27.10.2014 Views

iOPTRON - Astronomy Technology Today

iOPTRON - Astronomy Technology Today

iOPTRON - Astronomy Technology Today

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Hot Topic<br />

Active Cooling of a Primary Telescope Mirror<br />

By Steven Aggas<br />

Cooling glass, specifically a<br />

telescope mirror, has been the<br />

topic of many conversations at<br />

star parties and Internet forums,<br />

covering not just the<br />

boundary layer of warm air,<br />

which acts like a weak lens to<br />

deform the view before it<br />

reaches the eyepiece, but also<br />

concerning removing the<br />

source of that boundary layer:<br />

the excess heat load of the glass<br />

mass of the primary-mirror<br />

substrate. More telescopes than<br />

ever before are equipped with<br />

fans located at various points to<br />

address both the warm-air<br />

boundary layer and excess heat<br />

load, and, in some instances,<br />

fans are simply incapable of adequately<br />

addressing these thermal<br />

issue.<br />

Take a look, for instance,<br />

at the two graphs provided as<br />

Figures 1 and 2, derived from<br />

Robert Houdart’s telescope<br />

mirror-cooling calculator freeware,<br />

MirrorCooling (www.<br />

cruxis.com/scope/mirrorcooling.htm).<br />

The graphs differ<br />

only in the thicknesses of the<br />

mirror substrates for which<br />

cooling characteristics are modeled,<br />

30 mm versus 50.8 mm,<br />

two typical mirror thicknesses.<br />

The graphs demonstrate the<br />

additional cooling challenge<br />

faced as substrate thickness increases.<br />

As modeled in Figure 1,<br />

a mirror of 30-mm thickness<br />

takes approximately 140 minutes<br />

for surface and core temperatures<br />

to cool within 1°C of<br />

ambient without active cooling<br />

measures, while Figure 2<br />

demonstrates that, also sans active<br />

cooling measures, a mirror<br />

of 50.8-mm thickness has still<br />

not achieved core and surface<br />

temperatures within 1°C of declining<br />

ambient, even after 240<br />

minutes.<br />

Now, what if your primary<br />

mirror is a combination of<br />

thicknesses and/or has slightly<br />

more glass than your average<br />

primary? My primary mirror is<br />

36 inches in diameter and 6<br />

inches thick but features nineteen<br />

5 inch-deep hexagon holes<br />

to reduce its overall mass. The<br />

fans installed in my telescope<br />

would be adequate for following<br />

the gradual drop in ambient<br />

temperature on a given<br />

night … if it was already cooled<br />

to the starting ambient temperature.<br />

But, when dealing with<br />

250 pounds of glass, there’s a<br />

lot of initial stored heat that<br />

would have to be gotten rid of<br />

first!<br />

I had an expectation, a<br />

goal really, of wanting to spend<br />

no more than one hour cooling<br />

the primary mirror to less than<br />

1°C of night-time ambient air<br />

temperature. I’ve installed ther-<br />

Figure 1: With an ambient temperature that steadily declines from 10°C<br />

to 5°C over the course of 4 hours and without active cooling measures,<br />

a mirror of 30-mm thickness reaches core and surface temperatures<br />

that are within 1°C of ambient within approximately 140 minutes.<br />

Figure 2: With an ambient temperature that steadily declines from 10°C<br />

to 5°C over the course of 4 hours and without active cooling measures, a<br />

mirror of 50.8-mm thickness reaches has not achieved core and surface<br />

temperatures that are within 1°C of ambient even after 240 minutes.<br />

<strong>Astronomy</strong> TECHNOLOGY TODAY 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!