CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD

More documents

Recommendations

Info

for the tree root system, the Live Oak tree was preserved and a change in the palette was not made. C. <strong>CITY</strong> DEVELOPMENT CODE: Whether the proposed amendment is in conformance with all applicable portions of the City Development Code. Findings: COMPLIES The proposed changes to the landscape plan conform to all applicable portions of the City Development Code. D. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE: Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is inconsistent with existing and proposed land use. Findings: COMPLIES The land uses associated with this major amendment are not proposed to be changed. E. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of public facilities, including but not limited to transportation, sewerage, water supply, parks, fire, police, drainage, schools, and emergency medical facilities. Findings: COMPLIES The proposed amendment to revise the landscape plan will not cause the development to exceed the capacity of any public utilities. F. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: Whether and the extent to which, the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment. Findings: COMPLIES The proposed amendment to revise the landscape plan will not have any adverse impacts on the natural environment and result in an increase in the number of trees provided for the community. 10 – PB 1087TTT
G. PROPERTY VALUES: Whether and to the extent to which the proposed amendment would adversely affect property values in the area. Findings: COMPLIES The proposed amendment would likely not impact property values in the area. H. DEVELOPMENT PATTERN: Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern and the specific identification of any negative effects on such pattern. Findings: COMPLIES The proposed amendment to revise the landscape plan will complement the homes that are built within the community and will not negatively affect such development pattern. VI. PROJECT REVIEW Interdepartmental Review As no development is proposed as part of the amendment, no interdepartmental review was required. Inter-jurisdictional Review Traffic Concurrency: As no development is proposed as part of the amendment, no interdepartmental review was required. School Concurrency: Not required. Prepared and Respectfully Submitted by: Rick Greene, AICP Planning Manager PB 1087TTT - 11
Page 1 and 2: CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BO
Page 3 and 4: sizes, the narrow and shallow lot d
Page 5 and 6: Exhibit 4 Sidewalk lifting at 8496
Page 7 and 8: The resultant mix of trees should t
Page 9: To offset the removal of the 19 oak
Page 13 and 14: ATTACHMENT II PB 1087TTT - 13
Page 15 and 16: Attachment IV PB 1087TTT - 15
Page 17 and 18: PB 1087TTT - 17
Page 19 and 20: PB 1087TTT - 19
Page 21 and 22: PB 1087TTT - 21
Page 23 and 24: Attachment V PB 1087TTT - 23
Page 25: Attachment VII PB 1087TTT - 25

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?