



visible defects. Minor deadwood. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T50 

Mature 3 

Weeping Beech 12 3 48 6 6 


6 

‘pendula’ 



major visible defects. Grafted at 2 metres. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T51 

Mature 4 

Weeping Beech 12 3 40 4 5 


6 

‘pendula’ 



major visible defects. Grafted at 2 metres. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T52 

Semi Mature 4 

Ash 9 2 21 3 3 


3 



crown lifting. No major visible defects. Minor 

dieback. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T53 

Young 1 

Indian Bean Tree 4 1 5 1.5 1 

Catalpa 

1 

bignonioides 

Multi-stemmed at 1m. Well developed crown. – 

leaning. No evidence of previous pruning. No 


No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T54 

Mature 4 

Sweet Chestnut 15 2 75 4 6 

Castanea sativa 

4 


crown. Slight lean. Decay at base. Multiple 

Pruning wounds. Slight dieback. 

Monitor 

FAIR 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T55 

Mature 7 

Scots Pine 22 4 83 4 6 

Pinus sylvestris 

9 




Entangled with T56. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T56 

Mature 11 

Oak 19 2 81 12 4 

Quercus robur 

11 


Multiple pruning wounds due to crown lifting. 

No major visible defects. Leaning over 

building. Significant deadwood. Entangled with 

T55. 

Remedial 

prune. 

Reduce 

away from 

buildings 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T57 


To 

Holly 6 0 25 2 2 

Ilex aquifolium 

est. 

2 

Multi-stemmed at ground level. Well developed 

crown. Multiple Pruning wounds. Topped out – 

decay at centre. 

Monitor 

FAIR 

POOR 

M 

O 

D 

20-40 C 

T58 

Semi-Mature 1.5 

Holly 20 

7 0 2 2 

est. 


1.5 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T59 

Mature 1 



8 


Occasional pruning wounds. Northern fork 

topped at 14 metres, decay from 10 metres. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T60 

Mature 1 

Sycamore 16 4 61 6 4 

Acer 

8 


Single stemmed and leaning. Unbalanced 

crown. Basal decay. Occasional pruning 

wounds. 

Decay 

detection 

GOOD 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T61 

Mature 6 

Sweet Chestnut 17 1.5 97 7 5 


6 


crown. Basal decay – minor. Multiple Pruning 

wounds. Topped to 17 metres. 

Monitor 

GOOD 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T62 

Mature 6 



6 


crown. Multiple Pruning wounds. Minor decay. 

Full detailed inspection not possible due to 

epicormic shoots. 

Remedial 

prune – 

deadwood 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T63 

Mature 5 



4 


crown. Multiple Pruning wounds. Minor 

damage at base. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T64 

Mature 5 



7 



visible defects. Minor basal damage. Topped to 

18 metres. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T65 

Mature 5 



4.5 


crown. Minor basal damage. Multiple pruning 

wounds. No major visible defects – topped to 

20 metres. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T66 

Mature 7.5 

Lime 78 

22 1.5 4.5 5.5 

est. 

Tilia sp 

3 



visible defects. Full detailed inspection not 

possible. Epicormic shoots noted. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T67 

Mature 2.5 

Sweet Chestnut 19 1 90 6.5 2.5 


7.5 


crown. Multiple pruning wounds. Heavy crown 

reduction in past. Full detailed inspection not 

possible due to sucker growth. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T68 

Mature 4 

Corsican Pine 25 14 82 0 6 

Pinus nigra 

5 


crown. Multiple pruning wounds. No evidence 

of significant pruning. No major visible defects. 

Entangled with T69. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T69 

Mature 6.5 

Beech 14 5 77 6.5 6 


8 



visible defects. Entangled with T68. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T70 

Mature 4 

Sweet Chestnut 13 1.5 44 5 5 


4.5 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T71 

Mature 2 

Sweet Chestnut 19 4 88 3.5 4.5 


8.5 



visible defects. Minor Deadwood. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T72 

Mature 5.5 

Horse Chestnut 18 3 83 7 7 

Aesculus 

5 

hippocastanum 


crown. Multiple Pruning wounds – previously 

topped. Signs of Bleeding Horse Chestnut 

Canker. 

Monitor 

POOR 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

10-20 C 

T73 

Mature 4.5 

Sweet Chestnut 19 2 104 5.5 6 


6 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T74 

Mature 6 

Horse Chestnut 17 2 123 4 6 

Aesculus 

6.5 

hippocastanum 

Twin-stemmed at 2m. Unbalanced crown. 

Major die back. Multiple Pruning wounds. 

Major basal decay. Bleeding Horse Chestnut 

Canker. 

Remove 

POOR 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T81 

Mature 8 



8 



major visible defects. Major bark damage at 

base to 3 metres. 

Decay 

detection 

GOOD 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T82 

Mature 6 

Sweet Chestnut 18 2 120 4.5 5 


6.5 


crown. Basal damage. Multiple pruning 

wounds. No major visible defects. Topped to 15 

metres. 

Decay 

detection 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T83 


To 

Hawthorn 6 2 20 3 3 

Crataegus 

est. 

3 

monogyna 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

H84 

Early Mature 

Hawthorn 

Crataegus 

monogyna 

1.5 0.5 

To 

12 @ 

base 

See plan 

Multiple pruning wounds from trimming. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T85 


Norway Maple 15 2 38 4.5 4 


4.5 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T86 




5 


crown. Minor deadwood. No evidence of 


No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T87 

Semi Mature 1 

Norway Maple 14 3 26 5 5 


5 



visible defects. Minor damage at decay at 2 

metres. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T88 


Norway Maple 16 2 55 6 6.5 


5.2 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T89 

Young 1 

Rowan 7 3 8 1 2 


1 



major visible defects. Suppressed by T90. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

10-20 C 

T90 


Norway Maple 15 3 47 7.5 7.5 


6.5 


crown. Exposed roots. No evidence of 


No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T91 

Early mature 8 

Norway Maple 16 2 50 7.5 7.5 


8 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

G92 

T93 

Semi Mature 

Privet / Sycamore 

Ligustrum 

ovalifolium / Acer 


To 

4 

0 

To 

10 

est. 

See plan 

Mature 3 

Sycamore 17 2 58 8 7 

Acer 

6 





crown. Minor cavity at 1 metre. No evidence of 


No action 

required 

No action 

required 

FAIR 

FAIR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

40+ B 

T94 

Mature 8 

Oak 16 2 83 10 9 

Quercus robur 

6 




No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T95 

Mature 10 

Sycamore 60 

16 1.5 7 7 

Acer 

est. 

1 



crown – dieback. No evidence of significant 

pruning. Full detailed inspection not possible, 

ground vegetation. 

No action 

required 

FAIR 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T96 

Mature 7.5 

Sweet Chestnut 96 at 

17 2 3 6 

1 m 


7 


Occasional pruning wounds. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T97 

Mature 9 



7 



visible defects. Spreading open crown. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T98 

Mature 5 

Sycamore 17 4 56 4 4 

Acer 

3.5 




major visible defects. Minor dieback. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T99 

Mature 3 

Yew 9 0 57 6 5 

Taxus baccata 

7 


Slight lean. No evidence of significant pruning. 

No major visible defects. Full detailed 

inspection not possible – ivy present. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T100 

Mature 5 

Yew To 

8 6 4 4 

24 

Taxus baccata 

3 

Multi-stemmed at ground level. Unbalanced 

crown which is leaning. No evidence of 


Full detailed inspection not possible. 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T101 

Mature 4 

Yew 8 1 37 7 3 

Taxus baccata 

4 



major visible defects. Full detailed inspection 

not possible due to Ivy. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T102 

Mature 

9 est. 

Sycamore 12 10 

23 2 109 est. 

Acer 

12 est. 





No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T103 


Lawson Cypress 50 

13 0 3 2 

Chamaecyparis 

(Est) 

3 

lawsoniana 

Twin-stemmed at ground level. Well developed 



not possible. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T104 

Mature 7 

Lime 25 2 116 8 8 

Tilia x europaea 

8 


crown. Minor die back. Occasional pruning 

wounds due to crown lifting. No major visible 

defects. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T105 

Mature 6 

Swamp Cypress 27 2 116 5 5.5 

Taxodium 

distichum 

5.5 

Single stemmed and vertical with a welldeveloped 

crown. No evidence of significant 


No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T106 

Mature 8 

Wellingtonia 27 1 177 8 6 

Sequoiadendron 

8 

giganteum 


crown. Multiple pruning wounds. No 


No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T107 

Early-mature 5 

Birch 14 2 22 4 5 


4 

Single stemmed and leaning with a welldeveloped 



No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

G108 

Mature 

Rhododendron 

Rhododendron sp 

4 10 

To 

16 

(Est) 

See plan 

No evidence of previous pruning. No major 


No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

G109 

Mature 

Magnolia 

Magnolia sp 

5 0 

To 

20 

(Est) 

See plan 



No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T110 

Young 1.5 

Monkey Puzzle 11 

4 0.5 1.5 1.5 

Araucaria 

(Est) 

1.5 

araucana 

Single stemmed and vertical with an 

unbalanced crown. No evidence of previous 


No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T111 

Young 2 


5 0.5 2 2 

Araucaria 

est. 

2 

araucana 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T112 

Semi-mature 2 


6 0.5 2 2 

Araucaria 

est. 

2 

araucana 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T113 

Young 3 

Cherry 5 1.5 14 1 3.5 

Prunus sp 

2.5 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T114 

Young 2.5 

22 

Snake Bark maple 7 1 at 3 3.5 

Acer capillipes 

base 

4 

Twin-stemmed at ground level (tight forks). 

Well developed crown. No evidence of 

previous pruning. No major visible defects. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T115 

Semi-mature 6 

Beech 15 1 51 7 7 


8 (est.) 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T116 

Mature 6 

Monkey puzzle 21 0 91 5.5 7.5 

Araucaria 

5 

araucana 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T117 

Mature 5 

Cedar 20 1.5 123 5 4 

Cedrus sp 

4 


crown. Severe decay. No evidence of 

significant pruning. 

Decay 

detection 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

G118 

Semi-mature 

Holly, 

Rhododendron 

Ilex aquifolium, 


6 0 

To 

18 

(est.) 

See plan 



possible due to dense growth. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

G119 

Semi-mature 

Rhododendron 


5 0 

To 

18 

(est.) 

See plan 



No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T120 

Mature 6 

Douglas Fir 24 2 74 6 5.5 

Pseudotsuga 

5 

menziesii 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T121 

Early-mature 3.5 

Norway Maple 13 2 27 3 3 


3 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

G122 

Mature 

Mixed 

To 

6 

0 

To 

18 

(est.) 

See plan 



No action 

required. 

FAIR 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T123 

G124 

Mature 10 

Sweet Chestnut 200 10 10 

20 3 

(Est) 


10 

Mature 

Rhododendron 


5 0 

To 

20 

(est.) 

See plan 

Single stemmed with a slight lean and a welldeveloped 

crown; good branch junctions 

throughout. Multiple Pruning wounds. Topped 

– heavy limbs removed. Major dieback, tree is 

declining will not recover. 50% cambium die 

back to stem. 

Occasional pruning wounds. Trimming. 

Reduce to a 

safe height 

No action 

required. 

POOR 

POOR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

M 

O 

D 


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

H131 

Semi-mature 

Beech 


4 0.5 

To 

8 

See plan 


crown. Multiple Pruning wounds. 

Trimming. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T132 

Over-mature Est. 16 

Holm Oak 180 

22 0 3 11 

at 

Quercus ilex 

base 12 (Est) 

Multi-stemmed at 0.5m with a well-developed 

crown. Snapped branches. Multiple Pruning 

wounds. Huge amount of decay. Rotting fungal 

bracket possibly Fistulina hepatica. 

Remove. 

GOOD 

POOR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

10-20 R 

T133 

Semi-mature 1.5 

Cherry To 

6 1 2.5 2.5 

8 

Prunus sp 

2.5 

Multi-stemmed at ground level with a welldeveloped 


pruning. No major visible defects. Poor unions 

at base. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T134 

Semi-mature 3 

Cherry To 

6 1 2 3 

10 

Prunus sp 

3 



pruning. No major visible defects. Grafted - 

poor condition. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T135 

Semi-mature 1 

25 

Cypress Lawson 7 0.5 at 1 1.5 

Chamaecyparis 

base 

1 

lawsoniana 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T136 

Semi-mature 2 

Cherry 6 1 

To 

10 

2.5 2 

Prunus sp 

3.5 


crown. Grafted – poor condition. No 

evidence of significant pruning. No major 


No action 

required. 

GOOD 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T137 

Semi-mature 3 

Cedar 26 

10 0 3 3 

(est.) 

Cedrus sp 

3 



pruning. No major visible defects. Full detailed 

inspection not possible - too dense. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T138 

Mature 5.5 

Wellingtonia 23 0 133 6 5 


5.5 

giganteum 


crown. Occasional pruning wounds. 

No major visible defects. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T139 

T140 

Mature 3 

Leyland cypress 

To 

3 3 

X 

14 0 45 

Cupressocyparis 

(est.) 

3 

leylandii 

Mature 8 

Copper Beech 16 1 64 7 7 


8 

'Atropurpurea' 







No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

40+ A


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T141 

T142 


Leyland Cypress To 1 1 

X 

11 0 

12 


1 

leylandii 

Mature 8 

Larch 17 0.5 72 8 7 

Larix decidua 

7 

Multi-stemmed at 1m with a well-developed 



not possible too dense. 




No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ C 

40+ A 

T143 

Mature 4 

To 

Yew 6 0 20 3.5 4 

Taxus baccata 

(Est) 

4 




inspection not possible - too dense. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T144 

Mature 4 

Swamp Cypress 13 0.5 39 5 4 

Taxodium 

3.5 

distichum 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T145 

T146 

T147 

T148 

Mature 5 

Lawson Cypress 8 5 

X 

17 0 75 


6.5 

leylandii 

Mature 8.5 

Dawn Redwood 23 0 110 8 8 

Metasequoia 

8.5 

glyptostroboides 

Mature 10 

European Lime 9 8 

24 1.5 106 


Young 2 

Cherry 8 2 13 2 2.5 

Prunus sp 

8 

2 


unbalanced crown. Heavy low branches. 

Multiple Pruning wounds. Large branches 

topped at 15m. Dieback in upper crown. 


crown. 


crown, good branch junctions 

throughout. Multiple pruning wounds, (healing 

well). No major visible defects. Cavities noted. 

Epicormic growth to base, deadwood to lower 

crown. 


unbalanced crown. No evidence of significant 


Monitor 

yearly. 

No action 

required. 

Monitor 

annually. 

No action 

required. 

FAIR 

FAIR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

FAIR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

H 

I 

G 

H 

H 

I 

G 

H 

L 

O 

W 

20-40 C 

40+ A 

40+ B 

40+ C 

T149 

Young 1 

Cherry 16 at 

8 3 1 1 

base 

Prunus sp 

2 


crown. Rubbing branches basal 

damage. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T150 

Semi-mature 1 

Lawson cypress 18 at 

8 0 2.5 1 

Chamaecyparis 

base 

1 

lawsoniana 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T151 

Semi mature 1 

18 

Lawson Cypress 7 0 at 1 1 

Chamaecyparis 

base 

1 

lawsoniana 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T152 

Young 2.5 

Cherry To 

8 2 3.5 2.5 

10 

Prunus sp 

3 

Multi-stemmed at 0.5m. No evidence of 


Grafted. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

G153 

Semi-mature 

Leyland Cypress 

Chamaecyparis 

lawsoniana 

9 0 

To 

18 

(est.) 

See plan 



No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T154 

Mature 4.5 

Sweet Gum 17 1 51 8 8 

Liquidambar 

8 

styraciflua 


crown. Occasional pruning wounds 

(healing slowly). No major visible defects. 

Basal damage noted. Deadwood to crown. 

Remedial 

prune. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T155 


Kanzan Cherry 6 2 24 3 5 

Prunus kanzan 

5 

Single stemmed and leaning with an 

unbalanced crown. Occasional pruning wounds. 

No major visible defects. Exposed roots. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T156 

Early-mature 

2 (est.) 

Lawson Cypress 50 

15 0 2 2 

Chamaecyparis 

(Est) 

2 

lawsoniana 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

G157 

Semi-mature 

Mixed 

To 

7 

6 

To 

15 

(est.) 

See plan 

Mixed series of small hedges. Multiple Pruning 

wounds. Trimming. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

H158 

Mature 

Yew 

Taxus baccata 

1.5 0 

To 7 

(est.) 

See plan 

Multiple Pruning wounds. Trimmed. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T159 

Mature 7 

65 

Cedar 13 1 at 7 7 

Cedrus sp 

base 

6.5 



Topped to 10m. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T160 

Mature 4 

Deodar Cedar 18 1 69 6.5 7 

Cedrus deodara 

7 




Small basal cavity noted. Slightly sparse crown. 

Monitor 

annually 

FAIR 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

20-40 B


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T161 

T162 

Mature 5.5 

Common Oak 8 7.5 

15 2 57 

Quercus robur 

Early mature 4.5 



7 

3.5 



throughout. Occasional pruning wounds due to 

crown lifting, (healing slowly). No major 

visible defects. Minor cavities noted. Minor die 

back noted to crown. 




Monitor 

annually, 

Remedial 

prune. 

No action 

required. 

FAIR 

FAIR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

M 

O 

D 

20-40 B 

40+ C 

G163 

Semi-mature 

Cypress 


7 0 

To 

15 

(Est) 

See plan 



No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T164 

Mature 4.5 

Lime 45 

20 3 6 6 

(Est) 

Tilia sp 

5 (Est) 


crown. Full detailed inspection not possible 

epicormic shoots noted. Multiple Pruning 

wounds. Topped. Die back. 

Monitor. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T165 

Mature 11.5 

Cedar of Lebanon 20 3 146 10 

Cedrus libani 

13 

12 

(Est) 




Minor deadwood. Minor decay. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T166 

T167 

Mature 7 

Common Oak 6 7 

13 3 56 

Quercus Robur 


Purple Plum 7 2 15 2.5 3 


3 


8 



throughout. Occasional pruning wounds. No 

major visible defects. Minor deadwood. Die 

back noted to crown, deadwood to lower crown. 

. 




Monitor 

annually 

No action 

required. 

FAIR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

L 

O 

W 

20-40 B 

40+ C 

T168 

Semi-mature 1 

Cedar 18 

7 0 1 1 

(Est) 

Cedrus sp 

1 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T169 

Mature 6.5 

Horse Chestnut 17 2 93 7.5 6 

Aesculus 

7.5 (Est) 

hippocastanum 

Twin-stemmed at 2m with a well-developed 


visible defects. Advance sign of Bleeding Horse 

Chestnut Canker. 

Monitor. 

GOOD 

POOR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T170 

Semi-mature 3 

To 

Cedar 7 0 22 2.5 7.5 

Cedrus sp 

(Est) 

1 



pruning. No major visible defects. Broken main 

limb. Full detailed inspection not possible. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T171 

Mature 5 

European Lime 18 2 68 7 4 


6 



No major visible defects. Minor die back and 

epicormic shoots noted. 

Monitor 

annually 

FAIR 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

20-40 B 

T172 

Young 2 

Apple 6 2 11 2 3 

Malus sp 

3 



pruning. No major visible defects. Bark damage 

at 1m. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T173 


Beech 16 1 41 6 5 

Fagus Sylvatica 

6 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T174 

Mature 6.5 

Lime 16 2 79 8 7 

Tilia cordata 

8.5 


crown. Occasional pruning wounds. Significant 

decay in main stem. 

Monitor 

GOOD 

POOR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ C 

T175 

T176 

T177 

T178 

T179 

Mature 6 

Dawn Redwood 20 1 94 4.5 5.5 

Metasequoia 

5 

glyptostroboides 

Mature 7.5 

Sweet Chestnut 6 8 

17 3 143 



Leyland Cypress 40 3 3 

X 

16 0 

(est.) 


3 

leylandii 


Lawson Cypress 

To 

3.5 1 

X 

9 0 35 


(est.) 

0.5 

leylandii 


Cherry 5 2.5 21 3.5 4 

Prunus sp 

9 

3.5 


crown. Slight lean. No evidence of 


Possibly previously topped at 15m. Single 

stemmed and vertical with a well-developed 

crown. Significant deadwood noted. Multiple 

pruning wounds and some cavities. 1 large 

stub/torn branch at 6m. 


crown. Multiple pruning wounds. 

Topped to 6m, re-grown. Full detailed 


Multi-stemmed at ground level with an 

unbalanced crown. Leaning. No evidence of 

significant pruning. Lots of ripped out branches 

and snapped main stem. 




No action 

required. 

Aerial 

inspection. 

Monitor 

annually, 

Remedial 

prune. 

No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

FAIR 

FAIR 

GOOD 

FAIR 

GOOD 

POOR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

M 

O 

D 

M 

O 

D 

L 

O 

W 

M 

O 

D 

40+ A 

10-20 C 

40+ C 

40+ C 

40+ C 

T180 

Semi Mature 2 

Cypress 28 

9 0 2 2 

(est.) 


2 




inspection not possible too dense. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T181 

Mature 9.5 

Oak 20 2 88 10 10.5 

Quercus robur 

10 



No major visible defects. Minor deadwood. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T182 

Mature 3.5 

Wellingtonia 140 

23 0 4 4 


(est.) 

4 

giganteum 





No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

G183 

Mature 

Rhododendron 


To 

4 

0 

To 

14 

(est.) 

See plan 



No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T184 

Mature 7 

44 

Cherry 13 1.5 at 6.5 6 

Prunus sp 

base 

7 

Multi-stemmed at 1.5m with a well-developed 

crown. Poor unions. Occasional pruning 

wounds due to crown lifting. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T185 

Mature 3 

Pine 13 2 42 1.5 3 

Pinus sp 

2.5 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T186 

Mature 12 

Oak 21 2 118 13 13 

Quercus robur 

13.5 



Poor unions at 4m. Significant deadwood. 

Remove 

deadwood. 

Remedial 

prune. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T187 

Mature 8 

Cedar 19 1 100 3.5 8.5 

Cedrus sp 

8 



Included bark at approximately 10m. 

Significant deadwood. Full detailed inspection 

not possible. 

Remove. 

Remedial 

prune 

deadwood. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T188 


White Ash 17 2 49 7 6 

Fraxinus 

4.5 

americana 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T189 


Pine 40 

15 0 4.5 3.5 

(est.) 

Pinus sp 

4.5 

Twin-stemmed at 1m with an unbalanced 



No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T190 


White Ash 15 3 40 5 6 

Fraxinus 

6 

americana 



major visible defects. Minor deadwood. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T191 


White Ash 14 2.5 37 6 6.5 

Fraxinus 

6 

americana 


crown. Weak forks. No evidence of 


No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T192 


34 

White Ash 15 4 at 3 4 

Fraxinus 

base 

3.5 

americana 

Twin-stemmed at 1.5m with a well balanced 

crown. Weak main fork. No evidence of 


No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T193 

G194 

T195 


White Ash 14 2 38 5 6 

Fraxinus 

americana 

5.5 

Young – semimature 

Mixed, Holly, 

Elder 

0 See plan 


and Sambucus 

nigra 

To 

10 

To 

30 

Mature 9 

Atlas cedar 19 2 131 9.5 10 

Cedrus atlantica 

9 






possible. 



Crown reduced and topped at 19m. 

No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

L 

O 

W 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

40+ C 

40+ A 

T196 


Tulip 28 

18 1 5.5 5.5 

Liriodendron 

(est.) 

4.5 

tulipifera 



No major visible defects. Tight fork at 5m. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

G197 

Young 

Black Mulberry 

Morus nigra 

To 

8 

0 

To 

20 

See plan 



Remove 

stakes. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T198 

Over-mature 0 

Oak 10 278 0 0 

Quercus robur 

0 

Vetranised, odd limbs left. 

No action 

required 

FAIR 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ A 

T199 

Mature 5.5 

Lime 20 3 75 6 7 

Tilia europea 

4.5 





No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T200 

Mature 4 

Lime 20 3 75 8 9 

Tilia europea 

6 


crown. Poor union at 4m. Occasional 

pruning wounds. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T201 

Mature 6 

Lime 19 3 69 8.5 7.5 

Tilia europea 

4 

Twin-stemmed at 3m with an unbalanced 

crown. Multiple Pruning wounds. Large 

pruning wounds. Full detailed inspection not 

possible - epicormic shoots. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T202 

Mature 4.5 

Lime 17 3 55 6 5 

Tilia europea 

3.5 




inspection not possible - epicormic shoots. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T203 

Mature 4 

Lime 18 3 67 4.5 6 

Tilia europea 

3 


unbalanced crown. Multiple Pruning wounds. 

Full detailed inspection not possible - epicormic 

shoots. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T204 

Semi-mature 0 

Magnolia (est.) 

11 4 4 5 

to 18 

Magnolia sp 

4 

Multi-stemmed at ground level with an 

unbalanced crown. Leaning. Multiple Pruning 

wounds. Too close to house. Full detailed 


Remove. 

FAIR 

FAIR 

L 

O 

W 

40+ R 

G205 

T206 

Early-mature 

Yew and Ash 

Taxus baccata 

and Fraxinus 

excelsior 

To 

14 

0 

To 

24 

See plan 

Mature 5 

Eucalyptus 18 25 77 5 5.5 

Eucalyptus sp 

9 


visible defects. Close to fence. Full detailed 

inspection not possible restricted access. 



due to crown lifting. Decay at base. 

No action 

required. 

Decay 

detection. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

40+ C 

T207 


35 

Beech 13 2 at 5 5.5 


base 

7 


crown. Poor unions. Occasional pruning 

wounds due to crown lifting. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

G208 

G209 

G210 

Young – semi – 

mature- earlymature 

Oak, Birch 

Quercus robur, 

Betula sp 

Young – semimature 

– earlymature 

Cypress, Ash, Birch 

Chameacyparis sp, 

Fraxinus excelsior, 


Early-mature 

Yew, Holly 

Taxus baccata, 


To 

13 

To 

14 

(est.) 

To 

12 

(est.) 

0 

0 

0 

To 

28 

(est.) 

To 

30 

(est.) 

To 

40 

at 

base 

(est.) 

See plan 

See plan 

See plan 

No evidence of significant pruning. Full 

detailed inspection not possible dense. 

No evidence of significant pruning. Full 

detailed inspection not possible. 



No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

FAIR 

FAIR 

FAIR 

FAIR 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

M 

O 

D 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

40+ C 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T211 


Holly To 

10 0 5 2 

30 


3 



Stubs. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T212 

Mature 5.5 

Lime 17 3 40 5.5 4.5 

Tilia cordata 

4.5 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T213 

Mature 6 

Lime 15 2 36 5 4.5 

Tilia cordata 

4.5 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T214 

Mature 6 

Ash 18 10 58 6 6 


5 

Decayed with major die back. 

Remove. 

POOR 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T221 


Beech 17 1.5 36 7 5 


5 



Stubs. Minor deadwood. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T222 

Mature 10 

Beech (est.) 

21 2 8 9 

70 


7 


crown. Occasional pruning wounds. Weak 

main fork. 

No action 

required. 

FAIR 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

T223 

G224 

T225 

Mature 7 

Roble Beech 20 2 50 5 9 

Nothofagus 

7 

obliqua 

Semi-mature – 

early-mature 

Ash, Laburnum, 

cypress. 

To 

Fraxinus 18 1.5 See plan 

41 

excelsior, 

Laburnum sp, X 


leylandii 

Mature 5.5 

Oak 15 1.5 89 7 

Quercus robur 

7 

(est.) 

10 (est.) 



pruning. No major visible defects. Minor decay. 

Minor deadwood. 


visible defects. Some minor deadwood. 



No major visible defects. Stubs. Minor decay. 

No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

FAIR 

FAIR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

H 

I 

G 

H 

L 

O 

W 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ B 

40+ C 

40+ A 

T226 

Mature 7 

Horse Chestnut 20 1 86 6 5.5 

Aesculus 

4 (est.) 

hippocastanum 


crown. Multiple Pruning wounds. Major decay. 

Bleeding Horse Chestnut Canker. 

Remove. 

POOR 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T231 

Mature 5 

Red Oak (est.) 

16 39 6 8 

21 

Quercus rubra 

6 



pruning. No major visible defects. Minor 

deadwood. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T232 

Mature 6.5 

57 

Lime 21 

2 at 6 6 

(est.) 

Tilia sp 

base 

5 

Twin-stemmed at 1.5m with a well-developed 

crown. Occasional pruning wounds. Weak 

unions in crown. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

G233 

T234 

Young-semimature-earlymature-mature 

Oak, Lime, 

Sycamore 

Quercus sp, Tilia 

sp, Acer 


To 

18 

0 

To 

55 

See plan 


Apple 4 1.5 11 0.5 3 

Malus sp 

1.5 


visible defects. Remove hung up trees. 



No action 

required 

(remove the 

hung up 

trees) 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

L 

O 

W 

40+ B 

40+ C 

Semi-mature 

G235 Shrubs mix To 5 0 

To 

15 

(Est) 

See plan 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

T236 

Semi-mature 6 

Magnolia 15 

7 0 4 5 

(est.) 

Magnolia sp 

4 




No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

G237 

Early-mature 

Holly 


9 0 

16 

(est.) 

See plan 



No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

L 

O 

W 

40+ C 

Mature 

G238 Mix 19 0 

To 

50 

(est.) 

See plan 

Occasional pruning wounds. No major visible 

defects. Remove hung up trees. 

No action 

required 

(remove the 

hung up 

trees) 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T239 

Mature 5 

Oak To 

18 1 12 13 

75 

Quercus robur 

11 (est.) 

Twin-stemmed at ground level with an 

unbalanced crown. Occasional pruning 

wounds. No major visible defects. Minor 

deadwood. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 

40+ B 

T240 

Mature 10 

Oak To 

18 1 12 

70 

Quercus robur 

5 (est.) 

11 

(est.) 

Twin-stemmed at ground level with an 

unbalanced crown. Multiple Pruning wounds. 

Significant deadwood. Basal decay and 

Ganoderma decay fungus. Rubble at base. 

Decay 

detection. 

FAIR 

FAIR 

H 

I 

G 

H 

40+ C


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T241 

Mature 6 

To 

Lime 19 0.5 70 6 7 

Tilia cordata 

(est.) 

6.5 

Twin-stemmed at ground level with a welldeveloped 

crown. Decay on smaller fork, poor 

main union. Occasional pruning wounds. 

No action 

required. 

GOOD 

FAIR 

M 

O 

D 

40+ C 

T242 

Mature 7 

Lime 85 

10 3 0 0 

(est.) 

Tilia sp 

0 

Extremely decayed. 

Remove. 

POOR 

POOR 

L 

O 

W 


Ref 

No. 

Age 

& 

Species 

& 

Latin Name 

Height (m) 


Stem 

Diameter (cm) 

W 

Crown 

Spread 

N 

S 

E 

Observations 


Physiological 

Condition 

& 

Structural 

Condition 

Amenity Value 


(yrs) 

Retention 

Category 

T251 

T252 

T253 

T254 

T255 

Mature 4 

Sycamore 18 5+ 57 7 4 

Acer 

5 


Mature 5 

Sycamore 17 5 51 3 5 

Acer 

4 


Over-mature 10 

155 

Common Oak 16 4+ @ 6 10 

Quercus robur 

base 

9 

Mature 6 

Common lime 60 

18 4+ 6 4 

(Est.) 


6 

Mature 5 

Common Oak 18 5+ 76 3 6 

Quercus robur 

7 



throughout. No evidence of significant pruning. 




throughout. No evidence of previous pruning. 


Crown overhangs the boundary. Multi-stemmed 

at 1.5m with a slightly unbalanced crown. 3 

large pruning wounds, 2 with extensive cavities 

(poor formation of wound wood). Cavities do 

not compromise tree safety at present. 




No major visible defects. Dense epicormic 

growth to base prevented detailed inspection. 





No action 

required 

No action 

required 

Monitor 

annually 

No action 

required 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

FAIR 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 20-40 

M 

O 

D 20-40 

M 

O 

D 20-40 

M 

O 

D 20-40 

M 

O 

D 40+ 

B 

B 

C 

B 

B 

T256 

T257 

T258 

Mature 5 

Sycamore 90 

17 2+ 6 4 

Acer 

(Est.) 

6 



Sycamore 1.5 

13 30 4 3 

Acer 

+ 

4 



Sycamore 1.5 

14 38 4 3 

Acer 

+ 

4 


Twin-stemmed at 0.7m with a well-developed 

crown, good branch junctions throughout. No 

evidence of previous pruning. No major visible 

defects. 

Single stemmed and vertical with a balanced 



Single stemmed and vertical with a balanced 


major visible defects. Dense Ivy to 8m 

No action 

required 

No action 

required 

No action 

required 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

GOOD 

M 

O 

D 20-40 

M 

O 

D 20-40 

M 

O 

D 20-40 

B 

C 

B



Appendix 2: Explanation of Tree Descriptions 

A2.1 Measurements 

A2.1.1 HEIGHT of the tree is measured from the stem base in metres. Where the ground has a 

significant slope the higher ground is selected. 

A2.1.2 CROWN HEIGHT is an indication of the average height at which the crown begins. 

A2.1.3 STEM DIAMETER is measured at 1.5 metres above (higher) ground level. Where the 

tree is multi-stemmed at this point; the diameter is measured close to ground level, just 

above the root buttress. 

A2.1.4 CROWN SPREAD is measured from the centre of the stem base to the tips of the 

branches in all four cardinal points. 

A2.2 Evaluations 

A2.2.1 AGE CLASS of the tree is described as young, semi-mature, early-mature, mature, or 

over-mature. 

A2.2.2 PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION is classed as good, fair, poor, or dead. This is an 

indication of the health of the tree and takes into account vigour, presence of disease 

and dieback. 

A2.2.3 STRUCTURAL CONDITION is classed as good, fair or poor. This is an indication of 

the structural integrity of the tree and takes into account significant wounds, decay and 

quality of branch junctions. 

A2.2.4 LIFE EXPECTANCY is classed as; less than 10 years, 10-20 years, 20-40 years, or 

more than 40 years. This is an indication of the number of years before removal of the 

tree is likely to be required. 

© JCA Limited 2011



A2.3 Retention Categories 

A2.3.1 A (marked green on the plan) = retention most desirable. 

These trees are of high quality and value with a good life expectancy. They may be 

further sub-divided as follows: 

A1) Particularly good examples; perhaps rare or unusual species, or forming an essential 

part of arboricultural features e.g. avenues. 

A2) Groups of trees having a significant landscape impact or with excellent screening 

properties, or those softening the effect of existing structures. 

A3) Those having significant conservation or historical value e.g. veteran trees. 

A2.3.2 B (marked in blue on the plan) = retention desirable. 

These trees are of moderate quality and value with a significant life expectancy. They 

may be further sub-divided as follows: 

B1) Trees that might be included in the high category but because of their numbers or 

slightly impaired condition, are downgraded in favour of the better individuals. 

B2) Groups of trees forming distinct landscape features, thereby attracting a higher 

collective rating than they might as individuals. 

B3) Trees with clearly identifiable conservation or other cultural benefits. 

A2.3.3 C (marked in grey on the plan) = trees which could be retained. 

These trees are of low quality and value, and are in adequate condition to remain until 

new planting could be established. They may be further sub-divided as follows: 

C1) Trees not qualifying in higher categories. 

C2) Groups of trees which do not form a distinct landscape feature. 

C3) Trees with very limited conservation or other cultural benefits. 

A2.3.4 R (marked in red on the plan) = trees for removal. 

These trees are in such a condition that any existing value would be lost within 10 

years. This may be due to any of the following: 

1) Failure is likely due to serious, irredeemable, structural defects. 

2) Removal of other category R trees will render them exposed and unstable. 

3) They are in serious, overall decline or are dead. 

4) They are of low quality and suppressing adjacent trees of better quality. 

5) Diseases are present which may affect the health of adjacent trees. 

These trees should be removed or treated in such a way as to make them safe where 

they have high ecological value, such as in a woodland setting. 

© JCA Limited 2011



Appendix 3: General Guidelines 

A3.1 All work must be to BS 3998: 1989 ‘Recommendations for tree work’. 

A3.2 Staff carrying out the work must be qualified, experienced and ideally be Arboricultural 

Association approved contractors. They should be covered by adequate public liability 

insurance. 

A3.3 This report is based upon a visual inspection. The consultant shall not be responsible for 

events which happen after this time due to factors which were not apparent at the time, 

and the acceptance of this report constitutes an agreement with the guidelines and the 

terms listed in this report. 

A3.4 Any defects seen by a contractor or the employer that were not apparent to the 

consultant must be brought to the consultant's attention immediately. 

A3.5 No liability can be accepted by JCA in respect of the trees unless the recommendations 

of this report are carried out under the supervision of JCA and within JCA’s timescale. 

A3.6 It is advisable to have trees inspected by an arboricultural consultant regularly. In this 

instance it is recommended that these inspections are made every year. 

© JCA Limited 2011



Appendix 4: Glossary of Terms & Abbreviations 

Arboriculture 

Canker 

Co-dominant Stem 

Crown Lift 

Crown reduce 

The cultivation of trees in order to produce individual specimens of the 

greatest ornament, for shelter or any primary purpose other than the 

production of timber. 

Disease damaged area of a tree, usually caused by fungus or bacteria. 

A stem which has grown in direct competition to the main stem and which 

has formed a substantial size influencing the appearance of the tree. 

The removal of the lowest branches, usually to a given height. It allows 

more residual light and greater clearance underneath for vehicles etc. 

The reduction of a tree’s height or spread while preserving its natural shape. 

Crown thin The removal of some of the density of a tree’s crown, usually 5-25% 

allowing more light through its canopy and reducing wind resistance. 

Deadwood 

Dieback 

Epicormic shoots 

Formative pruning 

Included bark 

Pollarding 

Remedial pruning 

RPA 

Topping 

Either dead branches, or a procedure involving the removal of dead, dying 

and diseased branches. 

Where branches are beginning to show signs of death usually at the tips in 

the crown. 

Small branches that grow in uncharacteristic clusters around the base or the 

stem of a tree, usually as a result of bad pruning or some other stress factor. 

The trimming of a tree to remove weaknesses and irregularities which may 

lead to problems. The formative pruning operation is aimed at reducing the 

potential for future weaknesses or problems within the tree’s crown. 

Where the bark on two adjoining branches or stems is growing tight 

together, forming a joint with limited physical strength. 

A method of tree management in which the main trunk of the tree is cut at 

about 4m, and the resulting branches are then cropped on a regular basis. 

The removal of old stubs, deadwood, epicormic growth, rubbing or crossing 

branches and other unwanted items from the tree’s crown. Sometimes 

referred to as crown cleaning. 

Root Protection Area – Theoretical rooting area of a tree as defined in 

BS5837:2005 Trees in relation to construction. 

Topping is a form of pruning that removes terminal growth leaving a ‘stub’ 

cut end. Topping causes serious health problems to a tree. 

© JCA Limited 2011



Appendix 5: Author Qualifications 

Principal Consultant and Managing Director 

Jonathan Cocking F.R.E.S., Tech. Cert. (Arbor.A), PDipArb (RFS) FArborA CBiol MSB. MICFor. Jonathan is a Registered 

Consultant and Fellow of the Arboricultural Association and sits on its Professional Committee. He has 31 years experience in the 

Arboricultural profession and served for eight years as Senior Arboriculturist with a large local authority before establishing JCA 

in 1997. He has since developed JCA’s portfolio of services and its extensive client base. Jonathan is a Chartered Biologist, a 

Chartered Arboriculturalist and an Expert Witness with much experience of litigation work. 

Technical Coordinator 

Toby Thwaites BSc (Hons), HND (Arboriculture). Toby joined JCA in 1998 after graduating in Ecology at the University of 

Huddersfield and has since graduated in Arboriculture at the University of Lancashire. A former JCA team leader and Consulting 

Arboriculturist, Toby was promoted to Technical Coordinator and now oversees all office and on-site activities at JCA and is on 

hand to offer technical support and advice. 

Consulting Staff 

Andrew Bagshaw FDSc (Arboriculture). Andrew joined JCA in 2005 having gained several years experience in tree surgery and 

landscaping. He is trained in aerial rescue and is JCA’s principal first aid person. Andrew has obtained a foundation degree in 

Arboriculture at the University of Lancashire, is QTRA qualified and is a JCA team leader who manages an office of Consulting 

Arboriculturists. 

Adam Winson BSc (Hons), ND (Arboriculture) MSc (Arboriculture and Urban Forestry). Adam is a Professional Associate of 

the Institute of Chartered Foresters and an Associate Member of the Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management. Prior 

to joining JCA Adam worked as a tree surgeon. During his BSc in Environmental Conservation he gained the CPRE award for 

best dissertation. Adam has recently obtained an MSc in Arboriculture and Urban Forestry. 

Robert Godwin BA (Hons) (Landscape Planning), MArborA. Robert is a Professional Member of the Arboricultural Association 

and a Professional Associate of the Institute of Chartered Foresters. He has a degree in Landscape Planning & Management and 

has several years experience as a Consulting Arboriculturist. Robert is currently working towards an MSc in Arboriculture and 

Urban Forestry. 

Victoria Black FD (Arboriculture). Victoria has been with JCA since 2002 building her knowledge of the Arboricultural 

business. She has recently obtained her foundation degree in Arboriculture at the University of Lancashire. 

Andrew Bussey Andrew joined JCA having spent 12 years doing tree surgery for various private companies and a Local 

Authority. He has various NPTC qualifications, is QTRA qualified and is currently studying for his Arboricultural Technicians 

Certificate. 

Toby Parsons Cert. Arb. (RFS), Tech. Cert. (Arbor.A). Toby joined JCA after spending 6 years working as a senior climber for 

various Arboricultural contractors in the East Midlands and the South-West. He has gained the Level 2 Certificate in 

Arboriculture (RFS), an Arboricultural Technicians Certificate and is QTRA qualified. 

David Venables BSc (Forestry). David joined JCA in 2009 having achieved his degree at University of Wales, Bangor. David’s 

work experience prior to joining JCA was as a Management Support Officer for the Forestry Commission at Delamere Nursery, 

Cheshire, where his responsibilities included carrying out health and safety inspections to ensure all sites and staff met relevant 

standards, assisting with the supervision of the workforce and the initiation of a GIS system for the nursery. 

Raphael Skerratt BSc (Forestry) FArborA. Raphael covers the London area for JCA. He ran his own Arboricultural businesses 

since 1972 and is experienced in tree surveys for development, safety and subsidence purposes, and is an Expert Witness. 

Administrative Staff 

Sue Guest Administrative Team Leader. 

Sally Whitwam Administrative Assistant. 

Simeon Haigh BSc (Hons). IT Officer. 

Catherine Cocking Accounts Manager. 

Yasmin Hussain Administrative Assistant. 

Liz Bone Trainee Administrative Assistant 

Alec Fielden Cert. Arb. (RFS). CAD Technician. 

© JCA Limited 2011



Appendix 6: Tree Constraints Plan 

© JCA Limited 2011

o 

c 

u 

l 

t 

u 

r 

a 

A 

s 

o 

a 

t 

i 

o 

N 

W 

E 

G1 

S 

G2 

T3 

T 1 0 6 

PROJECTION OF THE NORTH LAYOUT 

T 1 0 7 

G 1 0 8 

T 1 0 5 

G 1 0 9 

T 1 1 0 

T 1 1 1 

T 1 0 4 

T 1 1 2 

T 1 1 3 

T 1 1 7 

T 1 0 3 

T 1 1 4 

T 1 1 5 

T 1 1 6 

G 1 1 8 

T 1 3 2 

G 1 3 0 

T 2 4 3 

G 1 1 9 

T 1 0 2 

T 1 2 0 

T 1 0 0 

T 1 0 1 

H 1 3 1 

H 1 2 9 

T 1 2 1 

T 9 9 

T 1 3 3 

G 1 2 2 

T 9 8 

T 9 7 

T 1 2 8 

G 1 2 4 

T 9 6 

T 9 4 

T 9 5 

T 9 3 

T 1 3 4 

T 1 4 4 

T 1 4 5 

G 1 2 7 

T 1 2 3 

T 1 2 5 

G 9 2 

T 1 4 3 

T 1 2 6 

T 9 1 

T 1 3 5 

T 1 5 4 

T 1 4 2 

T 1 4 6 

T 1 4 7 

G 1 5 3 

T 1 5 5 

T 5 8 

T 5 7 

T 9 0 

T 8 9 

T 8 8 

T 1 3 6 

T 1 4 0 

T 1 6 5 

T 1 3 7 

T 1 3 9 

T 1 4 1 

T 1 4 9 

T 1 4 8 

T 1 5 6 

T 5 6 

T 5 5 

T 8 5 

T 8 6 

T 8 7 

T 1 8 7 

T 1 8 6 

T 1 8 5 

T 1 6 4 

T 1 3 8 

T 1 5 2 

T 1 5 1 

T 1 5 0 

T 1 6 0 

H 1 5 8 

G 1 5 7 

T 4 9 

T 5 1 

T 5 0 

T 5 2 

T 5 3 T 5 4 

H 8 4 

T 8 3 

T 8 2 

T 8 1 

T 8 0 

T 7 9 

T 7 8 

T 1 9 2 

T 1 8 9 

T 1 9 0 

T 1 8 8 

T 1 8 4 

T 1 8 0 

T 1 7 8 

G 1 6 3 

T 1 6 2 

T 1 6 1 

T 1 5 9 

T 5 9 

T 6 0 

T 6 1 

T 6 4 

T 6 3 

T 6 5 

T 7 7 

T 1 9 1 

T 1 7 9 

T 1 7 7 

T 4 7 

G 2 0 8 

G 1 9 4 

T 1 9 3 

T 1 7 5 

T 6 2 

T 6 6 

T 7 2 

T 1 9 5 T 1 9 6 

G 1 9 7 

T 1 8 1 

T 1 7 6 

T 1 6 6 

T 4 6 

T 4 8 

T 6 7 

T 6 8 

T 6 9 

T 7 1 

T 7 4 

T 2 0 7 

T 1 8 2 

T 1 7 4 

T 1 6 7 

T 7 3 

G 2 0 9 

T 1 9 8 

G 1 8 3 

T 1 7 3 

T 1 6 8 

T 4 5 

T 7 0 

T 7 5 

T 2 0 6 

T 1 9 9 

T 2 1 6 

T 2 1 7 

T 1 7 2 

T 1 7 1 

T 1 6 9 

H 4 4 

T 7 6 

T 2 1 5 

G 2 0 5 

T 2 0 4 

T 2 0 1 

T 2 0 0 

T 2 1 3 

H 2 1 8 

T 2 4 2 

G 2 3 8 

T 1 7 0 

T 4 2 T 4 3 

T 2 0 2 

T 2 1 4 

G 2 1 9 

T 2 4 4 T 2 4 5 

T 2 0 3 

T 2 1 2 

T 2 2 0 

T 2 4 1 

T 1 4 

T 2 2 1 

T 2 0 

G 3 4 

G 2 1 0 

T 2 1 1 

T 2 2 3 

G 2 2 4 

T 2 2 2 

T 2 3 9 

T 2 4 0 

G 2 3 7 

T 2 3 4 

T 2 3 6 

T 1 9 

T 1 8 

T 1 7 

T 1 6 

T 1 5 

T 1 3 

T 1 2 

T 2 2 6 

G 2 3 3 

G 4 1 

T 1 1 

T 3 8 

T 2 1 

G 3 3 

T 2 2 5 

G 2 2 7 

T 2 3 2 

G 2 3 5 

T 4 0 

G 3 7 

T 2 2 

T 2 2 8 

T 2 3 1 

T 2 3 0 

H 3 9 

T 8 

G 2 2 9 

T 2 3 

T 3 2 

T 7 

T 3 1 

T 3 0 

T 2 9 

G 3 6 

T 2 4 

H 6 

G 3 5 

G 1 0 

G 9 

G 2 8 

G 2 5 

T 5 

T 2 6 

T 2 7 

T 4 

Appendix 6: 

Tree Constraints Plan 

BRITISH STANDARD 5837: 2005 4.3.1 

RETENTION CATEGORIES 

Detailed definitions of these catagories are at Appendix 2 of our 

report. N.B. These categories do not necessairly represent or 

correspond to recommendations for action made in this report. 

S el f - s eed ed , s em i - m at u r e 

n at i v e b r o ad l eaf s p eci es 

T 2 5 8 

T 2 5 7 

T 2 5 6 

T 2 5 5 

T 2 5 4 

T 2 5 3 

TITLE: Runnymede Campus, Coopers Hill Lane, 

Englefield Green, Egham, TW20 0JZ. 

JCA Ref: 9832/AB. 

CATEGORY A: 

'RETENTION MOST DESIRABLE' 

H o l l y 

U n d er s t o r ey 

T 2 5 2 

T 2 5 1 

T 2 5 0 

T 2 4 9 

T 2 4 8 

T 2 4 7 

T 2 4 6 

SCALE 1:1000 

PAPER SIZE 

A2 

CATEGORY B: 

'RETENTION DESIRABLE' 

Ch er r y L au r el 


SURVEYED BY: EJ/AB DRAWN BY: AB APPROVED BY: AJB 

i 

r 

Ar b 

JCA LTD 

Arboricultural & Forestry Consultants 

l 

Co n s u l t a nt 

s 

c 

i 

n 

CATEGORY C: 

'TREE WHICH COULD BE 

RETAINED' 

CATEGORY R: 

'TREE FOR REMOVAL' 

CENTRE OF TREE/SHRUB 

CENTRE OF TREE/SHRUB 

TO BE REMOVED 

ROOT PROTECTION AREA 

Root Protection Area: RPA 

THE ROOT PROTECTION AREA (RPA) INDICATES THE LIKELY 

ROOTING ZONE OF A TREE. THE RPA SHOULD IDEALLY 

REMAIN UNDISTURBED IF A TREE IS TO BE RETAINED. 

THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS SHOULD THEREFORE BE 

DESIGNED TO AVOID THE RPA OF ANY TREE WHICH IS TO 

BE RETAINED. 

IF IT IS NECESSARY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT TO ENCROACH 

INTO THE RPA OF A TREE WHICH IS TO BE RETAINED THEN 

SPECIALIST CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS 

MUST BE CONSIDERED.



Appendix 7: Arboricultural Implications Plan 

© JCA Limited 2011

G 2 0 9 

G 2 0 8 

G 3 4 

G 2 0 5 

T 2 0 7 

T 2 0 4 

G 1 9 4 

T 1 9 2 

T 2 0 3 

G 2 1 0 

T 1 9 3 

T 2 0 2 

G 3 3 

T 1 9 1 

T 2 1 1 

T 1 8 9 

T 1 9 0 

T 2 0 0 

T 2 1 2 

T 1 8 7 

T 1 8 8 

T 3 1 

T 1 9 9 

T 2 2 3 

T 2 2 5 

T 3 0 

G 1 9 7 

T 1 9 8 

T 2 1 3 

T 2 2 1 

T 2 1 4 

T 2 2 6 

T 2 2 2 

G 2 2 7 

H 2 1 8 

T 2 2 8 

T 2 1 5 

G 2 1 9 

T 2 1 6 

T 1 8 6 

T 2 3 9 

T 2 4 2 

G 2 3 3 

T 1 6 5 

T 2 1 7 

T 2 4 1 

T 2 4 0 

T 1 8 4 

T 1 8 2 

G 2 3 8 

T 2 3 2 

G 2 2 9 

T 2 3 0 

T 1 8 5 

G 1 8 3 

G 2 3 7 

T 2 3 4 

T 1 8 0 

G 2 3 5 

T 1 3 2 

T 1 7 9 

T 2 3 6 

T 1 7 2 

T 1 7 4 

T 1 6 4 

T 1 7 8 

H 1 2 9 

T 1 7 6 

G 1 3 0 

T 1 3 7 

G 1 6 3 

T 1 1 3 

T 1 6 8 

G 3 5 

T 1 7 7 

H 3 9 

G 2 8 

T 1 1 4 

T 1 3 3 

T 1 4 2 

T 1 6 7 

T 1 1 5 

T 1 4 3 

T 1 1 2 

T 1 3 8 

T 1 6 6 

T 1 4 0 

T 1 4 4 

G 4 1 

T 1 5 1 

T 1 7 0 

T 1 1 1 

T 1 4 1 

T 1 1 6 

T 1 4 6 

G 3 6 

T 1 4 5 

T 1 5 0 

T 1 6 1 

G 3 7 

G 1 0 8 

T 1 1 0 

T 1 1 7 

G 1 2 7 

T 1 2 0 

T 1 4 8 

T 1 4 7 

T 1 0 7 

G 1 2 2 

G 2 5 

G 1 0 9 

G 1 1 8 

T 1 6 0 

T 2 0 

G 1 5 3 

G 1 1 9 

T 1 0 6 

T 1 2 3 

T 1 2 6 

T 1 5 5 

T 1 7 

T 1 5 9 

G 1 2 4 

T 1 6 

T 1 2 5 

T 2 1 

T 1 5 

T 1 0 5 

H 1 5 8 

T 1 5 6 

G 1 5 7 

T 1 2 1 

H 4 4 

T 4 6 

T 4 5 

T 5 8 

T 4 2 T 4 3 

T 4 7 

T 1 0 4 

T 4 8 

T 1 0 0 

T 1 3 

T 5 1 

T 9 8 

G 1 0 

T 1 0 1 

T 1 0 2 

T 9 7 

T 9 6 

T 1 0 3 

T 1 1 

G 9 2 

T 9 3 

T 4 

T 9 5 

T 8 5 

T 9 0 

H 8 4 

T 8 6 

T 6 0 

S el f - s eed ed , s em i - m at u r e 

n at i v e b r o ad l eaf s p eci es 

T 2 5 8 

T 8 3 

T 8 7 

T 8 8 

T 6 1 

T 2 5 7 

T 8 2 

T 6 4 

T 8 0 

T 6 3 

T 7 9 

T 6 5 

T 6 7 

T 6 6 

T 7 0 

T 7 2 

T 7 1 

T 7 5 

r 

u 

T 2 5 5 

l 

a 

u 

t 

i 

s 

H o l l y 


T 2 5 4 

T 2 5 3 

c 

i 

r 

o 

Ch er r y L au r el 


T 2 4 9 

T 2 4 8 

T 2 4 7 

T 2 4 6 

b 

N 

W 

E 

S 

Appendix 7: 

Development Proposals 

TITLE: 

SCALE : 1:1000 

PAPER SIZE : A1 

TREE TO BE RETAINED 

TREE TO BE REMOVED 

CENTRE OF TREE 

CENTRE OF TREE 

TO BE REMOVED 



ENCROACHED BY THE 

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 

JCA LTD 

Arboricultural & Forestry Consultants 

As 

l 

i 

oc 

at 

on 

r 

A 

C o n s u l 

t a n t 

T 7 6 

T 7 4 

T 2 5 0 

T 2 5 1 

T 7 3 

T 2 5 2 

T 6 9 

T 6 8 

T 7 7 

T 7 8 

T 2 5 6 

T 8 1 

T 6 2 

H 6 

T 8 9 

T 9 1 

T 5 9 

T 8 

S p or t s 

Pa vi l i on 

T 5 

T 7 

T 9 4 

G 9 

T 5 3 T 5 4 

T 5 2 

T 1 2 

T 5 5 

T 5 0 

T 9 9 

T 5 6 

T 4 9 

T 5 7 

C h a p el 

T 1 4 

C ol l ege 

H a l l 

T 2 2 

T 2 7 

Pr esi dent 

H a l l 

T 1 8 

T 2 3 

T 2 4 

T 1 5 4 

T 1 9 

T 2 6 

T 3 8 

T 1 4 9 

T 1 2 8 

T 1 6 2 

T 1 3 9 

T 1 5 2 

T 2 4 3 

T 4 0 

T 1 6 9 

T 1 3 4 

T 1 7 1 

T 1 7 5 

T 1 3 5 

H 1 3 1 

T 1 3 6 

T 1 7 3 

T 1 8 1 

na t u r a l 

p l a y 

a r ea 

T 2 4 4 T 2 4 5 

N a t u r a l 

p la y a r e a 

T 2 3 1 

T 2 9 

Eq u ip p e d 

p la y a r e a 

Bl oc k C 

3 st or ey 

T 2 2 0 

G 2 2 4 

T 1 9 5 T 1 9 6 

T 3 2 

T h e 

L odge 

T 2 0 1 

T 2 0 6 

Oak Lane Cottages 

T47 

Oak Lane Survey 

Poplar 

DBH-18 HGT-12 

Oak 

T48 

G40 

T46 

G38 

T45 

DBH-39 HGT-13 

DBH-25 HGT-13 

Cotoneaster 

T39 

T44 T43 

T41 

Poplar 

DBH-35 HGT- 13 

DBH-28 HGT-9 

DBH-28 HGT-4 

T42 

T36 

T37 

T34 T35 

DBH-39 HGT-13 

Poplar 

Ash 

G49 

T32 

T51 

DBH-37 HGT-12 

DBH-44 HGT-39 

T16 

T50 

T31 

T29 

T52 

T33 

T27 

T18 T17 

T28 

T30 

T12 

T19 

T15 

T20 

T21 

T14 

T10 

T22 

T24 

T13 

T26 

T2 T23 

T9 

T11 

T1 

T25 

T3 

T8 

T5 

T7 

T4 

T6 

G2 

T3 

Beech 

Oak 

DBH-77 HGT-15 

DBH-130 HGT-14 

Runnymede Campus Survey 

PROJECTION OF THE NORTH LAYOUT 

G1 

Oak 

DBH-130 HGT-23 

Apple 

DBH-34 HGT-7 

Runnymede Campus, Coopers Hill Lane, 

Englefield Green, Egham, TW20 0JZ. 

JCA Ref: 9832/AB.



I hope that this report provides all the necessary information, but should any further advice be 

needed please do not hesitate to contact the author. 

Signed 

.................................................................... 

Andrew Bagshaw FDSc (Arboriculture). 

11 th January 2011 

For and on behalf of JCA Ltd 

Registered Office: 

Unit 80 

Bowers Mill 

Branch Road 

Barkisland 

Halifax 

HX4 OAD 

Tel. 01422 376335 

Fax. 01422 376232 

Email: jon@jcaac.com 

www.jcaac.com 

Report printed on recycled paper 

© JCA Limited 2011



APPENDIX 12.6 

Heads of Terms LEMF Plan 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVRON 

UK11-16357

Heads of Terms for the 

Runnymede Campus 

Landscape and Ecology 

Management Framework Plan 

Prepared for: 


Prepared by: 

ENVIRON 

London, UK 

Date: 

January 2011 

Project or Issue Number: 

UK1116357


Heads of Terms for the Runnymede Campus 

Landscape & Ecology Management Framework Plan 

Contents 

Page 

1 Introduction 1 

1.1 Background 1 

1.2 Purpose of the Plan 2 

1.3 Preparation of the Plan 2 

1.4 Scope of the Plan 3 

2 The Site 4 

3 Existing Landscape and Ecological Value of the Site 5 

3.1 Existing Site Landscape Character 5 

3.2 Existing Site Habitats 5 

3.3 Protected and Notable Species of Flora and Fauna 8 

3.4 Summary and Key Issues 8 

4 Landscape and Ecology Management Framework Plan 10 

4.1 Management Principles 10 

4.2 Landscaped Areas 11 

4.3 Protected and Notable Species of Fauna and Flora Group 13 

5 Implementation and Future Monitoring and Revisions of the Plan 14 

5.1 Implementation of the Plan 14 

5.2 Monitoring of the Plan 14 

5.3 Review and Revisions of the Plan 14 

Annex A: Phase 1 Habitat Plan Figure 

Annex B: Annotated Landscape Strategy Plan 

Annex C: Landscape Areas Plan 

Annex D: Example Specific Method Statement and Management Actions 

UK1116357 Issue: 2





1.1 Background 

This document has been prepared in support of planning applications being made to 

Runnymede Borough Council (RBC) by Orchid Runnymede Ltd for the comprehensive 

redevelopment of Runnymede Campus. The Hybrid Planning Application comprises: 

Redevelopment of the Site to construct 528 student bedspaces (including small shop 

Use Class A1); 59 units of Extra Care accommodation (Use Class C2); 104 new 

dwelling units including affordable housing (Use Class C3); car parking; landscaping 

and infrastructure works. 

Within this hybrid planning application, full planning permission is sought for: 

• 528 student bedspaces (and small shop); 

• 59 units of Extra Care accommodation; 

• 31 units of affordable housing; 

• 17 units of private housing comprising: 10 units through conversion of the 

Mews (7), and the Chapel (2) and refurbishment of the Lodge (1); and 7 

through new-build construction; and 

• Conversion of the Club House to a sports pavilion. 

Outline planning permission seeks approval of ‘Access’, ‘Layout’, ‘Scale’ and 

‘Landscaping’ (with ‘Appearance’ to be determined at a later stage as a reserved 

matter) for 56 units of private accommodation. 

Listed Building consent is sought for the Refurbishment and alterations of the Mews 

to provide 7 residential dwellings (Use Class C3); and refurbishment, alterations, 

extension and partial demolition to the Club House. 

Conservation Area consent is sought for the Demolition of the Principal's House, 

former Gardener's Cottages (and sections of wall to the north and east sides that 

make up part of their external envelope), and part of the concave sections of walling 

at the main entrance to the Site. 

It should be read in conjunction with the December 2010 John Thompson & Partners Design 

& Access Statement and December 2010 ENVIRON Environmental Statement prepared to 

support the planning applications. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 1




1.2 Purpose of the Plan 

This document sets out the Heads of Terms of a Landscape and Ecology Management 

Framework Plan (hereafter known as ‘the Plan’) that will be prepared, discussed and agreed 

with Runnymede Borough Council (RBC), and Natural England, Surrey Wildlife Trust, the 

National Trust (and Cliveden Group) and the Crown Estate (together, the Wildlife 

Consultees) pursuant to an anticipated planning condition should RBC be ‘minded to grant 

planning permission’ of the Proposed Development. 

The purpose of this document is to identify the landscape and ecological resources that are 

currently on the Site and set out how these resources can be managed to balance the 

objectives of biodiversity retention, conservation and enhancement with those of the 

Proposed Development’s activities, in particular amenity and public access. 

1.3 Preparation of the Plan 

This document has been prepared in line with the collected contributions and inputs received 

at several community and stakeholder meetings including those for an earlier but similar 

scheme at the Site in 2007 and 2008, as well as a more recent meeting on the Proposed 

Development as detailed in the bullets below: 

• a Community Planning Weekend (CPW) held on the 12 th and 13 th of October 2007. 

More than 150 stakeholders and local people participated in the workshops and 

planning groups to explore issues, opportunities and constraints for the Site; 

• two Runnymede Community Forum meetings held on the 20 th of November 2007 and 

22 nd of May 2008 to present the evolving masterplan for the Site to the local 

community; and 

• a public exhibition on 19 th and 20 th November 2010 to present an update on the revised 

proposals for the Site. 

Additionally, following the CPW an Ecology and Landscape Sub Group was established. 

This group met on-site on the 17th of January 2008 and subsequently discussed a 

Landscape Strategy which underpinned the draft Heads of Terms for the LEMFP which 

accompanied the 2008 applications. A further Ecology and Landscape Group meeting was 

held on Friday 19 th November 2010 to update the Group on the revised scheme proposals 

and the results of protected species surveys undertaken since January 2008, as well as to 

discuss the Landscape Strategy and the Management Principles to establish if any revisions 

were needed. 

Key contributions were received at the Ecology and Landscape Sub Group meetings 

attended by: 

• Sue Webber (Surrey Biodiversity Coordinator Surrey Wildlife Trust); 

• Nigel Boden (formerly National Trust Runnymede Head Warden now Countryside 

Manager, Cliveden Property Group, Incorporating Cliveden, Runnymede, Ankerwycke, 

Finchampstead Ridges, Maidenhead and Cookham Commons); 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 2




• James Smith-Wright (National Trust Ranger, Runnymede, Ankerwycke and 

Finchampstead Ridges Properties); 

• Bill Cathcart (Crown Estate Great Windsor Park (‘Inspector’); and 

• Sheila Quennell (Local Resident and biologist). 

1.4 Scope of the Plan 

This document is set out in the following sections: 

• a description of the current landscape and ecological characteristics and features of the 

Site, including: an evaluation of the resources in terms of their biodiversity status, 

landscape and character value and potential and intrinsic appeal; identification of 

existing Landscape Areas and Protected or Notable Flora and Faunal Groups across 

the Site; and a description of the current access arrangements at the Site; 

• the key Management Principles of the Plan; 

• the Management Objectives for each Landscape Area and Protected or Notable Flora 

and Fauna Group identified, which will assist in guiding the on-site management of 

each Landscape Area and Protected or Notable Flora or Fauna Groups to be reviewed 

every two years. The Management Objectives will be implemented through Method 

Statements and corresponding Management Specifications detailing practical, concrete 

and measurable actions to be delivered on-site; and 

• the Implementation and Future Monitoring of the Plan. 

It should be noted that the management controls and mitigation measures to reduce and 

alleviate potential adverse impacts and effects from demolition and construction activities 

arising from the Proposed Development will be outlined in a separate Demolition and 

Construction Environmental Management Plan, which - it is anticipated - will be required by 

an appropriately worded planning condition. 

This Plan covers the entire geographic area of the Runnymede Campus as defined by the 

planning applications. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 3




2 The Site 

The Site of the Proposed Development is located on Cooper’s Hill, immediately to the north 

of the village of Englefield Green and approximately 1.5 km north-west of Egham and 5 km 

south-east of Windsor at NGR SU 994 722. It was formerly occupied by Brunel University 

comprising its Runnymede Campus and also accommodated a range of commercial uses. 

The Site covers an area of approximately 27.1 hectare (ha) and is parkland of irregular 

shape. The majority of the former Runnymede Campus (approximately 24 ha) is 

undeveloped comprising woodland, sports fields, a 9-hole golf course and tennis courts. 

Buildings used by Brunel University (and latterly Royal Holloway College) and some 

commercial buildings, roads and paths occupy the remainder 3 ha of the Site, predominantly 

in the central southern part of the former University Campus. The buildings on the Site were 

used by Brunel University until July 2007 along with some additional commercial uses. The 

former university buildings are currently vacant. In addition all the commercial occupiers will 

have vacated the site by the end of January 2011. 

Habitats on-site support protected species (badgers, bats and reptiles). The Site is located 

within 2 km of a number of statutory and non-statutorily protected sites. 

The land to the north of the Site is predominantly agricultural land, woodland and grassland 

of the River Thames flood plain, which forms part of the National Trust’s Runnymede Estate. 

The River Thames flows in a north-easterly direction approximately 500 m to the north-east 

of the Site. Although much of the River Thames flood plain has been subjected to 

agricultural improvement in the past, part of the valley floor to the north of the Site is 

ecologically rich grassland. 

On the north-eastern boundary a large woodland area, which forms part of Langham Pond 

Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), is managed by the National Trust. 

On the eastern boundary the Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s Air Forces 

Memorial and memorial park, are located. 

To the south, the Site is bordered by Cooper’s Hill Lane, which leads to the south-west of 

Egham and is partly designated as a Conservation Area. There are also a number of Tree 

Preservation Order (TPO) Areas adjacent to the southern boundary of the Site. The TPOs 

are associated with the Englefield Green Conservation Area and Land at Greyholme. 

To the west is an area of woodland, which is surrounded by dispersed housing including 

institutions and retirement homes. Windsor Forest and Great Park SSSI, which is managed 

by the Crown Estate is situated approximately 700 m from the Site in a west-northwestly 

direction. 

These key biodiversity habitats to the west and north-east are identified in the South East 

Biodiversity Strategy as Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (namely ‘Windsor Great Park’ and 

‘Runnymede Meadow & Slopes’) which due to the proximity offer macro-scale regional 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 4




opportunities for the restoration and creation of Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) habitats 

through linking these areas together. The BPOA description for Runnymede Meadow and 

Slopes states it is “An attractive area of riverside meadows, grassland and broadleaved 

woodland on the outskirts of Egham. The Opportunity Area lies adjacent to the River 

Thames and is centred on the riverside meadows around Langham Pond SSSI and also 

includes important areas of woodland and parkland on and around Cooper’s Hill.” 

The Site is accessed by pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles via Cooper’s Hill Lane which has 

a separate exit and entrance with a loop road connecting the different areas of the Site. 

3 Existing Landscape and Ecological Value of the Site 

3.1 Existing Site Landscape Character 

The Site comprises a complex of buildings with associated roads set within an extensive 

area of parkland, woodland and playing fields. The Site’s location on the summit and 

forward slope of a terrace of the River Thames known as Coopers Hill, gives it a distinctive 

landscape setting. 

The northern part of the Site is an area of woodland on the escarpment slope which 

encloses a plateau to the south where the campus buildings are laid out. The escarpment 

wraps around the western side of the plateau and the landform changes to undulating 

parkland with tree clumps and belts. 

There is a very good population of mature and veteran trees, including many unusual and 

exotic species distributed throughout the Site, imparting a strong sense of identity and place 

to the Site. They are complemented by the remnants of former formal and semi-formal 

gardens, including evergreen shrubberies, particularly to the north and west of President 

Hall. Strong tree cover within and adjoining parts of the southern boundary of the Site also 

provides physical and visual enclosure. 

The landscape of the Site has been the backcloth for the everyday life for the campus 

community over many years and has been used for both active recreation, particularly rugby 

and golf, and informal recreation with walks possible throughout the grounds. 

There are stunning views from a few places along the escarpment across the Thames Valley 

and many attractive internal views most of which focus on the mature trees. 

3.2 Existing Site Habitats 

To inform the masterplanning and EIA processes Phase 1 Habitat Surveys of the Site were 

conducted by Ecology Consultancy in 2007, 2008 and 2010. The findings of the surveys are 

summarised below in short descriptions of the habitats identified. The locations of these 

habitats are illustrated on the 2010 Phase 1 Habitat Survey Plan included as Appendix A to 

this document. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 5




3.2.1 Buildings and Areas of Hard-Standing 

The main complex of buildings, which vary from the modern (late 20th Century) to Victorian, 

are grouped tightly together in the southern part of the Site. Hard-standing associated with 

the main building complex include internal roads, pathways, car parks and sports facilities 

comprising tennis, volley ball and basket ball courts. Other isolated buildings and areas of 

hard-standing occur in the west, north-east, north-west and south-east. 

3.2.2 Grassland 

Grassland areas on-site generally constitute intensively managed, short, amenity grass 

dominated by fescue Festuca spp. and bent species Agrostis spp., with a limited range of 

other species within the sward. In the east, a sports field is located, with amenity lawns 

surrounding existing buildings. These areas have been heavily grazed by rabbits. 

Some areas of lawn located on level ground surrounding existing buildings have an 

increased variety of broadleaved species with further increased species diversity within the 

sward on the lower slopes in damper areas, for example in the north of the Site. 

Areas of longer grass with increased species diversity are also found at the bases of hedges 

bordering the Site, along woodland edges (e.g. along the western boundary and around Oak 

Lane Cottage) and in island areas of scrub and mature trees in the north and northeast. 

3.2.3 Scattered Mature and Veteran Trees 

There is an assortment of mature and ornamental trees and shrubs (including extensive 

Rhododendron Rhododendron ponticum groves) in formally landscaped areas surrounding 

existing buildings, including several veteran trees (large and mature specimens) of sweet 

chestnut Castanea sativa and pedunculate oak Quercus robur. One large veteran oak has 

died but has been left in-situ and there are several other dead pollards in the central, 

previously developed area. Veteran trees are also located at the Site entrance and 

bordering the central woodland belt and woodland path in the north-west. Mature and 

veteran trees provide many large holes and splits with high bat roost potential, and offer 

good habitat for invertebrates. Grouped mature trees are also located in ‘islands’ within the 

grasslands. One large oak on the western boundary of the Site is thought to be diseased 

(Acute Oak Decline (AOD)) and will require urgent and careful removal to prevent spread of 

this infectious bacterial tree disease. 

3.2.4 Woodlands and Tree Belts 

The north-eastern part of the Site is characterised by semi-natural broad-leaved woodland. 

Trees growing towards the top of the slope include rowan Sorbus aucuparia, silver birch 

Betula pendula, downy birch Betula pubescens, pedunculate oak Quercus robur, sweet 

chestnut Castanea sativa, sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus, and occasional ash Fraxinus 

excelsior and holly Ilex acquifolium, with an understorey that include hazel Corylus avellana, 

as well as frequent rhododendron and cherry laurel. The oak and sweet chestnut include 

some large specimens, several showing evidence of having been pollarded in the past. 

Ground flora is dominated by small balsam Impatiens parviflora, with dog’s mercury 

Mercurialis perennis, bramble Rubus fructicosus agg. and ivy Hedera helix in places. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 6




Bluebell Hyacinthoides nonscripta is also frequent. Along the woodland edges nettle Urtica 

dioica, cow parsley Anthriscus sylvestris and bramble are prominent. Bracken Pteridium 

aquilinum is also locally abundant. 

Part of this area is classified as ancient woodland. 

Large and smaller areas of similar, semi-natural broadleaved woodlands are also present in 

the following locations within the Site: 

• a central belt to the west of the building complex; 

• a small area around Oak Lane Cottage; 

• surrounding the sewage works; 

• east of the main entrance; 

• the south-western corner of the Site; and 

• a woodland belt (with ditch) running along the western boundary. 

3.2.5 Hedgerows and Mixed Scrub 

Along the south-west border, the Site is separated from bordering properties on Coopers Hill 

Lane by a hedgerow dominated by holly Ilex aquifolium and, in sections further west, laurel 

Prunus laurocerasus. Bramble Rubus fruticosus agg. is also abundant within the hedging. 

On the northeast border, running from the derelict tennis courts to the woodland surrounding 

the sewage works, there is a hedgerow dominated by common hawthorn Crataegus 

monogyna, again with frequent bramble. Hornbeam hedging with dense rhododendron, 

holly and laurel scrub is also found next to the sports field. 

3.2.6 Ruderal Species 

In a few places around the previously developed part of the Site, most notably around the 

margins of a plant nursery, are disturbed ‘weedy’ areas where ruderal plants occur. Species 

include annual meadow grass Poa annua, dandelion Taraxacum officinale, chickweed 

Stellaria media, ragwort Senecio jacobaea, groundsel Senecio vulgaris, red dead-nettle 

Lamium purpureum, smooth sow-thistle Sonchus oleraceus, prickly lettuce Lactuca serriola 

and scarlet pimpernel Anagallis arvensis. 

3.2.7 Ornamental Plantings and Pond 

Ornamental shrubs and other plants are present in flowerbeds scattered throughout the 

central building complex together with ornamental hedging comprising a wide variety of 

species, inter alia: rose Rosa spp., elaeagnus Elaeagnus spp., mock orange Philadelphus 

spp., and Mexican orange Choisya ternata. Small ornamental trees such as crab apple, 

Malus spp., and cherry Prunus spp. were also identified. Large rhododendron shrubberies 

also occur within lawns in close proximity to the buildings and in small areas of woodland 

close to the buildings. 

A small, round ornamental pond with raised stone edging was observed near the science 

centre. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 7




3.2.8 Invasive species 

Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica was identified in scattered locations across the Site. 

This plant species is classified as an Invasive Species of Plant. Rhodedrondron ponticum is 

present throughout the woodland and within the garden areas around the developed area. 

The noxious weed ragwort Senecio jacobaea is found throughout the grassland areas within 

the west and northwest of the Site. 

3.3 Protected and Notable Species of Flora and Fauna 

Based on the recommendations of the 2007 Phase 1 Habitat Survey undertaken by Ecology 

Consultancy, a survey of more detailed Protected Species was undertaken in 2007, 2008 

and 2010. The results of these surveys and their conservation value are set out below: 

Feature Reason for Importance Value of the Site 

Bats Some bats are listed on the UK BAP . 

All species of bats are protected by UK 

and European legislation (particularly the 

Protection of Habitats and Species 

Regulations 2010). 

Nine species of bat have been recorded 

using the site although only four species 

have been confirmed as roosting in 

buildings on-site. 

The Site is considered to be of County 

Importance for bats. 

Reptiles 

Badgers 

All species of reptile are UK BAP species. 

Reptiles are protected by the Wildlife and 

Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). 

Badgers are protected by the Protection 

of Badgers Act 1992. 

A small population of grass snake breed 

within the Site. 

The Site is of Local Importance for reptiles. 

A number of badger setts within the 

Campus were identified in the 2008 

survey, with one active sett recorded in the 

most recent 2010 surveys 

3.4 Summary and Key Issues 

The Site itself and its associated social values within the existing surrounding community is 

well understood. It not only contains valuable ecological resources but is located within a 

surrounding context of predominant biodiversity value, landscape and visual amenity and a 

distinct sense of place. The Site provides a buffer for the neighbouring National Trust 

property and also to a certain extent for the Langham Ponds SSSI. 

Areas of key ecological value on-site include the ancient woodlands, veteran trees, dead 

trees and stumps (and their underground root systems) and hedgerows. 

The local value of the ancient woodland is recognised in its designation as an Area of High 

Ecological Quality in the Borough Local Plan. Due to its age and structure, the woodland 

has potential to support a range of protected species including bats, breeding birds, badgers, 

and Red Data book species of flora and fauna. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 8




Scattered veteran trees and standing dead trees are considered an uncommon habitat 

feature in the wider landscape. These have high potential to support bat roosts and are 

important sources of invertebrates for foraging bats and birds; they may also support rare 

invertebrate communities. 

Log piles and above and below ground deadwood habitat provide potential habitat for 

invertebrates such as stag beetle and fungi. 

Areas of negligible ecological value include paved areas, some buildings and areas of hardstanding 

such as roads etc. The grassland within the Site is generally of relatively low 

ecological value in its current, intensively managed state but has great potential for 

enhancement through sympathetic management, particularly the areas of damp grassland 

along spring lines. Ornamental plantings within formal gardens are also currently of low 

ecological value but could be enhanced through planting of species that are valuable to 

wildlife. 

The grassland, shrubberies and landscaped areas are all considered ‘replaceable’ and ‘recreatable’; 

whereas the ancient woodland and veteran trees were considered ‘irreplaceable’ 

and ‘non-recreatable’, at least within a human timeframe. 

Identified Landscape Areas on-site (as shown in Appendix C) and which have subsequently 

been used in dividing up the Site in the Landscape Strategy and this LEMFP include: 

• Parkland Recreational Area; 

• Parkland Conservation Area; 

• Woodland Conservation Area; 

• Chestnut Walk; and 

• Development Area, including the existing development footprint, playing field and 

internal garden spaces. 

Overall the Site is considered to be of importance at the scale of the Borough represented by 

the Local Planning Authority. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 9




4 Landscape and Ecology Management Framework Plan 

4.1 Management Principles 

Central to the document and the masterplan design of the Proposed Development has been 

the following management principles: 

Principle 1: To conserve and enhance the biodiversity and nature conservation value of 

the Site by retaining, managing and enhancing the existing and proposed 

habitat types, consistent with the objective of maintaining the setting of the 

Site with wider landscape and biodiversity objectives; 

Principle 2: 

Principle 3: 

To retain, maintain and sustain the tree cover, where practical in 

consideration of safety and plant disease control factors, and the wider 

parkland landscape setting of the Site and character of the local area; 

To maintain the value of the Site to protected and notable fauna and flora; 

Principle 4: To ensure the long term visually attractive, safe and sustainable accessibility 

of the Site for future residents of the Site and existing members of Engelfield 

Green, for recreational purposes; 

Principle 5: To monitor the landscape and ecological conditions of the Site’s existing and 

future habitats; and 

Principle 6: To rehabilitate habitats where and if required, to control any invasive and 

noxious weed species present at the Site and to actively manage and control 

the re-occurrence and spread of such species to neighbouring properties. 

These Management Principles are intended to guide actions and decisions of both the onsite 

management and the external organisations that make decisions affecting the Site. 

They are intended to be long-term and should remain relevant to future revisions to the Plan. 

The Management Objectives set out below for each Landscape Area and Protected or 

Notable Flora and Faunal Group guide the management of the each Landscape Area and 

Protected or Notable Flora and Fauna Group. 

An annotated map to illustrate some but not all of the proposed Management Objectives is 

included in Appendix B. 

The Management Objectives will be implemented through Method Statements containing 

Management Specifications which will set out practical actions to be delivered. The 

Method Statement and the Management Specifications will be discussed and agreed with 

the Wildlife Consultees, will be reviewed every two years and will be contained in the final 

Plan. An example draft template of the Management Objectives, Method Statement and 

Management Specifications is provided in Annex D of this Heads of Term document. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 10




4.2 Landscaped Areas 

4.2.1 Parkland Recreation Area 

This open area of the Site to the west of the university buildings swings down to Oak Lane 

cottages and currently comprises a large area of biodiversity poor amenity grassland that 

was formerly used as a golf course. 

Management Objectives for this area of the Site are: 

• Retention of access for local villagers and new residents without resulting in this area 

becoming a major district open space; 

• Creation of an attractive open, tranquil space; 

• Creation of a formal and informal path system, from the park entry point to the Scrivens 

Sunken Memorial Garden thereafter through more informal interconnecting mown 

paths; 

• Biodiversity enhancement of a species rich grassland with planting of locally native 

parkland specimen oaks; 

• Creation of a parkland grassland with intermittent animal grazing; 

• Creation of new tree clumps of large parkland tree stands using a mixture of planting 

nursery standards of local provenance and tree seeding in protected roundels; 

• Selective thinning (following arboricultural advice) of diseased, dead and dangerous 

limbs/trees for plant biology, health & safety reasons and/or use of safe brash piles to 

stop access to the area; 

• Improvements to western boundary with hedgerow planting of locally sourced trees and 

shrubs; and 

• Enhancement of the Sunken Memorial Garden space with some additional seating and 

planting. 

4.2.2 Parkland Conservation Area 

This northwestern area of the Site currently comprises two blocks of open, species poor, 

amenity grassland at the bottom of the golf-course slope and is partially divided by an 

intermittent block of mature and ancient oak trees (several of which are storm damaged). 


• Biodiversity enhancement of the existing grassland and trees; 

• Invertebrate habitat creation for Stag Beetles; 

• Improved landscaping, and creation of a wildlife pond; 

• Creation of a parkland grassland with intermittent animal grazing; 

• Creation of an orchard using locally characteristic varieties of apples and other fruit 

trees; 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 11




• Gapping up and reinforcing existing hedgerows; and 

• Controlled public access. 

4.2.3 Woodland Conservation Area 

This area of the Site comprises the woodland areas on the northern and north-eastern 

Cooper’s Hill slope boundary. 


• Structural improvements through selective removal and thinning out of non-locally 

native trees and creation of woodland glades and understorey; 

• Biodiversity improvements through the selective removal and control of sycamore trees 

(plus small areas of Japanese Knotweed present), creation of glades, plus the 

introduction of oak and hazel trees of local provenance; 

• Erection of bat boxes; and 

• Restriction of access into the woodland to create a buffer to the National Trust’s 

Runnymede Estate and Langham Ponds SSSI to the north-east and reduce 

disturbance pressures to wildlife. 

4.2.4 Chestnut Walk 

The mixed chestnut ‘avenue’ comprises mature trees of considerable age and interest and of 

importance as a habitat for a range of wildlife. 


• Restoration of the walk; 

• Selective removal of poor and dying trees to improve safety after further arboricultural 

advice and replacement of these trees with new plantings; 

• Surface improvements to ground underneath the trees to relieve the ground 

compaction and removal of non-organic litter; 

• Retention of and creation of habitat suitable for breeding grass snakes; and 

• Creation of a soft landscaped garden at the end of the walk with a viewpoint looking 

northwards through a glade/cleared area in the woodland. 

4.2.5 Development Area (Building Footprint, Playing Field, Garden Spaces) 

Although the landscape here will be more manicured and hard landscaped, consideration 

will be given to enhancing and maximising wildlife measures whilst creating a safe and 

pleasant place to live for new residents. 


• Creation of a safe and pleasant environment for future residents; 

• Creation and maintenance of communal (and private) gardens; 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 12




• Installation of wildlife friendly night-time lighting; 

• Installation of bat and swift bricks and where appropriate loft spaces in new buildings 

and buildings being refurbished; 

• Installation of 50 bird including swift and house sparrow boxes under eaves and 50 bat 

boxes on retained specimen trees and walled features; 

• Creation of root protection area around tree stumps (in particular around the major oak 

stump by the western Site entrance); and 

• Wildlife-friendly garden maintenance such as reduced and careful use of chemicals, 

avoidance of the use of peat compost, installation of log piling for Stag Beetles. 

4.3 Protected and Notable Species of Fauna and Flora Group 

As described in section 3 of this Plan, the ecological surveys of the Site conducted to inform 

the EIA have identified the presence of a number of protected species of fauna as well as a 

number of notable species of fauna and flora. 

Management Objectives for these current and future populations of valuable species are: 

• Ensuring populations of protected species are either maintained or increased on-site; 

• Ensuring disturbance to protected and notable species of flora and fauna is limited and 

does not adversely affect those species; 

• Ensuring that there are long-term biodiversity enhancements across the Site; and 

• Increasing educational awareness of the species and their behaviour to future residents 

and existing villagers. 

It should be noted that the redevelopment of the Site includes the refurbishment and 

demolition of existing university buildings that are known to support bat roosts and the felling 

of trees that might support bat roosts. As legally required, appropriate licences will be 

obtained from Natural England for these activities prior to their commencement. 

Additionally, it is anticipated that as part of the licence requirements post implementation 

monitoring will be required. 

Interpretative boards explaining the biodiversity and conservation value and objectives within 

the different landscape areas will also be provided. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 13




5 Implementation and Future Monitoring and Revisions 

of the Plan 

5.1 Implementation of the Plan 

A management company will be appointed or formed to manage the Site's parkland, 

grounds, communal areas and the private residential development. This company will also 

coordinate the other management activities on-site. The company will also be responsible for 

implementing the Plan either directly or through the use of appropriately qualified subcontractors. 

A member of the management company, will be the day-to-day individual 

responsible for implementation of the Management Objectives. 

It is anticipated that the precise wording and contents of this Plan will be discussed and 

agreed with the Wildlife Consultees and RBC as required by an appropriately worded 

planning condition. It is further anticipated that the implementation of the Plan will be 

secured by condition, whilst the long term funding of the Plan will be secured through a 

suitably worded S106 obligation. 

5.2 Monitoring of the Plan 

To ensure that the Plan is effective and informs the biannual reviews and the review of the 

overarching Management Principles at the year four review detailed below, it is proposed 

that monitoring of the landscape and ecology value of the Site and the success of the 

Management Objectives, Method Statements and Method Specifications is assessed by 

periodic monitoring surveys of protected species every two years or as required under the 

terms of any European Protected Species Licence. 

5.3 Review and Revisions of the Plan 

It is proposed that the Plan sets out the long term landscape and ecological management of 

the Site for the next eight years. However as landscape and biodiversity priorities and 

legislation may change along with the Site conditions and populations, it is proposed that the 

Plan’s Management Principles are reviewed and agreed with the Wildlife Consultees (plus 

RBC) at the end of year four, save that any changes as a result of reviews should be cost 

neutral. In the period prior to this review it is proposed that the Management Objectives for 

each Landscape Area and Notable and Protected Species of Fauna and Flora Group and 

the more detailed Method Statements are reviewed and agreed with the Wildlife Consultees 

every two years. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 14




Annex A: Phase 1 Site Habitat Plan Figure 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 15




UK1116357 Issue: 2 16




Annex B: Annotated Landscape Strategy Plan 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 17


Heads of Terms for the Runnymede Campus Landscape & Ecology Management Framework Plan 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 18




Annex C: Landscape Area Plan 

UK1116537 Issue: 2 19


Heads of Terms for the Runnymede Campus Landscape & Ecology Management Framework Plan 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 20




Annex D: Example Specific Method 

Statement & Management Actions 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 21




Example of Management Objectives and Management Specification for the 

Parkland Conservation Zone 

Landscape Area / 

Habitat / Species 

Parkland Conservation Zone 

Management Objectives 

Biodiversity enhancement of the 

grassland and trees 

Management Specification 

Planting of native trees, planting of 

oaks Quercus robur locally sourced 

from Windsor Great Park and 

enclosed by metal bar parkland 

fence. 

Detailing and installation of 

seedling protection from rabbits. 

Creation of improved buffer zone 

through native planting of gappy 

hedgerow on western boundary 

with tree and shrub species 

Collection and distribution of locally 

sourced seed and hay crop onto 

grassland in July and August of the 

first two years 

Invertebrate habitat creation for 

Stag Beetles 

Improved landscaping and use 

of the currently redundant tennis 

courts 

Creation of a parkland grassland 

with intermittent animal grazing 

Creation of a Native Apple 

Orchard 

Retaining standing dead wood insitu 

where it does not pose a safety 

hazard, as well as fallen and felled 

dead wood 

Excavation and removal of 

redundant tennis courts to be 

replaced with a combination of soft 

and hard landscaping including the 

creation of a small wildlife pond 

Controlling and managing 

grassland sward length through the 

introduction of grazing animals on 

a rotational basis at agreed times of 

the year March-April and August- 

September following an initial two 

year artificial managed regime of 

grass cutting to prevent trampling 

and encourage wildflower 

regeneration and cropping. 

Grass cutting in the first two years 

to be undertaken in early Spring 

and early August, September and 

October. Cuttings from the early 

Spring and August cuts to be left on 

grassland for 2-3 weeks before 

being removed 

Expanding the existing fruit trees 

near Oak Lane cottages with the 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 22




Landscape Area / 

Habitat / Species 

Management Objectives 

Controlled public access 

Management Specification 

creation of an enlarged orchard. 

Planting locally sourced apple 

varieties such as Claygate 

Pearmain and Cockle Pippin. 

Undertaking formative pruning of 

trees in line with a lot intervention 

approach. 

Erecting metal bar parkland fencing 

around the whole area to contain 

grazing livestock and limit public 

access. 

UK1116357 Issue: 2 23



APPENDIX 14.1 


Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVRON 

UK11-16357

RUNNYMEDE CAMPUS 

COOPERS HILL LANE, RUNNYMEDE 


January 2011

RUNNYMEDE CAMPUS 

COOPERS HILL LANE, RUNNYMEDE 


January 2011 

Project Code: ARTRunnymedeCampus.2 

Prepared by: ASA PLANT / JOHN GILBY 

Position: 

Principal Consultant / Consultant 

Approved by: Richard Gregory 

Issue Date: 24 th January 2011 

Status: 

FINAL 

Mayer Brown Limited Lion House Oriental Road Woking Surrey GU22 8AR 

Telephone 01483 750 508 Fax 01483 750 437 wokingoffice@mayerbrown.co.uk www.mayerbrown.co.uk


Coopers Hill Lane, Runnymede 

Contents 

1.0 Introduction 

2.0 Site Location & Accessibility 

3.0 Development Proposals 

4.0 Planning Policy 

5.0 Traffic Attraction 

6.0 Junction Modelling 

7.0 Summary and Conclusions



List of Figures 

Figure 1.1 

Site in Relation to the Regional Highway Network 

Figure 1.2 

Site in Relation to the Local Highway Network 

Figure 2.1 

Site in Relation to the Local Cycle Network 

Figure 3.1 

Site Access Points and Visibility Splays 

Figure 3.2 

Swept Path Analysis of Site Layout for Large Refuse Vehicle 

Figure 3.3 

Swept Path Analysis of Private Residential for Large Refuse 

Vehicle 

Figure 3.4 

Swept Path Analysis of Affordable Residential for Large 

Refuse Vehicle 

Figure 3.5 

Swept Path Analysis of Extra Care Residential for Large 


Figure 3.6 

Swept Path Analysis of Student Accommodation for Large 


Figure 3.7 

Site Layout Plan 

Figure 3.8 

Potential Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction 

Improvements 

Figure 3.9 

Proposed Coopers Hill Lane Footway Improvements 

Figure 3.10 

Potential Coopers Hill Lane Triangle Junction Improvements 

Figure 3.11 

Proposed Bus Stop on Coopers Hill Lane 

Figure 5.1 

Base Traffic Flows – AM Peak



List of Figures (continued) 

Figure 5.2 

Figure 5.3 

Figure 5.4 

Base Traffic Distribution – AM Peak 

Development Flows – AM Peak 

Total Flows (Base + Development) – AM Peak 

List of Appendices 

Appendix A 

Appendix B 

Appendix C 

Appendix D 

Appendix E 

Priest Hill Speed Survey Data and Visibility Calculations 

Accident Data 

TRICS Outputs and National Census Data 

PICADY Outputs 

ARCADY Outputs




1.0 INTRODUCTION 

1.1 Mayer Brown has been commissioned by Orchid Runnymede Limited to produce this 

Transport Assessment, to support the application to redevelop Brunel University‟s 

Runnymede Campus located on Coopers Hill Lane in Runnymede. 

1.2 The location of the site in relation to the regional and local highway networks is shown 

in Figures 1.1 and 1.2 respectively. 

1.3 The site was previously in use as a fully operational campus for Brunel University and 

is currently unoccupied, having been vacated in July 2007. The previous site use 

included halls of residence, lecture theatres and sports facilities. In total there is 

approximately 30,000sqm of floor space on the site, including 479 student bedrooms 

and 368 car parking spaces. Most recently the site comprised of student 

accommodation for circa 400 students for Royal Holloway College. 

1.4 Hybrid planning permission is sought for redevelopment of the site to construct 528 

student bedspaces (including small shop Use Class A1); 59 units of Extra Care 

accommodation (Use Class C2); 104 new dwelling units including affordable housing 

(Use Class C3); car parking; landscaping and infrastructure works. 

1.5 Within this hybrid planning application, full planning permission is sought for: 

528 student bedspaces (and small shop) 

59 units of Extra Care accommodation 

31 units of affordable housing 

16 units of private housing comprising 10 units through conversion of the 

Mews, and the Chapel and refurbishment of the Lodge; and 6 through 

new-build construction 

Conversion of the Clubhouse to sports pavilion 

1.6 Outline planning permission seeking approval of „Access‟, „Layout‟, „Scale‟ and 

„Landscaping‟ (with „Appearance‟ to be determined at a later stage as a reserved 

matter) for: 

56 units of private accommodation 

1.7 The re-development proposals which are the subject of this TA consist of the following 

parking provision: 

385 car parking spaces 

257 cycle parking spaces 

2 minibus parking spaces 

Page 1




1.8 In October 2006 planning permission (RU.03/0112) was granted to redevelop the site 

to provide the following additional built accommodation beyond that summarised in 

Paragraph 1.3: 

7,800sqm of student accommodation 

6,700sqm of academic and ancillary accommodation 


1.9 The current permitted development summarised in Paragraphs 1.3 and 1.5 above, 

would provide approximately 44,500sqm of floor space with 590 parking spaces on the 

site. 

1.10 In December 2008 a planning application (RU.08/1168) was submitted to redevelop the 

site as a mixed use development of approximately 43,655sqm comprising: 

153 new residential dwellings 

530 student bed dwellings 

73 care units 

788 sqm of commercial floorspace (B1) 


1.11 This application has now been withdrawn, however progress was made with Surrey 

County Council (SCC) on various transport matters and the current application has 

developed the previous assessment work undertaken. It should also be noted that the 

new application is for less development than permitted under extant permissions and 

less than was applied for in the December 2008 application. 

1.12 The scope of this assessment has been agreed with SCC. It has been agreed that, 

this report should be in the form of a full Transport Assessment (TA) incorporating 

junction capacity testing at the local junctions. 

1.13 The remainder of the report consists of the following sections: 

Site Location & Accessibility 

Development Proposals 

Planning Policy 

Traffic Attraction 

Junction Modelling 

Summary and Conclusions 

Page 2




2.0 SITE LOCATION & ACCESSIBILITY 

2.1 The development site is located to the north of Englefield Green, approximately 5.5km 

southwest of Windsor and 4.5km west of Staines. 

2.2 The site is currently occupied by the disused Brunel University Runnymede campus. 

Vehicular access to the site is currently provided at four points on the southern border 

of the site onto Coopers Hill Lane. The main vehicular access is located to the west of 

the Coopers Hill Lane triangle. A secondary access is provided approximately 35m to 

the east of the Cooper‟s Hill Lane triangle 

2.3 A third access is provided adjacent to the existing residential properties on the northern 

side of Coopers Hill Lane, which operates as an egress only. It is understood that 

historically this egress would have attracted a significant level of traffic, as a large 

proportion of the 368 parking spaces on site would have used this access. This traffic 

in turn would have egressed along Coopers Hill Lane to the west. A fourth, separate 

mews access is provided further east along Coopers Hill Lane. 

2.4 The site is located in a semi-rural location and is surrounded by wooded and open land 

to the north, residential dwellings to the south and west, and the Airforces Memorial on 

the eastern border of the site. 

2.5 A village green is located 360m to the south of the site providing a recreation area for 

local residents. 

2.6 The centre of Englefield Green is located approximately 1km to the south of the site, a 

walk of approximately 12 minutes assuming an average walking speed of 80m/min. 

There are a range of facilities available including pharmacies, restaurants, newsagents, 

pubs, churches and schools. Royal Holloway College is also located on the southern 

border of Englefield Green. 

2.7 The town of Egham is located approximately 2km to the southeast of the site and offers 

a wide range of facilities. Egham is accessible by bus and cycle from the site. 

Highway Network 

2.8 Coopers Hill Lane is a two-way road that runs along the southern border of the site and 

is the road from which vehicular access to the site is taken. Coopers Hill Lane runs 

from the west where it forms a junction with Priest Hill and continues to the east 

towards Egham. Although it is a no through route for cars beyond the Kingswood 

Campus, where it becomes a cycle route providing a direct connection to Egham. 

Directly to the south of the site between the main access and middle access, Coopers 

Hill Lane branches in two and also travels south forming a junction with St Judes Road. 

Page 3




2.9 St Jude‟s Road leads south into Englefield Green and continues north towards Old 

Windsor as Priest Hill. Priest Hill is subject to a 60mph national speed limit, which 

reduces to a 30mph limit towards Englefield Green, where the route becomes St Judes 

Road. 

Bus Accessibility 

2.10 The closest bus stop to the site is the Middle Hill stop located approximately 425m to 

the south. There are two more bus stops located within easy walking distance of the 

site (640m or an 8 minute walk); the Coopers Hill Lane stop located approximately 

470m to the west of the site and the Cricketers Lane stop located approximately 700m 

to the south of the site. 

2.11 A summary of the bus services available at the above stops is shown in the following 

table: 

Service 

71 

3 

Route 

Slough Town Centre, Slough Bus Station – 

Windsor Town Centre, Parish Church – 

Windsor Town Centre, Parish Church – 

Windsor, King Edward VII Hospital – Old 

Windsor, Bells of Ouseley – Englefield 

Green, Holly Tree – Englefield Green, 

Royal Holloway College – Egham, Arndale 

Way – Egham Hythe, Pooley Green Shops 

– Egham Hythe, Sainsburys – Staines, 

Elmsleigh Bus Station – Staines, Elmsleigh 

Bus Station – Heathrow Terminal 5 

St Peter's Hospital Outpatients Dept - St 

Peter's Hospital Abraham Cowley Unit - 

Lyne Almners Road - Virginia Water 

Stroude Road - Virginia Water Sandhills 

Lane - Stroude Royal Standard - Thope 

Red Lion - Pooley Green - Egham Arndale 

Way - Englefield Green Health Centre - 

Englefield Green Cherrywood Avenue - 

Egham Arndale Way - Pooley Green - 

Thorpe Red Lion - Stroude Royal Standard 

- Virginia Water Sandhills Lane - Virginia 

Water Stroude Road - Lyne Almners Road - 

St Peter's Hospital Abraham Cowley Unit - 

St Peter's Hospital Bus Terminus 

Table 2.1: Accessible Bus Services 

Weekday Peak 

Frequency 

Weekend Peak 

Frequency 

AM PM Sat Sun 

2 per 

hour 

1 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

1 per 

hour 

2per 

hour 

1 per 

hour 

- - 

Page 4




2.12 Table 2.1 shows that the site is accessible by two frequent bus services providing 

access to destinations including Slough, Windsor, Englefield Green, Egham, Staines 

and Heathrow Airport. 

2.13 A student bus currently serves the Kingswood Campus, providing a regular service to 

and from Royal Holloway College as outlined below: 

Service 

Student 

Bus 

Student 

Bus 

Route 

Kingswood – Main Campus 

Main Campus - Kingswood 

Table 2.2: Student Bus Service Frequency 

Weekday Peak 

Frequency 

Weekend Peak 

Frequency 

AM PM Sat Sun 

Every 

20 

mins 

Every 

20 

mins 

Every 

20 

mins 

Every 

20 

mins 

1 per 

hour 

1 per 

hour 

1 per 

hour 

1 per 

hour 

2.14 It can be seen from the above table that a frequent service is currently provided 

between Kingwood and the Main Royal Holloway Campus. This service runs along 

Coopers Hill Lane, past the proposed eastern access for the student accommodation, 

and then travels along St Judes Road to the Main Campus. 

Rail Accessibility 

2.15 Egham Station is the nearest railway station to the site located approximately 2km to 

the east of the site in Egham. 

2.16 Whilst the station is beyond what would typically be considered an easy walking 

distance, the station is accessible by cycle and the number 71 bus to Egham stops 

approximately 300m to the north of Egham Station. Therefore it is feasible that multimodal 

trips to the site by rail could be made via the number 71 bus or cycle. 

Page 5




2.17 Egham Station is operated by South West Trains and a summary of the train services 

available is provided in the following table: 

Route 

Egham – Staines- Feltham – Twickenham – Richmond 

– Clapham Junction – London Waterloo 

Egham – Ashford – Feltham – Hounslow – Isleworth – 

Syon Lane – Brentford – Kew Bridge – Chiswick – 

Barnes Bridge – Barnes – Putney – Wandsworth Town 

– Clapham Junction – Queenstown Road Battersea – 

Vauxhall – London Waterloo 

Egham – Virginia Water – Chertsey – Addlestone - 

Weybridge 

Egham – Virginia Water – Sunningdale – Ascot – 

Martins Heron – Bracknell – Wokingham – Winnersh – 

Winnersh Triangle – Earley - Reading 

Table 2.3: Accessible Rail Services 

Weekday Peak 

Frequency 

Weekend Peak 

Frequency 

AM PM Sat Sun 

3 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

1 per 

hour 

1 per 

hour 

2 per 

hour 

2.18 Table 2.3 shows that Egham Station provides numerous and frequent rail services to 

and from London Waterloo, Weybridge and Reading. 

Pedestrian Accessibility 

2.19 There are currently no pedestrian footways in the vicinity of the site access along 

Coopers Hill Lane, in keeping with the semi-rural environment. However, a footway is 

provided opposite the site access that leads south to the Middle Hill bus stop on St 

Jude‟s Road. 

2.20 Coopers Hill Lane is classified as a signposted cycle route and provides cycle access 

to Egham, located approximately 2km to the east (8 minute cycle). Many of the roads 

to the south of the site are classified as recommended cycle routes and these provide 

easy cycle access into Englefield Green and Egham from the site. A plan illustrating 

the site in relation to the local cycle network is provided at Figure 2.1. 

Accessibility Summary 

2.21 Given its semi-rural location, the site has a reasonable level of accessibility. The 71 

bus offers a regular service to various destinations in the area as well as Egham 

Railway Station. The site is also accessible by cycle from Egham and Englefield 

Green. 

Page 6




3.0 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS 











new-build construction; 




matter) for: 







Access Arrangements 

3.5 The site will have four access points serving the different elements of the scheme. The 

main access and secondary access will continue to be used. The Mews access will 

also continue to be used, with a new access to the student accommodation provided to 

the east of the site. 

3.6 The egress only access provided adjacent to the existing residential properties on the 

northern side of Coopers Hill Lane will no longer be used. 

3.7 The existing main access will be used to serve the 68 private residential dwellings and 

the 59 unit extra care building. 

3.8 The existing secondary access point approximately 35m to the east of the Coopers Hill 

Lane triangle will serve the 31 affordable dwellings and 5 private dwellings. 

Page 7




3.9 The mews access further to the east, opposite the Hollycombe junction, will serve 7 

private dwellings. 

3.10 The new eastern access will serve the 528 bed student accommodation and small 

shop. This will also serve the Sports Pavilion which will be an ancillary use to the 

student accommodation and Royal Holloway College. 

3.11 All of the access points can accommodate a 2.4m x 43m visibility splay, in accordance 

with Manual for Streets design guidance for a 30mph road. Vehicle speed 

measurements have supported this design speed. 

3.12 A plan illustrating the access points in relation to the scheme layout and visibility splays 

can be found at Figure 3.1. 

Refuse Arrangements 

3.13 Each element of the site has been TRACK tested for a Large Refuse Vehicle, as 

outlined at Figures 3.2 – 3.6. It is proposed that the refuse bins for the Student 

Accommodation will be managed and wheeled to accessible points as outlined at 

Figure 3.6. 

Car Parking Provision 

3.14 The parking standards for the area are set out in the Runnymede Borough Local Plan 

Second Alteration (April 2001) – Supplementary Planning Guidance on Car Parking 

(October 2001) document published by Runnymede Borough Council. 

3.15 The proposed provision in relation to the parking standards is outlined in Table 3.1: 

Page 8




Tenure Beds No. Units 

RBC Max. 

Parking Spaces / 

Unit 

Max. Parking 

Provision 

Proposed 

Parking 

Provision 

Net 

Difference 

1 bed 3 1 3 4 3 

Private 

2 bed 17 2 34 32 -2 

3 bed 36 2 72 76 4 

4+ bed 17 2 34 37 5 

Visitor - - - 16 - 

Total 73 143 165 22 

1 bed 13 1 13 

Affordable 

2 bed 14 2 28 

3 bed 3 2 6 

4 bed 1 2 2 

31 

2 

Visitor - - - 20 

Total 31 49 51 

Extra 

Care 

1 bed 16 0.5 8 

2 bed 39 1 39 

3 bed 4 1 4 

Total 59 51 61 10 

Student 1 bed 528 0.2 106 106 0 

Scheme Total 690 349 383 34 

Table 3.1: Parking Provision in Relation to RBC Parking Standards 

3.16 It can be seen from the above that the proposed development is broadly in-line with 

RBC parking standards. The level of parking has been set at the upper level of the 

standards to reflect the site‟s semi-rural location and the likely parking demand from 3+ 

bedroom units. This level of parking will also help to minimise the potential for any onstreet 

parking, a matter which has been raised by local residents through public 

consultation. An additional 2 disabled spaces and 2 minibus spaces are provided for 

the Sports Pavilion. 

3.17 It is acknowledged that in certain areas the level of parking is above the maximum 

standard. However looking at the site and local environment holistically, the level of 

parking is considered suitable for the site and development. 

3.18 A provision of 4 disabled spaces has been provided at the Extra Care Residential and 

and 16 spaces for the Student accommodation. 

Page 9




3.19 The student car parking provision of 106 spaces will be managed to allow for an 

appropriate level of visitor parking. It is proposed that 16 spaces be allocated for visitor 

parking in the first instance. This will be monitored and adjusted accordingly. The 

proposed Sports Pavilion will include parking for 2 minibus vehicles and 2 disabled 

spaces. The Sports Pavilion is considered to be ancillary to the Student 

Accommodation and Royal Holloway College, therefore a low demand of car use is 

expected. However it is proposed that any overflow parking of the Sports Pavilion will 

be accommodated within the student visitor parking allocation, if necessary. 

3.20 The Kingswood Campus, also on Coopers Hill Lane, provides student accommodation 

of 414 beds with 141 parking spaces. In 2009-2010 only 58 permits were issued for 

student parking. Assuming a similar take-up of parking spaces for the proposed 

student accommodation would result in 74 spaces being used. This demonstrates that 

there is significant spare capacity and any potential increase in student or visitor 

parking should be accommodated within the site. 

Cycle Parking Provision 

3.21 The cycle parking standards for the area are set out in the Runnymede Borough Local 

Plan Second Alteration (April 2001) – Supplementary Planning Guidance on Car 

Parking (October 2001) document published by Runnymede Borough Council. 

3.22 The proposed provision in relation to the cycle parking standards is outlined below: 

Tenure 

GEA 

sqm 

RBC Min. Parking 1 

Space / GFA 

Min. Parking 

Provision 

Proposed 

Parking 

Provision 

Net 

Difference 

Private 2752 150 18 18 0 

The Mews 300 150 2 9 +7 

Affordable 1702 150 11 12 +1 

Extra Care 7986 0 0 12 +12 

Student 14491 100 145 206 +61 

Scheme Total 176 257 +81 

Table 3.2: Cycle Parking Provision in Relation to RBC Parking Standards 

3.23 Cycle parking standards are not provided for residential houses or extra care 

residential. Whilst no standards are provided for extra care residential, 12 cycle 

spaces have been provided for staff and visitors. 

3.24 Cycle parking for the apartments will be provided in line with the above standards. 

Page 10




3.25 To help to promote cycling, a total of 206 cycle parking spaces are proposed for the 

student accommodation; a significant increase beyond the minimum guidance. The 

student cycle parking is provided in accessible areas for each block with natural 

surveillance from the accommodation. The parking areas will be secure with lockable 

entrances. 

3.26 The car and cycle parking provision is illustrated on the proposed Site Layout Plan 

provided at Figure 3.7 of this report. 

Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction Improvements 

3.27 The Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane junction was identified for potential highways 

improvements through discussions with Surrey County Council. 

3.28 Priest Hill has a 60mph national speed limit within the vicinity of the Coopers Hill Lane 

junction, however ATC surveys have been undertaken which illustrate that the wet 

weather 85th percentile vehicle speeds are 41mph for northbound traffic and 45mph for 

southbound traffic. The survey data can be found at Appendix A. 

3.29 The visibility splay from Cooper‟s Hill Lane has been measured as 2.4m x 86m to the 

south and 2.4m x 88m to the north. The sightlines guidance outlined outlined in 

Manual for Streets 2 would require a visibility splay of 2.4m x 84m and 2.4m x 95m 

respectively. The visibility splay to the south therefore accords with the above 

guidance, with the splay to the north slightly lower. The calculations can also be found 

at Appendix A. However, it should be noted that the visibility splay to the north is 

currently obstructed by an overhanging tree within the public highway and were this to 

be maintained, then an increased visibility splay may be achievable. 

3.30 The accident history at the junction has been reviewed to examine whether the 

currently limited visibility splays are affecting the safe operation of the junction. The 

accident data illustrates that there has been only 1 slight accident in the past 5 years. 

This involved an 82 year old driver egressing Cooper‟s Hill Lane. Whilst sufficient 

information is not provided to be certain of the exact cause, the driver‟s age may have 

been a contributory factor. 

3.31 The junction currently accommodates existing traffic flows of between 40-43 

movements during the peak periods. Based on daily traffic flow data on Cooper‟s Hill 

Lane, the daily level of movements at the Priest Hill Cooper‟s Hill Lane junction could 

be estimated at circa 700 daily movements. Given the total level of traffic movements 

over the 5 year period and the limited accident history, it would not appear that there is 

a significant accident problem at the Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane junction. The 

accident history for the junction and surrounding area can be found at Appendix B of 

this report. 

Page 11




3.32 Notwithstanding the above, given the concerns previously raised regarding the visibility 

levels, potential improvements at the junction have been considered at the request of 

SCC. A scheme to provide advance warning signage of the junction and “slow” 

markings on the southbound approach to the junction has been discussed with SCC. A 

Vehicle Activated Sign (VAS) is proposed, which would be set to only activate for 

vehicles travelling above a set speed. Not only would this advise drivers of the 

approaching junction, but VAS signs have also been demonstrated to reduce vehicle 

speeds. A plan illustrating the proposed scheme is provided at Figure 3.8. 

Coopers Hill Lane Footway Improvements 

3.33 Coopers Hill Lane has limited footway provision throughout its length, reflecting the 

semi-rural environment. A footway provision is provided along the western side of 

Coopers Hill Lane from the junction with St Judes Road to the Coopers Hill Lane 

triangle. This provides access to Englefield Green and Egham. 

3.34 A new footway is proposed on the northern side of Coopers Hill Lane between the main 

site access and the access to the affordable dwellings. This will provide a link to the 

existing footway to the south with an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing point. The 

footway improvements can be accommodated within the public highway boundary. 

3.35 The pedestrian improvements will enable all users of the site access to footway 

provision and will also provide a significant benefit to existing users of Coopers Hill 

Lane. A plan illustrating the proposed pedestrian improvements is provided at Figure 

3.9. 

Potential Coopers Hill Lane Triangle Junction Improvements 

3.36 The Coopers Hill Lane triangle was raised as a potential accident risk by members of 

the public at the Public Consultation Event held in November 2010. Of particular 

concern is traffic travelling from the eastern section of Coopers Hill Lane and turning 

into the southbound carriageway to the St Judes Road junction. The northern section 

of Coopers Hill Lane by the triangle narrows at this location creating a potential conflict 

between northbound and southbound vehicles. 

3.37 Accident data has been examined and this does not appear to illustrate that there has 

been an accident related to the junction within the past 5 years. Accident Ref: 

RU80480/06 occured on Coopers Hill Lane, however the accident data advises that the 

accident did not take place at or within 20m of the junction. The turning manoeuvres 

would also not indicate that this accident is related to the junction, but more likely 

related to a separate egress. This does not suggest that there is an accident problem 

at this location and it is therefore not considered necessary to provide any remedial 

measures as part of the development proposals. 

Page 12




3.38 However, given local resident concerns, potential measures to improve the junction by 

reducing the potential vehicle conflict have been considered. A kerb build-out, as 

outlined in Figure 3.10, would help to reduce vehicle speeds travelling from the eastern 

section of Coopers Hill Lane and improve forward visibility. Whilst this is not 

considered necessary as part of the proposed scheme, the Applicant fully supports this 

improvement should SCC wish to bring it forward. 

Improved Student Bus Service 

3.39 As outlined in Section 2 a student bus currently serves the Kingswood Campus, 

providing a regular service to and from Royal Holloway College. 

3.40 It is proposed that the existing bus service be used to also serve the proposed student 

accommodation on Coopers Hill Lane. Discussions are being undertaken with Royal 

Holloway College to ascertain the existing level of bus usage and required additional 

services. A commitment is provided for the level of additional service to be agreed with 

SCC prior to occupation of the student accommodation. 

3.41 A bus stop is proposed on Coopers Hill Lane to serve the new student accommodation. 

The eastern access to the Runnymede Campus will have a footway on the western 

side providing access to Coopers Hill Lane. A bus stop and footway provision waiting 

area is proposed on the southern section of Coopers Hill Lane, on land between the 

Coopers Hill Lane carriageway and public car park, as illustrated at Figure 3.11. 

Discussions have been undertaken with SCC on the bus stop provision and a bus 

shelter of wooden construction could be provided, in keeping with the local 

environment. 

3.42 It is acknowledged that Coopers Hill Lane is narrow in parts where it may not be 

possible for two buses to easily pass each other easily. It is therefore proposed that 

the service is managed to ensure that when two buses are running, they leave the 

Kingswood Campus and Main Campus at the same time. This should ensure that they 

cross each other on St Judes Road and do not cross on Coopers Hill Lane. 

3.43 The bus service will also be available for local residents to use, providing a significant 

benefit. Residents of the student accommodation will also be able to use the footways 

through the redeveloped site and the pedestrian link to the southern footway on 

Coopers Hill Lane. 

Travel Plan Framework 

3.44 A detailed Travel Plan Framework (TPF) is proposed to promote non-car modes of 

transport. This has been provided as a separate document, to be submitted with the 

planning application. 

Page 13




3.45 The TP sets out the measures being considered by our Client, which are to be agreed 

with the Local Authority at an appropriate stage. The proposals to be contained in the 

TP are as follows; 

measures to encourage trips to be made by public transport; 

measures to encourage the use of cycling as a major mode of transport; and 

a comprehensive information package for residents. 

3.46 Residents will be provided with a package of information on travel options in the local 

area (this may take the form of a physical pack of information, or presented on a 

compact disc for use in a computer). 

3.47 The TPF will include a Travel Plan Co-ordinator, appointed to implement and monitor 

the Travel Plan. The Travel Plan Co-ordinator will set targets to reduce single 

occupancy car use at the site and monitor the effectiveness of the Travel Plan in 

informing residents of sustainable transport opportunities. 

Page 14




4.0 PLANNING POLICY 

4.1 Central government policies are detailed in a series of documents titled Planning Policy 

Guidance Notes (PPG) or Planning Policy Statements (PPS). Planning policy for the 

South East is set out in South East Plan. Guidance on local planning policies is set out 

in the Runnymede Borough Local Plan. These documents are numbered and refer to 

specific areas of interest. 

Planning Policy Statement 1 – Delivering Sustainable Development 

4.2 Paragraph 27 (v) of PPS1 entitled “Delivering Sustainable Development – General 

Approach” states: 

“In preparing development plans, planning authorities should seek to provide improved 

access for all to jobs, health, education, shops, leisure and community facilities, open 

space, sport and recreation, by ensuring that new development is located where 

everyone can access services or facilities on foot, bicycle or public transport rather 

than having to rely on access by car, while recognising that this may be more difficult in 

rural areas.” 

4.3 Paragraph 27 (viii) of PPS1 entitled “Delivering Sustainable Development – General 

Approach” states: 

4.4 “Promote the more efficient use of land through higher density, mixed use development 

and the use of suitably located previously developed land and buildings. Planning 

should seek actively to bring vacant and underused previously developed land and 

buildings back into beneficial use to achieve the targets the Government has set for 

development on previously developed land.” 

4.5 The development will make use of a vacant and underused previously developed site 

and will be located within easy walking distance of a bus stop. This makes this rural 

development site accessible by public transport as well as having access to the local 

cycle facilities in the area which link to Englefield Green, Egham and Egham Rail 

stations. 

Page 15




Planning Policy Statement 3 – Housing 

4.6 PPS3 sets out national planning policy for housing. The key policies objectives set out 

in PPS3 with regard to housing include: 

ensuring a mix of affordable and private housing 

supporting variety of housing types at both rural and urban housing developments 

supporting housing development in sustainable locations, accessible to a range of 

facilities, key services, jobs and infrastructure 

4.7 PPS3 encourages developments in areas that are easily accessible by public transport, 

cyclists, pedestrians and other non-car modes of transport. 

Planning Policy Guidance 13 - Transport 

4.8 Paragraph 76 (2) of PPG13 entitled “Managing Travel Demand – Walking” states: 

“In preparing their development plans and in determining planning applications, local 

authorities pay particular attention to the design, location and access arrangements of 

new development to help promote walking as a prime means of access.” 

4.9 The development will be located within easy walking distance of the local bus network. 

This makes the development site accessible by public transport. It also has access to 

the local cycle facilities in the area. 

4.10 Paragraph 20.3 of PPG13 entitled “Linking Planning and Transport” states: 

“Local authorities should seek to ensure that strategies in the development plan and 

the local transport plan are complementary: consideration of development plan 

allocations and local transport priorities and investment should be closely linked. Local 

authorities should also ensure that their strategies on parking, traffic and demand 

management are consistent with their overall strategy on planning and transport. In 

developing the overall strategy, local authorities should take into account the potential 

for changing overall travel patterns, for instance by improving the sustainability of 

existing developments through a fully co-ordinated approach of development plan 

allocations and transport improvements.” 

4.11 The proposals comply with the above by offering improvements to the accessibility of 

the site by non-car modes of transport. 

Page 16




4.12 Paragraph 89 of PPG13 entitled “Travel Plans” states: 

“The Government considers that travel plans should be submitted alongside planning 

applications which are likely to have significant transport implications, including those 

for: 

i) all major developments comprising jobs, shopping, leisure and services; 

4.13 The proposals comply with the above by implementing a comprehensive Travel Plan at 

the site. 

The Runnymede Borough Local Plan 

4.14 Policy MV5 of the Runnymede Borough Local Plan states: 

“The layout and design of new housing developments should seek to facilitate 

convenient bus operation and services where possible. In considering proposals for 

other forms of development, account will be taken of accessibility to public transport. 

Where appropriate, substantial developments will be expected to make a contribution 

supporting or improving public transport services.” 

4.15 The development proposals comply with the above by being supported by a detailed 

Travel Plan as well as improving pedestrian access from the site to local bus facilities. 

An improved student bus service will also be provided. 

Page 17




5.0 TRAFFIC ATTRACTION 

Proposed Scheme – Private and Affordable Residential 

5.1 The TRICS database was interrogated for residential sites to identify the all modes trip 

rates of residents. The same trip rates based on “Private Houses” have been used for 

the private and affordable elements of the scheme, for both houses and apartments. 

This is considered to be robust, as private houses typically have a higher level of car 

use than affordable or apartments accommodation. The TRICS dataset for residential 

trips is contained in Appendix C with the peak hour trip data for all modes is outlined 

below: 

AM Peak 

PM Peak 

Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures 

32 96 67 41 

Table 5.1: Peak Hour Residential Trips – All Modes 

5.2 In order to estimate the modal split of the residents, the national census has been 

interrogated to establish the travel to work modal split of residents in the local area. 

The full outputs can be found at Appendix C, with the modal split summary provided 

below: 

Mode % 

Train 13.2% 

Bus, minibus or coach 3.1% 

Taxi or minicab 0.6% 

Driving a car or van 58.5% 

Passenger in a car or van 3.8% 

Motorcycle, scooter or moped 0.0% 

Bicycle 4.0% 

On foot 13.8% 

Other 3.1% 

Total 100.0% 

Table 5.2: 2001 National Statistics – Journey to Work of Daytime Population 

Page 18




5.3 The peak hour trip data for all modes has been applied to the census modal split data 

outlined in Table 5.2 above, to provide peak hour modal split trip information, as 

outlined below: 

Mode 

AM Peak 

PM Peak 


Train 4 13 9 5 

Bus, 

minibus or coach 

Taxi or 

minicab 

Driving a 

car or van 

Passenger in 

a car or van 

Motorcycle, 

scooter or 

moped 

1 3 2 1 

0 1 0 0 

19 56 39 24 

1 4 3 2 

0 0 0 0 

Bicycle 1 4 3 2 

On foot 4 13 9 6 

Other 1 3 2 1 

Total 32 96 67 41 

Table 5.3: Proposed Peak Hour Residential Trips – Modal Split 

5.4 It can be seen from the above table that the majority of trips will be made by car, 

reflecting the site‟s semi-rural location. However trips by train and foot are also likely to 

be a popular modal choice. 

Proposed Scheme – Student Accommodation 

5.5 The expected level of trip generation for the Student Accommodation has been based 

upon the survey undertaken at Kingswood Campus, as outlined in the Transport 

Assessment for the previous application on the site (Ref: RU.08/1168). The level of 

trips for the 430 bedroom student accommodation at the Kingswood Campus has been 

extrapolated pro-rata for the proposed 528 bedrooms student accommodation, to 

estimate the level of trips. The small shop is circa 38sqm and considered to be 

ancillary to the student accommodation. Local residents of the development and 

surrounding area will also be able to use the shop. No specific parking is provided for 

the shop. Given the size of the shop and its ancillary use, it is considered that the level 

of vehicle trips during the peak periods will be minimal, if any, as trips will either be on 

foot or linked with other trips. This assessment therefore focuses on the trip generation 

of the student accommodation. 

Page 19




5.6 Given the close proximity of the Kingswood Campus and similar level of accessibility, 

this is considered to provide an accurate estimation of the likely trip generation, as 

outlined below: 

Mode 

AM Peak 

PM Peak 


Car driver 11 15 22 17 

Walk 2 92 21 25 

Cycle 0 1 1 0 

Bus 0 50 47 0 

Total 13 158 91 42 

Table 5.4: Peak Hour Student Residential Trips – All Modes 

5.7 It can be seen from the above table that walking and bus use are likely to be popular 

transport choices for the student residents, with a limited level of vehicle movements. 

Proposed Scheme – Extra Care Residential Accommodation 

5.8 The trip generation for the Extra Care Residential element of the scheme has been 

estimated using the “Nursing Homes” class use of the TRICS database. The residents 

of the site are not expected to generate a significant level of trips, particularly during 

the peak periods. The level of staff trips are expected to be limited and given the shift 

patterns, staff are also likely to avoid the peak periods. The level of trips has been 

estimated for vehicles and all modes as outlined below, with full TRICS outputs 

provided at Appendix C. 

Mode 

AM Peak 

PM Peak 


Person Trips 8 4 6 8 

Vehicle Trips 4 2 3 5 

Table 5.5: Peak Hour Extra Care Residential Trips – All Modes 

5.9 It can be seen from the above table that the level of trips to the Extra Care 

accommodation will be limited, particularly for vehicle trips, during the peak periods. 

Page 20




Cumulative Vehicular Trips 

5.10 The cumulative level of vehicle trips for the proposed development is outlined below: 

Use 

Private 

Residential 

Private 

Residential 

Private and 

Affordable 

Residential 

Access 

AM Peak 

PM Peak 


Main Access 11 33 23 14 

Mews Access 1 4 3 2 

Middle Access 7 19 14 8 

Student 

Eastern 

11 15 22 17 

Access 

Extra Care Main Access 4 2 3 5 

Total 34 72 65 47 

Table 5.6: Peak Hour Total Development Trips – All Modes 

Net Vehicular Impact 

5.11 The permitted campus expansion (Ref: RU.03/0112) of the site and associated trip 

attraction can be offset against the development proposals, to ascertain the net impact 

of the proposals. This section therefore examines the traffic attraction of the proposed 

scheme and compares the vehicular impact with the previously permitted campus 

expansion scheme, to ascertain the net traffic impact during the peak periods. 

5.12 The traffic attraction associated with the permitted campus expansion scheme has 

been obtained from the submitted Transport Assessment to support the previous 

planning application on the site (Ref: RU.08/1168). This demonstrated that the 

permitted expansion scheme would generate the following during the AM and PM 

weekday peak periods: 

AM Peak 

PM Peak 

Arrivals Departures Total Arrivals Departures Total 

69 36 105 69 103 172 

Table 5.7: Permitted Campus Expansion Peak Hour Vehicle Trips 

Page 21




5.13 The net vehicular impact of the proposals is therefore outlined below: 

Use 

Permitted 

Student 

Expansion 

Proposed 

Development 

AM Peak 

PM Peak 

Arrivals Departures Total Arrivals Departures Total 

69 36 105 69 103 172 

34 72 106 65 47 112 

Net Impact -35 +36 +1 -4 -56 -60 

Table 5.8: Permitted Campus Expansion Peak Hour Vehicle Trips 

5.14 It can be seen from the above table that there is an increase of 1 vehicle movement 

during the AM peak and a decrease in trips during the PM peak. Overall there is a 

saving of trips during the peak periods. 

Page 22




6.0 JUNCTION MODELLING 

6.1 As outlined in the previous section, the level of additional movements is limited to one 

vehicle movement per 6 minutes in the AM peak. To provide a robust assessment, the 

potential impact of the development on the local highway network has been assessed. 

The Transport Assessment for the previous application identified that the only junctions 

which would result in a significant increase in traffic from the development are: 

Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane 

St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road 

St Judes Road / Middle Hill 

6.2 The above junctions have been modelled using the base traffic flows outlined in the 

previous Transport Assessment. For robustness, the base traffic flows from the 

previous TA (based on survey data collected in 2007 and 2008) have been compared 

to recent 2010 ATC survey data for St Judes Road and Priest Hill. The 2010 ATC 

flows were lower than the 2007 / 2008 TA base flows for the peak periods. It is 

therefore considered robust to use the TA base flows and not apply a negative growth 

factor. 

6.3 The 2010 base traffic flows for the AM peak periods is shown in Figure 6.1. 

6.4 The base traffic data has been used to provide a traffic distribution for the proposed 

development traffic. It has been assumed that all traffic travelling to and from the north 

will use the Priest Hill junction and all traffic travelling to and from the south will use the 

St Judes Road and Middle Hill junctions. The AM peak distribution, development flows 

and total flows are provided at Figures 6.2 to 6.4. 

Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction 

6.5 The operation of the Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction has been modelled using 

the computer program PICADY. This is widely accepted within the transport planning 

industry. 

6.6 The program assesses the maximum theoretical capacity of junctions and compares it 

to the actual traffic flow through the junction. It gives a measure of the ratio of flow to 

capacity (RFC), with an RFC of 1 indicating that the junction is operating at its 

maximum theoretical capacity. However, it is generally accepted that junctions do 

continue to operate above this theoretical capacity level. The program gives an 

estimate of the queue lengths at the junction (Q); these are expressed in „pcus‟ 

(passenger car units). 

Page 23




6.7 The Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane junction is a priority junction, with Priest Hill forming 

the major arm. There are no right turning facilities and all movements are permitted. 

6.8 The PICADY modelling of the junction for the base scenario and development scenario 

can be found in Appendix D and is summarised in the following table: 

Movement 

Coopers Hill 

Lane left 

Coopers Hill 

Lane right 

Priest Hill 

ahead or right 

AM Peak 

Base 

AM Peak 

Base + Development 

RFC Queue RFC Queue 

0.008 0.01 0.008 0.00 

0.101 0.11 0.168 0.20 

0.012 0.01 0.012 0.01 

Table 6.1: Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Base and Base + Development – AM Peak 

6.9 It can be seen from the above table that the Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Road junction will 

operate with significant reserve capacity and the impact of the development traffic is 

minimal. 

St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road Junction 

6.10 The operation of the St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road Junction 

has also been modelled using the computer program PICADY. 

6.11 The St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road junction is a priority 

staggered junction, with St Judes Road forming the major arm. There are no right 

turning facilities and all movements are permitted. 

6.12 The PICADY modelling of the junction for the base scenario and development scenario 

can be found in Appendix D and is summarised in the following table: 

Page 24




Movement 

Coopers Hill Lane left or 

ahead 

AM Peak 

Base 

AM Peak 

Base + Development 


0.067 0.07 0.160 0.19 

Coopers Hill Lane right 0.02 0.00 0.002 0.00 

St Judes Road (N) / 

Coopers Hill Lane to St 

Judes Road (S) / 

Bishopsgate Road 

St Judes Road (N) / 

Coopers Hill Lane to St 

Judes Road (S) 

St Judes Road (S) / 

Bishopsgate Road to St 

Judes Road (N) / Coopers 

Hill Lane 

St Judes Road (S) / 

Bishopsgate Road to St 

Judes Road (N) 

0.01 0.00 0.001 0.00 

0.010 0.00 0.010 0.00 

0.246 0.32 0.256 0.34 

0.122 0.28 0.180 0.41 

Table 6.2: St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road Base and Base + 

Development – AM Peak 

6.13 It can be seen from the above table that the St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / 

Bishopsgate Road junction will operate with significant reserve capacity and the impact 

of the development traffic is minimal. 

St Judes Road / Middle Hill Roundabout 

6.14 The operation of the St Judes Road / Middle Hill roundabout junction has been 

modelled using the computer program ARCADY. This is widely accepted within the 

transport planning industry. 

6.15 As for PICADY, ARCADY assesses the maximum theoretical capacity of junctions and 

compares it to the actual traffic flow through the junction. It gives a measure of the 

ratio of flow to capacity (RFC), with an RFC of 1 indicating that the junction is operating 

at its maximum theoretical capacity. Again, it is generally accepted that junctions do 

continue to operate above this theoretical capacity level. The program gives an 

estimate of the queue lengths at the junction (Q); these are expressed in „pcus‟ 

(passenger car units). 

Page 25




6.16 The ARCADY model used similar intercept parameters undertaken for the previous 

Transport Assessment, to calibrate the model and ensure that the model reflected the 

queuing and entry capacity previously observed. 

6.17 The ARCADY modelling of the junction can be found in Appendix E and is summarised 

in the following table: 

Movement 

St Judes Road 

(N) 

AM Peak 

Base 

AM Peak 

Development 


0.748 2.86 0.804 3.80 

Middle Hill 0.539 1.18 0.568 1.32 

St Judes Road 

(S) 

0.776 3.49 0.799 3.93 

Table 6.3: St Judes Road / Middle Hill Roundabout ARCADY Testing – AM Peak 

6.18 It can be seen from the above table that the St Judes Road / Middle Hill Roundabout 

junction will operate with reserve capacity and the proposed development traffic will 

have a negligible impact. 

Summary 

6.19 As outlined above, the traffic impact on the local highway network will be minimal and 

the local junctions will continue to operate with significant reserve capacity. 

Page 26




7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 

7.1 Mayer Brown has been commissioned by Orchid Runnymede Limited to produce this 

Transport Assessment, to support the application to redevelop the Runnymede 

Campus located on Coopers Hill Lane in Runnymede. 

7.2 The site was previously in use as a fully operational campus for Brunel University and 

is currently unoccupied, having been vacated in July 2007. The previous site use 

included halls of residence, lecture theatres and sports facilities. In total there is 

approximately 30,000sqm of floor space on the site, including 479 student bedrooms 

and 368 car parking spaces. Most recently the site comprised of student 

accommodation for circa 400 students for Royal Holloway College. 











new-build construction; 




matter) for: 







Page 27




7.7 In October 2006 planning permission (RU.03/0112) was granted to redevelop the site 

to provide the following additional built accommodation: 

7,800sqm of student accommodation 

6,700sqm of academic and ancillary accommodation 


7.8 The permitted scheme outlined above would provide approximately 44,500sqm of floor 

space with 590 parking spaces on the site. 

7.9 In December 2008 a planning application (RU.08/1168) was submitted to redevelop the 

site as a mixed use development of 43,655sqm comprising: 

153 new residential dwellings 

530 student bed dwellings 

73 care units 

788 sqm of commercial floorspace (B1) 


7.10 The above application has now been withdrawn, however progress was made with 

SCC on various transport matters and this application has developed the previous 

assessment work undertaken. It should also be noted that the new application is of a 

smaller scale than previously proposed. 

7.11 The scope of this assessment has been agreed with SCC. It has been agreed that, 

this report should be in the form of a full Transport Assessment (TA) incorporating 

junction capacity testing at the local junctions. 

7.12 This report concludes that the proposed development: 

is located in a reasonably accessible location given its semi-rural 

environment 

is located in an area with a low traffic accident history 

conforms with national and local policy 

will have no material impact on the operation of the local highway network 

will provide local highways benefits 

7.13 Therefore, this report concludes that there are no highways or transportation reasons 

why the proposed development at the Runnymede Campus site should not be 

permitted. 

Page 28

FIGURES

APPENDIX A 

Priest Hill Speed Survey Data and Visibility Calculations

VEHICLE SPEED AND CLASSIFICATION SURVEY – COOPERS HILL LANE, EGHAM 

REPORT ID: 

DATASETS: 

Custom List: 16 Site: Coopers Hill Lane, Egham (east of Hollycombe). 

Direction: 6 - West bound A>B, East bound B>A. 

Survey Duration: 12:03 01 July 2010 => 13:29 12 July 2010 

File: Site 312Jul2010.EC0 (Plus) 

Identifier: 2208EKAY MC56-6 [MC55] (c)Microcom 02/03/01. 

Algorithm: Factory default 

Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) 

PROFILE: 

Filter time: 00:00 02 July 2010 => 00:00 09 July 2010 

Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 

Speed range: 0 - 80 mph. 

Direction: East (bound) / West (bound) 

Headway: All - (Headway) 

Scheme: ARX Cycles. 

Name: Factory default profile 

Method: Vehicle classification 

Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton) 

DEFINITIONS / ABBREVIATIONS* 

Time - Time period commencing. (1-hour summaries given). 

Cls 1 - (Number of vehicles) Class 1 (Bicycles). 

Total - Total number of vehicles counted in time period. 

Cls 2 - Class 2 (Motor Cycles). 

RunTot - Running or cumulative total of vehicles over survey period. 

Cls 3 - Class 3 (cars and vans - without trailer). 

Vbin 

Cls 4 - Class 4 (cars and vans towing trailer). 

30 (eg) - Number of vehicles between 30 and 35 mph (30.0 – 34.9). Cls 5 - Class 5 (HGV / bus 2-axle rigid). 

35 Cls 6 - Class 6 (HGV / bus 3-axle rigid). 

Mean - Mean speed. 

Cls 7 - Class 7 (HGV 4-axle rigid). 

Vmin - Minimum speed. 

Cls 8 - Class 8 (HGV 3-axle articulated). 

Vmax - Maximum speed. 


n> PSL 30 - Number of vehicles exceeding Posted Speed Limit (30 mph). Cls 10 - Class 10 (HGV 5-axle articulated). 

%> PSL 30 - Percentage of vehicles exceeding Posted Speed Limit (30 mph). Cls 11 - Class 11 (HGV 6-axle articulated). 

Vpp 85 - 85th percentile speed. 

Cls 12 - Class 12 (HGV 6-axle articulated comprising two trailers).

*Not all definitions may be used in a single report. 

Cls 13 - Class 13 (HGV 7 + axle articulated comprising two trailers).

Benchmark Data Collection 

Fri 02 July 2010 Eastbound 

Time Total RunTot Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Cls Vmin Mean Vmax >PSL >PSL% Vpp 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 31.8 31.8 1 100 - 

0100 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 30.6 35.1 1 50 - 

0200 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 2 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 25.9 26.6 0 0 - 

0600 4 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 24.1 28.6 0 0 - 

0700 11 20 0 0 6 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 25.2 31.8 2 18.2 29.3 

0800 11 31 1 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 24.1 30.6 2 18.2 27.1 

0900 12 43 0 0 8 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 21.6 29.3 0 0 26.4 

1000 14 57 0 0 12 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 24.3 33.8 1 7.1 28.6 

1100 21 78 0 0 16 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 26.5 44.9 7 33.3 32 

1200 19 97 0 0 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 18.9 36.4 1 5.3 25.3 

1300 18 115 1 0 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 18.3 34.1 1 5.6 23.3 

1400 14 129 2 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 19.6 34.3 1 7.1 26.2 

1500 11 140 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 19.4 28.7 0 0 23.9 

1600 13 153 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 24.8 31.2 2 15.4 29.8 

1700 12 165 1 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.2 22.3 30.4 2 16.7 26.8 

1800 19 184 1 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 22.7 30.3 1 5.3 26.8 

1900 10 194 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 22.1 29.3 0 0 - 

2000 8 202 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 25.9 37.5 3 37.5 - 

2100 10 212 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 25.2 38.2 3 30 - 

2200 4 216 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.3 28.4 36 1 25 - 

2300 6 222 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 24.3 50.9 1 16.7 - 

07-19 175 222 6 0 136 0 30 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 22.3 44.9 20 11.4 28.6 

06-22 207 222 7 0 164 0 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 22.6 44.9 26 12.6 29.1 

06-00 217 222 7 0 174 0 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 22.7 50.9 28 12.9 29.3 

00-00 222 222 7 0 178 0 34 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 22.9 50.9 30 13.5 29.3 

Vehicle Speed And Classification Survey - Coopers Hill Lane, Egham (East of Hollycombe)


Sat 03 July 2010 Eastbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 2 224 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 41 49 2 100 - 

0100 0 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 3 227 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 21.7 26.6 0 0 - 

0300 1 228 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 18.8 18.8 0 0 - 

0400 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 1 229 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.4 38.4 38.4 1 100 - 

0600 4 233 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 22.1 25.7 0 0 - 

0700 6 239 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 27.6 36.9 2 33.3 - 

0800 10 249 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 24.7 31.3 2 20 - 

0900 24 273 1 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 21.7 36.5 2 8.3 26.6 

1000 37 310 2 2 29 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 20.8 33.9 2 5.4 25.5 

1100 29 339 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 20.6 41.5 1 3.4 22.8 

1200 17 356 0 0 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 20 33.5 1 5.9 24.8 

1300 24 380 1 0 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 20.8 41.2 1 4.2 23.9 

1400 21 401 1 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 21.3 32.1 3 14.3 29.8 

1500 12 413 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 22.6 40 1 8.3 25.5 

1600 16 429 0 0 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 22.1 31.5 2 12.5 29.8 

1700 23 452 1 0 17 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 23.4 34.2 4 17.4 31.1 

1800 12 464 1 0 9 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.2 24.3 37.7 2 16.7 28.4 

1900 9 473 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 24.3 31.9 2 22.2 - 

2000 10 483 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 26.2 35.1 3 30 - 

2100 5 488 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 24.6 38.3 2 40 - 

2200 6 494 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 24.5 29.2 0 0 - 

2300 3 497 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 25.4 30.4 1 33.3 - 

07-19 231 497 7 2 198 0 22 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 21.8 41.5 23 10 28 

06-22 259 497 7 2 221 0 27 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 22.1 41.5 30 11.6 28.4 

06-00 268 497 7 2 230 0 27 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 22.2 41.5 31 11.6 28.9 

00-00 275 497 7 2 235 0 29 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 22.4 49 34 12.4 28.9 



Sun 04 July 2010 Eastbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 1 498 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.6 40.6 40.6 1 100 - 

0100 0 498 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 0 498 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 0 498 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 1 499 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 21.4 21.4 0 0 - 

0500 1 500 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 16.4 16.4 0 0 - 

0600 2 502 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 27.7 31.4 1 50 - 

0700 9 511 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 24.6 34.1 3 33.3 - 

0800 13 524 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 21.5 30 0 0 25.5 

0900 6 530 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 22.4 29.1 0 0 - 

1000 12 542 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.8 21.8 31 1 8.3 26.4 

1100 12 554 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 18.7 26.5 0 0 23.3 

1200 20 574 2 0 16 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.1 20.5 29.6 0 0 26.4 

1300 17 591 0 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 20.4 28.6 0 0 27.3 

1400 22 613 2 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 18 29.5 0 0 24.6 

1500 22 635 1 0 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.8 19.6 36.6 1 4.5 25.3 

1600 19 654 3 0 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 14.9 28.5 0 0 20.1 

1700 23 677 0 0 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 26.7 37.1 5 21.7 31.3 

1800 10 687 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 23.5 35.4 1 10 - 

1900 15 702 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.5 24 40.3 3 20 30.2 

2000 3 705 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 19.2 28.1 0 0 - 

2100 4 709 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 26.3 34 1 25 - 

2200 7 716 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 28.1 37.2 3 42.9 - 

2300 9 725 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 26.7 41.5 1 11.1 - 

07-19 185 725 9 1 158 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 20.8 37.1 11 5.9 27.5 

06-22 209 725 9 1 179 0 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 21.1 40.3 16 7.7 28 

06-00 225 725 9 1 195 0 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 21.6 41.5 20 8.9 28.4 

00-00 228 725 9 1 198 0 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 21.6 41.5 21 9.2 28.4 



Mon 05 July 2010 Eastbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 3 728 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 28 37.7 1 33.3 - 

0100 0 728 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 1 729 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 17.4 17.4 0 0 - 

0300 0 729 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 0 729 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 2 731 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.2 29.4 30.5 1 50 - 

0600 7 738 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 26.1 37.2 1 14.3 - 

0700 11 749 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 26.5 39.4 3 27.3 30.9 

0800 12 761 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 24.8 34.5 3 25 33.1 

0900 17 778 0 0 13 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 23.5 32.7 1 5.9 27.3 

1000 14 792 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 20.1 29.7 0 0 23.9 

1100 21 813 0 0 16 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 22.5 35.3 3 14.3 29.5 

1200 23 836 0 0 19 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 20.9 31.9 3 13 29.3 

1300 21 857 1 0 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.7 20.7 31.7 1 4.8 26.8 

1400 13 870 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 20 28.6 0 0 25.9 

1500 21 891 1 0 17 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 21.4 32.3 2 9.5 28.2 

1600 19 910 0 1 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.5 25.9 37.5 5 26.3 30.4 

1700 10 920 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 22.4 31.9 2 20 - 

1800 20 940 0 1 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 23.3 38.4 3 15 30 

1900 11 951 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 28 33.3 5 45.5 31.8 

2000 6 957 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 24.5 28.8 0 0 - 

2100 12 969 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 20.4 34.6 1 8.3 23.5 

2200 5 974 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 25.7 31 2 40 - 

2300 5 979 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 20.8 27.8 0 0 - 

07-19 202 979 2 3 174 0 21 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 22.5 39.4 26 12.9 29.5 

06-22 238 979 4 3 204 0 25 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 22.8 39.4 33 13.9 29.5 

06-00 248 979 4 3 214 0 25 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 22.8 39.4 35 14.1 29.8 

00-00 254 979 4 3 220 0 25 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 22.9 39.4 37 14.6 29.8 



Tue 06 July 2010 Eastbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 3 982 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 22.4 30.3 1 33.3 - 

0100 0 982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 0 982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 0 982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 2 984 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 24.1 27.8 0 0 - 

0500 1 985 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 25.6 25.6 0 0 - 

0600 9 994 0 0 5 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.1 26.7 30.7 1 11.1 - 

0700 10 1004 0 1 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 27.5 36.1 4 40 - 

0800 10 1014 0 0 3 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 22.1 30.4 1 10 - 

0900 17 1031 0 0 15 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21.3 30.6 1 5.9 27.5 

1000 18 1049 1 0 14 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 19.4 26.9 0 0 23.7 

1100 22 1071 1 0 17 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.8 19.1 29.2 0 0 23.3 

1200 21 1092 0 0 16 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 20.9 31.5 1 4.8 27.7 

1300 18 1110 0 0 15 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.2 22.8 34.7 3 16.7 29.3 

1400 15 1125 0 0 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 21.5 34.6 2 13.3 28.9 

1500 19 1144 0 0 14 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.5 18.9 29.1 0 0 25.3 

1600 11 1155 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 24.6 30.7 1 9.1 29.3 

1700 21 1176 2 0 14 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 20.2 31.9 4 19 30.2 

1800 21 1197 0 0 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 21.1 33.2 1 4.8 25.1 

1900 20 1217 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 23 36.2 3 15 26.8 

2000 4 1221 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 31.4 46 2 50 - 

2100 8 1229 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.6 25.8 39.6 2 25 - 

2200 3 1232 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 23.8 26.7 0 0 - 

2300 6 1238 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 22.1 27.7 0 0 - 

07-19 203 1238 4 1 159 0 33 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.8 21.2 36.1 18 8.9 28.6 

06-22 244 1238 6 1 193 0 37 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.8 21.8 46 26 10.7 28.9 

06-00 253 1238 6 1 202 0 37 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.8 21.9 46 26 10.3 28.9 

00-00 259 1238 6 1 208 0 37 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.8 21.9 46 27 10.4 28.9 



Wed 07 July 2010 Eastbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 1 1239 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 26.6 26.6 0 0 - 

0100 1 1240 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.1 33.1 33.1 1 100 - 

0200 0 1240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 0 1240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 2 1242 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 23.2 29.1 0 0 - 

0500 0 1242 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0600 8 1250 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 27.5 42.9 2 25 - 

0700 11 1261 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 27.2 40.8 4 36.4 32.9 

0800 5 1266 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 26.2 39.1 2 40 - 

0900 17 1283 0 0 12 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 21 37 1 5.9 24.6 

1000 15 1298 0 0 11 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 24.4 34.9 3 20 31.5 

1100 10 1308 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 21.3 33.2 1 10 - 

1200 12 1320 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 20.8 26.4 0 0 25.9 

1300 12 1332 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 21.4 27.5 0 0 25.5 

1400 6 1338 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 24.5 33.3 2 33.3 - 

1500 16 1354 0 0 14 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 21.5 38 2 12.5 25.5 

1600 17 1371 0 0 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 26.4 42 4 23.5 30.4 

1700 17 1388 0 0 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 23.4 39.4 1 5.9 27.7 

1800 16 1404 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 22.3 31.5 3 18.8 30.2 

1900 12 1416 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 23.2 40.5 3 25 30.2 

2000 7 1423 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.8 20.9 25.6 0 0 - 

2100 8 1431 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.4 29.4 33.9 5 62.5 - 

2200 6 1437 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 25.5 31.2 1 16.7 - 

2300 4 1441 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 26 36.9 1 25 - 

07-19 154 1441 1 0 126 0 22 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 23.2 42 23 14.9 29.5 

06-22 189 1441 3 0 156 0 25 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 23.5 42.9 33 17.5 31.1 

06-00 199 1441 3 0 165 0 26 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 23.6 42.9 35 17.6 31.1 

00-00 203 1441 3 0 168 0 27 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 23.7 42.9 36 17.7 31.1 



Thu 08 July 2010 Eastbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 4 1445 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 31.1 33.7 3 75 - 

0100 0 1445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 1 1446 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.5 30.5 30.5 1 100 - 

0300 0 1446 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 0 1446 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 1 1447 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 25 0 0 - 

0600 6 1453 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 30.1 40.4 3 50 - 

0700 8 1461 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 23.9 35.7 2 25 - 

0800 14 1475 0 0 8 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 24.7 35.8 3 21.4 30 

0900 12 1487 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.9 19.2 24.2 0 0 22.4 

1000 19 1506 0 0 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21.9 35.6 3 15.8 28.9 

1100 10 1516 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.5 22.4 27.5 0 0 - 

1200 29 1545 0 0 19 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 22 30.9 4 13.8 29.8 

1300 18 1563 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 23.6 39.3 3 16.7 29.3 

1400 10 1573 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 24.6 35.6 3 30 - 

1500 16 1589 0 1 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 20.2 35.2 1 6.3 25.5 

1600 17 1606 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.5 27 40.9 4 23.5 30.6 

1700 21 1627 0 0 18 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 22.4 29.4 0 0 25.5 

1800 32 1659 2 0 27 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 21.4 32.5 2 6.3 26.4 

1900 20 1679 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.8 21.1 32.2 2 10 25.1 

2000 15 1694 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 23.9 33.4 1 6.7 28.2 

2100 8 1702 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 22.3 30.8 1 12.5 - 

2200 7 1709 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 22.9 32.4 2 28.6 - 

2300 5 1714 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 22.3 28.9 0 0 - 

07-19 206 1714 2 1 167 0 32 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 22.6 40.9 25 12.1 29.1 

06-22 255 1714 3 1 212 0 35 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 22.7 40.9 32 12.5 29.3 

06-00 267 1714 4 1 223 0 35 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 22.7 40.9 34 12.7 29.3 

00-00 273 1714 4 1 229 0 35 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 22.9 40.9 38 13.9 29.5 



Fri 02 July 2010 Westbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.8 37.7 44.6 2 100 - 

0100 2 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.9 33.2 36.5 1 50 - 

0200 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 2 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 21.6 22.7 0 0 - 

0600 2 8 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 22.7 26.2 0 0 - 

0700 11 19 1 0 4 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 26.9 39.1 4 36.4 31.8 

0800 6 25 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 24 28.1 0 0 - 

0900 9 34 0 0 5 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 25 32.8 2 22.2 - 

1000 10 44 0 0 8 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 20.8 36.4 1 10 - 

1100 18 62 0 0 16 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 22.9 38.8 5 27.8 34.2 

1200 13 75 0 0 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.8 23.1 36.4 2 15.4 28.6 

1300 25 100 1 0 22 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.8 22.5 35.7 6 24 32.4 

1400 7 107 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 23.2 39.8 2 28.6 - 

1500 14 121 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 19.5 35.3 2 14.3 28.9 

1600 9 130 1 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.8 25.7 38 3 33.3 - 

1700 15 145 0 0 11 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23.6 45.2 3 20 30 

1800 10 155 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.9 24.8 31.2 1 10 - 

1900 8 163 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 24 29.6 0 0 - 

2000 9 172 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 26 40.8 2 22.2 - 

2100 9 181 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.2 25.2 34.6 3 33.3 - 

2200 4 185 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 30.8 34.4 3 75 - 

2300 4 189 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.6 26.6 40.4 2 50 - 

07-19 147 189 7 0 114 0 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23.2 45.2 31 21.1 32.4 

06-22 175 189 7 0 140 0 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23.5 45.2 36 20.6 32.2 

06-00 183 189 7 0 147 0 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23.7 45.2 41 22.4 32.4 

00-00 189 189 7 0 152 0 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 45.2 44 23.3 32.4 



Sat 03 July 2010 Westbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 1 190 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 26.1 26.1 0 0 - 

0100 1 191 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.6 31.6 31.6 1 100 - 

0200 1 192 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.8 28.8 28.8 0 0 - 

0300 2 194 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 25.7 30.3 1 50 - 

0400 0 194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 1 195 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.8 36.8 36.8 1 100 - 

0600 2 197 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 23.2 25.3 0 0 - 

0700 6 203 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 27.1 31.8 2 33.3 - 

0800 6 209 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 24.9 31.4 1 16.7 - 

0900 15 224 1 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.8 24.1 32.9 2 13.3 28.4 

1000 16 240 0 0 9 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 29 55.6 6 37.5 33.6 

1100 11 251 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 23.2 44.5 2 18.2 29.5 

1200 15 266 1 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 18.8 32.7 1 6.7 23.7 

1300 7 273 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 23.7 32.6 1 14.3 - 

1400 10 283 1 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 16.9 26.2 0 0 - 

1500 15 298 0 1 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 22.9 45 3 20 32.4 

1600 9 307 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 24 39.4 3 33.3 - 

1700 18 325 2 0 13 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.8 25.5 39.3 5 27.8 31.5 

1800 14 339 1 2 6 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 24 48.4 3 21.4 32.2 

1900 11 350 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 25 35.4 2 18.2 28.9 

2000 13 363 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 27.3 44.7 3 23.1 35.8 

2100 4 367 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 26.5 36.5 2 50 - 

2200 5 372 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 28.5 33.9 2 40 - 

2300 2 374 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 30.7 41.2 1 50 - 

07-19 142 374 6 5 103 0 25 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 23.7 55.6 29 20.4 31.5 

06-22 172 374 6 5 130 0 28 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 24.1 55.6 36 20.9 31.5 

06-00 179 374 6 5 137 0 28 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 24.3 55.6 39 21.8 32.2 

00-00 185 374 6 5 141 0 30 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 24.5 55.6 42 22.7 32.2 



Sun 04 July 2010 Westbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 1 375 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.1 36.1 36.1 1 100 - 

0100 0 375 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 1 376 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44.7 44.7 44.7 1 100 - 

0300 0 376 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 0 376 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 1 377 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.7 21.7 21.7 0 0 - 

0600 1 378 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 19.6 19.6 0 0 - 

0700 4 382 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 26.6 33.9 2 50 - 

0800 5 387 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 23.4 36.3 1 20 - 

0900 11 398 2 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 22.3 34.7 1 9.1 28 

1000 15 413 1 0 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 23.8 35.3 4 26.7 33.3 

1100 9 422 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 21.8 33.1 2 22.2 - 

1200 13 435 1 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.9 19.2 30.8 1 7.7 28.4 

1300 5 440 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 19.2 33.6 1 20 - 

1400 11 451 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 21.4 31.6 1 9.1 28.9 

1500 17 468 1 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 21.8 42.6 5 29.4 32.4 

1600 14 482 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 17.7 34.9 2 14.3 23.7 

1700 21 503 4 0 13 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.1 21.6 41.6 3 14.3 29.5 

1800 13 516 1 1 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 23.5 38.2 2 15.4 29.3 

1900 9 525 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 27.1 35.6 3 33.3 - 

2000 8 533 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 27.2 34.6 4 50 - 

2100 5 538 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 25.9 33.5 2 40 - 

2200 6 544 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 31.1 47.4 3 50 - 

2300 6 550 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 34 53.5 4 66.7 - 

07-19 138 550 13 2 106 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 21.6 42.6 25 18.1 31.5 

06-22 161 550 14 2 124 0 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 22.3 42.6 34 21.1 32.4 

06-00 173 550 14 2 135 0 21 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 23 53.5 41 23.7 32.7 

00-00 176 550 14 2 138 0 21 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 23.2 53.5 43 24.4 32.9 



Mon 05 July 2010 Westbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 5 555 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 31.3 42.6 2 40 - 

0100 0 555 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 0 555 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 1 556 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.4 19.4 19.4 0 0 - 

0400 0 556 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 1 557 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.6 23.6 23.6 0 0 - 

0600 10 567 0 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 30.6 47 5 50 - 

0700 10 577 2 1 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.1 25.2 39.3 3 30 - 

0800 9 586 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 29.5 37 4 44.4 - 

0900 12 598 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.6 28 37.2 5 41.7 31.5 

1000 9 607 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 25.8 39.3 2 22.2 - 

1100 14 621 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 24.5 40 4 28.6 31.1 

1200 15 636 0 0 13 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21.9 32.2 2 13.3 28.2 

1300 11 647 1 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.8 21.7 35.7 1 9.1 25.3 

1400 12 659 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 18.6 27.5 0 0 23.9 

1500 16 675 0 0 13 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 23.6 32.2 3 18.8 31.3 

1600 16 691 1 1 12 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.9 25.1 48.7 2 12.5 28 

1700 6 697 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.8 28.4 37.1 3 50 - 

1800 9 706 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 20.8 36.2 1 11.1 - 

1900 16 722 1 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.5 23.4 35.7 3 18.8 32.7 

2000 12 734 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 30.5 36.7 6 50 36 

2100 9 743 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 23.8 41.3 2 22.2 - 

2200 5 748 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 30.3 34.3 3 60 - 

2300 4 752 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 21.3 34.2 1 25 - 

07-19 139 752 8 2 112 0 12 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 24.1 48.7 30 21.6 31.3 

06-22 186 752 10 3 152 0 16 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 24.8 48.7 46 24.7 32.2 

06-00 195 752 11 3 159 0 17 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 24.9 48.7 50 25.6 32.9 

00-00 202 752 11 3 166 0 17 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 25 48.7 52 25.7 33.1 



Tue 06 July 2010 Westbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 1 753 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 12.6 12.6 0 0 - 

0100 0 753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 0 753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 0 753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 2 755 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 19.8 23.8 0 0 - 

0500 1 756 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 25.6 25.6 0 0 - 

0600 7 763 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 30.7 36.7 5 71.4 - 

0700 10 773 1 1 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 26 46.2 3 30 - 

0800 8 781 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 26.7 39.2 2 25 - 

0900 12 793 1 0 6 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 22.3 39.9 3 25 32 

1000 13 806 0 0 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 22.9 32.6 2 15.4 26.4 

1100 15 821 1 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 19.6 36.1 1 6.7 23.9 

1200 14 835 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 22.7 34.3 2 14.3 28.9 

1300 12 847 1 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.8 23.9 36.1 4 33.3 30.4 

1400 18 865 0 0 14 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 23.9 31.9 2 11.1 29.8 

1500 22 887 1 2 17 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 21.3 34.8 5 22.7 30.6 

1600 12 899 1 1 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 24.4 39.6 3 25 32.7 

1700 14 913 1 0 8 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 23 34.4 2 14.3 29.8 

1800 12 925 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 25.4 38.2 4 33.3 32.9 

1900 12 937 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27.9 46.8 5 41.7 34 

2000 10 947 1 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 28.6 42.9 3 30 - 

2100 5 952 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 24.8 39.5 1 20 - 

2200 5 957 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 33.1 48.2 3 60 - 

2300 4 961 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 29 36.6 2 50 - 

07-19 162 961 7 4 124 0 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 23.2 46.2 33 20.4 31.3 

06-22 196 961 8 4 152 0 26 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 24.1 46.8 47 24 32.2 

06-00 205 961 8 4 161 0 26 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 24.4 48.2 52 25.4 32.7 

00-00 209 961 8 4 165 0 26 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 24.3 48.2 52 24.9 32.7 



Wed 07 July 2010 Westbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 1 962 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 24.5 24.5 0 0 - 

0100 1 963 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.4 40.4 40.4 1 100 - 

0200 0 963 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 0 963 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 1 964 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 17.4 17.4 0 0 - 

0500 1 965 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 20.7 20.7 0 0 - 

0600 5 970 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.1 32.2 38 3 60 - 

0700 11 981 1 0 5 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 28.8 42.1 4 36.4 36.5 

0800 9 990 0 0 6 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 22.4 35.4 2 22.2 - 

0900 9 999 0 0 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 26.4 39.1 2 22.2 - 

1000 9 1008 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 23.7 32.5 2 22.2 - 

1100 11 1019 0 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 20.1 34.8 1 9.1 23.5 

1200 10 1029 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 22.8 29.8 0 0 - 

1300 10 1039 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 27.6 52.1 4 40 - 

1400 12 1051 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 22.6 33.9 4 33.3 30.6 

1500 13 1064 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 22.7 34.4 2 15.4 28.6 

1600 11 1075 0 0 9 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 23.6 41.5 3 27.3 31.8 

1700 6 1081 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.5 25.7 33.2 2 33.3 - 

1800 7 1088 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 16.3 24 0 0 - 

1900 8 1096 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 29.4 34.8 2 25 - 

2000 11 1107 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 26 42.1 3 27.3 30.2 

2100 8 1115 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 24.5 34.3 3 37.5 - 

2200 5 1120 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 40.8 54.2 5 100 - 

2300 4 1124 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 27.6 38.5 1 25 - 

07-19 118 1124 4 0 88 0 19 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 23.6 52.1 26 22 32 

06-22 150 1124 4 0 117 0 22 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 24.5 52.1 37 24.7 33.1 

06-00 159 1124 4 0 125 0 23 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 25 54.2 43 27 33.3 

00-00 163 1124 4 0 128 0 24 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 25.1 54.2 44 27 33.6 



Thu 08 July 2010 Westbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 30 30 85 

0000 6 1130 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 33.5 43.7 3 50 - 

0100 0 1130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0200 0 1130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0300 1 1131 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.1 37.1 37.1 1 100 - 

0400 0 1131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0500 0 1131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0600 7 1138 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 32.8 37.6 5 71.4 - 

0700 8 1146 1 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 22.9 30.5 1 12.5 - 

0800 6 1152 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 25.8 40.1 1 16.7 - 

0900 15 1167 0 0 10 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 21.7 37.2 3 20 32.7 

1000 16 1183 0 0 10 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.9 26.4 38.8 7 43.8 35.1 

1100 10 1193 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 22.1 32.4 1 10 - 

1200 20 1213 0 0 15 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 21.8 38 4 20 32 

1300 14 1227 1 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 27.1 37.2 6 42.9 32 

1400 13 1240 0 0 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 20.7 30.5 2 15.4 29.5 

1500 19 1259 0 1 15 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.2 24.3 39.7 3 15.8 28.6 

1600 14 1273 1 1 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 21.3 33.5 2 14.3 27.7 

1700 17 1290 3 0 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.8 23 37.8 3 17.6 29.5 

1800 11 1301 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 18.2 27.3 0 0 25.3 

1900 9 1310 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 25.6 35.2 2 22.2 - 

2000 15 1325 0 0 12 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 25.7 40.7 6 40 35.8 

2100 6 1331 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 26.4 32.5 1 16.7 - 

2200 4 1335 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 29.8 39.6 2 50 - 

2300 5 1340 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 25.3 34.1 2 40 - 

07-19 163 1340 7 2 120 0 30 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 23 40.1 33 20.2 31.1 

06-22 200 1340 7 2 151 0 36 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 23.7 40.7 47 23.5 32 

06-00 209 1340 7 2 160 0 36 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 23.9 40.7 51 24.4 32 

00-00 216 1340 7 2 167 0 36 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 24.2 43.7 55 25.5 32.7 


85%ile Vehicle Speeds - Cooper's Hill Lane 

Wet Weather Vehicle Speed Reduction = 4kph 

4kph = 

2.49 mph 

Date Eastbound Westbound 

Fri 02 29.3 32.4 

Sat 03 28.9 32.2 

Sun 04 28.4 32.9 

Mon 05 29.8 33.1 

Tues 06 28.9 32.7 

Wed 07 31.1 33.6 

Thurs 08 29.5 32.7 

Average 29.4 32.8 

Wet Weather 26.9 30.3 

London-Heathrow AP 

Precipitation mm Jun 30 2010 - Jul 14 2010

VEHICLE SPEED AND CLASSIFICATION SURVEY – PRIEST HILL, EGHAM 

REPORT ID: 

DATASETS: 

Custom List: 16 Site: Priest Hill, Egham (on Lamp Column No. 1) 

Direction: 5 - South bound A>B, North bound B>A. 



Identifier: 22594XX3 MC56-6 [MC55] (c)Microcom 02/03/01 



PROFILE: 




Direction: North (bound) / South (bound) 













Vbin 

















Fri 02 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 30 30 0 0 28 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 44.5 70.6 2 6.7 55 

0100 10 40 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.9 42.5 48.7 0 0 - 

0200 8 48 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 35.2 46.7 0 0 - 

0300 7 55 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 42.3 48.3 0 0 - 

0400 5 60 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 41.1 46.5 0 0 - 

0500 20 80 0 2 15 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 44.3 56.2 0 0 49.9 

0600 90 170 0 2 80 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 39.9 65.9 2 2.2 48.8 

0700 349 519 0 1 325 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 36.7 58.3 0 0 43.4 

0800 413 932 1 2 388 0 21 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 37.4 58.5 0 0 43.2 

0900 294 1226 0 0 275 1 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 36.7 56.8 0 0 41.8 

1000 242 1468 0 2 226 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 36.1 57.3 0 0 42.1 

1100 213 1681 0 1 194 3 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 36.8 59.4 0 0 42.7 

1200 249 1930 0 1 230 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 37.3 58 0 0 43.2 

1300 262 2192 0 0 247 1 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 11.2 35.8 54.4 0 0 42.5 

1400 263 2455 0 2 251 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 38.2 65.1 2 0.8 43.4 

1500 305 2760 0 2 290 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14.1 38.3 61.9 1 0.3 44.1 

1600 449 3209 0 2 423 2 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.8 37.8 58.4 0 0 42.7 

1700 516 3725 0 2 494 1 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 38 54.9 0 0 43.2 

1800 383 4108 0 0 372 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.5 37.8 60.7 1 0.3 44.3 

1900 236 4344 0 1 227 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 38.5 61.1 1 0.4 45.2 

2000 133 4477 0 1 126 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 40.5 68 2 1.5 48.1 

2100 107 4584 0 0 104 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 37.9 55.5 0 0 45.4 

2200 78 4662 0 0 73 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 37.9 62.4 1 1.3 44.3 

2300 66 4728 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 36.4 65.9 1 1.5 42.9 

07-19 3938 4728 1 15 3715 11 188 3 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 8 37.3 65.1 4 0.1 43.2 

06-22 4504 4728 1 19 4252 12 211 4 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 8 37.6 68 9 0.2 43.6 

06-00 4648 4728 1 19 4391 12 216 4 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 8 37.5 68 11 0.2 43.6 

00-00 4728 4728 1 22 4462 12 222 4 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 8 37.6 70.6 13 0.3 43.8 

Vehicle Speed And Classification Survey - Priest Hill, Egham (Lamp Column No. 1)


Sat 03 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 42 4770 0 0 39 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 37.7 55.7 0 0 45.4 

0100 22 4792 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 40.3 51.5 0 0 47.6 

0200 6 4798 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 38.1 50.3 0 0 - 

0300 13 4811 0 1 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 41.3 50.2 0 0 45.4 

0400 6 4817 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 34.2 42.9 0 0 - 

0500 14 4831 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 43.7 52.6 0 0 50.6 

0600 38 4869 0 0 30 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 38.1 55.1 0 0 47 

0700 81 4950 0 2 73 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 38.1 53.2 0 0 44.5 

0800 191 5141 0 1 180 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 37.7 60.6 1 0.5 44.7 

0900 259 5400 1 2 248 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.2 36.1 61.8 1 0.4 42.7 

1000 277 5677 0 4 264 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 36.4 58.1 0 0 42.3 

1100 257 5934 1 3 241 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 36.1 57.1 0 0 42.7 

1200 302 6236 0 3 294 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.3 36.1 55.4 0 0 42.7 

1300 279 6515 0 2 268 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 36.7 56.9 0 0 42.7 

1400 222 6737 0 3 207 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 37.5 74.4 4 1.8 43.6 

1500 249 6986 0 3 234 2 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 37.5 57.8 0 0 43.8 

1600 232 7218 0 2 224 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 37.4 54.2 0 0 43.2 

1700 240 7458 2 3 220 1 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 35.9 54.9 0 0 41.8 

1800 180 7638 0 1 172 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 36.5 52.5 0 0 43.2 

1900 166 7804 0 0 163 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 37.5 57.8 0 0 44.5 

2000 105 7909 0 2 101 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 36 57.9 0 0 43.4 

2100 83 7992 0 0 79 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 18.1 39.3 57.6 0 0 47.9 

2200 87 8079 0 3 81 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 36.2 57.4 0 0 41.2 

2300 63 8142 0 0 62 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 36.3 47.8 0 0 42.5 

07-19 2769 8142 4 29 2625 5 99 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 7.4 36.7 74.4 6 0.2 43.2 

06-22 3161 8142 4 31 2998 5 115 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.4 36.8 74.4 6 0.2 43.4 

06-00 3311 8142 4 34 3141 5 119 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.4 36.8 74.4 6 0.2 43.4 

00-00 3414 8142 4 35 3238 5 123 1 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.4 36.9 74.4 6 0.2 43.4 



Sun 04 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 39 8181 0 0 38 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 41.8 68.8 2 5.1 48.3 

0100 28 8209 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 42.6 54.8 0 0 49.9 

0200 17 8226 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.5 41.3 56.3 0 0 51 

0300 12 8238 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.9 42.6 56.9 0 0 49.4 

0400 6 8244 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 37.8 46.3 0 0 - 

0500 15 8259 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 37.4 51.9 0 0 47.4 

0600 20 8279 0 1 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 36.1 60.4 1 5 46.8 

0700 46 8325 0 1 42 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 38.8 58.3 0 0 50.8 

0800 86 8411 0 0 84 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 36.5 64 1 1.2 45.9 

0900 148 8559 0 0 141 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 36.4 60.6 1 0.7 42.5 

1000 194 8753 0 0 186 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.8 37.1 54.6 0 0 42.7 

1100 226 8979 0 1 220 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 35.1 68.4 1 0.4 40.3 

1200 263 9242 0 6 256 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 36.2 61.5 1 0.4 41.6 

1300 258 9500 0 4 246 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 37.5 53.1 0 0 42.7 

1400 252 9752 0 4 243 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 36.1 51.4 0 0 42.1 

1500 237 9989 0 2 231 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 36.4 69.1 1 0.4 42.7 

1600 185 10174 0 1 179 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 35.4 53.6 0 0 42.3 

1700 206 10380 0 5 196 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 36.3 54.1 0 0 42.1 

1800 170 10550 0 0 167 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.8 37.2 57.7 0 0 42.9 

1900 139 10689 0 1 133 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 37.8 61.7 1 0.7 43.2 

2000 101 10790 0 1 94 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 40.4 69 3 3 48.3 

2100 95 10885 1 0 90 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 37.7 55.6 0 0 45.9 

2200 54 10939 0 0 51 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 38.4 53.7 0 0 46.3 

2300 34 10973 0 0 33 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 37.6 53.6 0 0 44.1 

07-19 2271 10973 0 24 2191 5 49 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 36.4 69.1 5 0.2 42.7 

06-22 2626 10973 1 27 2523 7 65 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 36.7 69.1 10 0.4 43.2 

06-00 2714 10973 1 27 2607 8 68 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 36.7 69.1 10 0.4 43.2 

00-00 2831 10973 1 28 2722 8 69 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 36.9 69.1 12 0.4 43.6 



Mon 05 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 14 10987 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 40.8 53.5 0 0 52.8 

0100 12 10999 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.2 45.6 58.2 0 0 53.5 

0200 2 11001 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 32.4 43.1 0 0 - 

0300 2 11003 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.4 46.4 55.4 0 0 - 

0400 9 11012 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.6 43.3 61.3 1 11.1 - 

0500 22 11034 0 2 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 42.3 59.5 0 0 50.1 

0600 86 11120 0 2 77 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 39.1 69.7 1 1.2 46.5 

0700 375 11495 0 3 353 2 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 39.1 61.9 1 0.3 44.5 

0800 479 11974 0 1 463 1 11 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 9.6 37.4 53.8 0 0 42.7 

0900 291 12265 0 1 274 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 37.8 70.2 1 0.3 42.9 

1000 192 12457 0 0 182 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 37.2 55 0 0 43.6 

1100 190 12647 0 0 175 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 36.5 51.6 0 0 42.7 

1200 247 12894 0 0 232 2 10 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 36.4 65.4 1 0.4 42.5 

1300 188 13082 0 0 177 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 38.1 62.5 1 0.5 43.6 

1400 230 13312 0 0 219 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 37.4 60.6 1 0.4 42.7 

1500 264 13576 0 3 251 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 37.1 56.3 0 0 42.7 

1600 387 13963 0 4 371 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 37.4 61.4 1 0.3 42.1 

1700 501 14464 1 3 483 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 37.4 55.2 0 0 42.5 

1800 321 14785 0 1 313 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 38.3 60.3 1 0.3 44.1 

1900 190 14975 0 2 182 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 38.1 60.6 1 0.5 44.7 

2000 90 15065 0 1 86 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 37.7 68 1 1.1 44.1 

2100 83 15148 1 0 80 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 36.8 54.8 0 0 43.2 

2200 74 15222 0 2 69 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 39.1 58.4 0 0 47 

2300 31 15253 0 1 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 39.1 51.3 0 0 45.9 

07-19 3665 15253 1 16 3493 9 138 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0.6 37.6 70.2 7 0.2 43.2 

06-22 4114 15253 2 21 3918 11 152 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0.6 37.6 70.2 10 0.2 43.4 

06-00 4219 15253 2 24 4017 11 155 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0.6 37.6 70.2 10 0.2 43.4 

00-00 4280 15253 2 26 4071 11 160 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0.6 37.7 70.2 11 0.3 43.6 



Tue 06 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 24 15277 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 39.4 59.9 0 0 45.2 

0100 4 15281 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.6 42.8 53.3 0 0 - 

0200 7 15288 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.1 42 54.8 0 0 - 

0300 1 15289 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.7 47.7 47.7 0 0 - 

0400 4 15293 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 38.7 45.9 0 0 - 

0500 28 15321 0 2 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 41.1 59.9 0 0 54.4 

0600 74 15395 0 1 65 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 41.8 59.2 0 0 49 

0700 366 15761 0 2 347 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 38 61.5 1 0.3 43.8 

0800 479 16240 0 0 465 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 37.8 51.9 0 0 42.3 

0900 280 16520 1 2 255 1 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 37.9 53.3 0 0 42.9 

1000 214 16734 0 3 193 1 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 36.8 54.3 0 0 42.7 

1100 210 16944 0 1 195 1 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 36.5 53.1 0 0 42.3 

1200 252 17196 0 2 238 1 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11.4 37.2 53.7 0 0 42.9 

1300 220 17416 0 2 203 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.8 33.2 53.3 0 0 39.4 

1400 233 17649 0 1 216 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.1 35.1 54.9 0 0 42.3 

1500 262 17911 0 4 244 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 36.8 60.5 1 0.4 42.3 

1600 354 18265 0 6 328 1 17 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 36.8 57.2 0 0 42.5 

1700 482 18747 0 1 469 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 36.8 63 1 0.2 41.6 

1800 339 19086 0 1 330 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12.2 38.5 72.5 3 0.9 44.5 

1900 225 19311 0 6 212 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 37.6 62.1 1 0.4 44.7 

2000 92 19403 0 0 90 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 39.9 55.5 0 0 45.2 

2100 76 19479 0 2 73 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 40.2 65.7 1 1.3 46.3 

2200 67 19546 0 0 64 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 38.6 56.7 0 0 45.9 

2300 35 19581 0 1 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 38.5 55 0 0 47.6 

07-19 3691 19581 1 25 3483 7 165 4 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 9.1 37 72.5 6 0.2 42.7 

06-22 4158 19581 1 34 3923 7 183 4 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 8.4 37.2 72.5 8 0.2 43.2 

06-00 4260 19581 1 35 4021 7 186 4 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 8.4 37.3 72.5 8 0.2 43.2 

00-00 4328 19581 1 37 4084 7 189 4 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 8.4 37.3 72.5 8 0.2 43.2 



Wed 07 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 13 19594 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 38.7 59.5 0 0 43.6 

0100 7 19601 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 46 64 1 14.3 - 

0200 2 19603 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41.9 42.5 43.1 0 0 - 

0300 2 19605 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 45.6 56.5 0 0 - 

0400 6 19611 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 33.1 49.4 0 0 - 

0500 21 19632 0 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 39.8 62.9 1 4.8 51.2 

0600 80 19712 0 0 75 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 38.7 57.4 0 0 46.8 

0700 389 20101 0 4 365 0 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 37.7 58.7 0 0 44.1 

0800 446 20547 0 0 430 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 37 55.1 0 0 42.5 

0900 254 20801 0 1 236 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 38.4 62.3 1 0.4 44.7 

1000 183 20984 0 1 170 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12.3 37.8 59.4 0 0 43.2 

1100 200 21184 0 1 185 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 35.5 49 0 0 42.7 

1200 200 21384 0 0 189 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 36.7 60.4 1 0.5 42.3 

1300 226 21610 0 5 207 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 37.2 76.2 3 1.3 43.4 

1400 232 21842 0 2 216 0 11 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 7.4 36.9 59.6 0 0 42.5 

1500 285 22127 0 2 271 1 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 35.9 54.4 0 0 42.9 

1600 376 22503 0 3 354 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 37.1 57.8 0 0 42.3 

1700 521 23024 0 1 499 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 38 59.6 0 0 42.7 

1800 397 23421 0 4 382 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 38.5 63.9 3 0.8 43.6 

1900 205 23626 0 4 197 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13.4 38.1 56.1 0 0 45 

2000 117 23743 0 2 112 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 40.4 60.9 1 0.9 46.3 

2100 97 23840 0 0 95 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 37.9 57.5 0 0 43.2 

2200 84 23924 0 2 78 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 36.6 67.2 1 1.2 43.8 

2300 43 23967 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 39.7 66.4 1 2.3 46.5 

07-19 3709 23967 0 24 3504 3 170 1 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 7.4 37.3 76.2 8 0.2 42.9 

06-22 4208 23967 0 30 3983 5 181 1 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.4 37.5 76.2 9 0.2 43.4 

06-00 4335 23967 0 32 4104 5 185 1 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.4 37.5 76.2 11 0.3 43.4 

00-00 4386 23967 0 35 4151 5 186 1 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.4 37.5 76.2 13 0.3 43.4 



Thu 08 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 29 23996 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 40.7 53.7 0 0 47.9 

0100 9 24005 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.3 42.1 52.3 0 0 - 

0200 4 24009 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.6 43.2 48.3 0 0 - 

0300 0 24009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 1 24010 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44.9 44.9 44.9 0 0 - 

0500 24 24034 0 1 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 42.2 54.7 0 0 50.3 

0600 80 24114 0 2 72 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 14.1 39.8 61.2 1 1.3 48.8 

0700 380 24494 0 3 359 2 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.3 38 59 0 0 43.2 

0800 465 24959 0 2 446 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 37.1 60.3 1 0.2 42.5 

0900 256 25215 1 1 237 0 14 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 11.8 36.7 57 0 0 43.4 

1000 205 25420 0 0 185 2 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 36.2 57.6 0 0 41.6 

1100 196 25616 0 1 177 1 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11.5 37 56.5 0 0 42.3 

1200 223 25839 0 0 210 0 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7.1 30.2 53.6 0 0 38.3 

1300 244 26083 0 1 225 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 12.4 33.1 50.3 0 0 38.9 

1400 253 26336 0 1 242 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 36.1 55.9 0 0 42.3 

1500 308 26644 0 1 294 0 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 12.2 35.6 57.5 0 0 41.8 

1600 404 27048 0 5 385 1 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10.4 37.6 53.3 0 0 42.5 

1700 552 27600 0 6 526 3 15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 14.6 38 61.9 1 0.2 42.9 

1800 435 28035 0 0 421 2 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 37.4 53.6 0 0 43.4 

1900 285 28320 0 4 275 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 37.6 61 1 0.4 44.3 

2000 135 28455 0 1 131 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 37.2 66.5 4 3 45.2 

2100 98 28553 0 0 97 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 38.8 59.6 0 0 46.3 

2200 79 28632 0 2 74 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 37.6 66.8 1 1.3 43.6 

2300 55 28687 0 1 53 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 36.6 51.3 0 0 45 

07-19 3921 28687 1 21 3707 11 165 2 6 4 3 0 1 0 0 7.1 36.5 61.9 2 0.1 42.5 

06-22 4519 28687 1 28 4282 11 178 2 8 4 3 1 1 0 0 7.1 36.7 66.5 8 0.2 42.7 

06-00 4653 28687 1 31 4409 11 181 3 8 4 3 1 1 0 0 7.1 36.7 66.8 9 0.2 42.9 

00-00 4720 28687 1 33 4471 11 184 3 8 4 3 1 1 0 0 7.1 36.8 66.8 9 0.2 42.9 



Fri 02 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 19 19 0 0 17 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 44.1 70.4 1 5.3 52.6 

0100 11 30 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 43.8 59.4 0 0 49.7 

0200 9 39 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 37.5 50.2 0 0 - 

0300 8 47 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45.2 48.9 52.8 0 0 - 

0400 5 52 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 46.2 59.4 0 0 - 

0500 21 73 0 0 16 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 38 61.2 1 4.8 52.8 

0600 73 146 0 0 64 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 37.9 64.7 3 4.1 49.4 

0700 247 393 0 2 224 2 17 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 14.1 39.6 68.1 4 1.6 49.2 

0800 350 743 1 2 316 2 26 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 10.3 39.2 66.9 1 0.3 47.4 

0900 207 950 1 1 188 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.5 39.9 68.8 5 2.4 49 

1000 192 1142 3 1 165 1 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 36.4 57.1 0 0 43.2 

1100 235 1377 1 1 208 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.8 40.4 63.2 3 1.3 50.1 

1200 253 1630 0 0 230 3 18 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13.9 37.3 56.6 0 0 45.4 

1300 237 1867 1 1 222 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 39 61 1 0.4 47.6 

1400 250 2117 1 2 221 3 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.9 39.7 68.2 2 0.8 47.2 

1500 267 2384 0 3 241 3 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14.7 39.9 70 1 0.4 49.4 

1600 346 2730 1 3 308 5 25 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 14.4 40.2 64.3 1 0.3 47.6 

1700 407 3137 0 3 367 7 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 41.1 67.9 6 1.5 48.3 

1800 300 3437 1 2 281 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 42.4 63.7 6 2 51.4 

1900 220 3657 0 1 205 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 40.2 63.6 4 1.8 49.4 

2000 149 3806 0 1 132 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 42.4 66.5 2 1.3 50.3 

2100 105 3911 0 2 98 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 41.2 58.9 0 0 48.3 

2200 81 3992 0 1 78 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 40.9 61 2 2.5 48.3 

2300 70 4062 0 2 66 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.6 40.1 66.3 1 1.4 48.1 

07-19 3291 4062 10 21 2971 29 247 3 1 0 5 1 2 1 0 7.8 39.8 70 30 0.9 48.3 

06-22 3838 4062 10 25 3470 30 290 3 1 0 5 1 2 1 0 7.8 39.9 70 39 1 48.3 

06-00 3989 4062 10 28 3614 31 293 3 1 0 5 1 2 1 0 7.8 39.9 70 42 1.1 48.3 

00-00 4062 4062 10 28 3679 31 301 3 1 0 5 1 2 1 0 7.8 40 70.4 44 1.1 48.5 



Sat 03 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 41 4103 0 0 40 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 41.9 67.5 1 2.4 49.9 

0100 10 4113 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.9 41.4 51.8 0 0 - 

0200 12 4125 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 42.4 53.1 0 0 48.1 

0300 10 4135 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.5 48.8 59.8 0 0 - 

0400 7 4142 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 43 58.3 0 0 - 

0500 7 4149 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 41.7 51.9 0 0 - 

0600 33 4182 0 1 28 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 45.1 75 1 3 56.4 

0700 54 4236 0 1 44 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 41 53.7 0 0 48.8 

0800 122 4358 2 2 100 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 40.8 59.5 0 0 50.1 

0900 181 4539 1 1 160 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 39.2 55.8 0 0 48.1 

1000 242 4781 3 4 217 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 36.7 61.3 1 0.4 45.6 

1100 253 5034 1 9 233 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 39 79.2 3 1.2 47.9 

1200 278 5312 4 5 255 4 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.1 35.8 70.7 2 0.7 43.6 

1300 239 5551 0 4 227 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 38.6 62 1 0.4 46.5 

1400 256 5807 0 3 245 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 38.8 60.3 1 0.4 46.3 

1500 231 6038 2 2 219 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.7 39.7 62.2 2 0.9 47 

1600 239 6277 0 3 225 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 39.9 65.4 2 0.8 46.3 

1700 246 6523 0 0 233 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 38 63.5 1 0.4 45.6 

1800 200 6723 2 2 187 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 38.6 66.2 1 0.5 47.4 

1900 148 6871 1 1 140 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 41.2 65.9 4 2.7 49.2 

2000 105 6976 0 3 97 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 40.1 65.7 2 1.9 50.6 

2100 78 7054 0 0 72 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 40.9 77.1 2 2.6 48.3 

2200 81 7135 0 1 77 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 39.1 68.5 1 1.2 45.6 

2300 68 7203 0 0 65 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.5 41.4 61.3 1 1.5 49.4 

07-19 2541 7203 15 36 2345 14 126 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 7.4 38.5 79.2 14 0.6 47 

06-22 2905 7203 16 41 2682 14 147 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 7.4 38.9 79.2 23 0.8 47.4 

06-00 3054 7203 16 42 2824 15 152 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 4.7 38.9 79.2 25 0.8 47.4 

00-00 3141 7203 16 42 2902 15 161 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 4.7 39 79.2 26 0.8 47.6 



Sun 04 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 35 7238 0 0 32 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 43.1 60.4 1 2.9 48.5 

0100 20 7258 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 43.1 56.8 0 0 49.9 

0200 17 7275 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 45.6 58.2 0 0 55.7 

0300 10 7285 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.3 49.2 61.9 1 10 - 

0400 12 7297 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 46.6 58 0 0 56.6 

0500 7 7304 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 45.2 59.6 0 0 - 

0600 12 7316 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 44.2 63.2 1 8.3 52.3 

0700 40 7356 0 2 34 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 39.8 63.8 1 2.5 51.7 

0800 58 7414 4 1 46 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 36.1 63.3 1 1.7 49.9 

0900 104 7518 4 2 93 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 35.6 61.2 1 1 45.9 

1000 163 7681 2 1 154 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 37.4 53.9 0 0 45.4 

1100 192 7873 0 3 185 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 37.5 61.4 2 1 46.5 

1200 222 8095 4 0 208 1 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 36.7 68.8 2 0.9 45.6 

1300 226 8321 2 2 216 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 36.7 56.7 0 0 44.3 

1400 217 8538 2 3 202 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 38.3 63.4 1 0.5 46.5 

1500 227 8765 2 2 220 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.9 38.1 61 1 0.4 46.1 

1600 229 8994 2 2 211 2 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.7 37.6 59.4 0 0 45 

1700 243 9237 3 3 228 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 39.5 55.5 0 0 48.1 

1800 216 9453 0 2 206 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 39.8 68.1 1 0.5 47.6 

1900 154 9607 1 1 145 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 41 69.4 4 2.6 49.2 

2000 112 9719 0 0 106 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.1 44.7 79 4 3.6 53.2 

2100 89 9808 1 0 84 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 38.8 59.6 0 0 48.8 

2200 47 9855 0 0 42 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.4 43.1 74.9 2 4.3 51 

2300 23 9878 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 37.2 54.8 0 0 51.9 

07-19 2137 9878 25 23 2003 7 74 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 37.9 68.8 10 0.5 46.5 

06-22 2504 9878 27 24 2350 8 88 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 38.4 79 19 0.8 47 

06-00 2574 9878 27 24 2415 8 93 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 38.5 79 21 0.8 47.2 

00-00 2675 9878 27 24 2509 8 100 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 38.7 79 23 0.9 47.4 



Mon 05 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 17 9895 0 0 14 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 43.9 60.9 1 5.9 51.2 

0100 13 9908 0 0 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.2 44.1 58.5 0 0 53.5 

0200 5 9913 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.1 46.2 51.4 0 0 - 

0300 2 9915 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51.6 58.4 65.3 1 50 - 

0400 8 9923 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 42.1 57.3 0 0 - 

0500 11 9934 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 39.5 56.8 0 0 48.5 

0600 67 10001 0 0 58 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 14 44.5 72.8 4 6 54.8 

0700 229 10230 0 2 208 2 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 41.8 63.1 1 0.4 49.9 

0800 345 10575 0 3 324 2 14 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 38.5 59.6 0 0 46.8 

0900 237 10812 1 1 214 4 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 39.5 57.2 0 0 49 

1000 171 10983 1 1 154 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 38.4 55.1 0 0 47.4 

1100 170 11153 0 0 151 2 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 40.2 59.7 0 0 48.1 

1200 209 11362 1 2 188 0 17 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13.7 38.2 60.7 2 1 47.2 

1300 173 11535 1 0 154 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 39 58.1 0 0 47.9 

1400 211 11746 1 1 189 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 39.9 75.4 1 0.5 47.2 

1500 271 12017 0 1 252 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 39 57.8 0 0 46.8 

1600 306 12323 1 2 280 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 38.7 63.6 2 0.7 47 

1700 379 12702 0 2 359 5 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 39.1 66.5 2 0.5 47.2 

1800 308 13010 4 5 284 3 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 40 66.1 2 0.6 49 

1900 185 13195 1 3 168 3 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9.1 41.6 79.7 3 1.6 48.3 

2000 109 13304 0 0 101 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 43.1 65.5 3 2.8 51.4 

2100 92 13396 1 1 88 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 41.6 63.9 2 2.2 48.3 

2200 72 13468 0 0 71 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.5 41.4 78.3 1 1.4 48.8 

2300 48 13516 0 0 44 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 42.6 64 2 4.2 52.8 

07-19 3009 13516 10 20 2757 22 191 4 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 8.4 39.3 75.4 10 0.3 47.6 

06-22 3462 13516 12 24 3172 26 217 4 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 8.3 39.7 79.7 22 0.6 48.1 

06-00 3582 13516 12 24 3287 26 222 4 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 8.3 39.8 79.7 25 0.7 48.1 

00-00 3638 13516 12 24 3332 26 233 4 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 8.3 39.9 79.7 27 0.7 48.1 



Tue 06 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 18 13534 0 0 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 42.5 74.5 2 11.1 48.1 

0100 5 13539 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.3 48.8 58.2 0 0 - 

0200 8 13547 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 41.8 61 1 12.5 - 

0300 1 13548 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 44 44 0 0 - 

0400 6 13554 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 34.1 55.3 0 0 - 

0500 9 13563 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.5 46 61.9 1 11.1 - 

0600 63 13626 0 0 54 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 45 68.5 3 4.8 53.7 

0700 272 13898 1 1 239 0 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.1 42 74.9 2 0.7 50.1 

0800 374 14272 1 4 339 3 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 39.9 61.6 2 0.5 48.1 

0900 228 14500 1 1 202 1 22 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7.6 39.9 65.5 3 1.3 47.6 

1000 168 14668 1 0 149 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 38 61.5 2 1.2 47 

1100 204 14872 4 0 183 1 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 37.7 64 2 1 45 

1200 183 15055 1 1 169 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.1 38.6 69.3 3 1.6 47.2 

1300 190 15245 1 2 169 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 38.2 58.7 0 0 46.5 

1400 207 15452 0 2 186 2 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 38.2 73.4 1 0.5 46.5 

1500 281 15733 1 1 255 1 20 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 12.4 38 55.7 0 0 45.4 

1600 302 16035 0 1 280 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 40.2 61.8 1 0.3 48.1 

1700 386 16421 4 1 363 4 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 39.6 67.3 3 0.8 47.9 

1800 349 16770 4 3 331 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 40.5 59.2 0 0 47.9 

1900 164 16934 1 4 151 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 39.8 68.2 3 1.8 47.4 

2000 126 17060 1 4 114 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 43.3 76.3 7 5.6 51.4 

2100 78 17138 0 1 71 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 42 58.6 0 0 50.8 

2200 71 17209 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 40.2 68.6 3 4.2 52.8 

2300 39 17248 0 1 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 42 63.1 1 2.6 53.7 

07-19 3144 17248 19 17 2865 18 215 4 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 7.6 39.4 74.9 19 0.6 47.6 

06-22 3575 17248 21 26 3255 18 243 5 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.6 39.7 76.3 32 0.9 47.9 

06-00 3685 17248 21 27 3364 18 243 5 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.6 39.8 76.3 36 1 48.1 

00-00 3732 17248 21 27 3404 19 249 5 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 7.6 39.8 76.3 40 1.1 48.1 



Wed 07 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 9 17257 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 45.8 79.8 2 22.2 - 

0100 8 17265 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 44.6 63.7 1 12.5 - 

0200 5 17270 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.9 49.5 61.6 1 20 - 

0300 1 17271 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 45 45 0 0 - 

0400 8 17279 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 29.8 50.8 0 0 - 

0500 12 17291 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 39 54.2 0 0 47.9 

0600 64 17355 0 0 54 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12.2 42.4 64.8 2 3.1 52.6 

0700 229 17584 1 1 206 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.8 41.2 61.3 2 0.9 49.2 

0800 336 17920 1 1 302 7 23 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12.6 40 74.7 1 0.3 47.2 

0900 227 18147 0 2 209 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 39.2 67 2 0.9 47.6 

1000 179 18326 0 0 163 0 14 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 10.7 39.2 58 0 0 47.2 

1100 171 18497 0 1 148 1 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.7 35.8 57.5 0 0 45 

1200 185 18682 0 0 171 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 40.8 70.3 1 0.5 47.4 

1300 216 18898 1 5 193 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 38.1 65.8 3 1.4 44.7 

1400 235 19133 3 4 208 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 36.5 57.1 0 0 44.7 

1500 261 19394 0 3 239 3 14 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 14.6 38.8 61.7 1 0.4 46.5 

1600 325 19719 1 2 303 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 39.5 57.9 0 0 47 

1700 372 20091 4 1 343 3 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8.2 41.1 60.7 1 0.3 47.9 

1800 339 20430 0 3 326 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 39.7 71.6 4 1.2 47.9 

1900 256 20686 1 1 242 1 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 39 67.1 2 0.8 47.4 

2000 119 20805 1 1 112 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 44.3 67.5 5 4.2 53.2 

2100 67 20872 0 1 63 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 41.7 70.9 3 4.5 50.6 

2200 79 20951 0 0 76 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 41 66.1 2 2.5 49 

2300 38 20989 0 0 37 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 45.5 63.8 3 7.9 51.7 

07-19 3075 20989 11 23 2811 21 202 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 8.2 39.4 74.7 15 0.5 47.2 

06-22 3581 20989 13 26 3282 22 229 2 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 8.2 39.6 74.7 27 0.8 47.6 

06-00 3698 20989 13 26 3395 22 233 2 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 8.2 39.7 74.7 32 0.9 47.9 

00-00 3741 20989 13 27 3427 22 243 2 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 8.2 39.7 79.8 36 1 47.9 



Thu 08 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 22 21011 0 0 20 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.3 47 67.5 2 9.1 54.6 

0100 10 21021 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.4 44 56.3 0 0 - 

0200 5 21026 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.9 48.5 57.9 0 0 - 

0300 1 21027 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.6 47.6 47.6 0 0 - 

0400 5 21032 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 42.5 52.8 0 0 - 

0500 15 21047 0 0 10 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 39.7 54.3 0 0 48.1 

0600 76 21123 0 0 66 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.5 43.6 68.7 2 2.6 55 

0700 250 21373 0 2 222 3 22 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 40.8 60.3 1 0.4 49.4 

0800 360 21733 0 2 335 1 20 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 11.3 39.2 61.6 1 0.3 46.8 

0900 237 21970 1 2 207 4 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 38.3 62.4 1 0.4 46.5 

1000 165 22135 0 0 148 0 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 40 65.3 1 0.6 48.1 

1100 153 22288 0 0 131 1 19 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12.9 37.1 60.4 2 1.3 48.1 

1200 228 22516 1 0 203 1 20 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 7.1 32.7 50.1 0 0 41.8 

1300 192 22708 1 1 177 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6.5 35.5 56.8 0 0 43.8 

1400 228 22936 0 1 201 3 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 37.5 58.3 0 0 45.4 

1500 266 23202 0 3 243 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 39 56.9 0 0 46.3 

1600 324 23526 0 4 300 1 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 38.6 61.9 2 0.6 46.5 

1700 397 23923 3 3 368 1 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.2 40.7 78.5 2 0.5 47.9 

1800 382 24305 3 2 358 2 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.1 40.6 64 2 0.5 49 

1900 229 24534 0 2 213 1 10 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 9.5 42.5 62.9 3 1.3 50.6 

2000 189 24723 2 4 172 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 41 62.7 3 1.6 49.2 

2100 114 24837 0 0 111 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 42.4 60.2 1 0.9 49.2 

2200 82 24919 0 0 79 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 38.8 59.1 0 0 45.4 

2300 46 24965 0 0 44 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 41 58.3 0 0 50.1 

07-19 3182 24965 9 20 2893 17 228 3 5 3 4 0 0 0 0 6.5 38.7 78.5 12 0.4 47.2 

06-22 3790 24965 11 26 3455 18 262 3 6 3 6 0 0 0 0 6.5 39.2 78.5 21 0.6 47.6 

06-00 3918 24965 11 26 3578 18 266 4 6 3 6 0 0 0 0 6.5 39.2 78.5 21 0.5 47.6 

00-00 3976 24965 11 26 3623 18 279 4 6 3 6 0 0 0 0 6.5 39.3 78.5 23 0.6 47.6 


85%ile Vehicle Speeds - Priest Hill 


4kph = 

2.49 mph 

Date Northbound Southbound 

Fri 02 43.8 48.5 

Sat 03 43.4 47.6 

Sun 04 43.6 47.4 

Mon 05 43.6 48.1 

Tues 06 43.2 48.1 

Wed 07 43.4 47.9 

Thurs 08 42.9 47.6 

Average 43.4 47.9 




VEHICLE SPEED AND CLASSIFICATION SURVEY – ST. JUDE'S ROAD, EGHAM 

REPORT ID: 

DATASETS: 

Custom List: 16 Site: St. Jude's Road, Egham (on Speed Camera Sign). 

Direction: 5 - South bound A>B, North bound B>A. 



Identifier: CA77GGMK MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 



PROFILE: 




Direction: North (bound) / South (bound) 













Vbin 

















Fri 02 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 30 30 0 0 28 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.2 37.3 54.6 0 0 48.8 

0100 10 40 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.2 36.7 44.6 0 0 - 

0200 7 47 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 39.1 48.5 0 0 - 

0300 7 54 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.1 35.5 39.7 0 0 - 

0400 6 60 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.9 36.6 45.9 0 0 - 

0500 19 79 0 2 14 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.9 42 52.9 0 0 47.9 

0600 88 167 0 2 76 0 7 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 9.4 37.7 73.2 1 1.1 44.1 

0700 347 514 1 1 324 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 34.4 51.5 0 0 38.7 

0800 409 923 3 2 381 0 20 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 12.2 34 54.3 0 0 38.9 

0900 283 1206 1 1 263 1 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 33.4 62.9 1 0.4 38 

1000 235 1441 1 2 220 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.9 34.1 49.5 0 0 38.5 

1100 205 1646 4 1 185 1 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.8 33.4 53.6 0 0 38.5 

1200 245 1891 1 1 223 0 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12.1 33.6 45.2 0 0 38.5 

1300 244 2135 0 0 233 1 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 15.6 33.1 50.7 0 0 37.1 

1400 261 2396 1 2 246 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 33.9 54.1 0 0 38.7 

1500 303 2699 0 2 287 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 34.6 57.4 0 0 39.1 

1600 444 3143 1 3 415 1 21 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 12.4 34.3 52.3 0 0 38.3 

1700 504 3647 0 2 484 1 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 34.4 57.6 0 0 37.6 

1800 360 4007 0 0 345 3 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 34.8 63.5 1 0.3 38.9 

1900 220 4227 0 1 211 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 35.4 52 0 0 40.7 

2000 125 4352 0 3 117 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 36.5 79 2 1.6 42.3 

2100 104 4456 1 0 100 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 34.2 47.4 0 0 39.1 

2200 77 4533 0 0 72 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 34.8 48.3 0 0 38.9 

2300 65 4598 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 33.5 50.7 0 0 38.9 

07-19 3840 4598 13 17 3606 11 178 7 3 1 2 0 2 0 0 9.8 34.1 63.5 2 0.1 38.5 

06-22 4377 4598 14 23 4110 12 200 8 4 1 3 0 2 0 0 9.4 34.3 79 5 0.1 38.7 

06-00 4519 4598 14 23 4247 12 205 8 4 1 3 0 2 0 0 9.4 34.3 79 5 0.1 38.7 

00-00 4598 4598 14 26 4316 12 212 8 4 1 3 0 2 0 0 9.4 34.4 79 5 0.1 38.9 

Vehicle Speed And Classification Survey - St. Jude's Road, Egham (On Speed Camera Sign)


Sat 03 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 40 4638 0 0 38 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 35.2 53.5 0 0 42.1 

0100 21 4659 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.3 37.3 47.8 0 0 41.4 

0200 6 4665 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.3 35.5 46.4 0 0 - 

0300 13 4678 0 1 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 35.1 41.9 0 0 40.7 

0400 5 4683 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.2 33.4 39.9 0 0 - 

0500 15 4698 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.9 40.5 47.1 0 0 45.9 

0600 36 4734 2 0 28 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 35 49.7 0 0 41.2 

0700 82 4816 1 2 75 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 36.5 56.6 0 0 41.8 

0800 185 5001 1 1 171 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 35.5 65.6 1 0.5 39.8 

0900 256 5257 0 2 245 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 34.4 53.6 0 0 38.9 

1000 270 5527 7 2 251 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 34 55.8 0 0 39.1 

1100 253 5780 8 2 228 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 33.1 56.2 0 0 38 

1200 276 6056 0 1 270 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.2 33.8 47.9 0 0 38.3 

1300 269 6325 0 2 256 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 16.2 33.6 50.9 0 0 38.7 

1400 216 6541 1 0 202 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 32.8 49 0 0 37.4 

1500 233 6774 0 3 217 2 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 19.9 34.8 52.9 0 0 39.6 

1600 222 6996 1 2 211 2 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 9.7 34.8 60.9 1 0.5 40.5 

1700 231 7227 0 3 218 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 33.3 49.5 0 0 37.8 

1800 172 7399 2 1 163 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 33.4 51.6 0 0 38.3 

1900 160 7559 1 0 156 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 35 53.2 0 0 38.9 

2000 97 7656 0 2 93 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.6 35.2 50.9 0 0 40.9 

2100 82 7738 0 0 79 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 21.3 34.4 46.7 0 0 40 

2200 84 7822 0 3 78 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 33.5 62 1 1.2 36.9 

2300 63 7885 0 0 62 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 32.9 42.2 0 0 38 

07-19 2665 7885 21 21 2507 7 101 0 5 1 1 0 1 0 0 8.6 34 65.6 2 0.1 38.9 

06-22 3040 7885 24 23 2863 7 114 0 5 1 2 0 1 0 0 8.6 34.1 65.6 2 0.1 39.1 

06-00 3187 7885 24 26 3003 7 118 0 5 1 2 0 1 0 0 8.6 34.1 65.6 3 0.1 39.1 

00-00 3287 7885 24 27 3098 7 122 0 5 1 2 0 1 0 0 8.6 34.2 65.6 3 0.1 39.1 



Sun 04 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 39 7924 0 0 38 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 37 59.2 0 0 42.3 

0100 29 7953 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 37.7 48.5 0 0 44.7 

0200 17 7970 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 37.4 46.8 0 0 42.7 

0300 12 7982 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.3 34.7 40.7 0 0 38.7 

0400 6 7988 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.3 36.8 42.2 0 0 - 

0500 13 8001 0 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 37.5 42.4 0 0 41.6 

0600 20 8021 1 1 14 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 34.3 50.9 0 0 38.7 

0700 43 8064 1 1 38 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 37 51.7 0 0 44.1 

0800 83 8147 4 0 78 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 34.1 49.9 0 0 39.8 

0900 146 8293 4 0 136 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 34.4 59.7 0 0 39.4 

1000 188 8481 1 0 179 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 34.2 61.1 1 0.5 39.1 

1100 217 8698 3 2 206 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32.8 63.1 1 0.5 37.1 

1200 262 8960 5 6 246 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 32.9 58.8 0 0 38.5 

1300 246 9206 1 3 231 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 34.5 53.3 0 0 38.5 

1400 245 9451 2 4 237 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 33.4 47.5 0 0 37.1 

1500 218 9669 4 2 208 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 33.8 58.4 0 0 38.7 

1600 178 9847 0 1 173 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.6 33.8 54.2 0 0 38.9 

1700 191 10038 1 3 180 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 17.5 32.9 50.6 0 0 37.4 

1800 168 10206 3 0 162 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 34.9 56.7 0 0 40.3 

1900 131 10337 1 1 123 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 33.3 53.1 0 0 38 

2000 100 10437 1 1 93 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 35.6 74.6 2 2 39.6 

2100 89 10526 0 0 86 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 22.6 34.6 46.8 0 0 38.5 

2200 53 10579 0 0 50 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 34.3 50.4 0 0 38.9 

2300 34 10613 0 0 33 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 34.3 41.4 0 0 38.9 

07-19 2185 10613 29 22 2074 3 51 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 9.3 33.8 63.1 2 0.1 38.7 

06-22 2525 10613 32 25 2390 4 65 1 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 9.3 33.9 74.6 4 0.2 38.7 

06-00 2612 10613 32 25 2473 5 68 1 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 9.3 33.9 74.6 4 0.2 38.9 

00-00 2728 10613 32 26 2586 5 70 1 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 9.3 34 74.6 4 0.1 39.1 



Mon 05 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 13 10626 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.5 35.4 43.8 0 0 40.5 

0100 12 10638 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.1 38.4 47.9 0 0 44.3 

0200 2 10640 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.2 39.5 40.8 0 0 - 

0300 2 10642 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.6 38.1 43.7 0 0 - 

0400 9 10651 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 37 53.1 0 0 - 

0500 22 10673 0 2 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 40.8 58.1 0 0 44.1 

0600 81 10754 0 2 74 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 37.2 55.1 0 0 41.6 

0700 374 11128 2 2 349 4 15 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 35.6 66.5 1 0.3 40 

0800 465 11593 1 1 454 0 6 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 16.1 34.3 51.3 0 0 38.5 

0900 282 11875 0 1 265 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 34.7 69.6 1 0.4 39.4 

1000 187 12062 0 0 171 2 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 16.1 33.7 53 0 0 38.7 

1100 173 12235 1 0 157 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 34.2 46.4 0 0 39.4 

1200 234 12469 2 1 218 1 10 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 33.3 62.1 1 0.4 37.4 

1300 187 12656 2 0 170 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.5 33.8 52.4 0 0 38.7 

1400 225 12881 0 0 211 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 34.3 59.8 0 0 38.5 

1500 256 13137 0 3 241 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 19.6 33.9 47.9 0 0 38.3 

1600 381 13518 0 4 368 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 21.9 34.1 54.4 0 0 37.8 

1700 497 14015 0 3 479 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 34.1 49.2 0 0 38 

1800 311 14326 1 1 302 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 35.1 56.5 0 0 38.7 

1900 177 14503 3 0 170 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 35.5 53.1 0 0 39.8 

2000 84 14587 0 1 80 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 35.8 65.5 1 1.2 39.6 

2100 77 14664 1 0 74 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 34.4 48.8 0 0 37.4 

2200 75 14739 0 2 71 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.7 36 56.8 0 0 41.4 

2300 29 14768 0 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 36 46.1 0 0 41.2 

07-19 3572 14768 9 16 3385 13 137 2 4 2 3 0 1 0 0 7.5 34.3 69.6 3 0.1 38.7 

06-22 3991 14768 13 19 3783 14 150 2 4 2 3 0 1 0 0 7.5 34.5 69.6 4 0.1 38.9 

06-00 4095 14768 13 22 3882 14 152 2 4 2 3 0 1 0 0 7.5 34.5 69.6 4 0.1 38.9 

00-00 4155 14768 13 24 3935 14 157 2 4 2 3 0 1 0 0 7.5 34.6 69.6 4 0.1 38.9 



Tue 06 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 24 14792 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.4 34.9 51.1 0 0 40.5 

0100 3 14795 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.7 33.1 36.9 0 0 - 

0200 7 14802 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 31.7 44.3 0 0 - 

0300 1 14803 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.3 39.3 39.3 0 0 - 

0400 5 14808 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 34.5 43.9 0 0 - 

0500 26 14834 0 2 22 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 40.5 51.5 0 0 46.5 

0600 74 14908 0 1 66 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.3 38.6 61.7 1 1.4 44.3 

0700 356 15264 0 4 335 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 34.9 65.6 1 0.3 39.1 

0800 467 15731 2 0 451 1 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 34.6 55.3 0 0 38.3 

0900 272 16003 1 2 252 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 34.6 56.1 0 0 39.4 

1000 207 16210 1 3 186 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 34.4 60.9 1 0.5 38.9 

1100 202 16412 1 1 187 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 34.3 58.5 0 0 39.4 

1200 238 16650 2 2 221 1 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11.2 34 63 1 0.4 38.3 

1300 212 16862 0 0 193 0 17 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 33.1 57.7 0 0 37.1 

1400 219 17081 1 0 200 0 17 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 14.4 32.8 51.8 0 0 37.8 

1500 254 17335 0 5 236 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 9.1 33.9 52.4 0 0 37.8 

1600 339 17674 0 3 317 2 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 33.9 61.4 1 0.3 37.6 

1700 476 18150 1 2 457 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 33.9 60.1 1 0.2 37.6 

1800 335 18485 0 1 327 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 34.8 62 2 0.6 39.6 

1900 207 18692 0 5 195 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 34.7 59.1 0 0 39.6 

2000 92 18784 0 0 89 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 36.9 55.9 0 0 40.5 

2100 72 18856 0 2 69 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 36 54.3 0 0 41.6 

2200 68 18924 0 0 64 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.1 35.3 65.2 1 1.5 39.1 

2300 34 18958 0 1 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.2 36.2 51.8 0 0 42.5 

07-19 3577 18958 9 23 3362 9 165 1 4 0 3 0 1 0 0 9.1 34.2 65.6 7 0.2 38.5 

06-22 4022 18958 9 31 3781 9 183 1 4 0 3 0 1 0 0 9.1 34.4 65.6 8 0.2 38.9 

06-00 4124 18958 9 32 3878 9 186 1 5 0 3 0 1 0 0 9.1 34.4 65.6 9 0.2 38.9 

00-00 4190 18958 9 34 3938 9 189 1 6 0 3 0 1 0 0 9.1 34.4 65.6 9 0.2 38.9 



Wed 07 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 12 18970 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.4 37.1 50.2 0 0 45.2 

0100 7 18977 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 47.4 54.1 0 0 - 

0200 2 18979 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.5 38.1 41.8 0 0 - 

0300 2 18981 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.4 39.2 48 0 0 - 

0400 5 18986 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 37.3 51 0 0 - 

0500 19 19005 0 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 41.2 49.4 0 0 47.4 

0600 78 19083 0 0 73 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 37.7 62.3 1 1.3 42.5 

0700 384 19467 1 5 358 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 34.8 48.1 0 0 39.6 

0800 440 19907 1 0 420 1 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 33.8 46.6 0 0 37.6 

0900 241 20148 0 1 223 2 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 35.3 55.2 0 0 38.9 

1000 186 20334 0 1 175 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 22.4 34.2 54.5 0 0 38.3 

1100 194 20528 1 0 177 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 34.3 56.6 0 0 39.4 

1200 187 20715 0 0 178 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 34.4 49.1 0 0 38.5 

1300 217 20932 2 3 196 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.6 34.1 59.7 0 0 38.9 

1400 222 21154 0 2 201 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 20.3 33.9 57.1 0 0 38.5 

1500 282 21436 0 0 271 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 34.1 55.2 0 0 39.1 

1600 366 21802 0 3 344 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 33.8 55.1 0 0 37.8 

1700 521 22323 0 2 496 2 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 34.3 49.7 0 0 38.7 

1800 388 22711 1 4 365 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 35.2 57.2 0 0 39.6 

1900 198 22909 0 3 191 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 22.8 34.8 54.3 0 0 39.6 

2000 111 23020 0 2 107 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 35.6 53.6 0 0 40.7 

2100 92 23112 0 0 90 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 35 57.1 0 0 39.1 

2200 80 23192 0 2 74 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 34 69.6 1 1.3 38.3 

2300 41 23233 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 36.1 51.6 0 0 42.3 

07-19 3628 23233 6 21 3404 9 182 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 9.6 34.4 59.7 0 0 38.7 

06-22 4107 23233 6 26 3865 10 193 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 9.6 34.5 62.3 1 0 38.9 

06-00 4228 23233 6 28 3980 10 197 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 9.6 34.5 69.6 2 0 39.1 

00-00 4275 23233 6 31 4022 10 199 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 9.6 34.6 69.6 2 0 39.1 



Thu 08 July 2010 Northbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 27 23260 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.6 35.3 49.4 0 0 38 

0100 9 23269 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 35 39.9 0 0 - 

0200 4 23273 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 38.9 43.6 0 0 - 

0300 0 23273 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 - 

0400 1 23274 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.2 39.2 39.2 0 0 - 

0500 23 23297 0 1 21 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 38.8 51.1 0 0 46.3 

0600 78 23375 0 2 70 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 23.1 37.4 65.2 1 1.3 42.3 

0700 372 23747 2 3 351 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 35.1 56.2 0 0 38.9 

0800 459 24206 4 3 432 1 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 33.7 55.8 0 0 38.3 

0900 249 24455 1 1 231 1 12 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 34.3 53.2 0 0 38.9 

1000 200 24655 0 0 181 1 16 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 34.2 48.2 0 0 39.4 

1100 191 24846 0 0 172 1 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 34.8 48 0 0 40 

1200 213 25059 0 0 198 0 13 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 32.1 50.2 0 0 37.8 

1300 229 25288 0 1 208 1 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 32.7 50.3 0 0 37.6 

1400 242 25530 0 1 231 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 34.3 49.7 0 0 39.4 

1500 291 25821 0 1 277 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 33.5 57.7 0 0 37.6 

1600 395 26216 2 5 366 1 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 34.2 47 0 0 38.3 

1700 537 26753 0 5 507 4 19 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 7.6 33.2 55.4 0 0 37.6 

1800 431 27184 0 0 422 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 34 53.9 0 0 38.7 

1900 263 27447 0 4 253 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 35.4 64.2 1 0.4 40.3 

2000 121 27568 1 0 118 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 35.5 58.9 0 0 40.5 

2100 92 27660 0 0 91 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 36 50.5 0 0 41.8 

2200 79 27739 0 2 73 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 35.3 72.9 1 1.3 40.7 

2300 56 27795 0 2 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 34.2 54.8 0 0 40.3 

07-19 3809 27795 9 20 3576 11 177 3 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 7.6 33.9 57.7 0 0 38.5 

06-22 4363 27795 10 26 4108 11 191 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 7.6 34.1 65.2 2 0 38.7 

06-00 4498 27795 10 30 4235 11 194 3 8 5 1 1 0 0 0 7.6 34.1 72.9 3 0.1 38.9 

00-00 4562 27795 10 32 4294 11 197 3 8 5 1 1 0 0 0 7.6 34.2 72.9 3 0.1 38.9 



Fri 02 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 19 19 0 0 17 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 39.5 55.1 0 0 47 

0100 11 30 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.3 41 48.6 0 0 44.3 

0200 8 38 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.7 37.7 49.8 0 0 - 

0300 9 47 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.5 40.2 50.1 0 0 - 

0400 4 51 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.2 47.1 50.6 0 0 - 

0500 20 71 0 1 14 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 38.3 48.7 0 0 46.8 

0600 59 130 0 0 54 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 39.7 55.8 0 0 45.9 

0700 236 366 0 3 219 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24.7 36.3 52.9 0 0 41.8 

0800 346 712 0 2 328 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 35.8 53.8 0 0 40.3 

0900 202 914 0 1 188 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.5 35.2 49.2 0 0 40.5 

1000 181 1095 1 0 160 1 17 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 35.5 50.9 0 0 40.9 

1100 228 1323 1 1 209 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 36.3 54.4 0 0 41.8 

1200 243 1566 2 0 223 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 34.7 51.1 0 0 40.3 

1300 233 1799 1 1 223 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10.6 34.9 53.9 0 0 40.7 

1400 248 2047 1 2 225 3 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 34 46.1 0 0 38.5 

1500 259 2306 0 3 240 2 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 35.4 51.2 0 0 40.7 

1600 342 2648 2 4 318 0 16 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 36.1 48.9 0 0 40.3 

1700 398 3046 1 3 374 2 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 35.1 52.6 0 0 40.5 

1800 296 3342 2 3 282 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 36.4 55.6 0 0 42.5 

1900 211 3553 0 0 199 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 36.4 50.4 0 0 41.2 

2000 143 3696 1 2 130 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 36.6 57.4 0 0 42.5 

2100 105 3801 1 1 99 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 36.5 50.2 0 0 41.4 

2200 79 3880 0 1 77 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.4 36.3 52.7 0 0 40.9 

2300 70 3950 0 2 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.4 37.6 55.3 0 0 41.8 

07-19 3212 3950 11 23 2989 12 169 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 10.6 35.5 55.6 0 0 40.7 

06-22 3730 3950 13 26 3471 15 197 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 10.6 35.7 57.4 0 0 40.9 

06-00 3879 3950 13 29 3616 15 198 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 10.6 35.7 57.4 0 0 40.9 

00-00 3950 3950 14 30 3677 15 206 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 10.6 35.8 57.4 0 0 40.9 



Sat 03 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 40 3990 0 0 39 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 37.4 51.2 0 0 43.8 

0100 10 4000 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.2 37.2 41.5 0 0 - 

0200 12 4012 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 39.9 52.1 0 0 41.4 

0300 10 4022 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.8 46 56 0 0 - 

0400 7 4029 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.7 39.8 57.4 0 0 - 

0500 7 4036 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.4 39 47.1 0 0 - 

0600 30 4066 0 1 26 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 41.7 56.1 0 0 48.1 

0700 51 4117 1 0 43 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 37.9 53.2 0 0 42.9 

0800 115 4232 2 3 99 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 38.3 52.2 0 0 43.8 

0900 180 4412 5 1 164 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 35.9 53 0 0 41.4 

1000 222 4634 3 2 205 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 35.2 47.5 0 0 40.5 

1100 242 4876 1 6 227 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 35.7 52.1 0 0 40.9 

1200 270 5146 8 5 249 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 35.2 48.8 0 0 40.7 

1300 245 5391 2 4 232 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 35 59.2 0 0 41.8 

1400 248 5639 0 3 239 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.9 34.7 52.1 0 0 40 

1500 228 5867 3 3 216 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.9 35.4 50.2 0 0 41.2 

1600 236 6103 1 3 223 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 35.4 56.7 0 0 40 

1700 248 6351 2 2 239 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 35.3 50.5 0 0 40.5 

1800 192 6543 1 2 183 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 34.7 49.5 0 0 41.2 

1900 145 6688 1 1 142 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 36.6 52.6 0 0 42.5 

2000 99 6787 0 3 93 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 37.3 51.4 0 0 43.2 

2100 76 6863 0 0 72 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 36.2 59.1 0 0 41.2 

2200 81 6944 0 2 78 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 36.1 51.4 0 0 39.6 

2300 67 7011 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 37.9 51.4 0 0 43.4 

07-19 2477 7011 29 34 2319 3 86 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 35.4 59.2 0 0 40.9 

06-22 2827 7011 30 39 2652 3 97 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 35.6 59.2 0 0 41.2 

06-00 2975 7011 30 41 2797 3 98 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 35.7 59.2 0 0 41.2 

00-00 3061 7011 30 41 2874 3 107 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 35.8 59.2 0 0 41.4 



Sun 04 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 36 7047 0 0 35 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 38.8 56.5 0 0 43.6 

0100 19 7066 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.6 38.6 46.8 0 0 40.5 

0200 17 7083 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.3 40.1 48.7 0 0 44.5 

0300 10 7093 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.9 44.3 50.6 0 0 - 

0400 12 7105 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 40 45.8 0 0 44.1 

0500 7 7112 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.7 39.8 47.8 0 0 - 

0600 13 7125 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 39.7 50.8 0 0 44.5 

0700 35 7160 0 2 30 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.3 39.4 52.9 0 0 44.3 

0800 49 7209 4 1 41 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 36.6 47.2 0 0 42.3 

0900 101 7310 7 2 88 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 35.5 51.2 0 0 41.8 

1000 164 7474 4 1 151 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 16.5 35.3 47.9 0 0 40.5 

1100 190 7664 1 3 183 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 36.3 58.7 0 0 40.7 

1200 212 7876 5 0 199 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.5 34.9 58.3 0 0 41.2 

1300 220 8096 3 2 214 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 35.1 51.2 0 0 40 

1400 209 8305 2 3 196 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.1 35 54.7 0 0 40.9 

1500 218 8523 0 2 209 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 36.2 49.6 0 0 40.9 

1600 229 8752 2 2 216 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 34.5 47.6 0 0 39.6 

1700 232 8984 3 4 222 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 35.5 52.6 0 0 40.7 

1800 204 9188 0 1 197 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.4 36.2 50.4 0 0 41.4 

1900 154 9342 1 1 145 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 35.4 54.3 0 0 41.4 

2000 115 9457 2 0 108 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 37.6 61.2 1 0.9 44.1 

2100 79 9536 0 0 77 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 35.8 53 0 0 40.5 

2200 48 9584 0 0 45 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 38.7 52.9 0 0 45.2 

2300 21 9605 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 37.3 49.9 0 0 44.5 

07-19 2063 9605 31 23 1946 8 51 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 12.5 35.5 58.7 0 0 40.9 

06-22 2424 9605 35 24 2288 10 62 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 12.5 35.7 61.2 1 0 41.2 

06-00 2493 9605 35 24 2354 10 65 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 12.5 35.7 61.2 1 0 41.2 

00-00 2594 9605 35 24 2451 10 69 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 12.5 35.9 61.2 1 0 41.4 



Mon 05 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 17 9622 0 0 14 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.4 40.5 58.4 0 0 47 

0100 13 9635 0 0 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 38.6 55.3 0 0 41.2 

0200 5 9640 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.9 40.5 45 0 0 - 

0300 2 9642 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41.1 49.2 57.4 0 0 - 

0400 6 9648 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 40.6 45.5 0 0 - 

0500 11 9659 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.8 38.5 47.9 0 0 45.6 

0600 59 9718 0 1 52 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 30.6 40.4 60 1 1.7 46.5 

0700 216 9934 1 1 203 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 37.8 52.7 0 0 42.3 

0800 342 10276 0 3 329 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.8 34.2 51.8 0 0 39.4 

0900 230 10506 1 1 214 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 35.6 54.1 0 0 41.8 

1000 159 10665 1 1 147 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 35.7 47.5 0 0 39.8 

1100 169 10834 1 0 154 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 36.3 50.2 0 0 40.7 

1200 207 11041 4 3 185 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 34.9 55 0 0 40.3 

1300 170 11211 1 1 156 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 36.8 50.7 0 0 41.8 

1400 200 11411 1 1 183 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 36.1 52.1 0 0 41.8 

1500 266 11677 1 1 254 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 17.5 35.5 48.7 0 0 40.7 

1600 303 11980 0 1 290 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 35.5 51.5 0 0 40 

1700 375 12355 2 2 361 3 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13.5 35.2 50 0 0 40.5 

1800 301 12656 4 4 286 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 35.7 52.6 0 0 40.9 

1900 185 12841 2 5 172 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 19.8 36.8 54.8 0 0 40.7 

2000 104 12945 0 0 102 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 38.2 52.7 0 0 42.7 

2100 89 13034 1 1 86 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 36.6 56.7 0 0 40.9 

2200 69 13103 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 37.2 58.6 0 0 42.1 

2300 43 13146 0 0 42 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.9 39 50.3 0 0 44.1 

07-19 2938 13146 17 19 2762 9 127 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 6.8 35.6 55 0 0 40.9 

06-22 3375 13146 20 26 3174 9 140 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 6.8 35.9 60 1 0 41.2 

06-00 3487 13146 20 26 3285 9 141 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 6.8 36 60 1 0 41.2 

00-00 3541 13146 20 26 3328 9 152 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 6.8 36 60 1 0 41.2 



Tue 06 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 16 13162 0 0 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.1 42.8 58.8 0 0 55.7 

0100 5 13167 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.9 43.1 54.6 0 0 - 

0200 8 13175 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.8 36.5 51.2 0 0 - 

0300 1 13176 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42.9 42.9 42.9 0 0 - 

0400 5 13181 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.3 37.8 45.1 0 0 - 

0500 8 13189 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 40.5 56.1 0 0 - 

0600 57 13246 1 0 49 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 39 49.2 0 0 44.5 

0700 262 13508 1 3 240 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 37.4 53.4 0 0 42.7 

0800 365 13873 1 4 343 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 36.4 54.3 0 0 41.2 

0900 221 14094 2 1 199 1 17 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 18.9 36.5 51.9 0 0 41.4 

1000 163 14257 0 0 152 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 35.6 50.5 0 0 40 

1100 191 14448 5 0 173 1 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 34.5 50.2 0 0 40.5 

1200 173 14621 0 1 163 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 36.7 50.3 0 0 42.1 

1300 183 14804 1 2 167 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.4 35.4 50.5 0 0 42.3 

1400 198 15002 0 2 183 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 34.1 53.5 0 0 39.4 

1500 271 15273 1 2 252 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 21 35.4 57.8 0 0 40.5 

1600 298 15571 0 1 281 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 36.6 54.6 0 0 41.4 

1700 379 15950 2 2 363 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 34.7 52.1 0 0 40.5 

1800 340 16290 3 3 328 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 35.7 63 1 0.3 40 

1900 159 16449 3 4 148 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.6 35.8 52 0 0 42.3 

2000 122 16571 0 3 116 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 38 56.8 0 0 43.6 

2100 77 16648 1 1 70 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.5 36.5 52.1 0 0 42.7 

2200 66 16714 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 37.7 56.4 0 0 42.7 

2300 37 16751 0 1 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 38.1 51.5 0 0 47.4 

07-19 3044 16751 16 21 2844 5 153 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 11.7 35.8 63 1 0 41.2 

06-22 3459 16751 21 29 3227 5 171 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 11.7 35.9 63 1 0 41.4 

06-00 3562 16751 21 30 3329 5 171 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 11.7 36 63 1 0 41.4 

00-00 3605 16751 21 31 3366 5 176 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 11.7 36 63 1 0 41.4 



Wed 07 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 7 16758 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.1 46.8 62.2 1 14.3 - 

0100 7 16765 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.2 40.8 47.1 0 0 - 

0200 5 16770 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 45 52.8 0 0 - 

0300 1 16771 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45.3 45.3 45.3 0 0 - 

0400 6 16777 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 41.2 51.7 0 0 - 

0500 13 16790 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 38.3 48.6 0 0 45.9 

0600 60 16850 0 0 54 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 26.6 39.6 55.3 0 0 45.6 

0700 228 17078 3 1 210 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 36.9 49.4 0 0 42.5 

0800 324 17402 0 2 299 2 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 34.8 46.8 0 0 39.4 

0900 215 17617 0 2 197 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.4 36.1 53.1 0 0 41.6 

1000 177 17794 0 0 169 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 23.2 36.4 51.9 0 0 41.2 

1100 165 17959 0 1 147 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 35 53.7 0 0 41.4 

1200 184 18143 1 0 170 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 35.4 51.1 0 0 40.9 

1300 207 18350 0 3 188 0 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 35.8 52.2 0 0 40.7 

1400 233 18583 3 3 213 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 34.5 65 1 0.4 39.4 

1500 256 18839 0 3 244 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 17.7 35.2 48.7 0 0 40.5 

1600 324 19163 1 2 310 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.9 35.2 50.4 0 0 40.7 

1700 365 19528 4 1 342 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 35.6 54.7 0 0 40.3 

1800 330 19858 1 3 318 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13.3 35.5 53.1 0 0 40.3 

1900 251 20109 2 2 236 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 35.9 51.3 0 0 41.6 

2000 115 20224 1 2 109 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 38.4 58 0 0 44.3 

2100 67 20291 0 1 64 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.1 37.6 49.9 0 0 42.5 

2200 76 20367 0 0 73 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 37.6 49.1 0 0 44.5 

2300 37 20404 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 39.5 66.2 1 2.7 43.2 

07-19 3008 20404 13 21 2807 8 151 3 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 8.6 35.5 65 1 0 40.7 

06-22 3501 20404 16 26 3270 10 170 3 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 8.6 35.7 65 1 0 41.2 

06-00 3614 20404 16 26 3380 10 173 3 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 8.6 35.8 66.2 2 0.1 41.4 

00-00 3653 20404 16 28 3409 10 181 3 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 8.6 35.9 66.2 3 0.1 41.4 



Thu 08 July 2010 Southbound 


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60 60 85 

0000 22 20426 0 0 20 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.2 39.5 52.9 0 0 45.6 

0100 11 20437 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.1 38.8 51.3 0 0 42.3 

0200 5 20442 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.7 45.8 53.9 0 0 - 

0300 2 20444 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 41.4 41.7 0 0 - 

0400 4 20448 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.8 40.7 43.4 0 0 - 

0500 12 20460 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.4 37.6 48.8 0 0 39.1 

0600 70 20530 0 0 64 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 40.6 54.7 0 0 47.4 

0700 238 20768 0 2 219 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 37.4 51.5 0 0 42.5 

0800 353 21121 0 2 339 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 16.4 35.8 53.6 0 0 40.7 

0900 226 21347 0 2 207 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 35.6 50.3 0 0 40.5 

1000 162 21509 0 0 146 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 37 51.5 0 0 41.8 

1100 147 21656 0 0 131 1 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 35.6 49.2 0 0 41.2 

1200 216 21872 1 0 199 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 35 51.6 0 0 40.3 

1300 178 22050 1 0 166 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.7 34.3 53.1 0 0 39.6 

1400 223 22273 1 1 197 2 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 35.3 46.3 0 0 39.8 

1500 257 22530 0 1 243 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.7 36.1 53.5 0 0 40.7 

1600 313 22843 0 4 293 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 36.2 50.5 0 0 40.5 

1700 391 23234 2 4 371 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 35.4 52.5 0 0 40.9 

1800 374 23608 2 2 357 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.4 35.6 48.6 0 0 40 

1900 228 23836 1 3 216 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 19.4 37.1 54.3 0 0 42.1 

2000 185 24021 2 2 173 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 36.9 51.6 0 0 42.5 

2100 111 24132 1 0 108 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 36.4 46.7 0 0 42.3 

2200 74 24206 0 0 72 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 35 45.9 0 0 40 

2300 45 24251 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 36.6 54.4 0 0 46.1 

07-19 3078 24251 7 18 2868 12 168 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 13.8 35.8 53.6 0 0 40.7 

06-22 3672 24251 11 23 3429 12 189 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 13.8 36 54.7 0 0 41.2 

06-00 3791 24251 11 23 3546 12 190 3 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 13.8 36 54.7 0 0 41.2 

00-00 3847 24251 11 23 3592 12 200 3 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 13.8 36.1 54.7 0 0 41.2 


85%ile Vehicle Speeds - St Jude's Road 


4kph = 

2.49 mph 

Date Northbound Southbound 

Fri 02 38.9 40.9 

Sat 03 39.1 41.4 

Sun 04 39.1 41.4 

Mon 05 38.9 41.2 

Tues 06 38.9 41.4 

Wed 07 39.1 41.4 

Thurs 08 38.9 41.2 

Average 39.0 41.3 




Bonnet Adjusted SSD (m) 

Manual for Streets 2 Stopping Site Distances Calculation 

Job Code ARTRunnymdede Assessor Name Asa John Plant 

Client Name ART Estates Date 19.10.10 

Site Name 


Traffic Direction Southbound 

Road Name Priest Hill 

Input Site Data 

General Vehicle Speeds (85%ile wet weather) 45.4 mph = 20.30 m/s 

HGV + Bus speeds (85%ile wet weather if above 5% of total flows) 44.6 mph = 19.94 m/s 

Longitudinal gradient (a) 2.575 % 

MfS Parameters 

Driver perception time (t) 

Deceleration (d) 

HGV Driver perception time (t) 

HGV Deceleration (d) 

2 seconds 

3.67875 m/s2 

2 seconds 

3.67875 m/s2 

Calculated Stopping Site Distances 

General Vehicle SSD 

92.9 m 

General Vehicle SSD adjusted for bonnet length (2.4m) 

95.3 m 

HGV + Bus SSD 91.9 m (1.5m bonnet correction) 

200 

Stopping Sight Distances 

180 

160 

140 

120 

100 

80 

General SSD 

HGV / Bus SSD 

Site General SSD 

Site HGV SSD 

60 

40 

20 

0 

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 

Speed (MPH)

Bonnet Adjusted SSD (m) 

Manual for Streets 2 Stopping Site Distances Calculation 

Job Code ARTRunnymdede Assessor Name Asa John Plant 

Client Name ART Estates Date 19.10.10 

Site Name 


Traffic Direction Northbound Road Name Priest Hill 

Input Site Data 

General Vehicle Speeds (85%ile wet weather) 40.9 mph = 18.28 m/s 

HGV + Bus speeds (85%ile wet weather if above 5% of total flows) 39.8 mph = 17.79 m/s 

Longitudinal gradient (a) 0 % 

MfS Parameters 

Driver perception time (t) 

Deceleration (d) 

HGV Driver perception time (t) 

HGV Deceleration (d) 

2 seconds 

3.67875 m/s2 

2 seconds 

3.67875 m/s2 

Calculated Stopping Site Distances 

General Vehicle SSD 

82.0 m 

General Vehicle SSD adjusted for bonnet length (2.4m) 

84.4 m 

HGV + Bus SSD 80.1 m (1.5m bonnet correction) 

200 

Stopping Sight Distances 

180 

160 

140 

120 

100 

80 

General SSD 

HGV / Bus SSD 

Site General SSD 

Site HGV SSD 

60 

40 

20 

0 

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 

Speed (MPH)

APPENDIX B 

Accident Data

APPENDIX C 

TRICS Outputs and National Census Data

TRICS 2010(b)v6.6.2 280910 B14.41 (C) 2010 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Friday 14/01/11 

Extra Care - Cyclists Page 1 

OFF-LINE VERSION Mayer Brown Oriental Road Woking Licence No: 807401 

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS: 

Land Use : 05 - HEALTH 

Category : F - NURSING HOMES 

MULTI-MODAL CYCLISTS 

Selected regions and areas: 

03 SOUTH WEST 

DC DORSET 1 days 

07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE 

WY WEST YORKSHIRE 1 days 

08 NORTH WEST 

GM GREATER MANCHESTER 1 days 

10 WALES 

CF CARDIFF 1 days 

Filtering Stage 2 selection: 

Parameter: Number of residents 

Range: 43 to 180 (units: ) 

Public Transport Provision: 

Selection by: 

Include all surveys 

Date Range: 01/01/02 to 15/06/10 

Selected survey days: 

Tuesday 

Wednesday 

Selected survey types: 

Manual count 

Directional ATC Count 

2 days 

2 days 

4 days 

0 days 

Selected Locations: 

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 4 

Selected Location Sub Categories: 

Residential Zone 3 

Built-Up Zone 1


Extra Care - Cyclists Page 2 


TRIP RATE for Land Use 05 - HEALTH/F - NURSING HOMES 

MULTI-MODAL CYCLISTS 

Calculation factor: 1 RESIDE 

Estimated TRIP rate value per 59 RESIDE shown in shaded columns 

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period 

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS 

No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated 

Time Range Days RESIDE Rate Trip Rate Days RESIDE Rate Trip Rate Days RESIDE Rate Trip Rate 

00:00 - 01:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

01:00 - 02:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

02:00 - 03:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

03:00 - 04:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

04:00 - 05:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

05:00 - 06:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

06:00 - 07:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

07:00 - 08:00 4 82 0.006 0.359 4 82 0.003 0.179 4 82 0.009 0.538 

08:00 - 09:00 4 82 0.003 0.179 4 82 0.003 0.179 4 82 0.006 0.358 

09:00 - 10:00 4 82 0.003 0.179 4 82 0.003 0.179 4 82 0.006 0.358 

10:00 - 11:00 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 

11:00 - 12:00 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.003 0.179 4 82 0.003 0.179 

12:00 - 13:00 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 

13:00 - 14:00 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 

14:00 - 15:00 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 

15:00 - 16:00 4 82 0.009 0.538 4 82 0.009 0.538 4 82 0.018 1.076 

16:00 - 17:00 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 

17:00 - 18:00 4 82 0.012 0.717 4 82 0.009 0.538 4 82 0.021 1.255 

18:00 - 19:00 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.000 0.000 

19:00 - 20:00 3 50 0.000 0.000 3 50 0.000 0.000 3 50 0.000 0.000 

20:00 - 21:00 2 53 0.000 0.000 2 53 0.009 0.557 2 53 0.009 0.557 

21:00 - 22:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

22:00 - 23:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

23:00 - 24:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

Total Rates: 0.033 1.972 0.039 2.349 0.072 4.321 

Parameter summary 

Trip rate parameter range selected: 43 - 180 (units: ) 

Survey date date range: 01/01/02 - 15/06/10 

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 4 

Number of Saturdays: 0 

Number of Sundays: 0 

Surveys manually removed from selection: 2


Extra Care - Pedestrians Page 1 





MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIANS 


03 SOUTH WEST 




08 NORTH WEST 


10 WALES 






Selection by: 


Date Range: 01/01/02 to 15/06/10 


Tuesday 

Wednesday 


Manual count 


2 days 

2 days 

4 days 

0 days 





Built-Up Zone 1


Extra Care - Pedestrians Page 2 



MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIANS 


Estimated TRIP rate value per 59 RESIDE shown in shaded columns 



No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated 

Time Range Days RESIDE Rate Trip Rate Days RESIDE Rate Trip Rate Days RESIDE Rate Trip Rate 

00:00 - 01:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

01:00 - 02:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

02:00 - 03:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

03:00 - 04:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

04:00 - 05:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

05:00 - 06:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

06:00 - 07:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

07:00 - 08:00 4 82 0.061 3.587 4 82 0.006 0.359 4 82 0.067 3.946 

08:00 - 09:00 4 82 0.033 1.973 4 82 0.024 1.435 4 82 0.057 3.408 

09:00 - 10:00 4 82 0.015 0.897 4 82 0.006 0.359 4 82 0.021 1.256 

10:00 - 11:00 4 82 0.009 0.538 4 82 0.006 0.359 4 82 0.015 0.897 

11:00 - 12:00 4 82 0.021 1.255 4 82 0.021 1.255 4 82 0.042 2.510 

12:00 - 13:00 4 82 0.009 0.538 4 82 0.015 0.897 4 82 0.024 1.435 

13:00 - 14:00 4 82 0.043 2.511 4 82 0.030 1.793 4 82 0.073 4.304 

14:00 - 15:00 4 82 0.012 0.717 4 82 0.033 1.973 4 82 0.045 2.690 

15:00 - 16:00 4 82 0.018 1.076 4 82 0.024 1.435 4 82 0.042 2.511 

16:00 - 17:00 4 82 0.006 0.359 4 82 0.027 1.614 4 82 0.033 1.973 

17:00 - 18:00 4 82 0.003 0.179 4 82 0.009 0.538 4 82 0.012 0.717 

18:00 - 19:00 4 82 0.000 0.000 4 82 0.015 0.897 4 82 0.015 0.897 

19:00 - 20:00 3 50 0.027 1.584 3 50 0.054 3.168 3 50 0.081 4.752 

20:00 - 21:00 2 53 0.000 0.000 2 53 0.019 1.113 2 53 0.019 1.113 

21:00 - 22:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

22:00 - 23:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

23:00 - 24:00 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0.000 

Total Rates: 0.257 15.214 0.289 17.195 0.546 32.409 









Extra Care - Public Transport Page 1 





MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT USERS 


03 SOUTH WEST 




08 NORTH WEST 


10 WALES 






Selection by: 


Date Range: 01/01/02 to 15/06/10 


Tuesday 

Wednesday 


Manual count 


2 days 

2 days 

4 days 

0 days 





Built-Up Zone 1


Extra Care - Public Transport Page 2 



MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT USERS 




No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip 

Time Range Days RESIDE Rate Days RESIDE Rate Days RESIDE Rate 

00:00 - 01:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

01:00 - 02:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

02:00 - 03:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

03:00 - 04:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

04:00 - 05:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

05:00 - 06:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

06:00 - 07:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

07:00 - 08:00 

4 82 0.040 4 82 0.012 4 82 0.052 

08:00 - 09:00 

4 82 0.027 4 82 0.015 4 82 0.042 

09:00 - 10:00 

4 82 0.009 4 82 0.000 4 82 0.009 

10:00 - 11:00 

4 82 0.006 4 82 0.003 4 82 0.009 

11:00 - 12:00 

4 82 0.012 4 82 0.000 4 82 0.012 

12:00 - 13:00 

4 82 0.000 4 82 0.009 4 82 0.009 

13:00 - 14:00 

4 82 0.018 4 82 0.021 4 82 0.039 

14:00 - 15:00 

4 82 0.018 4 82 0.040 4 82 0.058 

15:00 - 16:00 

4 82 0.006 4 82 0.024 4 82 0.030 

16:00 - 17:00 

4 82 0.000 4 82 0.009 4 82 0.009 

17:00 - 18:00 

4 82 0.006 4 82 0.000 4 82 0.006 

18:00 - 19:00 

4 82 0.000 4 82 0.015 4 82 0.015 

19:00 - 20:00 

3 50 0.034 3 50 0.020 3 50 0.054 

20:00 - 21:00 

2 53 0.009 2 53 0.019 2 53 0.028 

21:00 - 22:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

22:00 - 23:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

23:00 - 24:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

Total Rates: 0.185 0.187 0.372 








TRICS 2010(b)v6.6.2 280910 B14.41 (C) 2010 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 17/11/10 

Runnymede Campus - Residential AM Page 1 



Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL 

Category : A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED 

MULTI-MODAL TOTAL PEOPLE 


02 SOUTH EAST 

BD BEDFORDSHIRE 2 days 

SC SURREY 1 days 

03 SOUTH WEST 

CW CORNWALL 1 days 

04 EAST ANGLIA 

SF SUFFOLK 1 days 

05 EAST MIDLANDS 

LN LINCOLNSHIRE 1 days 

06 WEST MIDLANDS 

SH SHROPSHIRE 1 days 

WM WEST MIDLANDS 1 days 

WO WORCESTERSHIRE 1 days 


NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 1 days 

08 NORTH WEST 

CH CHESHIRE 1 days 

11 SCOTLAND 

FI FIFE 1 days 

SR STIRLING 1 days 


Parameter: Number of dwellings 



Selection by: 


Date Range: 01/01/02 to 21/06/09 


Monday 

Tuesday 

Wednesday 

Thursday 

Friday 


Manual count 


3 days 

5 days 

1 days 

2 days 

2 days 

13 days 

0 days 





No Sub Category 2


Runnymede Campus - Residential AM Page 2 


RANK ORDER for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED 


Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 08:00-09:00 

WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 

20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 

15th Percentile = No. 11 (**) 


Median Values 

Arrivals: 0.407 

Departures: 0.843 

Totals: 1.250 

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel 

Rank Site-Ref Description Area DWELLS Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 

1 BD-03-A-02 SEMI DETACHED, LUTON BEDFORDSHIRE 82 Tue 06/07/04 0.744 1.317 2.061 

2 SR-03-A-01 DETACHED, STIRLING STIRLING 115 Mon 23/04/07 0.270 1.452 1.722 

3 ** FI-03-A-02 SEMI DETACHED, GLENROTHE FIFE 58 Mon 16/05/05 0.379 1.121 1.500 

4 WO-03-A-03 DETACHED, KIDDERMINSTER WORCESTERSHIRE 138 Fri 05/05/06 0.384 1.058 1.442 

5 NY-03-A-01 MIXED HOUSES,NORTHALLERT NORTH YORKSHIRE 52 Tue 25/09/07 0.269 1.000 1.269 

6 WM-03-A-01 TERRACED, COVENTRY WEST MIDLANDS 79 Fri 03/02/06 0.380 0.886 1.266 

7 SH-03-A-04 TERRACED, SHREWSBURY SHROPSHIRE 108 Thu 11/06/09 0.407 0.843 1.250 

8 LN-03-A-02 MIXED HOUSES, LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE 186 Mon 14/05/07 0.301 0.790 1.091 

9 BD-03-A-01 SEMI DETACHED, LUTON BEDFORDSHIRE 131 Thu 08/07/04 0.206 0.870 1.076 

10 CW-03-A-02 SEMI D./DETATCHED, TRURO CORNWALL 73 Tue 18/09/07 0.178 0.877 1.055 

11 ** SF-03-A-01 SEMI DETACHED, IPSWICH SUFFOLK 77 Wed 23/05/07 0.117 0.805 0.922 

12 SC-03-A-03 DETACHED, EAST MOLESEY SURREY 54 Tue 12/11/02 0.204 0.667 0.871 

13 CH-03-A-06 SEMI-DET./BUNGALOWS,CREW CHESHIRE 129 Tue 14/10/08 0.225 0.457 0.682


Runnymede Campus - Residential Daily Page 1 







02 SOUTH EAST 



03 SOUTH WEST 












08 NORTH WEST 


11 SCOTLAND 







Selection by: 


Date Range: 01/01/02 to 21/06/09 


Monday 

Tuesday 

Wednesday 

Thursday 

Friday 


Manual count 


3 days 

5 days 

1 days 

2 days 

2 days 

13 days 

0 days 





No Sub Category 2


Runnymede Campus - Residential Daily Page 2 


TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED 


Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS 




Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate 

00:00 - 01:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

01:00 - 02:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

02:00 - 03:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

03:00 - 04:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

04:00 - 05:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

05:00 - 06:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

06:00 - 07:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

07:00 - 08:00 

13 99 0.140 13 99 0.433 13 99 0.573 

08:00 - 09:00 

13 99 0.312 13 99 0.921 13 99 1.233 

09:00 - 10:00 

13 99 0.296 13 99 0.402 13 99 0.698 

10:00 - 11:00 

13 99 0.271 13 99 0.332 13 99 0.603 

11:00 - 12:00 

13 99 0.330 13 99 0.308 13 99 0.638 

12:00 - 13:00 

13 99 0.333 13 99 0.320 13 99 0.653 

13:00 - 14:00 

13 99 0.299 13 99 0.314 13 99 0.613 

14:00 - 15:00 

13 99 0.294 13 99 0.344 13 99 0.638 

15:00 - 16:00 

13 99 0.639 13 99 0.417 13 99 1.056 

16:00 - 17:00 

13 99 0.621 13 99 0.367 13 99 0.988 

17:00 - 18:00 13 99 0.645 13 99 0.398 13 99 1.043 

18:00 - 19:00 

13 99 0.502 13 99 0.424 13 99 0.926 

19:00 - 20:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

20:00 - 21:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

21:00 - 22:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

22:00 - 23:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

23:00 - 24:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

Total Rates: 4.682 4.980 9.662 









Runnymdede Campus - Residential PM Page 1 







02 SOUTH EAST 



03 SOUTH WEST 












08 NORTH WEST 


11 SCOTLAND 







Selection by: 


Date Range: 01/01/02 to 21/06/09 


Monday 

Tuesday 

Wednesday 

Thursday 

Friday 


Manual count 


3 days 

5 days 

1 days 

2 days 

2 days 

13 days 

0 days 





No Sub Category 2


Runnymdede Campus - Residential PM Page 2 


RANK ORDER for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED 


Ranking Type: TOTALS Time Range: 17:00-18:00 

WARNING: Using 85th and 15th percentile highlighted trip rates in data sets of under 

20 surveys is not recommended by TRICS and may be misleading. 



Median Values 

Arrivals: 0.759 

Departures: 0.392 

Totals: 1.151 

Trip Rate (Sorted by Totals) Travel 

Rank Site-Ref Description Area DWELLS Day Date Arrivals Departures Totals Plan 

1 LN-03-A-02 MIXED HOUSES, LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE 186 Mon 14/05/07 0.769 0.548 1.317 

2 SR-03-A-01 DETACHED, STIRLING STIRLING 115 Mon 23/04/07 0.791 0.522 1.313 

3 ** SH-03-A-04 TERRACED, SHREWSBURY SHROPSHIRE 108 Thu 11/06/09 0.833 0.426 1.259 

4 FI-03-A-02 SEMI DETACHED, GLENROTHE FIFE 58 Mon 16/05/05 0.897 0.345 1.242 

5 CW-03-A-02 SEMI D./DETATCHED, TRURO CORNWALL 73 Tue 18/09/07 0.822 0.397 1.219 

6 WO-03-A-03 DETACHED, KIDDERMINSTER WORCESTERSHIRE 138 Fri 05/05/06 0.812 0.399 1.211 

7 WM-03-A-01 TERRACED, COVENTRY WEST MIDLANDS 79 Fri 03/02/06 0.759 0.392 1.151 

8 BD-03-A-02 SEMI DETACHED, LUTON BEDFORDSHIRE 82 Tue 06/07/04 0.415 0.476 0.891 

9 SF-03-A-01 SEMI DETACHED, IPSWICH SUFFOLK 77 Wed 23/05/07 0.494 0.377 0.871 

10 BD-03-A-01 SEMI DETACHED, LUTON BEDFORDSHIRE 131 Thu 08/07/04 0.573 0.290 0.863 

11 ** NY-03-A-01 MIXED HOUSES,NORTHALLERT NORTH YORKSHIRE 52 Tue 25/09/07 0.404 0.365 0.769 

12 SC-03-A-03 DETACHED, EAST MOLESEY SURREY 54 Tue 12/11/02 0.519 0.241 0.760 

13 CH-03-A-06 SEMI-DET./BUNGALOWS,CREW CHESHIRE 129 Tue 14/10/08 0.178 0.225 0.403

TRICS 2010(b)v6.6.2 280910 B14.41 (C) 2010 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Thursday 18/11/10 

Runnymede Campus - Extra Care Page 1 







03 SOUTH WEST 




08 NORTH WEST 


10 WALES 






Selection by: 


Date Range: 01/01/02 to 15/06/10 


Tuesday 

Wednesday 


Manual count 


2 days 

2 days 

4 days 

0 days 





Built-Up Zone 1











00:00 - 01:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

01:00 - 02:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

02:00 - 03:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

03:00 - 04:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

04:00 - 05:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

05:00 - 06:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

06:00 - 07:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

07:00 - 08:00 

4 82 0.264 4 82 0.103 4 82 0.367 

08:00 - 09:00 

4 82 0.137 4 82 0.073 4 82 0.210 

09:00 - 10:00 

4 82 0.094 4 82 0.043 4 82 0.137 

10:00 - 11:00 

4 82 0.106 4 82 0.055 4 82 0.161 

11:00 - 12:00 

4 82 0.122 4 82 0.100 4 82 0.222 

12:00 - 13:00 

4 82 0.052 4 82 0.076 4 82 0.128 

13:00 - 14:00 

4 82 0.176 4 82 0.140 4 82 0.316 

14:00 - 15:00 

4 82 0.112 4 82 0.164 4 82 0.276 

15:00 - 16:00 

4 82 0.088 4 82 0.201 4 82 0.289 

16:00 - 17:00 

4 82 0.064 4 82 0.103 4 82 0.167 

17:00 - 18:00 

4 82 0.097 4 82 0.137 4 82 0.234 

18:00 - 19:00 

4 82 0.079 4 82 0.116 4 82 0.195 

19:00 - 20:00 

3 50 0.141 3 50 0.168 3 50 0.309 

20:00 - 21:00 

2 53 0.047 2 53 0.104 2 53 0.151 

21:00 - 22:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

22:00 - 23:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

23:00 - 24:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

Total Rates: 1.579 1.583 3.162 














MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES 


03 SOUTH WEST 




08 NORTH WEST 


10 WALES 






Selection by: 


Date Range: 01/01/02 to 15/06/10 


Tuesday 

Wednesday 


Manual count 


2 days 

2 days 

4 days 

0 days 





Built-Up Zone 1





MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES 






00:00 - 01:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

01:00 - 02:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

02:00 - 03:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

03:00 - 04:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

04:00 - 05:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

05:00 - 06:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

06:00 - 07:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

07:00 - 08:00 

4 82 0.122 4 82 0.088 4 82 0.210 

08:00 - 09:00 

4 82 0.067 4 82 0.027 4 82 0.094 

09:00 - 10:00 

4 82 0.067 4 82 0.030 4 82 0.097 

10:00 - 11:00 

4 82 0.070 4 82 0.043 4 82 0.113 

11:00 - 12:00 

4 82 0.070 4 82 0.067 4 82 0.137 

12:00 - 13:00 

4 82 0.049 4 82 0.046 4 82 0.095 

13:00 - 14:00 

4 82 0.088 4 82 0.076 4 82 0.164 

14:00 - 15:00 

4 82 0.061 4 82 0.079 4 82 0.140 

15:00 - 16:00 

4 82 0.055 4 82 0.109 4 82 0.164 

16:00 - 17:00 

4 82 0.058 4 82 0.055 4 82 0.113 

17:00 - 18:00 

4 82 0.055 4 82 0.091 4 82 0.146 

18:00 - 19:00 

4 82 0.070 4 82 0.067 4 82 0.137 

19:00 - 20:00 

3 50 0.060 3 50 0.074 3 50 0.134 

20:00 - 21:00 

2 53 0.019 2 53 0.047 2 53 0.066 

21:00 - 22:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

22:00 - 23:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

23:00 - 24:00 

0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 

Total Rates: 0.911 0.899 1.810 








Works Underground, 

Bus, 

Motorcycle, 

TW20 0LB 

mainly at or metro, light 

minibus or Taxi or Driving a Passenger in scooter or 

All People from home rail or tram Train coach minicab car or van a car or van moped Bicycle On foot Other 

Travel to Work from TW20 0LB COA 43UGFZ0010 586 107 9 63 15 3 280 18 0 19 66 6 

Source: 

Web: 

MB: 

Origin-Destination statistics: Output Areas 

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/Product.asp?vlnk=13958&Pos=1&ColRank=1&Rank=272 

H:\_GIS\Trip distribution\OD COA.mdb 

TOTAL HOME TUBE RAIL BUS TAXI CARD CARP MOTORCYCLECYCLE WALK OTHER 

Trips FROM [Residence] COA 43UGFZ0010 220 48 3 27 9 0 72 6 0 16 39 0 

% 100.00 21.82 1.36 12.27 4.09 0.00 32.73 2.73 0.00 7.27 17.73 0.00 


Trips FROM [Residence] COA 43UGFY0001 179 36 0 12 3 3 110 6 0 0 6 3 

% 100.00 20.11 0.00 6.70 1.68 1.68 61.45 3.35 0.00 0.00 3.35 1.68 


Trips FROM [Residence] COA 43UGFY0008 187 23 6 24 3 0 98 6 0 3 21 3 

% 100.00 12.30 3.21 12.83 1.60 0.00 52.41 3.21 0.00 1.60 11.23 1.60 


Trips FROM [Residence] COA COMBINED 586 107 9 63 15 3 280 18 0 19 66 6 

100.00 18.26 1.54 10.75 2.56 0.51 47.78 3.07 0.00 3.24 11.26 1.02

Proposed Residential - TRICS Assessment using Census Modal Split Data 

National Census Travel to Work Data from COA 43UGFZ0010 

Mode of Travel Number Percentage 

Other 15 3.1% 

Train 63 13.2% 

Bus, minibus or coach 15 3.1% 

Taxi or minicab 3 0.6% 

Driving a car or van 280 58.5% 

Passenger in a car or van 18 3.8% 

Motorcycle, scooter or moped 0 0.0% 

Bicycle 19 4.0% 

On foot 66 13.8% 

479 100.0% 

TRAVL Total Residential Trips 

Residential Units 

66 Private 

7 Private Mews 

31 Affordable 

104 Total 

Final Mode - Private 

AM 

PM 

Daily 

Arr. Dep. Arr. Dep. Arr. Dep. 

Trip Rate 0.312 0.921 0.645 0.398 4.682 4.980 

Trips 21 61 43 26 309 329 

Residential Trips to Work 

Mode of Travel 

AM 

PM 

Daily 


Other 1 2 1 1 10 10 

Train 3 8 6 3 41 43 

Bus, minibus or coach 1 2 1 1 10 10 

Taxi or minicab 0 0 0 0 2 2 

Driving a car or van 12 36 25 15 181 192 

Passenger in a car or van 1 2 2 1 12 12 

Motorcycle, scooter or moped 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Bicycle 1 2 2 1 12 13 

On foot 3 8 6 4 43 45 

21 61 43 26 309 329 

Final Mode - Private Mews 

AM PM Daily 


Trip Rate 0.312 0.921 0.645 0.398 4.682 4.980 

Trips 2 6 5 3 33 35 



AM PM Daily 


Other 0 0 0 0 1 1 

Train 0 1 1 0 4 5 






Bicycle 0 0 0 0 1 1 

On foot 0 1 1 0 5 5 

2 6 5 3 33 35

Final Mode - Affordable 

AM PM Daily 


Trip Rate 0.312 0.921 0.645 0.398 4.682 4.980 

Trips 10 29 20 12 145 154 



AM 

PM 

Daily 


Other 0 1 1 0 5 5 

Train 1 4 3 2 19 20 






Bicycle 0 1 1 0 6 6 

On foot 1 4 3 2 20 21 

10 29 20 12 145 154 

Private + Mews + Affordable Residential Trips to Work 


AM PM Daily 


Other 1 3 2 1 15 16 

Train 4 13 9 5 64 68 






Bicycle 1 4 3 2 19 21 

On foot 4 13 9 6 67 71 

32 96 67 41 487 518 

Note: Residential TRICS sites selected on the following criteria 

Residential - Houses Privately Owned 

Regions - All except Greater London and Ireland 

Weekdays - Monday to Friday 

Dwellings - 50 to 200 

Location - Suburban Area 


Time Range 


Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate 

00:00-01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

01:00-02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

02:00-03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

03:00-04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

04:00-05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

05:00-06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

06:00-07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

07:00-08:00 13 99 0.14 13 99 0.433 13 99 0.573 

08:00-09:00 13 99 0.312 13 99 0.921 13 99 1.233 

09:00-10:00 13 99 0.296 13 99 0.402 13 99 0.698 

10:00-11:00 13 99 0.271 13 99 0.332 13 99 0.603 

11:00-12:00 13 99 0.33 13 99 0.308 13 99 0.638 

12:00-13:00 13 99 0.333 13 99 0.32 13 99 0.653 

13:00-14:00 13 99 0.299 13 99 0.314 13 99 0.613 

14:00-15:00 13 99 0.294 13 99 0.344 13 99 0.638 

15:00-16:00 13 99 0.639 13 99 0.417 13 99 1.056 

16:00-17:00 13 99 0.621 13 99 0.367 13 99 0.988 

17:00-18:00 13 99 0.645 13 99 0.398 13 99 1.043 

18:00-19:00 13 99 0.502 13 99 0.424 13 99 0.926 

19:00-20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

20:00-21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

21:00-22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

22:00-23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

23:00-24:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 4.682 4.980 9.662

Proposed Student Accommodation 

Kingswood Campus 430 Bedrooms 

Proposed Student 

528 Bedrooms 

Proposed / Kingswood 1.23 

KINGSWOOD CAMPUS 

Time Range 

Vehicles 

Pedestrians Cyclists Bus 

Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures 

07:00-08:00 3 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 

08:00-09:00 9 12 2 75 0 1 0 41 

09:00-10:00 10 6 8 78 1 0 1 50 

10:00-11:00 15 15 9 39 0 0 1 25 

11:00-12:00 8 19 9 30 0 0 21 12 

12:00-13:00 12 17 0 60 0 1 7 38 

13:00-14:00 13 11 13 18 1 0 24 16 

14:00-15:00 19 17 8 13 1 2 36 10 

15:00-16:00 14 13 12 5 1 0 34 16 

16:00-17:00 12 25 31 30 1 1 42 12 

17:00-18:00 18 14 17 20 1 0 38 0 

18:00-19:00 23 28 25 30 2 0 15 23 

Total 156 179 135 403 8 5 219 243 1348 

24.9% 39.9% 1.0% 34.3% 1 

PROPOSED STUDENT CAMPUS 

Time Range 

Vehicles Pedestrians Cyclists Bus 

Total 

Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures 

07:00-08:00 4 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 5 9 

08:00-09:00 11 15 2 92 0 1 0 50 14 158 

09:00-10:00 12 7 10 96 1 0 1 61 25 165 

10:00-11:00 18 18 11 48 0 0 1 31 31 97 

11:00-12:00 10 23 11 37 0 0 26 15 47 75 

12:00-13:00 15 21 0 74 0 1 9 47 23 142 

13:00-14:00 16 14 16 22 1 0 29 20 63 55 

14:00-15:00 23 21 10 16 1 2 44 12 79 52 

15:00-16:00 17 16 15 6 1 0 42 20 75 42 

16:00-17:00 15 31 38 37 1 1 52 15 106 83 

17:00-18:00 22 17 21 25 1 0 47 0 91 42 

18:00-19:00 28 34 31 37 2 0 18 28 80 99 

Total 192 220 166 495 10 6 269 298 636 1019

Extra Care - Health Nursing Homes 

VEHICLES 

Extra Care Provision Units Residents 

1 bed 16 16 

2 bed 38 76 

3 bed 5 15 

Total 59 107 


Time Range 


Trips Trips 


Trips 

00:00-01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

01:00-02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

02:00-03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

03:00-04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

04:00-05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

05:00-06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

06:00-07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

07:00-08:00 4 82 0.122 7 4 82 0.088 5 4 82 0.21 12 

08:00-09:00 4 82 0.067 4 4 82 0.027 2 4 82 0.094 6 

09:00-10:00 4 82 0.067 4 4 82 0.03 2 4 82 0.097 6 

10:00-11:00 4 82 0.07 4 4 82 0.043 3 4 82 0.113 7 

11:00-12:00 4 82 0.07 4 4 82 0.067 4 4 82 0.137 8 

12:00-13:00 4 82 0.049 3 4 82 0.046 3 4 82 0.095 6 

13:00-14:00 4 82 0.088 5 4 82 0.076 4 4 82 0.164 10 

14:00-15:00 4 82 0.061 4 4 82 0.079 5 4 82 0.14 8 

15:00-16:00 4 82 0.055 3 4 82 0.109 6 4 82 0.164 10 

16:00-17:00 4 82 0.058 3 4 82 0.055 3 4 82 0.113 7 

17:00-18:00 4 82 0.055 3 4 82 0.091 5 4 82 0.146 9 

18:00-19:00 4 82 0.07 4 4 82 0.067 4 4 82 0.137 8 

19:00-20:00 3 50 0.06 4 3 50 0.074 4 3 50 0.134 8 

20:00-21:00 2 53 0.019 1 2 53 0.047 3 2 53 0.066 4 

21:00-22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

22:00-23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

23:00-24:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 0.911 54 0.899 53 1.81 107

TOTAL PEOPLE 


Time Range 


Trips Trips 


Trips 

00:00-01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

01:00-02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

02:00-03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

03:00-04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

04:00-05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

05:00-06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

06:00-07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

07:00-08:00 4 82 0.264 16 4 82 0.103 6 4 82 0.367 22 

08:00-09:00 4 82 0.137 8 4 82 0.073 4 4 82 0.21 12 

09:00-10:00 4 82 0.094 6 4 82 0.043 3 4 82 0.137 8 

10:00-11:00 4 82 0.106 6 4 82 0.055 3 4 82 0.161 9 

11:00-12:00 4 82 0.122 7 4 82 0.1 6 4 82 0.222 13 

12:00-13:00 4 82 0.052 3 4 82 0.076 4 4 82 0.128 8 

13:00-14:00 4 82 0.176 10 4 82 0.14 8 4 82 0.316 19 

14:00-15:00 4 82 0.112 7 4 82 0.164 10 4 82 0.276 16 

15:00-16:00 4 82 0.088 5 4 82 0.201 12 4 82 0.289 17 

16:00-17:00 4 82 0.064 4 4 82 0.103 6 4 82 0.167 10 

17:00-18:00 4 82 0.097 6 4 82 0.137 8 4 82 0.234 14 

18:00-19:00 4 82 0.079 5 4 82 0.116 7 4 82 0.195 12 

19:00-20:00 3 50 0.141 8 3 50 0.168 10 3 50 0.309 18 

20:00-21:00 2 53 0.047 3 2 53 0.104 6 2 53 0.151 9 

21:00-22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

22:00-23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

23:00-24:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total 1.579 93 1.583 93 3.162 187

Cumulative Development Impact - Vehicle Trips 


AM PM Daily 


Residential - Private 12 36 25 15 181 192 

Residential - Mews 1 4 3 2 19 20 

Residential - Affordable 6 17 12 7 85 90 

Student Accommodation 11 15 22 17 192 220 

Extra Care 4 2 3 5 54 53 

Total 34 72 65 47 530 576

APPENDIX D 

PICADY Outputs

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

TRL TRL VIEWER 3.1 AD H:\.. \PICADY\Priest Hill-Coopers Hill Lane FINAL 10-12-16.vpo - Page 1 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

TRL LIMITED 

(C) COPYRIGHT 2006 

CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS 

PICADY 5.0 ANALYSIS PROGRAM 

RELEASE 3.0 (JUNE 2006) 

ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT 

BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO 

-------------------------------------------------------- 

FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, 

PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT: 

TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU 

TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864 

EMAIL: SoftwareBureau@trl.co.uk 

-------------------------------------------------------- 

THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS 

IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION 

Run with file:- 

"H:\_Planning 2\Current Jobs\ARTRunnymedeCampus\Modelling and TRICS\PICADY\ 

Priest Hill-Coopers Hill Lane FINAL 10-12-16.vpi" 

drive-on-the-left ) at 12:15:54 on Thursday, 16 December 2010 

RUN INFORMATION 

*************** 

RUN TITLE: Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 16/12/10 

CLIENT: Orchid Runnymede 

ENUMERATOR: aplant [APLANT] 

JOB NUMBER: 

STATUS: 

DESCRIPTION: 

.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY 

*************************************** 

INPUT DATA 

---------- 

ARM A IS Priest Hill (N) 

ARM B IS Coopers Hill Lane 

ARM C IS Priest Hill (S) 

MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) --------------------- MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

MINOR ROAD (ARM B) 

STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION 

--------------------------- 

STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B 

STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C 

ETC.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

GEOMETRIC DATA 

-------------- 

---------------------------------------------------------------- 

I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I 

---------------------------------------------------------------- 

I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 7.20 M. I 

I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I 

I I I 

I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.20 M. I 

I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 80.0 M. I 

I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I YES I 

I I I 

I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 26.0 M. I 

I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 18.0 M. I 

I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) - I 

I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) - I 

I - WIDTH AT 0 M FROM JUNC. I 9.00 M. I 





I - LENGTH OF FLARED SECTION I DERIVED: 1 PCU I 

---------------------------------------------------------------- 

.SLOPES AND INTERCEPT 

-------------------- 

(NB:Streams may be combined, in which case capacity 

will be adjusted ) 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I 

I Stream B-C Stream A-C Stream A-B I 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

I 584.39 0.21 0.08 I 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI 

I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-B Stream C-A Stream C-B I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 455.23 0.20 0.08 0.12 0.28 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

--------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream C-B Stream A-C Stream A-B I 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

I 620.29 0.23 0.23 I 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

NB These values do not allow for any site specific corrections 

TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA 

------------------- 

----------------------- 

I ARM I FLOW SCALE(%) I 

----------------------- 

I A I 100 I 

I B I 100 I 

I C I 100 I 

----------------------- 

Demand set: Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction - Base 

TIME PERIOD BEGINS 08.00 AND ENDS 09.00 

LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 60 

LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 

MINUTES. 

MINUTES. 

DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE INPUT DIRECTLY.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I 

I I TURNING COUNTS I 

I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I 

I -------------------------------------- 

I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.059 I 0.941 I 

I I I 0.0 I 8.0 I 127.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 12.0)I ( 3.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 7.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 11.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 173.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 2.8)I ( 50.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction - Base 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.043 I 0.957 I 

I I I 0.0 I 5.0 I 112.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 12.0)I ( 3.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 0.800 I 0.000 I 0.200 I 

I I I 4.0 I 0.0 I 1.0 I 

I I I ( 11.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 141.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 2.8)I ( 50.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 


I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.054 I 0.946 I 

I I I 0.0 I 6.0 I 105.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 12.0)I ( 3.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 3.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 11.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 0.991 I 0.009 I 0.000 I 

I I I 110.0 I 1.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 2.8)I ( 50.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 


----------------------------------------------------------- 




I -------------------------------------- 


----------------------------------------------------------- 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.067 I 0.933 I 

I I I 0.0 I 6.0 I 83.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 12.0)I ( 3.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 3.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 11.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 0.990 I 0.010 I 0.000 I 

I I I 103.0 I 1.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 2.8)I ( 50.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA 

THE TURNING PROPORTIONS USED VARY BETWEEN TIME SEGMENTS 

THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS 

QUEUE AND DELAY INFORMATION FOR EACH 15 MIN TIME SEGMENT 

-------------------------------------------------------- 

FOR DEMAND SET Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction - Base 

AND FOR TIME PERIOD 1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I 

I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I 

I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I 

I 08.00-08.15 

I 

I B-C 0.00 7.34 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I B-A 0.47 4.64 0.101 0.00 0.11 1.6 0.24 I 

I C-AB 0.00 7.47 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I A-B 0.53 I 

I A-C 8.47 I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.15-08.30 

I 

I B-C 0.07 8.43 0.008 0.00 0.01 0.1 0.12 I 

I B-A 0.26 5.17 0.051 0.11 0.05 0.9 0.20 I 

I C-AB 0.00 7.73 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I A-B 0.33 I 

I A-C 7.47 I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.30-08.45 

I 

I B-C 0.00 8.56 0.000 0.01 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I B-A 0.20 5.52 0.036 0.05 0.04 0.6 0.19 I 

I C-AB 0.07 5.73 0.012 0.00 0.01 0.2 0.18 I 

I A-B 0.40 I 

I A-C 7.00 I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.45-09.00 

I 

I B-C 0.00 8.91 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I B-A 0.20 5.90 0.034 0.04 0.04 0.5 0.18 I 

I C-AB 0.07 5.96 0.011 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.17 I 

I A-B 0.40 I 

I A-C 5.53 I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

QUEUE FOR STREAM B-C 

------------------------- 

TIME SEGMENT NO. OF 

ENDING VEHICLES 

IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 

QUEUE FOR STREAM B-A 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.1 

08.30 0.1 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

QUEUE FOR STREAM C-AB 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 

QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD 

-------------------------------------------- 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I 

I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I 

I I----------------------------------------------------------------I 

I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I B-C I 1.0 I 1.0 I 0.1 I 0.12 I 0.1 I 0.12 I 

I B-A I 17.0 I 17.0 I 3.6 I 0.21 I 3.6 I 0.21 I 

I C-AB I 2.0 I 2.0 I 0.3 I 0.17 I 0.3 I 0.17 I 

I A-B I 25.0 I 25.0 I I I I I 

I A-C I 427.0 I 427.0 I I I I I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I ALL I 998.9 I 998.9 I 4.0 I 0.00 I 4.0 I 0.00 I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD . 

* INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD. 

* THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD. 

END OF JOB 

.SLOPES AND INTERCEPT 

-------------------- 



--------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream B-C Stream A-C Stream A-B I 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

I 584.39 0.21 0.08 I 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-B Stream C-A Stream C-B I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 455.23 0.20 0.08 0.12 0.28 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

--------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream C-B Stream A-C Stream A-B I 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

I 620.29 0.23 0.23 I 

--------------------------------------------------------- 

NB These values do not allow for any site specific corrections 


-------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

----------------------- 


----------------------- 

I A I 100 I 

I B I 100 I 

I C I 100 I 

----------------------- 

Demand set: Copy of Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction - Total 




MINUTES. 

MINUTES. 

DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE INPUT DIRECTLY. 

----------------------------------------------------------- 




I -------------------------------------- 


----------------------------------------------------------- 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.059 I 0.941 I 

I I I 0.0 I 8.0 I 127.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 12.0)I ( 3.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 12.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 11.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 173.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 2.8)I ( 50.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

Copy of Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction - Total 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.043 I 0.957 I 

I I I 0.0 I 5.0 I 112.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 12.0)I ( 3.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 0.900 I 0.000 I 0.100 I 

I I I 9.0 I 0.0 I 1.0 I 

I I I ( 11.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 141.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 2.8)I ( 50.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

Copy of Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction - Total 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.054 I 0.946 I 

I I I 0.0 I 6.0 I 105.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 12.0)I ( 3.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 8.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 11.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 0.991 I 0.009 I 0.000 I 

I I I 110.0 I 1.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 2.8)I ( 50.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

Copy of Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction - Total

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

----------------------------------------------------------- 




I -------------------------------------- 


----------------------------------------------------------- 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.067 I 0.933 I 

I I I 0.0 I 6.0 I 83.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 12.0)I ( 3.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 1.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 

I I I 8.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 11.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 0.990 I 0.010 I 0.000 I 

I I I 103.0 I 1.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 2.8)I ( 50.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I 

----------------------------------------------------------- 


THE TURNING PROPORTIONS USED VARY BETWEEN TIME SEGMENTS 



-------------------------------------------------------- 

FOR DEMAND SET Copy of Runnymede Campus - Priest Hill / Coopers Hill Lane Junction - Total 

AND FOR TIME PERIOD 1 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.00-08.15 

I 

I B-C 0.00 7.17 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I B-A 0.77 4.59 0.168 0.00 0.20 2.8 0.26 I 

I C-AB 0.00 7.42 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I A-B 0.55 I 

I A-C 8.67 I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.15-08.30 

I 

I B-C 0.06 8.24 0.008 0.00 0.01 0.1 0.12 I 

I B-A 0.57 5.12 0.111 0.20 0.13 2.0 0.22 I 

I C-AB 0.00 7.68 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I A-B 0.34 I 

I A-C 7.68 I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.30-08.45 

I 

I B-C 0.00 8.39 0.000 0.01 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I B-A 0.50 5.47 0.091 0.13 0.10 1.6 0.20 I 

I C-AB 0.07 5.69 0.012 0.00 0.01 0.2 0.18 I 

I A-B 0.41 I 

I A-C 7.21 I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.45-09.00 

I 

I B-C 0.00 8.74 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 I 

I B-A 0.50 5.86 0.085 0.10 0.09 1.4 0.19 I 

I C-AB 0.07 5.92 0.011 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.17 I 

I A-B 0.41 I 

I A-C 5.74 I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

QUEUE FOR STREAM B-C 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 


------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.2 

08.30 0.1 

08.45 0.1 

09.00 0.1 

QUEUE FOR STREAM C-AB 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 


-------------------------------------------- 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



I I----------------------------------------------------------------I 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I B-C I 0.9 I 0.9 I 0.1 I 0.12 I 0.1 I 0.12 I 

I B-A I 35.1 I 35.1 I 7.8 I 0.22 I 7.8 I 0.22 I 

I C-AB I 2.0 I 2.0 I 0.3 I 0.17 I 0.3 I 0.17 I 

I A-B I 25.7 I 25.7 I I I I I 

I A-C I 439.4 I 439.4 I I I I I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I ALL I 1030.1 I 1030.1 I 8.2 I 0.01 I 8.2 I 0.01 I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 




END OF JOB 

============================================ end of file =============================================== 

[Printed at 13:36:03 on 16/12/2010]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

TRL TRL VIEWER 3.1 AD H:\.. \PICADY\St Judes Road-Coopers Hill Lane FINAL 10-12-16.vpo - Page 1 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

TRL LIMITED 

(C) COPYRIGHT 2006 

CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS 

PICADY 5.0 ANALYSIS PROGRAM 

RELEASE 3.0 (JUNE 2006) 

ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT 

BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO 

-------------------------------------------------------- 

FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, 

PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT: 

TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU 

TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864 

EMAIL: SoftwareBureau@trl.co.uk 

-------------------------------------------------------- 

THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS 

IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION 

Run with file:- 

"H:\_Planning 2\Current Jobs\ARTRunnymedeCampus\Modelling and TRICS\PICADY\ 

St Judes Road-Coopers Hill Lane FINAL 10-12-16.vpi" 

drive-on-the-left ) at 13:43:21 on Thursday, 16 December 2010 

RUN INFORMATION 

*************** 

RUN TITLE: St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road 

LOCATION: 

DATE: 16/12/10 

CLIENT: Orchid Rummymede 

ENUMERATOR: aplant [APLANT] 

JOB NUMBER: 

STATUS: 

DESCRIPTION: 

.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY 

*************************************** 

INPUT DATA 

---------- 

ARM A IS St Judes Road (N) 

ARM B IS Coopers Hill Lane 

ARM C IS St Judes Road (S) 

ARM D IS Bishopsgate Road 

MINOR ROAD (ARM D) 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) --------------------- MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

MINOR ROAD (ARM B) 

STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION 

--------------------------- 

STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B 

STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C 

ETC.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

GEOMETRIC DATA 

-------------- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I MINOR ROAD D I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 6.50 M. I ( W ) 6.50 M. I 

I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I 

I I I I 

I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.20 M. I (WA-D) 2.20 M. I 

I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 100.0 M. I (VA-D) 65.0 M. I 

I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I YES I YES I 

I I I I 

I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 32.0 M. I (VD-A) 30.0 M. I 

I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 43.0 M. I (VD-C) 60.0 M. I 

I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) - I (WD-A) - I 

I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) - I (WD-C) - I 

I - WIDTH AT 0 M FROM JUNC. I 9.00 M. I 8.20 M. I 





I - LENGTH OF FLARED SECTION I DERIVED: 0 PCU I DERIVED: 1 PCU I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

.SLOPES AND INTERCPET 

-------------------- 



B-A Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-D Stream A-B Stream C-A I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 468.33 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.13 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI 

I Stream D-A Stream C-B Stream D-B I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 0.13 0.30 0.30 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

D-C Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream D-C Stream C-A Stream C-B Stream C-D Stream A-C I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 475.41 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.13 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream B-C Stream A-D Stream B-D I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 0.13 0.31 0.31 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

CD-B Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream CD-B Stream A-B Stream A-C Stream A-D I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 611.61 0.24 0.24 0.21 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

AB-D Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream AB-D Stream C-D Stream C-A Stream C-B I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 611.61 0.23 0.23 0.21 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

B-CD Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I Stream B-CD Stream A-C Stream A-D Stream A-B I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 598.86 0.23 0.23 0.09 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

D-AB Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream D-AB Stream C-A Stream C-B Stream C-D I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 608.71 0.23 0.23 0.09 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------- 

----------------------- 


----------------------- 

I A I 100 I 

I B I 100 I 

I C I 100 I 

I D I 100 I 

----------------------- 

Demand set: St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road - Base 




MINUTES. 

MINUTES. 


-------------------------------------------------------------------- 




I ----------------------------------------------- 

I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I ARM D I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.002 I 0.995 I 0.002 I 

I I I 0.0 I 1.0 I 428.0 I 1.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I (100.0)I ( 4.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 0.025 I 0.000 I 0.975 I 0.000 I 

I I I 1.0 I 0.0 I 39.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 8.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 0.726 I 0.063 I 0.000 I 0.211 I 

I I I 498.0 I 43.0 I 0.0 I 145.0 I 

I I I ( 3.0)I ( 16.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 4.0)I 

I I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM D I 0.000 I 0.045 I 0.955 I 0.000 I 

I I I 0.0 I 4.0 I 85.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 8.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 




-------------------------------------------------------- 

FOR DEMAND SET St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road - Base 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.00-08.15 

I 

I B-CD 0.65 9.68 0.067 0.00 0.07 1.0 0.11 I 

I B-A 0.02 7.15 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.14 I 

I A-B 0.00 I 

I A-C 1.90 I 

I A-D 0.00 I 

I AB-CD ( 0.01) 9.31 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.0 I 

I AB-C ( 2.55) I 

I D-AB 0.07 6.79 0.010 0.00 0.01 0.1 0.15 I 

I D-C 1.42 5.77 0.245 0.00 0.32 4.5 0.23 I 

I C-D 2.42 I 

I C-A 8.30 I 

I C-B 0.72 I 

I CD-AB ( 1.76) 14.46 0.122 0.00 0.28 4.1 I 

I CD-A ( 7.32) I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.15-08.30 

I 

I B-CD 0.65 9.68 0.067 0.07 0.07 1.1 0.11 I 

I B-A 0.02 7.15 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.14 I 

I A-B 0.00 I 

I A-C 1.90 I 

I A-D 0.00 I 

I AB-CD ( 0.01) 9.31 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.0 I 

I AB-C ( 2.55) I 

I D-AB 0.07 6.78 0.010 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.15 I 

I D-C 1.42 5.77 0.246 0.32 0.32 4.8 0.23 I 

I C-D 2.42 I 

I C-A 8.30 I 

I C-B 0.72 I 

I CD-AB ( 1.76) 14.46 0.122 0.28 0.28 4.3 I 

I CD-A ( 7.32) I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.30-08.45 

I 

I B-CD 0.65 9.68 0.067 0.07 0.07 1.1 0.11 I 

I B-A 0.02 7.15 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.14 I 

I A-B 0.00 I 

I A-C 1.90 I 

I A-D 0.00 I 

I AB-CD ( 0.01) 9.31 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.0 I 

I AB-C ( 2.55) I 

I D-AB 0.07 6.78 0.010 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.15 I 

I D-C 1.42 5.77 0.246 0.32 0.32 4.8 0.23 I 

I C-D 2.42 I 

I C-A 8.30 I 

I C-B 0.72 I 

I CD-AB ( 1.76) 14.46 0.122 0.28 0.28 4.3 I 

I CD-A ( 7.32) I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.45-09.00 

I 

I B-CD 0.65 9.68 0.067 0.07 0.07 1.1 0.11 I 

I B-A 0.02 7.15 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.14 I 

I A-B 0.00 I 

I A-C 1.90 I 

I A-D 0.00 I 

I AB-CD ( 0.01) 9.31 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.0 I 

I AB-C ( 2.55) I 

I D-AB 0.07 6.78 0.010 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.15 I 

I D-C 1.42 5.77 0.246 0.32 0.32 4.9 0.23 I 

I C-D 2.42 I 

I C-A 8.30 I 

I C-B 0.72 I 

I CD-AB ( 1.76) 14.46 0.122 0.28 0.28 4.3 I 

I CD-A ( 7.32) I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

*WARNING* NO MARGINAL ANALYSIS OF CAPACITIES AS MAJOR ROAD BLOCKING MAY OCCUR 

QUEUE FOR STREAM B-CD 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.1 

08.30 0.1 

08.45 0.1 

09.00 0.1 


------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 

QUEUE FOR STREAM AB-CD 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 

QUEUE FOR STREAM D-AB 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 

QUEUE FOR STREAM D-C 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.3 

08.30 0.3 

08.45 0.3 

09.00 0.3

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

QUEUE FOR STREAM CD-AB 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.3 

08.30 0.3 

08.45 0.3 

09.00 0.3

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


-------------------------------------------- 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



I I----------------------------------------------------------------I 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I B-CD I 39.0 I 39.0 I 4.3 I 0.11 I 4.3 I 0.11 I 

I B-A I 1.0 I 1.0 I 0.1 I 0.14 I 0.1 I 0.14 I 

I A-B I 0.3 I 0.3 I I I I I 

I A-C I 114.1 I 114.1 I I I I I 

I A-D I 0.3 I 0.3 I I I I I 

I AB-CD I( 0.4)I( 0.4)I 0.0 I 0.11 I 0.0 I 0.11 I 

I AB-C I( 153.0)I( 153.0)I I I I I 

I D-AB I 4.0 I 4.0 I 0.6 I 0.15 I 0.6 I 0.15 I 

I D-C I 85.0 I 85.0 I 19.0 I 0.22 I 19.0 I 0.22 I 

I C-D I 145.0 I 145.0 I I I I I 

I C-A I 498.0 I 498.0 I I I I I 

I C-B I 43.0 I 43.0 I I I I I 

I CD-AB I( 105.9)I( 105.9)I 17.0 I 0.16 I 17.0 I 0.16 I 

I CD-A I( 439.1)I( 439.1)I I I I I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I ALL I 929.7 I 929.7 I 41.0 I 0.04 I 41.0 I 0.04 I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 




END OF JOB 

.SLOPES AND INTERCPET 

-------------------- 



B-A Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-D Stream A-B Stream C-A I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 468.33 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.13 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream D-A Stream C-B Stream D-B I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 0.13 0.30 0.30 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

D-C Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream D-C Stream C-A Stream C-B Stream C-D Stream A-C I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 475.41 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.13 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream B-C Stream A-D Stream B-D I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 0.13 0.31 0.31 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

CD-B Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream CD-B Stream A-B Stream A-C Stream A-D I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 611.61 0.24 0.24 0.21 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

AB-D Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I Stream AB-D Stream C-D Stream C-A Stream C-B I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 611.61 0.23 0.23 0.21 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

B-CD Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream B-CD Stream A-C Stream A-D Stream A-B I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 598.86 0.23 0.23 0.09 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

D-AB Stream 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


I Stream D-AB Stream C-A Stream C-B Stream C-D I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 608.71 0.23 0.23 0.09 I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------- 

----------------------- 


----------------------- 

I A I 100 I 

I B I 100 I 

I C I 100 I 

I D I 100 I 

----------------------- 

Demand set: St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road - Total 




MINUTES. 

MINUTES. 


-------------------------------------------------------------------- 




I ----------------------------------------------- 

I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I ARM D I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I 08.00 - 09.00 I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.002 I 0.995 I 0.002 I 

I I I 0.0 I 1.0 I 428.0 I 1.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I (100.0)I ( 4.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM B I 0.011 I 0.000 I 0.989 I 0.000 I 

I I I 1.0 I 0.0 I 93.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 8.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM C I 0.704 I 0.091 I 0.000 I 0.205 I 

I I I 498.0 I 64.0 I 0.0 I 145.0 I 

I I I ( 3.0)I ( 16.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 4.0)I 

I I I I I I I 

I 

I ARM D I 0.000 I 0.045 I 0.955 I 0.000 I 

I I I 0.0 I 4.0 I 85.0 I 0.0 I 

I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 8.0)I ( 0.0)I 

I I I I I I I 

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 




-------------------------------------------------------- 

FOR DEMAND SET St Judes Road / Coopers Hill Lane / Bishopsgate Road - Total 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.00-08.15 

I 

I B-CD 1.55 9.68 0.160 0.00 0.19 2.7 0.12 I 

I B-A 0.02 7.01 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.14 I 

I A-B 0.00 I 

I A-C 1.90 I 

I A-D 0.00 I 

I AB-CD ( 0.01) 9.86 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.0 I 

I AB-C ( 3.44) I 

I D-AB 0.07 6.68 0.010 0.00 0.01 0.1 0.15 I 

I D-C 1.42 5.54 0.256 0.00 0.34 4.7 0.24 I 

I C-D 2.42 I 

I C-A 8.30 I 

I C-B 1.07 I 

I CD-AB ( 2.61) 14.52 0.180 0.00 0.41 6.0 I 

I CD-A ( 6.82) I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.15-08.30 

I 

I B-CD 1.55 9.68 0.160 0.19 0.19 2.8 0.12 I 

I B-A 0.02 7.00 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.14 I 

I A-B 0.00 I 

I A-C 1.90 I 

I A-D 0.00 I 

I AB-CD ( 0.01) 9.87 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.0 I 

I AB-C ( 3.45) I 

I D-AB 0.07 6.66 0.010 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.15 I 

I D-C 1.42 5.53 0.256 0.34 0.34 5.1 0.24 I 

I C-D 2.42 I 

I C-A 8.30 I 

I C-B 1.07 I 

I CD-AB ( 2.62) 14.52 0.180 0.41 0.41 6.2 I 

I CD-A ( 6.82) I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.30-08.45 

I 

I B-CD 1.55 9.68 0.160 0.19 0.19 2.8 0.12 I 

I B-A 0.02 7.00 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.14 I 

I A-B 0.00 I 

I A-C 1.90 I 

I A-D 0.00 I 

I AB-CD ( 0.01) 9.87 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.0 I 

I AB-C ( 3.45) I 

I D-AB 0.07 6.66 0.010 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.15 I 

I D-C 1.42 5.53 0.256 0.34 0.34 5.1 0.24 I 

I C-D 2.42 I 

I C-A 8.30 I 

I C-B 1.07 I 

I CD-AB ( 2.62) 14.52 0.180 0.41 0.41 6.2 I 

I CD-A ( 6.82) I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




I 08.45-09.00 

I 

I B-CD 1.55 9.68 0.160 0.19 0.19 2.9 0.12 I 

I B-A 0.02 7.00 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.14 I 

I A-B 0.00 I 

I A-C 1.90 I 

I A-D 0.00 I 

I AB-CD ( 0.01) 9.87 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.0 I 

I AB-C ( 3.45) I 

I D-AB 0.07 6.66 0.010 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.15 I 

I D-C 1.42 5.53 0.256 0.34 0.34 5.1 0.24 I 

I C-D 2.42 I 

I C-A 8.30 I 

I C-B 1.07 I 

I CD-AB ( 2.62) 14.52 0.180 0.41 0.41 6.3 I 

I CD-A ( 6.82) I 

I 

I 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

*WARNING* NO MARGINAL ANALYSIS OF CAPACITIES AS MAJOR ROAD BLOCKING MAY OCCUR 

QUEUE FOR STREAM B-CD 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.2 

08.30 0.2 

08.45 0.2 

09.00 0.2 


------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 

QUEUE FOR STREAM AB-CD 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 

QUEUE FOR STREAM D-AB 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.0 

08.30 0.0 

08.45 0.0 

09.00 0.0 

QUEUE FOR STREAM D-C 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.3 

08.30 0.3 

08.45 0.3 

09.00 0.3

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

QUEUE FOR STREAM CD-AB 

------------------------- 



IN QUEUE 

08.15 0.4 

08.30 0.4 

08.45 0.4 

09.00 0.4 


-------------------------------------------- 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



I I----------------------------------------------------------------I 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I B-CD I 93.0 I 93.0 I 11.3 I 0.12 I 11.3 I 0.12 I 

I B-A I 1.0 I 1.0 I 0.1 I 0.14 I 0.1 I 0.14 I 

I A-B I 0.3 I 0.3 I I I I I 

I A-C I 114.1 I 114.1 I I I I I 

I A-D I 0.3 I 0.3 I I I I I 

I AB-CD I( 0.4)I( 0.4)I 0.0 I 0.10 I 0.0 I 0.10 I 

I AB-C I( 206.8)I( 206.8)I I I I I 

I D-AB I 4.0 I 4.0 I 0.6 I 0.15 I 0.6 I 0.15 I 

I D-C I 85.0 I 85.0 I 20.1 I 0.24 I 20.1 I 0.24 I 

I C-D I 145.0 I 145.0 I I I I I 

I C-A I 498.0 I 498.0 I I I I I 

I C-B I 64.0 I 64.0 I I I I I 

I CD-AB I( 156.9)I( 156.9)I 24.8 I 0.16 I 24.8 I 0.16 I 

I CD-A I( 409.1)I( 409.1)I I I I I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I ALL I 1004.7 I 1004.7 I 56.9 I 0.06 I 56.9 I 0.06 I 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 




END OF JOB 

============================================ end of file =============================================== 

[Printed at 13:43:34 on 16/12/2010]

APPENDIX E 

ARCADY Outputs

Generated on 16/12/2010 14:02:27 using ARCADY 7.0.0.0 

ARCADY 7 

Version: 7.0.0.99 [10 July 2009] 

© Copyright Transport Research Laboratory 2009 

For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: 

Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 E-mail: software@trl.co.uk Web: www.trlsoftware.co.uk 

The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution 

File: H:\_Planning 2\Current Jobs\ARTRunnymedeCampus\Modelling and TRICS\ARCADY\Middle Hill Roundabout FINAL 10-12- 

16.arc7 

Report generation date: 16/12/2010 14:02:27 

» A1 - FINAL Modelling - D1 - Base Modelling, AM 

File summary 

File Description 

Title 

(untitled) 

Date 22/11/2010 

Status 

(new file) 

Enumerator MAYERBROWN2K\aplant 

Results Upto Date 

True 

Analysis Options 

RFC Threshold Vehicle Length (m) Do Queue Variations 

0.85 5.75 

Sorting and Display 

Show Arm Names Arm Grouping Sorting Direction Sorting Type Data Matrix Style Time Style 

Order Ascending Numerical By Destination Absolute Time 

Units 

Distance Units Speed Units Traffic Units Input Traffic Units Results Flow Units Average Delay Units Total Delay Units Rate Of Delay Units 

m kph Veh PCU perTimePeriod min -Min perMin 

A1 - FINAL Modelling - D1 - Base Modelling, AM 

Data Errors and Warnings 

No errors or warnings 

Analysis Set Details 

Name 

FINAL 

Modelling 

Description 

Include In 

Report 

Use Specific 

Demand Set 

Demand 

Set 

Locked 

Network Flow Scaling 

Factor (%) 

Network Capacity Scaling 

Factor (%) 

Yes Yes D1 100.000 100.000 

Reason For Scaling 

Factors 

Demand Set Details 

Name 

Base 

Modelling, 

AM 

Scenario 

Name 

Base 

Modelling 

Time 

Period 

Name 

Description 

Locked 

Run 

Automatically 

Use 

Relationship 

Relationship 

Start Time 

(HH:mm) 

Finish 

Time 

(HH:mm) 

Time 

Period 

Length 

(min) 

Time 

Segment 

Length 

(min) 

Traffic 

Profile 

Type 

AM Yes 08:00 09:00 60 15 DIRECT 

1 

Roundabout Network

Modelling 


Name 

Base 

Modelling, 

AM 

Scenario 

Name 

Base 

Modelling 

Time 

Period 

Name 

Roundabout Network 

Roundabout Type(s) 

Description 

Locked 

Run 

Automatically 

Use 

Relationship 

Relationship 


Time Time 

Finish 

Traffic 

Start Time 

Period Segment 

Time 

Profile 

(HH:mm) 

Length Length 

(HH:mm) 

Type 

(min) (min) 

AM Yes 08:00 09:00 60 15 DIRECT 

ID Name Arm Order Roundabout Type Grade Separated Large Roundabout Do Geometric Delay 

1 St Judes Road / Middle Hill A,B,C Mini-roundabout 

Roundabout Network Options 

Driving Side Lighting Road Surface In London 

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown 

Arms 

Arms 

ID Name Description 

A St Judes Road (North) 

B Middle Hill 

C St Judes Road (South) 

Capacity Options 

Arm Minimum Capacity (PCU/TS) Maximum Capacity (PCU/TS) Assume Flat Start Profile Initial Queue (PCU) 

A 0.00 24999.75 0.00 

B 0.00 24999.75 0.00 

C 0.00 24999.75 0.00 

Mini Roundabout Geometry 

Arm 

Approach road halfwidth 

(m) 

Minimum approach road 

half-width (m) 

Entry 

width (m) 

Effective flare 

length (m) 

Distance to next 

arm (m) 

Entry corner kerb line 

distance (m) 

Gradient over 

50m (%) 

A 3.10 3.10 3.10 0.00 14.00 12.00 0.00 

B 3.70 3.70 3.70 0.00 11.90 8.10 0.00 

C 3.10 3.10 3.10 0.00 15.70 14.20 0.00 

Kerbed central 

island 

Pedestrian Crossings 

Arm Crossing Type 

A None 

B None 

C None 

Arm Slope/ Intercept and Capacity 

Slope and Intercept used in model 

Arm Enter Directly Slope Intercept (PCU/TS) Final Slope Final Intercept (PCU/TS) 

A Yes 0.54 273.00 0.541 273.000 

B Yes 0.55 201.69 0.553 201.690 

C Yes 0.55 271.17 0.550 271.170 

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments. 

Traffic Flows 

Demand Set Data Options 

Default 

Vehicle 

Mix 

Vehicle Mix 

Varies 

Over Time 

Vehicle 

Mix Varies 

Over Turn 

Yes 

Vehicle Mix 

Varies 

Over Entry 

Yes 

Vehicle Mix 

Source 

HV 

Percentages 

PCU 

Factor for 

a HV 

(PCU) 

Default 

Turning 

Proportions 

Estimate 

from 

entry/exit 

counts 

Turning 

Proportions 

Vary Over Time 

Turning 

Proportions 

Vary Over Turn 

Turning 

Proportions 

Vary Over Entry 

2.00 Yes Yes Yes 

2

B Yes 0.55 201.69 0.553 201.690 

C Yes 0.55 271.17 0.550 271.170 


Traffic Flows 



Default 

Vehicle 

Mix 

Vehicle Mix 

Varies 

Over Time 

Vehicle 

Mix Varies 

Over Turn 

Yes 

Vehicle Mix 

Varies 

Over Entry 

Yes 

Vehicle Mix 

Source 

HV 

Percentages 

PCU 

Factor for 

a HV 

(PCU) 

Default 

Turning 

Proportions 

Estimate 

from 

entry/exit 

counts 

Turning 

Proportions 


Turning 

Proportions 


Turning 

Proportions 



Entry Flows 

General Flows Data 

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) PHF 

A DIRECT Yes 100.000 0.92 

B DIRECT Yes 100.000 0.82 

C DIRECT Yes 100.000 0.74 

Direct/Resultant Flows 

Direct Flows Data 

Time Segment 

Arm 

Direct Demand Entry Flow 

(Veh/TS) 

DirectDemandEntryFlowInPCU 

(PCU/TS) 

Direct Demand Exit Flow 

(Veh/TS) 

Direct Demand Pedestrian Flow 

(Ped/TS) 

08:00-08:15 A 189.00 192.36 N/A N/A 

08:00-08:15 B 58.00 60.26 N/A N/A 

08:00-08:15 C 145.00 157.58 N/A N/A 

08:15-08:30 A 183.00 186.30 N/A N/A 

08:15-08:30 B 78.00 81.36 N/A N/A 

08:15-08:30 C 165.00 179.42 N/A N/A 

08:30-08:45 A 161.00 163.94 N/A N/A 

08:30-08:45 B 55.00 57.26 N/A N/A 

08:30-08:45 C 78.00 84.53 N/A N/A 

08:45-09:00 A 163.00 165.98 N/A N/A 

08:45-09:00 B 65.00 67.06 N/A N/A 

08:45-09:00 C 100.00 108.44 N/A N/A 

Turning Proportions 

Turning Counts or Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Roundabout 1 - (08:00-08:15) 

From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 85.00 104.00 

B 47.00 0.00 11.00 

C 117.00 28.00 0.00 

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Roundabout 1 - (08:00-08:15) 

From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.45 0.55 

B 0.81 0.00 0.19 

C 0.81 0.19 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 93.00 90.00 

B 70.00 0.00 8.00 

C 137.00 28.00 0.00 

3

From 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.45 0.55 

B 0.81 0.00 0.19 

C 0.81 0.19 0.00 



From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 93.00 90.00 

B 70.00 0.00 8.00 

C 137.00 28.00 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.51 0.49 

B 0.90 0.00 0.10 

C 0.83 0.17 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 91.00 70.00 

B 47.00 0.00 8.00 

C 54.00 24.00 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.57 0.43 

B 0.85 0.00 0.15 

C 0.69 0.31 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 92.00 71.00 

B 43.00 0.00 22.00 

C 72.00 28.00 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.56 0.44 

B 0.66 0.00 0.34 

C 0.72 0.28 0.00 

Vehicle Mix 

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Roundabout 1 (for whole period) 

From 

To 

A B C 

A 1.00 1.02 1.02 

B 1.05 1.00 1.00 

C 1.09 1.07 1.00 

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Roundabout 1 (for whole period) 

From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 2.00 1.60 

B 4.80 0.00 0.00 

C 9.20 6.50 0.00 

4

From 

A 1.00 1.02 1.02 

B 1.05 1.00 1.00 

C 1.09 1.07 1.00 



From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 2.00 1.60 

B 4.80 0.00 0.00 

C 9.20 6.50 0.00 

Results 

Results Summary 

Arm 

Max 

RFC 

Max 

Delay 

(min) 

Max 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Max 

LOS 

Total 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Total 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Total 

Queueing 

Delay (PCUmin) 

Average 

Queueing 

Delay (min) 

Rate Of 

Queueing 

Delay (PCUmin/min) 

Inclusive 

Queueing Total 


Inclusive 

Queueing 

Average Delay 

(min) 

Slope 

Intercept 

(PCU/TS) 

A 0.75 0.22 2.86 B 177.15 708.58 136.15 0.19 2.27 136.25 0.19 0.541 273.000 

B 0.54 0.22 1.18 B 66.48 265.94 46.60 0.18 0.78 46.63 0.18 0.553 201.690 

C 0.78 0.30 3.49 C 132.50 529.98 95.46 0.18 1.59 95.48 0.18 0.550 271.170 

Main Results 

Main results: (08:00-08:15) 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Entry Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Exit Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Circulating Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Pedestrian 

Demand (Ped/TS) 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

Saturation 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

A 192.36 192.36 189.51 174.88 29.46 0.00 257.06 251.01 0.748 0.00 2.86 

B 60.26 60.26 59.53 114.87 104.10 0.00 144.13 125.44 0.418 0.00 0.73 

C 157.58 157.58 155.68 114.96 48.66 0.00 244.41 214.77 0.645 0.00 1.91 

RFC 

Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Main results: (08:15-08:30) 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Entry Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Exit Flow 

(PCU/TS) 


(PCU/TS) 

Pedestrian 


Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

Saturation 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

A 186.30 186.30 186.39 221.14 29.60 0.00 256.99 254.53 0.725 2.86 2.76 

B 81.36 81.36 80.91 124.34 91.65 0.00 151.01 132.60 0.539 0.73 1.18 

C 179.42 179.42 177.85 99.67 72.89 0.00 231.08 205.41 0.776 1.91 3.49 

RFC 

Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Main results: (08:30-08:45) 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Entry Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Exit Flow 

(PCU/TS) 


(PCU/TS) 

Pedestrian 


Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

Saturation 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

A 163.94 163.94 164.90 111.29 25.97 0.00 258.95 239.80 0.633 2.76 1.81 

B 57.26 57.26 57.86 119.17 71.69 0.00 162.05 144.16 0.353 1.18 0.58 

C 84.53 84.53 87.43 79.73 49.82 0.00 243.77 202.96 0.347 3.49 0.58 

RFC 

Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Main results: (08:45-09:00) 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Entry Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Exit Flow 

(PCU/TS) 


(PCU/TS) 

Pedestrian 


Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

Saturation 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

A 165.98 165.98 165.95 123.50 29.76 0.00 256.90 240.57 0.646 1.81 1.83 

B 67.06 67.06 66.92 123.59 72.12 0.00 161.81 143.87 0.414 0.58 0.72 

C 108.44 108.44 108.18 93.97 45.08 0.00 246.38 218.00 0.440 0.58 0.84 

RFC 

Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Queueing Delay Results 

Queueing Delay results: (08:00-08:15) 

Arm 

Queueing Total Delay (PCUmin) 


Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCUmin/min) 

Average Delay Per Arriving Vehicle 

(min) 

Unsignalised Level Of 

Service 

Signalised Level Of 

Service 

A 38.30 2.55 0.218 B B 

B 10.32 0.69 0.183 B B 

C 26.38 1.76 0.180 B B 

5 

Arm 




(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 41.93 2.80 0.217 B B



Arm 




(min) 


Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of 

Service 

Service 

A 38.30 2.55 0.218 B B 

B 10.32 0.69 0.183 B B 

C 26.38 1.76 0.180 B B 


Arm 




(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 41.93 2.80 0.217 B B 

B 16.76 1.12 0.222 B B 

C 47.23 3.15 0.297 C B 


Arm 




(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 28.61 1.91 0.164 A A 

B 9.07 0.60 0.151 A A 

C 9.63 0.64 0.106 A A 


Arm 


Overview: Mini-roundabout Geometry 


Overview: Time Segment Results 

Time Segment Results 



(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 27.31 1.82 0.168 B B 

B 10.45 0.70 0.163 A A 

C 12.22 0.81 0.117 A A 

Arm 

Approach road 


Entry 

width 

(m) 


length (m) 

Minimum approach 

road half-width (m) 

Distance to 

next arm (m) 

Entry corner kerb 

line distance (m) 

Gradient 

over 50m (%) 

Kerbed 

central 

island 

Final 

Slope 

Final 

Intercept 

(PCU/TS) 

A 3.10 3.10 0.00 3.10 14.00 12.00 0.00 0.541 273.000 

B 3.70 3.70 0.00 3.70 11.90 8.10 0.00 0.553 201.690 

C 3.10 3.10 0.00 3.10 15.70 14.20 0.00 0.550 271.170 

Time Segment 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

RFC 

Pedestrian 


Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 


Delay (PCU-min) 

Geometric Total 


Average Delay Per 

Arriving Vehicle 

(min) 

08:00-08:15 A 192.36 257.06 0.748 0.00 0.00 2.86 38.30 (0.00) 0.218 

08:00-08:15 B 60.26 144.13 0.418 0.00 0.00 0.73 10.32 (0.00) 0.183 

08:00-08:15 C 157.58 244.41 0.645 0.00 0.00 1.91 26.38 (0.00) 0.180 

08:15-08:30 A 186.30 256.99 0.725 0.00 2.86 2.76 41.93 (0.00) 0.217 

08:15-08:30 B 81.36 151.01 0.539 0.00 0.73 1.18 16.76 (0.00) 0.222 

08:15-08:30 C 179.42 231.08 0.776 0.00 1.91 3.49 47.23 (0.00) 0.297 

08:30-08:45 A 163.94 258.95 0.633 0.00 2.76 1.81 28.61 (0.00) 0.164 

08:30-08:45 B 57.26 162.05 0.353 0.00 1.18 0.58 9.07 (0.00) 0.151 

08:30-08:45 C 84.53 243.77 0.347 0.00 3.49 0.58 9.63 (0.00) 0.106 

08:45-09:00 A 165.98 256.90 0.646 0.00 1.81 1.83 27.31 (0.00) 0.168 

08:45-09:00 B 67.06 161.81 0.414 0.00 0.58 0.72 10.45 (0.00) 0.163 

08:45-09:00 C 108.44 246.38 0.440 0.00 0.58 0.84 12.22 (0.00) 0.117 

6


ARCADY 7 

Version: 7.0.0.99 [10 July 2009] 

© Copyright Transport Research Laboratory 2009 

For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: 

Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 E-mail: software@trl.co.uk Web: www.trlsoftware.co.uk 

The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution 

File: H:\_Planning 2\Current Jobs\ARTRunnymedeCampus\Modelling and TRICS\ARCADY\Middle Hill Roundabout FINAL 10-12- 

16.arc7 

Report generation date: 16/12/2010 14:03:57 

» A1 - FINAL Modelling - D2 - Total Modelling, AM 

File summary 

File Description 

Title 

(untitled) 

Date 22/11/2010 

Status 

(new file) 

Enumerator MAYERBROWN2K\aplant 

Results Upto Date 

True 

Analysis Options 

RFC Threshold Vehicle Length (m) Do Queue Variations 

0.85 5.75 

Sorting and Display 

Show Arm Names Arm Grouping Sorting Direction Sorting Type Data Matrix Style Time Style 

Order Ascending Numerical By Destination Absolute Time 

Units 

Distance Units Speed Units Traffic Units Input Traffic Units Results Flow Units Average Delay Units Total Delay Units Rate Of Delay Units 

m kph Veh PCU perTimePeriod min -Min perMin 

A1 - FINAL Modelling - D2 - Total Modelling, AM 

Data Errors and Warnings 

No errors or warnings 

Analysis Set Details 

Name 

FINAL 

Modelling 

Description 

Include In 

Report 

Use Specific 

Demand Set 

Demand 

Set 

Locked 

Network Flow Scaling 

Factor (%) 

Network Capacity Scaling 

Factor (%) 

Yes Yes D2 100.000 100.000 

Reason For Scaling 

Factors 


Name 

Total 

Modelling, 

AM 

Scenario 

Name 

Total 

Modelling 

Time 

Period 

Name 

Description 

Locked 

Run 

Automatically 

Use 

Relationship 

Relationship 

Start Time 

(HH:mm) 

Finish 

Time 

(HH:mm) 

Time 

Period 

Length 

(min) 

Time 

Segment 

Length 

(min) 

Traffic 

Profile 

Type 

AM Yes 08:00 09:00 60 15 DIRECT 

1 

Roundabout Network

Modelling 


Name 

Total 

Modelling, 

AM 

Scenario 

Name 

Total 

Modelling 

Time 

Period 

Name 

Roundabout Network 

Roundabout Type(s) 

Description 

Locked 

Run 

Automatically 

Use 

Relationship 

Relationship 


Time Time 

Finish 

Traffic 

Start Time 

Period Segment 

Time 

Profile 

(HH:mm) 

Length Length 

(HH:mm) 

Type 

(min) (min) 

AM Yes 08:00 09:00 60 15 DIRECT 

ID Name Arm Order Roundabout Type Grade Separated Large Roundabout Do Geometric Delay 

1 St Judes Road / Middle Hill A,B,C Mini-roundabout 

Roundabout Network Options 

Driving Side Lighting Road Surface In London 

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown 

Arms 

Arms 

ID Name Description 

A St Judes Road (North) 

B Middle Hill 

C St Judes Road (South) 

Capacity Options 

Arm Minimum Capacity (PCU/TS) Maximum Capacity (PCU/TS) Assume Flat Start Profile Initial Queue (PCU) 

A 0.00 24999.75 0.00 

B 0.00 24999.75 0.00 

C 0.00 24999.75 0.00 


Arm 

Approach road halfwidth 

(m) 

Minimum approach road 


Entry 

width (m) 


length (m) 

Distance to next 

arm (m) 

Entry corner kerb line 

distance (m) 

Gradient over 

50m (%) 

A 3.10 3.10 3.10 0.00 14.00 12.00 0.00 

B 3.70 3.70 3.70 0.00 11.90 8.10 0.00 

C 3.10 3.10 3.10 0.00 15.70 14.20 0.00 

Kerbed central 

island 

Pedestrian Crossings 

Arm Crossing Type 

A None 

B None 

C None 

Arm Slope/ Intercept and Capacity 

Slope and Intercept used in model 

Arm Enter Directly Slope Intercept (PCU/TS) Final Slope Final Intercept (PCU/TS) 

A Yes 0.54 273.00 0.541 273.000 

B Yes 0.55 201.69 0.553 201.690 

C Yes 0.55 271.17 0.550 271.170 


Traffic Flows 


Default 

Vehicle 

Mix 

Vehicle Mix 

Varies 

Over Time 

Vehicle 

Mix Varies 

Over Turn 

Yes 

Vehicle Mix 

Varies 

Over Entry 

Yes 

Vehicle Mix 

Source 

HV 

Percentages 

PCU 

Factor for 

a HV 

(PCU) 

Default 

Turning 

Proportions 

Estimate 

from 

entry/exit 

counts 

Turning 

Proportions 


Turning 

Proportions 


Turning 

Proportions 



2

B Yes 0.55 201.69 0.553 201.690 

C Yes 0.55 271.17 0.550 271.170 


Traffic Flows 



Default 

Vehicle 

Mix 

Vehicle Mix 

Varies 

Over Time 

Vehicle 

Mix Varies 

Over Turn 

Yes 

Vehicle Mix 

Varies 

Over Entry 

Yes 

Vehicle Mix 

Source 

HV 

Percentages 

PCU 

Factor for 

a HV 

(PCU) 

Default 

Turning 

Proportions 

Estimate 

from 

entry/exit 

counts 

Turning 

Proportions 


Turning 

Proportions 


Turning 

Proportions 



Entry Flows 

General Flows Data 

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) PHF 

A DIRECT Yes 100.000 0.93 

B DIRECT Yes 100.000 0.82 

C DIRECT Yes 100.000 0.74 

Direct/Resultant Flows 

Direct Flows Data 

Time Segment 

Arm 

Direct Demand Entry Flow 

(Veh/TS) 

DirectDemandEntryFlowInPCU 

(PCU/TS) 

Direct Demand Exit Flow 

(Veh/TS) 

Direct Demand Pedestrian Flow 

(Ped/TS) 

08:00-08:15 A 203.00 206.62 N/A N/A 

08:00-08:15 B 60.00 62.35 N/A N/A 

08:00-08:15 C 149.00 161.95 N/A N/A 

08:15-08:30 A 197.00 200.55 N/A N/A 

08:15-08:30 B 80.00 83.46 N/A N/A 

08:15-08:30 C 169.00 183.79 N/A N/A 

08:30-08:45 A 175.00 178.19 N/A N/A 

08:30-08:45 B 57.00 59.35 N/A N/A 

08:30-08:45 C 82.00 88.90 N/A N/A 

08:45-09:00 A 177.00 180.23 N/A N/A 

08:45-09:00 B 67.00 69.16 N/A N/A 

08:45-09:00 C 104.00 112.81 N/A N/A 

Turning Proportions 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 92.00 111.00 

B 49.00 0.00 11.00 

C 121.00 28.00 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.45 0.55 

B 0.82 0.00 0.18 

C 0.81 0.19 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 100.00 97.00 

B 72.00 0.00 8.00 

C 141.00 28.00 0.00 

3

From 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.45 0.55 

B 0.82 0.00 0.18 

C 0.81 0.19 0.00 



From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 100.00 97.00 

B 72.00 0.00 8.00 

C 141.00 28.00 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.51 0.49 

B 0.90 0.00 0.10 

C 0.83 0.17 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 98.00 77.00 

B 49.00 0.00 8.00 

C 58.00 24.00 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.56 0.44 

B 0.86 0.00 0.14 

C 0.71 0.29 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 99.00 78.00 

B 45.00 0.00 22.00 

C 76.00 28.00 0.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 0.56 0.44 

B 0.67 0.00 0.33 

C 0.73 0.27 0.00 

Vehicle Mix 

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Roundabout 1 (for whole period) 

From 

To 

A B C 

A 1.00 1.02 1.02 

B 1.05 1.00 1.00 

C 1.09 1.07 1.00 


From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 2.00 1.60 

B 4.80 0.00 0.00 

C 9.20 6.50 0.00 

4

From 

A 1.00 1.02 1.02 

B 1.05 1.00 1.00 

C 1.09 1.07 1.00 



From 

To 

A B C 

A 0.00 2.00 1.60 

B 4.80 0.00 0.00 

C 9.20 6.50 0.00 

Results 

Results Summary 

Arm 

Max 

RFC 

Max 

Delay 

(min) 

Max 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Max 

LOS 

Total 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Total 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Total 

Queueing 


Average 

Queueing 

Delay (min) 

Rate Of 

Queueing 

Delay (PCUmin/min) 

Inclusive 



Inclusive 

Queueing 

Average Delay 

(min) 

Slope 

Intercept 

(PCU/TS) 

A 0.80 0.27 3.80 C 191.40 765.59 178.43 0.23 2.97 178.59 0.23 0.541 273.000 

B 0.57 0.24 1.32 B 68.58 274.32 51.55 0.19 0.86 51.58 0.19 0.553 201.690 

C 0.80 0.33 3.93 C 136.86 547.45 105.10 0.19 1.75 105.12 0.19 0.550 271.170 

Main Results 

Main results: (08:00-08:15) 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Entry Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Exit Flow 

(PCU/TS) 


(PCU/TS) 

Pedestrian 


Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

Saturation 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

A 206.62 206.62 202.81 181.12 29.44 0.00 257.07 251.66 0.804 0.00 3.80 

B 62.35 62.35 61.54 121.55 110.70 0.00 140.47 125.73 0.444 0.00 0.81 

C 161.95 161.95 159.87 121.56 50.68 0.00 243.29 214.22 0.666 0.00 2.08 

RFC 

Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Main results: (08:15-08:30) 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Entry Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Exit Flow 

(PCU/TS) 


(PCU/TS) 

Pedestrian 


Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

Saturation 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

A 200.55 200.55 200.62 227.31 29.57 0.00 257.01 254.98 0.780 3.80 3.73 

B 83.46 83.46 82.94 131.40 98.79 0.00 147.06 132.40 0.568 0.81 1.32 

C 183.79 183.79 181.95 106.81 74.93 0.00 229.96 205.33 0.799 2.08 3.93 

RFC 

Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Main results: (08:30-08:45) 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Entry Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Exit Flow 

(PCU/TS) 


(PCU/TS) 

Pedestrian 


Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

Saturation 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

A 178.19 178.19 179.59 118.17 26.02 0.00 258.92 241.41 0.688 3.73 2.33 

B 59.35 59.35 60.04 126.57 79.04 0.00 157.98 143.08 0.376 1.32 0.64 

C 88.90 88.90 92.19 87.08 52.00 0.00 242.57 203.08 0.366 3.93 0.63 

RFC 

Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 

Main results: (08:45-09:00) 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Arrivals 

(PCU) 

Entry Flow 

(PCU/TS) 

Exit Flow 

(PCU/TS) 


(PCU/TS) 

Pedestrian 


Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

Saturation 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

A 180.23 180.23 180.21 129.95 29.76 0.00 256.90 241.88 0.702 2.33 2.35 

B 69.16 69.16 69.01 130.73 79.24 0.00 157.87 142.87 0.438 0.64 0.79 

C 112.81 112.81 112.54 101.07 47.17 0.00 245.23 217.59 0.460 0.63 0.91 

RFC 

Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 



Arm 





(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 49.41 3.29 0.265 C B 

B 11.39 0.76 0.196 B B 

C 28.63 1.91 0.191 B B 

5 

Arm 




(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 56.43 3.76 0.272 C B



Arm 




(min) 


Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of 

Service 

Service 

A 49.41 3.29 0.265 C B 

B 11.39 0.76 0.196 B B 

C 28.63 1.91 0.191 B B 


Arm 




(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 56.43 3.76 0.272 C B 

B 18.64 1.24 0.242 B B 

C 52.61 3.51 0.327 C B 


Arm 




(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 37.42 2.49 0.196 B B 

B 10.04 0.67 0.161 A A 

C 10.64 0.71 0.110 A A 


Arm 


Overview: Mini-roundabout Geometry 


Overview: Time Segment Results 

Time Segment Results 



(min) 


Service 


Service 

A 35.17 2.34 0.199 B B 

B 11.47 0.76 0.174 B B 

C 13.22 0.88 0.122 A A 

Arm 

Approach road 


Entry 

width 

(m) 


length (m) 

Minimum approach 

road half-width (m) 

Distance to 

next arm (m) 

Entry corner kerb 

line distance (m) 

Gradient 

over 50m (%) 

Kerbed 

central 

island 

Final 

Slope 

Final 

Intercept 

(PCU/TS) 

A 3.10 3.10 0.00 3.10 14.00 12.00 0.00 0.541 273.000 

B 3.70 3.70 0.00 3.70 11.90 8.10 0.00 0.553 201.690 

C 3.10 3.10 0.00 3.10 15.70 14.20 0.00 0.550 271.170 

Time Segment 

Arm 

Demand 

(PCU/TS) 

Capacity 

(PCU/TS) 

RFC 

Pedestrian 


Start 

Queue 

(PCU) 

End 

Queue 

(PCU) 



Geometric Total 


Average Delay Per 

Arriving Vehicle 

(min) 

08:00-08:15 A 206.62 257.07 0.804 0.00 0.00 3.80 49.41 (0.00) 0.265 

08:00-08:15 B 62.35 140.47 0.444 0.00 0.00 0.81 11.39 (0.00) 0.196 

08:00-08:15 C 161.95 243.29 0.666 0.00 0.00 2.08 28.63 (0.00) 0.191 

08:15-08:30 A 200.55 257.01 0.780 0.00 3.80 3.73 56.43 (0.00) 0.272 

08:15-08:30 B 83.46 147.06 0.568 0.00 0.81 1.32 18.64 (0.00) 0.242 

08:15-08:30 C 183.79 229.96 0.799 0.00 2.08 3.93 52.61 (0.00) 0.327 

08:30-08:45 A 178.19 258.92 0.688 0.00 3.73 2.33 37.42 (0.00) 0.196 

08:30-08:45 B 59.35 157.98 0.376 0.00 1.32 0.64 10.04 (0.00) 0.161 

08:30-08:45 C 88.90 242.57 0.366 0.00 3.93 0.63 10.64 (0.00) 0.110 

08:45-09:00 A 180.23 256.90 0.702 0.00 2.33 2.35 35.17 (0.00) 0.199 

08:45-09:00 B 69.16 157.87 0.438 0.00 0.64 0.79 11.47 (0.00) 0.174 

08:45-09:00 C 112.81 245.23 0.460 0.00 0.63 0.91 13.22 (0.00) 0.122 

6



APPENDIX 16.1 

Glossary of Acoustic Terminology 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVIRON 

UK11-16357



Table 16.1A: Glossary of Acoustic Terminology 

Term 

Description 

Sound Pressure Sound, or sound pressure, is a fluctuation in air pressure over the static 

ambient pressure. 

Sound Pressure Level The sound level is the sound pressure relative to a standard reference 

(Sound Level) 

pressure of 20μPa (20x10 -6 Pascals) on a decibel scale. 

Decibel (dB) 

A scale for comparing the ratios of two quantities, including sound 

pressure and sound power. The difference in level between two sounds s1 

and s2 is given by 20 log 10 ( s1 / s2 ). The decibel can also be used to 

measure absolute quantities by specifying a reference value that fixes one 

point on the scale. For sound pressure, the reference value is 20μPa. 

A-weighting, dB(A) The unit of sound level, weighted according to the A-scale, which takes 

into account the increased sensitivity of the human ear at some 

frequencies. 

Noise Level Indices Noise levels usually fluctuate over time, so it is often necessary to consider 

an average or statistical noise level. This can be done in several ways, so 

a number of different noise indices have been defined, according to how 

the averaging or statistics are carried out. 

Leq,T 

A noise level index called the equivalent continuous noise level over the 

time period T. This is the level of a notional steady sound that would 

contain the same amount of sound energy as the actual, possibly 

fluctuating, sound that was recorded. 

Lmax,T 

A noise level index defined as the maximum noise level during the period 

T. Lmax is sometimes used for the assessment of occasional loud noises, 

which may have little effect on the overall Leq noise level but will still affect 

the noise environment. Unless described otherwise, it is measured using 

the 'fast' sound level meter response. 

L90,T 

A noise level index. The noise level exceeded for 90% of the time over the 

period T. L90 can be considered to be the "average minimum" noise level 

and is often used to describe the background noise. 

L10,T 

A noise level index. The noise level exceeded for 10% of the time over the 

period T. L10 can be considered to be the "average maximum" noise level. 

Generally used to describe road traffic noise. 

Free-Field 

Far from the presence of sound reflecting objects (except the ground), 

usually taken to mean at least 3.5m 

Facade 

At a distance of 1m in front of a large sound reflecting object such as a 

building façade. 

Fast Time Weighting An averaging time used in sound level meters. Defined in BS 5969. 

Displacement, 

Vibration is an oscillatory motion. The magnitude of vibration can be 

Acceleration and defined in terms of displacement (how far from the equilibrium position that 

Velocity 

something moves), velocity (how fast something moves), or acceleration 

Root Mean Square (the rate of change of velocity). When describing vibration, one must 

(r.m.s.) and Peak specify whether peak values are used (i.e. the maximum displacement or 

Values 

maximum velocity) or r.m.s. / r.m.q. values (effectively an average value) 

Peak Particle Velocity are used. Standards for the assessment of building damage are usually 

(PPV) 

given in terms of peak velocity (usually referred to as Peak Particle 

Velocity, or PPV), whilst human response to vibration is often described in 

Root Mean Square 

(r.m.s.) 

Root Mean Quad 

(r.m.q.) 

NEC 

terms of r.m.s. or r.m.q. acceleration. 

The r.m.s. value of a set of numbers is the square root of the average of 

the squares of the numbers. For a sound or vibration waveform, the r.m.s. 

value over a given time period is the square root of the average value of 

the square of the waveform over that time period. 

The r.m.q. value of a set of numbers is the fourth root of the average of the 

fourth powers of the numbers. For a vibration waveform, the r.m.q. value 

over a given time period is the fourth root of the average value of the fourth 

power of the waveform over that time period. 

Noise Exposure Category 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVIRON 

UK11-16357



Ambient Noise Level 

Free-Field 

Rating Noise Level 

Residual Noise Level 

Specific Noise Level 

The totally encompassing sound in a given situation at a given time, 

usually composed of a sound from many sources both distant and near 

(L AFeq,T ). 

Far from the presence of sound reflecting objects (except the ground), 

usually taken to mean at least 3.5 m 

The specific noise level plus any adjustment for the characteristic features 

of the noise (L Ar,T ). 

The ambient noise remaining at a given position in a given situation when 

specified sources are suppressed to a degree such that they do not 

contribute to the ambient noise level (L Aeq,T ) 

The equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level at the 

assessment position produced by the specific noise source (the noise 

source under investigation) over a given time interval (L Aeq,T ) 

In order to assist the understanding of acoustic terminology and the relative change in noise, 

the following background information is provided. 

The human ear can detect a very wide range of pressure fluctuations, which are perceived as 

sound. In order to express these fluctuations in a manageable way, a logarithmic scale called 

the decibel, or dB scale is used. The decibel scale typically ranges from 0 dB (the threshold of 

hearing) to over 120 dB. An indication of the range of sound levels commonly found in the 

environment is given in the following table. 

Table 16.1B: Typical Sound Levels in the Environment 

Sound Level 

0dB(A) 

Threshold of hearing 

20 to 30dB(A) Quiet bedroom at night 

30 to 40dB(A) Living room during the day 

40 to 50dB(A) Typical office 

50 to 60dB(A) Inside a car 

60 to 70dB(A) Typical high street 

70 to 90dB(A) Inside factory 

100 to 110dB(A) Burglar alarm at 1m away 

110 to 130dB(A) Jet aircraft on take off 

140dB(A) 

Threshold of Pain 

Location 

The ear is less sensitive to some frequencies than to others. The A-weighting scale is used to 

approximate the frequency response of the ear. Levels weighted using this scale are 

commonly identified by the notation dB(A). 

In accordance with logarithmic addition, combining two sources with equal noise levels would 

result in an increase of 3 dB(A) in the noise level from a single source. 

A change of 3 dB(A) is generally regarded as the smallest change in broadband continuous 

noise which the human ear can detect (although in certain controlled circumstances a change 

of 1 dB(A) is just perceptible). Therefore, a 2 dB(A) increase would not be normally be 

perceptible. A 10 dB(A) increase in noise represents a subjective doubling of loudness. 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVIRON 

UK11-16357



A noise impact on a community is deemed to occur when a new noise is introduced that is 

out of character with the area, or when a significant increase above the pre-existing ambient 

noise level occurs. 

For levels of noise that vary with time, it is necessary to employ a statistical index that allows 

for this variation. These statistical indices are expressed as the sound level that is exceeded 

for a percentage of the time period of interest. In the UK, traffic noise is measured as the 

LA10, the noise level exceeded for 10% of the measurement period. The LA90 is the level 

exceeded for 90% of the time and has been adopted to represent the background noise level 

in the absence of discrete events. An alternative way of assessing the time varying noise 

levels is to use the equivalent continuous sound level, LAeq. 

This is a notional steady level that would, over a given period of time, deliver the same sound 

energy as the actual fluctuating sound. 

To put these quantities into context, where a receiver is predominantly affected by 

continuous flows of road traffic, a doubling or halving of the flows would result in a just 

perceptible change of 3 dB, while an increase of more than 25%, or a decrease of more than 

20%, in traffic flows represent changes of 1 dB in traffic noise levels (assuming no alteration 

in the mix of traffic or flow speeds). 

Note that the time constant and the period of the noise measurement should be specified. 

For example, BS 4142 specifies background noise measurement periods of 1 hour during the 

day and 5 minutes during the night. The noise levels are commonly symbolised as L A90,1hour dB 

and L A90,5mins dB. The noise measurement should be recorded using a ‘FAST’ time response 

equivalent to 0.125 ms. 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVIRON 

UK11-16357



APPENDIX 16.2 

Construction Plant Assumptions Used in the Noise Assessment 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVIRON 

UK11-16357



Table 16.2A: Construction Plant Data 

10m 

level L WA No 

Site Preparation 

BS5228 Ref 

TOTAL 

Noise Sources dB(A) L WA 

Tracked Excavator (excavation) C2, Av 14-19, 20-25 75 103 1 50 100 

Dozer (Earthworks) C2, Av 10-13 80 108 1 20 101 

Dump Truck (Tipping Fill) C2, Ref 30 79 107 1 20 100 

Dozer (Towing Roller) C2, Ref 36 81 109 1 20 102 

Vibratory Plate C2, 41 80 108 1 20 101 

Hydraulic Vibratory Compactor C2, ref 42 78 106 1 40 102 

Pegson 1165 Tracked Crusher C1, ref 15 84 112 1 100 112 

TOTAL 113.7 

10m 

level L WA No 

Foundation 

BS5228 Ref 

TOTAL 


Tracked Excavator (excavation) C2, Av 14-19, 20-25 75 103 1 50 100 

Concrete Pump C3, 25-26 77 105 1 80 104 

Tracked Mobile crane C3, 28-30 69 97 1 80 96 

Gas Cutter C3, 34 - 35 67 95 1 5 82 

Generator C3, Ref 32 73 101 1 100 101 

Concrete Mixer Truck C4, Ref Av 21-22 77 105 1 60 103 

Bore Piling Rig C3, 14 83 111 1 50 108 

TOTAL 111.3 

10m 

level L WA No 

Super Structure 

BS5228 Ref 

TOTAL 


Concrete Mixer Truck C4, Ref Av 21-22 77 105 1 75 104 

Truck mounted concrete pump C4, 29-31 78 106 1 100 106 

Poker Vibrator C4, 33-34 76 104 1 100 104 

Mobile telescopic crain C4, 39,41,43,46 73 101 1 50 98 

Concrete Cutting (circular saw) C4, Av 72-73 82 110 1 5 97 

Generator C4, Av 76 - 85 66 94 1 100 94 

Tower Crane C4, 48 77 105 1 50 102 

TOTAL 110.7 

10m 

level L WA No 

Paving 

BS5228 Ref 

TOTAL 


Spreading Shipping/Fill (Dozer) C5, Av 12-13 80 108 1 20 101 

Earth Works (Tracked Excavator) C5, 18 80 108 1 10 98 

Vibratory Roller C5, Av 20, 25-28 75 103 1 20 96 

TOTAL 104 

% 

on 

% 

on 

% 

on 

% 

on 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVIRON 

UK11-16357



APPENDIX 16.3 

Traffic Flows Used in the Noise Assessment 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVIRON 

UK11-16357



Table 16.3A: Noise Assessment Traffic Data 

Scenario Statistic Road Section 

Priest Hill St Jude’s Road Cooper’s Hill 

Lane 

2010 Base 18hr AAWT Flow 8197 7960 427 

%HGV 5.5 5 15.5 

Speed kmh -1 64 36 38 

2016 Base 18hr AAWT Flow 8887 8629 467 

2016 Base + 

Development 

%HGV 5.5 5 15.5 

Speed kmh -1 64 36 38 

18hr AAWT Flow 9227 9395 1081 

%HGV 5.5 5 6.5 

Speed kmh -1 64 36 38 

Issue 1 

January 2011 

ENVIRON 

UK11-16357

Runnymede Campus - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?